(gentle music) >> High profile cyber attacks like the SolarWinds hack, the JBS meat and the Florida municipality breach, have heightened awareness of how exposed, critical infrastructure has become. Because the pandemic has shifted employees to remote modes of work, hackers now have a much easier target to fish for credentials and exploit less secure home networks. Take the recent Log4j vulnerability, that's yet another example, of how hackers can take advantage of weak links in the chain. Now data storage companies have an important role to play in fighting cyber crime. Ultimately, they provide the equivalent of a bank vault if you will, and are responsible for storing and protecting the data that cyber criminals are targeting to steal or encrypt, in an effort to hold companies hostage, in a ransomware attack. Now in an effort to help customers understand how to protect themselves from such vulnerabilities, and how one storage company is addressing these challenges, the Cube is hosting this special presentation InfiniGuard Cyber Resilience: New Cybercrime Solutions. And we're going to speak with Eric Herzog, who's the Chief Marketing Officer of Infinidat, and then we'll bring in Stan Wysocki who is the president of Mark III Systems who is either an expert in IT infrastructure and artificial intelligence. First, let me welcome Eric Herzog back to the Cube, hello, Eric. >> Great, Dave, thank you very much, always love talking to you and the Cube, about leading edge technology solutions for end users. >> Alright let's do it. So, first we want to address the transformation and big business progress of Infinidat. New CEO, he's injected new management, new head of marketing obviously, Phil Bullinger is really been focused on accelerating the company's original vision, and doing so, Eric, in the typically unconventional style of Infinidat, you just put out a press release, capping 2021, can you set the stage for us, and give us the business update? >> Sure, so of course we summarized our 2021 results. What a very, very strong year. What a very, very strong year. We increased our bookings over 40% year to year. Even in Q4, we increased our bookings over 68%. And over 25% of the fortune 50 use an Infinidat solution, either our InfiniBox, or InfiniBox SSA, all flash array, or our Infiniguard, which is the focus of the launch we're doing today, on February 9th. >> Yeah, so I always said that Infinidat is one of the best kept secrets in the storage business. So let's talk about that hard news, what you launched on February 9th, and why it's important. >> Well, what we've done is we've got a high end enterprise purpose-built backup appliance, the InfiniGuard. We made some substantial advances in that. The key is focused on cyber resilience with what we call our infinisafe technology. Infinisafe incorporates a number of subsets, of cyber resilience from immutable snapshots, to logical air gapping, to fenced isolated networks, to almost instantaneous recovery for your backup data sets. In addition, we also dramatically improved the performance of the backup and recovery, which means, for example, if a backup window was taking three hours, now the backup window on that primary backup dataset could take only an hour and a half, which of course, as we all know backup dramatically impacts the performance of your primary applications, your primary servers, and your primary storage. So we've done both the cyber resilience aspect and then, on modern data protection, making sure that the backup and recovery are faster, for a traditional backup workload. >> So tell us a little bit more about Infinisafe, and specifically, Eric I'm interested in how it's different from other solutions, don't make me a liar, I had said, you guys always kind of take nonconventional approaches so tell us, add a little color to Infinisafe and how is it really unique from competitors? >> Sure, well Infinisafe incorporates as I mentioned, several different aspects. First of all, the immutable snapshots. So immutable snapshots can not be deleted, they cannot be altered, you cannot accelerate the rate, you can set the rate of immutable stuff, do I want to do it once a day? Do I want to do it twice a day? And obviously if a hacker could get in, you could accelerate that. Our immutable snaps are physically separated from the management schema. So the inside of an Infiniguard, we have what we call a data dedupe appliance, and that data dedupe engine, it goes ahead and it applies data reduction technology, to that back up data set. But we've divorced the immutable snapshots from the management of what we now call a DDE. So the DDE has kind of access of giving you that gap, that logical gap between the management schema of a DDE, and of course the immutable snapshot. We also combine that with this air gap technology, you've got the immutability and the air gap, which is local in that instance, but we also can do it remotely. So we can replicate from one Infiniguard in data center A, to a different Infiniguard in data center B. You then can configure that backup data set with the same immutable snapshot, and the same length, one day, half a day, six hours, whatever you choose, and then of course it'll have that same capability. The third thing we've done is very unique. We have a fenced isolated network to perform forensics. So, if the Cube has a cyber or malware attack, you need to make sure that once you've cleaned it up, off the primary storage, the primary servers, that you recover, a known good data set. So we set up this isolated fence network in which to perform that forensic analysis, to give you the appropriate good recover point. However, unlike many of our competitors, we can do it with a single InfiniBox. Some of our competitors, right on their websites say, you need two of their purpose-built backup appliances, to do cyber resilience. Meaning, twice the CapEx and twice the OpEx, which we can do with a single Infiniguard solution. And then lastly is our near instantaneous recovery. As you know, we're recovering backup data sets. We can make between 15 and 30 minutes time, the backup data set fully accessible to the backup admin or the storage admin to use their Commvault, their Veeam, their Veritas, their IBM Spectrum Protect, or whatever their backup software is, to do recovery from the InfiniGuard box, back to the primary storage using of course the backup software that they created the original dataset with. That is very unique. When you look out in the industry and look at, whether it be purpose-built backup competitors, or whether you look at primary storage competitors, almost no one talks about the speed of their recovery, and the one or two that do, talk about recovering the data set. We recover the entire environment. We are ready to go, and the backup admin, if they were, for example, Commvault, Veeam or Veritas, they could immediately start the backup, as soon as we did our recovery, which again, takes between 15 and 30 minutes, independent of the data set size. That could be 50 terabytes, it could be a petabyte, it could be two petabytes. And even two petabytes of data can be available in 15 to 30 minutes. And then of course, the backup admin can restore from that backup dataset. Very powerful and very unique in those aspects. >> Whilst the reason why this is so important is like I said, it's like the bank vault, because hackers are going to go after that backup corpus that's where the gold is, that's where all the data is. So this all really sounds good. But there's more than Infinisafe in this launch. What else should we know? >> Well, the other thing we've done is dramatically improved the performance of the purpose-built backup plants at the core. So for example, the last time we publicly announced our numbers, we were at 74 terabytes an hour, now we're 180 terabytes an hour. So of course, as we all know, when you do a backup, it impacts the performance of the primary applications, the primary servers and the primary storage. So if that backup window was taking three hours, now that we've more than doubled the performance, you could be up to 50% better. So a three hour backup window, if that's what the dataset took to be backed up, now we can get that down to an hour and a half or even faster. So that of course minimizes the impact on primary storage, primary applications, and of course your primary storage, making it much, much more efficient, from a backup perspective, and of course less impact on the primary applications, the primary servers, and primary storage. >> So I've talked to a number of Infinidat customers, they're very loyal and kind of passionate. So I wonder if you could kind of put that perspective on this discussion. The impact that InfiniGuard, this announcement, that's going to have for your customers, paint a picture as to how it's going to change their business. >> Sure, so let me give you an example. One of our customers is a cloud service buyer, in North America, they focus only on healthcare. So here's a couple of key benefits that they got. First of all, they use our integration with two different backup vendors. They don't have one, they have two. So we're tightly integrated with our backup software partners. They got a 40% cost savings on CapEX, compared to the previous vendor that they had. And, they used to be able to do 30,000 backup per day, now they can do 90,000 backup a day. And by the way, that's all with the previous version of InfiniGuard, not the version we just announced on the 9th. One of our other customers, which is in AMEA and they happened to be an energy company, they were using purpose-built backup from the other vendor, and they had 14 of them, seven in data center one, and seven in data center two. With InfiniGuard, they've got one in data center one, and one in data center two. So 14 purpose-built backup appliances consolidated down into two. And on top of that, those purpose-built backup appliances from the other vendor actually had a couple recovery failures, where they were not able to recover the data. They've been installed for a year now, they've had zero recovers, zero recovery failures, whereas the previous vendor had some. And lastly, let's talk about a large global fortune financial services. So, one of the biggest in the industry, their cost savings from their previous vendor was 46%. In addition, when you look at their cyber resilience design, they were using one of those vendors that probably talks about needing two system products to do their cyber resiliency. They again were able to take those two systems out, and use one InfiniGuard solution. Again, reducing both their capital expenditure, two going to one. And then the operational expenditure, they only have to manage one InfiniGuard versus two of the other guys appliances. Those are just three examples all over the world. One in cloud service providing, one in the energy space, and one a global fortune 500 financial services company. Just some real world examples. And all those by the way, Dave, were before the enhancements of Infinisafe, and before the additional performance we've added in the launch of InfiniGuard on February 9th. >> So like I'm just kind of sketching out the business case, you know, put my CFO hat on. So you're lowering costs cause you're consolidating, so that means I need less hardware and software. But also there's probably labor costs associated with that. If I could do it faster with less resources, I got less stuff to manage. You're accelerating the backup time, so that frees up resources that I can apply elsewhere, recovery, you know, is really important. So I'm inferring faster recovery, all this lowers my risk, and then I can sort of calculate the probability of having data loss, and then what that means to my business. Am I getting that right? >> Yeah, yeah. And in fact, the other impact is on your primary service and your primary storage. If the backup window shrinks, then you're not slowing down that SAP app, that Oracle app, you know, that SQL app, whatever you're running, whether that be the financials, whether that be your logistics, whether it be your manufacturing system, every time you turn on that backup, to do that backup, that backup window slows you down. So cutting that in half has an impact on the real-world application side, which obviously most storage guys, you know, it's hard for us to quantify. But you are taking the impact of backup, and basically reducing it, if you will shrinking the backup window, so their primary applications don't get hammered as much by the backup while they're still trying to run that SAP, that Oracle or that SQL workload. >> And you're not a backup software vendor, so I have optionality there. I can pretty much choose all the popular, you know. >> Absolutely, so Veeam, Veritas, Commvault, IBM Spectrum Protect, all the majors. And in fact, one of the players I mentioned, as you were talking about the end-users, they use two different backup packages, two of 'em. So, two of the major vendors that I named, we work with them just within one account. So, we're very flexible, the user picks what they want from a backup software perspective, and we can work with anything. So, whatever they want to use, is fine with us. We integrate with all of them, we have integration, for example, also with VMware, for vVols and other aspects in container integration, so you know, whether it be our purpose-built backup appliance, InfiniGuard, or what we do with the InfiniBox, we always make sure we integrate with the surrounding environment. 'Cause storage is not an island, storage needs to exist in your data center, or your hybrid cloud data center, or what you're doing for containers. So we make sure we have integration with our InfiniBox, our InfiniBox SSA, all flash. And of course the product we're enhancing today, the InfiniGuard. >> Yeah, integration is super important in the enterprise. Enterprises want solutions, they're busy. (laughs) They don't have unlimited budget to go, you know, plugging stuff together. So, okay Eric, we got to leave it there. Thank you so much. >> Great, thank you very much Dave. Always love talking to the Cube. >> Okay, in a moment Stan Wysocki is coming in. He's the president of Mark III Systems. He's going to join us for a drill down on how InfiniGuard is impacting customers. You're watching the Cube, your global leader, in enterprise tech coverage. (gentle music)

(gentle music) >> High profile cyber attacks like the SolarWinds hack, the JBS meat and the Florida municipality breach, have heightened awareness of how exposed, critical infrastructure has become. Because the pandemic has shifted employees to remote modes of work, hackers now have a much easier target to fish for credentials and exploit less secure home networks. Take the recent Log4j vulnerability, that's yet another example, of how hackers can take advantage of weak links in the chain. Now data storage companies have an important role to play in fighting cyber crime. Ultimately, they provide the equivalent of a bank vault if you will, and are responsible for storing and protecting the data that cyber criminals are targeting to steal or encrypt, in an effort to hold companies hostage, in a ransomware attack. Now in an effort to help customers understand how to protect themselves from such vulnerabilities, and how one storage company is addressing these challenges, the Cube is hosting this special presentation InfiniGuard Cyber Resilience: New Cybercrime Solutions. And we're going to speak with Eric Herzog, who's the Chief Marketing Officer of Infinidat, and then we'll bring in Stan Wysocki who is the president of Mark III Systems who is either an expert in IT infrastructure and artificial intelligence. First, let me welcome Eric Herzog back to the Cube, hello, Eric. >> Great, Dave, thank you very much, always love talking to you and the Cube, about leading edge technology solutions for end users. >> Alright let's do it. So, first we want to address the transformation and big business progress of Infinidat. New CEO, he's injected new management, new head of marketing obviously, Phil Bullinger is really been focused on accelerating the company's original vision, and doing so, Eric, in the typically unconventional style of Infinidat, you just put out a press release, capping 2021, can you set the stage for us, and give us the business update? >> Sure, so of course we summarized our 2021 results. What a very, very strong year. What a very, very strong year. We increased our bookings over 40% year to year. Even in Q4, we increased our bookings over 68%. And over 25% of the fortune 50 use an Infinidat solution, either our InfiniBox, or InfiniBox SSA, all flash array, or our Infiniguard, which is the focus of the launch we're doing today, on February 9th. >> Yeah, so I always said that Infinidat is one of the best kept secrets in the storage business. So let's talk about that hard news, what you launched on February 9th, and why it's important. >> Well, what we've done is we've got a high end enterprise purpose-built backup appliance, the InfiniGuard. We made some substantial advances in that. The key is focused on cyber resilience with what we call our infinisafe technology. Infinisafe incorporates a number of subsets, of cyber resilience from immutable snapshots, to logical air gapping, to fenced isolated networks, to almost instantaneous recovery for your backup data sets. In addition, we also dramatically improved the performance of the backup and recovery, which means, for example, if a backup window was taking three hours, now the backup window on that primary backup dataset could take only an hour and a half, which of course, as we all know backup dramatically impacts the performance of your primary applications, your primary servers, and your primary storage. So we've done both the cyber resilience aspect and then, on modern data protection, making sure that the backup and recovery are faster, for a traditional backup workload. >> So tell us a little bit more about Infinisafe, and specifically, Eric I'm interested in how it's different from other solutions, don't make me a liar, I had said, you guys always kind of take nonconventional approaches so tell us, add a little color to Infinisafe and how is it really unique from competitors? >> Sure, well Infinisafe incorporates as I mentioned, several different aspects. First of all, the immutable snapshots. So immutable snapshots can not be deleted, they cannot be altered, you cannot accelerate the rate, you can set the rate of immutable stuff, do I want to do it once a day? Do I want to do it twice a day? And obviously if a hacker could get in, you could accelerate that. Our immutable snaps are physically separated from the management schema. So the inside of an Infiniguard, we have what we call a data dedupe appliance, and that data dedupe engine, it goes ahead and it applies data reduction technology, to that back up data set. But we've divorced the immutable snapshots from the management of what we now call a DDE. So the DDE has kind of access of giving you that gap, that logical gap between the management schema of a DDE, and of course the immutable snapshot. We also combine that with this air gap technology, you've got the immutability and the air gap, which is local in that instance, but we also can do it remotely. So we can replicate from one Infiniguard in data center A, to a different Infiniguard in data center B. You then can configure that backup data set with the same immutable snapshot, and the same length, one day, half a day, six hours, whatever you choose, and then of course it'll have that same capability. The third thing we've done is very unique. We have a fenced isolated network to perform forensics. So, if the Cube has a cyber or malware attack, you need to make sure that once you've cleaned it up, off the primary storage, the primary servers, that you recover, a known good data set. So we set up this isolated fence network in which to perform that forensic analysis, to give you the appropriate good recover point. However, unlike many of our competitors, we can do it with a single InfiniBox. Some of our competitors, right on their websites say, you need two of their purpose-built backup appliances, to do cyber resilience. Meaning, twice the CapEx and twice the OpEx, which we can do with a single Infiniguard solution. And then lastly is our near instantaneous recovery. As you know, we're recovering backup data sets. We can make between 15 and 30 minutes time, the backup data set fully accessible to the backup admin or the storage admin to use their Commvault, their Veeam, their Veritas, their IBM Spectrum Protect, or whatever their backup software is, to do recovery from the InfiniGuard box, back to the primary storage using of course the backup software that they created the original dataset with. That is very unique. When you look out in the industry and look at, whether it be purpose-built backup competitors, or whether you look at primary storage competitors, almost no one talks about the speed of their recovery, and the one or two that do, talk about recovering the data set. We recover the entire environment. We are ready to go, and the backup admin, if they were, for example, Commvault, Veeam or Veritas, they could immediately start the backup, as soon as we did our recovery, which again, takes between 15 and 30 minutes, independent of the data set size. That could be 50 terabytes, it could be a petabyte, it could be two petabytes. And even two petabytes of data can be available in 15 to 30 minutes. And then of course, the backup admin can restore from that backup dataset. Very powerful and very unique in those aspects. >> Whilst the reason why this is so important is like I said, it's like the bank vault, because hackers are going to go after that backup corpus that's where the gold is, that's where all the data is. So this all really sounds good. But there's more than Infinisafe in this launch. What else should we know? >> Well, the other thing we've done is dramatically improved the performance of the purpose-built backup plants at the core. So for example, the last time we publicly announced our numbers, we were at 74 terabytes an hour, now we're 180 terabytes an hour. So of course, as we all know, when you do a backup, it impacts the performance of the primary applications, the primary servers and the primary storage. So if that backup window was taking three hours, now that we've more than doubled the performance, you could be up to 50% better. So a three hour backup window, if that's what the dataset took to be backed up, now we can get that down to an hour and a half or even faster. So that of course minimizes the impact on primary storage, primary applications, and of course your primary storage, making it much, much more efficient, from a backup perspective, and of course less impact on the primary applications, the primary servers, and primary storage. >> So I've talked to a number of Infinidat customers, they're very loyal and kind of passionate. So I wonder if you could kind of put that perspective on this discussion. The impact that InfiniGuard, this announcement, that's going to have for your customers, paint a picture as to how it's going to change their business. >> Sure, so let me give you an