Image Title

Search Results for 10,000 cloud jobs:

Rachel Skaff, AWS | International Women's Day


 

(gentle music) >> Hello, and welcome to theCUBE's coverage of International Women's Day. I'm John Furrier, host of theCUBE. I've got a great guest here, CUBE alumni and very impressive, inspiring, Rachel Mushahwar Skaff, who's a managing director and general manager at AWS. Rachel, great to see you. Thanks for coming on. >> Thank you so much. It's always a pleasure to be here. You all make such a tremendous impact with reporting out what's happening in the tech space, and frankly, investing in topics like this, so thank you. >> It's our pleasure. Your career has been really impressive. You worked at Intel for almost a decade, and that company is very tech, very focused on Moore's law, cadence of technology power in the industry. Now at AWS, powering next-generation cloud. What inspired you to get into tech? How did you get here and how have you approached your career journey, because it's quite a track record? >> Wow, how long do we have? (Rachel and John laugh) >> John: We can go as long as you want. (laughs) It's great. >> You know, all joking aside, I think at the end of the day, it's about this simple statement. If you don't get goosebumps every single morning that you're waking up to do your job, it's not good enough. And that's a bit about how I've made all of the different career transitions that I have. You know, everything from building out data centers around the world, to leading network and engineering teams, to leading applications teams, to going and working for, you know, the largest semiconductor in the world, and now at AWS, every single one of those opportunities gave me goosebumps. And I was really focused on how do I surround myself with humans that are better than I am, smarter than I am, companies that plan in decades, but live in moments, companies that invest in their employees and create like artists? And frankly, for me, being part of a company where people know that life is finite, but they want to make an infinite impact, that's a bit about my career journey in a nutshell. >> Yeah. What's interesting is that, you know, over the years, a lot's changed, and a theme that we're hearing from leaders now that are heading up large teams and running companies, they have, you know, they have 20-plus years of experience under their belt and they look back and they say, "Wow, "things have changed and it's changing faster now, "hopefully faster to get change." But they all talk about confidence and they talk about curiosity and building. When did you know that this was going to be something that you got the goosebumps? And were there blockers in your way and how did you handle that? (Rachel laughs) >> There's always blockers in our way, and I think a lot of people don't actually talk about the blockers. I think they make it sound like, hey, I had this plan from day one, and every decision I've made has been perfect. And for me, I'll tell you, right, there are moments in your life that mark a differentiation and those moments that you realize nothing will be the same. And time is kind of divided into two parts, right, before this moment and after this moment. And that's everything from, before I had kids, that's a pretty big moment in people's lives, to after I had kids, and how do you work through some of those opportunities? Before I got married, before I got divorced. Before I went to this company, after I left this company. And I think the key for all of those is just having an insatiable curiosity around how do you continue to do better, create better and make better? And I'll tell you, those blockers, they exist. Coming back from maternity leave, hard. Coming back from a medical leave, hard. Coming back from caring for a sick parent or a sick friend, hard. But all of those things start to help craft who you are as a human being, not as a leader, but as a human being, and allows you to have some empathy with the people that you surround yourself with, right? And for me, it's, (sighs) you can think about these blockers in one of two ways. You can think about it as, you know, every single time that you're tempted to react in the same way to a blocker, you can be a prisoner of your past, or you can change how you react and be a pioneer of the future. It's not a blocker when you think about it in those terms. >> Mindset matters, and that's really a great point. You brought up something that's interesting, I want to bring this up. Some of the challenges in different stages of our lives. You know, one thing that's come out of this set of interviews, this, of day and in conversations is, that I haven't heard before, is the result of COVID, working at home brought empathy about people's personal lives to the table. That came up in a couple interviews. What's your reaction to that? Because that highlights that we're human, to your point of view. >> It does. It does. And I'm so thankful that you don't ask about balance because that is a pet peeve of mine, because there is no such thing as balance. If you're in perfect balance, you are not moving and you're not changing. But when you think about, you know, the impact of COVID and how the world has changed since that, it has allowed all of us to really think about, you know, what do we want to do versus what do we have to do? And I think so many times, in both our professional lives and our personal lives, we get caught up in doing what we think we have to do to get ahead versus taking a step back and saying, "Hey, what do I want to do? "And how do I become a, you know, "a better human?" And many times, John, I'm asked, "Hey, "how do you define success or achievement?" And, you know, my answer is really, for me, the greatest results that I've achieved, both personally and professionally, is when I eliminate the word success and balance from my vocabulary, and replace them with two words: What's my contribution and what's my impact? Those things make a difference, regardless of gender. And I'll tell you, none of it is easy, ever. I think all of us have been broken, we've been stretched, we've been burnt out. But I also think what we have to talk about as leaders in the industry is how we've also found endurance and resilience. And when we felt unsteady, we've continued to go forward, right? When we can't decide, the best answer is do what's uncomfortable. And all of those things really stemmed from a part of what happened with COVID. >> Yeah, yeah, I love the uncomfortable and the balance highlight. You mentioned being off balance. That means you're growing, you're not standing still. I want to get your thoughts on this because one thing that has come out again this year, and last year as well, is having a team with you when you do it. So if you're off balance and you're going to stretch, if you have a good team with you, that's where people help each other. Not just pick them up, but like maybe get 'em back on track again. So, but if you're solo, you fall, (laughs) you fall harder. So what's your reaction to that? 'Cause this has come up, and this comes up in team building, workforce formation, goal setting, contribution. What's your reaction to that? >> So my reaction to that that is pretty simple. Nobody gets there on their own at all, right? Passion and ambition can only take you so far. You've got to have people and teams that are supporting you. And here's the funny thing about people, and frankly, about being a leader that I think is really important: People don't follow for you. People follow for who you help them become. Think about that for a second. And when you think about all the amazing things that companies and teams are able to do, it's because of those people. And it's because you have leaders that are out there, inspiring them to take what they believe is impossible and turn it into the possible. That's the power of teams. >> Can you give an example of your approach on how you do that? How do you build your teams? How do you grow them? How do you lead them effectively and also make 'em inclusive, diverse and equitable? >> Whew. I'll give you a great example of some work that we're doing at AWS. This year at re:Invent, for the first time in its history, we've launched an initiative with theCUBE called Women of the Cloud. And part of Women of the Cloud is highlighting the business impact that so many of our partners, our customers and our employees have had on the social, on the economic and on the financials of many companies. They just haven't had the opportunity to tell their story. And at Amazon, right, it is absolutely integral to us to highlight those examples and continue to extend that ethos to our partners and our customers. And I think one of the things that I shared with you at re:Invent was, you know, as U2's Bono put it, (John laughs) "We'll build it better than we did before "and we are the people "that we've been waiting for." So if we're not out there, advocating and highlighting all the amazing things that other women are doing in the ecosystem, who will? >> Well, I've got to say, I want to give you props for that program. Not only was it groundbreaking, it's still running strong. And I saw some things on LinkedIn that were really impressive in its network effect. And I met at least half a dozen new people I never would have met before through some of that content interaction and engagement. And this is like the power of the current world. I mean, getting the voices out there creates momentum. And it's good for Amazon. It's not just personal brand building for my next job or whatever, you know, reason. It's sharing and it's attracting others, and it's causing people to connect and meet each other in that world. So it's still going strong. (laughs) And this program we did last year was part of Rachel Thornton, who's now at MessageBird, and Mary Camarata. They were the sponsors for this International Women's Day. They're not there anymore, so we decided we're going to do it again because the impact is so significant. We had the Amazon Education group on. It's amazing and it's free, and we've got to get the word out. I mean, talk about leveling up fast. You get in and you get trained and get certified, and there's a zillion jobs out (laughs) there in cloud, right, and partners. So this kind of leadership is really important. What was the key learnings that you've taken away and how do you extend this opportunity to nurture the talent out there in the field? Because when you throw the content out there from great leaders and practitioners and developers, it attracts other people. >> It does. It does. So look, I think there's two types of people, people that are focused on being and people who are focused on doing. And let me give you an example, right? When we think about labels of, hey, Rachel's a female executive who launched Women of the Cloud, that label really limits me. I'd rather just be a great executive. Or, hey, there's a great entrepreneur. Let's not be a great entrepreneur. Just go build something and sell it. And that's part of this whole Women of the cloud, is I don't want people focused on what their label is. I want people sharing their stories about what they're doing, and that's where the lasting impact happens, right? I think about something that my grandmother used to tell me, and she used to tell me, "Rachel, how successful "you are, doesn't matter. "The lasting impact that you have "is your legacy in this very finite time "that you have on Earth. "Leave a legacy." And that's what Women of the Cloud is about. So that people can start to say, "Oh, geez, "I didn't know that that was possible. "I didn't think about my career in that way." And, you know, all of those different types of stories that you're hearing out there. >> And I want to highlight something you said. We had another Amazonian on the program for this day earlier and she coined a term, 'cause inside Amazon, you have common language. One of them is bar raising. Raise the bar, that's an Amazonian (Rachel laughs) term. It means contribute and improve and raise the bar of capability. She said, "Bar raising is gender neutral. "The bar is a bar." And I'm like, wow, that was amazing. Now, that means your contribution angle there highlights that. What's the biggest challenge to get that mindset set in culture, in these- >> Oh. >> 'Cause it's that simple, contribution is neutral. >> It absolutely is neutral, but it's like I said earlier, I think so many times, people are focused on success and being a great leader versus what's the contribution I'm making and how am I doing as a leader, you know? And when it comes to a lot of the leadership principles that Amazon has, including bar raising, which means insisting on the highest standards, and then those standards continue to raise every single time. And what that is all about is having all of our employees figure out, how do I get better every single day, right? That's what it's about. It's not about being better than the peer next to you. It's about how do I become a better leader, a better human being than I was yesterday? >> Awesome. >> You know, I read this really cute quote and I think it really resonates. "You meditate to upgrade your software "and you work out to upgrade your hardware." And while it's important that we're all ourselves at work, we can't deny that a lot of times, ourselves still need that meditation or that workout. >> Well, I hope I don't have any zero days in my software out there, so, but I'm going to definitely work on that. I love that quote. I'm going to use that. Thank you very much. That was awesome. I got to ask you, I know you're really passionate about, and we've talked about this, around, so you're a great leader but you're also focused on what's behind you in the generation, pipelining women leaders, okay? Seats at the table, mentoring and sponsorship. What can we do to build a strong pipeline of leaders in technology and business? And where do you see the biggest opportunity to nurture the talent in these fields? >> Hmm, you know, that's great, great question. And, you know, I just read a "Forbes" article by another Amazonian, Tanuja Randery, who talked about, you know, some really interesting stats. And one of the stats that she shared was, you know, by 2030, less than 25% of tech specialists will be female, less than 25%. That's only a 6% growth from where we are in 2023, so in seven years. That's alarming. So we've really got to figure out what are the kinds of things that we're going to go do from an Amazon perspective to impact that? And one of the obvious starting points is showcasing tech careers to girls and young women, and talking openly about what a technology career looks like. So specifically at Amazon, we've got an AWS Git IT program that helps schools and educators bring in tech role models to show them what potential careers look like in tech. I think that's one great way that we can help build the pipeline, but once we get the pipeline, we also have to figure out how we don't let that pipeline leak. Meaning how do we keep women and, you know, young women on their tech career? And I think big part of that, John, is really talking about how hard it is, but it's also greater than you can ever imagine. And letting them see executives that are very authentic and will talk about, geez, you know, the challenges of COVID were a time of crisis and accelerated change, and here's what it meant to me personally and here's what we were able to solve professionally. These younger generations are all about social impact, they're about economic impact and they're about financial impact. And if we're not talking about all three of those, both from how AWS is leading from the front, but how its executives are also taking that into their personal lives, they're not going to want to go into tech. >> Yeah, and I think one of the things you mentioned there about getting people that get IT, good call out there, but also, Amazon's going to train 30 million people, put hundreds of millions of dollars into education. And not only are they making it easier to get in to get trained, but once you're in, even savvy folks that are in there still have to accelerate. And there's more ways to level up, more things are happening, but there's a big trend around people changing careers either in their late 20s, early 30s, or even those moments you talk about, where it's before and after, even later in the careers, 40s, 50s. Leaders like, well, good experience, good training, who were in another discipline who re-skilled. So you have, you know, more certifications coming in. So there's still other pivot points in the pipeline. It's not just down here. And that, I find that interesting. Are you seeing that same leadership opportunities coming in where someone can come into tech older? >> Absolutely. You know, we've got some amazing programs, like Amazon Returnity, that really focuses on how do we get other, you know, how do we get women that have taken some time off of work to get back into the workforce? And here's the other thing about switching careers. If I look back on my career, I started out as a civil engineer, heavy highway construction. And now I lead a sales team at the largest cloud company in the world. And there were, you know, twists and turns around there. I've always focused on how do we change and how do we continue to evolve? So it's not just focused on, you know, young women in the pipeline. It's focused on all gender and all diverse types throughout their career, and making sure that we're providing an inclusive environment for them to bring in their unique skillsets. >> Yeah, a building has good steel. It's well structured. Roads have great foundations. You know, you got the builder in you there. >> Yes. >> So I have to ask you, what's on your mind as a tech athlete, as an executive at AWS? You know, you got your huge team, big goals, the economy's got a little bit of a headwind, but still, cloud's transforming, edge is exploding. What's your outlook as you look out in the tech landscape these days and how are you thinking about it? What your plans? Can you share a little bit about what's on your mind? >> Sure. So, geez, there's so many trends that are top of mind right now. Everything from zero trust to artificial intelligence to security. We have more access to data now than ever before. So the opportunities are limitless when we think about how we can apply technology to solve some really difficult customer problems, right? Innovation sometimes feels like it's happening at a rapid pace. And I also say, you know, there are years when nothing happens, and then there's years when centuries happen. And I feel like we're kind of in those years where centuries are happening. Cloud technologies are refining sports as we know them now. There's a surge of innovation in smart energy. Everyone's supply chain is looking to transform. Custom silicon is going mainstream. And frankly, AWS's customers and partners are expecting us to come to them with a point of view on trends and on opportunities. And that's what differentiates us. (John laughs) That's what gives me goosebumps- >> I was just going to ask you that. Does that give you goosebumps? How could you not love technology with that excitement? I mean, AI, throw in AI, too. I just talked to Swami, who heads up the AI and database, and we just talked about the past 24 months, the change. And that is a century moment happening. The large language models, computer vision, more compute. Compute's booming than ever before. Who thought that was going to happen, is still happening? Massive change. So, I mean, if you're in tech, how can you not love tech? >> I know, even if you're not in tech, I think you've got to start to love tech because it gives you access to things you've never had before. And frankly, right, change is the only constant. And if you don't like change, you're going to like being irrelevant even less than you like change. So we've got to be nimble, we've got to adapt. And here's the great thing, once we figure it out, it changes all over again. And it's not something that's easy for any of us to operate. It's hard, right? It's hard learning new technology, it's hard figuring out what do I do next? But here's the secret. I think it's hard because we're doing it right. It's not hard because we're doing it wrong. It's just hard to be human and it's hard to figure out how we apply all this different technology in a way that positively impacts us, you know, economically, financially, environmentally and socially. >> And everyone's different, too. So you got to live those (mumbles). I want to get one more question in before we, my last question, which is about you and your impact. When you talk to your team, your sales, you got a large sales team, North America. And Tanuja, who you mentioned, is in EMEA, we're going to speak with her as well. You guys lead the front lines, helping customers, but also delivering the revenue to the company, which has been fantastic, by the way. So what's your message to the troops and the team out there? When you say, "Take that hill," like what is the motivational pitch, in a few sentences? What's the main North Star message in today's marketplace when you're doing that big team meeting? >> I don't know if it's just limited to a team meeting. I think this is a universal message, and the universal message for me is find your edge, whatever that may be. Whether it is the edge of what you know about artificial intelligence and neural networks or it's the edge of how do we migrate our applications to the cloud more quickly. Or it's the edge of, oh, my gosh, how do I be a better parent and still be great at work, right? Find your edge, and then sharpen it. Go to the brink of what you think is possible, and then force yourself to jump. Get involved. The world is run by the people that show up, professionally and personally. (John laughs) So show up and get started. >> Yeah as Steve Jobs once said, "The future "that everyone looks at was created "by people no smarter than you." And I love that quote. That's really there. Final question for you. I know we're tight on time, but I want to get this in. When you think about your impact on your company, AWS, and the industry, what's something you want people to remember? >> Oh, geez. I think what I want people to remember the most is it's not about what you've said, and this is a Maya Angelou quote. "It's not about what you've said to people "or what you've done, "it's about how you've made them feel." And we can all think back on leaders or we can all think back on personal moments in our lives where we felt like we belonged, where we felt like we did something amazing, where we felt loved. And those are the moments that sit with us for the rest of our lives. I want people to remember how they felt when they were part of something bigger. I want people to belong. It shouldn't be uncommon to talk about feelings at work. So I want people to feel. >> Rachel, thank you for your time. I know you're really busy and we stretched you a little bit there. Thank you so much for contributing to this wonderful day of great leaders sharing their stories. And you're an inspiration. Thanks for everything you do. We appreciate you. >> Thank you. And let's go do some more Women of the Cloud videos. >> We (laughs) got more coming. Bring those stories on. Back up the story truck. We're ready to go. Thanks so much. >> That's good. >> Thank you. >> Okay, this is theCUBE's coverage of International Women's Day. It's not just going to be March 8th. That's the big celebration day. It's going to be every quarter, more stories coming. Stay tuned at siliconangle.com and thecube.net here, with bringing all the stories. I'm John Furrier, your host. Thanks for watching. (gentle music)

Published Date : Mar 6 2023

SUMMARY :

and very impressive, inspiring, Thank you so much. and how have you approached long as you want. to going and working for, you know, and how did you handle that? and how do you work through Some of the challenges in And I'm so thankful that you don't ask and the balance highlight. And it's because you have leaders that I shared with you at re:Invent and how do you extend this opportunity And let me give you an example, right? and raise the bar of capability. contribution is neutral. than the peer next to you. "and you work out to And where do you see And one of the stats that she shared the things you mentioned there And there were, you know, twists You know, you got the and how are you thinking about it? And I also say, you know, I was just going to ask you that. And if you don't like change, And Tanuja, who you mentioned, is in EMEA, of what you know about And I love that quote. And we can all think back on leaders Rachel, thank you for your time. Women of the Cloud videos. We're ready to go. It's not just going to be March 8th.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
TelcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

RachelPERSON

0.99+

Tim CookPERSON

0.99+

Jeff FrickPERSON

0.99+

TelcosORGANIZATION

0.99+

Tanuja RanderyPERSON

0.99+

Rachel ThorntonPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

NayakiPERSON

0.99+

SanjayPERSON

0.99+

Peter BurrisPERSON

0.99+

2014DATE

0.99+

FordORGANIZATION

0.99+

TanujaPERSON

0.99+

Rachel SkaffPERSON

0.99+

Todd SkidmorePERSON

0.99+

NokiaORGANIZATION

0.99+

BarcelonaLOCATION

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

AustraliaLOCATION

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

Bob StefanskiPERSON

0.99+

Steve JobsPERSON

0.99+

Tom JoycePERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

Laura CooneyPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

ToddPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

2011DATE

0.99+

Mary CamarataPERSON

0.99+

Meg WhitmanPERSON

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

TeslaORGANIZATION

0.99+

BlackberryORGANIZATION

0.99+

Coca-ColaORGANIZATION

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

Sanjay SrivastavaPERSON

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

BMC SoftwareORGANIZATION

0.99+

U.S.LOCATION

0.99+

SiriTITLE

0.99+

BMCORGANIZATION

0.99+

HPORGANIZATION

0.99+

MotorolaORGANIZATION

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

SamsungORGANIZATION

0.99+

Mihir ShuklaPERSON

0.99+

2023DATE

0.99+

Nayaki NayyarPERSON

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Rachel Mushahwar SkaffPERSON

0.99+

6%QUANTITY

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Share A CokeORGANIZATION

0.99+

Chris Jones, Platform9 | Finding your "Just Right” path to Cloud Native


 

(upbeat music) >> Hi everyone. Welcome back to this Cube conversation here in Palo Alto, California. I'm John Furrier, host of "theCUBE." Got a great conversation around Cloud Native, Cloud Native Journey, how enterprises are looking at Cloud Native and putting it all together. And it comes down to operations, developer productivity, and security. It's the hottest topic in technology. We got Chris Jones here in the studio, director of Product Management for Platform9. Chris, thanks for coming in. >> Hey, thanks. >> So when we always chat about, when we're at KubeCon. KubeConEU is coming up and in a few, in a few months, the number one conversation is developer productivity. And the developers are driving all the standards. It's interesting to see how they just throw everything out there and whatever gets adopted ends up becoming the standard, not the old school way of kind of getting stuff done. So that's cool. Security Kubernetes and Containers are all kind of now that next level. So you're starting to see the early adopters moving to the mainstream. Enterprises, a variety of different approaches. You guys are at the center of this. We've had a couple conversations with your CEO and your tech team over there. What are you seeing? You're building the products. What's the core product focus right now for Platform9? What are you guys aiming for? >> The core is that blend of enabling your infrastructure and PlatformOps or DevOps teams to be able to go fast and run in a stable environment, but at the same time enable developers. We don't want people going back to what I've been calling Shadow IT 2.0. It's, hey, I've been told to do something. I kicked off this Container initiative. I need to run my software somewhere. I'm just going to go figure it out. We want to keep those people productive. At the same time we want to enable velocity for our operations teams, be it PlatformOps or DevOps. >> Take us through in your mind and how you see the industry rolling out this Cloud Native journey. Where do you see customers out there? Because DevOps have been around, DevSecOps is rocking, you're seeing AI, hot trend now. Developers are still in charge. Is there a change to the infrastructure of how developers get their coding done and the infrastructure, setting up the DevOps is key, but when you add the Cloud Native journey for an enterprise, what changes? What is the, what is the, I guess what is the Cloud Native journey for an enterprise these days? >> The Cloud Native journey or the change? When- >> Let's start with the, let's start with what they want to do. What's the goal and then how does that happen? >> I think the goal is that promise land. Increased resiliency, better scalability, and overall reduced costs. I've gone from physical to virtual that gave me a higher level of density, packing of resources. I'm moving to Containers. I'm removing that OS layer again. I'm getting a better density again, but all of a sudden I'm running Kubernetes. What does that, what does that fundamentally do to my operations? Does it magically give me scalability and resiliency? Or do I need to change what I'm running and how it's running so it fits that infrastructure? And that's the reality, is you can't just take a Container and drop it into Kubernetes and say, hey, I'm now Cloud Native. I've got reduced cost, or I've got better resiliency. There's things that your engineering teams need to do to make sure that application is a Cloud Native. And then there's what I think is one of the largest shifts of virtual machines to containers. When I was in the world of application performance monitoring, we would see customers saying, well, my engineering team have this Java app, and they said it needs a VM with 12 gig of RAM and eight cores, and that's what we gave it. But it's running slow. I'm working with the application team and you can see it's running slow. And they're like, well, it's got all of its resources. One of those nice features of virtualization is over provisioning. So the infrastructure team would say, well, we gave it, we gave it all a RAM it needed. And what's wrong with that being over provisioned? It's like, well, Java expects that RAM to be there. Now all of a sudden, when you move to the world of containers, what we've got is that's not a set resource limit, really is like it used to be in a VM, right? When you set it for a container, your application teams really need to be paying attention to your resource limits and constraints within the world of Kubernetes. So instead of just being able to say, hey, I'm throwing over the fence and now it's just going to run on a VM, and that VMs got everything it needs. It's now really running on more, much more of a shared infrastructure where limits and constraints are going to impact the neighbors. They are going to impact who's making that decision around resourcing. Because that Kubernetes concept of over provisioning and the virtualization concept of over provisioning are not the same. So when I look at this problem, it's like, well, what changed? Well, I'll do my scale tests as an application developer and tester, and I'd see what resources it needs. I asked for that in the VM, that sets the high watermark, job's done. Well, Kubernetes, it's no longer a VM, it's a Kubernetes manifest. And well, who owns that? Who's writing it? Who's setting those limits? To me, that should be the application team. But then when it goes into operations world, they're like, well, that's now us. Can we change those? So it's that amalgamation of the two that is saying, I'm a developer. I used to pay attention, but now I need to pay attention. And an infrastructure person saying, I used to just give 'em what they wanted, but now I really need to know what they've wanted, because it's going to potentially have a catastrophic impact on what I'm running. >> So what's the impact for the developer? Because, infrastructure's code is what everybody wants. The developer just wants to get the code going and they got to pay attention to all these things, or don't they? Is that where you guys come in? How do you guys see the problem? Actually scope the problem that you guys solve? 'Cause I think you're getting at I think the core issue here, which is, I've got Kubernetes, I've got containers, I've got developer productivity that I want to focus on. What's the problem that you guys solve? >> Platform operation teams that are adopting Cloud Native in their environment, they've got that steep learning curve of Kubernetes plus this fundamental change of how an app runs. What we're doing is taking away the burden of needing to operate and run Kubernetes and giving them the choice of the flexibility of infrastructure and location. Be that an air gap environment like a, let's say a telco provider that needs to run a containerized network function and containerized workloads for 5G. That's one thing that we can deploy and achieve in a completely inaccessible environment all the way through to Platform9 running traditionally as SaaS, as we were born, that's remotely managing and controlling your Kubernetes environments on-premise AWS. That hybrid cloud experience that could be also Bare Metal, but it's our platform running your environments with our support there, 24 by seven, that's proactively reaching out. So it's removing a lot of that burden and the complications that come along with operating the environment and standing it up, which means all of a sudden your DevOps and platform operations teams can go and work with your engineers and application developers and say, hey, let's get, let's focus on the stuff that, that we need to be focused on, which is running our business and providing a service to our customers. Not figuring out how to upgrade a Kubernetes cluster, add new nodes, and configure all of the low level. >> I mean there are, that's operations that just needs to work. And sounds like as they get into the Cloud Native kind of ops, there's a lot of stuff that kind of goes wrong. Or you go, oops, what do we buy into? Because the CIOs, let's go, let's go Cloud Native. We want to, we got to get set up for the future. We're going to be Cloud Native, not just lift and shift and we're going to actually build it out right. Okay, that sounds good. And when we have to actually get done. >> Chris: Yeah. >> You got to spin things up and stand up the infrastructure. What specifically use case do you guys see that emerges for Platform9 when people call you up and you go talk to customers and prospects? What's the one thing or use case or cases that you guys see that you guys solve the best? >> So I think one of the, one of the, I guess new use cases that are coming up now, everyone's talking about economic pressures. I think the, the tap blows open, just get it done. CIO is saying let's modernize, let's use the cloud. Now all of a sudden they're recognizing, well wait, we're spending a lot of money now. We've opened that tap all the way, what do we do? So now they're looking at ways to control that spend. So we're seeing that as a big emerging trend. What we're also sort of seeing is people looking at their data centers and saying, well, I've got this huge legacy environment that's running a hypervisor. It's running VMs. Can we still actually do what we need to do? Can we modernize? Can we start this Cloud Native journey without leaving our data centers, our co-locations? Or if I do want to reduce costs, is that that thing that says maybe I'm repatriating or doing a reverse migration? Do I have to go back to my data center or are there other alternatives? And we're seeing that trend a lot. And our roadmap and what we have in the product today was specifically built to handle those, those occurrences. So we brought in KubeVirt in terms of virtualization. We have a long legacy doing OpenStack and private clouds. And we've worked with a lot of those users and customers that we have and asked the questions, what's important? And today, when we look at the world of Cloud Native, you can run virtualization within Kubernetes. So you can, instead of running two separate platforms, you can have one. So all of a sudden, if you're looking to modernize, you can start on that new infrastructure stack that can run anywhere, Kubernetes, and you can start bringing VMs over there as you are containerizing at the same time. So now you can keep your application operations in one environment. And this also helps if you're trying to reduce costs. If you really are saying, we put that Dev environment in AWS, we've got a huge amount of velocity out of it now, can we do that elsewhere? Is there a co-location we can go to? Is there a provider that we can go to where we can run that infrastructure or run the Kubernetes, but not have to run the infrastructure? >> It's going to be interesting too, when you see the Edge come online, you start, we've got Mobile World Congress coming up, KubeCon events we're going to be at, the conversation is not just about public cloud. And you guys obviously solve a lot of do-it-yourself implementation hassles that emerge when people try to kind of stand up their own environment. And we hear from developers consistency between code, managing new updates, making sure everything is all solid so they can go fast. That's the goal. And that, and then people can get standardized on that. But as you get public cloud and do it yourself, kind of brings up like, okay, there's some gaps there as the architecture changes to be more distributed computing, Edge, on-premises cloud, it's cloud operations. So that's cool for DevOps and Cloud Native. How do you guys differentiate from say, some the public cloud opportunities and the folks who are doing it themselves? How do you guys fit in that world and what's the pitch or what's the story? >> The fit that we look at is that third alternative. Let's get your team focused on what's high value to your business and let us deliver that public cloud experience on your infrastructure or in the public cloud, which gives you that ability to still be flexible if you want to make choices to run consistently for your developers in two different locations. So as I touched on earlier, instead of saying go figure out Kubernetes, how do you upgrade a hundred worker nodes in place upgrade. We've solved that problem. That's what we do every single day of the week. Don't go and try to figure out how to upgrade a cluster and then upgrade all of the, what I call Kubernetes friends, your core DNSs, your metrics server, your Kubernetes dashboard. These are all things that we package, we test, we version. So when you click upgrade, we've already handled that entire process. So it's saying don't have your team focused on that lower level piece of work. Get them focused on what is important, which is your business services. >> Yeah, the infrastructure and getting that stood up. I mean, I think the thing that's interesting, if you look at the market right now, you mentioned cost savings and recovery, obviously kind of a recession. I mean, people are tightening their belts for sure. I don't think the digital transformation and Cloud Native spend is going to plummet. It's going to probably be on hold and be squeezed a little bit. But to your point, people are refactoring looking at how to get the best out of what they got. It's not just open the tap of spend the cash like it used to be. Yeah, a couple months, even a couple years ago. So okay, I get that. But then you look at the what's coming, AI. You're seeing all the new data infrastructure that's coming. The containers, Kubernetes stuff, got to get stood up pretty quickly and it's got to be reliable. So to your point, the teams need to get done with this and move on to the next thing. >> Chris: Yeah, yeah, yeah. >> 'Cause there's more coming. I mean, there's a lot coming for the apps that are building in Data Native, AI-Native, Cloud Native. So it seems that this Kubernetes thing needs to get solved. Is that kind of what you guys are focused on right now? >> So, I mean to use a customer, we have a customer that's in AI/ML and they run their platform at customer sites and that's hardware bound. You can't run AI machine learning on anything anywhere. Well, with Platform9 they can. So we're enabling them to deliver services into their customers that's running their AI/ML platform in their customer's data centers anywhere in the world on hardware that is purpose-built for running that workload. They're not Kubernetes experts. That's what we are. We're bringing them that ability to focus on what's important and just delivering their business services whilst they're enabling our team. And our 24 by seven proactive management are always on assurance to keep that up and running for them. So when something goes bump at the night at 2:00am, our guys get woken up. They're the ones that are reaching out to the customer saying, your environments have a problem, we're taking these actions to fix it. Obviously sometimes, especially if it is running on Bare Metal, there's things you can't do remotely. So you might need someone to go and do that. But even when that happens, you're not by yourself. You're not sitting there like I did when I worked for a bank in one of my first jobs, three o'clock in the morning saying, wow, our end of day processing is stuck. Who else am I waking up? Right? >> Exactly, yeah. Got to get that cash going. But this is a great use case. I want to get to the customer. What do some of the successful customers say to you for the folks watching that aren't yet a customer of Platform9, what are some of the accolades and comments or anecdotes that you guys hear from customers that you have? >> It just works, which I think is probably one of the best ones you can get. Customers coming back and being able to show to their business that they've delivered growth, like business growth and productivity growth and keeping their organization size the same. So we started on our containerization journey. We went to Kubernetes. We've deployed all these new workloads and our operations team is still six people. We're doing way more with growth less, and I think that's also talking to the strength that we're bringing, 'cause we're, we're augmenting that team. They're spending less time on the really low level stuff and automating a lot of the growth activity that's involved. So when it comes to being able to grow their business, they can just focus on that, not- >> Well you guys do the heavy lifting, keep on top of the Kubernetes, make sure that all the versions are all done. Everything's stable and consistent so they can go on and do the build out and provide their services. That seems to be what you guys are best at. >> Correct, correct. >> And so what's on the roadmap? You have the product, direct product management, you get the keys to the kingdom. What is, what is the focus? What's your focus right now? Obviously Kubernetes is growing up, Containers. We've been hearing a lot at the last KubeCon about the security containers is getting better. You've seen verification, a lot more standards around some things. What are you focused on right now for at a product over there? >> Edge is a really big focus for us. And I think in Edge you can look at it in two ways. The mantra that I drive is Edge must be remote. If you can't do something remotely at the Edge, you are using a human being, that's not Edge. Our Edge management capabilities and being in the market for over two years are a hundred percent remote. You want to stand up a store, you just ship the server in there, it gets racked, the rest of it's remote. Imagine a store manager in, I don't know, KFC, just plugging in the server, putting in the ethernet cable, pressing the power button. The rest of all that provisioning for that Cloud Native stack, Kubernetes, KubeVirt for virtualization is done remotely. So we're continuing to focus on that. The next piece that is related to that is allowing people to run Platform9 SaaS in their data centers. So we do ag app today and we've had a really strong focus on telecommunications and the containerized network functions that come along with that. So this next piece is saying, we're bringing what we run as SaaS into your data center, so then you can run it. 'Cause there are many people out there that are saying, we want these capabilities and we want everything that the Platform9 control plane brings and simplifies. But unfortunately, regulatory compliance reasons means that we can't leverage SaaS. So they might be using a cloud, but they're saying that's still our infrastructure. We're still closed that network down, or they're still on-prem. So they're two big priorities for us this year. And that on-premise experiences is paramount, even to the point that we will be delivering a way that when you run an on-premise, you can still say, wait a second, well I can send outbound alerts to Platform9. So their support team can still be proactively helping me as much as they could, even though I'm running Platform9s control plane. So it's sort of giving that blend of two experiences. They're big, they're big priorities. And the third pillar is all around virtualization. It's saying if you have economic pressures, then I think it's important to look at what you're spending today and realistically say, can that be reduced? And I think hypervisors and virtualization is something that should be looked at, because if you can actually reduce that spend, you can bring in some modernization at the same time. Let's take some of those nos that exist that are two years into their five year hardware life cycle. Let's turn that into a Cloud Native environment, which is enabling your modernization in place. It's giving your engineers and application developers the new toys, the new experiences, and then you can start running some of those virtualized workloads with KubeVirt, there. So you're reducing cost and you're modernizing at the same time with your existing infrastructure. >> You know Chris, the topic of this content series that we're doing with you guys is finding the right path, trusting the right path to Cloud Native. What does that mean? I mean, if you had to kind of summarize that phrase, trusting the right path to Cloud Native, what does that mean? It mean in terms of architecture, is it deployment? Is it operations? What's the underlying main theme of that quote? What's the, what's? How would you talk to a customer and say, what does that mean if someone said, "Hey, what does that right path mean?" >> I think the right path means focusing on what you should be focusing on. I know I've said it a hundred times, but if your entire operations team is trying to figure out the nuts and bolts of Kubernetes and getting three months into a journey and discovering, ah, I need Metrics Server to make something function. I want to use Horizontal Pod Autoscaler or Vertical Pod Autoscaler and I need this other thing, now I need to manage that. That's not the right path. That's literally learning what other people have been learning for the last five, seven years that have been focused on Kubernetes solely. So the why- >> There's been a lot of grind. People have been grinding it out. I mean, that's what you're talking about here. They've been standing up the, when Kubernetes started, it was all the promise. >> Chris: Yep. >> And essentially manually kind of getting in in the weeds and configuring it. Now it's matured up. They want stability. >> Chris: Yeah. >> Not everyone can get down and dirty with Kubernetes. It's not something that people want to generally do unless you're totally into it, right? Like I mean, I mean ops teams, I mean, yeah. You know what I mean? It's not like it's heavy lifting. Yeah, it's important. Just got to get it going. >> Yeah, I mean if you're deploying with Platform9, your Ops teams can tinker to their hearts content. We're completely compliant upstream Kubernetes. You can go and change an API server flag, let's go and mess with the scheduler, because we want to. You can still do that, but don't, don't have your team investing in all this time to figure it out. It's been figured out. >> John: Got it. >> Get them focused on enabling velocity for your business. >> So it's not build, but run. >> Chris: Correct? >> Or run Kubernetes, not necessarily figure out how to kind of get it all, consume it out. >> You know we've talked to a lot of customers out there that are saying, "I want to be able to deliver a service to my users." Our response is, "Cool, let us run it. You consume it, therefore deliver it." And we're solving that in one hit versus figuring out how to first run it, then operate it, then turn that into a consumable service. >> So the alternative Platform9 is what? They got to do it themselves or use the Cloud or what's the, what's the alternative for the customer for not using Platform9? Hiring more people to kind of work on it? What's the? >> People, building that kind of PaaS experience? Something that I've been very passionate about for the past year is looking at that world of sort of GitOps and what that means. And if you go out there and you sort of start asking the question what's happening? Just generally with Kubernetes as well and GitOps in that scope, then you'll hear some people saying, well, I'm making it PaaS, because Kubernetes is too complicated for my developers and we need to give them something. There's some great material out there from the likes of Intuit and Adobe where for two big contributors to Argo and the Argo projects, they almost have, well they do have, different experiences. One is saying, we went down the PaaS route and it failed. The other one is saying, well we've built a really stable PaaS and it's working. What are they trying to do? They're trying to deliver an outcome to make it easy to use and consume Kubernetes. So you could go out there and say, hey, I'm going to build a Kubernetes cluster. Sounds like Argo CD is a great way to expose that to my developers so they can use Kubernetes without having to use Kubernetes and start automating things. That is an approach, but you're going to be going completely open source and you're going to have to bring in all the individual components, or you could just lay that, lay it down, and consume it as a service and not have to- >> And mentioned to it. They were the ones who kind of brought that into the open. >> They did. Inuit is the primary contributor to the Argo set of products. >> How has that been received in the market? I mean, they had the event at the Computer History Museum last fall. What's the momentum there? What's the big takeaway from that project? >> Growth. To me, growth. I mean go and track the stars on that one. It's just, it's growth. It's unlocking machine learning. Argo workflows can do more than just make things happen. Argo CD I think the approach they're taking is, hey let's make this simple to use, which I think can be lost. And I think credit where credit's due, they're really pushing to bring in a lot of capabilities to make it easier to work with applications and microservices on Kubernetes. It's not just that, hey, here's a GitOps tool. It can take something from a Git repo and deploy it and maybe prioritize it and help you scale your operations from that perspective. It's taking a step back and saying, well how did we get to production in the first place? And what can be done down there to help as well? I think it's growth expansion of features. They had a huge release just come out in, I think it was 2.6, that brought in things that as a product manager that I don't often look at like really deep technical things and say wow, that's powerful. But they have, they've got some great features in that release that really do solve real problems. >> And as the product, as the product person, who's the target buyer for you? Who's the customer? Who's making that? And you got decision maker, influencer, and recommender. Take us through the customer persona for you guys. >> So that Platform Ops, DevOps space, right, the people that need to be delivering Containers as a service out to their organization. But then it's also important to say, well who else are our primary users? And that's developers, engineers, right? They shouldn't have to say, oh well I have access to a Kubernetes cluster. Do I have to use kubectl or do I need to go find some other tool? No, they can just log to Platform9. It's integrated with your enterprise id. >> They're the end customer at the end of the day, they're the user. >> Yeah, yeah. They can log in. And they can see the clusters you've given them access to as a Platform Ops Administrator. >> So job well done for you guys. And your mind is the developers are moving 'em fast, coding and happy. >> Chris: Yeah, yeah. >> And and from a customer standpoint, you reduce the maintenance cost, because you keep the Ops smoother, so you got efficiency and maintenance costs kind of reduced or is that kind of the benefits? >> Yeah, yep, yeah. And at two o'clock in the morning when things go inevitably wrong, they're not there by themselves, and we're proactively working with them. >> And that's the uptime issue. >> That is the uptime issue. And Cloud doesn't solve that, right? Everyone experienced that Clouds can go down, entire regions can go offline. That's happened to all Cloud providers. And what do you do then? Kubernetes isn't your recovery plan. It's part of it, right, but it's that piece. >> You know Chris, to wrap up this interview, I will say that "theCUBE" is 12 years old now. We've been to OpenStack early days. We had you guys on when we were covering OpenStack and now Cloud has just been booming. You got AI around the corner, AI Ops, now you got all this new data infrastructure, it's just amazing Cloud growth, Cloud Native, Security Native, Cloud Native, Data Native, AI Native. It's going to be all, this is the new app environment, but there's also existing infrastructure. So going back to OpenStack, rolling our own cloud, building your own cloud, building infrastructure cloud, in a cloud way, is what the pioneers have done. I mean this is what we're at. Now we're at this scale next level, abstracted away and make it operational. It seems to be the key focus. We look at CNCF at KubeCon and what they're doing with the cloud SecurityCon, it's all about operations. >> Chris: Yep, right. >> Ops and you know, that's going to sound counterintuitive 'cause it's a developer open source environment, but you're starting to see that Ops focus in a good way. >> Chris: Yeah, yeah, yeah. >> Infrastructure as code way. >> Chris: Yep. >> What's your reaction to that? How would you summarize where we are in the industry relative to, am I getting, am I getting it right there? Is that the right view? What am I missing? What's the current state of the next level, NextGen infrastructure? >> It's a good question. When I think back to sort of late 2019, I sort of had this aha moment as I saw what really truly is delivering infrastructure as code happening at Platform9. There's an open source project Ironic, which is now also available within Kubernetes that is Metal Kubed that automates Bare Metal as code, which means you can go from an empty server, lay down your operating system, lay down Kubernetes, and you've just done everything delivered to your customer as code with a Cloud Native platform. That to me was sort of the biggest realization that I had as I was moving into this industry was, wait, it's there. This can be done. And the evolution of tooling and operations is getting to the point where that can be achieved and it's focused on by a number of different open source projects. Not just Ironic and and Metal Kubed, but that's a huge win. That is truly getting your infrastructure. >> John: That's an inflection point, really. >> Yeah. >> If you think about it, 'cause that's one of the problems. We had with the Bare Metal piece was the automation and also making it Cloud Ops, cloud operations. >> Right, yeah. I mean, one of the things that I think Ironic did really well was saying let's just treat that piece of Bare Metal like a Cloud VM or an instance. If you got a problem with it, just give the person using it or whatever's using it, a new one and reimage it. Just tell it to reimage itself and it'll just (snaps fingers) go. You can do self-service with it. In Platform9, if you log in to our SaaS Ironic, you can go and say, I want that physical server to myself, because I've got a giant workload, or let's turn it into a Kubernetes cluster. That whole thing is automated. To me that's infrastructure as code. I think one of the other important things that's happening at the same time is we're seeing GitOps, we're seeing things like Terraform. I think it's important for organizations to look at what they have and ask, am I using tools that are fit for tomorrow or am I using tools that are yesterday's tools to solve tomorrow's problems? And when especially it comes to modernizing infrastructure as code, I think that's a big piece to look at. >> Do you see Terraform as old or new? >> I see Terraform as old. It's a fantastic tool, capable of many great things and it can work with basically every single provider out there on the planet. It is able to do things. Is it best fit to run in a GitOps methodology? I don't think it is quite at that point. In fact, if you went and looked at Flux, Flux has ways that make Terraform GitOps compliant, which is absolutely fantastic. It's using two tools, the best of breeds, which is solving that tomorrow problem with tomorrow solutions. >> Is the new solutions old versus new. I like this old way, new way. I mean, Terraform is not that old and it's been around for about eight years or so, whatever. But HashiCorp is doing a great job with that. I mean, so okay with Terraform, what's the new address? Is it more complex environments? Because Terraform made sense when you had basic DevOps, but now it sounds like there's a whole another level of complexity. >> I got to say. >> New tools. >> That kind of amalgamation of that application into infrastructure. Now my app team is paying way more attention to that manifest file, which is what GitOps is trying to solve. Let's templatize things. Let's version control our manifest, be it helm, customize, or just a straight up Kubernetes manifest file, plain and boring. Let's get that version controlled. Let's make sure that we know what is there, why it was changed. Let's get some auditability and things like that. And then let's get that deployment all automated. So that's predicated on the cluster existing. Well why can't we do the same thing with the cluster, the inception problem. So even if you're in public cloud, the question is like, well what's calling that API to call that thing to happen? Where is that file living? How well can I manage that in a large team? Oh my God, something just changed. Who changed it? Where is that file? And I think that's one of big, the big pieces to be sold. >> Yeah, and you talk about Edge too and on-premises. I think one of the things I'm observing and certainly when DevOps was rocking and rolling and infrastructures code was like the real push, it was pretty much the public cloud, right? >> Chris: Yep. >> And you did Cloud Native and you had stuff on-premises. Yeah you did some lifting and shifting in the cloud, but the cool stuff was going in the public cloud and you ran DevOps. Okay, now you got on-premise cloud operation and Edge. Is that the new DevOps? I mean 'cause what you're kind of getting at with old new, old new Terraform example is an interesting point, because you're pointing out potentially that that was good DevOps back in the day or it still is. >> Chris: It is, I was going to say. >> But depending on how you define what DevOps is. So if you say, I got the new DevOps with public on-premise and Edge, that's just not all public cloud, that's essentially distributed Cloud Native. >> Correct. Is that the new DevOps in your mind or is that? How would you, or is that oversimplifying it? >> Or is that that term where everyone's saying Platform Ops, right? Has it shifted? >> Well you bring up a good point about Terraform. I mean Terraform is well proven. People love it. It's got great use cases and now there seems to be new things happening. We call things like super cloud emerging, which is multicloud and abstraction layers. So you're starting to see stuff being abstracted away for the benefits of moving to the next level, so teams don't get stuck doing the same old thing. They can move on. Like what you guys are doing with Platform9 is providing a service so that teams don't have to do it. >> Correct, yeah. >> That makes a lot of sense, So you just, now it's running and then they move on to the next thing. >> Chris: Yeah, right. >> So what is that next thing? >> I think Edge is a big part of that next thing. The propensity for someone to put up with a delay, I think it's gone. For some reason, we've all become fairly short-tempered, Short fused. You know, I click the button, it should happen now, type people. And for better or worse, hopefully it gets better and we all become a bit more patient. But how do I get more effective and efficient at delivering that to that really demanding- >> I think you bring up a great point. I mean, it's not just people are getting short-tempered. I think it's more of applications are being deployed faster, security is more exposed if they don't see things quicker. You got data now infrastructure scaling up massively. So, there's a double-edged swords to scale. >> Chris: Yeah, yeah. I mean, maintenance, downtime, uptime, security. So yeah, I think there's a tension around, and one hand enthusiasm around pushing a lot of code and new apps. But is the confidence truly there? It's interesting one little, (snaps finger) supply chain software, look at Container Security for instance. >> Yeah, yeah. It's big. I mean it was codified. >> Do you agree that people, that's kind of an issue right now. >> Yeah, and it was, I mean even the supply chain has been codified by the US federal government saying there's things we need to improve. We don't want to see software being a point of vulnerability, and software includes that whole process of getting it to a running point. >> It's funny you mentioned remote and one of the thing things that you're passionate about, certainly Edge has to be remote. You don't want to roll a truck or labor at the Edge. But I was doing a conversation with, at Rebars last year about space. It's hard to do brake fix on space. It's hard to do a, to roll a someone to configure satellite, right? Right? >> Chris: Yeah. >> So Kubernetes is in space. We're seeing a lot of Cloud Native stuff in apps, in space, so just an example. This highlights the fact that it's got to be automated. Is there a machine learning AI angle with all this ChatGPT talk going on? You see all the AI going the next level. Some pretty cool stuff and it's only, I know it's the beginning, but I've heard people using some of the new machine learning, large language models, large foundational models in areas I've never heard of. Machine learning and data centers, machine learning and configuration management, a lot of different ways. How do you see as the product person, you incorporating the AI piece into the products for Platform9? >> I think that's a lot about looking at the telemetry and the information that we get back and to use one of those like old idle terms, that continuous improvement loop to feed it back in. And I think that's really where machine learning to start with comes into effect. As we run across all these customers, our system that helps at two o'clock in the morning has that telemetry, it's got that data. We can see what's changing and what's happening. So it's writing the right algorithms, creating the right machine learning to- >> So training will work for you guys. You have enough data and the telemetry to do get that training data. >> Yeah, obviously there's a lot of investment required to get there, but that is something that ultimately that could be achieved with what we see in operating people's environments. >> Great. Chris, great to have you here in the studio. Going wide ranging conversation on Kubernetes and Platform9. I guess my final question would be how do you look at the next five years out there? Because you got to run the product management, you got to have that 20 mile steer, you got to look at the customers, you got to look at what's going on in the engineering and you got to kind of have that arc. This is the right path kind of view. What's the five year arc look like for you guys? How do you see this playing out? 'Cause KubeCon is coming up and we're you seeing Kubernetes kind of break away with security? They had, they didn't call it KubeCon Security, they call it CloudNativeSecurityCon, they just had in Seattle inaugural events seemed to go well. So security is kind of breaking out and you got Kubernetes. It's getting bigger. Certainly not going away, but what's your five year arc of of how Platform9 and Kubernetes and Ops evolve? >> It's to stay on that theme, it's focusing on what is most important to our users and getting them to a point where they can just consume it, so they're not having to operate it. So it's finding those big items and bringing that into our platform. It's something that's consumable, that's just taken care of, that's tested with each release. So it's simplifying operations more and more. We've always said freedom in cloud computing. Well we started on, we started on OpenStack and made that simple. Stable, easy, you just have it, it works. We're doing that with Kubernetes. We're expanding out that user, right, we're saying bring your developers in, they can download their Kube conflict. They can see those Containers that are running there. They can access the events, the log files. They can log in and build a VM using KubeVirt. They're self servicing. So it's alleviating pressures off of the Ops team, removing the help desk systems that people still seem to rely on. So it's like what comes into that field that is the next biggest issue? Is it things like CI/CD? Is it simplifying GitOps? Is it bringing in security capabilities to talk to that? Or is that a piece that is a best of breed? Is there a reason that it's been spun out to its own conference? Is this something that deserves a focus that should be a specialized capability instead of tooling and vendors that we work with, that we partner with, that could be brought in as a service. I think it's looking at those trends and making sure that what we bring in has the biggest impact to our users. >> That's awesome. Thanks for coming in. I'll give you the last word. Put a plug in for Platform9 for the people who are watching. What should they know about Platform9 that they might not know about it or what should? When should they call you guys and when should they engage? Take a take a minute to give the plug. >> The plug. I think it's, if your operations team is focused on building Kubernetes, stop. That shouldn't be the cloud. That shouldn't be in the Edge, that shouldn't be at the data center. They should be consuming it. If your engineering teams are all trying different ways and doing different things to use and consume Cloud Native services and Kubernetes, they shouldn't be. You want consistency. That's how you get economies of scale. Provide them with a simple platform that's integrated with all of your enterprise identity where they can just start consuming instead of having to solve these problems themselves. It's those, it's those two personas, right? Where the problems manifest. What are my operations teams doing, and are they delivering to my company or are they building infrastructure again? And are my engineers sprinting or crawling? 'Cause if they're not sprinting, you should be asked the question, do I have the right Cloud Native tooling in my environment and how can I get them back? >> I think it's developer productivity, uptime, security are the tell signs. You get that done. That's the goal of what you guys are doing, your mission. >> Chris: Yep. >> Great to have you on, Chris. Thanks for coming on. Appreciate it. >> Chris: Thanks very much. 0 Okay, this is "theCUBE" here, finding the right path to Cloud Native. I'm John Furrier, host of "theCUBE." Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Feb 17 2023

SUMMARY :

And it comes down to operations, And the developers are I need to run my software somewhere. and the infrastructure, What's the goal and then I asked for that in the VM, What's the problem that you guys solve? and configure all of the low level. We're going to be Cloud Native, case or cases that you guys see We've opened that tap all the way, It's going to be interesting too, to your business and let us deliver the teams need to get Is that kind of what you guys are always on assurance to keep that up customers say to you of the best ones you can get. make sure that all the You have the product, and being in the market with you guys is finding the right path, So the why- I mean, that's what kind of getting in in the weeds Just got to get it going. to figure it out. velocity for your business. how to kind of get it all, a service to my users." and GitOps in that scope, of brought that into the open. Inuit is the primary contributor What's the big takeaway from that project? hey let's make this simple to use, And as the product, the people that need to at the end of the day, And they can see the clusters So job well done for you guys. the morning when things And what do you do then? So going back to OpenStack, Ops and you know, is getting to the point John: That's an 'cause that's one of the problems. that physical server to myself, It is able to do things. Terraform is not that the big pieces to be sold. Yeah, and you talk about Is that the new DevOps? I got the new DevOps with Is that the new DevOps Like what you guys are move on to the next thing. at delivering that to I think you bring up a great point. But is the confidence truly there? I mean it was codified. Do you agree that people, I mean even the supply and one of the thing things I know it's the beginning, and the information that we get back the telemetry to do get that could be achieved with what we see and you got to kind of have that arc. that is the next biggest issue? Take a take a minute to give the plug. and are they delivering to my company That's the goal of what Great to have you on, Chris. finding the right path to Cloud Native.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
ChrisPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

Chris JonesPERSON

0.99+

12 gigQUANTITY

0.99+

five yearQUANTITY

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

two yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

six peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

two personasQUANTITY

0.99+

AdobeORGANIZATION

0.99+

JavaTITLE

0.99+

three monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

20 mileQUANTITY

0.99+

Palo Alto, CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

SeattleLOCATION

0.99+

two toolsQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

eight coresQUANTITY

0.99+

KubeConEVENT

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

GitOpsTITLE

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

tomorrowDATE

0.99+

over two yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

HashiCorpORGANIZATION

0.99+

TerraformORGANIZATION

0.99+

two separate platformsQUANTITY

0.99+

24QUANTITY

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.98+

two waysQUANTITY

0.98+

third alternativeQUANTITY

0.98+

each releaseQUANTITY

0.98+

IntuitORGANIZATION

0.98+

third pillarQUANTITY

0.98+

2:00amDATE

0.98+

first jobsQUANTITY

0.98+

Mobile World CongressEVENT

0.98+

Cloud NativeTITLE

0.98+

this yearDATE

0.98+

late 2019DATE

0.98+

Platform9TITLE

0.98+

one environmentQUANTITY

0.98+

last fallDATE

0.97+

KubernetesTITLE

0.97+

yesterdayDATE

0.97+

two experiencesQUANTITY

0.97+

about eight yearsQUANTITY

0.97+

DevSecOpsTITLE

0.97+

GitTITLE

0.97+

FluxORGANIZATION

0.96+

CNCFORGANIZATION

0.96+

two big contributorsQUANTITY

0.96+

Cloud NativeTITLE

0.96+

DevOpsTITLE

0.96+

RebarsORGANIZATION

0.95+

Satish Puranam & Rebecca Riss, Ford | KubeCon + CloudNativeCon NA 2022


 

