>> Woman: From theCUBE studios in Palo Alto in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is a CUBE conversation. >> Okay welcome back already Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We're in our Palo Alto Studios here. Can't believe we just turned the calendar on September the 1st of 2020. What a year, it's cruising by. And one of the big topics obviously is working from home, we're seeing more and more companies telling everybody to expect to work from home through the end of the year or into next year, some are even saying indefinitely. And we've got an expert coming on the show that we're excited to have back. It's Dr. Karen Sobel Lojeski. She is the founder and CEO and author of "Virtual Distance and the Virtual Distance Company". Karen, great to see you. >> Great to see you too Jeff, thanks for having me. >> Absolutely, so I wanted to get you back on for a couple reasons. One is we first met at the ACGSV, Association for Corporate Growth Silicon Valley 2018 Awards, about two years ago was summer of 2018. And at that point, you introduced me to the concept and our audience, to the concept of virtual distance, which if I can summarize is basically communicating through devices versus face-to-face, like we're doing here. And the bad things that come from that and challenges and this and the other. Who knew that two years from then we would all be forced and not asked, but forced to basically go to a work-from-home environment and increase the frequency and use of using electronic devices to communicate not only for work, but also for social stuff, for school, for everything, so, oh my goodness, you happen to be in the right place at the right time for not necessarily the greatest of reasons, but wow, I mean, how amazing this transformation that we've all been forced to since the middle of March. First off, get your thoughts on that and then we'll dive into what people should be thinking about, what people should be doing about it and how they can, I want to say make the most, but it does kind of make the most of, not necessarily the greatest situation. >> Yeah, well, I could have never imagined when we were sitting out at that round table outside the room where we had dinner that we'd be here two years later, right, talking about virtual distances, you said in the context of everyone having to be isolated from each other and working from home. Obviously, like everyone on the planet, I think I would never have wanted to see this happen. But I feel fortunate in a way to have put this out there many years ago because today it's serving a lot of different organizations, corporations, schools, even government organizations to have a very steady framework that's based on 15 years of data, to understand how to make the best, as you said, of this situation and to reduce some of the negative consequences of virtual distance and actually use the framework as a way to get to know people better and really see them more as human beings in a way that helps them through not just their work life, but also through the family challenges that they're having with every kid now, sort of going back to school, many of them online, there's a lot of virtual distance that can crop up even in the house. But I guess I just, I'm glad that I discovered virtual distance, and that it's useful in this time. >> Right, right. So let's jump into it. And actually I want to skip to the end of the book before we get into the beginning of the book because you talked about leadership and when this thing first hit, we had a number of leaders from the community, talking about leading through trying times. And most great leaders know that their primary job is really communication, right? Communication to their teams, communication to their constituents, communication to their customers. COVID has really changed the communication challenges and increase them dramatically and most of the stuff we're hearing is that leaders need to communicate more frequently and in more variety, both in terms of topics as well as communication forms. How does that kind of jive with your studies on virtual distance and leadership, given the fact that there aren't a lot of other options in terms of face-to-face or a little bit more intimate things? They have to use these electronic means. So what tips do you have for leaders, as they suddenly were told everybody's working from home starting like tomorrow? >> Yeah, well, it's funny that you asked me that because we learned early on when I started looking at this phenomenon in the early 2000s. We learned early on that it actually takes a lot more work and time to lead virtually than it does in more traditional environments. And the reason is because a leader really has to bring forward a lot of context that tends to go underground or become invisible about other people when we're working virtually. So the leader already was under a lot of pressure if you will, to communicate much more than they had been in more traditional settings because a lot of the information and knowledge and intelligence if you will, about the company was available in the context of the environment and other people. So leaders were already on track to having to communicate much more in order to make make remote work and virtual work work. Well, which of course it can. >> Right. >> But what happened was, we found that when suddenly a light switch is turned off, leaders needed to communicate even more. And that is kind of standard crisis management leadership. We talked a little bit about that in the past, right? So we can look at the situation we're in as not just an acute crisis that came to bear in early January and then sort of everything locking down in March. But we can kind of look at this as a long-term leadership crisis management strategy on top of just over communicating to do better in virtual space. And in a crisis management situation you definitely want to have even more communication, but it's also an opportunity actually to develop other leaders behind you on teams that can also communicate as well, to share that responsibility, to share that leadership commitment to a lot of communication during times like this, that actually works really well. >> Right, 'cause one of the things you talked about that's super, super important, more important actually than physical distance or the virtual distance is what you called the affinity distance, and I think it ties back to another point in the book in terms of clarity of communication from the leadership. What are the goals, what is the vision? And reinforcing that at a rate and frequency much higher than they've ever done before to build that affinity so people can continue to feel like they're part of something beyond more just the tasks and the roles and the assignments that I have to do every day. >> Yeah, that's exactly right, Jeff. So again, we found early on. And it was a surprise to us at first, but then became kind of obvious that people tend to think that the real challenge with virtual work is physical distance, right, sort of the space between us in terms of a geography or a geographic separation. And what we learned early on through the statistics, as well as sort of common sense was that actually physical distance had the least impact on corporate outcomes than any of the other three factors. So the affinity distance piece is really all about, how do I gain an affinity for someone when I really don't know that much about them. And I don't know much about their context in the moment that we're talking, and I also just know less about them in general when we're virtual. >> Right. >> So affinity distance is much more important than the physical separation because it's what holds us together and allows us to build very, very deep relationships which we can count on and trust no matter what the situation is. And yeah, doing that in these times is very important. >> So it's funny, right? 