>>We're back at Supercomputing 22 in Dallas, winding down day four of this conference. I'm Paul Gillan, my co-host Dave Nicholson. We are talking, we've been talking super computing all week and you hear a lot about what's going on in the United States, what's going on in China, Japan. What we haven't talked a lot about is what's going on in Europe and did you know that two of the top five supercomputers in the world are actually from European countries? Well, our guest has a lot to do with that. Florian, bearish, I hope I pronounce that correctly. My German is, German is not. My strength is the operations director for price, ais, S B L. And let's start with that. What is price? >>So, hello and thank you for the invitation. I'm Flon and Price is a partnership for Advanced Computing in Europe. It's a non-profit association with the seat in Brussels in Belgium. And we have 24 members. These are representatives from different European countries dealing with high performance computing in at their place. And we, so far, we provided the resources for our European research communities. But this changed in the last year, this oral HPC joint undertaking who put a lot of funding in high performance computing and co-funded five PET scale and three preis scale systems. And two of the preis scale systems. You mentioned already, this is Lumi and Finland and Leonardo in Bologna in Italy were in the place for and three and four at the top 500 at least. >>So why is it important that Europe be in the top list of supercomputer makers? >>I think Europe needs to keep pace with the rest of the world. And simulation science is a key technology for the society. And we saw this very recently with a pandemic, with a covid. We were able to help the research communities to find very quickly vaccines and to understand how the virus spread around the world. And all this knowledge is important to serve the society. Or another example is climate change. Yeah. With these new systems, we will be able to predict more precise the changes in the future. So the more compute power you have, the better the smaller the grid and there is resolution you can choose and the lower the error will be for the future. So these are, I think with these systems, the big or challenges we face can be addressed. This is the climate change, energy, food supply, security. >>Who are your members? Do they come from businesses? Do they come from research, from government? All of the >>Above. Yeah. Our, our members are public organization, universities, research centers, compute sites as a data centers, but But public institutions. Yeah. And we provide this services for free via peer review process with excellence as the most important criteria to the research community for free. >>So 40 years ago when, when the idea of an eu, and maybe I'm getting the dates a little bit wrong, when it was just an idea and the idea of a common currency. Yes. Reducing friction between, between borders to create a trading zone. Yes. There was a lot of focus there. Fast forward to today, would you say that these efforts in supercomputing, would they be possible if there were not an EU super structure? >>No, I would say this would not be possible in this extent. I think when though, but though European initiatives are, are needed and the European Commission is supporting these initiatives very well. And before praise, for instance 2008, there were research centers and data centers operating high performance computing systems, but they were not talking to each other. So it was isolated praise created community of operation sites and it facilitated the exchange between them and also enabled to align investments and to, to get the most out of the available funding. And also at this time, and still today for one single country in Europe, it's very hard to provide all the different architectures needed for all the different kind of research communities and applications. If you want to, to offer always the latest technologies, though this is really hardly possible. So with this joint action and opening the resources for other research groups from other countries, you, we, we were able to, yeah, get access to the latest technology for different communities at any given time though. And >>So, so the fact that the two systems that you mentioned are physically located in Finland and in Italy, if you were to walk into one of those facilities and meet the people that are there, they're not just fins in Finland and Italians in Italy. Yeah. This is, this is very much a European effort. So this, this is true. So, so in this, in that sense, the geography is sort of abstracted. Yeah. And the issues of sovereignty that make might take place in in the private sector don't exist or are there, are there issues with, can any, what are the requirements for a researcher to have access to a system in Finland versus a system in Italy? If you've got a EU passport, Hmm. Are you good to go? >>I think you are good to go though. But EU passport, it's now it becomes complicated and political. It's, it's very much, if we talk about the recent systems, well first, let me start a praise. Praise was inclusive and there was no any constraints as even we had users from US, Australia, we wanted just to support excellence in science. And we did not look at the nationality of the organization, of the PI and and so on. There were quotas, but these quotas were very generously interpreted. So, and if so, now with our HPC joint undertaking, it's a question from what European funds, these systems were procured and if a country or being country are associated to this funding, the researchers also have access to these systems. And this addresses basically UK and and Switzerland, which are not in the European Union, but they were as created to the Horizon 2020 research framework. And though they could can access the systems now available, Lumi and Leono and the Petascale system as well. How this will develop in the future, I don't know. It depends to which research framework they will be associated or not. >>What are the outputs of your work at price? Are they reference designs? Is it actual semiconductor hardware? Is it the research? What do you produce? >>So the, the application we run or the simulation we run cover all different scientific domains. So it's, it's science, it's, but also we have industrial let projects with more application oriented targets. Aerodynamics for instance, for cars or planes or something like this. But also fundamental science like the physical elementary physics particles for instance or climate change, biology, drug design, protein costa, all these >>Things. Can businesses be involved in what you do? Can they purchase your, your research? Do they contribute to their, I'm sure, I'm sure there are many technology firms in Europe that would like to be involved. >>So this involving industry though our calls are open and is, if they want to do open r and d, they are invited to submit also proposals. They will be evaluated and if this is qualifying, they will get the access and they can do their jobs and simulations. It's a little bit more tricky if it's in production, if they use these resources for their business and do not publish the results. They are some, well, probably more sites who, who are able to deal with these requests. Some are more dominant than others, but this is on a smaller scale, definitely. Yeah. >>What does the future hold? Are you planning to, are there other countries who will be joining the effort, other institutions? Do you plan to expand your, your scope >>Well, or I think or HPC joint undertaking with 36 member states is quite, covers already even more than Europe. And yeah, clearly if, if there are other states interest interested to join that there is no limitation. Although the focus lies on European area and on union. >>When, when you interact with colleagues from North America, do you, do you feel that there is a sort of European flavor to supercomputing that is different or are we so globally entwined? No. >>So research is not national, it's not European, it's international. This is also clearly very clear and I can, so we have a longstanding collaboration with our US colleagues and also with Chap and South Africa and Canada. And when Covid hit the world, we were able within two weeks to establish regular seminars inviting US and European colleagues to talk to to other, to each other and exchange the results and find new collaboration and to boost the research activities. So, and I have other examples as well. So when we, we already did the joint calls US exceed and in Europe praise and it was a very interesting experience. So we received applications from different communities and we decided that we will review this on our side, on European, with European experts and US did it in US with their experts. And you can guess what the result was at the meeting when we compared our results, it was matching one by one. It was exactly the same. Recite >>That it, it's, it's refreshing to hear a story of global collaboration. Yeah. Where people are getting along and making meaningful progress. >>I have to mention you, I have to to point out, you did not mention China as a country you were collaborating with. Is that by, is that intentional? >>Well, with China, definitely we have less links and collaborations also. It's also existing. There, there was initiative to look at the development of the technologies and the group meet on a regular basis. And there, there also Chinese colleagues involved. It's on a lower level, >>Yes, but is is the con conversations are occurring. We're out of time. Florian be operations director of price, European Super Computing collaborative. Thank you so much for being with us. I'm always impressed when people come on the cube and submit to an interview in a language that is not their first language. Yeah, >>Absolutely. >>Brave to do that. Yeah. Thank you. You're welcome. Thank you. We'll be right back after this break from Supercomputing 22 in Dallas.

>>Hello, welcome back to the manager risk across the extended attack surface with Armas I'm John fair host of the cube. Got the demo. God here, Brian Inman sales engineer at Armit. Brian. Thanks for coming on. We're looking forward to the demo, how you doing? >>I'm doing well, John, thanks for having me, >>You know, we heard from Nair, you know, describing arm's platform, a lot of intelligence. It's like a search engine meets data at scale intelligent platform around laying out the asset map. If you will, the new vulnerability module among other things that really solves CISO's problems, a lot of great customer testimonials. And we, we got the demo here that you're gonna give us, what's the demo about what are we, what are we gonna see? >>Well, John, thanks. Great question. And truthfully, I think as NAIA has pointed out what AIS as a baseline is giving you is, is great visibility into every asset on your that's communicating within your, within your environment. And from there, what we've done is we've layered on known vulnerabilities associated with not just the device, but also what else is on the device. What's is there certain applications running on that device, the versions of those applications and what are the vulnerabilities known with that? So that's really gives you great visibility in, in terms of the devices that folks aren't necessarily have visibility into now, unmanaged devices, OT devices, OT, and critical infrastructure, medical devices, things that you're not necessarily able to actively scan or put an agent on. So not only is Armas telling you about these devices, but we're also layer layering on those vulnerabilities all passively and in real time, >>A lot of great feedback we've heard and I've talked to some of your customers, the agent list is a huge deal. The Discover's at awesome. You can see everything and, and just getting real time information. It's really, really cool. So I'm looking forward to, for the demo for our guests, take us on that tour. Let's go with the demo for the guests today. >>All right. Sounds good. So what we're looking at here is within the Armas console is just a clean representation of the passive reporting of what Armas has discovered. So we see a lot of different types of devices, you know, from your virtual machines and personal computers, things that are relatively easy to manage, but working our way down, you're able to see a lot of different of the different types of devices that are not necessarily easy to, to get visibility into things like your up systems, IP cameras, dash cams, et cetera, lighting systems, and, and today's day and age, where everything is moving to the, that smart feature. You know, it's, it's great to have that visibility into, you know, what's communicating on my network and getting that, being able to layer on the risk factors associated with it, as well as the vulnerabilities. So let's pivot over to our vulnerabilities tab and talk about the, the ADM portion, the asset vulnerability management. >>So what we're looking at is the dashboard where we're reporting a, a, another clean representation with customizable dashboards that gives you visuals and reporting and things like new vulnerabilities as they come in, you know, what are the most critical vulnerabilities that are the, the newest as they roll in the vulnerabilities by type, we have hardware, we have application, we have operating systems. As we scroll down, we can see things to break it down by vulnerabilities, by the operating system, windows, Linux, et cetera. We can take, you know, create dashes that show you views of the, the number of, of devices that are impacted by these CVEs and scrolling down. We can see, you know, what, how long have these vulnerabilities been sitting within my environment? So how, what are the oldest vulnerabilities we have here? And then also of course, vulnerabilities by applications. So things like Google Chrome, Microsoft office. >>So we're able to give a, a good representation of the amount of vulnerabilities as they're associated to the hardware and applications as well. So we're gonna dig in and take a, a deeper look at one of these vulnerabilities here. So I'm excited to talk today about where Armas ABM is, but also where it's going as well. So we're not just reporting on things like the CVSs score from, from N N VD. We're also able to report on things like the exploitability of that, right? How, how actively is this, this CVE being exploited in the wild, right? We're reporting E EPSS scores. For example, we're able to take open source information as well as a lot of our partnerships that we have with other vendors that are giving us a lot of great value of known vulnerabilities associated with the applications and with hardware, et cetera. >>But we're where we're going with. This is we're in Fu very near future releases. We're gonna be able to, to take sort of an algorithm approach of what are the most critical CVSs that we see, how exploitable are those, what are common threat actors doing with these, these CVEs have they weaponized these CVS? Are they actively using those weaponized tools to exploit these within, within other folks' environments? And who's reporting on these. So we're gonna take all of these and then really add that Armas