(bright music) (crowd talking indistinctly in the background) >> Hey guys, welcome back to Detroit, Michigan. theCUBE is live at KubeCon + CloudNativeCon 2022. You might notice something really unique here. Lisa Martin with our newest co-host of theCUBE, Savannah Peterson! Savannah, it's great to see you. >> It's so good to be here with you (laughs). >> I know, I know. We have a great segment coming up. I always love talking couple things, cars, one, two, with companies that have been around for a hundred plus years and how they've actually transformed. >> Oh yeah. >> Ford is here. You have a great story about how you, about Ford. >> Ford brought me to Detroit the first time. I was here at the North American International Auto Show. Some of you may be familiar, and the fine folks from Ford brought me out to commentate just like this, as they were announcing the Ford Bronco. >> Satish: Oh wow. >> Which I am still lusting after. >> You don't have one yet? >> For the record. No, I don't. My next car's got to be an EV. Although, ironically, there's a Ford EV right behind us here on set today. >> I know, I know. >> Which we were both just contemplating before we went live. >> It's really shiny. >> We're going to have to go check it out. >> I have to check it out. Yep, we'll do that. Yeah. Well, please welcome our two guests from Ford, Satish Puranam, is here, The Technical Leader at Cloud and Rebecca Risk, Principal Architect, developer relations. We are so excited to have you guys on the program. >> Clearly. >> Thanks for joining us. (all laugh) >> Thank you for having us. >> I love you're Ford enthusiasts! Yeah, that's awesome. >> I drive a Ford. >> Oh, awesome! Thank you. >> I can only say that's one car company here. >> That's great. >> Yes, yes. >> Great! Thank you a lot. >> Thank you for your business! >> Absolutely. (all laugh) >> So, Satish, talk to us a little bit about- I mean I think of Cloud as a car company but it seems like it's a technology company that makes cars. >> Yes. Talk to us about Ford as a Cloud first, technology driven company, and then we're going to talk about what you're doing with Red Hat and Boston University. >> Yeah, I'm like everything that all these cars that you're seeing, beautiful right behind us it's all built on, around, and with technology, right? So there's so much code goes into these cars these days, it's probably, it's mind boggling to think that probably your iPhones might be having less code as opposed to these cars. Everything from control systems, everything is code. We don't do any more clay models. Everything is done digital, 3D, virtual reality and all that stuff. So all that takes code, all of that takes technology. And we have been in that journey for the last- since 2016 when we started our first mobile app and all that stuff. And of late we have been like, heavily invested in Google. Moving a lot of these experiences, data acquisition systems AI/ML modeling for like all the autonomous cars. It's all technology and like from the day it is conceived, to the day it is marketed, to the day when you show up for a servicing, and hopefully soon how you can buy and you know, provide feedback to us, is all technology that drives all of this stuff. So it's amazing for us to see everything that we go and immerse ourselves in the technology. There is a real life thing that we can see what we all do for it, right? So- >> Yes, we're only sorry that our audience can't actually see the car, >> Yep. >> but we'll get some B-roll for you later on. Rebecca, talk a little bit about your role. Here we are at KubeCon, Savannah and I and John were talking when we went live this morning, that this is huge. That the show floor is massive, a lot bigger than last year. The collaboration and the spirit of the community is not only alive and well, as we heard in the keynote this morning, it's thriving. >> Yeah. >> Talk about developer relations at Ford and what you are helping to drive in your role. >> Yeah, so my team is all about helping developers work faster with different platforms that my team curates and produces, so that our developers don't have to deal with all of the details of setting up their environments to actually code. And we have really great people, kind of the top software developers in the company, are part of my team to produce those products that other people can use, and accelerate their development. And we have a great relationship with the developers in the company and outside with the different vendor relationships that we have, to make sure that we're always producing the next platform with the next tech stack that our developers will want to continue to use to produce the really great products that we are all about making at Ford. >> Let's dig in there a little bit because I'm curious and I suspect you both had something to do with it. How did you approach your Cloud Native transformation and how do you evaluate new technologies for the team? >> It's sometimes- many a times I would say it's like dogfooding and like experimentation. >> Yeah. Isn't anything in innovation a lot of- >> Yeah, a lot of experimentation. We started our, as I said, the Cloud Native journey back in 2016 with Cloud Foundry and things, technologies around that. Soon realized, that there was like a lot of buzz around that time. Twelve-Factor was a thing, Stateless was a thing. And then all those Stateful needs to drive the Stateless. So where do we do that thing? And the next logical iteration was Kubernetes was bursting upon the scene at that time. So we started doing a lot of experimentation. >> Like the Kool-Aid man, burst on the Kubernetes scene- >> Exactly right. >> Through the wall. >> So, the question is like, why can't we do? I think we were like crazy enough to say that Kubernetes people are talking about our serverless or Twelve-Factor on Kubernetes. We are crazy enough to do Stateful on Kubernetes and we've been doing it successfully for five years. So it's a lot about experimentation. I think good chunk of experiments that we do do not yield the results that we get, but many a times, some of them are like Gangbusters. Like, other aspects that we've been doing of late is like partnering with Becky and rest of the organization, right? Because they are the people who are like closest to the developers. We are somewhat behind the scenes doing some things but it is Becky and the rest of the architecture teams who are actually front and center with the customers, right? So it is the collaborative effort that we've been working through past few years that has been really really been useful and coming around and helping us to make some of these products really beautiful. >> Yeah, well you make a lot of beautiful products. I think we've all, I think we've all seen them. Something that I think is really interesting and part of why I was so excited for this interview, and kind of nudged John out, was because you've been- Ford has been investing in technology in a committed way for decades and I don't think most people are aware of that. When I originally came out to Dearborn, I learned that you've had a head of VR who happens to be a female. For what it's worth, Elizabeth, who's been running VR for you for two and a half decades, for 25 years. >> Satish: Yep. >> That is an impressive commitment. What is that like from a culture perspective inside of Ford? What is the attitude around innovation and technology? >> So I've been a long time Ford employee. I just celebrated my 29th year. >> Oh, wow! >> Congratulations! >> Wow, congrats! That's a huge deal. >> Yeah, it's a huge deal. I'm so proud of my career and all that Ford has brought to me and it's just a testament. I have many colleagues like me who've been there for their whole career or have done other things and come to Ford and then spent another 20 years with us because we foster the culture that makes you want to stay. We have development programs to allow you to upscale and change your role and learn new things and play with the new technologies that people are interested in doing and really make an impact to our community of developers at Ford or the company itself and the results that we're delivering. So to have that, you know, culture for so many years that people really love to work. They love to work with the people that they're working with. They love to stay engaged and they love the fact that you can have many different careers within the same umbrella, which we call the "blue oval". And that's really why I've been there for so long. I think I probably had 13 very unique and different jobs along the way. It's as if I left, and you know shopped around my skills elsewhere. But I didn't ever have to leave the company. It's been fabulous. >> The cultural change and adoption of- embracing modern technology- Cloud Native automotive software is impressive because a lot of historied companies, you guys have been there a long time, have challenges with that because it's really hard to get an entire moving, you'll call it the blue oval, to change and adapt- >> Savannah: I love that. >> and be willing to experiment. So that that is impressive. Talk about, you go by Becky, so I'll call you Becky, >> Rebecca/Becky: Yeah. >> The developer culture in terms of the developers really being the center of the nucleus of influencing the direction in which the company's going. I imagine that they probably are fairly influential. >> Yeah, so I had a very- one of the unique positions I held was a culture change for our department, Information Technology in 2016. >> Satish: Yeah. >> As the teacher was involved with moving us to the cloud, I was responsible- >> You are the transformation team! This is beautiful. I love this. We've got the right people on the show. >> Yeah, we do. >> I was responsible for changing the culture to orient our employees to pay attention to what do we want to create for tomorrow? What are the kind of skills we need to trust each other to move quickly. And that was completely unique. >> Satish: Yeah. >> Like I had men in the trenches delivering software before that, and then plucked out because they wanted someone, you know who had authentic experience with our development team to be that voice. And it was such a great investment that Ford continues to do is invest in our culture transformation. Because with each step forward that we do, we have to refine what our priorities are. And you do that through culture transformation and culture management. And that's been, I think really, the key to our successful pivots that we've made over the last six years that we've been able to continue to refine and hone where we really want to go through that culture movement. >> Absolutely. I think if I could add another- >> Please. >> spotlight to it is like the biggest thing about Ford has been among various startup-like culture, right? So the idea is that we encourage people to think outside the box, right? >> Savannah: Or outside the oval? >> Right! (laughs) >> Lisa: Outside the oval, yes! >> Absolutely! Right. >> So the question is like, you can experiment with various things, new technologies and you will get all the leadership support to go along with it. I think that is very important too and like we can be in the trenches and talk about all of these nice little things but who the heck would've thought that, you know Kubernetes was announced in 2015, in late 2016, we have early dev Kubernetes clusters already running. 2017, we are live with workloads on Kubernetes! >> Savannah: Early adopters over here. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. >> I'm like all of this thing doesn't happen without lot of foresight and support from the leadership, but it's also the grassroot efforts that is encouraged all along to be on the front end of all of these things and try different things. Some of them may not work >> Savannah: Right. >> But that's okay. But how do we know we are doing something, if you're not failing? We have to fail in order to do something, right? >> Lisa: I always say- >> So I think that's been a great thing that is encouraged very often and otherwise I would not be doing, I've done a whole bunch of stuff at Ford. Without that kind of ability to support and have an appetite for, some of those things would not have been here at all. >> I always say failure is not a bad F-word. >> Satish: Yep. >> Savannah: I love that. >> But what you're talking about there is kind of like driving this hot wheel of experimentation. You have to have the right culture and the mindset- >> Satish: Absolutely. >> to do that. Try fail, move on, learn, iterate, go. >> Satish: Correct. >> You guys have a great partnership with Red Hat and Boston University. You're speaking about that later today. >> Satish: Yes. >> Unpack that for us. What, from a technical perspective, what are you doing and what's it resulting in? >> Yeah, I think the biggest thing is Becky was talking about as during this transformation journey, is lot has changed in very small amount of time. So we traditionally been like, "Hey, here's a spreadsheet of things I need you to deliver for me" to "Here is a catalog of things, you can get it today and be successful with it". That is frightening to several of our developers. The goal, one of the things that we've been working with Q By Example, Red Hat and all the thing, is that how can we lower the bar for the developers, right? Kubernetes is great. It's also a wall of YAML. >> It's extremely complex, number one complaint. >> The question is how can I zero on? I'm like, if we go back think like when we talk about in cars with human-machine interfaces, which parts do I need to know? Here's the steering wheel, here's the gas pedal, or here's the brake. As long as you know these two, three different things you should be fairly be okay to drive those things, right? So the idea of some of the things with enablementing we are trying to do is like reduce that barrier, right? Reduce- lower the bar so that more people can participate in it. >> One of the ways that you did that was Q By Example, right, QBE? >> Satish: Yes, Yes. >> Can you tell us a little bit more about that as you finish this answer? >> Yeah, I think the biggest thing with Q By Example is like Q By Example gives you the small bite-sized things about Kubernetes, right? >> Savannah: Great place to start. >> But what we wanted to do is that we wanted to reinforce that learning by turning into a real world living example app. We took part info, we said, Hey, what does it look like? How do I make sure that it is highly available? How do I make sure that it is secure? Here is an example YAML of it that you can literally verbatim copy and paste into your editor and click run and then you will get an instant gratification feedback loop >> I was going to say, yeah, they feel like you're learning too! >> Yes. Right. So the idea would be is like, and then instead of giving you just a boring prose text to read, we actually drop links to relevant blog posts saying that, hey you can just go there. And that has been inspirational in terms of like and reinforcing the learning. So that has been where we started working with the Boston University, Red Hat and the community around all of that stuff. >> Talk a little bit about, Becky, about some of the business outcomes. You mentioned things like upskilling the workforce which is really nice to hear that there's such a big focus on it. But I imagine too, there's more participation in the community, but also from an end customer perspective. Obviously, everything Ford's doing is to serve the end customers >> Becky: Right. How does this help the end customer have that experience that they really, these days, demand with patience being something that, I think, is gone because of the pandemic? >> Right? Right. So one of the things that my team does is we create the platforms that help Accelerate developers be successful and it helps educate them more quickly on appropriate use of the platforms and helps them by adopting the platforms to be more secure which inherently lead to the better results for our end customers because their data is secure because the products that they have are well created and they're tested thoroughly. So we catch all those things earlier in the cycle by using these platforms that we help curate and produce. And that's really important because, like you had mentioned, this steep learning curve associated with Kubernetes, right? >> Savannah: Yeah. >> So my team is able to kind of help with that abstraction so that we solve kind of the higher complex problems for them so that developers can move faster and then we focus our education on what's important for them. We use things like Q By Example, as a source instead of creating that content ourselves, right? We are able to point them to that. So it's great that there's that community and we're definitely involved with that. But that's so important to help our developers be successful in moving as quickly as they want and not having 20,000 people solve the same problems. >> Satish: (chuckles) Yeah. >> Each individually- >> Savannah: you don't need to! >> and sometimes differently. >> Savannah: We're stronger together, you know? >> Exactly. >> The water level rises together and Ford is definitely a company that illustrates that by example. >> Yeah, I'm like, we can't make a better round wheel right? >> Yeah! So, we have to build upon what we have already been built ahead of us. And I think a lot of it is also about how can we give back and participate in the community, right? So I think that is paramount for us as like, here we are in Detroit so we're trying to recruit and show people that you know, everything that we do is not just old car and sheet metal >> Savannah: Combustion. >> and everything and right? There's a lot of tech goes and sometimes it is really, really cool to do that. And biggest thing for us is like how can we involve our community of developers sooner, earlier, faster without actually encumbering them and saying that, hey here is a book, go master it. We'll talk two months later. So I think that has been another journey. I think that has been a biggest uphill challenge for us is that how can we actually democratize all of these things for everybody. >> Yeah. Well no one better to try than you I would suspect. >> We can only try and hope everything turns out well, right? >> You know, as long as there's room for the bumpers on the lane for if you fail. >> Exactly. >> It sounds like you're driving the program in the right direction. Closing question for you, what's next? Is electric the future? Is Kubernetes the future? What's Ford all in on right now, looking forward? (crowd murmuring in the background) >> Data is the king, right? >> Savannah: Oh, okay, yes! >> Data is a new currency. We use that for several things to improve the cars improve the quality of autonomous driving Is Level 5 driving here? Maybe will be here soon, we'll see. But we are all working towards it, right? So machine learning, AI feedback. How do you actually post sale experience for example? So all of these are all areas that we are working to. We are, may not be getting like Kubernetes in a car but we are putting Kubernetes in plants. Like you order a Marquis or you order a Bronco, you see that here. Here's where in the assembly line your car is. It's taking pictures. It's actually taking pictures on Kubernetes platform. >> That's pretty cool. >> And it is tweeting for you on the Twitter and the social media platform. So there's a lot of that. So it is real and we are doing it. We need more help. A lot of the community efforts that we are seeing and a lot of the innovation that is happening on the floor here, it's phenomenal. The question is how we can incorporate those things into our workflows. >> Yeah, well you have the right audience for that here. You also have the right attitude, >> Exactly. >> the right appetite, and the right foundation. Becky, last question for you. Top three takeaways from your talk today. If you're talking to the developer community you want to inspire: Come work for us! What would you say? >> If you're ready to invest in yourself and upskill and be part of something that is pretty remarkable, come work for us! We have many, many different technical career paths that you can follow. We invest in our employees. When you master something, it's time for you to move on. We have career growth for you. It's been a wonderful gift to me and my family and I encourage everyone to check us out careers.ford.com or stop by our booth if you're happen to be here in person. >> Satish: Absolutely! >> We have our curated job openings that are specific for this community, available. >> Satish: Absolutely. >> Love it. Perfect close. Nailed pitch there. I'm sure you're all going to check out their job page. (all laugh) >> Exactly! And what you talked about, the developer experience, the customer experience are inextricably linked and you guys are really focused on that. Congratulations on all the work that you've done. We got to go get a selfie with that car girl. >> Yes, we do. >> Absolutely. >> We got to show them, we got to show the audience what it looks like on the inside too. We'll do a little IG video. (Lisa laughs) >> Absolutely. >> We will show you that for our guests and my cohost, Savannah Peterson. Lisa Martin here live in Detroit with theCUBE at KubeCon and CloudNativeCon 2022. The one and only John Furrier, who you know gets FOMO, is going to be back with me next. So stick around. (all laugh) (bright music)

Published Date : Oct 27 2022

SUMMARY :

it's great to see you. It's so good to be We have a great segment coming up. You have a great story Some of you may be For the record. Which we were both just I have to check it out. Thanks for joining us. I love you're Ford Thank you. I can only say that's Thank you a lot. (all laugh) So, Satish, talk to Talk to us about Ford as a Cloud first, to the day when you show of the community is not and what you are helping don't have to deal with all of the details something to do with it. a times I would say it's in innovation a lot of- a lot of buzz around that time. So it is the collaborative Something that I think is What is the attitude around So I've been a long time Ford employee. That's a huge deal. So to have that, you know, culture So that that is impressive. of influencing the direction one of the unique positions You are the transformation What are the kind of skills we need that Ford continues to do is I think Absolutely! So the question is that is encouraged all along to be on the We have to fail in order Without that kind of ability to support I always say failure and the mindset- to do that. You're speaking about that later today. what are you doing and and all the thing, is that It's extremely complex, So the idea of some of the things it that you can literally and the community around in the community, but also from is gone because of the pandemic? So one of the things so that we solve kind of a company that illustrates and show people that really cool to do that. try than you I would suspect. for the bumpers on the in the right direction. areas that we are working to. and a lot of the innovation You also have the right attitude, and the right foundation. that you can follow. that are specific for to check out their job page. and you guys are really focused on that. We got to show them, we is going to be back with me next.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
ElizabethPERSON

0.99+

RebeccaPERSON

0.99+

2016DATE

0.99+

SatishPERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

BeckyPERSON

0.99+

13QUANTITY

0.99+

FordORGANIZATION

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

Savannah PetersonPERSON

0.99+

Red HatORGANIZATION

0.99+

SavannahPERSON

0.99+

2015DATE

0.99+

DetroitLOCATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

Rebecca RiskPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

Satish PuranamPERSON

0.99+

Rebecca RissPERSON

0.99+

Boston UniversityORGANIZATION

0.99+

25 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

five yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

2017DATE

0.99+

two guestsQUANTITY

0.99+

iPhonesCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

careers.ford.comOTHER

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

29th yearQUANTITY

0.99+

20,000 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

KubeConEVENT

0.99+

Detroit, MichiganLOCATION

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

20 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

two months laterDATE

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

EachQUANTITY

0.98+

CloudORGANIZATION

0.98+

late 2016DATE

0.98+

KubernetesTITLE

0.98+

Shawn Henry, CrowdStrike | CrowdStrike Fal.Con 2022


 

>>All we're back. We're wrapping up day two at Falcon 22 from the area in Las Vegas, CrowdStrike CrowdStrike. The action is crazy. Second day, a keynotes. Sean Henry is back. He's the chief security officer at CrowdStrike. He did a keynote today. Sean. Good to see you. Thanks for coming >>Back. Good. See you, Dave. Thanks for having me. >>So, unfortunately, I wasn't able to see your keynote cuz I had to come do cube interviews. You interviewed Kimbo Walden from, from, you know, white house, right? >>National cyber security >>Director. We're gonna talk about that. We're gonna talk about Overwatch, your threat hunting report. I want to share the results with our audience, but start with your, well actually start with the event. We're now in day two, you've had a good chance to talk to customers and partners. What are, what are your observations? Yeah, >>It's first of all, it's been an amazing event over 2200 attendees here. It's really taking top three floors at the area hotel and we've got partners and customers, employees, and to see the excitement and the level of collaboration here is absolutely phenomenal. All these different organizations that are each have a piece of cyber security to see them coming together, all in support of how do you stop breaches? How do you work together to do it? It's really been absolutely phenomenal. You're >>Gonna love the collaboration. We kind of talked about this on our earlier segment is the industry has to do a better job and has been doing a better job. You know, I think you and Kevin laid that out pretty well. So tell me about the interview with the fireside chat with Kimba. What was that like? What topics came up? >>Yeah. Kimba is the principal, deputy national cyber security advisor. She's been there for just four months. She spent over 10 years at DHS, but she most recently came from the private sector in cybersecurity. So she's got that the experience as a private sector expert, as well as a public sector expert and to see her come together in that position. It was great. We talked a lot about some of the strategies the white house is looking to put forth in their new cybersecurity strategy. There was recently an executive order, right? That the, the president put forth that talks about a lot of the things that we're doing here. So for example, the executive order talks about a lot of the legacy type of capabilities being put to pasture and about the government embracing cloud, embracing threat, hunting, embracing EDR, embracing zero trust and identity protection. Those are all the things that the private sector has been moving towards over the last year or two. That's what this is all about here. But to see the white house put that out, that all government agencies will now be embracing that I think it puts them on a much shorter footing and it allows the government to be able to identify vulnerabilities before they get exploited. It allows them to much more quickly identify, have visibility and respond to, to threats. So the government in infrastructure will be safer. And it was really nice to hear her talk about that and about how the private sector can work with the government. >>So you know how this works, you know, having been in the bureau. But so it's the, these executive orders. A lot of times people think, oh, it's just symbolic. And there are a couple of aspects of it. One is president Biden really impressed upon the private sector to, you know, amp it up to, to really focus and do a better job. But also as you pointed out that executive order can adjudicate what government agencies must do must prioritize. So it's more than symbolic. It's actually taking action. Isn't >>It? Yeah. I, I, I think it, I think it's both. I think it's important for the government to lead in this area because while a, a large portion of infrastructure, major companies, they understand this, there is still a whole section of private sector organizations that don't understand this and to see the white house, roll it out. I think that's good leadership and that is symbolic. But then to your second point to mandate that government agencies do this, it really pushes those. That might be a bit reluctant. It pushes them forward. And I think this is the, the, the type of action that as it starts to roll out and people become more comfortable and they start to see the successes. They understand that they're becoming safer, that they're reducing risk. It really is kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy and we see things become much safer. Did, >>Did you guys talk about Ukraine? Was that, was that off limits or did that come up at all? >>It wasn't, it wasn't off limits, but we didn't talk about it because there are so many other things we were discussing. We were talking about this, the cyber security workforce, for example, and the huge gap in the number of people who have the expertise, the capability and the, and the opportunities to them to come into cyber security technology broadly, but then cyber security as a sub sub component of that. And some of the programs, they just had a big cyber workforce strategy. They invited a lot of people from the private sector to have this conversation about how do you focus on stem? How do you get younger people? How do you get women involved? So getting maybe perhaps to the untapped individuals that would step forward and be an important stop gap and an important component to this dearth of talent and it's absolutely needed. So that was, was one thing. There were a number of other things. Yeah. >>So I mean, pre pandemic, I thought the number was 350,000 open cybersecurity jobs. I heard a number yesterday just in the us. And you might have even told me this 7, 7 50. So it's doubled in just free to post isolation economy. I don't know what the stats are, but too big. Well, as a, as a CSO, how much can automation do to, to close that gap? You know, we were talking earlier on the cube about, you gotta keep the humans in the loop, you, you, the, the, the, the Nirvana of the machines will just take care of everything is just probably not gonna happen anytime in the near term, even midterm or long term, but, but, but how can automation play and help close that gap? So >>The, the automation piece is, is what allows this to scale. You know, if we had one company with a hundred endpoints and we had a couple of folks there, you could do it with humans. A lot of it when you're talking about hundreds of millions of endpoints spread around the globe, you're talking about literally trillions of events every week that are being identified, evaluated and determined whether they're malicious or not. You have to have automation and to have using the cloud, using AI, using machine learning, to sort through, and really look for the malicious needle in a stack of needle. So you've gotta get that fidelity, that fine tune review. And you can only do that with automation. What you gotta remember, Dave, is that there's a human being at the end of every one of these attacks. So we've got the bad guys, have humans there, they're using the technology to scale. We're using the technology to scale to detect them. But then when you get down to the really malicious activity, having human beings involved is gonna take it to another level and allow you to eradicate the adversaries from the environment. >>Okay. So they'll use machines to knock on the door when that door gets opened and they're in, and they're saying, okay, where do we go from here? And they're directing strategy. Absolutely. I, I spent, I think gave me a sta I, I wonder if I wrote it down correctly, 2 trillion events per day. Yeah. That you guys see is that I write that down. Right? >>You did. It changes just like the number of jobs. It changes when I started talking about this just a, a year and a half ago, it was a billion a day. And when you look at how it's multiplied exponentially, and that will continue because of the number of applications, because of the number of devices as that gets bigger, the number of events gets bigger. And that's one of the problems that we have here is the spread of the network. The vulnerability, the environment is getting bigger and bigger and bigger as it gets bigger, more opportunities for bad guys to exploit vulnerabilities. >>Yeah. And we, we were talking earlier about IOT and extending, you know, that, that threats surface as well, talk about the Overwatch threat hunting report. What is that? How, how often have you run it? And I'd love to get into some of the results. Yeah. >>So Overwatch is a service that we offer where we have 24 by seven threat hunters that are operating in our customer environments. They're hunting, looking for, looking for malicious activity, malicious behavior. And to the point you just made earlier, where we use automation to sort out and filter what is clearly bad. When an adversary does get what we call fingers on the keyboard. So they're in the box and now a human being, they get a hit on their automated attack. They get a hit that, Hey, we're in, it's kind of the equivalent of looking at the Bober while you're fishing. Yeah. When you see the barber move, then the fisherman jumps up from his nap and starts to reel it in similar. They jump on the keyboard fingers on the keyboard. Our Overwatch team is detecting them very, very quickly. So we found 77,000 potential intrusions this past year in 2021, up to the end of June one, one every seven minutes from those detections. >>When we saw these detections, we were able to identify unusual adversary behavior that we'd not necessar necessarily seen before we call it indicators of attack. What does that mean? It means we're seeing an adversary, taking a new action, using a new tactic. Our Overwatch team can take that from watching it to human beings. They take it, they give it to our, our engineering team and they can write detections, which now become automated, right? So you have, you have all the automation that filters out all the bad stuff. One gets through a bad guy, jumps up, he's on the keyboard. And now he's starting to execute commands on the system. Our team sees that pulls those commands out. They're unusual. We've not seen 'em before we give it to our engineering team. They write detections that now all become automated. So because of that, we stopped over with the 77,000 attacks that we identified. We stopped over a million new attacks that would've come in and exploited a network. So it really is kind of a big circle where you've got human beings and intelligence and technology, all working together to make the system smarter, to make the people smarter and make the customers safer. And you're >>Seeing new IAS pop up all the time, and you're able to identify those and, and codify 'em. Now you've announced at reinforced, I, I, in July in Boston, you announced the threat hunting service, which is also, I think, part of your you're the president as well of that services division, right? So how's that going? What >>What's happening there? What we announced. So we've the Overwatch team has been involved working in customer environments and working on the back end in our cloud for many years. What we've announced is this cloud hunting, where, because of the adoption of the cloud and the movement to the cloud of so many organizations, they're pushing data to the cloud, but we're seeing adversaries really ramp up their attacks against the cloud. So we're hunting in Google cloud in Microsoft Azure cloud in AWS, looking for anomalous behavior, very similar to what we do in customer environments, looking for anomalous behavior, looking for credential exploitation, looking for lateral movement. And we are having a great success there because as that target space increases, there's a much greater need for customers to ensure that it's protected. So >>The cloud obviously is very secure. You got some of the best experts in the planet inside of hyperscale companies. So, and whether it's physical security or logical security, they're obviously, you know, doing a good job is the weakness, the seams between where the cloud provider leaves off and the customer has to take over that shared responsibility model, you know, misconfiguring and S3 bucket is the, you know, the common one, but I'm so there like a zillion others, where's that weakness. Yeah. >>That, that's exactly right. We see, we see oftentimes the it piece enabling the cloud piece and there's a connectivity there, and there is a seam there. Sometimes we also see misconfiguration, and these are some of the things that our, our cloud hunters will find. They'll identify again, the equivalent of, of walking down the hallway and seeing a door that's unlocked, making sure it's locked before it gets exploited. So they may see active exploitation, which they're negating, but they also are able to help identify vulnerabilities prior to them getting exploited. And, you know, the ability for organizations to successfully manage their infrastructure is a really critical part of this. It's not always malicious actors. It's identifying where the infrastructure can be shored up, make it more resilient so that you can prevent some of these attacks from happening. I >>Heard, heard this week earlier, something I hadn't heard before, but it makes a lot of sense, you know, patch Tuesday means hack Wednesday. And, and so I, I presume that the, the companies releasing patches is like a signal to the bad guys that Hey, you know, free for all go because people aren't necessarily gonna patch. And then the solar winds customers are now circumspect about patches. The very patches that are supposed to protect us with the solar winds hack were the cause of the malware getting in and, you know, reforming, et cetera. So that's a complicated equation. Yeah. >>It, it certainly is a couple, couple parts there to unwind. First, when you, you think about patch Tuesday, there are adversaries often, not always that are already exploiting some of those vulnerabilities in the wild. So it's a zero day. It's not yet been patched in some cases hasn't yet been identified. So you've got people who are actively exploiting. It we've found zero days in the course of our threat hunting. We report them in a, in a, in a responsible way. We've gone to Microsoft. We've told them a couple times in the last few months that we found a zero day and give them an opportunity to patch that before anybody goes public with it, because absolutely right when it does go public, those that didn't know about it before recognize that there will be millions of devices depending on the, the vulnerability that are out there and exploitable. And they will absolutely, it will tell everybody that you can now go to this particular place. And there's an opportunity to gain access, to exploit privileges, depending on the criticality of the patch. >>I, I don't, I, I don't, I'm sorry to generalize, but I wanna ask you about the hacker mindset. Let's say that what you just described a narrow set of hackers knows that there's an unpatched, you know, vulnerability, and they're making money off of that. Will they keep that to themselves? Will they share that with other folks in the net? Will they sell that information? Or is it, is it one of those? It depends. It, >>I was just gonna say, it depends you, you beat me to it. It absolutely depends. All of, all of the above would be the answer. We certainly see organ now a nation state for example, would absolutely keep that to themselves. Yeah. Right. Their goal is very different from an organized crime group, which might sell access. And we see them all the time in the underground selling access. That's how they make money nation states. They want to keep a zero day to themselves. It's something they're able to exploit in some cases for months or years, that that, that vulnerability goes undetected. But a nation state is aware of it and exploiting it. It's a, it's a dangerous game. And it just, I think, exemplifies the importance of ensuring that you're doing everything you can to patch in a timely matter. Well, >>Sean, we appreciate the work that you've done in your previous role and continuing to advance education, knowledge and protection in our industry. Thank you for coming on >>You. Thank you for having me. This is a fantastic event. Really appreciate you being here and helping to educate folks. Yeah. >>You guys do do a great job. Awesome. Set that you built and look forward to future events with you guys. My >>Friends. Thanks so much, Dave. Yeah. Thank >>You. Bye now. All right. Appreciate it. All right, keep it right there. We're gonna wrap up in a moment. Live from Falcon 22. You're watching the cube.

Published Date : Sep 21 2022

SUMMARY :

He's the chief security officer at CrowdStrike. Walden from, from, you know, white house, right? the event. cyber security to see them coming together, all in support of how do you stop breaches? So tell me about the interview So she's got that the experience as a private sector expert, So you know how this works, you know, having been in the bureau. become more comfortable and they start to see the successes. They invited a lot of people from the private sector to have this conversation about how do you focus on So it's doubled in just free to post isolation economy. having human beings involved is gonna take it to another level and allow you to eradicate the adversaries from the environment. That you guys see is that I write that down. And that's one of the problems that we have here is And I'd love to get into some of the results. And to the point you just made earlier, where we use automation to sort out and filter what So you have, you have all the automation So how's that going? the cloud and the movement to the cloud of so many organizations, they're pushing data to the cloud, take over that shared responsibility model, you know, misconfiguring and S3 bucket is the, so that you can prevent some of these attacks from happening. the cause of the malware getting in and, you know, reforming, et cetera. And they will absolutely, it will tell everybody that you can now go to I, I don't, I, I don't, I'm sorry to generalize, but I wanna ask you about the hacker mindset. It's something they're able to exploit in some cases for Thank you for coming on Really appreciate you being here and helping to educate folks. Set that you built and look forward to future events with you guys. Thank We're gonna wrap up in a moment.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Shawn HenryPERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

Sean HenryPERSON

0.99+

KevinPERSON

0.99+

KimbaPERSON

0.99+

SeanPERSON

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

JulyDATE

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

24QUANTITY

0.99+

Second dayQUANTITY

0.99+

77,000 attacksQUANTITY

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

Kimbo WaldenPERSON

0.99+

second pointQUANTITY

0.99+

millionsQUANTITY

0.99+

OverwatchTITLE

0.99+

WednesdayDATE

0.99+

BidenPERSON

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

FirstQUANTITY

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

DHSORGANIZATION

0.99+

77,000 potential intrusionsQUANTITY

0.99+

zero dayQUANTITY

0.98+

four monthsQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

over 10 yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

one companyQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

this week earlierDATE

0.98+

day twoQUANTITY

0.98+

CrowdStrikeORGANIZATION

0.98+

a year and a half agoDATE

0.97+

OneQUANTITY

0.97+

2 trillion eventsQUANTITY

0.97+

TuesdayDATE

0.97+

eachQUANTITY

0.97+

zero daysQUANTITY

0.97+

pandemicEVENT

0.97+

over 2200 attendeesQUANTITY

0.97+

a billion a dayQUANTITY

0.96+

firstQUANTITY

0.96+

Falcon 22LOCATION

0.96+

over a million new attacksQUANTITY

0.96+

CrowdStrikeEVENT

0.96+

trillions of eventsQUANTITY

0.95+

Falcon 22ORGANIZATION

0.95+

end of June oneDATE

0.95+

7, 7 50QUANTITY

0.95+

threeQUANTITY

0.94+

2021DATE

0.93+

seven minutesQUANTITY

0.92+

hundreds of millions of endpointsQUANTITY

0.92+

seven threat huntersQUANTITY

0.91+

UkraineLOCATION

0.89+

OverwatchORGANIZATION

0.87+

twoQUANTITY

0.86+

350,000 open cybersecurity jobsQUANTITY

0.85+

coupleQUANTITY

0.83+

last yearDATE

0.83+

devicesQUANTITY

0.83+

couple partsQUANTITY

0.82+

presidentPERSON

0.81+

zero trustQUANTITY

0.75+

hundred endpointsQUANTITY

0.72+

this past yearDATE

0.71+

Azure cloudTITLE

0.68+

Fal.Con 2022EVENT

0.68+

couple timesQUANTITY

0.68+

monthsQUANTITY

0.64+

couple of folksQUANTITY

0.62+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.62+

dayQUANTITY

0.61+

every weekQUANTITY

0.61+

yearsQUANTITY

0.61+

cyber securityORGANIZATION

0.6+

houseORGANIZATION

0.59+

lastDATE

0.54+

cloudTITLE

0.54+

S3TITLE

0.52+

monthsDATE

0.48+

Stephen Manley, Druva & Jake Burns, AWS | AWS re:Invent 2021


 

(gentle music) (background chattering) >> Welcome to theCUBE's continuous coverage of AWS re:Invent 2021. I'm Dave Nicholson, and we are running one of the largest, most important hybrid events in the technology business. We've got two live sets here in Las Vegas, along with our two studios back home. And I'm absolutely delighted to have two fantastic guests with me. I'm joined by Stephen Manley, Chief Technology Officer from Druva. Stephen, welcome. >> Thanks, great to be here. >> Welcome back to theCUBE. >> I know. >> CUBE alumni. >> Love theCUBE. >> Along with Jake Burns, Enterprise Strategist from AWS, which I think stands for Amazon Web Services. >> You are correct, thank you. >> Fantastic, so the first question to you Jake is, well, first welcome, again, enterprise strategist, what does that mean exactly? >> Yeah, so- >> What do you do? (laughing) >> We're a team of former CIOs and CTOs who have all spent most of our time as customers and have all had large-scale success digitally transforming our organizations using the AWS Cloud. And now we work for AWS and we advise and work with some of our largest customers, share what worked for us, what didn't, and help them with the beginning stages of their cloud journey. >> Fantastic. >> And, Dave. Dave, you got to ask him, in the last year how many customers have you met? >> Oh, in the past year, I'm averaging about 150 to 200 different customers per year. >> Nice. >> So in the past three years, it's about 550. >> Nice. So can you remember all their names? Or do you do a lot of, "Hey, buddy. Hey, Sport." >> Jake: It's a lot harder with the masks on. >> Yes. >> But I recognize faces better than I remember the names. >> And Stephen, tell us about Druva. >> Yeah, so Druva, we are a SaaS data protection company. We built the first data resiliency cloud. So think of this as you might have data in endpoints, your data center, in AWS, in SaaS applications, and we're really shifting the discussion from, it's not just about backing it up, it's not just about protecting it anymore. It's about how do you recover it? how do you make sure your data is always on, always available to you? And that's really where we're trying to take the conversation. Is making sure that your data is there when you need it. >> And to be clear, this isn't just about resiliency for data that's in the cloud? This is also- >> Everywhere. >> on-premises? IT as well? >> On-premises, you might have VMs, you might have NAS servers, you might have Oracle databases on-prem, again, you might have endpoints. You might have Salesforce data, all of it. We want to make sure all your data's available to you. >> So let's focus on the relationship between Druva and AWS for a minute. It's always interesting to hear about success stories. Let's talk about inhibitors. What are the things that keep the two of you up at night? What are some of the things that... You talked about former CIOs and CTOs, CTOs like Stephen, you're working with existing CIOs and CTOs in all sorts of organizations, what are the things that are preventing them from leveraging cloud as well as they could be? Stephen, start with you on that. >> Yeah, I'll say the first thing is everybody right now is terrified of Ransomware, right? I met a CIO last night and he said, "My entire agenda for 2021, and now 2022 is security, security, security." And everyone is just searching for solutions to say, "How can I make sure that my environment is secure? How can I make sure my data is secure? Especially from these pretty much ubiquitous Ransomware attacks, because until I get that taken care of, it's really hard for me to get on these cloud transformation journeys." And so a lot of the discussion we have with them is, again, Druva in combination with AWS can actually help solve that Ransomware challenge for you so that instead of thinking it as, "Do one, and then you can do the cloud transformation." Let's put those two together, right? But for me, that's the number one thing, is people are just worried about how they're going to deal with security. >> So they're worried, but Jake, isn't it true, we'll do a little perimysium here. (laughing) Tell me the truth. >> All right. >> Isn't that the case that some people still think that effectively their money is safer under their mattress than in a bank? In other words, "I feel safer with on-prem IT than I do having it in some cloud somewhere." Are we still facing that sort of cultural divide between reality and perception? >> Yeah, there's definitely an education, widespread education effort going on right now. Training and certification, which AWS has a lot of experience with and has fantastic courses I went through when I was a customer, my team went through when we were a customer, we were able to get up-skilled very quickly. That fear of the unknown really the way to solve it is through information, through knowing how the cloud works. And it was so funny, I was just having a conversation right before this with an executive team of one of our largest customers and they were talking about how their CSO was dead set against the cloud and then one day did a complete 180. And we're seeing this all the time. When they realize what the cloud is, all the compliance and controls that we have, all of the redundancy that we have, all the benefits of being in the cloud. Then it seems to be like, there's just a moment where it clicks and then people become strong advocates. So there is still a lot of work to do in that area, but we find that people get it very quickly. >> Yeah, Stephen, you've had a long and illustrious career, I say that seriously. >> Stephen: There you go. >> And so you're living that bridging the divide between the old world of on-premises IT and cloud. What are you seeing in that regard in terms of where people's emotions are? >> Oh yeah, and that transformation that Jake talks about, I see it all the time where I'll sit down with a customer and it is exactly that, "Well, I have this on an appliance and because that appliance is under my control, I feel safer." And then we start talking about what the real threats are, that, let's face it Ransomware can come through your environment and it gets in anywhere and it can spread everywhere. And internal threats, internal bad actors, they can get at your appliances. And it very quickly shifts that conversation from, "Oh my gosh, how am I going to maintain all this? I have to do security patching, and upgrades, and I've got to watch everything." And Druva a sort of sits and says, "One of the great things that we had because we're built natively on AWS, a lot of the problems I worried about back when I built appliances are gone. I don't have to worry about capacity planning because AWS always gives me more. I don't have to worry about provisioning new equipment because it just automatically scales for me. I don't have to worry about a lot of the networking challenges that I used to have to worry about because it's built into the environment." And so a lot of what we talked to them about is, by taking these sort of daily routine things off the table, you can actually focus on the higher level value. You can focus on making your environment more secure because you're not just doing the basic blocking and tackling 'cause that's being done for you. And that really gets people sort of across that chasm. >> So you talk about basic block and tackle, in the keynote today, it was mentioned that there are 475 different types of instances within AWS. That gave me a little jolt to the heart because I was thinking back to Steve Jobs saying, "We can only have three of everything." And so sometimes with choice and with flexibility comes complexity. How does Druva manage the potential complexity that exists in the AWS space? How do you take what's best from AWS and deliver it to Druva customers to achieve what they want to achieve? >> Yeah, I think for us, that's really the benefit of being a SaaS provider is, we've designed a system from the ground up for AWS. And so, whether you're talking about the different storage types, where you've got S3, you've got Glacier, you've got Glacier Deep Archive. You have all the different instance types. You have different container services, ECS, EKS, there's all these choices. And frankly, it's something that we've spent a lot of time working on. And honestly, tons of people like Jake inside of AWS willing to help us. We characterize our workload and then they walk us through what's sort of the best practices so that we can deliver an end to end solution for the customer. So that, for our customers, it's just one simple cost, right? How much data are you storing? That's it, right? All the things happening in the background we take care of. And we take care of because we have AWS helping us design and implement this the best possible way. >> And so Jake, with all of the customer conversations that you've had, I'm sure we can guess what some of the themes have been over the last year or two with the pandemic and with things related to security. What are some of the other conversations that you're having with customers that people might not expect? >> Yeah. >> Based on what's going on? >> I think the biggest thing that would be surprising to most people is that vast majority of our conversations are about culture and about people, not about technology. We've gotten to a point where, and I've said this for a number of years, there's never been a better time to move to cloud, but that just keeps being more and more true as time goes on, as the technology gets more mature and as we have more and more examples of people who are very successful doing it. But like you said earlier, there are still some people who are used to the old way of doing things. So it's really largely an education issue, it's a culture issue. It's getting people to wrap their heads around this new way of doing things. And once they see that they get very excited about it. We very rarely see people who are kind of neutral about it. The very, very beginning stages, sometimes they're fearful. When they learn what it is they get very excited and they get very enthusiastic. And my advice to customers is to get your team excited and enthusiastic as early as possible, and they'll solve all of those process and technology problems very quickly and very easily. >> Now what are you seeing in terms of any skill gaps or skill divides? We, coming from a background where we're bridging the divide between sort of the legacy world and cloud. You have IT practitioners that have been doing this stuff for a long time. >> Right. >> That either need to move into the future or not. >> Right. >> Or you need to hire new people. Are there any challenges there in terms of finding the skill sets you need versus training up existing people? >> Yeah, so this is something I talk about a lot, and you do have a choice between hiring and trying to use the people you have and get them up skilled. I strongly favor the second. For one, it's very difficult to hire for cloud skills because it's in such high demand right now, but you use that to your advantage. And by training your staff, it's one of the kind of carrots you can use to get them excited about it. "You learn this, you will be valuable in the marketplace." And when you frame it that way, they get very excited to learn. And when you combine the training with the firsthand experience and give them opportunities to use it, and this could be everyone in the organization, it doesn't have to be like your engineering team or your infrastructure team. I had people in the help desk that learned how to become cloud engineers. When you give them that opportunity, and you give them the tools to do it, and the opportunity to use it with the training, it tends to be a much easier recipe for success. And then your problem becomes retention. But like I say, you're going to have either the problem of hiring or, retention, or you're going to have the problem of having people who don't have enough skills. I'd rather have the problem of retention. And if you have that capability of up-skilling people, then you don't really need to worry about it because there's more people all the time that are becoming more and more skilled. The other thing is, it's a lot easier to overlay cloud skills on top of people who already know your organization and your applications, than bring in new people- >> Sure. >> who have cloud skills, try to retain them and then teach them how your organization works. So there's a lot of advantages to using the people that you have, and the training is a lot easier than people think. >> So who were the people in those organizations that are making the decision to go with Druva? >> [Stephen} Right. >> And who are the people in organizations who are then managing Druva environments moving forward? Do you need a PhD in Druva- (laughing) >> Stephen: Right. >> to be able to manage an environment like that? >> I'll tell you one of the things that I talk to a lot of customers about that are going through sort of that, "How do I up skill?" Is, the first thing we try to remind them is, don't just about what you did on-premises, and then say, "And we're going to do the exact same thing in cloud." Because that is usually a path to either frustration or failure. "I had a physical appliance, I'm going to run a virtual appliance." That's not usually the right answer. So a lot of times we spend time walking them through, "Here's how you think differently. Again, cloud is dynamically scalable. You want something that breaks apart those limits. Cloud gives you 475 options, which means you have purchasing power that you never had as a company that you can have so many different options in front of you." So think of these not as how you thought of your on-premises environment, but think of it as a new way of doing things. And so what we find is the people who tend to be most attracted to Druva are those customers who are saying, "I'm spending too much time, effort, and money on my data protection environment." Which basically is everybody. Nobody wakes up and says, "I wish I could spend more time and money doing backup." And then in terms of who runs it, what we find is it often gets absorbed in sort of a cloud administrator task, right? Where they're looking more broadly across the organization. It's not just about backup, it's backup, it's disaster recovery, it's security, it's compliance because they're looking at the data as opposed to the infrastructure at that point. And that's where they can really start to grow their careers and have a lot bigger impact inside their companies. >> So I can tell that you're an awesome guy to have at a party, because you'll talk about all the risks that we face. >> Absolutely! >> Talking about data center fire drills, you're literally talking about fires and drills at that point. >> You got it. >> But so what's on the horizon for Druva? What are the things that you... When you look out into the future, in the area of resiliency, what are some of the things that you're thinking about? >> There's a couple of things for me. I think one of them, again, Ransomware is everywhere. And so many people right now are still focused on just, "Can I get a clean copy? Can I get a safe copy?" That's built into Druva. So, we're beyond that. The real focus for me is, how do we streamline your recovery process? Because for so many customers, they make this assumption that a Ransomware recovery is just like a disaster recovery. And it's not, it's not as if you just had a system outage. Someone has invaded your environment and you need to make sure that the data, the environment is clean before you recover. You're going to want clean sandboxes to play around with things before you put it in, you're going to need to work with your legal team. So a lot of what we're working with is helping them orchestrate at larger scale. I think the other area that gets really interesting is this notion of autonomous, right? We talk about self-driving cars. Again, nobody wants to spend time tuning and managing their backup environment. So as Druva moves forward it's, "How can we just do this automatically for you?" Again, we're built in the cloud, everything scales automatically. You as a customer shouldn't have to be doing anything. You shouldn't be babysitting this. Let us take care of it for you. So for me, those are the really two big things. It's cybersecurity, that full end to end recovery, and it's around the autonomous protection. >> So Jake, a reality check, anything that he just said that sounds like... (laughing) sounds out of line based on your experience talking to customers in the last year? >> Jake: No, I agree with that. And I think we're touching on something that's really powerful here, because you kind of alluded to the choice that people have in AWS and we're creating new services all the time and new features all the time, right? So these are building blocks that companies can use. And there's a lot of builders at a lot of companies that get very excited to see all these building blocks, and it's about using the right tool for the job. So by giving you more choices, we're giving you more of an opportunity to find the exact fit for the workload you have. But if you just want it to work, then we have this partner of ecosystems. Druva being one of our... My personal favorites (laughing) >> Love you , Jake. >> that build on AWS, use these very resilient, very secure building blocks to build something that's turnkey for a customer. So I think it's a great marriage and it benefits customers ultimately. So it makes us happy. >> All right, well 2022 we expect this gentlemen here to see at least 300 customers to meet his goal. That's what we're expecting from you, Jake. >> All right, I'm on it. >> Thanks to all for joining us here at theCUBE's, continuous coverage of AWS re:Invent 2021, I almost said 2022, live from Las Vegas. Stay tuned for much more from the leader in hybrid technology event programming, theCUBE. (gentle music)

Published Date : Dec 1 2021

SUMMARY :

to have two fantastic guests with me. Along with Jake Burns, and help them with the beginning stages in the last year how many Oh, in the past year, So in the past three So can you remember all their names? harder with the masks on. than I remember the names. So think of this as you again, you might have endpoints. the two of you up at night? And so a lot of the discussion Tell me the truth. Isn't that the case that all of the redundancy that we have, I say that seriously. that bridging the divide "One of the great things that we had and deliver it to Druva customers the background we take care of. What are some of the other And my advice to customers between sort of the move into the future of finding the skill sets you need versus and the opportunity to to using the people that you have, that you can have so all the risks that we face. and drills at that point. What are the things that you... and it's around the autonomous protection. in the last year? the workload you have. to build something that's customers to meet his goal. from the leader

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
StephenPERSON

0.99+

Dave NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

Stephen ManleyPERSON

0.99+

Steve JobsPERSON

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

475 optionsQUANTITY

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

Jake BurnsPERSON

0.99+

JakePERSON

0.99+

two studiosQUANTITY

0.99+

Amazon Web ServicesORGANIZATION

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

DruvaTITLE

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

2022DATE

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

two live setsQUANTITY

0.99+

pandemicEVENT

0.98+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.98+

475 different typesQUANTITY

0.98+

threeQUANTITY

0.98+

first questionQUANTITY

0.98+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.98+

first thingQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

two fantastic guestsQUANTITY

0.98+

secondQUANTITY

0.97+

OneQUANTITY

0.96+

CUBEORGANIZATION

0.96+

last nightDATE

0.96+

two big thingsQUANTITY

0.95+

past yearDATE

0.93+

180QUANTITY

0.93+

GlacierTITLE

0.92+

about 150QUANTITY

0.91+

about 550QUANTITY

0.89+

200 different customersQUANTITY

0.87+

at least 300 customersQUANTITY

0.87+

S3TITLE

0.85+

SalesforceORGANIZATION

0.85+

Kingdon Barrett, Weaveworks | KubeCon + CloudNativeCon NA 2021


 

>>Good morning, welcome to the cubes coverage of Qube con and cloud native con 21 live from Los Angeles. Lisa Martin, here with Dave Nicholson. David's great to be in person with other humans at this conference. Finally, I can't believe >>You're arms length away. It's unreal. >>I know, and they checked backs cards. So everybody's here is nice and safe. We're excited to welcome kingdom Barrett to the program, flux, maintainer and open source support engineer at we works. He came to him. Welcome to the program. >>Oh, thank you for having me on today. >>So let's talk about flux. This is a CNCF incubating project. I saw catalyze as adopt talk to us about flux and its evolution. >>Uh, so flex is, uh, uh, just got into its second version a while ago. We've been, uh, working on, um, uh, we're an incubating project and we're going towards graduation at this point. Um, flex has seen a great deal of adoption from, uh, infant cloud infrastructure vendors in particular, uh, like Microsoft and Amazon and VMware, all building products on, um, flux, uh, the latest version of flux. And, uh, we've heard, uh, from companies like Alibaba and state farm. We had a, uh, uh, conference, uh, at a co-hosted event earlier on Tuesday called get-ups con, uh, where we presented all about get ops, which is the technology, uh, guiding, uh, set of principles that underlies flux. And, uh, there are new adopters, um, all, all every day, including, uh, the department of defense, uh, who has a hundred thousand developers. Um, it's, it's, it's very successful project at this point, who are the >>Key users of flux flux? >>Excuse me. The key users of flux are, uh, probably, uh, application developers and infrastructure engineers, and platform support folks. So a pretty broad spectrum of people. >>And you've got some news at the event. >>Yeah, we actually, uh, we have a, uh, ecosystem event that's coming up, um, on October 20th, uh, it's free virtual event. Uh, folks can join us to hear from these companies. We have people from high level, uh, CTOs and GMs, uh, from companies like Microsoft, Amazon VMware, uh, we've worked D two IQ, um, that are, uh, going to be speaking, uh, about their, uh, products that you can buy from their cloud vendor, uh, that, uh, are based on flux. Uh, so, so that's a milestone for us. That's a major milestone. These are large vendors, um, major cloud vendors that have decided that they trust, uh, flux with their customers workloads. And it's, it's the way that they want to push get ups. Great >>Validation. Yeah. >>So give us an example, just digging in a little bit on flux and get ops. What are some of the things that flux either enforces or enables or validates? What, how would you describe the flux get ops relationship? >>So the first to get ops principles is declarative infrastructure and that's, uh, that's something that people who are using Kubernetes are already very familiar with. Um, flux has a basic itself, or, or I guess spawned, uh, maybe is a better way to say it. Uh, this, um, uh, whole get ops working group, that's just defined the principles. There's four of them in the formal definition. That's just been promoted to a 1.0 and, uh, the get ups working group, publish, publish this at, uh, open get-ups dot dev where you can read all four. And, um, it's great copy site. If you're not really familiar with get ops, you can, you can read all four, but, uh, the other, uh, the second one I would have mentioned is, uh, version storage is, is, uh, it's called get ups and get as a version store. So it's a good for, um, disaster recovery. >>Uh, and, uh, if you have an issue with a new release, if you're, uh, pushing changes frequently, that's, you know, more than likely you will have issues from time to time. Uh, you can roll back with, get ups because everything is version. Um, and, uh, you can do those releases rapidly because the deployment is automatic, um, and it's continuously reconciling. So those are the four principles of get ups. Uh, and they're, they're not exactly prescriptive. You don't have to adopt them all at once. You can pick and choose where you want to get started. Um, but that's what, uh, is underneath flux. >>How do you help customers pick and choose based on what are some of the key criteria that you would advise them on? >>We would advise them to try to follow all of those principles, because that's what you get out of the box with fluxes is a solution that does those things. But if there is one of those things that gets in a way, um, there's also the concept of a closed loop that is, um, sometimes debated as whether it should be part of the get ops principles or not. Um, that just means that, uh, when you use get-ups the only changes that go to your infrastructure are coming through get-ups. Uh, so you don't have someone coming in and using the back door. Um, it all goes through get, uh, w when you want to make a change to your cluster or your application, you push it to get the automation takes over from there and, um, and makes, uh, developers and platform engineers jobs a lot easier. And it makes it easier for them to collaborate with each other, >>Of course, productivity. You mentioned AWS, Microsoft, VMware, uh, all working with you to deliver, get ups to enterprise customers. Talk to me about some of the benefits in it for these big guys. I mean, that's great validation, but what's in it for AWS and VMware and Microsoft, for example, business outcome wise. >>Well, uh, one of the things that we've been promoting and since June is a flex has been, uh, uh, there's an API underneath, that's called the get ops toolkit. This is, uh, if you're building a platform for platforms like these cloud vendors are, um, we announced that fluxes APRs are officially stable. So that means that it's safe for them to build on top of, and they can, uh, go ahead and build things and not worry that we're going to pull the rug out from under them. So that's one of the major vendors, uh, one of the major, uh, uh, vendor benefits and, um, uh, we've, we've also added a recent improvement, uh, uh, called service side apply that, uh, will improve performance. Uh, we reduced the number of, um, API calls, but also for, for, uh, users, it makes things a lot easier because they don't have to write explicitly health checks on everything. Uh, it's possible for them to say, we'd like to see everything is healthy, and it's a one-line addition, that's it? >>So, you know, there's been a lot of discussion from a lot of different angles of the subject of security, uh, in this space. Um, how does this, how does this dovetail with that? A lot of discussion specifically about software supply chain security. Now this is more in the operations space. How do, how do those come together? Do you have any thoughts on security? >>Well, flux is built for security first. Um, there are a lot of products out there that, uh, will shell out to other tools and, and that's a potential vulnerability and flux does not do that. Uh, we've recently undergone a security audit, which we're waiting for the results and the report over, but this is part of our progress towards the CNCF graduated status. Um, and, uh, we've, we've liked what we've seen and preliminary results. Uh, we've, we've prepared for the security audit on knowing that it was coming and, uh, uh, flexes, uh, uh, designed for security first. Uh, you're able to verify that the commits that you're applying to your cluster are signed and actually come from a valid author who is, uh, permitted to make changes to the cluster and, uh, get ops itself is, is this, uh, model of operations by poll requests. So, um, you, you have an opportunity to make sure that your changes are, uh, appropriately reviewed before they get applied. >>Got it. So you had a session at coupon this week. Talk to me a little bit about that. What were like the top three takeaways, and maybe even share with us some of the feedback that you got from the audience? >>Um, so, uh, the session was about Jenkins and get ups or Jenkins and flux. And the, um, the main idea is that when you use flux, flux is a tool for delivery. So you've heard maybe of CIC, D C I N C D are separate influx. We consider these as two separate jobs that should not cross over. And, uh, when, when, uh, you do that. So the talk is about Jenkins and flux. Jenkins is a very popular CII solution and the messages, uh, you don't have to abandon, if you've made a large infrastructure investment in a CII solution, you don't have to abandon your Jenkins or your GitHub actions or, or whatever other CII solution you're using to build and test images. Uh, you can take it with you and adopt get ups. >>Um, so there's compatibility there and, and usability familiarity for the audience, the users. Yeah. What was some of the feedback that they provided to you? Um, were they surprised by that? Happy about that? >>Well, and talk to us a little bit fast paced. Uh, we'll put it in the advanced CIC D track. I covered a lot of ground in that talk, and I hope to go back and cover things in a little bit smaller steps. Um, I tried to show as many of the features of Fluxus as I could. Uh, and, and so one of the feedback that I got was actually, it was a little bit difficult to follow up as, so I'm a new presenter. Um, this is my first year we've worked. I've never presented at CubeCon before. Um, I'm really glad I got the opportunity to be here. This is a great, uh, opportunity to collaborate with other open source teams. And, um, that's, that's, uh, that's the takeaway from me? No. >>So you've got to give a shout out to, uh, to weave works. Absolutely. You know, any, any organization that realizes the benefit of having its folks participating in the community, realizing that it, it helps the community, it helps you, it helps them, you know, that's, that's what we love about, about all of this. >>Yeah. We're, uh, we're really excited to grow adoption for, um, Kubernetes and get ops together. So, >>So I've asked a few people this over the last couple of days, where do you think we are in the peak Kubernetes curve? Are we still just at the very beginning stages of this, of this as a, as a movement? >>Um, certainly we're, um, it's, it's, uh, for, for people who are here at CubeCon, I think we see that, you know, uh, a lot of companies are very successful with Kubernetes, but, um, I come from a university, it, uh, background and I haven't seen a lot of adoption, uh, in, in large enterprise, um, more conservative enterprises, at least in, in my personal experience. And I think that, uh, there is a lot for those places to gain, um, through, through, uh, adopting Kubernetes and get ups together. I think get ops is, uh, we'll provide them with the opportunity to, uh, experience Kubernetes in the best way possible. >>We've seen such acceleration in the last 18, 19 months of digital transformation for companies to survive, to pivot during COVID to survive, doubt to thrive. Do you see that influencing the adoption of Kubernetes and maybe different industries getting more comfortable with leveraging it as a platform? >>Sure. Um, a lot of companies see it as a cost center. And so if you can make it easier or possible to do, uh, operations with fewer people in the loop, um, that, that makes it a cost benefit for a lot of people, but also you need to keep people in the loop. You need to keep the people that you have included and, and be transparent about what infrastructure choices and changes you're making. So, uh, that's one of the things that get ups really helps with >>At transparency is key. One more question for you. Can you share a little bit before we wrap here about the project roadmap and some of the things that are coming down the pike? Yeah. >>So I mentioned a graduation. That's the immediate goal that we're working towards? Uh, most directly, uh, we have, um, grown our, uh, number of integrations pretty significantly. We have an operator how entry in red hat, open shift there's operator hub, where you can go and click to install flux. And that's great. Um, and, uh, we looked forward to, uh, making flux more compatible with more of the tools that you find in the CNCF umbrella. Um, that's, that's what our roadmap is for >>Increasing that compatibility. And one more time mentioned the event, October 20th, I believe he said, let folks know where they can go and find it on the web. Yeah. >>If you're interested in the get ups days.com, it's the get-ups one-stop shop and it's, uh, vendors like AWS and Microsoft and VMware detour IQ. And we've worked, we've all built a flux based solutions, um, for, uh, that are available for sale right now. So if you're, uh, trying to use get-ups and you have one of these vendors as your cloud vendor, um, it seems like a natural fit to try the solution that's out of the box. Uh, but if you need convincing, you get Upstate's dot com, you can go find out more about the event and, uh, we'll hope to see you there. >>I get upstairs.com kingdom. Thank you. You're joining Dave and me on the program, talking to us about flux. Congratulations on its evolution. We look forward to hearing more great things as the years unfold. >>Thank you so much for having me on our pleasure >>For Dave Nicholson. I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching the kid live from Los Angeles at CubeCon cloud native con 21 stick around Dave and I, and we'll be right back with our next guest.