example. One of our customers is a cloud service buyer, in North America, they focus only on healthcare. So here's a couple of key benefits that they got. First of all, they use our integration with two different backup vendors. They don't have one, they have two. So we're tightly integrated with our backup software partners. They got a 40% cost savings on CapEX, compared to the previous vendor that they had. And, they used to be able to do 30,000 backup per day, now they can do 90,000 backup a day. And by the way, that's all with the previous version of InfiniGuard, not the version we just announced on the 9th. One of our other customers, which is in AMEA and they happened to be an energy company, they were using purpose-built backup from the other vendor, and they had 14 of them, seven in data center one, and seven in data center two. With InfiniGuard, they've got one in data center one, and one in data center two. So 14 purpose-built backup appliances consolidated down into two. And on top of that, those purpose-built backup appliances from the other vendor actually had a couple recovery failures, where they were not able to recover the data. They've been installed for a year now, they've had zero recovers, zero recovery failures, whereas the previous vendor had some. And lastly, let's talk about a large global fortune financial services. So, one of the biggest in the industry, their cost savings from their previous vendor was 46%. In addition, when you look at their cyber resilience design, they were using one of those vendors that probably talks about needing two system products to do their cyber resiliency. They again were able to take those two systems out, and use one InfiniGuard solution. Again, reducing both their capital expenditure, two going to one. And then the operational expenditure, they only have to manage one InfiniGuard versus two of the other guys appliances. Those are just three examples all over the world. One in cloud service providing, one in the energy space, and one a global fortune 500 financial services company. Just some real world examples. And all those by the way, Dave, were before the enhancements of Infinisafe, and before the additional performance we've added in the launch of InfiniGuard on February 9th. >> So like I'm just kind of sketching out the business case, you know, put my CFO hat on. So you're lowering costs cause you're consolidating, so that means I need less hardware and software. But also there's probably labor costs associated with that. If I could do it faster with less resources, I got less stuff to manage. You're accelerating the backup time, so that frees up resources that I can apply elsewhere, recovery, you know, is really important. So I'm inferring faster recovery, all this lowers my risk, and then I can sort of calculate the probability of having data loss, and then what that means to my business. Am I getting that right? >> Yeah, yeah. And in fact, the other impact is on your primary service and your primary storage. If the backup window shrinks, then you're not slowing down that SAP app, that Oracle app, you know, that SQL app, whatever you're running, whether that be the financials, whether that be your logistics, whether it be your manufacturing system, every time you turn on that backup, to do that backup, that backup window slows you down. So cutting that in half has an impact on the real-world application side, which obviously most storage guys, you know, it's hard for us to quantify. But you are taking the impact of backup, and basically reducing it, if you will shrinking the backup window, so their primary applications don't get hammered as much by the backup while they're still trying to run that SAP, that Oracle or that SQL workload. >> And you're not a backup software vendor, so I have optionality there. I can pretty much choose all the popular, you know. >> Absolutely, so Veeam, Veritas, Commvault, IBM Spectrum Protect, all the majors. And in fact, one of the players I mentioned, as you were talking about the end-users, they use two different backup packages, two of 'em. So, two of the major vendors that I named, we work with them just within one account. So, we're very flexible, the user picks what they want from a backup software perspective, and we can work with anything. So, whatever they want to use, is fine with us. We integrate with all of them, we have integration, for example, also with VMware, for vVols and other aspects in container integration, so you know, whether it be our purpose-built backup appliance, InfiniGuard, or what we do with the InfiniBox, we always make sure we integrate with the surrounding environment. 'Cause storage is not an island, storage needs to exist in your data center, or your hybrid cloud data center, or what you're doing for containers. So we make sure we have integration with our InfiniBox, our InfiniBox SSA, all flash. And of course the product we're enhancing today, the InfiniGuard. >> Yeah, integration is super important in the enterprise. Enterprises want solutions, they're busy. (laughs) They don't have unlimited budget to go, you know, plugging stuff together. So, okay Eric, we got to leave it there. Thank you so much. >> Great, thank you very much Dave. Always love talking to the Cube. >> Okay, in a moment Stan Wysocki is coming in. He's the president of Mark III Systems. He's going to join us for a drill down on how InfiniGuard is impacting customers. You're watching the Cube, your global leader, in enterprise tech coverage. (gentle music)

>>live from San Diego, California It's the Q covering Koopa and Cloud Native Cot brought to you by Red Cloud. Native Computing Pounding and its ecosystem March >>Welcome back. This is the cubes coverage. Fourth year of Q Khan Cloud native Khan, 2019 Here in San Diego. I am still Minutemen like co host for this afternoon is Justin Warrant and happy to welcome to the program A first time guests, but was on the keynote stage yesterday Sougou Super Marine, who is the co founder and CEO of Planet Scale and also one of the, uh, we're gonna be talking about the test which graduated, announced on the stage. They didn't put a cap and gown or roll everything out, which they did a couple of years ago. But first, thanks so much for joining us. And congratulations. Thank you. All right, so, Sougou, bring us back. You know, we're talking about a cloud native database and we'll dig into that and everything, but bring us back to what you were working on. And you know why of what we now call >>so the When we started with us, we were really not thinking of cloud native itself. for say, it was kind of a sequence of events that kind of forced with us to become cloud native long before cloud native was actually born as even the term was born. Which was when we had to move the test from YouTube on print into Google's board, which use the predecessor off Cooper natives. Um, the reason why the test is kind of one of the leading storage projects in Cloud Native was because it was probably the first project that remained open source, even though we managed to ram it with >>work. Yeah, you know what? One of things we've been talking about at the show here is you know, in the early days, you know, we were very much talking about infrastructure, but we know the reason we have infrastructure is to run applications, and one of the most important applications is databases, and I talk to customers. It's not just one database. Often they have many different databases on, and that is one of the big challenges today. So, you know, you kind of look at that landscape, help us understand how this fits into that. That overall picture. >>Yeah, so that kind of goes back in tow, Google's history and how that can influence kubernetes itself. So if you look at Google's board, most off its features are meant for running stateless application. So within Google, people who wrote applications when they wanted to store state they just called out into a service that was semi part of board but wasn't itself run by board as if you would run your application. So many of those properties were inherited by Cooper natives. So which is the reason why? Um, right from the beginning, it was hard to make storage work for cover natives on Dhe. For that reason, even a zoo recently as early this year, If you look at the tweets from Kelsey Hightower, don't just move your database into communities. You're going to regret it. People still say that, but at the same time, because we test way, we're able to figure out howto make storage work under the stringent rules that Borg had, which was mainly to support stateless applications. In other words, we actually land because, as if it was a stateless application, while still managing while still making state state will not survive this stateless behavior, which is actually why we just managed to be launched within communities as soon as it was born. Ah, but it has been a struggle for other people because they didn't have the luxury of preparing for it without even knowing. Uh so I think that more effort needs to be made on both sides, both from people who are writing storage to make them work with communities as well as kubernetes itself, trying to meet them halfway, trying to add features to help the storage developers. >>It has been a real struggle. I remember from even the very first show I came to four years ago in Seattle looking at the set. My media thing is an ex storage guy and has a backup guy was to go and look at things and say OK, this is lovely for stateless applications, you said. But riel applications have data in them and they need to maintain state. Where's the state looking at all of the group in any type of things, like there were no state full sets with another thing that has changed a lot in four years, and people have come to the party and we need to be able to manage state. But now that you we have a database like a test, isn't that just taking things to the point where I as an app developer, I can just write my stateless application and then my data can live inside a data management service like a test? So I don't actually need to deal with any of that state management problem myself. >>That's what it amounts to. Uh, the the one property of the test is that it can run both in communities and outside. So there are people who run tests on Prem and they have their own orchestration layer. So that has given some challenge where we just cannot depend on communities. You cannot call into communities a p I s o. The way we have the architect of the test is that it knows when it runs within a orchestrated environment, how to interact with it, but it doesn't assume that it exists. So >>why have you provided that functionality? Is that because customers said that I actually want to be able to run the test, But I don't wanna have to deal with kubernetes >>exactly like so not everyone has migrated to communities. It is surprising that everybody wants to migrate communities. But then many of them are saying, I don't know how many years out it is on. Then for them, we just solved a different problem, which is the problem of sheer massive scale ability on dhe for them. They want to be able to still run with us on print s. So for that reason, that is actually a small gap between communities and the test itself. On dhe, we're filling that gap with health charts in the open source on Dhe Planet Scale, which is the company that I founded has built an operator that we're also going to open source so that people can use that to launch community >>before we talk about planet scale You. No, no, no, no. Absolutely. In the keynote you had some customer stories on might might help illustrate some what we're talking about, you know, the scalability of the environment, everything. So you know, I'll let you choose that kind of a short example. You know, the slack One you know, is one that I think president in the audience there. But >>I would choose slack. Ah, Jerry's always obviously enormous, but I will choose slack and nozzle because they represent two very different but really genuine needs in the industry. Slack once not just massive scale, but they want flexibility with manipulating data on DDE. That is something that is manipulating data really, really hard. Onda. We believe that we found the secret sauce to make that work with tests, and that is the reason you saw those statements from Slack. They're so passionate and with so much conviction, that is because they were fascinated by what we could do with their data. So that is one example and slack does not run on communities. They don't run on cloud. They run on AWS, but they don't they run it like they their own claim. They have very fixed I p addresses fixed instance names, but they're on it like a cloud. Sometimes I would say they are more coordinated behavior than some applications that run on kubernetes like they treat everything as disposable. When something goes away, they don't try to recover it or anything destroyed out. Replace it with something new, which is property off cloud native behavior. And on the other hand, a company like nozzle because they're they're actually a startup on dhe. It is surprising that why would the start of one to use? Ah, something that is Mento scale. Massively. That's when we realized that the cloud native nature of it does fills a gap that currently is not filled by many people, which is I want to run everything in Cooper natives all in one. And we didn't realize until they showed us what they did with it, which is, like, completely migrate from one cloud to another. They're a super amazing. And I heard it on dhe. They did that without even telling me are telling anybody in the community because one day I talked to them. They say they are on a key s on. A few days later, I still assumed that they are Nikki s and they know of your booty. Jakey, when did you do this? Oh, we did that last month because we got some really good deal with them, super exciting, >>and that that is a surprising, exactly affected. That's surprising. It is a bit of a concern to me because we hear a lot of talk about multi cloud and the idea of applications being being mobile between different clouds. Data movement is really hot. Exactly. So the fact that someone has actually managed to do that and haven't moved from one community service across to another one is that we find that remarkable because we know it's such a hard problem. But that's one of the great things I think about kubernetes, which is possibly under appreciated, is that it's not that it makes everything easy, but it makes what What used to be hard is now >>possible. Yes, yes, yes, that is very true. Yeah, it's, um uh, like it took It took us a while to, uh, think to make this mind shit, because some of these things, even though they're like it looks, looks looks very obvious. But for the longest time, we were, you're saying, tested for massive scale ability. It's for It's what this and that and even two years ago, up sport came and said, We're going to use the tests for communities orchestration. Weird, but okay, feel free. We don't have a problem with it. And then nozzle came out, and now suddenly you see Oh, this is this is why. And this Saul's really, really difficult problem on. They all did especially hot Spot. Did a lot of work in with tests to actually make it easier. But now we see Now we see the light. >>So Sougou Planet scales the company. Help us understand Vitesse planet scale. How that fits together. What's kind of the business model for your company? >>Yeah. So, um uh, so the test was originally developed at YouTube by you, too. There was one thing That was some pressure. We were beginning to feel when we developed it. We didn't mean for anybody to use it. Really. It was open source, more for academic reasons to show that we can do these things on. But it was interesting when people started adopting it. You're adopting this system. Okay, so we'll see what we can do to help you. But after a while, when the community started growing, some of them were contributing. But definitely storage is a difficult software to write, too. It's not like a pitiful software. Any anybody can understand the cord and start writing. It was obvious that the number of people wanting to use with death and wanting peaches from it are also people that we're not really capable of. writing those features because they're really hard features, too. Right on DDE. That pressure was going and they were saying all I wish you two could do this for me. You know, YouTube is a video company. They're not in the We just did this for ourselves. There's no reason for us to spend so many person years they've left in the future for you. And that time it became obvious that we need to start a company to support this community where there's this huge growing demand, Which is kind of what motivated towards us, uh, thinking about starting planet scale and one requirement waas It cannot remain a YouTube project at that point. So which is why we work it out that way, will actually move it to see NCF. And then I ended up leaving. You do have to start planet scale with my co founder. Then >>so is just from a business standpoint, is that service is on their customers ask for things and fun that that that gets contributed upskirt stream. >>So that was initially what we thought we will do. Initially we thought it was just get out laptops and start helping people that that was our initial thinking. But what we realized was at the same time the industry has shifted towards this new business model which is to actually run everything as a service. And we realized, Oh, my God, years All we have to do is we know how to run with us. You've done it at YouTube. You help people deployed with testing various companies. You know exactly what it takes to run with us. All we have to do is take this. I'm does the service. And that's exactly what people want. Because otherwise, because of the fact that we tested this flexible, it is also extremely complex, too confident because it can run on frame. Then you have to sit all these flags. You runnin carbonate is you said all these flags. So all this has to be managed and we realized, OK, we can manage this and we know exactly how to make it work. And we actually just announced two days ago that our planet scale CNDP Cloud native database is available for people to come in use. >>Well, congratulations on the progress of the business as well as the test graduation and thank you. So much for joining us here on the Cube. Thank you. Alright for Justin Warren. I'm stupid Men. We will be back with more of our day. Two of three days. Whoa! Wall coverage here from San Diego. Thank you for watching the Cube.

>>This is Dave Violante. We're here at a W s with the Keep talking About Storage palate cars. Here is the director of product management for E B s Elastic block storage. Welcome. Good to see again. >>Nice to see it. If >>so, let's talk about E b s. You know, it all started with us. Three and course customers demand Maur. What do we need to know about E b s? Like, what are the options that you provide? Give us the late low down. >>Yeah. So the way to think about block storage in the AWS eight abreast constructors. Really two kinds of offerings. One is around instant storage, which is a form of block strategy. And then you have a block started service, which is E. B s Andi. Sort of. The key thing they're from customer standpoint of different shit between the two is if you warn your storage like cycle to be coincident with your instance like cycle, then you use instant surgeon. That's why we see a lot of our customers using since storage, because they won't want that experience if you want. On the other hand, it's storage life cycle that's different from your instance life cycle. So the ability to change instances, the ability to grow size is the ability to to take back ups. Then you want to choose the obvious experience. And there we have a series of volume types that customers can consume. Be a GP two we have, I want. We have our stream volumes, which are a C one and C one. >>So she's when you talk to customers of block stores. What did they tell you that they most care about? >>Yeah, uh, it is. It is a Lord around performance. It is a lot around. Availability is a lot on your ability. He's a fuse. Those of the core characteristics that that customers care about earlier this year as an example, one of the things that we launched for customers was the ability to encrypt their volumes by default on you. Say, Well, why is that important? So security becomes a big concern for customers a day as they think about their environment and with encryption by default. We just made it simple. With a single setting, you can now, at an account level, ensure that all your PBS volumes created from that point on our fully encrypted. >>Okay, let's talk about snapshots. So how o r r. Snapshots in the cloud? Different. And how are your customers using stamps? >>Yeah, that's great. Great. Great. Cigarette in tow. Common conversation. Customers who are coming from on premises environment are used to snapshots is being sort of this copy on right type attack volumes. The way to think about aws snapshot. Devious snapshots in particular are really to think of them as backup. And so that is the one sort of key thing that I always tell customers is to think of what we call snapshots, really as backups. Especially if you're coming from a non premises environment. >>Okay, um, how about things you're doing to really improve? Uh, EBS snapshots. I mean, is it more performance? Is it making simple Are expanding use cases. Yeah. >>Yeah. Let's talk about the use case scenario Is that that snapshots get use, and snapshots are really the underlying storage for water called Amazon machine images. Our aim eyes. That is how snaps that is, how our instances boot. That is also the way that customers create CBS Williams from, so you can create an obvious volume from a snapshot. So on that on that particular use case, one of the things that we're we're now launching is a capability via calling far snapshot restored. So you can now take a knee, be a snapshot and then within an availability is soon. Make it such that you can. You can now launch volumes from it without encountering any Leighton sing and back on DDE. That we think is a tremendously powerful capability for customs. Because if you can, it takes away all the undifferentiated heavy lifting that they had to do in order to lure the data from the snapshot into the volume completely out of the picture and allows them to focus on getting their data to their applications. That's right. >>All right, we'll give you the last word. Final thoughts on the innovations that you had. Congratulations on all the hard work. >>No, actually, this is the team has done a tremendous amount of work in art launches. Couldn't be happier to see this in the hands of customers. We look forward to seeing what they build from from the things that we provided them so excited to see that happen. >>That's actually quite amazing. It started all very simple with us three. And now we've seen service is just become more granular. Higher performance. Really meeting customer demands. She's thanks so much. Thank you so much. All right. Thanks for watching. Your body will be back right after this short break.