flavor of we already know what that device is, and we can explain. And, and so can the users of it, the business criticality of that device, right? So we're able to pivot over to the matches as we see the CVEs, we're able to very cleanly view, what are, what exactly are the devices that the CVE resides on, right? >>And as you can see, we're giving you more than just an IP address or more, you know, a lot more context, and we're able to click in and dive into what exactly are these devices and how, and more importantly, how critical are these devices to, to my, my environment, if one of these devices were to go down, if it were to be a server, if you know, whatever it may be, I would wanna focus on those particular devices and ensuring that that CVE, especially if it's an exploitable CVE were to be addressed or early, earlier than, than say the others, and really be able to manage and prioritize these another great feature about it is, you know, for example, we're looking at a, a particular CVE in terms of its its patch and build number from windows 10. So the AutoSol feature that we have, for example, we've passively detected what this particular personal computer is running windows 10 and the build and revision numbers on it. >>And then once Armas passively discovers an update to that firmware and patch level, we can automatically resolve that, giving you a, a confidence that that has been addressed from that particular device. We're also able to customize and look through and potentially select a few of these, say, you know, these particular devices reside on your guest network or an employee wifi network where we don't necessarily, I don't wanna say care, but we don't necessarily value that as much as something in, you know, internally that has holds significantly more business criticality. So we can select some of these and potentially ignore or resolve for determining reasons. As you see here, be able to really truly manage and prioritize these, these CVEs. As I scroll up, I can pivot over to the remediation tab and open up each one of these. So what this is doing is essentially Arma says, you know, through our knowledge base, been able to work with the vendors and, and pull down the patches associated with these. >>And within the remediation portion, we're able to view, for example, if we were to pull down the patch from this particular vendor and apply it to these 60 devices that you see here, right now, we're able to F to view, you know, which patches are gonna gimme the most impact as I prioritize these and take care of these affected devices. And lastly, as I pivot back, go again, where we're at now is we're able to allow the, the users to customize the organizational priority of this particular CVE, to where in terms of, you know, this has, has given us a high CVSs score, but maybe for whatever reasons it may be maybe this CVE in terms of this particular logical segment of my network, I'm gonna give it a low priority for whatever the use case may be. We have compensating controls set in place that, that render this CVE, not impactful to this particular segment of my environment. >>So we're able to add that organizational priority to that CVE and where we're going, as you can see that that popped up here, but where we're going is we're gonna start to be able to apply the, the organizational priority in terms of the actual device level. Right? So what we'll see is we'll see a, a column added to here to where we'll see the, the business impact of that device, based on the importance of that particular segment of your environment or the device type, be it, you know, critical networking device, or maybe a, a critical infrastructure device, PLCs controllers, et cetera, but really giving you that passive reporting on the CVEs in terms of what the device is within your network. And then finally we do integrate with your vulnerability, vulnerability management, and scanners as well. So if you have a scanner actively scanning these, but potentially they're missing segments of your net network, or they're not able to actively scan certain devices on your network, that's the power of Armas being able to come back in and give you that visibility of not only what those devices are for visibility into them, but also what vulnerabilities are associated with those passive devices that aren't being scanned by your network today. >>So with that that's, that concludes my demo. So I'll kick it back over to you, John. >>Awesome. Great, great walk through there. Take me through what you think the most important part of that. Is it the discovery piece? Is it the interaction what's your favorite? >>Honestly, I think my favorite part about that is, you know, in terms of being able to have the visibility into the devices, that a lot of folks don't see currently. So those OT devices, those OT devices, things that you're not able to, to run a scan on or put an agent on Armas is not only giving you visibility into them, but also layering in, as I said before, those vulnerabilities on top of that, that's just visibility that a lot of folks today don't have. So Armas does a great job of giving you visibility and vulnerabilities and risks associated with those devices. >>So I have to ask you, when you give this demo to customers and prospects, what's the reaction falling outta their chair moment? Are they more skeptical? It's almost too good to be true. And the end to end vulnerability management's is a tough nut to crack in terms of solution. >>Well, honestly, a lot of clients that we've had, you know, especially within the OT and the medical side, they're, they're blown away because at the end of the day, when we can give them that visibility, as I've said, you know, Hey, I, I didn't even know that those devices resided in that, that portion, but not only are we showing them what they are and where they are and enrichment on risk factors, et cetera. But then we show them, Hey, there's a known, you know, we've worked with that vendor, whatever it may be and, you know, Rockwell, et cetera. And we know that there's vulnerabilities associated with those devices. So they just seem to be blown away by the fact that we can show them so much about those devices from behind one single console. >>You know, it reminds me of the old days. I'm gonna date myself here. Remember the old Google maps, mashup days. This is customers. Talk about this as the Google maps for their assets. And when you have the Google maps and you have the Ubers out there, you can look at the trails, you can look at what's happening inside the, inside the enterprise. So there's gotta be a lot of interest in once you get the assets what's going on, on those, on, in those, on those networks or those roads, if you will, cuz you got in packet movement, you got things happening, you got upgrades, you got changing devices. It's always on kind of living thing. >>Absolutely. Yeah. It's what's on my network. And more importantly at times what's on those devices, right? Are the, what are the risks associated with the, the applications running on those? How are those devices communicating? And then as we've seen here, what are the vulnerabilities associated with those and how can I take action with them? >>All right. Real quick, put a plug in for where I can find the demo. Is it online is on YouTube, on the website. Where does someone see this demo? >>Yeah, the Amis website has a lot of demo content loaded. Get you in touch with folks like engineers like myself to, to provide demos whenever, whenever needed. >>All right, Brian, thanks for coming on this show. Appreciate sales engineer, Armas Brian Inman, given the demo God award out to him. Good job. Thanks for the demo. >>Thanks. Thanks for having me. >>Okay. You know, in a moment we're gonna have my closing thoughts on this event and really the impact to the business operation side. In a moment I'm John fur the cube. Thanks for watching.

>>Hello and welcome to the AWS partners showcase season one, episode two. I'm your host of the cube John ferry. We're here with two great guests who John Kumar, CEO of and Sabina Joseph, the general manager of AWS. Welcome to the show. Welcome to welcome to the cube, >>John. Good to see you >>Again. Great to see both of you both cube. Alumna's great to see how the businesses is going, going very well. Cloud scale, continuing to dominate Columbia is doing extremely well. Tell us more about what's going on in Columbia. What's your mission? What kinds of use cases are you seeing? Napa John, that's helping you guys keep your growth trajectory and solve your customer problems. >>Yeah. Firstly, thank you, John. Thank you, Sabina. Great to be here is a backup as a service platform. That's built natively on AWS for AWS, and we do support other use cases beyond AWS. But our primary mission is to basically deliver, you know, a ransomware data protection solution, you know, on AWS for AWS customers. Right? So if we think about it, you know, one of the things that's, you know, typically holding back any company to put mission critical workloads on a fantastic platform, a public cloud platform like AWS is to make sure that the data is protected in the event of any attack. And it's also done with extreme amount of simplicity, right? So that nobody is doing the heavy lift of doing backup themselves, right? So that's what really drew me or provides. It's a service. It's a turnkey service that provides, you know, data protection on AWS, whatever. >>Well, you're a frequent cube alumni. We're always talking about the importance of that, but I want to ask you this year more than ever, you're seeing it at the center of the conversation built in from day one, you're seeing a lot more threats, certainly mentioned ransomware and more there's more and more online attacks that's impacting this particular area more than ever before. Can you comment on what your focus has been this year around that? >>Yeah, I see it. If you think about tumor's evolution, our primary mission has been to go and protect every data source, but guess what? Right with more and more move to the public cloud and you look just AWS is journey and that pioneer in public cloud going from, you know, whatever 3 billion in revenues, 10 years ago to north of 70 billion run rate today, there's so much of data that is in the public cloud and the, and the most important thing that customers need is they want to free themselves from going and protecting this data themselves. Right? And, and there's a lot of scale in these environments, right? If you look at customers running hundreds of thousands of AWS accounts across every region on AWS, and if you give them that kind of flexibility and that kind of scale, what they want is give me a turnkey solution that just allows me to go and protect all of these workloads running across all of these regions in a service that takes the data out of my accounts separately in an air gap fashion, right. And that's really what we basically provide. And that's what we focused on over the last 12 months. Right? So if you look at what we have done is we've gone after every important service on AWS TC to EBS RDS, S3, dynamo, sequel databases, and other databases running on top of BC too. So now that becomes the comprehensive set of things that somebody needs to use to really deliver an application on top of the public cloud. And that's where we want for, >>And the growth has been there and the results on Amazon because of the refactoring has been huge. Can you share any examples of some successes that you've had with, with the AWS refactoring and all that good stuff going on? >>Yeah. I mean, I think that what we have seen is, you know, customers that basically told us that before you guys existed, we had to go and build these things ourselves, right. Again, you know, they had all the, the, the blocks to go and do it themselves, but it was so much of a heavy lift to go and do it themselves. And again, they didn't want to be in a, you know, in that business. So, so what we have done essentially for, and we have, you know, we have some joint customers at a pretty massive scale that basically have said that, okay, let me just use your solution to protect my critical assets. Like, you know, things, you know, sitting in S3 and really, you know, we'll use gloomy as a, as a >>Yeah, I think that's a great example of the refactoring Sabina. Gotta, I gotta ask you, you obviously you're at the center of this. You have your hand on the wheel of the partnerships and all the innovators out there. The growth of AWS just has been spectacular because there's value being created. Again, companies are refactoring their business on the cloud and you're at the center of it. So talk about the partnership with Clooney. Can you tell us how it all started and where it's going? >>Yeah, thanks for having me here, John, and good to see you again, Fujian, if I'm not mistaken for John, we met each other at the San Francisco summit, the AWS San Francisco summit, actually I believe it was in 2016 or 2017. You can correct me if I'm wrong here, but yes, I think so. It was, it was in the 8% a month of April. I still remember it. And that's when, you know, you kind of mentioned to me about and this modern backup as a service solution that you were creating, you're still in stealth mode. So you couldn't talk a lot about it. And B started to engage deeply on the partnership, right from 2017. And initially we were kind of focused around helping Colombia build a solution using our well-architected review. And then as soon as we all came out of stealth mode, we started to engage more deeply around deeper integrations and also on go to market activities. >>As you know, AWS has a very prescriptive approach to our partnerships. So we started to work with around the five pillars of security, reliability, cost optimization, performance, and operational excellence to really help them tune the solution on AWS. And we also started to engage with our service teams and I have to thank Paul John and his team here. They really embraced those deeper and broader integrations, many services that Pooja mentioned, but also specifically want to mention S3 EBS. And our Columbia was also a launch partner for AWS outpost when AWS in fact, launched outpost. So I want to kind of commend CLU, CLU MEO, and the entire team kind of embracing this technology and innovation and this modern backup as a service approach. And also also embracing how we want to focus on the five key pillars that I mentioned. >>And that's a great example of success when you ride the wave, which I talk about the ACLU, Colombia trends in the data protection, because one of the things that you pointed out earlier is the ransomware. Okay. That's a big one, right? That's a big, hot area. How, how is the cloud, first of all, how is that going? And then how has the cloud equation changed the ransomware defense and protection piece of it? >>Yeah. Now I just, I wonder I had a little bit on what Sabina mentioned before I answered the question, John, if you don't mind. Sure. I think that collaboration is where is the reason why we are here today, right? Like if you think about it, like we were the first design partners to go and build, you know, the EBS direct API, right. And we work closely with the EBS teams, not just for