Published Date : Oct 14 2021

SUMMARY :

David's great to be in person with other humans You're arms length away. We're excited to welcome kingdom Barrett to the program, to us about flux and its evolution. Uh, so flex is, uh, uh, just got into its second version a while So a pretty broad spectrum of people. uh, products that you can buy from their cloud vendor, uh, that, uh, are based on flux. Yeah. What, how would you describe the flux get ops and, uh, the get ups working group, publish, publish this at, uh, open get-ups dot dev where you can Uh, and, uh, if you have an issue with a new release, if you're, uh, w when you want to make a change to your cluster or your application, you push it to get the automation uh, all working with you to deliver, get ups to enterprise customers. So that means that it's safe for them to build on top of, and they can, uh, of security, uh, in this space. Um, and, uh, we've, we've liked what we've seen and preliminary results. and maybe even share with us some of the feedback that you got from the audience? And, uh, when, when, uh, you do that. Um, so there's compatibility there and, and usability familiarity for the audience, uh, opportunity to collaborate with other open source teams. it helps the community, it helps you, it helps them, you know, that's, So, I think get ops is, uh, we'll provide them with the opportunity to, Do you see that influencing the adoption of Kubernetes and maybe different So, uh, that's one of the things that get ups really helps with Can you share a little bit before we wrap here about the project roadmap Um, and, uh, we looked forward to, uh, And one more time mentioned the event, October 20th, I believe he said, uh, trying to use get-ups and you have one of these vendors as your cloud vendor, You're joining Dave and me on the program, talking to us about flux. con 21 stick around Dave and I, and we'll be right back with our next guest.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
DavePERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

AlibabaORGANIZATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

October 20thDATE

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Los AngelesLOCATION

0.99+

DavidPERSON

0.99+

JuneDATE

0.99+

one-lineQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

JenkinsTITLE

0.99+

second versionQUANTITY

0.98+

CNCFORGANIZATION

0.98+

flexORGANIZATION

0.98+

VMwareORGANIZATION

0.98+

this weekDATE

0.98+

first yearQUANTITY

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.97+

GitHubORGANIZATION

0.97+

todayDATE

0.97+

CubeConEVENT

0.96+

two separate jobsQUANTITY

0.95+

Kingdon BarrettORGANIZATION

0.95+

udNativeCon NA 2021EVENT

0.95+

One more questionQUANTITY

0.93+

WeaveworksORGANIZATION

0.92+

second oneQUANTITY

0.92+

CICTITLE

0.92+

UpstateORGANIZATION

0.92+

KubernetesTITLE

0.92+

CubeConORGANIZATION

0.89+

FluxusTITLE

0.87+

Qube conEVENT

0.86+

KubernetesORGANIZATION

0.85+

KubeConEVENT

0.84+

ups days.comOTHER

0.83+

upstairs.comOTHER

0.83+

fourQUANTITY

0.82+

BarrettPERSON

0.81+

three takeawaysQUANTITY

0.8+

hundred thousand developersQUANTITY

0.79+

18QUANTITY

0.75+

VMware detour IQORGANIZATION

0.75+

KubernetesPERSON

0.75+

one more timeQUANTITY

0.74+

four of themQUANTITY

0.71+

getOTHER

0.7+

1.0OTHER

0.7+

19 monthsQUANTITY

0.69+

CIITITLE

0.68+

CloORGANIZATION

0.66+

fluxTITLE

0.64+

TuesdayDATE

0.64+

COVIDTITLE

0.63+

D two IQORGANIZATION

0.62+

conEVENT

0.59+

conORGANIZATION

0.59+

lastDATE

0.56+

21QUANTITY

0.5+

cloudORGANIZATION

0.5+

VMwareTITLE

0.37+

Ajay Singh, Pure Storage | CUBEconversation


 

(upbeat music) >> The Cloud essentially turned the data center into an API and ushered in the era of programmable infrastructure, no longer do we think about deploying infrastructure in rigid silos with a hardened, outer shell, rather infrastructure has to facilitate digital business strategies. And what this means is putting data at the core of your organization, irrespective of its physical location. It also means infrastructure generally and storage specifically must be accessed as sets of services that can be discovered, deployed, managed, secured, and governed in a DevOps model or OpsDev, if you prefer. Now, this has specific implications as to how vendor product strategies will evolve and how they'll meet modern data requirements. Welcome to this Cube conversation, everybody. This is Dave Vellante. And with me to discuss these sea changes is Ajay Singh, the Chief Product Officer of Pure Storage, Ajay welcome. >> Thank you, David, gald to be on. >> Yeah, great to have you, so let's talk about your role at Pure. I think you're the first CPO, what's the vision there? >> That's right, I just joined up Pure about eight months ago from VMware as the chief product officer and you're right, I'm the first our chief product officer at Pure. And at VMware I ran the Cloud management business unit, which was a lot about automation and infrastructure as code. And it's just great to join Pure, which has a phenomenal all flash product set. I kind of call it the iPhone or flash story super easy to use. And how do we take that same ease of use, which is a heart of a Cloud operating principle, and how do we actually take it up to really deliver a modern data experience, which includes infrastructure and storage as code, but then even more beyond that and how do you do modern operations and then modern data services. So super excited to be at Pure. And the vision, if you may, at the end of the day, is to provide, leveraging this moderate experience, a connected and effortless experience data experience, which allows customers to ultimately focus on what matters for them, their business, and by really leveraging and managing and winning with their data, because ultimately data is the new oil, if you may, and if you can mine it, get insights from it and really drive a competitive edge in the digital transformation in your head, and that's what be intended to help our customers to. >> So you joined earlier this year kind of, I guess, middle of the pandemic really I'm interested in kind of your first 100 days, what that was like, what key milestones you set and now you're into your second a 100 plus days. How's that all going? What can you share with us in and that's interesting timing because the effects of the pandemic you came in in a kind of post that, so you had experience from VMware and then you had to apply that to the product organization. So tell us about that sort of first a 100 days and the sort of mission now. >> Absolutely, so as we talked about the vision, around the modern data experience, kind of have three components to it, modernizing the infrastructure and really it's kudos to the team out of the work we've been doing, a ton of work in modernizing the infrastructure, I'll briefly talk to that, then modernizing the data, much more than modernizing the operations. I'll talk to that as well. And then of course, down the pike, modernizing data services. So if you think about it from modernizing the infrastructure, if you think about Pure for a minute, Pure is the first company that took flash to mainstream, essentially bringing what we call consumer simplicity to enterprise storage. The manual for the products with the front and back of a business card, that's it, you plug it in, boom, it's up and running, and then you get proactive AI driven support, right? So that was kind of the heart of Pure. Now you think about Pure again, what's unique about Pure has been a lot of our competition, has dealt with flash at the SSD level, hey, because guess what? All this software was built for hard drive. And so if I can treat NAND as a solid state drive SSD, then my software would easily work on it. But with Pure, because we started with flash, we released went straight to the NAND level, and as opposed to kind of the SSD layer, and what that does is it gives you greater efficiency, greater reliability and create a performance compared to an SSD, because you can optimize at the chip level as opposed to at the SSD module level. That's one big advantage that Pure has going for itself. And if you look at the physics, in the industry for a minute, there's recent data put out by Wikibon early this year, effectively showing that by the year 2026, flash on a dollar per terabyte basis, just the economics of the semiconductor versus the hard disk is going to be cheaper than hard disk. So this big inflection point is slowly but surely coming that's going to disrupt the hardest industry, already the high end has been taken over by flash, but hybrid is next and then even the long tail is coming up over there. And so to end to that extent our lead, if you may, the introduction of QLC NAND, QLC NAND powerful competition is barely introducing, we've been at it for a while. We just recently this year in my first a 100 days, we introduced the flasher AC, C40 and C60 drives, which really start to open up our ability to go after the hybrid story market in a big way. It opens up a big new market for us. So great work there by the team,. Also at the heart of it. If you think about it in the NAND side, we have our flash array, which is a scale-up latency centric architecture and FlashBlade which is a scale-out throughput architecture, all operating with NAND. And what that does is it allows us to cover both structured data, unstructured data, tier one apps and tier two apps. So pretty broad data coverage in that journey to the all flash data center, slowly but surely we're heading over there to the all flash data center based on demand economics that we just talked about, and we've done a bunch of releases. And then the team has done a bunch of things around introducing and NVME or fabric, the kind of thing that you expect them to do. A lot of recognition in the industry for the team or from the likes of TrustRadius, Gartner, named FlashRay, the Carton Peer Insights, the customer choice award and primary storage in the MQ. We were the leader. So a lot of kudos and recognition coming to the team as a result, Flash Blade just hit a billion dollars in cumulative revenue, kind of a leader by far in kind of the unstructured data, fast file an object marketplace. And then of course, all the work we're doing around what we say, ESG, environmental, social and governance, around reducing carbon footprint, reducing waste, our whole notion of evergreen and non-disruptive upgrades. We also kind of did a lot of work in that where we actually announced that over 2,700 customers have actually done non-disruptive upgrades over the technology. >> Yeah a lot to unpack there. And a lot of this sometimes you people say, oh, it's the plumbing, but the plumbing is actually very important too. 'Cause we're in a major inflection point, when we went from spinning disk to NAND. And it's all about volumes, you're seeing this all over the industry now, you see your old boss, Pat Gelsinger, is dealing with this at Intel. And it's all about consumer volumes in my view anyway, because thanks to Steve Jobs, NAND volumes are enormous and what two hard disk drive makers left in the planet. I don't know, maybe there's two and a half, but so those volumes drive costs down. And so you're on that curve and you can debate as to when it's going to happen, but it's not an if it's a when. Let me, shift gears a little bit. Because Cloud, as I was saying, it's ushered in this API economy, this as a service model, a lot of infrastructure companies have responded. How are you thinking at Pure about the as a service model for your customers? What's the strategy? How is it evolving and how does it differentiate from the competition? >> Absolutely, a great question. It's kind of segues into the second part of the moderate experience, which is how do you modernize the operations? And that's where automation as a service, because ultimately, the Cloud has validated and the address of this model, right? People are looking for outcomes. They care less about how you get there. They just want the outcome. And the as a service model actually delivers these outcomes. And this whole notion of infrastructure as code is kind of the start of it. Imagine if my infrastructure for a developer is just a line of code, in a Git repository in a program that goes through a CICD process and automatically kind of is configured and set up, fits in with the Terraform, the Ansibles, all that different automation frameworks. And so what we've done is we've gone down the path of really building out what I think is modern operations with this ability to have storage as code, disability, in addition modern operations is not just storage scored, but also we've got recently introduced some comprehensive ransomware protection, that's part of modern operations. There's all the threat you hear in the news or ransomware. We introduced what we call safe mode snapshots that allow you to recover in literally seconds. When you have a ransomware attack, we also have in the modern operations Pure one, which is maybe the leader in AI driven support to prevent downtime. We actually call you 80% of the time and fix the problems without you knowing about it. That's what modern operations is all about. And then also Martin operations says, okay, you've got flash on your on-prem side, but even maybe using flash in the public Cloud, how can I have seamless multi-Cloud experience in our Cloud block store we've introduced around Amazon, AWS and Azure allows one to do that. And then finally, for modern applications, if you think about it, this whole notion of infrastructure's code, as a service, software driven storage, the Kubernetes infrastructure enables one to really deliver a great automation framework that enables to reduce the labor required to manage the storage infrastructure and deliver it as code. And we have, kudos to Charlie and the Pure storage team before my time with the acquisition of Portworx, Portworx today is truly delivers true storage as code orchestrated entirely through Kubernetes and in a multi-Cloud hybrid situation. So it can run on EKS, GKE, OpenShift rancher, Tansu, recently announced as the leader by giggle home for enterprise Kubernetes storage. We were really proud about that asset. And then finally, the last piece are Pure as a service. That's also all outcome oriented, SLS. What matters is you sign up for SLS, and then you get those SLS, very different from our competition, right? Our competition tends to be a lot more around financial engineering, hey, you can buy it OPEX versus CapEx. And, but you get the same thing with a lot of professional services, we've really got, I'd say a couple of years and lead on, actually delivering and managing with SRE engineers for the SLA. So a lot of great work there. We recently also introduced Cisco FlashStack, again, flash stack as a service, again, as a service, a validation of that. And then finally, we also recently did a announcement with Aquaponics, with their bare metal as a service where we are a key part of their bare metal as a service offering, again, pushing the kind of the added service strategy. So yes, big for us, that's where the buck is skating, half the enterprises, even on prem, wanting to consume things in the Cloud operating model. And so that's where we're putting it lot. >> I see, so your contention is, it's not just this CapEx to OPEX, that's kind of the, during the economic downturn of 2007, 2008, the economic crisis, that was the big thing for CFOs. So that's kind of yesterday's news. What you're saying is you're creating a Cloud, like operating model, as I was saying upfront, irrespective of physical location. And I see that as your challenge, the industry's challenge, be, if I'm going to effect the digital transformation, I don't want to deal with the Cloud primitives. I want you to hide the underlying complexity of that Cloud. I want to deal with higher level problems, but so that brings me to digital transformation, which is kind of the now initiative, or I even sometimes call it the mandate. There's not a one size fits all for digital transformation, but I'm interested in your thoughts on the must take steps, universal steps that everybody needs to think about in a digital transformation journey. >> Yeah, so ultimately the digital transformation is all about how companies are gain a competitive edge in this new digital world or that the company are, and the competition are changing the game on, right? So you want to make sure that you can rapidly try new things, fail fast, innovate and invest, but speed is of the essence, agility and the Cloud operating model enables that agility. And so what we're also doing is not only are we driving agility in a multicloud kind of data, infrastructure, data operation fashion, but we also taking it a step further. We were also on the journey to deliver modern data services. Imagine on a Pure on-prem infrastructure, along with your different public Clouds that you're working on with the Kubernetes infrastructures, you could, with a few clicks run Kakfa as a service, TensorFlow as a service, Mongo as a service. So me as a technology team can truly become a service provider and not just an on-prem service provider, but a multi-Cloud service provider. Such that these services can be used to analyze the data that you have, not only your data, your partner data, third party public data, and how you can marry those different data sets, analyze it to deliver new insights that ultimately give you a competitive edge in the digital transformation. So you can see data plays a big role there. The data is what generates those insights. Your ability to match that data with partner data, public data, your data, the analysis on it services ready to go, as you get the digital, as you can do the insights. You can really start to separate yourself from your competition and get on the leaderboard a decade from now when this digital transformation settles down. >> All right, so bring us home, Ajay, summarize what does a modern data strategy look like and how does it fit into a digital business or a digital organization? >> So look, at the end of the day, data and analysis, both of them play a big role in the digital transformation. And it really comes down to how do I leverage this data, my data, partner data, public data, to really get that edge. And that links back to a vision. How do we provide that connected and effortless, modern data experience that allows our customers to focus on their business? How do I get the edge in the digital transformation? But easily leveraging, managing and winning with their data. And that's the heart of where Pure is headed. >> Ajay Singh, thanks so much for coming inside theCube and sharing your vision. >> Thank you, Dave, it was a real pleasure. >> And thank you for watching this Cube conversation. This is Dave Vellante and we'll see you next time. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Aug 18 2021

SUMMARY :

in the era of programmable Yeah, great to have you, And the vision, if you the pandemic you came in in kind of the unstructured data, And a lot of this sometimes and the address of this model, right? of 2007, 2008, the economic crisis, the data that you have, And that's the heart of and sharing your vision. was a real pleasure. And thank you for watching

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

DavidPERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

Ajay SinghPERSON

0.99+

CharliePERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Pat GelsingerPERSON

0.99+

AjayPERSON

0.99+

Steve JobsPERSON

0.99+

80%QUANTITY

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

PureORGANIZATION

0.99+

TrustRadiusORGANIZATION

0.99+

VMwareORGANIZATION

0.99+

2008DATE

0.99+

2007DATE

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

CapExORGANIZATION

0.99+

AquaponicsORGANIZATION

0.99+

PortworxORGANIZATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.99+

GartnerORGANIZATION

0.99+

OPEXORGANIZATION

0.99+

MartinPERSON

0.99+

iPhoneCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

100 plus daysQUANTITY

0.99+

Pure StorageORGANIZATION

0.99+

second partQUANTITY

0.99+

over 2,700 customersQUANTITY

0.99+

WikibonORGANIZATION

0.98+

secondQUANTITY

0.98+

first 100 daysQUANTITY

0.98+

billion dollarsQUANTITY

0.98+

this yearDATE

0.97+

KubernetesTITLE

0.97+

CiscoORGANIZATION

0.96+

two and a halfQUANTITY

0.96+

oneQUANTITY

0.96+

MongoORGANIZATION

0.96+

TansuORGANIZATION

0.95+

AzureORGANIZATION

0.95+

early this yearDATE

0.94+

earlier this yearDATE

0.94+

100 daysQUANTITY

0.94+

FlashRayORGANIZATION

0.93+

first companyQUANTITY

0.93+

tier two appsQUANTITY

0.93+

C60COMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.92+

pandemicEVENT

0.92+

OpenShiftORGANIZATION

0.91+

SLSTITLE

0.91+

2026DATE

0.91+

CartonORGANIZATION

0.91+

three componentsQUANTITY

0.9+

todayDATE

0.88+

CloudTITLE

0.88+

a minuteQUANTITY

0.87+

SREORGANIZATION

0.86+

Cloud blockTITLE

0.86+

two hard disk driveQUANTITY

0.86+

EKSORGANIZATION

0.85+

KubernetesORGANIZATION

0.82+

about eight months agoDATE

0.82+

AnsiblesORGANIZATION

0.8+

GKEORGANIZATION

0.79+

KakfaORGANIZATION

0.79+

a decadeDATE

0.77+

tier one appsQUANTITY

0.76+

Peer InsightsTITLE

0.75+

GitTITLE

0.75+

TensorFlowORGANIZATION

0.71+

one big advantageQUANTITY

0.7+

Keynote Reaction with DR


 

(upbeat music) >> Okay, Chloe, thank you very much. Hey folks, in here in the Cloud City We with Danielle Royston. Great to see you. Watching you up on stage, I got to say, as the CEO of TelcoDR, leader and chief executive of that company. As well as a great visionary, you laid out the vision. It's hard to debate that. I mean, I think there's people who will say that vision, is like freedom, no one can debate it. It's not going to happen. >> Yeah, there's still a lot of debate in our industry about it. There's a lot of articles being written about it. I've referenced one about, you know, should we let the dragons into the castle? For me, I think it's super obvious. I think other industries are like "Duh, we've made the move." And Telco is still like, "Hmm, we're not sure." And so, am I a visionary, I don't know. I'm just sort of just Babe Ruth-ing it a little bit. I think that's where we're going. >> You know you do, you have a lot of content, podcasts, you write blogs, you do a lot of speaking. You brought it all together on stage, right? That has got to feel good. >> Yeah. >> You've got a body of work and it came together very nicely. How did you feel up there? >> Oh my God, it's absolutely nerve wrecking. I sort of feel like, you know, could you tell if my hands were shaking? Right, could you tell that my heart was racing? >> It's a good feeling. >> I don't know. >> Come on! >> I'll be honest, I'm happy it's over, I'm happy. I think I did a really great job and I'm really happy >> Yeah, you did a great job, I love the dragon reference-- >> Have it in the can. >> Fantastic, loved the Game of Thrones vibe there. It was cool-- >> Totally. >> One of the things I wanted pick up on, I thought it was very interesting and unique was the iPhone reference 14 years ago, because that really, to me, was a similar moment because that shifted the smartphone. A computer that happened to make phone calls. And then we all knew who was the leader at that time, Nokia, Blackberry with the phones, and they became toast. That ushered in a whole another era of change, wealth creation, innovation, new things. >> Yeah. Well, up until that moment, carriers had been designing the phones themselves. They were branded with their logos. And so Steve Jobs fought for the design of the iPhone. He designed it with the consumer, with the user in mind. But I think what it really, I mean, it's such a big pivotal moment in our industry because it singled the end of voice revenue and ushered in the era of data. But it also introduced the OTT players, right? That came in through the apps and started a siphon approved from the carriers. And this is like, it's a pivotal moment in the industry, like, changed the industry forever. >> It's a step function, it was a step function change, it's obvious, everyone knew it. But what's interesting is that we were riffing yesterday about O-RAN and Android. So you have iPhone, but Android became a very successful open source project that changed the landscape of the handset. Some are saying that that kind of phenomenon is coming here. Into Telco with software, kind of like an Android model where that'll come in. What's your thoughts on that, reaction to that? >> Yeah, well the dis-aggregation of the hardware, right? We're in the iconic Erickson booth, right? They get most of their revenue from RAN, from Radio Access Networks. And now with the introduction of Open RAN, right? With 50% less CapEx, 40% less OPEX, you know, I think it's easiest for Greenfield operators like Dish, that are building a brand new network. But just this month, Vodafone announced they're going to build the world's largest Open RAN network. Change is happening and the big operators are starting to adopt Open RAN in a real big way. >> So to me, riding the dragon means taking the advantage of new opportunities on top of that dragon. Developing apps like the iPhone did. And you mentioned Android, they got it right. Remember the Windows Phone, right? They tried to take Windows and shove it to the phone-- >> Barely. >> It was a kin phone too. >> I try to delete it from my, look here, beep! >> I'm going to take this old world app and I'm going to shove it into the new world, and guess what, it failed. So if the Telco is trying to do the same thing here, it will fail, but if they start building 5G apps in the cloud and pick the cloud native and think about the consumer, isn't really that the opportunity that you're talking about? >> Well, I think it is, absolutely. And I think it's a wake up call for the vendors in our space, right? And I'm certainly trying to become a vendor with Totogi. I'm really pushing my idea. But you can't take, using your Windows example on the Windows Phone, you can't take a Windows app and stuff it onto a phone and you can't take these old school applications that were written 20 years ago and just stuff them into the cloud, right? Cloud is not a place, it's a way to design applications and it all needs to be rewritten and let's go write, rewrite it. >> It's not a destination as we always say. Let's take a step back on the keynote 'cause I know we just did a couple of highlights there, wasn't the whole thing. We were watching it, by the way, we thought you did a great job, you were very cool and calm under pressure. But take us through the core ideas in the keynote. Break down the core elements of what the talk was about. >> Yeah, I think the headline really is, you know, just like there were good and bad things about the iPhone, right? It killed voice, but introduced data and all these other things. There's good and bad things about the public cloud, right? It's not going to be smooth sailing, no downsides. And so I acknowledge that, even though I'm the self appointed queen, you know? This self appointed evangelist. And so, I think that if you completely ignore the public cloud, try to stick your head in the sand and pretend it doesn't exist, I think there's nothing but downsides for Telcos. And so I think you need to learn how to maximize the advantage there, ride he dragon, like spew some fire and, you know, get some speed and height, and then you can double your ARPU. But I think, going from there, so the next three, I was trying to give examples of what I meant by that, of why it's a double-edged sword, why it's two sides of the coin. And I think there's three areas, which is the enterprise, the network, and a relationship with subscribers. And so that really what the talk, that's what the talk is about >> The three main pillars. >> Yeah, yeah! >> Future, work, enterprise, transition, Open RAN. >> The network and then the relationship with the subscribers. >> Those are the structural elements you see. >> Yeah, yeah, yeah. >> What's the most important one you think, right now, that people are focused on? >> I mean, I think the first one, with work, that's an easy one to do, because there's not too much downside, right? I think we all learned that we could work productively from home. The reason public cloud matter there is because we had tools like Zoom and G Suite and we didn't need to be, I mean, imagine if that this had happened even 20 years ago, right? Broadband at the home wasn't ready, the tools weren't ready. I mean, it would have been, I mean a bigger disaster than it was, right? And so this is an opportunity to sort of ride this work from home wave that a lot of CEOs are saying, we're not coming back or we're going to have smaller offices. And all of those employees need fiber to their home. They need 5G at their home. I mean, if I'm a head of enterprise in a Telco, I am shifting my 5G message from like random applications or whatever, to be like, how are you getting big pipes to the home so your workers can be productive there? And that, I don't hear Telco's talking about that and that's a really big idea. >> You know, you say it's a no brainer, but it's interesting you had your buildings crumbling, which was great, very nice effect in the talk. I heard a executive, Wall Street executive the other day, talking about how, "My people will be back in the office. "I'm going to mandate vaccinations, they're going to be back "in the office, you work for me. "Even though it's an employee friendly environment "right now, I don't care". And I was shocked. I go, okay, this is just an old guy. But, and it's not just the fact that it's an old guy, old guard doing that because I take two examples of old guys, Michael Dell and Frank Slootman. >> Yeah. >> Right, Michael Dell, you know, hundred billion dollar company, Frank Slootman, hottest, you know, software company. Both of them, sort of agree. It's a no brainer. >> Yeah. >> Why should I spend all this money on buildings? And my people are going to be more productive. They love it, so. Why fight the fashion? >> Well, I think the office and I can talk about this for a long time and I know we don't have that much time, but on offices, it's a way to see when did you come in and when did you leave, and look over your shoulder and what we're working on. And that's what offices are for. Now, we tell ourselves it's about collaboration and all this other stuff. And you know, these guys are saying, "come back to the office." It's because they don't have an answer on how to manage productivity. What are you working on? Are you off, are you authentically working 40 hours a week? I want to see, I know if at least you're here, you're here. Now, you might be playing, you know, Minesweeper. You might be playing Minesweeper on your computer, but at least you were, your butt was at your computer. So yeah, I think this is a pivotal moment in work. I think Telcos could push it, to work from home. We'll get you the pipes, we'll get you the cloud-based tools to help manage productivity, to change in work style. >> Yeah, and we've covered this in theCube many times, about how software is going to enable this virtual first model, no one's actually built software for virtual first. I think that's going to happen. Again, back to your team software, but I want to ask you about software defined infrastructure. You mentioned O-RAN, and as software eats the world and eats infrastructure, you still need infrastructure. So, talk about the relationship of how you see O-RAN competing and winning with the balance of software versus the commodity argument. >> Yeah, and I think this is really where people get scared in Telco. I mean, authentically nervous, right. Where you're like, okay, really the public cloud is at that network edge, right? We're really going to like, who are we? It's an identity crisis. We're not the towers anymore. We're renting space, right? We're now dis-aggregating the network, putting the edge cloud right there and it's AWS or Google. Who are we, what do we do, are we networks? Are we a tech company? Right, and so I'm like, guys, you are your subscribers and you don't focus on that. I mean, it's kind of like a last thought. >> So you're like a therapist then too, not just an evangelist. >> I'm a little bit of a therapist. >> Okay, lay down on the couch, Telco. >> Let's talk about what your problems are. (laughs) >> They have tower issues. >> All seriousness, no but, the tower is changing is backhauling. Look at direct connects for instance. The rise of direct and killed the exchanges. I mean, broadband, backhaul, last mile, >> Yeah. >> Completely, still issues, >> Yeah. >> But it's going to software and so that's there. The other thing I want to get to quickly, I know we don't have a lot of time, is the love relationship you talk about with subscribers. We had Peter Adderton on, from a Boost Mobile, formerly Boost Mobile, earlier. He was saying, if you don't have a focus on the customer, then you're just selling minutes and that's it. >> Yeah. >> And his point was, they don't really care. >> Yeah. Let's talk about organizational energy, right? How much energy is contained within any organization, not just Telco, but any organization. To some of your people time is the hours they work per week. And then you think of that as a sack on how you're allocating your time and spending your time, right? And so I think they spend 50% of their time, maybe more, fighting servers, machines, the network, right? And having all these battles. How much of that organizational energy is dedicated to driving great subscriber experiences? And it just shrunk, right? And I think that's where the public cloud can really help them. Like ride the dragon. Let the dragon deal with some of this underlying stuff. So that you can ride a dragon, survey the land, focus on your subscriber and back to the software. Use software, just like the OTT players are doing. They are taking away your ARPU. They're siphoning your ARPU, 'cause they're providing a better customer experience. You need to compete on that dimension. Not the network, not the three Telcos in the country. You're competing again, WhatsApp, Apple, Amazon, Facebook. And you spent how much of your organizational energy to focus on that? Very small. >> And that's where digital platforms roll by, it uses the word platform, why? Because everybody wants to be a platform. Why do you want to be a platform? Because I want to be like Amazon, they're a platform. And you think about Netflix, right? It's not, you know, you don't think about Netflix UK or Netflix Spain, right? >> It's global. >> There's one Netflix >> Yeah, yeah. >> You don't think about their marketing department or their sales department or their customer service, you think about the app. >> Yeah. >> You know. One interface. And that's what digital platforms allow you to do. And granted, there's a lot of public policy to deal with, but if you're shooting satellites up in space, >> Yeah. >> You know, now, you own that space, right, global network. >> And what makes Netflix so good, I think, is that it knows you, right? It knows what you're watching and recommends things, and you're like, "Oh, I would like that, that's great." Who knows more about you than your mobile phone? Carry it everywhere you go, right? What you're watching, what you're doing, who you're calling, what time did you wake up? And right now all of that data we talked about a couple of days ago, it's trapped in siloed old systems. And like why do people think Google knows so much about you? Telco knows about you. And to start to use that to drive a great experience. >> And you've got a great relationship with Netflix. The relationship we have with our our carrier is to your admin, "can you call these guys? "I don't know, I lost the password, I can't get in". >> Right. >> It's like-- >> Or you get SIM hacked-- >> I don't have an hour and a half to call your call center 'cause you don't have a chat bot, right. >> I don't have time. >> Chat bot, right. I can't even do the chat bot because my problem is, you're like, I got to talk to someone. All of their systems are built with the intention of a human being on the other side, and there's all this awesome chat bot AI that works. >> Yeah. >> Set it free. >> Yeah, yeah, right. You almost rather go to the dentist, then calling your carrier. >> Well, we're going to wrap things up here on the keynote review. Did you achieve what you wanted to achieve? I mean, controversy, bold vision, leadership, also that came across, but people they know who you are now. You're out there and that's great news. >> Yeah. I think I rocked the Telco universe and I'm really, that was my goal, and I think I accomplish it so, very excited. >> Well, we love having you on theCUBE. It's great to have great conversations, not only are you dynamic and smart, you're causing a lot of controversy, in a good way and getting, waking people up. >> Making people talk, that's a start. >> And I think, the conversations are there. People are talking and having relationships on the ecosystem open, it's all there. Danielle Royston, you are a digital revolution, DR. Telco DR, thanks for coming to theCube. >> Thank you so much, always fun. >> Good to see you. >> Thanks. >> Of course, back to the Cloud City studios. Adam is going to take it from here and continue on day three of theCube. Adam in studio, thanks for having us and take it from here.

Published Date : Jul 3 2021

SUMMARY :

I got to say, as the CEO of TelcoDR, I've referenced one about, you know, You know you do, you How did you feel up there? I sort of feel like, you know, I think I did a really great job Fantastic, loved the because that shifted the smartphone. because it singled the that changed the landscape of the handset. of the hardware, right? And you mentioned Android, and I'm going to shove and you can't take these we thought you did a great job, And so I think you need Future, work, enterprise, with the subscribers. Those are the structural I think we all learned "in the office, you work for me. you know, hundred billion dollar company, Why fight the fashion? And you know, these guys are saying, I think that's going to happen. and you don't focus on that. So you're like a therapist then too, of a therapist. Okay, lay down on the couch, what your problems are. the tower is changing is backhauling. is the love relationship you And his point was, And then you think of that as a sack And you think about Netflix, right? you think about the app. platforms allow you to do. you own that space, right, global network. And to start to use that to "I don't know, I lost the 'cause you don't have a chat bot, right. I can't even do the chat You almost rather go to the dentist, but people they know who you are now. and I'm really, that was my goal, Well, we love having you on theCUBE. that's a start. And I think, the Cloud City studios.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
TelcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

ChloePERSON

0.99+

Frank SlootmanPERSON

0.99+

Steve JobsPERSON

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

Danielle RoystonPERSON

0.99+

VodafoneORGANIZATION

0.99+

NokiaORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

BlackberryORGANIZATION

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

AdamPERSON

0.99+

Peter AddertonPERSON

0.99+

TelcosORGANIZATION

0.99+

Boost MobileORGANIZATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

iPhoneCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

50%QUANTITY

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

two sidesQUANTITY

0.99+

Michael DellPERSON

0.99+

WhatsAppORGANIZATION

0.99+

MinesweeperTITLE

0.99+

WindowsTITLE

0.99+

TelcoDRORGANIZATION

0.99+

AndroidTITLE

0.99+

Game of ThronesTITLE

0.99+

40%QUANTITY

0.99+

BothQUANTITY

0.99+

three areasQUANTITY

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

Michael DellPERSON

0.99+

O-RANTITLE

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

an hour and a halfQUANTITY

0.98+

Radio Access NetworksORGANIZATION

0.98+

three main pillarsQUANTITY

0.98+

G SuiteTITLE

0.98+

14 years agoDATE

0.98+

20 years agoDATE

0.98+

this monthDATE

0.97+

first modelQUANTITY

0.96+

two examplesQUANTITY

0.96+

hundred billion dollarQUANTITY

0.96+

OneQUANTITY

0.96+

40 hours a weekQUANTITY

0.96+

Cloud CityLOCATION

0.95+

first oneQUANTITY

0.95+

OPEXORGANIZATION

0.94+

day threeQUANTITY

0.93+

CapExORGANIZATION

0.92+

couple of days agoDATE

0.9+

DishORGANIZATION

0.9+

ZoomTITLE

0.9+

TotogiORGANIZATION

0.89+

One interfaceQUANTITY

0.89+

Wall StreetLOCATION

0.89+

Open RANTITLE

0.89+

Netflix UKORGANIZATION

0.88+

firstQUANTITY

0.87+

DRPERSON

0.86+

theCubeORGANIZATION

0.83+

Day 2 Intro


 

(upbeat electronic music) >> Okay thanks, Adam, and the studio. We're here on the floor in Cloud City, right in the middle of all the action, the keynotes are going on in the background. It's a packed house. I'm John Furrier. Dave Vellante's on assignment, digging in, getting those stories. He'll have the analysis, he'll be back on theCUBE, but I want to welcome Chloe Richardson, who has been holding down the main stage here in Cloud City with amazing content that she's been hosting. Chloe, great to see you. Thanks for coming on theCUBE, and kicking it off day two with me. >> No, not at all. Thank you for having me! It's very exciting! I love what you guys have got over here, very fun! >> We're inside theCUBE. This is where all the action is, and also, Cloud City is really changing the game. If you look at what's going on here in Cloud City, it's pretty spectacular. >> No, I mean, the atmosphere is absolutely palpable. Isn't it? You can just feel it. People walk in and see what the future looks like for the telecoms industry. Very exciting. >> And you've been doing a great job on the main stage, we're really loving your content. Let's get into some of the content here. After the keynotes are going on, we're going to have DR maybe fly by the set later, we're going to check that out. But let's check out this videotape. This is TelcoDR. You got to check out this reel, and we'll be right back, and we'll talk about it. (smooth electronic music) >> TelcoDR burst onto the global telecom scene this year, making headlines for taking over the huge Erickson space at MWC 21, and for building Cloud City in just a hundred days. But why did the company go to such trouble? And what is their unique offering to the telecoms industry? And what drives their dynamic CEO, Danielle Royston, or DR, as everyone calls her? Cloud City Live caught up with DR, away from the hustle and bustle of the city to find out. (upbeat instrumental music) >> Hi, I'm Danielle Royston, coming to you from beautiful Barcelona! I'm here for MWC 21. About a hundred days ago, I decided to take over the iconic Erickson booth to turn it into Cloud City. Cloud City has over 30 vendors, and 70 demos, to introduce telco to what I think is the future for our industry. We're going to have three awesome experiences. We're going to talk about the new subscriber experience. We're going to talk about what's in store for the new network, and the future of work. And I'm really excited to create a community, and invite awesome telco executives to see this new feature. It's been a really tough 18 months, and we didn't know what MWC 21 was going to be like in terms of attendance. And so from the get-go, we planned this amazing experience that we call Cloud City Live. At Cloud City Live, we have two main components. We have the speaker series, where we have over 50 speakers from Amazon, Google, Microsoft, as well as CSPs, and awesome vendors, talking about the public cloud in telco. The second part of Cloud City Live is theCUBE. Think of this as like an ESPN desk of awesome tech interviews focused on telco and the public cloud, hosted by John furrier and Dave Vallente. Dave and John are going to talk to a variety of guests focused on telco in the public cloud. It's a great way for our virtual participants to feel like they're at the show, experiencing what's going on here. So excited to have them as part of the Cloud City booth. There's a ton of innovation going on in telco, and 20 years ago, Elon Musk set on his mission to Mars. I, like Elon Musk, am on a quest to take telco to the public cloud. Every year at MWC, there's always a flurry of announcements, and this year is no different. At this year's MWC, Totogi, a startup that I invested $1,000,000 in, will be launching. Totogi is introducing two products to the market this week at MWC. The first is at planetary scale charger. More than a charger, it's an engagement, coupling your network data with charging information to drive subscriber engagement, and doubling your ARPU. The second product that Totogi is introducing is a planetary scale BSS system, built on top of the TM Forum Open APIs. Both of these products will be available for viewing in the virtual booth, as well as on the show floor. The public cloud is an unstoppable mega trend that's coming to telco! I'm super excited to bring to you the vendors, the products, the demonstrations, and the speakers, both to people here in Barcelona, and virtually around the world! (upbeat instrumental music) Well, that was a fascinating insight into the origins of TelcoDR, why public cloud is going to truly disrupt the telecoms industry, and why DR herself is so passionate about it. If you'd like to find out more, come and see us at Cloud City. (groovy electronic music) >> Okay, thanks. Just rolling that reel. Chloe, I mean, look at that reel, I mean, DR, Danielle Royston, she's a star. And I've seen a lot of power players in the industry. She's got guts and determination, and she's got a vision, and she's not just, you know, making noise about telco and cloud, there's actually a lot of real good vision there! I mean, it's just so impressive. >> No, it really is. And for me, it's almost like the next moonshot. It's the moonshot of the telco world! She's innovative, she's exciting. And if we've learned anything over the last 18 months, it's that we need that in this industry, to grow for the future of the industry. So, so exciting. I think she's a real inspiration! >> And I love the fact that she's so takes the tiger by the tail. Because the telco industry is being disrupted, she's just driving the bus here. And I remember, I did a story on Teresa Carlson, who was with Amazon Web Services, she was running the public sector, and she was doing the same exact thing in that public sector world in DC, and around the world. She opened up regions in Bahrain, which as a woman, that was an amazing accomplishment. And she wasn't just a woman, she was just a power player! And she was an exceptional leader. I see DR doing the same thing, and people aren't going to like that, I'll tell you right now. People are going to be like, "Whoa, what's going on here?" >> Now of course, it's always that way we pioneers though, isn't it? At the time, people thinking what is going on here, we don't like change, why are being shaken up? But actually, afterwards, in retrospect, they think, "Oh, okay. I see why that happened, and we needed it." So, really exciting stuff. >> Making things happen, that's what we're doing here on theCUBE. Obviously, the main stage's doing a great job. Let's go check out this highlight reel. If you're watching and you missed some of the action, this is obviously the physical event back since 2019 in February, but there's also a hybrid event, a lot of virtual action going on. So, you got theCUBE Virtual, you got a lot of content on virtual sites. But in person here, we're going to go show you a highlight reel from what we did yesterday, and what was happening around the show. Enjoy this quick highlight reel from yesterday. (groovy electronic music) (cheerful instrumental music) (groovy electronic music) Okay. We're back here in theCUBE. We're on the main floor out here with Chloe, who is emceeing, hosting, and driving the content on the Cloud City main stage. Chloe, it's been great here. I mean so far, day one, I was watching your presentations and fireside chats you've been hosting. Awesome content. I mean, people are like jazzed up. >> Yeah, no, for sure. We had Scott Brighton on yesterday, who was our opening keynote on the live stage, and his session was all about the future of work, which is so relevant and so pertinent to now. And he talked about the way it's changing. And in 10 years, it's going to be a trillion dollar industry to be in the cloud at work. So, really interesting! I mean, yeah, the atmosphere here is great. Everyone's excited. It's new content everyday. And that's the thing, it's not stale content! It's stuff that people want to hear. People are here for the new hot trends, the new hot topics. It's very exciting. >> Yeah, the next big thing. And also it's a fiscal event, so since 2019, this Mobile World Congress has been a massive event, and hasn't happened since February, 2019. That's a lot of time that's elapsed in the industry because of COVID, and people are glad to be here. But a lot of stuff's changed! >> Yeah. It's a different world, right? I mean, two years in the telco industry is like a hundred years elsewhere. Everything has changed! Digital transformation migration, obviously cloud, which is what we're talking about over here at Cloud City Live. I'm wondering though, John, I'd like to pick your brains on something. >> John: Sure. >> It has changed in the last two years. We know that! But what about the future of Mobile World Congress? How do you see it changing in the next few years. >> Oh, man. That's a great question. I mean, my observation, I've been coming to the show for a very long time, over a decade and a half, and it's been a nerdy show about networks, and telecom, which is basically radios, and wireless, and then mobile. But it's very global, a lot of networks. But now it's evolving! And many people are saying, and we were talking on theCUBE yesterday, Dave Vellante was commenting, that this show is turning into a consumer like show. So CES is the big consumer electronics show in the US, in Las Vegas every year. This show has got a vibe, because of all the technology from the cloud players, and from the chips, getting smaller, faster, cheaper, more capability, lower power. So people look at the chips, the hardware. It's less about the speeds and feeds, it's more about the consumer experience. We got cars. I was talking to a guy yesterday, he said, "Vehicle e-commerce is coming." I went, "What the hell his vehicle e-commerce?" And you could be on your app driving down the freeway and go, "Hey, I want some food." Instead of having it delivered to you, you order it, you pick it up. So that's kind of what can be happening now in real time, you can do all kinds of other things. So, a lot of new things are happening. >> Yeah, I think so. Do you see that as another disruption for the industry? That is, the fact that it's moving to be more consumer focused? Is there anything we should be worried about in that space? >> Well, I think the incumbents are going to lose their positions. So I think in any new shift, new brands come in out of nowhere. And it's the people that you don't think about. It's the the company that you don't see. (audience in background applauding) And we got DR on the main stage right here, look at this! We saw her walk out with the confidence of a pro. >> Chloe: Yeah, for sure. >> She just walked out there, and she's not afraid. >> Well, as she said in her video, she is ready to wake them up! And you can see as soon as she walks out, that is what she intends to do today. >> I love her mojo. She's got a lot of energy. And back to the show, I mean, she's just an example of what I was saying. Like in every market shift, a new brand emerges. >> Chloe: Yep. >> I mean, even when Apple was tainted, they were about to shut down, they were going to run out of cash, when Steve Jobs brought back Apple, he consolidated and rebooted the company, the iPad was a seminal, iPod, a seminal moment. Then the iPhone, and just, the rest is history. That kind of disruption is coming. You're going to see that now. >> Oh, it's exciting though, isn't it? To be future ready, rather than future proof! But actually I wanted to ask you something as well, because we are seeing all these cloud players getting hot under the collar about telco. Why are they so excited? What's the buzz about wire, as you're on AWS and Google Cloud, why do they want to have a slice of the pie? >> Well, I think they're hot and heavy on the fact that telco is a ripe opportunity. And it used to be this boring, slow moving glacier. It's almost like global warming now, the icebergs are melting, and it's going to just change. And because of the edge, 5G is not a consumer wireless thing, it's not like a better phone. It's a commercial app opportunity, because it's high bandwidth. We've all been to concerts, or football games, or sporting events where a stadium is packed. Everyone gets bars on their wifi, but can't get out. Can't upload their picture to Instagram. Why? Because it's choking them on the network. That's where 5G solves a problem. It brings a lot of bandwidth, and that's going to bring the edge to life, and that's money. So when you got money, and greed, and power, changing hands, if it's on the table, and the wheel's spinning, it could be double zero, or it could be lucky seven. You don't know! >> Oh, for sure. And that's certainly enough to get all the big players hot and bothered about getting involved! And I suppose it circles back to the fact that DR is really leading the charge, and they're probably thinking, "Okay, what's going on here? This is different. We want something new." You did notice it, OpenRAN is something that we've been talking about over the last day or so. We've had quite a few of us speakers over here at Cloud City Live mention OpenRAN. What is it all about, Don? Because why all the buzz if 5G is such a hot topic? Why are we get excited about it? >> That's a great thing. The 5G certainly will drive the main trend, for sure. OpenRAN is essentially an answer to the fact that 5G is popular, and they need more infrastructure. So open source, the Linux Foundation, has been the driver for most of the open source software. So, they're trying to make open software, and open architectures, to create more entrepreneurial activity around hardware, and around infrastructure, because we need more infrastructure, we need more antennas, we need more transceivers, we need more devices. That could be open. So in order to do that, you got to open up the technology, and you want to minimize the licensing, and minimize a lot of these, you know, proprietary aspects. >> What did we look at? So on Wednesday, we've got a great keynote from Phillip Langlois, who is CEO and founder of P1 Security. And he's coming to talk to us about cybersecurity within the cloud, and within telco. So you just mentioned that OpenRAN is all about having open source, about having that space where we can share more efficiently and easily more easily. What does that mean for security though? Is it at risk? >> I think it's going to increase the value of security, and minimize the threats. Because open source, even though it's open, the more people that are working on it, the more secure it could be. So yes, it could be more open in a sense that could be explored by hackers, but open can also protect. And I think we've seen open source, and cloud in particular, be more secure. Because everyone said, cloud is not secure, open source is insecure. And as it turns out, when the collective hive minds of developers work on things, it gets secure. >> And it is interesting, isn't it? Because we have seen that there has been an uptick in cyber security threats, but actually I was speaking to some leaders across various industries, and particularly in tech, and they were saying, actually, there's not been an uptick in attempted threats, there's been an uptick because with this open-source environment, we are able to track them, and measure them, and defend more efficiently. So actually, they're being batted away. But the number is probably the same as it always was, we just didn't know about them before we had this open source environment. >> There's more money in threats, and there's more surface area. So as the tide rises, so to the threats. So on a net basis, it's more, because there's more volume, but it's pretty much the same. And look it, there's money involved, they are organized. There's a business model on attacking and getting the cash out of your bank, or ransomware is at an all time high. >> Yes! >> So this is like a big problem, and it's beyond the government. It's around individual freedom. So, security is huge. And I think open source and cloud are going to be, I think, the answer to that. >> Yeah, for sure. And it's, again, about collaboration, isn't it? Which we talk about all the time, but without collaboration, the industries are going to have to work together to promote this environment. So yeah, it should be good to talk with Phillip on Wednesday. >> I'd just say on security, don't download that PDF, if you don't know who it came from. The phishing is always good. Well, we got some great stuff coming up. We're going to have a great day. We got a video here of Mobile World Live. We're going to show this next segment, and we're going to toss it to a video. And this is really about to give the experience, Chloe, for people who aren't here. To get a feel for what's going on in Barcelona, and all the action. And if you look at the video, enjoy it. >> Hi, I'm Daniel Royston, CEO and founder of TelcoDR. But you can call me DR! Ready for some more straight talk about telco? It's go time! Let's do it. Holy shit! It sure is a great time to be a tech company! I mean, if you're Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Grab, Twilio, Door Dash, or Uber, life's pretty great! Just look at these stock prices over the past five years, with their shareholder value going up and to the right. Totally amazing! But where's telco? Dare I add our stocks to this awesome chart? Let's compare these fabulous tech stocks to AT&T, Vodafone, Telefonica, TIM, America Movil, and Zain Group. Huh. Not so great, right? Yep. I'm talking directly to you, senior telco execs. I'm here to wake you up! Why is it that Wall Street doesn't see you as tech? Why aren't CSPs seen as driving all the tech change? Why is it always Apple, Amazon and Google who get the big buzz? But more importantly, why isn't it you? Before I came to this industry, I always thought of carriers as tech companies. I gave more of my money to AT&T than to Apple, because I really cared about the quality of the network. But I also wondered why on earth the carriers allowed all the other tech companies to take center stage. After spending the last few years in telco, I now understand why. It's because you are network people, you are not customer people! I get it. You have the security blanket. You're a network oligopoly. It's crazy expensive to build a network, and it's expensive to buy spectrum. It takes operational chops to run a killer network, and it takes great skill to convince Wall Street to finance all of it. You telco execs are amazing at all those things. But because you focus on the network, it means you don't focus on the customer. And so far, you haven't had to. Every Telco's KPI is to be less shitty than their next competitor. You don't have to be the best. Just don't be last. Everyone else's NPS is in the thirties too. Their mobile app ratings are just as terrible as yours. Everyone's sucks at customer sat. And it's widely acknowledged and accepted. Let's talk about the cost of that. The cost is not measured on market share against other MNOs. The cost is measured in lost ARPU that the tech guys are getting. Everyone knows about the loss of texting to WeChat, WhatsApp, and the other OTT apps. But it is not just texting. The total adjustable market, or TAM, of the mobile app disruptors is huge! Instead of remaining network focused, you should be leveraging your network into a premier position. And because you're network people, I bet you think I'm talking about coercive network leverage. That is not what I'm talking about! I'm talking about love, customer love. There is one thing the highly valued tech companies all have in common. They all crush it on customer love! They look at every interaction with the customer and say, how do we make the customer love this? Like Netflix has easy monthly cancellation, Amazon does no questions asked returns, Uber gives users a real time view into driver rating and availability. Compare those ideas to the standard telco customer interaction. The highly valued tech companies don't have the network oligopoly to fall back on like you do. To survive, they must make customers love them. So, they focus on it in a big way! And it pays off. Their NPS is close to 70, and they have app ratings of 4.5 or higher. A far cry from your thirties NPS, and app ratings of 3.5. If you want to have those huge tech multiples for yourself, you have to start thinking about these guys as your new competition, not the other telcos in your market. The crazy thing is, if you give up using your network as a crutch, and put all of your focus on the customer, the network becomes an asset worth more than all the super apps. Let's step back and talk about the value of super apps, and becoming customer centered! Retooling around the customer is a huge change, so let's make sure it's worth it. We aren't talking about 25% improvement. I'm going to show you that if you become customer centric, you can double your ARPU, double your valuation multiples, and drive big shareholder value, just like the tech companies on that chart! Now let's talk about the customer focused super apps. There are hundreds of companies in a variety of categories vying for your subscribers' disposable income. Movies, food delivery, financial services. Who are they? And why does Wall Street give them such high valuations and like them so much? Well first, look at what they are telling Wall Street about their TAM. They broadcast ridiculously huge TAMs that are greater than the telco TAMs. You know, who should have a ridiculously huge TAM? You! Hello? What I'm saying is that if you got what's yours, you double in size. And if you take the TAMs they throw around, you'd be five times as big. When I think about the opportunity to double ARPU, without having to double the cap ex to build out the network, I say to myself, hell yeah! We should totally go do it, and do whatever it takes to go get it. For example, let's talk about Grab. Grab is a Southeast Asian super app company with an expected $40 billion valuation. Grab's customer focus started in Rideshare, but then leveraged its customer love into wallet deliveries, hospitality, and investing. Their ARPU is now larger than a Telco's ARPU in countries where they compete, and they have a higher valuation than those telcos too. Imagine if you could combine a great user experience with the valuable services that helped grow your ARPU. That would be huge! So, how do you build a super app? I bet right about now, you're wishing you had a super app. Everyone wants a super app! A lot of money has been unsuccessfully spent by telcos trying to build their own. I bet you're saying to yourself, "DR, your pie in the sky sounds great, but it has no chance of success." Well, I'm betting things are about to change. There is a public cloud startup called to Totogi that is going to help carriers build world-class super apps. To have a successful super app, there is one key metric you need to know. It is the KPI that determines if your super app will be a success or a flop. It's not about the daily active users. It's not the average order value. It's not even gross merchandise value. It's all about the frequency of use per day by the user. That's the metric that matters. How many have you used that metric in your telco apps? Do you have a team driving up user app interactions every day? Most telco apps are used for top-up, or to check a bill. This is a huge missed opportunity. Super app companies excel at building great experiences and driving a huge amount of interactions. They have to, their business depends on it. They have to be customer focused. They have to keep bringing the user back to the app, every day, multiple times a day. And you know what? They do a great job. Customers love their super apps. They have great user experiences. Like Apple credit cards, no information required application process. They have high net promoter scores because of customer friendly policies. Like how Door Dash retroactively credits fees when you move to a better plan. And they have great app store ratings, because they do simple things, like remember your last order, or allow you to use the app, rather than forced you to call customer service. Customers of successful super apps love it when new services are added. And because of the customer love, every time something is added to the app, customers adopt it immediately. New services drive frequent daily user interactions. So our problem in telco is we have an app that is only open once per month, not multiple times per day. And without frequent opens, there is no super app. Hm, what do we have in telco that we could use to help with this problem? I wonder. While you don't currently have a mobile app that subscribers use multiple times a day, you have something that's 10 times better! You have a network. Subscribers already interact with your network. 10 times more frequently than any user with any of the super apps. But telcos don't leverage those interactions into the insanely valuable engagements they could be. Worse, even if you wanted to, your crappy, over customized, on-premise solutions, make it impossible. Thankfully, there's this new tech that's come around, you may have heard of it, the public cloud. When you bring the enabling technology of the public cloud, you can turn your network interactions into valuable super app interactions. And there's a special new startup that's going to help you do it, Totogi! Totogi will leverage all those network interactions, and turn them into valuable customer interactions. Let me repeat that. Totogi will leverage all those network interactions, and turn them into valuable customer interactions. Totogi allows the carrier to leverage its network, and all the network interactions, into customer engagement. This is something that super apps don't have, but will wish they did. But this magic technology is not enough. Telcos also need to move from being network focused to being customer focused. Totogi enables telcos to chase exciting revenue growth without that annoying, massive cap ex investment. Totogi is going to help you transform your sucky mobile apps, with the crappy customer ratings, into something your subscribers want to open multiple times a day, and become a platform for growth. I'm so excited about Totogi, I'm investing $100,000,000 into it. You heard me right. $100,000,000. Is this what it feels like to be SoftBank? I'm investing into Totogi because it's going to enable telcos to leverage their network interactions into super app usage! Which will lead to an improved subscriber experience, and will give you a massive jump in your ARPU. And once you do that, all those telco valuations will go from down here, (buzzes lips) to up here. And so I've been talking to some folks, you know, checking in, feeling them out, getting their thoughts. And I've been asking them, what do you think about telcos building super apps? And the response has been, "Click. Eh." Everyone says, no way. Telcos can't do it. Zero chance. Total goose egg. (egg cracking) One suggested I build a bonfire with a hundred million dollars, because then at least I wouldn't waste years of my life. Well, I think those people are dead wrong! I do believe that telcos can build super apps and make them super successful. The public cloud is changing all parts of telco, and Totogi and super apps are fundamentally changing the customer relationships. In one month at MWC, people will see what Totogi has to offer, and they will understand why I'm making this bold call. Because Totogi takes the value of the network, and the power of the public cloud, to help telcos move from being network centric, to being customer centric. Boom! If you want to make this transformation and reap all the financial benefits, you will have to compete for customers with a whole new set of players. You will no longer compete with the network focused guys, like the other telcos. Instead, you will be competing against the customer focused companies. These players don't have a network to fall back on like your old competitors, they know they have to make customers love them. Their customer loyalty is so off the charts, their customers are called fans. So if you want that big money, you will have to compete on their turf, and make the customers want to choose you. You need Apple level loyalty. That bar is uber high. We'll have to give up the security blanket of the network, and change. Instead of NPS at the thirties, it needs to be in the seventies. Instead of mobile app ratings in the threes, they need to get five stars. I'm betting big that Totogi will make that possible! I'm going to help you every step of the way, starting with my keynote next month at MWC. Join me, and I'll share the secrets to converting your super valuable network interactions to make your super app a massive success. We're going to have an amazing time, and I can't wait to see you there! >> Okay. We're back here in theCUBE here at Mobile World Congress in Cloud City. I'm John Furrier. Chloe Richardson's filling in for Dave Vellante who's out on assignment. He's out getting all the data out there and getting stories. Chloe, what a great keynote by Danielle Royston. We just heard her involving major action, major pump you up, punch in the face, "Wake the heck up cloud people, cloud is here!" She didn't pull any punches. >> No, I mean the thing is, John, there's trillions of dollars on the table, and everyone seems to be fighting for it. >> And you heard her up there, if you're not on the public cloud, you're not going to get access to that money. It's a free for all. And I think the cloud people are like, they might think they're going to walk right in, and the telco industry is going to just give it up. >> No, of course. >> And it's not going to be, it's going to be a fight! Who will win? >> Who will win, but also who will build the next big thing? (John laughing) >> Someone needs to die in the media conversations. It's always a fight. Something's dead. Something's dead but keeps the living. All that kidding aside, this is really about partnering. Think what's happened is Telco's already acknowledged that they need to change. And the 5G edge conversation, the chip acceleration. Look at Apple. They've got their own processors, Nvidia, Amazon makes their own chips, Intel's pumping stuff out, you've got Qualcomm. You've got all these new things. So, the chips are getting faster, and the software's more open source. And I'm telling you, the cloud is just going to drive that bus right down Cloud Street, and it's going to be in Cloud City everywhere. >> And it's going to be peepin' on the board as it drives down. (John laughing) John, I'm not a stalker, but I have read some of the things that you've written, and one of the things you mentioned that was really interesting was the difference between building and operating. Break it down for me, what does that mean? >> That means basically in mature markets, and growing markets, things behave differently, and certainly economics, and the people, and the makeup, and the mindset. So the telco has been kind of this mature market, it's been changing and growing, but not like radically. Cost optimization, make profit. You know, to install a lot of cable, you got to get the rents out of that infrastructure. And that's kind of gone on for too long. Cloud is a growth market. And it's about building, not just operating. And you've got operators, carriers are operating networks. So you're going to see the convergence of operators and builders coming together. Builders being software developers, new technology, and executives that think about building. And you want people on your team that are going to be, I won't say war time, you know, lieutenants or generals, but people who can handle the pace of change. Because the change and the nature is different. And some people want slow and steady, keep the boat from rocking. But in a growth market, it's turbulent, and the ride might not be quiet, first-class ticket to paradise. It's bumpy, but it's thrilling. >> No, of course. Is it similar to the old sales adage of hunter versus farmer? Are there parallels there? >> Yeah. I mean, there's a mindset. If you have a team of people that aren't knocking down new opportunities and building the next big thing, fixing your house, get your house in order, you know, refactor, reset, reboot, replatform with the cloud, and then refactor your business! If you don't have the people thinking like that, you're probably either going to be taken over, or go out of business. And that's what the telcos with all these assets, they're going to get bought, rolled into a SPAC, Special Purpose Acquisition Company, which is super hot in the United States. A lot of roll-ups going on with private equity. So a lot of these telcos, if they don't refactor, or replatform then refactor, they're going to be toast, and they're going to get rolled up, and eaten up by somebody else. >> Yeah, sure. It's interesting though, isn't it? Because when we think of telco in tech, we often think of, obviously we've got the triad, people, process, technology, and we think, process and technology really to the forefront here. But like you said there, people are also so important because if you don't have this right balance, you're not going to be able to drive that change. We had, obviously, Scott Brighton on the stage yesterday, and after his session, somebody came up to me and just said, "I'm interested to hear what that means for education." So how can we establish this new generation of tech and telco leaders from the grassroots with educational associations, establishments. How can we encourage that? I wonder, is this something that you talk about? >> Yeah. I mean, education's huge, and this highlights the change that telco's now part of. Telco used to be a boring industry that ran the networks, or moving packets around, and mobile was there. But once the iPhone came out in 2007, the life has changed, society has changed, education's changed, how people interact has changed. So, you start to see people now aware of the value. And if you look at during COVID, the internet didn't crash, the telcos actually saved our asses, and everyone survived because the network didn't break. Yeah, we had some bad Zoom meetings here and there, and some teleconferences that didn't go well, but for the most part we survived, and they really saved everybody. So, they should get kudos for that. But now they're dependent upon healthcare, education. People care about that stuff, so now you're going to start to see an elevated focus on what telecom is doing. That's why the edge has got trillions of dollars up for grabs. But education, there's negative unemployment in cybersecurity and in cloud. So for the people who say, "Oh, there's no jobs." Or, "I can't work." That's a bunch of BS, because you can just get online, get on YouTube, and just get a degree. You can get a degree. You can get an Amazon job. It pays a hundred thousand dollars a year! American. You can make a hundred thousand pounds, and be unemployed six months, and then be employed. So negative unemployment means, there's more jobs than people to fill them all, in fact. >> Yeah, it's interesting you mentioned that, because I was talking to a cyber security leader who was saying in something, I think there were now 3 million vacancies in cybersecurity. And there's such a skill shortage. There is nobody around to fill it! So it's an interesting problem to have, isn't it? Because it's reversed to what we've been used to for the last few decades! And obviously, telco is in the same space. But what can we do about it do you think, to actually -- >> I think it's going to take leadership, and I'm a big proponent of kids not going to university if they don't have to. Why spend the dough, money, if you don't have to? You can get online. I mean, the data's there. But to me, it's the relationships, the mentorship. You're starting to see a women in tech, and underrepresented minorities in the tech field, where mentorship is more important than curriculum. Community is more important than just going through a linear courseware. Nobody wants to sit online and go through linear courseware. Now, if they have to get a certificate, or degree, and accreditation, no problem. But the communities are out there, so that's a big change over, I'm a big fan of that. And I think people should, you know, get some specialized skills. You can get that online, so why even go to school? So, people are figuring that out. >> For sure. And also, even transferring. I mean, so many skills are transferable nowadays, aren't they, so we could easily be talking to people from other industries, and bringing them into telco, and saying, "Look, bring what you know from your retail background, or your healthcare background, and help us at telco to, again, drive forwards." Just like DR was saying, it's all about the next big thing. >> Well, Danielle is always also driving a lot of change. And if you think about the jobs, and the pedigree of going to a university, oh, Harvard, all the big Ivy Leagues, Oxford in your area. So it's like, if you go to the school like that, and you get a pedigree, you instantly get a job. Now the jobs that are available weren't around five years ago, so there's no like pedigree or track record. There's no like, everyone's equal. >> Yeah. >> So you could, the democratization of the internet now, from a job standpoint, is people are leveling up faster. So it's not about the Ivy League, or the big degree, or silver spoon in your mouth, you've got the entitlement. So you start to see people emerging and making things happen. Entrepreneurship in America, immigrant entrepreneurship. People are billionaires that have no high school diplomas! >> It's interesting you mention that, John, because we can't have more than five years experience in this space, we know that. But in telco, there is a problem. And maybe it's, again, it's a flipped problem where telco recruiters, or talent acquisition leaders, are now asking for kind of 10, 20 years experience when they're sending out job descriptions. So does that mean that we are at fault for not being able to fill all these vacancies? >> I think that's just, I mean I think there's a transition of the new skill set happening, one. But two, I think, you know, to be like a chip engineer, (laughs) you can't learn that online. But if you want to run a cloud infrastructure, you can. But I think embedded systems is an area that I was talking to an engineer, there's a huge shortage of engineers who code on the microprocessors, on the chips. So, embedded systems is a big career. So there's definitely paths you can specialize. Space is another area you've seen a lot of activity on. You see Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk is going to be here on a virtual keynote, trying to go to Mars. And you know, Danielle Royston always says, "What's going to happen first, Mars colony, or telco adopting public cloud?" And some people think Mars will happen first, but. >> What do you think, John? >> I think Telco's going to get cloud. I mean first of all, public cloud is now hybrid cloud, and the edge, this whole internet edge, 5G, is so symbolic and so important, because it's an architectural beachhead. And that's where the trillion dollar baby is. So, the inside baseball, and the inside money, and all the investors are focusing on the edge, because whoever can command the edge, wins all the dollars. So everyone kind of knows, it's a public secret, and it's fun to watch everyone jockey for the positions. >> Yeah no, it really is. But it's also quite funny, isn't it? Because the edge is almost where we were decades ago, but we're putting the control back in the hands of consumers. So, it's an interesting flip. And I wonder if, with the edge, we can really enhance this acceleration of product development, this efficiency, this frictionless system in which we live in. And also, I've heard you say hybrid a few times, John. >> John: Yeah. >> Is hybrid going to be the future of the world no matter what industry you're in? >> Hybrid is everything now. So, we're the hybrid CUBE, we've got hybrid cloud. >> Exactly. >> You got hybrid telco, because now you've got the confluence of online and offline coming together. That is critical dynamic! And you're seeing it. Like virtual reality, for instance, now you're seeing things, I know you guys are doing some great work at your company around creating experiences that are virtual. You got, companies like Roblox went public recently. Metaverse. It's a good time to be in that business, because experiential human relations are coming. So, I think that's going to be powered by 5G. You know, gamers. So, all good stuff. Chloe, great to be with you here on theCUBE, and we're looking forward to seeing your main stage. >> Great. >> And then we're going to send it back to the studio, Adam, and the team. We're waiting for DR to arrive here in Cloud City. And this is theCUBE, from Cloud City, back to you, Adam, and the studio.

