(upbeat music playing) >> Narrator: theCUBE presents Ignite 22, brought to you by Palo Alto Networks. >> Hey guys, girls, welcome back. It's theCUBE Live in Las Vegas at the MGM Grand for Palo Alto Networks Ignite 22. Lisa Martin here with Dave Vellante. Dave, We've had some great conversations. This is day one of two days of cube coverage. We're talking with Palo Alto executives, their partner network, their customers, going to be learning a lot about what they've been doing to really be that golden nugget. >> Yeah. We've talked, Lisa, about how Palo Alto Networks is affecting a TAM expansion strategy through acquisitions and integration and company CDW, that I remember, you know, been around a long time. I remember back in the Comdex days talk about transformation of a company. Really excited to have them on. >> We're going to talk about that. Stephanie Hagopian is here, the VP of Security at CDW. >> Stephanie, >> Hey it's great to have you on the program. >> It's so nice to be here. Thank you. >> So lots going on. CDW has made several acquisitions in the past couple of quarters alone as it relates to security. Talk to us about what's going on. >> Yes. So we are way more than the computer warehouse that you used to know. The computer catalog days, we've moved beyond that. We've made a lot of strategic acquisitions in the past several quarters. The reason for that is we're trying to change our image and our brand and how, more importantly, we engage with our customers in security. We used to traditionally be, you know, kind of at the end of the procurement cycle with our customers, and we want to be an advisor. We want to really sell solutions and help influence the outcomes that our clients are trying to achieve when it comes to, not just security, but also risk, governance, threatened vulnerability management, how are they dealing with major issues around zero trust and building a zero trust framework for a company. >> Lisa: And I imagine these acquisitions, that really from a catalyst perspective was really driven >> Yeah. by the customers and what they were >> absolutely wanting to see and feel and hear and be able to do. >> Absolutely. So the acquisitions have given us over 400 delivery resources, consultants, advisors people who can actually engage with our clients who have real life experience, have worked with global organizations, some of the biggest companies in the world in order to solve their problems. And using that experience to be able to to really create higher value, you know as we interact and engage. >> Dave: You were telling us, Stephanie, that you actually came into CDW through an acquisition. >> I did. >> And I think if you go back 10 years ago when the cloud was just sort of hitting its steep steep ramp, and it looked, it was pretty obvious. And at the same time you had what we affectionately called you know, box sellers. And it was very clear that if they didn't transform their businesses and you know, the, they a lot of 'em were small, regional companies. They had the owners had big houses and big boats but the companies were going to go away if they didn't transform. So it's interesting to me that you've chosen security and governance in some of the really most difficult areas to as part of that transformation. Where did that come from, from your perspective and you know, why security and why such challenging areas? >> Well, I've been part of security in the security industry for over 20 years, and I've loved the fact it is challenging. It's what, it's what makes us so important and critical to our clients. Security's not an easy problem to solve. And it, it's because the landscape keeps changing. The advent of cloud and now hybrid infrastructure creates endless challenges for our customers. Threat actors change. We have insider threats, we have external threats. There's all sorts of risk when you talk about third parties and how third parties interact with organizations. We have supply chain management. And now that we've moved into this hybrid work environment of virtual, not virtual. You know, we have people kind of engaging within organizations in different ways. There's just a lot of risk associated with that. It's not easy and you have to engage with stakeholders across the entire organization. You have to understand how legal thinks of this and compliance and HR. It's not just an IT issue, it's a business issue. And we understand that and it's just, it's so interesting for us to engage with our customers on critical initiatives and security is at the top of the list. It's not just a, a CISO or even a CIO problem anymore. Boards care about this, >> Lisa: Right? >> We make or break companies with cybersecurity and risk strategies. That's why it's so critical. So we consider ourselves to be a high priority for every single organization, big or small. >> Lisa: From a security perspective, what's the common denominator among industries that you're seeing? >> Oh, I mean, we see, in terms of common denominator, I think every single organization's contending with ransomware. >> Ah >> That's probably number one. Breaches. You know, how do you prevent bad actors from doing something, you know, that's threatening to information sensitive data, especially consumer data. Third party risk is a big topic, and how to secure hybrid cloud infrastructures which is a key part of, you know, Palo's strategy as well. And we realize that. >> Why do they buy from CDW? Pitch me. I'm a customer, what can you do for me? >> Yeah. Because we want to partner. So we, we provide true advisory and consulting services to our customers. We aren't there just to make a sale and walk away. We want long-term commitments and long-term partnerships with our customer base. We're there to, to give them outcomes, right? And to align to their priorities and their challenges. It's, it's not a one and done for us. This is about a long-term partnership and that's what makes us so different. And we're now through the acquisition strategies. We're the largest security integrator in North America in terms of our revenue and our size just our sheer size and capability and the amount of full-time employees we have dedicated to this part of our business. So they know they can trust us and that we can scale. >> Dave: Do you? Is is it a, a teach me how to fish strategy? Or is it also if >> Yeah, >> if you want to have, if I, if I as a customer want to have you continue to manage or at least provide some kind of managed services, where's the the line? >> Stephanie: Yeah. So we are incredibly unique in the way we've built out our security practice in that we, we do both. And we want our clients to understand that there are going to be elements of what they do that they want to keep in house from a security perspective. That is why, and it also came from an acquisition, we have a workforce development team for security. We actually are a Palo authorized training partner. And we're incredibly proud of that fact because we don't just want to configure technology. We want to enable our customers to enhance and maintain their investments with Palo and with all technologies, with all of security. At the same time, we know they can't do everything in-house, and it just might make more sense to do manage through us. So we have end-to-end managed capabilities as well and we continue to enhance that part of our business. >> So a lot, a lot of opportunities for customers there. Talk a little bit about the Palo Alto Network's extension of the value prop that you just talked about. >> Oh yes. We love, you know, Palo is taking a platform approach and really focusing on helping customers rationalize their IT infrastructure around security. We're doing the same exact thing and focusing on zero trust is huge. We're, we're having those conversations with our customers as well. We want them to take their Palo investment and try to create a platform approach because there's simplicity and cost savings in that. The security conversations becoming a CFO conversation, right? We love rationalizing those technology investments in a way that makes sense. And we're right in line with Palo in that we want to provide those capabilities end to end and we want to ensure they integrate and use that all of the capabilities within your platform to the extent of that investment, right? We want them to use everything and not just parts of the technology or just do a partial deployment. We want them to use everything that it functionally is available to them through that investment. >> Dakesh, in his keynote this morning, said the answer is not just more people. I know there's this, this, this gap between the number of required number of cyber professionals that we need and >> Stephanie: Oh yeah. >> And how many employees we have, et cetera, et cetera. However, you just can't get there overnight. So that's where service providers, you know, come in. >> Stephanie: It's huge. >> I saw a stat recently, I think it said 50% of organizations in North America don't have a SOC. >> That's true. >> Okay. So they, they need managed services. So, >> Stephanie: They do. >> What are you seeing with some of the small and mid-size companies >> Stephanie: Managed >> and, and and how does, how is that, how is that going? We're entering a new era with, >> Stephanie: Yeah with, you know, cloud can can be a, a great help and and reduce the IT load internally. >> Yeah. >> Dave: What, what's the dynamic like in the customer base? >> Smaller customers especially they just can't attract the cyber talent. It's a high demand field because there just aren't many people who have that capability, right? For us, providing managed a managed SOC is huge. One of our key acquisitions, Sirius, was our largest acquisition recently, brought us a 24 7 managed SOC capability. And that's exactly what our mid-size customers want and demand and what they need, and it's more cost effective. And now they don't have to worry about being a security business. That's not what they are. They need to run their businesses and that's what we provide through managed capabilities especially for that customer base in particular. >> Lisa: And and >> Dave: How about the really small customers, right? Who, who, you know, they're in some ways the most vulnerable. >> Yeah >> Right? >> In many ways >> They don't have the budgets they're kind of working hand to mouth. How, how do you help them? >> Stephanie: Yeah. Yeah. So we, we provide cost effective managed capabilities. So there's managed for enterprise, there's managed for mid-market, but then for small medium businesses they want something that is at the right price point. And that's what we're doing actually in co-development with Palos. That's why we're expanding, not just our professional services capabilities with the Palo platform, but also providing managed support for every aspect of the platform so that customers don't need to invest in full-time employees to do that. They can, they have a predictable cost model that's affordable, that they can leverage over time. So we're very intent on making sure we're fulfilling that not just for our big customers but also for SMB and our, and small businesses as well. >> So you really have that whole suite taken care of >> The whole suite, yeah. I want to talk about some of the the large enterprises for a second. I saw a survey recently that, you know, you talked about security is a board level conversation. It is. >> Stephanie: Very much so. >> We talk about that all the time, CFO conversation but the survey that I saw recently was that there's not there's lack of alignment on boards with the executive suite where security is concerned. Are you seeing that and how can CDW and the Palo Alto partnership help gain that important alignment? >> Stephanie: Yeah So we, we face this all the time. What's on the CISO whiteboard might not be on the CFO's whiteboard or the, the board's whiteboard right? We love, and this is the whole part of our strategy and our strategy partnering with Palo, is that we want to engage further up on the, on the cycle. The, you know, we don't want to to talk to them at the end of the purchasing cycle because we're not providing value. >> Lisa: Yeah. >> We want to help advise them and build the business case. And by them, I mean our CISOs are, you know the heads of network security. You know, their are various stakeholders that we want to engage with to help them build the business case and the justification so that they are speaking the same language as the board member, the CFO. And we do that in many ways. I think the biggest is that we've we've built a global security strategy office that encompasses practitioners. So these are former CISOs, CIOs CTOs who have sat in their shoes and done what they've done. And we bring that experience to bear, coincidentally but not so coincidentally, Palo has the same capability. So Palo's also has a team of field CISOs and former practitioners. So we're partnering together to make sure that we're enabling our customers in, in providing the right value statements and the the right ROI within the the board meetings so that they get that investment right. And they're able to do what they need to do to secure the infrastructure. >> Dave: I mean, historically the business case has been we're going to help you not get breached, and you're going to reduce your, your, your loss >> Stephanie: (indistinct) still relevant. >> And, and I'm, and it's still very relevant. Is there any sort of on the other side of the algebra algebraic equation where actually having this kind of security practice can actually drive productivity >> Absolutely. >> Or or even drive revenue and can you talk about that part of the equation? >> Stephanie: Yeah, security as an industry, we're we've gotten a lot smarter. We understand it's not just about the compliance aspect or the data privacy aspect. It's very important to your point, you know breach prevention is certainly, you know, a a great justification. It's also about automation. So you think of SOAR, right? Providing automation and visibility and dashboard views into who's doing what actually really reduces administrative overhead. We, you know, we want to re-allow our clients to repurpose individuals because there are a finite amount of people in the security industry to focus on higher value tasks. So we're enabling just a lot of cost savings through that. Self-service is a big piece of this. You know, when you think about security we bring along a lot of automation, self-service automation of business logic, and business process. There's a huge value in cost savings attached to that. So that's huge. That's a huge part of the security conversation. >> I was reading, you talked about the cybersecurity skills gap and I was reading some interesting numbers that there's 26 million developers in the world less than 3 million cybersecurity professionals. >> Stephanie: Yeah. >> Talk to us about one of your favorite customer stories where you think CDW and Palo really nailed it in terms of helping organization drive that value the top line value, the bottom line value while enabling them with your expertise. >> Oh my gosh, I don't even want to focus on one because since we became a Palo authorized training partner we have worked with over a hundred clients. We just started this this year and we've helped over a hundred clients and thousands of people get enabled on on Palo firewall configuration and training and development. So we've co, we've partnered together as and we've impacted over a hundred organizations this year in making sure their people are enabled and they're, they're going from that I'm a developer generic to I'm a security professional. So we're helping to close that cybersecurity workforce gap. And we're just so excited at the scale we've been able to do that in such a short amount of time that, I mean, if you think about next year and the year following I mean it's going to be thousands of different clients. But you think about each client, we're impact we're, we're holding classes with 30 plus people. So we've already impacted thousands of people which is amazing. >> Right? So the idea to scale the program in in calendar year 2023 >> Absolutely. We're going to, we, we tried it. This was a trial run and it was amazingly successful trial run. So we're incredibly excited to scale this even more and continue to provide, you know, that element, that workforce development element, that training element for the entire Palo's stack, not just elements of it. >> Lisa: Excellent. Stephanie, thank you so much for joining us on the program. >> Stephanie: Thank you. >> Sharing what CDW and Palo Alto Networks are doing together. The what's in it for me from a customer perspective, big impact there. We appreciate your insights. >> Thank you so much. >> Dave: Great to have you >> Lisa: Our pleasure. >> It's great to have, great to be here. >> Yeah. For our guest and for Dave Vellante, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE, the leader in live and emerging tech coverage.

>>Good afternoon, brilliant humans, and welcome back to the Cube. We're live in Detroit, Michigan at Cub Con, and I'm joined by John Furrier. John three exciting days buzzing. How you doing? >>That's great. I mean, we're coming down to the third day. We're keeping the energy going, but this segment's gonna be awesome. The CD foundation's doing amazing work. Developers are gonna be running businesses and workflows are changing. Productivity's the top conversation, and you're gonna start to see a coalescing of the communities who are continuous delivery, and it's gonna be awesome. >>And, and our next guess is an outstanding person to talk about this. We are joined by Stephen Chin, the chair of the CD Foundation. Steven, thanks so much for being here. >>No, no, my pleasure. I mean, this has been an amazing week quote that CubeCon with all of the announcements, all of the people who came out here to Detroit and, you know, fantastic. Like just walking around, you bump into all the right people here. Plus we held a CD summit zero day events, and had a lot of really exciting announcements this week. >>Gotta love the shirt. I gotta say, it's one of my favorites. Love the logos. Love the love the branding. That project got traction. What's the news in the CD foundation? I tried to sneak in the back. I got a little laid into your co-located event. It was packed. Everyone's engaged. It was really looked, look really cool. Give us the update. >>What's the news? Yeah, I know. So we, we had a really, really powerful event. All the key practitioners, the open source leads and folks were there. And one of, one of the things which I think we've done a really good job in the past six months with the CD foundation is getting back to the roots and focusing on technical innovation, right? This is what drives foundations, having strong projects, having people who are building innovation, and also bringing in a new innovation. So one of the projects which we added to the CD foundation this week is called Persia. So it's a, it's a decentralized package repository for getting open source libraries. And it solves a lot of the problems which you get when you have centralized infrastructure. You don't have the right security certificates, you don't have the right verification libraries. And these, these are all things which large companies provision and build out inside of their infrastructure. But the open source communities don't have the benefit of the same sort of really, really strong architecture. A lot of, a lot of the systems we depend upon. It's >>A good point, yeah. >>Yeah. I mean, if you think about the systems that developers depend upon, we depend upon, you know, npm, ruby Gems, Mayn Central, and these systems been around for a while. Like they serve the community well, right? They're, they're well supported by the companies and it's, it's, it's really a great contribution that they give us. But every time there's an outage or there's a security issue, guess, guess how many security issues that our, our research team found at npm? Just ballpark. >>74. >>So there're >>It's gotta be thousands. I mean, it's gotta be a lot of tons >>Of Yeah, >>They, they're currently up to 60,000 >>Whoa. >>Vulnerable, malicious packages in NPM and >>Oh my gosh. So that's a super, that's a jar number even. I know it was gonna be huge, but Holy mo. >>Yeah. So that's a software supply chain in actually right there. So that's, that's open source. Everything's out there. What's, how do, how does, how do you guys fix that? >>Yeah, so per peria kind of shifts the whole model. So when, when you think about a system that can be sustained, it has to be something which, which is not just one company. It has to be a, a, a set of companies, be vendor neutral and be decentralized. So that's why we donated it to the Continuous Delivery Foundation. So that can be that governance body, which, which makes sure it's not a single company, it is to use modern technologies. So you, you, you just need something which is immutable, so it can't be changed. So you can rely on it. It has to have a strong transaction ledger so you can see all of the history of it. You can build up your software, build materials off of it, and it, it has to have a strong peer-to-peer architecture, so it can be sustained long term. >>Steven, you mentioned something I want to just get back to. You mentioned outages and disruption. I, you didn't, you didn't say just the outages, but this whole disruption angle is interesting if something happens. Talk about the impact of the developer. They stalled, inefficiencies create basically disruption. >>No, I mean, if, if, so, so if you think about most DevOps teams in big companies, they support hundreds or thousands of teams and an hour of outage. All those developers, they, they can't program, they can't work. And that's, that's a huge loss of productivity for the company. Now, if you, if you take that up a level when MPM goes down for an hour, how many millions of man hours are wasted by not being able to get your builds working by not being able to get your codes to compile. Like it's, it's >>Like, yeah, I mean, it's almost hard to fathom. I mean, everyone's, It's stopped. Exactly. It's literally like having the plug pulled >>Exactly on whenever you're working on, That's, that's the fundamental problem we're trying to solve. Is it, it needs to be on a, like a well supported, well architected peer to peer network with some strong backing from big companies. So the company is working on Persia, include J Frog, which who I work for, Docker, Oracle. We have Deploy hub, Huawei, a whole bunch of other folks who are also helping out. And when you look at all of those folks, they all have different interests, but it's designed in a way where no single party has control over the network. So really it's, it's a system system. You, you're not relying upon one company or one logo. You're relying upon a well-architected open source implementation that everyone can rely >>On. That's shared software, but it's kind of a fault tolerant feature too. It's like, okay, if something happens here, you have a distributed piece of it, decentralized, you're not gonna go down. You can remediate. All right, so where's this go next? I mean, cuz we've been talking about the role of developer. This needs to be a modern, I won't say modern upgrade, but like a modern workflow or value chain. What's your vision? How do you see that? Cuz you're the center of the CD foundation coming together. People are gonna be coalescing multiple groups. Yeah. >>What's the, No, I think this is a good point. So there, there's a, a lot of different continuous delivery, continuous integration technologies. We're actually, from a Linux Foundation standpoint, we're coalescing all the continued delivery events into one big conference >>Next. You just made an announcement about this earlier this week. Tell us about CD events. What's going on, what's in, what's in the cooker? >>Yeah, and I think one of the big announcements we had was the 0.1 release of CD events. And CD events allows you to take all these systems and connect them in an event scalable, event oriented architecture. The first integration is between Tecton and Capin. So now you can get CD events flowing cleanly between your, your continuous delivery and your observability. And this extends through your entire DevOps pipeline. We all, we all need a standards based framework Yep. For how we get all the disparate continuous integration, continuous delivery, observability systems to, to work together. That's also high performance. It scales with our needs and it, it kind of gives you a future architecture to build on top of. So a lot of the companies I was talking with at the CD summit Yeah. They were very excited about not only using this with the projects we announced, but using this internally as an architecture to build their own DevOps pipelines on. >>I bet that feels good to hear. >>Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. >>Yeah. You mentioned Teton, they just graduated. I saw how many projects have graduated? >>So we have two graduated projects right now. We have Jenkins, which is the first graduated project. Now Tecton is also graduated. And I think this shows that for Tecton it was, it was time, the very mature project, great support, getting a lot of users and having them join the set of graduated projects. And the continuous delivery foundation is a really strong portfolio. And we have a bunch of other projects which also are on their way towards graduation. >>Feels like a moment of social proof I bet. >>For you all. Yeah, yeah. Yeah. No, it's really good. Yeah. >>How long has the CD Foundation been around? >>The CD foundation has been around for, i, I won't wanna say the exact number of years, a few years now. >>Okay. >>But I, I think that it, it was formed because what we wanted is we wanted a foundation which was purpose built. So CNCF is a great foundation. It has a very large umbrella of projects and it takes kind of that big umbrella approach where a lot of different efforts are joining it, a lot of things are happening and you can get good traction, but it produces its own bottlenecks in process. Having a foundation which is just about continuous delivery caters to more of a DevOps, professional DevOps audience. I think this, this gives a good platform for best practices. We're working on a new CDF best practices Yeah. Guide. We're working when use cases with all the member companies. And it, it gives that thought leadership platform for continuous delivery, which you need to be an expert in that area >>And the best practices too. And to identify the issues. Because at the end of the day, with the big thing that's coming out of this is velocity and more developers coming on board. I mean, this is the big thing. More people doing more. Yeah. Well yeah, I mean you take this open source continuous thunder away, you have more developers coming in, they be more productive and then people are gonna even either on the DevOps side or on the straight AP upside. And this is gonna be a huge issue. And the other thing that comes out that I wanna get your thoughts on is the supply chain issue you talked about is hot verifications and certifications of code is such big issue. Can you share your thoughts on that? Because Yeah, this is become, I won't say a business model for some companies, but it's also becoming critical for security that codes verified. >>Yeah. Okay. So I, I think one of, one of the things which we're specifically doing with the Peria project, which is unique, is rather than distributing, for example, libraries that you developed on your laptop and compiled there, or maybe they were built on, you know, a runner somewhere like Travis CI or GitHub actions, all the libraries being distributed on Persia are built by the authorized nodes in the network. And then they're, they're verified across all of the authorized nodes. So you nice, you have a, a gar, the basic guarantee we're giving you is when you download something from the Peria network, you'll get exactly the same binary as if you built it yourself from source. >>So there's a lot of trust >>And, and transparency. Yeah, exactly. And if you remember back to like kind of the seminal project, which kicked off this whole supply chain security like, like whirlwind it was SolarWinds. Yeah. Yeah. And the exact problem they hit was the build ran, it produced a result, they modified the code of the bill of the resulting binary and then they signed it. So if you built with the same source and then you went through that same process a second time, you would've gotten a different result, which was a malicious pre right. Yeah. And it's very hard to risk take, to take a binary file Yep. And determine if there's malicious code in it. Cuz it's not like source code. You can't inspect it, you can't do a code audit. It's totally different. So I think we're solving a key part of this with Persia, where you're freeing open source projects from the possibility of having their binaries, their packages, their end reduces, tampered with. And also upstream from this, you do want to have verification of prs, people doing code reviews, making sure that they're looking at the source code. And I think there's a lot of good efforts going on in the open source security foundation. So I'm also on the governing board of Open ssf >>To Do you sleep? You have three jobs you've said on camera? No, I can't even imagine. Yeah. Didn't >>You just spin that out from this open source security? Is that the new one they >>Spun out? Yeah, So the Open Source Security foundation is one of the new Linux Foundation projects. They, they have been around for a couple years, but they did a big reboot last year around this time. And I think what they really did a good job of now is bringing all the industry players to the table, having dialogue with government agencies, figuring out like, what do we need to do to support open source projects? Is it more investment in memory, safe languages? Do we need to have more investment in, in code audits or like security reviews of opensource projects. Lot of things. And all of those things require money investments. And that's what all the companies, including Jay Frogger doing to advance open source supply chain security. I >>Mean, it's, it's really kind of interesting to watch some different demographics of the developers and the vendors and the customers. On one hand, if you're a hardware person company, you have, you talk zero trust your software, your top trust, so your trusted code, and you got zero trust. It's interesting, depending on where you're coming from, they're all trying to achieve the same thing. It means zero trust. Makes sense. But then also I got code, I I want trust. Trust and verified. So security is in everything now. So code. So how do you see that traversing over? Is it just semantics or what's your view on that? >>The, the right way of looking at security is from the standpoint of the hacker, because they're always looking for >>Well said, very well said, New >>Loop, hope, new loopholes, new exploits. And they're, they're very, very smart people. And I think when you, when you look some >>Of the smartest >>Yeah, yeah, yeah. I, I, I work with, well former hackers now, security researchers, >>They converted, they're >>Recruited. But when you look at them, there's like two main classes of like, like types of exploits. So some, some attacker groups. What they're looking for is they're looking for pulse zero days, CVEs, like existing vulnerabilities that they can exploit to break into systems. But there's an increasing number of attackers who are now on the opposite end of the spectrum. And what they're doing is they're creating their own exploits. So, oh, they're for example, putting malicious code into open source projects. Little >>Trojan horse status. Yeah. >>They're they're getting their little Trojan horses in. Yeah. Or they're finding supply chain attacks by maybe uploading a malicious library to NPM or to pii. And by creating these attacks, especially ones that start at the top of the supply chain, you have such a large reach. >>I was just gonna say, it could be a whole, almost gives me chills as we're talking about it, the systemic, So this is this >>Gnarly nation state attackers, like people who wanted serious >>Damages. Engineered hack just said they're high, highly funded. Highly skilled. Exactly. Highly agile, highly focused. >>Yes. >>Teams, team. Not in the teams. >>Yeah. And so, so one, one example of this, which actually netted quite a lot of money for the, for the hacker who exposed it was, you guys probably heard about this, but it was a, an attack where they uploaded a malicious library to npm with the same exact namespace as a corporate library and clever, >>Creepy. >>It's called a dependency injection attack. And what happens is if you, if you don't have the right sort of security package management guidelines inside your company, and it's just looking for the latest version of merging multiple repositories as like a, like a single view. A lot of companies were accidentally picking up the latest version, which was out in npm uploaded by Alex Spearson was the one who did the, the attack. And he simultaneously reported bug bounties on like a dozen different companies and netted 130 k. Wow. So like these sort of attacks that they're real Yep. They're exploitable. And the, the hackers >>Complex >>Are finding these sort of attacks now in our supply chain are the ones who really are the most dangerous. That's the biggest threat to us. >>Yeah. And we have stacker ones out there. You got a bunch of other services, the white hat hackers get the bounties. That's really important. All right. What's next? What's your vision of this show as we end Coan? What's the most important story coming outta Coan in your opinion? And what are you guys doing next? >>Well, I, I actually think this is, this is probably not what most hooks would say is the most exciting story to con, but I find this personally the best is >>I can't wait for this now. >>So, on, on Sunday, the CNCF ran the first kids' day. >>Oh. >>And so they had a, a free kids workshop for, you know, underprivileged kids for >>About, That's >>Detroit area. It was, it was taught by some of the folks from the CNCF community. So Arro, Eric hen my, my older daughter, Cassandra's also an instructor. So she also was teaching a raspberry pie workshop. >>Amazing. And she's >>Here and Yeah, Yeah. She's also here at the show. And when you think about it, you know, there's always, there's, there's, you know, hundreds of announcements this week, A lot of exciting technologies, some of which we've talked about. Yeah. But it's, it's really what matters is the community. >>It this is a community first event >>And the people, and like, if we're giving back to the community and helping Detroit's kids to get better at technology, to get educated, I think that it's a worthwhile for all of us to be here. >>What a beautiful way to close it. That is such, I'm so glad you brought that up and brought that to our attention. I wasn't aware of that. Did you know that was >>Happening, John? No, I know about that. Yeah. No, that was, And that's next generation too. And what we need, we need to get down into the elementary schools. We gotta get to the kids. They're all doing robotics club anyway in high school. Computer science is now, now a >>Sport, in my opinion. Well, I think that if you're in a privileged community, though, I don't think that every school's doing robotics. And >>That's why Well, Cal Poly, Cal Poly and the universities are stepping up and I think CNCF leadership is amazing here. And we need more of it. I mean, I'm, I'm bullish on this. I love it. And I think that's a really great story. No, >>I, I am. Absolutely. And, and it just goes to show how committed CNF is to community, Putting community first and Detroit. There has been such a celebration of Detroit this whole week. Stephen, thank you so much for joining us on the show. Best Wishes with the CD Foundation. John, thanks for the banter as always. And thank you for tuning in to us here live on the cube in Detroit, Michigan. I'm Savannah Peterson and we are having the best day. I hope you are too.