the API, but the cost structure of it. How would somebody like us use it? So we are at the bleeding edge of some of these services that we are using and that has enabled us, you know, to be where we are today. So again, thank you very much to be enough for this fantastic partnership. And again, there's so much to go and do to really go and nail this in a, in a, in a, in a great way on, on the public cloud. >>So now coming back to your question, John, you know, fundamentally, if you see right, you know, what happened is when, when, when customers move to the public cloud, you know, right there, you know, the ease of use with which, you know, AWS provides these services, right? And the consumption of these services actually drives some amazing behavior, right? Where people actually want to go and build, build, build, and build. But then it comes a time where somebody comes in and says, okay, you know, are you compliant? Right. You know, do you have the right compliance in place? You have all these accounts that you have, but what is running in each of these accounts, you have visibility in those accounts. And are these accounts that the data in these accounts is this gap, right? This is getting air gap in the same region, or does it need to be across regions? >>Right. You know, I'm in the east, do I need to, you know, have an air gap in the west and so on and so forth. Right? So all of these, you know, confluence of all these things come in and by the, all these problems existed in on-premise world, they get translated in, in the public cloud, where do I need to replicate my data, doing it to back it up? Do I need air gapped in a, like an on-prem world? You had a data domain of plans, which was separate from your primary storage for a reason, same similar something similar now needs to happen here for compliance reasons and for ransomware reason. So a lot of parallels here is just that here we are, it almost feels like, you know, as they say, right, the more things changed. The more they remain the same. That's what it is in the public cloud again. >>Well, that's a good point. I mean, let's take that example of on premises versus the cloud. Also, the clouds got more scale too, by the way. So now you've got regions, this is a common problem that customers are having, you can build your own and, or use solutions, but if you don't get ahead of it, the compliance question can bite you in the, you know what, because you then got to go back and retrofit everything. So, so that's kind of what I hear a lot on my end is like, okay, I want to be compliant from day one. I want to have an answer when asked, I don't want to have to go to old techniques that don't fit the cloud. That comes up a lot. What's your answer to that? >>Yeah, no, no. We were pretty much right. I think it's like, you know, when it, when it comes to compliance and all of these things, you know, people at the end of the day are looking for that same foundation of, of things. The same questions are asked for an encryption. You know, you know, I is my data where it needs to be when it needs to be right. What is my recovery point? Objective? What is my recovery time objective? All of these things basically come together. And now, as you said, it's just the scale that you're dealing is, is extremely different in the cloud and the, and the services, right? The easier it is that, you know, it is to use these services. And especially what AWS does, it makes it so easy. So compelling that same ease of use needs to get translated with a SAS service, like what we are doing with data protection, right? That that ease of use is very important. You have to preserve that sanctity >>Sabina. Let's get back to you. You mentioned earlier about the design partner, that benefits for Colombia. Now let's take it to the next level. As customers really realize they have a problem, they need solutions and you're on the AWS side. So you gotta have the answers for the customers. You've got to put people together, make things work. There's a variety of things that you guys offer. What are some of the different facets of the ISV or the partner programs that you offer to partners like Clooney, you know, that they can benefit from? >>Absolutely John, we believe in a win-win approach to the partnerships because that's what makes partnerships durable over time. We're always striving to do better here. And we continue to broaden our investments. As you know, John, the AWS management team, right from Adam Phillipsky, our CEO down firmly believe that partners are critical to our success, our longterm success, and as partners like CLU MEO work to lean in with us with more investment resources, our technology innovation. We also ensure that we are doing our part by providing value back to Cleo about a few years ago, as you might recall, right. We really did a lot of investment in our sales team on the AWS side. Well, one of the tanks me and also our partners observed is while we were making investments in the AWS sales team, I don't think we were doing a great job at helping our partners with reaching out to those customers. >>What we call as co-sale and partners gave us feedback on this. We are very partner and customer feedback driven, and we introduced in fact, a new role called the ISP success manager, ISS, who are basically embedded in our field. And they work with partners to help them close opportunities. And also net new opportunities are we've also in 2020. I believe that re-invent, we launched the ISB accelerate program whereby we offer incentives to the AWS field team to work with our partners to close existing opportunities and also bring in net new opportunities. So all of this has led to closer collaboration in the field between both our field teams, Muir's field team and our field team, but also accelerated mutual customer wins. I'm not saying that we are doing everything great. We still have a long ways to go. And we are constantly getting feedback from cluneal and also some of our other key partners, and we'll continue to get better at it. But I think the role of the ISV success manager and also the ISP accelerate program has been key to bringing in cold cell success. >>Well, John, what's your take on, is this a good partnership for you? I mean, see, the wave of Vegas has got the growth numbers. You mentioned that, but from a partnership standpoint, you're closing business, they got scale. Is it working? How do you organize your company to take advantage of these benefits? Can you share your thoughts? >>Absolutely not. We have embraced the ecosystem wholeheartedly 100%, but if you think about it, what we have done is look at our offering on AWS marketplace. There's an example, right? We are the only company I would say in our domain, obviously that routes our entire business through AWS marketplace. Whether obviously we get a lot of organic benefit from AWS marketplace, people go and search for a solution and from your shows up, and obviously they go and onboard self onboard themselves, and guess what? We let them self onboard themselves. And we rely on AWS's billing automatically. So you don't need to talk to us. You can just get billed automatically in your AWS bill and you get your data protection solution. Or if you directly reached out to us, guess what we do. We actually route you through AWS marketplace. All the onboarding is just to one place and it's a fantastic experience. >>So we have gone like all in, on that experience and completely like, you know, internalized that that's the right way to do things. And of course, thanks to, you know, Sabina's team and the marketplace team to create that platform so that we could actually plug it into it. But that's the kind of benefits that we have that we have, you know, taken advantage of a DWI. That's one example, another example that Sabina mentioned, right, which is the whole ACE program. We put a ton of registrations on AIS and with all the wins that we get on AWS, they could broadcast it to the sellers. So that creates its own vicious cycle in terms of more coming into the pipeline and more closing in. So, so these are just two small examples, but there's other examples that we look at our recent press release, where AWS, you know, when we, when we launched yesterday data protection and backup, the GM of AWSs three supported us in the press release. So there's things like that, that it's a, it's a fantastic collaboration. That's working really well for our joint customers. Sorry. >>And tell us something about the partnership between 80 of us, including, you know, that people might not be aware of some of the things that Poojan said that they're different out there that, that are, co-selling go marketing, that you guys offer people you guys work together on. >>Yeah. The, the ISV accelerate program that was created, it was really created with partners like Klunier in mind, our SAS partners. I think that that is something very, very unique between our partnership and, you know, I, I want to double click on what Poojan said, which is riding their opportunities through marketplace, right? All of their opportunities. That is something pretty unique. They understand the richness of the platform and also how customers are procuring software today in this world. And they've embraced that. And we really appreciate that. And I want to say, you know, another thing about Qumulo is they're all in on AWS, which is another unique thing. There are not a lot of, I would say all in partnerships in my world and I manage infrastructure, business apps, applications, and industry partnerships from the Americas globally. And all of those things are very, very unique in our partnership, which has led to success. Right. We started very, very early stage when Columbia was in stealth mode in 2017 and look where we've come today. And it's really kudos to Paul, John and his entire team for believing in the partnership for leaning in with us and for placing that trust with us. >>Awesome. Pooja, any final words you'd like to share for folks out there about the conversation and what's going on in Columbia? >>Yeah, no, absolutely. You know, as I said, I think we have been fortunate to be very early adopters of all these technologies and go and really build what a true cloud native solution has to be. Right. And, and again, right, you know, this is what customers are really looking for. And people are looking for, you know, at least on the data protection side, you know, ransomware air gap solution, people are looking for a solution natively built on the cloud because that's the only way a solution can deliver something at the scale and the cost structure that is needed to have, you know, a data protection solution in the public cloud. So, so this has been just a fantastic thing end to end, you know, for us overall. And we really look forward to, you know, going, you know, doing much more with AWS as we essentially go and scale, >>I have to ask, but before we, before we go, cause you're the CEO of the company and founder having all that backend infrastructure from Amazon, just on the resources, great. It creates a market for your product, but also the sales piece, you know, they got the marketplace, you mentioned, that's a big expense that you don't have to carry, you know, and you get revenue and top line. I mean, that's an impact for startups out there and growing companies. That's a pretty big deal. What's your, what's your advice to folks out there who are trying to think about the buy versus use the leverage of the, of the marketplace, which is, which is at large scale, because as a CEO, you're, you've got to make these decisions. What's your opinion on that? >>It's not, it's not as, as easy as I make it sound to do your own part. You know, AWS is, is, is, is huge, right? It's huge. And so we have to do our part to educate everybody within the, you know, even the AWS seller base to make sure that they internalize the fact that this is the right solution for the customers, for our joint customers, right? So we have to do that all day long. So there's no running away the no shortcut to everything, but obviously AWS does its part to make it very, as easy as possible, but there's a lot of heavy lifting we still have to do. And I think that'll only become easier and easier over the next few years >>And Sabina your takeout at AVS. You've got a great job. You were with all the hot growth companies. This is the big wave we're on right now with the cloud next generation clouds here, a lot of opportunities. >>Absolutely. And it's, and it's thanks to Pooja and, and partners like Lumeo that really understand what it takes to build a cloud native solution because it's part of it is building. And part of it is the co-selling go-to-market engine and embracing both of that is critical to success. >>Well, thank you both for coming on this journey here on the cube, as part of the showcase, push on. Great to see you to being a great to see you as well. And thanks for sharing that insight. Appreciate it. >>Thank you very much. >>Okay. AWS partners showcase speeding innovation with AWS. I'm John Ford, your host of the cube. Thanks for watching.