Published Date : Jul 3 2021

SUMMARY :

We're here on the floor in Cloud City, I love what you guys have really changing the game. No, I mean, the atmosphere great job on the main stage, and bustle of the city And so from the get-go, we and she's not just, you know, It's the moonshot of the telco world! And I love the fact that she's so At the time, people thinking and driving the content on And that's the thing, and people are glad to be here. I'd like to pick your brains on something. It has changed in the and from the chips, That is, the fact that it's moving It's the the company that you don't see. She just walked out And you can see as soon as she walks out, And back to the show, I mean, the iPad was a seminal, have a slice of the pie? bring the edge to life, over the last day or so. and minimize a lot of these, you know, And he's coming to talk and minimize the threats. But the number is probably So as the tide rises, so to the threats. and it's beyond the government. the industries are going and all the action. And because of the customer love, "Wake the heck up cloud and everyone seems to be fighting for it. and the telco industry is the cloud is just going to drive that bus and one of the things you mentioned and the makeup, and the mindset. Is it similar to the old sales adage and building the next big Brighton on the stage yesterday, but for the most part we survived, And obviously, telco is in the same space. And I think people should, you know, all about the next big thing. and the pedigree of going to a university, So it's not about the Ivy for not being able to of the new skill set happening, and the edge, this back in the hands of consumers. Hybrid is everything now. It's a good time to be in that business, Adam, and the team.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

Danielle RoystonPERSON

0.99+

VodafoneORGANIZATION

0.99+

Danielle RoystonPERSON

0.99+

TelcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

TelefonicaORGANIZATION

0.99+

ChloePERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VallentePERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

2007DATE

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

AdamPERSON

0.99+

Daniel RoystonPERSON

0.99+

Teresa CarlsonPERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

AT&TORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

Amazon Web ServicesORGANIZATION

0.99+

BarcelonaLOCATION

0.99+

TotogiORGANIZATION

0.99+

$100,000,000QUANTITY

0.99+

six monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

Chloe RichardsonPERSON

0.99+

BahrainLOCATION

0.99+

MarsLOCATION

0.99+

Steve JobsPERSON

0.99+

GrabORGANIZATION

0.99+

Elon MuskPERSON

0.99+

Jeff BezosPERSON

0.99+

$1,000,000QUANTITY

0.99+

NvidiaORGANIZATION

0.99+

Phillip LangloisPERSON

0.99+

TwilioORGANIZATION

0.99+

10 timesQUANTITY

0.99+

TIMORGANIZATION

0.99+

iPhoneCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

TelcoDRORGANIZATION

0.99+

telcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

WednesdayDATE

0.99+

February, 2019DATE

0.99+

$40 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

telcosORGANIZATION

0.99+

70 demosQUANTITY

0.99+

Zain GroupORGANIZATION

0.99+

P1 SecurityORGANIZATION

0.99+

TelcosORGANIZATION

0.99+

Scott BrightonPERSON

0.99+

United StatesLOCATION

0.99+

QualcommORGANIZATION

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

DaniellePERSON

0.99+

Day 2 Kickoff with Chloe Richardson | Cloud City Live 2021


 

(upbeat music) >> Okay, thanks Adam in the studio. We're here on the floor in Cloud City, right in the middle of all the action. The keynotes are going on in the background, it's a packed house. I'm John Furrier. Dave Vellante is on assignment, digging in, getting those stories. He'll have the analysis, he'll be back on theCUBE but I want to welcome Chloe Richardson, who has been holding down the main stage here in Cloud City, with amazing content that she's been hosting. Chloe, great to see you. Thanks for coming on theCUBE and kicking it up day two with me. >> No, not at all. Thank you for having me. It's very exciting. I love what you guys have got over here, very fun. >> We're inside theCUBE. This is where all the action is. And also the Cloud City is really changing the game. If you look at what's going on here in Cloud City, it's pretty spectacular. >> Know, I mean the atmosphere is absolutely palpable, isn't it? You can just feel as people walk in and see what the future looks like to the Telecoms industry, it's very exciting. >> And you've been doing a great job on the main stage. We've been really loving your content. Let's get into some of the content here. Actually the keynote is going on, we're going to have DR, maybe fly by the set later, we're going to check that up. But let's check out this videotape of, this is TelcoDR. You got to check out this reel and we'll be right back, we'll talk about it. (upbeat music) >> TelcoDR burst onto the global telecom scene this year, making headlines for taking over the huge Erickson's space at MWC21. And for building Cloud City in just a hundred days. But why did the company go to such trouble? And what is the unique offering to the telecoms industry? And what drives their dynamic CEO, Danielle Royston or DR as everyone calls her? Cloud City Live caught up with DR, away from the hustle and bustle of the city to find out. (upbeat music) >> Hi, I'm Danielle Royston, coming to you from beautiful Barcelona. I'm here for MWC21. About a hundred days ago, I decided to take over the iconic Erickson booth to turn it into Cloud City. Cloud City has over 30 vendors and 70 demos to introduce telco to what I think is the future for our industry. We're going to have three awesome experiences. We're going to talk about the new subscriber experience, we're going to talk about what's in store for the new network and the future of work. I'm really excited to create a community and invite awesome telco executives to see this new future. It's been a really tough 18 months, and we didn't know what MWC21 was going to be like in terms of attendance. And so from the get go we plan this amazing experience that we call, Cloud City Live. At Cloud City Live, we have two main components. We have the speaker series where we have over 50 speakers from Amazon, Google, Microsoft, as well as CSPs and awesome vendors talking about the public cloud in telco. The second part of Cloud City Live, is theCUBE. Think of this as like an ESPN desk of awesome tech interviews focused on telco and the public cloud hosted by John Furrier and Dave Vellante. Dave and John are going to talk to a variety of guests, focused on telco and the public cloud. It's a great way for our virtual participants to feel like they're at the show, experiencing what's going on here. So excited to have them as part of the Cloud City booth. There's a ton of innovation going on in telco. And 20 years ago, Elon Musk set on his mission to Mars. I, like Elon Musk, I'm on a quest to take telco to the public cloud. Every year at MWC, there's always a flurry of announcements and this year is no different. At this year's MWC, Totogi, a startup that I invested a hundred million dollars in, will be launching. Totogi is introducing two products to the market, this week at MWC. The first is a planetary scale charger. More than a charger, it's an engagement coupling dual network data with charging information to drive subscriber engagement and doubling your ARPU. The second product that Totogi is introducing, is a planetary scale BSS system built on top of the TM forum, open APIs. Both of these products will be available for viewing in the virtual booth, as well as on the show for. The public cloud is an unstoppable mega trend that's coming to telco. I'm super excited to bring to you, the vendors, the products, the demonstrations, and the speakers, both to people here in Barcelona and virtually around the world. (upbeat music) >> Well, that was a fascinating insight into the origins of TelcoDR, why public cloud is going to truly disrupt the telecoms industry and why DR herself is so passionate about it. If you'd like to find out more, come and see us at Cloud City. (upbeat music) >> Okay, thanks. Just roll on that reel. Chloe, I mean, look at that reel. I mean, DR, Danielle Royston, she's a star and I've seen a lot of power players in the industry. She's got guts and determination, and she's got a vision and she's not just, you know, making noise about telco and cloud, there's actually a lot of real good vision there. I mean, it's just so impressive. >> No, really isn't. And for me, it's almost like the next moonshot. It's the moonshot of the telco world. She's innovative, she's exciting and if we've learned anything over the last 18 months is that we need to in this industry to grow and for the future of the industry. So, it's so exciting. I think she's a real inspiration. >> And I love the fact that she's so, takes a tiger by the tail, because the telco industry is being disrupted. She's just driving the bus here and I remember I did a story on Teresa Carlson, who was with Amazon web services, she was running the public sector and she was doing the same exact thing in that public sector world in DC and around the world. She opened up regions in Bahrain, which as a woman, that was an amazing accomplishment. And she wasn't just a woman, she was just a power player. And she was exceptional leader. I see DR doing the same thing and people aren't going to like that, I'll tell you right now. People are going to be like, whoa, what's going on here? >> And of course, it's always the way we pioneers though, isn't it? At the time people thinking what's going, we don't like change, why are we being shaken up. But actually afterwards, in retrospect, they think, oh, okay, I see why that happened and we needed it. So really exciting stuff. >> Making things happen, that's what we're doing here in theCUBE. Obviously the main stage's doing a great job. Let's go check out this highlight reel. If you're watching and you miss some of the action, this is, I'll see the physical event back since 2019 in February, but there's also a Hybrid event. A lot of virtual action going on. So you got theCUBE virtual, you got a lot of content on virtual sites, but in person here, we're going to go show you a highlight reel from what we did yesterday, what was happening around the show? Enjoy this quick highlight reel from yesterday. (upbeat music) (upbeat music) (upbeat music) Okay. We're back here in theCUBE. We're the main floor out here with Chloe Richardson, who is emceeing, hosting and driving the content on the Cloud City main stage. Chloe, it's been great here. I mean, so far day one, I was watching your presentations and inspire site chats you've been hosting. Awesome content. I mean, people are like jazzed up. >> Yeah, I know for sure. We had Scott Brighton on yesterday, who was our opening keynote on the live stage. And his session was all about the future of work, which is so relevant and so pertinent to now. And he talked about the way it's changing and in 10 years it's going to be a trillion dollar industry to be in the cloud at work. So really interesting. I mean, yeah, the atmosphere here is great, everyone's excited, there's new content everyday. And that's the thing, it's not stale content. It's stuff that people want to hear. People are here for the new hot trends, the new hot topics. Really exciting. >> Yeah, the next big thing. And also it's a fiscal event. So since 2019, this Mobile World Congress has been a massive event and hasn't happened since February, 2019. That's a lot of time that's elapsed in the industry cause of COVID and people are glad to be here, but a lot of stuff's changed. >> Yeah, it's a different world, right? I mean, two years in the telco industry is like a hundred years elsewhere. Everything has changed, digital transformation migration, obviously cloud, which is what we're talking about over here at Cloud City Live. I'm wondering though John, I'd like to pick your brains on something. >> Sure. >> It has changed in the last two years, we know that, but what about the future of Mobile World Congress? How do you see it changing in the next few years? >> Oh man, that's a great question. I mean, my observation, I've been coming to the show for a very long time, over a decade and a half, and it's been a nerdy show about networks and telecom, which is basically radios and wireless and then mobile. It's very global, a lot of networks, but now it's evolving and many people are saying, and we were talking on theCUBE yesterday, Dave Vellante was commenting that this show is turning into a consumer like show. So CES is the big consumer electronics show in the US, in Las Vegas every year. This show has got a vibe because what's all the technology from the cloud players and from the chips, are getting smaller, faster, cheaper, more capability, lower power. So if you look at the chips, the hardware, it's less about the speeds and feeds. It's more about the consumer experience. You got cars. I was talking to a guy yesterday, he said, "Vehicle e-commerce is coming." I'm like, "What the hell his vehicle e-commerce?" And you could be on your app, driving down the freeway and go, "Hey, I want some food." Instead of having it delivered to you, if you order it you pick it up. So that's kind of can be happening now in real time, you can do all kinds of other things. so a lot of new things are happening. >> Yeah, I think so. Do you see that as another disruption for the industry that is the fact that it's moving to be more consumer focused? Is that anything we should be worried about in that space? >> Well I think the incumbents are going to lose their position. So I think in any new shift, new brands come in out of nowhere. >> For sure. >> And it's the people that you don't think about. It's the company that's not, that you don't see. And we got DR on the main stage right here, look at this. You saw her walk out with the confidence of a pro. She just walked out there and she's not afraid. >> No. Well, as she said in her video, she is ready to wake them up and you can see as soon as she worked out. That is what she intends to do. >> I love her mojo, she's got a lot of energy. And back to the show, I mean, she's just an example of what I was saying. Like in every market shift, a new brand emerges. >> Yep. >> I mean, even when apple was tainted, they were about to shut down, they were going to run out of cash. When Steve Jobs brought back apple, he consolidated and rebooted the company. The iPad was a similar moment, then the iPhone and just the rest is history. That kind of disruption's coming. You're going to see that here. >> Yeah. Oh, it's exciting though isn't it? To be future ready rather than future proof but actually I wanted to ask you something as well, because we are seeing all these cloud players getting hot under the collar about telco. Why are they so excited? What's the buzz about why, as you're in MWS and Google Cloud? Why do they want to have a slice of the pie? >> Well, I think they're hot, hot and heavy on the fact that telco is a ripe opportunity and it used to be this boring, slow moving glacier. >> Okay. >> It's almost like global warming now. The icebergs are melting and it's going to just change and because of the edge, 5G is not a consumer wireless thing. It's not like a better phone, it's a commercial app opportunity cause it's high bandwidth. We've all been to concerts or football games or sporting events where a stadium is packed. Everyone gets bars on their wifi, but can't get out, can't upload their pictures on Instagram. Why? Because it's choking them in the network. That's where 5G solves the problem. It brings a lot of bandwidth and that's going to bring the edge to life and that's money. So when you got money and greed and power changing hands, it's every, it's on the table and the wheel's spinning, and it could be double zero, or it could be lucky seven. You don't know. >> Yeah, for sure. And that's certainly enough to get all the big players hot and bothered about getting involved. And I suppose it circles back to the fact that, DR is really leading the charge and they're probably thinking, okay, what's going on here? This is different, we want something new. You didn't know it's an open run or something that we've been talking about over the last day or so. We've had quite a few of us speakers over here constantly. I've mentioned open run. What is it all about John? Because why all the bars, if 5G is such a hot topic? Why are we getting excited about it? >> That's a great thing. 5G certainly is Google Drive the main trend for sure. OpenRent is essentially an answer to the fact that 5G is popular and they need more infrastructure. So open source, the Linux Foundation has been the driver for most of the open source software. So they're trying to bring software and open architectures to create more entrepreneurial activity around hardware and around infrastructure because we need more infrastructure. We need more antennas, we need more transceivers, we need more devices that could be open. So in order to do that, you got to open up the technology and you want to minimize the licensing and minimize a lot of these, you know, proprietary aspects. >> What if we look at, so on Wednesday, we've got a great keynote from Philippe Langlois, who is CEO and founder of P1 Security. And he's coming to talk to us about cybersecurity within the cloud and within telco. So you just mentioned that. Open mind, it's all about having open source, about having that space where we can share more efficiently and easy, more easily. What does that mean for security though? Is it a risk? >> I think that's going to increase the value of security and minimize the threats. Because open source, even though it's open, the more people that are working on it, the more secure it could be. So yes, it could be more open in sense that could be explored by hackers, but it can be open to also protect. And I think we've seen open source and cloud in particular be more secure because everyone said, "Cloud is not secure, open source is not secure." And as it turns out when the collective hive minds of developers work on things, it gets secure. >> And it is interesting, isn't it? Because we have seen that there has been an uptick in cyber security and threats. But actually I was speaking to some leaders in across various industries and particularly in tech. And they were saying, "Actually there's not been an uptick in attempted threats, there's been an uptick because with this open source environment. We are able to track them and measure them and defend more efficiently. So actually they're being battered away, but the number is probably the same as it always was. We just didn't know about them before we had this open source environment. >> There's more money in threats and there's more surface area. So as the tide rises, so do the threats. So on a net basis it's more because there's more volume, but it's pretty much the same. And look at it, there's money involved, they're organized, there's a business model on attacking and getting the cash out of your bank or ransomwares at an all time high. So this is like a big problem and it's beyond the government, it's our individual freedom. So security its huge and I think open source and cloud are going to be, I think the answer to that. >> Yeah, for sure. And it's again about collaboration, isn't it? Which we talk about all the time but without collaboration that the industries aren't going to have to work together to promote this environment. So yeah, it should be good to talk with Phillip on Wednesday. >> I just say in security, don't download that PDF if you don't know who came from. The fishing is always good. Well, we got some great stuff coming up. We're going to have a great day. We got a video here on Mobile World Live, we're going to show this next segment and we're going to toss it to a video. And this is really about to give the experience Chloe, for people who aren't here, right? >> Yeah. >> To get a feel for what's going on in Barcelona and all the actions. And if you look at the video, enjoy it. >> Hi, I'm Danielle Royston, CEO and founder of TelcoDr, but you can call me DR. Ready for some more straight talk about telco? It's go time, let's do it. Holy shit. It sure is a great time to be a tech company. I mean, if you're Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Grab, Twilio, DoorDash or Uber, life's pretty great. Just look at these stock prices over the past five years with their shareholder value going up into the right. Totally amazing. But where's telco? There I add our stocks to this awesome chart. Let's compare these fabulous tech stocks to AT&T, Vodafone, Telefonica, Tim, America Movil and Zain group. Huh, not so great, right? Yep. I'm talking directly to you senior telco execs. I'm here to wake you up. Why is it that Wall Street doesn't see you as tech? Why aren't CSPs seen as driving all the tech change? Why is it always Apple, Amazon and Google who get the big buzz? But more importantly, why isn't it you? Before I came to this industry, I always thought of carriers as tech companies. I gave more of my money to AT&T and to Apple because I really cared about the quality of the network. But I also wondered why on earth, the carriers allowed all the other tech companies to take center stage. After spending the last few years in telco, I now understand why. It's because you are network people, you are not customer people. I get it, you have the security blanket, you're a network oligopoly. It's crazy expensive to build a network and it's expensive to buy spectrum. It takes operational chops to run a killer network and it takes great skill to convince Wall Street, to finance all of it. You telco execs are amazing at all those things, but because you focus on the network, it means you don't focus on the customer. And so far you haven't had to. Every telco's KPI is to be less shitty than their next competitor. You don't have to be the best, just don't be last. Everyone else's NPS, is in the thirties too. Their mobile app ratings are just as terrible as yours. Everyone's sucks at customer sat and it's widely acknowledged and accepted. Let's talk about the cost of that. The cost is not measured on market share against other MNOs. The cost is measured in lost ARPU that the tech guys are getting. Everyone knows about the loss of texting, to WeChat, WhatsApp and the other OTT apps, but it is not just texting. The total adjustable market or term of the mobile app disruptors is huge. Instead of remaining network focused, you should be leveraging your network into a premier position. And because you're a network people, I bet you think I'm talking about coercive network leverage. That is not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about love, customer love. There is one thing the highly valued tech companies all have in common. They all crush it on customer love. They look at every interaction with the customer and say, "How do we make the customer love this?" Like Netflix has easy monthly cancellation, Amazon does no questions asked returns, Uber gives users a real time view into driver rating and availability. Compare those ideas to the standard telco customer interaction. The highly valued tech companies, don't have the network oligopoly to fall back on like you do. To survive they must make customers love them. So they focus on it in a big way and it pays off. Their NPS is close to 70 and they have app ratings of 4.5 or higher. A far cry from your thirties NPS and app ratings of 3.5. If you want to have those huge tech multiples for yourself, you have to start thinking about these guys as your new competition, not the other telcos in your market. The crazy thing is, if you give up using your network as a crutch and put all of your focus on the customer, the network becomes an asset worth more than all the super apps. Let's step back and talk about the value of super apps and becoming customer centric. Retooling around the customer is a huge change. So let's make sure it's worth it. We aren't talking about 25% improvement. I'm going to show you that if you become customer centric, you can double your ARPU, double your valuation multiples and drive big shareholder value just like the tech companies on that chart. Now let's talk about the customer focused super apps. There are hundreds of companies and a variety of categories vying for your subscriber's disposable income. Movies, food delivery, financial services, who are they? And why does Wall Street give them such high evaluations and like them so much? Well first, look at what they are telling Wall Street about their TAM. They broadcast ridiculously huge TAMs that are greater than the telco TAMs. You know, who should have a ridiculously huge TAM? You. Hello. What I'm saying is that if you got what's yours, you double in size. And if you take the TAAMs they throw around, you'll be five times as big. When I think about the opportunity to double ARPU, without having to double the CapEx, to build out the network, I say to myself, "Hell yeah, we should totally go do it and do whatever it takes to go get." For example, let's talk about Grab. Grab is a southeast Asian super app company with an expected $40 billion valuation. Grab's customer focused started in rideshare, but then leverage its customer love into wallet deliveries, hospitality, and investing. Their ARPU is now larger than a telco's ARPU in countries where they compete, and they have a higher valuation than those telcos too. Imagine if you could combine a great user experience with a valuable services that helped grow your ARPU, that would be huge. So how do you build a super app? I bet right about now, you're wishing you had a super app. Everyone wants a super app. A lot of money has been unsuccessfully spent by telcos trying to build their own. I bet you're saying to yourself, "DR, your pie in the sky sounds great but it has no chance of success." Well, I'm betting things are about to change. There is a public cloud startup called Totogi that is going to help carriers build world class super apps. To have a successful super app, there is one key metric you need to know. It is the KPI that determines if your super app will be a success or a flop. It's not about the daily active users, it's not the average order value, it's not even gross merchandise value. It's all about the frequency of use per day by the user, that's the metric that matters. How many of you use that metric in your telco apps? Do you have a team driving up user app interactions every day? Most telco apps are used for top up or to check a bill. This is a huge missed opportunity. Super app companies excel at building great experiences and driving a huge amount of interactions. They have to, their business depends on it. They have to be customer focused. They have to keep bringing the user back to the app, every day, multiple times a day. And you know what? They do a great job. Customers love their super apps. They have great user experiences like Apple credit cards, no information required, application process. They have high net promoter scores because of customer friendly policies, like how DoorDash retroactively credits fees when you move to a better plan. And they have great app store ratings because they do simple things like remember your last order, or allow you to use the app rather than force you to call customer service. Customers of successful super apps love it when new services are added. And because of the customer love, every time something is added to the app, customers adopt it immediately. New services drive frequent daily user interactions. So our problem in telco is we have an app that is only open once per month, not multiple times per day. And without frequent opens, there is no super app. What do we do we have in telco that we could use to help with this problem? I wonder, why you don't currently have a mobile app that subscribers use multiple times a day. You have something that's 10 times better. You have a network. Subscribers already interact with your network 10 times more frequently than any user with any of the super apps. But telcos don't leverage those interactions into the insanely valuable engagements they could be. Worse, even if you wanted to your crappy over customized on premise solutions, make it impossible. Thankfully, there's this new tech that's come around, you may have heard of it. The public cloud. When you bring the enabling technology of the public cloud, you can turn your network interactions into valuable super app interactions. And there's a special new startup that's going to help you do it, Totogi. Totogi will leverage all those network interactions and turn them into valuable customer interactions. Let me repeat that. Totogi will leverage all those network interactions and turn them into valuable customer interactions. Totogi allows the carrier to leverage its network and all the network interactions into customer engagement. This is something the super apps don't have but will wish they did. But this magic technology is not enough. Telcos also need to move from being network focus to being customer focused. Totogi enables telcos to chase exciting revenue growth without that annoying massive CapEx investment. Totogi is going to help you transform your sucky mobile apps with the crappy customer ratings, into something your subscribers want to open multiple times a day and become a platform for growth. I'm so excited about Totogi, I'm investing $100 million into it. You heard me right, $100 million. Is this what it feels like to be soft bank? I'm investing in Totogi because it's going to enable telcos to leverage the network interactions into super app usage. Which will lead to an improved subscriber experience and will give you a massive jump in your ARPU. And once you do that, all those Telco valuations will go from down here to up here. And so I've been talking to some folks, you know, checking in, feeling them out, getting their thoughts, and I've been asking them, what do you think about telcos building super apps? And the response has been, click, everyone says, "No way, telcos can't do it." Zero chance, total goose egg. One suggested I build a bonfire with 100 million dollars, because then at least I wouldn't waste years of my life. Well I think those people are dead wrong. I do believe that telcos can build super apps and make them super successful. The public cloud is changing all parts of telco and Totogi and super apps are fundamentally changing, the customer relationships. In one month at MWC, people will see what Totogi has to offer, and they will understand why I'm making this bold call. Because the Totogi takes the value of the network and the power of the public cloud to help telcos move from being network centric, to being customer centric. Boom! If you want to make this transformation and reap all the financial benefits, you will have to compete for customers with a whole new set of players. You will no longer compete with the network focus guys like the other telcos, instead you will be competing against the customer focused companies. These players don't have a network to fall back on like your old competitors. They know they have to make customers love them. Their customer loyalty is so off the charts, their customers are called fans. So if you want that big money, you will have to compete on their turf and make the customers want to choose you, you need Apple level loyalty. That bar is uber high. We will have to give up the security blanket of the network and change. Instead of NPS of the thirties, it needs to be in the 70s. Instead of mobile app ratings in the threes, they need to get five stars. I'm betting big that Totogi will make that possible. I'm going to help you every step of the way, starting with my keynote next month at MWC. Join me and I'll share the secrets to converting your super valuable network interactions to make your super app a massive success. We're going to have an amazing time and I can't wait to see you there. >> Okay. We're back here in theCUBE here at Mobile World Congress in Cloud City. I'm John Furrier, Chloe Richardson filling it for Dave Vellante who's out on assignment. He's out getting all the data out there and getting stories. Chloe, what a great keynote by Danielle Royston. We just heard her and while with major action, major pump me up, punch in the face, wake the heck up cloud people, cloud is here. She didn't pull any punches. >> No, I mean the thing is John, there's trillions of dollars on the table and everyone seems to be fighting for it. >> And you heard her up there, if you're not on the public cloud, you're not going to get access to that money. It's a free for all. And I think the cloud people are like, they might think they're going to walk right in and the telco industry is going to just give it up. >> No, of course. >> There's not going to be, it's going to be a fight, who will win. >> Who will win but also who will build the next big thing? >> Someone needs to die in the media conversation, it's always a fight, something's dead, something's dead but keeps the living. All that kidding aside, this is really about partnering. I think what's happened is, telco's already acknowledged that they need to change in the 5G edge conversation, the chip acceleration. Look at Apple, they've got their own processors, Nvidia, Amazon makes their own chips, Intel's pumping stuff out, you've got Qualcomm, you've got all these new things. So the chips are getting faster and the software's more open source and I'm telling you, cloud is just going to drive that bus right down clouds street and it's going to be in Cloud City everywhere. >> And it's going to be peeping on the board as it drives down. John, I'm not a stalker, but I have read some of the things that you've written. And one of the things you mentioned that was really interesting was the difference between building and operating. Break it down for me. What does that mean? >> That means basically in mature markets and growing markets things behave differently and certainly economics and the people and the makeup and the mindset. >> Okay. >> So the telco has been kind of this mature market. It's been changing and growing but not like radically. Cost optimization, make profit, you know, install a lot of cable. You got to get the rents out of that infrastructure and that's kind of gone on for too long. Cloud is a growth market, and it's about building, not just operating and you've got operators, carriers are operating networks. So you're going to see the convergence of operators and builders coming together, builders being software developers, new technology and executives that think about building. And you want people on your team that are going to be, I won't say war time, you know, lieutenants or generals, but people who can handle the pace of change. >> Okay. >> Because the change and the nature is different. And some people want slow and steady, keep the boat from rocking, but in a growth market, it's turbulent and ride might not be quiet, first class ticket to paradise, but it's bumpy, but it's thrilling. >> No, of course. Is it similar to the old sales adage of hunter versus farmer and the parallels? >> Yeah. I mean, the mindset. If you have a team of people that aren't knocking down new opportunities and building the next big thing, fixing your house, get your house in order, you know, refactor, reset, reboot, re platform with the cloud and then refactor your business. If you don't have the people thinking like that, you're probably either going to be taken over or go out of business. And that's what the telco with all these assets, they're going to get bought roll into a SPAC, special purpose acquisition company was a super hot in the United States. A lot of roll ups going on with Private equity. So a lot of these telcos, if they don't refactor or re platform, then refactor, they're going to be toast and they're going to get rolled up and eaten up by somebody else. >> Yeah, sure. It's interesting though, isn't it? Because when we think of telco in tech, we often think of, obviously we've got the triad. People process technology, and we think process and technology really take the forefront here but like you said there, people are also so important because if you don't have this right balance, you're not going to be able to drive that change. We had, obviously Scott Brighton on the stage yesterday and after his session, somebody came up to me and just said, "I'm interested to hear what that means for education." So how can we establish this new generation of tech and telco leaders from the grassroots with educational associations establishments? How can we encourage that? I wonder, is this something that you talk about often? >> Yeah. I mean, education is huge and this highlights the change that telcos now part of. Telco used to be a boring industry that ran the networks, or moving packets around and mobile was there, but once the iPhone came out in 2007, the life has changed, society has changed, education's changed, how people interact has changed. So you start to see people now aware of the value and if you look at the, during the COVID, the internet didn't crash, the telcos actually saved our asses and everyone was, survive because the network didn't break. Yeah, we had some bad zoom meetings here and there and some teleconferences that didn't go well but for the most part we survived and they really saved everybody, my goodness. So they should get kudos for that. But now they're dependent upon healthcare, education, people care about that stuff. So now you're going to start to see an elevated focus on what telecom is doing. That's why The Edge has checked trillions of dollars up for grabs. But education, there's negative unemployment in cybersecurity and in cloud. So for the people who say, oh, there's no jobs or I can't work, that's a bunch of BS because you can just get online, get on YouTube and just get a degree. You can get a degree, you can get an Amazon job, it pays a hundred thousand dollars a year, American. You can make a hundred thousand pounds and be unemployed six months and then be employed. So negative unemployment means there's more jobs than people to fill them qualify. >> Yeah, it's interesting you mentioned that because I was talking to a cyber security leader who was saying in some of the things there were now 3 million vacancies in cybersecurity and there's such a skill shortage, there is nobody around to fill it. So it's an interesting problem to have isn't it? Cause it's reversed to what we've been used to for the last few decades and obviously telco is in the same space. What can we do about it? Do you think it will actually bring people in? >> I think it's going to take leadership and I'm a big proponent of kids not going to university, they don't have to. Why spend the dough, money if you don't have to? You can get online. I mean, the data's there, but to me it's the relationships, the mentorship. You starting to see women in tech and underrepresented minorities in the tech field, where mentorship is more important than curriculum. Community is more important than just going through a linear course where nobody wants to sit online and go through linear courseware. Now, if they have to get a certificate or degree and accreditation no problem, but communities are out there. So that's a big change over, I'm a big fan of that and I think people should, you know, get some specialized skills, you can get that online. So why even go to school? So people are figuring that out. >> For sure. And also even transferring, I mean, so many skills are transferable nowadays, aren't there? So we could easily be talking to people from other industries and bringing them into telco and saying, look, bring what you know from your retail background or your healthcare background and help us at telco to again, drive forward, just like DR is saying it's all about the next big thing. >> Danielle, I was also driving a lot of change and if you think about the jobs and a pedigree of going to a university, oh, Harvard, all the big Ivy leagues, Oxford in your area. So it's like, if you go to a school like that and you get a pedigree, you instantly get a job. Now, the jobs that are available, weren't around five years ago. So there's no like pedigree or track record, there's no like, everyone's equal. >> Yeah. >> So you could, the democratization of the internet now is, from a job standpoint is, people are leveling up faster. So it's not about the Ivy league or the big degree or silver spoon in your mouth, you've got the entitlement. So you start to see people emergent and make things happen, entrepreneurship in America, immigrant entrepreneurship. People are billionaires that have no high school diplomas. >> It's interesting you mentioned that John, because we can have more than five years experience in this space, we know that but in telco there is a problem and maybe it's, again it's a flipped problem where, telco recruiters or talent acquisition leaders, are now asking for kind of 10, 20 years experience when they're sending out job descriptions. So does that mean that we are at fault for not being able to fill all these vacancies? >> Well, I mean, I think that's just, I mean, I think there's a transition of the new skill set happening one, but two, I think, you know, you've got to be like a chip engineer, you can't learn that online, but if you want to run a cloud infrastructure, you can. But I think embedded systems is an area that I was talking to an engineer, there's a huge shortage of engineers who code on the microprocessors, on the chips. So embedded systems is a big career. So there's definitely parts, you can specialize, space is another area you've seen a lot of activity on, obviously Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk is going to be here on virtual keynote, trying to go to Mars. And, you know, Danielle Royston always says, who's going to happen first, Mars, colony, or telco adopting public cloud? Some people think Mars will happen first but. >> What do you think John? >> I think telco's going to get cloud. I mean, first of all, public cloud is now hybrid cloud and the edge, this whole internet edge, 5G, is so symbolic and so important because it's an architectural beachhead. >> Yeah. >> And that's where the trillion dollar baby is. >> Of course. >> So the inside baseball and the inside money and all the investors are focusing on the edge because whoever can command the edge, wins all the dollars. So everyone kind of knows it's a public secret and it's fun to watch, everyone jockey for the positions. >> Yeah, know, it really is. But it's also quite funny, isn't it? Because the edge is almost where we were decades ago, but we're putting the control back in the hands of consumers. So it's an interesting flip and I wonder if with the edge, we can really enhance this acceleration of product development its efficiency, this frictionless system in which we live in. And also, I've heard you say hybrid a few times John. >> Yeah. >> Is hybrid going to be the future of the world no matter what industry you're in? >> Hybrid is everything now. So it's, we're the hybrid cube, we've got hybrid cloud. >> Exactly. >> You got hybrid telco, because now you've got the confluence of online and offline coming together. >> Yeah. >> That is critical dynamic, and you seeing it. Like virtual reality for instance, now you seeing things, I know you guys are doing some great work at your company around creating experiences that are virtual. >> Exactly. >> You got, like Roblox went public recently. >> Yeah. >> Metaverse is a good time to be in that business because experiential human relations are coming. So I think that's going to be powered by 5G, you know, gamers. So all good stuff, Chloe, great to be with you here in theCUBE. >> Thank you. >> And we're looking forward to seeing your main stage. >> Great. >> And then we're going to send it back to the studio, Adam and the team, we're waiting for DR to arrive here in Cloud City and this is theCUBE, from Cloud City back to you, Adam in the studio.

Published Date : Jun 29 2021

SUMMARY :

We're here on the floor in Cloud City, I love what you guys have And also the Cloud City is Know, I mean the atmosphere great job on the main stage. bustle of the city to find out. and the future of work. insight into the origins and she's not just, you know, It's the moonshot of the telco world. And I love the fact that she's so, the way we pioneers though, and driving the content and so pertinent to now. of COVID and people are glad to be here, I'd like to pick your brains So CES is the big consumer that is the fact that it's moving are going to lose their position. And it's the people and you can see as soon as she worked out. And back to the show, I he consolidated and rebooted the company. have a slice of the pie? hot and heavy on the fact and because of the edge, DR is really leading the charge So in order to do that, you And he's coming to talk and minimize the threats. but the number is probably and it's beyond the government, that the industries aren't And this is really about to and all the actions. Totogi is going to help you He's out getting all the data on the table and everyone on the public cloud, you're going to be a fight, who will win. So the chips are getting And one of the things you mentioned and the makeup and the mindset. So the telco has been Because the change and and the parallels? and they're going to and telco leaders from the grassroots So for the people who of the things there were I mean, the data's there, but and saying, look, bring what you know and if you think about the So it's not about the Ivy to fill all these vacancies? to run a cloud infrastructure, you can. and the edge, this And that's where the and the inside money in the hands of consumers. So it's, we're the hybrid of online and offline coming together. and you seeing it. You got, like Roblox great to be with you here to seeing your main stage. Adam and the team, we're

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Danielle RoystonPERSON

0.99+

TelefonicaORGANIZATION

0.99+

VodafoneORGANIZATION

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

DaniellePERSON

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

Philippe LangloisPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

2007DATE

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

ChloePERSON

0.99+

Danielle RoystonPERSON

0.99+

Teresa CarlsonPERSON

0.99+

telcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

Chloe RichardsonPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

AmericaLOCATION

0.99+

BahrainLOCATION

0.99+

Jeff BezosPERSON

0.99+

BarcelonaLOCATION

0.99+

Steve JobsPERSON

0.99+

AdamPERSON

0.99+

Chloe RichardsonPERSON

0.99+

AT&TORGANIZATION

0.99+

GrabORGANIZATION

0.99+

appleORGANIZATION

0.99+

six monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

TotogiORGANIZATION

0.99+

TwilioORGANIZATION

0.99+

$100 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

$40 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

Scott BrightonPERSON

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

WednesdayDATE

0.99+

P1 SecurityORGANIZATION

0.99+

Scott BrightonPERSON

0.99+

Elon MuskPERSON

0.99+

TelcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

five starsQUANTITY

0.99+

10 timesQUANTITY

0.99+

NvidiaORGANIZATION

0.99+

MarsLOCATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

iPhoneCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

USLOCATION

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

February, 2019DATE

0.99+

DoorDashORGANIZATION

0.99+

Ricardo Rocha, CERN | KubeCon + CloudNativeCon Europe 2021 - Virtual


 

>>from around the globe. It's >>the cube >>with coverage of >>Kublai khan and >>Cloud Native Con, Europe 2021 virtual brought >>to you by red hat, >>the cloud Native >>Computing foundation and ecosystem partners. Hello, welcome back to the cubes coverage of Kublai khan. Cloud Native Con 2021 part of the CNC. S continuing cube partnership virtual here because we're not in person soon, we'll be out of the pandemic and hopefully in person for the next event. I'm john for your host of the key. We're here with ricardo. Roach computing engineers sir. In CUBA. I'm not great to see you ricardo. Thanks for remote ng in all the way across the world. Thanks for coming in. >>Hello, Pleasure. Happy to be here. >>I saw your talk with Priyanka on linkedin and all around the web. Great stuff as always, you guys do great work over there at cern. Talk about what's going on with you and the two speaking sessions you have it coop gone pretty exciting news and exciting sessions happening here. So take us through the sessions. >>Yeah. So actually the two sessions are kind of uh showing the two types of things we do with kubernetes. We we are doing we have a lot of uh services moving to kubernetes, but the first one is more on the services we have in the house. So certain is known for having a lot of data and requests, requiring a lot of computing capacity to analyze all this data. But actually we have also very large community and we have a lot of users and people interested in the stuff we do. So the first question will actually show how we've been uh migrating our group of infrastructure into the into communities and in this case actually open shift. And uh the challenge there is to to run a very large amount of uh global websites on coordinators. Uh we run more than 1000 websites and there will be a demonstration on how we do all the management of the website um life cycle, including upgrading and deploying new new websites and an operator that was developed for this purpose. And then more on the other side will give with a colleague also talk about machine learning. Machine learning has been a big topic for us. A lot of our workloads are migrating to accelerators and can benefit a lot from machine learning. So we're giving a talk about a new service that we've deployed on top of Cuban areas where we try to manage to uh lifecycle of machine learning workloads from data preparation all the way to serving the bottles, also exploring the communities features and integrating accelerators and a lot of accelerators. >>So one part of the one session, it's a large scale deployment kubernetes key to there and now the machine learning essentially service for other people to use that. Right? Like take me through the first large scale deployment. What's the key innovation there in your opinion? >>Yeah, I think compared to the infrastructure we had before, is this notion that we can develop an operator that will uh, manage resource, in this case a website. And this is uh, something that is not always obvious when people start with kubernetes, it's not just an orchestra, it's really the ap and the capability of managing a huge amount of resources, including custom resources. So the possibility to develop this operator and then uh, manage the lifecycle of uh, something that was defined in the house and that fits our needs. Uh, There are challenges there because we have a large amount of websites and uh, they can be pretty active. Uh, we also have to some scaling issues on the storage that serves these these websites and we'll give some details uh during the talk as well, >>so kubernetes storage, this is all kind of under the covers, making this easier. Um and the machine learning, it plays nicely in that what if you take us for the machine learning use case, what's going on there, wow, what was the discovery, How did you guys put that together? What's the key elements there? >>Right, so the main challenge there has been um that machine learning is is quite popular but it's quite spread as well, so we have multiple groups focusing on this, but there's no obvious way to centralize not only the resource usage and make it more efficient, but also centralize the knowledge of how these procedures can be done. So what we are trying to do is just offer a service to all our users where we help them with infrastructure so that they don't have to focus on that and they could focus just on their workloads and we do everything from exposing the data systems that we have in the house so that they can do access to the data and data preparation and then doing um some iteration using notebooks and then doing distributed training with potentially large amount of gps and that storage and serving up the models and all of this is uh is managed with the coordinates cluster underneath. Uh We had a lot of knowledge of how to handle kubernetes and uh all the features that everyone likes scalability. The reliability out of scaling is very important for this type of workload. This is, this is key. >>Yeah, it's interesting to see how kubernetes is maturing, um congratulations on the projects. Um they're going to probably continue to scale. Remember this reminds me of when I was uh you know coming into the business in the 98 late eighties early nineties with TCP I. P. And the S. I. Model, you saw the standards evolve and get settled in and then boom innovation everywhere. And that took about a year to digest state and scale up. It's happening much faster now with kubernetes I have to ask you um what's your experience with the question that people are looking to get answered? Which is as kubernetes goes, the next generation of the next step? Um People want to integrate. So how is kubernetes exposing a. P. I. S. To say integration points for tools and other things? Can you share your experience and where this is going, what's happening now and where it goes? Because we know there's no debate. People like the kubernetes aspect of it, but now it's integration is the conversation. Can you share your thoughts on that? >>I can try. Uh So it's uh I would say it's a moving target, but I would say the fact that there's such a rich ecosystem around kubernetes with all the cloud, David projects, uh it's it's uh like a real proof that the popularity of the A. P. I. And this is also something that we after we had the first step of uh deploying and understanding kubernetes, we started seeing the potential that it's not reaching only the infrastructure itself, it's reaching all the layers, all the stack that we support in house and premises. And also it's opening up uh doors to easily scale into external resources as as well. So what we've been trying to tell our users is to rely on these integrations as much as possible. So this means like the application lifecycle being managed with things like Helmand getups, but also like the monitoring being managed with Prometheus and once you're happy with your deployment in house we have ways to scale out to external resources including public clouds. And this is really like see I don't know a proof that all these A. P. I. S are not only popular but incredibly useful because there's such a rich ecosystem around it. >>So talk about the role of data in this obviously machine learning pieces something that everyone is interested in as you get infrastructure as code and devops um and def sec ops as everything's shifting left. I love that, love that narrative day to our priests. All this is all proving mature, mature ization. Um data is critical. Right? So now you get real time information, real time data. The expectations for the apps is to integrate the data. What's your view on how this is progressing from your standpoint because machine learning and you mentioned you know acceleration or being part of another system. Cashing has always done that would say databases. Right. So you've got now is databases get slower, caches are getting faster now they're all the ones so it's all changing. So what's your thoughts on this next level data equation into kubernetes? Because you know stateless is cool but now you've got state issues. >>Yeah so uh yeah we we've always had huge needs for for data we store and I I think we are over half an exhibit of data available on the premises but we we kind of have our own storage systems which are external and that's for for like the physics data, the raw data and one particular charity that we had with our workloads until recently is that we we call them embarrassing parallel in the sense that they don't really need uh very tight connectivity between the different workloads. So if it's people always say tens of thousands of jobs to do some analysis, they're actually quite independent, they will produce a lot more data but we can store them independently. Machine learning is is posing a challenge in the sense that this is a training tends to be a lot more interconnected. Um so it can be a benefit from from um systems that we are not so familiar with. So for us it's it's maybe not so much the cashing layers themselves is really understanding how our infrastructure needs to evolve on premises to support this kind of workloads. We had some smallish uh more high performance computing clusters with things like infinite and for low latency. But this is not the bulk of our workloads. This is not what we are experts on these days. This is the transition we are doing towards uh supporting this machine learning workers >>um just as a reference for the folks watching you mentioned embarrassing parallel and that's a quote that you I read on your certain tech blog. So if you go to tech blog dot web dot search dot ch or just search cern tech blog, you'll see the post there um and good stuff there and in there you go, you lay out a bunch of other things too where you start to see the deployment services and customer resource definitions being part of this, is it going to get to the point where automation is a bigger part of the cluster management setting stuff up quicker. Um As you look at some of the innovations you're doing with machines and Coubertin databases and thousands of other point things that you're working on there, I mean I know you've got a lot going on there, it's in the post but um you know, we don't want to have the problem of it's so hard to stand up and manage and this is what people want to make simpler. How do you how do you answer that when people say say we want to make it easier? >>Yeah. So uh for us it's it's really automate everything and up to now it has been automate the deployment in the kubernetes clusters right now we are looking at automating the kubernetes clusters themselves. So there's some really interesting projects, uh So people are used to using things like terra form to manage the deployment of clusters, but there are some projects like cross playing, for example, that allows us to have the clusters themselves being resources within kubernetes. Uh and this is something we are exploring quite a bit. Uh This allows us to also abstract the kubernetes clusters themselves uh as uh as carbonated resources. So this this idea of having a central cluster that will manage a much larger infrastructure. So this is something that we're exploring the getups part is really key for us to, it's something that eases the transition from from from people that are used already to manage large scale systems but are not necessarily experts on core NATO's. Uh they see that there's an easier past there if they if they can be introduced slowly through through the centralized configuration. >>You know, you mentioned cross plane, I had some on earlier, he's awesome dude, great guy and I was smiling because you know I still have you know flashbacks and trigger episodes from the Hadoop world, you know when it was such so promising that technology but it was just so hard to stand up and managed to be like really an expert to do that. And I think you mentioned cross plane, this comes up to the whole operator notion of operating the clusters, right? So you know, this comes back down to provisioning and managing the infrastructure, which is, you know, we all know is key, right? But when you start getting into multi cloud and multiple environments, that's where it becomes challenging. And I think I like what they're doing is that something that's on your mind to around hybrid and multi cloud? Can you share your thoughts on that whole trajectory? >>Absolutely. So I actually gave an internal seminar just last week describing what we've been playing with in this area and I showed some demo of using cross plane to manage clusters on premises but also manage clusters running on public clouds. A. W. S. Uh google cloud in nature and it's really like the goal there. There are many reasons we we want to explore external resources. We are kind of used to this because we have a lot of sites around the world that collaborate with us, but specifically for public clouds. Uh there are some some motivations there. The first one is this idea that we have periodic load spikes. So we knew we have international conferences, the number of analysis and job requests goes up quite a bit, so we need to be able to like scale on demand for short periods instead of over provisioning this uh in house. The second one is again coming back to machine learning this idea of accelerators. We have a lot of Cpus, we have a lot less gPS uh so it would be nice to go on fish uh for those in the public clouds. And then there's also other accelerators that are quite interesting, like CPUs and I p u s that will definitely play a role and we probably, or maybe we will never have among premises, will only be able to to use them externally. So in that, in that respect, actually coming back to your previous question, this idea of storage then becomes quite important. So what we've been playing with is not only managing this external cluster centrally, but also managing the wall infrastructure from a central place. So this means uh, making all the clusters, whatever they are look very, very much the same, including like the monitoring and the aggregation of the monitoring centrally. And then as we talked about storage, this idea of having local storage that that will be allow us to do really quick software distribution but also access to the data, >>what you guys are doing as we say, cool. And relevant projects. I mean you got the large scale deployments and the machine learning to really kind of accelerate which will drive a lot of adoption in terms of automation. And as that kicks in when you got to get the foundational work done, I see that clearly the right trajectory, you know, reminds me ricardo, um you know, again not do a little history lesson here, but you know, back when network protocols were moving from proprietary S N A for IBM deck net for digital back in the history the old days the os I Open Systems Interconnect Standard stack was evolving and you know when TCP I P came around that really opened up this interoperability, right? And SAM and I were talking about this kind of cross cloud connections or inter clouding as lou lou tucker. And I talked that open stack in 2013 about inter networking or interconnections and it's about integration and interoperability. This is like the next gen conversation that kubernetes is having. So as you get to scale up which is happening very fast as you get machine learning which can handle data and enable modern applications really it's connecting networks and connecting systems together. This is a huge architectural innovation direction. Could you share your reaction to that? >>Yeah. So actually we are starting the easy way, I would say we are starting with the workloads that are loosely coupled that we don't necessarily have to have this uh tighten inter connectivity between the different deployments, I would say that this is this is already giving us a lot because our like the bulk of our workloads are this kind of batch, embarrassing parallel, uh and we are also doing like co location when we have large workloads that made this kind of uh close inter connectivity then we kind of co locate them in the same deployment, same clouds in region. Um I think like what you describe of having cross clouds interconnectivity, this will be like a huge topic. It is already, I would say so we started investigating a lot of service measure options to try to learn what we can gain from it. There is clearly a benefit for managing services but there will be definitely also potential to allow us to kind of more easily scale out across regions. There's we've seen this by using the public cloud. Some things that we found is for example, this idea of infinite, infinite capacity which is kind of sometimes uh it feels kind of like that even at the scale we have for Cpus But when you start using accelerators, Yeah, you start negotiating like maybe use multiple regions because there's not enough capacity in a single region and you start having to talk to the cloud providers to negotiate this. And this makes the deployments more complicated of course. So this, this interconnectivity between regions and clouds will be a big thing. >>And, and again, low hanging fruit is just a kind of existing market but has thrown the vision out there mainly to kind of talk about what what we're seeing which is the world's are distributed computer. And if you have the standards, good things happen. Open systems, open innovating in the open really could make a big difference is going to be the difference between real value for the society of global society or are we going to get into the silo world? So I think the choice is the industry and I think, you know, Cern and C and C. F and Lennox Foundation and all the companies that are investing in open really is a key inflection point for us right now. So congratulations. Thanks for coming on the cube. Yeah, appreciate it. Thank you. Okay, Ricardo, rocha computing engineer cern here in the cube coverage of the CN Cf cube con cloud, native con europe. I'm john for your host of the cube. Thanks for watching.

Published Date : May 5 2021

SUMMARY :

from around the globe. I'm not great to see you ricardo. Happy to be here. what's going on with you and the two speaking sessions you have it coop gone pretty exciting news the two types of things we do with kubernetes. So one part of the one session, it's a large scale deployment kubernetes key to there and now So the possibility to Um and the machine learning, it plays nicely in that what if you take us for the machine learning use case, the data systems that we have in the house so that they can do access to the data and data preparation in the 98 late eighties early nineties with TCP I. P. And the S. I. Model, you saw the standards that the popularity of the A. P. I. And this is also something that we So talk about the role of data in this obviously machine learning pieces something that everyone is interested in as This is the transition we are doing towards So if you go to tech blog dot web dot search dot ch Uh and this is something we are exploring quite a bit. this comes back down to provisioning and managing the infrastructure, which is, you know, we all know is key, The first one is this idea that we have periodic load spikes. and the machine learning to really kind of accelerate which will drive a lot of adoption in terms of uh it feels kind of like that even at the scale we have for Cpus But when you open innovating in the open really could make a big difference is going to be the difference

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
PriyankaPERSON

0.99+

Ricardo RochaPERSON

0.99+

2013DATE

0.99+

DavidPERSON

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

two sessionsQUANTITY

0.99+

first questionQUANTITY

0.99+

CERNORGANIZATION

0.99+

two typesQUANTITY

0.99+

RicardoPERSON

0.99+

more than 1000 websitesQUANTITY

0.99+

last weekDATE

0.99+

CUBALOCATION

0.99+

98 late eightiesDATE

0.99+

NATOORGANIZATION

0.99+

Lennox FoundationORGANIZATION

0.98+

two speaking sessionsQUANTITY

0.98+

first oneQUANTITY

0.98+

thousandsQUANTITY

0.98+

Cloud Native ConEVENT

0.98+

second oneQUANTITY

0.97+

Cloud Native Con 2021EVENT

0.97+

first stepQUANTITY

0.97+

one sessionQUANTITY

0.96+

C. FORGANIZATION

0.96+

KubeConEVENT

0.95+

CORGANIZATION

0.95+

ricardoPERSON

0.95+

linkedinORGANIZATION

0.95+

tens of thousands of jobsQUANTITY

0.95+

johnPERSON

0.95+

PrometheusTITLE

0.95+

one partQUANTITY

0.94+

europeLOCATION

0.94+

about a yearQUANTITY

0.93+

cloud NativeORGANIZATION

0.9+

2021EVENT

0.89+

one particular charityQUANTITY

0.88+

pandemicEVENT

0.81+

red hatORGANIZATION

0.81+

single regionQUANTITY

0.81+

HelmandTITLE

0.81+

Kublai khanPERSON

0.8+

first largeQUANTITY

0.8+

CubanLOCATION

0.8+

Cern andORGANIZATION

0.79+

EuropeLOCATION

0.78+

P.OTHER

0.77+

CoubertinORGANIZATION

0.75+

early ninetiesDATE

0.7+

CloudNativeCon Europe 2021EVENT

0.7+

over halfQUANTITY

0.68+

formTITLE

0.68+

conCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.67+

S. I. ModelOTHER

0.67+

Kublai khanPERSON

0.65+

TCP I.OTHER

0.65+

CfCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.64+

deploymentQUANTITY

0.56+

servicesQUANTITY

0.53+

googleORGANIZATION

0.48+

SAMORGANIZATION

0.46+

P. I.OTHER

0.4+

native conCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.37+

Nirav Shah and Peter Newton, Fortinet | CUBE Conversation, March 2021


 

(ethereal music) >> Welcome to the special Cube Conversation. I'm John Furrier, your host of "The Cube" here in Palo Alto, California. We've got two great remote guests here having a conversation around security, security convergence with platforms around networking and security with cybersecurity at an all time high, the need for understanding how to manage the breaches how to understand them, prevent them, everything in between cybersecurity and data are the number one conversation happening in the world today. We got two great guests, we've got Nirav Shah, VP of products at Fortinet and Peter Newton's senior director of products at Fortinet. The product leaders in the hottest cybersecurity company. And guys, thanks for coming on this Cube Conversation. >> Thanks for having us. >> Thank you, John. >> So last month or so I talked to John Madison about the Fortinet new release, FortiOS 7.0, as well as highlighting the convergence that's going on between the platforms around companies trying to consolidate and or manage or grow and build, converting networking and security together. Seeing that happening in real time, still doesn't change the underpinnings of how the internet works, and how these companies are structured. But the need for security is at an all time high. Talk about the impact to the customer. Do you guys have the keys to the kingdom here, product group? What is the killer product? What are customers doing? Give us the overview of why there's such a big need for the security platforms right now. >> Yeah, absolutely John. So if you see today's environment, we have seen working from anywhere it's become normal. And as part of that, we have seen so many different network edges. At the same time, they have different devices that they're using from anywhere. So what's important is as users have different devices, different users and applications that they're consuming from Cloud, we have to make sure that we provide security across the endpoint, across all network edges, and going to the Cloud compute. And for that kind of approach, you cannot have point products provide the visibility control and management. You need to have a comprehensive cybersecurity platform, which gives you security from that endpoint, to the edge, to the user, so that you have a simple but effective management and have a solid security in place to get that working from anywhere in a much more better user experience way. And that's exactly Fortinet describes as the security fabric platform. >> It's interesting not to kind of go on a tangent here, but to illustrate the point is, if you look at all the cyber security challenges that we're facing globally, especially here in the United States, the public private partnerships are increasing. We're seeing more public sector, commercial integration, the role of data. We've covered this on SiliconANGLE and many other cube interviews, especially with you guys. And there's all this kind of new approaches. Everyone's trying everything. They're buying every product that's out there, but now there's like overload. There's too much product. And that the obvious thing that's becoming clear, as cloud-scale, the evolution of this new edge environment. And so with that becomes the importance two trends that you guys are participating in. I want to get your thoughts on this because that's called SASE and SD-WAN. We know SD-WAN, but SASE stands for Secure Access Service Edge. That's I think Gartner made that term up or someone made that term up, but that's a new technology. And you've got SD-WAN, these are traditionally had been like edge for like branch offices. Now evolve now as pure network edges than a distributed computing environment. What's so important about these two topics. Nirav take us through the changes that are happening and why it's important for enterprises to get a handle on this >> Yeah John. So, as you said, SASE, Secured Access Services Edge. Really the foundation of that topic is the convergence of networking and security. And as you mentioned, Fortinet has been doing a lot of innovation in this area, right? Six years back, we pioneered the convergence of security and networking with security SD-WAN but what's happening now with the SASE is, as that working from anywhere continues to remain the dominant trend, users are looking for a Cloud-Delivered Security. And that's what Fortinet recently announced, where we can provide the most comprehensive Cloud-Delivered Security for remote users. For thin edge. You can still, anytime access from any device. To give you an example, now, our remote users, they are still at home or they can be branch of one user, but still have that always on threat protection with the consistent security given in the Cloud. So they don't have to go anymore from the branch or data center, but have a direct connectivity to the Cloud Security before they access SaaS application. That's what one of the SASE trend is. Second thing, John we are observing is users are now, as they are going back to the hybrid workforce, they are looking for a thin edge right? To your point of an edge, edge is still intelligent and a very important but there is an interesting architectural shift of, can I just use an intelligent networking there move my CapEx to OPEX and have security in Cloud? That unified security, unified policy is again becoming important. That's what SASE-- >> Okay, so I like this Cloud-Delivered Security. This is a hybrid workforce you're addressing with this marketplace, that's clear. Hybrid is a everywhere, hybrid cloud, hybrid workforce, hybrid events are coming. I mean, we love covering events physically but also now virtual. Everything's impacted by the word hybrid and Cloud. But talk about this thin edge. What do you mean by that? I mean I think thin edge, I think thin clients, the old trend. What is thin edge mean? >> Yeah, so there're different organizations are looking at the architecture in a different way. Some organizations are thinking about having a very simple branch where it is used for modern networking technologies, while security has been shifted to the Cloud deliver. What happens with this model is, now they are relying more into technologies like SD-WAN on edge to provide that intelligence steering, while everything in the security is being done in a Cloud compute way for both remote users and thin edge environment. Now the good news here is, they don't have to worry about the security patching, or any of those security capabilities. It is all done by Fortinet as they go and use the SaaS applications performance >> I want to come back and drill down on that but I want to get Peter in here in the Zero Trust equation because one of the things that comes up all the time with this edge discussion is network access. I mean, you go back to the old days of computing, you had edge log in, you'd come in, radius servers, all these things were happening, pretty simple cut paradigm. It's gotten so complicated now, Peter. So Zero Trust is a hot area. It's not only one of the things but it's a super important, what is Zero Trust these days? >> Zero Trust is indeed a very hot term because I think part of it is just it sounds great from a security standpoint, Zero Trust, you don't trust anyone, but it really comes down to a philosophical approach of how do you address the user's data applications that you want to protect? And the idea of Zero Trust and really what's driving it is the fact that as we've been talking, people are working remotely. The perimeter of the organization has dissolved. And so you no longer can afford to have a trusted internal zone and an untrusted external zone. Everything has to be "Zero Trust." So this means that you need to be authenticating and verifying users and devices on a repeat and regular basis, and you want to when you're bringing them on and giving them access to assets and applications, you want to do that with as granular of control as possible. So the users and devices have access to what they need, but no more. And that's kind of the basic tenets of Zero Trust. And that's what, it's really about prioritizing the applications and data, as opposed to just looking at, am I bringing someone into my network. >> God, the concept of Zero Trust, obviously hot. What's the difference between Zero Trust Access and Zero Trust Network Access, or as people say ZTA versus ZTNA? I mean, is there a nuance there? I mean, what's the difference between the two? >> That's actually a really good question because they both have the Zero Trust in the name. ZTNA is actually a specific term that a Gardner created or other analyst I should say, created 10 years ago. And this refers specifically to controlling application to controlling access to applications. whereas Zero Trust, overall Zero Trust access deals with both users and devices coming on to networks, how are you connecting them on? What kind of access are you giving them on the network? ZTNA is specifically how are you bringing users and connecting them to applications? Whether those applications are on premise or in the Cloud. >> So what the NA is more like the traditional old VPN model connecting users from home or whatever. Just connecting across the network with user to app. Is that right? >> That's actually a really good insight, but ironically the VPN clinical benefits of this are actually an outgrowth of the ZTNA model because ZTA doesn't differentiate between when you're on network or off network. It creates a secure tunnel automatically no matter where the user is, but VPN is all just about creating a secure tunnel when you're remote. ZTNA just does that automatically. So it's a lot easier, a lot simpler. You get a hundred percent compliance and then you also have that same secure tunnel even when you're "on a safe network" because with Zero Trust, you don't trust anything. So yes it really is leading to the evolution of VPN connectivity. >> So Nirav I want to get back to you on tie that circle back to what we were talking about around hybrid. So everyone says everything's moving to the Cloud. That's what people think. And Cloud ops is essentially what hybrid is. So connect the dots here between the zero trust, zero trust A and NA with the move to the hybrid cloud model. How does that, how does it, what's the difference between the two? Where's the connection? What's the relevance for your customers and the marketplace? >> Yeah, I think that again goes back to that SASE framework where ZTNA plays a huge role because John, we talked about when users are working from anywhere in this hybrid workforce, one of the important thing is to not give them this implicit trust right? To the applications, enabling the explicit trust is very important. And that is what ZTNA does. And the interesting thing about Fortinet is we provide all of this part of FortiOS and users can deploy anywhere. So as they are going to the Cloud-Delivered Security, they can enable ZTNA there so that we make sure this user at what time, which application they're accessing and should we give them that access or not. So great way to have ZTNA, SASE, everything in one unified policy and provide that anytime access for any device with a trusting place. >> Okay, real quick question to you is, what's the difference between SASE, Secure Access Service Edge, and SD-WAN? Real quick. >> Yeah, so SD-WAN is one of the core foundation element of SASE, right? So far we talked about the Cloud-Delivered Security, which is all important part of the security of the service. SASE is another element, which is a networking and a service where SD-WAN plays a foundation role. And John that's where I was saying earlier that the intelligent edge modern technology that SD-WAN provides is absolutely necessary for a successful SASE deployment, right? If users who are sitting anywhere, if they can't get the right application steering, before they provide the Cloud-Delivered Security, then they are not going to get the user experience. So having the right SD-WAN foundation in that edge, working in tandem with the Cloud-Delivered Security makes a win-win situation for both networking and security teams. >> So Peter, I want to talk to you. Last night I was on a chat on the Clubhouse app with some cybersecurity folks and they don't talk in terms of "I got ZTNA and I got some SASE and SD-WEN, they're talking mostly about just holistically their environment. So could you just clarify the difference 'cause this can be confusing between Zero Trust Network Access ZTNA versus SASE because it's kind of the same thing, but I know it's nuance, but, is there a difference there? People get confused by this when I hear people talking 'cause like they just throw jargon around and they say, "Oh, with Zero Trust we're good. What does that even mean? >> Yeah, we get a lot of that when talking with customers because the two technologies are so complimentary and similar, they're both dealing with security for remote workers. However sassy is really dealing with that kind of firewall in the Cloud type service, where the remote user gets the experience and protection of being behind a firewall, ZTNA is about controlling the application and giving them that secure tunnel to the application. So they're different things one's kind of that firewall and service, security and service, even networking in a service. But ZTNA is really about, how do I have the policies no matter where our user is, to give them access to specific applications and then give them a secure tunnel to that application? So very complimentary, but again, they are separate things. >> What's the landscape out there with competitive because has there products, I mean you guys are product folks. You'll get the product question. Is it all kind of in one thing, is this bundled in? Do you guys have a unique solution? Some people have it, they don't. What's the marketplace look like from a product standpoint? >> Yeah. So John, that starts back to the platform that we talked about, right? Fortinet always believes in not to develop a point product, but doing organic development which is part of a broader platform. So when we look at the thing like SASE, which required a really enterprise grade networking and security stack, Fortinet has organically developed them SD-WAN, we are a leading vendor, for the Gartner magic quadrant leader there, network firewall, including whether they deployed on Cloud, on-prem or a segmentation. We are a leader there. So when you combine both of them and ZTNA is part of it, there is only handful of vendor you will see in the industry who can provide the consistent security, networking, and security together and have that better user experience for the single management. So clearly there's a lot of buzz John, about a lot of vendors talk about it. But when you go to the details and see this kind of unified policy of networking and security, Fortinet is emerging as a leader. >> Well I always like talking the experts like you guys on this topic. And we get into the conversations around the importance under the hood. SASE, SD-WEN, we've been covering that for a long time. And now with Zero Trust becoming such a prominent architectural feature in Cloud and hybrid, super important under the hood. At the end of the day though, I got to ask the customers question, which is, "what's in it for me? "I care about breaches. "I don't want to be breached. "The government's not helping me over the top. "I got to defend myself. "I have to put resources in place, it's expensive, "and nevermind if I get breached." The criticality of that alone, is a risk management discussion. These are huge table. These are huge stakes and the stakes are high. So what I care about is are you going to stop the breaches? I need the best security in town. What do you say to that? >> Yeah this goes back to the beginning. We talked about consistent certified security, right John. So yes a SASE model is interesting. Customers are going to move to Cloud, but it's going to be a journey. Customers are not going Cloud first day one. They are going to take a hybrid approach where security is required in a segment, in an edge and on the Cloud. And that's where having a solid security in place is a number one requirement. And when you look at the history of Fortinet, over the last 20 years, how we have done, with our FortiGuard Labs, our threat intelligence and ability for us to protect over 450,000 customers, that's a big achievement. And for us to continue to provide that security but more importantly, continue to go out, and do a third-party certification with many organization to make sure no matter where customers are deploying security, it is that same enterprise grade security deployment. And that's very important that we talk to our users to make sure they validate that. >> Peter would weigh in on this. Customers don't want any breaches. How do you help them with the best security? What's your take on that? >> Well, to kind of reiterate what Nirav said earlier, we really believe that security is a team sport. And you do need best in class products at each individual element, but more importantly you need those products we talking together. So the fact that we have industry leading firewalls, the fact that we have industry-leading SD-WAN, we've got industry leading products to cover the entire gamut of the end point all the way email application, Cloud, all these products while it's important that they're, third-party validated as Nirav was mentioning, it's more important that they actually talk together. They're integrated and provide automated actions. Today's cyber security moves so fast. You need that team approach to be able to protect and stop those breaches. >> Well, you guys have a great enterprise grade solution. I got to say, I've been covering you guys for many years now and you guys have been upfront, out front on the data aspect of it with FortiGuards. And I think people are starting to realize now that data is the key, value proposition is not a secret anymore. Used to be kind of known for the people inside the ropes. So congratulations. I do know that there's a lot action happening. I want to give you guys a chance to at the end of this conversation now to just put a plug in Fortinet because there's more people coming into the workforce now. Post pandemic, young people with computer science degrees and other degrees that want to go into career with cybersecurity, could you guys share both your perspective on for the young people watching or people re-skilling, what opportunities there are from a coding standpoint, and or from say an analyst perspective. What are some of the hot openings? 'cause there are thousands and thousands of jobs give a quick plug for Fortinet and what openings you guys might have. >> Well, certainly in the cyber industry, one of the major trends we have is a work place shortage. There are not enough trained professionals who know about cybersecurity. So for those who are interested in retooling or starting their career, cybersecurity is an ongoing field. It's going to be around for a long time. I highly encourage those interested, come take a look at Fortinet. We offer free training. So you can start from knowing nothing to becoming certified up to a security architect level, and all those, all that training is now available for free. So it's a great time to star, great time to come into the industry. The industry needs you >> Any particularly areas, Peter you see that's like really jumping off the page. >> Well, it's hybrid, knowing Cloud, knowing on-prem, knowing the traffic, knowing the data on the applications, there's just so much to do. >> You're the head of product, you've got all, probably a ton of openings but seriously young people trying to figure out where to jump in, what are the hot areas? Where can people dig in and get retrained and or find their career? >> Yeah, no, I think to reiterate what Peter said, right? The program that Fortinet has built, LSE one, two, three which is free available, is a great foundation. Because that actually goes into the detail of many topics we touched upon. Even though we are talking about SD-WAN, SASE, ZTNA, fundamentally these are the networking and security technologies to make sure users are able to do the right work in the user experience. And that will be really helpful to the young people who are looking to learn more and go into this area. So highly encouraged to take those training, reach out to us. We are there to provide any mentorship, anything that is required to help them in that journey. >> Anything jump off the page in terms of areas that you think are super hot, that are in need. >> Certainly there's convergence of networking and security. There is a growing need of how and what is Zero Trust is? and how the security is applied everywhere. Definitely that's a topic of mine for a lot of our customers, and that's an area, it's a good thing to gain more knowledge and utilize it. >> Nirav and Peter, thank you for coming on. You guys are both experts and the leaders at Fortinet, the product team. The need for security platform is an all time high consolidating tools into a platform. More tools are needed and there's new tools coming. So I'm expecting to have more great conversations as the world evolves. Certainly the edge is super important. Thanks for coming on, appreciate it. >> Thanks for having us. >> Okay, Cube Conversation on security here in the Palo Alto studios. I'm John furrier. Thanks for watching. (ethereal music)