>>Live from Orlando, Florida It's the cue covering Microsoft Ignite Brought to you by Cohee City. >>Hello, everyone. And welcome to the Cubes live coverage of Microsoft Ignite. We're kicking off three days of live coverage here at the Orange County Civic Center Convention Center. Sorry, I'm your host. Rebecca Knight coasting along side of stew Minutemen. Do we have so much to cover? So many new products? So many new strategies. New Emphasis Head knew new buzzwords, tech intensity and democratization. Uh, you were here. You were in the hub. You heard Satya Nadella live on the main stage. I'd like to just get your initial impressions and initial thoughts of of his keynote, and we're gonna dig into all of >>them. Rebecca, it's great to be here second year doing it with you here. Your background, really on business. Productivity. Really enjoyed doing this one within you. Chew said Walter Wall. Three days of covered The place is just buzzing with activity. 26,000 in attendance for a show that's been called soft night for I think it's been about six years. It was tech head back in the day we talked about last year, you know, this was originally, you know, the windows and office. You know, administrators show and has really matured over time. Trust was a big topic of conversation. And you know what? With my general thing, they rearrange some of the logistics of it. I actually, you know, usually I'm sitting with the press and the analyst upfront. Actually, you know, when in the shoes of the attending here, which meant I stood in our for almost two hours waiting to be one of the 3000 out of 26,000 to go get a seat and communication was a little bit weird and we kind of move in. But I did get a nice seat. Such intel was up on front. I thought they covered a lot of ground and it ran well, logistically. For those of us that were watching from the main stage, I heard remotely, you know, as sometimes happens, you know, Internet or things that there could be some calendars. It is with all of these cloud shows that we go to you just get this barrage of so many different things, everything from you know, really interesting as your arc, which we're gonna spend a bunch of time talking about through all of the latest. Aye. Aye. And the power things that they're going on all the way down through dynamics and teams and devices and EJ and on DDE down to the browser and the search engine. So so many different things. You know, Microsoft, Of course. You know, one of the store words in technology, but clearly laying out Ah, lot of announcements, books worth of you work of all of the announcement that go out there. And you know, general, take that I get for most people is they definitely are impressed so far. And they're gonna spend all week digging in tow, learn more, >>So we're gonna We're gonna dig in right now. But But I also just want to say that setting the scene doll, this is October 25th. Microsoft was given the jet, announced it was announced it was given the jet I contract. This was a big surprise. And this is Microsoft, which is a distant number two to AWS. Did Sathya seem on a high from that still or what is your impression? >>Unless I missed it, I didn't catch anything about it. Absolutely. I've talked to some people around the show, Talk to somebody appears in the media and analyst community. That air talking about it absolutely was a big surprise. Anybody that's interested in this go check out John. For years written down on this, David Lantz has done a lot of analysis. We've been looking at this quite a bit. Amazon really had one this deal, and it went through courts and Oracle, you know, pushed against really hard to try to make for the Amazon, did it. General Mattis writes about it in his book that I think you came out recently, You know, from the president down to make sure that Amazon did not get this politics entry. The high level is it's $10 billion over 10 years, but when you look into it, number one is the minimum purchase. In the first years only like a 1,000,000. It's expected to be more like 202 150 million in the 1st 2 years, but it is a big deal. Microsoft really spent a lot of time the last couple of years going deeper into public sector, making sure they've got the governance and the compliance sergeant is Kino talked about the 54 azure regions and what they're doing. They're still work that Microsoft needs to do. They don't have the Level six security yet which Amazon does that They've been given less than a year to get that, to make sure that they can fulfill this. But a lot of pieces and there will be lots of other government contracts, but lots of intrigue there. I think it goes back to thing we mentioned trust. Can the government trust that Microsoft will allow them to do all they need to do? There's a lot of office 3 65 in the government. And, of course, Microsoft does. This other thing. There's a bunch of in the government is they use Oracle. We know that Oracle and Amazon are still butting heads. You don't expect to see Oracle on Amazon, you know, shaking hands on stage any time soon. At Oracle OpenWorld This year you saw Oracle allowing their solution to run on Azure in friendly licensing terms because you can run Oracle on AWS. But oracles gonna do everything you can to make sure that the licensing terms her onerous in that environment, they want you to do it on their infrastructure or on their environment and really opening up to Azure. Now, the government contrast that they can run it there. And for me, that trust resident. When I talk to the partner ecosystem, there definitely is some concern about Amazon's power in the marketplace and what they will do. Amazon, to their credit, has a big ecosystem there. Marketplace is phenomenal and they are open and give customers choice. But obviously, just like if you serve on amazon dot com, if it's a Amazon Basics or Amazon provider solution, they're probably going toe move that them in that way. Every company does this for, you know, Google makes sure that they optimize for their ads and everything like that. Microsoft in the past was known for optimizing their licensing revenue. Today they're more trusted. They're more open. I think Santa leaves that on the from the top. But you know so many things that they need to dig into. So Jet I not something I'd expect to spend a lot of time on this week, But thank you for bringing it up happily undertone. Because what the moral of the stories today cloud is AWS and Azure are the clear leaders. Yes, AWS still has a sizable lead. A measure is slowly eating into that lead. But as a as a user, as an enterprise, as any company out there, you can't be wrong by choosing either of those solutions. And one of Microsoft's embracing is that multi cloud environment going back to art will talk about how do I live in that multi cloud world? Eight of us still leads with their hybrid solution and use eight of us don't use other clouds. Azure is more embracing of a multi cloud world. >>So so let's talk about that now. But I just in terms of the trust at a time where there is such deep and tremendous skepticism, a big tech in government right now, the trust really is a crucial element. We're gonna We're gonna talk about that today with a lot of our guests two developments that you're most interested in. And I really want to dig into here as your ark. We're gonna start azure Arkin Power platform. But as your brand new today, uh, your thoughts, your impressions? >>Yes. So, as your ark, I can automate update with my policies across any environment, not just azure. So where I look at this and say, OK, do I manage azure with this? Absolutely. It's got kubernetes in it, so I should be able to move things around if need be. My my data center. In what? I'm putting their all of the azure stack and EJ hub all of these azure pieces in my data center. Can I manage that with us? Of course. The question is, what about if I'm using Google? Service is if I'm using A W S service is in the demo that they ran. They showed 80 was and said, Oh, we can manage that I said, That's great that they can. But will customers actually do that? There's a certain skill set. There's no way a program for it. And of course, AWS has its tooling that everybody uses their. So we've been trying to get that single pane of glass of, you know, for more than my entire career. And the techies I talked to is that pane of glass is nothing but P a. I n is the joke we always make. So it is great that they've done this by the way it's on Lee in Tech preview right now, so it's great that they have this. We've been saying for years that Microsoft, if you talk about hybrid, has the lead when you talk about thought, leadership and solutions. But really, that hybrid solution is azure and data center, and I've got my APs that live everywhere. So 03 65 or in my data center in there. What we're really hearing here is a comprehensive reimagining of hybrid, as we've been talking about it more recently is I really blur the lines between my data center, the public cloud and even the edge. So it's great to see Microsoft do this. I got a lot of friends that are at the V M World Europe Show in Barcelona this week. We've been talking about this in the V M where environment for last couple of years of the VM, where on AWS via where on Azure V M wear on Google, Oracle, IBM and more. So it's great that Microsoft has stepped up here. In some ways. It makes me really think how I thought about Microsoft because Microsoft has been, in my mind a leader and hybrid and realizing that they need to really, really make a significant change to the portfolio. To really deliver on the promise of hybrid and multi My definition of when we will have a true multi con solution is when the value that extract from the system is greater than the sum of the parts. And absolutely that's not where we are today. Microsoft has a lot of pieces. Absolutely. They have a right to be one of the leaders pulling those pieces together. And really, it is a place where you see Microsoft and IBM, where partnering, but also all going to be that leader in the management of my cloud native environment. And we're gonna spend a lot of time this week talking to the developers because that's another area that sought to spend a lot of time. Those two point 6,000,000 citizen developers, as he calls them. I'm sure you must have really loved Rebecca. 61% of job openings for developers are outside of the tech sector. >>Well, exactly, and that is that is such a huge point and that's what Sathya said. That's always been our sweet spot wear for the citizen developers and we want to democratize computing. We want to make sure that you can bring your best self to work and be your most productive self to work in. So many of the tools that they have introduced today are all about creativity, collaboration, time management, productivity, individual time productivity as well as team productivity. So there's a lot of exciting developments today. Let's talk about power platform. Speaking of the parts and pieces What what does it do? What most interests you and excites you about power platform >>boy. So you know, first, the last thing. The citizen developers. It's funny when most people do, you know, where do I start? And I started to excel. And of course, Microsoft is probably the company that most people I'm old enough now that I remember, you know, using the spreadsheets before Excel was the leader that it was there. But the power platform, The thing I've been looking at is way were here a year ago. There was no power platform. Did we talk a lot about a I Absolutely. We talk about data warehousing and business intelligence and all of these things. So I'm trying to understand how much of This is just the new umbrella. Platt, the new umbrella messaging around it and how much there's new products. I talked to a couple people that dig in straight here. I talked to a couple of Microsoft Mbps. Which way? There are lots of them here. I haven't mentioned it, Rebecca already. But the community at the show is excellent. It is welcoming. It is engaging. Diversity is front and center at this show and Microsoft Great kudos for that because it ties into that citizen developers. But when you talk about the power platform, it's about enabling the citizen developers. So a few announcements in their power automate is really there are p a solution. We've got power virtual agents, which is understanding natural language and conversations. Such actually did a cute little thing. He went toe like universal and fought the demi Gorgon from stranger things. Stranger things, fan. I thought it was really cute and everything. But, he explained, he's like, Okay, here's you know it's understanding my name and saying, Get back to me. It's understanding the movements that I'm doing and turning that into what what's happening so way. Understand that we're still relatively early into gaining the full benefits out of a I hear. But there's a lot of tooling, and from what the people I've talked to is the power platform absolutely is much more than just a rebranding. There are acquisitions that have come in. There are software launches and you know, Microsoft in the agile, continuously shipping code mode that everybody is in these days, you know, is going through a lot of veneration. So I believe that you know that the platform was announced back in the spring, and something that I've seen with Microsoft and many companies like Cisco, that air going heavily of software, a platform of software, actually could be a unifying factor forcing function between all of these groups. So rather than saying, Oh my gosh, Microsoft, you've got, you know, 1000 different software packages that I would by no, no, that's not the way you think about it. You know, they don't come on a CD or disk anymore. Instead, it's there's something that I plug into on it, cloud enabled. It's able to be, you know, purchase interruptible model. So we've got number of guests that that power platform absolutely is. You know, hearing good things in the ecosystem and absolutely, you know, you know, it is a strength of Microsoft when you talk about the leverage and use of data in a business environment, on is their legacy. >>And this is a company that is going from strength to strength right now, really firing on all four senators cylinders, azure office, 3 65 windows. We haven't talked about fortnight and the other gaming elements here, but in terms of, um, usage issues, I know there were There were a couple of hiccups last week. >>Yeah, so you know, outages or something. People are definitely worried about the cloud. There was reported last week that there was some availability and performance issues. They were throttling things back. They were saying you couldn't scale and we're like, Wait, you know, infinite compute, infinite storage on demand. That's what we need. And from some of the things I heard from the community, the gaming platforms actually were impacting this and actually gaming that run across both AWS and azure. So it definitely is a little bit of a red flag. You know, your azure, your your your microsoft, and you want to talk about that you are a leader in the face. You can trust them. We're gonna keep you going. Well, you know, cos have spent decades making sure that their data centers have the up time and reliability that we need. You know, when I talk to the big cloud providers, they have some of the same conversation we were having back in the infrastructure world, You know, 15 years ago about data availability and data loss, You know? D u D E l date on availability and data loss. It was a four letter word. You can't have it. You would have war rooms and make for the things you know. Don't go down so little bit of a red flag especially, you know, will there be any contesting of the government deal? You don't want something sitting there saying Oh, hey, wait. I have a critical you know d o d operation. That needs to happen. Wait, We can't speak out when we need it. You know that. That's a no No. >>Right. Exactly. Well, this is these air, all the topics we're going to get into and then some over the next three days, it's gonna be an action packed show. I'm looking forward to it. A lot of great guests to thanks >>so much. I can't wait. I >>hope you'll stay tuned for more of the cubes. Live coverage of Microsoft IC night coming up in just a little bit.

>>live from Boston, Massachusetts. It's the Q covering I. F s World Conference 2019. Brought to you by I. F. S. >>Welcome back to Boston, everybody. You're watching The Cube. The leader in live tech coverage is Day one coverage of the I. F s World Conference. Darren Russo's here is the CEO of F S Darren. Thanks for coming back in the Cube. Great TV again. So last year was your first year. He was kind of laid out your vision at the World Conference. How's progress? >>Yeah, Look, it's going incredibly well. We were really focused on how we go from being a pretty fragment of global business to being, you know, an integrated business where we were able to operate. You know, its scale globally in a very homogenous way, where the customer experience was the same, irrespective where they engaged with us. And, you know, we've made a tremendous amount of progress with it, So you know, the business is growing really strongly. Net revenues up 22% year on year. I lost its revenues up 40% year on year are clouds up in the triple digits, so you know it's tough to be critical of how it's going so far. >>That's great, Great. You're growing faster than your peers. I think the stat was you gave us three Ex factory except in the industry would be awesome. Is that means that your primary benchmark do you want? You want to gain share? You want to go faster than the big whales, I presume. I >>think two things One is customer satisfaction, we believe, is the key indicator of long term success. S O. You know, we're the number one ranked European efforts. Salmon gotten appearance sites. That's that is and always will be my number. One metric. Can we be way the number one from a customer satisfaction perspective? And then I believe the revenue stats will follow and you know that's where we are. So certainly, if you look at our our core peers, the big G R P vendors, all of them are flat on. Dhe were growing 20 ships since >>one of the things you mentioned in your Cube interview last year was one of the things that you wanted to focus on was I'll call regional alignment. Paul and I used to work for I D. G. I worked for I. D. C. You were editor in chief of Computer World. We work for a company, had more offices overseas and IBM, and it was really hard to herd the cats. And that was one of the things that you cited. Have you been able to get people generally poor or at the same time? And how has that affected your business? Yeah. Look, I >>think the big challenge before I arrived was that there wasn't really a strategy of global strategy for the business. My face had a way of working and there was a strong culture, but there wasn't really a strategy. And obviously it's difficult to be critical of people when they not following the strategy when there isn't one s o. You know, Step one was really making sure that we had a strategy on DDE that was really about being focused on the five industries that we focused on, focused on three solutions on dhe focused on the six segments of customer, which is half a 1,000,000,000 to 5 billion. So now, globally, you know, irrespective the office that you go to, um anywhere in the world, they're focused on those five industries they focused on those three solutions and they're focused on their customer segments. So it helps me. P. M >>I said during our preview video video this morning that I've been around this industry as long as I f s has, until last year had never even heard of it. Is that just me being clueless? There's something there >>that we were just saying before we started that we're the definitely the biggest software business you've never heard of. Um, and and and that's common, I think, you know, we were There are a couple of factors. One is that the business was very European centric. Andi didn't really engaged in a tremendous amount of marketing and media prison. So, you know, those are elements that, you know, I think we're doing a better job off now, But we have a long way to go. The challenge that we have is that where we compete, we win when we get in and were able to tell our story, and we're able to show the value we win. We just don't get into as many deals as we need to. And that's the challenge we have. >>Yeah, there was a lot of talk this morning about the importance of those five pillars of those five industries. If you're going to become the next S A P, you're gonna have to branch out beyond that. What is your thinking about diversify >>becoming the next? They say he is definitely not my ambition, You know, I think way remain focused on customer satisfaction. And, you know, I think that there's a there's a difference. Whatever it is leading them, it's not customer satisfaction. You worked >>there for four years. >>I worked there for four years. I know. I think the big thing for me is is that we've got to stay focused on their customer voice. They focused on what delivers value for our customers beyond just the rhetoric and hyperbole. You know, I think when you when you listen to a lot of the complexity that our customers are facing today, any customers are facing. Companies are facing increasingly disruptive times, and the tech industry is making life more difficult for them. The more best of breed solutions get both. The more fragments that potential the landscape is, the more complex it becomes for customers if they have to try and figure out. How do we integrate these things and derive value from this highly fragmented landscape? So you know, we're trying to solve that problem. How do we make it easier for customers to challenge in their industry? And that's where this whole for the challenges has check comes from. How do we help him to be disruptive in their industry? Have competitive advantage? >>That seems to be a sort of a fundamentally different thing about your approach, though. Is this focus on those vertical industry's most e r P companies did not do that. Is that something that is core to your values? >>Look, I >>think what we recognize is that as you move to the cloud, you have to drive to standard. That's just the reality of going to the cloud on what's happening for the horizontal E. R B vendors. So the locks of ASAP and Oracle is that they have one e r P solution that fits every industry. So if it's good for health insurance and it's good for a bank, then it's difficult to really get your head around the fact that it could be good for a defense manufacturer, but the functional requirements is simply vastly different on that means that you have to customize them. If you have to customize that, they can go to the cloud. So what we believe is that you have to have this vertical specialization, the five industries that we serve us all. A lot of commonality in the process is that they use. And that's why that vertical strategy is so key to our success. So you won't see us going into financial service is, or health care or retail worth that core application. We may in time in many years to come branch out. That will be a different solutions. >>So your tailor, that app for that module for that industry, Yes, just go deep, deep functionality. You're known for that, but at the same time you're also messaging. You want your customers to be able to tailor this for their environment. So square that circle for me. >>So I think when we talk about a choice and and I think tailoring is the wrong word, we talk about choice. We're talking about choice of deployments on Prem or in the cloud choice of customer choice of partner, rather who they're going to deploy with on Dhe, then The solution is really an industry solution that comes with that functional death. And we don't we don't advocate their customers customized that all. We really don't want them to customize it. What we explain to them in some detail is that the real value comes from adopting the solution for two standard and staying on a vanilla application. Because that vanilla application, you're going to be able to withstand future upgrades, the total cost of ownership gets lower. The processes that are embedded in that application or best of breed at the box. That's what they're intended to do, and that works when you have a vertical application. When you have a horizontal application and you're trying to have a do things that it shouldn't naturally be doing, that becomes company. >>Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't that essentially the message ASAP had when it went through? It's hyper growth in the late nineties. I mean, there was a Y two k thing there, too, but ah, lot of the message was around. Do it our way and and then you don't have to get stuck in a rut, >>So I think that when it came out with that generation of application. That certainly was what they had hoped would happen. But what happened in practice is that the system integrators came in and the whole business process reengineering explosion happened on Dhe. That's not how it how it manifested itself. So what you see is, you see, he's very large, monolithic ASAP applications that were customized over in some cases decades, not not. You know, if a customer is deploying for two standard, then they should be able to deploy in a period mission. In weeks, we spoke about our deployment with Racing Point. If one team and going live in 12 weeks, you know, we're a 700 million global business. We deployed a knife s in 24 weeks. You know, if a customer's deploying for two standard, it's measured in weeks. As soon as they start to talk about two years or three years or five years or seven years there, customizing the solution significantly. Yeah, I >>mean, it became just sort of a perpetual upgrade, maintenance and up for the time it had a business impact. But boy, you think a cloud today agility, you know, getting rid of waterfall approaches, Missus. Antithetical to today's Look >>what I don't point fingers here. I think that this just maturity come with experience. The line of business applications you'll see our EMS and your HR solutions have taught people that you can, if you think about this is look at sea. Are Emma's an example? You had Siebel before people would implement stable. They would customize Siebel that would take long implementations. They were highly bespoke applications and then sells. Force came along and just destroyed them, and they destroyed them. Because what people learned very quickly was that there was a really easy to consume, really easy to use application that functionally might be inferior. But the compromises that you'd make from a functionality perspective will weigh, outweighed by their time to value in ease of use. And and the learnings from CR mnh are in procurement. Those line of business applications have now being backed into in the e. R. P >>world. So in terms of capital allocation, you're owned by private equity, which is actually a public company. I'm interested in how you're allocating capital R and D, where you're where your emphasis is. You don't have to you have to do stock buy back, but, you know, describe the P relationship. >>So look, one of my learning's to see survive this is that not all private equity firms or equal they have different strategies are very fortunate to be with Ekiti, who are a growth investor. They're known as a growth investor on dhe, and they buy companies that are strong growth tech firms on dhe. They've been hugely supportive of us investing because they understand that the investment in technology is important. So, you know, just looking at some detail today we invest twice as much in R and D as we did three years ago, just to give you, you know, one data point. So there's a big focus on technology, and the thing is, is that we we have to invest in technology to drive those attributes that are discussed earlier. How do we How do we enable customers to adopt a solution? It's a standard so they can go alive quicker. How do we enable customers to be able to sit down in the front of the application like we do with the mobile phone and intuitively know how to use it? How do we reduce the total cost of ownership through automation. Those are capabilities that you know that they don't come for free. We have to invest in them. So big investments in technology. And >>I think the private equity guys, at least the modern ones, have realized Why should the V. C's have all the fun they realize? Hey, we can actually put some money in tow and the transforming we can have a bigger exit and actually make much better returns than sucking the company drive. Yeah, well, look, I think the other >>thing is is that you know, in public companies, you have the downside off. You know this this courtly metric Ondas quarterly cadence. Andi, you see very compromising decisions being made because you know, people can't afford to miss 1/4. There's no long term planning that's done on dhe. That's fundamentally not the case and the private equity world, you know, not unusual now for four p firms to hold companies for 5678 years on, and that allows you to take a very long term strategic view. If if if a shift from perpetual to subscription is the right thing to happen, they can do that without worrying that, you know, because of the definite earnings are revenue that you're going to get caned by the market next quarter. Andi. I think that that needs to, I think, better decision making for the long term. >>A lot of companies are struggling. >>If you have the right P for because you get bought by the firm of events, you want to go public. But the the you said something this morning that 50% of your customers each year or net knew, How are you pulling that off >>That 50% of our license revenue? Eso way we went about 300 odd new customers a year. Obviously, that's growing, as I said, you know, 40%. But you know, it's ah, I think, having done this for 25 years, there are companies that are or good at extracting revenue from their installed based. One of the analysts here has as a hashtag wallet Fracking is what do you think It's such a great So you know, they're good at Wallick fracking and and I think the customers that that our customers off those vendors know exactly who they are and you know I think that for us to that the fact that we're able to go out and win 50% of our license revenue from net new name customers, I think is a really strong indicator of the health of the business. It's much harder to do than just extracting revenue out of the install base. You know, we don't have a compliance practice. We've never charged a customer for you in direct access. You know, these are principles that we stand by, and it's easier to say that your customer centric on get 80% of your revenue, have your installed base because you're doing compliance rounds. But, you know, we put our money where our mouth is, and that's not that's not how we do it. >>Are these net new customers? Are they? Are they migrating from QuickBooks or they migrating from a Competitors >>know, because of the segment that we're in this half a 1,000,000,000 to 5 billion? I would say the majority of them are what I would call first generation the Rp solution. So you know you're talking about you know, the original generation of Microsoft's acquisitions, the divisions and the eggs actors and the Solomon's and so on on. And then, you know, it's a P R two and our three customers you're talking about customer sitting on, you know, the solutions that in for hoovered up the matrix B picks type customers, ace 400 customers. So they're you know, they're first generation your P solutions that simply don't have the flexibility to deal with the complexity and demands of modern business world. >>From 2009 about 2017 I f. S was pretty inquisitive and then just actually, I was gonna ask you >>when I started, you stopped >>it, right? But then, you know, today you announced an extra small acquisition, But how should we think about M and a >>look? The first year for me was really about trying to build a functional business. You know, we spoke about how fragmented this really hit to Jenna's business. Andi just occurred to me. You know, if we go out and we start to buy things, how do we integrate them into a business that's completely fragments? And you know, it had no identity or culture. So, you know, the last year has been focused on how do we build their common understanding of what it is that we're doing. We now have a very clear strategy. Five industries, three solutions, one segment. And you know, when you when you have that clarity of vision that it's really easy to guard and do him and I because you know what fits and what doesn't fit, you can understand exactly how you're gonna build value for customers on dhe. That's why the S t a deal is so good for us. Because we're now the undisputed leader in field service management, you know, 8000 our customers globally, which is way more than anybody else. Scott, Andi, you know, you should absolutely expect more from us. But it will be in the five industries, three technology segments and one customers. Isaac. >>Well, in the A p I enablement should obviously facility. >>Absolutely. I mean, I was just with a partner of ours now, and they have this amazing augmented reality solution. You know, it will be a combination of off going out there to build market, share a cz well, as finding you know, really innovative solutions that can help us advance the technology that we provide customers. >>You have a new slogan this year for the challengers, which seems to be aimed at companies that that imagine themselves as challenging the Giants, which is great. But if you're not a company that season sees themselves that way. Are the studies level home with I have s Look, >>I I think I was with a group of CEOs from one of the big analyst rooms, and they had the portfolio companies and their private equity firm and analysts that CEOs of the companies are having a conversation with him about digital transformation. And I I made a rather provocative statement which, you know, got unanimous agreement, which is that all of the CEOs there with either in an industry that was being disrupted and we're trying to figure out how they respond to that disruption or they would soon not every job and they all acknowledge that they absolutely fit into that category. In other words, all of them were being disrupted. All of them were facing a challenge. It was kind of like, you know, if it is happening to all of us at a more rapid pace than we have ever had before. So my view is, is that you know if if you're in the room and you're going, you know, if it's might not be for us because we're not a challenger. Yeah, The lights may not be on >>for Long s o double click on that. What role does I s play in terms of digital transformation? >>If I could just hold on there because the thing is, there are leaders in Mama, there challenges. And there are leaders. The leaders typically are gonna go with seif solution. They're gonna go with one of the legacy our peace. So I'm not suggesting that everybody necessarily is a challenger. There are leaders, you know, Nokia was a leader until they weren't because they were complacent. Andi, I think they you know, they didn't run on I office. So, you know, I think there are two segments. There are leaders and there are challenges, and we're there for the ones that are ready to disrupt. Sorry. >>Please clarify that. No. Good. So So get back to it. Sort of digital transformation and disruption. What do you see? Is the role of AARP generally, but specifically I f s. >>Look, I think we digital information. A lot of discussion about it on the stage this morning. I've just touched on it now. I think that it takes very different forms. What most industries are finding is that they're facing a lot of non traditional competition and they're having to innovate around their business models. They can't going to market in the same way as they did before. They're having to innovate because of this non traditional competition. Andi. Understanding your your customer's understanding, your your staff, understanding your supply chain understanding your financials are all critical parts of being able to respond to whatever their changes, and that's where the RP solution comes into it. I think there's an interesting challenge now, which is that as those applications have become more fragmented and you've got more based debris cloud applications Ah, lot of the value often E. R P was that you had this integrated set of applications that you had this one source of the truth andan. Fortunately for many customers today, they don't have that because they've got import all of these best of breed applications and they don't have one source of the truth that multiple invoices made it multiple versions of their customer in the databases. Andi we still stand for a single integrated the r p. So, you know, I think understanding those elements of your businesses key. I was with a customer of ours in Nebraska a short while ago, and they were talking about our existing office customer. They were talking about the steel import duties that were imposed through the trade war with China. And they were saying, Look, that they had been able to respond to that in a way that they had good visibility of the supply chain, who was improved, imposing the tariffs, how they were going to impact them when they were going to impact them. And because they had this integrated Siara AARP. They were able to pass those pricing changes onto their customers, and they survived this. What could have been a cataclysmic event for their business had they not had an integrated your pee? They not being able to have this visibility into the supply chain and the customer base. They may well have gone out of business just because of that one change >>to meet all day and all comes back to the data, putting their putting data at the core of their business. That integrated data pipeline is essentially what they get out of that last question. So thinking about the next 18 to 24 months, what are the milestones that observers should look for? One of the barometers that we should be watching. >>So look, in the next two years, it's it's really about us building incremental scale. We have, ah, four year plan, which I built when I came in. We're halfway through that plan. We've hit all of the metrics and exceeded most the metrics that we had on their plan. It's really continue to focus on the strategy. As I said, we focus on those five industries, continue to build market share, continue to focus on those three solution types and build market share and market dominance on those three solutions. Andi in that segment that I defined before, so no change from a strategy perspective. I think there's really value in the consistency that we bring on on their talk track and, you know, along the way we passed the $1,000,000,000 mark, which we will do, I think, in 2021 organically if we accelerate, some of the money will pass the 1,000,000,000 before, but you know business. The margins continue to expand. We focus on customer satisfaction and, you know, it's a It's a pretty straight, you know, traditional prey book that we have to execute on now. >>Well, congratulations. It's a great playbook, and you're growing very nicely. So love that. Look, we really an honor to the last couple of years. Learn a little bit about the company in your industry. So appreciate meeting you guys. Thank you. All right. And thank you for watching over right back with our next guest. Ready for this short break day Volonte with Paul Gill in. You're watching the Cube from I f s World Conference from Boston 2019 right back.