(upbeat music) >> Welcome to theCube's coverage of AWS Storage Day. We're here with a couple of AWS product experts. Covering AWS's migration and transfer services, Randy Boutin is the general manager of AWS DataSync, and Mat Matthews, GM of AWS Transfer Family. Guys, good to see you again. Thanks for coming on. >> Dave, thanks. >> So look, we saw during the pandemic, the acceleration to cloud migration. We've tracked that, we've quantified that. What's driving that today? >> Yeah, so Dave, great to be back here. Saw you last year at Storage Day. >> Nice to be in studio too, isn't it? Thanks, guys, for coming in. >> We've conquered COVID. >> So yeah, I mean, this is a great question. I think digital transformation is really what's driving a lot of the focus right now from companies, and it's really not about just driving down costs. It's also about what are the opportunities available once you get into the cloud in terms of, what does that unlock in terms of innovation? So companies are focused on the usual things, optimizing costs, but ensuring they have the right security and agility. You know, a lot has happened over the last year, and companies need to be able to react, right? They need to be able to react quickly, so cloud gives them a lot of these capabilities, but the real benefit that we see is that once your data's in the cloud, it opens up the power of the cloud for analytics, for new application development, and things of that sort, so what we're seeing is that companies are really just focused on understanding cloud migration strategy, and how they can get their data there, and then use that to unlock that data for the value. >> I mean, if I've said it once, I've said it 100 times, if you weren't a digital business during the pandemic, you were out of business. You know, migration historically is a bad word in IT. Your CIOs see it and go, "Ugh." So what's the playbook for taking years of data on-prem, and moving it into the cloud? What are you seeing as best practice there? >> Yeah, so as you said, the migration historically has been painful, right? And it's a daunting task for any business or any IT executive, but fortunately, AWS has a broad suite of capabilities to help enable these migrations. And by that, I mean, we have tools to help you understand your existing on-prem workloads, understand what services in the AWS offering align to those needs, but also help you estimate the cost, right? Cost is a big part of this move. We can help you estimate that cost, and predict that cost, and then use tools like DataSync to help you move that data when that time comes. >> So you're saying you help predict the cost of the migration, or the cost of running in the cloud? >> Running in the cloud, right. Yeah, we can help estimate the run time. Based on the performance that we assess on-prem, we can then project that into a cloud service, and estimate that cost. >> So can you guys explain DataSync? Sometimes I get confused, DataSync, what's the difference between DataSync and Storage Gateway? And I want to get into when we should use each, but let's start there if we could. >> Yeah, sure, I'll take that. So Storage Gateway is primarily a means for a customer to access their data in the cloud from on-prem. All right, so if you have an application that you want to keep on-prem, you're not ready yet to migrate that application to the cloud, Gateway is a strong solution, because you can move a lot of that data, a lot of your cold or long tail data into something like S3 or EFS, but still access it from your on-prem location. DataSync's all about data movement, so if you need to move your data from A to B, DataSync is your optimized solution to do that. >> Are you finding that people, that's ideally a one time move, or is it actually, sometimes you're seeing customers do it more? Again, moving data, if I don't- Move as much data as you need to, but no more, to paraphrase Einstein. >> What we're seeing in DataSync is that customers do use DataSync for their initial migration. They'll also, as Matt was mentioning earlier, once you get your data into the cloud, that flywheel of potential starts to take hold, and customers want to ultimately move that data within the cloud to optimize its value. So you might move from service to service. You might move from EFS to S3, et cetera, to enable the cloud flywheel to benefit you. DataSync does that as well, so customers use us to initially migrate, they use us to move within the cloud, and also we just recently announced service for other clouds, so you can actually bring data in now from Google and Azure as well. >> Oh, how convenient. So okay, so that's cool. So you helped us understand the use cases, but can we dig one more layer, like what protocols are supported? I'm trying to understand really the right fit for the right job. >> Yeah, so that's really important. So for transfer specifically, one of the things that we see with customers is you've got obviously a lot of internal data within your company, but today it's a very highly interconnected world, so companies deal with lots of business partners, and historically they've used, there's a big prevalence of using file transfer to exchange data with business partners, and as you can imagine, there's a lot of value in that data, right? Sometimes it's purchase orders, inventory data from suppliers, or things like that. So historically customers have had protocols like SFTP or FTP to help them interface with or exchange data or files with external partners. So for transfer, that's what we focus on is helping customers exchange data over those existing protocols that they've used for many years. And the real focus is it's one thing to migrate your own data into the cloud, but you can't force thousands or tens of thousands sometimes of partners to also work in a different way to get you their data, so we want to make that very seamless for customers using the same exact protocols like SFTP that they've used for years. We just announced AS2 protocol, which is very heavily used in supply chains to exchange inventory and information across multi-tiers of partners, and things of that nature. So we're really focused on letting customers not have to impact their partners, and how they work and how they exchange, but also take advantage of the data, so get that data into the cloud so they can immediately unlock the value with analytics. >> So AS2 is specifically in the context of supply chain, and I'm presuming it's secure, and kind of governed, and safe. Can you explain that a little bit? >> Yeah, so AS2 has a lot of really interesting features for transactional type of exchanges, so it has signing and encryption built in, and also has notification so you can basically say, "Hey, I sent you this purchase order," and to prove that you received it, it has capability called non-repudiation, which means it's actually a legal transaction. So those things are very important in transactional type of exchanges, and allows customers in supply chains, whether it's vendors dealing with their suppliers, or transportation partners, or things like that to leverage file transfer for those types of exchanges. >> So encryption, providence of transactions, am I correct, without having to use the blockchain, and all the overhead associated with that? >> It's got some built in capabilities. >> I mean, I love blockchain, but there's drawbacks. >> Exactly, and that's why it's been popular. >> That's really interesting, 'cause Andy Jassy one day, I was on a phone call with him and John Furrier, and we were talking up crypto and blockchain. He said, "Well, why do, explain to me." You know Jassy, right? He always wants to go deeper. "Explain why I can't do this with some other approach." And so I think he was recognizing some of the drawbacks. So that's kind of a cool thing, and it leads me- We're running this obviously today, August 10th. Yesterday we had our Supercloud event in Palo Alto on August 9th, and it's all about the ecosystem. One of the observations we made about the 2020s is the cloud is totally different now. People are building value on top of the infrastructure that you guys have built out over the last 15 years. And so once an organization's data gets into the cloud, how does it affect, and it relates to AS2 somewhat, how does it affect the workflows in terms of interacting with external partners, and other ecosystem players that are also in the cloud? >> Yeah, great, yeah, again, we want to try and not have to affect those workflows, take them as they are as much as possible, get the data exchange working. One of the things that we focus on a lot is, how do you process this data once it comes in? Every company has governance requirements, security requirements, and things like that, so they usually have a set of things that they need to automate and orchestrate for the data as it's coming in, and a lot of these companies use something called Managed File Transfer Solutions that allow them to automate and orchestrate those things. We also see that many times this is very customer specific, so a bank might have a certain set of processes they have to follow, and it needs to be customized. As you know, AWS is a great solution for building custom solutions, and actually today, we're just announcing a new set of of partners in a program called the Service Delivery Program with AWS Transfer Family that allows customers to work with partners that are very well versed in transfer family and related services to help build a very specific solution that allows them to build that automation orchestration, and keep their partners kind of unaware that they're interfacing in a different way. >> And once this data is in the cloud, or actually, maybe stays on-prem in some cases, but it basically plugs in to the AWS services portfolio, the whole security model, the governance model, shared responsibility comes in, is that right? It's all, sort of all in there? >> Yeah, that's right, that's exactly right, and we're working with it's all about the customer's needs, and making sure that their investment in AWS doesn't disrupt their existing workflows and their relationships with their customers and their partners, and that's exactly what Matt's been describing is we're taking a close look at how we can extend the value of AWS, integrate into our customer's workflows, and bring that value to them with minimal investment or disruption. >> So follow up on that. So I love that, because less disruption means it's easier, less friction, and I think of like, trying to think of examples. Think about data de-duplication like purpose-built backup appliances, right? Data domain won that battle, because they could just plug right in. Avamar, they were trying to get you to redo everything, okay, and so we saw that movie play out. At the same time, I've talked to CIOs that say, "I love that, but the cloud opens up all these cool new opportunities for me to change my operating model." So are you seeing that as well? Where okay, we make it easy to get in. We're not disrupting workflows, and then once they get in, they say, "Well if we did it this way, we'd take out a bunch of costs. We'd accelerate our business." What's that dynamic like? >> Exactly that, right. So that moved to the Cloud Continuum. We don't think it's going to be binary. There's always going to be something on-prem. We accept that, but there's a continuum there, so day one, they'll migrate a portion of that workload into the cloud, start to extract and see value there, but then they'll continue, as you said, they'll continue to see opportunities. With all of the various capabilities that AWS has to offer, all the value that represents, they'll start to see that opportunity, and then start to engage and consume more of those features over time. >> Great, all right, give us the bumper sticker. What's next in transfer services from your perspectives? >> Yeah, so we're obviously always going to listen to our customers, that's our focus. >> You guys say that a lot. (all laughing) We say it a lot. But yeah, so we're focused on helping customers again increase that level of automation orchestration, again that suite of capability, generally, in our industry, known as managed file transfer, when a file comes in, it needs to get maybe encrypted, or decrypted, or compressed, or decompressed, scanned for viruses, those kind of capabilities, make that easier for customers. If you remember last year at Storage Day, we announced a low code workflow framework that allows customers to kind of build those steps. We're continuing to add built-in capabilities to that so customers can easily just say, "Okay, I want these set of activities to happen when files come in and out." So that's really what's next for us. >> All right, Randy, we'll give you the last word. Bring us home. >> I'm going to surprise you with the customer theme. >> Oh, great, love it. >> Yeah, so we're listening to customers, and what they're asking for our support for more sources, so we'll be adding support for more cloud sources, more on-prem sources, and giving the customers more options, also performance and usability, right? So we want to make it easier, as the enterprise continues to consume the cloud, we want to make DataSync and the movement of their data as easy as possible. >> I've always said it starts with the data. S3, that was the first service, and the other thing I've said a lot is the cloud is expanding. We're seeing connections to on-prem. We're seeing connections out to the edge. It's just becoming this massive global system, as Werner Vogels talks about all the time. Thanks, guys, really appreciate it. >> Dave, thank you very much. >> Thanks, Dave. >> All right, keep it right there for more coverage of AWS Storage Day 2022. You're watching theCube. (upbeat music)

(gentle music) >> Hey, everyone. Welcome back to New York City. Lisa Martin and John Furrier here with theCUBE, covering AWS Summit NYC. This is a series of summits this year. There's about 15 of them globally. We are excited to be here with a couple of guests. We have an alumni back with us. Couple of guests from Caylent, Stephen Garden joins us, the Executive Chairman, and Valerie Henderson, Chief Revenue Officer. Guys, welcome to the program. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. Thank you for having us. >> Great to have you, welcome back. >> Appreciate it, from 2016. >> 2016, it's been a minute. >> Yep. >> But that was before Caylent. Talk to us about Caylent, what do you guys do? What do you deliver? How are you affiliated with AWS? >> Sure, so we were founded in 2015, initially as a container management product. So our roots are very deeply centered around Cloud native. We've since evolved and become a Cloud native consultancy. We're all in with AWS. We were actually just awarded AWS Premier Partner a couple of weeks ago, so we're pretty pumped about that, but we're about 250 people now, across North and South America. And our goal is really to work with customers that are looking to innovate and evolve and use AWS as a catalyst to build new products for their business. >> As a catalyst, I like that. Valerie, talk about the customer. Obviously so much tumbled in the last couple of years. Still going through it. >> Yeah, of course. >> How have customer conversations evolved and changed in the last couple of years, from your perspective? >> Yeah, I think from my perspective it is such a unique time and it's a time that is constantly changing. And I think change breeds opportunity, and I feel like customers see that, and they're leaning in. They want the opportunity to create new revenue streams, do more, more efficiently, and I think that's the key. And the questions are really asking, how can we take our data, and turn it into something that we can monetize? How can we be smarter with what we have? And I think it's an incredible time to be in the space that we're in. Every conversation I have is really forward thinking, and about the business. And I've been in this space for a while, and that was not always that case. And I think now people are shifting that IT shop to IP shop, and that's so key, from my perspective. >> Interesting, interesting shift there. Every company has to be a data company these days, to be competitive, the last couple of years it was, how did we survive? Pivot, pivot, pivot. But to be a data company, means you have to be able to extract the value and insights from that data and act on it, to your point, develop new products, new revenue streams, new opportunities. How do you enable companies, and maybe this is a question that you can both answer, to truly become data companies? >> The whole model from a service's perspective is not a do-for model, it is a do-with model. And any time we go into a customer, it's like, where are they on the curve? From monolith application, to microservices, where do they sit today? And I think when you dig in, you assess, you deeply understand where they are, you can get them to where they want to be, and build a plan. And the way our model works is, we're doing it with them, and what that means is we're enabling them, documentation, we're supporting them, that if we're not there, they're going to be able to carry it forward and continue to do more. So, that's so so important. I'd love Stephen's take on it. >> Yeah, I think the other trend that we're seeing in data more recently is that customers need to share their information with other partners, collaborate. And AWS is just the perfect platform to be able to do that, enable that sharing. And you're seeing even businesses like Snowflake build a data Cloud on top of AWS. So, I think that's a new angle that we're seeing which is really bringing together way more innovation- >> What about that data clean-room trend that's going on, Snowflake's doing a lot of that. But some of them have a little lock in spec there, versus being open, security, privacy, governance, what's the balance between open sharing and the requirements you need to be secure and compliant? >> Yeah, I think very simplistically, the information that you are using to deliver your product and service to customers generally safer, more public and available, the information that's confidential to your business behind the scenes, obviously, you use the right protocols to lock it out. But it is a very hot topic in today's world, especially with Web3 and people seeking to get their information back, so... >> So you mentioned you guys around since 2015, if you go back in time, it seems like yesterday, but Cloud time, it's like two generations ago. Why is data now more relevant? Is it because the technology's gotten better and easier, or more maturization of the client's understanding, or being full with data, having a data problem and hence an opportunity? Or is it open source has evolved? Or all three, what's your reaction to that? Why is it exploding now when it's been around for a while? >> It keeps exponentially growing, right? The more and more data. There was a stat four or five years ago about, hey, we're taking more photographs in a single year now than all of mankind, leading up to that date, but I think just the sheer quantities and the way people are managing it now, and being able to actually capture information points of everything across their entire business, just presents a much bigger opportunity to be able to take and form decisions of the back of that. >> So do you see the customers having more data full problems, that they're having more data? So that's... And in that one >> 100%. >> Of the consequences of not leveraging it? >> Yeah, it's what to do. Yeah, absolutely, and if you think about when you wake up in the morning if you ask Alexa what the weather is, and like, you're creating data, in every engagement with the world. So I think it's this explosion of it, but then it exists, and what do you do, and having a strategy. I still think one of the biggest gaps is people, and talent, and expertise to do the work, frankly. Which is, the hypothesis of Caylent existing. >> Yeah, I think a data concept and application, because what's the weather to Alexa, is an application of what's the weather, it's a request, but it's actually the data's built into the app. >> It's built in. >> So data as code is a new trend. >> Yes, yeah, yeah, and I think it's funny to answer the question. There's more data points surrounding how to leverage your data, and I'm like, it's crazy, I think you're really seeing that working- >> We have an old data warehouse, we can't get the weather data, although it's there somewhere. But that's the problem. Getting the data, in the applications, this is not... Wasn't around 10 years ago. No one was talking like that. Now it's more standard. That sounds like DevOps to me, a DevOps problem. >> Yeah, moving from the monolithic to the microservice is wild, and just the way that people are building applications today. The users, their customers are demanding more from the service, and AWS is able to deliver that. >> What are some of your customers doing with you guys, can you give some examples and scope the scale of your relationship with the customers, vis-a-vis AWS and the Cloud, how they're using you guys and the Cloud. >> Yeah, yeah, for sure, a customer of ours, Allergen, which is an incredible organization, really had a large effort to modernize. And they actually have a data lab within their company called Allergen Data Labs, and they leveraged us to truly just modernize this containerization effort. How they can do more with less, and that serverless experience. So, I think from my perspective what we're seeing is also a need to be thoughtful about DevOps retooling and tooling because talent wants to work with the best toolset, the hottest stuff on the street, and again, to keep talent is key, in any organization's success. >> Valerie, how does Caylent help with that from a talent perspective? Obviously there's talent shortage, we're also still in the great resignation. >> Oh my gosh. >> How do you help organizations bridge the gap so that they can glean insights from data and be competitive and win? >> Yeah, we actually just published a case study with Novus which was bought by SEI, which is a huge financial firm. Where they said, "Listen, it's human nature to say I have a gap, and I need to fill it, I'm going to hire somebody." That's human nature to say, okay, this is what we're going to do. But the reality is, I think companies are starting to see the advantage of using a partner and say, okay, I could hire one person or I could bring in a partner who's going to have a team of five, works incrementally for a period of time, does with, helps coach my team up, document all of that, and I think that they're seeing value from that. And ultimately, it's not that we don't want them to eventually hire. When they do hire, we want that person to come in and have the best experience. >> And sometimes the people aren't even available, right? >> Correct, yeah. >> So you have a combination of managed services, a plethora of managed services that are also involved with the customers. So, it's that integration, scale, and partnering and sharing. You mentioned sharing data earlier, how do you guys view that integration piece, 'cause if you have a modern architecture, you got to have that decomposed, decoupled but integrated approach. >> Yeah, we really believe that the whole world of project services and managed services is coming together as one. So we have a single delivery model which we're really passionate about. And we look at it as an embedded team within our customers, embedded DevOps to support them, basically on anything that could be from a modernizing a new application through to addressing a more traditional Cloud architecture framework that's in place. But yeah, the trick to it is, as Val said earlier is the do with approach, not just do for, right? I think customers need to learn about the Cloud. They need to understand the technology that they're using. They want to have that understanding. And we found a way of fitting in our services to help them accelerate that part. >> So Valerie, I got to ask you the question. So, in sports you talk about the modern era of baseball or whatever, we're in the modern era of Cloud, going next generation. We call it Super Cloud, a concept that Dave and I put out at re:Invent. If someone asks you, what does the modern era look like? As you look at your customer base and the data you guys have, how would you describe this modern era? What is it made up of? Is it outcomes versus solutions? Is it technology that's decentralized? How do you talk about it? What is the modern era, if you were- >> Not to oversimplify it, but I'm going to, the idea that somebody could come into work and all they have to think about is business outcomes and the data points that they need to achieve said business outcomes. I'm the biggest fan of measure what matters, I think it is an incredibly powerful methodology. And I think anybody who thinks about running business, they know that it's a scale. The amount of companies that are in that place is very small right now. So I think modern era is really that running an IT company to an IP company. >> So Stephen, if you unpack that, what's under the covers to make that happen? Automation, machines, what's your assessment of that outcome, which by the way was well said. Beautiful, beautiful comment. What makes that happen? >> I think it is around automation. It is around do once and then apply many times. That is key. Obviously it's a fundamental principle of the Cloud, is that consistency in that repeatability. So when you can simplify services down to a point, click, deploy, I think you're in a much better position to be able to move quickly and then not have to worry about anything under the hood and just focus, like Val said, on the business outcomes. >> That's more creative. They're focusing on the problems, to not do the rock fetches and the heavy lifting that's not differentiated. >> I find that what gives people energy generates opportunity. And I think when people hit those roadblocks of, these things don't work together. There's all these interdependencies. It's really challenging. So I love what's happening. I think there's never been a better time to be in this business. >> Not a dull moment, That's for darn sure. >> Not a dull moment. >> Valerie, talk about outcomes. You mentioned a couple of customers that you're working with, some case studies. It is all about outcomes these days. That's the conversations that we have with the entire ecosystem is all about business outcomes. What are some of those key transformative business outcomes that Caylent is helping customers to achieve? >> Yeah, to me one thing that is key is, anytime I'm meeting with a customer, I want to understand who their customers are. I'm like, who is your customer? And how can we create a better experience for that customer. Whether it's their end users or their external customers. And I think that is a huge element. What we're seeing is that sassification of, how do I make it easier for my customers to procure and engage with my platform? And a lot of what we're doing right now is helping clients with that. And it's not a flip of a switch, it's not a click of a button, it's complicated. But that is what we are here to help, help simplify, help create that understanding of what's possible. >> How do you guys talk to your customers, take a minute to give a plug for the company. What are you looking for? What's the stats? How many employees you guys hiring, and what's the pitch to customers? >> Yeah, so I think every organization is on their journey to the Cloud now. It's gotten to that point where if you're not working with a public Cloud provider, you're part of a very, very small group. We like to say that we'll meet customers where they are, and help evolve them as a business, help evolve their teams. And that's what we mean when we say do with, so it's a pretty broad spectrum. We're big in healthcare. We're big in FinTech. We've worked with a lot of startup customers. We have about 250 customers today, 250 employees. And we're scaling rapidly. We've grown that from about 50 employees a year ago. >> Oh, wow. >> Yes, when I started, we were just around 60 people and we're at 260 today. >> And why are people working with you? What are you guys, solving a problem? Are you enabling them? What's the pitch? >> Without a doubt, I love that. Being in sales my whole career, somebody asking me for a pitch is my favorite. >> Okay, let's go. >> Yeah, yeah, the true value prop of what we do is all of the above. We enable, we help customers do more faster, but again, we do not want customers to walk away from an engagement with us saying, oh no, we don't know what to do. We want them to feel empowered. I still think the biggest gap from everything being in that IP business outcome is people. And for us, we're so passionate about that, and building a company that really truly believes that. And that's part of who we are as a company and our value system. >> And the digital transformation, ultimately what they're going through, you get them there faster. They get the outcomes and they're operational. >> Absolutely, and also to be clear, when a customer has a great experience working with you, they want to tell other people about the experience. And for us, like the referrals that we get, the partnership with Amazon is so key. >> What are some reactions after you go through an engagement? We've been riffing on this concept of Super Cloud where you're starting to see people build on top of, not the AWSs, but their partners that work with them. And so the customers are getting their own Cloud experience at scale. What are some of the comments you hear from your successful customers? What are some anecdotal feedback? >> Yeah, yeah. >> I'm so glad we did this because now I'm selling more, I'm doing this, what are some of the things that they're thinking? >> Yeah, yeah, I think ultimately the consistent theme that we get is, "I'm so glad that I didn't let fear hold me back from engaging a partner," because a lack of control scares a lot of customers. It does. And I think customers that are willing to say, "Okay, I'm going to have a little faith, trust in the process." They thank us. They do, and we've seen that across the board. I think that crossing that chasm is not to be underestimated without a doubt. >> Great story, congratulations. >> Oh, thank you. >> Well, there's nothing more powerful and potent than the voice of the customer. >> Without a doubt. And really you have to listen. >> Yes, yes, definitely. Stephen, Valerie, thank you so much for joining Dave and me on the program today, talking about Caylent, what you guys are doing for customers with AWS, empowering, enabling, collaboration. I love it, thank you. >> Yeah, thank you both. >> All right, our pleasure. For John Furrier, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE live in New York City, we are at AWSO in NYC, John and I will be right back with our next guest. (gentle music)