Published Date : Mar 31 2021

SUMMARY :

in the world today. Talk about the impact to the customer. to the user, so that you have a simple And that the obvious thing So they don't have to go the word hybrid and Cloud. are looking at the architecture here in the Zero Trust equation So the users and devices have access God, the concept of Zero Trust in the name. Just connecting across the of the ZTNA model because So connect the dots here So as they are going to the Okay, real quick question to you is, that the intelligent because it's kind of the same of firewall in the Cloud type service, What's the landscape So John, that starts back to the platform and the stakes are high. in an edge and on the Cloud. How do you help them So the fact that we have that data is the key, one of the major trends we really jumping off the page. knowing the data on the applications, Because that actually goes into the detail of areas that you think are and how the security and the leaders at here in the Palo Alto studios.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
FortinetORGANIZATION

0.99+

PeterPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

Nirav ShahPERSON

0.99+

March 2021DATE

0.99+

thousandsQUANTITY

0.99+

John MadisonPERSON

0.99+

NiravPERSON

0.99+

Peter NewtonPERSON

0.99+

GartnerORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

two technologiesQUANTITY

0.99+

Zero TrustORGANIZATION

0.99+

United StatesLOCATION

0.99+

Palo Alto, CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

ZTNATITLE

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

SASETITLE

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

TodayDATE

0.99+

over 450,000 customersQUANTITY

0.99+

FortiGuard LabsORGANIZATION

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

two great guestsQUANTITY

0.98+

10 years agoDATE

0.98+

two topicsQUANTITY

0.98+

Second thingQUANTITY

0.98+

first dayQUANTITY

0.98+

FortiGuardsORGANIZATION

0.97+

Six years backDATE

0.97+

CloudTITLE

0.97+

FortiOS 7.0TITLE

0.97+

Last nightDATE

0.97+

last monthDATE

0.97+

todayDATE

0.97+

OPEXORGANIZATION

0.96+

one userQUANTITY

0.95+

each individual elementQUANTITY

0.95+

Justin Antonipillai, WireWheel | AWS Startup Showcase: Innovations with CloudData & CloudOps


 

(upbeat music) >> We're here theCUBE on Cloud Startup Showcase brought to you by AWS. And right now we're going to explore the next frontier for privacy, you know, security, privacy, and compliance, they're often lumped together and they're often lumped on as an afterthought bolted on to infrastructure, data and applications. But, you know, while they're certainly related they're different disciplines and they require a specific domain knowledge and expertise to really solve the challenges of today. One thing they all share is successful implementations, must be comprehensive and designed in at the start and with me to discuss going beyond compliance and designing privacy protections into products and services. Justin Antonipillai, who is the founder and CEO of WireWheel, Justin awesome having you on the AWS Startup Showcase. Thanks for being here >> Dave, thanks so much for having me. It's a real honor, and I appreciate it. Look forward to the discussion. >> So I always love to ask founders, like, take us back. Why did you start this company? Where did your inspiration come from? >> So Dave, I was very lucky. I had the honor of serving in president Obama's second term as an Acting Under Secretary for Economic Affairs. So I ran the part of the government that includes the U.S. Census Bureau and the Bureau of Economic Analysis. So core economic statistical bureaus. But I helped lead a lot of the Obama administration's, outreach and negotiations on data privacy around the world. Including on something called the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield. So at the time the two jobs I had really aligned with what our discussion is here today. The first part of it was, I could see that all around the world in the U.S. and around the world, data privacy and protecting privacy, had become a human rights issue. It was a trade issue. You could see it as a national security issue and companies all around the world were just struggling with how to get legal, how to make sure that I do it right, and how I make sure that I'm treating my customer's data, in the right way. But when I was also leading the agency, a lot of what we were trying to do was to help our U.S. citizens, our folks here around the country solve big public problems by ethically and responsibly using government data to do it. And I can talk about what that meant in a little while. So the inspiration behind why WireWheel was, we need better more technically driven ways to help companies get compliance, to show their customers that they're protecting privacy and to put customers, our customers onto a path where they can start using the customer data better, faster and stronger, but most importantly, ethically. And that's really what we try to tackle at WireWheel. >> Right, excellent. Thank you for that. I mean, yeah you know, in the early days of social media, people kind of fluffed it off and oh there is no privacy in the internet, blah, blah, blah. And then wow, it became a huge social issue and public policy really needed to step in but also technology needs this to help solve this problem. So let's try to paint a picture for people as to really dig into the problem that you solve and why it's so complicated. We actually have a graphic. It's a map of the U S that we want to pull up here. Explain this. >> Yeah, I mean, what you're saying here is that every one of your, our viewers today is going to be looking at privacy laws moving across the country Dave but there's a lot of different ones. You know, if you're a company that's launching and building your product, that you might be helping your customers your consumer facing. The law, and you're even let's assume you want to do the right thing. You want to treat that customer data responsibly and protect it. When you look at a map like this and you can see three States have already passed different privacy laws, but look at the number of different States all across the country that are considering their own privacy laws. It really could be overwhelming. And Virginia, as you can see is just about to pass it's next privacy law but there's something like 23,24 States that are moving them through. The other thing Dave, that's really important about this is, these are not just breach laws. You know, I think years ago we were all looking at these kinds of laws spreading across the country and you would be saying, okay, that's just a breach law. These laws are very comprehensive. They have a lot to them. So what we have been really helping companies with is to enable you to get compliant with a lot of these very quickly. And that's really what we've tried to take on. Because if you're trying to do the right thing there should be a way to do it. >> Got it. Yeah, I can't even imagine what the it had been so many permutations and complexities but imagine this, if this were a globe we were looking at it says it gets out of control. Okay, now you guys well you use a term called phrase beyond compliance? What do we mean by that? >> There are a couple of things. So I'd say almost every company taking a product to market right now, whether you're B2C or B2B you want to make sure you can answer the customer question and say, yes, I'm compliant. And usually that means if you're a B2C company it means that your customers can come to your site. Your site is compliant with all of the laws out there. You can take consents and preferences. You can get their data back to them. All of these are legal requirements. If you're a B2B company, you're also looking at making sure you can create some critical compliance records that's it, right? But when we think beyond compliance, we think of a couple of basic things. Number one, do you tell the story about all the trust and protection you put around your data in a way that your customers want to do business with you? I mean Dave, if you went to CES the last couple of years and you were walking into the center or looking at a virtual version of it, on every billboard, the top five, top 10 global companies advertise that they take care of your data and they're onto something, they're onto something. You can actually build a winning strategy by solving a customer's problem and also showing them that you care, and that they're trustworthy. Because there are too many products out there, that aren't. The second thing, I'm sorry, go ahead. >> No, please carry on. >> No, I mean the second thing, and then I think I'd say is going beyond compliance also means that you're thinking about how you can use that data for your customer, to solve all of their problems. And Dave, what I'd say here is imagine a world right now, in which, you know you trusted that the data that you gave to companies or to the government, was protected and that if you changed your mind and you wanted it back that they would delete it or give it back to you. Can you imagine how much more quickly we would have solved getting a COVID vaccine? Can you imagine how much data would have been available to pharmaceutical companies to actually develop a vaccine? Can you imagine how much more quickly we would have opened the economy? The thing is companies can't solve every problem that they could for a customer because customers don't trust that the data is going to be used correctly and companies don't know how to use it in that way and ethically. And that's what we're talking about when we say getting beyond compliance which is we want to enable our customers to use the data in the best way and most ethical way to solve all of their customer's problems. >> Okay, so I ask the elephant in the room question. If you asked most businesses about personal information, where it's stored, you know who has access to it, the fact is that most people can't answer it. And so when they're confronted with these uncomfortable questions. The other documents and policies that maybe check some boxes, why is that not a good idea? I mean, there's an expense to going beyond that but so why is that not just a good idea to check it off? >> Well look, a lot of companies do need to just check it off and what I mean, get it right, make sure you label and the way we've thought about this is that when you're building on a backbone like AWS, it does give you the ability to buy a lot of services quickly and scale with your company. But it also gives us an ability to comply faster by leveraging that infrastructure to get compliant faster. So if you think about it, 20 years ago whenever I wanted to buy storage or if I wanted to buy servers and look we're a company that built in the cloud, Dave it would have been very difficult for us to buy the right storage and the processing we needed, given that we were starting. But I was able to buy very small amounts of it until our customer profile grew. But that also means my data moved out of a single hard drive and out of a single set of servers, into other places that are hosted in the cloud. So the entire tech stack that all of our customers are building on means they're distributing personal data into the cloud, into SAS platforms. And there's been a really big move through integration platforms as a service to allow you to spread the personal data quickly. But that same infrastructure can be used to also get you compliant faster, and that's the differentiation. So we built a platform that enables a company to inventory their systems, to track what they're doing in those systems and to both create a compliance record faster by tracking what they're doing inside the cloud and in SAS systems. And that's the different way we've been thinking about it as we've been going to market. >> So, okay. So what actually do you sell, you sell a service? Is it a subscription? >> Yeah. >> And AWS is underneath that, maybe you could put down a picture for us. >> Sure, we're a cloud hosted software as a service. We have two core offerings. One is the WireWheel Trust Access Consent Solution. So if you go to a number of major brands, and you go to their website, when they tell you here's the data we're collecting about you, when they collect your consents and preferences, when they collect a request for data correction or deletion of the data, all the way from the request to delivery back to the consumer, we have an end to end system that our customers use with their customers, a completely cloud hostable in a subscription. So enables even very small startups, to build that experience into their website and into their products, from the very beginning, at a cost efficient point. So if you want to stand up a compliant website or you want to build into your product that Trust Access Consent Solution, we have a SAS platform, and we have developer tools and our developer portal to let you do it quickly. The second thing we do is we have a privacy operations manager. So this is the most security center but for privacy operations. It helps you inventory your systems, actually create data flow maps and most critically create compliance records that you need to comply with, you know the European law, the Brazilian law, and that whole spectrum of U.S. privacy laws that you showed a few minutes ago. And those are the two core offerings we have. >> I love it. I mean, it's the cloud story, right? One is you don't have to spend a millions of dollars on hardware and software. And the second is, when you launch you enable small companies, not just the biggest companies you give them the same, essentially the same services. And that's a great story. Who do you sell to Justin? What does a typical customer engagement look? >> Yeah, we, in many of our customers and in the AWS say startup environment, you often don't have companies that have like a privacy officer. They often don't even have a general counsel. So we sell a package that will often go to whoever is responsible at the company for privacy compliance. And, you know, interestingly Dave in some startups that might be a marketing officer, it might be a CLO, it might be the CTO. So in startups and sort of growing companies, we've put out a lot of guidance, and our core WireWheel developer portal is meant to give even a startup all they need to stand up that experience and get it going, so that when you get that procurement imagine you're about to go sell your product, and they ask you, are you compliant, then you have that document ready to provide. We also do provide this core infrastructure for enormous enterprises. So think telecoms, think top three global technology companies. So Dave, we get excited about is we've built a core software platform privacy infrastructure that is permanently being used by some of the largest companies in the world. And our goal is to get that infrastructure at the right price point into every company in the world, right? We want to enable any company to spend and stand up the right system, that's leveraging that same privacy infrastructure that the big folks have, so that as they scale, they can continue to do the right thing. >> That's awesome. I mean, you mentioned a number of roles of marketing folks. I can even see a sales, let's say sales lead saying, okay we got this deal on the table. How do we get through the procurement because we didn't check the box, all right. So, let me ask you this. We talked a little bit about designing privacy in a and it's clear you help do that. How do you make it, you know fundamental to customer's workloads? Do they have to be like an AWS customer to take advantage of that concept? Or how did they make it part of their workflow? >> Yeah, so there's a couple of critical things. How do you make it part of the workflow? The first thing is, you go to any company's website right now, they have to be compliant with the California law. So a very straightforward thing we do is we can for both B2B and B2C companies stand up an entire customer experience that matches the scale of the company that enables it to be compliant. That means you have a trust center that shows the right information to your customers, it collects the consents, preferences, and it stands up with a portal to request data. These are basics. And for a company that's standing up the internal operations, we can get them app collecting that core record and create a compliance record very fast. With larger companies, Dave you're right. I mean, when you're talking about understanding your entire infrastructure and understanding where you're storing and processing data it could seem overwhelming, but the truth is, the way we onboard our customers is we get you compliance on your product and website first, right? We focus on your product to get that compliance record done. We focus on your website so that you can sell your product. And then we go through the rest of the major systems where you're handling personal information, your sales, your marketing, you know, it's like a natural process. So larger enterprises we have a pretty straightforward way that we get them up and running, but even small startups we can get them to a point of getting them compliant and starting to think about other things very, very quickly. >> And so Justin, you're a government so you understand big, but how I talk about the secret ingredient that allows you to do this at scale and still handle all that diversity, like what we showed in that graphic, the different locations, different local laws, data sovereignty, et cetera. >> Yeah, there's a couple things on the secret source. One is, we have to think about our customers every day. And we had to understand that companies will use whatever their infrastructure is to build. Like you've seen, even on AWS there are so many different services you can use. So number one, we always think with an engineering point of view in mind. Understand the tools, understand the infrastructure in a way that brings that kind of basic visibility to whoever it is that's handling privacy, that basic understanding. The second is, we focused on core user experience for the non-technical user. It's really easy to get started. It's really easy to stand up your privacy page and your privacy policy. It's really easy to collect that and make that first record. The third is, and you know, this is one of those key things. When I was in the government, I met with folks in the intelligence community at one point day, and this always stuck with me. They were telling me that 20 years ago, you know to do the kind of innovation that you have going on now, you would have had to have had a defense contract. You would have had to have invested an enormous amount of money to buy the processing and the services and the team. But the ability for me as a startup founder, to understand the big picture and understand that companies need to be compliant fast, get their website compliant fast, get their product compliant fast, but build on a cloud infrastructure that allowed me to scale was incredible. Because it allows us to do a lot with our customers that a company like ours would have been really challenged to do without that cloud backbone. >> Love this, the agility and the innovation. Last question, give us the company update Justin, you know where are you? What can you share with us, fundraising, head count, are you generating revenue? Where you are? >> Oh yeah, we're excited as I mentioned, we are already the privacy platform of choice of some of the larger brands in the world, which we're very excited about. And we help them solve both the trust, access consent problem for their customers, and we help with the privacy operations management. We recently announced a new $20 million infusion of capital, led by a terrific venture capital fund, ForgePoint Capital. We've been lucky to have been supported by NEA, Sands Capital, Revolution Capital, Pritzker Capital, PSP. And so we have a terrific group of investors behind us. We are scaling, we've grown the company a lot in the last year. Obviously it's been an interesting and challenging year with COVID, but we are really focused on growing our sales team, our marketing team, and we're going to be offering some pretty exciting solutions here for the rest of the year. >> The timing was unbelievable, you had the cloud at your beck and call, you had the experience in government. You've got your background as a lawyer. And it all came in, and the legal come into the forefront of public policy, just a congratulations on all your progress today. We're really looking forward to seeing you guys rocket in the future. I really appreciate you coming on. >> Dave, thanks so much for having me, really enjoyed it. And I look forward to seeing you soon. >> Great, and thank you for watching everyone is Dave Vellante for theCUBE on cloud startups. Keep it right there. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Mar 9 2021

SUMMARY :

brought to you by AWS. Look forward to the discussion. So I always love to ask I could see that all around the world problem that you solve is to enable you to get Okay, now you guys and also showing them that you care, that the data that you gave to companies elephant in the room question. and the processing we needed, So what actually do you maybe you could put down a picture for us. to let you do it quickly. One is you don't have to so that when you get that procurement and it's clear you help do that. that you can sell your product. that allows you to do this at scale that you have going on now, and the innovation. of some of the larger brands in the world, forward to seeing you guys And I look forward to seeing you soon. Great, and thank you for watching

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
DavePERSON

0.99+

JustinPERSON

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

NEAORGANIZATION

0.99+

Bureau of Economic AnalysisORGANIZATION

0.99+

Justin AntonipillaiPERSON

0.99+

Sands CapitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

Pritzker CapitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Revolution CapitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

ForgePoint CapitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

U.S. Census BureauORGANIZATION

0.99+

two jobsQUANTITY

0.99+

PSPORGANIZATION

0.99+

$20 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

COVIORGANIZATION

0.99+

second thingQUANTITY

0.99+

thirdQUANTITY

0.99+

second termQUANTITY

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

VirginiaLOCATION

0.99+

U.S.LOCATION

0.99+

WireWheelORGANIZATION

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

secondQUANTITY

0.99+

CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

COVIDOTHER

0.98+

last yearDATE

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

first partQUANTITY

0.98+

23,24 StatesQUANTITY

0.98+

presidentPERSON

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

CESEVENT

0.98+

three StatesQUANTITY

0.97+

first thingQUANTITY

0.96+

two core offeringsQUANTITY

0.96+

20 years agoDATE

0.96+

Cloud Startup ShowcaseEVENT

0.95+

single setQUANTITY

0.95+

ObamaPERSON

0.94+

single hardQUANTITY

0.92+

BrazilianOTHER

0.9+

one point dayQUANTITY

0.88+

EUORGANIZATION

0.87+

millions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.87+

few minutes agoDATE

0.86+

first recordQUANTITY

0.86+

years agoDATE

0.85+

last couple of yearsDATE

0.84+

firstQUANTITY

0.83+

two core offeringsQUANTITY

0.82+

One thingQUANTITY

0.79+

Startup ShowcaseEVENT

0.77+

three global technology companiesQUANTITY

0.76+

coupleQUANTITY

0.74+

10 global companiesQUANTITY

0.73+

CloudOpsTITLE

0.72+

SASORGANIZATION

0.71+

EuropeanOTHER

0.65+

Justin Antonipillai, Founder & CEO, WireWheel


 

(upbeat music) >> We're here theCUBE on Cloud Startup Showcase brought to you by AWS. And right now we're going to explore the next frontier for privacy, you know, security, privacy, and compliance, they're often lumped together and they're often lumped on as an afterthought bolted on to infrastructure, data and applications. But, you know, while they're certainly related they're different disciplines and they require a specific domain knowledge and expertise to really solve the challenges of today. One thing they all share is successful implementations, must be comprehensive and designed in at the start and with me to discuss going beyond compliance and designing privacy protections into products and services. Justin Antonipillai, who is the founder and CEO of WireWheel, Justin awesome having you on the AWS Startup Showcase. Thanks for being here >> Dave, thanks so much for having me. It's a real honor, and I appreciate it. Look forward to the discussion. >> So I always love to ask founders, like, take us back. Why did you start this company? Where did your inspiration come from? >> So Dave, I was very lucky. I had the honor of serving in president Obama's second term as an Acting Under Secretary for Economic Affairs. So I ran the part of the government that includes the U.S. Census Bureau and the Bureau of Economic Analysis. So core economic statistical bureaus. But I helped lead a lot of the Obama administration's, outreach and negotiations on data privacy around the world. Including on something called the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield. So at the time the two jobs I had really aligned with what our discussion is here today. The first part of it was, I could see that all around the world in the U.S. and around the world, data privacy and protecting privacy, had become a human rights issue. It was a trade issue. You could see it as a national security issue and companies all around the world were just struggling with how to get legal, how to make sure that I do it right, and how I make sure that I'm treating my customer's data, in the right way. But when I was also leading the agency, a lot of what we were trying to do was to help our U.S. citizens, our folks here around the country solve big public problems by ethically and responsibly using government data to do it. And I can talk about what that meant in a little while. So the inspiration behind why WireWheel was, we need better more technically driven ways to help companies get compliance, to show their customers that they're protecting privacy and to put customers, our customers onto a path where they can start using the customer data better, faster and stronger, but most importantly, ethically. And that's really what we try to tackle at WireWheel. >> Right, excellent. Thank you for that. I mean, yeah you know, in the early days of social media, people kind of fluffed it off and oh there is no privacy in the internet, blah, blah, blah. And then wow, it became a huge social issue and public policy really needed to step in but also technology needs this to help solve this problem. So let's try to paint a picture for people as to really dig into the problem that you solve and why it's so complicated. We actually have a graphic. It's a map of the U S that we want to pull up here. Explain this. >> Yeah, I mean, what you're saying here is that every one of your, our viewers today is going to be looking at privacy laws moving across the country Dave but there's a lot of different ones. You know, if you're a company that's launching and building your product, that you might be helping your customers your consumer facing. The law, and you're even let's assume you want to do the right thing. You want to treat that customer data responsibly and protect it. When you look at a map like this and you can see three States have already passed different privacy laws, but look at the number of different States all across the country that are considering their own privacy laws. It really could be overwhelming. And Virginia, as you can see is just about to pass it's next privacy law but there's something like 23,24 States that are moving them through. The other thing Dave, that's really important about this is, these are not just breach laws. You know, I think years ago we were all looking at these kinds of laws spreading across the country and you would be saying, okay, that's just a breach law. These laws are very comprehensive. They have a lot to them. So what we have been really helping companies with is to enable you to get compliant with a lot of these very quickly. And that's really what we've tried to take on. Because if you're trying to do the right thing there should be a way to do it. >> Got it. Yeah, I can't even imagine what the it had been so many permutations and complexities but imagine this, if this were a globe we were looking at it says it gets out of control. Okay, now you guys well you use a term called phrase beyond compliance? What do we mean by that? >> There are a couple of things. So I'd say almost every company taking a product to market right now, whether you're B2C or B2B you want to make sure you can answer the customer question and say, yes, I'm compliant. And usually that means if you're a B2C company it means that your customers can come to your site. Your site is compliant with all of the laws out there. You can take consents and preferences. You can get their data back to them. All of these are legal requirements. If you're a B2B company, you're also looking at making sure you can create some critical compliance records that's it, right? But when we think beyond compliance, we think of a couple of basic things. Number one, do you tell the story about all the trust and protection you put around your data in a way that your customers want to do business with you? I mean Dave, if you went to CES the last couple of years and you were walking into the center or looking at a virtual version of it, on every billboard, the top five, top 10 global companies advertise that they take care of your data and they're onto something, they're onto something. You can actually build a winning strategy by solving a customer's problem and also showing them that you care, and that they're trustworthy. Because there are too many products out there, that aren't. The second thing, I'm sorry, go ahead. >> No, please carry on. >> No, I mean the second thing, and then I think I'd say is going beyond compliance also means that you're thinking about how you can use that data for your customer, to solve all of their problems. And Dave, what I'd say here is imagine a world right now, in which, you know you trusted that the data that you gave to companies or to the government, was protected and that if you changed your mind and you wanted it back that they would delete it or give it back to you. Can you imagine how much more quickly we would have solved getting a COVID vaccine? Can you imagine how much data would have been available to pharmaceutical companies to actually develop a vaccine? Can you imagine how much more quickly we would have opened the economy? The thing is companies can't solve every problem that they could for a customer because customers don't trust that the data is going to be used correctly and companies don't know how to use it in that way and ethically. And that's what we're talking about when we say getting beyond compliance which is we want to enable our customers to use the data in the best way and most ethical way to solve all of their customer's problems. >> Okay, so I ask the elephant in the room question. If you asked most businesses about personal information, where it's stored, you know who has access to it, the fact is that most people can't answer it. And so when they're confronted with these uncomfortable questions. The other documents and policies that maybe check some boxes, why is that not a good idea? I mean, there's an expense to going beyond that but so why is that not just a good idea to check it off? >> Well look, a lot of companies do need to just check it off and what I mean, get it right, make sure you label and the way we've thought about this is that when you're building on a backbone like AWS, it does give you the ability to buy a lot of services quickly and scale with your company. But it also gives us an ability to comply faster by leveraging that infrastructure to get compliant faster. So if you think about it, 20 years ago whenever I wanted to buy storage or if I wanted to buy servers and look we're a company that built in the cloud, Dave it would have been very difficult for us to buy the right storage and the processing we needed, given that we were starting. But I was able to buy very small amounts of it until our customer profile grew. But that also means my data moved out of a single hard drive and out of a single set of servers, into other places that are hosted in the cloud. So the entire tech stack that all of our customers are building on means they're distributing personal data into the cloud, into SAS platforms. And there's been a really big move through integration platforms as a service to allow you to spread the personal data quickly. But that same infrastructure can be used to also get you compliant faster, and that's the differentiation. So we built a platform that enables a company to inventory their systems, to track what they're doing in those systems and to both create a compliance record faster by tracking what they're doing inside the cloud and in SAS systems. And that's the different way we've been thinking about it as we've been going to market. >> So, okay. So what actually do you sell, you sell a service? Is it a subscription? >> Yeah. >> And AWS is underneath that, maybe you could put down a picture for us. >> Sure, we're a cloud hosted software as a service. We have two core offerings. One is the WireWheel Trust Access Consent Solution. So if you go to a number of major brands, and you go to their website, when they tell you here's the data we're collecting about you, when they collect your consents and preferences, when they collect a request for data correction or deletion of the data, all the way from the request to delivery back to the consumer, we have an end to end system that our customers use with their customers, a completely cloud hostable in a subscription. So enables even very small startups, to build that experience into their website and into their products, from the very beginning, at a cost efficient point. So if you want to stand up a compliant website or you want to build into your product that Trust Access Consent Solution, we have a SAS platform, and we have developer tools and our developer portal to let you do it quickly. The second thing we do is we have a privacy operations manager. So this is the most security center but for privacy operations. It helps you inventory your systems, actually create data flow maps and most critically create compliance records that you need to comply with, you know the European law, the Brazilian law, and that whole spectrum of U.S. privacy laws that you showed a few minutes ago. And those are the two core offerings we have. >> I love it. I mean, it's the cloud story, right? One is you don't have to spend a millions of dollars on hardware and software. And the second is, when you launch you enable small companies, not just the biggest companies you give them the same, essentially the same services. And that's a great story. Who do you sell to Justin? What does a typical customer engagement look? >> Yeah, we, in many of our customers and in the AWS say startup environment, you often don't have companies that have like a privacy officer. They often don't even have a general counsel. So we sell a package that will often go to whoever is responsible at the company for privacy compliance. And, you know, interestingly Dave in some startups that might be a marketing officer, it might be a CLO, it might be the CTO. So in startups and sort of growing companies, we've put out a lot of guidance, and our core WireWheel developer portal is meant to give even a startup all they need to stand up that experience and get it going, so that when you get that procurement imagine you're about to go sell your product, and they ask you, are you compliant, then you have that document ready to provide. We also do provide this core infrastructure for enormous enterprises. So think telecoms, think top three global technology companies. So Dave, we get excited about is we've built a core software platform privacy infrastructure that is permanently being used by some of the largest companies in the world. And our goal is to get that infrastructure at the right price point into every company in the world, right? We want to enable any company to spend and stand up the right system, that's leveraging that same privacy infrastructure that the big folks have, so that as they scale, they can continue to do the right thing. >> That's awesome. I mean, you mentioned a number of roles of marketing folks. I can even see a sales, let's say sales lead saying, okay we got this deal on the table. How do we get through the procurement because we didn't check the box, all right. So, let me ask you this. We talked a little bit about designing privacy in a and it's clear you help do that. How do you make it, you know fundamental to customer's workloads? Do they have to be like an AWS customer to take advantage of that concept? Or how did they make it part of their workflow? >> Yeah, so there's a couple of critical things. How do you make it part of the workflow? The first thing is, you go to any company's website right now, they have to be compliant with the California law. So a very straightforward thing we do is we can for both B2B and B2C companies stand up an entire customer experience that matches the scale of the company that enables it to be compliant. That means you have a trust center that shows the right information to your customers, it collects the consents, preferences, and it stands up with a portal to request data. These are basics. And for a company that's standing up the internal operations, we can get them app collecting that core record and create a compliance record very fast. With larger companies, Dave you're right. I mean, when you're talking about understanding your entire infrastructure and understanding where you're storing and processing data it could seem overwhelming, but the truth is, the way we onboard our customers is we get you compliance on your product and website first, right? We focus on your product to get that compliance record done. We focus on your website so that you can sell your product. And then we go through the rest of the major systems where you're handling personal information, your sales, your marketing, you know, it's like a natural process. So larger enterprises we have a pretty straightforward way that we get them up and running, but even small startups we can get them to a point of getting them compliant and starting to think about other things very, very quickly. >> And so Justin, you're a government so you understand big, but how I talk about the secret ingredient that allows you to do this at scale and still handle all that diversity, like what we showed in that graphic, the different locations, different local laws, data sovereignty, et cetera. >> Yeah, there's a couple things on the secret source. One is, we have to think about our customers every day. And we had to understand that companies will use whatever their infrastructure is to build. Like you've seen, even on AWS there are so many different services you can use. So number one, we always think with an engineering point of view in mind. Understand the tools, understand the infrastructure in a way that brings that kind of basic visibility to whoever it is that's handling privacy, that basic understanding. The second is, we focused on core user experience for the non-technical user. It's really easy to get started. It's really easy to stand up your privacy page and your privacy policy. It's really easy to collect that and make that first record. The third is, and you know, this is one of those key things. When I was in the government, I met with folks in the intelligence community at one point day, and this always stuck with me. They were telling me that 20 years ago, you know to do the kind of innovation that you have going on now, you would have had to have had a defense contract. You would have had to have invested an enormous amount of money to buy the processing and the services and the team. But the ability for me as a startup founder, to understand the big picture and understand that companies need to be compliant fast, get their website compliant fast, get their product compliant fast, but build on a cloud infrastructure that allowed me to scale was incredible. Because it allows us to do a lot with our customers that a company like ours would have been really challenged to do without that cloud backbone. >> Love this, the agility and the innovation. Last question, give us the company update Justin, you know where are you? What can you share with us, fundraising, head count, are you generating revenue? Where you are? >> Oh yeah, we're excited as I mentioned, we are already the privacy platform of choice of some of the larger brands in the world, which we're very excited about. And we help them solve both the trust, access consent problem for their customers, and we help with the privacy operations management. We recently announced a new $20 million infusion of capital, led by a terrific venture capital fund, ForgePoint Capital. We've been lucky to have been supported by NEA, Sands Capital, Revolution Capital, Pritzker Capital, PSP. And so we have a terrific group of investors behind us. We are scaling, we've grown the company a lot in the last year. Obviously it's been an interesting and challenging year with COVID, but we are really focused on growing our sales team, our marketing team, and we're going to be offering some pretty exciting solutions here for the rest of the year. >> The timing was unbelievable, you had the cloud at your beck and call, you had the experience in government. You've got your background as a lawyer. And it all came in, and the legal come into the forefront of public policy, just a congratulations on all your progress today. We're really looking forward to seeing you guys rocket in the future. I really appreciate you coming on. >> Dave, thanks so much for having me, really enjoyed it. And I look forward to seeing you soon. >> Great, and thank you for watching everyone is Dave Vellante for theCUBE on cloud startups. Keep it right there. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Mar 2 2021

SUMMARY :

brought to you by AWS. Look forward to the discussion. So I always love to ask I could see that all around the world problem that you solve is to enable you to get Okay, now you guys and also showing them that you care, that the data that you gave to companies elephant in the room question. and the processing we needed, So what actually do you maybe you could put down a picture for us. to let you do it quickly. One is you don't have to so that when you get that procurement and it's clear you help do that. that you can sell your product. that allows you to do this at scale that you have going on now, and the innovation. of some of the larger brands in the world, forward to seeing you guys And I look forward to seeing you soon. Great, and thank you for watching

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
DavePERSON

0.99+

JustinPERSON

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

NEAORGANIZATION

0.99+

Bureau of Economic AnalysisORGANIZATION

0.99+

Justin AntonipillaiPERSON

0.99+

Sands CapitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

Pritzker CapitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Revolution CapitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

ForgePoint CapitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

U.S. Census BureauORGANIZATION

0.99+

two jobsQUANTITY

0.99+

PSPORGANIZATION

0.99+

$20 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

COVIORGANIZATION

0.99+

second thingQUANTITY

0.99+

thirdQUANTITY

0.99+

second termQUANTITY

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

VirginiaLOCATION

0.99+

U.S.LOCATION

0.99+

WireWheelORGANIZATION

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

secondQUANTITY

0.99+

CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

COVIDOTHER

0.98+

last yearDATE

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

first partQUANTITY

0.98+

23,24 StatesQUANTITY

0.98+

presidentPERSON

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

CESEVENT

0.98+

three StatesQUANTITY

0.97+

first thingQUANTITY

0.96+

two core offeringsQUANTITY

0.96+

20 years agoDATE

0.96+

Cloud Startup ShowcaseEVENT

0.95+

single setQUANTITY

0.95+

ObamaPERSON

0.94+

single hardQUANTITY

0.92+

BrazilianOTHER

0.9+

one point dayQUANTITY

0.88+

EUORGANIZATION

0.87+

millions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.87+

few minutes agoDATE

0.86+

first recordQUANTITY

0.86+

years agoDATE

0.85+

last couple of yearsDATE

0.84+

firstQUANTITY

0.83+

two core offeringsQUANTITY

0.82+

One thingQUANTITY

0.79+

Startup ShowcaseEVENT

0.77+

three global technology companiesQUANTITY

0.76+

coupleQUANTITY

0.74+

10 global companiesQUANTITY

0.73+

SASORGANIZATION

0.71+

EuropeanOTHER

0.65+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.64+

fiveQUANTITY

0.63+

Andy Jassy Becoming the new CEO of Amazon: theCUBE Analysis


 

>> Narrator: From theCUBE studios in Palo Alto in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world. This is a CUBE conversation. >> As you know by now, Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon, is stepping aside from his CEO role and AWS CEO, Andy Jassy, is being promoted to head all of Amazon. Bezos, of course, is going to remain executive chairman. Now, 15 years ago, next month, Amazon launched it's simple storage service, which was the first modern cloud offering. And the man who wrote the business plan for AWS, was Andy Jassy, and he's navigated the meteoric rise and disruption that has seen AWS grow into a $45 billion company that draws off the vast majority of Amazon's operating profits. No one in the media has covered Jassy more intimately and closely than John Furrier, the founder of SiliconANGLE. And John joins us today to help us understand on theCUBE this move and what we can expect from Jassy in his new role, and importantly what it means for AWS. John, thanks for taking the time to speak with us. >> Hey, great day. Great to see you as always, we've done a lot of interviews together over the years and we're on our 11th year with theCUBE and SiliconANGLE. But I got to be excited too, that we're simulcasters on Clubhouse, which is kind of cool. Love Clubhouse but not since the, in December. It's awesome. It's like Cube radio. It's like, so this is a Cube talk. So we opened up a Clubhouse room while we're filming this. We'll do more live hits in studio and syndicate the Clubhouse and then take questions after. This is a huge digital transformation moment. I'm part of the digital transformation club on Clubhouse which has almost 5,000 followers at the moment and also has like 500 members. So if you're not on Clubhouse, yet, if you have an iPhone go check it out and join the digital transformation club. Android users you'll have to wait until that app is done but it's really a great club. And Jeremiah Owyang is also doing a lot of stuff on digital transformation. >> Or you can just buy an iPhone and get in. >> Yeah, that's what people are doing. I can see all the influences are on there but to me, the digital transformation, it's always been kind of a cliche, the consumerization of IT, information technology. This has been the boring world of the enterprise over the past, 20 years ago. Enterprise right now is super hot because there's no distinction between enterprise and society. And that's clearly the, because of the rise of cloud computing and the rise of Amazon Web Services which was a side project at AWS, at Amazon that Andy Jassy did. And it wasn't really pleasant at the beginning. It was failed. It failed a lot and it wasn't as successful as people thought in the early days. And I have a lot of stories with Andy that he told me a lot of the inside baseball and we'll share that here today. But we started covering Amazon since the beginning. I was as an entrepreneur. I used it when it came out and a huge fan of them as a company because they just got a superior product and they have always had been but it was very misunderstood from the beginning. And now everyone's calling it the most important thing. And Andy now is becoming Andy Jassy, the most important executive in the world. >> So let's get it to the, I mean, look at, you said to me over holidays, you thought this might have something like this could happen. And you said, Jassy is probably in line to get this. So, tell us, what can you tell us about Jassy? Why is he qualified for this job? What do you think he brings to the table? >> Well, the thing that I know about Amazon everyone's been following the Amazon news is, Jeff Bezos has a lot of personal turmoil. They had his marriage fail. They had some issues with the smear campaigns and all this stuff going on, the run-ins with Donald Trump, he bought the Washington post. He's got a lot of other endeavors outside of Amazon cause he's the second richest man in the world competing with Elon Musk at Space X versus Blue Origin. So the guy's a billionaire. So Amazon is his baby and he's been running it as best he could. He's got an executive team committee they called the S team. He's been grooming people in the company and that's just been his mode. And the rise of AWS and the business performance that we've been documenting on SiliconANGLE and theCUBE, it's just been absolutely changing the game on Amazon as a company. So clearly Amazon Web Services become a driving force of the new Amazon that's emerging. And obviously they've got all their retail business and they got the gaming challenges and they got the studios and the other diversified stuff. So Jassy is just, he's just one of those guys. He's just been an Amazonian from day one. He came out of Harvard business school, drove across the country, very similar story to Jeff Bezos. He did that in 1997 and him and Jeff had been collaborating and Jeff tapped him to be his shadow, they call it, which is basically technical assistance and an heir apparent and groomed him. And then that's how it is. Jassy is not a climber as they call it in corporate America. He's not a person who is looking for a political gain. He's not a territory taker, but he's a micromanager. He loves details and he likes to create customer value. And that's his focus. So he's not a grandstander. In fact, he's been very low profile. Early days when we started meeting with him, he wouldn't meet with press regularly because they weren't writing the right stories. And everyone is, he didn't know he was misunderstood. So that's classic Amazon. >> So, he gave us the time, I think it was 2014 or 15 and he told us a story back then, John, you might want to share it as to how AWS got started. Why, what was the main spring Amazon's tech wasn't working that great? And Bezos said to Jassy, going to go figure out why and maybe explain how AWS was born. >> Yeah, we had, in fact, we were the first ones to get access to do his first public profile. If you go to the Google and search Andy Jassy, the trillion dollar baby, we had a post, we put out the story of AWS, Andy Jassy's trillion dollar baby. This was in early, this was January 2015, six years ago. And, we back then, we posited that this would be a trillion dollar total addressable market. Okay, people thought we were crazy but we wrote a story and he gave us a very intimate access. We did a full drill down on him and the person, the story of Amazon and that laid out essentially the beginning of the rise of AWS and Andy Jassy. So that's a good story to check out but really the key here is, is that he's always been relentless and competitive on creating value in what they call raising the bar outside Amazon. That's a term that they use. They also have another leadership principle called working backwards, which is like, go to the customer and work backwards from the customer in a very Steve Job's kind of way. And that's been kind of Jobs mentality as well at Apple that made them successful work backwards from the customer and make things easier. And that was Apple. Amazon, their philosophy was work backwards from the customer and Jassy specifically would say it many times and eliminate the undifferentiated heavy lifting. That was a key principle of what they were doing. So that was a key thesis of their entire business model. And that's the Amazonian way. Faster, cheaper, ship it faster, make it less expensive and higher value. While when you apply the Amazon shipping concept to cloud computing, it was completely disrupted. They were shipping code and services faster and that became their innovation strategy. More announcements every year, they out announced their competition by huge margin. They introduced new services faster and they're less expensive some say, but in the aggregate, they make more money but that's kind of a key thing. >> Well, when you, I was been listening to the TV today and there was a debate on whether or not, this support tends that they'll actually split the company into two. To me, I think it's just the opposite. I think it's less likely. I mean, if you think about Amazon getting into grocery or healthcare, eventually financial services or other industries and the IOT opportunity to me, what they do, John, is they bring in together the cloud, data and AI and they go attack these new industries. I would think Jassy of all people would want to keep this thing together now whether or not the government allows them to do that. But what are your thoughts? I mean, you've asked Andy this before in your personal interviews about splitting the company. What are your thoughts? >> Well, Jon Fortt at CNBC always asked the same question every year. It's almost like the standard question. I kind of laugh and I ask it now too because I liked Jon Fortt. I think he's an awesome dude. And I'll, it's just a tongue in cheek, Jassy. He won't answer the question. Amazon, Bezos and Jassy have one thing in common. They're really good at not answering questions. So if you ask the same question. They'll just say, nothing's ever, never say never, that's his classic answer to everything. Never say never. And he's always said that to you. (chuckles) Some say, he's, flip-flopped on things but he's really customer driven. For example, he said at one point, no one should ever build a data center. Okay, that was a principle. And then they come out and they have now a hybrid strategy. And I called them out on that and said, hey, what, are you flip-flopping? You said at some point, no one should have a data center. He's like, well, we looked at it differently and what we meant was is that, it should all be cloud native. Okay. So that's kind of revision, but he's cool with that. He says, hey, we'll revise based on what customers are doing. VMware working with Amazon that no one ever thought that would happen. Okay. So, VMware has some techies, Raghu, for instance, over there, super top notch. He worked with Jassy, directly in his team Sanjay Poonen when they went to business school together, they cut a deal. And now Amazon essentially saved VMware, in my opinion. And Pat Gelsinger drove that deal. Now, Pat Gelsinger, CEO, Intel, and Pat told me that directly in candid conversation off theCUBE, he said, hey, we have to make a decision either we're going to be in cloud or we're not going to be in cloud, we will partner. And I'll see, he was Intel. He understood the Intel inside mentality. So that's good for VMware. So Jassy does these kinds of deals. He's not afraid he's got a good stomach for business and a relentless competitor. >> So, how do you think as you mentioned Jassy is a micromanager. He gets deep into the technology. Anybody who's seen his two hour, three hour keynotes. No, he has a really fine grasp of the technology across the entire stack. How do you think John, he will approach things like antitrust, the big tech lash of the unionization of the workforce at Amazon? How do you think Jassy will approach that? >> Well, I think one of the things that emerges Jassy, first of all, he's a huge sports fan. And many people don't know that but he's also progressive person. He's very progressive politically. He's been on the record and off the record saying things like, obviously, literacy has been big on, he's been on basically unrepresented minorities, pushing for that, and certainly cloud computing in tech, women in tech, he's been a big proponent. He's been a big supporter of Teresa Carlson. Who's been rising star at Amazon. People don't know who Teresa Carlson is and they should check out her. She's become one of the biggest leaders inside Amazon she's turned around public sector from the beginning. She ran that business, she's a global star. He's been a great leader and he's been getting, forget he's a micromanager, he's on top of the details. I mean, the word is, and nothing gets approved without Andy, Andy seeing it. But he's been progressive. He's been an Amazon original as they call it internally. He's progressive, he's got the business acumen but he's perfect for this pragmatic conversation that needs to happen. And again, because he's so technically strong having a CEO that's that proficient is going to give Amazon an advantage when they have to go in and change how DC works, for instance, or how the government geopolitical landscape works, because Amazon is now a global company with regions all over the place. So, I think he's pragmatic, he's open to listening and changing. I think that's a huge quality >> Well, when you think of this, just to set the context here for those who may not know, I mean, Amazon started as I said back in 2006 in March with simple storage service that later that year they announced EC2 which is their compute platform. And that was the majority of their business, is still a very large portion of their business but Amazon, our estimates are that in 2020, Amazon did 45 billion, 45.4 billion in revenue. That's actually an Amazon reported number. And just to give you a context, Azure about 26 billion GCP, Google about 6 billion. So you're talking about an industry that Amazon created. That's now $78 billion and Amazon at 45 billion. John they're growing at 30% annually. So it's just a massive growth engine. And then another story Jassy told us, is they, he and Jeff and the team talked early on about whether or not they should just sort of do an experiment, do a little POC, dip their toe in and they decided to go for it. Let's go big or go home as Michael Dell has said to us many times, I mean, pretty astounding. >> Yeah. One of the things about Jassy that people should know about, I think there's some compelling relative to the newest ascension to the CEO of Amazon, is that he's not afraid to do new things. For instance, I'll give you an example. The Amazon Web Services re-invent their annual conference grew to being thousands and thousands of people. And they would have a traditional after party. They called a replay, they'd have a band like every tech conference and their conference became so big that essentially, it was like setting up a live concert. So they were spending millions of dollars to set up basically a one night concert and they'd bring in great, great artists. So he said, hey, what's been all this cash? Why don't we just have a festival? So they did a thing called Intersect. They got LA involved from creatives and they basically built a weekend festival in the back end of re-invent. This was when real life was, before COVID and they turned into an opportunity because that's the way they think. They like to look at the resources, hey, we're already all in on this, why don't we just keep it for the weekend and charge some tickets and have a good time. He's not afraid to take chances on the product side. He'll go in and take a chance on a new market. That comes from directly from Bezos. They try stuff. They don't mind failing but they put a tight leash on measurement. They work backwards from the customer and they are not afraid to take chances. So, that's going to board well for him as he tries to figure out how Amazon navigates the contention on the political side when they get challenged for their dominance. And I think he's going to have to apply that pragmatic experimentation to new business models. >> So John I want you to take on AWS. I mean, despite the large numbers, I talked about 30% growth, Azure is growing at over 50% a year, GCP at 83%. So despite the large numbers and big growth the growth rates are slowing. Everybody knows that, we've reported it extensively. So the incoming CEO of Amazon Web Services has a TAM expansion challenge. And at some point they've got to decide, okay, how do we keep this growth engine? So, do you have any thoughts as to who might be the next CEO and what are some of their challenges as you see it? >> Well, Amazon is a real product centric company. So it's going to be very interesting to see who they go with here. Obviously they've been grooming a lot of people. There's been some turnover. You had some really strong executives recently leave, Jeff Wilkes, who was the CEO of the retail business. He retired a couple of months ago, formerly announced I think recently, he was probably in line. You had Mike Clayville, is now the chief revenue officer of Stripe. He ran all commercial business, Teresa Carlson stepped up to his role as well as running public sector. Again, she got more power. You have Matt Garman who ran the EC2 business, Stanford grad, great guy, super strong on the product side. He's now running all commercial sales and marketing. And he's also on the, was on Bezos' S team, that's the executive kind of team. Peter DeSantis is also on that S team. He runs all infrastructure. He took over for James Hamilton, who was the genius behind all the data center work that they've done and all the chip design stuff that they've innovated on. So there's so much technical innovation going on. I think you still going to see a leadership probably come from, I would say Matt Garman, in my opinion is the lead dog at this point, he's the lead horse. You could have an outside person come in depending upon how, who might be available. And that would probably come from an Andy Jassy network because he's a real fierce competitor but he's also a loyalist and he likes trust. So if someone comes in from the outside, it's going to be someone maybe he trusts. And then the other wildcards are like Teresa Carlson. Like I said, she is a great woman in tech who's done amazing work. I've profiled her many times. We've interviewed her many times. She took that public sector business with Amazon and changed the game completely. Outside the Jedi contract, she was in competitive for, had the big Trump showdown with the Jedi, with the department of defense. Had the CIA cloud. Amazon set the standard on public sector and that's directly the result of Teresa Carlson. But she's in the field, she's not a product person, she's kind of running that group. So Amazon has that product field kind of structure. So we'll see how they handle that. But those are the top three I think are going to be in line. >> So the obvious question that people always ask and it is a big change like this is, okay, in this case, what is Jassy going to bring in? And what's going to change? Maybe the flip side question is somewhat more interesting. What's not going to change in your view? Jassy has been there since nearly the beginning. What are some of the fundamental tenets that he's, that are fossilized, that won't change, do you think? >> I think he's, I think what's not going to change is Amazon, is going to continue to grow and develop their platform business and enable more SaaS players. That's a little bit different than what Microsoft's doing. They're more SaaS oriented, Office 365 is becoming their biggest application in terms of revenue on Microsoft side. So Amazon is going to still have to compete and enable more ecosystem partners. I think what's not going to change is that Bezos is still going to be in charge because executive chairman is just a code word for "not an active CEO." So in the corporate governance world when you have an executive chairman, that's essentially the person still in charge. And so he'll be in charge, will still be the boss of Andy Jassy and Jassy will be running all of Amazon. So I think that's going to be a little bit the same, but Jassy is going to be more in charge. I think you'll see a team change over, whether you're going to see some new management come in, Andy's management team will expand, I think Amazon will stay the same, Amazon Web Services. >> So John, last night, I was just making some notes about notable transitions in the history of the tech business, Gerstner to Palmisano, Gates to Ballmer, and then Ballmer to Nadella. One that you were close to, David Packard to John Young and then John Young to Lew Platt at the old company. Ellison to Safra and Mark, Jobs to Cook. We talked about Larry Page to Sundar Pichai. So how do you see this? And you've talked to, I remember when you interviewed John Chambers, he said, there is no rite of passage, East coast mini-computer companies, Edson de Castro, Ken Olsen, An Wang. These were executives who wouldn't let go. So it's of interesting to juxtapose that with the modern day executive. How do you see this fitting in to some of those epic transitions that I just mentioned? >> I think a lot of people are surprised at Jeff Bezos', even stepping down. I think he's just been such the face of Amazon. I think some of the poll numbers that people are doing on Twitter, people don't think it's going to make a big difference because he's kind of been that, leader hand on the wheel, but it's been its own ship now, kind of. And so depending on who's at the helm, it will be different. I think the Amazon choice of Andy wasn't obvious. And I think a lot of people were asking the question who was Andy Jassy and that's why we're doing this. And we're going to be doing more features on the Andy Jassy. We got a tons, tons of content that we've we've had shipped, original content with them. We'll share more of those key soundbites and who he is. I think a lot of people scratching their head like, why Andy Jassy? It's not obvious to the outsiders who don't know cloud computing. If you're in the competing business, in the digital transformation side, everyone knows about Amazon Web Services. Has been the most successful company, in my opinion, since I could remember at many levels just the way they've completely dominated the business and how they change others to be dominant. So, I mean, they've made Microsoft change, it made Google change and even then he's a leader that accepts conversations. Other companies, their CEOs hide behind their PR wall and they don't talk to people. They won't come on Clubhouse. They won't talk to the press. They hide behind their PR and they feed them, the media. Jassy is not afraid to talk to reporters. He's not afraid to talk to people, but he doesn't like people who don't know what they're talking about. So he doesn't suffer fools. So, you got to have your shit together to talk to Jassy. That's really the way it is. And that's, and he'll give you mind share, like he'll answer any question except for the ones that are too tough for him to answer. Like, are you, is facial recognition bad or good? Are you going to spin out AWS? I mean these are the hard questions and he's got a great team. He's got Jay Carney, former Obama press secretary working for him. He's been a great leader. So I'm really bullish on, is a good choice. >> We're going to jump into the Clubhouse here and open it up shortly. John, the last question for you is competition. Amazon as a company and even Jassy specifically I always talk about how they don't really focus on the competition, they focus on the customer but we know that just observing these folks Bezos is very competitive individual. Jassy, I mean, you know him better than I, very competitive individual. So, and he's, Jassy has been known to call out Oracle. Of course it was in response to Larry Ellison's jabs at Amazon regarding database. But, but how do you see that? Do you see that changing at all? I mean, will Amazon get more publicly competitive or they stick to their knitting, you think? >> You know this is going to sound kind of a weird analogy. And I know there's a lot of hero worshiping on Elon Musk but Elon Musk and Andy Jassy have a lot of similarities in the sense of their brilliance. They got both a brilliant people, different kinds of backgrounds. Obviously, they're running different things. They both are builders, right? If you were listening to Elon Musk on Clubhouse the other night, what was really striking was not only the magic of how it was all orchestrated and what he did and how he interviewed Robin Hood. He basically is about building stuff. And he was asked questions like, what advice do you give startups? He's like, if you need advice you shouldn't be doing startups. That's the kind of mentality that Jassy has, which is, it's not easy. It's not for the faint of heart, but Elon Musk is a builder. Jassy builds, he likes to build stuff, right? And so you look at all the things that he's done with AWS, it's been about enabling people to be successful with the tools that they need, adding more services, creating things that are lower price point. If you're an entrepreneur and you're over the age of 30, you know about AWS because you know what, it's cheaper to start a business on Amazon Web Services than buying servers and everyone knows that. If you're under the age of 25, you might not know 50 grand to a hundred thousand just to start something. Today you get your credit card down, you're up and running and you can get Clubhouses up and running all day long. So the next Clubhouse will be on Amazon or a cloud technology. And that's because of Andy Jassy right? So this is a significant executive and he continue, will bring that mindset of building. So, I think the digital transformation, we're in the digital engine club, we're going to see a complete revolution of a new generation. And I think having a new leader like Andy Jassy will enable in my opinion next generation talent, whether that's media and technology convergence, media technology and art convergence and the fact that he digs music, he digs sports, he digs tech, he digs media, it's going to be very interesting to see, I think he's well-poised to be, and he's soft-spoken, he doesn't want the glamorous press. He doesn't want the puff pieces. He just wants to do what he does and he puts his game do the talking. >> Talking about advice at startups. Just a quick aside. I remember, John, you and I when we were interviewing Scott McNealy former CEO of Sun Microsystems. And you asked him advice for startups. He said, move out of California. It's kind of tongue in cheek. I heard this morning that there's a proposal to tax the multi-billionaires of 1% annually not just the one-time tax. And so Jeff Bezos of course, has a ranch in Texas, no tax there, but places all over. >> You see I don't know. >> But I don't see Amazon leaving Seattle anytime soon, nor Jassy. >> Jeremiah Owyang did a Clubhouse on California. And the basic sentiment is that, it's California is not going away. I mean, come on. People got to just get real. I think it's a fad. Yeah. This has benefits with remote working, no doubt, but people will stay here in California, the network affects beautiful. I think Silicon Valley is going to continue to be relevant. It's just going to syndicate differently. And I think other hubs like Seattle and around the world will be integrated through remote work and I think it's going to be much more of a democratizing effect, not a win lose. So that to me is a huge shift. And look at Amazon, look at Amazon and Microsoft. It's the cloud cities, so people call Seattle. You've got Google down here and they're making waves but still, all good stuff. >> Well John, thanks so much. Let's let's wrap and let's jump into the Clubhouse and hear from others. Thanks so much for coming on, back on theCUBE. And many times we, you and I've done this really. It was a pleasure having you. Thanks for your perspectives. And thank you for watching everybody, this is Dave Vellante for theCUBE. We'll see you next time. (soft ambient music)

Published Date : Feb 4 2021

SUMMARY :

leaders all around the world. the time to speak with us. and syndicate the Clubhouse Or you can just buy I can see all the influences are on there So let's get it to and the other diversified stuff. And Bezos said to Jassy, And that's the Amazonian way. and the IOT opportunity And he's always said that to you. of the technology across the entire stack. I mean, the word is, And just to give you a context, and they are not afraid to take chances. I mean, despite the large numbers, and that's directly the So the obvious question So in the corporate governance world So it's of interesting to juxtapose that and how they change others to be dominant. on the competition, over the age of 30, you know about AWS not just the one-time tax. But I don't see Amazon leaving and I think it's going to be much more into the Clubhouse and hear from others.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
AndyPERSON

0.99+

Mike ClayvillePERSON

0.99+

Jay CarneyPERSON

0.99+

JassyPERSON

0.99+

Jeff WilkesPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

Jeff BezosPERSON

0.99+

Matt GarmanPERSON

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

1997DATE

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

Teresa CarlsonPERSON

0.99+

Jon ForttPERSON

0.99+

TexasLOCATION

0.99+

Michael DellPERSON

0.99+

CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Amazon Web ServicesORGANIZATION

0.99+

January 2015DATE

0.99+

Andy JassyPERSON

0.99+

Pat GelsingerPERSON

0.99+

Larry EllisonPERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

James HamiltonPERSON

0.99+

Donald TrumpPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

John YoungPERSON

0.99+

Jeremiah OwyangPERSON

0.99+

2006DATE

0.99+

Sun MicrosystemsORGANIZATION

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

45 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

BezosPERSON

0.99+

Teresa Carlson, AWS | AWS re:Invent 2020


 