>>Oh, welcome back to theCube coverage of AWS re:Invent Executive Summit presented by Accenture. I'm John,  your host of theCube. We're joined by two great guests, Leo Barella, Chief Technology Officer of Takeda and Don Heiliger Managing Director at Accenture. Gentlemen, welcome to theCube. >> Thank you. Great to be here.  >>Last year, Karl Hick joined us to discuss Takeda's cloud journey. I know a lot's gone by the pandemic. Didn't go away as fast as we hoped, but we're starting to see visibility of the future with cloud at narrow and seeing cloud scale. Um, it's refactoring of business models, new opportunities. How's it gone? >>Well, I think it's a, it's going wonderful, as planned actually.  I can, I can share with you that there are definitely some lessons learned, uh, what the plan was quite structured. We definitely discovered that  maybe we should have actually had about 50% of our time, uh, in the planning for organizational change management and communication. And because we definitely, uh, want to, uh, be able to kind of explain why, uh, moving to cloud is actually important to, to our business. Uh, and so, so if you were to actually do it again, uh, I think we would have probably put a lot more time in communicating the value of the program and wild visibly. Now, uh, we're going to be able to move a lot faster than a, than a year ago. Uh, seeing that the community of the Qaeda is, uh, is already, you know, kind of come around, uh, to, to truly understand the value of, uh, of, uh, moving to cloud >>No last year, any Jessie gave up on stage the keys to success for the cloud journey, you guys were in the middle of it. Um, what was the big takeaway, um, on the, on, on your, your journey, because a lot of people are having real situational awareness and doubling down on successes, identifying what's not working and being real agile. This has been the big aha. What's the big aha moments you had, uh, this year? >>Well, I can tell you that. I say from the, the migration of our applications to cloud, which, which is basically table stakes for elimination of our data centers. So at the end of the program, we're likely gonna retain only few application in our data centers, but move more than 80% of our application workloads to cloud. What actually most excited about is, uh, is really our new strategy around data as a digital platform enabler. Uh, so from now on we're, we're really going to be focusing on the value stream of the Qaeda at the understanding of, of digital platforms that we actually want to able to, to, to further consolidate, um, and, um, uh, you know, and globally expand, uh, the, the, the technologies that we have, but old built on a data foundation, uh, that, that is actually governed across the community of the Qaeda. So data actually becomes the center of our strategy. Uh, and then digital is basically just a way for us to actually interact with data, uh, which includes applications, such as machine learning and AI, which we were heavily investing in. And, uh, and we definitely plan on now leveraging more and more. >>And just to real quick, before we go to a central for a second, I want you to double down on that journey dynamics because we're seeing and maybe reporting, and the theme here this year at reinvent is multiple workloads in the cloud changing workloads. You have evolution of workloads, data as the center of it. And then this cultural shifts where you got the, you know, these modern applications at the top of the stack. So you were AIS contributing. So you've got three major innovation theaters kind of exploding. I mean, this is pretty, I mean, one of those is, is mindblowing. Nevermind, all three. >>Yeah. And I can tell you that, uh, you know, um, I'd like to achieve further expand the circle, uh, beyond the Qaeda. We don't necessarily believe that the digital transformation is just about, I don't want enterprise. That is definitely a fundamental, uh, but the digital transformation is truly about, um, connecting the Qaeda as a digital, uh, pharmaceutical company to the overall healthcare ecosystem and be able to basically transact with our partners, uh, in real time, which is the reason why we actually put data at the center because at the end of the day, uh, when other partners wants to interact with our data, the should in real time be able to transact as if they were transacting on their own systems with our own data, especially DCPS and patients, >>Don your, your reaction, because a lot of learnings, new opportunities, you're at the center of essentially doing a lot of great work. We've been documented a lot of it as well. What's your reaction? >>I mean, I just to amplify a lot of Leo's comments already, I think if I, if I think back and on this journey with, with the Qaeda and AWS and Accenture as the power of three, I think, you know, leaning in to that has been a recipe for success. So as Leo said, we've definitely had some lessons learned, but you know, being there with this power of three, I think has been, uh, enabling us to, uh, attack those challenges that have, uh, that have come up and, and really gotten ahead of those. I think the other thing you talked about is this, um, you know, all these different things coming together, you know, before the pandemic, we had, uh, done done some research at Accenture that kind of had two groups of companies with the leader leaders and the laggards. And, uh, it showed, know the difference in revenue growth of the leaders that adopt technology and those that are falling behind and really, um, that gap has widened, but there's a new entrance of companies that have emerged, which is the, leapfroggers the ones that take advantage of all of the things that like AWS has to offer in terms of the AI capabilities, the data capabilities, the foundational elements that are enabling them to really do this compressed transformation journey in a much shorter timeline. >>I think that's been the element that, uh, you know, I think we know you and I have firsthand together with our AWS colleagues of us being able to really do this on a pace that I think has just been on, on the unseen or unmatched in the past. >>Well, we get to the innovation pilots you guys are doing. I want to just jump on that topic for a quick second time. If you don't mind, that's a really important point. I think the people who shifted to the cloud and replatformed, and then learned all the goodness and then refactored their businesses have done great. This notion of leapfrog is people who move and say, Hey, I don't need, I'm going to replatform and refactor at the same time, get the learnings from others. Okay. They get the best practice is so what's the scar tissue from all the pioneers who have been playing in the cloud, who got the benefits are also paving the path for others. This is actually a motivating, cultural and personal kind of impact motivation. People are happier. What's your guys' reaction to this culture of the cloud, this cloud reef, leapfrogging and refactoring. >>Yeah. I mean, uh, w what I'm saying, uh, and, and lovely, or your perspective on this too, but frankly, you know, I think, uh, you know, with, with the, uh, the war on talent right now, that's out there. I think, you know, companies are investing, whether they're leaders, whether they're leapfroggers in this digital, uh, you know, platform I think are attracting the best talent and actually making it a place where people can innovate. And I know we're going to talk about some of the innovations here in a second, but I think that is, um, you know, some, a way to differentiate, uh, right now in the marketplace, given everything that we're seeing around, uh, retention and attraction of talent. I mean, being able to be on the front edge of this is quite critical in any company's view, but, you know, especially when you're trying to attract the best talent in, in, uh, developing, uh, medicines that actually say lots, >>Leo jumping on this wave and moving leapfrogging, what's your perspective on this? >>Yeah. You know, I, I agree to, uh, you know, talent is that talent is key. Uh, and quite frankly, uh, you know, Takeda, we've been at, you know, pharmaceutical company for the past 240 years. Uh, and now what should you really, uh, you know, starting to become a digital, um, pharmaceutical, uh, power. Uh, and, and so, uh, part of the attractiveness of, uh, of joining Takeda for instance, is the fact that, uh, not only you actually get to, uh, you know, uh, be with a company that is investing heavily, uh, in, in, in digital re-skilling and actually training of people, but also you're connecting to the mission of, uh, of literally saving saving lives, right? So basically, uh, the, the, the connection of really this transformation to become a digital superpower, uh, and also, uh, the, the mission of, uh, of really finding new medicines were, uh, for people that actually experienced, you know, for instance, you know, order of disease, uh, it's quite exciting because it's, uh, it's the application of artificial intelligence machine learning, uh, where now you're actually really trying to find someone that is, that is struggling. Uh, and we're now actually connecting them to a cure that, that is drastically changing their lifestyle. >>It's interesting, the agile agility and the speed of innovation really kind of puts away the old analysis of like, what's the payback. I mean, if you, if you can't see the value right away, then you, then you don't know what you're doing. Basically people in the cloud that say I can contribute and leapfrog and get that value. This has been a big part of the business model. And one of the ways people are doing it is just getting involved, starting pilots, doing the projects. Um, so I'd like to have you guys share the project that you guys have got going on with nurse line. Can you share what you're trying to achieve and how has the cloud enabled you to, to innovate, but also capture the value and can, and can you see it, is there, is there a big analysis there's like a big payback it's like you're buying this 20 year project, or how do you guys look at this? >>I mean, the nimbleness of, uh, of cloud, uh, in our ability to come in and fail fast is what's extremely attractive to, uh, to, to the business, right? Because now all of a sudden we can quickly spin up a prototype. We can quickly actually put it out as a product and actually see how effective it is compared to traditional processes. Uh, so for instance, nurse line is actually what we, uh, it's one of the many, uh, innovation initiatives that we actually have going on, but specifically addressing, uh, one of our, um, uh, therapy areas, which is, uh, our plasma derived therapies, uh, plasma and other therapies is actually, uh, the supply chain actually really starts with, uh, the good wheel of a innovative individual like yourself, um, deciding to actually not donate plasma that eventually is being processed and fractionated to deliver medicines that are life savings in most cases is actually the, the literally life savings. >>Um, and, uh, so what we're trying to do is actually really make that experience as flawless as, uh, in, as seamless as possible. Uh, if you, if you, if you have ever experienced, you know, going into Amazon go, uh, where you kind of, you know, walk in, you get some groceries and walk out and don't pass through a register. And, uh, it's the same type of experience that we actually want to provide where, uh, in the past, um, when you're actually donating plasma, obviously it's a, it's a fairly invasive procedure because obviously you need to actually be in a, being a bad and your, your plasma is getting distracted, but there's a lot of paperwork that you need to actually fill in. And, uh, and what we actually did, uh, is now actually enabled that through a digital experience where a donor, uh, they do a short approaching the center can now actually initiate a chat with, uh, with Amazon connect the ILX. >>Uh, and then, uh, depending on the priority, uh, the donor is going to assign to a nurse that can actually be anywhere in the country. Uh, in all of a sudden the nurse can actually initiate, uh, through, through Amazon connect, um, a dialogue with the, you know, with, with the donor, uh, answering some of the questions in the, you know, in the regular questionnaire. So, so now all of a sudden the nurse is actually feeding up the people work for you. Uh, and, uh, and that is actually done through the initiation of a video call. Uh, and we're actually using chime, which is, again, a part of like, you know, the, the, you know, the, the Amazon AWS services. And then basically upon the, the completion of a, of the questionnaire that is action, analytic, Tronic signature, that has been applied to, um, you know, to the form. >>Uh, and so did, this is actually all happening while basically the person is actually walking through the center or walking into the center. Uh, and now all of a sudden, the only thing that they need to do is actually having a signed bat and, uh, and actually initiate the process of, uh, of plasma donation. So all of this is actually done through microservices. Uh, now everything that we do now is actually API enabled and, you know, obviously like many other companies right now, what I should really think about microservices and the usability of, of technology and, and reusable components. So we're extremely excited about the fact that now, uh, that experience can actually be carried on, uh, to, to other parts of the business and that, that, that can actually leverage these technologies. >>That's a great example of refactoring. What's next for you guys, a division Accenture, what's the plans? >>Well, again, uh, the Google got done. >>Well, I was going to say, I mean, I think, you know, we, we started touching on it, uh, experience, right. And, uh, how do we embed more technology experiences that we're all used to? I mean, you know, to get into some of the return to office, the easiest way for me to do some of the COVID testing has been using my, uh, my trusty iPhone. Right. And so, as, as Liam talked about that experience, uh, part of this beyond just the therapies and, and attracting donors is really key for any business to succeed and thrive. Um, yeah, I think it, you know, if you think about, um, you've got the natives that are really more technology-based, you've got the, the Peloton of the world that obviously have, you know, a platform, but also a product you're going to see product and specifically life sciences companies get more into platform enabled, uh, services that they can provide outside, uh, as a, uh, service to others. And I think, um, you know, the, the platform, uh, experience and the user experience, the donor experience, all that I'd say innovating in, in more use cases like, uh, some of the ones you just heard that's what's next, and being able to, uh, use those guys more even externally to, uh, to do even more good for society, >>Leah, your thoughts with that. >>Well, um, you know, what I should really just getting started, right? So it's not a, you know, this transformation is now cloud enabled, uh, but, but w we're systematically actually going through our value chain, uh, and trying to throw the, understand, uh, you know, our customers, you know, again, as a business, we don't actually sell directly to consumers. So we're, we're, we're basically brokering through, but primarily through CPS and hospitals, right, to basically be able to diagnose a disease that can actually be cured with our products. Uh, and we do feel that, uh, you know, there is actually a huge role that we can actually play because obviously we're are experts in the, of, uh, you know, of the disease that we actually cure with our products. So basically the interactions, like the one that I just described nurse line, uh, can actually be directed, uh, not only to the HCPs, but also to the patients, uh, and the access to communities. >>Uh, and so we want to actually continue to provide platforms by which, you know, people that experienced, you know, especially a rare disease can now actually already connect and, uh, and, and, and share, um, you know, th th the sense of community that, that the business is, is so, so very important, right? For someone that physically has, uh, you know, the diseases that we cure. Uh, so again, uh, I think that the systematic approach of API APIs, and actually making sure that the data is actually ready for say the FDA to actually consume, to accelerate the clinical trials or to an hospital to kind of already understand if there is maybe a clinical trial that can be applied to one of the patients that is, that is actually showing some, some side effects that, uh, you know, or, or symptoms that visibly can be cured with, you know, with our, with our products, I think is going to be, uh, you know, ultimately the, the value that we can provide to society. So >>You guys did a great work and a great example. And to me, and this really showcases the management philosophy of cloud and the culture of cloud, where you take something like connect, and you can refactor and reconfigure these existing resources in a way that creates value, that saves lives. And this is the new, this new playbook. Congratulations on an exceptional story. I appreciate it. Thanks for coming on the cube coverage rapist, reinvent executive summit presented by Accenture I'm John ferry, your host, thanks for watching.