(upbeat music) >> Hey everyone. Welcome to theCUBE's presentation of the AWS Startup Showcase. This is Data as Code, The Future of Enterprise Data and Analytics. This is also season two, episode two of our ongoing series with exciting partners from the AWS ecosystem who are here to talk with us about data and analytics. I'm your host, Lisa Martin. Two guests join me, one, a cube alumni. Venkat Venkataramani is here CEO & Co-Founder of Rockset. Good to see you again. And Doug Moore, VP of cloud platforms at Command Alkon. You're here to talk to me about how Command Alkon implemented real time analytics in just days with Rockset. Guys, welcome to the program. >> Thanks for having us. >> Yeah, great to be here. >> Doug, give us a little bit of a overview of Command Alkon, what type of business you are? what your mission is? That good stuff. >> Yeah, great. I'll pref it by saying I've been in this industry for only three years. The 30 years prior I was in financial services. So this was really exciting and eye opening. It actually plays into the story of how we met Rockset. So that's why I wanted to preface that. But Command Alkon is in the business, is in the what's called The Heavy Building Materials Industry. And I had never heard of it until I got here. But if you think about large projects like building buildings, cities, roads anything that requires concrete asphalt or just really big trucks, full of bulky materials that's the heavy building materials industry. So for over 40 years Command Alkon has been the north American leader in providing software to quarries and production facilities to help mine and load these materials and to produce them and then get them to the job site. So that's what our supply chain is, is from the quarry through the development of these materials, then out to the to a heavy building material job site. >> Got it, and now how historically in the past has the movement of construction materials been coordinated? What was that like before you guys came on the scene? >> You'll love this answer. So 'cause, again, it's like a step back in time. When I got here the people told me that we're trying to come up with the platform that there are 27 industries studied globally. And our industry is second to last in terms of automation which meant that literally everything is still being done with paper and a lot of paper. So when one of those, let's say material is developed, concrete asphalt is produced and then needs to get to the job site. They start by creating a five part printed ticket or delivery description that then goes to multiple parties. It ends up getting touched physically over 50 times for every delivery. And to give you some idea what kind of scale it is there are over 330 million of these type deliveries in north America every year. So it's really a lot of favor and a lot of manual work. So that was the state of really where we were. And obviously there are compelling reasons certainly today but even 3, 4, 5 years ago to automate that and digitize it. >> Wow, tremendous potential to go nowhere but up with the amount of paper, the lack of, of automation. So, you guys Command Alkon built a platform, a cloud software construction software platform. Talk to me of about that. Why you built it, what was the compelling event? I mean, I think you've kind of already explained the compelling event of all the paper but give us a little bit more context. >> Yeah. That was the original. And then we'll get into what happened two years ago which has made it even more compelling but essentially with everything on premises there's really in a huge amount of inefficiency. So, people have heard the enormous numbers that it takes to build up a highway or a really large construction project. And a lot of that is tied up in these inefficiencies. So we felt like with our significant presence in this market, that if we could figure out how to automate getting this data into the cloud so that at least the partners in the supply chain could begin sharing information. That's not on paper a little bit closer to real time that we could make has an impact on everything from the timing it takes to do a project to even the amount of carbon dioxide that's admitted, for example from trucks running around and being delayed and not being coordinated well. >> So you built the connect platform you started on Amazon DynamoDB and ran into some performance challenges. Talk to us about the, some of those performance bottlenecks and how you found Venkat and Rockset. >> So from the beginning, we were fortunate, if you start building a cloud three years ago you're you have a lot of opportunity to use some of the what we call more fully managed or serverless offerings from Amazon and all the cloud vendors have them but Amazon is the one we're most familiar with throughout the past 10 years. So we went head first into saying, we're going to do everything we can to not manage infrastructure ourselves. So we can really focus on solving this problem efficiently. And it paid off great. And so we chose dynamo as our primary database and it still was a great decision. We have obviously hundreds of millions of billions of these data points in dynamo. And it's great from a transactional perspective, but at some point you need to get the data back out. And what plays into the story of the beginning when I came here with no background basically in this industry, is that, and as did most of the other people on my team, we weren't really sure what questions were going to be asked of the data. And that's super, super important with a NoSQL database like dynamo. You sort of have to know in advance what those usage patterns are going to be and what people are going to want to get back out of it. And that's what really began to strain us on both performance and just availability of information. >> Got it. Venkat, let's bring you into the conversation. Talk to me about some of the challenges that Doug articulated the, is industry with such little automation so much paper. Are you finding that still out there for in quite a few industries that really have nowhere to go but up? >> I think that's a very good point. We talk about digital transformation 2.0 as like this abstract thing. And then you meet like disruptors and innovators like Doug, and you realize how much impact, it has on the real world. But now it's not just about disrupting, and digitizing all of these records but doing it at a faster pace than ever before, right. I think this is really what digital transformation in the cloud really enable tools you do that, a small team in a, with a very very big mission and responsibility like what Doug team have been, shepherding here. They're able to move very, very, very fast, to be able to kind of accelerate this. And, they're not only on the forefront of digitizing and transforming a very big, paper-heavy kind of process, but real-time analytics and real time reporting is a requirement, right? Nobody's wondering where is my supply chain three days ago? Are my, one of the most important thing in heavy construction is to keep running on a schedule. If you fall behind, there's no way to catch up because there's so many things that falls apart. Now, how do you make sure you don't fall behind, realtime analytics and realtime reporting on how many trucks are supposed to be delivered today? Halfway through the day, are they on track? Are they getting behind? And all of those things is not just able to manage the data but also be able to get reporting and analytics on that is a extremely important aspect of this. So this is like a combination of digital transformation happening in the cloud in realtime and realtime analytics being in the forefront of it. And so we are very, very happy to partner with digital disruptors like Doug and his team to be part of this movement. >> Doug, as Venkat mentioned, access to real time data is a requirement that is just simple truth these days. I'm just curious, compelling event wise was COVID and accelerator? 'Cause we all know of the supply chain challenges that we're all facing in one way or the other, was that part of the compelling event that had you guys go and say, we want to do DynamoDB plus Rockset? >> Yeah, that is a fantastic question. In fact, more so than you can imagine. So anytime you come into an industry and you're going to try to completely change or revolutionize the way it operates it takes a long time to get the message out. Sometimes years, I remember in insurance it took almost 10 years really to get that message out and get great adoption and then COVID came along. And when COVID came along, we all of a sudden had a situation where drivers and the foreman on the job site didn't want to exchange the paperwork. I heard one story of a driver taping the ticket for signature to the foreman on a broomstick and putting it out his windows so that he didn't get too close. It really was that dramatic. And again, this is the early days and no one really has any idea what's happening and we're all working from home. So we launched, we saw that as an opportunity to really help people solve that problem and understand more what this transformation would mean in the long term. So we launched internally what we called Project Lemonade obviously from, make lemonade out of lemons, that's the situation that we were in and we immediately made some enhancements to a mobile app and then launched that to the field. So that basically there's now a digital acceptance capability where the driver can just stay in the vehicle and the foreman can be anywhere, look at the material say it's acceptable for delivery and go from there. So yeah, it made a, it actually immediately caused many of our customers hundreds to begin, to want to push their data to the cloud for that reason just to take advantage of that one capability >> Project lemonade, sounds like it's made a lot of lemonade out of a lot of lemons. Can you comment Doug on kind of the larger trend of real time analytics and logistics? >> Yeah, obviously, and this is something I didn't think about much either not knowing anything about concrete other than it was in my driveway before I got here. And that it's a perishable product and you've got that basically no more than about an hour and a half from the time you mix it, put it in the drum and get it to the job site and pour it. And then the next one has to come behind it. And I remember I, the trend is that we can't really do that on paper anymore and stay on top of what has to be done we'll get into the field. So a foreman, I recall saying that when you're in the field waiting on delivery, that you have people standing around and preparing the site ready to make a pour that two minutes is an eternity. And so, working a real time is all always a controversial word because it means something different to anyone, but that gave it real, a real clarity to mean, what it really meant to have real time analytics and how we are doing and where are my vehicles and how is this job performing today? And I think that a lot of people are still trying to figure out how to do that. And fortunately, we found a great tool set that's allowing us to do that at scale. Thankfully, for Rockset primarily. >> Venkat talk about it from your perspective the larger trend of real time analytics not just in logistics, but in other key industries. >> Yeah. I think we're seeing this across the board. I think, whether, even we see a huge trend even within an enterprise different teams from the marketing team to the support teams to more and more business operations team to the security team, really moving more and more of their use cases from real time. So we see this, the industries that are the innovators and the pioneers here are the ones for whom real times that requirement like Doug and his team here or where, if it is all news, it's no news, it's useless, right? But I think even within, across all industries, whether it is, gaming whether it is, FinTech, Bino related companies, e-learning platforms, so across, ed tech and so many different platforms, there is always this need for business operations. Some, certain aspects certain teams within large organizations to, have to tell me how to win the game and not like, play Monday morning quarterback after the game is over. >> Right, Doug, let's go back at you, I'm curious with connects, have you been able to scale the platform since you integrated with Rockset? Talk to us about some of the outcomes that you've achieved so far? >> Yeah, we have, and of course we knew and we made our database selection with dynamo that it really doesn't have a top end in terms of how much information that we can throw at it. But that's very, very challenging when it comes to using that information from reporting. But we've found the same thing as we've scaled the analytics side with Rockset indexing and searching of that database. So the scale in terms of the number of customers and the amount of data we've been able to take on has been, not been a problem. And honestly, for the first time in my career, I can say that we've always had to add people every time we add a certain number of customers. And that has absolutely not been the case with this platform. >> Well, and I imagine the team that you do have is far more, sorry Venkat, far more strategic and able to focus on bigger projects. >> It, is, and, you've amazed at, I mean Venkat hit on a couple of points that it's in terms of the adoption of analytics. What we found is that we are as big a customer of this analytic engine as our customers are because our marketing team and our sales team are always coming to us. Well how many customers are doing this? How many partners are connected in this way? Which feature flags are turned on the platform? And the way this works is all data that we push into the platform is automatically just indexed and ready for reporting analytics. So we really it's no additional ad of work, to answer these questions, which is really been phenomenal. >> I think the thing I want to add here is the speed at which they were able to build a scalable solution and also how little, operational and administrative overhead that it has cost of their teams, right. I think, this is again, realtime analytics. If you go and ask hundred people, do you want fast analytics on realtime data or slow analytics on scale data, people, no one would say give me slow and scale. So, I think it goes back to again our fundamental pieces that you have to remove all the cost and complexity barriers for realtime analytics to be the new default, right? Today companies try to get away with batch and the pioneers and the innovators are forced to solve, I know, kind of like address some of these realtime analytics challenges. I think with the platforms like the realtime analytics platform, like Rockset, we want to completely flip it on its head. You can do everything in real time. And there may be some extreme situations where you're dealing with like, hundreds of petabytes of data and you just need an analyst to generate like, quarterly reports out of that, go ahead and use some really, really good batch base system but you should be able to get anything, and everything you want without additional cost or complexity, in real time. That is really the vision. That is what we are really enabling here. >> Venkat, I want to also get your perspective and Doug I'd like your perspective on this as well but that is the role of cloud native and serverless technologies in digital disruption. And what do you see there? >> Yeah, I think it's huge. I think, again and again, every customer, and we meet, Command Alkon and Doug and his team is a great example of this where they really want to spend as much time and energies and calories that they have to, help their business, right? Like what, are we accomplishing trying to accomplish as a business? How do we enable, how do we build better products? How do we grow revenue? How do we eliminate risk that is inherent in the business? And that is really where they want to spend all of their energy not trying to like, install some backend software, administer build IDL pipelines and so on and so forth. And so, doing serverless on the compute side of that things like AWS lambda does and what have you. And, it's a very important innovation but that isn't, complete the story or your data stack also have to become serverless. And, that is really the vision with Rockset that your entire realtime analytics stack can be operating and managing. It could be as simple as managing a serverless stack for your compute environments like your APS servers and what have you. And so I think that is going to be a that is for here to stay. This is a path towards simplicity and simplicity scales really, really well, right? Complexity will always be the killer that'll limit, how far you can use this solution and how many problems can you solve with that solution? So, simplicity is a very, very important aspect here. And serverless helps you, deliver that. >> And Doug your thoughts on cloud native and serverless in terms of digital disruption >> Great point, and there are two parts to the scalability part. The second one is the one that's more subtle unless you're in charge of the budget. And that is, with enough effort and enough money that you can make almost any technology scale whether it's multiple copies of it, it may take a long time to get there but you can get there with most technologies but what is least scalable, at least that I as I see that this industry is the people, everybody knows we have a talent shortage and these other ways of getting the real time analytics and scaling infrastructure for compute and database storage, it really takes a highly skilled set of resources. And the more your company grows, the more of those you need. And that is what we really can't find. And that's actually what drove our team in our last industry to even go this way we reached a point where our growth was limited by the people we could find. And so we really wanted to break out of that. So now we had the best of both scalable people because we don't have to scale them and scalable technology. >> Excellent. The best of both worlds. Isn't it great when those two things come together? Gentlemen, thank you so much for joining me on "theCUBE" today. Talking about what Rockset and Command Alkon are doing together better together what you're enabling from a supply chain digitization perspective. We appreciate your insights. >> Great. Thank you. >> Thanks, Lisa. Thanks for having us. >> My pleasure. For Doug Moore and Venkat Venkatramani, I'm Lisa Martin. Keep it right here for more coverage of "theCUBE", your leader in high tech event coverage. (upbeat music)

from the cube studios in palo alto in boston bringing you data driven insights from the cube and etr this is breaking analysis with dave vellante five publicly traded u.s based companies have market valuations over or just near a trillion dollars as of october 29th apple and microsoft topped the list each with 2.5 trillion followed by alphabet at 2 trillion amazon at 1.7 and facebook now meta at just under a trillion off from a tie of 1.1 trillion prior to its recent troubles these companies have reached extraordinary levels of success and power what if anything could disrupt their market dominance in his book seeing digital author david micheller made three key points that i want to call out first in the technology industry disruptions of the norm the waves of mainframes minis pcs mobile and the internet all saw new companies emerge and power structures that dwarfed previous eras of innovation is that dynamic changing second every industry has a disruption scenario not just the technology industry and third silicon valley broadly defined to include seattle or at least amazon has a dual disruption agenda the first being horizontally disrupting the technology industry and the second as digital disruptors in virtually any industry how relevant is that to the future power structure of the digital industry generally in amazon specifically hello and welcome to this week's wikibon cube insights powered by etr in this breaking analysis we welcome in author speaker researcher and thought leader david michela to assess what could possibly disrupt today's trillionaire companies and we're going to start with amazon dave good to see you welcome thanks dave good to see you yeah so dave approached us about a month or so ago he was working on these disruption scenarios and we agreed to make this a community research project where we're going to tap the knowledge of the cube crowd and its adjacent communities and to that end we're initiating a community survey that asks folks to rate the likelihood of seven plus one disruption scenarios so we have a slide here that sort of shows what that survey structure is going to look like and so as i say there's seven plus another one which is kind of an open open-ended and we're going to start with amazon as the disruptee so dave you've been writing about the technology industry for decades and digital disruption and china and automation and hundreds of other topics what prompted you to start this project yeah it's a great question you know as you said that the whole history of our business has been you know every decade or so you have a new set of leaders ibm digital microsoft the internet companies etc but when i started looking at it you know that seems in some ways to have actually stopped that you know microsoft is now 40 years old amazon is what 1995 is getting towards 30. you know google's been a dominant company for 20 years and you know apple of course and facebook more recently so so whatever reason this sort of longevity of these firms has been longer than we've seen in the past so i sort of say well is there anything that's going to change that so part of it and we'll get into it is what could happen to disrupt those big five but then the sort of second question was well maybe the uh disruptive energies of the of the tech business have moved elsewhere they've moved to crypto currencies or they've moved to tesla and so you start to sort of broaden your sense of disruption and when you talked about that dual disruption agenda that whole ability of tech to disrupt other sectors banking health care insurance automobiles whatever is sort of a second wave of disruption so uh we started coming out all right what sort of scenarios are we really looking at over say for the 2020s what might shake up the big five as we know them and how might disruption spread to sort of more industry specific parts of the world and that was really the the genesis of the project and really just my own thinking of all right what scenarios can i come up with and then reaching out to companies like yourselves to figure out okay how can we get more input on that how can we crowdsource it how can we get a sense of of what the community thinks of all this it's great love it and as you know we're very open to do that so we're going to crowdsource this we're going to open it up to virtually anyone and use multiple channels so let's go through some of the scenarios all of them actually and explain the reasoning behind their inclusion the first one the govern government mandated separation divestment and or limits on amazon's cloud computing retail media credit card and or in-house product groups it probably no coincidence that this was the first one you chose today but why start here well i think the government interest in doing something to get back at big tech is is pretty clear and probably one of the few things that has bipartisan support in washington these days and also government interventions have always been an enormous part of the tech industry's history the the antitrust efforts against ibm and att in particular and more recently microsoft a smaller one but it's it's always been there there's a vibe to do it now and when you look at all the big ones but particularly amazon you can see that potential divestments and breakups are sitting there right in front of you the separation of retail and aws uh perhaps breaking out credit card or music or media businesses these sorts of things are all on the surface at least relatively clean things to do and i think when you look at the formation of an alphabet or a meta those companies themselves are starting to see their own businesses as consisting of multiple firms yeah so i just want to kind of drill into the cloud piece just to emphasize the importance of aws in the context of amazon amazon announced earnings thursday night after the close aws is now a 64 billion revenue run rate company and they're growing at 39 percent year over year that's actually an accelerated growth rate from q3 2020 when the company was grew at 29 it's astounding think about a company this size moreover aws accounted for more than actually but 100 of amazon's operating profit last quarter so the aws cloud is obviously crucial as a funding vehicle and ecosystem accelerant for amazon and i just wanted to share some data points dave before we move on to these other scenarios yeah and just on that uh i think that is the fundamental point it's very easy to see aws on its own as a powerhouse but i think you know if you figure how much freedom aws money has given the retail business or the credit card business or the music businesses to launch themselves and to essentially make no money for very long periods of time uh you see that you know if you're a walmart trying to compete with amazon as a retailer well that money from aws is is an awful big problem and and so when they look at separation that's the sort of stuff people talk about right so i just want to i want to put that into context just in in terms of the the cloud business so this chart is one from our etr surveys that isolates the four hyperscale cloud providers and adds in oracle and ibm we both own public clouds but don't you know don't have nearly the the scale we don't have apple or facebook they have clouds as well and we can talk about that in a moment but the chart shows net score or spending momentum on the vertical axis and market share or pervasiveness in the survey on the horizontal axis it's it's really mentioned share not dollar market share but it's an indicator and the red line is an indicator of elevated spending momentum and you can see azure and aws they're up and to the right i mean amazon is 64 billion you know uh azure will claim larger because they're including their application business but just their their their i asked business obviously smaller than amazon's but you can see in the survey the respondents define cloud they include that sas business so they they both impressively have this high spending momentum on the vertical axis well above that 40 line despite their size google obviously well behind those to the left and then alibaba which has a small sample in the etr survey it's you know it's not as prominent in china but even though it's ias cloud businesses larger than google's by probably a couple billion dollars now the point is these four hyperscalers and there really are only four in my view anyway they have a presence that allows them to build new businesses and disrupt ecosystems and enact that dual disruption agenda should they choose to do so at least in the case of amazon oracle and ibm are not in a position to do that it's not part of their agenda they don't they don't have that scale but dave can you talk about your dual disruption scenario very clearly amazon fits in there and i would think alibaba as well but what about microsoft facebook apple google yeah i mean you know people often say what's the biggest difference between microsoft and amazon from from a cloud point of view and the answer is pretty clear that microsoft goes out of its way to assure its customers that it really doesn't have any interest in competing directly about them so you don't see microsoft going into the retail business or the banking business or the healthcare business all that seriously in contrast that's really what amazon is all about is taking its capabilities to essentially any industry it likes and therefore as one is as great as the service aws provides it's often being provided to people who amazon is actually competing with at least some degree or another and you know that's a huge part of microsoft's sales pitch and it's certainly a potential vulnerability down the road uh it's very hard in the end to be an essential supplier and a direct competitor at the same time but so far they've managed to do that yeah so we put together just another sort of aside here this little thought experiment to see what aws would look like as a separate entity and so it's a chart that looks at a number of tech companies and lays out their revenue run rate the growth rates gross margin probably should have done operating margin might have been more relevant but market cap and revenue multiple again given the size of aws at 64 billion run rate and accelerating growth trajectory it's just it's remarkable and so we we figured this out based on industry norms and today's valuations it's not inconceivable that aws could be you know in the trillionaire club or close to it so based on that discussion we had earlier amazon amazon's dual disruption agenda being funded by empowered by aws as we just discussed dave yeah and just keep in mind nothing that you or i are saying are predictions or saying that anything is going to happen they are possible scenarios of what might happen that seem to make some plausible sense so that when amazon is making the sort of profits that it's making aws naturally that's going to attract other companies because there's margin to to be had there and similarly you know look at uh you look at microsoft for all those years the profits it made in windows or in office software allowed it to do all kinds of other things and essentially that's what amazon is doing today but if a google or a microsoft could cut into those profits through some sort of aggressive pricing and perhaps we'll talk about that you know that would have a lot of impact on amazon as a whole all right so let's quickly go through the other description scenarios and maybe make some comments the next one sort of major companies increasingly choose to do their own cloud computing and or sell their products directly for competitive cost security or other reasons so dave i saw this and look at a company like walmart and others no way they're going to run their business on aws walmart as we know is building out its own cloud and maybe it doesn't have the size of a hyperscaler but it's very large it's got the technical chops it can most likely do it a lot cheaper than renting cloud space what was your thinking in this scenario yeah the broader thing here is essentially one of that computing paradigms have been proven to go in cycles you know a long time ago people shared computers and called timeshare and then people ran their own and now they're sharing again through the cloud and who knows it's possible that the cycle could shift again through some innovation and you know a lot of companies today look at the bills they're getting for cloud or for various sas services and some of them are pretty high and a lot of them will look at and say hey maybe we actually can do some of this stuff cheaper so the scenario is that essentially the the cycle shifts once again uh and it makes more sense to do stuff in-house again that's not a prediction but uh certainly something that's happened before and couldn't plausibly happen again yeah there's a lot of discussion about that in the industry of martine casado and sarah wong wrote that piece about the you know the trillion dollar basically sucking sound basically saying the the scenario was the the the premise rather was the that that sas companies their cost of goods sold are increasingly going to be you know chewed up by cloud costs and then of course mark andreessen says every company is going to be a sas company so as the sassification of business occurs that's something to consider okay next scenario is environmental policies raise costs change packaging delivery recycling rules and or consumer preferences can you comment dave on your thinking on this scenario yeah first i'll just back up a bit we're used to thinking of technology is the great disrupter and clearly that's still important but there are now other forces out there china which will talk about uh the environment uh various cultural forces and and here with the environment you see all kinds of things that could change that you know if you look at amazon and its model of very high levels of packaging lots of delivery vehicles and all the things it is doing are those necessarily the best environmentally and will there potentially be various taxes carbon metrics or things that might work against that model and tend to favor more traditional stores where people go to pick them up that seems to be a plausible scenario and i think everybody here knows that desire to do something in the in the climate environmental spaces is pretty strong and you know if you look at you know just throws aside the recycling industry itself has arguably been quite a failure in that much of what is so-called recycled is basically put in tankers and shipped to the third world which no longer wants it uh and so the backlog of packaging and concerns about packaging and uh what to do with all that you know those those issues are rising and and will be real and i i don't know whether amazon has a good answer to that they're you know they obviously are very aware of it they're working very hard to do everything they can in that space but their fundamental model of essentially packaging every good in its own little box or envelope or whatever is arguably not the greenest way of doing business got it thank you so okay so the next one is price in slash trade wars with the u.s and or china cloud and e-commerce giant so protectionism favors national players so we talking here about for example google bombing prices or alibaba or trade policy making it difficult for amazon to do business in certain parts of the world can you add some color on this one yeah all those things and i would just start with with china itself you know you could argue that covet has been the biggest disruptor of the last couple years but if you look out the next five or eight you had to look at all these things you'd probably say china the size of the chinese market the power of its vendors players like alibaba clearly can rival amazon in many different ways uh you know it's no secret that it'd be hard for amazon to they're not going to be a big success in china uh but you can see it in harder ways that you imagine across asia or other markets where alibaba is strong and you're in today's sort of environment where there's scarce goods and maybe certain products well maybe they go chinese may probably go to alibaba first and you want to buy that product well amazon doesn't have it but alibaba has it you know those sort of scenarios if you get into a sharp trade war with china or even if the current tensions continue it's quite easy to see how that could uh play some havoc with amazon's supply chains in many ways the whole amazon retail model is based on a steady flow of goods manufactured in china and that clearly is not as stable as it was right got it the next one actually caught my attention and this is a big part of the reason why we want to survey the community to see how plausible folks think this is in its its technology related scenario so that would potentially disrupt aws and by fault by default hit amazon so that's major computing innovations such as quantum edge machine machine would obsolete today's cloud architectures okay so so here what you're thinking just as aws changed the game in i.t some future innovations or new business models that we haven't conceived yet could disrupt the prevailing cloud computing model right yeah absolutely i mean you know again we'll go back to where we started that new technologies have always been the main disruptors and here we're looking at some potentially very powerful uh new technologies you know your guess is good in mind about what's gonna happen with quantum is clearly a very different way of computing quite possibly led by other vendors possibly even led by china which would be a huge issue you look at the cloud well cloud's not very good at sort of edge stuff or machine to a machine stuff or sort of near field things out cars in the highway talking to each other uh you know again amazon's totally aware of these things and they are working on it but they have a huge investment in other ways of doing things and historically that inertia that need to protect existing bases of activity and practices has made it difficult for a lot of companies to adjust to new things and so that could happen again uh and there's certainly a puzzle but yeah in all these cases so far amazon has been aware of it is trying to do it but you can still see the scenario playing out and in a truly disruptive technology it's not always possible for the incumbent to effectively cope with it okay the next scenario speaks to i think some of the work that you've done in automation and related areas software replaces centralized warehouses as delivery services are directly connected to suppliers and factories so dave this is like cut out the middle man right software and automation changes the nature of the route absolutely i mean you know in a world of ubiquitous delivery services and product standardization metrics and products being built and shipped from all over the world the concept of running them all through a centralized warehouse is at least at a minimum uh seems like something that might be uh obsoleted and replaced and you know imagine if google built a significant taxonomy of of core products that could be traced directly to where they are either manufactured supplied or brought into the country from whatever company that tries to sell them and the delivery service connected directly to that uh and so that model has always been out there i think at various times people have looked at it it hasn't happened so far and i think amazon itself is is is looking at this particularly as it gets more into food that the idea of shipping all fresh food any sort of centralized warehouse is a pretty bad idea uh and so you know that model of software essentially replacing giant automated warehouses uh is out there and and seems to me uh likely and i just say that you know alibaba for the record doesn't really use that warehouse model it uses a network of suppliers and does it that way and and there do seem to be uh some efficiencies that would likely come with that the next one is was really interesting from a historian's perspective and it's the penultimate uh scenario and that's the proverbial self-inflicted wound and you and i certainly remember ibm's you know fateful decision to outsource the microprocessor and operating system to intel and and and and and microsoft sorry ibm's decision to do that lotus you might recall it refused to allow 123 to run on windows back in the day novell buying word perfect jim barksdale a lot of young people the audience won't of course remember this but jim barksdale poo-pooing microsoft's decision to bundle internet explorer into the operating system all those were kind of self-inflicted or blind spots so this one is complacency arrogance blindness abuse of power loss of trust so much more than the examples i gave consumer and or employee backlash you're seeing some of that at facebook now and i guess this is taking their eye off the customer ball losing the day zero in amazon's case forgetting that customer obsession formula they're working backwards culture and i think this is a big reason why andy jassy was put in charge so this wouldn't happen but we've seen time and time again as the examples i just gave blind spots have absolutely killed companies haven't they dave absolutely he listed many of the most famous but perhaps my favorite of all was kennels and the founder of digital equipment corporation one of the great tech visionaries of his time who stated over and over again why would anybody want a home computer or eunuch's snake oil was his other beautiful all of those things and and so there's the blindness uh there's the area ibm who just came to the view that they and att both came to the view that they were invincible and nothing could ever crack their control of their customer base so we've seen all that i think uh more recently i think some of these things can actually go from the bottom up and you know what's happening to facebook today well they're being hurt by former employees speaking out uh you know this never really happened too much to in the ibm and t days but people calling into question amazon's work labor practices and such things is certainly a possible scenario and the whole sort of you know in the end you know people talk about a cultural backlash against technology i'm not sure i believe it'll happen but it certainly is possible that people will start to rebel against these firms you see it more likely with facebook is fairly well along there uh amazon's still popular but you know in the end and as you i think you said the the core thing that companies routinely fail on is they lose their customer focus and they get caught up in other things their financial numbers their their power inside their position of their company but they they lose track of staying close to the customer has need and terrific job of staying close to the customers over the years uh so if anyone you know was maybe less vulnerable that they they would be well along that that line but it can happen to anyone and new management is often you know one of the real tests and there's many examples of that through history when a new executive comes in will they have that same focus that same thing particularly you know as the first generation's employees get wealthy and retired in a new set of people come in you know you look at microsoft the new people who came in well they're not going to be multi-millionaires they may have missed the great runs they're there to work and and the culture of companies changes when you get to that state the m is not that there yet but you can envision that comings soon enough so you know cultural issues have always been a factor and it's hard to imagine there won't be some sort of factor going forward well and you know you talk about that the the succession of founders and ceos i mean that's what to me makes microsoft so astounding because during the bomber years it was unclear that they were ever going to become relevant again and so nadella has done a masterful job but of course they had the margins from the pc software business that allowed them to buy that time but look at intel and the troubles it's going through uh and so many other examples of companies that just sort of said all right well we're going to pack it in and either sell the company or which is again what i think makes think companies like oracle and dell which you know founder-led ceos not ceo in the case of oracle but still running the business uh so quite uh significant yeah yeah and you know we've talked a lot about things that might hurt answers but you gotta recognize how in many ways how amazing they are and most tech companies a lot of them anyways have essentially been one trick ponies i mean google still makes overwhelming amount of its money selling ads and the things it's tried to do in cars and healthcare and various things you know they've often struggled you know apple still makes the core of its money around it's it's cell phone platform amazon's one of the few that continually generates entirely new huge businesses and and you have to give them an enormous amount of credit for that you know microsoft uh was a they failed repeatedly over and over again with internet stuff and phone stuff and all these things and it really wasn't until you know satya came in and really focused on their customers and their need for enterprise services that he that he really got the company on the right track so you know amazon has always been good listeners customers and if they continue to do so it bodes well but history says other stuff comes along okay and the last scenario is open-ended dave included uh you know what did we miss is there another scenario that we haven't put forth that you could feel it could be disruptive to amazon right i mean you've got to have the at least what'd we miss yeah i mean you know these are things that me and you and i just sort of made up the top of our head these are things we see that that might happen but you know in your huge audience of people in this community every day i'm sure there are other people out there who have thoughts of what might shake things up or even doing things that might shake things up already uh and you know one of the things you do for you guys is get this sort of material out there and and see what ideas surface so hopefully people will uh participate in this and we'll see what comes out of it all right so what happens from here is we're going to publish the the link to the survey in this video description and in our posts we ask you to take the survey please tell your friends we're going to publish the results as always we do in an open and free david michelle thanks so much for putting your brain power on this and collaborating with us i'm really excited to see the results and and and run through the other giants with you as well once we see what this survey says yeah thanks david great and yeah if we can make this one work be fun to do it for for google and microsoft and facebook and apple and see where it all goes thanks a lot all right okay that's it for today remember these episodes are all available as podcasts wherever you listen just search breaking analysis podcast i publish each week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com etr.plus is where all the cool survey data lives they just dropped their october survey with some great findings so do check that out you can reach me on twitter at d velante he's at d michelle or comment on my linkedin post or email me at david.vellante at siliconangle.com this is dave vellante for dave michelle thanks for watching thecube insights powered by etr be well and we'll see you next time