>>From around the globe. It's the queue with digital coverage of AWS reinvent 2020 sponsored by Intel, AWS, and our community partners. >>Hello, and welcome back to the cubes coverage of ADFS reinvent 2020 it's virtual this year because of the pandemic we can't be in person normally would do in these interviews face to face, but we're here remote. I'm your host, John furrier. We're the cube virtual and we're here with Teresa Carlson, who is the chief and heads up the public sector business, uh, for AWS and also now has industries, which is a lot of the verticals and just continues to, um, have great leadership and continues to do well in the business. I Theresa great to see you for the eighth consecutive cube interview you've been on every year and we thank you for coming on big year this year. Thanks for coming on. Great to see you. >>Thank you, John. Thank you for having me. It's hard to believe it's eight years already. Wow, go ahead. >>Well, first of all, I want to say congratulations. Um, the first year you will run, you never wavered. You always had a North star. Um, you had the Amazonia and kind of way, um, you told us what you were going to do and you did it. The CIA came on board and the dots just connected. So congratulations this year more than ever, um, during your keynote. And re-invent, even though it was virtual, um, again, you're raising the bar on the theme leadership and making use of the data two major themes this year on your keynote because of the pandemic. And just because of the cloud computing benefits are all kind of coming together. You're helping more people than ever doing a more public service with cloud when it needs it. The most. This has been a big story. Share your, your reaction to that. >>Yeah. Well, John, thank you again for having me in your coverage of reinvent. It's been three weeks of, wow. I mean, three weeks we do one hour a day three, uh, that COVID, you know, we're still, we're still not dead, right? The vaccinations are out. People are starting to, I saw on the television yesterday here in the U S the first nurse that was vaccinated. Uh, but for us, I will tell you the data side of this piece during COVID has been huge. I mean, huge. It has been, you know, our customers have always said data is golden for them, right. Uh, but during COVID, we have actually seen the use of data, just go up like crazy and not just the use of it, but, um, I will say it's multiple data lakes that are used hydrating multiple data lakes and using that data to merge. >>So if you think about economic data and health data and putting those data sets together in a way that they have deeper understanding of what's happening within their community, their state, their, their, uh, their country. So we've seen emerging of data, uh, in a big way. If you think about the vaccinations themselves, uh, John, that wouldn't have been possible to move this fast without the use of scalable compute, processing and analytics in a way like no one has ever seen it. And, uh, it's, it's, it's pretty amazing. And I don't think we'll ever go back. And also I'll just say sharing of that data has changed. Researchers are now much more open to sharing that data air cord 19 a research site that we've done has thousands of researchers on it. Now, hundreds of thousands of views on it with people sharing research about COVID and think about that. I mean, research has always been held tightly, and now we're really starting to see them open up and share that data so that we can move much faster. >>I think doing that public service with the data has always been a killer idea. We talked about national parks being kind of open for the people over the years now, super computing and data. You guys do a great job doing that, but the other area that you're getting a lot of press on and, and rightfully so is an area that I know is close to your heart, as well as our mission, which is getting people trained up on cloud computing. And you've done this for years, but this year more importantly, with all the pressure and all the need, you guys have offered, offering a huge training skills training for 29 million people globally. I saw that on the news, I saw you on doing some TV interviews on this. It's been all over the press has been getting a lot of great buzz. Can you tell me more about what that is? >>Yeah. So part of my, when I picked up bear industry business units also picked up our training and certification organization that is ran by Maureen Lonergan. I know you've had Maureen on your show before too, and then I have education, which is run by Kimma Jarris in the U S and max, uh, Peterson internationally. And we are now we've merged so that we have a model that we can teach and train around the world in a much more scalable way that this announcement was about going into 200 Kemp countries and territories training, 29 million people by 2025 free do free skills training and making that available job through multiple different programs and scaling those. So we'll take the programs we have and we'll scale those app much more rapidly. And then now we'll also look for new programs that we need to run in parallel because that's what we do. >>We have to look around corners. Also make sure that we have the right programs and, you know, I've lived, I've lived, you know, they're all amazing, but near and dear to my heart has always been our AWS educate, which we started, uh, for ages 14 and up to at the university and high school level, to be able to start to bring on those cloud skills. Then we added badging and credentialing onto that. And from there, you can go into the air Academy, which you can actually get certifications as a solution architect. Uh, but we've, we've added so many more, uh, our program restart now, which has been really, which is about training. Those who are jobless or an underserved communities and socioeconomic depressed areas. Uh, and I love that program. I told a story about an individual in Boston who had opened a training center, a gym he's a fitness trainer, and he had to close it, uh, because you know, COVID, and he went through our 12 week. >>We restart training program and now has a job with a company there in Boston. And I just love those kind of stories where you know, that you're putting people to work. And I think for us, there's thousands and thousands of jobs around the world, just in any city, if you, if you search on cloud computing jobs open, I just looked in New York when I was on CNBC. I looked in New York and there are 10,000 cloud jobs just there in New York. And I just did a quick search. So there's always jobs, and we've got to make sure that we're skilling them so they can go now fill those jobs. And that will help us close that gap. Uh, John, which we still have a big one, uh, to get all the jobs filled that are out there. >>That's a great mission. And I got to say, it's super important because one is cloud computing. There's openings for this kind of new, the new paradigm, which is now mainstream and playing out on, in real time, as, as Andy was talking about, but also the global it markets being reshaped by cloud computing. So you have the intersection of those two, which is a new skill. You can't just take it and make a cloud. You've got to bring it together. So it's a great opportunity for someone to come into the industry and level up pretty quickly. You don't have to have the 20 years of experience to do this. It's you can come in instantly level up, have a great job. >>You know, it's the one thing John, I hear all the time around the world before from like when I would go and speak with university chancellors and presidents and just professors, they would say, Hey, you know, AWS, we need you to do the micro-credentialing along the way. And this was pre COVID when they said, we need to get your students want to work while they're in school. Well now more than ever, it's important. And we also, John Luke, just in September, over 800,000 women left the workplace. That is a trend that we do not want and we can not sustain. And so doing, you know, doing programs like this virtually that you can do self paced environments, intensive environments. We want to make, we want to make these programs fit for whatever the individual needs. So it's not just a one size fits all. We want to make sure that the programs that we're providing will fit the needs of the individuals doing the training. And I, I particularly am, uh, I want to push this with their, you know, inclusion and diversity of the individuals that we need to get into the workplace, but it is pretty alarming when you see that many women leaving the workplace, you know, when a choice is being made right now, we're seeing women take the brunt of that. And we want to make sure that they have the opportunity to work virtually train themselves and get those new jobs that are out in tech. >>Well, that's one of the questions I had for you. I'll just jump to that. Now I'll get back to some of the other ones, but the customers that pivot to remote work and learning, uh, it's changing. And, you know, I was, um, riffing on an interview. Um, I think it was with one of your public sector customers, the future of work. And if you just think about the word work workforce, workplace workload work flows, the notion of work is now impacted. And you mentioned the diversity piece. This is an opportunity. So how should people think about this, uh, relearning? So we don't lose people and we actually get a net positive inbound migration to the workforce. >>You know, the flexibility I had, I did a fireside chat with Andrew Nooney. Um, he was the former CEO of PepsiCo and chairman, and is now on our Amazon board, uh, for re-invent. And she talked about, you know, being your authentic self, uh, curiosity, but one of her big points is women in the workplace. Uh, and she's gonna publish a new book soon, and it's going to be really focused on kind of equity policy, uh, areas of need that we have to focus on to make sure that we have at women being able to tackle both the home issues and being able to work and taking advantage of that plus 50%. And I would say the virtual opportunity is really fantastic, especially for, um, all levels of socioeconomic individuals, because you can work part-time full-time, you can work virtually. And I do believe while we all want to get back into the workplace. >>I think for me, I'm a social animal. I'd love to be there sitting beside you, John, you know, I think for a lot of us, we are, we kind of yearn to be back in the office, but there's also a lot that working from home, um, is, is much more achievable for them, right? Especially with childcare if school day, if it's a short day, because the schools and allowing flexibility with work is going to be really important and COVID has taught us that that is possible. My team did not miss a beat during COVID. I tell ya, it's like unbelievable. Our business, uh, has, has really kinda been on fire because public sector. And if you look at the other industries, I've picked up financial services, uh, energy and telecommunications and training and certification. These are all that had to keep going. Uh, governments were moving faster than ever. >>So our team was really busy. Um, I've had individuals asked me, well, how did you manage the downtowns? Like we didn't have any downtime. Like literally day one, we were like 24 seven and the teams were working with it pretty much every government around the world because COVID moved so quickly and all virtually. And I will have to say, John, I was really skeptical in the beginning about how is this? How, how are we going to do this? Um, but the teams really, we figured out how to operate. You know, you had to, it's a new muscle. You kind of have to build that virtual work muscle and figure out how you manage your day, how you fit things in. And then there's the point that people think you're always available because you are at home, right? So you can never, that you can't possibly not be available because you know, you're, you are sitting at home. And then there's the many times where people's cats walk across and kind of with their tail on their face. And that dog child were at REMS in with the diaper. And you know, it's all, you, you have to have grace and humor about all this. Sometimes T like you can't take everything so seriously. And perhaps we've learned that, um, work and life can blend a little bit more, right? That you can, you can have that when a lot of people, when they talk about work-life balance, now we have work-life harmony. >>You know, you and I have talked about this before. If you can tap whoever taps, the diversity of talent will always let me win the game and not just, um, diversity in terms of gender or background role. I mean, if you can tap the virtual space, you're a winner because there's talent out there that can be aggregated in, and there's no stigma associated with anything. So, you know, this is, I think Andy kinda, uh, expressed that to me. And, and he heard it in his keynote where he said, Hey, people are a square, but you can get more participation. I think that is a real positive, um, upside. And I love the perspective of this new muscle. I totally agree. You need to, you need to have that >>Square. I mean, we've, we've actually chatted. I don't know if we'll ever go back to having big rooms with people in it, because you have a voice, you have a face. And I do believe, especially for women, uh, John, who can not always speak up, it's an opportunity for them to have their own space. They ha they can have their own voice. All individuals cause centers. They have great ideas, but they don't always value them. So having, you know, when you, each person has their own square, you can actually kind of see, well, who's, who's has an opinion. Who's spoken up. Who, who do I want to call on here and ask them if they have an opinion? So I like the idea of everybody having their own space when you're having a meeting. If you have to be virtual, because you get lost in translation, especially if you have that large leader in the room and everybody else's around them, then sometimes they only kind of adhere to their voice. This is an opportunity for others to really have that pool. >>I was just, I saw a joke on Twitter from a friend that said, Hey, I run all the meetings now because I can mute people. So if someone starts talking, you're muted bye-bye. So again, this is a whole new muscle great stuff. Well, since you've, since you brought up your role, I know you have a new expanded role. Could you take a minute to explain what that is? Because I'm still not clear. I know you've been doing an amazing job. I've written about, uh, your initial successes, and now you continue to do well with public sector and believe me, I've exploding. I see it. We're reporting on it. Public service is changing with digital transformation, but these other things, what are you working on? What are the new areas? Yeah, so I >>Just passed my 10th year. I'm starting my 11th year and it's been like amazing building this public sector business. I, I, and our government customers. Wow. The innovation and education during COVID has been pretty off the charts, which I don't think I'll slow down. And then a few months ago I was asked to take on our, uh, our training and certification org and our evangelist in solution architecture org, along with the industry business units of, uh, finance, telecommunications, and energy. And then, uh, John, if you remembering June, I announced our aerospace and satellite industry business unit. So, uh, these are the ones that we have right now are very regulated. A lot of them are, you know, very closely aligned to regulated industry. Um, you know, there could be others that are not as regulated, but the ones right now, if you think about aerospace, satellite, financial services, telecommunications in, in, in energy. >>So they, for me, um, they're very, it can tell a lot of the work I've been doing in building public sector, because when I go into a country today, when my teams go in, we generally always have to work with these groups. So if you think about telecommunications, we have to go in and make sure that we're working on our networking, our connectivity, and we negotiate and work with those telco providers. Same with the energy companies, both large ones and small ones. We go in and we work to build a power purchasing agreements, you know, solar power, uh, renewable energy to power our data centers and make sure that we're giving back to the grid. So we have that partnership. And then in the financial sector, I've had our, uh, I've had all of our regulators anyway, like FINRA fed reserve. Um, I R S treasury. >>So I've already, I've always had all the regulators. So now working with the, uh, you know, the additional, the banking, the investment sector, capital markets, it's very, it's, it seems so natural if that makes sense. And now diving into the upstream and downstream stream of supply chain for both that energy and telco and what a fantastic time now for telcos with 5g. I mean, I've been saying for two or three years that I thought this would be a huge opportunity for telecommunications companies to actually look for new, uh, work streams for their customers. And I mean, edge, you know, now our connect or call centers that they can do and take advantage of that. So I'm actually really excited. Uh, John seeing seven of new opportunities and, you know, renewable the new energy, uh, startups that are out there, the things I'm seeing, power, solar, nuclear, um, and then seeing a lot of the larger energy companies take on these projects. It's a lot of fun. And, um, I'm very excited now to continue to meet those customers. I got to meet a lot during re-invent. I love their energy. Yeah. I love kind of learning about what they're looking to solve. And, and I'm also just looking forward to helping them, um, with the connections that we've already been doing in government. I think it's a really nice combination of working together. Now. >>I, I see it as, um, what you've done with public sector was take a partnership approach to an old standing industry, changed them quickly, get the transformation, build the relationships, get the successes and establish that transformation and this needed versus the organically developing, you know, stuff. That's going to be the cloud startups and whatnot. Those are going to use Amazon, but you're a transformational leader. >>John, if I could just save for a minute, if you think about re-invention, you're at re-invent and a lot of these are going through massive reinvention, uh, you know, again, 5g with telco renewables, uh, with energy and then financial services where everything is kind of moving to an online model and digital model with different types of currencies that they have to deal with. It's, it's really perfect for cloud and what we offer. So I think the opportunity, um, to dive in and really partner with these industries and aerospace and Salado. Oh my gosh. It's just, I have to say, I really do believe cloud computing is, um, the perfect kind of step forward with all these industries for reinvention and innovation, which they're all moving towards. >>Well, Theresa, you're a re-invention leader. Uh, we've covered it. And now we've got all new territory for you to work on. Um, bring your playbook, you know, people-centric partner results are charging Theresa, thank you for your time. Great to have you on. Great to see you. Wish you, we were in person in real life again soon. Thank you for coming on. >>Yeah, John, thank you. Happy holidays. I look forward to seeing you next year. >>Okay. This is the cubes coverage of AWS reinvented. We have Teresa Carlson, she heads up the public sector. She's the chief of the whole public sector, and now taking on other industries to bring that playbook, the reinvention to the industries, really a big part of the Amazon web services, vision and cultural change. That's going on with the pandemic reach rechanging and reformatting and refactoring industries. That's what's going on in the big picture and a lot of gay tech under the hood. I'm John for your host. Thanks for watching.

Published Date : Dec 15 2020

SUMMARY :

It's the queue with digital coverage of I Theresa great to see you for the eighth It's hard to believe it's eight years already. Um, the first year you will run, you never wavered. I will tell you the data side of this piece during COVID has been huge. So if you think about economic data and health data and putting those data sets together I saw that on the news, I saw you on doing some TV interviews on this. And we are now we've merged so that we have a model that we can teach and he had to close it, uh, because you know, COVID, and he went And I just love those kind of stories where you know, that you're putting people to work. And I got to say, it's super important because one is cloud computing. And so doing, you know, doing programs like this virtually that you can And if you just think about the word work workforce, you know, being your authentic self, uh, curiosity, but one of her big points And if you look at the other industries, I've picked up financial services, uh, energy and telecommunications And you know, it's all, you, you have to have grace and humor about all this. I mean, if you can tap the virtual space, you're a winner because there's talent out there that can be aggregated So having, you know, when you, each person has their own square, you can actually kind of see, I know you have a new expanded role. A lot of them are, you know, very closely aligned to regulated industry. to build a power purchasing agreements, you know, solar power, uh, you know, the additional, the banking, the investment sector, capital markets, and this needed versus the organically developing, you know, stuff. John, if I could just save for a minute, if you think about re-invention, you're at re-invent and a lot And now we've got all new territory for you to I look forward to seeing you next year. the reinvention to the industries, really a big part of the Amazon web services,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
TheresaPERSON

0.99+

Teresa CarlsonPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

Maureen LonerganPERSON

0.99+

AndyPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

PepsiCoORGANIZATION

0.99+

Andrew NooneyPERSON

0.99+

John LukePERSON

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

Kimma JarrisPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

SeptemberDATE

0.99+

CIAORGANIZATION

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

New YorkLOCATION

0.99+

thousandsQUANTITY

0.99+

20 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

MaureenPERSON

0.99+

three weeksQUANTITY

0.99+

sevenQUANTITY

0.99+

10th yearQUANTITY

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

11th yearQUANTITY

0.99+

eight yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

12 weekQUANTITY

0.99+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

29 million peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

telcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

2025DATE

0.99+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

over 800,000 womenQUANTITY

0.99+

JuneDATE

0.98+

U SLOCATION

0.98+

FINRAORGANIZATION

0.98+

29 million peopleQUANTITY

0.98+

first nurseQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

this yearDATE

0.98+

CNBCORGANIZATION

0.98+

each personQUANTITY

0.98+

50%QUANTITY

0.98+

pandemicEVENT

0.98+

10,000 cloud jobsQUANTITY

0.97+

eighth consecutive cubeQUANTITY

0.97+

telcosORGANIZATION

0.96+

SaladoORGANIZATION

0.96+

5gORGANIZATION

0.94+

COVIDEVENT

0.94+

two major themesQUANTITY

0.93+

thousands of researchersQUANTITY

0.93+

hundreds of thousands of viewsQUANTITY

0.92+

firstQUANTITY

0.9+

John furrierPERSON

0.87+

one hour a day threeQUANTITY

0.86+

first yearQUANTITY

0.85+

200 KempQUANTITY

0.85+

Breaking Analysis: Cloud 2030 From IT, to Business Transformation


 

>> From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto in Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from theCUBE in ETR. This is Breaking Analysis with Dave Vellante. >> Cloud computing has been the single most transformative force in IT over the last decade. As we enter the 2020s, we believe that cloud will become the underpinning of a ubiquitous, intelligent and autonomous resource that will disrupt the operational stacks of virtually every company in every industry. Welcome to this week's special edition of Wikibon's CUBE Insights Powered by ETR. In this breaking analysis, and as part of theCUBE365's coverage of AWS re:Invent 2020, we're going to put forth our scenario for the next decade of cloud evolution. We'll also drill into the most recent data on AWS from ETR's October 2020 survey of more than 1,400 CIOs and IT professionals. So let's get right into it and take a look at how we see the cloud of yesterday, today and tomorrow. This graphic shows our view of the critical inflection points that catalyze the cloud adoption. In the middle of the 2000s, the IT industry was recovering from the shock of the dot-com bubble and of course 9/11. CIOs, they were still licking their wounds from the narrative, does IT even matter? AWS launched its Simple Storage Service and later EC2 with a little fanfare in 2006, but developers at startups and small businesses, they noticed that overnight AWS turned the data center into an API. Analysts like myself who saw the writing on the wall and CEO after CEO, they poo-pooed Amazon's entrance into their territory and they promised a cloud strategy that would allow them to easily defend their respective turfs. We'd seen the industry in denial before, and this was no different. The financial crisis was a boon for the cloud. CFOs saw a way to conserve cash, shift CAPEX to OPEX and avoid getting locked in to long-term capital depreciation schedules or constrictive leases. We also saw shadow IT take hold, and then bleed in to the 2010s in a big way. This of course created problems for organizations rightly concerned about security and rogue tech projects. CIOs were asked to come in and clean up the crime scene, and in doing so, realized the inevitable, i.e., that they could transform their IT operational models, shift infrastructure management to more strategic initiatives, and drop money to the bottom lines of their businesses. The 2010s saw an era of rapid innovation and a level of data explosion that we'd not seen before. AWS led the charge with a torrent pace of innovation via frequent rollouts or frequent feature rollouts. Virtually every industry, including the all-important public sector, got into the act. Again, led by AWS with the Seminole, a CIA deal. Google got in the game early, but they never really took the enterprise business seriously until 2015 when it hired Diane Green. But Microsoft saw the opportunity and leaned in heavily and made remarkable strides in the second half of the decade, leveraging its massive software stake. The 2010s also saw the rapid adoption of containers and an exit from the long AI winter, which along with the data explosion, created new workloads that began to go mainstream. Now, during this decade, we saw hybrid investments begin to take shape and show some promise. As the ecosystem realized broadly that it had to play in the AWS sandbox or it would lose customers. And we also saw the emergence of edge and IoT use cases like for example, AWS Ground Station, those emerge. Okay, so that's a quick history of cloud from our vantage point. The question is, what's coming next? What should we expect over the next decade? Whereas the last 10 years was largely about shifting the heavy burden of IT infrastructure management to the cloud, in the coming decade, we see the emergence of a true digital revolution. And most people agree that COVID has accelerated this shift by at least two to three years. We see all industries as ripe for disruption as they create a 360 degree view across their operational stacks. Meaning, for example, sales, marketing, customer service, logistics, etc., they're unified such that the customer experience is also unified. We see data flows coming together as well, where domain-specific knowledge workers are first party citizens in the data pipeline, i.e. not subservient to hyper-specialized technology experts. No industry is safe from this disruption. And the pandemic has given us a glimpse of what this is going to look like. Healthcare is going increasingly remote and becoming personalized. Machines are making more accurate diagnoses than humans, in some cases. Manufacturing, we'll see new levels of automation. Digital cash, blockchain and new payment systems will challenge traditional banking norms. Retail has been completely disrupted in the last nine months, as has education. And we're seeing the rise of Tesla as a possible harbinger to a day where owning and driving your own vehicle could become the exception rather than the norm. Farming, insurance, on and on and on. Virtually every industry will be transformed as this intelligent, responsive, autonomous, hyper-distributed system provides services that are ubiquitous and largely invisible. How's that for some buzzwords? But I'm here to tell you, it's coming. Now, a lot of questions remain. First, you may even ask, is this cloud that you're talking about? And I can understand why some people would ask that question. And I would say this, the definition of cloud is expanding. Cloud has defined the consumption model for technology. You're seeing cloud-like pricing models moving on-prem with initiatives like HPE's GreenLake and now Dell's APEX. SaaS pricing is evolving. You're seeing companies like Snowflake and Datadog challenging traditional SaaS models with a true cloud consumption pricing option. Not option, that's the way they price. And this, we think, is going to become the norm. Now, as hybrid cloud emerges and pushes to the edge, the cloud becomes this what we call, again, hyper-distributed system with a deployment and programming model that becomes much more uniform and ubiquitous. So maybe this s-curve that we've drawn here needs an adjacent s-curve with a steeper vertical. This decade, jumping s-curves, if you will, into this new era. And perhaps the nomenclature evolves, but we believe that cloud will still be the underpinning of whatever we call this future platform. We also point out on this chart, that public policy is going to evolve to address the privacy and concentrated industry power concerns that will vary by region and geography. So we don't expect the big tech lash to abate in the coming years. And finally, we definitely see alternative hardware and software models emerging, as witnessed by Nvidia and Arm and DPA's from companies like Fungible, and AWS and others designing their own silicon for specific workloads to control their costs and reduce their reliance on Intel. So the bottom line is that we see programming models evolving from infrastructure as code to programmable digital businesses, where ecosystems power the next wave of data creation, data sharing and innovation. Okay, let's bring it back to the current state and take a look at how we see the market for cloud today. This chart shows a just-released update of our IaaS and PaaS revenue for the big three cloud players, AWS, Azure, and Google. And you can see we've estimated Q4 revenues for each player and the full year, 2020. Now please remember our normal caveats on this data. AWS reports clean numbers, whereas Azure and GCP are estimates based on the little tidbits and breadcrumbs each company tosses our way. And we add in our own surveys and our own information from theCUBE Network. Now the following points are worth noting. First, while AWS's growth is lower than the other two, note what happens with the laws of large numbers? Yes, growth slows down, but the absolute dollars are substantial. Let me give an example. For AWS, Azure and Google, in Q4 2020 versus Q4 '19, we project annual quarter over quarter growth rate of 25% for AWS, 46% for Azure and 58% for Google Cloud Platform. So meaningfully lower growth rates for AWS compared to the other two. Yet AWS's revenue in absolute terms grows sequentially, 11.6 billion versus 12.4 billion. Whereas the others are flat to down sequentially. Azure and GCP, they'll have to come in with substantially higher annual growth to increase revenue from Q3 to Q4, that sequential increase that AWS can achieve with lower growth rates year to year, because it's so large. Now, having said that, on an annual basis, you can see both Azure and GCP are showing impressive growth in both percentage and absolute terms. AWS is going to add more than $10 billion to its revenue this year, with Azure growing nearly 9 billion or adding nearly 9 billion, and GCP adding just over 3 billion. So there's no denying that Azure is making ground as we've been reporting. GCP still has a long way to go. Thirdly, we also want to point out that these three companies alone now account for nearly $80 billion in infrastructure services annually. And the IaaS and PaaS business for these three companies combined is growing at around 40% per year. So much for repatriation. Now, let's take a deeper look at AWS specifically and bring in some of the ETR survey data. This wheel chart that we're showing here really shows you the granularity of how ETR calculates net score or spending momentum. Now each quarter ETR, they go get responses from thousands of CIOs and IT buyers, and they ask them, are you spending more or less than a particular platform or vendor? Net score is derived by taking adoption plus increase and subtracting out decrease plus replacing. So subtracting the reds from the greens. Now remember, AWS is a $45 billion company, and it has a net score of 51%. So despite its exposure to virtually every industry, including hospitality and airlines and other hard hit sectors, far more customers are spending more with AWS than are spending less. Now let's take a look inside of the AWS portfolio and really try to understand where that spending goes. This chart shows the net score across the AWS portfolio for three survey dates going back to last October, that's the gray. The summer is the blue. And October 2020, the most recent survey, is the yellow. Now remember, net score is an indicator of spending velocity and despite the deceleration, as shown in the yellow bars, these are very elevated net scores for AWS. Only Chime video conferencing is showing notable weakness in the AWS data set from the ETR survey, with an anemic 7% net score. But every other sector has elevated spending scores. Let's start with Lambda on the left-hand side. You can see that Lambda has a 65% net score. Now for context, very few companies have net scores that high. Snowflake and Kubernetes spend are two examples with higher net scores. But this is rarefied air for AWS Lambda, i.e. functions. Similarly, you can see AI, containers, cloud, cloud overall and analytics all with over 50% net scores. Now, while database is still elevated with a 46% net score, it has come down from its highs of late. And perhaps that's because AWS has so many options in database and its own portfolio and its ecosystem, and the survey maybe doesn't have enough granularity there, but in this competition, so I don't really know, but that's something that we're watching. But overall, there's a very strong portfolio from a spending momentum standpoint. Now what we want to do, let's flip the view and look at defections off of the AWS platform. Okay, look at this chart. We find this mind-boggling. The chart shows the same portfolio view, but isolates on the bright red portion of that wheel that I showed you earlier, the replacements. And basically you're seeing very few defections show up for AWS in the ETR survey. Again, only Chime is the sore spot. But everywhere else in the portfolio, we're seeing low single digit replacements. That's very, very impressive. Now, one more data chart. And then I want to go to some direct customer feedback, and then we'll wrap. Now we've shown this chart before. It plots net score or spending velocity on the vertical axis and market share, which measures pervasiveness in the dataset on the horizontal axis. And in the table portion in the upper-right corner, you can see the actual numbers that drive the plotting position. And you can see the data confirms what we know. This is a two-horse race right now between AWS and Microsoft. Google, they're kind of hanging out with the on-prem crowd vying for relevance at the data center. We've talked extensively about how we would like to see Google evolve its business and rely less on appropriating our data to serve ads and focus more on cloud. There's so much opportunity there. But nonetheless, you can see the so-called hybrid zone emerging. Hybrid is becoming real. Customers want hybrid and AWS is going to have to learn how to support hybrid deployments with offerings like outposts and others. But the data doesn't lie. The foundation has been set for the 2020s and AWS is extremely well-positioned to maintain its leadership, in our view. Now, the last chart we'll show takes some verbatim comments from customers that sum up the situation. These quotes were pulled from several ETR event roundtables that occurred in 2020. The first one talks to the cloud compute bill. It spikes and sometimes can be unpredictable. The second comment is from a CIO at IT/Telco. Let me paraphrase what he or she is saying. AWS is leading the pack and is number one. And this individual believes that AWS will continue to be number one by a wide margin. The third quote is from a CTO at an S&P 500 organization who talks to the cloud independence of the architecture that they're setting up and the strategy that they're pursuing. The central concern of this person is the software engineering pipeline, the cICB pipeline. The strategy is to clearly go multicloud, avoid getting locked in and ensuring that developers can be productive and independent of the cloud platform. Essentially separating the underlying infrastructure from the software development process. All right, let's wrap. So we talked about how the cloud will evolve to become an even more hyper-distributed system that can sense, act and serve, and provides sets of intelligence services on which digital businesses will be constructed and transformed. We expect AWS to continue to lead in this build-out with its heritage of delivering innovations and features at a torrid pace. We believe that ecosystems will become the main spring of innovation in the coming decade. And we feel that AWS has to embrace not only hybrid, but cross-cloud services. And it has to be careful not to push its ecosystem partners to competitors. It has to walk a fine line between competing and nurturing its ecosystem. To date, its success has been key to that balance as AWS has been able to, for the most part, call the shots. However, we shall see if competition and public policy attenuate its dominant position in this regard. What will be fascinating to watch is how AWS behaves, given its famed customer obsession and how it decodes the customer's needs. As Steve Jobs famously said, "Some people say, give the customers what they want. "That's not my approach. "Our job is to figure out "what they're going to want before they do." I think Henry Ford once asked, "If I'd ask customers what they wanted, "they would've told me a faster horse." Okay, that's it for now. It was great having you for this special report from theCUBE Insights Powered by ETR. Keep it right there for more great content on theCUBE from re:Invent 2020 virtual. (cheerful music)

Published Date : Nov 25 2020

SUMMARY :

This is Breaking Analysis and bring in some of the ETR survey data.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
DavidPERSON

0.99+

MaribelPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

KeithPERSON

0.99+

EquinixORGANIZATION

0.99+

Matt LinkPERSON

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

IndianapolisLOCATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

ScottPERSON

0.99+

Dave NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

Tim MinahanPERSON

0.99+

Paul GillinPERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

Stephanie CoxPERSON

0.99+

AkanshkaPERSON

0.99+

BudapestLOCATION

0.99+

IndianaLOCATION

0.99+

Steve JobsPERSON

0.99+

OctoberDATE

0.99+

IndiaLOCATION

0.99+

StephaniePERSON

0.99+

NvidiaORGANIZATION

0.99+

Chris LavillaPERSON

0.99+

2006DATE

0.99+

Tanuja RanderyPERSON

0.99+

CubaLOCATION

0.99+

IsraelLOCATION

0.99+

Keith TownsendPERSON

0.99+

AkankshaPERSON

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

Akanksha MehrotraPERSON

0.99+

LondonLOCATION

0.99+

September 2020DATE

0.99+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.99+

David SchmidtPERSON

0.99+

90%QUANTITY

0.99+

$45 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

October 2020DATE

0.99+

AfricaLOCATION

0.99+

Breaking Analysis: Azure Cloud Powers Microsoft's Future


 

>> From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto and Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from theCUBE and ETR. This is Breaking Analysis with Dave Vellante. >> As we reported last week, we believe that in the next decade, there will be changes in public policy that are going to restrict the way in which big internet companies are able to appropriate user data. Big tech came under fire again this week with the CEOs of Facebook, Twitter, and Google going toe to toe with several U.S. senators. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, however, was not one of those CEOs in the firing line. Microsoft doesn't heavily rely on ad revenues, rather, the company's momentum is steadily building around Azure, which by my estimates is now roughly 19% of Microsoft's overall revenues. It's surpassed, maybe nearly got to $7 billion for the first time on a quarterly basis. I'll come back to you on that. Hello everyone, and welcome to this week's Wikibon CUBE insights powered by ETR. In this Breaking Analysis, we'll respond to the many requests we've had to dig into the business of Microsoft a little bit deeper and provide a snapshot of how the company is faring in the ETR dataset. Let's take a quick look at Microsoft's financials, and the scope of Microsoft's business is actually mind-boggling. The company has roughly $150 billion in revenue, and it grew its top line 12% last quarter. It has more than $136 billion in cash on the balance sheet. Microsoft generates over $60 billion annually in operating cashflow. And last quarter alone threw off more than 19 billion in operating cash. Its gross margins are expanding across virtually all of its major business lines. So let's look at those business sectors. Microsoft, it doesn't suffer from the nagging problems that we've talked about with a lot of older tech companies. Companies like IBM and Dell and Cisco and Oracle and SAP, they struggle with growth sometimes because their growth businesses are not yet large enough to offset the declines in their traditional on-premises business segments. Now at the highest level, Microsoft breaks its business into three broad categories, and they're all growing quite nicely. Let me add some color here. Let's start with the productivity and business process line of business. LinkedIn, which is growing at 16%, is in this category as is Office. This business is shifting from one of on-prem licenses, which are really headwinds right now from Microsoft, to the cloud, in the form of SaaS with Office 365, which is growing at a 20% clip within its commercial market base. Even the consumer side of O365 is growing in the double digits. Dynamics is Microsoft's ERP and CRM business, and that falls into this slice of the pie, that's growing at 18%. And then the newer Dynamics 365, that's growing at 37%. So you can see, Microsoft is easily able to show growth despite the transitions from its legacy business. Intelligent cloud is the next segment. It's kind of the kitchen sink category, meaning there's stuff in there that includes a bit of cloud washing in my opinion, but Microsoft is not nearly as egregious as IBM with the liberties that it takes around its cloud categorization. For Microsoft it's a $13 billion quarterly business. And it's growing at 19%, as we show in the pie chart. Azure is an increasingly large portion of this segment. Azure is the most direct comparison with AWS. And I have said in the past quarter, I'd say it's around 50% of the intelligent cloud, and that it's approaching by my estimates around $7 billion a quarter. Azure grew at 47% annually this past quarter, the same growth rate as last quarter. Ironically, both AWS and Google Cloud grew at the same year over year rate this quarter as they did last quarter. AWS is 29% GCP in the high 50s by at my estimates. AWS revenue was 11.6 billion this past quarter, and I have GCP still well under 2 billion. We'll be updating our cloud numbers and digging deeper next week into this topic. So consider these estimates preliminary for Azure and GCP, which the respective companies don't break out for as Amazon, as you know, breaks out AWS explicitly. Now, back to Microsoft's intelligent cloud business. It includes on-prem server software, which is a managed decline business from Microsoft. They also include enterprise services in this category. So as you can see, it's not a clean cloud number for comparison purposes. Now finally, the third big slice of the pie is more personal computing. I know, it's kind of a dorky name, but nonetheless it's nearly a $12 billion business that's growing at 6% annually. The Windows OEM business is in here, as is Windows 10 and some security offerings. Surface is also in here as well and it's growing in the mid-thirties. Search revenue is in this category as well. It's declining per my earlier statements that it's not a main piece of Microsoft's business. Now, one of the most interesting areas of this sector is gaming. Microsoft's gaming business is growing at 21% and they just acquired ZeniMax Media for seven and a half billion dollars. Let me land on gaming for a minute. The gaming experts at theCUBE are really excited about Microsoft's XBox content services, which grew at about 30% this past quarter. Game Pass is essentially Microsoft's Netflix, or you can think of it as maybe like a Spotify model. You can get in for as low as $5 a month. I think you can pay as much as $15 a month and get access to a huge catalog of games that you can download. In November of last year, Microsoft launched its xCloud beta service, which allows you to download to a PC or a game box. Now eventually with 5G, the box goes away. All you'll need is a screen and you know, controller with the joysticks, no download. In fact, this is how it works today for Android. Now, interestingly, Apple is blocking Microsoft and some others like Google's Stadia, saying that they don't allow streaming game apps like Microsoft's xCloud service, because they don't follow the company's guidelines. What Apple's not telling you is that its adjacent offering, Apple Arcade, is considered subpar by hardcore gamers. And while Apple allows the streaming of movies and music from any service on the iPhone, it's decided not to allow streaming games. Now, the last thing I want to stress about Microsoft is its leverage point around developers. Developers is a big one here, we all remember the sweaty Steve Ballmer running around the stage like a mad man, screaming, "Developers, developers, developers!" Well, despite his obsession with Windows, he sure got that one right. The GitHub acquisition was Microsoft's way of buying more developer love. It does concentrate power with a tech giant, but you know what, if it wasn't Microsoft that bought GitHub, it would have been Facebook or Amazon or Google or one of the other tech giants. Now, despite some angst in the developer community over this, GitHub, it really is a linchpin for Microsoft to more tightly integrate GitHub with its pretty vast developer tool set. All right. Let's look deeper into the Microsoft data and focus on the enterprise. We'll bring in the ETR as we always do. We said last week that Google needed to look to the cloud and edge and get its head out of its ads. Well, Microsoft recovered from its Windows myopia after Satya Nadella took over in 2014, and by all accounts from the ETR survey data, Microsoft is killing it across the board. Let me start by putting Microsoft in context with some of the most prominent companies that both compete with, and sometimes partner with Microsoft. So this xy graph, it's one of our favorites. I show it all the time and it shows net score on the vertical axis, which is a measure of spending momentum from ETR, and the horizontal axis shows what we call market share, which is a measure of pervasiveness in the survey. Now in the upper right hand table, you can see the data for each of the companies. There's an ETR survey taken in October and it had more than 1400 completes. Several points stand out here. Microsoft is by far the most pervasive in the dataset, and yet its net score or spending velocity is right there with AWS, ServiceNow, Salesforce, and Workday. Only Snowflake, which I put in there for context, because of its consistently strong net scores, shows a meaningfully higher net score, of course from a much smaller base. Now what makes this so impressive is it represents a pan-Microsoft view across its entire portfolio. And you can see where companies like IBM and Oracle struggle from a momentum standpoint compared to Microsoft, which is a much, much larger company. It's that problem that I referred to earlier regarding the smaller size of their respective growth businesses. Also called Cisco and SAP, which despite some earnings challenges lately, are able to maintain net scores that while not in the green, they're not in the red, either. Green essentially means your overall install base is expanding. Red indicates contraction. Now let's look at the spending patterns for Microsoft customers. This chart shows the granularity of ETR's net score for Microsoft. The green represents increased spend and the red decreased spend. What's impressive is that Microsoft's red zone, I mean it's essentially negligible at 6%, when you add two reds up, the pink and the bright red. Their customers, they're all spending more, or the same, and very few are leaving the platform. Now I made the case last week that Google should double or triple its efforts and focus on cloud and the edge. Microsoft has already made that transition in its business and is the, that's the premise really of my discussion today. Specifically, Microsoft Azure is powering the company across all of its products and services. It's giving Microsoft tremendous operating leverage and steadily improving marginal economics. You can see that in the gross margin lines this quarter, across all of its businesses. And here's a graphic showing its position within cloud computing in terms of net score. Microsoft Azure functions, which is the first bar on this chart, and Azure overall, which is the third set of bars, shows momentum that's as strong as any cloud category, including AWS Lambda, which as we've talked about many times is killing it. Now five over from the left, count them over, one, two, three, four, five, you can see AWS overall. So that's a really important reference point. And while its levels are still elevated, Azure overall, which again is number three from the left, has meaningfully more momentum with 65% net score versus 52% for AWS overall. Now reasonable people can debate the quality of these respective clouds and you could argue over feature sets, who's got the most features, who's got the most regions, which regions are most reliable, who's got the most data centers and all that stuff, but it's really hard to argue against Microsoft's "Good enough" strategy. It's working in the cloud, and it has been working for the company for decades. Now another Microsoft strategy has been to be a late comer to a category and then bundle multiple capabilities into one suite. We saw this at first, really in the late 1980s with Office, and it's continued in a number of areas. The latest example, Microsoft Teams. Teams combines features like meetings, phone, chat, collaboration, as well as business process workflows that leverage tools like SharePoint and PowerPoint. I mean, it's a killer strategy, and you can see the results in this chart. I mean, it's essentially competing with Zoom, it's competing with Slack and all the sort of productivity plays there in that space. And this graphic compares net scores from the year ago October survey for reference, the July survey from this year, and the most recent October survey, as I said, 1400 respondents. Look at the lead that Teams has relative to the competition. There's a story across Microsoft's portfolio. Look at Microsoft's products in the ETR taxonomy. Video conferencing with Teams, productivity apps, RPA, cloud, cloud functions, machine learning, artificial intelligence, containers, security, end point, analytics, mobile, even database. The only signs of softness are really seen in the company's legacy businesses like Skype or on-prem licenses business, which I said were a headwind for them. And while PCs and tablets are weaker, that's what you'd expect from this mature industry relative to some of these other categories. Now, again, the premise here today is that by pivoting to the cloud and going all in competing with infrastructure as a service, Microsoft has created a platform for innovation for its business, and its developer chops are really credible, so it's evolving its install base very successfully to Azure. It's got a very solid hybrid and multi-cloud strategy and story with Microsoft Arc, which eventually it can take to the edge. You know, we think its edge strategy needs some work, but nonetheless, the company is really, really well positioned. Microsoft has a huge partner ecosystem, heck, it even partners with Oracle and database, as well as using Azure to enter new markets, including vertical clouds like healthcare, which it talked about on its earnings call. I mean, there's really not much on which you can criticize Microsoft. You know, sure, they've had some high profile failures in the past. The Nokia acquisition, the Windows phone, you remember Zune? Mixer, you know, Bing. Is Bing a fail? I don't know. Maybe not really. I guess the fail is, you know, what I was talking about last week with antitrust, Microsoft was distracted by the DOJ and maybe that caused it to miss search, give it to Google, and in that sense, maybe it was a failure, but overall, pretty good track record from Microsoft. Yeah, maybe you can say Microsoft is somewhat of a copycat, you know, the graphical user interface that they copied from the Mac, but hey, even Steve Jobs stole that. Surface, okay. The cloud? But so what, ideas, they're plentiful, execution is the key, really. No matter how you slice it, the data doesn't lie. Microsoft's financial performance, its pivot to the cloud, and the success of its adjacent businesses, make it one of the most remarkable rebirths in the history of technology industry. Now I didn't use the word turnaround because the company was never really in trouble. It just became irrelevant and kind of boring. Today, Microsoft is far from immaterial. Okay. That's it for this week. Remember all these episodes are available as podcasts wherever you listen. So please subscribe. I publish weekly on Wikibon.com and Siliconangle.com. And don't forget to check out ETR.plus for all the survey data and analytics. I appreciate always the comments on my LinkedIn posts or you can DM me @DVellante, or email me at David.Vellante@SiliconAngle.com. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE Insights powered by ETR. Thanks for watching everybody, be well, and we'll see you next time. (calm music)

Published Date : Oct 31 2020

SUMMARY :

This is Breaking Analysis Microsoft is by far the most

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

CiscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Steve BallmerPERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

2014DATE

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

OctoberDATE

0.99+

Steve JobsPERSON

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

JulyDATE

0.99+

$7 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

20%QUANTITY

0.99+

11.6 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

Satya NadellaPERSON

0.99+

65%QUANTITY

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

6%QUANTITY

0.99+

21%QUANTITY

0.99+

BingORGANIZATION

0.99+

18%QUANTITY

0.99+

52%QUANTITY

0.99+

16%QUANTITY

0.99+

$13 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

last weekDATE

0.99+

iPhoneCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

19%QUANTITY

0.99+

NokiaORGANIZATION

0.99+

47%QUANTITY

0.99+

more than $136 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

last quarterDATE

0.99+

LinkedInORGANIZATION

0.99+

ZeniMax MediaORGANIZATION

0.99+

SkypeORGANIZATION

0.99+

Roger Johnston, axial3D & Tim Brown, Belfast City Hospital | AWS Public Sector 2020 Partners Awards


 

>>from the Cube Studios in Palo Alto and Boston connecting with thought leaders all around the world. This is a cube conversation. Welcome to the >>Special Cube program. We are here with the Amazon Web Services Public Sector Partner Awards program. It's a celebration of AWS public sectors partners and their end user customers where there's been innovation and we're pleased to have on this show here, the award winner for the most innovative AI and ML Artificial intelligence and machine learning solution. Axial three D is the partner, and the end user is Belfast Hospital. He got Roger Johnson, the CEO of actual three D, and Dr Tim Brown consulted transplant surgeon at Belfast Hospital, who has been doing amazing things not only on the as an innovative partner, but really during Covic making things happen by solving the problem of the surgical gap in the number of surgeries that you're doing really high performance saving lives. Congratulations. First of all, congratulations. Roger. Dr Kimberly. Thanks for joining me. >>Re pleasure. >>Okay, let's get into it. First of all, Dr Tim Brown, I really want to commend you on the amazing work that you're doing before we get into some of the partnership awards conversations. You have been at the front lines solving a lot of problems around the gap between the number of surgeries that could take place with Cove. It, um, tell that story real quick. I really think it's super important. Take a minute to >>explain. Yeah, thanks for the opportunity. And it's been an incredible rollercoaster for the last three months, pretty much all of the transplant programs across the world who have been affected by Coupet of shut down but with some pretty innovative on the grill leadership team Working advances with managed to open a program up again. And and Belfast, we have a bytes and 50 to 50 disease donor transplants year over the last three months, with just a 90 90 kidney transplants. Pretty much we've cleared the whole waiting list in Northern Ireland, pretty much for people waiting for a kidney transplant at this time. And it's been a remarkable few weeks, but it really is a testament to the critical care community. People that work in intensive care is the high marks, a support organ donation. Of course, our donors who have given so selflessly at such a tragic time for them. So I'd like to pay tribute to all of our donors into the amazing people who have been involved in the team. Mark belt faster this time. >>That's super amazing. Can you just I just want to pause from and just captured the number of order of magnitude. You said it was 6 to 10 year and you didn't 90 90. >>Yeah, so six weeks basically Teoh, two years work in six weeks old in the middle of the night as well. So it's been It's been hard of hard work, so you can see the sleeplessness. I'm trying to catch up with a minute, but it's been really, really satisfying. An incredible I come for patients and legacy of this of this, the program is gonna last about faster. 40 years. >>Well, I want to say congratulations. I'll give you my Cube Award for not changing the world but saving the world. One person at a time. 90 interviews and six weeks. That's amazing. That's like thinking clearing the waiting list. You really changing lives there. Congratulations. >>That's very kind of you. Thank you very much. >>Roger. Good. A great partner and customer. You have here. Talk about this award. You guys have talked about the company? What is this all about? Why you guys in this position? Why are you winning? >>Yes, So I think our motivation for our company is driven by our partners, such such as? In what they're doing transforms care And even in these horrific situation, our scenarios. We have the moment with Kobe. Think you're hearing the start of the amazing story our job is to give Surgeons liked him the best possible insight that he can have going into his surgeries For the last 20 years, surgeons of relied largely on two D imaging, so C, t and memory scans or for being able to plan their surgeries when it's murdered, technology should apply them much greater insight or they actually perform the surgery. So we've created a technology that platforms on AWS that allows us to turn those traditional hard to understand to the images into micro millimeter precise models off the patients exact anatomy. The value hopefully, two amazing colleagues like Tim is that instead of trying to interpret what a two D image CD or memory scan might mean he can actually see for the first time before he opens the patient up exactly what he's going to find when when he when he starts the surgery. So he immediately start to complete that planning before the surgery actually takes. So hopefully that analyze a number of benefits to results without the shorter operations. Find less surgical meeting we brought into the surgery. Hopefully, faster Surgeries names last risk of infection For patients being shorter Time means most >>awesome. Dr. Brian, I want to get your take on this. Can you describe the impact on your side because you know the future of work, which is everyone's been talking about in the tech industry for many years now, with code we were just talking about. The success is you're having and changing lives and saving lives. The notion of work workplace work, forces, work loads, work flows are all changing. Certainly the workplace people aren't as on site as they used to be. The workforce has to be protected. How does the AI and how does the actual three D help you and your work flows? Are you getting more done? Can you give specifics around the impact to your job? >>Yeah, it's a bit It's been a fantastic journey to date. We're still learning away. It's a journey. We're trying to work out exactly where this lies in. The fact that Kubla does not come along, which has changed, or working practices, that means that we have to look for different solutions on this, I think, is very 100 solution to amend. My practice over the last three years has been in terms of complex and real surgery on oncological surgery, where we have, for example, a tumor and kidney where we think, my goodness, we're gonna have to take this kidney I and throw it in the bin because it's very badly disease. So the index case that we were involved with that was building a child who wanted to donate his kidney to his daughter. But when we worked him up, we find a tumor in his kidney, which ordinarily would have to be discarded. But thanks to the imaging that Excel was able to produce for us, we were able to plan Well, geez, well cut well and as a result of kidney, I really plan a removal of the tumor from the kidney itself. We really repair kidney and then transplant it into his daughter. So with the technology that was available, we were able to save two lives on one particular case on, and it's really grown from there on. We've been involved in five or six different, really complex cases where the imaging has changed the outcomes for our patients who ordinarily wouldn't have been able to. Chief insight comes, I think, the AI interface on the AI solution we've developed in our partnership with the Excel. As I said, it's a journey and we're still finding our way. But to insights that I've really got our the first is that what we want to do is reduce variability, not just in our in our observers, from the way that we interpret imaging tradition is what you're saying is, look a two D images. We're now able to sit and look at this, emerging in a three dimensional space on our desk. Rather than trying to reconstruct these things in your head, we can look at them and discuss the different images with our colleagues in real time, a zealous that which I think is probably the most important thing, is that we're not able to engage our patients and a partnership. Before we had a bit of an unfair advantage that we're able to interpret these images because 20 or 30 years of getting used to doing this as professionals. But the patients are presented with some incredibly difficult decisions to make by their own health and with very little understanding that. But now I can handle the model of their own disease very easy to understand, and that gives my patient autonomy to make the decisions about their own bodies back again. And I think that's a hugely powerful, powerful tool for these guys have about potential decisions that they have to make that more effective for the rest of their lives. >>So the problem you're solving was one of the technical problem. So you're trying to figure out manually, get more insight into the the imaging and to the customer or the patient. This case customer, the patient. I can make a better decision. Those are two problems, statements that seem to be the big ones that I missed. Anything? >>Absolutely, absolutely. >>Okay, so actual three d you guys have a great solution? How >>did you >>get here? Tell us about your story. What's what's What's the big trajectory for you guys? In terms of the value proposition, it seems to be amazing and again highlights. The advantages of technology really solves the problem. But the outcome on the patient side is pretty phenomenal. >>Yes, so the chance for us is there or the development that we have made. The lately, we admit, is to be able to automatically turn these two D images into three D models. So we take each of the slices off of memory or cities. Using AWS is machine learning. We construct three D macro millimeter precise representation of For me. That's only possible. First of all, we treat the algorithms that we created on Amazon platform using over a 1,000,000 pre labeled CDs. Consume our system automatically detect. Yeah, it's a level. What is bone? What is ligament? What is on our earlier vessel? With the training that we're able to perform, we've been able to with with these 1,000,000 images we've been able to in effect, tree and our system automatically detect the parts of me with this micro service level that hasn't been previously possible. This technology, or the ability to create three D models, has existed for maybe 10 or 15 years, but it's it's needed. Experts like him who were, in effect manually code the two D image pixel level and could affect so some software and turn it into a three D image. Typically, too, it's in ours, often expert like them to do. And the problem is, Tim could only do one of the time. We estimate there about three million of these complex surgeries each year in the world that need open effort from greatly from this enhanced imaging. And we couldn't get 33 million under these, especially. And that. So we have this process no on the AWS platform, with dozens of these models in parallel, and each more will take maybe a few minutes to turn from the CD into the into the three D representation. So through the park off the Amazon Public cloud, we've been able to provide this this powerful machine learning automated solution that can actually scale toe man >>Dr Brian talk about the impact because, I mean Andy Jassy, the CEO of AWS, always talks about this. When I interviewed him, he says, you know, we're here to help do the heavy lifting this sounds like some pretty heavy lifting. What was just talked about? I mean, the manual work involved. You essentially have a collective intelligence and supercomputer power with AWS. What's your take on this as this evolves? Why isn't everyone doing this? >>Yeah, well, I don't know why. Every minute. That's that's That's the key question. It really is. From my perspective, there is no heavy lifting at all, and what I do is I push a couple buttons. I put a bit of data, and I send it off. From my perspective, it is about as easy as it gets is probably a ZTE sending email, which we do hundreds of times a day. And so, from from my perspective, I'm delighted to say there's no heavy lifting until I get a patient's data. I send data through to excel, who will then fool me and say, Listen to what is it exactly that we want to have a personal service from actual on? A couple days later, there's a delivery of a beautiful life size three D representation model, will check and then take to plan on and treat a patient with. So the heavy lifting really has all been done. A Z Roger alluded to in the past. It was hugely time consuming work that required a huge amount of training. But basically that's being replaced with a push of a button on. These supercomputers have taken all of my heavy lifting away on, and I think this is one of the true representation. Zoff technology really, really advances real world solutions and my patients are benefactors. From this >>Roger Dr Brown. Lay out the architecture because, first of all, pretend I want to take this every single friend that I have here in California and around the world. I want to just deploy this. What's the architecture and what's needed on the deployment side? Say it to Belfast as you deploy this. What's kind of involved in you? Just take us through high level. I must be cloud scales. Amazing, No doubt about it. We just talked about that. But what's involved in the architecture side of my standing? A bunch PC two's Is there sage maker involvement? What's the architecture and then deployment? What does that look like? >>Sure, So again, a slight step back. One of the challenges when, when we is the MedTech community try and introduce innovation into health and hospitals that the hospitals i t. Infrastructure network definition is often very locked on. So we're trying to bring new software and load it and install it in the hospital data system. That is a huge, often lengthy process that has to be done through lots of hoops in terms off Hey, network a compliance. Lots of different steps along the journey and that often wants from a good reasons, is a significant barrier to the timely adoption off innovative technologies in the cars. What a what a platform a selfie on AWS allies were just another website, as Tennis said, is, uh, only that, though his only existence with actual three D in terms of the interface is dragging and dropping the CT scan into our website into a portal portal exists quickly on the AWS instance. In one of our region, we are working with a little in the US. Never leave the US We use the the public client version in US East. We take advantage of many features within AWS, but a sage maker is probably a core of what we do. It's not innovation that AWS introduced know several years ago that was like juice this this machine learning trained set of algorithms that allow us to give this disruption. >>And it sounds like the more you use it, the more get smarter. Or is that as well? >>Absolutely. So our journey is, As Tim said, we're on a journey not only in terms off the technology and you're very receptive. In terms of yes, the more we train it, the more we treated on specific anatomy types or pathology types or trouble types, the better our system gets recognizing the specific characteristics of those. More importantly, this is about a journey I having made this disruption, we make the change and transformation off new standards of care pathways. That's the innovation that we just enable. It's amazing. Surgical teams like hymns. Let me transformation >>Dr Brown on your side. You're sitting there. I got a big problem trying to solve these problems. I got patients one but one better outcomes. They want to live. I don't want to throw away kitty, so I don't have to you to solve that problem that when when they bring that over, what was it like over on your side of the house is a practitioner. Deploying it. You've got you've got two jobs going. You're kind of doing I t integration on one hand and you're a surgeon on the other, trying to make things happen. You know what I see? This is not a lot of I t here. What's the deployment? Looks like. >>Yeah, deployment means I don't know. Why ever announces doing that. Such a straightforward, easy situation. It's that's remarkable. Ready? It's such a good solution, and I think part of any sort of change management program, and this again is change management. It's challenging the way we think about things. It's challenging people's comfort zones on any time we need to do change. We've got this anatomy of change. You've got innovators go early, adopters will lead the doctors, and I think what we're going to see over the next 5 to 10 years is people are recognizing that this technology is a game changer, possibly being driven by their patients who say I'm on the three D model and I want to see what this actually looks like because basically not black and white picture you're showing me doesn't make any sense to me and I think there's going to be the two drivers is that the first is that we want to have a consistency of care on the lack of variation in our care across across old old services. But as well is that patients? I think we're gonna drive this as well. So once once we get the innovators and the early adopters of this technology on board, then we'll see a tipping point. And that's that's when it becomes an acceptable normal thing for people to do. When they come in the hospital, they'll be sure print tight off their three d printed like moral off their pathology. I'm not a huge demand for their decision making for treatment processes, and that's a true collaboration between doctor or surgeon on the patient. That's that's where we need to be in the 21st century. It's it's going to be a collaborative decision making process. You talked about the pressures, journeys and this This is a really integral part. This is the roadmap of your journey to a large extent. So I think this I can see this being rolled out worldwide, being driven by patients buying a correction and variability of healthcare provision. >>That's a great example is an innovative award winner for the most innovative use of artificial intelligence and machine learning. Three D images saving lives Congratulations, Tim Rogers. Phenomenal Final question As we end this out, what's the scar tissue pun intended? You know, What did you learn? What was some of the things that you could share with folks as people look at this and say This is an example of cloud scale and the technology for good. What lessons have you learned? What can you share for folks? Take a minute to explain the split. Roger. We'll start with you. >>Yeah, sure. So I think a number off lessons for us on this journey Assistances, This is Ah, we're at the start of a journey of understanding the power off the what three d imaging can bring just to providing a consistent use variable care, but also as a stem also alluded to in terms of off the patient understanding, I think that patient understanding is one of the huge leap forwards that way. Didn't set out initially thinking we're going to be able to help educate on better inform patients. But that was one of the derive benefits suddenly part. So that was a great lesson. I think there is incredible levels of adoption that we're starting to see across the US across Europe because it's so easy to adopt. Compared to traditional methods, surgeons registered for Canadian start transacting and instead of us almost as opposed to having to have these huge I t programs. So I think we're now starting to really scratch the surface and start seeing the benefits of this isn't an administrative system. It's not me. HR system. It's not a finance system. Or maybe a healthcare was comfortable. And using public like this is core hard core clinical services, clinical diagnosis. Clinical education on the Amazon cloud is enabling that it just wouldn't be possible with this technology we started. Actually, the lessons were learning or just just >>Dr Tim Brown and take us home and the segment with your take lessons learned and advice to others. >>I think the lessons learned are the doctors and health care providers are all extremely wary off change of new innovations because they feel that already they're overburdened. Probably my colleagues in the states and across Europe perfectly like they were a bit over, burdened by all the things that we have to do, and this may potentially have been more difficult or wants to your workloads. And actually, let's make your workload along each year convincing people and getting people to understand that this really does make your life a lot easier. It actually removes all the scar tissue, removes the difficulties that have been put in place by by organizations on once. People realize that, that's what that there is no heavy lifting. And this will make a huge difference to your practices, your patients understanding of your practice, and we'll stop so people really realize that the tipping point will be achieved. I'm looking forward to that day because this this is going to be the new normal in the next 5 to 10 years. >>While the performance that you're putting up the numbers of 90 transplant successfully over six weeks dwarfs the full year, last year really kind of shows the outcome is a game changer. And again, congratulations on your success. Roger think Thank you for coming on Corrections on being the award winner. Eight of his partner for the most innovative AI and machine learning solutions. Thanks for taking the time for this 80 s partner awards program. Thank you. >>Thank you. >>Okay, I'm John Furrier. We're covering the AWS Public Sector Partner Awards program put on by the Cube and AWS Public Sector Partners. Thanks for watching. Yeah, Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Published Date : Jul 14 2020

SUMMARY :

from the Cube Studios in Palo Alto and Boston connecting with thought leaders all around the world. He got Roger Johnson, the CEO of actual three D, and Dr Tim Brown consulted transplant surgeon You have been at the front lines solving a lot of problems around the gap between the number of surgeries the last three months, with just a 90 90 kidney transplants. You said it was 6 to 10 year and you didn't 90 90. So it's been It's been hard of hard work, clearing the waiting list. Thank you very much. You guys have talked about the company? We have the moment with Kobe. how does the actual three D help you and your work flows? So the index case that we were involved with get more insight into the the imaging and to the customer or The advantages of technology really solves the problem. This technology, or the ability to create three D models, has existed for maybe 10 I mean, the manual work involved. So the heavy Lay out the architecture because, first of all, pretend I want to take this every single friend that I have health and hospitals that the hospitals i t. Infrastructure network And it sounds like the more you use it, the more get smarter. That's the innovation that we just enable. on the other, trying to make things happen. over the next 5 to 10 years is people are recognizing that this technology is a game the scar tissue pun intended? the US across Europe because it's so easy to adopt. Dr Tim Brown and take us home and the segment with your take lessons removes the difficulties that have been put in place by by organizations Eight of his partner for the most innovative AI on by the Cube and AWS Public Sector Partners.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Tim RogersPERSON

0.99+

KimberlyPERSON

0.99+

Andy JassyPERSON

0.99+

Roger JohnsonPERSON

0.99+

TimPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

RogerPERSON

0.99+

Tim BrownPERSON

0.99+

CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

fiveQUANTITY

0.99+

BrianPERSON

0.99+

20QUANTITY

0.99+

6QUANTITY

0.99+

50QUANTITY

0.99+

1,000,000 imagesQUANTITY

0.99+

10QUANTITY

0.99+

33 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

Roger JohnstonPERSON

0.99+

six weeksQUANTITY

0.99+

USLOCATION

0.99+

two yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

six weeksQUANTITY

0.99+

21st centuryDATE

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

15 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

two problemsQUANTITY

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

Northern IrelandLOCATION

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

Belfast HospitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

30 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

ZTEORGANIZATION

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

two driversQUANTITY

0.99+

two jobsQUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

excelTITLE

0.99+

40 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

10 yearQUANTITY

0.99+

EightQUANTITY

0.99+

90QUANTITY

0.99+

BrownPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

BelfastLOCATION

0.99+

90 interviewsQUANTITY

0.99+

first timeQUANTITY

0.98+

each yearQUANTITY

0.98+

hundreds of times a dayQUANTITY

0.98+

One personQUANTITY

0.98+

several years agoDATE

0.97+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

CoupetPERSON

0.97+

ExcelTITLE

0.97+

US EastLOCATION

0.97+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.97+

two livesQUANTITY

0.97+

KobePERSON

0.96+

over six weeksQUANTITY

0.96+

Cube AwardTITLE

0.95+

A couple days laterDATE

0.95+

FirstQUANTITY

0.95+

AWS Public Sector PartnersORGANIZATION

0.94+

axial3DORGANIZATION

0.94+

Buno Pati, Infoworks io | CUBEConversation January 2020


 