>>Hey, welcome to this cube conversation with Dell technologies. I'm Lisa Martin. I've got kosha ghost here with me. He's back on the cube director of product management for unified NAS solutions at Dell technologies. CATIA. Great to see you again. >>Yes. I raped a great to be here again. >>We're going to be talking about the major announcement that Dell technologies just made with their scale-out file storage system that has Dell EMC power scale. We're going to unpack the recent announcement, new features, capabilities, all that good stuff. Kaushik let's go ahead and start. Just give us that high level view of Dell EMC power scale. >>Yes, absolutely. Itself power scale is a high-performance scale-out file storage solution. Um, it's the successor to the Isilon family record, which as you guys know, I mean, there's one of the leading file solutions in the market today. Um, power scale one best, which is the file system that runs on power scale and also the Isilon family, um, is offers an exceptional simplicity, flexibility, and performance, um, which is what Isilon and Parscale is known for. I mean, um, if you look at Gardner's magic ordered one, Fs has been listed as the leader in that, uh, in the distributed and object file system. So, uh, so that basically is now our scaled. We launched our first Parscale all flash products last year. And then this year with this launch, we are sort of completing that portfolio, um, with, uh, with new hybrid and archive, uh, platforms. >>Excellent. And we're going to get into that as well. Let's go ahead and start unpacking this announcement. Walk me through some of the key things that are new and announced in this recent announcement. >>Yeah, except we just launched the hybrid archive platforms, um, on, as part of the Parscale family, are there two archive platforms and two hybrid platforms that we launched and, uh, they offer better CPU, performance, cash, and all that stuff, but, but we don't want to go into the speeds and feeds what I really want to hide breast is the, is the software capabilities that is far skull rings for starters. Um, it is, uh, it now includes inline data compression in 99 reduction. It's all built into it. Um, we support now new ransomware protection capabilities with, uh, with this product. Um, there's a new data protection capability that we now support with our, um, with our, our protected data data manager. Um, and, um, and then the, all the goodness of, uh, Iceland, one Fs and Parscale one Fs that sort of continues. >>I imagine, since the launch last year, cash took a lot of customer conversations that helped to drive this launch and the complete transition on the innovation of what we now see as power scale. >>Yeah. Yeah. I mean, uh, there, there have been some great conversations. People have been, um, people have been really waiting for this product offering because now, uh, they can basically combine those flash platforms that we launched last year with these hybrid platforms and can offer a really a solution that only gives you that performance, but also the, the cost and, uh, savings and the value that, um, that, uh, only our powers skill in Iceland can give you, >>Give me a good overview of some of those key capabilities that the existing Isilon customers and the prospective new customers of power scale are going to be able to take advantage of. >>Yes. So the new, some of the new capabilities as in line efficiency, as I mentioned earlier, that's now built into the product. Um, we have a line efficiency today on our all flash platforms. Uh, so now introducing it with these hybrid and archived nodes, what that means is that when you set up a mixed cluster with all flash and hybrid, when you gear the data down from the national hybrid, the data does not have to be rehydrated. They stay compressed, they stay in protected and so on and so forth. So that's one big advantage that you get. Second, um, these power skill hybrid type platforms were built ground up, uh, with our own custom hardware, unlike the flashback phones with be leverage powered servers for these ones, we use our custom hardware. And the reason for that is because what those archive and storage, the whole story we want that density, we can store up to 500 terabytes of usable capacity, effective usable capacity in, in these archive nodes in a single, uh, one U rack unit. And then, uh, of course, uh, from a software perspective, uh, we talked about ransomware protection. So, so we have a new capability with trends of bear protection. And then there's this new capability that we just launched in regard to backups, more efficient, more faster backups with, uh, with our, our protector will be bought predict family of products. >>Excellent. I want to dig into the ransomware and data protection in a minute, but I want to get a sense of the overall theme of the launch. You talked about this being the completion of that tech refresh some of the new capabilities and enhancements that customers are going to be able to take advantage of it. Give me that higher level kind of thematic look at this news. >>The big team of this is basically finishing that Parscale family that we started last year, right? So we started with launching the whole flash. Now with this hybrid and archive. Now we have the flu family done, um, all products, not support in line efficiency, so we can move the data around, you get the same, uh, data doesn't get high rehydrated. Um, you are, you can make it part of a single cluster. Um, and you get all the performance benefits, um, the scalability benefits of one Fs, um, and new data management capabilities, the, um, so all of that, that we started all of that goodness that we started with our skill, all flash. Um, we soft, continued now with this, uh, with this platform. >>Got it. And I know you guys did your own internal study and I'd like you to share some of the results with the audience, you guys compared power scale to competitors in traditional NAS in flash only NAS in mixed NAS, San and software only NAS give us a snapshot into what some of those results were for power scale. >>Yeah. I mean, uh, the big take away out here is that, um, that when it comes to power scale, um, they, we don't have a competitor when it comes to scalability, right? Uh, the fact that you can now work, uh, on petabytes of capacity under a single namespace, a single file system, and also give you that performance. Um, we, there is none to today, right? And, um, and then there may be some which can do those also, but then they don't have the enterprise capabilities like replication, um, and, uh, the rich enterprise capabilities that one, if fit, sets so off performance, scale capabilities and all the, uh, the simplicity of one Fs. And that's basically what the unique thing about our skaters >>W performance scale and simplicity, three things that I'm sure enterprises, small, medium businesses in any industry appreciate you. You talked about the, um, what's new in terms of the hybrid notes and the archive nodes. Can you help us understand what workloads does nos are best targeted for? >>Absolutely so hybrid and archive. What we have realized is that not every data can be a compressed RDU, right? So, so it's not, we would love customers to use our all flash products. They get the deduplication, they get the compression, then it lowers the cost. And clearly then you get the performance and the cost, but there are workloads like media and entertainment, video surveillance, where you will not be able to compress or that guest, rather than it being for a very expensive flash. You could put those data sets in our lower cost archive platforms as an example. And if you have situations where look, I need some performance, but there is a lot of old data and you can actually mix and match it also. So you're going to have those flash platform is giving that performance. And then you have our archive platforms, which is basically giving you the lowest cost storage for that data. And it is not so frequent giving access. >>And there's the flexibility there. So how can, this is the tech refresh? He said, this has been completed now a power scale from Isilon. How can existing Isilon customers take advantage? What are their next steps to be able to take advantage of the newer capabilities and technologies? >>Yeah, absolutely. I mean, one thing we, we, our scale has it, that's very different from others is that Parscale has this mantra called the no, no left behind. So if you are an existing Isilon customer, you can basically add these Parscale nodes to your existing Iceland cluster without breaking any donut. Then we put our scale, we lock them, magically redistribute, rebalance your workloads across these new nodes. And you sort of keep on expanding our cluster. And when you, when you feel like that, you can, uh, take out the older nodes, uh, at the time of your choosing, right? So that stuff, um, that's a huge benefit that we get. So in fact, in some customer environments, their data has been there for almost 10 to 12 years now, uh, uh, because they've never had to do a forklift upgrade. So that sort of continues with this family. Um, if you learn to learn more about it, I would encourage, uh, going to Dell technologies slash power scale, uh, or contact your Dell technologies, uh, rep >>Let's kind of wrap up things here with talking about, dig into ransomware. We've seen ransomware become a household word, the colonial pipeline, the meat packing organization that was attacked earlier this summer. We know that that a lot of data show that there's a one ransomware attack happens every 11 seconds. And of course we only hear about the really big attacks. Um, I've had the opportunity to talk to a lot of cybersecurity leaders lately, and they're showing that ransomware is up, you know, at least 10 X in the last year with this massive pivot to work from home now, work from anywhere. Talk to me about some of the focus that Dell has put in power scale now with perspective of ransomware protection and recovery. >>Yeah. So for ransomware product, we have to do things that we are doing. So one is this concept of a detection. So when an attack is happening, we want it to be able to detect with date at an attack is happening and take some corrective measures, right? And so we have this product called Sabrina eyeglass, which is exclusively built for, uh, uh, built for, uh, uh, our scale and using this product they use, we use AIS, uh, to basically to figure out that if an attack is happening, we detect it. And based on that based on policies, we can then either, if it's happening with only one user, we can start off, um, uh, start off, uh, prevent, uh, sort of lock it down that particular user profile or, or take other corrective actions taking meaning set up. So that's one aspect of it, which is about the detection of it and taking some quick steps. >>Then there's a second aspect of it, which is all about recovery, right? So, so we do have a replications event. If the customer chooses, we can have reputations set up from your Parscale, uh, production cluster to another cluster. And, um, and in that replication, uh, we can introduce an air gap so that, uh, any, anything bad thing is happening here does not get, uh, uh, does not get replicated to that, uh, remote in mine. So, um, so, so those are the two ways, one detecting, and second basically protecting it. Um, and not only just protecting it, but ensuring that air gap, um, capabilities, data as well, so that, uh, the ransom reason not replicated there as well. >>Absolutely critical. Given some of the things that you and I mentioned a few minutes ago in terms of the explosion of ransomware, which hopefully in our remote, remote work hybrid environment, as more technologies like this come out from Dell technologies and its partners, we'll start to see those ransomware numbers go down. Lastly, I want you to just restate, you mentioned a URL where folks can go to learn more information. Now you've got several different links to point folks to, can you go ahead and remind us what those are again? >>Yes, absolutely. I mean, uh, the easiest you are to go to is Dell technologies slash flower scale. I mean, if you're, that's a one-to-one URL and I'd like you to remember, once you go there, there'll be videos, articles, blogs, and you can, uh, look through a much going and then whatever you want from them. >>Excellent contract. Thank you for joining me today. Talking to me about what's new with power scale, congratulations on the completion of the refresh, a lot of new capabilities and, and, uh, technologies that your customers, existing Isilon and feature perspective, power scale customers are going to be able to take advantage of, look forward to hearing in the next few months in customer success stories. Thanks for your time. Thank >>You >>For Casha gauche. I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching a cube conversation.

>> From theCUBE studios in Palo Alto, in Boston bringing you data-driven insights from theCUBE and ETR. This is breaking analysis with Dave Vellante. >> SaaS companies have been some of the strongest performers in this COVID era. They finally took a bit of a breather this month, but they remain generally well-positioned for the next several years with their predictable models and cloud platforms. Meanwhile, the demise of on-prem legacy players from COVID shock, seems to have been overstated, in part because of the return of the laptop and in the case of Oracle with some see as a cloud play, Hmm. Then there's Bitcoin which is seeing public companies use their balance sheet liquidity to invest in the cryptocurrency. (chuckles) Wow. What does that all mean? I'll leave that for another day. Hello everyone and welcome to this week on Cube insights powered by ETR. On this breaking analysis, we'll pick out some of the more recent themes from this month and share our thoughts in some major enterprise software players, the future of on-prem, a review of our take on cloud and what cloud will look like in the 2020s. Wow. It's true, trees really don't grow to the moon. As predicted, the stock market has been a little bit crazy this month. February saw some leading SaaS names like Workday, Salesforce, and ServiceNow take a bit of a breather in the second half of the month. Workday and Salesforce announced earnings on the 25th. Workday had its first billion dollar subscription revenue quarter at 16% revenue growth a revenue and earnings beat. And of course the stock closed down Friday, more than 2%. Salesforce had a nearly $6 billion revenue quarter 20% growth, a revenue and earnings beat. And the day after it announced earnings the stock was down more than 6%. The market is worried about rising interest rates, and maybe concerned that an inflation fears are going to kill the stimulus bill. And so any whiff of caution by company managements is met with dampened enthusiasm. Meanwhile, it's looking like some of the big on-prem legacy firms, notably Dell, HPQ and HPE are making it through COVID, and might even come out in the other side stronger maybe. Dell handily beat expectations on the 25th on the strength of 17% growth in its client business. That's PCs. It's the gift that keeps on giving. HPQ had a strong beat as well, and we're anticipating a solid quarter from HPE next week on March 2nd. And then there's Oracle. Barron's had a big article on February 19th, entitled, "Oracle is turning into a cloud giant and why it's stock is a buy". It moved the market. And many investors rotated out of growth stocks, tech growth tech stocks into Oracle, others who had owned Oracle for a while scooped up some profits. Is Oracle a cloud giant? Hmm. We'll discuss that in a moment. And then there's all this Bitcoin mania. You know, our interest there is much more beyond the price fluctuations rather we're interested in the innovations in crypto. Look, we're going to table this for another day, but it's an interesting side note of this February madness. Let's take a look closer look at the February chill for SaaS companies. Here's a chart showing the relative performance of some of the big SaaS names in the latter half of this month. Now despite the strong earnings for Workday and Salesforce you can see the market's negative response on the 26th. Snowflake and ServiceNow they had epic runs last year, and