>> Narrator: From around the globe, it's the CUBE with digital coverage of IBM Think 2021, brought to you by IBM. >> Welcome back to IBM Think 2021, the virtual edition. This is the CUBEs, continuous, deep dive coverage of the people, processes and technologies that are really changing our world. Right now, we're going to talk about modernization and what's beyond with Jamie Thomas, general manager, strategy and development, IBM Enterprise Security. Jamie, always a pleasure. Great to see you again. Thanks for coming on. >> It's great to see you, Dave. And thanks for having me on the CUBE is always a pleasure. >> Yeah, it is our pleasure. And listen, we've been hearing a lot about IBM is focused on hybrid cloud, Arvind Krishna says we must win the architectural battle for hybrid cloud. I love that. We've been hearing a lot about AI. And I wonder if you could talk about IBM Systems and how it plays into that strategy? >> Sure, well, it's a great time to have this discussion Dave. As you all know, IBM Systems Technology is used widely around the world, by many, many 1000s of clients in the context of our IBM System Z, our power systems and storage. And what we have seen is really an uptake of monetization around those workloads, if you will, driven by hybrid cloud, the hybrid cloud agenda, as well as an uptake of Red Hat OpenShift, as a vehicle for this modernization. So it's pretty exciting stuff, what we see as many clients taking advantage of OpenShift on Linux, to really modernize these environments, and then stay close, if you will, to that systems of record database and the transactions associated with it. So they're seeing a definite performance advantage to taking advantage of OpenShift. And it's really fascinating to see the things that they're doing. So if you look at financial services, for instance, there's a lot of focus on risk analytics. So things like fraud, anti money laundering, mortgage risk, types of applications being done in this context, when you look at our retail industry clients, you see also a lot of customer centricity solutions, if you will, being deployed on OpenShift. And once again, having Linux close to those traditional LPARs of AIX, I-Series, or in the context of z/OS. So those are some of the things we see happening. And it's quite real. >> Now, you didn't mention power, but I want to come back and ask you about power. Because a few weeks ago, we were prompted to dig in a little bit with the when Arvind was on with Pat Kessinger at Intel and talking about the relationship you guys have. And so we dug in a little bit, we thought originally, we said, oh, it's about quantum. But we dug in. And we realized that the POWER10 is actually the best out there and the highest performance in terms of disaggregating memory. And we see that as a future architecture for systems and actually really quite excited about it about the potential that brings not only to build beyond system on a chip and system on a package, but to start doing interesting things at the Edge. You know, what do you what's going on with power? >> Well, of course, when I talked about OpenShift, we're doing OpenShift on power Linux, as well as Z Linux, but you're exactly right in the context for a POWER10 processor. We couldn't be more we're so excited about this processor. First of all, it's our first delivery with our partner Samsung with a seven nanometer form factor. The processor itself has only 18 billion transistors. So it's got a few transistors there. But one of the cool inventions, if you will, that we have created is this expansive memory region as part of this design point, which we call memory inception, it gives us the ability to reach memory across servers, up to two petabytes of memory. Aside from that, this processor has generational improvements and core and thread performance, improved energy efficiency. And all of this, Dave is going to give us a lot of opportunity with new workloads, particularly around artificial intelligence and inferencing around artificial intelligence. I mean, that's going to be that's another critical innovation that we see here in this POWER10 processor. >> Yeah, processor performance is just exploding. We're blowing away the historical norms. I think many people don't realize that. Let's talk about some of the key announcements that you've made in quantum last time we spoke on the qubit for last year, I think we did a deeper dive on quantum. You've made some announcements around hardware and software roadmaps. Give us the update on quantum please. >> Well, there is so much that has happened since we last spoke on the quantum landscape. And the key thing that we focused on in the last six months is really an articulation of our roadmaps, so the roadmap around hardware, the roadmap around software, and we've also done quite a bit of ecosystem development. So in terms of the roadmap around hardware, we put ourselves out there we've said we were going to get to over 1000 qubit machine and in 2023, so that's our milestone. And we've got a number of steps we've outlined along that way, of course, we have to make progress, frankly, every six months in terms of innovating around the processor, the electronics and the fridge associated with these machines. So lots of exciting innovation across the board. We've also published a software roadmap, where we're articulating how we improve a circuit execution speeds. So we hope, our plan to show shortly a 100 times improvement in circuit execution speeds. And as we go forward in the future, we're modifying our Qiskit programming model to not only allow a easily easy use by all types of developers, but to improve the fidelity of the entire machine, if you will. So all of our innovations go hand in hand, our hardware roadmap, our software roadmap, are all very critical in driving the technical outcomes that we think are so important for quantum to become a reality. We've deployed, I would say, in our quantum cloud over, you know, over 20 machines over time, we never quite identify the precise number because frankly, as we put up a new generation machine, we often retire when it's older. So we're constantly updating them out there, and every machine that comes on online, and that cloud, in fact, represents a sea change and hardware and a sea change in software. So they're all the latest and greatest that our clients can have access to. >> That's key, the developer angle you got redshift running on quantum yet? >> Okay, I mean, that's a really good question, you know, as part of that software roadmap in terms of the evolution and the speed of that circuit execution is really this interesting marriage between classical processing and quantum processing and bring those closer together. And in the context of our classical operations that are interfacing with that quantum processor, we're taking advantage of OpenShift, running on that classical machine to achieve that. And once again, if, as you can imagine, that'll give us a lot of flexibility in terms of where that classical machine resides and how we continue the evolution the great marriage, I think that's going to that will exist that does exist and will exist between classical computing and quantum computing. >> I'm glad I asked it was kind of tongue in cheek. But that's a key thread to the ecosystem, which is critical to obviously, you know, such a new technology. How are you thinking about the ecosystem evolution? >> Well, the ecosystem here for quantum is infinitely important. We started day one, on this journey with free access to our systems for that reason, because we wanted to create easy entry for anyone that really wanted to participate in this quantum journey. And I can tell you, it really fascinates everyone, from high school students, to college students, to those that are PhDs. But during this journey, we have reached over 300,000 unique users, we have now over 500,000 unique downloads of our Qiskit programming model. But to really achieve that is his back plane by this ongoing educational thrust that we have. So we've created an open source textbook, around Qiskit that allows organizations around the world to take advantage of it from a curriculum perspective. We have over 200 organizations that are using our open source textbook. Last year, when we realized we couldn't do our in person programming camps, which were so exciting around the world, you can imagine doing an in person programming camp and South Africa and Asia and all those things we did in 2019. Well, we had just like you all, we had to go completely virtual, right. And we thought that we would have a few 100 people sign up for our summer school, we had over 4000 people sign up for our summer school. And so one of the things we had to do is really pedal fast to be able to support that many students in this summer school that kind of grew out of our proportions. The neat thing was once again, seeing all the kids and students around the world taking advantage of this and learning about quantum computing. And then I guess that the end of last year, Dave, to really top this off, we did something really fundamentally important. And we set up a quantum center for historically black colleges and universities, with Howard University being the anchor of this quantum center. And we're serving 23 HBCUs now, to be able to reach a new set of students, if you will, with STEM technologies, and most importantly, with quantum. And I find, you know, the neat thing about quantum is is very interdisciplinary. So we have quantum physicist, we have electrical engineers, we have engineers on the team, we have computer scientists, we have people with biology and chemistry and financial services backgrounds. So I'm pretty excited about the reach that we have with quantum into HBCUs and even beyond right I think we can do some we can have some phenomenal results and help a lot of people on this journey to quantum and you know, obviously help ourselves but help these students as well. >> What do you see in people do with quantum and maybe some of the use cases. I mean you mentioned there's sort of a connection to traditional workloads, but obviously some new territory what's exciting out there? >> Well, there's been a really a number of use cases that I think are top of mind right now. So one of the most interesting to me has been one that showed us a few months ago that we talked about in the press actually a few months ago, which is with Exxon Mobil. And they really started looking at logistics in the context of Maritime shipping, using quantum. And if you think of logistics, logistics are really, really complicated. Logistics in the face of a pandemic are even more complicated and logistics when things like the Suez Canal shuts down, are even more complicated. So think about, you know, when the Suez Canal shut down, it's kind of like the equivalent of several major airports around the world shutting down and then you have to reroute all the traffic, and that traffic and maritime shipping is has to be very precise, has to be planned the stops are plan, the routes are plan. And the interest that ExxonMobil has had in this journey is not just more effective logistics, but how do they get natural gas shipped around the world more effectively, because their goal is to bring energy to organizations into countries while reducing CO2 emissions. So they have a very grand vision that they're trying to accomplish. And this logistics operation is just one of many, then we can think of logistics, though being a being applicable to anyone that has a supply chain. So to other shipping organizations, not just Maritime shipping. And a lot of the optimization logic that we're learning from that set of work also applies to financial services. So if we look at optimization, around portfolio pricing, and everything, a lot of the similar characteristics will also go be applicable to the financial services industry. So that's one big example. And I guess our latest partnership that we announced with some fanfare, about two weeks ago, was with the Cleveland Clinic, and we're doing a special discovery acceleration activity with the Cleveland Clinic, which starts prominently with artificial intelligence, looking at chemistry and genomics, and improve speed around machine learning for all of the the critical healthcare operations that the Cleveland Clinic has embarked on but as part of that journey, they like many clients are evolving from artificial intelligence, and then learning how they can apply quantum as an accelerator in the future. And so they also indicated that they will buy the first commercial on premise quantum computer for their operations and place that in Ohio, in the the the years to come. So it's a pretty exciting relationship. These relationships show the power of the combination, once again, of classical computing, using that intelligently to solve very difficult problems. And then taking advantage of quantum for what it can uniquely do in a lot of these use cases. >> That's great description, because it is a strong connection to things that we do today. It's just going to do them better, but then it's going to open up a whole new set of opportunities. Everybody wants to know, when, you know, it's all over the place. Because some people say, oh, not for decades, other people say I think it's going to be sooner than you think. What are you guys saying about timeframe? >> We're certainly determined to make it sooner than later. Our roadmaps if you note go through 2023. And we think the 2023 is going to will be a pivotal year for us in terms of delivery around those roadmaps. But it's these kind of use cases and this intense working with these clients, 'cause when they work with us, they're giving us feedback on everything that we've done, how does this programming model really help me solve these problems? What do we need to do differently? In the case of Exxon Mobil, they've given us a lot of really great feedback on how we can better fine tune all elements of the system to improve that system. It's really allowed us to chart a course for how we think about the programming model in particular in the context of users. Just last week, in fact, we announced some new machine learning applications, which these applications are really to allow artificial intelligence users and programmers to get take advantage of quantum without being a quantum physicist or expert, right. So it's really an encapsulation of a composable elements so that they can start to use, using an interface allows them to access through PyTorch into the quantum computer, take advantage of some of the things we're doing around neural networks and things like that, once again, without having to be experts in quantum. So I think those are the kind of things we're learning how to do better, fundamentally through this co-creation and development with our quantum network. And our quantum network now is over 140 unique organizations and those are commercial, academic, national laboratories and startups that we're working with. >> The picture started become more clear, we're seeing emerging AI applications, a lot of work today in AI is in modeling. Over time, it's going to shift toward inference and real time and practical applications. Everybody talks about Moore's law being dead. Well, in fact, the yes, I guess, technically speaking, but the premise or the outcome of Moore's law is actually accelerating, we're seeing processor performance, quadrupling every two years now, when you include the GPU along with the CPU, the DSPs, the accelerators. And so that's going to take us through this decade, and then then quantum is going to power us, you know, well beyond who can even predict that. It's a very, very exciting time. Jamie, I always love talking to you. Thank you so much for coming back on the CUBE. >> Well, I appreciate the time. And I think you're exactly right, Dave, you know, we talked about POWER10, just for a few minutes there. But one of the things we've done in POWER10, as well as we've embedded AI into every core that processor, so you reduce that latency, we've got a 10 to 20 times improvement over the last generation in terms of artificial intelligence, you think about the evolution of a classical machine like that state of the art, and then combine that with quantum and what we can do in the future, I think is a really exciting time to be in computing. And I really appreciate your time today to have this dialogue with you. >> Yeah, it's always fun and it's of national importance as well. Jamie Thomas, thanks so much. This is Dave Vellante with the CUBE keep it right there our continuous coverage of IBM Think 2021 will be right back. (gentle music) (bright music)

(bright music) >> Narrator: From around the globe, it's the CUBE with digital coverage of IBM Think 2021, brought to you by IBM. >> Welcome back to IBM Think 2021, the virtual edition. This is the CUBEs, continuous, deep dive coverage of the people, processes and technologies that are really changing our world. Right now, we're going to talk about modernization and what's beyond with Jamie Thomas, general manager, strategy and development, IBM Enterprise Security. Jamie, always a pleasure. Great to see you again. Thanks for coming on. >> It's great to see you, Dave. And thanks for having me on the CUBE is always a pleasure. >> Yeah, it is our pleasure. And listen, we've been hearing a lot about IBM is focused on hybrid cloud, Arvind Krishna says we must win the architectural battle for hybrid cloud. I love that. We've been hearing a lot about AI. And I wonder if you could talk about IBM Systems and how it plays into that strategy? >> Sure, well, it's a great time to have this discussion Dave. As you all know, IBM Systems Technology is used widely around the world, by many, many 1000s of clients in the context of our IBM System Z, our power systems and storage. And what we have seen is really an uptake of monetization around those workloads, if you will, driven by hybrid cloud, the hybrid cloud agenda, as well as an uptake of Red Hat OpenShift, as a vehicle for this modernization. So it's pretty exciting stuff, what we see as many clients taking advantage of OpenShift on Linux, to really modernize these environments, and then stay close, if you will, to that systems of record database and the transactions associated with it. So they're seeing a definite performance advantage to taking advantage of OpenShift. And it's really fascinating to see the things that they're doing. So if you look at financial services, for instance, there's a lot of focus on risk analytics. So things like fraud, anti money laundering, mortgage risk, types of applications being done in this context, when you look at our retail industry clients, you see also a lot of customer centricity solutions, if you will, being deployed on OpenShift. And once again, having Linux close to those traditional LPARs of AIX, I-Series, or in the context of z/OS. So those are some of the things we see happening. And it's quite real. >> Now, you didn't mention power, but I want to come back and ask you about power. Because a few weeks ago, we were prompted to dig in a little bit with the when Arvind was on with Pat Kessinger at Intel and talking about the relationship you guys have. And so we dug in a little bit, we thought originally, we said, oh, it's about quantum. But we dug in. And we realized that the POWER10 is actually the best out there and the highest performance in terms of disaggregating memory. And we see that as a future architecture for systems and actually really quite excited about it about the potential that brings not only to build beyond system on a chip and system on a package, but to start doing interesting things at the Edge. You know, what do you what's going on with power? >> Well, of course, when I talked about OpenShift, we're doing OpenShift on power Linux, as well as Z Linux, but you're exactly right in the context for a POWER10 processor. We couldn't be more we're so excited about this processor. First of all, it's our first delivery with our partner Samsung with a seven nanometer form factor. The processor itself has only 18 billion transistors. So it's got a few transistors there. But one of the cool inventions, if you will, that we have created is this expansive memory region as part of this design point, which we call memory inception, it gives us the ability to reach memory across servers, up to two petabytes of memory. Aside from that, this processor has generational improvements and core and thread performance, improved energy efficiency. And all of this, Dave is going to give us a lot of opportunity with new workloads, particularly around artificial intelligence and inferencing around artificial intelligence. I mean, that's going to be that's another critical innovation that we see here in this POWER10 processor. >> Yeah, processor performance is just exploding. We're blowing away the historical norms. I think many people don't realize that. Let's talk about some of the key announcements that you've made in quantum last time we spoke on the qubit for last year, I think we did a deeper dive on quantum. You've made some announcements around hardware and software roadmaps. Give us the update on quantum please. >> Well, there is so much that has happened since we last spoke on the quantum landscape. And the key thing that we focused on in the last six months is really an articulation of our roadmaps, so the roadmap around hardware, the roadmap around software, and we've also done quite a bit of ecosystem development. So in terms of the roadmap around hardware, we put ourselves out there we've said we were going to get to over 1000 qubit machine and in 2023, so that's our milestone. And we've got a number of steps we've outlined along that way, of course, we have to make progress, frankly, every six months in terms of innovating around the processor, the electronics and the fridge associated with these machines. So lots of exciting innovation across the board. We've also published a software roadmap, where we're articulating how we improve a circuit execution speeds. So we hope, our plan to show shortly a 100 times improvement in circuit execution speeds. And as we go forward in the future, we're modifying our Qiskit programming model to not only allow a easily easy use by all types of developers, but to improve the fidelity of the entire machine, if you will. So all of our innovations go hand in hand, our hardware roadmap, our software roadmap, are all very critical in driving the technical outcomes that we think are so important for quantum to become a reality. We've deployed, I would say, in our quantum cloud over, you know, over 20 machines over time, we never quite identify the precise number because frankly, as we put up a new generation machine, we often retire when it's older. So we're constantly updating them out there, and every machine that comes on online, and that cloud, in fact, represents a sea change and hardware and a sea change in software. So they're all the latest and greatest that our clients can have access to. >> That's key, the developer angle you got redshift running on quantum yet? >> Okay, I mean, that's a really good question, you know, as part of that software roadmap in terms of the evolution and the speed of that circuit execution is really this interesting marriage between classical processing and quantum processing and bring those closer together. And in the context of our classical operations that are interfacing with that quantum processor, we're taking advantage of OpenShift, running on that classical machine to achieve that. And once again, if, as you can imagine, that'll give us a lot of flexibility in terms of where that classical machine resides and how we continue the evolution the great marriage, I think that's going to that will exist that does exist and will exist between classical computing and quantum computing. >> I'm glad I asked it was kind of tongue in cheek. But that's a key thread to the ecosystem, which is critical to obviously, you know, such a new technology. How are you thinking about the ecosystem evolution? >> Well, the ecosystem here for quantum is infinitely important. We started day one, on this journey with free access to our systems for that reason, because we wanted to create easy entry for anyone that really wanted to participate in this quantum journey. And I can tell you, it really fascinates everyone, from high school students, to college students, to those that are PhDs. But during this journey, we have reached over 300,000 unique users, we have now over 500,000 unique downloads of our Qiskit programming model. But to really achieve that is his back plane by this ongoing educational thrust that we have. So we've created an open source textbook, around Qiskit that allows organizations around the world to take advantage of it from a curriculum perspective. We have over 200 organizations that are using our open source textbook. Last year, when we realized we couldn't do our in person programming camps, which were so exciting around the world, you can imagine doing an in person programming camp and South Africa and Asia and all those things we did in 2019. Well, we had just like you all, we had to go completely virtual, right. And we thought that we would have a few 100 people sign up for our summer school, we had over 4000 people sign up for our summer school. And so one of the things we had to do is really pedal fast to be able to support that many students in this summer school that kind of grew out of our proportions. The neat thing was once again, seeing all the kids and students around the world taking advantage of this and learning about quantum computing. And then I guess that the end of last year, Dave, to really top this off, we did something really fundamentally important. And we set up a quantum center for historically black colleges and universities, with Howard University being the anchor of this quantum center. And we're serving 23 HBCUs now, to be able to reach a new set of students, if you will, with STEM technologies, and most importantly, with quantum. And I find, you know, the neat thing about quantum is is very interdisciplinary. So we have quantum physicist, we have electrical engineers, we have engineers on the team, we have computer scientists, we have people with biology and chemistry and financial services backgrounds. So I'm pretty excited about the reach that we have with quantum into HBCUs and even beyond right I think we can do some we can have some phenomenal results and help a lot of people on this journey to quantum and you know, obviously help ourselves but help these students as well. >> What do you see in people do with quantum and maybe some of the use cases. I mean you mentioned there's sort of a connection to traditional workloads, but obviously some new territory what's exciting out there? >> Well, there's been a really a number of use cases that I think are top of mind right now. So one of the most interesting to me has been one that showed us a few months ago that we talked about in the press actually a few months ago, which is with Exxon Mobil. And they really started looking at logistics in the context of Maritime shipping, using quantum. And if you think of logistics, logistics are really, really complicated. Logistics in the face of a pandemic are even more complicated and logistics when things like the Suez Canal shuts down, are even more complicated. So think about, you know, when the Suez Canal shut down, it's kind of like the equivalent of several major airports around the world shutting down and then you have to reroute all the traffic, and that traffic and maritime shipping is has to be very precise, has to be planned the stops are plan, the routes are plan. And the interest that ExxonMobil has had in this journey is not just more effective logistics, but how do they get natural gas shipped around the world more effectively, because their goal is to bring energy to organizations into countries while reducing CO2 emissions. So they have a very grand vision that they're trying to accomplish. And this logistics operation is just one of many, then we can think of logistics, though being a being applicable to anyone that has a supply chain. So to other shipping organizations, not just Maritime shipping. And a lot of the optimization logic that we're learning from that set of work also applies to financial services. So if we look at optimization, around portfolio pricing, and everything, a lot of the similar characteristics will also go be applicable to the financial services industry. So that's one big example. And I guess our latest partnership that we announced with some fanfare, about two weeks ago, was with the Cleveland Clinic, and we're doing a special discovery acceleration activity with the Cleveland Clinic, which starts prominently with artificial intelligence, looking at chemistry and genomics, and improve speed around machine learning for all of the the critical healthcare operations that the Cleveland Clinic has embarked on but as part of that journey, they like many clients are evolving from artificial intelligence, and then learning how they can apply quantum as an accelerator in the future. And so they also indicated that they will buy the first commercial on premise quantum computer for their operations and place that in Ohio, in the the the years to come. So it's a pretty exciting relationship. These relationships show the power of the combination, once again, of classical computing, using that intelligently to solve very difficult problems. And then taking advantage of quantum for what it can uniquely do in a lot of these use cases. >> That's great description, because it is a strong connection to things that we do today. It's just going to do them better, but then it's going to open up a whole new set of opportunities. Everybody wants to know, when, you know, it's all over the place. Because some people say, oh, not for decades, other people say I think it's going to be sooner than you think. What are you guys saying about timeframe? >> We're certainly determined to make it sooner than later. Our roadmaps if you note go through 2023. And we think the 2023 is going to will be a pivotal year for us in terms of delivery around those roadmaps. But it's these kind of use cases and this intense working with these clients, 'cause when they work with us, they're giving us feedback on everything that we've done, how does this programming model really help me solve these problems? What do we need to do differently? In the case of Exxon Mobil, they've given us a lot of really great feedback on how we can better fine tune all elements of the system to improve that system. It's really allowed us to chart a course for how we think about the programming model in particular in the context of users. Just last week, in fact, we announced some new machine learning applications, which these applications are really to allow artificial intelligence users and programmers to get take advantage of quantum without being a quantum physicist or expert, right. So it's really an encapsulation of a composable elements so that they can start to use, using an interface allows them to access through PyTorch into the quantum computer, take advantage of some of the things we're doing around neural networks and things like that, once again, without having to be experts in quantum. So I think those are the kind of things we're learning how to do better, fundamentally through this co-creation and development with our quantum network. And our quantum network now is over 140 unique organizations and those are commercial, academic, national laboratories and startups that we're working with. >> The picture started become more clear, we're seeing emerging AI applications, a lot of work today in AI is in modeling. Over time, it's going to shift toward inference and real time and practical applications. Everybody talks about Moore's law being dead. Well, in fact, the yes, I guess, technically speaking, but the premise or the outcome of Moore's law is actually accelerating, we're seeing processor performance, quadrupling every two years now, when you include the GPU along with the CPU, the DSPs, the accelerators. And so that's going to take us through this decade, and then then quantum is going to power us, you know, well beyond who can even predict that. It's a very, very exciting time. Jamie, I always love talking to you. Thank you so much for coming back on the CUBE. >> Well, I appreciate the time. And I think you're exactly right, Dave, you know, we talked about POWER10, just for a few minutes there. But one of the things we've done in POWER10, as well as we've embedded AI into every core that processor, so you reduce that latency, we've got a 10 to 20 times improvement over the last generation in terms of artificial intelligence, you think about the evolution of a classical machine like that state of the art, and then combine that with quantum and what we can do in the future, I think is a really exciting time to be in computing. And I really appreciate your time today to have this dialogue with you. >> Yeah, it's always fun and it's of national importance as well. Jamie Thomas, thanks so much. This is Dave Vellante with the CUBE keep it right there our continuous coverage of IBM Think 2021 will be right back. (gentle music) (bright music)