>> From the SiliconANGLE media office in Boston, Massachusetts, it's theCUBE. Now, here's your host, Dave Vellante. >> Hello everyone, and welcome to this CUBE Conversation. You know, theCUBE has been following the trends in the so-called big data space since 2010. And one of the things that we reported on for a number of years is the complexity involved in wrangling and making sense out of data. The allure of this idea of no schema on write and very low cost platforms like Hadoop became a data magnet. And for years, organizations would shove data into a data lake. And of course the joke was it was became a data swamp. And organizations really struggled to realize the promised return on their big data investments. Now, while the cloud certainly simplified infrastructure deployment, it really introduced a much more complex data environment and data pipeline, with dozens of APIs and a mind-boggling array of services that required highly skilled data engineers to properly ingest, shape, and prepare that data, so that it could be turned into insights. This became a real time suck for data pros, who spent 70 to 80% of their time wrestling data. A number of people saw the opportunity to solve this problem and automate the heavy lift of data, and simplify the process to adjust, synchronize, transform, and really prepare data for analysis. And one of the companies that is attacking this challenge is InfoWorks. And with me to talk about the evolving data landscape is Buno Pati, CEO of InfoWorks. Buno, great to see you, thanks for coming in. >> Well thank you Dave, thanks for having me here. >> You're welcome. I love that you're in Palo Alto, you come to MetroWest in Boston to see us (Buno laughs), that's great. Well welcome. So, you heard my narrative. We're 10 years plus into this big data theme and meme. What did we learn, what are some of the failures and successes that we can now build on, from your point of view? >> All right, so Dave, I'm going to start from the top, with why big data, all right? I think this big data movement really started with the realization by companies that they need to transform their customer experience and their operations, in order to compete effectively in this increasingly digital world, right? And in that context, they also realized very quickly that data was the key asset on which this transformation would be built. So given that, you look at this and say, "What is digital transformation really about?" It is about competing with digital disruption, or fending off digital disruption. And this has become, over time, an existential imperative. You cannot survive and be relevant in this world without leveraging data to compete with others who would otherwise disrupt your business. >> You know, let's stay on that for a minute, because when we started the whole big data, covering that big data space, you didn't really hear about digital transformation. That's sort of a more recent trend. So I got to ask you, what's the difference between a business and a digital business, in your view? >> That is the foundational question behind big data. So if you look at a digital native, there are many of them that you can name. These companies start by building a foundational platform on which they build their analytics and data programs. It gives them a tremendous amount of agility and the right framework within which to build a data-first strategy. A data-first strategy where business information is persistently collected and used at every level of the organization. Furthermore, they take this and they automate this process. Because if you want to collect all your data and leverage it at every part of the business, it needs to be a highly automated system, and it needs to be able to seamlessly traverse on-premise, cloud, hybrid, and multi-cloud environments. Now, let's look at a traditional business. In a traditional enterprise, there is no foundational platform. There are things like point tools for ETL, and data integration, and you can name a whole slew of other things, that need to be stitched together and somehow made to work to deliver data to the applications that consume. The strategy is not a data-first strategy. It is use case by use case. When there is a use case, people go and find the data, they gather the data, they transform that data, and eventually feed an application. A process that can take months to years, depending on the complexity of the project that they're trying. And they don't automate this. This is heavily dependent, as you pointed out, on engineering talent, highly skilled engineering talent that is scarce. And they have not seamlessly traversed the various clouds and on-premise environments, but rather fragmented those environments, where individual teams are focused on a single environment, building different applications, using different tools, and different infrastructure. >> So you're saying the digital native company puts data at the core. They organize around that data, as opposed to maybe around a bottling plant, or around people. And then they leverage that data for competitive advantage through a platform that's kind of table stakes. And then obviously there's cultural aspects and other skills that they need to develop, right? >> Yeah, they have an ability which traditional enterprises don't. Because of this choice of a data-first strategy with a foundational platform, they have the ability to rapidly launch analytics use cases and iterate all them. That is not possible in a traditional or legacy environment. >> So their speed to market and time to value is going to be much better than their competition. This gets into the risk of disruption. Sometimes we talk about cloud native and cloud naive. You could talk about digital native and digital naive. So it's hard for incumbents to fend off the disrupters, and then ultimately become disrupters themselves. But what are you seeing in terms of some of the trends where organizations are having success there? >> One of the key trends that we're seeing, or key attributes of companies that are seeing a lot of success, is when they have organized themselves around their data. Now, what do I mean by that? This is usually a high-level mandate coming down from the top of the company, where they're forming centralized groups to manage the data and make it available for the rest of the organization to use. There are a variety of names that are being used for this. People are calling it their data fabric. They're calling it data as a service, which is pretty descriptive of what it ends up being. And those are terms that are all sort of representing the same concept of a centralized environment and, ideally, a highly automated environment that serves the rest of the business with data. And the goal, ultimately, is to get any data at any time for any application. >> So, let's talk a little bit about the cloud. I mentioned up front that the cloud really simplified infrastructure deployment, but it really didn't solve this problem of, we talked about in terms of data wrangling. So, why didn't it solve that problem? And you got companies like Amazon and Google and Microsoft, who are very adept at data. They're some of these data-first companies. Why is it that the cloud sort of in and of itself has not been able to solve this problem? >> Okay, so when you say solve this problem, it sort of begs the question, what's the goal, right? And if I were to very simply state the goal, I would call it analytics agility. It is gaining agility with analytics. Companies are going from a traditional world, where they had to generate a handful of BI and other reporting type of dashboards in a year, to where they literally need to generate thousands of these things in a year, to run the business and compete with digital disruption. So agility is the goal. >> But wait, the cloud is all about agility, is it not? >> It is, when you talk about agility of compute and storage infrastructure. So, there are three layers to this problem. The first is, what is the compute and storage infrastructure? The cloud is wonderful in that sense. It gives you the ability to rapidly add new infrastructure and spin it down when it's not in use. That is a huge blessing, when you compare it to the six to nine months, or perhaps even longer, that it takes companies to order, install, and test hardware on premise, and then find that it's only partially used. The next layer on that is what is the operating system on which my data and analytics are going to be run? This is where Hadoop comes in. Now, Hadoop is inherently complex, but operating systems are complex things. And Spark falls in that category. Databricks has taken some of the complexity out of running Spark because of their sort of manage service type of offering. But there's still a missing layer, which leverages that infrastructure and that operating system to deliver this agility where users can access data that they need anywhere in the organization, without intensely deep knowledge of what that infrastructure is and what that operating system is doing underneath. >> So, in my up front narrative, I talked about the data pipeline a little bit. But I'm inferring from your comments on platform that it's more than just this sort of narrow data pipeline. There's a macro here. I wonder if you could talk about that a little bit. >> Yeah. So, the data pipeline is one piece of the puzzle. What needs to happen? Data needs to be ingested. It needs to be brought into these environments. It has to be kept fresh, because the source data is persistently changing. It needs to be organized and cataloged, so that people know what's there. And from there, pipelines can be created that ultimately generate data in a form that's consumable by the application. But even surrounding that, you need to be able to orchestrate all of this. Typical enterprise is a multi-cloud enterprise. 80% of all enterprises have more than one cloud that they're working on, and on-premise. So if you can't orchestrate all of this activity in the pipelines, and the data across these various environments, that's not a complete solution either. There's certainly no agility in that. Then there's governance, security, lineage. All of this has to be managed. It's not simply creation of the pipeline, but all these surrounding things that need to happen in order for analytics to run at-scale within enterprises. >> So the cloud sort of solved that layer one problem. And you certainly saw this in the, not early days, but sort of mid-days of Hadoop, where the cloud really became the place where people wanted to do a lot of their Hadoop workloads. And it was kind of ironic that guys like Hortonworks, and Cloudera and MapR really didn't have a strong cloud play. But now, it's sort of flipping back where, as you point out, everybody's multi-cloud. So you have to include a lot of these on-prem systems, whether it's your Oracle database or your ETL systems or your existing data warehouse, those are data feeds into the cloud, or the digital incumbent who wants to be a digital native. They can't just throw all that stuff away, right? So you're seeing an equilibrium there. >> An equilibrium between ... ? >> Yeah, between sort of what's in the cloud and what's on-prem. Let me ask it this way: If the cloud is not a panacea, is there an approach that does really solve the problem of different datasets, the need to ingest them from different clouds, on-prem, and bring them into a platform that can be analyzed and drive insights for an organization? >> Yeah, so I'm going to stay away from the word panacea, because I don't think there ever is really a panacea to any problem. >> That's good, that means we got a good roadmap for our business then. (both laugh) >> However, there is a solution. And the solution has to be guided by three principles. Number one, automation. If you do not automate, the dependence on skill talent is never going to go away. And that talent, as we all know, is very very scarce and hard to come by. The second thing is integration. So, what's different now? All of these capabilities that we just talked about, whether it's things like ETL, or cataloging, or ingesting, or keeping data fresh, or creating pipelines, all of this needs to be integrated together as a single solution. And that's been missing. Most of what we've seen is point tools. And the third is absolutely critical. For things to work in multi-cloud and hybrid environments, you need to introduce a layer of abstraction between the complexity of the underlying systems and the user of those systems. And the way to think about this, Dave, is to think about it much like a compiler. What does a compiler do, right? You don't have to worry about what Intel processor is underneath, what version of your operating system you're running on, what memory is in the system. Ultimately, you might-- >> As much as we love assembly code. >> As much as we love assembly code. Now, so take the analogy a little bit further, there was a time when we wrote assembly code because there was no compiler. So somebody had to sit back and say, "Hey, wouldn't it be nice if we abstracted away from this?" (both laugh) >> Okay, so this sort of sets up my next question, which is, is this why you guys started InfoWorks? Maybe you could talk a little bit about your why, and kind of where you fit. >> So, let me give you the history of InfoWorks. Because the vision of InfoWorks, believe it or not, came out of a rear view mirror. Looking backwards, not forwards. And then predicting the future in a different manner. So, Amar Arsikere is the founder of InfoWorks. And when I met him, he had just left Zynga, where he was the general manager of their gaming platform. What he told me was very very simple. He said he had been at Google at a time when Google was moving off of the legacy systems of, I believe it was Netezza, and Oracle, and a variety of things. And they had just created Bigtable, and they wanted to move and create a data warehouse on Bigtable. So he was given that job. And he led that team. And that, as you might imagine, was this massive project that required a high degree of automation to make it all come together. And he built that, and then he built a very similar system at Zynga, when he was there. These foundational platforms, going back to what I was talking about before digital days. When I met him, he said, "Look, looking back, "Google may have been the only company "that needed such a platform. "But looking forward, "I believe that everyone's going to need one." And that has, you know, absolute truth in it, and that's what we're seeing today. Where, after going through this exercise of trying to write machine code, or assembly code, or whatever we'd like to call it, down at the detailed, complex level of an operating system or infrastructure, people have realized, "Hey, I need something much more holistic. "I need to look at this from a enterprise-wide perspective. "And I need to eliminate all of this dependence on," kind of like the cloud plays a role because it eliminates some of the dependence, or the bottlenecks around hardware and infrastructure. "And ultimately gain a lot more agility "than I'm able to do with legacy methodology." So you were asking early on, what are the lessons learned from that first 10 years? And lot of technology goes through these types of cycles of hype and disillusionment, and we all know the curve. I think there are two key lessons. One is, just having a place to land your data doesn't solve your problem. That's the beginning of your problems. And the second is that legacy methodologies do not transfer into the future. You have to think differently. And looking to the digital natives as guides for how to think, when you're trying to compete with them is a wonderful perspective to take. >> But those legacy technologies, if you're an incumbent, you can't just rip 'em and throw 'em out and convert. You going to use them as feeders to your digital platform. So, presumably, you guys have products. You call this space Enterprise Data Ops and Orchestration, EDO2. Presumably you have products and a portfolio to support those higher layer challenges that we talked about, right? >> Yeah, so that's a really important question. No, you don't rip and replace stuff. These enterprises have been built over years of acquisitions and business systems. These are layers, one on top of another. So think about the introduction of ERP. By the way, ERP is a good analogy of to what happened, because those were point tools that were eventually combined into a single system called ERP. Well, these are point capabilities that are being combined into a single system for EDO2, or Enterprise Data Operations and Orchestration. The old systems do not go away. And we are seeing some companies wanting to move some of their workloads from old systems to new systems. But that's not the major trend. The major trend is that new things that get done, the things that give you holistic views of the company, and then analytics based on that holistic view, are all being done on the new platforms. So it's a layer on top. It's not a rip and replace of the layers underneath. What's in place stays in place. But for the layer on top, you need to think differently. You cannot use all the legacy methodologies and just say that's going to apply to the new platform or new system. >> Okay, so how do you engage with customers? Take a customer who's got, you know, on-prem, they've got legacy infrastructure, they don't want to get disrupted. They want to be a digital native. How do you help them? You know, what do I buy from you? >> Yeah, so our product is called DataFoundry. It is a EDO2 system. It is built on the three principles, founding principles, that I mentioned earlier. It is highly automated. It is integrated in all the capabilities that surround pipelines, perhaps. And ultimately, it's also abstracting. So we're able to very easily traverse one cloud to another, or on-premise to the cloud, or even back. There are some customers that are moving some workloads back from the cloud. Now, what's the benefit here? Well first of all, we lay down the foundation for digital transformation. And we enable these companies to consolidate and organize their data in these complex hybrid, cloud, multi-cloud environments. And then generate analytics use cases 10x faster with about tenth of the resource. And I'm happy to give you some examples on how that works. >> Please do. I mean, maybe you could share some customer examples? >> Yeah, absolutely. So, let me talk about Macy's. >> Okay. >> Macy's is a customer of ours. They've been a customer for about, I think about 14 months at this point in time. And they had built a number of systems to run their analytics, but then recognized what we're seeing other companies recognize. And that is, there's a lot of complexity there. And building it isn't the end game. Maintaining it is the real challenge, right? So even if you have a lot of talent available to you, maintaining what you built is a real challenge. So they came to us. And within a period of 12 months, I'll just give you some numbers that are just mind-blowing. They are currently running 165,000 jobs a month. Now, what's a job? A job is a ingestion job, or a synchronization job, or a transformation. They have launched 431 use cases over a period of 12 months. And you know what? They're just ramping. They will get to thousands. >> Scale. >> Yeah, scale. And they have ingested a lot of data, brought in a lot of DataSources. So to do that in a period of 12 months is unheard of. It does not happen. Why is it important for them? So what problem are they trying to solve? They're a retailer. They are being digitally disruptive like (chuckles) no one else. >> They have an Amazon war room-- >> Right. >> No doubt. >> And they have had to build themselves out as a omni-channel retailer now. They are online, they are also with brick and mortar stores. So you take a look at this. And the key to competing with digital disrupters is the customer experience. What is that experience? You're online, how does that meld with your in-store experience? What happens if I buy online and return something in a store? How does all this come together into a single unified experience for the consumer? And that's what they're chasing. So that was the first application that they came to us with. They said, "Look, let us go into a customer 360. "Let us understand the entirety "of that customer's interaction "and touchpoints with our business. "And having done so, we are in a position "to deliver a better experience." >> Now that's a data problem. I mean, different DataSources, and trying to understand 360, I mean, you got data all over the place. >> All over the place. (speaking simultaneously) And there's historical data, there's stuff coming in from, you know, what's online, what's in the store. And then they progress from there. I mean, they're not restricting it to customer experience and selling. They're looking at merchandising, and inventory, and fulfillment, and store operations. Simple problem. You order something online, where do I pull this from? A store or a warehouse? >> So this is, you know, big data 2.0, just to use a sort of silly term. But it's really taking advantage of all the investment. I've often said, you know, Hadoop, for all the criticism it gets, it did lower our cost of getting data into, you know, at least one virtual place. And it got us thinking about how to get insights out of data. And so, what you're describing is the ability to operationalize your data initiatives at scale. >> Yeah, you can absolutely get your insights off of Hadoop. And I know people have different opinions of Hadoop, given their experience. But what they don't have, what these customers have not achieved yet, most of them, is that agility, right? So, how easily can you get your insights off of Hadoop? Do I need to hire a boatload of consultants who are going to write code for me, and shovel data in, and create these pipelines, and so forth? Or can I do this with a click of a button, right? And that's the difference. That is truly the difference. The level of automation that you need, and the level of abstraction that you need, away from this complexity, has not been delivered. >> We did, in, it must have been 2011, I think, the very first big data market study from anybody in the world, and put it out on, you know, Wikibon, free research. And one of the findings was (chuckles) this is a huge services business. I mean, the professional service is where all the money was going to flow because it was so complicated. And that's kind of exactly what happened. But now we're entering, really it seems like a phase where you can scale, and operationalize, and really simplify, and really focus your attention on driving business value, versus making stuff work. >> You are absolutely correct. So I'll give you the numbers. 55% of this industry is services. About 30% is software, and the rest is hardware. Break it down that way. 55%. So what's going on? People will buy a big data system. Call it Hadoop, it could be something in the cloud, it could be Databricks. And then, this is welcome to the world of SIs. Because at this point, you need these SIs to write code and perform these services in order to get any kind of value out of that. And look, we have some dismal numbers that we're staring at. According to Gardner, only 17% of those who have invested in Hadoop have anything in production. This is after how many years? And you look at surveys from, well, pick your favorite. They all look the same. People have not been able to get the value out of this, because it is too hard. It is too complex and you need too many consultants (laughs) delivering services for you to make this happen. >> Well, what I like about your story, Buno, is you're not, I mean, a lot of the data companies have pivoted to AI. Sort of like, we have a joke, ya know, same wine, new bottle. But you're not talking about, I mean sure, machine intelligence, I'm sure, fits in here, but you're talking about really taking advantage of the investments that you've made in the last decade and helping incumbents become digital natives. That sounds like it's at least a part of your mission here. >> Not become digital natives, but rather compete with them. >> Yeah, right, right. >> Effectively, right? >> Yep, okay. >> So, yeah, that is absolutely what needs to get done. So let me talk for a moment about AI, all right? Way back when, there was another wave of AI in the late 80s. I was part of that, I was doing my PhD at the time. And that obviously went nowhere, because we didn't have any data, we didn't have enough compute power or connectivity. Pretty inert. So here it is again. Very little has changed. Except for we do have the data, we have the connectivity, and we have the compute power. But do we really? So what's AI without the data? Just A, right? There's nothing there. So what's missing, even for AI and ML to be, and I believe these are going to be powerful game changers. But for them to be effective, you need to provide data to it, and you need to be able to do so in a very agile way, so that you can iterate on ideas. No one knows exactly what AI solution is going to solve your problem or enhance your business. This is a process of experimentation. This is what a company like Google can do extraordinarily well, because of this foundational platform. They have this agility to keep iterating, and experimenting, and trying ideas. Because without trying them, you will not discover what works best. >> Yeah, I mean, for 50 years, this industry has marched to the cadence of Moore's Law, and that really was the engine of innovation. And today, it's about data, applying machine intelligence to that data. And the cloud brings, as you point out, agility and scale. That's kind of the new cocktail for innovation, isn't it? >> The cloud brings agility and scale to the infrastructure. >> In low risk, as you said, right? >> Yeah. >> Experimentation, fail fast, et cetera. >> But without an EDO2 type of system, that gives you a great degree of automation, you could spend six months to run one experiment with AI. >> Yeah, because-- >> In gathering data and feeding it to it. >> 'Cause if the answer is people and throwing people at the problem, then you're not going to scale. >> You're not going to scale, and you're never going to really leverage AI and ML capabilities. You need to be able to do that not in six months, in six days, right, or less. >> So let's talk about your company a little bit. Can you give us the status, you know, where you're at? As their newly minted CEO, what your sort of goals are, milestones that we should be watching in 2020 and beyond? >> Yeah, so newly minted CEO, I came in July of last year. This has been an extraordinary company. I started my journey with this company as an investor. And it was funded by actually two funds that I was associated with, first being Nexus Venture Partners, and then Centerview Capital, where I'm still a partner. And myself and my other two partners looked at the opportunity and what the company had been able to do. And in July of last year, I joined as CEO. My partner, David Dorman, who used to be CEO of AT&T, he joined as chairman. And my third partner, Ned Hooper, joined as President and Chief Operating Officer. Ned used to be the Chief Strategy Officer of Cisco. So we pushed pause on the funding, and that's about as all-in as a fund can get. >> Yeah, so you guys were operational experts that became investors, and said, "Okay, we're going to dive back in "and actually run the business." >> And here's why. So we obviously see a lot of companies as investors, as they go out and look for funding. There are three things that come together very rarely. One is a massive market opportunity combined with the second, which is the right product to serve that opportunity. But the third is pure luck, timing. (Dave chuckles) It's timing. And timing, you know, it's a very very challenging thing to try to predict. You can get lucky and get it right, but then again, it's luck. This had all three. It was the absolute perfect time. And it's largely because of what you described, the 10 years of time that had elapsed, where people had sort of run the experiment and were not going to get fooled again by how easy this supposed to be by just getting one piece or the other. They recognized that they need to take this holistic approach and deploy something as an enterprise-wide platform. >> Yeah, I mean, you talk about a large market, I don't even know how you do a TAM, what's the TAM? It's data. (laughs) You know, it's the data universe, which is just, you know, massive. So, I have to ask you a question as an investor. I think you've raised, what 50 million, is that right? >> We've raised 50 million. The last round was led by NEA. >> Right, okay. You got great investors, hefty amount. Although, you know, in this day and age, you know, you're seeing just outrageous amounts being raised. Software obviously is a capital efficient business, but today you need to raise a lot of money for promotion, right, to get your name out there. What's your thoughts on, as a Silicon Valley investor, as this wave, I mean, get it while you can, I guess. You know, we're in the 10th year of this boom market. But your thoughts? >> You're asking me to put on my other hat. (Dave laughs) I think companies have, in general, raised too much money at too high a value too fast. And there's a penalty for that. And the down round IPO, which has become fashionable these days, is one of those penalties. It's a clear indication. Markets are very rational, public markets are very rational. And the pricing in a public market, when it's significantly below the pricing of in a private market, is telling you something. So, we are a little old-fashioned in that sense. We believe that a company has to lay down the right foundation before it adds fuel to the mix and grows. You have to have evidence that the machinery that you build, whether it's for sales, or marketing, or other go-to-market activities, or even product development, is working. And if you do not see all of those signs, you're building a very fragile company. And adding fuel in that setting is like flooding the carburetor. You don't necessarily go faster. (laughs) You just-- >> Consume more. >> You consume more. So there's a little bit of, perhaps, old-fashioned discipline that we bring to the table. And you can argue against it. You can say, "Well, why don't you just raise a lot of money, "hire a lot of sales guys, and hope for the best?" >> See what sticks? (laughs) >> Yeah. We are fully expecting to build a large institution here. And I use that word carefully. And for that to happen, you need the right foundation down first. >> Well, that resonates with us east coast people. So, Buno, thanks very much for comin' on theCUBE and sharing with us your perspectives on the marketplace. And best of luck with InfoWorks. >> Thank you, Dave. This has been a pleasure. Thank you for having me here. >> All right, we'll be watching, thank you. And thank you for watching, everybody. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE. We'll see ya next time. (upbeat music fades out)

Published Date : Jan 14 2020

SUMMARY :

From the SiliconANGLE media office and simplify the process to adjust, synchronize, transform, and successes that we can now build on, that they need to transform their customer experience So I got to ask you, what's the difference and it needs to be able to seamlessly traverse on-premise, and other skills that they need to develop, right? they have the ability to rapidly launch analytics use cases is going to be much better than their competition. for the rest of the organization to use. Why is it that the cloud sort of in and of itself So agility is the goal. and that operating system to deliver this agility I talked about the data pipeline a little bit. All of this has to be managed. And you certainly saw this in the, not early days, the need to ingest them from different clouds, on-prem, Yeah, so I'm going to stay away from the word panacea, That's good, that means we got a good roadmap And the solution has to be guided by three principles. So somebody had to sit back and say, and kind of where you fit. And that has, you know, absolute truth in it, You going to use them as feeders to your digital platform. But for the layer on top, you need to think differently. Take a customer who's got, you know, on-prem, And I'm happy to give you some examples on how that works. I mean, maybe you could share some customer examples? So, let me talk about Macy's. And building it isn't the end game. So to do that in a period of 12 months is unheard of. And the key to competing with digital disrupters you got data all over the place. And then they progress from there. So this is, you know, big data 2.0, and the level of abstraction that you need, And one of the findings was (chuckles) And you look at surveys from, well, pick your favorite. I mean, a lot of the data companies have pivoted to AI. and I believe these are going to be powerful game changers. And the cloud brings, as you point out, that gives you a great degree of automation, and feeding it to it. 'Cause if the answer You need to be able to do that not in six months, Can you give us the status, you know, where you're at? And in July of last year, I joined as CEO. Yeah, so you guys were operational experts And it's largely because of what you described, So, I have to ask you a question as an investor. The last round was led by NEA. right, to get your name out there. You have to have evidence that the machinery that you build, And you can argue against it. And for that to happen, And best of luck with InfoWorks. Thank you for having me here. And thank you for watching, everybody.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

David DormanPERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

ZyngaORGANIZATION

0.99+

CiscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

January 2020DATE

0.99+

Ned HooperPERSON

0.99+

Amar ArsikerePERSON

0.99+

six monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

AT&TORGANIZATION

0.99+

BunoPERSON

0.99+

Centerview CapitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

NedPERSON

0.99+

Nexus Venture PartnersORGANIZATION

0.99+

third partnerQUANTITY

0.99+

2011DATE

0.99+

80%QUANTITY

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

12 monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

two partnersQUANTITY

0.99+

55%QUANTITY

0.99+

70QUANTITY

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

50 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

six daysQUANTITY

0.99+

thousandsQUANTITY

0.99+

first applicationQUANTITY

0.99+

one pieceQUANTITY

0.99+

10th yearQUANTITY

0.99+

HortonworksORGANIZATION

0.99+

InfoWorksORGANIZATION

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

nine monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

50 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

two fundsQUANTITY

0.99+

Buno PatiPERSON

0.99+

thirdQUANTITY

0.99+

three thingsQUANTITY

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

431 use casesQUANTITY

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

NetezzaORGANIZATION

0.99+

secondQUANTITY

0.99+

two key lessonsQUANTITY

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

singleQUANTITY

0.98+

three layersQUANTITY

0.98+

late 80sDATE

0.98+

MapRORGANIZATION

0.98+

Boston, MassachusettsLOCATION

0.98+

dozensQUANTITY

0.98+

three principlesQUANTITY

0.98+

10xQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

second thingQUANTITY

0.98+

17%QUANTITY

0.98+

2010DATE

0.97+

first 10 yearsQUANTITY

0.97+

ClouderaORGANIZATION

0.97+

todayDATE

0.97+

GardnerPERSON

0.96+

about 14 monthsQUANTITY

0.96+

John Chambers, Pensando Systems | Welcome to the New Edge 2019


 

(upbeat music) >> From New York City, it's theCUBE. Covering "Welcome To The New Edge." Brought to you by Pensando Systems. >> Hey, welcome back here ready. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We are high atop Goldman Sachs in downtown Manhattan, I think it's 43 floors, for a really special event. It's the Pensando launch. It's really called welcome to the new edge and we talked about technology. We had some of the founders on but, these type of opportunities are really special to talk to some really senior leaders and we're excited to have John Chambers back on, who as you know, historic CEO of Cisco for many, many years. Has left that, is doing his own ventures he's writing books, he's investing and he's, happens to be chairman of the board of Pensando. So John, thanks for taking a few minutes with us. >> Well, more than a few minutes, I think what we talked about today is a major industry change and so to focus on that and focus about the implications will be a lot of fun. >> So let's jump into it. So, one of the things you led with earlier today was kind of these 10 year cycles and they're not exactly 10 years, but you outlined a series of them from mainframe, mini client server everybody knows kind of the sequence. What do you think it is about the 10 year kind of cycle besides the fact that it's easy and convenient for us to remember, that, kind of paces these big disruptions? >> Well, I think it has to do with once a company takes off they tend to, dominate that segment of the industry for so long that even if a creative idea came up they were just overpowering. And then toward the end of a 10 year cycle they quit reinventing themselves. And we talked earlier about the innovator's dilemma and the implications for it. Or an architecture that was designed that suddenly can't go to the next level. So I think it's probably a combination of three or four different factors, including the original incumbent who broke the glass, disrupted others, not disrupting themselves. >> Right, but you also talked about a story where you had to shift focus based on some customer feedback and you ran Cisco for a lot longer than 10 years. So how do you as a leader kind of keep your ears open to something that's a disruptive change that's not your regular best customer and your regular best salesman asking for a little bit faster, a little bit cheaper, a little bit of more the same versus the significant disruptive transformational shift? >> Well this goes back to one of my most basic views in life is I think we learn more from our setbacks or setbacks we were part of, or even the missteps or mistakes than you ever do your successes. Everybody loves to talk about successes and I'm no different there. But when you watched a great state like West Virginia that was the chemical center of the world and the coal mining center of the world, the 125,000 coal mines, six miners very well paid, 6,000 of the top engineers in the world, it was the Silicon Valley of the chemical industry and those just disappear. And because our state did not reinvent itself, because the education system didn't change, because we didn't distract attract a new set of businesses in we just kept doing the right thing too long, we got left behind. Then I went to Boston, it was the Silicon Valley of the world. And Route 128 around Boston was symbolic with the Silicon Valley and I-101 and 280 around it. And we had the top university at that time. Much like Stanford today, but MIT generating new companies. We had great companies, DEC, Wang, Data General. Probably a million jobs in the area and because we got stuck in a segment of the market, quit listening to our customers and missed the transitions, not only did we lose probably 1.2 million jobs on it, 100,000 out of DEC, 32,000 out of Wang, etc, we did not catch the next generation of technology changes. So I understand the implications if you don't disrupt yourself. But I also learned, that if you're not regularly reinventing yourself, you get left behind as a leader. And one of my toughest competitors came up to me and said, "John, I love the way you're reinventing Cisco "and how you've done that multiple times." And then I turned and I said "That's why a CEO has got to be in the job "for more than four or five years" and he said, "Now we disagree again." Which we usually did and he said, "Most people can't reinvent themselves." And he said "I'm an example." "I'm a pretty good CEO" he's actually a very good CEO, but he said, "After I've been there three or four years "I've made the changes, that I know "I've got to go somewhere else." And he could see I didn't buy-in and then he said, "How many of your top 100 people "you've been happy with once they've been "in the job for more than five years?" I hesitated and I said "Only one." And he's right, you've got to move people around, you've got to get people comfortable with disruption on it and, the hardest one to disrupt are the companies or the leaders who've been most successful and yet, that's when you got to think about disruption. >> Right, so to pivot on that a little bit in terms of kind of the government's role in jobs, specifically. >> Yes. >> We're in this really strange period of time. We have record low unemployment, right, tiny, tiny unemployment, and yet, we see automation coming in aggressively with autonomous vehicles and this and that and just to pick truck drivers as a category, everyone can clearly see that autonomous vehicles are going to knock them out in the not too distant future. That said, there's more demand for truck drivers today than there's every been and they can't fill the positions So, with this weird thing where we're going to have a bunch of new jobs that are created by technology, we're going to have a bunch of old jobs that get displaced by technology, but those people aren't necessarily the same people that can leave the one and go to the other. So as you look at that challenge, and I know you work with a lot of government leaders, how should they be thinking about taking on this challenge? >> Well, I think you've got to take it on very squarely and let's use the U.S. as an example and then I'll parallel what France is doing and what India is doing that is actually much more creative that what we are, from countries you wouldn't have anticipated. In the U.S. we know that 50% of the Fortune 500 will probably not exist in 10 years, 12 at the most. We know that the large companies will not incrementally hire people over this next decade and they've often been one of the best sources of hiring because of AI and automation will change that. So, it's not just a question of being schooled in one area and move to another, those jobs will disappear within the companies. If we don't have new jobs in startups and if we don't have the startups running at about three to four times the current volumes, we've got a real problem looking out five to 10 years. And the startups where everyone thinks we're doing a good job, the app user, third to a half of what they were two decades ago. And so if you need 25 million jobs over this next decade and your startups are at a level more like they were in the 90s, that's going to be a challenge. And so I think we've got to think from the government perspective of how we become a startup nation again, how we think about long-term job creation, how we think about job creation not taking money out of one pocket and give it to another. People want a real job, they want to have a meaningful job. We got to change our K through 12 education system which is broken, we've got to change our university system to generate the jobs for where people are going and then we've got to retrain people. That is very doable, if you got at it with a total plan and approach it from a scale perspective. That was lacking. And one of the disappointing things in the debate last night, and while I'm a republican I really want who's going to really lead us well both at the presidential level, but also within the senate, the house. Is, there was a complete lack of any vision on what the country should look like 10 years from now, and how we're going to create 25 million jobs and how we're going to create 10 million more that are going to be displaced and how we're going to re-educate people for it. It was a lot of finger pointing and transactional, but no overall plan. Modi did the reverse in India, and actually Macron, in all places, in France. Where they looked at GDP growth, job creation, startups, education changes, etc, and they executed to an overall approach. So, I'm looking for our government really to change the approach and to really say how are we going to generate jobs and how are we going to deal with the issues that are coming at us. It's a combination of all the the above. >> Yep. Let's shift gears a little bit about the education system and you're very involved and you talked about MIT. Obviously, I think Stanford and Cal are such big drivers of innovation in the Bay area because smart people go there and they don't leave. And then there's a lot of good buzz now happening in Atlanta as an investment really piggy-backing on Georgia Tech, which also creates a lot of great engineers. As you look at education, I don't want to go through K through 12, but more higher education, how do you see that evolving in today's world? It's super expensive, there's tremendous debt for the kids coming out, it doesn't necessarily train them for the new jobs. >> Where the jobs are. >> How do you see, kind of the role of higher education and that evolving into kind of this new world in which we're headed? >> Well, the good news and bad news about when I look at successful startups around the world, they're always centered around a innovative university and it isn't just about the raw horse power of the kids, It starts with the CEO of the university, the president of the university, their curriculum, their entrepreneurial approach, do they knock down the barriers across the various groups from engineering to business to law, etc? And are they thinking out of box? And if you watch, there is a huge missing piece between, Georgia Tech more of an exception, but still not running at the level they need to. And the Northeast around Boston and New York and Silicon Valley, The rest of the country's being left behind. So I'm looking for universities to completely redo their curriculum. I'm looking for it really breaking down the silos within the groups and focus on the outcomes. And much like Steve Case has done a very good job on focusing, about the Rust Belt and how do you do startups? I'm going to learn from what I saw in France at Polytechnique and the ITs in India, and what occurred in Stanford and MIT used to occur is, you've got to get the universities to be the core and that's where they kids want to stay close to, and we've got to generate a whole different curriculum, if you will, in the universities, including, continuous learning for their graduates, to be able to come back virtually and say how do I learn about re-skilling myself? >> Yeah. >> The current model is just not >> the right model >> It's broken. >> For the, for going forward. >> K through 12 is >> hopelessly broken >> Yeah. >> and the universities, while were still better than anywhere else in the world, we're still teaching, and some of the teachers and some of the books are what I could have used in college. >> Right, right >> So, we got to rethink the whole curriculum >> darn papers on the inside >> disrupt, disrupt >> So, shifting gears a little bit, you, played with lots of companies in your CEO role you guys did a ton of M&A, you're very famous for the successful M&A that you did over a number of years, but in an investor role, J2 now, you're looking at a more early stage. And you said you made a number of investments which is exciting. So, as you evaluate opportunities A. In teams that come to pitch to you >> Yeah. >> B. What are the key things you look for? >> In the sequence you've raised them, first in my prior world, I was really happy to do 180 acquisitions, in my current world, I'm reversed, I want them to go IPO. Because you add 76% of your headcount after an IPO, or after you've become a unicorn. When companies are bought, including what I bought in my prior role, their headcount growth is pretty well done. We'd add engineers after that, but would blow them through our sales channel, services, finance, etc. So, I want to see many more of these companies go public, and this goes back to national agenda about getting IPO's, not back to where they were during the 90's when it was almost two to three times, what you've seen over the last decade. But probably double, even that number the 90's, to generate the jobs we want. So, I'm very interested now about companies going public in direction. To the second part of your question, on what do I look for in startups and why, if I can bridge it, to am I so faired up about Pensando? If I look for my startups and, it's like I do acquisitions, I develop a playbook, I run that playbook faster and faster, it's how I do digitization of countries, etc. And so for a area I'm going to invest in and bet on, first thing I look at, is their market, technology transition, and business model transition occurring at the same time. That was Amazon of 15 years ago as an example. The second thing I look at, is the CEO and ideally, the whole founding team but it's usually just the CEO. The third thing I look for, is what are the customers really say about them? There's only one Steve Jobs, and it took him seven years. So, I go to the customers and say "What do you really think of this company?" Fourth thing I look for, is how close to an inflection point are they. The fifth thing I look for, is what they have in their ecosystem. Are they partnering? Things of that type. So, if I were to look at Pensando, Which is really the topic about can they bring to the market the new edge in a way that will be a market leading force for a whole decade? Through a ecosystem of partners that will change business dramatically and perhaps become the next major tech icon. It's how well you do that. Their vision in terms of market transitions, and business transitions 100% right. We've talked about it, 5G, IOT, internet of things, going from 15 billion devices to 500 billion devices in probably seven years. And, with the movement to the edge the business models will also change. And this is where, democratization, the cloud, and people able to share that power, where every technology company becomes a business becomes a, every business company becomes a technology company. >> Right. >> The other thing I look at is, the team. This is a team of six people, myself being a part of it, that thinks like one. That is so unusual, If you're lucky, you get a CEO and maybe a founder, a co-founder. This team, you've got six people who've worked together for over 20 years who think alike. The customers, you heard the discussions today. >> Right. >> And we've not talked to a single cloud player, a single enterprise company, a single insurance provider, or major technology company who doesn't say "This is very unique, let's talk about "how we work together on it." The inflection point, it's now you saw that today. >> Nobody told them it's young mans game obviously, they got the twenty-something mixed up >> No, actually were redefining (laughs) twenty-something, (laughs) but it does say, age is more perspective on how you think. >> Right, right. >> And Shimone Peres, who, passed away unfortunately, two years ago, was a very good friend. He basically said "You've got all your life "to think like a teenager, "and to really think and dream out of box." And he did it remarkably well. So, I think leaders, whether their twenty-something, or twenty-some years of experience working you've got to think that way. >> Right. So I'm curious, your take on how this has evolved, because, there was data and there was compute. And networking brought those two thing together, and you were at the heart of that. >> Mm-hmm. Now, it's getting so much more complex with edge, to get your take on edge. But, also more importantly exponential growth. You've talked about going from, how ever many millions the devices that were connected, to the billions of devices that are connected now. How do you stay? How do you help yourself think along exponential curves? Because that is not easy, and it's not human. But you have to, if you're going to try to get ahead of that next wave. >> Completely agree. And this is not just for me, how do I do it? I'm sharing it more that other people can learn and think about it perhaps the same way. The first thing is, it's always good to think of the positive, You can change the world here, the positive things, But I've also seen the negatives we talked about earlier. If you don't think that way, if you don't think that way as a leader of your company, leader of your country, or the leader of a venture group you're going to get left behind. The implications for it are really bad. The second is, you've got to say how do you catch and get a replicable playbook? The neat thing about what were talking about, whether it's by country in France, or India or the U.S., we've got replicable playbooks we know what to run. The third element is, you've got to have the courage to get outside your comfort zone. And I love change when it happens to you, I don't like it when it happens to me And I know that, So, I've got to get people around me who push me outside my comfort zone on that. And then, you've got to be able to dream and think like that teenager we talked about before. But that's what we were just with a group of customers, who were at this event. And they were asking "How do we get "this innovation into our company?" "How do we get the ability to innovate, through not just strategic partnerships with other large companies or partnerships with startups?" But "How do we build that internally?" It's comes down to the leader has to create that image and that approach. Modi's done it for 1.3 billion people in India. A vision, of the future on GDP growth. A digital country, startups, etc. If they can do it for 1.3 billion, tell me why the U.S. can not do it? (laughs) And why even small states here, can't do it. >> Yeah. Shifting gears a little bit, >> All right. >> A lot of black eyes in Silicon Valley right now, a lot of negativity going on, a lot of problems with privacy and trading data for currency and, it's been a rough road. You're way into tech for good and as you said, you can use technology for good you can use technology for bad. What are some things you're doing on the tech for good side? Because I don't think it gets the spotlight that it probably should, because it doesn't sell papers. >> Well, actually the press has been pretty good we just need to do it more on scale. Going back to Cisco days, we never had any major issues with governments. Even though there was a Snowden issue, there were a lot of implications about the power of the internet. Because we work with governments and citizens to say "What are the legitimate needs so that everybody benefits from this?" And where the things that we might have considered doing that, governments felt strongly about or the citizens wouldn't prosper from we just didn't do it. And we work with democrats and republicans alike and 90% of our nation believed tech was for good. But we worked hard on that. And today, I think you got to have more companies doing this and then, what, were doing uniquely in JC2, is were literally partnering with France on tech is for good and I'm Macron's, global tech ambassador and we focus about job creation and inclusion. Not just in Paris, or around Station F but throughout all the various regions in the country. Same thing within India, across 26 different states with Modi on how do you drive it through? And then if we can do it in France or India why can't we do it in each state in the U.S.? Partnering with West Virginia, with a very creative, president of the university there West Virginia University. With the democrats and republicans in their national senate, but also within the governor and speaker of the house and the president and senate within West Virginia, and really saying were going to change it together. And getting a model that you can then cookie cut across the U.S. if you change the curriculum, to your earlier comments. If you begin to focus on outcomes, not being an expert in one area, which is liable not to have a job >> Right. >> Ten years later. So, I'm a dreamer within that, but I think you owe an obligation to giving back, and I think they're all within our grasps >> Right >> And I think you can do, the both together. I think at JC2 we can create a billion dollar company with less than 10 people. I think you can change the world and also make a very good profit. And I think technology companies have to get back to that, you got to create more jobs than you destroy. And you can't be destroying jobs, then telling other people how to live their lives and what their politics should be. >> Yeah. >> That just doesn't work in terms of the environment. >> Well John, again, thanks for your time. Give you the last word on >> Sure >> Account of what happened here today, I mean you're here, and Tony O'Neary was here or at the headquarters of Goldman. A flagship launch customer, for the people that weren't here today why should they be paying attention? >> Well, if we've got this market transition right, the technology and business model, the next transition will be everything goes to the edge. And as every company or every government, or every person has to be both good in their "Area of expertise." or their vertical their in, they've got to also be good in technology. What happened today was a leveling of the playing field as it relates to cloud. In terms of everyone should have choice, democratization there, but also in architecture that allows people to really change their business models, as everything moves to the edge where 75% of all transactions, all data will be had and it might even be higher than that. Secondly, you saw a historic first never has anybody ever emerged from stealth after only two and a half years of existing as a company, with this type of powerhouse behind them. And you saw the players where you have a customer, Goldman Sachs, in one of the most leading edge areas, of industry change which is obviously finance leading as the customer who's driven our direction from the very beginning. And a company like NetApp, that understood the implication on storage, from two and a half years ago and drove our direction from the very beginning. A company like HP Enterprise's, who understood this could go across their whole company in terms of the implications, and the unique opportunity to really change and focus on, how do they evolve their company to provide their customer experience in a very unique way? How do you really begin to think about Equinix in terms of how they changed entirely from a source matter prospective, what they have to do in terms of the direction and capabilities? And then Lightspeed, one of the most creative intra capital that really understands this transition saying "I want to be a part of this." Including being on the board and changing the world one more time. So, what happened today? If we're right, I think this was the beginning of a major inflection point as everything moves to the edge. And how ecosystem players, with Pensando at the heart of that ecosystem, can take on the giants but also really use this technology to give everybody choice, and how they really make a difference in the future. As well as, perhaps give back to society. >> Love it. Thank you John >> My pleasure, that was fun. >> Appreciate it. You're John, I'm Jeff you're watching theCUBE. Thanks for watching, we'll see you next time. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Oct 18 2019

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Pensando Systems. and he's, happens to be chairman of the board of Pensando. focus on that and focus about the implications So, one of the things you led with earlier today and the implications for it. a little bit of more the same versus the and, the hardest one to disrupt are the companies of the government's role in jobs, specifically. that can leave the one and go to the other. And one of the disappointing things and to really say how are we going to generate jobs are such big drivers of innovation in the Bay area and it isn't just about the raw horse power of the kids, and some of the teachers and some of the books are what I the successful M&A that you did over a number of years, and ideally, the whole founding team the team. you saw that today. on how you think. "and to really think and dream out of box." and you were at the heart of that. how ever many millions the devices that were connected, But I've also seen the negatives we talked about earlier. Yeah. and as you said, you can use technology for good and the president and senate within West Virginia, but I think you owe an obligation to giving back, And I think technology companies have to get back to that, Give you the last word on or at the headquarters of Goldman. and drove our direction from the very beginning. Thank you John we'll see you next time.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JohnPERSON

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

Steve CasePERSON

0.99+

Tony O'NearyPERSON

0.99+

fiveQUANTITY

0.99+

Jeff FrickPERSON

0.99+

IndiaLOCATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

CiscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

Steve JobsPERSON

0.99+

FranceLOCATION

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

DECORGANIZATION

0.99+

ParisLOCATION

0.99+

WangORGANIZATION

0.99+

Shimone PeresPERSON

0.99+

76%QUANTITY

0.99+

10 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

StanfordORGANIZATION

0.99+

AtlantaLOCATION

0.99+

1.3 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

New York CityLOCATION

0.99+

MITORGANIZATION

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

12QUANTITY

0.99+

New YorkLOCATION

0.99+

90%QUANTITY

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

ModiPERSON

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

seven yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Goldman SachsORGANIZATION

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

six peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

MacronPERSON

0.99+

6,000QUANTITY

0.99+

PensandoORGANIZATION

0.99+

100,000QUANTITY

0.99+

Georgia TechORGANIZATION

0.99+

John ChambersPERSON

0.99+

10 yearQUANTITY

0.99+

75%QUANTITY

0.99+

180 acquisitionsQUANTITY

0.99+

six minersQUANTITY

0.99+

32,000QUANTITY

0.99+

West Virginia UniversityORGANIZATION

0.99+

1.2 million jobsQUANTITY

0.99+

second partQUANTITY

0.99+

Route 128LOCATION

0.99+

50%QUANTITY

0.99+

third elementQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

West VirginiaLOCATION

0.99+

U.S.LOCATION

0.99+

three timesQUANTITY

0.99+

Pensando SystemsORGANIZATION

0.99+

JC2ORGANIZATION

0.99+

26 different statesQUANTITY

0.99+

Data GeneralORGANIZATION

0.99+

125,000 coal minesQUANTITY

0.99+

EquinixORGANIZATION

0.99+

dman SachsORGANIZATION

0.99+

I-101LOCATION

0.99+

Station FLOCATION

0.99+

four yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Yuvi Kochar, GameStop | Mayfield People First Network


 

>> Announcer: From Sand Hill Road in the heart of Silicon Valley, it's theCUBE, presenting the People First Network, insights from entrepreneurs and tech leaders. (bright electronic music) >> Everyone, welcome to this special CUBE conversation. We're here at Sand Hill Road at Mayfield Fund. This is theCUBE, co-creation of the People First Network content series. I'm John Furrier, host of theCUBE. Our next guest, Yuvi Kochar, who's the Data-centric Digital Transformation Strategist at GameStop. Variety of stints in the industry, going in cutting-edge problems around data, Washington Post, comScore, among others. You've got your own practice. From Washington, DC, thanks for joining us. >> Thank you, thanks for hosting me. >> This is a awesome conversation. We were just talking before we came on camera about data and the roles you've had over your career have been very interesting, and this seems to be the theme for some of the innovators that I've been interviewing and were on the People First is they see an advantage with technology, and they help companies, they grow companies, and they assist. You did a lot of different things, most notably that I recognized was the Washington Post, which is on the mainstream conversations now as a rebooted media company with a storied, historic experience from the Graham family. Jeff Bezos purchased them for a song, with my opinion, and now growing still, with the monetization, with subscriber base growing. I think they're number one in subscribers, I don't believe, I believe so. Interesting time for media and data. You've been there for what, how many years were you at the Washington Post? >> I spent about 13 years in the corporate office. So the Washington Post company was a conglomerate. They'd owned a lot of businesses. Not very well known to have owned Kaplan, education company. We owned Slate, we owned Newsweek, we owned TV stations and now they're into buying all kinds of stuff. So I was involved with a lot of varied businesses, but obviously, we were in the same building with the Washington Post, and I had front row seat to see the digital transformation of the media industry. >> John: Yeah, we-- >> And how we responded. >> Yeah, I want to dig into that because I think that illustrates kind of a lot what's happening now, we're seeing with cloud computing. Obviously, Cloud 1.0 and the rise of Amazon public cloud. Clearly, check, done that, a lot of companies, startups go there. Why would you provision a data center? You're a startup, you're crazy, but at some point, you can have a data center. Now, hybrid cloud's important. Devops, the application development market, building your own stack, is shifting now. It seems like the old days, but upside down. It's flipped around, where applications are in charge, data's critical for the application, infrastructure's now elastic. Unlike the old days of here's your infrastructure. You're limited to what you can run on it based on the infrastructure. >> Right. >> What's your thoughts on that? >> My thoughts are that, I'm a very, as my title suggests, data-centric person. So I think about everything data first. We were in a time when cloud-first is becoming old, and we are now moving into data-first because what's happening in the marketplace is the ability, the capability, of data analytics has reached a point where prediction, in any aspect of a business, has become really inexpensive. So empowering employees with prediction machines, whether you call them bots, or you call them analytics, or you call them machine learning, or AI, has become really inexpensive, and so I'm thinking more of applications, which are built data-out instead of data-in, which is you build process and you capture data, and then you decide, oh, maybe I should build some reporting. That's what we used to do. Now, you need to start with what's the data I have got? What's the data I need? What's the data I can get? We were just talking about, everybody needs a data monetization strategy. People don't realize how much asset is sitting in their data and where to monetize it and how to use it. >> It's interesting. I mean, I got my computer science degree in the 80s and one of the tracks I got a degree in was database, and let's just say that my main one was operating system. Database was kind of the throwaway at that time. It wasn't considered a big field. Database wasn't sexy at all. It was like, database, like. Now, if you're a database, you're a data guru, you're a rock star. The world has changed, but also databases are changing. It used to be one centralized database rules the world. Oracle made a lot of money with that, bought all their competitors. Now you have open source came into the realm, so the world of data is also limited by where the data's stored, how the data is retrieved, how the data moves around the network. This is a new dynamic. How do you look at that because, again, lagging in business has a lot to do with the data, whether it's in an application, that's one thing, but also having data available, not necessarily in real time, but if I'm going to work on something, I want the data set handy, which means I can download it or maybe get real-time. What's your thoughts on data as an element in all that moving around? >> So I think what you're talking about is still data analytics. How do I get insights about my business? How do I make decisions using data in a better way? What flexibility do I need? So you talk about open source, you think about MongoDB and those kind of databases. They give you a lot of flexibility. You can develop interesting insights very quickly, but I think that is still very much thinking about data in an old-school kind of way. I think what's happening now is we're teaching algorithms with data. So data is actually the software, right? So you get an open source algorithm. I mean Google and everybody else is happy to open source their algorithms. They're all available for free. But what, the asset is now the data, which means how you train your algorithm with your data, and then now, moving towards deploying it on the edge, which is you take an algorithm, you train it, then you deploy it on the edge in an IoT kind of environment, and now you're doing decision-making, whether it's self-driving cars, I mean those are great examples, but I think it's going down into very interesting spaces in enterprise, which is, so we have to all think about software differently because, actually, data is a software. >> That's an interesting take on it, and I love that. I mean I wrote a blog post in 2007 when we first started playing with the, in looking at the network effects on social media and those platforms was, I wrote a post, it was called Data is the New Development Kit. Development kit was what people did back then. They had a development kit and they would download stuff and then code, but the idea was is that data has to be part of the runtime and the compilation of, as software acts, data needs to be resident, not just here's a database, access it, pull it out, use it, present it, where data is much more of a key ingredient into the development. Is that kind of what you're getting at? >> Yes. >> Notion of-- >> And I think we're moving from the age of arithmetic-based machines, which is we put arithmetic onto chips, and we then made general-purpose chips, which were used to solve a huge amount of problems in the world. We're talking about, now, prediction machines on a chip, so you think about algorithms that are trained using data, which are going to be available on chips. And now you can do very interesting algorithmic work right on the edge devices, and so I think a lot of businesses, and I've seen that recently at GameStop, I think business leaders have a hard time understanding the change because we have moved from process-centric, process automation, how can I do it better? How can I be more productive? How can I make better decisions? We have trained our business partners on that kind of thinking, and now we are starting to say, no, no, no, we've got something that's going to help you make those decisions. >> It's interesting, you mentioned GameStop. Obviously, well-known, my sons are all gamers. I used to be a gamer back before I had kids, but then, can't keep up anymore. Got to be on that for so long, but GameStop was a retail giant in gaming. Okay, when they had physical displays, but now, with online, they're under pressure, and I had interviewed, again, at an Amazon event, this Best Buy CIO, and he says, "We don't compete with price anymore. "If they want to buy from Amazon, no problem, "but our store traffic is off the charts. "We personalize 50,000 emails a day." So personalization became their strategy, it was a data strategy. This is a user experience, not a purchase decision. Is this how you guys are thinking about it at GameStop? >> I think retail, if you look at the segment per se, personalization, Amazon obviously led the way, but it's obvious that personalization is key to attract the customer. If I don't know what games you play, or if I don't know what video you watched a little while ago, about which game, then I'm not offering you the product that you are most prone or are looking for or what you want to buy, and I think that's why personalization is key. I think that's-- >> John: And data drives that, and data drives that. >> Data drives that, and for personalization, if you look at retail, there's customer information. You need to know the customer. You need to know, understand the customer preferences, but then there's the product, and you need to marry the two. And that's where personalization comes into play. >> So I'll get your thoughts. You have, obviously, a great perspective on how tech has been built and now working on some real cutting-edge, clear view on what the future looks like. Totally agree with you, by the way, on the data. There's kind of an old guard/new guard, kind of two sides of the street, the winners and the losers, but hey, look, I think the old guard, if they don't innovate and become fresh and new and adopt the modern things that need to attract the new expectations and new experiences from their customers, are going to die. That being said, what is the success formula, because some people might say, hey, I'm data-driven. I'm doing it, look at me, I'm data. Well, not really. Well, how do you tell if someone's really data-driven or data-centric? What's the difference? Is there a tell sign? >> I think when you say the old guard, you're talking about companies that have large assets, that have been very successful in a business model that maybe they even innovated, like GameStop came up with pre-owned games, and for the longest of times, we've made huge amount of revenue and profit from that segment of our business. So yes, that's becoming old now, but I think the most important thing for large enterprises at least, to battle the incumbent, the new upstarts, is to develop strategies which are leveraging the new technologies, but are building on their existing capability, and that's what I drive at GameStop. >> And also the startups too, that they were here in a venture capital firm, we're at Mayfield Fund, doing this program, startups want to come and take a big market down, or come in on a narrow entry and get a position and then eat away at an incumbent. They could do it fast if they're data-centric. >> And I think it's speed is what you're talking about. I think the biggest challenge large companies have is an ability to to play the field at the speed of the new upstarts and the firms that Mayfield and others are investing in. That's the big challenge because you see this, you see an opportunity, but you're, and I saw that at the Washington Post. Everybody went to meetings and said, yes, we need to be digital, but they went-- >> They were talking. >> They went back to their desk and they had to print a paper, and so yes, so we'll be digital tomorrow, and that's very hard because, finally, the paper had to come out. >> Let's take us through the journey. You were the CTO, VP of Technology, Graham Holdings, Washington Post, they sold it to Jeff Bezos, well-documented, historic moment, but what a storied company, Washington Post, local paper, was the movie about it, all the historic things they've done from a reporting and journalism standpoint. We admire that. Then they hit, the media business starts changing, gets bloated, not making any money, online classifieds are dying, search engine marketing is growing, they have to adjust. You were there. What was the big, take us through that journey. >> I think the transformation was occurring really fast. The new opportunities were coming up fast. We were one of the first companies to set up a website, but we were not allowed to use the brand on the website because there was a lot of concern in the newsroom that we are going to use or put the brand on this misunderstood, nearly misunderstood opportunity. So I think it started there, and then-- >> John: This is classic old guard mentality. >> Yes, and it continued down because people had seen downturns. It's not like media companies hadn't been through downturns. They had, because the market crashes and we have a recession and there's a downturn, but it always came back because-- >> But this was a wave. I mean the thing is, downturns are economic and there's business that happens there, advertisers, consumption changes. This was a shift in their user base based upon a technology wave, and they didn't see it coming. >> And they hadn't ever experienced it. So they were experiencing it as it was happening, and I think it's very hard to respond to a transformation of that kind in a very old-- >> As a leader, how did you handle that? Give us an example of what you did, how you make your mark, how do you get them to move? What were some of the things that were notable moments? >> I think the main thing that happened there was that we spun out washingtonpost.com. So it became an independent business. It was actually running across the river. It moved out of the corporate offices. It went to a separate place. >> The renegades. >> And they were given-- >> John: Like Steve Jobs and the Macintosh team, they go into separate building. >> And we were given, I was the CTO of the dotcom for some time while we were turning over our CTO there, and we were given a lot of flexibility. We were not held accountable to the same level. We used the, obviously, we used-- >> John: You were running fast and loose. >> And we were, yes, we had a lot of flexibility and we were doing things differently. We were giving away the content in some way. On the online side, there was no pay wall. We started with a pay wall, but advertising kind of was so much more lucrative in the beginning, that the pay wall was shut down, and so I think we experimented a lot, and I think where we missed, and a lot of large companies miss, is that you need to leave your existing business behind and scale your new business, and I think that's very hard to do, which is, okay, we're going to, it's happening at GameStop. We're no longer completely have a control of the market where we are the primary source of where, you talk about your kids, where they go to get their games. They can get the games online and I think-- >> It's interesting, people are afraid to let go because they're so used to operating their business, and now it has to pivot to a new operating model and grow. Two different dynamics, growth, operation, operating and growing. Not all managers have that growth mindset. >> And I think there's also an experience thing. So most people who are in these businesses, who've been running these businesses very successfully, have not been watching what's happening in technology. And so the technology team comes out and says, look, let me show you what we can do. I think there has to be this open and very, very candid discussion around how we are going to transform-- >> How would you talk about your peer, developed peers out there, your peers and other CIOs, and even CISOs on the security side, have been dealing with the same suppliers over, and in fact, on the security side, the supplier base is getting larger. There's more tools coming out. I mean who wants another tool? So platform, tool, these are big decisions being made around companies, that if you want to be data-centric, you want to be a data-centric model, you got to understand platforms, not just buying tools. If you buy a hammer, they will look like a nail, and you have so many hammers, what version, so platform discussions come in. What's your thoughts on this? Because this is a cutting-edge topic we've been talking about with a lot of senior engineering leaders around Platform 2.0 coming, not like a classic platform to... >> Right, I think that each organization has to leverage or build their, our stack on top of commodity platforms. You talked about AWS or Azure or whatever cloud you use, and you take all their platform capability and services that they offer, but then on top of that, you structure your own platform with your vertical capabilities, which become your differentiators, which is what you take to market. You enable those for all your product lines, so that now you are building capability, which is a layer on top of, and the commodity platforms will continue to bite into your platform because they will start offering capabilities that earlier, I remember, I started at this company called BrassRing, recruitment automation. One of the first software-as-a-service companies, and I, we bought a little company, and the CTO there had built a web server. It was called, it was his name, it was called Barrett's Engine. (chuckles) And so-- >> Probably Apache with something built around it. >> So, in those days, we used to build our own web servers. But now today, you can't even find an engineer who will build a web server. >> I mean the web stack and these notions of just simple Web 1.0 building blocks of change. We've been calling it Cloud 2.0, and I want to get your thoughts on this because one of the things I've been riffing on lately is this, I remember Marc Andreessen wrote the famous article in Wall Street Journal, Software is Eating the World, which I agree with in general, no debate there, but also the 10x Engineer, you go into any forum online, talking about 10x Engineers, you get five different opinions, meaning, a 10x Engineer's an engineer who can do 10 times more work than an old school, old classical engineer. I bring this up because the notion of full stack developer used to be a real premium, but what you're talking about here with cloud is a horizontally scalable commodity layer with differentiation at the application level. That's not full stack, that's half stack. So you think the world's kind of changing. If you're going to be data-centric, the control plane is data. The software that's domain-specific is on top. That's what you're essentially letting out. >> That's what I'm talking about, but I think that also, what I'm beginning to find, and we've been working on a couple of projects, is you put the data scientists in the same room with engineers who write code, write software, and it's fascinating to see them communicate and collaborate. They do not talk the same language at all. >> John: What's it like? Give us a mental picture. >> So a data scientist-- >> Are they throwing rocks at each other? >> Well, nearly, because the data scientists come from the math side of the house. They're very math-oriented, they're very algorithm-oriented. Mathematical algorithms, whereas software engineers are much more logic-oriented, and they're thinking about scalability and a whole lot of other things, and if you think about, a data scientist develops an algorithm, it rarely scales. You have to actually then hand it to an engineer to rewrite it in a scalable form. >> I want to ask you a question on that. This is why I got you and you're an awesome guest. Thanks for your insights here, and we'll take a detour into machine learning. Machine learning really is what AI is about. AI is really nothing more than just, I love AI, it gets people excited about computer science, which is great. I mean my kids talk about AI, they don't talk about IoT, which is good that AI does that, but it's really machine learning. So there's two schools of thought on machine. I call it the Berkeley school on one end, not Berkeley per se but Berkeley talks about math, machine learning, math, math, math, and then you have other schools of thought that are on cognition, that machine learning should be more cognitive, less math-driven, spectrum of full math, full cognition, and everything in between. What's your thoughts on the relationship between math and cognition? >> Yeah, so it's interesting. You get gray hair and you kind of move up the stack, and I'm much more business-focused. These are tools. You can get passionate about either school of thought, but I think that what that does is you lose sight of what the business needs, and I think it's most important to start with what are we here trying to do, and what is the best tool? What is the approach that we should utilize to meet that need? Like the other day, we were looking at product data from GameStop, and we know that the quality of data should be better, but we found a simple algorithm that we could utilize to create product affinity. Now whether it's cognition or math, it doesn't matter. >> John: The outcome's the outcome. >> The outcome is the outcome, and so-- >> They're not mutually exclusive, and that's a good conversation debate but it really gets to your point of does it really matter as long as it's accurate and the data drives that, and this is where I think data is interesting. If you look at folks who are thinking about data, back to the cloud as an example, it's only good as what you can get access to, and cybersecurity, the transparency issue around sharing data becomes a big thing. Having access to the data's super important. How do you view that for, as CIOs, and start to think about they're re-architecting their organizations for these digital transformations. Is there a school of thought there? >> Yes, so I think data is now getting consolidated. For the longest time, we were building data warehouses, departmental data warehouses. You can go do your own analytics and just take your data and add whatever else you want to do, and so the part of data that's interesting to you becomes much more clean, much more reliable, but the rest, you don't care much about. I think given the new technologies that are available and the opportunity of the data, data is coming back together, and it's being put into a single place. >> (mumbles) Well, that's certainly a honeypot for a hacker, but we'll get that in a second. If you and I were doing a startup, we say, hey, let's, we've got a great idea, we're going to build something. How would we want to think about the data in terms of having data be a competitive advantage, being native into the architecture of the system. I'll say we use cloud unless we need some scale on premise for privacy reasons or whatever, but we would, how would we go to market, and we have an app, as apps defined, great use case, but I want to have extensibility around the data, I don't want to foreclose any future options, How should I think about my, how should we think about our data strategy? >> Yes, so there was a very interesting conversation I had just a month ago with a friend of mine who's working at a startup in New York, and they're going to build a solution, take it to market, and he said, "I want to try it only in a small market "and learn from it," and he's going very old school, focus groups, analytics, analysis, and I sat down, we sat at Grand Central Station, and we talked about how, today, he should be thinking about capturing the data and letting the data tell him what's working and what's not working, instead of trying to find focus groups and find very small data points to make big decisions. He should actually utilize the target, the POC market, to capture data and get ready for scale because if you want to go national after having run a test in... >> Des Moines, Iowa. >> Part of New York or wherever, then you need to already have built the data capability to scale that business in today's-- >> John: Is it a SaaS business? >> No, it's a service and-- >> So he can instrument it, just watch the data. >> And yes, but he's not thinking like that because most business people are still thinking the old way, and if you look at Uber and others, they have gone global at such a rapid pace because they're very data-centric, and they scale with data, and they don't scale with just let's go to that market and then let's try-- >> Yeah, ship often, get the data, then think of it as part of the life cycle of development. Don't think it as the old school, craft, launch it, and then see how it goes and watch it fail or succeed, and know six months later what happened, know immediately. >> And if you go data-centric, then you can turn the R&D crank really fast. Learn, test and learn, test and learn, test and learn at a very rapid pace. That changes the game, and I think people are beginning to realize that data needs to be thought about as the application and the service is being developed, because the data will help scale the service really fast. >> Data comes into applications. I love your line of data is the new software. That's better than the new oil, which has been said before, but data comes into the app. You also mentioned that app throws off data. >> Yuvi: Yes. >> We know that humans have personal, data exhaust all the time. Facebook made billions of dollars on our exhaust and our data. The role of data in and out of the application, the I/O of the application, is a new concept, you brought that up. I like that and I see that happening. How should we capture that data? This used to be log files. Now you got observability, all kinds of new words kind of coming into this cloud equation. How should people think about this? >> I think that has to be part of the design of your applications, because data is application, and you need to design the application with data in mind, and that needs to be thought of upfront, and not later. >> Yuvi, what's next for you? We're here in Sand Hill Road, VC firm, they're doing a lot of investments, you've got a great project with GameStop, you're advising startups, what's going on in your world? >> Yes, so I'm totally focused, as you probably are beginning to sense, on the opportunity that data is enabling, especially in the enterprise. I'm very interested in helping business understand how to leverage data, because this is another major shift that's occurring in the marketplace. Opportunities have opened up, prediction is becoming cheap and at scale, and I think any business runs on their capability to predict, what is the shirt I should buy? How many I should buy? What color should I buy? I think data is going to drive that prediction at scale. >> This is a legit way that everyone should pay attention to. All businesses, not just one-- >> All businesses, everything, because prediction is becoming cheap and automated and granular. That means you need to be able to not just, you need to empower your people with low-level prediction that comes out of the machines. >> Data is the new software. Yuvi, thanks so much for great insight. This is theCUBE conversation. I'm John Furrier here at Sand Hill Road at the Mayfield Fund, for the People First Network series. Thanks for watching. >> Yuvi: Thank you. (bright electronic music)