they've been softening although on Friday morning ServiceNow shut down quickly on the open on sympathy with Workday and ServiceNow and then investors, you know, came back in. Very weird action in the market these days, again, not surprising. And look at the reaction investors had to the Barron's article on the 19th. They anointed Oracle as a cloud giant. Kudos to the Oracle PR team for that one. Now, let's take a look at these companies and put them in context. Even though they're not direct competitors it's instructive to model some of the top enterprise software players in positions, and line them up against each other. This chart here shows two dimensions from the ETR data. On the vertical axis is net score or customer spending momentum. And the horizontal axis is market share or pervasiveness in the survey. The table inset shows the net score measurement in the shared end. That's the metric that plots the dots. In both cases bigger is better. Note, that red dotted-line there is the 40% line. 40% to us is the magic number. Anything above that line is considered elevated. So we have ServiceNow and Salesforce they're up to the right. They're both big companies. They have significant market presence amongst the CIO and both have elevated spending velocity in the 50% range. And I've said for years, these two companies are on a collision course and I stand by that. It started happening and McDermott Bill McDermott, new CEO he's going to accelerate that in our view. We put a cloud around Snowflake tongue in cheek, because they are literally in the clouds on this chart. They stand alone, with a solid market presence that continues to grow in an off the charts net score of 83.3% now. For context you can see Oracle Fusion, NetSuite and Taleo. In addition, we put Slack and Coupa on the graphic, two names that have been on the radar lately and SAP, which continues to show decent spending momentum despite its challenges. All right, let me make a few comments on some of these companies. Snowflake, we've talked about a lot. I said earlier that their IPO, that if you really wanted to own it and couldn't wait for a better price, which I thought you'd get. And by the way you did, but then if you really wanted to own it on day one hold your nose and buy it and then wait a few years. So, you know, good luck. And I think you'll, it'll turn out okay for you. Now, the data really continues to show strong demand for Snowflake. There's no signs of them slowing down. So they announced earnings on March 3rd. We didn't have more data there. So we would expect confirmation of our analysis but you never know. Now Workday, here's our take. In our view the market is catching up to Workday. They had about a three-year lead at least in human capital management and the cloud and that whole model. And they had the best product. It was really simple and it was quite disruptive. But now you got Oracle, ADP, Ceridian they're catching up. Workday's expansion into financial management has been much more challenging and as it gets bigger, things get tougher. It's still though an enduring name. Salesforce, we see a bit differently. Salesforce is so big now, it's really hard for it to move the needle. And so it's been on an acquisition binge, and to grow that's likely going to continue. It could work well for the company. I mean, similar to the ways in which Oracle consolidated software names and picked up a lot of customers. Salesforce is a great name, and we think is going to continue to grow. ServiceNow is interesting. It's entering a new chapter under CEO, Bill McDermott, new CEO. He wants to double the company's revenue. And I think he's got a reasonable chance at that through a combination of great go-to-market and expanding the platform and in McDermott style doing acquisitions. SAP's market value tripled under his watch, and he knows the customers. And he's a magnet for attracting talent. Now ServiceNow is not without its challenges. Its customers often complain that ServiceNow is pricing is really high and it's becoming the Oracle of service management. But as McDermott aims more at SAP and Oracle customers, they create a nice umbrella for ServiceNow to work with. And technically, we think ServiceNow has other challenges around its multi-instance. We call it, if you can't fix it feature it architecture. That may present some issues down the road at scale. We don't have time to go into that in detail but suffice it to say that ServiceNow runs on its own cloud. So it's not running on a hyper scale cloud. Yeah. Good news it doesn't have to pay it through that. The bad news is, has got to manage all that infrastructure. It's basically be a cloud supply supplier but it doesn't do multi-tenant which means fundamentally, it has a more expensive cost structure. Okay. Let's turn our attention to what's happening on-prem with some of the big legacy names. Here's the same X Y chart with some of the big names that have a presence on-prem. First you can see VMware and Cisco, Oracle, Dell, IBM and HP. Look at them on the horizontal scale. They've got a large market share of presence in the ETR dataset. Unlike the larger SaaS companies however, none is above that magic 40% net scoreline. Pure, Dell's laptop business, Red Hat, OpenShift. They're above the line with Nutanix just about there at the line. The other major laptop players, Lenovo and HPQ showing momentum from the whole remote work trend. And for context, we put in NetApp so you can get a sense of where they're at. Pure beat its earnings last week but only grew 2% last quarter. Now remember the ETR survey, this is a forward-looking survey. So this potentially bodes well for the companies that are above that 40% line. Okay. So most so sorry of the companies on this chart only IBM and Oracle, those two own a public cloud. And we'll dig further into that in a moment, but virtually every name shown here, even Oracle has a mandate to redefine cloud. Meaning it has to put forth in our view in North star vision and execute on it. That will unify the experience between on-prem, hybrid cloud, public clouds, cross clouds and the edge. Now I say even Oracle, because in my view, Oracle is in a stronger position than the others, because of it's more coherent software architecture. Now the other companies on this chart, they have to architect a platform that abstracts the underlying complexity of clouds, leverage cloud native tooling in the respective public clouds. Connect on-prem infrastructure and build a layer, that stretches out and accommodates edge workloads. I think Oracle will follow suit and is actually ahead of most in a narrower context, i.e hybrid. But it doesn't have to race toward this vision. It can sit back as it often does, watch everyone else fumble around and make mistakes. And then Oracle will keep investing in R&D, watch the market, you know make its own experimental mistakes, and then enter the market and act like we invented it. Now, Cisco will come at this from a strong networking and security perspective. And it has a nice story on programmable infrastructure with Cisco DevNet. But unfortunately it does not own VMware as does Dell, but Dell is in the middle of a fairly remarkable journey. And it will be interesting to see what happens with the VMware spin-out and the cozy commercial relationship that Dell is structuring with VMware as you know, and as we've reported, Dell has used VMware's cash for a lot of this restructuring. And so we'll see, as it exits the current phase and enters a new phase, how it will be able to pursue that vision. It's going to be, whatever it does it's going to be much different than that vertically integrated Oracle approach, which of course brings me to IBM. Potentially Red Hat with OpenShift is the most powerful card in the deck right now. OpenShift I mean, it's open it's everywhere. It has momentum as we showed. And I like their position. My concern is IBM, IBM is still unwinding and restructuring its business. And it's taking a long time as we've seen, with its outsourcing business. And now the Watson health assets, Irvine is continuing that downsizing trend that we saw under Ginny, shedding non-strategic businesses that don't fit, Irvine has a lot to deal with. And I want to point out that this idea of an abstraction layer across clouds is not trivial. First, all of these companies have to stop being so defensive about the public cloud. To a large extent, VMware and Red Hat have found a happy place. But in my view, they all should be thanking AWS, Azure, and Google for building out this great global distributed system, that they can leverage and build on top of. And second, this is going to be expensive. And Cisco, Dell VMware, IBM, they're all really stretched thin from an R&D perspective. They a lot of mouths to feed across the portfolio. So is HPE stretched thin, and it doesn't have the R&D budget at less than $2 billion annually. So my concern is that we're going to have lots of complexity across these obstructions layers by vendor. Now maybe the good news for companies. This may be good news for companies like Hashi or specialists with a vision to do this within a domain like a clumial, or a vast data, but this is big, and they are small. So it's going to take the better part of a decade to play out. Now, let's take a quick look at the cloud players. OMG when I saw that article in Barron's last weekend my mouth dropped. What a headline and it had this illustration of a stout Larry Ellison rising above the clouds. Here's a picture of the ETR data for the cloud players. It's the same X, Y plotting or net score and market share. If you follow this program, you know we believe there are four and only four hyper scale cloud players, with the resources to compete and differentiate as horizontal infrastructure players, which really is how we view the origination of modern cloud computing. AWS created it with S3 and EC2 with 2006. Those four are AWS and Azure, which have a large lead over the pack. Google cloud and Alibaba. And you can see we've circled the on-prem pack which comprises Oracle and IBM along with Dell VMware. And we snuck Google just stuck them at the edge of that circle because the differentiate they're cozying up to companies with strong enterprise sales teams and Google's, they're smart, they're patient. And so we, by no means, count them out. They're spending like mad and they have a lot of cash. They've done some really interesting open source things with containers. And so, you know, no doubt they're a player, but they are behind. Now in that on-prem pack, IBM and Oracle they actually own their own public clouds. IBM, they acquired soft layer which was a bare metal hosting company at the time to get IBM into the game. They retooled the platform over several years. Now here's the thing, try and unpack IBM's cloud business looking at its financial or in earnings reports. It's just a mess. I hope Irvine cuts the nonsense and actually develops and reports a set of metrics that are meaningful to cloud observers and IBM observers, because the way IBM reports its cloud business today is opaque and it's nonsense. It's frankly embarrassing to the company. It needs to end sooner rather than later is fundamentally meaningless to any observers. Now observers of cloud. If you care about the big chunk of whatever then maybe it has meaning. Now Oracle for its part, they announced the public cloud years ago, its version of one datto cloud was crap. And the company, they hired a bunch of really smart cloud engineers and they spent a lot of money to fix that. Now neither IBM nor Oracle have the CapEx resources of the big four, not even close, yet they'll build out data centers and yes they'll have a play, but they're different and that's okay. Now in the Barron's article on Oracle, the author was quite positive on Oracle, noting that quote, "On a recent earnings call CEO Safra Catz said that Oracle cloud infrastructure revenue was up 139% for the quarter". So, (laughs) we have really no sense or a stake in the ground is to up from what? Anyway, noting further the author said, quote, "Alas! Oracle doesn't break out OCI sales and comps can be messy". Hmm, indeed. Oracle is hiding the ball on OCI, that's because if they did break it out, which by the way they used to report, AIS revenue explicitly, but if they did break it out, they would only be highlighting that they are a minor player in AIS. Further, the article continues, quote, "Catz says that hers is the only tech company that has both a global cloud and a full set of enterprise applications". Unquote, bingo. There it is. That's why Oracle is in a better position than many of or most of the on-prem players listed in this chart. By the way, I would argue that Microsoft has a pretty impressive set of enterprise applications in a fairly global cloud. But what Safra is talking about is applications that support the world's most mission critical work. And when it comes to that, Oracle is number one. Don't fool yourself and get caught up in the Oracle lock-in and high pricing narrative, thinking that they're going to get crushed. They're not. Oracle is the best in the mission critical workload game. There is no one better, period. But guys, come on. The big four last year grew 41% and accounted for $86 billion in AIS revenue, AKA real cloud revenue. And they're going to surpass $115 billion this year combined. Real cloud companies don't grow in the single digits today. So talk to me when we reach equilibrium on that front. Okay. So let's wrap by looking at what does a cloud company look like in the 2020s? Now, I'm not saying that the rest of the pack shouldn't redefine cloud they should. But I hope we can all agree by now that modern day cloud computing was defined in business terms by AWS. They are number one in cloud computing, make no mistake. However, AWS is bringing the cloud into the wheelhouse of the on-prem players, cleverly saying that it's bringing AWS to the edge and it looks at the data centers. Just another edge node is great positioning but that is not trivial. Just look it out posts and how AWS has had to evolve its pricing strategy in terms, can't just turn it off like you can, the public cloud. I have an entire rant on all the, SaaS service transformations. It's really interesting to watch as AWS goes out, and the on-prem players come in and go hybrid. I got a lot of thought on what's happening there both in terms of SaaS, which I think is an outdated pricing model, and the infrastructure as a service players that are really getting into this game, we would love to do a session on that sometime. And it's a real disruption I think coming. Anyway, AWS competitors should absolutely try to redefine cloud. By AWS moving to the edge, it's opened up the door to that possibility. Microsoft is obviously in the best position I think by far here. They've earned the right and I'll never accuse them of cloud washing. Google, they got some work to do in this regard, but they probably have the largest physical cloud infrastructure in the world. As I've said, they just need to pull their heads out of their ads and quadruple down on cloud. But this idea of abstracting away the underlying complexity of the cloud, leveraging cloud native capabilities and building on top of the shoulders of the cloud giants such as David Floyer has expressed in this chart, moving from stateless to state full, integrating across clouds, advancing automation not only through the stack, but across domains and ultimately using metadata to govern where workloads should live or be moved, be disintegrated and recombined with low latency and be highly secured. I look at this, I think about this and I say one there is this technically feasible and smart techies tell me yes, so I keep trying to dig here for signs and I definitely see some movement in this direction. And two, I don't think any one vendor is going to do this themselves. They're not going to, it's not going to be owned by one company. I think what's going to happen is you'll get successes within layers of the stack. I mean, think about Snowflakes data cloud. We're going to see that for storage. See it for backup, data management, security maybe security within different domains. You see endpoint and identity access management. Maybe that cloud comes together as cloud security. You see it in applications, but without clear standards, it's going to be a challenge. And with respect to my friends at Snowflake, we might even see it in database sometime LOL, but look you all have a lot of work to do. And to my CIO friends, you know the drill much better than I, technology is going to keep relentlessly coming at you and you can deal with that. It's the people and the change management in the culture. Those are your bigger challenges, but don't screw up the tech. Okay. Thanks for watching. Remember, these episodes are all available as podcasts wherever you listen, just search breaking analysis podcasts, and please subscribe to the series, we appreciate that. Check out ETR's website at ETR.plus sorry, ETR.plus. We also publish a full report every week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com. You can email me at David.Vellante@siliconangle.com or DM me on Twitter at DVellante that's @DVellante or comment, excuse me on my LinkedIn posts. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE Insights powered by ETR. Stay safe, be well, get the jab if you have an opportunity. And we'll see you next time. (soft music)