>> Announcer: From around the globe, it's The Cube. With digital coverage of Ansible Fest 2020 brought to you by Red Hat. >> Hello, welcome back to The Cube's coverage of Ansible Fest 2020. This is The Cube. Cube Virtual. I'm your host, John Furrier with The Cube and Silicon Angle. Two great guests here. Two engineers and architects. Michael McCarthy who is a architect at Delivery Engineering, who's giving a talk with Gamesys and Jurgen Grech who's a technical architect for the platform engineering team at Gamesys. Gentlemen, welcome to The Cube, thanks for coming on. >> Hello. >> Nice to see you. >> Coming in from London, coming in from Malta, you guys are doing a lot of engineering. You're a customer of Ansible, want to get into some of the cool things you're doing obviously Kubernetes automation, platform engineering, this is what everyone's working on right now that's going to be positioned for the future. Before we get started though, tell me a little bit about what Gamesys does and you guys' role. Michael, we'll start with you. >> Sure, so we're a gaming operator, we run multiple bingo-led and casino-led gaming websites, some of them are B2B, some are B2C. I think we've been doing it now for probably 14 or 15 years at least. I've been there for 12 and a half of those. So we essentially run gaming websites where people come and play their favorite games. >> And what's your role there? What do you do? >> So I'm in the operation side of things, I used to be a developer for 12 or so years. We make sure that everything's kind of up and running, we keep the systems running. My team in particular focuses on the speed of delivery for developers so we're constantly looking at, how long has it taken to get things in front of the customers, can we make it faster, can we make it easier, can we put cool stuff out there quicker? So it's a kind of platformy type role that I do, and I enjoy it a lot, so it's good. >> Jurgen you're platform engineering that sounds deep. >> Yes. >> Which is your role? (laughing) >> Well, I've been with Gamesys also for eight and a half years now. I hold the position of technical architect at the moment within this platform engineering group which is mostly tasked with all things ops related. I am responsible for designing, implementing and validating strategies for continuous deployment, whilst always ensuring high availability on both production and pre-production systems. I'm also responsible for the design and implementation of automated dynamic environment to support the needs of the development teams and also collaborating with other architects, especially those on the development floors in order to optimize the deployment and operational strategies for both existing and new types of services alike. >> Awesome, thanks for sharing that. Good, good context. Well, I mean, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that when you talk about gaming it's uptime and a high availability is critical. You know, having people, being the login you got to have the right data strategies, it can't be down, right. (laughs) It's a critical app. People are not going to enjoy it if they're not at, so I can see how scale's huge. Can you guys talk about how Ansible fits in because automation's been the theme here, you guys have been having a journey with automation. What's been your automation solution with Ansible? >> I'll go Michael. >> Yeah sure. >> So, basically back in July 2014, we started to look at Ansible to replace those commonly used, day to day, best scripts, which our ops team use to execute and which could lead to some human error. That was our main original goal of using Ansible at the time. At the time was our infrastructure looked considerably different. Definitely much, much smaller than the current private cloud footprint. And as I said, as early adopters within the operations team it was imperative for us to automate as much as possible. Those repetitive tasks, which involved the execution of various scripts and were prone to human error. Since then however, aware Ansible usage, it worked quickly. Since 2014, we went through two major infrastructure overhauls and automation using Ansible was always at the heart of each of those overhauls. In fact, our latest private cloud which is based on OpenStack is completely built from the ground up using Ansible code. So this includes the provision and co-visual machines, our entire networking stacks, so switches, routers, firewall, the SDN which OpenStack is built up on, our internal DNS system. Basically all you need to have a fully functional private cloud. At Gamesys we also have some workloads running in two different public clouds. And even in this case, we are running against the build code to set up all the required infrastructure components. Again, since we were fairly new adopters at the time of this technology, without all of those Ansible code, using the original as the case, cover now this has worked considerably and with enhancements of litigated modules polished public cloud, we've made the code look much cleaner, readable and ad approved. >> You made some great progress. Michael, you want to weigh in on this? Any thoughts on? >> Yeah, I think it's kind of, I mean, adding to what Jurgen said I think it's kind of everywhere. So, you know, you mentioned, you mentioned high availability, you mentioned kind of uptime, you know, imagine the people that operate the infra, the people who get called out and they're working 24 seven, you know, a lot of the things that they would do, the kind of run books they would use to, you know, restart something they're Ansible as well. So it's the deployment scripts, it's the kind of scripts that keep things running, it's the stuff that spins up the environments as Jurgen said. I've noticed a lot on the development side where, you know, we look at continuous delivery, people are running their own build servers. A lot of the scripting that people do, which, you know you'd imagine, might be done with say Bash, I think I've seen a lot of Ansible being used there amongst developers, I guess. Yeah, it's got an easy learning curve. It's all of those modules. A lot of the scripting around CD I think is Ansible. It plays quite nicely, you know, URI module and file modules and yeah, I think it's kind of everywhere I think. It's quite pervasive. >> Once again I said, when to get something going. Good, it's awesome. >> Yeah. Automation get great success. So it's been a big theme of Ansible Fest 2020 automation collectors, et cetera. But the question I have for you guys as customers, is how large of an IT estate were you looking to automate and where was the most imperative places to automate first? >> The most imperative items we wanted to automate first as I said, were those operational day to day tasks handled by our network operations team. Our estate is massive. So we are running our infrastructure across five different data centers around the world, thousands of virtual machines, hundreds of network components. So we, we deal with customers all around the world. So our point of presence is spread out around the world as well. And you can't really handle such kind of size without some sort of automation. And Ansible fit the bill perfectly, in my opinion. >> And so your goal is to automate the entire landscape. Are you there now? Where are you on that progress? >> I would say we're at a very advanced stage in that process. Since 2014 we've made huge strides. All of our most recent private cloud setups as I said, have been built from the ground up using Ansible. And I would say a good 90% plus of our operational tasks are handled using some kind of Ansible playbook. >> Yeah, that makes total sense. Michael you brought up the, you start early in people's, it spreads. Those are my words, but you were saying that. What kind of systems do people tend to start with at Ansible? And what's, where's that first sticky moment where it lands and expands and which teams jump on it first? Is it the developers? Is it more the IT? Take us through some of the how this all gets started and how it spreads. >> I think in the, the first time I remember using it was probably I think 2014, 2015. And it was what Jurgen mentioned. I was on the Dev side and we wanted a way to have consistency in how we deployed. We wanted to be able to deploy the exact same way, you know into earlier environments, into Dev environments as we did in staging and production. And, you know, someone kind of found Ansible and then someone in operations kind of saw it and they were happy with it and they felt comfortable using the, kind of getting up to speed. And I think it was hard to know where it really started first, but you sort of looked around and every team, every team kind of had it. So, you know, who actually started I'm not sure, but it's all over the place. >> He did. (laughs) >> Yeah. I think, you know, where people start with it first it probably depends if you're on the ops or the dev side, I think on the dev side you know, we're encouraging people to own their own deployment playbooks you know, you're responsible for the deployment of your system to production. Obviously you've got the network operations the not group sort of doing it for you, but you know, your first exposure is probably going to be writing a playbook to deploy your app or maybe it's around some build tooling, spinning up your own build environment but that's something you'll be doing. I know with Ansible and it's especially around this point of stuff because everything's in git, there's that collaboration which I never saw, obviously I saw people chatting over kind of slack in teams but in terms of being able to sort of raise PR's having developers raise PR's, having operations comment on them the same the other way around, that's been a massive change which I think has come from using Ansible. >> The collaboration piece is huge. And I think it's one of those things early on out of all the Ansible friends that I know that use it and customers and in the company product was just good. It just word of mouth, spreads it around and be like, this is workable, saves a lot of time and it's a pain point remover. Also enables some things to happen with now automation, but now it's mature. Right? So Jurgen I got to ask you in the maturation of all this automation you're talking about scale, you mentioned it. OpenStack, you guys got the private clouds, people use it for public cloud, I now see Red Hat has a angle on that. But when you think about the current modern state of the art today, you can't go anywhere without talking about Kubernetes. >> Yup. >> Kubernetes has really emerged on the scene to manage these clusters but yet it's just getting started. You have a lot of experience with Ansible and Kubernetes. Can you share your journey with Kubernetes and Ansible, and what's your reaction to that? >> Yes, so back in June 2016 Gamesys was developing a new gaming platform which was stood on now Kubernetes. Kubernetes at the time was fairly new to many at an enterprise level with only a handful of production systems online. So we were tasked to assess how we're going to bring Kubernetes into production. So we first, we identified the requirements to set up a production grade cluster and given our experience with Ansible, we embarked on a journey to automate the installation process. Again using Ansible this would ensure that all the required installation and configuration parameters as Michael mentioned, we are committing it, the code is shared with all the respective development teams for ease of collaboration and feedback. And we decided to logically divide our code into two. And we said, we're going to have an installation code in order to provide Kubernetes as a service. So this basically installs Docker onto every worker node. It installs cube lit, all the master playing components of Kubernetes installs core DNS, the container storage interface, and they full blown and cluster monitoring stack. Then we also had our configuration code which basically sets up name spaces, it labels nodes for specific uses at certain security policies according to the cluster use case and creates all the required role based access configurations. This need to split the code in two came about really with the growing adoption of Kubernetes because at the inception stage we only had the one team which had a requirement to use Kubernetes. However, with various teams getting on board each required their own flavor with their particular unique configurations. This is of course well managed quite easily to reduce of different Ansible inventories. And it's all integrated now within Ansible Tower with different unique drop templates to install and configure the Kubernetes clusters. We started as I said with just one pre-production or staging cluster in 2010 16. Today we manage 42 different Kubernetes clusters including six which are in production. >> What problems >> So, as I mentioned earlier >> I got to ask you 'cause Kubernetes certainly when it came out, I mean, that was a big fan boy of that. I was promoting Kubernetes from the beginning. I saw it as a really great opportunity to bring things together with containers. It turns out that developers love it for that reason. What, so getting your hands on is great, but as you moved it in to practice, what problems did it solve for you? >> So using Ansible, definitely solve the problem of ensuring that all of our 42 clusters across all the different data centers are running the same configuration. So they're running the same version. They're running the same security policies. They're running the same name space, according to the type. Each team has a similar deployment token. And it's very, very convenient to roll out changes and upgrades especially when all of our code has been integrated with Ansible Tower through a simple user interface click. >> How's Ansible Tower working for you? Is that going well? Ansible Tower? >> Eh, I would say so, yes. Most of our code now is integrated with Ansible Tower. It's allowed us to also share some of the tasks with a wider group of people. Within Peg we are the guardians of the production environments really. However, we share the responsibility of staging environments with the respective development teams, who primarily those environments. So as such, through the use of Ansible Tower we've managed to also securely and consistently share the same way how they can install and upgrade these clusters themselves without our involvement. >> Thank you. Michael you're giving, oh sorry go ahead. Go ahead Jurgen. >> Sorry is no no. >> Michael, you're giving a presentation breakout session at Ansible Fest. Can you give us a sneak peek >> Yup. >> Of what you're going to talk about? >> Yeah sure. So we, I said we've been using Tower for a long time. We've been using it since 2015 I think. Think we've probably made some mistakes along the way, I guess, or we've learned a lot of stuff from how we started then to now. So what it does is it follows this sort of timeline of how we started, why there was this big move to making an effort to put all of our deployment playbooks in Ansible. Why you would go to Tower over and above Ansible itself. It talks about our early interactions with quite an old version of Tower and now version two, things that we struggled with, then we saw version three came out there was loads and loads of really good stuff in version three. And it's really about kind of how we've used the new features, how it's worked out for us. It's kind of about what Gamesys have done with Tower but I think it's probably applicable to everyone and anyone that uses Tower I think will, they'll probably come across the same things, how do I scale it for multiple teams? How do I give teams the ownership to kind of own their own playbooks? How do I automate Tower itself? It talks about that. Sort of check pointing every few years about where we'd got to and what was going well and what was going less well. So, and a bit of a look forward to, what's going to come next with Tower. So we're constantly keeping up to date and we've got kind of roadmap for where we want to go. >> What's interesting about you guys is you think about look at OpenStack and then how Cloud came on the scene and Private Cloud has emerged with hybrid and obviously public, you guys are right on the wave of all this large scale stuff and your gaming app really kind of highlights that. And you've been through the paces with Ansible. So I guess my question, and you've got a lot of scar tissue and you got success to show for it too, a lot of great stuff. What advice would you give people who are now getting on the new wave, the bigger wave that's coming which is more users, more scale, more features more automation, microservices are coming around the corner. As long as I get more scale. What advice would you give someone who's coming on board with Ansible for the first time? >> I think there was, you were talking before about Kubernetes and it was so where we were, I think we'd got into containers kind of relatively early. And we were deploying Docker and we had some pretty big, kind of scary playbooks and they managed low balances and deployed Docker containers. And it was always interesting thinking how is this all going to change when Kubernetes comes along? And I think that's been really smooth. I think there's a really nice Ansible module that's just called gates. And I think it's really simple actually, it simplified a lot of the playbooks. And I think that the technologies can coexist quite happily. I don't think you have to feel like Kubernetes is going to change all of the investment you've made into Ansible. Even if you go down the route of Kubernetes operators, you can write them in Ansible. So I still think it's a very relevant tool even with Kubernetes being so kind of prevalent. >> Jurgen what's your thoughts on folks getting in now, who want to jump in and take advantage of the automation, all the cool stuff with Ansible? What advice would you give them? >> Yes, I would definitely recommend to look at their infrastructure set ups as they would look at their code. So break it down into small manageable components, start small, build your roles, make sure to build your roles properly for each of that small component. And then definitely look at Ansible Tower as a way to visualize and control the execution of your code. Make sure you're running it with the proper security policies with the proper credentials and all, they're not, of course so break anything which is at the production level. >> Michael McCarthy, Jurgen Grech two great engineers at Gamesys. Congratulations on your success and love to unpack the infrastructure and the scale you have and certainly automation, great success path. And it's going to get easier. I mean, that's what everyone's saying, it's going to get easier. Thanks for coming on. I appreciate the conversation. Thank you very much. >> Thank you, welcome >> Thank you, take care. Bye bye. >> I'm John Furrier with The Cube here in Palo Alto California. We're virtual, The Cube virtual for Ansible Fest 2020 virtual. Thank you for watching. (upbeat music)

