(upbeat music) >> Welcome back to Chicago, guys and gals. Lisa Martin here in Chicago with Ansible Fest 2022 with John Furrier. John, we've had great conversations. This is day two of our coverage. We were here yesterday. >> Yeah. >> We're here today. We've gotten to talk with great folks in the Ansible community, the partner ecosystem customers. We've broken some news that they've talked about. Now we're going to talk about industrial automation, IT/OT convergence. What excites you about this conversation? >> Yeah, this is going to be a great segment. This is one of the feature keynote presenters, customer Rockwell. Huge in OT, IT, edge, robotics, plants, equipment. Everything that we probably have, they do. This guest has really great story about what's cutting edge and what's relevant in the edge and IT slash automation area. Super relevant. Looking forward to the segment. >> Yes, please welcome David Rapini, the Global PlantPAx business manager at Rockwell Automation. David, great to have you on theCUBE. >> Thank you. Nice to be here. >> Give the audience a bit of an overview of Rockwell Automation and then let's dig into what you guys are doing there. >> Sure. Rockwell Automation probably is the largest global automation provider of equipment focused exclusively on automation. About 22,000 employees. About 7 billion kind of revenue numbers. We make, basically, controllers for the automation industry, industrialized software, power drives, you know, of the robotics content, smart cart kind of applications. >> Lisa: And what are your key industries that you're covering? >> Wow, so that's a broad market. So we do a lot of different industries. So we cover, obviously, oil and gas, life science, water, wastewater. We do automotive. So just about any industry, actually. Any place that needs industrial automation covering any type of manufacturing process or any type of process application. We're pretty much there. >> John: You know, it's interesting, IOT has been a word, in and of things, light bulb, wearables, industrial IOT where you're in is a really key space. It's physical plants. Sometimes it's sensitive critical infrastructure for governments, businesses. >> David: Exactly. >> I mean there's running stuff. >> David: Definitely. >> This is huge. >> Yeah, and it's a big area for us, like getting that data, you know, everybody talks about analytics and what the world's going to be happening to in that IT, OT space. And Rockwell's really well positioned at that lower level where we actually own the data, create the data for all that analytics that you're talking about. >> What was your main message today on stage? I want to replay that here and then get into it because I think this is really, we're starting to see, real traction in adoption, in automation, cloud scale, edges happening, exploding. What was your key message on stage today? >> Yeah, I think it's that the world's really changing in that space. You know, five years ago you would have had a completely different message around, you know that connectivity and having that content actually delivered to that space and having, like even the connectivity to that OT space makes people uncomfortable in that world because there's obviously moving pieces, you know, damage to equipment, you know God forbid any types of explosions or things like that on bad environmental type conditions. So we're working in that space to really make those connections much more open and now that those connections are starting to happen and we're getting more and more comfort with that, in that layer, there's a lot more we can do in that space which is kind of why we're here. >> And talk about why Ansible and what it's going to be able to unlock for Rockwell to be able to achieve. >> Sure. There's a lot of areas that we want to play with, but our, in Ansible but our first targets are really our, primarily our servers. So there's a lot of edge based servers out there, you know, we call them a pass server, which is a process automation system server. And there's an engineering workstation operator, which are those main core servers. Some of them are redundant, you know, the OT guys to them it's a burden to manage that content. They're good at making, you know, oil and gas they know how to do water wastewater. They know how to build cars. But managing servers, you know, not in their wheelhouse. >> John: Not in their wheelhouse.(laughs) >> Exactly. Right. So having that capability and that connection to get down there gives us some power with Ansible to go ahead and start building them initially. So making that initial builds out of the gate. That makes them really consistent and built together, so every application looks and feels the same and they know what they're going to get when their servers power up. So that's a big one. But, but just maintain them, keeping them patched, you know keeping security vulnerabilities down. You know, I was in a facility not long ago that was still running Windows 2000. Right. So, you know, they have an application there that's just working. It works. They don't want to touch it and it's been running for 20 years, so why touch it? Right. So this was going to kind of hopefully break that challenge. >> Make sure that you keep that password handy. (laughs) >> David: Yeah, exactly right. (laughs) >> We've had (indistinct) people leave. What about the security aspect is OT has been locked down, mindset, hardened, end to end, supply chains, vetted. Everything's kind of tight on the old OT model. Relatively secure when you get to IT, you mentioned vulnerabilities but the innovation's there too. So how does that reconcile for you? What's your reaction to that? >> Yeah, we see a big move there, right? So it used to be they were always head head to head butting heads IT, OT, you know it focuses on, you know, keeping the system secure keeping the data down, locked down, and reliable. OT focuses more on production, right? Making sure they hit their numbers in the production. So oftentimes, you know, having it push out a patch in the middle of production line in the middle of a day and rebooting a server shuts down production and you know, that those kind of conflicts. Yeah, exactly. So those conflicts were, were pretty common. There's still a lot of that there, but it's getting better. Yeah, right. And I see more and more of that working together as a team to, to solve a lot of those challenges. And honestly, I keep going back to the analytics angle and the diagnostics and that world of deep data, you know, big data kind of mining, you know, without the IT space to cover that the cloud data storage, the horsepower. >> If you had to kind of like rank the complexity 'cause we were just talking before you came on about things got to get complex before they can get simpler 'cause the inflection points bring that new capability. What's some of the complexities that you're seeing that are going to be either abstracted away or solved with some of these new technologies like Ansible and others that are coming fast? Cause at the end of the day it's got to still be easier. It's not going to be hard. That can't be harder. >> Yeah. So I'll give you a real world example that's a little embarrassing. So today we deliver our past servers as a solution and we we provide that as a VM image that people start with as the first building block. But once you start to deploy that and actually connect it with the rest of the infrastructure, hook it up to our factory talk directory, hook it up to the DNS service, once you start doing all that work it's about 700 mouse clicks that somebody has to know what they're doing to actually spin it up the rest of the way and get it connected with Ansible. We're cutting that number like in half is the hope. So, and, and we're going to continue to expand that and make it even less work for the users to >> Talk about skill gap issue. The training alone on that is to have the right people. >> That's the second big piece, right? So, so those OT people typically don't have that skill set. So you have to have a fairly high skilled level person to do that work. We're hoping to take that, that work off of them and put that on on answer. >> Yeah, that sounds pretty consistent. Do you think, is that the, kind of the consistency of the problem space is that the OT just has a different goal and they just need something to be invisible and easy, like electricity? >> Yeah, I think so. Especially in this world, right? In that OT space, right in in that IT space. Sorry. Yeah, so, so managing servers and things like that it's just is not what they want to want to deal with and it's not what they went to school for and it's not what they're doing when their job when they get hired. Right. Yeah. >> It sounds to me like Rockwell Automation is a facilitator of the IT and OT folks coming together and actually working better together, maybe understanding each other's requirements, goals, objectives. >> Most definitely. So we have, you know we are offering a lot of cloud content now. We're continuing to expand that content. We're working with a lot of different IT departments and OT departments to try to marriage those two groups together to try to bring that stuff together. We have a partnership with Cisco where we actually, you know, industrialize you know, some of their switch components and sell that as as part of our content and that relationship gives us a big inroad with a lot of the IT departments. >> That's important to have that be able to speak the language of both sides. >> Yeah, definitely. Right. Knowing and understanding the terminology and just being able to know the challenges that IT guys face as well as the OTs is really a big component of what we do. >> You know, one of the questions I wanted to ask and 'cause the keynote was very cool, but you made a comment that your claim to fame was that you wrote the code for the Spider-Man ride at Universal. Tell a story. How does that work? I'm just, I've rode them many times. So take us through that little journey. >> Yeah, so I, every time people ask me what we do for a living and automation, you know, I can talk about, you know, making cars and things like that, but it doesn't ring troops. So I did do a lot of work on Spider-Man Ride which is at Universal Studios, you know it was a real challenge, making sure you know how that connections actually work and make, I did most of the motion control content for that to make the movements of the cars, you know, seamless with the backgrounds. Definitely a lot of fun. So those kind of projects are rare but they're really fun when you get those. >> I hope you have a free pass for any time you want to go on it. >> I don't, unfortunately. >> Oh, you should. >> I try to get in the backrooms all the time at that facility but it's rare to hear. >> I mean it's like, it's a high end rollercoaster machine. It's like, I mean that is this robotics, industrial cause, this, I mean it's an intense ride. >> It is, and you know, you never move more than like eight feet on that whole ride and it feels like you've dropped, you know 2000 feet out of the sky on some of that content. So it's really amazing. I will say it's a little dated. I've been writing on the part of my team worked on the the Harry Potter rides, which are much next generation. >> I couldn't get on that one, line was too long. >> It's a long way, but it's worth it. >> Dave I asked you a question on the future for people watching who are new observing industrial IOT. What's the most important story going on in your world today? Is it the transformation? Is it the standards? Is it the security? What's, what are the top two or three things that are going on that are really transformative right now in automating at the edge? >> I really want to say that it's standardization. It's about using open standards and standard protocols to deliver content in a reusable fashion. So, you know, having custom proprietary content like a lot of automation suppliers or even like a lot of other industries, it's hard to maintain. It doesn't work well with other products. It's great 'cause you can do a lot of flexibility what you want to do, but at the end of the day it's about keeping the thing running and hooking it up to other components so that open standards based solution you'll see us spending more energy on you know, part of the Ansible open community thing is nice in that space as well. And you'll see us doing more stuff in that place that, that play. >> Talk about your influence there in the community. You know, we, we've been talking the last couple of days about Ansible is nothing if not the power of the community, the collaboration within. Talk about being able to influence that and what that means to you personally as well as to Rockwell. >> Yeah, so open communities are big for us. We have, you know, obviously a customer advisory boards and things like that that we deal with but we also have an open community forum where people can share dialogues and share ideas. We have large events, we have a process solution users group events where we bring in, you know hundreds not thousands of engineering people to to talk to all of these problems that they're facing. And it's not a Rockwell event it's a, you know, community event, right. Where we actually are talking about, you know what industry problem people are seeing. And a lot of the IT OT convergence thing is really top of mind. A lot of people say no minds especially the cybersecurity content. >> What are some of the things that you heard the last couple of days, announcement wise? Obviously big news coming out today that excites you about the direction that Ansible's going and how it's responding to the community. >> Yeah, I think a lot of their feedback that they get and sitting a lot of these sessions, they get a lot of interesting feedback from their customer base. And reacting to that I think is very high on their priority list. And what I've been seeing here, you know, some of the AI stuff that they were showing on automatically, like defining some of the scripts for their code that intelligence behind a lot of that content was amazing. I see a lot of that moving forward. And we're heading the same direction at Rockwell as well with more AI in our company. >> The data's a big story too coming out of all the devices, analytics, great stuff. >> Yeah, I'm pulling that data up into the cloud space and trying to do something valuable with all that data. It's, you know, we've had big data for a long time. It's just figuring out analytics and how to actually act on that data and get it back into the control to do something with. >> It's all getting aside. My serious question on this is that, you know is it the year finally OT and IT converge? Seems like it's been trying for about a decade. >> Yeah, that's a tough one to answer. So I would say it's not there yet. I think there's still a lot of conflict in that space. You know, the OT guys still have a long history of that space, but as you see more retirement and more people phasing out of that and younger crowds coming in, you know the automation space is ripe for that kind of transition because coming out of college, you know jumping into automation isn't always the top of the notch. A lot of people want to go work at the big Amazons or wherever. >> A lot, a lot of stuff going on in space. It's pretty cool. A lot of physical, I've seen a lot more machine learning and physical devices in the industry we've been reporting on. It's interesting. I think it's close to a tipping point because we saw machine learning and the trivial apps like chat bots never really took off, yep. Just expert systems basically, but they're not really going the next level. So now they are, you're starting to see more, you know of wisdom projects, you know, different models being adopted. So I see AI now kind of kicking up similar to OT IT. >> Yeah, most definitely. You know, we have a lot of projects in that space like doing predictive analysis on, let's just say something simple like a pump, right? If you have pumps out there that are running for years and years, but you notice that there's a trend that on day 305 or whatever you know, a bearing starts to fail all the time. You know, that kind of analytics can start doing predictive maintenance content and start pushing out work orders in advance before the things fail because downtime costs millions of dollars for these maintenance. >> Downtime also incidents, right? So you never know, right? >> Exactly. Right, right. So it's good to have that safety net at least from a manufacturing perspective. >> Final question for me. What's the most exciting thing going on in your world right now if you had to kind of pick one thing that you're most jazzed up about? >> I have to say, you know, Rockwell's doing a big shift to cloud-based content and more big data numbers like we were just talking about for that AI. That complexity of what you can do with AI and the value that you can do to like just, you know if I can make quality of a product a half a percent better that's millions of dollars for my customer and I see us doing a lot of work in that space and moving that forward. That's big for me, I think. >> And what are some of that, my last question is what are some of the impacts that customers can expect from that? >> Yeah, so everything from downtime to product quality to increasing production rates and volumes of data that come out. You know, we do something called model predictive control that does, you know, very tight control on control loops to improve like just the general product quality with a lot of the big data numbers that are coming in on that. So you'll see us moving more in that space too to improve you know, product quality and then downtime. >> And really driving outcomes, business outcomes for your customers. David, thank you so much for joining us on the program, sharing what Rockwell Automation is doing. We appreciate your insights, your time and we want to keep watching to see what comes next. >> Sure. Glad to be here. It's great. Thank you very much. >> Our pleasure. For our guest, our John Furrier. I'm Lisa Martin. You've watched theCUBE Live in Chicago, Ansible Fest 2022. Thanks for watching. (gentle music)

(soft music) >> Welcome back to Chicago guys and gals. Lisa Martin here with John Furrier. We have been covering Ansible Fest '22 for the last two days. This is our show wrap. We're going to leave you with some great insights into the things that we were able to dissect over the last two days. John, this has been an action packed two days. A lot of excitement, a lot of momentum. Good to be back in person. >> It's great to be back in person. It was the first time for you to do Ansible Fest. >> Yes. >> My first one was 2019 in person. That's the last time they had an event in person. So again, it's a very chill environment here, but it's content packed, great active loyal community and is growing. It's changing. Ansible now owned by Red Hat, and now Red Hat owned by IBM. Kind of see some game changing kind of movements here on the chess board, so to speak, in the industry. Ansible has always been a great product. It started in open source. It evolved configuration management configuring servers, networks. You know, really the nuts and bolts of IT. And became a fan favorite mainly because it was built by the fans and I think that never stopped. And I think you started to see an opportunity for Ansible to be not only just a, I won't say niche product or niche kind of use case to being the overall capabilities for large scale enterprise system architectures, system management. So it's very interesting. I mean I find it fascinating how, how it stays relevant and cool and continues to power through a massive shift >> A massive shift. They've done a great job though since the inception and through the acquisition of being still community first. You know, we talked a lot yesterday and today about helping organizations become automation first that Ansible has really stayed true to its roots in being community first, community driven and really that community flywheel was something that was very obvious the last couple of days. >> Yeah, I mean the community thing is is is their production system. I mean if you look at Red Hat, their open source, Ansible started open source, good that they're together. But what people may or may not know about Ansible is that they build their product from the community. So the community actually makes the suggestions. Ansible's just in listening modes. So when you have a system that's that efficient where you have direct working backwards from the customer like that, it's very efficient. Now, as a product manager you might want to worry about scope creep, but at the end of the day they do a good job of democratizing that process. So again, very strong product production system with open source, very relevant, solves the right problems. But this year the big story to me is the cultural shift of Ansible's relevance. And I think with multicloud on the horizon, operations is the new kind of developer kind of ground. DevOps has been around for a while. That's now shifted up to the developer themselves, the cloud native developer. But at cloud scale and hybrid computing, it's about the operations. It's about the data and the security. All of it's about the data. So to me there's a new ops configuration operating model that you're seeing people use, SRE and DevOps. That's the new culture, and the persona's changing. The operator of a large scale enterprise is going to be a lot different than it was past five, 10 years. So major cultural shift, and I think this community's going to step up to that position and fill that role. >> They seem to be having a lot of success meeting people where they are, meeting the demographics, delivering on how their community wants to work, how they want to collaborate. But yesterday you talked about operations. We talked a lot about Ops as code. Talk about what does that mean from your perspective, and what did you hear from our guests on the program with respect that being viable? >> Well great, that's a great point. Ops as code is the kind of their next layer of progression. Infrastructure is code. Configuration is code. Operations is code. To me that means running the company as software. So software influencing how operators, usually hardware in the past. Now it's infrastructure and software going to run things. So ops as code's, the next progression in how people are going to manage it. And I think most people think of that as enterprises get larger, when they hear words like SRE, which stands for Site Reliable Engineer. That came out of Google, and Google had all these servers that ran the search engine and at scale. And so one person managed boatload of servers and that was efficient. It was like a multiple 10x engineer, they used to call it. So that that was unique to Google but not everyone's Google. So it became language or parlance for someone who's running infrastructure but not everyone's that scale. So scale is a big issue. Ops as code is about scale and having that program ability as an operator. That's what Ops as code is. And that to me is a sign of where the scale meets the automation. Large scale is hard to do. Automating at large scale is even harder. So that's where Ansible fits in with their new automation platform. And you're seeing new things like signing code, making sure it's trusted and verified. So that's the software supply chain issue. So they're getting into the world where software, open source, automation are all happening at scale. So to me that's a huge concept of Ops as code. It's going to be very relevant, kind of the next gen positioning. >> Let's switch gears and talk about the partner ecosystem. We had Stefanie Chiras on yesterday, one of our longtime theCUBE alumni, talking about what they're doing with AWS in the marketplace. What was your take on that, and what's the "what's in it for me" for both Red Hat, Ansible and AWS? >> Yeah, so the big news on the automation platform was one. The other big news I thought was really, I won't say watered down, but it seems small but it's not. It's the Amazon Web Services relationship with Red Hat, now Ansible, where Ansible's now a product in AWS's marketplace. AWS marketplace is kind of hanging around. It's a catalog right now. It's not the most advanced technical system in the world, and it does over 2 billion plus revenue transactions. So even if it's just sitting there as a large marketplace, that's already doing massive amounts of disruption in the procurement, how software is bought. So we interviewed them in the past, and they're innovating on that. They're going to make that a real great platform. But the fact that Ansible's in the marketplace means that their sales are going to go up, number one. Number two, that means customers can consume it simply by clicking a button on their Amazon bill. That means they don't have to do anything. It's like getting a PO for free. It's like, hey, I'm going to buy Ansible, click, click, click. And then by the way, draw that down from their commitment to AWS. So that means Amazon's going into business with Ansible, and that is a huge revenue thing for Ansible, but also an operational efficiency thing that gives them more of an advantage over the competition. >> Talk what's in it for me as a customer. At Red Hat Summit a few months ago they announced similar partnership with Azure. Now we're talking about AWS. Customers are living in this hybrid cloud world, often by default. We're going to see that proliferate. What do you think this means for customers in terms of being able to- >> In the marketplace deal or Ansible? >> Yeah, the marketplace deal, but also what Red Hat and Ansible are doing with the hyperscalers to enable customers to live successfully in the hyper hybrid cloud world. >> It's just in the roots of the company. They give them the choice to consume the product on clouds that they like. So we're seeing a lot of clients that have standardized on AWS with their dev teams but also have productivity software on Azure. So you have the large enterprises, they sit on both clouds. So you know, Ansible, the customer wants to use Ansible anyway, they want that to happen. So it's a natural thing for them to work anywhere. I call that the Switzerland strategy. They'll play with all the clouds. Even though the clouds are fighting against each other, and they have to to differentiate, there's still going to be some common services. I think Ansible fits this shim layer between clouds but also a bolt on. Now that's a really a double win for them. They can bolt on to the cloud, Azure and bolt on to AWS and Google, and also be a shim layer technically in clouds as well. So there's two technical advantages to that strategy >> Can Ansible be a facilitator of hybrid cloud infrastructure for organizations, or a catalyst? >> I think it's going to be a gateway on ramp or gateway to multicloud or supercloud, as we call it, because Ansible's in that configuration layer. So you know, it's interesting to hear the IBM research story, which we're going to get to in a second around how they're doing the AI for Ansible with that wisdom project. But the idea of configuring stuff on the fly is really a concept that's needed for multicloud 'Cause programs don't want to have to configure anything. (he laughs) So standing up an application to run on Azure that's on AWS that spans both clouds, you're going to need to have that automation, and I think this is an opportunity whether they can get it or not, we'll see. I think Red Hat is probably angling on that hard, and I can see them kind of going there and some of the commentary kind of connects the dots for that. >> Let's dig into some of news that came out today. You just alluded to this. IBM research, we had on with Red Hat. Talk about what they call project wisdom, the value in that, what it also means for for Red Hat and IBM working together very synergistically. >> I mean, I think the project wisdom is an interesting dynamic because you got the confluence of the organic community of Ansible partnering with a research institution of IBM research. And I think that combination of practitioners and research groups is going to map itself out to academic and then you're going to see this kind of collaboration going forward. So I think it's a very nuanced story, but the impact to me is very clear that this is the new power brokers in the tech industry, because researchers have a lot of muscle in terms of deep research in the academic area, and the practitioners are the ones who are actually doing it. So when you bring those two forces together, that pretty much trumps any kind of standards bodies or anything else. So I think that's a huge signaling benefit to Ansible and Red Hat. I think that's an influence of Red Hat being bought by IBM. But the project itself is really amazing. It's taking AI and bringing it to Ansible, so you can do automated configurations. So for people who don't know how to code they can actually just automate stuff and know the process. I don't need to be a coder, I can just use the AI to do that. That's a low code, no code dynamic. That kind of helps with skill gaps, because I need to hire someone to do that. Today if I want to automate something, and I don't know how to code, I've got to get someone who codes. Here I can just do it and automate it. So if that continues to progress the way they want it to, that could literally be a game changer, 'cause now you have software configuring machines and that's pretty badass in my opinion. So that thought that was pretty cool. And again it's just an evolution of how AI is becoming more relevant. And I think it's directionally correct, and we'll see how it goes. >> And they also talked about we're nearing an inflection point in AI. You agree? >> Yeah I think AI is at an inflection point because it just falls short on the scale side. You see it with chatbots, NLP. You see what Amazon's doing. They're building these models. I think we're one step away from model scaling. I think the building the models is going to be one of these things where you're going to start to see marketplace and models and you start to composability of AI. That's where it's going to get very interesting to see which cloud is the best AI scale. So I think AI at scale's coming, and that's going to be something to watch really closely. >> Something exciting. Another thing that was big news today was the event driven Ansible. Talk about that, and that's something they've been working on in conjunction with the community for quite a while. They were very proud of that release and what that's going to enable organizations to do. >> Well I think that's more meat on the bone on the AI side 'cause in the big trend right now is MLAI ops. You hear that a lot. Oh, data ops or AI ops. What event driven automation does is allows you to take things that are going on in your world, infrastructure, triggers, alarms, notifications, data pipelining flows, things that go on in the plumbing of infrastructure. are being monitored and observed. So when events happen they trigger events. You want to stream something, you send a trigger and things happen. So these are called events. Events are wide ranging number of events. Kafka streaming for data. You got anything that produces data is an event. So harnessing that data into a pipeline is huge. So doing that at scale, that's where I think that product's a home run, and I think that's going to be a very valuable product, 'cause once you understand what the event triggers are, you then can automate that, and no humans involved. So that will save a lot of time for people in the the higher pay grade of MLAI ops automate some of that low level plumbing. They move their skill set to something more valuable or more impactful. >> And we talked about, speaking of impact, we talked about a lot of the business impact that organizations across industries are going to be able to likely achieve by using that. >> Yeah, I mean I think that you're going to see the community fill the gap on that. I mean the big part about all this is that their community builds the product and they have the the playbooks and they're shareable and they're reusable. So we produce content as a media company. They'd talk about content as is playbooks and documentation for people to use. So reuse and and reusing these playbooks is a huge part of it. So as they build up these catalogs and these playbooks and rules, it gets better by the community. So it's going to be interesting to see the adoption. That's going to be a big tell sign for what's going to happen. >> Yep, we get definitely are going to be watching that space. And the last thing, we got to talk to a couple of customers. We talked to Wells Fargo who says "We are a tech company that does banking," which I loved. We got to talk with Rockwell Automation. What are some of your takeaways from how the customers are leveraging Ansible and the technology to drive their businesses forward to meet demanding customers where they are? >> I think you're seeing the script flipping a little bit here, where the folks that used to use Ansible for configuration are flipping to be on the front edge of the innovation strategy where what process to automate is going to drive the profitability and scale. Cause you're talking about things like skill gaps, workflows. These are business constructs and people These are assets so they have economic value. So before it was just, IT serve the business, configure some servers, do some stuff. When you start getting into automation where you have expertise around what this means, that's economic value. So I think you're going to see the personas change significantly in this community where they're on the front lines, kind of like developers are. That's why ops as code is to me a developer kind of vibe. That's going to completely change how operations runs in IT. And I think that's going to be a very interesting cultural shift. And some will make it, some won't. That's going to be a big thing. Some people say, I'm going to retire. I'm old school storage server person, or no, I'm the new guard. I'm going to be the new team. I'm going be on the right side of history here. So they're clearly going down that right path in my opinion. >> What's your overall summary in the last minute of what this event delivered the last couple of days in terms of really talking about the transformation of enterprises and industries through automation? >> I think the big takeaway from me in listening and reading the tea leaves was the Ansible company and staff and the community together. It was really a call for arms. Like, hey, we've had it right from the beginning. We're on the right wave and the wave's getting bigger. So expand your scope, uplevel your skills. They're on the right side of history. And I think the message was engage more. Bring more people in because it is open source, and if they are on that track, you're going to see more of hey, we got it right, let's continue. So they got platform release. They got the key products coming out after years of work. So you know, they're doing their work. And the message I heard was, it's bigger than we thought. So I think that's interesting. We'll see what that means. We're going to unpack that after the event in series of showcases. But yeah, it was very positive, I thought. Very positive. >> Yeah, I think there was definitely some surprises in there for them. John, thank you so much. It's been a pleasure co-hosting with you the last couple of days, really uncovering what Ansible is doing, what they're enabling customers in every industry to achieve. >> Been fun. >> Yes. All right for my co-host, John Furrier, I'm Lisa Martin. You've been watching theCUBE's coverage of Ansible Fest 2022 live from Chicago. We hope you take good care and we'll see you soon.