(upbeat music) >> Man: From San Francisco it's theCUBE covering Accenture Tech Vision 2020 (upbeat music) brought to you by Accenture. >> Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We are high atop San Francisco. It is absolutely beautiful outside. Sun is going down, we're here for a really special event, It's the Accenture Tech Vision, kind of unveiling of the five things that we should be paying attention to as we look to 2020 the year that we're going to know everything with the benefit of hindsight. So it's pretty exciting, it's pretty exciting time. And we have a new guest, Mike Redding, he's the managing director of Accenture Ventures telling us where the Accenture Ventures plays in all this stuff, so Mike, well, welcome. >> Well, thanks for having me, I'm really excited to be here. It's a big day here at Accenture with the launch of the 2020 tech vision. You know, and one of the key trends is about innovation DNA, which is really saying, how does an organization connect to the external ecosystems to systematically and scalably and sustainably innovate? And that's part of the role of Accenture Ventures. >> Well, it's an interesting play, right? Because unfortunately Clayton Christensen just passed away, my favorite business writer ever. And the whole innovator's dilemma is that smart people working at big companies making sound business decisions based on revenue and their customers will always miss this continuous change. So really you need some other things to help motivate that. And that's really piece that you guys play. >> Right, exactly cause what, you know, we're a bridge builder between those highly successful large enterprises, which are big, they're slow and they're risk adverse, and the startups, which are small, fast and nothing but risk. And so for us, the role of Accenture and Accenture ventures as being part of that innovation DNA is to say, let's make a bridge, let's figure out how the elephant can dance. And as a result, not get caught up in those disruptions, but in fact leverage them to propel those big enterprises forward. >> Right, now you guys invest in all types of areas, Ais, looking through the portfolio, security, big data, I love this Industry X Dot O, what is Industry X Dot O? >> Well, so, you know, a lot of places talk about industry 4.0 but we're like, why put it, you know, X dot O, is make it a variable? five point O, six point O, which makes it evergreen. Which says, every industry on the planet is going through a transformation, you know, powered by AI, powered by all those areas you mentioned. And as a result, we want to make sure that whatever the future of any industry is, Accenture is part of it and we're bringing in the startups and of course the big technology players that are going to be the fundamental players making that transformation possible. >> Right, there's so much synergy, right? Because for the little guys, right? They've got all the juice behind the innovation and the really smart people and they're kind of breaking things and moving fast, but the challenges there are scale and a sales force and marketing and reach and distribution and all these things that are not too hard for the big guys. >> Right, and so that's why it's a marriage made heaven, right? Again, if you can bring, I always like to say the analogy of you've got the aircraft carrier and then you have all the battleships and the PT boats circling around it, that's a battle group. And so that's what we really see as the opportunity is to bring what each strength, the strength of that disruption and passion and energy and capital to marry to market scale and data and customer base, right? Put those things together, unstoppable force? >> How do the enterprises, you know, kind of view it, do they, obviously they see the value, you wouldn't be doing what you're doing, but is that something that's attracted to them? Is it too disruptive to them? How do they try to work these little startups? Cause (laughs) the other thing, right? Is always vendor viability when you're a little startup doing business with a big company and they can kill you with meetings and there's all kinds of, you know, kind of interesting things that can happen to screw that up. >> Well you're right on and so that's part of where, you know, Accenture comes in as that broker, that bridge maker, because we help each other find how to match up, how not to crush the little guy with infinite meetings, you know, in an enterprise, you know, six months is quick, in a startup, that's a funding cycle, right? And so we've got to find a way to meet each other in the middle and as a result, get the strength of each, but pointed in the same direction and really, you know, become really good dance partners. And that's what we really think any organization, cause they know they need to do it, they know they want to do it, they just don't know how. And that's the gap we help fill. >> And then how do you find your investments? Are you partnering with other venture firms? How are you kind of out prospecting for new opportunities? >> Well, so for us, since we're a corporate strategic, we're really focused on the future of our client's business, the future of the marketplace. And so for us, it's a network game. It's, you know, it's everything from what the corporate venture units at our clients are up to where they're seeing strategic bets. Of course, we're the VC, you know, of Sand Hill Road, of Tel Aviv, of Shenzhen and Shanghai, you know, Bangalore, you know, there's so many great venture capital communities. We love the syndicate, we love friends because we, you know, a financial VC will bring their discipline and we'll bring Accenture's discipline and that's a combo pack that one plus one is three. >> Right, so I want to get your take, you've been in this for a while -- >> Oh, yeah. and one of the themes that we hear over and over, right, is the acceleration of accelerating pace of technology innovation, right? And this exponential curve and people have a hard time with exponential curves, we like linear curves. But it's getting steeper and steeper and steeper. So you know, from your kind of cap bird seed, as you've watched the evolution, do you see, you know, kind of, is this the only way for the enterprises to keep ahead of these things? Is it just an augment? Is it more important than it used to be? How has the landscape kind of changing as this acceleration just keeps going and going and going? >> Well, I think that the era of build it all yourself vertically integrate it So, you know, start to finish, soup to nuts yourself, you can't do it, right? If you're a large incumbent and, but also if you think about this way, and I would talk to audience especially, you know, business audience and say, "Who's got enough budget?" Nobody, there's no such thing as enough budget, the government doesn't have enough budget, right? Nobody does, but if you partner, you can leverage other people's money, their investment cycles, and as a result, for every dollar you have, you can get multiple dollars of leverage. And as a result, no matter how fast it's going, because of the Public Clouds, because of the big software players, you can get so much further. So even though things are moving faster, what you can leverage to adapt to that change is more powerful than ever before. So the good news is the rate of change is fast, but you're not starting from dead stop. You're jumping on a moving train and going where it's going and putting your own business spin on it. >> Right, the other piece is kind of the disruptive speeds. It's funny you mentioned Amazon just, you know, watch a lot of great interviews with Bezos. One of them, he talks about AWS having, you know, a seven-year uninterrupted headstart because no one down the road in Redwood shores or Philadelphia or Waldorf was really paying attention to the little bookseller up in Seattle as a competitor for enterprise infrastructure. So you know that which is going to get you is often not the competitors that you're benchmarking against. It's not the same people that you've been competing with but can completely come out of left field. >> Well, and so that again, is why we really believe passionately that with this future, the next few years, those enterprises that have an innovation DNA that get out of their foxhole and don't just look at your bank, don't just look at FinTech, look at all tech and thanks to this thing called the internet. It's really possible, and language translation, even if you don't speak Chinese, you can get a sense of what's happening in China, where you can call a friend like Accenture and we can hook you up. And regardless of the fact is you can now, if you cast that wide net, if you challenge yourself to get out of that Foxhole and look around, well then suddenly you can't be surprised. You can see it coming and you can then use your superpowers, which is incumbency, scale, balance sheet, customer base, you know, loyalty, all those things that you brand, all the things that make you strong, you can now append that disruption to it and basically, not get disrupted. So I think that's, that's the formula for going forward. >> Yeah, well, I love the one plus one makes three formula cause it really is kind of a match made in heaven really bringing together two sets of strengths that the other person or the other party doesn't really have. So you guys been at it for awhile and continued success. >> Well, thank you very much. All right. Well, Mike, thanks for taking a minute. He's Mike, I'm Jeff, you're watching theCUBE. With the Accenture Tech Vision launch 2020. Thanks for watching, we'll see you next time. (upbeat music)

>> Live from Orlando, Florida, it's theCUBE covering Microsoft Ignite, brought to you by Cohesity and theCUBE's ecosystem partners. >> Welcome back, everyone, to theCUBE's live coverage of Microsoft Ignite here at the Orange County Civic Center in Orlando, Florida. I'm your host, Rebecca Knight, along with my co-host, Stu Miniman. We're joined by Brian Cox, he is the director of product marketing at Nutanix. Thank you so much for coming on the show. >> Well thanks for having me, Rebecca, and Stu, it's good to see you again, so-- >> Yes, you're a CUBE alum, an esteemed CUBE alum. >> I've been here before and it's a great experience. >> Great, well, before the cameras were rolling we were talking about how Nutanix really pioneered hyper-converged infrastructure. But, the vision is bigger, Nutanix is about more than hyper-converged. >> Yeah, and we're very, actually, glad to see here at Microsoft Ignite that Microsoft, in the next version of Windows, is touting the whole hyper-converged concept. So, we are seeing validation from one of the most established computing companies in the world. The thing is, when Nutanix got started, we didn't even know what to call it. We never used the term hyper-converged infrastructure. It was one of your colleagues in the analyst community, they coined that term. We were really thinking of something, I think, bigger and beyond, which is, how can we simplify IT, because at the end of the day, all the business cares about are the services that IT delivers. Those get delivered through applications. Everything below that, frankly, the business doesn't care, right? If you're a donut company, you want to make donuts. If you're a shipping company, you want to have trucks and all that logistics to be optimal. IT, and finance, and marketing, and HR, they're all just means to an end. And so, when we looked at this we said, What can we do to just deliver those services and apps, and simplify everything else? Anything that we can do to save time, that we can save money, we get to return that back to the business to help be a better trucking company or a better donut company, right? So with that in mind, we said we need to simplify. >> Brian, great point, I mean, your background, my background, we're on the infrastructure side of things. You know, I got reminded many times in my career, Look, the whole goal of infrastructure is to make those apps run. You know, it's my data and my applications, those are the important things of the business. That doesn't mean that we've, you know, made y'know, IT is not yet a utility, it's not completely commoditized, there's differentiation, so, maybe help explain a little bit, Nutanix in the Microsoft ecosystem and how that fits in the overall view of Nutanix's value in the marketplace. >> Sure, so, the larger vision that Nutanix had is just, Let's simplify everything below the app layer. We did start at one place, which is just to fundamentally clean up and simplify the physical infrastructure, so you have storage arrays over here, servers over here, a sand-fabric in-between, virtualization layered on top of that, all coming from different vendors, not necessarily all tested together. I know because I used to work at the vendors, right? All different management consoles. It's really hard to become a mastermind of all of that, to have it optimized, and not to have points of failure. So we said, The first thing we need to do is eliminate that complexity. So we brought that down into like a single building block appliance, which ultimately got termed hyper-converged infrastructure, but that wasn't our destination. That was just, we needed common building blocks like LEGO pieces, right, that can snap together without any fuss and allow the companies to build that up. Then, from there, we can then raise the level of simplification all the way between the physical infrastructure to the app. So, one of the things that we get an immediate benefit from, when we consolidate storage and servers, the virtualization, is that we improve performance for things like Microsoft SQL or Exchange. So, no longer do you have that long hop from the compute with the servers all the way out to the external storage arrays. It all collapses, performance gets better, we eliminate points of failure, and, in fact, even when you have multiple of these LEGO blocks, this cluster, we try to always associate the data and the compute onto the same node, so there's very little latency at all. So, Microsoft SQL, Exchange performance goes up, the up-time goes up, and then to manage it, is also simpler. >> Alright, so Microsoft business productivity apps live on the Nutanix infrastructure-- >> Yeah, they benefit immediately by going to the simpler infrastructure versus this complex distributed architecture, where there's different pieces from different vendors. >> Alright, so, we hear from Microsoft, and we know customers hear, it's a multi-hypervisor and multi-cloud world, so, how does the Microsoft pieces of that fit in with the Nutanix Story? >> Well, we realize that customers want to have choice. So, if you look at really the three pillars, that come from our founding, is we want to be able to make it simple, we want to make it scalable, and we do want to give you choice. So, when we look at that last one, we're going to give you a choice of, let's say, whatever hyper-visor you wish to use. It could be Hyper-V, it could be DSXI, it could be the Nutanix AHV, it could be XenServer from Citrix. All of those are supported, we support this on multiple different