>>live from Washington, D. C. It's the Cube covering Bumi World 19 Do you buy movie? >>Welcome back to the Cubes. Coverage of Bumi World 19 I'm Lisa Martin with John Ferrier. John and I have a couple of gents joining us. To my right is Jeff Emerson, the global managing director for Custom Application Engineering Ethics Center. Hey, just hey, welcome. Thank you were glad to tell you, and we've got Steve would back with us. The CPO up. Hey, Steve, >>Hayley says. Ages >>minutes. You sticking into some research about that? The history of Bumi and Ipads and just looking at how the consumer ization effect has infected by a bad word has really infiltrated has that every industry organizations went from having enterprise applications. Legacy applications, cloud applications, custom applications. Let's talk about custom applications. What are you seeing in the customer marketplace for the demand for having this level of customization, whether it's a retail or or, you know, utilities company, >>it really doesn't matter what industry it is these days. Custom applications were going through a renaissance. It is. It is truly the renaissance of custom, where there was once a swing towards enterprise applications and the packages and so on. And now it's realized that oh gosh t separate ourselves from our competition. We have two great something that doesn't exist well, that is, by its nature, a custom application. And so these air coming up, Maura and Maur across the industry, and it's really starting to dominate the value chain for software. >>You were here in D. C. And public sector is going through a modernization as well. He looked at government procurement. I mean, essentially with data, everything's instrumental. You have unlimited resource with cloud computing. So essentially personalization. Hot trend. So applications air being personalized. They're customized. So every app should be not general purpose unless it's either under the covers. So this is the country's We've been having you guys. Bumi has a platform. You enable APS? You guys are deploying it. How are customers responded to this? Because to me they might go Will custom haps me, feels expensive. It feels one off the old adage. It's a one off, but it seems to be coming back. >>It does end. Fact is, you're able to do things so much more quickly today than you ever have been able to in the fast in the past and three ability to create new experiences quickly and react in an agile fashion to how those applications are being received in the marketplace. React to the data that is generated both as the primary data and the data exhaust from those systems to determine what your customers need, what they want, how they're going to act, what they're going to buy. All of those things are things that we can pull together so much more quickly today than we could ever in the past. And so it's great. >>Steve, We were talking earlier about how the data's real big part of the equation. Now everything about the application world it used to be the infrastructure would dictate what you could build. Yeah, now you have application developers saying, This is what I want now the infrastructures so programmable it's kind of flipped around that they're dictating kind of terms. >>Well, there's suddenly being this sort of emergence of these low code platforms to kind of help manage that. I mean, and they're kind of taking care of a lot of the infrastructure so you can kind of skill them is needed, but yeah, I mean, there's been a him. It's been a huge birthday. I couldn't agree more. There's like the demand for applications. We're seeing a lot. Sure there's the mega applications. We tend to leave those to our sister company Pivotal toe code those with this whole other ecosystem of applications everywhere. The personalization sze of the line of business needs to improve. Their business processes were going after that layer. We have to do it in the right way to make it super easy to do on the infrastructure that people expected to be with the architecture they expect to see. So they're highly customizable, so get exactly what they want. >>Jeff, you know, we always talk on the industry joke on the Cube, and the game is changed, but it's still the same. And every time a new trend comes, you know it's the death of something. A meteorite media to say something's dying when something new starts right. But nothing really changes everything about applications. It's the same gain just with a different twist. Do it with cloud. How are customers were spouting this? Because obviously his benefits business benefits cost benefits lot of mount up line with how they're attacking the application development. Then they got a data tsunami happening. But they gotta build APS, right, Not anything, right? >>It was once said that absolute in the world, and now it's really that data is feeding the world right? And so the amount of data that's out there and accessible and usable within applications is absolutely incredible. And so, with the emergence of the cloud in order, Thio support those massive amounts of data and Dr Rapid Development and then lo code to make that development much easier. These things all time come together, and you talked about the death of X, y or Z. We talk now about living systems, right on living systems are things that are easy to modify, their absolutely attainable and usable and expandable for for any kind of use and ultimately adaptable. >>So John mentioned the word one off a minute ago, and it reminded me of something where, you know, whatever industry that you're in, Not too long ago it was customers got some one off. Whether it's an application or part of the infrastructure, that's expensive, and it's not something that can be monetized but down to your point it's it's really custom. Applications are a big part of a business. Is competitive advantage. So what is it about the customized app? Is it Is it the fact that it's driven by an A P I? That's programmable that allows it to be customized at scale toe, where it's not a one off from a support perspective, it's something that really a company can use as that competitive leg up. >>Right in the this livings living systems world. We really have agile engineering, agile methods and so that we're doing development quickly. And we're doing this in an engineering fashion that has micro service's and small pieces of functionality that could be grabbed and plugged and played together. Thio great, different experiences. And so that granular ization of software is something that drives his flexibility and enables us to make modifications and updates quickly. >>Actually, ive your customer example that it was something we'd done, which is absence of term it like how the oil and gas industry saved nurses in Africa are saved people in Africa, which is we built, a solution that allowed them nurses in sub Saharan Africa to visit patients out in the field. They built it on a loco pa from witches. Flow part of me connected through a P eyes connected to all the infrastructure. But a lot of the work was on, uh, android tablets offline. So with the loco PA from that could deliver this solution with all offline capabilities, all the connectivity, all the integration, all built in without writing. Really any code? The only code there rose to customize the look and feel so looked exactly what they want. They delivered that on early version of our offline framework and then latterly the oil and gas industry origin energy deployed a similar solution to their rigs. The lot of you seem really complicated things of form, validation and better validation rules and better data synchronization that really forced us to improve our offline framework to something which is a Steve a big jump ahead of where it was before. And then lo and behold, the nurses nafta came back to us and said, Well, actually went up, Did or are we gonna run on desktops as well as ipads? Funnily enough, and we're like, Well, good news. We've actually already added that support. And so literally from three days of that phone call to them going live within our laptops and ipads. That was all it took. They didn't have to write any CO. They literally We just give them access to the new you. I will find framework. They installed it, turn off the wet. And that's kind of the power of this kind of next gen of up building that for this kind of line of business applications where you just need to innovate, how you work, you don't have to spend three years rebuilding those for iPad and >>Jeff houses. That dynamic, which is pretty much, I think, consisted a lot of these new APS. How's it changed your business? Because you know the theme that we've been identifying the mega trend is that there's more project work going on fast time to value, agile. You guys been doing exceptional work there and following Madu Center's been doing talking to Paul Doherty amongst others. Get a huge data science team you guys are on. I know you guys have transformed but big project and now a bunch of little projects going on, so it's kind of have to make you guys more agile as a practice because you've got to go out and solve the business problems with the customers. How is this dynamic changed? >>You're right. We absolutely do. And we have to assume muchas anything. It's helping our customers get into that mode of thinking as well. What was once a six months of gathering and documenting requirements is now done in a handful of ours. At first to get the first small bit of what's gonna be valuable functionality to put out there. And you keep doing that irritably. Overtime is instead of in a six month period, but then gets thrown over the wall. Thio have other people do this for another build stuff for six or nine >>months. I mean, the federation and getting those winds early gets proof points, gets mo mentum validation. You're not waiting for a gestation period. >>You make good decisions about what to do next on DDE. What to not do that you were planning on doing but turns out, doesn't mean >>I want to get your thoughts on something important you mentioned humanization. We see that big trend because Avery people centric and you're thinking at Bumi and we've had this debate in the queue we? We didn't come in on either side yet, but you know it orations great, great, fast. But the old days of software was a lot of craftsmanship involved, you know, crafting the product, getting it right now it's ship be embarrassed, ship it fast and then injury, which is great for efficiency. But there's a trend coming back to crafting product. They're absolutely. What is your thoughts on this? Because craft Manship is now design thinking. Would it be calling in different names? But this is a new thing. It's happening all the time. >>That software software craftsmanship is something that is more important today than it ever has been. Because you're going fast. And because you're putting things out into the market very quickly, you can't afford to make big mistakes, right? You could make functional decision mistakes, right? Oh, that wasn't the right thing for the customer, but having it not work or creating it bad experiences, right? Very bad, right? And so that craftsmanship building in all the Dev Ops pipelines and the error check in the testing and gateways and security checking all that happens automatically every time you check in code that is critical and it drives that craftsmanship back to the developer, right? Pushing left so that you make a mistake. You fix it within minutes, as opposed to >>you. Run private engineering, Smile on your face. Come on, What's your angle on this >>time? And craftsmanship is obviously huge mean? When we thought about like Bumi, we kind of wanted to make sure that yeah, that way we used to talk a little bit. No code platforms. And I think that what they did was they left out the craftsmanship that developers could do. And I've kind of thought it was like, Hey, if you can put like the business or the person who really understands the process of the application into the beating heart of the creation process so they could be on the right side of the soft waiting the world like they could be a creator and producer as much as they could be a consumer of applications, you allow them to do that and then let developers have radiate that that out with new engage with models, coding out new experiences that really hyper specific to the EU's case of the user. That's kind of the ultimate you get the core business value, and then you get the craftsmanship of the engineers together, I think, >>and I'm glad you said that because there's so many cases where here, we want to push it so that we don't even need software engineers for our software. And that's an interesting idea. Yeah, but it's actually not a good idea. Ll know or idea, Yes, simply because you there's an important aspect of software and and how I t runs that even if you have low coach, uh, components in order to drive the functionality right, these things that have to be done. But frankly, professional software engineers know how to do. >>It's better and faster and easier to do it that way. >>I think the federation certainly makes the problem that you're trying to solve. Solvable, right? Don't take your eye off the main ball, which is saw the problem, but get it elegantly designed all right, but I think that's a good This is a big discussion. You're seeing a lot with loco. So again, this is back. The custom maps custom APS just means a targeted app that solves a specific problem because it is a unique problem and it's different than the other one, right? That's the speed game. It's a speed game to nose in it that fast, fast, fast. >>And the engineering methods have changed really over the last couple of decades. While I've been doing this. Where way talked a moment about ago about the waterfall ways and then the agile ways. And the simple fact of the matter is that you're developing small pieces of software to get out into the market quickly, and you can do this in a matter of days and weeks. A supposed to months and quarters >>right, which many businesses don't have that time for company competitors gonna get in there. I'm curious as the development methods have changed so dramatically have the customer conversations like Are you guys talking more with business leaders vs You know the Guys and Girls and Dev Ops is that is this movie business little conversation that a CEO CFO, a CEO is involved in? >>So from our perspective at Accenture that the technology is always there to drive a business need, and so that conversation is first with the business owners, and that was true 20 years ago as well. The a CZ much as we do. I t transformation. It's a business lead. I transformation and, more often, technology supported business transformation. >>Excellent. Well, guys, thank you for joining John and me on the program today. Talking about all the things that you guys are seeing out in the field. Exciting stuff. >>Thanks for having us. >>We appreciate your time. Thank you for John Ferrier. I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching the Cube from Bhumi World 19. Thanks for watching.