>>Hey guys. Welcome back to the Cubes coverage of Ansible Fast 2022. This is day two of our wall to wall coverage. Lisa Martin here with John Ferer. John, we're seeing this world where companies are saying if we can't automate it, we need to, The automation market is transforming. There's been a lot of buzz about that. A lot of technical chops here at Ansible Fest. >>Yeah, I mean, we've got a great guest here coming on Cuba alumni, Dean Newman, future room. He travels every event he's got. He's got his nose to the grindstone ear to the ground. Great analysis. I mean, we're gonna get into why it's important. How does Ansible fit into the big picture? It's really gonna be a great segment. The >>Board do it well, John just did my job for me about, I'll introduce him again. Daniel Newman, one of our alumni is Back Principal Analyst at Future and Research. Great to have you back on the cube. >>Yeah, it's good to join you. Excited to be back in Chicago. I don't know if you guys knew this, but for 40 years, this was my hometown. Now I don't necessarily brag about that anymore. I'm, I live in Austin now. I'm a proud Texan, but I did grow up here actually out in the west suburbs. I got off the plane, I felt the cold air, and I almost turned around and said, Does this thing go back? Yeah. Cause I'm, I've, I've grown thin skin. It did not take me long. I, I like the warm, Come on, >>I'm the saying, I'm from California and I got off the plane Monday. I went, Whoa, I need a coat. And I was in Miami a week ago and it was 85. >>Oh goodness. >>Crazy. So you just flew in. Talk about what's going on, your take on, on Ansible. We've talked a lot with the community, with partners, with customers, a lot of momentum. The flywheel of the community is going around and round and round. What are some of your perspectives that you see? >>Yeah, absolutely. Well, let's you know, I'm gonna take a quick step back. We're entering an era where companies are gonna have to figure out how to do more with less. Okay? We've got exponential data growth, we've got more architectural complexity than ever before. Companies are trying to discern how to deal with many different environments. And just at a macro level, Red Hat is one of the companies that is almost certainly gonna be part of this multi-cloud hybrid cloud era. So that should initially give a lot of confidence to the buying group that are looking at how to automate their environments. You're automating workflows, but really with, with Ansible, we're focused on automating it, automating the network. So as companies are kind of dig out, we're entering this recessionary period, Okay, we're gonna call it what it is. The first thing that they're gonna look at is how do we tech our way out of it? >>I had a wonderful one-on-one conversation with ServiceNow ceo, Bill McDermott, and we saw ServiceNow was in focus this morning in the initial opening session. This is the integration, right? Ansible integrating with ServiceNow. What we need to see is infrastructure automation, layers and applications working in concert to basically enable enterprises to be up and running all the time. Let's first fix the problems that are most common. Let's, let's automate 'em, let's script them. And then at some point, let's have them self resolving, which we saw at the end with Project Wisdom. So as I see it, automation is that layer that enterprises, boards, technologists, all can agree upon are basically here's something that can make our business more efficient, more profitable, and it's gonna deal with this short term downturn in a way that tech is actually gonna be the answer. Just like Bill and I said, let's tech our way out of it. >>If you look at the Red Hat being bought by ibm, you see Project Wisdom Project, not a product, it's a project. Project Wisdom is the confluence of research and practitioners kind of coming together with ai. So bringing AI power to the Ansible is interesting. Red Hat, Linux, Rel OpenShift, I mean, Red Hat's kind of position, isn't it? Kind of be in that right spot where a puck might be coming maybe. I mean, what do you think? >>Yeah, as analysts, we're really good at predicting the, the recent past. It's a joke I always like to make, but Red Hat's been building toward the future. I think for some time. Project Wisdom, first of all, I was very encouraged with it. One of the things that many people in the market probably have commented on is how close is IBM in Red Hat? Now, again, it's a $34 billion acquisition that was made, but boy, the cultures of these two companies couldn't be more different. And of course, Red Hat kind of carries this, this sort of middle ground layer where they provide a lot of value in services to companies that maybe don't use IBM at, at, for the public cloud especially. This was a great indication of how you can take the power of IBM's research, which of course has some of the world's most prolific data scientists, engineers, building things for the future. >>You know, you see things like yesterday they launched a, you know, an AI solution. You know, they're building chips, semiconductors, and technologies that are gonna power the future. They're building quantum. Long story short, they have these really brilliant technologists here that could be adding value to Red Hat. And I don't know that the, the world has fully been able to appreciate that. So when, when they got on stage and they kind of say, Here's how IBM is gonna help power the next generation, I was immediately very encouraged by the fact that the two companies are starting to show signs of how they can collaborate to offer value to their customers. Because of course, as John kind of started off with, his question is, they've kind of been where the puck is going. Open source, Linux hybrid cloud, This is the future. In the future. Every company's multi-cloud. And I said in a one-on-one meeting this morning, every company is going to probably have workloads on every cloud, especially large enterprises. >>Yeah. And I think that the secret's gonna be how do you make that evolve? And one of the things that's coming out of the industry over the years, and looking back as historians, we would say, gotta have standards. Well, with cloud, now people standards might slow things down. So you're gonna start to figure out how does the community and the developers are thinking it'll be the canary in the coal mine. And I'd love to get your reaction on that, because we got Cuban next week. You're seeing people kind of align and try to win the developers, which, you know, I always laugh cuz like, you don't wanna win, you want, you want them on your team, but you don't wanna win them. It's like a, it's like, so developers will decide, >>Well, I, I think what's happening is there are multiple forces that are driving product adoption. And John, getting the developers to support the utilization and adoption of any sort of stack goes a long way. We've seen how sticky it can be, how sticky it is with many of the public cloud pro providers, how sticky it is with certain applications. And it's gonna be sticky here in these interim layers like open source automation. And Red Hat does have a very compelling developer ecosystem. I mean, if you sat in the keynote this morning, I said, you know, if you're not a developer, some of this stuff would've been fairly difficult to understand. But as a developer you saw them laughing at jokes because, you know, what was it the whole part about, you know, it didn't actually, the ping wasn't a success, right? And everybody started laughing and you know, I, I was sitting next to someone who wasn't technical and, and you know, she kinda goes, What, what was so funny? >>I'm like, well, he said it worked. Do you see that? It said zero data trans or whatever that was. So, but if I may just really quickly, one, one other thing I did wanna say about Project Wisdom, John, that the low code and no code to the full stack developer is a continuum that every technology company is gonna have to think deeply about as we go to the future. Because the people that tend to know the process that needs to be automated tend to not be able to code it. And so we've seen every automation company on the planet sort of figuring out and how to address this low code, no code environment. I think the power of this partnership between IBM Research and Red Hat is that they have an incredibly deep bench of capabilities to do things like, like self-training. Okay, you've got so much data, such significant size models and accuracy is a problem, but we need systems that can self teach. They need to be able self-teach, self learn, self-heal so that we can actually get to the crux of what automation is supposed to do for us. And that's supposed to take the mundane out and enable those humans that know how to code to work on the really difficult and hard stuff because the automation's not gonna replace any of that stuff anytime soon. >>So where do you think looking at, at the partnership and the evolution of it between IBM research and Red Hat, and you're saying, you know, they're, they're, they're finally getting this synergy together. How is it gonna affect the future of automation and how is it poised to give them a competitive advantage in the market? >>Yeah, I think the future or the, the competitive space is that, that is, is ecosystems and integration. So yesterday you heard, you know, Red Hat Ansible focusing on a partnership with aws. You know, this week I was at Oracle Cloud world and they're talking about running their database in aws. And, and so I'm kind of going around to get to the answer to your question, but I think collaboration is sort of the future of growth and innovation. You need multiple companies working towards the same goal to put gobs of resources, that's the technical term, gobs of resources towards doing really hard things. And so Ansible has been very successful in automating and securing and focusing on very certain specific workloads that need to be automated, but we need more and there's gonna be more data created. The proliferation, especially the edge. So you saw all this stuff about Rockwell, How do you really automate the edge at scale? You need large models that are able to look and consume a ton of data that are gonna be continuously learning, and then eventually they're gonna be able to deliver value to these companies at scale. IBM plus Red Hat have really great resources to drive this kind of automation. Having said that, I see those partnerships with aws, with Microsoft, with ibm, with ServiceNow. It's not one player coming to the table. It's a lot of players. They >>Gotta be Switzerland. I mean they have the Switzerland. I mean, but the thing about the Amazon deal is like that marketplace integration essentially puts Ansible once a client's in on, on marketplace and you get the central on the same bill. I mean, that's gonna be a money maker for Ansible. I >>Couldn't agree more, John. I think being part of these public cloud marketplaces is gonna be so critical and having Ansible land and of course AWS largest public cloud by volume, largest marketplace today. And my opinion is that partnership will be extensible to the other public clouds over time. That just makes sense. And so you start, you know, I think we've learned this, John, you've done enough of these interviews that, you know, you start with the biggest, with the highest distribution and probability rates, which in this case right now is aws, but it'll land on in Azure, it'll land in Google and it'll continue to, to grow. And that kind of adoption, streamlining make it consumption more consumable. That's >>Always, I think, Red Hat and Ansible, you nailed it on that whole point about multicloud, because what happens then is why would I want to alienate a marketplace audience to use my product when it could span multiple environments, right? So you saw, you heard that Stephanie yesterday talk about they, they didn't say multiple clouds, multiple environments. And I think that is where I think I see this layer coming in because some companies just have to work on all clouds. That's the way it has to be. Why wouldn't you? >>Yeah. Well every, every company will probably end up with some workloads in every cloud. I just think that is the fate. Whether it's how we consume our SaaS, which a lot of people don't think about, but it always tends to be running on another hyperscale public cloud. Most companies tend to be consuming some workloads from every cloud. It's not always direct. So they might have a single control plane that they tend to lead the way with, but that is only gonna continue to change. And every public cloud company seems to be working on figuring out what their niche is. What is the one thing that sort of drives whether, you know, it is, you know, traditional, we know the commoditization of traditional storage network compute. So now you're seeing things like ai, things like automation, things like the edge collaboration tools, software being put into the, to the forefront because it's a different consumption model, it's a different margin and economic model. And then of course it gives competitive advantages. And we've seen that, you know, I came back from Google Cloud next and at Google Cloud next, you know, you can see they're leaning into the data AI cloud. I mean, that is their focus, like data ai. This is how we get people to come in and start using Google, who in most cases, they're probably using AWS or Microsoft today. >>It's a great specialty cloud right there. That's a big use case. I can run data on Google and run something on aws. >>And then of course you've got all kinds of, and this is a little off topic, but you got sovereignty, compliance, regulatory that tends to drive different clouds over, you know, global clouds like Tencent and Alibaba. You know, if your workloads are in China, >>Well, this comes back down at least to the whole complexity issue. I mean, it has to get complex before it gets easier. And I think that's what we're seeing companies opportunities like Ansible to be like, Okay, tame, tame the complexity. >>Yeah. Yeah, I totally agree with you. I mean, look, when I was watching the demonstrations today, my take is there's so many kind of simple, repeatable and mundane tasks in everyday life that enterprises need to, to automate. Do that first, you know? Then the second thing is working on how do you create self-healing, self-teaching, self-learning, You know, and, and I realize I'm a little broken of a broken record at this, but these are those first things to fix. You know, I know we want to jump to the future where we automate every task and we have multi-term conversational AI that is booking our calendars and driving our cars for us. But in the first place, we just need to say, Hey, the network's down. Like, let's make sure that we can quickly get access back to that network again. Let's make sure that we're able to reach our different zones and locations. Let's make sure that robotic arm is continually doing the thing it's supposed to be doing on the schedule that it's been committed to. That's first. And then we can get to some of these really intensive deep metaverse state of automation that we talk about. Self-learning, data replication, synthetic data. I'm just gonna throw terms around. So I sound super smart. >>In your customer conversations though, from an looking at the automation journey, are you finding most of them, or some percentage is, is wanting to go directly into those really complex projects rather than starting with the basics? >>I don't know that you're, you're finding that the customers want to do that? I think it's the architecture that often ends up being a problem is we as, as the vendor side, will tend to talk about the most complex problems that they're able to solve before companies have really started solving the, the immediate problems that are before them. You know, it's, we talk about, you know, the metaphor of the cloud is a great one, but we talk about the cloud, like it's ubiquitous. Yeah. But less than 30% of our workloads are in the public cloud. Automation is still in very early days and in many industries it's fairly nascent. And doing things like self-healing networks is still something that hasn't even been able to be deployed on an enterprise-wide basis, let alone at the industrial layer. Maybe at the company's on manufacturing PLAs or in oil fields. Like these are places that have difficult to reach infrastructure that needs to be running all the time. We need to build systems and leverage the power of automation to keep that stuff up and running. That's, that's just business value, which by the way is what makes the world go running. Yeah. Awesome. >>A lot of customers and users are struggling to find what's the value in automating certain process, What's the ROI in it? How do you help them get there so that they understand how to start, but truly to make it a journey that is a success. >>ROI tends to be a little bit nebulous. It's one of those things I think a lot of analysts do. Things like TCO analysis Yeah. Is an ROI analysis. I think the businesses actually tend to know what the ROI is gonna be because they can basically look at something like, you know, when you have an msa, here's the downtime, right? Business can typically tell you, you know, I guarantee you Amazon could say, Look for every second of downtime, this is how much commerce it costs us. Yeah. A company can generally say, if it was, you know, we had the energy, the windmills company, like they could say every minute that windmill isn't running, we're creating, you know, X amount less energy. So there's a, there's a time value proposition that companies can determine. Now the question is, is about the deployment. You know, we, I've seen it more nascent, like cybersecurity can tend to be nascent. >>Like what does a breach cost us? Well there's, you know, specific costs of actually getting the breach cured or paying for the cybersecurity services. And then there's the actual, you know, ephemeral costs of brand damage and of risks and customer, you know, negative customer sentiment that potentially comes out of it. With automation, I think it's actually pretty well understood. They can look at, hey, if we can do this many more cycles, if we can keep our uptime at this rate, if we can reduce specific workforce, and I'm always very careful about this because I don't believe automation is about replacement or displacement, but I do think it is about up-leveling and it is about helping people work on things that are complex problems that machines can't solve. I mean, said that if you don't need to put as many bodies on something that can be immediately returned to the organization's bottom line, or those resources can be used for something more innovative. So all those things are pretty well understood. Getting the automation to full deployment at scale, though, I think what often, it's not that roi, it's the timeline that gets misunderstood. Like all it projects, they tend to take longer. And even when things are made really easy, like with what Project Wisdom is trying to do, semantically enable through low code, no code and the ability to get more accuracy, it just never tends to happen quite as fast. So, but that's not an automation problem, That's just the crux of it. >>Okay. What are some of the, the next things on your plate? You're quite a, a busy guy. We, you, you were at Google, you were at Oracle, you're here today. What are some of the next things that we can expect from Daniel Newman? >>Oh boy, I moved Really, I do move really quickly and thank you for that. Well, I'm very excited. I'm taking a couple of work personal days. I don't know if you're a fan, but F1 is this weekend. I'm the US Grand Prix. Oh, you're gonna Austin. So I will be, I live in Austin. Oh. So I will be in Austin. I will be at the Grand Prix. It is work because it, you know, I'm going with a number of our clients that have, have sponsorships there. So I'll be spending time figuring out how the data that comes off of these really fun cars is meaningfully gonna change the world. I'll actually be talking to Splunk CEO at the, at the race on Saturday morning. But yeah, I got a lot of great things. I got a, a conversation coming up with the CEO of Twilio next week. We got a huge week of earnings ahead and so I do a lot of work on that. So I'll be on Bloomberg next week with Emily Chang talking about Microsoft and Google. Love talking to Emily, but just as much love being here on, on the queue with you >>Guys. Well we like to hear that. Who you're rooting for F one's your favorite driver. I, >>I, I like Lando. Do you? I'm Norris. I know it's not necessarily a fan favorite, but I'm a bit of a McLaren guy. I mean obviously I have clients with Oracle and Red Bull with Ball Common Ferrari. I've got Cly Splunk and so I have clients in all. So I'm cheering for all of 'em. And on Sunday I'm actually gonna be in the Williams Paddock. So I don't, I don't know if that's gonna gimme me a chance to really root for anything, but I'm always, always a big fan of the underdog. So maybe Latifi. >>There you go. And the data that comes off the how many central unbeliev, the car, it's crazy's. Such a scientific sport. Believable. >>We could have Christian, I was with Christian Horner yesterday, the team principal from Reside. Oh yeah, yeah. He was at the Oracle event and we did a q and a with him and with the CMO of, it's so much fun. F1 has been unbelievable to watch the momentum and what a great, you know, transitional conversation to to, to CX and automation of experiences for fans as the fan has grown by hundreds of percent. But just to circle back full way, I was very encouraged with what I saw today. Red Hat, Ansible, IBM Strong partnership. I like what they're doing in their expanded ecosystem. And automation, by the way, is gonna be one of the most robust investment areas over the next few years, even as other parts of tech continue to struggle that in cyber security. >>You heard it here. First guys, investment in automation and cyber security straight from two analysts. I got to sit between. For our guests and John Furrier, I'm Lisa Martin, you're watching The Cube Live from Chicago, Ansible Fest 22. John and I will be back after a short break. SO'S stick around.