Published Date : Sep 11 2019

SUMMARY :

Announcer: From Sand Hill Road in the heart of the People First Network content series. and the roles you've had over your career So the Washington Post company was a conglomerate. Obviously, Cloud 1.0 and the rise of Amazon public cloud. and then you decide, oh, and one of the tracks I got a degree in was database, So data is actually the software, right? of the runtime and the compilation of, as software acts, that's going to help you make those decisions. Is this how you guys are thinking about it at GameStop? I think retail, if you look at the segment per se, but then there's the product, and you need to marry the two. and become fresh and new and adopt the modern things I think when you say the old guard, And also the startups too, that they were here That's the big challenge because you see this, and they had to print a paper, and so yes, Washington Post, they sold it to Jeff Bezos, I think the transformation was occurring really fast. They had, because the market crashes and we have a recession I mean the thing is, downturns are economic and I think it's very hard to respond to a transformation It moved out of the corporate offices. John: Like Steve Jobs and the Macintosh team, and we were given a lot of flexibility. is that you need to leave your existing business behind and now it has to pivot to a new operating model and grow. I think there has to be this open and in fact, on the security side, and you take all their platform capability and services But now today, you can't even find an engineer but also the 10x Engineer, you go into any forum online, and it's fascinating to see them communicate John: What's it like? and if you think about, a data scientist and then you have other schools of thought but I think that what that does is you lose sight as what you can get access to, and cybersecurity, much more reliable, but the rest, you don't care much about. being native into the architecture of the system. and letting the data tell him what's working Yeah, ship often, get the data, then think of it That changes the game, and I think people but data comes into the app. the I/O of the application, is a new concept, and you need to design the application with data in mind, I think data is going to drive that prediction at scale. This is a legit way that everyone should pay attention to. you need to empower your people with low-level prediction Data is the new software. (bright electronic music)

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Marc AndreessenPERSON

0.99+

Yuvi KocharPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

Jeff BezosPERSON

0.99+

GameStopORGANIZATION

0.99+

2007DATE

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

GrahamPERSON

0.99+

New YorkLOCATION

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

10 timesQUANTITY

0.99+

Washington PostORGANIZATION

0.99+

YuviPERSON

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Washington, DCLOCATION

0.99+

Steve JobsPERSON

0.99+

KaplanORGANIZATION

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

MacintoshORGANIZATION

0.99+

two schoolsQUANTITY

0.99+

BerkeleyORGANIZATION

0.99+

Sand Hill RoadLOCATION

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

Mayfield FundORGANIZATION

0.99+

a month agoDATE

0.99+

Graham HoldingsORGANIZATION

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

People First NetworkORGANIZATION

0.98+

SlateORGANIZATION

0.98+

MayfieldORGANIZATION

0.98+

comScoreORGANIZATION

0.98+

six months laterDATE

0.98+

tomorrowDATE

0.98+

NewsweekORGANIZATION

0.98+

Best BuyORGANIZATION

0.98+

BrassRingORGANIZATION

0.98+

two sidesQUANTITY

0.98+

washingtonpost.comOTHER

0.97+

50,000 emails a dayQUANTITY

0.97+

about 13 yearsQUANTITY

0.97+

MongoDBTITLE

0.97+

80sDATE

0.97+

Software is Eating the WorldTITLE

0.96+

ApacheORGANIZATION

0.96+

Des Moines, IowaLOCATION

0.96+

dotcomORGANIZATION

0.96+

five different opinionsQUANTITY

0.96+

Cloud 1.0TITLE

0.95+

CUBEORGANIZATION

0.95+

one endQUANTITY

0.95+

Mayfield People First NetworkORGANIZATION

0.94+

Grand Central StationLOCATION

0.94+

each organizationQUANTITY

0.94+

Jay Carney, AWS | AWS Public Sector Summit 2019


 

>> Narrator: Live from Washington D.C., it's theCUBE. Covering AWS Public Sector Summit. Brought to you by Amazon Web Services. >> Welcome back, everyone, to Washington D.C. and theCUBE's live coverage of AWS Public Sector Summit. I'm your host, Rebecca Knight, alongside John Furrier. We are joined by Jay Carney. He is the senior vice president global corporate affairs Amazon and AWS. Thank you so much for coming on theCUBE. >> Thank you so much for having me. It's great to be here. >> You are just coming from a panel with Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, where the topic was regulation and tech. I want to hear what was talked about and what your thoughts were there. >> Sure, there were a lot of topics, including the HQ2, which as you know, we're locating in northern Virginia. Senator Warner has a very specific interest in that, and we talked about that a lot. One thing that he's involved in, he's the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, the leading democrat on the committee, and he takes these issue very seriously. He's very focused on, especially social media, but tech in general and national security concerns, as well as issues around deep fake news and fake news and the like. Now, a lot of that isn't our territory as a business, but we think that where we do fall into scrutiny for regulation, we welcome the scrutiny. We're a big company, obviously, and we're very focused on serving our customers. Part of delivering for our customers means ensuring that we work with elected officials and regulators and pass that scrutiny well. We'll see what the future brings in different spaces. Our concern, or our hope in general, if it's around privacy or other areas of tech regulation, that uniformity is obviously preferable to having, say, 50 state laws, whether it's around facial recognition technology or broader privacy initiatives. Senator Warner's supportive of a federal legislation, as a lot of folks are both sides of the aisle. >> Jay one of the things that you guys live every day at Amazon, and following you guys for the past nine, ten years now for theCUBE, is you're willing to be misunderstood as a company to continue the long game. Jeff Bezos talked about the long game all the time. Doesn't look at stock prices, all those kind of quips, but the innovation engine has been very strong, and with digital transformation now at an all time high, new value is being created in new ways that some people don't understand. You guys are on a constant mission to educate. Here in D.C., what's clear to me is this awakening of this value proposition, and in some cases, it's not very good, the value. Weaponizing is a word we've heard. Big tech is kind of under a lot of conversations, but there's a lot of good things happening. You guys create a lot of value as a company-- >> Sure, and I think the industry at large creates a lot of value. I think we need to ensure, we, the American people, American citizenry, and on our behalf, those elected officials who ultimately make the decisions, that as we scrutinize and explore regulating some of these arenas, that we do it in a way that creates public benefit, that prevents, wherever possible, misuse of technology, but that continues to allow the kind of innovation that's made the United States the center of technological innovation over the last 30 or 40 years. That's not an easy job, but I think that folks in tech need to work with and collaborate with regulators and lawmakers to talk about how to do that because you wouldn't want, I mean, a good example, I think is technological innovation is value neutral, usually. It's a new service or a new product that can do something. It itself is just a product, so it doesn't have a conscience. It's self moral. How you use it is really what determines whether it's something that's good or bad. Many technologies can be used for good or for ill. We have a service at AWS, a facial recognition service. We're certainly not the only company that provides that service to customers. Thus far, since Amazon recognition has been around, we've had reports of thousands of positive uses, finding missing children, breaking up human sex trafficking, human trafficking rings, assisting law enforcement in positive ways. We haven't heard yet any cases of abuses by law enforcement, but we certainly understand that that potential exists, and we encourage regulators and lawmakers to look closely at that. We've put forth publicly guidelines that we think would be useful as they build a legislative, a regulatory framework. >> (mumbles) asking last night even was saying you guys are very open. He wasn't hiding behind any kind of stories. How do we talk to regulators? We want to embrace those conversations. He wasn't saying, "We want to be regulated." He didn't say that, but he wasn't hiding from the fact that these conversations we need to have. >> I think we understand that the potential misuse of some technology is real. We've seen it in other countries, for example, in ways that violate civil liberties. We want to make sure that in this democracy, that we have an infrastructure in place, a regulatory infrastructure, that continues to allow innovation to blossom but protects the civil liberties of people in the United States. We're a global company, but we started off, and we are an American company, and we care deeply about those issues as a company. >> I think that that's really the big question, is how would this regulatory process work? You're talking about having these conversations, particularly around unintended consequences of these new technologies and services. How would it work? Particularly, someone like you who was in government, now in the private sector, at what point are these conversations taking place, and how might it work? At the innovation stage? At the creation, you know what I mean? Just now that we're really getting into it. >> In some cases, there's real progress being made. On privacy for example, all of your viewers no GDPR in Europe was the first multinational comprehensive privacy regulation that's been implemented. In the United States, we don't have a federal law yet. California's taken steps, has passed a bill, and other states are looking at it. We think for U.S. competitiveness, one law is better than 50 laws. We think that we're fully compliant with GDPR, and it actually was not as complicated for us to meet the compliance requirements as it might've been for other tech companies because of the nature of our business in the European Union. There are aspects of GDPR that I think are unnecessarily bureaucratic or clunky, so there's ways to take that as a base and improve it so that the privacy concerns are rightfully addressed, but innovation continues at pace. >> How about antitrust? We had a conversation a couple years ago to reinvent around antitrust. You made a comment to me, we're faster, ship faster, lower cheaper price, lower prices, how are people harmed? There's been a lot of young academics who are challenging the old antitrust definition. Does digital recast itself in antitrust? This is a conversation that think tanks are starting to have now around what does that mean for the modern era, or modernizing government, including laws of regulation? Your thoughts on that. >> I'm not a lawyer. I'm careful to speak authoritatively where I don't know all the details. Consumer harm is the standard. For all the reasons that you described, our mission as a company is to reward the customer with more convenience, more selection, and lower prices. Certainly, we fulfill that mission and don't meet that standard when it comes to any way you might look at that competitively. Even more broadly, there's a misconception about Amazon. Because we're a consumer-facing business primarily, and because we are involved in a lot of different things, some more successfully than others, that we're perceived as bigger than we are. The fact is retail, our original business, our core business, is the biggest marketplace there is. In the United States, we're less than 4% of retail, and we're not even the biggest retailer in the United States. Cloud, AWS, we're here at the Public Sector Summit. >> You've got competition-- >> We have intense, high quality competition, and deep-pocketed competition. As you know, and your viewers know this, the cloud revolution is in its early stages. The opportunity there is enormous, and we're just getting started. There'll be plenty of winners in this space, so again, I don't see any way that you might look at it, that there would be competitive issues. Also, there's a perception that Amazon itself is singular, so that you buy from Amazon, therefore you're not buying from somebody else, but in fact, when we opened Marketplace, I think in 2001, we opened the website to other sellers. What used to be 100% Amazon product and inventory for sale on amazon.com, has now, 2019, risen to over 55% not being Amazon. Third-party sellers, small and medium sized businesses, more than a million of them in the United States, sell in our store and get access to all the customers we have through our store. That side of our business is growing much faster than the Amazon retail business, and I think it demonstrates the value proposition for all of the small and medium sized businesses. >> Yeah, we've got time for one more question, for Rebecca and I, one, you might have one. As Steve Jobs once said, technology, liberal arts, you've got the nice street signs kind of intersecting, I think that plays now more than ever societal impact has become a huge part of the conversation around tech, tech impact. You're a policy expert. You've been studying it. You're living in D.C. The policy game seems to be more important now than ever before around tech and the participation of technology companies in policy, not just hiring a policy firm, or a team to do it, actively engage and be, as an ingredient of the company. Is there enough people (laughs) that can actually do that, one, and what are some of the key policy opportunities are out there for either young individuals, like my daughter, or other young people coming out of college? Because it seems to me the game is shaping into a new direction. >> The space is fascinating because these issues really are front and center right now around questions around technology and how to ensure that as it continues to evolve that it does so in a way that allows for innovation but also protects private, civil liberties, and the like. You can't be in a more exciting space if you're going to be in the private sector engaging in policy. Even if you're in government, if you're on that side, it's a very interesting space to be in. All of it, tech has grown up, the internet has grown up, and there's no question that with that more attention is being paid. That's fine and appropriate. >> More responsibility and accountability. >> More responsibility, sure. >> I just have one more final thing in this. Because of your vantage point of someone who is in a famously tech savvy administration, the Obama Administration, and then we also see lawmakers questioning Mark Zuckerberg, seemingly not understanding how Facebook makes money, do lawmakers get it? >> I think a lot of lawmakers do. I was just with one, Mark Warner, from Virginia, U.S. senator, former telecomm executive and investor. He very much gets it. The caricature is, I think, exaggerated, but look, that's our job. It's our job, it's the press', it's everybody... One thing we do here with the team we have in D.C. is be a resource of information, try to explain, here's what's happening. Here's how our model works. Here's how the technology works. I think that can only help as regulators and lawmakers decide how they want to approach these problems. >> A lot of innovation opportunities. Just the CIA deal alone is set off from a gestation period, now growth around cloud acceleration. >> I think it demonstrates in a way we're very customer focused, and that is especially true when it comes to our national security agencies and defense agencies, but also that security's our first concern at AWS, as well as at broader Amazon. We're glad to have those customers. >> Thanks for coming by. >> Yup, thanks a lot. >> Yes, excellent. Thanks so much, Jay. >> Thank you. >> I'm Rebecca Knight for John Furrier. Please stay tuned for more of theCUBE AWS Public Sector. We will have Theresa Carlson coming up next. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Jun 11 2019

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Amazon Web Services. He is the senior vice president It's great to be here. and what your thoughts were there. legislation, as a lot of folks are both sides of the aisle. Jay one of the things that you guys live every day but that continues to allow from the fact that these conversations a regulatory infrastructure, that continues to allow At the creation, you know what I mean? In the United States, we don't have a federal law yet. This is a conversation that think tanks are starting to have For all the reasons that you described, for all of the small and medium sized businesses. and the participation of technology companies in policy, that as it continues to evolve that it does so and accountability. and then we also see lawmakers questioning It's our job, it's the press', it's everybody... Just the CIA deal alone is set off from a gestation period, but also that security's our first concern at AWS, Thanks so much, Jay. We will have Theresa Carlson coming up next.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Jay CarneyPERSON

0.99+

RebeccaPERSON

0.99+

Rebecca KnightPERSON

0.99+

Jeff BezosPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

JayPERSON

0.99+

Steve JobsPERSON

0.99+

Amazon Web ServicesORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Theresa CarlsonPERSON

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

United StatesLOCATION

0.99+

Senate Intelligence CommitteeORGANIZATION

0.99+

2001DATE

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

D.C.LOCATION

0.99+

Mark WarnerPERSON

0.99+

VirginiaLOCATION

0.99+

GDPRTITLE

0.99+

Obama AdministrationORGANIZATION

0.99+

Mark ZuckerbergPERSON

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

SenatorPERSON

0.99+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.99+

CIAORGANIZATION

0.99+

amazon.comORGANIZATION

0.99+

2019DATE

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

Washington D.C.LOCATION

0.99+

less than 4%QUANTITY

0.99+

northern VirginiaLOCATION

0.99+

50 state lawsQUANTITY

0.99+

more than a millionQUANTITY

0.99+

one lawQUANTITY

0.99+

50 lawsQUANTITY

0.99+

both sidesQUANTITY

0.98+

last nightDATE

0.98+

OneQUANTITY

0.98+

Public Sector SummitEVENT

0.97+

over 55%QUANTITY

0.97+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

one more questionQUANTITY

0.97+

first concernQUANTITY

0.97+

WarnerPERSON

0.96+

ten yearsQUANTITY

0.95+

thousandsQUANTITY

0.95+

AWS Public Sector SummitEVENT

0.94+

European UnionORGANIZATION

0.92+

AWS Public Sector Summit 2019EVENT

0.88+

Narrator:TITLE

0.84+

couple years agoDATE

0.82+

AWS Public SectorORGANIZATION

0.81+

CaliforniaORGANIZATION

0.78+

One thingQUANTITY

0.72+

40 yearsQUANTITY

0.71+

U.S.LOCATION

0.67+

last 30DATE

0.65+

one more finalQUANTITY

0.64+

CloudORGANIZATION

0.62+

AmericanOTHER

0.6+

Karen Quintos, Dell Technologies | Dell Technologies World 2019


 

>> Live from Las Vegas, it's theCUBE covering Dell Technology's World 2019. Brought to you by Dell Technologies and it's ecosystem partners. >> Hi, welcome to theCUBE Lisa Martin with Stu Miniman and we are live at Dell Technologies World 2019 in Las Vegas with about 15,000 or so other people. There's about 4,000 of the Dell Technologies community of partners here as well. Day one as I mentioned, we're very pleased to welcome back one of our cube alumni, Karen Quintos, EVP and Chief Customer Officer from Dell Technologies, Karen, welcome back to theCUBE. >> Thank you, thank you. Always great to be with you all. >> So one of the things you walk down on stage this morning with Michael Dell and and the whole gang and you started to share a story that I'd love for you to share with our audience about this darling little girl, Phoebe from Manchester, England that has to do with this Dell Technologies partnership with Deloitte Detroit and 3D prosthetics. Can you share this story and what it meant about this partnership. >> Well we wanted to tell this story about Phoebe because we really wanted the audience to understand the innovation and all of what's done it with social good is really about the individual, You know, technology plays a key role but the face behind the technology and the innovation are people and you know, as you mention Phoebe is from Manchester, U.K. Her father wrote this blog about Phoebe's experience. Phoebe's aunt, Claire works for Deloitte. She had access to a lot of what they could do in terms of 3D printing and basically came to Dell and we were able to take it and scale it and accelerate it and speed it up with a engineer by the name of Seamus who saw what the precision workstation could do. So it was this small idea to help an amazing little girl like this that has now turned into this movement around how do we more rapidly, quickly scale 3D prosthetics so these children and adults can have a chance at a normal life so. >> What kind of prosthetics did you guys build for her? >> It's an arm, so the very first arm that we built for her when she was about five years old had the frozen Disney theme painted on it. I asked her father Keith what is the one that she's wearing now because she's now this like really super cool seven-year-old that goes to school and all of her classmates and friends around her see her as this rock star and the one that she has today is printed with unicorns and rainbows. So if you know anything about seven-year-old girls, it's all about unicorns and rainbows and she's done an amazing thing and she's inspired so many other people around the world, individuals, customers, partners like Deloitte and others that we're working with to really take this to a whole new level. >> Karen, I think back to Dell you know, if you think back a couple of decades ago you know, drove a lot of the some of the waves of technology change you know, think back to the PC, but in the early days it was you know supply chain and simple ordering in all these environments and when I've watched Dell move into the enterprise, a lot of that is, I need to be listening to my customer, I need to be much closer to them because it's not just ordering your SKU and having it faster and at a reasonable price but there's a lot more customization. Can you talk about how you're kind of putting that center, that customer in the center of the discussion and that feedback loops that you have with them, how that's changed in Dell. >> Yeah sure, so all of the basic fundamentals around you got to order, deliver, make the supply chain work to deliver for our customers still matters but it's gone beyond that to your point and probably the best way to talk about it is these six customer award winners that we recognized last night. I've gotten to know all six of those over the last year and while they are doing amazing things from a digital transformation using technology in the travel business, the automotive business, banking, financial services, insurance, kind of across the board, the thing that they say consistently is look, we didn't always have the answer in terms of what we needed but you came in, you listened, you rolled up your sleeves to try to figure out how you could design a solution that would meet the needs that we have and they said, that's why you're one of the most strategic partners that we have. Now you can do all those other things, right? You can supply chain ride and build and produce and all that but it's the design of a solution that helps us do the things that will allow us to be differentiated and you look at that list of six customers and brands that they represent, right, Carnival Cruise Lines, USAA, Bradesco, McLaren I mean, the list kind of goes on, they are the differentiators out there and we're really honored to be able to be working with them. >> So we're only a day one and it's only just after lunchtime but one of the things I think somatically that I heard this morning in the keynote with Michael and Pat and Jeff and Satya and yourself is, it's all about people. A couple interviews I did earlier today, same sort of thing, it's like we had the city of Las Vegas on. This is all driven by the people in for the people so that sense of community is really strong. I also noticed this year's theme of real transformation, parlays off last year's theme of make it real, it being digital transformation, IT, security, workforce transformation, what are some of the things that were like at Dell Technologies. Cloud this morning for example, VMware Cloud on Dell EMC that you guys specifically heard say from last year's attendees that are manifesting in some of the announcements today and some of the great things the 15 or so thousand people here are going to get to see and feel and touch at this year's event? >> Well, Lisa you nailed it. What you heard on stage today is what customers have been telling us over the last year. We unveiled about a month ago with a very small group of CIOs in Amia, our cloud strategy, our portfolio, the things that we're going to be able to do and one customer in particular immediately chimed in and said, we need you in the cloud and we need you in there now because you offer choice, you offer open, you offer simplicity, you offer integration and they're like, there's just too many choices and a lot of them are expensive. So what you heard on stage is absolutely a manifestation of what they told us. The other pieces, look, I think I think the industry and CIOs are very quickly realizing their workforce matters, making them happy and productive matters having them enabled that they can work flexibly wherever they want to really, really matters and you know, our Unified Workspace ONE solution is all about how we help them simplify, automate, streamline that experience with their workforce so their employees stick around. I mean, there's a war on talent and everybody's dealing with it and that experience is really, really important in particular to the gensies and the millennials. >> Karen, I love that point. Actually, I was really impressed this morning. In the press and analyst session this morning, there was a discussion of diversity and inclusion and the thing that I heard is, it's a business imperative, it's not, okay it's nice to do it or we should do it but no, this is actually critical to the business. Can you talk about what that means and what you hear from your customers and partners. >> Yes, yes, well, we're seeing it in spades and all of these technology jobs that are open, right. So look, all the research has shown that if you build a diverse team, you'll get to a more innovative solution and people generally get that but what they really get today is here in the U.S. alone, there's 1.1 million open technology jobs by the year 2024, half of them, half of them are going to be filled by the existing workforce. So there is this war in talent that is going to get bigger and bigger and bigger and I think that's what really has given a wake-up call to corporations around why this matters. I think the other piece that we're starting to see, not just around diversity but in our other social impact priorities around the environment as well as how we use our technology for good, look, customers want to do business with a corporation that has a soul and they stand for something and they're doing something, not just a bunch of talking heads but where it's really turning into action and they're being transparent about the journeys and where they're at with it. So it matters now to the current generation, the next generation, it matters to business leaders, matters to the financial services community, which you start to see you know, some of the momentum around you know, the black stones and state street. So it's really exciting that we're part of it and we're leading the way in a lot of number of areas. >> And it's something to that we talked about a lot on theCUBE, diversity and inclusion from many different levels, one of them being the business imperative that you talked about, the workforce needing to compete for this talent, but also how much different products and technologies and apps and APS and things can be with just thought diversity in and of itself and I think it's refreshing to what Stu was saying, hey, we're hearing this is a business imperative but you're also seeing proof in the pudding. This isn't just, we've got an imperative and we're going to do things nominally, you're seeing the efforts manifest. One of the, Draper Labs who was one of the customer award winners. That video that was shown this morning struck probably everyone's heart with the campfire in Paradise California. >> Tragic. >> I grew up close to there and that was something that only maybe, I get goosebumps, six months ago, so massively devastating and we think you know, that was 2018 but seeing how Dell Technologies is enabling this laboratory to investigate the potential toxins coming from all of this chart debris and how they're working to understand the social impact to all of us as they rebuild, I just thought it was a really nice manifestation of a social impact but also the technology breadth and differentiation that Dell has enabling. >> That was also why this story today was so great about Phoebe, right because it's where you can connect the human spirit with technology and scale and have an even bigger impact and there's so much that technology can help with today. You know, that that story about Phoebe. From the time that her aunt from Deloitte identified, you know, what we could do, all the way to the time that Phoebe got her first arm was less than seven months, seven months and you think about you know, some of the other prototypes that were out there, times would take years to be able to do it. So I love that you know, connection of human need with the human spirit and connecting and inspiring and motivating so many children and adults around the world. >> And what what are some of the next, speaking of Phoebe and the Deloitte digital 3D prosthetics partnership, what are some of the other areas we're going to see this technology that this little five-year-old from Manchester spurned. >> Well, I'll give you another example. So we, there was an individual in India, actually an employee of ours that designed an application to help figure out how to deploy healthcare monitoring in some of the remote villages in India where they don't have access to basic things that we take for granted. Monitoring your blood pressure, right, checking your cholesterol level and he created this application that a year later now, we have given kind of the full range of the Dell portfolio technology suite. So it is you know our application plus Pivotal plus VMware plus Dell EMC combined with the partnering that we've done with Tata Trust and the State of India, we've now deployed this healthcare solution called Life Care Solution to nearly 37 million rural residents, citizens in India. >> Wow 37 million. >> 37 million, so a small idea, you take from a really passionate individual, a person, a human being and figure out how you can really leverage that across the full gamut of what Dell can do, I think the results are incredible. >> Awesome, you guys also have a Women in Technology Executive Summit that you're hosting later this week. Let's talk about that in conjunction of what we talked a minute ago about, it's a business imperative as Stu pointed out, there are tangible, measurable results, tell us about this. >> Well, I'm kind of done honestly with a lot of the negativity around, oh, we're not making any progress, oh, we need to be moving fast and if you look at the amount of effort, energy and focus that is going into this space by so many companies and the public sector, it's remarkable and I've met a number of these CIOs over the last year or two, so we basically said let's invite 20 of them, let's share our passion, have made progress, care about solving this across their organization. A lot of us are working on the same things so if we simply got in a room and figured out, are their power in numbers and if we worked collectively together, could we accelerate progress. So that's what it's all about. So we have about 15 or 20 CEOs, both men and women and we'll be spending you know, six or seven hours together and we want to walk away with one or two recommendations on some things that we could collaborate on and have a faster, bigger impact. >> And I heard that, you mentioned collaboration, that's one of the vibes I also got from the keynote this morning when you saw Michael up there with Pat and Jeff and Satya, the collaboration within Dell Technologies, I think even talking with Stu and some of the things that have come out and that I've read, it seems to be more symbiosis with VMware but even some the, like I said, we're only in, I wouldn't even say halfway through day one and that is the spirit around here. We talk about people influence, but this spirit of collaboration is very authentic here. You are the first chief customer officer for Dell, if you look back at your tenure in this role, could you have envisioned where you are now? >> No, because it was like the first ever chief customer officer at Dell and you know, it really gave me a unique opportunity to build something from scratch and you know, there's been a number of other competitors as well as other companies that have announced in the last year or so the need to have a chief customer officer, the need to figure out how, which is a big remit of mine across Dell Technologies, how do we how do we eliminate the silos and connect the seams because that's where the value is going to be unlocked for our customers. That's what you saw on stage today. You saw the value of that with Jeff, with Pat, with Satya, some you know, one of our most important partners out there. Our customers don't want point solutions, they want them to be integrated, they want it to be streamlined, they don't be automated, they want us to speed time to value, they want us to streamline a lot of the back-office kind of mundane things that they're like, I don't want my people spending their time anymore and doing that and that's where we see Dell Technologies being so much more differentiated from other choices in the market. >> Yep, I agree with you. Well Karen, thank you so much for joining Stu and me on theCUBE this afternoon, sharing some of the stories, look forward to hearing next year what comes out of this year's as Women in Tech Exec Summit. Thank you so much for your time. >> Thank you very much, thank you. >> with Stu Miniman, I'm Lisa Martin, you're watching theCUBE, live day one of Dell Technology World from Las Vegas, thanks for watching. (light electronic music)

Published Date : Apr 29 2019

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Dell Technologies There's about 4,000 of the Always great to be with you all. So one of the things you and you know, as you mention Phoebe is and the one that she has today is printed a lot of that is, I need to and probably the best way to talk about it and some of the great things the 15 and said, we need you in the cloud and what you hear from your and people generally get that that you talked about, the and we think you know, that was 2018 and adults around the world. and the Deloitte digital Trust and the State of India, that across the full gamut Awesome, you guys also have a and the public sector, it's remarkable and that is the spirit around here. and connect the seams sharing some of the stories, of Dell Technology World from Las Vegas,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
ClairePERSON

0.99+

KarenPERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

Karen QuintosPERSON

0.99+

DeloitteORGANIZATION

0.99+

IndiaLOCATION

0.99+

Stu MinimanPERSON

0.99+

BradescoORGANIZATION

0.99+

Michael DellPERSON

0.99+

Dell TechnologiesORGANIZATION

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

USAAORGANIZATION

0.99+

Tata TrustORGANIZATION

0.99+

KeithPERSON

0.99+

PatPERSON

0.99+

PhoebePERSON

0.99+

2018DATE

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

McLarenORGANIZATION

0.99+

Carnival Cruise LinesORGANIZATION

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

seven monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

MichaelPERSON

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

2024DATE

0.99+

first armQUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

StuPERSON

0.99+

six customersQUANTITY

0.99+

SatyaPERSON

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

a year laterDATE

0.99+

Manchester, EnglandLOCATION

0.99+

37 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

Draper LabsORGANIZATION

0.99+

20QUANTITY

0.99+

less than seven monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

U.S.LOCATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

ManchesterLOCATION

0.99+

six months agoDATE

0.98+

last nightDATE

0.98+

Women in Tech Exec SummitEVENT

0.98+

this yearDATE

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

Manchester, U.K.LOCATION

0.98+

Kevin Akeroyd, Cision | CUBEConversation, March 2019


 

(upbeat music) >> From our studios in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, California, this is a CUBE conversation. >> Hello everyone, welcome to Palo Altos Cube Studios for CUBE Conversation. I'm John Furrier, co-host of theCUBE. We're with Kevin Ackroyd, CEO of Cision, CUBE Alumni. He's been on before. Building one of the most compelling companies that's disrupting and changing the game in Comms, advertising, PR, with Cloud technologies. Kevin, great to see you again, thanks for coming in. >> Likewise John, It's really good to be back. >> So, we haven't chatted in two years. You've been busy. Our last conversation was the beginning of 2017. Cision's done a lot of interesting things. You've got a lot of M and A under your belt. You're putting this portfolio together with Cloud technologies. Really been interesting. I really got to say I think you cracked the code on I think a new reality, a new economic reality. Also new capabilities for comms folks. Congratulations. >> Thank you, it's been a fun ride. >> So give us the update. So two years since we talked, how many deals, companies have you bought? What's the headcount, what's the revenue? Give us an update. >> In the four years, 12 acquisitions, seven of which have happened since I've been here. Up to 4,500 employees in over 40 countries. Customer count has grown to over 50,000 customers globally. Revenue's kind of gone from 500s to just shy of 800 million. A lot of leadership changes, and as you just mentioned, pretty seismic change, finally. We've certainly been the catalyst and the cattle prod for that seismic change around tech, data, measurement and analytics finally becoming mature and adopted inside this line of business like the Chief Communication Officer, the earn media folks. To say that they were not tech savvy a few years ago would be an understatement. So, a lot's been going on. >> Yeah, and certainly the trend is your friend, in my opinion, for you. But I think the reality is not yet upon people's general mindset. It's coming quickly, so if you look at some of the big trends out there. Look at fake news, look at Facebook, look at the Google effect. Elizabeth Warren wants to break up Big Tech, Amazon. Cloud computing, in that time period that you were, prior to just going to Cision, you had Oracle Cloud, done a lot of great things on the Marketing Cloud side. But the timing of Cloud computing, the timing of how media has changed. There's not many journalists anymore. We had Andy Cunningham, a legendary industry veteran, formerly of Cunningham Communications. He did the PR for Steve Jobs. You said, there's no more journalists, a few left, but you got to tell your story direct to the consumer. >> You do. >> This is now a new marketing phenomenon. This is a tailwind for you at Cision because you guys, although put these cubbies together, have a unique vision around bringing brand value advertising at PR economics. >> Yeah, that's a good way to put it. >> Tell us the vision of Cision and specifically the shift that's happening. Why are you guys important? What wave are you riding? >> So, there's a couple shifts, John. You and I have talked about this in previous programs There's this shift of the line of business, having to work in a whole bunch of non-integrated point solutions. The CFO used to live in 17 different applications from 17 vendors. That's all squished together. Now I buy from one Cloud platform, right, from Oracle or SAP. Same thing happened in Human Capital Management. 22 things squished into the Cloud, one from Workday, right. Same thing happened, you had 25 different things for sales and service. That all squished together, into one CRM in the Cloud, I buy from Salesforce, right. And our last rodeo, the early part of this stack, it was me and Adobe battling it out for the right to go squish the entire the LUMAscape into a marketing cloud, right, so there could be one ring to rule them all for the CMO. So, it happens in every single category. It just hasn't had over here, happened on the earned media side and the Chief Communications Officer. So, bringing the tech stack so that now we are for the CCO what Adobe is for the CMO what Salesforce is for the CRO, Workday is for the CHRO. That has to happen. You can't do, you can't manage it this way without sophisticated tech, without automation, without integration, you can't do it. The second thing that had to happen, especially in marketing and advertising, they all figured out how to get revenue credit. Advertising was a slow single-digit CAGR industry for 50 years. And then something happened. After 5% CAGR for 50 years, and then something happened over the next 10 years. Digital paid went from like 15 billion to 150 billion. And what happened is that old, I know half my advertising is wasted on this one half. That went bye-bye. Now I know immediately, down to the page, down the ad unit, down to this, exactly what worked, right. When I was able to put Pixels on ads, John, you'd go to that page, Pixel would go on you, It would follow you around If you ended up putting something in the e-commerce shop that ad got credit. I'm not saying that's right, I'm just saying that's how the entire-- >> But that's how the infrastructure would let you, allowed you, it enabled you to do that. Then again, paid advertising, paid search, paid advertising, that thing has created massive value in here. >> Massive value. But my buyer, right, so the person that does the little ad on the most regional tech page got credit. My buyer that got Bob Evans, the Cloud King, to write an article about why Microsoft is going to beat AWS, he's a credible third party influencer, writing objectively. That article's worth triple platinum and has more credibility than 20,000 Microsoft sales reps. We've never, until Cision, well let's Pixel that, let's go figure out how many of those are the target audience. Let's ride that all the way down to the lead form that's right. Basically it's super simple. Nobody's ever tracked the press releases, the articles or any of the earned media content, the way people have tracked banner ads or e-commerce emails. Therefore this line of business never get revenue credit. It stayed over here in the OpEx pile where things like commerce and advertising got dumped onto the revenue pile. Well, you saw the crazy investment shift. So, that's really the more important one, is Comms is finally getting quantified ROI and business's attribution like their commerce and advertising peers for the first time ever in 2018 via what Cision's rolled out. That's the exciting piece. >> I think, I mean, I guess what I hear you saying is that for the first time, the PR actually can be measured, similar to how advertising >> You got it. >> Couldn't be measured then be measured. Now PR or communications can be measured. >> They get measured the same way. And then one other thing. That ad, that press release, down to the business event. This one had $2 million dollars of ad spend, this one had no ad spend. When it goes to convert, in CRM or it goes to convert on a website, this one came from banner ad, this one came from credible third party content. Guess which one, not only had zero ad spend instead of $2 million in ad spend. Guess which one from which source actually converts better. It's the guy that chose to read credible third-party article. He's going to convert in the marketing system way better that somebody who just clicked on the ad. >> Well certainly, I'm biased-- >> So all the way down the funnel, we're talking about real financial impact based on capturing earned media ID, which is pretty exciting. >> Well, I think the more exciting thing is that you're basically taking a value that is unfunded quote by the advertising firm, has no budget basically, or thin budgets, trying to hit an organic, credible outlet which is converting in progression to a buyer, an outcome. That progression is now tracked. But let's just talk about the economics because you're talking about $2 million in spend, it could be $20 million. The ratio between ad spend and conversion to this new element you mentioned is different. You're essentially talking about the big mega trend, which is organic content. Meaning connecting to sources. >> That's right. >> That flow. Of course, we believe and we, at the Cube, everyone's been seeing that with our business. Let's talk about that dynamic because this is not a funded operationalized piece yet, so we've been seeing, in the industry, PR and comms becoming more powerful. So, the Chief Communication Officer isn't just rolling out press releases, although they have to do that to communicate. You've got medium posts now, you've got multiple channels. A lot of places to put the story. So the Chief Communication Officer really is the Chief Storyteller Officer, Not necessarily the CMO. >> Emphatically. >> The Martech Stack kind of tracking. So talk about that dynamic. How is the Chief Communication Officer role change or changing? Why is that important and what should people be thinking about, if they are a Chief Communication Officer? >> You know, it's interesting. There's a, I'm just going to call it an actual contradiction on this front. When you and I were getting out of our undergrad, 7 out of 10 times that CCO, the Chief Communication Officer, worked for the CEO and 30% of time other. Yet the role was materially narrow. The role has exploded. You just said it pretty eloquently. This role has really exploded and widened its aperture. Right now though 7 out of 10 of them actually do work for the CMO, which is a pretty interesting contradiction. And only 30% of them work for the CEO. Despite the fact that from an organizational stand point, that kind of counter intuitive org move has been made. It doesn't really matter because, so much of what you just said too, you was in marketing's purview or around brand or around reputation or around telling the story or around even owning the key assets. Key assets isn't that beautiful Budweiser frog commercial they played on Super Bowl anymore. The key assets are what's getting done over in the communications, in part. So, from a storytelling standpoint, from an ownership of the narrative, from a, not just a product or a service or promotion, but the whole company, the whole brand reputation, the goodwill, all of that is comms. Therefore you're seeing comms take the widest amount of real estate around the boardroom table than they've ever had. Despite the fact that they don't sit in the chair as much. I mentioned that just because I find it very interesting. Comms has never been more empowered, never had a wider aperture. >> But budget wise, they're not really that loaded up with funding. >> And to my earlier point, it's because they couldn't show. Super strategic. Showing ROI. >> So, showing ROI is critical. >> Not the quality of clippings. >> It was the Maslow of Hierarchy of Needs if you can just show me that I put a quarter in and I got a dollar out. Like the ads and the e-commerce folks do. It simply drives the drives me. >> So take us through some of those analytics because people who know about comms, the old school comms people who are doing this, they should really be thinking about what their operation is because, can I get an article in the Wall Street Journal? Can Silicon Angle write about us? I've got to get more clippings. That tend to be the thing. Did we get the press release out on time? They're not really tied into some of the key marketing mix pieces. They tend to be kind of a narrow scope. Those metrics were pretty clear. What are the new metrics? What's the new operational playbook.? >> Yeah, we call those Vanity Metrics. I cared about theoretical reach. Hey, Yahoo tells me I reached 222 billion people, so I plug in 222 billion people. I reached more people than there are on the planet with this PR campaign. I needed to get to the basic stuff like how many people did I actually reach, number one. But they don't, they do theoretical reach. They work in things like sentiment. Well, I'm going to come up with, 100 reporters wrote about me. I'm going to come up with, how many of them I thought were positive, negative, neutral. Sentiment analysis, they measure number of reporters or hits versus their competitors and say, Proctor and Gamble rolled out this diaper product, how did I do this five days? How much did Proctor and Gamble diapers get written about versus Craft diapers versus Unilever's. Share a voice. Not irrelevant metrics. But not metrics the CEO and the CFO are going to invest in. >> Conversion to brand or sales, those kind of things? >> They never just never existed. Those never existed. Now when we can introduce the same exact metrics that the commerce and the ad folks do and say, I can tell you exactly how many people. I can tell you exactly who they were, demographic, firmographic, lifestyle, you name it. I can tell you who the audience is you're reaching. I can tell you exactly what they do. When those kind of people read those kind of articles or those kind of people read those kind of press releases, they go to these destinations, they take these behaviors. And because I can track that all the way down to whatever that success metric is, which could be a lead form if I'm B2B for pipe. It could be a e-commerce store from B2C. It could be a rating or review or a user generation content gourd. It could be a sign up and register, if I'm trying to get database names. Whatever the business metric is. That's what the commerce and the ad people do all day every day. That's why they are more funded than ever. The fact that press releases, articles, tweets, blogs, the fact that the earned media stuff has never been able to do those things is why they just continue to suffer and have had a real lack of investment prices going on for the last 20 year. >> Talk about the trend around-- >> It's simple stuff. >> I know, if you improve the ROI, you get more budget. >> It really is that simple. >> That's been the challenge. I think PR is certainly becoming, comms is becoming more powerful. People know I talk about it all the time. I think comms is the new CMO I think command and control and organic content work together in the organic. We've seen it first hand in our business. But, it's an issue of tech savviness and also vision. A lot of people just are uncomfortable shifting to the new realities. >> That's for sure. >> What are some of the people tech savvy look at when they look at say revamping comms platform or strategy versus say old school? >> I'll give you two answers on that, John. Here is one thing that is good for us, that 7 out of 10 to the CCOs work for the CMO. Because when I was in this seat starting to light that fire under the CMO for the first time, which was not that long ago, and they were not tech savvy, and they were not sophisticated. They didn't know how to do this stuff either. That was a good 10 year journey to get the CMO from not sophisticated to very sophisticated. Now they're one of the more sophisticated lines of business in the world. But that was a slog. >> So are we going to see a Comms Stack? Like Martech, ComTech. >> ComTech is the decision communication Cloud, is ComTech. So we did it. We've built the Cloud stack. Again like I said, just like Adobe has the tech stack for marketing, Cision has the tech stack for comms, and we've replicated that. But because the CCO works for the CMO and the CMO's already been through this. Been through this with Ad Techs, been through this with MarTech, been through this with eCommerce, been through this with Web. You know, I've got a three or four year sophistication path this time just because >> The learnings are there >> The company's already done it everywhere else. The boss has already done it everywhere else. >> So the learnings are there from the MarTech so it's a pretty easy leap to take? >> That's exactly right. >> It's just-- >> How CommTech works is shocking. Incredibly similar to how MarTech and AdTech work. A lot of it is the same technology, just being applied different. >> That's good news >> So, the adoption curve for us is a fantastic thing. It's a really good thing for us that 70% of them work for CMOs because the CMO is the most impatient person on the planet, to get this over because the CMO is sick of doing customer journeys or omni channel across just paid and owned. They recognize that the most influential thing to influence you, it's not their emails, it's not their push notifications, It's not their ads. It's recognizing which credible third-party content you read, getting them into that, so that they're influencing you. >> It's kind of like Google PageRank in the old days. This source is more relevant than that one, give it more weight. >> And now all of a sudden if I have my Cision ID, I can plug in the more weight stuff under your profile. I want to let him go across paid and owned too, I materially improve the performance of the paid and owned because I'm putting in the really important signal versus what's sitting over there in the DMP or the CDP, which is kind of garbage. That's really important. >> I really think. >> I thinks you've got a home run here. I think you've really cracked the code on this. I think you are absolutely right on the money with comms and CommsTech. I see it all the time. In my years of experiences, it's so obvious. Then again, the tailwind is that they've been through the MarTech. The question I have for you is cultural shift. That's a big one. So, I'm out evangelizing all the time about the CUBE Cloud and some of the things we're doing. I run into the deer in the headlights on one side, what do you mean? And then people like, I believe, I totally understand. The believers and the non believers. What's the cultural shift? Because some chief comms op, they're very savvy, progressive, we've got to make the shift. How do they get the ship to turn? What are some of the cultural challenges? >> And boy is that right. I felt the same thing, getting more doing it with the CMO. A lot of people kept their head in the sand until they got obsoleted. They didn't know. Could they not see the train coming? They didn't want to see the train coming. Now you go look at the top 100 CMOs in the world today. Pretty different bunch than who those top 100 CMOs were 10 years ago. Really different bunch. History's repeating itself over here too. You've got the extremely innovative CCOs that are driving that change and transformation. You've got the deer in the headlight, okay, I know I need to do this, but I'm not sure how, and you do have your typical, you know, nope, I've got my do not disturb sign and police tape over my office. I won't even let you in my door. I don't want to hear about it. You've got all flavors. The good news is we are well past the half point where the innovators are starting actually to deploy and show results, the deer in the headlights are starting to innovate, and these folks are at least opening up the door and taking down some tape. >> Is there pressure on the agency side now? A lot of agencies charge a lot of monthly billings for these clients, the old school thing. Some are trying to be progressive and do more services. Have you seen, with the Cision Cloud and things that you're doing, that you're enabling, those agencies seem to be more productive? >> Yes. >> Are the client's putting pressure on those agencies so they see more value? Talk about the agency dynamic. >> That's also a virtuous cycle too, right? That cycle goes from, it's a Bell Curve. At the beginning of the bell curve, customers have no clue about the communications. They go to their agencies for advice. So, you have to educate the agencies on how to say nice things about you. By the time you're at the Bell Curve, the client's know about the tech or they've adopted the tech, and the agencies realize, oh, I can monetize the hell out of this. They need strategy and services and content and creative and campaign. This is yet another good old fashioned >> High gross profit. >> A buck for the tech means six bucks for me as the service agency. At the bottom, over here, I'll never forget this when we did our modern marketing experiences, Erik, the CMO of Clorox said, hey, to all you agencies out there, now that we're mature, you know, we choose our our agency based on their fluency around our tech stack. So it goes that violently and therefore, the agencies really do need to try to get fluent. The ones that do, really reap rewards because there is a blatant amount of need as the line of business customer tries to get from here to here. And the agency is the is the very first place that that customer is going to go to. >> So, basically the agency-- >> The customer has first right of refusal to go provide these services and monetize them. >> So, the agency has to keep up. >> They certainly do. >> Because, if the game gets changed by speed, it's accelerated >> If they keep up, yup. >> Value is created. If they don't have their running shoes on, they're out. >> If they keep up and they stay fluent, then they're going to be great. The last thing back in the things. We've kind of hit this. This is one of those magic points I've been talking about for 20 years. When the CFO or the CEO or the CMO walk down to the CCOs office and say, where are we on this, 'cause it's out in the wild now, there are over 1200 big brands doing this measurement, Cision ID, CommsTech stuff. It's getting written about by good old fashioned media. Customer says, wow, I couldn't do this for 50 years, now I am, and look what I just did to my Comms program. That gets read. The world's the same place as it always has been. You and I read that. We go down to our comms department and say, wow, I didn't know that was possible, where are we on this? So the Where Are We On This wave is coming to communications, which is an accelerant. >> It's an accountability-- >> Now it's accountability, and therefore, the urgency to get fluent and changed. So now they're hiring up quantums and operations and statisticians and database people just like the marketers did. The anatomy of a communications department is starting to like half science half art, just like happened in marketing. Whereas before that, it was 95% art and 5% science. But it's getting to be 50/50. >> Do you have any competition? >> We have, just like always. >> You guys pretty much have PR Newswire, a lot of big elements there. >> We do. >> You've got a good foothold. >> This is just an example. Even though Marketo is part of Adobe, giant. And Eloqua is part of Oracle, giant and Pardot is part of Salesforce. You've got three goliaths in marketing automation. Hubspot's still sticking around. PeerPlay, marketing Automation. You can just picture it. CRM giants, Microsoft and Salesforce have eaten the world Zendesk's still kicking around. It's a little PeerPlay. That equivalent exists. I have nobody that's even one fifth as big as I am, or as global or complete. But I do have some small, point specific solution providers. They're still hanging out there. >> The thing is, one, first you're a great leader. You've seen the moving on the marking tech side. You've got waves of experience under your belt. But I think what's interesting is that like the Web 1.0, having websites and webpages, Web 2.0 and social networks. That was about the first generation. Serve information, create Affiliate programs, all kind of coded tracking. You mentioned all that. I over-simplified it, but you get the idea. Now, every company needs a new capability. They need to stand up media infra structure. What does that mean? They're going to throw a podcast, they're going to take their content, put them into multiple channels. That's a comms function. Now comms is becoming the new CMO-like capability in this earned channel. So, your Cloud becomes that provisioning entity for companies to stand up capabilities without waiting. Is that the vision? >> You've nailed it. And that is one of the key reasons why you have to have a tech stack. That's a spot on one, another one. Early in my career, the 20 influences that mattered, they were all newspaper reporters or TV folks. There was only 20 of them. I had a Rolodex. so I could take each one of them out for a three Martini lunch, they'd write something good about me. >> Wish is was that easy now. >> Now, you have thousands of influencers across 52 channels, and they change in real time, and they're global in nature. It's another example of where, well, if you don't automate that with tech and by the way. >> You're left behind. >> If you send out digital content they talk back to you in real time. You have to actually not only do influencer identification, outreach and curation, you've got to do real time engagement. >> There's no agility. >> There's none. >> Zero agility. >> None, exactly. >> There's no like Dev Ops mindset in there at all. >> Then the speed with which, it's no longer okay for comms to call the agency and say, give me a ClipBook, I've got to get it to my CEO by Friday. That whole start the ClipBook on Tuesday, I've got to have the ClipBook, the physical ClipBook on the CEO as an example. Nope, if I'm not basically streaming my senior executives in real time, curated and analyzed as to what's important and what it means, I can't do that without a tech stack. >> Well, Andy Cunningham was on the Cube. >> This whole thing has been forced to get modernized by cloud technology and transformation >> Andy Cunningham, a legend in the comms business who did all Steve Jobs comms, legend. She basically said on The Cube, it's not about waiting for the clips to create the ClipBook, create your own ClipBook and get it out there. Then evaluate and engage. This is the new command and control with digital assets. >> Now, it's become the real-time, curated feed that never stops. It sure as hell better not. Because comms is in trouble if it does. >> Well this is a great topic. But let's have you in this, I can go deep on this. I think this is a really important shift, and you guys are the only ones that are on it at this level. I don't think the Salesforce and the Adobe yet, I don't think they're nimble enough to go after this wave. I think they're stuck on their wave and they're making a lot of money. >> You know John, paid media and owned media. The Google Marketing Cloud, that SAP Marketing Cloud, Adobe, Oracle, Salesforce Marketing Clouds. They don't do anything in earned. Nothing. This is one of the reasons I jumped because I knew this needed to happen. But, you know, they're also chasing much bigger pots of money. Marketing and Advertising is still a lot more money. We're working on it to grow the pie for comms. But, bottom line is, they're chasing the big markets as I was at Oracle. And they're still pretty much in a violent arms race against each other. Salesforce is still way more focused on what Adobe's doing. >> You're just on a different wave. >> So, we're just over here doing this, building a billion dollar cloud leader, that is mission critical to everyone of their customers. They're going to end up being some pretty import partners to us, because they've been too focused on the big arms race against each other, in paid and owned and have not had the luxury to even go here. >> Well I think this wave that you're on is going to be really big. I think they don't see it, in my opinion, or can't get there. With the right surfboard, to use a surfing analogy, there's going to be a big wave. Thanks for sharing your insights. >> Absolutely. >> While you're here, get the plug in for Cision. What's going on, what's next? What's the big momentum? Get the plug in for the company. What are you guys still going to do? >> Plugin for the company. The company has acquired a couple of companies in January. You might see, one of which is Falcon. Basically Falcon is one of the big four in the land of Hootsuite, Sprinklr, Spredfast. Cloud companies do this. Adobe has Creative Cloud, Document Cloud, Parking Cloud. Salesforce has Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, Marketing Cloud. Cision has just become a multi cloud company. We now have the Cision Social Cloud and the Cision Communications Cloud. And we're going to go grab a couple hundred million dollars of stuff away from Sprinklr, Hootsuite and collapse social into this. Most of social is earned as well. So, look for a wing spread, into another adjacent market. I think that's number one. Then look for publishing of the data. That's probably going to be the most exciting thing because we just talked about, again our metrics and capabilities you can buy But, little teaser. If we can say, in two months here's the average click through on a Google ad, YouTube ad, a banner ad, I'll show it to you on a Blog, a press release, an article. Apples to apples. Here is the conversion rate. If I can start becoming almost like an eMarketer or publisher on what happens when people read earned, there's going to be some unbelievable stats and they're going to be incredibly telling, and it's going to drive where are we on that. So this is going to be the year. >> It's a new digital advertising format. It's a new format. >> That's exactly right. >> It's a new digital advertising format. >> And its one when the CEO understands that he or she can have it for earned now, the way he's had it for marketing and advertising, that little conversation walking down the hall. In thousands of companies where the CCO or the VP of PR looks up and the CEO is going where are we on that? That's the year that that can flip switches, which I'm excited about. >> Every silo function is now horizontally connected with data, now measured, fully instrumented. The value will be there and whoever can bring the value gets the budget. That's the new model. Kevin Ackroyd, CEO of Cision, changing the game in the shift around the Chief Communications Officer and how that is becoming more tech savvy. Really disrupting the business by measuring earned media. A big wave that's coming. Of course, it's early, but it's going to be a big one. Kevin, thanks for coming on. >> My pleasure, John, thank you. >> So, CUBE conversation here in Palo Alto Thanks for watching. >> Thanks John. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Mar 14 2019

SUMMARY :

in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, California, Building one of the most compelling companies I really got to say I think you cracked the code What's the headcount, what's the revenue? We've certainly been the catalyst and the cattle prod Yeah, and certainly the trend is your friend, This is a tailwind for you at Cision and specifically the shift that's happening. for the right to go squish the entire the LUMAscape But that's how the infrastructure would let you, Let's ride that all the way down Now PR or communications can be measured. It's the guy that chose to read So all the way down the funnel, But let's just talk about the economics So, the Chief Communication Officer How is the Chief Communication Officer role change Despite the fact that they don't sit in the chair as much. they're not really that loaded up with funding. And to my earlier point, it's because they couldn't show. Like the ads and the e-commerce folks do. can I get an article in the Wall Street Journal? But not metrics the CEO and the CFO are going to invest in. that the commerce and the ad folks do That's been the challenge. in the world. So are we going to see a Comms Stack? and the CMO's already been through this. The boss has already done it everywhere else. A lot of it is the same technology, They recognize that the most influential thing It's kind of like Google PageRank in the old days. I can plug in the more weight stuff under your profile. I run into the deer in the headlights on one side, the deer in the headlights are starting to innovate, those agencies seem to be more productive? Are the client's putting pressure on those agencies and the agencies realize, the agencies really do need to try to get fluent. to go provide these services and monetize them. If they don't have their running shoes on, they're out. When the CFO or the CEO or the CMO just like the marketers did. a lot of big elements there. CRM giants, Microsoft and Salesforce have eaten the world Now comms is becoming the new CMO-like capability And that is one of the key reasons and by the way. they talk back to you in real time. Then the speed with which, This is the new command and control with digital assets. Now, it's become the real-time, curated feed I don't think they're nimble enough to go after this wave. This is one of the reasons I jumped and have not had the luxury to even go here. With the right surfboard, to use a surfing analogy, Get the plug in for the company. Basically Falcon is one of the big four It's a new digital advertising format. or the VP of PR looks up and in the shift around the Chief Communications Officer So, CUBE conversation here in Palo Alto Thanks John.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
ErikPERSON

0.99+

Andy CunninghamPERSON

0.99+

Kevin AckroydPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

Bob EvansPERSON

0.99+

Elizabeth WarrenPERSON

0.99+

KevinPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

JanuaryDATE

0.99+

MarTechORGANIZATION

0.99+

Steve JobsPERSON

0.99+

7QUANTITY

0.99+

2018DATE

0.99+

AdobeORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

ComTechORGANIZATION

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

15 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

YahooORGANIZATION

0.99+

$20 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

March 2019DATE

0.99+

52 channelsQUANTITY

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

50 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

sevenQUANTITY

0.99+

six bucksQUANTITY

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

30%QUANTITY

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

$2 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

AdTechORGANIZATION

0.99+

10 yearQUANTITY

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

FridayDATE

0.99+

17 vendorsQUANTITY

0.99+

100 reportersQUANTITY

0.99+

ZendeskORGANIZATION

0.99+

5%QUANTITY

0.99+

12 acquisitionsQUANTITY

0.99+

10 timesQUANTITY

0.99+

800 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

TuesdayDATE

0.99+

FalconORGANIZATION

0.99+

500sQUANTITY

0.99+

PardotORGANIZATION

0.99+

Kevin AkeroydPERSON

0.99+

thousandsQUANTITY

0.99+

10QUANTITY

0.99+

CisionORGANIZATION

0.99+

150 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

Super BowlEVENT

0.99+

20 influencesQUANTITY

0.99+

70%QUANTITY

0.99+

first generationQUANTITY

0.99+

Proctor and GambleORGANIZATION

0.99+

four yearQUANTITY

0.99+

first timeQUANTITY

0.99+

Cunningham CommunicationsORGANIZATION

0.99+

four yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

two answersQUANTITY

0.99+

17 different applicationsQUANTITY

0.99+

UnileverORGANIZATION

0.99+

two yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

222 billion peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

over 50,000 customersQUANTITY

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+