>> from Austin, Texas. It's Theo Cube covering your storage Accelerate 2019 Brought to you by pure storage. >> How do y'all welcome back Thio, the Cube leader In live coverage we're covering day to a pure accelerate 19 Lisa Martin With Day Volonte Welcoming to the cue for the first time from SG Mark Peters principal analyst and practice >> Oh, my apologies. So young. >> I wish I wish that was true. >> In fact, one of the first analysts I think that's true if not the first analyst ever on the Q. But, >> well, I'll say Welcome back. Thank you. We're glad to have you here. So you've been with Ishii for quite a while, You know, the storage industry inside and out, I'm sure pure. Just about to celebrate their 10th anniversary. Yesterday we heard lots of news, which is always nice for us to have father to talk about. But I'd love to get your take on this disruptive company. What they've been able to achieve in their 1st 10 years going directly through is Dave's been saying the last two days driving a truck there am sees, install, base, back of the day, your thoughts on how they've been able to achieve what they have. >> That'll last me to talk about something I really want to talk about. And I think it addresses your question. How have they been able to do it? It's by being different. Andi, I don't know. I mean, obviously you do a stack of into sheer and maybe other people have talked about that. But that is the end. When I say different, I don't necessarily mean technology. I have a kind of standard riff in this business that we get so embroiled in the technology. Do not for one second think it's not important, but we get so embroiled in that that we missed the human element or the emotional element on dhe. I think that's important. So they were very different. They created, you know, these thes armies of fans who just bought into what they did. Now, of course, that was based on initially bringing flash to the market making flasher Fordham. Well, they've extended that here with the sea announcement and other things as well, so I don't want to just focus on that, but you know, they continue to do things differently with the technology, But I think what really made them an attractive company and why they've survived 10 years on her now big sizable is because they were a different sort of company to deal with. >> Are you at all surprised that the fourth accelerate is in Austin, Texas? Dell's backyard? Yes. Well, they're disruptive. They're different. They're bold. We're okay, >> you see, But But also, did you go to the other three? >> Uh, the last two. I was trying to remind >> myself where they were. I know one was kind of on a pier in a ballpark in San Francisco. One words. You remember the one that was in that you Worf, But that was a a rusting, so cool it was. But it was a metaphor in a rusting spinning desk, right. But it was also such a different sort of place on, So I probably was also a few it D m c. But I agree. And then the last one was in some sort of constantly. Yes, So >> they were all >> different. And so I Yes, I know this is Dell's backyard. Probably literally, because I'm sure Michael owns a lot of the place. It's also kind of very normal place and so there's a little bit of me that I don't want to use the world worry. But as you grow up and of course, we've got the 10 year anniversary, we're in Austin. What's the tagline of Austin? >> I don't know. No. Keep Austin weird. Okay, >> I >> don't want to suggest appears weird, but they were always a little different, I said. That's why I think they were attracted as much as anything. Yes, that's why I had the hordes of admiring fans, all wearing their orange socks and T shirts and cheering on DDE as they get older as they get more mature as they expand their portfolio. Charlie was on stage talking not so much about scale the problem when he was asked, but more about complexity. As you get more complex, you actually get more normal on, So I don't know that weird is the word, but a bit like Austin pure needs to keep your interesting. >> I like that >> Very interesting. So >> you and I, >> we've been around a while. We were kind of students of the industry. I was commenting earlier that it's just to me very impressive that this company has achieved a new definition of escape velocity receiving a billion dollars show. First company since Nana to do it, I gotta listed three. Park couldn't do it. Compelling data domain isolani ecological left hand. Really good cos all very successful companies. Uh, >> what do you think? It's >> all coming out of >> the dot com crash. Maybe that pay part of it. Pure kind of came out of the, you know, the recession. Why >> do you >> think Pure has been able to achieve that? That you know, four x three par, for example in terms of revenues. And it's got a ways to go. They probably do 1.7 this year. I think they have aspirations for five on enough there. Publicly stated that they probably have, right? Of course. Why wouldn't they thoughts on why they were able to achieve that? What were the sort of factors genuinely know? Having no idea what you were gonna ask me. And now actually, listening to question let me You've just made me think of something that I had not really thought. So I took so long to ask the question formulated. And you are so, um, you used the word escape velocity. Let's think about planes. I mean, you know, I think it's a V one, isn't it to take off, Mitch? Maybe not the same as escape, which is in the skies. But you get the point. How long to really take off? Be independently airborne? They gave themselves. I don't know how much was by design default how it really happened? I don't know. They had an immensely long runway. You think the whole conversation about pure for years and years was Oh, yeah, yeah, they're making loads of revenue, but they lose 80 cents every time they get 50. That was the conversation for years and years. I know they've now turned that corner, and I think the difference. Actually, the more I think about it, yes. You can talk about product. Yes, you can talk about the experience. I think those things are both part of it. But the other companies you named had cool things too. They all had cool products you had. What was it? The autopilot thing with compelling. And they had lots of people cheering. Actually, in this building, I think three part was yellow and kind of cool in a different part of the market. and disruptive. But they were both trying to get to the exit fast. Whether the exit was being bought or whether it was going under. I don't know it was gonna be one or the other, and for both of them, they got bought. I don't think pure had that same intention, and it's certainly got funding and backers that allowed it to take longer. So that's a really good point. I think there's a There's a new Silicon Valley playbook. You saw it with service. Now, with Frank's limits like the Silicon Valley Mafia's Sweetman Dietzen, Bush re at Work Day, they all raised a boatload of cash and a sacrifice profits for for growth. I mean, I remember Dave Scott telling me, you know, when he came on, the board was saying, Hey, we're ready to you know, we're prepared to raise 30 million. He said, I need 80 eighties chump change today compared to what these guys were raising. Well, I mean, I think I mean, they pretty quickly raised hundreds of millions, didn't they? They weren't scraping by on 50 or 80 million, which which is what you see. You sort of want one more thought just this escape velocity idea, I think is interesting because the other thing about escape velocity is partly how long you take runway orbit, whatever. But it's the payload on, you know, The more the payload, the longer it takes the take off the ground or the more thrust you need thrust in this case, his money again. But if you think about it, this is another thing where he and I gotta say, we've been doing this a long time. The storage industry over decades has been one of the easiest industries to enter on one of the hardest to actually do well. Why is that? Because the payload is heavy. It's easy to make a box that works fast, big whatever you want in your garage. Two men on one application working for a day. It's really hard to be interoperable with every app, every other system, operational needs and so on and so forth. And so the payload to be successful. I think they understood that, too. So, you know, they didn't let ourselves get distracted by like the initial shiny, glittery we need to get out of this business. >> I love the parallels with payloads and Rockets. Because, of course, we had Leland Melvin inner keynote this morning. I'm a former NASA geek. Talk to us about your thoughts on their cloud strategy, the evolution of the partnership with a W s. We talked about that yesterday. Sort of this customers bringing this forcing function together, but being able to sort of simplify and give customers this pure management playing the software layer wherever their data is your thoughts on how their position themselves for multi cloud hybrid world. >> Okay, two thoughts, one cloud. Then you also used the word simplicity. So I want to talk about both of those things if I can, Um I don't know. I'm sorry. This is not a very good answer. I think it's the truth. I mean, you can't exist in this world if you haven't got a cloud story, and it better be hybrid or pub. Oh, are multi, whichever you prefer. I think those have very distinct meanings, by the way, but we would be here for an hour and 1/2. It'll be a cube special to really get into that. However, So you've got to do this. I mean, there is just, you know, none of the clients they're dealing with. Almost none. That's not research. I'll talk research in a second but glib statement. Everyone's got a cloud strategy. It doesn't matter which analyst company you put up the data, we'll do it. I want to talk about a cup, some research we've done in a second. But everyone will tell you a high number of people who have a cloud first strategy, whether that's overall or just the new applications or whatever. So they've got to do it. What's crucial to whether or not they succeed is not the AWS branding, because everyone's got a W s branding me people that they don't work with or will not work within the next year or two. I mean, I'm sure there's one God you look like you're anxious, you're on a roll. But simplicity is really important. So David knows we do a lot of research early yesterday, one of our cornerstone piece of researchers think all the spending intentions we do every year. One of the questions this year's Bean for a couple of years now is basically saying simple question Excuse. The overuse of the word is how much more complex is I t you know, in your experience, more or less complex. And it was two years ago. I t broadly and you know that I love this question. You know the answer on dhe. 66% of people say it is more complex now than it was two years ago. People don't want complexity. We all know that there's not enough skills around the research to back that up. A swell on dso Simplicity is really important cause who was sitting in this seat before May I think I will say that the company here was founded on simplicity. That was the point. They were to be the apple of storage. I think that's why people love them. They were just very easy to use on dso coming finally back to your question. If they can do this and keep it simple, then they have a better chance of success than others. But how do you define successful them isn't keeping their customers are getting new ones. That's a challenge. >> They do have a very high retention rate. I want to say like 140% but things like we have our dinner for two U percent attention. Yes. How did >> you do? So? So this is is interesting. It's actually 100 and 50% renewal rate. Oh, by the Mike Scarpelli CFO Math of renewal rates on a dollar value on net dollar value renewal rate subscriptions. Mike Scarpelli was the CFO of service. Now invented this model and service now had, like, 100 and whatever 1500 whatever 27. And so it's a revenue based renewal. Makes sense. Sorry for one second you're retaining more people than you >> go. 101 100 >> 50% is insane. 105 >> percent is great. Yeah, 150% is interrupted. Your question. >> Well, I'm just saying >> it's good. Good nuance, >> Yes, Thanks for clarifying its. You know, companies can say whether it's one. Appears customers are pure themselves or competitors. We are cloud. First, we have a cloud for strategy, and a company like pure can say we deliver simplicity, those air marketing terms until they're actually put in the field and delivered. So in your perspective, how does pure take what I T professionals are saying? Things are so much more complex these days? How does a pure commit and say simple, seamless, sustainable, like Charlie, Giancarlo said yesterday. And actually make that a reality. Well, I >> mean, obviously, that's their challenge, and that's what they have work to do to some degree. And this comes back to what I was saying that to some degree it becomes self fulfilling because your that's why your customers come back with more money because they bought into this on. So as long as they're kept happy, they're probably not going to go and look at 20 other people. I'm not saying they never had any of that simplicity to start off with, but it's very interesting if you go to a pure event, their customers and this might be sacrilege sitting in this environment don't talk about the product. They talk about the company, >> right? >> The experience There's that word again, off being appear customer yes on So they're into it. They brought into whatever this is, and as long as the product, please do not strike me down is good enough. I'm not saying that's all it is. I think it's a lot better that, but as long as it's good enough, but you're really well looked after a few minutes ago, when I'm saying that's why I think this market is about so much more than just how fast can you make the box? How big can you make the box? How smart can you make the box? All of those are interesting, But ultimately, I'm only looking at Dave because he's so old. Ultimately, technology is a leapfrog game. Yeah, branding is not >> Beaver >> s O. So that's a good point. But we've not seen the competitors be able to leap frog pure or be able to neutralize them the way, for example, that DMC was able to somewhat neutralize three par by saying, Oh, yeah, we have virtual ization, too, you know, are thin provisioning. Rather. Yeah. And even though they had a thin provisioning bolt on, it was it was good enough. Yes, they did the check box. You haven't seen the competitors be able to do that here? I'm not saying they won't, but are they? I think, um, I was going to say basically this on my MBA, but I don't have one, so I can't say that, but, you know, I've read that. Read the books. If you look at Harvard Business School cases, I think the mistake made by the competition was to assume that Pierre would go away, that they would each try it or that it would fail on will make fun of the fact they don't make any money for the first few years on dhe. You know, the people going to them, we're gonna be sadly mistaken when they can't handle these features, whether that be cloud or whether that be analytics or fresh blades or whatever else again to add on. They thought they would just go away that there are great parallels in history when you let competition in and you just keep thinking at each point they're going to go away. Spot the accent. British motorcycle industry. When the Japanese came in, they literally said, Well, let them. There are records. We'll let them have the 50 cc market because we don't really care about that. But we'll make the big bikes Well, Okay, well, let them have 152 100 cc because really, that doesn't matter. And 10 years later, there was no industry well, and I think what happened with the emcee in particular because, let's face it, pure hired a bunch of DMC wraps. They took your product and, as I've said before, they drove a truck to the the symmetric V n X install base Emcee responded by buying X extreme io and they said, You know what? We're sick of losing the pure. We're gonna go really aggressive into our own accounts and we're gonna keep them with flash. And then what happened is their accounts. It Hey, we're good. We don't actually really need more stores because the emcee tried to keep it is trying to keep both lines alive. And now they're conflicted, pure. You know, I had a what? We're mission. >> You thought not up a great point. Sorry. Just just because I think >> thing about that is if you look at how e. M. C using my words accurately usedto act, I think you said that, too. So I'm not criticizing Adele is they were exceptional organized marketing organization. We go that way. And if you're not going that way, you got a big problem both as a custom, Miranda's UN employees. But the problem with that is also is that way would sometimes become that way, and then it become that way on the product depending what was doing well. So, for example, they had, you know, tens of thousands of feet, all marching to the extreme. I owe beat for a few quarters, and then they would go off on to the next product pure. Just carried on, marching to its beat down that runway escape velocity question >> appoint you brought up a minute ago before we wrap her. That I think is really interesting is that you write your customers talk about the experience. I think we were talking with a customer yesterday. Dave was asking, Well, what technologies are you think he started talking about workloads? So when we're at other events, you hear other names of boxes brought up here to your point. It is all about the experience so interesting and how they're Can you continuing to just be different, but to wrap things up since they're in my ear, we're almost that time. I just wanna take a minute to ask you kind of upcoming research. What are some of the things that you're working on? Their really intriguing you and SG land. I think right >> now, from my perspective, I mean, as a company would continue to do 27,000 different things because there's so much going on in the market. So whether that's security is massive area of focus right now, even improvements in networking. So it's not just the regular run of the mill, you know, Bigger, faster, cheaper. Which is always there s o A. I, of course, in all these again, you may both know you will now doesn't mean we're always looking at buying intentions rather than counting boxes. So it's really where people are moving over the next few years. That said to May. I think what's really interesting is to other things. Number one is to what extent can. I don't think we can really measure this easily. But to what extent can we get people talking about pure again to acknowledge that emotions, attitudes, experiences are an important part of this business? I'm old enough that I'm not scared of saying it, and I think pure is a company is not scared of saying it, you know, I think a lot of companies don't want to admit that Andi all know that they have different corporate cultures and mantras and views on their customers reflect that two on The other thing just generally is the future of I t. As a whole. I know that. So, I mean, I'm doing this because none of us really know what that is, but, you know, clearly way gotta stop talking about the cloud At some point. It's just part of I t. It's not a thing as such. It's just another resource that you bring to bear. I don't know that we're yet at that point, but that's >> got to happen. >> Interesting. Thanks for looking. I'm imagine this was a crystal ball. But Mark, I wish we had more time because I know we could keep talking. But it's been a pleasure to have you >> got the whole multi cloud hybrid cloud for an hour and 1/2. >> We come back, we'll have that discussion. Like what I'll means and yeah, back anytime. >> Excellent. Thank you for joining David. Me. Thank you for David. Dante. I'm Lisa Martin. You were watching the Cube from pure accelerate 19

>> live from San Francisco, celebrating 10 years of high tech coverage. It's the Cube covering Veum World 2019 brought to you by IBM Wear and its ecosystem partners. >> Hey, welcome back. Everyone's the cubes. Live coverage here in San Francisco v. Emerald 2019. We're in the hall of Must Going north. Lot of stuff going on here. I'm John for David. Want a day for 10 years covering the emeralds? Been quite a ride, Seeing from 2010 to 20 A lot has changed, but still de our backup and recovery still is always a big thing. Our next two guests is already CTO co founder of a tree, Um, and Igor Zika, director of I t Sensible. Thanks for coming on your early customer since one Dato. You're on the journey with day tree. Um, congratulations. Been a wild ride. Good ride. Tell us. Thank >> you. It's been a journey. It's It's been a good relationship. We've been using day trim for three years. Started with 10 we're now in 5.3. I believe it's >> been really >> good. It's been, um, innovative. It's been challenging from us working in the space where we have to think about what next step is and working towards the data transformation internally in order to get to a cloud. But we're almost there. So we're pretty excited about the >> opportunities when they build a great product. They got some new news is all about the new news you got going on here. You get your core product now you got some new stuff. Share the news, >> we're gonna finish the journey, and we started off. The idea was to make a recovery be better for everybody else. As you know, we are is really mostly about disaster for everybody. So what we have done is that we are able to offer cloud disaster. Recovery of the service idea is that you can have backups in the club on Amazon, and then you push a button you can fail over and bring up your remember servers on demand so you can run your workloads right away, and when you push a button will bring it down and bring it. Bring data back to you on from we call it a cloud. Br the service to a movie. Every cloud on Amazon >> specific to Amazon, >> physically via MacLeod and Amazon, >> right Okay, um, one of the one of the early instance see ations of leveraging that platform. I think people they misunderstand atrium. I mean, you guys have been around now for a while, but in the early days, it wasn't clear that you guys were really kind of changing the way in which people approach storage. Maybe that's what interested you in the beginning, but But both primary and secondary storage, high performance yet gloss, That's right. All right. So it's kind of like magic sauce that you >> ultimately d r finishes the story because really look at any data center. The reason white B R doesn't work is because you end up with five different products, won his primary on his back up. One is the orchestration and some other things, like encryption by an optimization. You buy all these products for you, manage your data in one day to center, and then you replicate the same fight things on your second data center. No, that's not movies law. I don't know what it is. You push the button one day when there's a disaster. Every is watching the ideal person to actually do this. It's very fragile. It's very scary for a lot of people, which is why it doesn't really work. No customer as ever met. I've said it's amazing that the D R works for them. They're nobody's ever, >> well, most customers, almost all customers say they can't test D R because it's too dangerous. That contest test portions of it. They could test, fail over but not fail back. Can you explain sort of your approach in D. R. And how this potentially could change it? >> Yeah, and are, in my experience, the or is challenging for a variety of reasons. Major reasons. Yes, you can't actually fully test the d. R. You have to put a lot of efforts, a lot of thoughts and develop a really strong game plan in order to execute D. R. Flawlessly and a lot of times you have a chance of very short windows to perform these tests, and in order to deliver, you have to do a lot of homework, and you have to do a really good design of your infrastructure and extensive design in order to have a successful outcome. So in my experience, I mean, what are we hoping again? I mean, we are joining towards the day trim the Our solution is to actually have a solution that's going to be baked in that we can press a button on DDE, have our vision off d r and meet our objectives. Meet Rto is executed, >> So let's hit the escape key element So sensible San Fillipo What? >> What about? We are one of the largest California North based accounting firm. We deal with accounting and finance and compliance and assuring service is so. Our focus is to provide clients with no peace of mind knowing that their financial data is you know, that is correct. >> So paint a picture of your technology infrastructure. So you're obviously presuming inferring VM where customers that >> we are the M or customer. You are also a customer gets >> an idea of what what she looks like and >> we are basically operating out of a single location. We are multi multi office, you know, company, but we operate our single location. We are the m were based. We also VD I based so everybody works from a digital workspace are strong. Focus been to provide a robust and high performance digital workspace for employees so they can have a peace of mind and work anytime they want. >> I was at the first use case for atrium was video air >> atrium Woz our foundation to build that robust beady eye platform. >> Okay, so give us a before and after what prompted you to goto? Damn. What was it like before? What was the problem? You were trying to solve >> the challenge of the VD. I is. We have to provide a very robust platform. So people feel they work on their local machines. So highly responsive systems like highly responsive story systems of foundations red. Besides having a very, you know, high optimized bandwidth, we need to make sure that our bottlenecks are not focused on the storage. So our challenge is warped provisioning VD I machines within the within the time frame that we actually would really kp eyes that we designed. So our challenge was deploying all the master images, deploying provisional service's. And it's taking a very long period of time, which basically was putting us towards on ability for I t guys to do the job. So we were deploying virtual machine master images that too now and have to deploy every time we have a change every time we make a change in our environment, it to interment a smarter time in order to apply those changes. So day tree, um changed that. >> That was an infrastructure issue. I mean, the storage >> of that was a storage infrastructure. How? How >> did atrium change that? And maybe says all you could follow with the tech behind it >> The good >> Well, if you look at most people, end user scare about late and see my office is one thing but didn't see is what matters and deserves indeed. So having our architecture, having the local flash and the software running of the local host for you, that's what really provides the end user experience. Which is kind of what we here for a lot of a customer. The end users tell the A d folks that, hey, something has changed for me. That was our fundamental design architecture we chose from So those primary storage. And how do you make that high performance low latency? We're closed for everybody, and that's what we have done so that technology is basically local flash suffering host. That's what gives you the >> best of your experiences. You went from what you say an hour and 1/2 to >> 15 minutes. So that was pretty dramatic moment of truth when we deployed atrium and we started the imaging process and it was finished. And to be honest, I thought, that is broken, but it actually was that fast. So gave us a tremendous amount of ability to deploy and manage and do the war during the War day instead of working after hours >> and what we do for data protection before day tree, >> we use variety of different solutions. Backups, just a tape and variety of service. Is that actually backed up? They still do our know. We've given that a lot. The floor >> of all the legacy stuff you got rid of that. Did you have to change your processes or what was that like? Was painful. >> We have to We have to get rid of a lot of process that we're focused on backup focus on the time that it took to manage back up with a tree. Um, Day Trio didn't have the backup from the day one. This is something that they've designed, I think a second year, and that was very different to see the company that deals with storage. Creating such innovative vision for developing old I'm developing a road map that was actually coming true with every generation off the software deployment s o. The second tier that we provisioned was the snapshots on the snapshots that were incredibly fast. That didn't take a lot of space. That was give us ability to restore almost instantly gave us a huge amount of, you know, focus on not focusing on the storage anymore. >> But when you and Brian and you go got together and said, Okay, we're gonna do this you must have been thinking about backup, obviously, right? >> It's mostly not so much backup, but about data of the Mikado recovery faster for people That's not back up. I've been in business for a long time, backup, but you go back. I was very taxing. It's about recovery, and we made recovery fast. Freddy are finishes the story of recovery to be in the club >> and essentially eliminate the need for a separate sort of backup. My set, right? That's that was the vision >> you can recover from a backup device. Size it >> right. All right. So where do you go from here? >> That's a good question. Way hoping to go into fully orchestrated the our solution so we don't have to think about it. Don't mean my thing is like, I don't I don't want to worry about D. R. I want to make sure it's there. I want to be able to prove to business owners and our clients that we have a viable, orchestrated automated the our solution. >> So you you gave us some metrics in terms of hour and 1/2 to 15 minutes for deployment. But what about like, this is the staff, um, you know, not talking about getting rid of staff redeploying staff. Or maybe you got rid of staff, I don't know. But what are the people that were spending all that time? You know, the hour and 1/2 before, What are they doing now? Have you sort of re allocated them to some you know, other higher value initiatives, and you could add some color they're >> using the M or and integrated solutions allows us to have a pretty small profile on my T group. We actually operating with three people, believe it or not supporting over 250 users and systems so we can focus. I mean our main focus. Instead of troubleshooting technology systems and problems with the storage and problems with networking, we are focused on looking for the next best thing, providing high level of customer support, focusing on performance, looking for innovations and, you know, So it's definitely better use than troubleshooting, for sure. And >> innovative solution. What's it like working with the entrepreneurial? Not start up Very >> cool. Very fresh. Very good feeling off knowing that you can call in and you have a you have almost in house. I t relationship a defender is extremely valuable to us >> and bring it to innovate approach. It makes it go fast. I mean and making it easier. They talk about the industry and you go back. I mean, the interest has changed so much. We've been the cube for 10 years. I mean, so much has changed in I t. But in product sides, that's where the sprawl happens. I think >> the iPhone changed everything. Right, So, you know, iPhone, Icloud. That's what we wanted with our d R service as well. I think the world has changed. You expect those same experiences in your in your off duty and on I t. The people have wanted a similar experiences. This kind of what you want to do. >> This is cloud to point out. This is Enterprise Cloud the innovations, that clean sheet of paper you built from the ground up solves a lot of problems. I'm sweep the floor with the other guys >> as an observer of the of the storage business, right? Kind of Look at it. There's two companies now that there are over a billion dollars in revenue that are independent storage companies. And I was always surprised the year I met Brian. We had him on the Cube several years ago, and, you know, he was kind of, you know, coy about what? Actually, guys are doing a secret. And so and at the time we were thinking, Wow, it's stores. Amazing is the industry's consolidating, but money keeps flowing into storage because it's still hard Problem the salt. So what do you thoughts about that about the industry, its structure as a independent, you know, pure play storage company. What you want to do with this? This company want to grow it so >> we don't up your praise storage company in the sense that be focused on data management as well. So it's not just a pure prey storage only. So that's just a dumb stories. You're not gonna go anywhere. What you need to do is move a level up and provide customer level, higher level functionality so that they can make their lives easier. Dumb story doesn't sell anymore, just Lund's son anymore. >> So that says, essentially that. And I would agree with you. By the way. That's essentially. That old thinking about the storage model is dead. That's why the industry is consolidating data. You mentioned data management. Certainly. You're seeing a lot of the the the next generation Data protection companies use that term because that term means a lot of things to a lot of different people. What does it mean to you? >> Okay, I'll tell you what it means to us if I made any CEO their sake Lord for started. What they mean is that they want to be able to run their workloads anywhere they want to push a button, move, move from place to place. That's all they care about. So what are you doing? What you're building is a platform a multiple of data plane where we can run in any clothes you want to get. The same survey data service is you push a button will take you anyplace you want. That's what really aiming for. And it's just we believe the number is there everywhere, and Kubernetes is the other one. So if you put the America Bernadis on top and a trim on the bottom, you can move to any cloudy. Wantto, you cannot tell the difference, >> and you guys are software. It's a subscription model >> SAS model in the club. No, no deployment of software. It's all like new mortal of doing sass right, >> which is the new architecture cloud to point my point to point. Our >> people want that kind of stuff. People don't want to be installed if you're gonna go to the club and doing the same things you were doing before. That's not how people who want to operate anymore. We don't have time and patience. >> A lot of people are handcuffed to their old stuff they wanted Just get the shackles free beer, liberating people. You're a living. Yeah, he's their case Study. Well, you were nimble enough. You had a good team. You could do it harder >> for the bigger guys. It was It was hard doing it without them. You know, this is all I am. The team presented division. >> All right, The product. This is exactly the kind of stories we love to talk about. Thanks for coming on. Sharing the inside a cloud to point. No, this isn't a great example of innovation. Bm where? Kubernetes statement of the covers. All good. It's a cube. We're right back after this short break. Thank >> you.