>>We're back with the cube at Falcon 2022, Dave ante and Dave Nicholson. We're at the aria. We do of course, a lot of events in Las Vegas. It's the, it's the place to do events. Dave, I think is my sixth or seventh time here this year. At least. I don't know. I lose track. Jeff Swain is here. He's the vice president of global programs store and tech alliances at CrowdStrike. Jeff. Good to see you again. We saw each other at reinvent in July in Boston. >>Yes. Yeah, it was great to see you again, Dave, thank >>Very much. And we talked about making this happen so thrilled to be here at, at, at CrowdStrike Falcon. We're gonna talk today about the CrowdStrike XDR Alliance partners. First of all, what's XDR >>Well, I hope you were paying attention to George's George's keynote this morning. I guess. You know, the one thing we know is that if you ask 10, five people, what XDR is you'll get 10 answers. >>I like this answer a holistic approach to endpoint security. I, that was, >>It was good. Simple. >>That was a good one at black hat. So, but tell us about the XDR Alliance partners program. Give us the update there. >>Yeah, so I mean, we spoke about it reinforced, you know, the XDR program is really predicated on having a robust ecosystem of partners to help us share that telemetry across all of the different parts of our customers' environment. So we've done a lot of work over the last few weeks and trying to bolster that environment specifically, putting a lot of focus on firewall. You'll see that Cisco and fortunate have both joined the XD XDR Alliance. So we're working on that right now. A lot of customer demand for firewall data into the telemetry set. You know, obviously it's a very rich data environment. There's a lot of logs on firewalls. And so it drives a lot of, of, of information that we can, we can leverage. So we're continuing to grow that. And what we're doing is building out different content packs that support different use cases. So firewall is one CAS B is another emails another and we're building, building out the, the partner set right across the board. So it's, it's, it's been a, a great set of >>Activity. So it's it's partners that have data. Yep. There's probably some, you know, Joe Tuchi year old boss used to say that that overlap is better than gaps. So there's sometimes there's competition, but that's from a customer standpoint, overlap is, is better than gaps. So as gonna mention Cisco forte and there are a number of others, they've got data. Yes. And they're gonna pump it into your system, our platform, and you've got the, your platform. You've got the ability to ingest. You've got the cloud native architecture, you've got the analytics and you've got the near real time analysis capability. Right, right. >>Augmented by people as well, which is a really important part of our value proposition. You know, we, it's not just relying purely on AI, but we have a human, a human aspect to it as well to make sure we're getting extremely accurate responses. And then there's the final phase is the response phase. So being able to take action on a CASB, for example, when we have a known bad actor operating in the cloud is a really important, easy action for our customer to take. That's highly valuable. You're >>Talking about your threat hunting capability, right? >>So it's threat hunting and our Intel capability as well. We use all of that information as well as the telemetry to make sure we're making good, actionable >>Decisions, Intel being machine intelligence or, or human and machine >>Human and human and machine intelligence that we have. We have a whole business that's out there gathering Intel. I believe you think to Adam Myers who runs that business. And you know, that Intel is critical to making good decisions for our customers. >>So the X and XDR is extended, correct. Extending to things like firewalls. That's pretty obvious in the security space. Are there some less obvious data sources that you look to extend to at some point? >>Yeah, I think we're gonna continually go with where the customer demand is. And firewalls is one of the first and is very significant. Other one, you'll see that we're announcing support for Microsoft 365 as well as part of this, this announcement, but then we'll still grow out into the other areas. NDR is, you know, a specific area where we've already got a number of partners in that, in that space. And, and we'll grow that as we go. I think one of the really exciting additional elements is the, the OCS F announcement that we made at at, at, at, at reinforced, which also is a shared data scheme across a number of vendors as well. So talking to Mike's point, Microsoft ST's point this morning in his keynote, it's really about the industry getting together to do better job for our customers. And XDR is the platform to do that. And crowd strikes it way of doing it is the only really true, visible way for a customer to get their hands on all that information, make the decision, see the good from the bad and take the action. So I feel like we're really well placed to help our customers in >>That space. Well, Kevin mania referenced this too today, basically saying the industry's doing a better job of collaborations. I mean, sometimes I'm skeptical because we've certainly seen people try to, you know, commercialize private information, private reports. Yeah. But, but, but you're talking about, you know, some of your quasi competitors cooperatives, you know, actually partnering with you now. So that's a, that's a good indicator. Yeah. I want to step back a little bit, talk about the macro, the big conversation on wall street. Everybody wants to talk about the macro of course, for obvious reasons, we just published our breaking analysis, talking about you guys potentially being a generational company and sort of digging into that a little bit. We've seen, you know, cyber investments hold up a little bit better, both in terms of customer spending and of course the stock market better than tech broadly. Yeah. So in that case it would, it would suggest that cyber investments are somewhat non-discretionary. So, but that is my question are cyber investments non-discretionary if, if so, how, >>You know, I think George George calls that out directly in our analyst reports as well that, you know, we believe that cyber is a non-discretionary spend, but I, I actually think it's more than that. I think in this current macro or economic environment where CIOs and CSOs are being asked to sweat their assets for significantly longer period of time, that actually creates vulnerabilities because they have older kit, that's running for a longer period that they normally, you know, round out or churn out of their environment. They're not getting the investment to replace those laptops. They're not getting the, I placement to replace those servers. We have to sweat them for a little bit longer, longer, which means they need to be on top of the security posture of those devices. So that means that we need the best possible telemetry that we can get to protect those in the best possible way. So I actually think not only is it makes it non-discretionary, it actually increases the, the business case for, for, for taking on a, a cyber project. >>And I buy that. I buy that the business case is better potentially for cyber business case. And cyber is about, about risk reduction, right? It's about, it's about reducing expected loss. I, I, I, I, but the same time CISOs don't have an open wallet. They have to compete with other P and L managers. I also think the advantage for CrowdStrike I'm, I'm getting deeper into the architecture and beginning to understand the power of a lightweight agent that can do handle. I think you're up to 22 modules now, correct? Yes. I've got questions on how you keep that lightweight, but, but nonetheless, if you can consolidate the point tools, which is, you know, one of the biggest challenges that, that SecOps teams face that strengthens the ROI as well. >>Absolutely. And if you look at what George was saying this morning in the keynote, the combination of being able to provide tools, not only to the SecOps team, but the it ops team as well, being able to give the it ops team visibility on how many assets they have. I mean, these simple, these are simple questions that we should be able to answer. But often when we ask, you know, an operations leader, can you answer it? It sometimes it's hard for them. We actually have a lot of that information. So we are able to bring that into the platform. We're able to show them, we're able to show them where the assets are, where the vulnerabilities are against those assets and help it ops do a better job as well as SecOps. So the, the strength, the case strengthens, as you said, the CSO can also be talking to the it ops budget. >>The edge is getting more real. We're certainly hearing a lot about it now we're seeing a lot more and you kind of got the, the near edge, like the home Depot and the lows, you know, stores. Yeah. Okay. That I, I can get a better handle on, okay. How do I secure that? I've got some standards, but that's the far edge. It's, it's the, the OT yes. Piece of it. That's sort of the brave new world. What are you seeing there? How do you protect those far flowing estates? >>I think this gets back to the question of what's what's new or what's coming and where do we see the, the next set of workloads that we have to tackle? You know, when we came along first instance, we were really doing a lot of the on-prem on-prem and, and, and known cloud infrastructure suites. Then we started really tackling the broader crowd market with tools and technology to give visibility and control of the overall cloud environment. OT represents that next big addressable market for us, because there are so many questions around devices where they are, how old they are, what they're running. So visibility into the OT network is extremely, extremely important. And, you know, the, the wall that has existed again between the CISO and the OT environments coming down, we're seeing that's closer, closer alignment between the security on both those worlds. So the announcement that we've made around extending our Falcon discover product, to be able to receive and understand device information from the OT network and bring it into the same console as the, the it and the OT in the same console to give one cohesive picture of, of visibility of all of our devices is a major step forward for our customers and for, for the industry as well. >>And we see that being, being able to get the visibility will then lead us to a place of being able to build our AI models, build our response frameworks. So then we can go to a full EDR and then beyond that, there's, you know, all the other things that CrowdStrike do so well, but this is the first step to really the first step on control is visibility. And >>The OT guys are engineers. So they're obviously conscious of this stuff. It's, it's more it's again, you're extending that culture, isn't >>It? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Now when you're looking at threats, great, you want to do things to protect against those threats, but how much, how much of CrowdStrike's time is spent thinking about the friction that's involved in transactions? If I wanna go to the grocery store, think of me as an end point. If I wanna go to the grocery store, if I had to drive through three DUI checkpoints or car safety inspections. Yeah. Every time I went to the grocery store, I wouldn't be happy as an end point as an end user in this whole thing. Ideally, we'd be able just to be authenticated and then not have to worry about anything moving forward. Do you see that as your role, reducing friction 1%, >>That's again, one of the core tenants of, of, of why George founded the company. I mean, he tells the story of sitting on an airplane and seeing an executive who was also on the airplane, trying to boot their machine up and try and get an email out before the plane took off and watching the scanning happen, you know, old school virus scanning happening on the laptop and, and that executive not making it because, and he is like in this day and age, how can we be holding people back with that much friction in their day to day life? So that's one of the, again, founding principles of what we do at CrowdStrike was the security itself needs to support business growth, support, user growth, and actually get out of the way of how people do things. And we've seen progression along that lines. I think the zero trust work that we're doing right now really helps with that as well. >>Our integrations into other companies that play within the zero trust space makes that frictionless experience for the user, because yeah, we, we, we want to be there. We want to know everything that's happening, but we don't wanna see where we always want control points, but that's the value of the telemetry we take. We're taking all the data so we can see everything. And then we pick what we want to review rather than having to do the, the checkpoint approach of stop here. Now, let me see your credentials. Stop here. Let me see your credentials because we have a full field of, of knowledge and information on what the device is doing and what the user is doing. We're able to then do the trust with verify style approach. >>So coming back to the, to the edge in IOT, you know, bringing that zero trust concept to the, to the edge you've got, you've got it. And OT. Okay. So that's a new constituency, but you're consolidating that view. Your job gets harder. Doesn't it? So, so, so talk about how you resolve that. Do do the, do the concepts that you apply to traditional it endpoints apply at the edge. >>So first things we have to do is gain the visibility. And, and so the way in which we're doing that is effectively drawing information out from the OT environment at, by, by having a collector that's sitting there and bringing that into our console, which then will give us the ability to run our AI models and our other, you know, indications of attack or our indicators of misconfiguration into the model. So we can see whether something's good or bad whilst we're doing that. Obviously we're also working on building specific senses that will then sit in OT devices down, you know, one layer down from rather being collected and pulled and brought into the platform, being collected at the individual sensor level when we have that completed. And that requires a whole different ecosystem for us, it means that we have to engage with organizations like Rockwell and Siemens and Schneider, because they're the people who own the equipment, right? Yeah. And we have to certify with them to make sure that when we put technology onto their equipment, we're not going to cause any kind of critical failure that, you know, that could have genuine real world physical disastrous consequences. So we have to be super careful with how we build that, which we're we're in the process of >>Doing are the IOA signatures indicator as a tax. So I don't have to throw a dollar in the jar. Are the IOA signatures substantially similar at, at the edge, or >>I think we learn as we go, you know, first we have to gain the information and understand what good and bad looks like, what the kind of behaviors are there. But what we will see is that, you know, as someone's trying to, there's an actor, you know, making an attack, you know, will be able to see how they're affecting each of those endpoints individually, whether they're trying to take some form of control, whether they're switching them on and off in the edge and the far edge, it's a little bit more binary in terms of the kind of function of the device. It is the valve open or is the valve closed? It's is the production line running or is the production not line running, not running. So we need to be able to see that it's more about protecting the outcomes there as well. But again, you know, it's about first, we have to get the information. That's what this product will help us do, get it into the platform, get our teams over the top of it, learn more about what's going on there and then be able to take action. >>But the key point is the architecture will scale. And that's where the cloud native things comes >>Into. Yeah, it'll, it'll it'll scale. But to your, to your point about the lack of investment and infrastructure means older stuff means potentially wider gaps, bigger security holes, more opportunity for the security sector. Yep. I buy that. That makes sense. I think if it's a valid argument, when you, when you, when you know, we, we loosely talk about internet of things, edge, a lot of those things on the edge, there's probably a trillion dollars worth of a hundred year old garbage, and I'm only slightly exaggerating on the trillion and the a hundred years old, a lot of those critical devices that need to be sensed that are controlling our, our, our, our electrical grid. For example, a lot of those things need to be updated. So, so as you're pushing into that frontier, are you, you know, are, are you extending out developer kits and APIs to those people as they're developing those new things? Well, because some of the old stuff will never work. >>And that's what we're we're seeing is that there is a movement within the industrial control side of things to actually start, you know, doing this. Some, some simple things like removing the air gap from certain systems because you, now we can build a system around it. That's trustable and supportable. So now we can get access there over, over and over a network over the internet to, to, to kind of control a valve set that's down a pipeline or something like that. So there is, there is, there is willingness within the ecosystem, the, the IOT provider ecosystem to give us access to some of those, those controls, which, which wasn't there, which has led to some of some of these issues. Are we gonna be able to get to all of them? No, we're gonna have to make decisions based on customer demand, based on where the big, the big rock lie. And, and so we will continue to do that based on customer feedback on again, on what we see >>And the legacy air gaps in the OT worlds were by design for security reasons, or just sort of >>Mostly because there was no way to, to do before. Right. So it was, was like black >>Connectivity is >>So, so, so it was, people felt more comfortable sending an engineer route to the field truck roll. Yeah, yeah, yeah. To do it rather than expensive, rather. And, and exactly that, again, going back to our macro economic situation, you know, it's a very expensive way of managing and maintaining your fleet if you have to send someone to it every time. So there is a lot of there's, there's a lot of customer demand for change, and we're engaging in that change. And we want, we see a huge opportunity there >>Coming back to the X XDR Alliance, cuz that's kind of where we started. Where do you wanna see that go? What's your vision for that? >>So the Alliance itself has been fundamental in terms of now where we go with the overall platform. We are always constantly looking for customer feedback on where we go next on what additional elements to add that the Alliance members have been this fantastic time and effort in terms of engaging with us so that we can build in responses to their platforms, into, you know, into, into what we do. And they're seeing the value of it. I, I feel that over the next, you know, over the next two year period, we're gonna see those, our XDR Alliance and other XDR alliances growing out to get to each other and they will they'll touch each other. We will have to do it like the OSF project at AWS. And as that occurs, we're gonna be able to focus on customer outcomes, which is, you know, again, if you listen to George, you listen to Mike protecting the customers, the mission of CrowdStrike. So I think that's core to that, to, to that story. What we will see now is it's a great vehicle for us to give a structured approach to partnership. So we'll continue to invest in that. We've, we've got, we've got a pipeline of literally hundreds of, of partners who want to join. We've just gotta do that in a way that's consumable for us and consumable for the customer. >>Jeff Swain. Thanks so much for coming back in the cube. It's great to have you. Yeah. Thanks guys. Thank you. Okay. And thank you for watching Dave Nicholson and Dave ante. We'll be back right after this short break. You're watching the cube from Falcon 22 in Las Vegas, right back.

(intro music) >> Hi everybody. Dave Vellante, back with Day Two coverage, we're live at the ARIA Hotel in Las Vegas for fal.con '22. Several thousand people here today. The keynote was, it was a little light. I think people were out late last night, but the keynote was outstanding and it's still going on. We had to break early because we have to strike early today, but we're really excited to have Stephan Goldberg here, Vice President of Technology Alliances at Claroty. And we're going to talk about an extremely important topic, which is the internet of things, the edge, we talk about it a lot. We haven't covered securing the edge here at theCUBE this week. And so Stephan really excited to have you on. >> Thank you for having me. >> You're very welcome. Tell us more about Claroty, C-L-A-R-O-T-Y, a very interesting spelling, but what's it all about? >> Claroty is cybersecurity company that specializes in cyber physical systems, also known as operational technology systems and the extended internet of things. The difference between the traditional IoT and what what everyone calls an IoT in the cyber physical system is that an IoT device has anything connected on the network that traditionally cannot carry an agent, a security camera, a card reader. A cyber physical system is a system that has influence and operates in the physical world but is controlled from the cyberspace. An example would be a controller, a turbine, a robotic arm, or an MRI machine. >> Yeah, so those are really high-end systems, run, are looked after by engineers, not necessarily consumers. So what's what's happening in that world? I mean, we've talked a lot on theCUBE about the schism between OT and IT, they haven't really talked a lot, but in the last several years, they've started to talk more. You look at the ecosystem of IoT providers. I mean, it's companies like Hitachi and PTC and Siemens. I mean, it's the different names than we're used to in IT. What are the big trends that you're seeing the macro? >> So, first of all, traditionally, most manufacturers and environments that were heavy on operations, operational technology, they had the networks air-gapped, completely separated. You had your IT network for business administration, you had the OT network to actually build stuff. Today with emerging technologies and even modern switching architecture everything is being converged. You have the same physical infrastructure in terms of networking, that carries both networks. Sometimes a human error, sometimes a business logic that needs to interconnect these networks to transmit data from the OT side of the house, to the IT side of the house, exposes the OT environment to cyber threats. >> Was that air-gap by design or was it just that there wasn't connectivity? >> It was air-gap by design, due to security and operational reasons, and also ownership in these organizations. The IT-managed space was completely separate from the OT-managed space. So whoever built a network for the controllers to build a car, for example, was an automation engineer and the vendors, that have built these networks, were automation vendors, unlike the traditional Ciscos of the world, that we're specializing in IT. Today we're seeing the IT vendors on the OT side, and the OT vendors, they're worried about the IT side. >> But I mean, tradition, I mean, engineers are control freaks. No offense, but, I'm glad they are, I'm thankful for that. So there must have been some initial reticence to them connecting up these air-gap systems. They went wanted to make sure that they were secure, that they did it right, and presumably that's where you guys come in. What are the exposures and risks of these, of this critical infrastructure that we should be aware of? >> So you're completely right. And from an operational perspective let let's call it change control is very rigorous. So they did not want to go on the internet and just, we're seeing it with adoption of cloud technologies, for example. Cloud as in industry four ago, five ago, cloud as in cyber security. We all heard Amol's keynote from this morning talking about critical infrastructures and we'll touch upon our partnership in a second, but CrowdStrike, CrowdStrike being considered and deployed within these environments is a new thing. It's a new thing because the OT operation managers and the chief information security officers, they understand that air-gap is no longer a valid strategy. From a business perspective, these networks are already connected. We're seeing the trends of cyber attacks, IT cyber attacks, like not Patreon, I'm not talking about the Stoxnet, the targeted OT. I'm talking about WannaCry, EternalBlue, IT vulnerabilities that did not target OT, but due to the outdated and the specification of OT posture on the networks, they hit healthcare, they hit OT much harder than they did IT. >> Was Log4J, did that sleep into OT, or any IT that. >> So, absolutely. >> So Log4J right, which was so pervasive, like so many of these malwares. >> All these vulnerabilities that, it's a windows vulnerability, it has nothing to do with OT. But then when you stop and you say, hold on, my human machine interface workstation, although it has some proprietary software by Rockwell or Siemens running on it, what is the underlying operating system? Oh, hold on, it's Windows. We haven't updated that for like eight years. We were focused on updating the software but not the underlying operating system. The vulnerabilities exist to a greater extent on the OT side of the house because of the same characteristic of operational technology environments. >> So the brute force air-gap approach was no longer viable because the business imperative came in and said, no, we have to connect these systems to digitally transform, or advance our business, there's opportunities to monetize, whatever it was. The business laid that out as an imperative. So now OT engineers have to rethink how they secure it. So what are the steps that they're taking and how does Claroty help? Is there a sort of a playbook, a sequential playbook? >> Absolutely, so before we discussed the maturity curve of adopting an CPS security, or OT security technology, let's touch upon the characteristic of the space and what it led vendors like Claroty to build. So you have the rigorous chain control. You have the security in mind, operations, lowered the risk state of mind. That led vendors, likes of Claroty, to build a solution. And I'm talking about seven, eight years ago, to be passive, mostly passive or passive only to inspect network and to analyze network and focus on detection rather than taking action like response or preventative maintenance. >> Um-hmm. >> It made vendors to build on-prem solutions because of the cloud-averse state of mind of this industry. And because OT is very specific, it led vendors to focus only on OT devices, overlooking what we discussed as IoT, Unfortunately, besides HMI and PLC, the controller in the plant, you also have the security camera. So when you install an OT security solution I'm talking about the traditional ones, they traditionally overlook the security camera or anything that is not considered traditional OT. These three observations, although they were necessary in the beginning, you understand the shortcomings of it today. >> Um-hmm. >> So cloud-averse led to on-prem which leads to war security. It's like comparing CrowdStrike and one of its traditional competitors in the antivirus space. What CrowdStrike innovated is the SaaS first, cloud-native solution that is continuously being updated and provide the best in cloud security, right? And that is very much like what Claroty's building. We decided to go SaaS first and cloud-native solution. >> So, because of cloud-aversion, the industry shows somewhat outdated deployment models, on-prem, which limited scale and created greater diversity, more stovepipes, all the problems that we always talk about. Okay, and so is the answer to that, just becoming more cloud, having more of an affinity to cloud? That was a starting point, right. >> This is exactly it. Air-gap is perceived as secured, but you don't get updates and you don't really know what's going on in your network. If you have a Claroty or a crosswork installer, you have much higher probability detecting fast and responding fast. If you don't have it, you are just blind. You will be bridged, that's the. >> I was going to say, plus, air-gap, it's true, but people can get through air-gaps, too. I mean, it's harder, but Stoxnet. Yeah, look at Stoxnet right, oh, it's mopping the floor, boom, or however it happened, but so yeah. >> Correct. >> So, but the point being, you know, assume that breach, even though I know CrowdStrike thinks that the unstoppable breach is a myth, but you know, you talk to people like Kevin Mandia, it's like, we assume you're going to get breached, right? Let's make that assumption. Yeah, okay, and so that means you've got to have visibility into the network. So what are those steps that you would, what's that maturity model that you referenced before? >> So on top of these underlying principles, which is cloud-native, comprehensive, not OT only, but XIoT, and then bring that the verticalization and OT specificity. On top of that, you're exactly right. There is a maturity curve. You cannot boil the ocean, deploy protections, and change the environment within one day. It starts with discovering everything that is connected to your network. Everything from the traditional workstations to the cameras, and of course ending up with the cyber physical systems on the network. That discovery cannot be only a high level profile, it needs to be in depth to the level you need to know application versions of these devices. If you cannot tell the application version you cannot correlate it to a vulnerability, right? Just knowing that's an HMI or that's a PLC by Siemens is insufficient. You need to know the app version, then you can correlate to vulnerability, then you can correlate to risk. This is the next step, risk assessment. You need to put up a score basically, on each one of these devices. A vulnerability score, risk score, in order to prioritize action. >> Um-hmm. >> These two steps are discovery and thinking about the environment. The next two steps are taking action. After we have the prioritized devices discovered on your network, our approach is that you need to ladle in and deploy protections from a preventative perspective. Claroty delivers recommended policies in the form of access control lists or rules. >> Right. >> That can leverage existing infrastructure without touching a device without patching it, just to protect it. The next step would be detection and response. Once you have these policies deployed you also can leverage them to spot policy deviations. >> And that's where CrowdStrike comes in. So talk about how you guys partner with CrowdStrike, what that integration looks like and what the differentiation is. >> So actually the integration with CrowdStrike crosses the the entire customer journey. It starts with visibility. CrowdStrike and us exchange data on the asset level. With the announcement during FalCon, with Falcon Discover for IoT, we are really, really proud working on that with CrowdStrike. Traditionally CrowdStrike discovered and provided data about the IT assets. And we did the same thing with CPS and OT. Today with Falcon Discover for IoT, and us expanding to the XIoT space, both of us look at all devices but we can discover different things. When you merge these data sets you have an unparalleled visibility into any environment, and specifically OT. The integrations continue, and maybe the second spotlight I'll put, but without diminishing the other ones, is detection and response. It's the XDR Alliance. Claroty is very proud to be one of the first partners, XDR Alliance partners, for CrowdStrike, fitting in to the XDR, to CrowdStrike's XDR, the data that is needed to mitigate and respond and get more context about breaches in these OT environments, but also take action. Also trigger action, via Claroty and leverage Claroty's network-centric capabilities to respond. >> We hear a lot. We heard a lot in today's keynote note about the data, the importance of data, of the graph database. How unique is this Stephan, in the industry, in your view? >> The uniqueness of what exactly? >> Of this joint solution, if you will, this capability. >> I told my counterparts from CrowdStrike yesterday, the go-to market ones and the product management ones. If we are successful with Falcon Discover for IoT, and that product matures, as we plan for it to mature, it will change the industry, the OT security industry, for all of us. Not only for Claroty, for all players in this space. And this is why it's so important for us to stay coordinated and support this amazing company to enter this space and provide better security to organizations that really support our lives. >> We got to leave it there, but this is such an important topic. We're seeing in the war in Ukraine, there's a cyber component in the future of war. >> Yes. >> Today. And what do they do? They go after critical infrastructure. So protecting that critical infrastructure is so important, especially for a country like the United States, which has so much critical infrastructure and a lot to lose. So Stephan, thanks so much. >> Thank you. >> For the work that you're doing. It was great to have you on theCUBE. >> Thank you. >> All right, keep it right there. Dave Vellante for theCUBE. We'll be right back from fal.con '22. We're live from the ARIA in Las Vegas. (techno music)