hardware platforms. So, you have Adelium C, Lenovo, IBM, Fujitsu in Europe, we just added Hitachi last week as a partner, we run on Cisco, we run on HPE servers, and that list continues to grow. So, whatever is your standard, we'll go ahead and work with that. We'll give you choices, different clouds, as well. So, the software to manage and optimize is not only just for your on-prem environment, you can use this if you're in a distributed environment, whether it's Robo or Edge sites, like oil rigs and other IOT, we can give the same interface, and then the same interface out to the public cloud as well. So we give you the choice of different clouds, different platforms, different hyper-visors, and then different operating systems. We support everything from a Windows server environment to Linux and even IBM's AIS. All are supported on the platform, so you get to have it fit the way you want to work, versus the other way around. >> How closely do you work with customers in making theses decisions? Because, as you said, your goal is simplification, making it easy for them to choose and deploy, so how do you walk them through the process, and is it ever analysis paralysis, because there are simply so many options? >> Well for some customers who are struggling with that choice, we do offer our own branded appliance. So, it's very simple, you have the computing framework, the Nutanix software's there, it's one single support line to call, and that's a very simple model. Other customers, though, have chosen who their platform of choice is, whether that's on-prem, like a physical server, or it's a public cloud. That choice, oftentimes, has already been made, right? We're just working with that, so, for those who already have an opinion in the customers sight, we'll work with that. If for some reason they don't have an opinion, or they want it even simpler, they can go with the Nutanix branded offering, but we'll work either way. >> Great, Brian, you go to a number of different shows. Tell us, what are you hearing from customers, what are some of the challenges, what are they looking for, and maybe what's different about the customers who are here at the Microsoft show, versus some of the others we might hear. >> Well, it depends on who you're talking to right? So, if you're talking to C-suite, at the end of the day, these are the guys or gals running the donut company, they're running the trucking company, and they view IT just like they view HR, or finance, or whatever. It's like, yes, that's absolutely critical, we need that function, but the goal is to make it more efficient, more effective so I can deliver more shipments, make more donuts, right? So, for the C-suite, they want to see, On my capital that I'm investing, what is the return on this, and do I have to over-commit capital now, because I can only buy it in big chunks?. So we address that by having what we call fractional consumption. Basically, you're buying one LEGO block at a time, so you're not consuming capital that could elsewhere be used in the business. So, C-suite, they have a different, y'know, one set of needs. Then you look at the sys admins, and they are overwhelmed with all of this complexity of infrastructure, it burns all of their time. They're spending all their nights, all their weekends, they're not very happy, they make mistakes. If we can give them back hours in their day, they're going to be more productive. They can actually do higher level tasks. And even for the folks on the dev team, if we can simplify the infrastructure and spin up new instances, whether it's containers, or VMs, and they can even do it through self-service, that makes them more productive. So, we try to address the needs of all those audiences. >> The customers you are referring to, they are different groups of customers, but they're all essentially the same company, so, are they talking to each other? I mean, are the tech people talking to the business people in terms of what are over-arching goals here. >> Yeah, they do talk to each other. Granted, probably the audience we talk to them most frequently are the sys admins, y'know, because we're very operationally tied, and we'll then arm them with arguments to talk to the C-suite, right? So I was just presenting yesterday here, told them, You're going to get your nights and weekends back., but when you got to go talk to the CFO, here are the things that that person's going to care about, right? When you go talk to the dev team, here's the things that you need to share with them. So, we do arm the sys admins, but we do have a growing presence, at the C-suite, for example. We've also started attending a number of developer conferences, saying, Hey, this actually makes sense to you, to get your job done, it's not just the sys admins, it's you as a developer, it's you as a leader of the company. This is transforming the power of IT to help fulfill the organization's mission. >> I'm curious about your perceptions of Microsoft. Right now we have Satya Nadella, who really portrays this company as a company that is open, inclusive, with a growth mindset, Don't be a know-it-all, be a learn-it-all. I mean, is that your... Do you feel that as someone who works closely with Microsoft, who rubs up against its colleagues-- >> I think it's an embrace, like what you can't exact in regards to, the reality is customers want choice, and it's not one size fits all, not one cookie-cutter approach. So Satya is saying, Hey, what can we do to integrate with Linux? That never would've been heard, maybe, under the previous regimes, right? What can you do to work more closely in the app development environments that the app developers want to work in? So, there's a lot of affinity, I think, between Nutanix and where Satya's going, and in providing that choice, providing best-in-class wherever you can then let the customer choose, but provide them the pros and cons, so they make an informed decision. >> Brian, thank you so much for coming on theCUBE. It was a pleasure having you. >> Well, thank you Rebecca, and thank you Stu, it's always great to be here. >> We will have more from theCUBE's live coverage of Microsoft Ignite coming up in just a little bit. (techno music)

>> Announcer: From the Fairmont Hotel in the heart of Silicon Valley, it's The Cube. Covering When IoT met AI: The Intelligence of Things. Brought to you by Western Digital. >> Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeff Frick here with The Cube. We're in downtown Los Angeles at the Fairmont Hotel at a interesting little show called When IoT Met AI: The Intelligence of Things. A lot of cool startups here along with some big companies. We're really excited go have our next guest, taking a little different angle. He's Scott Noteboom. He is the co-founder and CEO of a company called Litbit. First off, Scott, welcome. >> Yeah, thank you very much. >> Absolutely. For folks that aren't familiar, what is Litbit, what's your core mission? >> Well, probably, the simplest way to put it is, is in business we enable our users who have a lot of experience in a lot of different areas to take their expertise and experience which may not be coding software, or understanding, or even being able to spell what an algorithm is on the data science perspective, and being able to give them an easy interface so they can kind of create their own Siro or Alexa, an AI but an AI that's based on their own subject matter expertise that they can put to work in a lot of different ways. >> So, there's often a lot of talk about kind of tribal knowledge, and how does tribal knowledge get passed down so people know how to do things. Whether it's with new employees, or as you were talking about a little bit off camera, just remote locations for this or that. And there hasn't really been a great system to do that. So, you're really attacking that, not only with the documentation, but then making an AI actionable piece of software that can then drive machines and using IoT to do things. Is that correct? >> That's right. So, if you created, say an AI that I've been passionate about 'cause I ran data centers for a lot of years, is DAC. So, DAC's an AI that has a lot of expertise, and how to run a data center by, and kind of fueled and mentored by a lot of the experts in the industry. So, how can you take DAC and put Dak to work in a lot of places? And the people who need the best trained DAC aren't people who are building apps. They are people who have their area of subject matter expertise, and we view these AI personas that can be put to work as kind of apps of the future, where can people can prescribe to personas that are build directly by the experts, which is a pretty pure way to connect AIs with the right people, and then be able to get them and put them-- >> So, there's kind of two steps to the process. How does the information get from the experts into your system? How's that training happen? >> So, where we spend a lot of attention is, a lot of people question and go, "Well, an AI lives in this virtual logical world "that's disconnected from the physical world." And I always questions for people to close their eyes and imagine their favorite person that loves them in the world. And when they picture that person hear that person's voice in their head, that's actually a very similar virtual world as what AIs working. It's not the physical world. And what connects us as people to the physical world, our senses, our sight, our hearing, our touch, our feeling. And what we've done is we've enabled using IoT sensors, the ability of combining those sensors with AI to turn sensors into senses, which then provide the ability for the AI to connect really meaningful ways to the physical world. And then the experts can teach the AI this is what this looks like, this is what this sounds like, this is what it's supposed to feel like. If it's greater than 80 degrees in an office location, it's hot. Really teaching the AI to be able to form thoughts based on a specific expertise and then be able to take the right actions to do the right things when those thoughts are formed. >> How do you deal with nuance, 'cause I'm sure there's a lot of times where people, as you said, are sensing or smelling or something, but they don't even necessarily consciously know that that's an input into their decision process, even though it really is. They just haven't really thought of it as a discrete input. How do you separate out all these discreet inputs so you get a great model that represents your best of breed technicians? >> Well, to try to answer the question, first of all, the more training the better. So, the good way to think of the AI is, unlike a lot of technologies that typically age and go out of life over time, an AI continuously gets smarter the more it's mentored by people, which would be supervised learning. And the more it can adjust and learn on it's own combined with real day to day data activity combined with that supervised learning and unsupervised learning approach, so enabling it to continuously get better over time. We've figure out some ways that it can produce some pretty meaningful results with a small amount of training. So, yeah. >> Okay. What are some of the applications, kind of your initial go to market? >> We're a small startup, and really, what we've done is we've developed a platform that we really like to, our goal is for it to be very horizontal in nature. And then the applications or the AI personas can be very vertical or subject matter experts across different silos. So, what we're doing is, is we're working with partners right now in different silos developing AIs that have expertise in the oil and gas business, in the pharmaceutical space, in the data center space, in the corporate facilities manage space, and really making sure that people who aren't technologists in all of those spaces, whether you're a very specific scientists who're running a lab, or a facilities guy in a corporate building, can successfully make that experiential connection between themselves and the AI, and put it to practical use. And then as we go, there's a lot of efforts that can be very specific to specific silos, whatever they may be. >> So, those personas are actually roles of individuals, if you will, performing certain tasks within those verticals. >> Absolutely. What we call them is coworkers, and the way things are designed is, one of the things that I think is really important in the AI world is that we approach everything from a human perspective because it's a big disruptive shift, and there's a lot of concern over it. So, if you get people to connect to it in a humanistic way, like coworker Viv works along with coworker Sophia, and Viv has this expertise, Sophia has this expertise, and has better improving ways to interface with people who have names that aren't a lot different from them and have skillsets that aren't a lot different. When you look at the AIS, they don't mind working longer hours. Let them work the weekends so I can spend hours with my family. Let them work the crazy shifts. So, things are different in that regard. But the relationship aspect of how the workplace works, try not to disrupt that too much. >> So, then on a consumption side, with the person coworker that's working with the persona, how do they interact with it, how do they get the data out, and I guess even more importantly, maybe, how do they get the new data back in to continue to train the model? >> So, the biggest thing you have to focus on with a human and machine learning interface that doesn't require a program or a data science, is that the language that the AI is taught in is human language, natural human language. So, we developed a lot of natural human language files that are pretty neat because a human coworker in California here could be interfacing in english to their coworker, and at the same time, someone speaking Mandarin in Shanghai could be interfacing with the same coworker speaking mandarin unless you can get multilingual functionality. Right now, to answer your question, people are doing it in a text based scenario. But the future vision, I think when the industry timing is right, is we view that every one of the coworkers we're developing will have a very distinct unique fingerprint of a voice. So, therefor, when you're engaging with your coworker using voice, you'll begin to recognize, oh, that's Dax, or that's Viv, or that's Sophia, based on their voice. So, like many people, this is how we're communicating with voice, and we believe the same thing's going to occur. And a lot of that's in timing. That's the direction where things are headed. >> Interesting. The whole voice aspect is just a whole 'nother interesting thing in terms of what type of voice personality attributes associated with voice. That's probably going to be a huge piece in terms of the adoption, in terms of having a true coworker experience, if you will. >> One of the things we haven't figure out, and these are important questions, and there's so many unknowns, is we feel really confident that the AI persona should have a unique voice because then I know who I'm engaging with, and I can connect by ear without them saying what their name is. But what does an AI persona look like? That's something where actually we don't know that, and we explore different things and, oh, that looks scary, or oh, that doesn't make sense. Should it look like anything? Which has largely been the approach of what does an Alexa or a Siri look like. As you continue to advance those engagements, and particularly when augmented reality comes into play, through augmented reality, if you're able to look and say, "Oh, a coworker's working over there," there's some value in that. But what is it going to look like? That's interesting, and we don't know that. >> Hopefully, better than those things at the San Jose Airport that are running around. >> Yeah, exactly. >> Classic robot. All right, Scott, very interesting story. I look forward to watching you grow and develop over time. >> Awesome, it's good to talk. >> Absolutely, all right, he's Scott Noteboom, he's from Litbit. I'm Jeff Frick, you're watching The Cube. We're at When IoT met AI: The Intelligence of Things, here at San Jose California. We'll be right back after the short break. Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)