>> from Santa Clara, California It's the Cube covering techno ovation World Pitch Summit 2019 Brought to you by Silicon Angle Media. Now here's Sonia to Gari. >> Hi. And welcome to the Cube. I'm your host, Sonia to Gari and we're hearing oracles Agnew's campus in Santa Clara, California covering techno vacations world its Summit 2019 a pitch competition in which girls from around the world developed mobile lapse in order to create positive change in the world with us. Today we have team tech witches from India with a nun. You Grover said in there. Um, when she got the other, um, and Anushka Sharma. Welcome to the Cube. And congratulations on being finalists. Thank you. So your app is called May 3. Can you tell us more about that? >> Yeah. App is an android application which connects old age homes with orphanages so that senior citizens can spend time with orphan children on individuals like you and I and everyone else can volunteer and donate to old age homes and orphanages through our app. >> Okay. And so how would someone used the Afghanis? Oh, go through Step by step >> s O as an individual. If you log into the app usually do lis. So if you press on connect, you could either press on connect to an old age home or connect to. And often it's so. For instance, I want to connect to an old age home. I press that button I would see a list off old age homes. On that list is a list of organizations that have signed up on the APP. So I press on their arranged on the order off proximity to my location. So I pressed on. Whichever one I want is a view, and then I see all of their details. I could contact them, connect to them by messaging them, calling them up, viewing their website or even navigating to their location using who will maps. Then I could also press on, see what donations they require and see exactly what they need. For instance, if an organization requires clothes or blankets, I would be able to view that on donate accordingly. Okay, >> so it's not just introducing older people to orphans, it's it's more about like, just like what can we do as a society to like donate to exactly >> on as the administrator? Often old days home, you can connect to an orphanage on organized meetings between senior citizens on children so they can spend time together and have fun activities. For instance, we have already conducted two activities in which people mingo together on the children were singing songs and they were even, you know, sharing stories. They were dancing together. It was really heartwarming. >> Wow. And do you have any other success stories from what's happened so far? >> So yeah said the two meetings that have been conducted already were huge successes in our opinion. So we had children from an often it's called cyber ball creep are going to an old age home on dhe. They spent time with the elders there, talk to them, mingled with them, learned about their life experiences on DDE up in the other meeting to reverse singing songs on Theo. Elders and children were sort of having fun together, and it was amazing. >> So I visited your instagram page and which looks amazing, by the way, thank you. And I noticed that there were a list of activities for every for for them to do when they meet each other. So can you tell us more about those activities? >> Yes, so some of the activities I already talked about them, but they could also sort of have a picnic together, get some food for each other or the children could make drawings, write poems for the elders. And those can be put up in the old age home itself so that even after the children leave, it's like a reminder and a token of love for the elders that reminds them that they are loved on the you are cared for Andi. They could also have other activities, like yoga sessions together, maybe read books to each other. There was other kinds of activities that are listed on. How did >> you come up with this idea? >> Oh, well, the initial inspiration. Or I wouldn't say inspiration. It was a bus, the incident that happened to me. So I lost both of my grandparent's. Within the span of failure, I lost my grandmother, too, can't cancer. And then after her, she passed away. My grandfather sort of felt like really lonely and that he had lost all purpose in life. On I could see firsthand the effects that loneliness could have on someone's mental and social well being on that lead to health problems that he never, ever had before. And we lost him in, unfortunately in January this year, so I really wanted to work on senior care on. Then. My teammate Basseterre suggested that we should also include orphans within this. Since you know we in India especially, we have a very strong familial bond between children and grand parents, and the's children do not have that same connection. They grew up without that kind of nurturing love that only parents or grandparents can provide to a child on. So we felt that we should be solving both of these problems and bridging them together in some in some way on. That's how we came up with this idea. >> It sounds like it's an amazing idea, and it also sounds like it could help more than just the community that you're in. But it could really help the whole world because so many people deal with loneliness, especially in old age or orphans who want love from a grand parent or parents, so it just sounds like it could be really useful. It's a lot of people, thank you. So how has your experience a techno nation been >> It has bean an amazing Johnny. We want expecting to make hated this level and is just phenomenal on the huge honor to be standing here on We began by just Regis formed We are all classmates on We have known each other for a while and so we just found out about this competition formed a team started working towards that on We were really passionate about this car. So working and taking time out of school to work on this just came naturally simply because how important this cause, boss, for us personally on then. So 12 The deactivation journey we kept on learning new things. Not all of us were aware off how to court applications. So we used Tekken ovations or curriculum on other online resources to teach ourselves those skills along the way and developed our entire project submission on DDE. Yeah, it's just amazing to be here now, sitting in front of such a huge audience. >> Absolutely. It's such a huge success for all of you. So can you tell us more about how how you all met your said your classmates, right? >> Yeah. So the four of us are classmates on Anushka is in another class within the stools, so be already sort of knew each other. Andi, I found out about the competition online and techno vacation seemed really ins like, Ah, create platform, especially because it's like, if specifically wants to empower women to court and going to make a stone. Male dominated fields that computer science on entrepreneurship. So the four of us off science students and she studies Commerz on. That's how we came together and started walking. >> That's amazing. So where do you have to see this app? You know, if you get the funding if you win today, where do you hope to see it in five years? >> Right now? Are up has already been launched in the play store, and we have about 1000 plus downloads in the future. We would like to know just to expand out of the Delhi nCr reason by We're currently working on a go pan in there and hopefully in the future in about 10 years. Maybe spread this throughout the world because I feel like communities across the work and benefit from >> men. Three. >> That's amazing. Best of luck to all of you and good luck for your pitch tonight. And congratulations. Once again. Thank you so much. So this has been team tech witches from India. You're watching the cube staging for more.

>> from Santa Clara, California It's the Cube covering techno ovation World Pitch Summit 2019 Brought to you by Silicon Angle Media Now here's Sonia to Gari >> Hi and welcome to the Cube. I'm your host, Sonia to Gari. And we're here at Oracle's Agnew's campus in Santa Clara, California covering techno vacations World Pitch Summit 2019. Ah, pitch competition in which girls from around the world developed mobile lapse in order to create positive change in the world with us. Today we have Team Coco from Kazakhstan. Welcome. The members are, um Dilma as camel Over and Mallika Bree by Ava Uh, Donna Ulanova and Lube of do Chen Kuo Welcome. And congratulations on being finalists. Thank you. So your app is called tech Go. Can you tell us more about it? >> Yes. Uh so so techo in three d mobile application, which has a minute reality and as connected to the hardware which has dedicated for the behavioral change of people for so that they can become more conscious and like a friendly. >> And can you tell us more about how it works? Yes, >> of course there is. Luba, who can explain this? Okay. S >> o r application is about an astronaut who needs to save the planet. S O Firstly is there is a game in which a person needs to save your hair. Virtual airs by selling some ecological problems in it so that he or she wrote, be educated to both real life scenarios. And I also have a step counter which tracks your carbon footprint and encourages people to trust Morgan Friend the transportation options And that's a rare make really impact is that we connect our application with a special trash boxes in our city. All those locations are shown on the map, and coming to this place is user received trash box. And since Rosa Garbage and then because he has restaurants carriage here, she will get some points and your impact will be realized in the eventuality. Yeah, >> So what impact in society do you hope that this app will help change >> Rapids three t mobile application and it's a game. That is why Gamification and theater magic reality, which is a r which is inside this game a cz more visually in psychological attractive to people and those challenges that we provide a game are intensified so that most of the people. When they accomplish their goals, they might get, like, have a certain profit out of it so that they can become worker friendly and gain benefits. This is how we want to make sure that people might gain my changed a behavior for the sake of ecology. >> That's awesome. So you're using essentially a game incentivize people to make better choices in their everyday lives. That's great. And so how >> did you >> come up with this idea? >> So look, I will explain >> this. Actually, there were before some eco trash boxes in our school because like the thing off, ecological problems and recycling is one of the most talked about topics in Kazakhstan nowadays. And like in our school, the students try. Thio make this echo charge boxes, but they were always empty because students wasn't incent ified to recycle the garbage. And we tested our up in our school and we already launched it in our school and this ups incentivize our students. And now this I could trash boxes with our hard way always full. So >> that's awesome. See, you already found some success with your app. Thank you. Do you think that that this is a problem in the bigger community. >> Oh, maybe Donna Comptel. >> So we're saying that we started locally, but we got to go globally within that, uh, a pollution, like a pollution global problem and we trying to solve all over the world. So in our game, we have the whole world that you become an astronaut. So you should be aware for hold the problem that was happening in the earth. So we are trying to engage and educate people to be more global on to be more responsible for our final for our home. >> It sounds like everyone in the world should download that app. Yes, I do hope Thio uh, expand if you get the funding. >> Yes, um, we plan to expand not only in our country, Kazakhstan on only locally, but also globally. And we would like to create the eco friendly community across Central Asia since we want to make sure that consciousness is global in our area. >> And what struggles have you faced trying to create this app? >> Um, probably there were some struggles and off course in the realization and, uh, the realization of technical part of this project and creating a business model, since we are not very experienced in this kind of things. But since we have participated in techno vacation and we were immersed in this protest and were modified Thio motivated. Yeah, and we're motivated to learn all this things and acquire those skills. And this is why we became more experienced in this stuff. So right now, uh, those struggles that we face before not longer problem for us. So yeah, this what we faced? >> So techno vacation has definitely helped. Do you improve your app and yes, right houses. Tech innovation Helped you? >> Yeah, Um, probably someone else wants to ask you this question. >> How is SECNAV ation help? You were What skills have you learned from this journey? For >> example, one of the most important skills, I guess iss a teamwork. Like after we started to work on the one project, we started to listen each other excavation actually helped us too. Um, I understand the opinions off other people and like to understand the problems in our society. We start to dream bigger to think bigger, wider kind of that >> That's amazing. And also take Novation helping us >> to explore new companies to be more like open a person to come to The company's asked about the help on not like B just like see the problems and trying to solve trying to find a solution and be the people of the world and be responsible for our planet for what's happening in our local community on be aware of everything. >> And, um So I heard you guys had an amazing week. Um, you you went to whoever You went some other places. So can you tell us more about your week >> you want? So we went to amazing places in a Silicon Valley in a San Francisco San Jose and we so, like it'd, for example, Golden Gate Bridge. And also the Alcatraz so were so impressed by their architecture by the people by the nature on DDE. We just expected a lot of Onda. We just got this old expectations come to the reality on dhe. We hope that that kind of dream will come true in our future, and we gonna to work in a one of the big companies that were located here. I know all the universities. So >> how is it like going to the different tech companies and seeing it in real life. >> So we >> visited Uber Company and Google Ventures, and both we I have seen people who work is there, and we're really impressive on. And we really like it. It? Yeah. And, uh, I think so. Before, like in my childhood, I dreaming to be to be in Silicon Valley, to goes there and, like, meet people who are work already working you And now, like my dream came through. >> That's awesome. And you get to see California And you you might be able to win today. So thank you so much for being on. I wish you all the best. And I hope you haven't amazing pitch tonight. Thank you. This has been Team Coco from Kazakhstan. I'm your host, Sonia to Garey. This is the Cube. Stay tuned for more

>> from our studios in the heart of Silicon Valley. PALO ALTO, California It is a cute conversation, >> living welcome to this special Cuba conversation in Palo Alto, California We're here with our friends on Twitter and influences in the cloud computing edge and open source game. We have our distinguished power panel here talking about if every tech company, every company should be a tech company. And what does it mean in the air of a modern infrastructure? Police to have my kale with ct of everest dot org's from most Gatto's California Rob Hirschfeld, founder and CEO of Rock n Calling in From Where You Calling in from >> Austin, Texas. >> Austin, Texas. Good to have you and Mark Theo Who's with EJ Gravity brand New opportunity. Congratulations calling in Las Vegas. Thanks for coming in, guys. Thanks for spending the time on this cube power panel from the influencers. Always great to see you guys on Twitter with this morning. I woke up, was very active at a Crouch said earlier this morning. And Mark, you wrote a post that got my attention. So I think you hit a nerve that has been sparking around the Internets around the role of technology as couples, they're starting to rethink and building out there enterprise architectures in their businesses. And we're seeing some signals around cybersecurity. Dev Ops certainly has been kind of banging on this drum with cloud computing, and that is that the role of technology plays as a percentage of the business part of the business. And your tweet was simply put, you said every bit. If every business needs to become a tech business, it business has to decide to own its own infrastructure something of that effect, which which triggered me because it's like That's a good question. It isn't just a part of an organization supporting it. Tech is becoming much more instrumental. So I want to get your reaction. What was the motivation behind that tweet? What's your what's your What was your point around it? >> Yeah, I mean, like many of my tweets, they're poorly worded and rushed out, so you know, it's not as clear as it could have been. But the real point of the message wasn't Thio highlight that a technology company has to be all in the cloud or has to own its infrastructure, but rather as a company makes a change towards becoming a technology company. I mean, if we go back Thio you know, 1995 or 1996 when we wanted a library, we went to the library. But now we have Google. We didn't know that Google was gonna become an online the equivalent of a library. But it became a digital company before anybody asked for that solution or anybody was running that kind of solution in some sort of company format and then changed it over. But, you know, Google Facebook, Microsoft's into it. Adobe PayPal. We could go down the long list there. All I t cos in the end, whether you call the technology that they built to run their businesses engineering with a CTO or I t. Is the material. They are in fact, large giant I t organizations that do what they do to make money. And so, as more companies look to make the change as digital transformation takes hold as more efforts are presented to try to get a closer handle on customers to build loyalty with customers, create new engagement models, maybe at the edge, even in traditional application environments, then companies have to make a decision about how they're going toe oh, nightie and whether they're goingto own any portion of the infrastructure of I T. And if they're going to do that, then I don't think that there's any question that they have to own it. Atleast following a model of the way the large providers and the facebooks, et cetera have provided for us cannot continue. In other words, what I've been known to say before, we can't continue to throw more hardware and people at the problem. >> My mike, I want to get your thoughts on this because one of the things that I know you have been involved a lot with security on dhe I t. As well in security, which which is a canary in the coal mine. For a lot of these architectural decisions are all kind of looking at how they hire and build on premise in house around tech stacks. And one of the things that became apparent to me at Amazon Aws reinforce, which is their Amazons first cloud security conference, was most of the ceases. When I talk privately was saying, we don't really believe in multi cloud. We have multiple clouds, but We're investing in people on certain stacks that fit our guiding principles of what we're building as a company. And they said we then go to the suppliers and saying, Here's the AP eyes we want you to support So you start to see the shift from being hiring the general purpose software vendors to come in and supply them with I t stuff Were hardware. As Mark pointed out, too much more, the customer saying No, no, this is our spec build that we built it. And so the trend that points to the trend of a reinvestment of building tech at the core of the business, which would imply to Mark's point around their tech companies. What's your thoughts on this? >> So a nuance. My answer. I think their tech enabled companies more than tech companies like Tech is enabling, whether it's Google or into it or pay power of the other companies. Mark mentioned technologies the base of their companies stack, um, then to go into your security portion, security has to be architected and embedded into the core solutions not bolted on after the fact with vendor solutions like it is today, and I think we've proven time and time again, including the capital one issue as a day or two ago that the current approaches are not working. And, uh, I agree with whomever See says you've been talking thio like being driving a P I integrations and be consumptive of them and telling what you need to build is a much better approach. Would you want to build a custom house with that actually talking to your builder and finding out later? What? What features and pictures have been installed in your home. But what do you wanna have a hand in that from the ground up? I think that's the mischief. >> Well, I want to come back to the capital. One point that's gonna be a separate talk track. So let's hold that thought. Rob, I want to go to you. Because StarBeat Joel, whose prolific on these threads you know, posting is nice Twitter cards on their um, he said, If you know, talk about leasing out extra capacity in a private data centers question Mark, you know, teasing out the question. And then Ben Haines responded and said, Why the hell would you want to be in that business when you have a real business to run again to what Mark was saying about, You know, Tech is going to be everywhere. Why should I even be in the data center? Because I don't want to be in that business. I gotta figure out Tech for the business. So Ben kind of brings that practitioner perspective. What's your thought? Because you're in the middle of this with the devil's movement. Bare metal, big part of it, Your thoughts. >> Yeah, And that's why we really focus on fixing the bear mental problem. Andi, I want to come back to where a bear metal fits with all this because you really can't get away from bare metal. I think the first question is really is every day to send is every business in I t business. And you know, not every business is a Google and strictly a nighty business. But what we're seeing with machine learning and Internet of things and just extension of what was traditionally siloed I t or data center, I t into everyday operations. You can't get away from the fact that if you're not able to take in the data, work with the data, manipulate and understand what your customers were doing. Then you are going to be behind. That's That's how you're gonna lose. You're gonna be out of business on. So I think that what we're doing is we're redefining business into not just a product that you're selling, but understanding how your customers air interacting with that product, what value they're getting from it. We really redefined supply chain in a very transformative way compared to anything else. And that's an I T enabled transformation. >> Ben brings up a good point, but the Brent wanted Friends Point is essentially teasing out mark and yourself a bare metal. All this stuff is complicated. Cut and make investments. Ben's teasing as What the hell business do you want to be in? I think that becomes a lot of this digital transformation. Conversation is Hey, Cloud is an easy decision. We were start up 10 years ago. We don't have I t. We have 50 plus people on growing. We're all in the cloud. That's fine for us. Dropbox started in the cloud. All these guys started class. It's easy as hell to do it. No, no debate there. But as you start thinking, Maurin Maur integration as a big enterprise which wasn't born in the cloud. This is where the transformations happening is what business? What the hell they doing? What's what's the purpose of their >> visit? Yeah, but the reality of you, a cloud infrastructure and how cloud infrastructure is structured does not really take you away from owning how you operate and run that infrastructure, right Amazons than an amazing marketing job of telling everybody that they're not smart enough to run their own infrastructure. And it's just not true way definitely let operations get very lax. We built up a lot of technical debt that we we need to be able to fix. An Amazon walked in and said, This is too hard for you. Let us take it off your plate. But the reality is people using Amazon still have toe owned their operations of that infrastructure. The capital one didn't doesn't get to just get a pass and say, I used Amazon. Oh, well, Too bad. Talk to them. You still own your infrastructure. >> Technically, it wasn't Amazons fall, so let's get the capital. One is this brings up a good point. Converged infrastructure was the Holy Grail, savior for the I t If you go back when we started doing Cuba interviews, stupidity and I would talk about converged is awesome. You got Nutanix kicked ass and grew like crazy. And so then you have the converge kind of meat's maker. When it sees the cloud, it's like, OK, I got great converged infrastructure, but yet the breach on capital one had nothing to do with a W s. It was basically an s three bucket that the firewall Miss configured. So