>>We're back with the cube at Falcon 2022, Dave ante and Dave Nicholson. We're at the aria. We do obvious of course, a lot of events in Las Vegas. It's the, it's the place to do events. Dave, I think is my sixth or seventh time here this year. At least. I don't know. I lose track. Jeff Swayne is here. He's the vice president of global programs store and tech alliances at CrowdStrike. Jeff. Good to see again. We saw each other at reinvent in July in Boston. >>Yes. Have it's great to see you again, Dave. Thank you very >>Much. And we talked about making this happen, so it's thrilled to be here at, at, at CrowdStrike Falcon. We're gonna talk today about the CrowdStrike XDR Alliance partners. First of all, what's XDR >>Well, I hope you were paying attention to George's George's keynote this morning. I guess. You know, the one thing we know is that if you ask 10, five people, what XDR is you'll get 10 answers. >>I like this answer a holistic approach to endpoint security. I, that was a, >>It was good. Simple. That >>Was a good one at black hat. So, but tell us about the XDR Alliance partners program. Give us the update there. >>Yeah, so I mean, we spoke about it reinforced, you know, the XDR program is really predicated on having a robust ecosystem of partners to help us share that telemetry across all of the different parts of our customers' environment. So we've done a lot of work over the last few weeks and trying to bolster that environment, specifically, putting a, a lot of focus on firewall. You'll see that Cisco and fortunate have both joined the XD XDR Alliance. So we're working on that right now. A lot of customer demand for firewall data into the telemetry set. You know, obviously it's a very rich data environment. There's a lot of logs on firewalls. And so it drives a lot of, of, of information that we can, we can leverage. So we're continuing to grow that. And what we're doing is building out different content packs that support different use cases. So firewall is one CAS B is another emails another and we're building, building out the, the partner set right across the board. So it's, it's, it's been a, a great set of >>Activity. So it's it's partners that have data. Yep. There's probably some, you know, Joe, Tuchi your old boss used to say that that overlap is better than gaps. So there's sometimes there's competition, but that's from a customer standpoint, overlap is, is better than gaps. So you gonna mention Cisco forte and there are a number of others. They've got data. Yes. And they're gonna pump it into your system, our platform, and you've got the, your platform. You've got the ability to ingest. You've got the cloud native architecture, you've got the analytics and you've got the near real time analysis capability, right. >>Augmented by people as well, which is a really important part of our value proposition. You know, we, it's not just relying purely on AI, but we have a human, a human aspect to it as well to make sure we're getting extremely accurate responses. And then there's the final phase is the response phase. So being able to take action on a CASB, for example, when we have a known bad actor operating in the cloud is a really important, easy action for our customer to take. That's highly valuable. You're >>Talking about your threat hunting capability, right? >>So threat hunting and our Intel capability as well. We use all of that information as well as the telemetry to make sure we're making good, actionable >>Decisions, Intel being machine intelligence or, or human in >>Machine human and human and machine intelligence that we have. We have a whole business that's out there gathering Intel. I believe you're thinking to Adam Myers who runs that business. And you know, that Intel is critical to making good decisions for our customers. >>So the X and XDR is extended, correct. Extending to things like firewalls. That's pretty obvious in the security space. Are there some less obvious data sources that you look to extend to at some point? >>Yeah, I think we're gonna continually go with where the customer demand is. Firewalls is one of the first and email is very significant. Other one, you'll see that we're announcing support for Microsoft 365 as well as part of this, this announcement, but then we'll still grow out into the other areas. NDR is, you know, a specific area where we've already got a number of partners in that, in that space. And, and we'll grow that as we go. I think one of the really exciting additional elements is the, the OCS F announcement that we made at at, at, at, at reinforced, which also is a shared data scheme across a number of vendors as well. So talking to Mike's point Microsoft's point this morning in his keynote, it's really about the industry getting together to do better job for our customers. And XDR is the platform to do that. And crowd strikes it way of doing it is the only really true, visible way for a customer to get their hands on all that information, make the decision, see the good from the bad and take the action. So I feel like we're really well placed to help our customers in >>That space. Well, Kevin, Mandy referenced this too today, basically saying the industry's doing a better job of collaboration. I mean, sometimes I'm skeptical because we've certainly seen people try to, you know, commercialize private information, private reports. Yeah. But, but, but you're talking about, you know, some of your quasi competitors cooperatives, you know, actually partnering with you now. So that's a, that's a good indicator. Yeah. I want to step back a little bit, talk about the macro, the big conversation on wall street. Everybody wants to talk about the macro of course, for obvious reasons, we just published our breaking analysis, talking about you guys potentially being a generational company and sort of digging into that a little bit. We've seen, you know, cyber investments hold up a little bit better, both in terms of customer spending and of course the stock market better than tech broadly. Yeah. So in that case it would, it would suggest that cyber investments are somewhat non-discretionary. So, but that's is my question are cyber investments non-discretionary if so, how, >>You know, I think George George calls that out directly in our analyst reports as well that, you know, we believe that cyber is a non-discretionary spend, but I, I actually think it's more than that. I think in this current macro of economic environment where CIOs and CSOs are being asked to sweat their assets for a significantly longer period of time, that actually creates vulnerabilities because they have older kit, that's running for a longer period that they normally, you know, round out or churn out of their environment. They're not getting the investment to replace those laptops. They're not getting the investment to replace those servers. We have to sweat them for a little bit longer, longer, which means they need to be on top of the security posture of those devices. So that means that we need the best possible telemetry that we can get to protect those in the best possible way. So I actually think not only is it makes it non-discretionary, it actually increases the, the business case for, for, for taking on a, a cyber project. >>And I buy that. I buy that the business case is better potentially for cyber business case. And cyber is about, about risk reduction, right? It's about, it's about reducing expected loss. I, I, I, I, but the same time CISOs don't have an open wallet. They have to compete with other P and L managers. I also think the advantage for CrowdStrike I'm, I'm getting deeper into the architecture and beginning to understand the power of a lightweight agent that can do handle. I think you're up to 22 modules now, correct? Yes. I've got questions on how you keep that lightweight, but, but nonetheless, if you can consolidate the point tools, which is, you know, one of the biggest challenges that, that SecOps teams face that strengthens the ROI as well. >>Absolutely. And if you look at what George was saying this morning in the keynote, the combination of being able to provide tools, not only to the SecOps team, but the it ops team as well, being able to give the it ops team visibility on how many assets they have. I mean, these simple, these are simple questions that we should be able to answer. But often when we ask, you know, an operations leader, can you answer it? It sometimes it's hard for them. We actually have a lot of that information. So we are able to bring that into the platform. We're able to show them, we're able to show them where the assets are, where the vulnerabilities are against those assets and help it ops do a better job as well as SecOps. So the, the strength, the case strengths, as you said, the CSO can also be talking to the it ops budget. >>The edge is getting more real. We're certainly hearing a lot about it. Now we're seeing a lot more and you kind of got the, the near edge. It's like the home Depot and the lows, you know, stores okay. That I, I can get a better handle on, okay. How do I secure that? I've got some standards, but that's the far edge. It's, it's the, the OT yes. Piece of it. That's sort of the brave new world. What are you seeing there? How do you protect those far flung estates? >>I think this gets back to the question of what's what's new what's coming and where do we see the, the next set of workloads that we have to tackle? You know, when we came along first instance, we were really doing a lot of the on-prem on-prem and, and, and known cloud infrastructure suites. Then we started really tackling the broader cloud market with tools and technology to give visibility and control of the overall cloud environment. OT represents that next big addressable market for us, because there are so many questions around devices where they are, how old they are, what they're running. So visibility into the OT network is extremely, extremely important. And, you know, the, the wall that has existed again between the CISO and the OT environments coming down, we're seeing that's closer, closer alignment between the security on both those worlds. So the announcement that we've made around extending our Falcon discover product, to be able to receive and understand device information from the OT network and bring it into the same console as the, the it and the OT in the same console to give one cohesive picture of, of visibility of all of our devices is a major step forward for our customers and for, for the industry as well. >>And we see that being, being able to get the visibility will then lead us to a place of being able to build our AI models, build our response frameworks. So then we can go to a full EDR and then beyond that, there's, you know, all the other things that CrowdStrike do so well, but this is the first step to really the first step on control is visibility. And >>The OT guys are engineers. So they're obviously conscious of this stuff. It's, it's more it's again, you're extending that culture, isn't it? >>Yeah, yeah, yeah. Now when you're looking at threats, great, you want to do things to protect against those threats, but how much, how much of CrowdStrike's time is spent thinking about the friction that's involved in transactions? If I wanna go to the grocery store, think of me as an end point. If I wanna go to the grocery store, if I had to drive through three DUI checkpoints or car safety inspections, every time I went to the grocery store, I wouldn't be happy as an end point as an end user in this whole thing. Ideally, we'd be able just to be authenticated and then not have to worry about anything moving forward. Do you see that as your role, reducing friction >>100%, that's again, one of the core tenants of, of, of why George founded the company. I mean, he tells the story of sitting on an airplane and seeing an executive who was also on the airplane, trying to boot their machine up and trying, and get an email out before the plane took off and watching the scanning happen, you know, old school virus scanning happening on the laptop and, and that executive not making it because, and he is like in this day and age, how can we be holding people back with that much friction in their day to day life? So that's one of the, again, founding principles of what we do at CrowdStrike was the security itself needs to support business growth, support, user growth, and actually get out of the way of how people do things. And we've seen progression along that lines. I think the zero trust work that we're doing right now really helps with that as well. >>Our integrations into other companies that play within the zero trust space makes that frictionless experience for the user, because yeah, we, we, we want to be there. We want to know everything that's happening, but we don't want to see where we always want control points, but that's the value of the telemetry we take. We're taking all the data so that we can see everything. And then we pick what we want to review rather than having to do the, the checkpoint approach of stop here. Now, let me see your credentials stop here. And let me see your credentials because we have a full field of, of knowledge and information on what the device is doing and what the user is doing. We're able to then do the trust with verify style approach. >>So coming back to the, to the edge and IOT, you know, bringing that zero trust concept to the, to the edge you've got, you've got it and OT. Okay. So that's a new constituency, but you're consolidating that view. Your job gets harder. Doesn't it? So, so, so talk about how you resolve that. Do do the, do the concepts that you apply to traditional it endpoints apply at the edge. >>So first things we have to do is gain the visibility. And, and so the way in which we're doing that is effectively drawing information out from the OT environment at, by, by having a collector that's sitting there and bringing that into our console, which then will give us the ability to run our AI models and our other, you know, indications of attack or our indications of misconfiguration into the model. So we can see whether something's good or bad whilst we're doing that. Obviously we're also working on building specific sensors that will then sit in OT devices down, you know, one layer down from rather being collected and pulled and brought into the platform, being collected at the individual sensor level when we have that completed. And that requires a whole different ecosystem for us, it means that we have to engage with organizations like Rockwell and Siemens and Schneider, because they're the people who own the equipment, right? Yeah. And we have to certify with them to make sure that when we put technology onto their equipment, we're not going to cause any kind of critical failure that, you know, that could have genuine real world physical disastrous consequences. So we have to be super careful with how we build that, which we're we're in the process of doing >>Are the IOA signatures indicator as a tax. So I don't have to throw a dollar in the jar, are the IOA signatures substantially similar at, at the edge? I think >>We learn as we go, you know, first we have to gain the information and understand what good and bad looks like, what the kind of behaviors are there. But what we will see is that, you know, as someone's trying to make, if there's an actor, you know, making an attack, you know, we'll be able to see how they're affecting each of those end points individually, whether they're trying to take some form of control, whether they're switching them on and off in the edge and the far edge, it's a little bit more binary in terms of the kind of function of the device. It is the valve open or is the valve closed? It's is the production line running or is the production not line running, not running. So we need to be able to see that it's more about protecting the outcomes there as well. But again, you know, it's about first, we have to get the information. That's what this product will help us do. Get it into the platform, get our teams over the top of it, learn more about what's going on there and then be able to take action. >>But the key point is the architecture will scale. That's where the cloud native things >>Comes into. Yeah, it'll, it'll it'll scale. But to your, to your point about the lack of investment and infrastructure means older stuff means potentially wider gaps, bigger security holes, more opportunity for the security sector. Yep. I buy that. That makes sense. I think if it's a valid argument, when you, when you, when you know, we, we loosely talk about internet of things, edge, a lot of those things on the edge, there's probably a trillion dollars worth of a hundred year old garbage, and I'm only slightly exaggerating on the trillion and the a hundred years old, a lot of those critical devices that need to be sensed that are controlling our, our, our, our electrical grid. For example, a lot of those things need to be updated. So, so as you're pushing into that frontier, are you, you know, are, are you extending out developer kits and APIs to those people as they're developing those new things, right? Because some of the old stuff will never work. >>And that's what we're we're seeing is that there is a movement within the industrial control side of things to actually start, you know, doing this. Some, some simple things like removing the air gap from certain systems, because now we can build a system around it, that's trustable and supportable. So now we can get access there over, over and over a network over the internet to, to, to kind of control a valve set that's down a pipeline or something like that. So there is a, there is, there is willingness within the ecosystem, the, the IOT provider ecosystem to give us access to some of those, those controls, which, which wasn't there, which has led to some of some of these issues. Are we gonna be able to get to all of them? No, we're gonna have to make decisions based on customer demand, based on where the big, the big rock lie. And, and so we will continue to do that based on customer feedback on again, on what we see >>And the legacy air gaps in the OT worlds were by design for security reasons, or just sort of, >>I see. Because there was no way to, to do before. Right. So it was, was like >>Lack connectivity is, >>Yeah. So, so, so it was, people felt more comfortable sending an engineer route to the field truck roll. Yeah, yeah, yeah. To do it rather than expensive, rather. And, and exactly that, again, going back to our macro economic situation, you know, it's a very expensive way of managing and maintaining your fleet if you have to send someone to it every time. So there is a lot of there's, there's a lot of customer demand for change, and we're engaging in that change. And we want to see a huge opportunity there >>Coming back to the XDR Alliance, cuz that's kind of where we started. Where do you wanna see that go? What's your vision for that? >>So the Alliance itself has been fundamental in terms of now where we go with the overall platform. We are always constantly looking for customer feedback on where we go next on what additional elements to add. The, the Alliance members have video this fantastic time and effort in terms of engaging with us so that we can build in responses to their platforms, into, you know, into, into what we do. And they're seeing the value of it. I, I feel that over the next, you know, over the next two year period, we're gonna see those, our XDR Alliance and other XDR alliances growing out to get to each other and they will they'll touch each other. We will have to do it like this O project at AWS. And as that occurs, we're gonna be able to focus on customer outcomes, which is, you know, again, if you listen to George, you listen to Mike protecting the customers, the mission of CrowdStrike. So I think that's core to that, to, to that story. What we will see now is it's a great vehicle for us to give a structured approach to partnership. So we'll continue to invest in that. We've, we've got, we've got a pipeline of literally hundreds of, of partners who want to join. We've just gotta do that in a way that's consumable for us and consumable for the customer. >>Jeff Swain. Thanks so much for coming back in the cube. It's great to have you. Yeah. Thanks guys. Thank you. Okay. And thank you for watching Dave Nicholson and Dave ante. We'll be back right to this short break. You're watching the cube from Falcon 22 in Las Vegas, right back.

(upbeat music) >> Okay, welcome back everyone. CUBE's coverage of re:MARS, here in Las Vegas, in person. I'm John Furrier, host of theCUBE. This is the analyst panel wrap up analysis of the keynote, the show, past one and a half days. We got two great guests here. We got Andy Thurai, Vice President, Principal Consultant, Constellation Research. Larry Carvalho, Principal Consultant at RobustCloud LLC. Congratulations going out on your own. >> Thank you. >> Andy, great to see you. >> Great to see you as well. >> Guys, thanks for coming out. So this is the session where we break down and analyze, you guys are analysts, industry analysts, you go to all the shows, we see each other. You guys are analyzing the landscape. What does this show mean to you guys? 'Cause this is not obvious to the normal tech follower. The insiders see the confluence of robotics, space, automation and machine learning. Obviously, it's IoTs, industrials, it's a bunch of things. But there's some dots to connect. Let's start with you, Larry. What do you see here happening at this show? >> So you got to see how Amazon started, right? When AWS started. When AWS started, it primarily took the compute storage, networking of Amazon.com and put it as a cloud service, as a service, and started selling the heck out of it. This is a stage later now that Amazon.com has done a lot of physical activity, and using AIML and the robotics, et cetera, it's now the second phase of innovation, which is beyond digital transformation of back office processes, to the transformation of physical processes where people are now actually delivering remotely and it's an amazing area. >> So back office's IT data center kind of vibe. >> Yeah. >> You're saying front end, industrial life. >> Yes. >> Life as we know it. >> Right, right. I mean, I just stopped at a booth here and they have something that helps anybody who's stuck in the house who cannot move around. But with Alexa, order some water to bring them wherever they are in the house where they're stuck in their bed. But look at the innovation that's going on there right at the edge. So I think those are... >> John: And you got the Lunar, got the sex appeal of the space, Lunar Outpost interview, >> Yes. >> those guys. They got Rover on Mars. They're going to have be colonizing the moon. >> Yes. >> I made a joke, I'm like, "Well, I left a part back on earth, I'll be right back." (Larry and Andy laugh) >> You can't drive back to the office. So a lot of challenges. Andy, what's your take of the show? Take us your analysis. What's the vibe, what's your analysis so far? >> It's a great show. So, as Larry was saying, one of the thing was that when Amazon started, right? So they were more about cloud computing. So, which means is they try to commoditize more of data center components or compute components. So that was working really well for what I call it as a compute economy, right? >> John: Mm hmm. >> And I call the newer economy as more of a AIML-based data economy. So when you move from a compute economy into a data economy, there are things that come into the forefront that never existed before, never popular before. Things like your AIML model creation, model training, model movement, model influencing, all of the above, right? And then of course the robotics has come long way since then. And then some of what they do at the store, or the charging, the whole nine yards. So, the whole concept of all of these components, when you put them on re:Invent, such a big show, it was getting lost. So that's why they don't have it for a couple of years. They had it one year. And now all of a sudden they woke up and say, "You know what? We got to do this!" >> John: Yeah. >> To bring out this critical components that we have, that's ripe, mature for the world to next component. So that's why- I think they're pretty good stuff. And some of the robotics things I saw in there, like one of them I posted on my Twitter, it's about the robot dog, sniffing out the robot rover, which I thought was pretty hilarious. (All laugh) >> Yeah, this is the thing. You're seeing like the pandemic put everything on hold on the last re:Mars, and then the whole world was upside down. But a lot of stuff pulled forward. You saw the call center stuff booming. You saw the Zoomification of our workplace. And I think a lot of people got to the realization that this hybrid, steady-state's here. And so, okay. That settles that. But the digital transformation of actually physical work? >> Andy: Yeah. >> Location, the walk in and out store right over here we've seen that's the ghost store in Seattle. We've all been there. In fact, I was kind of challenged, try to steal something. I'm like, okay- (Larry laughs) I'm pulling all my best New Jersey moves on everyone. You know? >> Andy: You'll get charged for it. >> I couldn't get away with it. Two double packs, drop it, it's smart as hell. Can't beat the system. But, you bring that to where the AI machine learning, and the robotics meet, robots. I mean, we had robots here on theCUBE. So, I think this robotics piece is a huge IoT, 'cause we've been covering industrial IoT for how many years, guys? And you could know what's going on there. Huge cyber threats. >> Mm hmm. >> Huge challenges, old antiquated OT technology. So I see a confluence in the collision between that OT getting decimated, to your point. And so, do you guys see that? I mean, am I just kind of seeing mirage? >> I don't see it'll get decimated, it'll get replaced with a newer- >> John: Dave would call me out on that. (Larry laughs) >> Decimated- >> Microsoft's going to get killed. >> I think it's going to have to be reworked. And just right now, you want do anything in a shop floor, you have to have a physical wire connected to it. Now you think about 5G coming in, and without a wire, you get minute details, you get low latency, high bandwidth. And the possibilities are endless at the edge. And I think with AWS, they got Outposts, they got Snowcone. >> John: There's a threat to them at the edge. Outpost is not doing well. You talk to anyone out there, it's like, you can't find success stories. >> Larry: Yeah. >> I'm going to get hammered by Amazon people, "Oh, what're you're saying that?" You know, EKS for example, with serverless is kicking ass too. So, I mean I'm not saying Outpost was wrong answer, it was a right at the time, what, four years ago that came out? >> Yeah. >> Okay, so, but that doesn't mean it's just theirs. You got Dell Technologies want some edge action. >> Yeah. >> So does HPE. >> Yes. >> So you got a competitive edge situation. >> I agree with that and I think that's definitely not Amazon's strong point, but like everything, they try to make it easy to use. >> John: Yeah. >> You know, you look at the AIML and they got Canvas. So Canvas says, hey, anybody can do AIML. If they can do that for the physical robotic processes, or even like with Outpost and Snowcone, that'll be good. I don't think they're there yet, and they don't have the presence in the market, >> John: Yeah. >> like HPE and, >> John: Well, let me ask you guys this question, because I think this brings up the next point. Will the best technology win or will the best solution win? Because if cloud's a platform and all software's open source, which you can make those assumptions, you then say, hey, they got this killer robotics thing going on with Artemis and Moonshot, they're trying to colonize the moon, but oh, they discovered a killer way to solve a big problem. Does something fall out of this kind of re:Mars environment, that cracks the code and radically changes and disrupts the IoT game? That's my open question. I don't know the answer. I'd love to get your take on what might be possible, what wild card's out there around, disrupting the edge. >> So one thing I see the way, so when IoT came into the world of play, it's when you're digitizing the physical world, it's IoT that does digitalization part of that actually, right? >> But then it has its own set of problems. >> John: Yeah. >> You're talking about you installing sensor everywhere, right? And not only installing your own sensor, but also you're installing competitor sensors. So in a given square feet how many sensors can you accommodate? So there are physical limitations on liabilities of bandwidth and networking all of that. >> John: And integration. >> As well. >> John: Your point. >> Right? So when that became an issue, this is where I was talking to the robotic guys here, a couple of companies, and one of the use cases they were talking about, which I thought was pretty cool, is, rather than going the sensor route, you go the robot route. So if you have either a factor that you want to map out, you put as many sensors on your robot, whatever that is, and then you make it go around, map the whole thing, and then you also do a surveillance in the whole nine yards. So, you can either have a fixed sensors or you can have moving sensors. So you can have three or four robots. So initially, when I was asking them about the price of it, when they were saying about a hundred thousand dollars, I was like, "Who would buy that?" (John and Larry laugh) >> When they then explained that, this is the use case, oh, that makes sense, because if you had to install, entire factory floor sensors, you're talking about millions of dollars. >> John: Yeah. >> But if you do the moveable sensors in this way, it's a lot cheaper. >> John: Yeah, yeah. >> So it's based on your use case, what are your use cases? What are you trying to achieve? >> The general purpose is over. >> Yeah. >> Which you're getting at, and that the enablement, this is again, this is the cloud scale open question- >> Yep. >> it's, okay, the differentiations isn't going to be open source software. That's open. >> It's going to be in the, how you configure it. >> Yes. >> What workflows you might have, the data streams. >> I think, John, you're bringing up a very good point about general purpose versus special purpose. Yesterday Zoox was on the stage and when they talked about their vehicle, it's made just for self-driving. You walk around in Vegas, over here, you see a bunch of old fashioned cars, whether they're Ford or GM- >> and they put all these devices around it, but you're still driving the same car. >> John: Yeah, exactly. >> You can retrofit those, but I don't think that kind of IoT is going to work. But if you redo the whole thing, we are going to see a significant change in how IoT delivers value all the way from the industrial to home, to healthcare, mining, agriculture, it's going to have to redo. I'll go back to the OT question. There are some OT guys, I know Rockwell and Siemens, some of them are innovating faster. The ones who innovate faster to keep up with the IT side, as well as the MLAI model are going to be the winners on that one. >> John: Yeah, I agree. Andy, your thoughts on manufacturing, you brought up the sensor thing. Robotics ultimately is, end of the day, an opportunity there. Obviously machine learning, we know what that does. As we move into these more autonomous builds, what does that look like? And is Amazon positioned well there? Obviously they have big manufacturers. Some are saying that they might want to get out of that business too, that Jassy's evaluating that some are saying. So, where does this all lead for that robotics manufacturing lifestyle, walk in, grab my food? 