>> Announcer: From theCUBE studios in Palo Alto in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is a CUBE conversation. >> Everyone, welcome to this CUBE conversation here in theCUBE studios in Palo Alto. We're here for remote interview. We're continuing with the COVID coverage, the quarantine crew. I'm John Furrier, host of theCUBE. Got a great guest, Christal Bemont. The CEO of Talend, just joined the club in the middle of the pandemic. Christal, thanks for joining us and nice seeing you. >> It's a pleasure to be here. Thank you for having me. Well, I think it's a really great conversation to have a couple of threads that are interesting to me. One is, Talend's... We've been covering for a long time, obviously. Their position in the marketplace, we've been following their trajectory. You're new to the company, but you joined right in the middle of, as COVID was going down. And we're still in this mode and it looks like it's going to be for some time. I'd love to get your thoughts as we're in this mode. First, what attracted you to Talend, your new? And, what's it been like there since you've been there, you can't meet people face to face. So you must be doing a lot of remote interviews, then remote conversations. >> Well, you're right about that, I had a very short window that I could get out on the road. And I'm so grateful that I did because visiting our offices, our customers and our partners is critical to, really surrounding ourselves with amazing people that we have Talend. But you know, I'll just go back to why I joined Talend and it really goes to the customers, our customer stories just captured my attention right away. The way that Talend shows up to drive outcomes for customers that are tangible, that are quantifiable, and that are game changing was something that interested me. And it really is that at the heart of every conversation is data. So it was a simple decision for me to say, those are the types of things I want to be involved in. And so Talend was definitely something that became very attractive. >> It's interesting, we've watched the progression of the big data market and now 10 years in, and the explosion of cloud, obviously, everyone's talking about data as a key ingredient for application development. And you're still seeing kind of the challenges of how do you manage the data. And then how do you put that into action for insights, because now you have these connected experiences. And even more highlighted with the COVID pandemic, you still got to run the business, you still need the data. The workforce is remote. The future of work, work force, workplace, workloads and workflows all have data. This is a real. >> That's right >> Challenge with now the connected experience being the number one problem and making that good, and making that valuable. What's your take on? >> That's right. I couldn't agree more. You know, we talked a lot about digital transformation for years, quite frankly. And I would say, you know, we've been in a digital transformation evolution. And I think what has happened now is COVID is an accelerant and it's a, now it's a digital revolution and at the heart or maybe the cornerstone, if you will, of the any digital transformation is data transformation. You think about digital transformation is about mindset. It's about changing your entire way that you operate as a company. It's not just about systems and technology, that's a really critical part. But everything that fuels the ability to get outcomes out of a digital transformation is data. And so the ability to leverage. Like you said, there's connected data, there's more data than we've ever had. And that's a massive opportunity. But having a lot of data is not always the answer. Sometimes that becomes a big responsibility with regulations, and also something that if not carefully governed, not really something you can leverage properly to run your business. So data is at the heart of all the things going on at this moment. >> It's interesting to, you know, a lot of the main trends outside of kind of the inside the industry discussions around data and the role of data. The consumer side of it, is seeing it with fake news. You're seeing it with the data around COVID. Anyone can make data tell a story. There's always you know, >> Right. causation versus correlation, that discussion. But when you start thinking people being exposed to the data problems, there's an opportunity in there and one of the big things is trust. What data can I trust? What's authentic? And then, how do I make sure that it's not just supporting a story? There's all kinds of things going on around it. It makes it seem like a broader challenge. Trust seems to be at the heart of it. What do you trust? Who's the source? It's just all life now as data infiltrated all of our lives. It's certainly now exposed. >> You couldn't be more right on that one. And you can see it play out, in the media, you can see it play out again. This accelerating set of circumstances that are playing out every single day, as people are staying so closely, watchful of data informing decisions that everyone's making around the world in a lot of different ways. And you've seen a lot of times where there's a question about the quality of the data, the accuracy of the data, who's providing the data. And, that's the environment that Talend, really supports and lives in, even prior to COVID. But it just underscores the importance of not just having a complete set of data. And I would say, even taking it further than just having what we would traditionally call quality of data. And really taking it down to something, you used really important word is, trust. How can you make sure that the data that you're making decisions on is something you can trust, and when it comes to health and well being that's certainly something that you can't afford not to have? And it's an area that is underserved right now that we've spent a lot of time thinking about and how we're starting to show up to provide those solutions to our customers. >> I want to get into the customer conversation. I think there's a lot of use cases I want to unpack with you. But I want to first get your vision on how you guys see the future. What is the vision of Talend? And how do you see it? What's the plan? What's the big story there? >> You know, there's a couple of things. I look at this and say, right now in the industry and in our customers, which we cover all different segments, all different sizes of customers all around the globe. They have a variety of use cases, if you will. A variety of needs, everything from the most simple ingestion to some of the more complex transformation and governance projects that they're running. And first and foremost, we show up uniquely as a platform, a platform that allows people to activate and utilize different parts of our services that we can provide to an entire organization. And that's something that is really important to us. And we also look at how do we make the process in which they're using Talend and the skills that are required, you know, really push the envelope on making those as simple as possible. The ability to get to time to value as quickly as possible is our ultimate goal. And then looking, you know, finally, the third lane is to make sure that we can provide not just, as I said, the completeness of data, but that it's really data that they can boil down to something that has intrinsic and quantifiable trust. Because all the time we spend, all the money that's spent on collecting the data is really only as good as the, ability to say I can emphatically trust it, and I can tell you why. And I can show you the footprint of that data. And that's something really important right now more than ever. >> I was talking to my family, I've four kids, and they're all kind of growing up now. And, we're having these conversations on COVID and the question of AI comes up all the time and AI is very, cool for kids, but they don't really know how to talk about machine learning. So I got to ask you around how you see the machine learning piece come in because data feeds AI, I mean you got, it's a real... And that's how I described my kids, data is the fuel for AI and you got to feed that in there. But it's not that easy. What's your reaction to that? Because I think a lot of companies are saying, I have to automate things, the DevOps world and agility come into the mainstream operations of businesses. And there's a agility piece, there's a value of the data is being recognized. But now I got to put it to practice. What's the playbook? What's your reaction to all that? >> Yeah, I think you're right. I mean, first of all, AI and machine learning have a really important role in the simplification, the ability to move at speed and to, perform functions that quite frankly are going to move us into an entirely new realm of possibility. I still will contend, whether you're feeding that with, anything that you feed data into with data has to be really good quality data. AI machine learning is only as good as the information that you're feeding it with. And so, it is really, really critical that we leverage these technologies to their fullest extent, but that we make sure that we feed it in the right way. So I think it's a really big part of our future. I think it's something that's going to be important. But we have to have the certainty that we're using them in a way that's coming to, a place of the right outcome. And that starts with what you feed it to use to go use to improve the processes. >> Christal, one of the patterns we're seeing is that decision makers and CXOs are looking at the COVID pandemic and saying, okay, I did my thing with triage. Now, I got to reset and get the foundation set again and look at the projects that are going to be important. And I got to figure out the holistic architecture 'cause I need a growth strategy, and I got a reset maybe some of the team members projects and whatnot. What's your view on this? Because now new decisions have to be made, roles that might change as well. So this is going to change, how come he's going to make decisions? What's your reaction to that with the customers? They are trying to figure this out, what's your advice? >> Yeah, that's absolutely right. And this is about re-instrumenting a business, reinventing it in many cases, a great example is Domino's, who is maybe surprisingly, for some a pioneer in, digital transformation that's been a number of years in the making, that really has shown that with being in a state of being able to adapt quickly to circumstances and to be forward looking, how critical it is. And so I think this has been a wake up call for organizations across the globe to say we have have to be on the ready, we have to be able to be instrumented in a way that we can make quick decisions and Domino's case it became, originally the ability to you know, they were the first pizza delivery to try out drones for pizza delivery and, you know, to... And have gaming devices where you can order pizza because that's where their customers read and when COVID hit contact list became a criteria and so you can really see how they are able to separate themselves. You see people being leaders that have been further along in their transformation. So I think what this has done is expose some vulnerabilities, quite frankly. And this is a wake up call for companies around the globe that can no longer afford to be in a state where they can't pivot quickly. And looking backwards is no longer the thing that informs people in a state of something like COVID, because there really aren't examples or patterns to look at. So re-instrumenting the business is really critical, data has to be transformed to perform better for companies. >> It's interesting you bring that, a point about the pivot and the companies resetting and reinventing for that growth strategy is that, you're seeing brand impacts and also financial results are directly related to it. So if you're not ready, this has, it could have a real detrimental impact on the brand value, and ultimately financial results. And this is kind of forcing people to say, it's not just an IT problem. It's a business model change and data is shown now to be the key ingredient, because that's where the agility is going to come from, that's where the value is there. And this is all been talked about in the industry before. But now it's kind of our mainstream. This is now the new reality that my brand opportunity and the financial results, my company are at stake. Can you comment on your thinking around that? Because this is a top line, high order bit, if you will conversation among the top boardrooms. >> Yeah, it is. And I agree with you, many of these conversations have been going on for a while now, right. And I think this just exposes the criticality of what happens when you're not in a state of being able to really reinvent yourself or like I said, re-instrument, and if you're already in that state, how much better off you are. Brands are taking a hit in terms of their ability to show up and it goes beyond just their ability to perform, as a business, but to really show up differently for their customers, support people in a different way. And really make sure that they can respond also from a social perspective, how are they going to help and contribute to what the world is facing. And so, it really is asking companies to really fire on all cylinders, quite frankly. >> I want to give you a thoughts on two thought tracks and they're kind of connected, so bear with me. One is, we've heard a lot from the marketplace that with the pandemic, the reality of the IT teams that collect the data and the business teams that have to make the decisions are changing, obviously with the work at home and all the different dynamics around the re-architecting. And then you have the competitive advantage now which people are pointing to as speed and scale. So you've got your internal kind of organizations that are managing wrangling data, ingesting data, the business teams with the customers, and that's kind of was the slow rolling way it was before. Now you got that changing. And now you got pressure to be faster and more scalable. So scale is a competitive advantage, speeds that competitive advantage. These are important kind of flywheel elements of the new models that people are being successful, what is your reaction to that? >> I couldn't agree more. It is a competitive weapon, quite frankly. It is an operational accelerant. And it is an innovation catalyst. And, you know, time is no one's friend, quite frankly, it's one of those odd things right now where for all of us that are working from home and time has this odd sense of reality to it. But it's... You know, really quite frankly you cannot act fast enough. But what's interesting about enabling companies to act fast, that has to come down to the ability for them to be able to, spend the time in the right places. So for example, when I think about the number one thing that we can do is it takes a lot for organization sometimes to put the information in the hands of the right people at the right time. So that the time that's being spent by an overall company, not just an individual within a company but the entire company. You have to be able to decrease that, so that the time that they're spending is actually on helping drive outcomes. And so some of this and you just struck a chord on in everything I think about is, how quickly we can get the right data in the hands of the right people because, in AstraZeneca's case for example, the difference of being able to do that, their highest cost in their business is clinical trials. Being able to get information you can use and reduce a month of, how fast they can bring those clinical trials to bear is saving them hundreds of millions of dollars. But that right now AstraZeneca is an important player in helping us solve for this. So you think about how important it is to get information to the right people, and time is of critical essence right now. >> Yeah, it's interesting (indistinct) that business model advantage, but also you got a lot of... That's an opportunity not for many, but there's also a lot of, I won't say heavy lifting, but maybe a drag, some might call it compliance. You know, GDPR, whatnot. Balancing that kind of, I won't say drag. I mean, I think it's a drag personally, but I think we have to have those things in place. You want to maintain the compliance, rigidity that's out there, but also have room to innovate. That balance is very difficult. And it's really mostly highlighted in the data bases because that's where the action is around data privacy and those compliance things. But if you got an innovation formula there that you're talking about, and you got compliance, if you get one wrong and right, you got to balance it. What's your take on that? Because that's a huge challenge. It's one of those things that's kind of not talked about much, but pretty much there. >> You're right, indeed it is a complete balance but you can't have one without the other. In highly regulated industries, especially with companies like AstraZeneca. But really, if you think about any company the ironic thing right now is that when you're looking at, even a single report, but certainly across an entire company or line of business, right now you can see that there's quality measures and governance that, we put into play. But the ability to actually, quantifiably say on a single piece of data that you can track, where that data has been, who's touched it? How complete is it? And really kind of put a measurable trust score against it, there's work to be done there. But, with GDPR, with HIPAA, and interestingly enough, we're looking to, kind of challenge some of the norms with COVID that says, we now want to collect data that is formally considered privacy, and maybe something that would be regulated. And now we want to share it for the greater good of, making sure that we can track and trace where people are at that maybe are infected and so forth. And so you're starting to see this interesting conversion of challenging the fact that we've got at least be able to support people in their governance of data, but take that a step further, really. >> Awesome, final question. You had Talend Connect, which is your big kind of confab. What best practices are emerging out of Talend these days for customers? If you had to kind of highlight the top use cases or best practices that customers and your potential customers could leverage right now with data, what are you guys putting out there? What are the key best practices? 'Cause everyone has a new reality sets of knowledge, we talk deeply about it, but what's the best practices? What are you guys offering? >> Well, I think, one of the things that I alluded to before is really making sure that we show up as a strategic business partner. And this is really important to us, you know, there all this these things that we've been talking about, they're heavy lifting for organizations to really look at how they bring the digital revolution to the forefront. There's a lot to consider. And so our part in that is to say, we believe that when you power your business on Talend, and you're able to solve for a number for different problems across platform, then that's really important that we show up in the way that we can meet our customers where they're at, so that's one. Making it simple, you know, really pushing the boundaries on the level of expertise, the specialization, the time to value of making sure that they can leverage. Again, spending their time on the things that are important, which are making sure that they're spending it in quality data and data they trust. And then really making sure that final lane is covered up saying, we want to make sure that data is accessible when you need it, where you need it. Things like IoT and edge devices, this proliferation of data is just becoming immense. And so, taking the data, giving it to people, but in a way that they can have confidence. It's the same thing you just said before, there's a lot to consider. And there's in a way a burden of people not knowing maybe all the data they have and how it's being used. We feel responsibility to make sure that we're part of helping that become easy and identifiable and really taking it to the next step beyond quality, so it's really across all of it just simply putting people in a position to be able to make good decisions and not have to do so much of the heavy lifting. And making sure that they know for a fact that it's something that they've made a good decision around because of the data has been trusted, and they can have the confidence in that. >> Awesome, we think data is added advantage. It's just getting more important then ever as the days go on. So great, great insight. Christal, thank you for that insight. Before we end, take a minute to put the plug in for Talend. What do you up to? You guys are hiring, you looking for folks? What's the business plan? Why you guys winning? What's the hot product? Take a minute to give up a quick update on Talend. >> Sure, we're in a great situation where, this is a point in time at Talend where (indistinct) a great trajectory in front of us, we see speed and scale of our organization that has an opportunity in front of it to really help solve problems for every part of the market, whether it's the, smaller businesses who are certainly in it at a point where they're, having a big impact to the largest organizations. And we feel that there's a set of solutions that we can really work to drive as a partner, to each of those customers to solve for the problems that put them in a position to really be able to re-instrument and to reinvent their business. And when we partner like we have with the companies that I mentioned, Domino's and AstraZeneca, and many others, it comes back to why I join Talend, we have the ability to change the outcome of really separating organizations from the pack and data is the competitive advantage. It is the thing that will put people on a different trajectory. And I'm excited about what we bring to the table and I'm really excited about what's to come and how we'll continue to push the envelope for how we help our customers. >> That's awesome, congratulations. Congrats on the new role of Talend to CEO, Christal Bemont. >> Thank you. >> Big up Talend, data is at the heart of the value proposition. We've been saying that for 10 years now more than ever, it's exposed that the value is there, speed and scales the new table stakes for competitiveness and business models for the applications. Again, great CUBE captures, great insight. Christal thank you for joining me today. I'm John Furrier, host of theCUBE. It's been a CUBE conversation. Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)

(upbeat funky music) >> From our studios, in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, California. This is a CUBE conversation. >> Okay, welcome back everyone, we're here at theCUBE studios in Palo Alto for a special CUBE conversation. Talking security, talking about the internet and cloud computing. Martin Bosshardt is the CEO of Open Systems. Martin, great to see you. Last time we chatted was in December you were in Vegas, we had a little on the ground, great to meet your team. Welcome back to theCUBE. >> Thank you so much. It's great to be here. >> So exciting things going on, I want to get a state of the Open Systems and the industry, obviously security's a really big big thing, a lot stuff going on in the industry. Black Hat. Defcon. Amazon had a big event called re:Inforce, which was really kind of the first cloud securities show. Which brings the whole, your kind of value proposition to the table but, you guys have a new office here in Silicon Valley. I saw a video on the internet, trending. >> Yeah. >> Pretty nice place work. Give us the update on the current office and Silicon Valley presence. >> Yeah we are, you know, we are really happy to be now here in the U.S. headquarters in Redwood City and Silicon Valley. So, this really helps us also to be closer to the talents, to be closer to all the going to market activities and also to understand the market better. So, it's really exciting to be here and obviously also our, I mean the people love to work here in Silicon Valley. Weather is always great. >> Yeah, weathers always great and the office has got that good working vibe there. Take a minute to explain Open Systems real quick for the folks not familiar with the video 'cause we did last December in Vegas with your team. Tell them what your companies value propositions is and some of the growth you're experiencing. >> Right, so, Open Systems really is, you know, we operate SD-WAN in a secure way for our customer, so it's really focusing on making a relatively complicated technology, from operational point of view, very easy to consume for our customers. So this is, I think, something we started more than 15 years ago in Europe and I would say Open Systems is very much comparable, or at least the going to market part, is very much comparable to an organic farms. We have a wonderful ecosystems in Switzerland, especially in the financial services industry and our customers just love the way we provided those services and told their neighbors and friends and this is really how we grew on a global scale. Currently Open Systems is operating in more than 180 countries, SD-WAN and security infrastructure for customers and protect approximately 2.5 to three million in users globally. And when we started to enter the U.S. market, we learned that the way we provide SD-WAN in a secure way, really resonates a lot with the U.S. market because we can make complex infrastructures, especially projects going to the cloud, very easy to consume for our customers. So, we are really exciting on the growth side right now, we grow super fast in the U.S., we have been very successful in latest customers, we won Chemers, we won Chemit... >> So you're winning a lot of business. >> We are winning a lot of business and what's exciting about it is those customers give us really very valuable feedback on the difference how we provided services is really exciting... >> You know Martin, I was observing and talking to your team in December when we first met you guys for the first time and you just briefly touched on it on your description of the company success. A lot of the early success and continued success has been word of mouth. >> Right. >> With the organic, not like big marketing splash in the pool, kind of like, you know, banging the drum hard, although you are doing some marketing now but and being in the U.S. That word of mouth has been really a testament to the quality of the product, so I got to ask you, what are they happy about? What's the problem that you're solving? What's the big buzz? Why are they so excited to share, to their peers and colleagues about Open Systems? What's the big revelation? >> Thank you for the credit. I think, you know, everybody goes to the cloud and what you really need is an SD-WAN to access the cloud. What that also means for all those companies, they have to rethink their security posture. So if you add now all those products and then you try to operate those products, it turns out it's relatively complicated compared to an old school MPLS Network we used to operate in the past. So, this is really where Open Systems comes in and helps customers to operate that in very easy ways. So we integrate, all those products needed, to operate the global SD-WAN in a secure way, on a single delivery platform and that allows customers to consume that entire suite in a very very easy way. >> I want to get your vision on the future of Open Systems. I know you guys call it secure SD-WAN. I'm a little bit more radical and controversial in the sense. I think SD-WAN is kind of passe term, I think, it's really cloud connectivity work anywhere, people are working at home more than ever, cloud computing has brought in essentially enterprise cloud. We're calling it cloud 2.0, where, it's not just public cloud and having workloads in there, taking advantage of the greatest of cloud 1.0. It's enterprises, this is hybrid, it's multi-cloud, you seeing a, really a distributed computing, a networking problem and a security problem being at the center of this new work environment. >> Yeah. >> Essentially, people connected to something. >> Right. >> It's cloud right, I mean. We can call it SD-WAN because it used to be an office, campus, remote office, very static dynamic. What's your vision? >> You're absolutely right. I mean, this is really where it all goes. Let's say, a network was a network and it was very clear what a network does, right now it's more like, we want to just connect users to cloud services and it's not so clear where those services are coming from and it's not so clear where those users are sitting, where you consume from. And, it results in a phenomenal opportunity to be much more agile, much more, much faster, also to set-up new services, but it also is a challenge for IT operations. Because you know, you might have a group of users saying, well this and this service doesn't work well and now you have to debug. Why is not performing, why isn't Germany maybe, a service coming from the U.S., not performing well? Or you have an IoT device suddenly not really collecting data in a right way and this is really where SD-WAN becomes an orchestration layer. SD-WAN really helps you to orchestrate all those services and make sure you have the SLA available, at all times, everywhere. And also, understand if it's not delivering right and this is really rare where I believe... Ya, we need new solutions to make these easy because... >> You know, a lot of companies talk about digital transformation, that becomes the office, you know, the top CEO, board conversation, let's transform and be digital. But the underlying infrastructure, which is very complex, you can talk about distributing computing, you got networking, all these things in place and old, new, all kind of mashed together with cloud. It's easy to say digital transformation but you're talking about digital transformation of the business on top of existing complex hardware, which comes out the networking, moving packets from A to B, storing it on drives and now you have people working at home, so you have people working globally. >> Right. >> It's not that simple. >> No. >> It's complicated. >> It is really... >> It's not just a U.S. problem, it's like a have a team in, an engineering team in the U.K. and Germany, wherever, business... So it's a global problem. >> Exactly and also it's about, you know, how do you process all the data in an efficient way. And where we see a lot of iteration power released is right now in the Cloud. It's really exciting how easy it gets to consume all that computing power out of the cloud but you need to make sure it is available and you need to understand what is happening if it's not available and how to fix that. And this is really where, I think networking became more demanding, more challenging but also, obviously offers a tremendous opportunity for innovation. >> And I think the security industry has gotten much broader scope to it, used to be, hey you know, I'm a nerd, I'm Black Hat, I'm a blue team, red team, secure the environment, get a perimeter and okay that's gone, we'll take care of threats, malware, all this stuff's going on. But when you think about like cloud 2.0, cloud 1.0 is compute storage, great applications can load up at the cloud, all this great stuffs happening, hooray, yeah, rah-rah. Now cloud 2.0 is networking and security. >> Right. >> Independent of everything right so, what's your take on that? How is Open Systems, you know, helping companies? And what do you say to your customers when you say, hey, you know, compute networking, the storage is good, the cloud on premise no problem, there's operating models for that but you got networking and you got security to deal with on top of all the complexity. What's your story? >> I think the most important thing is, you know, we have to live with the fact that some device system tools are not secure. So I think IoT's a very good example. If you want to have all those sensors out there and be close to the customer, be close to some business processes, you need IoT. But, it's just not possible to have these very cheap devices built in a secure way. So, it's a lot about how do you design a network, to design it in a resilient secure way and that means that you have to think in cells, you have to think in compartments and that makes it relatively easy, secure again, but, it is from operational point of view, quite a challenge because you do not operate any more one network, you suddenly operate maybe any networks. >> On that point, just to kind of wrap up here. The the security challenges around IoT, Machine Learning and AI, which is clearly becoming part of the fabric of, a company's going to leverage that... >> Right. What are some of the big challenges that companies are having and what do you do to solve it? >> You know, in the old network world, you had a network where everything was connected based on one network. So, when you introduce SD-WAN and you introduce all these capabilities, it is very dangerous if you think just, in the old school of one network because suddenly you have IoT working on the same network as maybe your finance department. Or you have productivity facilities working the same network as your network department. So, it just doesn't make sense to have those very different functionalities on exactly the same network because if you have a compromised situation, you suddenly have your entire company compromised and this is really where compartments become very very important. I think this also something you in every industry, historically as well. Security and safety starts also with compartments. So, if you think fire, fire security, it has a lot to do with fire compartments. In case you have a fire, you don't lose the entire building or the same goes with ship building. I mean, Titanic was the last very big ship that sunk but the reason was the compartments haven't been pressurized. A modern ship doesn't sink anymore. And I think this really what we have to do now also in IT. We have to think in compartments. We have to think in layers and that's easy to do with SD-WAN but it's not so easy to operate. >> Final question for you real quick, you know, people talk about hybrid cloud, multi-clouds, the big conversation in this cloud 2.0. But you guys as being successful in outside the United States and now in the U.S., there's also multi-geo work environment. >> Right. What should people think about when they kind of want to frame that debate or conversation? I'm a multinational, I'm operating in the U.S., now I have regions, clouds have regions. There's also all kind of of now regulatory pressure coming across those areas. >> I would say around 2,000 companies really started to globalize their value chains. You know, in the past, maybe you had a production facility in one country and then you sold your products globally but if you want to be competitive, you have to globalize your value chain. So it doesn't make sense to produce everything in one place. Your product usually, or your service, is produced on a global scale and that means that networks also have to help you to really produce that global value chain. But, it means also that you are operating in different jurisdictions, in different regions and you have to respect those different regulations and laws. And this is, obviously then and also a challenge for network operators because privacy in Germany is different than in the U.S., access rights are different, China's again very different, but all those multinationals, we operate in all those countries and we have to respect the local law. >> And the provide the security they need. >> Exactly. >> Martin, thanks for coming in and sharing your insights. Appreciate, good to see you, we'll follow up with and keep of the progress. Thanks for coming in. >> Thank so much. >> I'm John Furrier for CUBE Conversation in Palo Alto, at theCUBE Studios, thanks for watching. (upbeat funky music)

(upbeat music) >> Announcer: Live, from Las Vegas, It's theCube! Covering Informatica World 2018, brought to you by Informatica. >> Welcome back everyone. It's theCube's live coverage of Informatica World 2018, here in Las Vegas. I'm John Furrier, your host and analyst, with Peter Burris, co-host and analyst at Wikibon and still going on theCube. Our next two guests is Gitesh Ghai, C Vice President, General Manager of Data Quality Security and Governance for Informatica, and Smail Haddad who is the Senior IT Director of Data Governance and Data Delivery Architecture at Toyota, company wide, Great to have you on Gitesh. Great to have you on Smail. So we were just talking before coming on camera, before we went on live about the massive role that you have at Toyota with data. You are looking at everything now. You're touching all the data. But it wasn't always like that. >> Smail: Yeah it wasn't always like that... >> Tell us about your journey and your role at Toyota. >> Yeah thank you. So Toyota, again, started business in North America. People know, maybe not, 65 years ago. And we started as a little dealership in North Hollywood. Bringing these Japanese cars. So we grew from that single dealership in North Hollywood to this big company we are today, with almost 25 plants around North America, Canada, US, and Mexico. And almost 2,600 dealerships across nationwide. So what that came with, it came with a big responsibility, in terms of understanding our customer base and trying to be more closer to what the customer needs. So our supply chains, where we produce the vehicles, it really was mostly a push supply chain, where we build a car and we push it to the customer to buy it. The model works very well, all the way to 2008. Where things change and we all understand what happened back in the financial meltdown and the crisis, that was a worldwide crisis. And that was a turning point for Toyota because we start seeing a shift in the demand. The customers becoming more savvy. Demanding for example, more electrical cars, less gas guzzlers vehicles and so on. The marketing department, which was a different company back then, understood that but the production companies, which was producing the vehicles, they didn't have that knowledge. So the journey to bring these two together became really critical after that 2008 crisis. Because what it forced us to do was the vehicles were being produced everyday, the dealers were not able to sell, and we were just stuck in vehicles around the lot. So why the digital disruption was so key for us, is the data was always there. Data always told us the truth. And that's what the facts are. Where we started looking at, back after that, is hey, if we look at the data and the data always predicted that the shift in the market will happen that way. And we should've have throttled down maybe, our production system better. Why we didn't do it that way? We were not looking at the data. Data was available. So what we undertook, under Toyota IS, we said, "Can we bring all this data across all these silos, "into one place?" So we build our big data solution, where the data is coming from various departments and various business lines. And it's being blended together and correlated. What that gives us is really that 360 view of our business, which we were missing. 'Cause we were looking at the business in silo, in pieces. And with that explosion of data, that we were gathering, obviously that brings a lot of questions about where this data, how good it is, if I'm going to make decisions on it, can I trust it? All that was a good takeaway into the business I'm in, which is the Data Governance. It's basically how can we govern this data that we are collecting on a daily basis today? And so my department is leading basically, the North American Governance and Quality across all the business line in North America. So as we are gathering these data points everyday, on a daily basis, even today we are gathering. What made it even, made it go even further in terms of volume, is we started capturing data coming from the cost, on a real time basis. So this is not just sales data where we capture the experience, the sales, and configuration of the vehicles on a daily basis... >> John: That's a lot of data coming in. >> A lot of it, a lot of it. So the volume exploded. With that, the responsibility to put a solution, where people can go quickly, find the right data. So basically, the time to data became so critical. How can we shorten that time to find the right data you want? And understand it, and trust it, and use it? >> John: So last... >> Sorry John, the Toyota story that you're telling us is especially interesting 'cause Toyota is legendary for empirical based management, lean manufacturing, so you have plants and marketing organizations, and sales organizations who, because of the Toyota way, have grown up on the role that data needs to play in their function. And what you're doing is you're saying, "That was great. "But we had to take it to a next level "and organize our data differently so we could look at it "across the entire company." >> Across the entire company. So absolutely, there are four, basically, goals that Toyota is trying to achieve today. One is understanding our customer in a more personalized way. Understand today's demand and hopefully predict tomorrow's demand. The second important pillar, empower our employees and our team members. By the way, Toyota, we call employees team members. And the third one is optimize our operations. And the fourth is transform our product. In order to achieve all these four goals, data is at the middle of all this. Why it's so important, we understand that today, in this day and age of digital disruption. And by the way, the automotive industry is being disrupted. Not our competition right now, Toyota, is no more the GM, and the Ford, the traditional automotive companies. But our new competition is all the technology companies, Google, Apple, Amazon. And you might have heard the news. Everyday, how they are disrupting these segments where you hear about autonomous driving cars and everybody's jumping on it. And behind all that, taking just the autonomous driving cars. The amount of data behind these so you can make the vehicle drive itself and take you from point a to point b in a safe manner and avoid all the road hazards. That needs a huge amount of data that's behind it, and fuels that. We're able to make huge stride. The new story of Data Governance at Toyota, is really, how we can enable that and not being just about compliance and risk management, which is kind of understood, that's part of the job. But we make that seamless. We wanted our business unit to focus more on the core business and goals, versus worrying about, "Am I in compliance, do I need to do this or that?" Try to seize the opportunities and put Toyota in a competitive way so they can compete with all these new disrupters like I said, Google, and the, the Apple of the world. Because what they have in common, those companies, >> John: They're data companies. >> Exactly. Data companies, technology. They understand how to use data. They understand how to analyze data. This is where traditional automotive companies like Toyota, and GM, and Ford, are basically bound to learn about that. >> But Waymo is not a car manufacturer, Uber is not a car manufacturer, they're companies that are providing a transportation service. And the only way that Toyota could provide a transportation service, is if you started organizing your data differently, in service to the idea of providing consumers a better, and businesses, with better transportation services. Whether you call it personal. I don't want to be the typical analyst that kind of goes off and starts renaming things. But that's fundamentally what you're trying to do. Is you're saying, "Our customers are mainly focused "on getting from point a to point b safely. "Let's make sure that we have products and services "that help them get there. "Perhaps through a lot of intermediaries along the way." But is that kind of how you're organizing things? >> Absolutely, so in order to achieve that goal. We wanted to bring the silos. Like I said, the data was always there but it was always built in silos, stored in silos. What we did in the next, last few years, we started breaking all the silos because we started looking at the data as an enterprise assets and no more as just a departmental assets or as a tool to get to a goal. It became the strategic assets for the company. And in order to achieve that, was to really break the silos. Bring it together so we can see across and understand how are business is operating. And hopefully, put the company in a competitive advantage to see the future coming to. >> It must be really frustrating to know that the data was there the whole time. And you're kind of kicking yourself. What did you do? I mean, you brought Informatica in. What's the Informatica connection, Gitesh? Get a word in, come on. With the Informatica connection, these guys. Are you the core supplier? Do you guys, the connective tissue between Toyota's groups? >> It's all about the data, right? It's all about the data. Informatica's role in all of this, it's a great story. Toyota's, Smail's story, is a great story. What Informatica brought to bear for Toyota, it's actually the promise of big data. The promise of big data is bringing together data that hasn't been analyzed together in a new context before. So breaking down these silos and bringing together the data. What's interesting is when you bring it together, you create a data lake. But there's a very big difference between a data lake and a data swamp. Which is why naturally, governance, quality, trustworthiness became a focus area of bringing all of this data together. >> Well last year, talking about data swamp and data lake as our core theme. This year governance and enterprise catalog is a bigger story because you guys easily could've been swamped out because of all this new data coming in, whether it's car telemetry or new data. 'Cause if you had set the table for your intercompany connective tissue, if you will, then you're like, "Oh, hey we're done, wait a minute." >> But Toyota was applying data to the work of manufacturing, to the work of marketing cars. And now you're trying to apply data to the work of providing better transportation. And the only way to think that through is to see how all this data can be reorganized and brought together. And at the same time, you can still, then turn that data around and still apply it for the work of manufacturing, the work of marketing, and the work of selling. >> Gitesh: Absolutely. >> Also I'd add, to be competitive in a new market, they are going to use their, leverage their assets. Not only data but their physical assets. To compete at a new level, a new playing field. >> Smail: Absolutely. >> With data at the center. >> And I think you said it earlier, you have to bring this data together in the lake. But you need an organized view of all the data that's out there, which starts with our data catalog. So the data catalog gives you a sense of what data do you want to bring in the lake and what data, frankly, is noise, doesn't matter? >> Whole 'nother level of operations, whole 'nother level of intelligence. Competitive advantage, competitive strategy. >> Peter: What a job. >> We're data geeks, geeking out here. Great story, I'd like to do a follow up. I think that this is a real big story of not only of digital transformation, digital evolution, digital disruption, digital business, great story... >> You used to be able to do this job in Southern California. >> Yes, absolutely. >> Thanks for bringing Toyota to the table. Thanks for coming on. >> My pleasure. Thank you for having me on. >> The beginning of a journey that's going to continue it's not ending anytime soon. Toyota company, really bringing data into the center of the action. Of course, we're in the center of the action as theCube, bringing you the data from Informatica World, right here, on theCube. More coverage after this short break. I'm John Furrier, Peter Burris. Stay with us, we'll be right back. (upbeat music)