it was really Amazon was a victim of its simplicity there. I mean, there's a >> I mean, this is this is what we're talking about with. To me with this tweet is that we need to look, we need to be better at operating the infrastructure we have, whether it's Amazon or physical assets on your premises. What we've really done is we've eroded our ability to manage those pieces well and do it in a way that builds on itself. And so as soon as we can get on improvement there, I mean, this this is where I went with this threat is if we can really improve our operational efficiency with the infrastructure we have, whether it's in the cloud on premises. You create benefits there than everything you build on top of that is gonna have a nim prove mint, right. We're gonna change the way we look at infrastructure. Amazons already done that on. We think about infrastructure in cloud terms, but I don't think that what they've done is the end destination. They just taught us how to be better running infrastructure. >> Well, it brings up that it brings up the point, and I have so Mike shaking his head to get his thought and mark on this. If I is that I tease problem our operational technologies problem because the world's not as simple as it used to be. It was not. It wasn't. It's not simple. You got edge. You get externally incest cloud players now multi cloud. So information technology teams and operational technology teams whose fault is it? Who is responsible thing? Could you just had a AI bots managing the the filtering and access to history buckets that could have been automated away? What, Whose problem was it? Operations, technology or I t. >> So that I think, to touch upon what Rob was talking about. There's my chain and technology, uh, from the classic sound byte is people process and technology. The core cause of literally every security breach, including capital one is a lack of sophisticated process and the root cause being people, and there's no amount of a I currently that can fix that. So you have to start focusing on your operational supply chain processes, which has, Rob said. Amazon has really solidified, and the company should look to emulate that forces trying to emulate the cloud infrastructure and some of your processed and your people challenges first. And then you can leverage the technology. >> Great point. Totally agree with you on that one >> market. Yeah, I would agree with everything that both Mike and Rob just said, and I would just add that we we don't have any choice but to face the future. That is, I t. And in order to provide the best possible service to our customers for our applications that even haven't been built yet, we have to look at the service is that are available to us and utilize them the best way possible and then find appropriate management and, like so correctly put it supply chain processes for managing them. So I've talked to people who are building unique cloud platforms internally to solve a specific business problem in ways that the individual clouds offered by the Big Three is an example can't do or can't do as well or can't do is cheaply. And the same thing applies to customers who are just using more than one of the big cloud providers. Even for some in some cases, for workloads. That might seem similar because each of the clouds provide a different opportunity associated with that specific set of requirements. And so we don't have any choice but to manage it better. And whether it's we make a choice to use it in our data center because it's more cost effective long term. And that's our single most important driver. Or whether we decide to leverage every tool in our tool belt, which includes a handful of cloud providers. And some we do our own, um, or we put it all in one cloud. It doesn't change our responsibility for owning it correctly, right? And my simple message really was that you have to figure out how to own and I'll steal from Mike again. You have to figure out how to own that supply chain. But more lower down more base is ifs. Part of that supply chain is delivering compute into a data center or environment that you own. Then you have to find the tools capabilities to ensure that you're not making the kind of mistakes that were made with capital or >> or, if you have tools are networks and tools you don't know and look at the quotes. So called scare with the China hack from Super Micro. That's a silly why chain problems? Well, it's on the silicon. So again, back to the process, people an equation. I think that's right on this brings us kind of through the next talking track. I want to get your thoughts on, which is cloud two point. Oh, I mean, I'm putting that term out there on Lee is a provocative way. Remember, Web to point. It works so well in debating about what it what it was. If one if cloud one data was Amazon Web service is, thank you very much. Public cloud. You could say cloud two point. Oh, our second inning would be just what happens next because you're seeing now a confluence of different dynamics edge, um, security, industrial edge. And then you know this all coming into on premises, which is hybrid and public, all working together. And then you throw multi cloud in there from a complexity standpoint. Do you wanna have support Microsoft's Stack, Azure Stack, Google and Amazon? This is this is the fundamental 2.0 question. Because things are more real time. Things are data specific. This costs involved. There's really network innovation needed what you guys thoughts on cloud to point out. >> I think the basic cloud 2.0, is moving to the shared responsibility model. And we should stop blaming people for teams for breaches as architectures become much more complex, including network computing, storage and in service orchestration layers like kubernetes, no one team or individual, individual or one team and manage all of that. So you're all responsible for infrastructure, scalability, performance and security. So I think it's the cultural movement more than the technology movement at the base of >> Rob. What's your definition? Cloud 2.0, from your perspective. >> Oh boy, I've been calling it Post Cloud Is my feeling on this? Yeah, it to me. It's it's about rethinking the way we automate. Um, you know, we really learned that we had to interact with infrastructure via automation and eliminate the human risk elements of. This doesn't mean that we have an automation is foolproof either It's not, but what? What I think we've seen is that people have really understood that we have to bring the type of automation and power that we're seeing in clouding the benefits because they're very riel. But back into everything that we do. There's no doubt in my mind that infrastructure is moving back into the environment. Where is what? Which is EJ from my perspective, and we'll see computing in a much more distributed way and those benefits and getting that right in the automation. Is this necessary to run autonomous zero touch infrastructure in environmental situations. That is gonna be justice transformative, freighted that that environment makes the cloud look easy. Frankly, >> Mark, what's your take? I want to get because, you know, security houses, one element get self driving cars. You got kind of a new front end of of EJ devices, whether it's a Serie Buy Me a song on iTunes, which has to go out to a traditional system and purchase a song. But that that Siri priest is different than what? The back end? Does this simply database, Get it? Moving over self driving cars, You're seeing all kinds of EJ industrial activity. You know, the debate of moving compute to the data. You got Amazon with ground station, all these new infrastructure physical activities going on that needs software to power it. What, you're in cloud to point. It seems to be a nice place not just for analytics, but for operational thing. Your thoughts on cloud to point out >> Well, I mean you you describe the opportunity relatively well. I could certainly go in. I've spent a lot of time going into detail about what EJ might mean and what might populate edge and why people would use it. But I think from if we just look at it from a cloud 2.0, standpoint, maybe I'm oversimplifying. But I would say, you know, if you add on to what Mike and Rob already so well pointed out is that it's best fit right, it's best fit from compute location, Thio CPU type Thio platform on, and historically, for I t they've always had to make pragmatic choice is that I believe, limit their ability on Helped to create Maur you know, legacy Tech that they have to manage, um on and create overhead tech debt, as they call it on DSO. I think judo. And in my book the best case for two Dato is that I can put best fit work where I need it when I need it for as long as I need it. >> That's that's really kind of gasp originals. Well, people got to get the software stood up. That's where I think Kubernetes has shown a nice position. I want to extend this track to another thought, another topic around networking. So if you look at the three pillars of computing computing mean industry, compute storage and networking, cloud one daughter, you can say pretty much compute storage did a good job. Amazon has a C two as three. Everything went great. Networking always got taken to the wood shed. You know, networking was getting, you know, people were pissing and moaning about networking. But if you look at kind of things were just talking about networking seems to be an area that this cloud 2.0, could innovate on. So wanna get each of your thoughts on? If you could throw the magic wand out there around the network doesn't take the same track as Dev ops that gets abstracted away because you see VM wear now doing deals. All the cloud providers they got they're going after Cisco with the networking PCC Cisco trying to be relevant. The big guys you got edge, which is power and network connection. You need those things. So what is the role of the network? And two point If you guys could wave the magic wand and have something magically happen or innovate, what would it be? >> Oh, wait, it's part complaining. It's your world. You know, it's ironic that I said this Thio competitors to my most previous company. Ericsson Company was away. They asked me after an event in San everything was a cloud expo. I just got off stage and the gentleman came up to me and asked me So mark you the way you talked about Cloud. I appreciate the comments you made yada, yada, yada. But what do you think about networking? And I said Well, network big problem right now is that you can't follow cloud assumptions as faras usage characteristics and deployment characteristics with networking. When that problem is solved, will have moved light years ahead in how people can use and deploy i t. Because it doesn't matter if you can define workload opportunity in 30 minutes on an edge device somewhere or on a new set of data centers belonging to Google or 10 Cent or anybody else. If you can't treat the network with same functionality and flexibility and speed to value that, you can the cloud then, um, it's Unfortunately, you're really reducing your opportunity and needlessly lengthening the time to value for whatever activity it is. You're really >> so network, certainly critical in 2.0, terms have absolutely that Mike any any thoughts there? >> So I think you know, there's there's easy answers to this that are actually the answer. You know, I P v six was the answer from a couple years ago, and that hasn't solved in the fantasy of the solved. All the problems, just like five G is not gonna magically transform our edge infrastructure into this brilliant network. The reality is, networking is hard and it's hard because there's a ton of legacy embedded stuff that still has to keep working. You can't just, you know, install a new container on container system and say, I've now fixed networking. You have to deal with the globally interconnected MASH insistence. I think when we look at networking, we have to do it in a way that respects the legacy and figures out migration strategies. One of the biggest problems I see that a lot of our technology stacks here is that they just assume we're gonna pave over the problems of yesteryear, nor them and with network, when you don't get that benefit, what you described with cloud networking, never living up the potential, it's because cloud networking isn't club networking. It's it's, you know, early days of the Internet. Networking is still what we use today. It's not. It's not something you can just snap your fingers and disrupt. >> Well, I mean, networking had two major things that were big parts of a networking and who build networks knows you provisioned them and you have policy stuff that runs on them, right? You moving paintings from A to B, then you got networks you don't own right so that's kind of pedestrian, old thinking. But if you want to make networks programmable to me, it just seems like they just seem to be so much more there that needs to be developed, not just moving package. Well, >> you just said it's traditional. Networks were built first, and the infrastructure was then built around them or leveraging them, so you need to take like in zero. Trust paper. When Bugsy Siegel built Las Vegas, he built the town first and then put the roads around the infrastructure. So you need to take that approach with networking. You need to have the core infrastructure of first and then lay down the networking around to support it. And, as Mark said, that needs to be much more real time or programmable. So moving from ah, hardware to find to a software to find model, I think, is how you fix networking. It's not gonna be fixed by a new protocol or set of protocols or adding more policies or complexity to it, >> so you see a lot of change then, based on that, I'd take away that you see change coming to networking in a big way because Vegas we're gonna build >> our if it has to happen. The current way is not working. And that's why we need the bottlenecks. Wherever >> Mark you live in is the traffic's brutal. But, you know, still e gotta figure out, You know, they got some more roads. The bill change coming. What are your thoughts on the change coming with this networking paradigm >> show? I mean, there are a few companies in the space already. I'm going to refuse to name anyway at this point because one of them is a partner of my new company, not my new company, but the new company I work for and I don't want to leave them out of the discussion. But there are several companies in the space right now that are attempting to do just then just that from centralized locations, helping customers to more rapidly deploy network services to and from cloud or two and from other data centers in a chain of data centers. Programmatically as we've talked about. But in the long run, your ability to lay down networking from your office without having to create new firewall rules and spend months on on contract language and things like that on being able to take a slice of the network you already have and deploy it on DDE, not have to go through the complex Mpls or Or VPN set ups that are common today on defectively reroute destinations when you want to or make new connections when you need to. Is far as I'm concerned, that's vital to the success of anything we would call a cloud two point. Oh, >> well, we're gonna try tracks when he's hot startups. So you guys see anyone around this area? I love this topic. I think it's worth talking a lot more about love. Love to continue on with you guys on that another. Another time. Final five minutes. I'd love to spend with you guys talking about the the digital transformation paradox. Rob, we're talking before we came on camera. He loved this paradox because it's simply not as easy to saying Kill the old man, bringing the new and everything's gonna be hunky dorey. It's not that simple, but but it also brings up the fact that in all these major waves, the hype outlives the reality, too. So you're seeing so I want to get your thoughts on digital transformation. Each of you share your thoughts on what's come home to be realistic in digital transformation, which what hasn't showed up yet in terms of benefits and capability. >> I mean, this is this to me is one of the things that we see happen in every wave. They people jump on that bandwagon really hard, and then they tell everybody who's doing the current stuff, that they're doing it wrong. Um, and that that to me, actually does a lot more heart. What we what we've seen in places where people said, burn the boats, you know, we don't care. They have actually not managed to get traction and not create the long term sustainability that you would get if you created ways to bring things forward. Networking is a good example for that, right? Automating a firewall configuration and creating a soft firewall or virtual network function is just taking something that people understand and moving it into a much more control perspective in a lot of ways. That's what we saw with Cloud Cloud took working I t infrastructure that people understood added some change but also kept things that people 1% and so the paradox. Is that you? Is it the more you tell people, they just have to completely disrupt and break everything they've done and walk away from their no nighty infrastructure, the less actually you create these long term values. And I know there are people who really know you got totally changed everything that disrupted value. But a lot of the disrupted value comes from creating these incremental changes and then building something on top of that. So what? So >> what did what Indigenous in digital transformation, what has happened? That's positive and what hasn't happened that was supposed to happen. >> So when I look att Dev ops on what people thought we were going to do, just automate all things that turned out to be a much bigger lift than people expected. But when we started looking at pipelines and deployment pipelines and something very concrete for that which let people start in one or two places and then expand, I think I think, uh, pipelines and build deploy pipelines are transformative, right? Going from a continuously integrated system all the way to a continuously integrated data center. Yeah, that's transformative. And it's very concrete just telling people automate everything is not been as effective >> guys. Other thoughts there on the digital >> transformation dream. I agree with everything that Rob just said, and I would just add just because, you know, it's the boarding piece that someone always has to say, and nobody in Tech everyone is he here? But you know, every corporation at one point or another in its Kurt in its life span faces a transformative period of time because of product change or a new competitor that's doing things differently, or has figured out a way to do it cheaper or whatever it is. And they usually make or break that transformation not because of technology, not because of whether they have smart people, not because of whether they implemented the newest solution, but because of culture and organizational motivation and the vast majority of like Everything, Rob said doesn't just apply to I. T. A lot of the best I T frameworks around Agile and Dev ops apply to how the rest of the organization can and should react to opportunity so that if I t can be and should be really time, then it only makes sense that the business should be able to be real time in responding to what is being created through I t systems. And right now I would argue that the vast majority of the 80% of transformations that don't see the benefit that they're looking for have nothing to do with whether they could have gotten the right technology or done the technology correctly. But it has to do with institutional culture and motivation. And if you can fix that, then the only piece all add on to that. That again I vociferously, really agree with Robin is that if you want to lower the barrier to entry and you want to get more people into this market, you won't get more people to buy more of your stuff and grow what they own. Then you have to be able to show them a path to taking, getting the most value out of what they already have. There is no doubt in my mind that that's the only way forward, and that's where some of the tools that we're talking about and what we're talking about today on Twitter or so important >> Mike final stops on the >> docks >> on your thoughts on the transmission paradox, >> so the paradox that Robb describe think is set, the contact is set incorrectly by calling it digital transformation should be digital revolution, where the evolution process doesn't end. Transformation makes people think that there's some end state, which means let's burn the votes. That's let's get rid of all over all on prime infrastructure moved to cloud and we're done. And really, that's only the beginning. Which is why we're talking about Cloud two point. Oh, do you have to take that approach that you want to have continuous evolution and improvements, which Segways into what Rob said about de box and automating all the things you don't automate your tasks and processes and you're done? You want to keep improving upon them. Figuring out how to improve the process is and then change the automation five that the is, Mark said. It's a cultural and mental shift versus trying to get to this Holy Grail and state of transforming transformation. >> Awesome. Well, why I got you guys here first off. Thanks for spending the time and unpacking these big issue. Well, two more of it. I'd >> love to just get >> your thoughts real quick on just your opinion of Capital One. The breach, survivability and impact of the industry. Since it's still in the news, who wants to jump for us? We'll start with Mike. Mike, start with you will go down the line. Mike, Robin Mara. >> I mean, the good news for Capital One is I don't think any personal information was breached that hasn't already been exposed by the various other massive reaches. Like I do my so security number as a throw away at this point which never should have been used for identity. But I want All >> right, So there were Do you think >> it's recoverable is not gonna be as critical, say, Equifax, which was brutal. >> It doesn't sound like there was negligence where Equifax seemed like it was Maura negligent driven than just ah ah, bad process or bad hygiene around a user or roll account and access to a certain subset of data. >> I mean, this was someone who stumbled upon open history bucket and said, >> Well, well, look at this >> bragging about it on Twitter and the user groups. I mean, this >> was like from from what the press said, I think there's other companies that may or may not be affected by this as well, so that it's just capital one, which will probably defuse the attention on them and lessen the severity or backlash. >> Rob your thoughts on Capital One. >> Yeah, I wish it would move the needle. I think that we have become so used to the security of breach of the week or the hardware. Very. You know, it is we We need to really think through what it's really gonna take toe treat security as a primary thing, which means actually treating operations and infrastructure and the human processes piece of this, um, and slowed down a little bit. Um, and I always saw >> 11 lawmaker, one congressman's woman said, More regulation. >> Yeah, they don't want this. I don't think regulation is the right is the right thing. I don't know exactly what it is because I think >> regularly, we don't understand. That's Washington, DC, >> But but we're building a very, very, very fragile I T infrastructure. And so this is not a security problem. It's a It's a fact that we've built this Jenga tower of I t infrastructure, and we don't actually understand how it's built, Um, and that I don't see that slowing down. Unfortunately, >> unlike Las Vegas is, Mike pointed out, it's was built with purpose. They built the roads around the town. Mark, you live there now What's your thoughts on this capital? One piece ends and >> I have been said I would say that what I'm hoping sort of like when you have, ah, a lack of employees for a specific job type. Like right now in United States, it's incredibly difficult to find a truck driver if you're a trucking company, So what does that mean? But that means it's gonna accelerate automation and truck driving because that's the best alternative, right? If you can't solve it the old way, then you find a new way to solve it. And we have an enormous number of opportunity. He's from a process standpoint, but also, from a technology standpoint, did not build on this. Pardon my French crap that we have already >> they were digital. Then, when I ruled by the FCC, >> had build it the right way from the start. >> Well, you know what was soon? How about self driving security? We needed guys. Thanks for spending the time this cube talk. Keep conversation. Appreciate time. Mike, Rob mark. Thanks for kicking it off. Thanks. >> Thank you. >> You're watching Cute conversation with promote guests. Panel discussion Breaking down. How businesses should look at technology as part of their business. Cloud 2.0, security hacks and digital transformation Digital evolution. I'm John free. Thanks for watching.