'Cause it's all robotics and AI at the end of the day, I got sensors, I got cameras, I got non-humans moving heavy lifting stuff, fixing the moon will be done by robots, not humans. So it's all coming. What's your analysis? >> Well, so, the point about robotics is on how far it has come, it is unbelievable, right? Couple of examples. One was that I was just talking to somebody, was explaining to them, to see that robot dog over there at the Boston Dynamics one- >> John: Yeah. >> climbing up and down the stairs. >> Larry: Yeah. >> That's more like the dinosaur movie opening the doors scene. (John and Larry laugh) It's like that for me, because the coordinated things, it is able to go walk up and down, that's unbelievable. But okay, it does that, and then there was also another video which is going on viral on the internet. This guy kicks the dog, robot dog, and then it falls down and it gets back up, and the sentiment that people were feeling for the dog, (Larry laughs) >> you can't, it's a robot, but people, it just comes at that level- >> John: Empathy, for a non-human. >> Yeah. >> But you see him, hey you, get off my lawn, you know? It's like, where are we? >> It has come to that level that people are able to kind of not look at that as a robot, but as more like a functioning, almost like a pet-level, human-level being. >> John: Yeah. >> And you saw that the human-like walking robot there as well. But to an extent, in my view, they are all still in an experimentation, innovation phase. It doesn't made it in the industrial terms yet. >> John: Yeah, not yet, it's coming. >> But, the problem- >> John: It's coming fast. That's what I'm trying to figure out is where you guys see Amazon and the industry relative to what from the fantasy coming reality- >> Right. >> of space in Mars, which is, it's intoxicating, let's face it. People love this. The nerds are all here. The geeks are all here. It's a celebration. James Hamilton's here- >> Yep. >> trying to get him on theCUBE. And he's here as a civilian. Jeff Barr, same thing. I'm here, not for Amazon, I bought a ticket. No, you didn't buy a ticket. (Larry laughs) >> I'm going to check on that. But, he's geeking out. >> Yeah. >> They're there because they want to be here. >> Yeah. >> Not because they have to work here. >> Well, I mean, the thing is, the innovation velocity has increased, because, in the past, remember, the smaller companies couldn't innovate because they don't have the platform. Now Compute is a platform available at the scale you want, AI is available at the scale. Every one of them is available at the scale you want. So if you have an idea, it's easy to innovate. The innovation velocity is high. But where I see most of the companies failing, whether startup or big company, is that you don't find the appropriate use case to solve, and then don't sell it to the right people to buy that. So if you don't find the right use case or don't sell the right value proposition to the actual buyer, >> John: Mm hmm. >> then why are you here? What are you doing? (John laughs) I mean, you're not just an invention, >> John: Eh, yeah. >> like a telephone kind of thing. >> Now, let's get into next talk track. I want to get your thoughts on the experience here at re:Mars. Obviously AWS and the Amazon people kind of combined effort between their teams. The event team does a great job. I thought the event, personally, was first class. The coffee didn't come in late today, I was complaining about that, (Larry laughs) >> people complaining out there, at CUBE reviews. But world class, high bar on the quality of the event. But you guys were involved in the analyst program. You've been through the walkthrough, some of the briefings. I couldn't do that 'cause I'm doing theCUBE interviews. What would you guys learn? What were some of the key walkaways, impressions? Amazon's putting all new teams together, seems on the analyst relations. >> Larry: Yeah. >> They got their mojo booming. They got three shows now, re:Mars, re:inforce, re:invent. >> Andy: Yeah. >> Which will be at theCUBE at all three. Now we got that coverage going, what's it like? What was the experience like? Did you feel it was good? Where do they need to improve? How would you grade the Amazon team? >> I think they did a great job over here in just bringing all the physical elements of the show. Even on the stage, where they had robots in there. It made it real and it's not just fake stuff. And every, or most of the booths out there are actually having- >> John: High quality demos. >> high quality demos. (John laughs) >> John: Not vaporware. >> Yeah, exactly. Not vaporware. >> John: I won't say the name of the company. (all laugh) >> And even the sessions were very good. They went through details. One thing that stood out, which is good, and I cover Low Code/No Code, and Low Code/No Code goes across everything. You know, you got DevOps No Low-Code Low-Code. You got AI Low Code/No Code. You got application development Low Code/No Code. What they have done with AI with Low Code/No Code is very powerful with Canvas. And I think that has really grown the adoption of AI. Because you don't have to go and train people what to do. And then, people are just saying, Hey, let me kick the tires, let me use it. Let me try it. >> John: It's going to be very interesting to see how Amazon, on that point, handles this, AWS handles this data tsunami. It's cause of Snowflake. Snowflake especially running the table >> Larry: Yeah. >> on the old Hadoop world. I think Dave had a great analysis with other colleagues last week at Snowflake Summit. But still, just scratching the surface. >> Larry: Yeah. >> The question is, how shared that ecosystem, how will that morph? 'Cause right now you've got Data Bricks, you've got Snowflake and a handful of others. Teradata's got some new chops going on there and a bunch of other folks. Some are going to win and lose in this downturn, but still, the scale that's needed is massive. >> So you got data growing so much, you were talking earlier about the growth of data and they were talking about the growth. That is a big pie and the pie can be shared by a lot of folks. I don't think- >> John: And snowflake pays AWS, remember that? >> Right, I get it. (John laughs) >> I get it. But they got very unique capabilities, just like Netflix has very unique capabilities. >> John: Yeah. >> They also pay AWS. >> John: Yeah. >> Right? But they're competing on prime. So I really think the cooperation is going to be there. >> John: Yeah. >> The pie is so big >> John: Yeah. >> that there's not going to be losers, but everybody could be winners. >> John: I'd be interested to follow up with you guys after next time we have an event together, we'll get you back on and figure out how do you measure this transitions? You went to IDC, so they had all kinds of ways to measure shipments. >> Larry: Yep. >> Even Gartner had fumbled for years, the Magic Quadrant on IaaS and PaaS when they had the market share. (Larry laughs) And then they finally bundled PaaS and IaaS together after years of my suggesting, thank you very much Gartner. (Larry laughs) But that just performs as the landscape changes so does the scoreboard. >> Yep. >> Right so, how do you measure who's winning and who's losing? How can we be critical of Amazon so they can get better? I mean, Andy Jassy always said to me, and Adam Salassi same way, we want to hear how bad we're doing so we can get better. >> Yeah. >> So they're open-minded to feedback. I mean, not (beep) posting on them, but they're open to critical feedback. What do you guys, what feedback would you give Amazon? Are they winning? I see them number one clearly over Azure, by miles. And even though Azure's kicking ass and taking names, getting back in the game, Microsoft's still behind, by a long ways, in some areas. >> Andy: Yes. In some ways. >> So, the scoreboard's changing. What's your thoughts on that? >> So, look, I mean, at the end of the day, when it comes to compute, right, Amazon is a clear winner. I mean, there are others who are catching up to it, but still, they are the established leader. And it comes with its own advantages because when you're trying to do innovation, when you're trying to do anything else, whether it's a data collection, we were talking about the data sensors, the amount of data they are collecting, whether it's the store, that self-serving store or other innovation projects, what they have going on. The storage compute and process of that requires a ton of compute. And they have that advantage with them. And, as I mentioned in my last article, one of my articles, when it comes to AIML and data programs, there is a rich and there is a poor. And the rich always gets richer because they, they have one leg up already. >> John: Yeah. >> I mean the amount of model training they have done, the billion or trillion dollar trillion parametrization, fine tuning of the model training and everything. They could do it faster. >> John: Yeah. >> Which means they have a leg up to begin with. So unless you are given an opportunity as a smaller, mid-size company to compete at them at the same level, you're going to start at the negative level to begin with. You have a lot of catch up to do. So, the other thing about Amazon is that they, when it comes to a lot of areas, they admit that they have to improve in certain areas and they're open and willing and listen to the people. >> Where are you, let's get critical. Let's do some critical analysis. Where does Amazon Websters need to get better? In your opinion, what criticism would you, in a constructive way, share? >> I think on the open source side, they need to be more proactive in, they are already, but they got to get even better than what they are. They got to engage with the community. They got to be able to talk on the open source side, hey, what are we doing? Maybe on the hardware side, can they do some open-sourcing of that? They got graviton. They got a lot of stuff. Will they be able to share the wealth with other folks, other than just being on an Amazon site, on the edge with their partners. >> John: Got it. >> If they can now take that, like you said, compute with what they have with a very end-to-end solution, the full stack. And if they can extend it, that's going to be really beneficial for them. >> Awesome. Andy, final word here. >> So one area where I think they could improve, which would be a game changer would be, right now, if you look at all of their solutions, if you look at the way they suggest implementation, the innovations, everything that comes out, comes out across very techy-oriented. The persona is very techy-oriented. Very rarely their solutions are built to the business audience or to the decision makers. So if I'm, say, an analyst, if I want to build, a business analyst rather, if I want to build a model, and then I want to deploy that or do some sort of application, mobile application, or what have you, it's a little bit hard. It's more techy-oriented. >> John: Yeah, yeah. >> So, if they could appeal or build a higher level abstraction of how to build and deploy applications for business users, or even build something industry specific, that's where a lot of the legacy companies succeeded. >> John: Yeah. >> Go after manufacturing specific or education. >> Well, we coined the term 'Supercloud' last re:Invent, and that's what we see. And Jerry Chen at Greylock calls it Castles in the Cloud, you can create these moats >> Yep. >> on top of the CapEx >> Yep. >> of Amazon. >> Exactly. >> And ride their back. >> Yep. >> And the difference in what you're paying and what you're charging, if you're good, like a Snowflake or a Mongo. I mean, Mongo's, they're just as big as Snow, if not bigger on Amazon than Snowflake is. 'Cause they use a lot of compute. No one turns off their database. (John laughs) >> Snowflake a little bit different, a little nuanced point, but, this is the new thing. You see Goldman Sachs, you got Capital One. They're building their own kind of, I call them sub clouds, but Dave Vellante says it's a Supercloud. And that essentially is the model. And then once you have a Supercloud, you say, great, I'm going to make sure it works on Azure and Google. >> Andy: Yep. >> And Alibaba if I have to. So, we're kind of seeing a playbook. >> Andy: Mm hmm. >> But you can't get it wrong 'cause it scales. >> Larry: Yeah, yeah. >> You can't scale the wrong answer. >> Andy: Yeah. >> So that seems to be what I'm watching is, who gets it right? Product market fit. Then if they roll it out to the cloud, then it becomes a Supercloud, and that's pure product market fit. So I think that's something that I've seen some people trying to figure out. And then, are you a supplier to the Superclouds? Like a Dell? Or you become an enabler? >> Andy: Yeah. >> You know, what's Dell Technologies do? >> Larry: Yeah. >> I mean, how do the box movers compete? >> Larry: I, the whole thing is now hybrid and you're going to have to see just, you said. (Larry laughs) >> John: Hybrid's a steady-state. I don't need to. >> Andy: I mean, >> By the way we're (indistinct), we can't get the chips, cause Broadcom and Apple bought 'em all. (Larry laughs) I mean there's a huge chip problem going on. >> Yes. I agree. >> Right now. >> I agree. >> I mean all these problems when you attract to a much higher level, a lot of those problems go away because you don't care about what they're using underlying as long as you deliver my solution. >> Larry: Yes. >> Yeah, it could be significantly, a little bit faster than what it used to be. But at the end of the day, are you solving my specific use case? >> John: Yeah. >> Then I'm willing to wait a little bit longer. >> John: Yeah. Time's on our side and now they're getting the right answers. Larry, Andy, thanks for coming on. This great analyst session turned into more of a podcast vibe, but you know what? (Larry laughs) To chill here at re:Mars, thanks for coming on, and we unpacked a lot. Thanks for sharing. >> Both: Thank you. >> Appreciate it. We'll get you back on. We'll get you in the rotation. We'll take it virtual. Do a panel. Do a panel, do some panels around this. >> Larry: Absolutely. >> Andy: Oh this not virtual, this physical. >> No we're live right now! (all laugh) We get back to Palo Alto. You guys are influencers. Thanks for coming on. You guys are moving the market, congratulations. Take a minute, quick minute each to plug any work you're doing for the people watching. Larry, what are you working on? Andy? You go after Larry, what you're working on. >> Yeah. So since I started my company, RobustCloud, since I left IDC about a year ago, I'm focused on edge computing, cloud-native technologies, and Low Code/No Code. And basically I help companies put their business value together. >> All right, Andy, what are you working on? >> I do a lot of work on the AIML areas. Particularly, last few of my reports are in the AI Ops incident management and ML Ops areas of how to generally improve your operations. >> John: Got it, yeah. >> In other words, how do you use the AIML to improve your IT operations? How do you use IT Ops to improve your AIML efficiency? So those are the- >> John: The real hardcore business transformation. >> Yep. >> All right. Guys, thanks so much for coming on the analyst session. We do keynote review, breaking down re:Mars after day two. We got a full day tomorrow. I'm John Furrier with theCUBE. See you next time. (pleasant music)

(upbeat music) >> Hello everyone, welcome back to the manager risk across the extended attack surface with Armis. I'm John Furrier, your host of theCUBE. Got the demo. Got here, Bryan Inman sales engineer at Armis. Bryan, thanks for coming on. We're looking forward to the demo. How you doing? >> I'm doing well, John, thanks for having me. >> We heard from Nadir describing Armis' platform, lot of intelligence. It's like a search engine meets data at scale, intelligent platform around laying out the asset map, if you will, the new vulnerability module among other things that really solves CISCO's problems. A lot of great customer testimonials and we got the demo here that you're going to give us. What's the demo about? What are we going to see? >> Well, John, thanks. Great question. And truthfully, I think as Nadir has pointed out what Armis as a baseline is giving you is great visibility into every asset that's communicating within your environment. And from there, what we've done is we've layered on known vulnerabilities associated with not just the device, but also what else is on the device. Is there certain applications running on that device, the versions of those applications, and what are the vulnerabilities known with that? So that's really gives you great visibility in terms of the devices that folks aren't necessarily have visibility into now, unmanaged devices, IoT devices, OT, and critical infrastructure, medical devices things that you're not necessarily able to actively scan or put an agent on. So not only is Armis telling you about these devices but we're also layering on those vulnerabilities all passively and in real time. >> A lot of great feedback we've heard and I've talked to some of your customers. Rhe agentless is a huge deal. The discoveries are awesome. You can see everything and just getting real time information. It's really, really cool. So I'm looking forward to the demo for our guests. Take us on that tour. Let's go with the demo for the guests today. >> All right. Sounds good. So what we're looking at here is within the Armis console is just a clean representation of the passive reporting of what Armis has discovered. So we see a lot of different types of devices from your virtual machines and personal computers, things that are relatively easy to manage. But working our way down, you're able to see a lot of different types of devices that are not necessarily easy to get visibility into, things like your up systems, IT cameras, dash cams, et cetera, lighting systems. And today's day and age where everything is moving to that smart feature, it's great to have that visibility into what's communicating on my network and getting that, being able to layer on the risk factors associated with it as well as the vulnerabilities. So let's pivot over to our vulnerabilities tab and talk about the the AVM portion, the asset vulnerability management. So what we're looking at is the dashboard where we're reporting another clean representation with customizable dashlets that gives you visuals and reporting and things like new vulnerabilities as they come in. What are the most critical vulnerabilities, the newest as they roll in the vulnerabilities by type? We have hardware. We have application. We have operating systems. As we scroll down, we can see things to break it down by vulnerabilities, by the operating system, Windows, Linux, et cetera. We can create dashlets that show you views of the number of devices that are impacted by these CVEs. And scrolling down, we can see how long have these vulnerabilities been sitting within my environment? So what are the oldest vulnerabilities we have here? And then also of course, vulnerabilities by applications. So things like Google Chrome, Microsoft Office. So we're able to give a good representation of the amount of vulnerabilities as they're associated to the hardware and applications as well. So we're going to dig in and take a a deeper look at one of these vulnerabilities here. So I'm excited to talk today about of where Armis AVM is, but also where it's going as well. So we're not just reporting on things like the CVSS score from NIST NVD. We're also able to report on things like the exploitability of that. How actively is this CVE being exploited in the wild? We're reporting EPSS scores. For example, we're able to take open source information as well as a lot of our partnerships that we have with other vendors that are giving us a lot of great value of known vulnerabilities associated with the applications and with hardware, et cetera. But where we're going with this is in very near future releases, we're going to be able to take an algorithm approach of, what are the most critical CVSS that we see? How exploitable are those? What are common threat actors doing with these CVEs? Have they weaponized these CVEs? Are they actively using those weaponized tools to exploit these within other folks' environments? And who's reporting on these? So we're going to take all of these and then really add that Armis flavor of we already know what that device is and we can explain and so can the users of it, the business criticality of that device. So we're able to pivot over to the matches as we see the CVEs. We're able to very cleanly view, what exactly are the devices that the CVE resides on. And as you can see, we're giving you more than just an IP address or a lot more context and we're able to click in and dive into what exactly are these devices. And more importantly, how critical are these devices to my environment? If one of these devices were to go down if it were to be a server, whatever it may be, I would want to focus on those particular devices and ensuring that that CVE, especially if it's an exploitable CVE were to be addressed earlier than say the others and really be able to manage and prioritize these. Another great feature about it is, for example, we're looking at a particular CVE in terms of its patch and build number from Windows 10. So the auto result feature that we have, for example, we've passively detected what this particular personal computer is running Windows 10 and the build and revision numbers on it. And then once Armis passively discovers an update to that firmware and patch level, we can automatically resolve that, giving you a confidence that that has been addressed from that particular device. We're also able to customize and look through and potentially select a few of these, say, these particular devices reside on your guest network or an employee wifi network where we don't necessarily, I don't want to say care, but we don't necessarily value that as much as something internally that holds significantly, more business criticality. So we can select some of these and potentially ignore or resolve for determining reasons as you see here. Be able to really truly manage and prioritize these CVEs. As I scroll up, I can pivot over to the remediation tab and open up each one of these. So what this is doing is essentially Armis says, through our knowledge base been able to work with the vendors and pull down the patches associated with these. And within the remediation portion, we're able to view, for example, if we were to pull down the patch from this particular vendor and apply it to these 60 devices that you see here, right now we're able to view which patches are going to gimme the most impact as I prioritize these and take care of these affected devices. And lastly, as I pivot back over. Again, where we're at now is we're able to allow the users to customize the organizational priority of this particular CVE to where in terms of, this has given us a high CVSS score but maybe for whatever reasons it may be, maybe this CVE in terms of this particular logical segment of my network, I'm going to give it a low priority for whatever the use case may be. We have compensating controls set in place that render this CVE not impactful to this particular segment of my environment. So we're able to add that organizational priority to that CVE and where we're going as you can see that popped up here but where we're going is we're going to start to be able to apply the organizational priority in terms of the actual device level. So what we'll see is we'll see a column added to here to where we'll see the the business impact of that device based on the importance of that particular segment of your environment or the device type, be it critical networking device or maybe a critical infrastructure device, PLCs, controllers, et cetera, but really giving you that passive reporting on the CVEs in terms of what the device is within your network. And then finally, we do integrate with your vulnerability management and scanners as well. So if you have a scanner actively scanning these, but potentially they're missing segments of your net network, or they're not able to actively scan certain devices on your network, that's the power of Armis being able to come back in and give you that visibility of not only what those devices are for visibility into them, but also what vulnerabilities are associated with those passive devices that aren't being scanned by your network today. So with that, that concludes my demo. So I'll kick it back over to you, John. >> Awesome. Great walk through there. Take me through what you think the most important part of that. Is it the discovery piece? Is it the interaction? What's your favorite? >> Honestly, I think my favorite part about that is in terms of being able to have the visibility into the devices that a lot of folks don't see currently. So those IoT devices, those OT devices, things that you're not able to run a scan on or put an agent on. Armis is not only giving you visibility into them, but also layering in, as I said before, those vulnerabilities on top of that, that's just visibility that a lot of folks today don't have. So Armis does a great job of giving you visibility and vulnerabilities and risks associated with those devices. >> So I have to ask you, when you give this demo to customers and prospects, what's the reaction? Falling out of their chair moment? Are they more skeptical? It's almost too good to be true and end to end vulnerability management is a tough nut to crack in terms of solution. >> Honestly, a lot of clients that we've had, especially within the OT and the medical side, they're blown away because at the end of the day when we can give them that visibility, as I've said, Hey, I didn't even know that those devices resided in that portion, but not only we showing them what they are and where they are and enrichment on risk factors, et cetera, but then we show them, Hey, we've worked with that vendor, whatever it may be and Rockwell, et cetera, and we know that there's vulnerabilities associated with those devices. So they just seem to be blown away by the fact that we can show them so much about those devices from behind one single console. >> It reminds me of the old days. I'm going to date myself here. Remember the old Google Maps mashup days. Customers talk about this as the Google Maps for their assets. And when you have the Google Maps and you have the Ubers out there, you can look at the trails, you can look at what's happening inside the enterprise. So there's got to be a lot of interest in once you get the assets, what's going on those networks or those roads, if you will, 'cause you got in packet movement. You got things happening. You got upgrades. You got changing devices. It's always on kind of living thing. >> Absolutely. Yeah, it's what's on my network. And more importantly at times, what's on those devices? What are the risks associated with the the applications running on those? How are those devices communicating? And then as we've seen here, what are the vulnerabilities associated with those and how can I take action with them? >> Real quick, put a plug in for where I can find the demo. Is it online? Is it on YouTube? On the website? Where does someone see this demo? >> Yeah, the Armis website has a lot of demo content loaded. Get you in touch with folks like engineers like myself to provide demos whenever needed. >> All right, Bryan, thanks for coming on this show. Appreciate, Sales Engineer at Armis, Bryan Inman. Given the demo God award out to him. Good job. Thanks for the demo. >> Thanks, thanks for having me. >> Okay. In a moment, we're going to have my closing thoughts on this event and really the impact to the business operations side, in a moment. I'm John Furrier of theCUBE. Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)