>> Announcer: Live from Las Vegas it's theCUBE covering ServiceNow Knowledge 2018. Brought to you by ServiceNow. >> Welcome back everyone to theCUBE's live coverage of ServiceNow Knowledge18 live from Las Vegas. I'm your host Rebecca Knight. We're joined by Raja Renganathan, he is the Vice President of Cloud Services at Cognizant Technology Solutions. I should say welcome back, it's not just welcome, it's welcome back to theCUBE. >> Thank you Rebecca. >> So tell our viewers a little bit about Cognizant Technology. What does your company do and what do you do there? >> I head the cloud services for Cognizant in the capacity of a vice president. Cognizant is a world-leading professional services company. Our objective is to help our clients to navigate the shift to digital. We have three pillars: go to market, we have Cognizant Digital Business which focuses on the user experience, data related, and we have the Cognizant Digital Operations which is predominantly a middle-office, back-end processing in an enterprise, and the third pillar is Cognizant Digital Systems and Technology which is basically modernizing the platform systems that is required to create the digital foundation. >> And you're also just this week been called a Certified Global Partner of ServiceNow so explain how that works. >> Our relationship with ServiceNow goes back six years. Today I think the ServiceNow line of business, which is under the cloud services, is one of the fastest-growing business unit for us. The key thing in any platform such as ServiceNow is the human intellectual capital. That is where we give a lot of importance. While technology is created by ServiceNow, someone has to go execute and implement the technology. So that's where we spent time and started hiring people, re-skilling the people, and then getting certified across different facets of what ServiceNow recommends as a part of their education system. So today we have about 850 plus certified people across the globe and we also do the delivery across our global operation centers, we also call it as RDCs, Regional Delivery Centers, we have one in Budapest, one in Phoenix, and one in Buenos Aires. So all these three centers caters to different service areas of ServiceNow. As a part of this RDC we're also adding, creating an experience zone, a ServiceNow experience zone, so when client walks in they not only see our associates working on projects, but they also get the panoramic view or the panoramic experience of how ServiceNow orchestration happens, how automation happens, how HR module works, and things like that. Because of the people we have, in terms of re-skilling and certification, we are being measured as the best overall global partner award yesterday in Knowledge18. >> Well congratulations. When you were searching for these people, as you said you had to so a lot of hiring, what were the kind of skills you were looking for when you were trying to find the top talent? >> If you look at Cognizant as a 265,000 plus organization we know the art of hiring people. >> And it is an art, it absolutely is an art. >> So our approach is, one we go to the campus, hire the fresh grads in all of the campus. If you look at of late the kids that are coming out of the campus, they are pretty smart in the sense of they come with the latest digital technologies, artificial intelligence, machine learning, natural language processing understanding, and things like that. So we take them and then we, within 30 days, we completely format them for ServiceNow. This is one approach. The second approach is we go to the lateral market and we hire and we bring them up to speed on the ServiceNow-related technologies. The third option is, with 265,000 people we have, the raw material is inside Cognizant, so we take people from other business units, other domain and then try to format them and to do that. But of late what we have started, especially within the U.S. footprint, is we go to all the community colleges and also we go to all the veteran's associations, those type of organizations and we hire them. So if you look at our Phoenix RDC, I'm proud to say that it is a woman-powered delivery center, when it comes to ServiceNow, with a pretty good mix of veterans. So these are the different approaches we use to hire people towards the ServiceNow practice. >> And they've been successful. >> They have been successful and if you look at how long can they continue in ServiceNow 'til they retire? No, so we do job rotation, every three years we give them opportunity. I have a unique advantage since I run the cloud services. I always rotate my people from ServiceNow to go to Amazon or to Microsoft as you're in different technologies every 24 to 36 months we do the job rotation. In that way I think I'm managing my retention well. >> So we know that the role of IT is really changing in so many organizations around the world. What are you hearing from customers, what are their pain points? What are the challenges that you're trying to solve? >> I think that's a great question now, Rebecca. We are in a very interesting time. The customers have a tremendous problem in their hand because they need to stay relevant in their business because business models are changing and if you look at for a retailer, the competition is not from the same industry. Similar for a pharmaceutical company, the competition is not from the same pharma industry. Everybody wanted to know, a pharma company wanted to know why Google is hiring 100 physicians. So the disruption is going to happen not in your industry, outside your industry. So that is the biggest challenge. The second thing is they need to continue to reinvent their business model. They cannot operate. We are hearing many stories like a lot of regional stores are closing because they didn't stay relevant to the business, to the customers. The third thing if you look at, let's take healthcare industry. Typically patients expect, historically, they were asked to maintain their prescription and medical records, but today in the new age patients are expecting the hospitals to manage everything because keep the data and intelligently apply the data because data is the new fuel or new oxygen, whatever you want to call it. >> Fuel, oxygen, one of those analogies. >> Data is going to play a critical role for any business. So every business is looking for how do I take the data and apply it intelligently? In the process how do I elevate experience? When I say experience it's both customer experience and also employee experience. So that's why if we look at, going back to the purpose of ServiceNow when John Donahoe was presenting in the keynote, he said, "We are in the world to make people's work better." The work is basically the experience. So we know about all the digital, every client is adopting the digital because of the advent of the cloud and the technologies around the AI, machine learning, et cetera, everybody is having a clear chatter of the digital transformation chatter as a part of their enterprises. So that is where we, companies like Cognizant, we go to them and then help them in truly being digital, how do you get there. That is where technologies like ServiceNow plays a critical role. >> And so it is the mission of ServiceNow, and it sounds like also the mission of Cognizant, to make the world of work work better for people. So give me some examples of ways that you are creatively solving employee headaches. How are you making the world of work better? >> I'll give a couple of examples. To start with, for a leading manufacturing company there are a lot of equipment dispersed across the field so we use IOT technology, sensors, and we collect the data, and the data gets analyzed and then we give a dashboard to our customers. When I say customers, the chief customer support officer, he or she can look at the dashboard and send the technician for evaluate it Imagine if the cloud was not there and moreover we use ServiceNow as a platform to do all the orchestration. If the cloud was not there, if products like ServiceNow was not there, this could have been a humongous task, but we are helping the problem for the customer. Today, with one click, the chief customer support officer can know which machine is giving which problem, accordingly dispatch a technician. This is one example. The second example is we are helping some agricultural companies where, in fact this came out during our hackathon, which I'll talk about you a little bit later, all this agricultural farms, the lands are there. When you wanted to grow something, you also need to know everyday what is the moisture of the soil, what is the temperature, et cetera. So we apply IOT technology and then collect the data and use ServiceNow dashboard to give it back to the customer. These are all real-time problems the customers are facing. There are so many examples, but if you look at most of the solutions and the outcomes what we give to the customer, it's all triggered by our innovation. So we are the only company, I can proudly say, conducted three hackathons with ServiceNow. When I say hackathon, all the people are put under one room and ideas were given and end of the day you'll get 100 plus ideas. Recently we did, about a month back, we did a global hackathon. First time we wanted to try India, three continents, seven cities, India, Budapest, Phoenix, 20 hours of continuous time. We generated about 115 ideas. Out of the 115 ideas, I think we are going to come with certain ideas and then put that back into ServiceNow app store. We have close to six plus apps already running on the ServiceNow store, now our plan for the next six months is to add another about 10 plus apps onto the ServiceNow store. >> That is the other questions that that begs. Are hackathons the best way in your mind to spark energy and innovation and creativity? >> Especially with the millennials. The millennials, yes definitely because they don't want to very mundane, routine work. They want a challenge, they are asking for challenge. So this hackathon is one of the ways to keep them happy. Because the future of workforce is changing with millennials coming in. And the jobs, they're also expecting, even in my team people wanted a change every 12 months. While we need to address our customers, we also need to take care of their expectations also. >> Let's think about the future a little bit now. What do you see your customers' future demands and where do you see Cognizant and ServiceNow being able to provide solutions to the problems they don't even know they're having. >> Right, right. So digital is the heartbeat. When I say digital is the heartbeat, the outcome is all about experience because if someone asks me, digital is not technology. Digital is all about experience so in order to give that experience, customers wanted multiple technologies, they wanted to reinvent, rewire, rethink their business models. So that is where we wanted to go as a Cognizant. For example, if you take ServiceNow, if you're taking that platform to them, how can I digitize your enterprise process, digitize your entire workflow and create automation, et cetera and then bring a collaborative work environment within your ecosystem. So this is what they are expecting. Nobody wants non-value add, mundane task, everything they want to get operated in an automation manner. That is where we are helping, basically anything that changes the experience, or pave a new way to the experience, that is where we at Cognizant we are constantly reinvesting on people, process, technology, and then taking that back to our customers. >> That's a great note to end on. Raja, we'll look forward to seeing you again at Knowledge19 next year. >> Thank you, definitely. >> I'm Rebecca Knight, we will have more of theCUBE's live coverage of ServiceNow Knowledge18 in just a little bit.

[Narrator] Live from Las Vegas, it's theCUBE. Covering VMworld 2017. Brought to you by VMware, and it's ecosystem partner. >> Hi, I'm Stu Miniman, here with my cohost Keith Townsend. You're watching theCUBE's coverage of VMworld 2017 here in Las Vegas. Happy to welcome to the program two guests who are going to dig into what's happening in the cloud space. A big, big hot topic of the show. Dave Shacochis, who is the vice president of product management at CenturyLink, Ajay Patel, SVP/GM of now Cloud Provider Software at VMware. Gentlemen, thanks so much for joining us. >> Thank you Stu. >> Nice to see you again Stu. >> Alright, so Dave. Here's a question we've asked coming into this week. VMware was doing this vCloud Air for a bunch of years. They're a competitor, no they're a partner with the vCloud network ... vCloud air now went over to OVH, and I think they waited 48 hours before they made this big deal with AWS so, tell us how the relationship has been not just one of the 4,500 service providers, but you're sitting on panels with VMware, you're one of the larger partners. >> We were on a panel discussion and we were talking about this earlier today. I think when vCloud Air launched we had some of these same conversations, and there were probably cube discussions where almost the same question was asked. What I said back then, and what a lot of us in the service provider community said back then, and we say it again now, is that ... And this is true, not just of VMware, but this is true of any enterprise architect, you run a better system, you build better software when you're running it 24-7 as a live service. It's just better. The software is better. The user experience is better. You're thinking about integration angles, and availability issues. The software gets better when you run it operationally, and VMware's technology got better when they launched vCloud Air and figured out that their virtualization technology, what they had been working with the service provider community around for years, it improved when they went and launched it and lived the life of a service provider. So we're actually excited about that. We're aligning to the same architecture. What's nice is that what they're running in the cloud, in the VMware cloud foundation, is the same thing we're running in our cloud-neutral facilities inside of the CenturyLink data center footprint. So, it's very interoperable. >> Ajay please ... >> So my response would be there are a few things that I've changed. One is, there wasn't a Cloud provider software business unit. I am dedicated to making the likes of David successful. Taking that IP and commercializing that, that's fundamental to our strategy. Second one is, we rebranded this to VMware cloud providers. The idea is you can get VMware cloud in one of three ways. You can build it yourself, get it on VMware cloud or AWS, more importantly but get it through our partners. Your choice based on the best cloud that fits your needs. So it's that level playing field, both on go to market, in terms of Geoff Waters, now the cloud sales leader over all of the different programs, technology, IP being made available, compensation neutrality ... These are all the things we "learn" from our VCM experience, if you will to do this right. So that we continue driving multi-cloud strategy, and certainly about centered around customer choice. >> Can we talk about the basic difference between those three delivery methods? From a customer's perspective, what's the difference in the look and feel of those? >> I think at the end of the day it's about getting VMware value in an integrated fashion. But that's not just sufficient, so when you go to cloud it's no longer just say, "Give me a virtualized environment." That's the "hard bit" of packaging stuff infrastructure, but that's not enough value. On top of that is the application is really the value. Managing that application, and the life cycle of the value. This is where the likes of CenturyLink really come into play. So we believe we're kind of democratizing in terms of the consumption of a cloud stack in one of three ways. It's really customer preference, and really how much burden they want to take on. On the private cloud side they're building it instead of buying it as a service. They prefer to go on AWS for whatever reason for their cloud strategy. They now have a VMware choice. Or they can go to a partner like CenturyLink to help them manage the entire journey including managing multiple clouds. So it's really about the customer choice, what's right for them versus putting them in a silo. >> What's really been good for us especially around the VMware cloud foundation reference architecture is that it starts to make the private clouds react predictably. Our offer net has now been architected and based around VMware Cloud Foundation. It stands up with the software defined data center architecture at each layer of the stack. We don't have to orchestrate nearly as many technology sets in order to make a private cloud app. We've been running hosted private cloud for as long as there have been hosted private clouds. CenturyLink has been managing as part of the cloud service provider program and all its earlier naming variances. But what this latest architecture allows us to do is not only remove the number of things that we need to integrate against, the integration code we need to write and all the different vendor technologies we need to orchestrate against it, it pulls it all into one scale out software, a divine stack, which makes our customer experience better. It drives better self-service, more reliable self-service, into the hands of our customers so that they can move faster. It allows our private cloud to become more predictable so that we can start managing it with our multi-cloud cloud application manager product. So we launched that earlier this year. It was a combination of some of the managed hosting tools and capabilities that we've had back in the days. It combines in the abstraction software we got from a company called ElasticBox that we acquired last year. We weave that together into one multi-cloud layer, so it now looks at private clouds and other public clouds as just another deployment destination on that multi-cloud managing journey. >> Effectively competition moving above the SVC layer. We're kind of making SVC common. Let's compete on the value, and the solution that we both want. >> Ironically this was the promise of open source projects to make this common platform across private, public, and multi-clouds. You use the term that a lot of people may not be familiar with, cloud neutral facilities. What is that term? >> A cloud neutral facility is one that can basically get you connected to a number of different cloud deployment form factors. It's not a one note show, a one approach kind of model. It's really about a service provider that from... When you said the term facility, that can really just be a service provider environment that basically gets the particular workload to the best execution venue for that individual set of run time conditions. To us, being in more of a cloud neutral posture, certainly means we're bringing some parts of our hosted environment, whether it's private or We have a multi-tenant environment that we can provision to as well. We use that multi-tenant environment to actually speed up our own development of higher level services. And then we partner across the different cloud service providers like AWS and Microsoft Azure. We tie into that. It's really about looking at the data center as an extension of all the potential run time venues, both ones that you might build on your own, and then ones that are available to you. >> Dave, I want you to expand on that. One of the things I've been getting out of this week is that maturation of how we've been talking about clouds. A couple years ago I was critical of VMware. It was like, any device, any application, one cloud. I was like "Wrong". No. Amazon. Absolutely, 100 percent public cloud ... I think they understand, if not 100 percent, we'll see where Amazon goes in the future. You said you're tying into the likes of Amazon and Azure. I'm assuming that's direct connect, and those kinds of services. How do we think of CenturyLink? Where do you add value? How do you make money in these various pieces? I remember (old company name) was one of the vCloud era data centers, and boy margins were going to be real tight on something like that. >> Our multi-cloud posture and the direction we see things going is really one that starts and the largest anchor point for CenturyLink's strategy is the strength of our network. It's all the places that that network can take us. A lot of the investments that we've made in virtualization management, a lot of the investments we've made around managing workloads inside data centers we control has really been a precursor to how we need to evolve the core of our network, and how our networking is becoming more software defined. We built and we launched, as I said before, CenturyLink Cloud which is a multi-tenant hosting environment. That has been a huge IT accelerator for us. As we've started to advance and start to figure out how do we manage virtualization inside the core of our points of presence on the network, and as our network starts to expand, as most folks know, we're in the closing stages of the announced acquisition of level three, as that transaction completes and the whole network gets even stronger, and now we have more software assets to be able to drive even further into the core of that network. So it starts from the network and everything we do from either a cloud neutral or multi-cloud perspective is really around helping customers at the workload layer to really thicken that network value proposition. >> I'm also excited about the whole notion of competing on the edge. And once you have a network of this scale, and the ability to then distribute, compute, either on the edge, consult in the back, or even leverage third party probably clouds, seamlessly with a high bandwidth, low jitter network. I think that's a foundational infrastructure that's needed. These guys have really done a good job of kind of bringing that to bear. Pretty excited about that opportunity. >> Ajay, wondering if you can give us a little color on service providers. When I go to most service providers, most of them, networking key strength, obviously we know CenturyLink, Telco, all that kind of background. Management layer. Most service providers build their own. So there's a lot of pieces now, when I see the cloud foundation suite and they're embracing it. How did you work through some of those, "Hey, no, we've got our way of doing things. We know better." As opposed to embracing them. Where is that give and take? >> I think what's happening is, depending on the sophistication of the service provider, the larger ones have the ability to kind of create a bare metal service, kind of drive higher automation, have the infrastructure spend to drive that. As you go a little bit down the market, they're really looking for "a cloud in a box". You and I spoke about this last year, right? They want an easy to type experience for the end customers without the cost and the complexity of building one. So my opportunity as a service provider business is, how do I give them that platform? That multi-tenant platform that can cover resources? But in the future, elastically leverage a VMware cloud on AWS, right, as an endpoint that they can start to use for geo distribution, DR, or simply new capacity. So we're going to see a world where they're going to start mixing and matching what they build, what they buy and how they drive that. And the management solution around that, around a high performance network, is going to be the future that I see together. >> So one of the buzzwords over the past few year in the industry has been the invisible infrastructure. This concept that infrastructure should be something that people use and don't see. How does CenturyLink help support, not necessarily making an invisible infrastructure, but this concept that this is something we use and don't see. From the network, to the software layer that we're now talking about. Where's the differentiating value that CenturyLink brings versus me rolling my own? >> Yeah, I think where we've been making most of our investments, and where we've been driving and focusing on success for our customers has been up at that managed services and application layer. The way we view the infrastructure layer of the stack ... When we think of stacks, we think of the network at the base level of the foundation, data center infrastructure at the next tier up and then workloads and applications. It's not a groundbreaking tiered model, but it's helped me kind of think and organize a lot of what's in our business. When it comes to the infrastructure layer, as I said before, we're in a highly interoperable posture with a lot of the other partner clouds, because our network can link us there pretty seamlessly, and because we still know how to orchestrate enough at the infrastructure layer. But the investment has really been inside the core of the network, as we start driving that virtualization capabilities into the core, and then up at the workload layer, what we're really trying to work around is creating, as in all computer science problems, an abstraction layer. The trick about an abstraction layer in our part of the world, and in our part of the industry is not creating one that creates a new layer of lock in. That allows each of the individual underpinning infrastructure venues to do their thing, and do what they're good at. We build that abstraction layer with the idea of a best execution venue mindset that lets each of those individual underpinning infrastructure offerings, whether its the VCF architecture or hosted up on AWS, or whether it's one of the other particular software platforms because of geography or performance, or service capabilities that they're good at. The trick of creating an abstraction layer is not locking anybody in or reducing those platforms to lowest common denominator. So what our cloud application manager offering being able to manage our private cloud based on VCF, as well as manage other environments down the road ... That's really where we try to make that infrastructure invisible is to sort of create a lightweight abstraction layer that they can think more at the workload layer than at the individual nuts and bolts layer. >> The great thing about creating an abstraction layer, when you own the underlying infrastructure, it makes it a lot easier to support. So I want to make sure that I understand this concept from the ground up. You talked about the network as being the glue or the foundation that ties all this together, especially with the level three acquisition. From an ILT perspective, if I need those far flung services I have the physical network capability to get it there. If I need to put (data terminology) in at the edge, we just had a guest on talking about (data terminology), and at the edge. And get that data into a CenturyLink data center using VCF to get it there and consistently have that same level of abstraction, and then I can build cloud native applications on Azure, Google Compute... (cross talking) and it's a consistent experience across that whole abstraction layer. >> Right. Right. Going back to that idea that, what we call the hybrid IT stack of network infrastructure and workloads, what we're trying to build is a platform that spans those layers, that doesn't try to own or be one or indifferentiate at one of those layers, is build a connective tissue that spans them, so a workload running on the right infrastructure venue connected to the right networks. We're investing in orchestration that crosses all of that, and it's really some of the great conversations we've been having this week with VMware about what they're thinking, we think PTS is interesting because container based deployment models are going to be what makes the most sense as you get further into the core of the network and out towards the edge. We think Pulse is interesting. As we start to do more things in our smart cities, and smart venue type of initiatives, that we're doing at the Internet Of Things solutions base as well. >> Ajay, last thing I want to get to is when you look at your partners, how do you see them? Both that similarity that they're going to have, but how do they differentiate, and also how will they participate in the VMware on AWS piece that we've been talking about? >> Yes, so I think I'll break it into two parts. As I talk to customers, the consistent feedback I get is we made resource consumption ubiquitous. And we're hoping to standardize that with VMware Cloud Foundation and other approaches. What's hard is the experienced skillset and knowledge of how to use this technology. So increasingly we're constrained with the folks who know how to take this complexity, put an organized plan together, and drive the set of value in our own applications. So I believe the cloud provider program and the partnership is really about moving up from trying to build infrastructure, to build solutions, and offer value to our partners. And the differentiation is really moving up stack in terms that manage services value. The second part is- They themselves now have a choice. If I'm a regional player, or customer who, everyone's a multinational nowadays, you always have some customer who happens to reach beyond the boundaries ... How do I now go into a new market? How can I leverage VMware Cloud on AWS as another data center? So the management technology we're trying to provide is we will priority manage your endpoint, customer endpoint, or even VMware Cloud. You mix and match what makes business sense. Then abstract the complexity. As we talked about the cloud as a new hardware. How do we take that infrastructure and really make it easy? And the issues are on security, management, are going to be different ... So, application usage, value added services, being able to leverage resources, build or buy is really the basis of our strategy. >> Yep. So we're excited to ... As we know that that program starts to expand a little bit more in 2018 and we've had some early discussions with the VMware team around what that starts to look like, but at our most foundational level, because what we're already launching and what we launched here this week at VMware is just what we call our dedicated cloud compute product, which is now based on the VMware Cloud Foundation reference architecture. It's going to look the exact same as the VMware Cloud Foundation architecture that runs in AWS. Our approach towards managing both is to let their own individual control panels do what they do best, but then manage over the top of it with our cloud application manager service. >> Dave and Ajay. Thank you so much for sharing with us all the updates. Look forward to watching the continued maturation and development of what's happening in the cloud environment. >> Great chat, thank you. >> Thank you. >> Keith Townsend and I will be back with lots more coverage here of VMworld 2017. You're watching theCUBE. (electronic music)