>>live from Madrid, Spain. It's the Q covering HP Discover Madrid 2017 Brought to you by Hewlett Packard Enterprise >>Welcome back to Madrid, Spain. Everybody, this is cute. The leader in live tech coverage And we have a day to HP discover Madrid. My name is Dave Volonte with my co host for the week Peter Verse. Jeff, Carla is here. He's the senior director of solutions. Go to market system integrators at Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Kalyan Gara Mela. Who is the i o t manager? Deloitte. Yes, Gentlemen, welcome to the Cube. Thanks for coming on, You bad love too deep here. It's always a great time. Yes. So you know, when you come on with Deloitte, we always sort of mentioned you guys. One of the top system integrators in the planet. You got deep expertise and vertical industries. You guys bring the technology expertise. Last time we were talking about manufacturing. This time we're gonna talk about retail. Yes. Why? Retail, You know, retails in turmoil. Everybody's got numbers on war room. But you guys are going after that, helping some of your customers so to take advantage of their physical presence, bringing in an online presence move into digital. Is there hope there's hope, their retail dead? You know, >>I hear all the time about this retail apocalypse retail is dead, and in reality, it's not dead at all. Still, 85 to 90% of purchases were being going through a brick and mortar store problem here, and the apocalypse will happen to those brick and mortar retailers that don't change. They don't digitize and change to the changing demands of a consumer and the way they want purchase something, give you an example, my son or even myself. Now I increasingly want to do things through an experience. My computer, my mobile phone. I do research. I I want to understand. I want recommendations. I want personalization. I want to be catered to. I don't want to go stand in line. Well, that experience can be done but are unique. Ability. Is taking that experience in a planet into a brick and mortar environment? >>Well, I got to say I love going Cabela's with my kid with my wife. I mean, I could spend all day. Hey, get that on Callie and tell us about your you're rolling. The Lloyd, obviously specializing in the retail practice. What, Your background? >>Yes, my name's Kalyan. Gotta Mila being a coyote manager from the >>delight you >>practice based out of San Francisco, and we have been working with our partners and friends. Hitch be Aruba over the past year or so, helping them dollar, I ot go to market projects, products that can be that we can take to market on Dhe. Recently. We're just working with manufacturing and retail industry. >>So what's the conversation >>like with your customers? As I said, everybody's got an Amazon war room they're trying to figure out. Okay, >>how do we leverage our physical presence as an advantage? What were the conversations like with clients with >>our clients? Mostly that talking about How did the mimic our online channels? Right. If I go to an online retailer, you know, if I go open, say amazon dot com, they know exactly what item I am for chasing where I'm going next. What? How much time I'm spending. So in order to differentiate the brick and mortars in order to differentiate themselves from the fellow retailers, they have to offer that customized shopping experience in order to get given a reason for the customers to come in store and make that purchase. So they're trying to look at what new technologies that we can can we can help with. What are some of the new processes that we can help with? And that's where most of our conversations have been going on, >>Really experience. Problem >>it is. And you talk about the bells and I moved into a new house, ready to buy my big >>lazy boy chair and watch Sunday >>football, and I'm not gonna go online just by here. I want to touch and feel that I was late and I want to understand. Well, that is a perfect opportunity of providing an experience. Allows me to do the research, get suggestions, go into a brick and mortar store. Try it out, then guess what? I'm getting personalized. Hey, you know what? There's a nice beer stand that I could put right next to that table. Be calm, perfectly complemented. Hey, there's a light that can look over So we have that ability of actually tying together and experience, actually predicting in advance what the customer really doesn't know they want next. But they really do want example. We just walked out of a client engagement. Beautiful example. Plan Engagement sells high end women's fashions, right dresses and shoes and accessories. Everything. And he's He basically said, We're dabbling around with R F I. D tags, um, inventory management, but we don't know what to do, right? Bingo. We now have a proven, referenced architecture called the Connected Consumer. This is a preview to be announced to be soon, but that can allow, actually that client to integrate and optimized and digitized the solution for a number of different use cases that spans a unique customer experience in store operations and efficiencies, and then providing insights through analytics in store analytics to make decisions quickly. So you've got by using this architecture building of solutions based with Deloitte Competence season capabilities in HPD Aruba technology. We can deliver that to increase top line revenue, increase basket side, decrease inventory costs, lost inventory and provide much greater brand loyalty to those customers by having a nice, personalized teachers. They know me by name. They know what I'm looking for in advance. Beautiful solution. >>So the online retail world did two crucial things. One is provided new way of customer to buy something and number two, it provided a new way for the retailer to learn something about the customer. Very, very powerful. But as you said, we're still last time. I checked physical things that move through space that used physical senses, too. Make decisions, Tactile. Do I like the color? You know the experience. I mean, I remember having arguments with people about whether the Apple stores are ever gonna have any impact in the world. And, boy, did they prove that experience of physically being there matters. So in many respects we're talking about, We're talking about creating spaces, the correspond to the experience that a customer wants in a way that doesn't force them into another channel. >>I think that is excellent. Thank you will hear security and character talks about who these are Aruba team. And they are renowned for taking a space and providing using technology and I, t and software and security to provide a total experience, an immersive experience for those that are occupying that. >>But that's not how retailers used to think. What they used to think was this is the space where I put my inventory where I show my product and then I'll put the catch register over here. What you guys I presume we're trying to do is show how. Show them how they could turn that physical space into a place that can bring in the online digital elements, complimented in a way that makes that door a source of different jack >>experience in the brick and mortar store and allows the comfort of Yeah, you know >>that makes it differentiated so that someone wants to go there, because that is a valuable experience in and of itself. >>And sadly, retailers of the past 40 years have always relied on big brand names to attract customers. If I have the best brands in the world, customers will come to me back. That scenario doesn't hold true anymore. You need to give them a reason. A personalized, curated experience for them to come in >>well, not least of which is the digital technology allows us to spin up new brands like overnight and so also so there's a there's it's having an erosion of effect on the other side of the inventory. So tell us a little bit about where you think over the next few years that differentiated in store experience is gonna be what is going to constitute great retail. >>I'll start enough shit. >>First and foremost, the expectations of millennials and other generations is more of that online experience. So I think I think retailers of the future have to be able to provide that customized experience. To be able to provide predicted people are not waiting in line is not an option in the future, right? I mean, even you. You look a waiting in line is not an option. I think that ability of you have to have more instantaneous gratification but allowing, if you will, the personalization being covered. I think that one expectation for those that want to sustain a business in retail in the future >>and add on to that right. I mean, the marketing managers are the store managers of the past have always relied on opinions rather than data and insights to make this better business stations. Where do I place my product? Where are my customer spending most of my time? It's just guess it's most of it was guessing. Now there is a technology out there where we can actually monitor what's happening inside your retail store and dead. While you can make better business nations to help you with your customer journeys, >>traffic, foot traffic, you know through video analytics and the data someone's hanging around the Nike booth or whatever you know financially, and you can purposely point them and give them suggestions of 20% off. And so you can personalize that experience. >>So wait. See Io client on DDE that's in the retail space on the way he described it is, you gotta break the whole thing down. Let me test you guys. You have a period of I want the experience of shopping on. The example that he gave me was a bike company a number of years ago who used flexible manufacturing to collapse the time high end bike to collapse, a time from order in the bike, getting the bike down to a few days. And they failed because the customer like waiting the process of buying, reducing time. Simple, straightforward, but also what they said. And this is the kind of flexibility we're talking about is some people don't wanna walk out of the store with the product they want to deliver to their home, so the store is again, not the place where the inventory is. It's the place where you experience the product and that they create an option. How would you like that? I like to be delivered to my house. No problem. There you go. Is that the kind of thing that we're talking about in the future? >>Absolutely. We call it the unified commerce of the Arm and channel shopping experience. You want to give the customer all the options available. Like you said, I could buy online shipping in store O. R. I can buy in store get into my house all the different options that a customer is looking for. A non online channel, which is easy and convenient. We want to do that in a brick and mortar as well, and our solution can help you do that as well. So you >>guys encounter a client that is, you know, declining same store sales management is concerned about, You know, the future. It seems like it's a tired sort of experience and, you know, that's sort of the end of the spectrum. And you want, you know, the to be his future. Stefano, the talk about where do you start so >>who brings what experts is. >>Actually, I'm gonna repeat what I said last time. Our mantra is First off, you gotta think big. Then you start small and then you scale fast. And what I mean, that what we mean by that is with the Lloyds capability. It's been a week and jointly come in and help a retailer. Let's think it through. Let's think you have how many branches looking to wear? What are your problems? What your inventory leak age. You know what your current experience, but you're in store WiFi. We can build a plan on what we can do. But the next big problem that we see is not about the technology is about the people in the process. How do you convince its How do you commit? Some who invest to change well, this through our proof of concept capabilities, we have the ability of starting small. Let's just go in and we can do through this architect modular proven architecture. We could do a starting Well, let's just start with some R F I. D tags and tags and start small. We can deliver the business value and calculate that and extrapolate that out if we apply that to your all your stores and scale fast. So we're making it. This be an on ramp for those retailers because they're saying what I do. I know I need to change, but what do I >>So you do like a test store model, right? Okay. And then what? That's your POC is actual. >>Yeah, And then So I wanna go back a little bit on this whole coyote offering. It's a composite offering, right? It takes a lot of technologies coming together and a lot of SMEs subject matter experts to come in and help you to build a whole solution. And that's where I think our solution is where it's ready to go, where all the pieces have been put together and can be easy from day one. The time to market has been drastically reduced because of this. Right? So we see a lot of value in that. >>So So you're able to say Okay, what kind of target customer? What kind of inventory? What's the cost of it? What's the turn? Take all those business attributes and then say we can map that back into a set of physical and system components that you can scale fast >>really comes around you. Three buckets were doing this to optimize an increase revenue, basket size conversions, everything timed revenue, decrease costs, efficiencies and inventory logistics people, uh, labor. And then providing a much greater experience of brand loyalty, which will also affect both costs and >>capture and capture additional data. So, for example, returns means two things costs, but also, somebody had a problem. >>So, uh, we're out of time, but so summarize kind of where you guys were at, >>uh, your solutions when it's gonna be available, you go to market, give us the >>tickets. That right now we're here at HP discovered we're previewing this connected consumer architecture. We're will deploy it. Calendar quarter one of next year will be the full announcement. We have contact information. We would love to engage in clients and start that discussion now around doing proof of concepts on dhe. We're going to be not only driving this collective retail solution that could be extrapolated into different use. Cases in markets were also continued to drive the Moorman industrial Internet of things and manufacturing offering around predicting maintenance, asset monitoring, maintenance that we talked about in Vegas. >>Great. Well, I hope next next Vegas come back with some examples and some a customer, and we could go through so that one of impact you've had, maybe you'll be through a POC. At that point. I'd >>love to get the cube into one of their poc >>a well loved. All right, guys. Thanks very much for coming on the Cube. All right. Good >>to see you. See? All right. Thanks. Keep it right there, >>buddy. We'll be back with our next guest day. Volonte for Peter Burke alive from Madrid 17.

>> live from the Mandalay Bay Convention Center in Las Vegas. It's the King covering via World 2016 brought to you by IBM Wear and its ecosystem sponsors. Now here's your host stew minimum. Welcome back to the Cube here at VM World 2016. Happy to welcome back to the PO program. Christos Caramel analysts. Who's the fellow in CTO of the V A more storage and availability business unit. Thank you for joining us again. >> About to be buck >> Storage is a big focus here. Big announcements around. Not only the sand, but everything happened in the storage room. Tell us what you've been working on the last year. >> Yeah, quite a few things. As you know, Miss Olsen has become practically mainstream product now, especially since we saved the very same 6.2 back in March 2016 with a number of new enterprise grade features for space efficiency. New availability. Fisher's with the razor calls right 56 The product is really taking off. Taking off, especially in old flask configurations, is becoming the predominant model that our customers are using. So ultimately, of course, customers buy a new product like this on and hyper converts product because of the operational efficiencies and brings to their data centers. The way I present this is you have the personal efficiency off public clouds into your private data center now. But this is for me is thus the stepping stone for even a longer term term, bolder vision will have around the stores, the data management. So, the last several months now, I have been working on a new range of projects. Main theme. There is moving up the stock from stores and the physical infrastructure implications. It has two data management on starting with data protection on overall and managing the life cycle of your data for protection, for disaster recovery, for archival, so that you can have tools to be able to effectively and efficiently discover your data. Mine your data. Use them by new applications, including cloud native applications and a dent even know that this may sound a little controversial coming from Vienna, where sitio even moving your data to public clouds and allow application mobility freely between private public clouds. >> Yeah, it's really interesting and wonder if you can packed out a little bit for us, Veum, where, of course, really dominant, the Enterprise Data Center. We're trying to understand where Veum, where fits into the public cloud on how you cut both support the existing ecosystem and move forward. So, you know, it's interesting off >> course. There are silences. There are many open questions. I do not claim that we have the answers to everything. Everything. But you do see that we put a lot of emphasis on that because it is obvious that the I T world is evolving. Our own customers are gradually slowly, but certainly there start incorporating public clouds into the bigger I T organizations that have. So our goal is to start delivering value to our customers based on clouds, starting with what they have today into the data centers. Let me give you a specific example in the case of Virtual San, who have some really cool tools for Mona's in your infrastructure in a holistic way, computer networking and now stores a SZ part of that you have ah solutions and tools that allow the customer to monitor constantly there covered infrastructure, the configuration of that. The class is the network servers controller's down to individual devices, and we provide a lot of data to the customers, not only for the health but also for the performance off the off the infrastructure data to the customer can today used to perform root cause analysis of potential issues to decide how to optimize there. Infrastructure in the world clothes. But that is actually pretty no sophisticated house. You cannot expect a lot 500 thousands 1000 customers. Of'em were to be ableto do this kind of sophisticate analysis. So what we're working on right now is a set off analytics tools that do all this data Kranz ink and analysis a root cause analysis on DDE evaluation of the infrastructure on because of the customer instead of providing data now we're providing answers and suggestions now way want to be able to deliver those analytics in a very rapid cadence. So what we do is we develop all those things in via Morse. Cloud will collect data from the customer side through telemetry, the emir's phone home product, and we get off the data up in our club. We crunch the data on because of the customer, and we use really sophisticated methods that will be evolving over time and eventually will be delivering feedback and suggestions at a kind level to the customer that can be actionable. For example, weekend point out that certain firm were the 1st 1 off certain controllers, and the infrastructure is falling behind. I may have problems or point out to a certain SS thes uh, a problem getting close to the end off life. For more sophisticated thing. Starts us reconfigure your application with a different policy for data distribution to achieve better performers. The interesting thing is that going to be, you're going to be combining data from must multiple sites, multiple customers to be able to do this holistic analytics and say, You know what? Based on trance, I see. Another customer says. It says You also do that. Now they're really coursing out of this is that the customer does not have to go and use yet another portal on a public cloud to take advantage of that. But they in fact, we send all that feedback through the this fear you. I own premise to the customers, so really cool. So you have the best of both wars. There are big development off analytics using actually behind the senses a really complex cloud native application with the existing tools that the customers are usedto in on premise. So this is just one example >> crystals. Could you give us a little bit of insight as the guiding light for your development process? Do you use that kind of core customers that you're pulling in and working in? Is it a mandate from above that says, you know, Hey, we need to build a more robust and move up the stack. You know, what are some of the pieces that lead to the development that you >> know? This is a very interesting point. I must start by stating that vehement has always bean admitting they're driven company. Um, and look for products were, you know, ideas that were, you know, Martin by engineers, while others thought that was not your not even visible, of course, Mutualization in several stages. But features like the Muslim or stores of emotion Oreo even, you know, ideas kind of ritual, son, right. Claiming that I could do very effectively rate six in software was something that was not really, you know, appreciated in the industrial area stages. So a lot of the innovation is a grassroots innovation. We have our engineers exposed directly to customers customer problems off course. They also understand what is happening in the industry. The trends, whether that is encounter as its case these days with a new generation off first or its cover that is emerging, or where that that is a trend. Samoan customers, for example, using public clouds in certain ways where that is for doing testing dead or archiving their data way. Observe those things and then through a grassroots. Therefore, all this get amalgamated into some concrete ideas. I'm not saying that all those ideas result into products, but we definitely have a very open mind in letting engineers experiment and prove sometimes common sense to be wrong. So this is the process thesis. How Virtual Son started were a couple of us went to our CEO back then for marriage and suggested we do this drastic thing that is called no softer stores on that you can run the soft store of stock in software on the same servers that we visualize, and we're under V. M. So this is really how the process has always been working and this is still the case and we're very proud of this culture. This is one way we're actually tracking opens enduring talent in the competent. >> Yeah, I was loved digging into some of the innovation processes. Had a good chat with Steve Harris, former CEO of GM, where if I remember right? One of the thing processes user called flings, whereas you can actually get visibility from the outside it to some of those kind of trials and things that are going on that aren't yet fully supported yet. >> Absolutely. And that is still the case. Probably the best known fling these days is the HTML five days they you I for your sex, which is used extensively, both internally in the humor where it actually started as a tool for that purpose, but now wild by the community. And that Flynn gave us a lot off insides and how to evolve our mainstream user interface for for this fear, proper notes, Astoria sex. So this is exactly this alternative process that leads us to test the water and feel much more confident when we make bigger and investments in in Ireland, >> right architecturally via Moore has been around for quite a while now. I had a good talk with such a Pagani Who? I m f s earlier today and we were talking about, you know, new applications and new architectures when vms foot fest was built. You know, nobody's thinking about containers. You know, they weren't thinking about applications like duper some of these more cloud native applications. How do you take into consideration where things were going? How did these fit into, you know, kind of traditional VM wear V sphere. You know what things need to change? How do you look at kind of the code basis? >> Right. So first of all of'em affairs, I must say it's probably the most mature and most widely adopted class. The file system in the industry for over 10 years now has been used to visualize enterprise grade store, its stores, alien networks, and it was going to have a role for many years to come. But on the other hand, we all are technologists, and we understand that the product is designed with certain assumptions and constraints, and the EM affairs was designed back in the meat to thousands toe address the requirements for ritual izing lungs, and you know the traditional volumes that you'd be consuming from a disgrace. Now the world is changing, right. We have a whole new generation off solid state devices for stores. Servers on softer on commodity servers with Commodity stores Devices is becoming as your own reports that have been indicating the predominant no mortal of delivering stores in there in the enterprise that the sender and off course in even public clouds with copper scale storage. So what? The requirements there? Some things are changing. You need the store. Its plot from that can really take out the violence of the very low latency is off those devices. I was at Intel Developer for form a couple of weeks ago, and their intel announced for first time performance numbers for the new generation off Envy Me devices obtained that include the three D Chris Point technology under the covers. Latents is at around 10 microseconds, right and Iost per second scruples that are in the several kinds of thousands, if not millions so completely young game changer. And that is not the only company that is coming up with this technology. So you need to invest now in new technologies that can take the can harness the capabilities of this new devices, lightweights protocols like Envy me. In fact, I see envy me as the protocol is not just a protocol to accident device, but I can see a future for that off. Replacing Scott Z into the software start soon, and this is committing specific days. But soon will be sipping a vision off this fear that comes with ritual and via me in the guest visual ization of envy Me. So you can see here where we're heading and envy me, becoming a predominant protocol for the transport and for brutalizing stores. >> Interesting. And we've got a long history of things that start on. The guests Usually then takes a lot of engineering work to get them down to the hyper visor themselves. So, you know, without having to give away too much, is that we see that kind of progression sometime in the future. For some of these new memory, architectures >> certainly certainly are the sex store stock, and this is the stuff that is used by Veum infest by ritual son. It has been designed again for another era off stores. Now we are regarding a lot of these things there, and I cannot disclose too much detail, obviously, but I can tell that it's going to be a very different software stock. Much leaner, much more optimized for local, very fast devices and ultimately envying me is going to be a key technology in this new store stock. >> All right, so just last follow up on that topic. I think about kind of a new memory architectures. What's going on? As of September 7th, Del will acquire TMC. There's the relationship between A. M, C and V M wear. So could we expect some of these new memory technologies impacting things to be something that you'll work even closer with a deli emcee? And >> that is definitely case irrespective off the deal between the emcee and Dell, which, as you said, it's going to be closing. It seems pretty soon. From what I read in the newspapers, >> Michael confirmed, it's finally official. Some of the pathetic ALS. >> Yes, we're moving ahead with this new technologists, and we're working closely with all the partners micro intel and many of the other car vendors that are introducing such technologies to incorporate them into our systems into our software, for example, I see great opportunities for this very fast Cayenne dude owns but still quite expensive technologies to be used, for example, to store meta data. Things like duplication. Costabile is those kind off meta data that have an impact through because of my own verification to the performance that is perceived by the application by moving meta data like that into those tears are going to make a great difference in terms of performance consistent, late and see predictability of the day for the application. Now, thanks to the relations with del Auntie em. See, I can hope that some of these technologies will find their way into several platforms sooner than later. So all of us and our customers would benefit from that. >> All right? What? Christos really appreciate getting the update from you. Lots happening on the storage world. We're kind of talking about. One of my things coming into this this'll week was, if we can really simplify storage, we might actually have a storage. This world doesn't mean it reduces the value of storage or the importance of it, but gonna help the users to be able to move beyond that, we'll be back with lots more coverage here from the emerald 2016. You're watching the Cube. Glad to be here. Whatever. Apply from the Mandalay Bay Convention Center in Las Vegas. It's the King covering via World 2016 brought to you by IBM Wear and its ecosystem sponsors. Now here's your host stew minimum. Welcome back to the Cube here at VM World 2016. Happy to welcome back to the PO program. Christos Caramel analysts. Who's the fellow in CTO of the V A more storage and availability business unit. Thank you for joining us again. >> Glad to be back.