>>Hello, welcome back to the manager risk across the extended attack surface with Armas I'm John fair host of the cube. Got the demo. God here, Brian Inman sales engineer at Armit. Brian. Thanks for coming on. We're looking forward to the demo, how you doing? >>I'm doing well, John, thanks for having me, >>You know, we heard from Nair, you know, describing arm's platform, a lot of intelligence. It's like a search engine meets data at scale intelligent platform around laying out the asset map. If you will, the new vulnerability module among other things that really solves CISO's problems, a lot of great customer testimonials. And we, we got the demo here that you're gonna give us, what's the demo about what are we, what are we gonna see? >>Well, John, thanks. Great question. And truthfully, I think as NAIA has pointed out what AIS as a baseline is giving you is, is great visibility into every asset on your that's communicating within your, within your environment. And from there, what we've done is we've layered on known vulnerabilities associated with not just the device, but also what else is on the device. What's is there certain applications running on that device, the versions of those applications and what are the vulnerabilities known with that? So that's really gives you great visibility in, in terms of the devices that folks aren't necessarily have visibility into now, unmanaged devices, OT devices, OT, and critical infrastructure, medical devices, things that you're not necessarily able to actively scan or put an agent on. So not only is Armas telling you about these devices, but we're also layer layering on those vulnerabilities all passively and in real time, >>A lot of great feedback we've heard and I've talked to some of your customers, the agent list is a huge deal. The Discover's at awesome. You can see everything and, and just getting real time information. It's really, really cool. So I'm looking forward to, for the demo for our guests, take us on that tour. Let's go with the demo for the guests today. >>All right. Sounds good. So what we're looking at here is within the Armas console is just a clean representation of the passive reporting of what Armas has discovered. So we see a lot of different types of devices, you know, from your virtual machines and personal computers, things that are relatively easy to manage, but working our way down, you're able to see a lot of different of the different types of devices that are not necessarily easy to, to get visibility into things like your up systems, IP cameras, dash cams, et cetera, lighting systems, and, and today's day and age, where everything is moving to the, that smart feature. You know, it's, it's great to have that visibility into, you know, what's communicating on my network and getting that, being able to layer on the risk factors associated with it, as well as the vulnerabilities. So let's pivot over to our vulnerabilities tab and talk about the, the ADM portion, the asset vulnerability management. >>So what we're looking at is the dashboard where we're reporting a, a, another clean representation with customizable dashboards that gives you visuals and reporting and things like new vulnerabilities as they come in, you know, what are the most critical vulnerabilities that are the, the newest as they roll in the vulnerabilities by type, we have hardware, we have application, we have operating systems. As we scroll down, we can see things to break it down by vulnerabilities, by the operating system, windows, Linux, et cetera. We can take, you know, create dashes that show you views of the, the number of, of devices that are impacted by these CVEs and scrolling down. We can see, you know, what, how long have these vulnerabilities been sitting within my environment? So how, what are the oldest vulnerabilities we have here? And then also of course, vulnerabilities by applications. So things like Google Chrome, Microsoft office. >>So we're able to give a, a good representation of the amount of vulnerabilities as they're associated to the hardware and applications as well. So we're gonna dig in and take a, a deeper look at one of these vulnerabilities here. So I'm excited to talk today about where Armas ABM is, but also where it's going as well. So we're not just reporting on things like the CVSs score from, from N N VD. We're also able to report on things like the exploitability of that, right? How, how actively is this, this CVE being exploited in the wild, right? We're reporting E EPSS scores. For example, we're able to take open source information as well as a lot of our partnerships that we have with other vendors that are giving us a lot of great value of known vulnerabilities associated with the applications and with hardware, et cetera. >>But we're where we're going with. This is we're in Fu very near future releases. We're gonna be able to, to take sort of an algorithm approach of what are the most critical CVSs that we see, how exploitable are those, what are common threat actors doing with these, these CVEs have they weaponized these CVS? Are they actively using those weaponized tools to exploit these within, within other folks' environments? And who's reporting on these. So we're gonna take all of these and then really add that Armas flavor of we already know what that device is, and we can explain. And, and so can the users of it, the business criticality of that device, right? So we're able to pivot over to the matches as we see the CVEs, we're able to very cleanly view, what are, what exactly are the devices that the CVE resides on, right? >>And as you can see, we're giving you more than just an IP address or more, you know, a lot more context, and we're able to click in and dive into what exactly are these devices and how, and more importantly, how critical are these devices to, to my, my environment, if one of these devices were to go down, if it were to be a server, if you know, whatever it may be, I would wanna focus on those particular devices and ensuring that that CVE, especially if it's an exploitable CVE were to be addressed or early, earlier than, than say the others, and really be able to manage and prioritize these another great feature about it is, you know, for example, we're looking at a, a particular CVE in terms of its its patch and build number from windows 10. So the AutoSol feature that we have, for example, we've passively detected what this particular personal computer is running windows 10 and the build and revision numbers on it. >>And then once Armas passively discovers an update to that firmware and patch level, we can automatically resolve that, giving you a, a confidence that that has been addressed from that particular device. We're also able to customize and look through and potentially select a few of these, say, you know, these particular devices reside on your guest network or an employee wifi network where we don't necessarily, I don't wanna say care, but we don't necessarily value that as much as something in, you know, internally that has holds significantly more business criticality. So we can select some of these and potentially ignore or resolve for determining reasons. As you see here, be able to really truly manage and prioritize these, these CVEs. As I scroll up, I can pivot over to the remediation tab and open up each one of these. So what this is doing is essentially Arma says, you know, through our knowledge base, been able to work with the vendors and, and pull down the patches associated with these. >>And within the remediation portion, we're able to view, for example, if we were to pull down the patch from this particular vendor and apply it to these 60 devices that you see here, right now, we're able to F to view, you know, which patches are gonna gimme the most impact as I prioritize these and take care of these affected devices. And lastly, as I pivot back, go again, where we're at now is we're able to allow the, the users to customize the organizational priority of this particular CVE, to where in terms of, you know, this has, has given us a high CVSs score, but maybe for whatever reasons it may be maybe this CVE in terms of this particular logical segment of my network, I'm gonna give it a low priority for whatever the use case may be. We have compensating controls set in place that, that render this CVE, not impactful to this particular segment of my environment. >>So we're able to add that organizational priority to that CVE and where we're going, as you can see that that popped up here, but where we're going is we're gonna start to be able to apply the, the organizational priority in terms of the actual device level. Right? So what we'll see is we'll see a, a column added to here to where we'll see the, the business impact of that device, based on the importance of that particular segment of your environment or the device type, be it, you know, critical networking device, or maybe a, a critical infrastructure device, PLCs controllers, et cetera, but really giving you that passive reporting on the CVEs in terms of what the device is within your network. And then finally we do integrate with your vulnerability, vulnerability management, and scanners as well. So if you have a scanner actively scanning these, but potentially they're missing segments of your net network, or they're not able to actively scan certain devices on your network, that's the power of Armas being able to come back in and give you that visibility of not only what those devices are for visibility into them, but also what vulnerabilities are associated with those passive devices that aren't being scanned by your network today. >>So with that that's, that concludes my demo. So I'll kick it back over to you, John. >>Awesome. Great, great walk through there. Take me through what you think the most important part of that. Is it the discovery piece? Is it the interaction what's your favorite? >>Honestly, I think my favorite part about that is, you know, in terms of being able to have the visibility into the devices, that a lot of folks don't see currently. So those OT devices, those OT devices, things that you're not able to, to run a scan on or put an agent on Armas is not only giving you visibility into them, but also layering in, as I said before, those vulnerabilities on top of that, that's just visibility that a lot of folks today don't have. So Armas does a great job of giving you visibility and vulnerabilities and risks associated with those devices. >>So I have to ask you, when you give this demo to customers and prospects, what's the reaction falling outta their chair moment? Are they more skeptical? It's almost too good to be true. And the end to end vulnerability management's is a tough nut to crack in terms of solution. >>Well, honestly, a lot of clients that we've had, you know, especially within the OT and the medical side, they're, they're blown away because at the end of the day, when we can give them that visibility, as I've said, you know, Hey, I, I didn't even know that those devices resided in that, that portion, but not only are we showing them what they are and where they are and enrichment on risk factors, et cetera. But then we show them, Hey, there's a known, you know, we've worked with that vendor, whatever it may be and, you know, Rockwell, et cetera. And we know that there's vulnerabilities associated with those devices. So they just seem to be blown away by the fact that we can show them so much about those devices from behind one single console. >>You know, it reminds me of the old days. I'm gonna date myself here. Remember the old Google maps, mashup days. This is customers. Talk about this as the Google maps for their assets. And when you have the Google maps and you have the Ubers out there, you can look at the trails, you can look at what's happening inside the, inside the enterprise. So there's gotta be a lot of interest in once you get the assets what's going on, on those, on, in those, on those networks or those roads, if you will, cuz you got in packet movement, you got things happening, you got upgrades, you got changing devices. It's always on kind of living thing. >>Absolutely. Yeah. It's what's on my network. And more importantly at times what's on those devices, right? Are the, what are the risks associated with the, the applications running on those? How are those devices communicating? And then as we've seen here, what are the vulnerabilities associated with those and how can I take action with them? >>All right. Real quick, put a plug in for where I can find the demo. Is it online is on YouTube, on the website. Where does someone see this demo? >>Yeah, the Amis website has a lot of demo content loaded. Get you in touch with folks like engineers like myself to, to provide demos whenever, whenever needed. >>All right, Brian, thanks for coming on this show. Appreciate sales engineer, Armas Brian Inman, given the demo God award out to him. Good job. Thanks for the demo. >>Thanks. Thanks for having me. >>Okay. You know, in a moment we're gonna have my closing thoughts on this event and really the impact to the business operation side. In a moment I'm John fur the cube. Thanks for watching.

>>From the cube studios in Palo Alto, in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world. This is a cute conversation. Hi, welcome back. I'm Stu middleman. And this is a cube conversation digging in with, talking about what they're doing to help people. Yeah. Really bringing some of the networking ideals to cloud native environment, both know in the cloud, in the data centers program, Krishna penny. He is the vice president of software. Thanks so much for joining us. Thank you so much for talking to me. Alright, so, so Krishna the pin Sandow team, uh, you know, very well known in the industry three, uh, you innovation. Yeah. Especially in the networking world. Give us a little bit about your background specifically, uh, how long you've been part of this team and, uh, you know, but, uh, you know, you and the team, you know? Yeah. >>And Sando. Yup. Um, so, uh, I'm VP of software in Sandow, um, before Penn Sarno, before founding concern, though, I worked in a few startups in CME networks, uh, newer systems and Greenfield networks, all those three startups have been acquired by Cisco. Um, um, my recent role before this, uh, uh, this, this company was a, it was VP of engineering and Cisco, uh, I was responsible for a product called ACA, which is course flagship SDN tonic. Mmm. So I mean, when, why did we find a phone, uh, Ben Sandoz? So when we were looking at the industry, uh, the last, uh, a few years, right? The few trends that are becoming clear. So obviously we have a lot of enterprise background. We were watching, you know, ECA being deployed in the enterprise data centers. One sore point for customers from operational point of view was installing service devices, network appliances, or storage appliances. >>So not only the operational complexity that this device is bringing, it's also, they don't give you the performance and bandwidth, uh, and PPS that you expect, but traffic, especially from East West. So that was one that was one major issue. And also, if you look at where the intelligence is going, has been, this has been the trend it's been going to the edge. The reason for that is the motors or switches or the devices in the middle. They cannot handle the scale. Yeah. I mean, the bandwidths are growing. The scale is growing. The stateful stuff is going in the network and the switches and the appliances not able to handle it. So you need something at the edge close to the application that can handle, uh, uh, this kind of, uh, services and bandwidth. And the third thing is obviously, you know, x86, okay. Even a few years back, you know, every two years, you know, you're getting more transistors. >>I mean, obviously the most lined it. And, uh, we know we know how that, that part is going. So the it's cycles are more valuable and we don't want to use them for this network services Mmm. Including SDN or firewalls or load balancer. So NBME, mutualization so looking at all these trends in the industry, you know, we thought there is a good, uh, good opportunity to do a domain specific processor for IO and build products around it. I mean, that's how we started Ben signed off. Yeah. So, so Krishna, it's always fascinating to watch. If you look at startups, they are often yeah. Okay. The time that they're in and the technologies that are available, you know, sometimes their ideas that, you know, cakes a few times and, you know, maturation of the technology and other times, you know, I'll hear teams and they're like, Oh, well we did this. >>And then, Oh, wow. There was this new innovation came out that I wish I had add that when I did this last time. So we do, a generation. Oh, wow. Talking about, you know, distributed architectures or, you know, well, over a decade spent a long time now, uh, in many ways I feel edge computing is just, you know, the latest discussion of this, but when it comes to, and you know, you've got software, uh, under, under your purview, um, what are some of the things that are available for that might not have been, you know, in your toolkit, you know, five years ago. Yeah. So the growth of open source software has been very helpful for us because we baked scale-out microservices. This controller, like the last time I don't, when we were building that, you know, we had to build our own consensus algorithm. >>We had to build our own dishwasher database for metrics and humans and logs. So right now, uh, we, I mean, we have, because of open source thing, we leverage CD elastic influx in all this open source technologies that you hear, uh, uh, since we want to leverage the Kubernetes ecosystem. No, that helped us a lot at the same time, if you think about it. Right. But even the software, which is not open source, close source thing, I'm maturing. Um, I mean, if you talk about SDN, you know, seven APS bank, it was like, you know, the end versions of doing off SDN, but now the industry standard is an ADPN, um, which is one of the core pieces of what we do we do as Dean solution with DVA. Um, so, you know, it's more of, you know, the industry's coming to a place where, you know, these are the standards and this is open source software that you could leverage and quickly innovate compared to building all of this from scratch, which will be a big effort for us stocked up, uh, to succeed and build it in time for your customer success. >>Yeah. And Krishna, I, you know, you talk about open forum, not only in the software, the hardware standards. Okay. Think about things, the open compute or the proliferation of, you know, GPS and, uh, everything along that, how was that impact? I did. So, I mean, it's a good thing you're talking about. For example, we were, we are looking in the future and OCP card, but I do know it's a good thing that SEP card goes into a HP server. It goes into a Dell software. Um, so pretty much, you know, we, we want to, I mean, see our goal is to enable this platform, uh, that what we built in, you know, all the use cases that customer could think of. Right. So in that way, hardware, standardization is a good thing for the industry. Um, and then same thing, if you go in how we program the AC, you know, we at about standards of this people, programming, it's an industry consortium led by a few people. >>Um, we want to make sure that, you know, we follow the standards for the customer who's coming in, uh, who wants to program it., it's good to have a standards based thing rather than doing something completely proprietary at the same time you're enabling innovations. And then those innovations here to push it back to the open source. That's what we trying to do with before. Yeah. Excellent. I've had some, some real good conversations about before. Um, and, and the way, uh, and Tondo is, is leveraging that, that may be a little bit differently. You know, you talk about standards and open source, oftentimes it's like, well, is there a differentiator there, there are certain parts of the ecosystem that you say, well, kind of been commodified. Mmm. Obviously you're taking a lot of different technologies, putting them together, uh, help, help share the uniqueness. Okay. And Tondo what differentiates, what you're doing from what was available in the market or that I couldn't just cobbled together, uh, you know, a bunch of open source hardware and software together. >>Yeah. I mean, if you look at a technologist, I think the networking that both of us are very familiar with that. If you want to build an SDN solution, or you can take a, well yes. Or you can use exhibit six and, you know, take some much in Silicon and cobble it together. But the problem is you will not get the performance and bandwidth that you're looking for. Okay. So let's say, you know, uh, if you want a high PPS solution or you want a high CPS solution, because the number of connections are going for your IOT use case or Fiji use case, right. If you, uh, to get that with an open source thing, without any assist, uh, from a domain specific processor, your performance will be low. So that is the, I mean, that's once an enterprise in the cloud use case state, as you know, you're trying to pack as many BMCs containers in one set of word, because, you know, you get charged. >>I mean, the customer, uh, the other customers make money based on that. Right? So you want to offload all of those things into a domain specific processor that what we've built, which we call the TSC, which will, um, which we'll, you know, do all the services at pretty much no cost to accept a six. I mean, it's to six, you'll be using zero cycles, a photo doing, you know, features like security groups or VPCs, or VPN, uh, or encryption or storage virtualization. Right. That's where that value comes in. I mean, if you count the TCO model using bunch of x86 codes or in a bunch of arm or AMD codes compared to what we do. Mmm. A TCO model works out great for our customers. I mean, that's why, you know, there's so much interest in a product. Excellent. I'm proud of you. Glad you brought up customers, Christina. >>One of the challenges I have seen over the years with networking is it tends to be, you know, a completely separate language that we speak there, you know, a lot of acronyms and protocols and, uh, you know, not necessarily passable to people outside of the silo of networking. I think back then, you know, SDN, uh, you know, people on the outside would be like, that stands for still does nothing, right? Like networking, uh, you know, mumbo jumbo there for people outside of networking. You know what I think about, you know, if I was going to the C suite of an enterprise customer, um, they don't necessarily care about those networking protocols. They care about the, you know, the business results and the product Liberty. How, how do you help explain what pen Sandow does to those that aren't, you know, steeped in the network, because the way I look at it, right? >>What is customer looking? But yeah, you're writing who doesn't need, what in cap you use customer is looking for is operational simplicity. And then he wants looking for security. They, it, you know, and if you look at it sometimes, you know, both like in orthogonal, if you make it very highly secure, but you make it like and does an operational procedure before you deploy a workload that doesn't work for the customer because in operational complexity increases tremendously. Right? So it, we are coming in, um, is that we want to simplify this for the customer. You know, this is a very simple way to deploy policies. There's a simple way to deploy your networking infrastructure. And in the way we do it is we don't care what your physical network is, uh, in some sense, right? So because we are close to the server, that's a very good advantage. >>We have, we have played the policies before, even the packet leaves the center, right? So in that way, he knows his fully secure environment and we, and you don't want to manage each one individually, we have this, okay, Rockwell PSM, which manages, you know, all this service from a central place. And it's easy to operationalize a fabric, whether you talk about upgrades or you talk about, you know, uh, deploying new services, it's all driven with rest API, and you can have a GUI, so you can do it a single place. And that's where, you know, a customer's value is rather than talking about, as you're talking about end caps or, you know, exactly the route to port. That is not the main thing that, I mean, they wake up every day, they wake up. Have you been thinking about it or do I have a security risk? >>And then how easy for me is to deploy new, uh, in a new services or bring up new data center. Right. Okay. Krishna, you're also spanning with your product, a few different worlds out. Yeah. You know, traditionally yeah. About, you know, an enterprise data center versus a hyperscale public cloud and ed sites, hi comes to mind very different skillset for management, you know, different types of okay. Appointments there. Mmm. You know, I understand right. You were going to, you know, play in all of those environments. So talk a little bit about that, please. How you do that and, you know, you know, where you sit in, in that overall discussion. Yes. So, I mean, a number one rule inside a company is we are driven by customers and obviously not customer success is our success. So, but given said that, right. What we try to do is that we try to build a platform that is kind of, you know, programmable obviously starting from, you know, before that we talked about earlier, but it's also from a software point of view, it's kind of plugable right. >>So when we build a software, for example, at cloud customers, and they use BSC, they use the same set of age KPI's or GSP CRS, TPS that DSC provides their controller. But when we ship the same, uh, platform, what enterprise customers, we built our own controller and we use the same DC APS. So the way we are trying to do is things is fully leverage yeah. In what we do for enterprise customers and cloud customers. Mmm. We don't try to reinvent the wheel. Uh, obviously at the same time, if you look at the highest level constructs from a network perspective, right. Uh, audience, for his perspective, what are you trying to do? You're trying to provide connectivity, but you're trying to avoid isolation and you're trying to provide security. Uh, so all these constructs we encapsulated in APA is a, which, you know, uh, in some, I, some, some mostly like cloud, like APS and those APIs are, are used, but cloud customers and enterprise customers, and the software is built in a way of it. >>Any layer is, can be removed on any layer. It can be hard, right? Because it's not interested. We don't want to be multiple different offers for different customers. Right. Then we will not scale. So the idea when we started the software architecture, is that how we make it pluggable and how will you make the program will that customer says, I don't want this piece of it. You can put them third party piece on it and still integrate, uh, at a, at a common layer with using. Yeah. Yeah. Well, you know, Krishna, you know, I have a little bit of appreciation where some of the hard work, what your team has been doing, you know, a couple of years in stealth, but, you know, really accelerating from, uh, you know, the announcement coming out of stealth, uh, at the end of 2019. Yeah. Just about half a year, your GA with a major OEM of HPE, definitely a lot of work that needs to be done. >>It brings us to, you know, what, what are you most proud about from the work that your team's doing? Uh, you know, we don't need to hear any, you know, major horror stories, but, you know, there always are some of them, you know, not holes or challenges that, uh, you know, often get hidden yeah. Behind the curtain. Okay. I mean, personally, I'm most proud of the team that we've made. Um, so, uh, you know, obviously, you know, uh, our executors have it good track record of disrupting the market multiple times, but I'm most proud of the team because the team is not just worried about that., uh, that, uh, even delegate is senior technologist and they're great leaders, but they're also worried about the customer problem, right? So it's always about, you know, getting the right mix, awfully not execution combined with technology is when you succeed, that is what I'm most proud of. >>You know, we have a team with, and Cletus running all these projects independently, um, and then releasing almost we have at least every week, if you look at all our customers, right. And then, you know, being a small company doing that is a, Hmm, it's pretty challenging in a way. But we did, we came up with methodologists where we fully believe in automation, everything is automated. And whenever we release software, we run through the full set of automation. So then we are confident that customer is getting good quality code. Uh, it's not like, you know, we cooked up something and that they should be ready and they need to upgrade to the software. That's I think that's the key part. If you want to succeed in this day and age, uh, developing the features at the velocity that you would want to develop and still support all these customers at the same time. >>Okay. Well, congratulations on that, Christian. All right. Final question. I have for you give us a little bit of guidance going forward, you know, often when we see a company out and we, you know, to try to say, Oh, well, this is what company does. You've got a very flexible architecture, lot of different types of solutions, what kind of markets or services might we be looking at a firm, uh, you know, download down the road a little ways. So I think we have a long journey. So we have a platform right now. We already, uh, I mean, we have a very baby, we are shipping. Mmm Mmm. The platforms are really shipping in a storage provider. Uh, we are integrating with the premier clouds, public clouds and, you know, enterprise market, you know, we already deployed a distributed firewall. Some of the customers divert is weird firewall. >>So, you know, uh, so if you take this platform, it can be extendable to add in all the services that you see in data centers on clubs, right. But primarily we are driven from a customer perspective and customer priority point of view. Mmm. So BMW will go is even try to add more ed services. We'll try to add more storage features. Mmm. And then we, we are also this initial interest in service provider market. What we can do for Fiji and IOT, uh, because we have the flexible platform. We have the, see, you know, how to apply this platform, this new application, that's where it probably will go into church. All right. Well, Krishna not a penny vice president of software with Ben Tondo. Thank you so much for joining us. Thank you, sir. It was great talking to you. All right. Be sure to check out the cube.net. You can find lots of interviews from Penn Sundo I'm Stu Miniman and thank you. We're watching the cute.