>> Narrator: From the Computer History Museum in the heart of Silicon Valley, it's theCUBE, covering food IT: Fork to Farm, brought to you by Western Digital. >> Hey, welcome back here and ready, Jeffrey Frick with theCUBE. We are in Silicon Valley at the Computer History Museum at a really unique event. It's food IT: Fork to farm, not the other way around, which you might think, "Hm, that doesn't make sense," but actually it does, really by the consumer-driven world that's hitting everything including the food and agriculture and we're really excited to have the guys running this show, representing The Mixing Bowl. Rob Trice is the founder and Michael Rose, partner, of The Mixing Bowl. Gentlemen, welcome. >> Thank you for having us. >> Thank you. >> So, first off, a little history on this event, it's the first time we've been here. I think you said there's about 350 people, really a broad spectrum: academe, technology, farmers, from New Zealand, I think was the one I heard from the furthest place. What's kind of the genesis of this show? >> So, my background is 15 years in mobile internet, telecom venture capital and my wife, actually, a couple of years ago, started running a cattle ranch out on the Pacific Coast and through that I saw how little technology was being used on the ranch and amongst local food producers. I came back to Silicon Valley and none of the big food or ag. players were here then, four years ago. Monsanto just had up a venture group, Unilever and Nestle had one person each here, but by and large, Silicon Valley's IT innovation ecosystem was not focused on food and agriculture. So I started The Mixing Bowl as a little bit more than just a Meetup group and we did it a couple of times and then somebody said, "You know, we should do a conference on this topic." So the first year we did it at Stanford with a partner of ours, and we thought might have 150 people come. We had over 300 people come and it was this kind of audience, kind of cross-section of technologists, food and agriculturalists. So that's when I said, "You know, I'm done with telecom. I want to go ride this food tech, ag. tech wave and see where the heck this comes to roost." So, it's been four years now and I'm pleased to be working not only with Michael, but then our colleagues Seana and Brita, and having a blast, learning a lot. >> Okay, so that's the conference. What about for The Mixing Bowl specifically, what is your charter as an organization? >> Well we've got three aspects of our business, so the first one is information sharing, so doing events like this. We do themed events, we did a water-tech for agricultural event down in Fresno. And then we also are contributing writers for Forbes. We also have an advisory business where we work with large corporates who are seeking innovation and trying to bring innovation to the food and ag. Sector, trying to bring technology and innovation. And then we have an investment side of our business, out of the brand Better Food Ventures. So we invest in the space as well, we have about 12 companies in our portfolio. >> That's interesting that you said there wasn't a lot of tech in ag. here and yet, we talked to Paul from Ford, we talked about their conference that they have at Salinas and of course, Sacramento Valley, San Fernando Valley, or not San Fernando Valley, San Joaquin Valley is a huge producer of food. So why do you think it was so late to come here? >> Well, I think that there have been other opportunities and I think that there's a misperception that agriculture doesn't need IT and I think what we've now realized is there's a huge opportunity, whether it is Internet of Things or looking at tracking and transparency, there's a lot of inefficiencies in our food production system and there also are a lot of societal challenges that we have. Everyone talks about feeding nine billion people by 2050, but then also we look at food safety, we look at what the consumer wants, which is why we're here today, talking about the fork to the farm. Consumers want change in food. They want different kinds of food. They want it delivered to them in different ways. All of these are opportunities for tech to be applied to food and agriculture. >> So we love being here. Go ahead, Michael. >> No, I was just going to say, I think it's like any other vertical in any other sector that starts to adopt technology over time. And even in the ag. sector, you've seen in the commodity crops in the Midwest with the automation that they adopted technology early but you've got other sectors, whether it's the specialty crops down in Salinas or people who are doing almonds, etc. Those people are starting to adopt technology, they're just a little further behind than you are with commodity crops. >> Right. It's funny, we interviewed the guy from Caterpillar a few weeks ago, and they are already running huge fleets of autonomous vehicles in mining. Obviously they have a lot of equipment involved in agriculture as well, so it seems kind of start and stop depending on the vendors that you're talking about. But one of the big themes we talk about, we go to a lot of platform shows, right? It's Cloud, it's edge, it's connectivity, it's big data, drones, I mean, as you look at some of these big classifications of technology that are now being applied in ag. are there any particular ones that kind of jump out as either the catalyst or the leading edge of adoption that's really helping drive this revolution? >> I guess, if you think about the fact that we're kind of looking at this staircase of adoption. One thing that we need to do is actually digitize information and that's one of the challenges that we have. Once we digitize, then we can start to manage operations based on that data, then we can start to optimize, and then we can automate. So it's a four-step staircase that we look at and I think in a lot of cases, even at restaurants, a lot of them are still placing orders via fax and telephone. We need to get off of that and start getting them to order online through online platforms and so forth. So, at any rate, one area that I'm particularly excited about is aerial imaging for agriculture because I think you are instantaneously, by just doing a flyover, providing farmers with more information than they've ever had. In some cases, I think you could actually argue, you're going from a data desert to a data flood. Now the challenge is moving up that staircase to go make sense of that data and then ultimately be able to give prescriptive machine-learning or artificial intelligence-based recommendations to that farmer on how to do a better job, whether that is increasing sustainability, maximizing yield, looking at pricing, any of those kind of things. >> Right, one of the things you hear real often in every industry, is kind of the old guy using intuition versus becoming really a data-driven organization. Are you seeing that classic conflict, or do people get it pretty quickly when you can provide the data to show them things that they could never really see before? >> I was going to say, one of the biggest challenges that's also dictating the market timing is the fact that average American farmer is about 65, so we now are having this turn as the kids are coming back who are tech-enabled back to the production point, back to the farm and starting to take over farms from their parents. And their parents, of course, have just been maybe a little slower to adopt new technology. So it's just a timing issue. I think the other thing is, there are all the different pieces, whether it's the sensors or whether it's the connectivity of data or whether it's the storage of data, there needs to be a solution and they need to be integrated. And so we see this on the farm, getting that data off and then getting it stored and then how to use it. But then you also see this in restaurants. In restaurants, you have all of the delivery services coming in, so a restaurant can have seven different delivery services picking up from the restaurant. And they have seven different iPads that they have to manage with their point of sales system and very few of them currently will integrate with a POS, right? >> Right. And I think whether it's in a restaurant or on a farm, this lack of integration, API integration, making it a usable solution as opposed to a number of features, is where we're probably going to see a lot more tech innovation. I think unfortunately what you're probably also going to see is a lot of consolidation because you've had venture capital-backed companies with solutions for food and agriculture that have their own proprietary solution, their own OS. And we know that, from other tech sectors, that's not a long-term viable strategy. Ultimately, the data will be free, it will open up, it will interconnect, and we just need to happen in food and in agriculture. >> And are they getting that? Because the classic farmer dilemma that you learn in economics 101 is they have a great crop, crap prices go in the toilet. They have a crappy crop, price is up but they don't have enough quantity to share and gaming the system, and who's going to plant what? Do they start to see the value of sharing some level of data aggregation for the benefit of all? >> I think there's a misperception out there that farmers won't share their data. The reality is they're willing to share their data, if it's providing some value to them. A lot of people want to charge these farmers for their data without any demonstrable benefit to using that data. And I think where you can find a solution, I think the farmers are, speaking generally here, I think the other thing is, farmers know, if you're not paying for the data, you probably are the product, right? And they're smart enough to figure that out, so they don't want people misusing their data for reasons that aren't clear to them. And they've had bad experiences with that in the past. >> It's not any different than any other sector. I mean, go back seven years ago when people said, "Well, we're going to mix your data up with somebody else's data, but it's not a problem, right? Zeros and ones, it's bits." And they were both like, "Nooo," and they got over it, right? >> Right, but the other thing I'll say is I think that the challenges are changing and this is not just standard commodity ups and downs, particularly if you look at here in California, the specialty crops. We have lost access to what has been a cheap labor pool historically and we need to automate. So now we need to go where northern Europe has already gone, in terms of automating production for specialty crops and then things like climate change are causing different crops to grow in different seasons and we need to be able to predict that, we need to take more of it indoors as a nice complement to outdoor growing. So there's a lot of different things that farmers are dealing with now that they really haven't had to deal with in the future. And I think the same is true on the restaurant side. >> Yeah, and the predictability of understanding what your needs are going to be is going to be so important here, particularly because we need to see more automation, both on the farm and production and the restaurants. I know a lot of people talk about being concerned about losing their jobs to automation or robotics, but the reality is, the National Restaurant Association says in the next 10 years, we have a shortage of 200,000 line cooks. >> Jeff: Just line cooks? >> Just line cooks, right. So when you see someone like Chowbotics who's here showing the automated customized salad maker, there's clearly a need in the market place for these kind of approaches. >> The other thing too is you touch on such big, global societal issues. Obviously we're in California here, water. We had a really wet winter, but you know, I'm looking for the water track, I mean that's got to be a huge piece of this whole thing. You have the environmental concern, again, in California, there's always the fight between the farmers that want the water in the rivers and the environmentalists who want to keep the salmon swimming upstream. These are not simple problems that have an obvious solution, and as I think somebody said in they keynote, there's no free trade-off. You've got to make decisions based on values and they're not simple problems. So you guys are right in the middle of a lot of big society changes. >> Yeah, and I think that's one of the things. This is not just a US or a California thing. Globally, things are changing. And whether it is China having more disposable income available to eat more meat and what the ramifications of that are versus other societies with more environmental challenges moving front and center to them, the labor challenge. There's a lot of different things that are happening globally and we don't really have that connectivity layer globally to share this innovation to find the right solutions and get them addressing these market challenges. >> Right. >> Yeah, I would say the thing is, it is complex, so they're going to be talking about tomato growth later on today, and the example somebody was giving is we went to precision watering instead of spray, well, when you go to drip irrigation, you actually have to pressurize an entire system so you actually use more energy. So we use less water but we burn more coal, more oil, whatever it may be, to pressurize the system. And then if it produces a product that has more water content, you spend more energy drying it on the backend. So there's trade-offs. I would say the other thing that we found is really interesting is people ask us if we're social impact investors and we aren't but we have a social impact consideration about what we do, but pretty much everything that you see in this space right now from an innovative side is moving the ball forward, either it's better nutrition, it's less input, it's less chemicals, less water. So this innovation in food and ag. is just by its nature having a very positive impact. >> Right, two years ago, we called food IT macro to micro, and fundamentally what we believe at The Mixing Bowl is, as Michael said, at Better Food Ventures, we don't consider ourselves social impact investors, first and foremost, we want to keep financial grounding. However, I think at a core level, we all believe that harnessing IT to go address these societal challenges in food and agriculture is the biggest thing that we can make. So the reality is we're not going to be able to do much more with the chemical era, we've maximized the yield that we can get there. So now we are going to be looking at IT and how can we actually apply IT to these different challenges and I'm going to cough now. (Jeff laughs) (Rob coughs) >> Well, even something, people think IT and they think highly technical and they think of Cloud, they think of data connections, well look at food waste. The bulk of food waste that happens in our society happens at the home to the restaurant. So even if it's an iPhone app that's teaching our children how to deal with food waste in their home, it's a technical approach, it's hugely impactful. And it's those kind of touch points that will make a difference. >> Right, right. Well, Rob, Michael, thanks for inviting us, it's really fun to come to more of an application-centered show than an infrastructure show and see how the impact of Cloud and big data and sensors and IOT and drones and all of these things are having material impact on us day by day. So congratulations on the event and we'll let you go back to the keynote stage, they're waiting for you. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. >> All right, I'm Jeff Frick, you're watching theCUBE. We are at the Food IT show in Mountain View, California. We'll be right back with the next guest after this short break. Thanks for watching. (electronic music)

>> Narrator: Live from Orlando Florida, it's theCUBE! Covering ServiceNow, Knowledge17. Brought to you by ServiceNow. >> Hi everybody, we're back. This is theCUBE and we're live from Knowledge17, I'm Dave Vellante with Jeff Frick. Michael Dippolito, did I say that right? >> D'Ippolito, close enough. >> D'Ippolito, sorry about that. A fellow Italian, I should get that right. D'Ippolito is assistant Vice President of Run Services Delivery, infrastructure and operations for Nationwide Insurance. Nationwide is on your side. >> You got it. It's in our heads right? >> I remember that. >> What a great marketing campaign. Michael, great to see you, thanks for coming on theCUBE. >> Thank you, thanks for having me. >> So how's Knowledge going for ya? >> Very good, very good. I'm really excited about some of the new things coming out with the newest release that was just announced this morning. And as a matter of fact I'm ready to go back and say let's jump to that version right? Because it sounds really exciting. >> So where are you right now? Which version are you on? Are you on the Helsinki? >> We are on the Helsinki release now. We usually like to jump a couple and stay as current as we can, usually you know one release behind maybe but if we find there's good functionality in jumping one we'll do it. >> I want to come back and talk about that, because we like to pick your brains about what's the best practice there, but before we do maybe set up your role at Nationwide. >> Yeah, RunService is a pretty large organization for Nationwide, through acquisitions and through our legacy environments, we have lots of application systems, you know, keeping all those running is a monumental task. So, our group is kind of sitting mainly in the middle of the applications, the infrastructure, the process, and trying to help everything stay running smoothly. >> Okay and you started with IT service management change management, like most customers, is that right? And then, you've been evolving that. Can you talk about that a little bit? >> Yeah we just implemented, about a year ago actually, we installed a year ago. >> Okay. >> We went with the Fuji release that we implemented then we've already jumped to Helsinki, and we pretty much went all processes all at once and kind of a big bang. We actually did ask that management at first does a little bit of a pilot, but then we actually went through all the other ITSM functionality, big bang after that. >> Jeff: So you're all in. >> Michael: Yeah. >> So what was life like, you know, give us a before and after, and maybe take us through the business case and how that all came about. >> I'll give you a perfect example, I just kind of did an after action review for our senior management, on our previous platform, which was an on prem heavily customized platform, to take a release would require a year and a half with a lot of planning and about a million dollars. >> Jeff: To do an upgrade. >> To do an upgrade. (Jeff Laughing) This last release to Helsinki went about six weeks, and about $100,000. So, that's a huge business case right there. Being able to be in the cloud, not having to worry about the infrastructure ourselves, and really we drove a model of zero customization so we wanted to stay out of box as much as possible, just for that reason so we could take releases fast and stay current. >> Wow, I'm sure that benefits. >> In the, you know, was situtation, the cost was predominantly people cost, programming cost, license cost, maintenance, consultants? >> It was mostly hours of effort. >> Yeah. >> The amount of customization we had and then to retrofit and test all those changes back into the release from the vendor was a monumental task and we never want to get into that situation again. >> And so with the ServiceNow upgrade, it's not out of pocket cost as much, you're quantifying time, is that correct? >> Correct. >> Yeah okay. >> It's mostly our internal cost. >> You said the time it took was a year and a half and then, like a typical upgrade in ServiceNow is, >> Michael: Less than two months. >> Okay. >> For us to bring it in test it, exercise it, making sure all our customizations, or configurations actually I should say, are working well. And a lot of it is more just the change management around it, you know, putting out the word, the communications, doing a little bit of training, or whatever it takes to get ready for a smooth launch. >> And some of the upfront planning of that as well. Now, when we talk to customers, there seems to be, we heard today that 90% of customers are adopting service catalog, CMDB, I don't know. It's mixed, right? We hear some yes, some no. Maybe tell us your experiences. >> We have a huge focus on CMDB right now. We think that CMDB is basically the foundation to all your other processes to run more smoothly right? So good trustworthy data enables faster incident resolution, better problem solving, more rigorous change management so you asses your risk of change better. So really when we sold our CMDB project, we didn't sell it based on the CMDB, we sold it based on all those other things, >> All the benefits. >> That get a ramp off of it. You know, from doing that effort. So, we're putting a lot of effort on CMDB maturity. >> So you were talking before about some of the things you saw today in Jakarta that were of interest before we go there, you had mentioned you started with Fuji, and now you're on Helsinki. What was the, you didn't double leapfrog did you? Or did you? What's your upgrade strategy? You said you might be an N minus one, but you like to stay pretty current. What's your strategy in regards to upgrades? >> Right now, we're looking at trying to be N minus one >> Uh huh. >> and taking two per year. So looking at two releases a year. We're trying to plan our schedules around maybe spring and fall. So we organize our work and our patterns around that. But something like that. We haven't really solidified that yet. A lot of it depends on what we see coming up, and what we can take advantage of. Like for example, we're getting ready to implement Work Day. And we want to make sure we have great integration between Work Day and ServiceNow. Some of the things that Jakarta is going to offer us is going to integrate nicely into Work Day. So, we may jump to that version because of that. >> So we heard this morning that the big things, well CJ set up the big things in Jakarta were going to be performance, obviously everybody better performance, maybe some UX stuff in there too, vendor risk management, and then the software asset management, which got the big cheers and the whoohoo! >> Yeah. (Jeff chuckling) >> Yeah, so, what in Jakarta is appealing to you? >> This software as a management I'd say, is very interesting because we're looking at that very closely right now in terms of our strategy around that. The other one I really like is the performance analytics and the predictive analytics that are coming out. I'd really love to be able to benchmark ourselves against other companies in terms of how we're doing. I feel we beat ourselves up a lot internally around things like availability or performance. But then, when I look and talk to others, we're not so bad. (Jeff chuckling) We're actually doing pretty good. So it'd be nice to get that benchmarking. >> Right, right. >> And some of that trend analysis that's offered. And then, finally, how do we get into a more predictive analytics mode where we can prevent incidents from happening before they do? So that's key. >> It was interesting, listening to Farrell Hough this morning talk about sort of the evolution of automation. How do you look at automation? Some shops are afraid of automation, but it seems like the ServiceNow customers we talk to really can't go fast enough. What is your thought, and how are you evolving automation? >> Well, one of our key drivers right now is how do we increase the speed of delivery to the marketplace? But, we also have to stay safe and reliable, right? And the key to speed is through automation. You can't really get that speed if you're not highly automated. And, to be highly automated, you need really high trustworthy data. So that enables fast decision making, and accuracy. >> Jeff: And that ties back to your CMDB commitment. >> Exactly, so, that all entailed enables speed, which we really want because in today's world speed is everything in terms of how you're constantly adapting your systems of engagement out there with your customers. Constantly learning from their patterns and adjusting on the fly. And that requires new mindsets. >> So you start with IT service management, you've got HR as well, is that right? >> We don't have the HR model. Right now we're only IT service management. >> Okay, straight IT services. >> We're looking at other modules, as we speak. >> Okay, so you want to make sure you get the value out of the initial ITSM, and then, how do you see that, you know, evolving? What is the conversation like internally? Do the business lines say, wow, all of a sudden we're getting improved service, and how are you doing that? Or is it more of a push where you go out to the business and say hey, here are some ideas. How does that all work? >> I'll tell you what we're really starting to see is a really change in what's driving innovation. And it's more coming from IT versus, the former models where IT was kind of like the order taker, and the business came up with everything they needed. Now, with the pace of change with technology, new business models are coming from IT to the business. And we're actually almost seeing ourselves more of an IT company than we are an insurance company. And, you starting to see those patterns especially with things like, now we're talking about metered insurance for auto, right? So basically, pay by the mile insurance, versus paying the same rate for six months. With the data we're getting out of vehicles today we can adjust your rates on the fly as you drive. Why should you pay the same rate if your car sits in the garage all weekend, versus you take it out and drive it 200 miles, right? So with the kind of data, big data and analytics that are coming from the vehicles we can do that now. >> So how is that conversation taking place? Is it being initiated by somebody in the IT staff that says hey, did you know that we have this data and we can do this? Let's take it to the business unit. Or does the business unit saying, I just saw Flo, the competitor, sticking the little thing in the dashboard? (Michael chuckling) Can we do that too? You know, there's a lot of talk about IT taking a seat at the business table >> Right. >> But how have you seen it actually been executed inside of Nationwide? >> Actually what we're seeing is, the lines are very blurry now between IT and the business. Almost to where, we're just a team working together versus the silos you used to have, and throwing the ideas over the fence. So we actually have a team that their goal is strategy and innovation. They report up through our CIO, and then business line teams have similar organizations, and they all work in a matrix fashion together. So anybody can bring any type of idea to the table, regardless of who you report up through. And we take those into consideration and we look for partners, we've got partners coming to us all the time that want to join us in innovation. And so it doesn't have to be our own solution. It could just be us on the back end of somebody else's front end, right? So, there's a lot of interesting ideas coming at us. >> What's happening in the business Mike? I mean you've got, obviously you're supporting the big systems or claims, you've got your agents systems, but mobile has exploded onto the scene. >> Yes. >> How has that affected you? What are some of the drivers in the insurance business these days? >> Well, definitely we're in this digital world now so, mobile first is critical. Everything has to be mobile enabled. We have to think of our strategy in a digital way constantly so we have a whole digital strategy that we work on. The traditional models of agency sold insurance won't ever really go away, per se, but they are shrinking. You see the demands and needs of the millennials coming up, very differently and changing. You have to compete on price to get in the door. That's important, so again we're trying to find all those interaction or intercept points with our customers as they need us. People don't really like to think of insurance, it's not on top of mind in their day to day life. But, when certain events happen like oh, I'm going to get married, or I'm going to take a trip, or you know, those kinds of things. >> Jeff: Right, kid turns sixteen. >> Yeah, we have different ways to interact with our customers, and offer some solutions that meet their need at the time. >> Well it seems like you're right, to be competitive, you've got to have the right price for those that say okay, I've got to get insurance, I need to start somewhere, great, but are you able to, as an industry, sell value? I mean, increasingly you're seeing some companies I would say Nationwide is one, where you're selling value. >> Yeah. >> Is that a trend in the business? >> Absolutely, I'll give you an example. One of the things that, normally the insurance model used to be I buy insurance and I'm protected when something bad happens. then when something bad happens, you compensate me. You pay my claim. But what about, if we can help you prevent the bad thing from even happening? So with products like our Smart Home package that you can buy now with internet of things, we can put sensors on those hot water tanks or on those pipes, or connected to your alarm system so that maybe we could alert you when we see your pipe is about to break. >> Right so, we cover, as you know our audience, we cover big data a lot. And the data business, and the insurance business have come mashing together, right? You had mentioned before, Mike, in many regards you're becoming an IT company and digitization is all about data. And the data allows you guys to build new products, to offer new services, to be more competitive and at the end of the day it's all about speed. >> Correct, speed and then that helps drive that value equation, right? So it's not so much being the lowest price, although you have to have a good price to be in the game, but then after that how can you provide that value? >> I'm curious Mike, from an insurance point of view, where before the business was based on, you know you didn't have so much data, right? So you had some big swaths, Age, sex, smoker, not smoker, but now as you're able to get data to the individual level, how that changes the way you look at it? Because it's very different than just kind of aggregating to the bulk, and then the poor unfortunate soul who has a car wreck, you pay the claim. But now, like you said, you know if I'm driving on the weekends, or if I'm parking my car. How is that really shaping the way that you guys look at the marketplace and the opportunities? >> Well you know, in the old days, you used to be able to take basically a subset of data from the past, and make your decisions based on that. >> A subset of data from the past, I love that. >> Now we're taking all the data in real time. >> In real time. >> So that puts more demands on the need for the technologies to provide that. It's critical, like especially if we're going to change your rates daily on how we insure your car, we have to have all the data, all the time. >> I remember Abhi Mehta, one of our early big data CUBE interviews, he made the statement in 2010 he said, "Sampling is dead." And, now, some people will debate that but the point he was making is just the same one you just made Michael is that you've got that data coming in, streaming it in real time. Some consumers, you know, have an issue with sticking that little meter in their car, but ultimately, that's the trend. It's going to happen. >> And you know we're seeing, and you're probably seeing it in other businesses as well, if you can provide that value, customers will give you the access and the data, because they see a value in return. So, it's that value equation. If it's good enough, they'll give you the value, and they'll give you the data. >> Dave: Yeah, you see it every day in mobile apps, right? >> Correct. >> You know, you're in New York City trying to get somewhere and it's like, turn on location services and I can help you. >> When you download any app, there's a big screen that comes up and you say I accept at the bottom, and then it has access to your pictures, access to your location and you're free to hit that accept because you see the value in that application. >> It's a quid pro quo, you know it's interesting we had the author on yesterday, Pink, Daniel Pink? >> Jeff: Pink, Mr. Pink, yes. >> And he was pointing out, he said look there used to be that the brand used to have all the information, and now there's parody in information, but in many regards, this whole digitization is an attempt by the brand to provide, to use more data and to give the consumers more value, and to create differentiation in the marketplace, and that's kind of what you're describing in your business. Last question, what's on ServiceNow's to-do list? What do you want to see a year, year and a half in? >> Well, after we implemented, we partnered with ServiceNow in a project they call Inspire, and basically it's to, what are we going to do next? You know, that very question, how do we leverage now what we've implemented, and take advantage of what the platform has to offer? We see lots of opportunities, as a matter of fact our list is so long we just don't have the bandwidth to do it all (Jeff chuckling) and we have to prioritize, but we see a lot of integration points, we see a lot of APIs coming in, we are in a kind of a really big phase in automation right now, we're trying to automate as much as possible, so for our on prem technology, we really want to go into automated provisioning of our assets, which means being able to connect those into the CMDB as they're provisioned, all automatically, and we want to really shorten those cycle times for when we have to provision infrastructure and support our applications. So ServiceNow is setting us up to do just that. >> Inspire is a great program, it's one of the best freebies in the business, and it leads, it's a win win. The customer gets the best experts, they come in and obviously, the hope is they're going to buy more stuff from ServiceNow, and if the value's there you will. Why not? It's going to drive to the bottom line. >> Using cloud to provision on prem resources, I like that. (all laughing) >> Mike thanks very much for coming to theCUBE, it was really a pleasure having you. >> Thank you, thanks for having me. >> Jeff: Thanks for sharing the insight. >> Alright keep it right there buddy we'll be back with our next guest right after this short break, there's a CUBEr live from Knowledge, be right back. (techno music)