>> Announcer: Live from Barcelona Spain, it's theCUBE! Covering Cisco Live 2020, brought to you by Cisco and its ecosystem partners. >> Welcome back, this is theCUBE's live coverage of Cisco Live 2020 here in Barcelona, Spain. I'm Stu Miniman, my cohost for this segment is Dave Vellante, John Furrier is also in the house. We're doing about three and a half days, wall-to-wall coverage. The surface area that we are covering here is rather broad and I use that term, my guest is laughing, Vikas Butaney, who is the Vice President of IoT, of course. Extending the network to the edge, to the devices, and beyond with Cisco. Thank you so much for joining us. >> It's great to be here. >> All right, the IoT thing. I've worked with Cisco my entire career, I've watched through the fog computing era for a couple of years. Edge of course, one of the hottest conversations, something that I bought up in many of the conversations, the across the portfolio but Liz Centoni was up on the main stage for the day one keynote talking a lot about IoT and IT and OT and your customers of the like. So let's start there, what's new, and how does IoT fit into the overall Cisco Story? >> Absolutely. So as Liz was on the main stage and David talked about the cross domain and multi-domain architecture; Now, IoT and our operational environment is one of the key domains within that environment. And what Liz announce yesterday are two pieces of news that we are releasing at Cisco Live. First of them is an IoT security architecture which ties together the capabilities with cyber vision and then integrates it within the rest of our IT security portfolio and the second part that I'm also excited to talk about is Edge Intelligence. It's about how we are helping our customers extract the data at the edge, then deploy and move it to wherever the applications are in the multicloud environment. >> You know, we definitely want to dig into those pieces, but IoT is such a diverse solution set so it's often helpful to talk about specific industries, any customer examples so what can you share with us there to help illuminate where Cisco's helping the customers love the security angles and edge? >> That's right. Just a level set, when we think about industrial IoT we're really talking about the heavier industries, plant environments for a manufacturing company. We're thinking about roadways for a public sector customer. We're thinking the grid for utility environments. We're thinking refineries and oil extraction upstream environments, right. So this is the kind of spectrum in which we are working in, where customers have real businesses, real assets where the operations is the heart of the enterprise that they are running. And the technology can really be a revolutionary change for them to help them connect and then extract the data and then make sense of the data to improve their business practice so industrial IoT, whether you're a roadway in Austria like Asfinag, you're a utility in Germany like NRG, or EDF in France as an example. Enel in turn in Italy, all of these industries and all of these customers are using industrial IoT technologies in running their businesses better today. >> Where are we in terms of that critical infrastructure being both connected and instrumented? Where are we on the adoption curve? >> Sure, look and many of these industries we have talked about SCADA systems, right, that have been here for thirty plus years for our customers and most of those is really a one-way flow of information, right. And typically customers stood up separate side load networks which weren't really connected to the rest of the enterprise so, Rockwell has a saying from the shop floor to the top floor, right like how the digital enterprise where all of these environments are coming together is where customers are. Critical infrastructure, as you said, in this day and age with security and other kind of threats, customers are a little hesitant about how they connect it all together. But Cisco is working with these customers and helping them think through the benefits they can get but also make sure, from a cyber security point of view, that you're helping protect assets, manage these environments because you can't just arbitrarily connect them because IT tool sets just are not ready to manage these environments. >> I love that all the examples you gave were European, of course, being here in Europe. I'm curious, there's some technologies where North America might take the lead or Asia might take the lead. Is IoT relatively distributed? Is Europe kind of on-par or with the rest of the world when it comes to general adoption? >> What we have found in Europe, because of many countries like Germany leading in the renewable energy effort, and the climate is a big focus here. Data privacy and concerns around data sharing are much more top-of-mind in Europe, so we find those kind of use cases getting adopted much much faster. In Germany, as an example, NRG which is one of our customers, and they were here with us last year at Cisco live and we launched a capability with them. They are trying to manage the real time flow of energy in their grid environment, such that make sure there are no outages, no brownouts in these environments. So utilities and customers like that across Europe are adopting technology faster. Manufacturing, as always, is a leading use case. There we see some of the automotives in US are leading a little bit more in getting environments connected to their environment but overall, IoT is a global market. We work, we have over 70,000 enterprise IoT customers today at Cisco so we are fortunate to be able to serve these customers on a global basis across the range of industries I talked about earlier. >> In a lot of respects too, I would say the US is behind, right, when you look at public policy from a federal standpoint, the US doesn't really have a digital strategy from an overall perspective whereas certainly India does and countries in Europe. You look at the railway systems in Europe. >> Vikas: Much more advanced, yeah. >> Beautiful and shiny and advanced. So I would say the US has a little bit of work to do here, in my perspective. >> That's right, in India Prime Minister Modi started the effort around One Hundred Smart Cities, right, and Cisco is working with many of those smart cities with our Cisco Kinetic for Cities to kind of create, connect all of the sensor networks. Video surveillance, safety, environmental sensors, managing the flow of that data and digitizing those environments, right, and in Europe we've been working in France, Germany, Italy, UK. I think we are seeing much more adoption in these specific industries but it's a global market and again, like I said, 70,000 customers, we get to see quite a bit of the landscape around the globe. >> What should we know about the architecture? Can you give us kind of a high-level summary? What are the basics? >> Sure, so in the comprehensive IoT security architecture we released this week, it really starts with, you have to be able to identify the devices, right. In IT environments, you know, to your laptop and to your PC, they have been managed by MDM technologies for years but in the industrial environment I might have a programmable logic controller that I deployed 15 years ago. It's not ready for modern capabilities so what you really have to start with is identifying all of these assets in the communication baselines that are happening there, that's step one. Step number two is really, now that I know that this is a PLC or that's a controller, I need to come up with a policy, a security policy which says this cell in a plant environment can only talk to the other cell but doesn't need to talk to a paint zone. So I'll give you an example in automotive, if I'm welding a car, I'm building a car, the welding robots need to be communicating with each other. There's no real reason that the welding robot needs to talk to the paint shop, as an example. So you can come up with a set of policies like that to keep these environments separate because if you don't, then if there is one infection, one malware, one security, then it just traverses your whole factory. And we know customers in Europe that their networks have gone down and they've impacted 150 to 200 million dollars of downtime impact. >> Well we had a real world use case 10 years ago or so with Stuxnet with Siemens PLC and boom it went all over the world, I mean it was amazing. >> Exactly right, so again back to identification then I create the policy, then I implement the policy within our switching or a firewall network but you're never done so you have to keep monitoring on a real time basis as the landscape changes. What's happening, how do I keep up with it? And that's where things like anomaly detection are super important, right, so those are the four steps off the architecture that I want to talk about. >> So it sounds like something like cyber security is both a threat and an opportunity of bringing together IT and OT. Bring us inside a little bit those dynamics, we know it's one of the bigger challenges in the IoT space. >> Yeah, I mean I think, look, both parties whether I'm an operational person or an IT person, both of us, both audiences have their own care-abouts. If I'm a plant manager, I'm measured on number of units I'm producing, the quality, the reliability of my products. If I'm in IT I really am measured on downtime of the network or the cyber security threat. There aren't really common measurable capabilities but cyber and security, it kind of brings both the parties together. So when we use our cyber vision product, we're able to provide to that plant manager visibility to what's happening, how are their PLC's performing, did anybody change my program, is my recipe for my given product I'm making secure and safe? So you have to appeal to the operational user with what they care about. IT really cares about to manage the threat surface, don't let that threat kind of propigate. Now at the board level because the board sees both sides of it, they're asking these teams to work together because they have a complimentary skill set. >> Well I think that's critical because, rhetorical question, who's bigger control freaks? Network engineers or operation technology engineers? They both, you know, keep that operation going and are very protective of their infrastructure. So it's got to come from top down and it is a board level discussion, right? >> Yeah that's right, we have customers where, you know, the board, the CEO has mandated to say listen, whether it's for the national threat actors or other corporate espionage, I need to protect the corporate intellectual property. Because it's not just a process, it's also about safety of employees and safety of their assets that comes into play, right. So when some of the customers we're working with, where the CEO has kind of dictated that the IT teams help the operational environments, but it is a two-way street, like, there has to be value for both parties to come together to solve these challenges. >> Okay so we talked a little bit about the threat, also when we're talking IoT, there's all that data involved. What's the opportunity there for customers with data, how's Cisco involved? >> Absolutely, look, I think one of the reasons customers are doing digitization projects is because they're trying to use the data to make better business decisions. It has to improve, yield, and meet their KPI's of their industry. So far what we have seen is that all of the data is really trapped in all of these distributed environments. Gartner tells you that 75% of the data will be produced at the IoT edge. But our customers to date have not had the tool set to be able to get access to the data, cleanse the data at the edge of the network, bring the right data that they can create insights with, and improve their businesses so it's been a heterogeneous environment, lots of protocols, lots of legacy, so that's kind of what our customers are struggling with today. >> Yeah, absolutely and most of that data is going to stay at the edge so I need to be able to process the edge. Heck I even went to a conference last year, talked about satellites that are collecting all of the data, I need to be able to have the storage, the processing, the compute there because I can't send all of the data back, as fast as it is. So it's a changing architecture as to where I collect data, where I process data. We think it is very much additive to traditional cloud and data center environments today, it's just yet another challenge that enterprises need to deal with. >> That's right, so the work that Cisco is doing in the IoT edge environment is we are enabling these customers to connect their remote terminal units, their machines, and their robots and providing them the tool set with four capabilities. First, extract the data. So we have a set of protocols like Modbus, like OPC UA where they can extract the data from their machine so that's step number one. Second is to transform the data, as you said, over an LTE circuit or over a connection, I'm not going to be able to send all of the data back so how do I transform the circuit, transform the data where I maybe take an average over the last five minutes or I kind of put some functions, and we are providing, as we are in the Devnet zone, we are providing developers the capability such that they can use visual studio, they can use Javascript to write logic that can run right at the edge of the network so now you have extracted the data, you have transformed the data. Governance is a key topic, who should have access to my data, especially here in Europe where we're concerned about privacy, we're concerned about data governance. We are enabling our customers to come up with the right logic by which if there's a machine data and you are the supplier, I'm only going to give you the data, the temperature, the vibration, the pressure that you need to support the machine, but I'm not going to give you the number of units I produce. I'm not going to give you the data about my intellectual property. And then you have to integrate to where the data is going, right. So what we're doing is we are working with the public cloud providers, we are working with software ISVs, and we are giving them the integration capability and the benefit of this for the customer is we have done pre-integration on the extraction part and we have done pre-integrations on the delivery part, which allows the projects to go faster and they can deliver their IoT efforts. >> So how do you envision the compute model at the edge, I mean, probably not going to throw a zillion cores so maybe lighter weight components, and I have some follow up on that as well. >> Sure, absolutely. Look, Moore's law is a friend of ours here, right, like with every cycle, every generation of CPU technology, you get more and more compute capabilities. So the IoT gateways that we provide to our customers today have four ARM cores in them. We are using a couple, two of those ARM cores for the networking function but those cores are available for our customers. We have designed an extra memory for them to be able to process these applications and we give them SSD and some storage at that so we can provide up to sixty gigs or one hundred gigs of storage so now that gateway, that communication device, a router, a switch that's at the edge of the network can kind of do a dual purpose. It can not only process and provide you security for the communications but is now an edge processing node so we call them IoT gateways and I can tell you, we are deploying these kind of products on buses. You know, in a mass transit bus, we all ride these buses, there are over six systems that are on that bus. A video surveillance system, I'm going to monitor the tire pressure, I want to monitor if the driver is going over the speed limit. We have now connected all of these systems and we are running logic at the edge such that the riders have a safer experience and then they can get real time visibility to where the bus is as well. >> Yeah and my follow up was on persisting, so you mentioned storage, you know, flash storage at the edge and then you also referred to earlier the challenges this data today is locked in silos or maybe it's not even persisted, it's analog data sometimes. So do you envision, if you think about successful digital companies, kind of born digital, data's at the core and traditionally big manufacturing firms, large infrastructure, the manufacturing plant is the center of the universe and data sort of sits around it. Do you envision a period where that data is somehow virtualized and we have access to it, we could really build digital businesses around that data, what are your thoughts? >> Absolutely. So we have been working with a customer, it's a steel manufacturer in Austria, the heartland of Europe as an example. And they make high quality steel, right, and when they're building the high quality steel, they have two hundred different machine types and like you're saying, the data is trapped in there. This customer is trying to digitize and trying to do that but they have been struggling for the last two years or so to be able to get the data because it's a variety of machines and they want to use our IoT services but they haven't been able to pipeline the data all the way to their cloud environments so that was one of our lighthouse customers and we worked with them like, you know, roll up your sleeves and kind of designed the system with them. And we worked to get that data such that now, they're not quite a born-digital company but they are a hard manufacturing company, they can get the best of the tool sets and analytics and all of the things that contemporary tech companies use and they can bridge them into this digital environment. >> Yeah and this is how the incumbents can compete with the sort of digital natives, right I mean it's an equilibrium that occurs. >> That's right, I mean look we love the digital companies but they're not really, they don't have physical assets there or out there working. They're working in a more physical or more of the real economy whether if you are an oil company and you're getting, extracting oil from a pumpjack, right, well you need to still have the capability to do that better. So that's what we're doing, whether you're a transportation, like the bus example I gave you, an oil and gas company whose trying to extract oil from the ground or you are a manufacturer or you're a utility, if we improve use of our digital technologies and operate, improve the efficiency of the business, a 0.1%, a 1%, that has got a much much bigger implication for us as a society and the world at large. But just making them better and more efficient. >> Huge productivity gains. >> Exactly right, that's right, right. >> Massive, yeah. >> So I think that technology and IoT technologies can benefit all of these industries and you know Cisco is kind of invested and kind of helping our 70,000 customers to get better with all of these capabilities. >> Awesome, congratulations. 70,000 customers, big number, rolling out IoT solutions. Look forward to keeping track of Cisco's IoT solutions. >> Super excited to be here, thanks again. >> For Dave Vellante, I'm Stu Miniman, back with lots more wall-to-wall coverage here at Cisco Live 2020 in Barcelona. Thanks for watching theCUBE. (upbeat music)

>> From Boston Massachusetts, it's The Cube! Covering LiveWorx 18. Brought to you by PTC. >> Welcome to Boston everybody. You're watching The Cube, the leader in live tech coverage. And we're here with a special presentation in coverage of the LiveWorx show sponsored by PTC of Needham, soon to be of Boston. My name is Dave Vellante. I'm here with my co-host Stu Miniman. And Stu, this is quite a show. There's 6,000 people here. Jim Heppelmann this morning was up giving the keynote. PTC is a company that kind of hit the doldrums in the early 2000s. A company that as manufacturing moved offshore, its core business was CAD software for manufacturers, and it went through a pretty dramatic transformation that we're going to be talking about today. Well, fast forward 10 years, 12 years, 15 years on, this company is smokin, the stock's up 50 percent this year. They got a billion dollars plus in revenue. They're growing at 10 to 15 percent a year. They've shifted their software business from a perpetual software license to a recurring revenue model. And they're booming. And we're here at the original site of The Cube, as you remember well in 2010, the Boston Convention Center down at the seaport. And Stu, what are your initial impressions of LiveWorx? >> Yeah, it's great to be here, Dave. Good to be here with you and they dub this the largest digital transformation conference in the world. (laughing) So, I mean, Dave, you and I have been to much bigger conferences and we've been to a lot of conferences that are talking about digital transformation. But, IOT, AI, Augmented Reality, Block Chain, Robotics, all of these things really are about software, it's about digital transformation, and a really interesting space as you mentioned kind of the legacy of PTC. I have been around long enough. I remember when we used to call them Parametric Technologies. They kind of rebranded themselves as PTC. Windchill brings back some memories for me. When I worked for a high tech manufacturing company, it was that's the life cycle management tool that we used back in the early 2000s. So, I had a little bit of background in them. And, as you said, they're based in Needham, and they're moving to the Seaport. Hot area, especially, as we've said Dave, Boston has the opportunity to be the hub of IOT. And it's companies like PTC that are going to help bring those partnerships and lots of companies to an event like this. >> Well PTC has always been an inquisitive company, as you were pointing out to me off camera. They brought Prime Computer, Computer Vision. A number of acquisitions that they made back in the late 90s, which essentially didn't pan out the way they had hoped. But now again, fast forward to the modern era, Jim Heppelmann came in I think around 2010, exceeded ThingWorx, a company called Cold Light, Kept Ware is another company that they purchased. And took these really sort of independent software components and put them together and created a platform. Everybody talks about platform. We'll be talking about that a lot today, where the number of customers and partners of PTC. And we even have some folks from PTC on. But, basically, talking about digital transformation earlier, Stu, IOT is a huge tailwind for a company like PTC. But they had to really deliberately pivot to take advantage of this market. And if you think about it, yes, it's about connecting and instrumenting devices and machines, it's about reaching them, creating whatever wireless connections. But it's also about the data. We talk about that all the time. And constructing data that goes from edge to core, and even into the cloud, whether that cloud's on prem or in the data center. So you're seeing the transformation of this company. Obviously, I talked about some of the financials. We'll go into some of that. But an evolving ecosystem we heard Accenture's here, Infosys is here, Deloitte is here. As I like to say, the SI's like to eat at the trough. If the SI's are here, that means there's money here, right? >> Yeah Dave and actually a number that jumped out at me when Microsoft was up on stage, and it wasn't that Microsoft is investing five billion dollars in diode, the number that caught my ear was the 20 to 25 partners that it takes to deploy a single IOT solution. So, anybody that's been in tech for a long time, when you see these complicated stack solutions, the SIs need to be here. It takes a long time to work through them, and integration is a big challenge. How do I get all of these pieces together? It's not something that I just tit buy off the shelf. It's not shrink wrap software. This is complicated solution. It is very fragmented in how we make them up. Very specific to the industry that we're building, so really fascinating stuff that's going on. But we are still very early in the life-cycle of IOT. Huge, huge, huge opportunities but big players like Microsoft, like Google, like Amazon are going to be here making sure that they're going to simplify that environment over time. Huge, you know Dave, what's the original forecast I think we did at Wiki Bon, was a 1.2 trillion dollar opportunity, which most of that, that was actually for the industrial Internet, which is not the commercial things that we think about all the time, when we talk about the home sensors and some of the things, some of the consumer stuff, but also the industrial here. >> Well, I think a couple of key points that you're making here. First of all, the market is absolutely enormous. It's almost impossible to size. I mean you're talking about a trillion dollars in sort of spending on hardware, software, services, virtually everything. But to your point, Stu. It's highly highly fragmented, virtually every industry. And a lot of different segmented technologies. But it's also important to point out this is the mashing together of operations technology, OT with Information Technology, IT, and those four leading companies IT is actually leaning in and embracing this notion of edge, computing, and IOT. Now, I wouldn't even say that IT and OT are Hatfield and McCoy's. They're not. They're parts of the organization that don't talk to each other. So they are cultural differences. They use different languages. They think differently. One is largely engineers who make machines work. The other IT guys, which we obviously know what they do, they keep information technology systems running. They deploy a lot of new IT projects. So, really different worlds that have to start coming together. Jim Heppelmann today I thought did a really good job in his keynote. He talked about innovation. Usually you start with okay we're here at point A, we want to go here. We want to get to point B. And we're going to take a straight line and have a bunch of linear steps and milestones to get there. He pointed out that innovation today is really sort of a non-linear process. And he talked about the combinatorial effects of really three things. Machines, or the physical, computers and humans. Machines are strong, they can do heavy lifting. Computers are fast, and they can do repetitive tasks very accurately. And humans are creative. And he talked about innovation in this new world coming together by combining those three aspects, finding new ways to attack problems, to solve nature's challenges. And bringing nature into that problem solving. He gave a lot of examples of how mother nature mimicking mother nature is now possible with AI and other technologies. Pretty cool. >> Yeah, absolutely Dave. I'm sure we'll be talking a lot today about the fourth Industrial Revolution. A lot of discussion as to what jobs are Robots going to take. I look around the show floor here and there's a lot of cool robotics going on. But as Eric Manou said and Aaron McAfee, the folks from MIT that we've interviewed a couple of times talked about the second machine age. Really the marring of people and machines that are going to be powerful. And absolutely Jim Heppelmann talked about that a lot. It's humans, it's physical, and it's digital. Putting those together and then, the other thing that he talked about is we're talking a lot about voice lightly with all of these assistants, but, you're really limited as to how much input and how fast you can take information in from an auditory standpoint. I mean, I know that I listen to podcasts at 1.5 to 2 X to try to get more information in faster, but it is sight that we're going to get 80 percent of the information in, and therefore, it's the VR and AR that are huge opportunities. I know when I've been talking to some of the large manufacturers, what they used to have in written documentations and then they went digital with, they're now getting you inside to be able to configure the systems with the hollow lens, or some of the AR headsets, the VR headsets, to be able to play with that. So, we're really early but excited to see where this technology has come so far. >> Yeah, we're seeing a lot of practical applications of VR and AR. We go to a lot of these shows and they'll have the demos, and you go, okay, what will I do with this? Well, you're really seeing here at LiveWorx some of the things you actually can do. One good example I thought they did was BEA Systems up in Nashua, actually showing the folks that are doing the manufacturing, little tutorial in how to do that. We're going to see some surgical examples today. Remote surgery. There are thousands, literally thousands of examples. In the time we have remaining, I want to just do the rundown on PTC. Cause it really is quite an amazing transformation story. You're talking about a company with 1.1 billion dollars in revenue. Their aspiration is by 2021 to be a two billion dollar company. They're growing at ten percent a year, their software business has grown at 12 to 15 percent a year. 15 percent is that annual recurring revenue. So this is an example of a company that has successfully shifted from that perpetual model to that recurring model. They got 200 million dollars this year in free cash flow. Their stock, as I said, is up 50 percent this year. They got 350 million dollars in cash, but they just got a billion dollar investment from Rockwell Automation that took about 8.4 percent of the company given them an implied evaluation of almost 11 billion dollars, which has got a little uplift from the stock market there. They're selling a lot of seven figure deals. Really, the core is manufacturing product life-cycle management, CAD. That's the stuff that we know PTC well from. And I talked about some of those acquisitions that they made. They sell products like Creo, which is their 3D CAD software. I think they're on Rev five or six by now. So they've taken their sort of legacy software and sort of updated that for the digital world. >> Yep ,it is version five that they were just announced today. Talking about really the 3D effort they're doing there. Some partnerships around it, and like every other software Dave that we've been hearing about AI is getting infused in here because with so many devices and so much data, we really need the machines to help us process that and do things that humans can't keep up with. >> And the ecosystem's grown. This is a complicated marketplace. If you look at the Gartner Magic Quadrant, there is no leader, even though PTC is the leader. But there is no leader. They're all sort of in the lower right, PTC is up highest. GE is interestingly is not in there, because it doesn't have an on prem solution. I don't know why GE doesn't have an on prem solution. And I don't know why they're not in there. >> Is there another version of the magic quadrant that includes the Amazons and GEs of the world? >> I don't know. So that's kind of interesting. We'll try to unpack that as we go on here. PTC announced today a relationship with a company called Ansys, which does simulation software. Normally, simulation comes sort of after the design. They're bringing those two worlds together. The CAD design piece and the simulation piece, sort of closer to real time. So, there's a lot of stuff going on. As you said, it's data, analytics, edge computing. It's cloud, it's on prim, it's block chain for security. We haven't talked about security. A lot bigger threat metrix, so block chain comes into play. >> Yeah, Dave. I saw a great joke. Do you realize that the S in IOT stands for security? Did you know that? (laughing) Oh wait, there's no S in IOT. Well, that's the point. >> All right, good. So Stu and I will be here all day today. This is actually a three day conference. The Cube will only be there for day one. Keep right there everybody. And we'll be right back. You're watching The Cube, Live from Liveworx in Boston. (upbeat music)

>> From Boston, Massachusets it's theCube. Covering LiveWorx 18. Brought to you by PTC. >> Welcome back to bean town, everybody. This is theCube, the leader in live tech coverage, and we're covering LiveWorx, the three day conference hosted by PTC. We're at the BCEC, which is kind of the Starship Enterprise. I'm Dave Vellante, with my co-host Stu Miniman. As I say, Cube one day coverage of this three day conference. Maciek Kranz is here. He's the Vice President of Strategic Innovations at Cisco. Maciek, thanks for coming on theCube. >> Thank you so much for having me. It really looks like a cube. >> Usually we're out in the open, but they've put us here in a cube, which is great. Of course we were at Cisco Live last week. You were there, it was an awesome show. 27, 28 thousand people. A lot of the innovations that we're talking about here, you guys, you know, at Cisco, are obviously touching upon. Whether it was blockchain or the edge. May I ask you, innovation's in your title. What are you doing here at this conference? >> Basically we're on the mission to make sure that every company, large and small, whatever the industry you're in, gets started on the IOT journey. All of us here, we were talking about it last week at Cisco Live, we are sort of on the mission to make sure that everybody knows how to do it, how to get started, how to go through the journey. So I'm here to promote the cause. >> You had posted a blog a little bit ago on LinkedIn. Check it out, if you go to Maciek's LinkedIn profile you'll see it. Five myths around IOT, and I thought it was quite instructive. I'm going to start with the middle of it, which is IOT is this one big market, and we've been talking about how it's a trillion dollar market. It's almost impossible to size. It's so fragmented, and bringing together the operations technology and information technology world, and there's the edge, there's the core, there's hardware, there's software, there's services. How should we think about the IOT, obviously not as one big market as you pointed out in your blog. >> Right, and you actually nailed it. When you think about sort of a traditional way that technology companies think about the market, it was sort of model of just get a billion people to get on your platform and the good things will happen. Well in the IOT space, as you pointed out, it's a very fragmented market. So you basically need to have two strategies. You either become a horizontal specialist and then you integrate with a vertical specialist to develop a joint solution, or you focus on use case and you focus on one market, and you go deep and focus with customers. So from that perspective the approach is different, but in a nutshell to be successful in this space, it's not only about technology, it's about ecosystem. It's about building the coaliltion of the willing, because at the end of the day, the customers want solutions to their problems. And they don't want to just buy your technology, they want to work with you on developing solutions that drive business outcomes. >> Maciek, one of the things that's been interesting to watch is that people want to try, and they want to try faster. One of the big benefits of public cloud was that I have this sandbox that I could throw some people at, have a little bit of money, and try things and fail and try again. One of the concerns I have when I hear things like PTC and Microsoft get up on stage and say, "It's going to take 20 to 25 partners to put this together." When I hear that it's fragmented, it's going to take time, it's going to take money, help us. Are there are ways I can start playing with things to understand what will and what won't work for my environment, or is this something that I have to throw a million dollars and group of people for a year and a half on? >> It's actually a great point, and it's another, I would say, misconception, which is I need to go deep, have a sort of a big strategy. One of the things that I talk about with the customers is, yes, dream big but start small. So yes, have a sort of a big vision, big architecture, but then focus on a first project, because it's a multi-year, multi-phased journey. So from that perspective, you know, at Cisco we have roughly 14,000 customers that already got started on this IOT journey, and the use cases that we've seen sort of are in four different categories. First one is connect things, so connecting your operations, the second one is remote operations, the third one is predictive analytics, the fourth one is preventive maintenance. So don't be a hero, pick one of these four use cases, try it out, then do a ROI on this, and if your ROI is positive then do a next, maybe more sophisticated, more adventurous kind of a project down the road. So pace yourself. >> This is our 9th year doing theCube, and the one thing we've learned about information technology, operations technology, is it all comes back to data. And you pointed out again, you pointed it out in your piece, it's not just about connecting, it's about the data. So let's talk about the data, the data model. You've got edge, you've got core. You've got this really increasingly complex and elongating data pipeline. You've got physics, you've got latency. So what's your perspective on the data, how that's evolving, and how organizations need to take advantage of the data? >> Dave, I think you nailed it. It may come across funny because I work for Cisco and we connect things, but if you think about the first wave of internet, the main purpose of the devices and the way we were connecting them, was basically for you and I to get access to each other, to get access to the online data, to the online processes. The main purpose we connecting IOT devices, so that they can generate the data, and then we can analyze that data, turn these systems into solutions to drive business outcomes. So from that perspective we're actually seeing a big shift in the sort of data model, and it requires flexibility. Traditionally, we talked about cloud, right? In a cloud we usually see the use cases that require a processing of a lot of data, sort of in the batch possessing mode, or for example if you want to connect a bunch of vending machines, you can connect them directly to the cloud, because these machines actually send only very few packets and they send them very infrequently. Basically saying, "Hey, come on over "and replenish a bunch of supplies." But if you look at connected vehicle, if you look at an oil rig, in the case of oil rig, there's let's say a large one that has 100,000 sensors. These sensors generate a couple terabytes of data per day. You can't just send this data directly to the cloud through the satellite connection, right? You have to process the data on the oil rig based on the policy coming from the cloud. So from that perspective we've seen that there's a need for a more flexible architecture. We call it Fog Computing, which basically allows you to have flexibility of extending the cloud to the edge so you can process the data at the edge. You can execute on the AI functions at the edge as well. So that's one of the big architectural shifts that we've seen with IOT as well. >> Maciek, one of the opportunities of new architectures has been to do a redo for security. When it comes to IOT, though, there's a lot of concern around that, because just the surface area that we're going to have, the devices. Talk to us about how security fits into IOT. >> Yeah, it's hard to talk about IOT without mentioning security, right? And we obviously seen over the last two years a lot of press around IOT denial of service attacks and so forth, and for me I think the silver lining out of all of this news is that, first of all, that we have seen the vendor community finally taking IOT security seriously. So all the security vendors are actually investing in IOT security now appropriately. We now working together as an industry on standards, on interoperability, on sort of come on architectures, even with the device vendors who traditionally didn't pay much attention to security as well. Sort of like what we did with wifi, you remember, about 15 years ago but at a much greater scale. So the vendor community's focusing on it, but more importantly also the businesses are moving from what I would consider sort of a... I would say that kind of a denial. Hoping that their plant is not connected to the outside world and that it's secure. Moving down now to the much more modern model, which is basically a comprehensive architecture working with are-see-sos, across the enterprise, focusing on before, during, and after. So IOT now is being integrated into a broader security architecture, and IT and OT are working together. So yes, there is a concern, yes. There are a lot of events hitting the news, but I also think as an industry we're making progress. >> Just to follow up on that, Cisco obviously has an advantage in security, because you go end-to-end, you guys make everything, and you can do deep-packet inspection, and that seems to be a real advantage here. But then there's this thing called blockchain, and everybody talks about how blockchain can be applied. Where do you see blockchain fitting into the security equation? >> Yeah, I think that's a good question. Maybe a bit more broader story, I actually believe there's four legs to this digital transformations tool. There's IOT generating the data and acting on the decisions, there's AI, there is the fog computing we talked about, and the fourth tool is blockchain, which basically allows us to make sure that the data we're using we can actually trust. At the high level blockchain, people often confuse blockchain and Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, but blockchain is an underlying technology behind sort of the crypto, that allows basically multiple parties to write their transactions in a fast and permanent way. But in the enterprise context, in IOT context, blockchain allows us to actually come up with very new use cases by looking at the provenance, and looking at the data across multiple parties. The data we can trust. For example, the use cases such as counterfeiting, there are use cases like food safety. Like patient records. Like provenance of materials. So now we can enable these use cases, because we have a single source of truth. >> I want to ask you about disruption. I like the mental model and picture that you created before of a horizontal technologies, and you kind of get vertical industries, and it seems like, again I'm bringing it back to data. We heard Super Mario at the host of the conference say this was the largest digital transformation conference. Which we laughed, like every conference is a digital transformation conference. But to us, digital transformation, digital means data. And that picture you drew of horizontal technology and vertical industries, it's all data, and data enables disruption. It used to be a vertical stack of talent and manufacturing and supply chain within an industry, and now data seems to be blowing that to pieces in digital. You see Amazon getting into, you know, buying Whole Foods in grocery. You see Apple in financial services. Others, Silicon Valley type companies, disrupting healthcare, which we all know needs disruption. What do you make of disruption? It seems like no industry is safe. It seems like Silicon Valley has this dual disruption agenda. Horizontal technology and then partnering within industries, and everything is getting turned up on its side. What do you make of it all? >> Dave, I think you nailed it. It is about and verus or, right? When you think about companies, you mentioned Microsoft, Cisco, Amazon, verus PTC or Rockwell, or Emerson and others. 10 years ago we sort of lived on a different planet, right, and rarely these companies even talked to each other. And now, even at this show, these companies are actually showing joint solutions. So that's precisely, I think, what we've seen, which is technology competence coming from the Valley and from traditional technology industry, and then the vertical and market expertise coming from these more traditional vendors. At the end of the day, it is about technology, but it is also about talent. It is about skillsets. It's about all of us pulling our resources together to develop solutions to drive business outcomes. So cloud, obviously, was a very disruptive force in our industry. But when you think about IOT, just based on what you just said, it seems to me given the assets, the resources, the people, the plants, the equipment, it seems like IOT is maybe somewhat evolutionary. Not a completely... It's a disruptive force in that's new and that it's different, but it seems like the incumbents, I mean look at PTC, their resurgence. It seems like the incumbents have an advantage here. What are your thoughts? >> I think that if they play it right they absolutely do. But it requires also a shift in mindset, and I think we seeing it already, which is moving from a vertical, one company does it all kind of mentality, into the lets build an ecosystem based on open systems, open standards, interoperability. And that's sort of a shift I think we are seeing. So for me, I think that the incumbents, if they embrace this kind of a model, they absolutely have a critical role to play. On the flip side, the technology companies realizing that they need to, it's not only about technology, but it's also about partnering. It's about integrating within legacy ecosystems and the legacy infrastructure. So each of the sides of the coin need to learn new tricks. >> Okay, last question, is your initial thoughts, anyway, on this event, some initial take aways. I know it's early, day one, but you've been here. You've heard the keynotes. Final thoughts? >> I think so far it's actually a great start to the event. I have to say, what we've talked about already, my biggest take away is to see, and actually joy, is to see companies from different walks of life working together. You have robotics companies, you have AI companies, you have industrial companies. All of them are coming up with solutions together, and that's basically what we want to see. Is breaking the barriers and multiple companies working together to move the industry forward. >> And you're also seeing the big SIs are here. I can see Accenture, I can see Deloid. I know InfoSys is here, et cetera, et cetera. So if they're here, you know there's a lot of money to be made. So Maciek, thanks very much. It's really a pleasure having you. Alright, keep it right there, everybody. This is theCube, from LiveWorx in Boston. We'll be right back after this short break.

>> Announcer: Live from Las Vegas, it's theCUBE, covering Oracle Modern Customer Experience 2017, brought to you by Oracle. (techno music) >> Okay, welcome back, we're live here at the Mandalay Bay, this is theCUBE's coverage of Oracle's Modern Customer Experience event, I'm John Furrier with SiliconANGLE and my co-host Peter Burris, Chief Researcher at Wikibon.com, and our next guest is Nick Edouard, who's the President CM of LookBookHQ, welcome to theCUBE. >> Thank you very much-- >> I was talking hockey, so I'm all distracted, I'm ruined, I'm disappointed, good to see you, before we get into it, it's all intelligent content, some of the things that are going on on this platform. But take a minute to talk about what your company does so we have some context. >> Yeah, absolutely. Well, we're a marketing technology company based in Toronto. We are a very big part of the Oracle Marketing App Cloud. And we kind of pick out where Oracle basically leaves off, where the Marketing Cloud stops. So a lot of what happens in the Marketing Cloud is focused on generating moments of attention and orchestrating that kind of buyer's journey. We're what happens in the destination side of the click. So we focus on the intelligent use of content. How do we deliver content? We think of every moment of attention as core to a marketer, that that really is their currency, the attention. We need to actually think that marketers, B2B marketers in particular, need to think a lot more like B2C, to think more like publishers. They're obsessed with attention. We shouldn't be satisfied with clicks or form fills. We need to actually be capitalizing on those moments of attention to make sure that if Bob is really my whitepaper, then I need to know that he's actually reading it. How do I then move him to the next best content asset, or give him a choice of content assets in session? So in essence what we do, what our company does, and we help companies like Thomson Reuters and ADP, in fact ADP is speaking on about half this afternoon, Polycom, Quintiles, whole host of big Eloqua customers. What we do is to help them take their content use model from something that looks and feels like Blockbuster, one size fits all, I don't know if actually Bob watched the video that he walked out of the shop with or the DVD, rather. And hence, why Blockbuster is RIP. And we take that and make it far more like Netflix. We make it far more on demand. >> Instrumented. >> Yeah, it's very much like-- >> This is interesting, the attention to impact is interesting, and you know, attention is essentially aided awareness, which is the Holy Grail in marketing, right? I mean, getting people to have some aid to a final destination or transaction of some sort. Am I getting that right? >> Yeah, very much so. I mean in the B2B side, obviously a marketer's job is to generate high quality marketing qualified leads and the real emphasis is on the Q, qualified. But companies like SiriusDecisions report that 94% of marketing qualified leads don't close. And that's a damning statistic for a B2B marketer. And our whole hypothesis is, and we're proving this to our customers is the reason why that happens is they're not qualified. Bob might have clicked on an e-mail, he might have filled in a form, et cetera, but did he read the content? We need to get an MQL to engage with five, seven, ten pieces of content to become a high quality MQL. And if we're only doing that one piece of content every engagement, that's really hard to do. No wonder our sales stat was this low. >> Well, we also need to understand that there's a progression people go through as they learn. It's not just that we want them to click on nine pieces of content-- >> Absolutely. >> As much as we want to see a pattern. So they've read this content and there was a suggestion made or an option provided and they then took the option, which is an even stronger suggestion that they've absorbed it, they've internalized it, and they're now part of a journey. So how does, I really like the idea that we're on the delivery side of the click, so you're, you know, we got all the stuff that's happening on the presenting things, the options, and then you're ensuring that when they click, whatever is being delivered is the highest quality-- >> Yeah. >> In terms of driving that customer forward in the journey, have I got that right? >> Yeah, absolutely. So if we take, if you take something which Eloqua's done a fantastic job, for example, of teaching their community of their customers about lead nurture and the typical nurture track looks and feels something like six emails over six weeks advertising content offer A, then content offer B, content offer C. And typically they're scheduled 10:00 a.m on a Thursday. Now this would be great, if we could get Bob and the other 12,000 people that we sent the email to to click on every single one of those emails. And the reality is, if I've got low, single-digit clickthrough rate, it's not going to happen. So what we do instead is, well, if they're engaging with A, why don't we give them B in the same session? While they're here, while we've done the hard work in getting their attention. And to your point, Peter, we're tracking that, and then we can start to make some really intelligent decisions going forward, as to, oh it worked, this is what resonated with Bob. This content asset's actually performed well. So we have two basic approaches to this. One is we let the marketer curate that experience, decide what A, B, C is et cetera. Or we actually use machine learning to auto-generate. If Bob arrives at A, what should B, C, and D et cetera be? So to that, it's very much like Netflix, where we kind of base our algorithm, it looks and feels very similar to Netflix's content discovery. That's great for anonymous or net new prospects in the top of your funnel, once you've figured out what they're actually interested in, then you can actually-- >> How does it work for you guys? Do you require registration, because content in these days has two flavors, free and gated. So there's always that dilemma, how much is free, you want some flow, tension, and then you go on conversion, gated, maybe premium content, how do you guys view that, is that part of or independent of what you do? >> No, it's a big part of what we do. And, one of the things, one of the capabilities that we have in our application is actually the ability to serve forms based on time and behavior. So, if they've engaged with three content assets, then maybe I actually want them to give me some more information or put up a hand. So we can make the form time-based, you can let them try before you buy, as it were, or you can hard gate it. We use Eloqua Forms in our application, so all that information flows as normal, as the work flows all get triggered, et cetera. It's very much up to the marketer how they want to use it, but one of the things, what we increasingly see amongst our customers, is the most successful do try to take the forms out of the way. Once we've got, once they are a member of our known database, how much more information do we really need them to volunteer, particularly with our ability to augment that contact record with other sources of data. Asking the marketer, I'm sorry, asking the prospect for it isn't always the most sensible thing to do. >> It's the free versus registration, but it's also new kinds of content. One of the things I like to say is software is content. Trying software, for example, is content. Or presenting an interactive experience that has a software element associated with it is a crucial part of gaging where people are. Are you able to start embedding your tooling directly into some of these more interactive elements and choose options within that interaction, or is it more options on static content? >> It could be both. So we are fundamentally content diagnostic. The best way to think about what we do is really as a very smart wrapper that goes around the content and then that can be embedded or it could be shared however you want, it could be used as a destination in its own right. So, sure if you want to kick something off with some former interactive content, absolutely. We also pull all different types of content together. So if your content is distributed or you want to use third party content, reviews, an expert in the space that's writing about something, and you pull that in and use that as a jumping off point. And what's really interesting is frequently it is the sequence of content that's the most interesting thing, not the behavior or engagement of a single asset. >> Right, and so part of the experience that sort of marketing is developing here translates into other disciplines within the business, for example, service. Come into respects, one of the things that you're presumably testing is is the prospect learning the right stuff that actually makes them more qualified. Well the same thing could be said for service, self-service. Is the person going through the right sequencing? Are you also seeing a demand for this kind of a product over on the service side and does that tie marketing back together? >> That's a great question. And one of the things that when we kind of officially launched our company in the application, three or four years ago now, we focused very much upon demand generation. Like we knew the problem that were helping themselves, but there are a handful of our customers, Cisco being one, actually, where actually at the moment, all they do is use us on the customer marketing side of things. How do I drive adoption, how do I drive cross-sell and upsell? I mean, all this is, we've got to remember that attention's what we're looking for and the way that we achieve that is using content as our primary asset as a marketer. The channels are important, the creative is important, but these really are content offers. Bob doesn't buy because he clicks on an email, Bob buys because he reads the stuff and watches the things. >> Peter: But it's attention and competence. >> Yeah. >> Right, so it's, Sy Syms used to say, I think it was Sy Syms, used to say that an informed customer is the best customer. You want a competent customer. >> Nick: Yeah. >> In many respects, the process of moving from the marketing qualified an MQL to an SQL it is, is that customer competent enough to actually engage with a sales person or somebody else to do something. >> That is spot on. So what we're seeing across our customer base is improvement in conversion rates from MQL to SAL for example. So McAfee, Intel Security, now McAfee again, they've seen a three times increase in the MQL to SAL conversion rates. Rockwell Automation has actually made a 300x return on their investment in us in nine months by passing higher qualified leads to the sales team. I think they generated $250 million in additional net-- >> Peter: Rockwell? >> Rockwell, yeah. ADP, that's doing our customer case study this afternoon, a 3x increase in marketing influence opportunities, and a 6x increase in closed won marketing opportunities. So more, but to your point here, better qualified. We know that these people are actually read our stuff, therefore the conversation is easier. They are actually generally qualified. Carrier's been proving that out by actually 2.4 times faster through the funnel to MQL, and then their ACP is 2.3 times higher. Why? Because they're not getting the pushback in the sale cycle because the prospect has self-educated and they see the value now. >> Nick, I want to get your thoughts on something that's involved in our, we're in a independent media company and we don't really have any ads on our site at all, but we have a sponsorship model, we have data. But it's interesting, I'm reading an Ad Age article right now that says for the first time ever, digital has surpassed TV. I mean, I can remember-- >> Wow. back in the days, it's always this little slice and it's getting bigger and bigger. But for the first time, desktop and mobile ad revenue surpasses TV for the first time, 22% upswing from the previous year. So, digital ads, some are calling it native advertisement, whatever the hell that means, is a key part of the attention cycle. So the role that a marketer needs to take with channels as important, and a lot of content marketers are failing these days that we talk to because they're not being authentic with their message and the users can smell-- >> Right. >> You know, non-relevant content. Some are clever and make it link-baitish and some are actually really super smart and actually do authentic content. But, so that's kind of progression. That's an evolution in the industry, but from a data standpoint, there are platforms out there, like SiliconANGLE and others, that have an opportunity for impression and attention in real time. How does your system, how does your clients, and how do people deal with that? Is there a way, is there mechanisms? >> So we have two large publisher customers that run multiple different properties and have very large communities they're looking to monetize and they're all part of the Oracle Marketing Cloud, they use their tech stat, and we're helping them in two ways. Firstly, kind of from an advertising thing, like high value added, advertising solutions, for want of a better description. How do I help to monetize my community, not just pass to HP, if they're the advertiser, here's a list of names of people that filled in the form. Here's actually people that are engaging with your content. And it's a mix of our editorial and your content to tell a story. And then one of the things that we're starting to explore for them is actually far more on the native side of things, actually being embedded as... >> John: An asset? >> Essentially, as a native ad in its own right, which can kind of get launched. That's something which I'm keen to explore further. And at the heart of it is, it's probably an even bigger problem on the ad tech side that it is on the martech side, but people like Gary Vaynerchuk are starting to ask the ad tech industry, we need a dose of common sense here, was the marketing consumed? And that's something which I am fascinated with, we're starting to see that we can actually identify by channels. This channel might, well this particular display provide the SP may have generated, you say, oh I don't know, 1,000 clicks in the last 30 days. Did it do anything? Did my-- >> A lot of times valuable. >> Exactly. >> You know at the end of the day, to sustain attention, you have to be valuable. I think John, we're talking really about a continuum from impression to attention to competence. We want to work with competent buyers because it cuts down the time that we spend on it, it reduces the risk that we're wasting our time, and quite frankly, it's a lot easier to work with someone who's really engaged and wants to succeed with whatever we're offering. >> It's also, he mentioned the publisher angle, I was thinking also from the customer angle, because I'm a customer and a marketer, I'm going to be looking for mechanisms to go to. The publisher wants better monetization of their communities, so have you seen any patterns in the business that could be a use case for helping customers operationalize, and we had great success with our business in the sense of saying, hey, we're engaging users, so that's good, you should join in with us at the right time not, you know, try to do it six hours too late, right, it's like being late to the party, right. So that real time piece is really super important. >> For sure. We've actually just changed the way that we're integrating with Eloqua to speed that up. So now we've actually moved to using web hooks as part of the integration and using their map form processing capabilities. Because it's faster, it's more extensive, it's more scalable. It means we can get very rich in content engagement data into someone's hands faster and better. And, I think, what is it? 50% of people buy from the first person that shows up, so being able to do that is critically important. >> Member-based communities are getting a lot of trends, traction these days. Some call, you know, subscribers, buyer walls, but member-based. >> So something we're starting to look at is how do we actually start to auto-generate the content experience, yeah, around kind of key accounts or topics, et cetera. >> Fascinating conversation, Nick, appreciate it, coming on. >> Nick: My pleasure. >> LookBookHQ, check 'em out, doing intelligent content, scaling content, looking at data, congratulations on your success, look forward to following up with you on some of the native advertising solutions that we, me need, that you need and congratulations, Oracle's certainly taking advantage of it. >> See you next time. Cheers. >> Thanks for coming out. Be back with more live coverage, I'm John Furrier, Peter Burris after this short break. (techno music)