'Cause so much of the problems that we have with communications are in the subtle feedback mechanisms that aren't necessarily in the overt communication and as you said, those can be lost in a lot of channels. What's kind of (chuckles) interesting that's going on with COVID is we're actually seeing a side of people that we never did see in the physical space, right. Now we're literally being invited into everyone's home. I mean, I'm in your home office, I can see your books on your bookshelf and people are bringing people into their home which they may not have done before or been comfortable. Not only that, but the spouse is there, he or she is working from home. The kids are there, they're doing their school from home, the occasional dog or pet or other thing kind of jumping through the screen. So it's this weird kind of juxtaposition. On one hand you've lost a whole lot of kind of subtle communication reinforcers. On the other hand, you're getting kind of a whole new kind of the human side aspect in terms of who these people are and what they're all about, that you never necessarily had before. So I think the blending of the whole self is probably been elevated, even though the communication challenges without having kind of all these subtle feedback loops that we really rely on, are gone. So when you think about communication and communication methods based on communication messages and what you're trying to do, how do you tell people to think about that? What types of communications should be done in which ways to make them the most effective and avoid some of the real problems that come from the wrong type of communication on the wrong type of channel? >> Yeah, so first of all, you make some great points. Because it really is when we invite people into our home via these kind of video links, people see a different side of us, a contextualized side to us that they normally wouldn't see. And that opens the door, as you said, to having other communications. I think before I get directly to your question, one thing that strikes me about what you say is that this is truly a shared experience, right? So all of us are being impacted by COVID-19, the economics of the situation, the childcare issues that are raised by the situation, the community issues that we all have in our towns or cities. And we're sharing that experience, which is a great jumping off point in terms of communications because we actually have a very similar context from which were working. In terms of which communications to use when. This is a really important question, I had a person from a very, very large tech company that people use every day to go look for things on the Internet, call me and tell me at one point early, sort of early on in the pandemic that some of his people were starting to beg him to turn off the video screens. (chuckles) And just use audio because sometimes when we're overwhelmed with a crisis the video can be helpful, but it can also sort of be overwhelming. So it's important to understand sort of when to discern, when to use audio and when to use visual, when to use email and when to use tax. And the basic tips here is that email has really never been good to explain ourselves to other people. It's been great to set up lunch dates or an appointment and things like that. So email should be used pretty sparingly. Audio is really great if we don't have video, but we also just kind of need a rest from video. And we also need to really focus on a person's voice very, very intensely. So if we're trying to solve a really critical problem that's a little bit conceptual, sometimes audio can can be more helpful. Video is obviously great because it gives us all this context and it allows people to see into our home and hear our cats kind of screaming at each other which is happening right now in my house. But it also lets us see each other's expressions and a little bit of the facial communication that we need in order to know if people are okay with what we're saying, if they're quizzical and looking like they kind of don't understand et cetera, The overarching goal of communications in a situation like this, that I talk a lot about in the book, is to mix up modes of communication as much as you can think about that, right? Because we get context as I've just explained in different ways through different modes. And so if we mix it up, if I say well, I've talked to Jeff a lot over video maybe I'll just give him a call today. Or I've been using a lot of email to talk to one of my colleagues in Norway, maybe I should really try to set up a video call that is very helpful because it gives us dimensionality to someone's personality as well as their context. >> Yeah, that's a really interesting point. I think most people are always saying turn on the video, turn on the video, we want to see everybody's face but as this thing continues to go and go and go and it's going to go for the foreseeable future, and people are going to get fatigue, right, people are getting Zoom fatigue. That's a really interesting and simple way to I think, kind of lessen the stress a little bit by telling people, let's just turn the video off. We don't necessarily need to see each other, we know what we look like. And if you feel some reason to turn it on, you can turn it on, but having that as an option, I think that's a really insightful. And the other thing I want to focus on is it's not all negative, right? I mean, there's a lot of studies about the open office plan, which didn't necessarily work so well, and we've had conversations with a lot of people that say, just because you throw everybody in a room together doesn't mean that they're necessarily going to communicate more and there aren't necessarily the water cooler chatter that you're kind of hoping for. And in fact, you have a bunch of stats in the book here about remote workers having actually a lot of success. They have less trouble with technology, they can cope best with multiple projects. There's so many less interruptions, (chuckles) assuming the rest of the family has a place to work. But you don't get kind of the work interruptions that you would in terms of actually getting projects done. So, it's not all bad. And I think there's a lot of things that we can help people think about to really take advantage or make the most of the opportunity, to take advantage is probably the wrong word. So, vary communications, frequency in communications is certainly a good one. What are other ways that people kind of build trust? 'Cause you talk a lot about trust and feeling part of something bigger and not letting the individual tasks and the little day-to-day things that we do get in the way of still feeling like you belong to something that's important, that you care about, with your teammates that you want to move forward. >> Yeah, so the it's a great question, and again I think, obviously, amongst sort of the darkness there's always sort of opportunities to see some light. And I think one of the ways that we can see light through working this way at this time is to expand our understanding of the people that we're working with, right? And we can do that in a framework, it doesn't have to be haphazard. So when we look at affinity, what we really want to do is to bring forward the way people feel about their value systems, what's important to them about work in sort of pre-COVID or BC, right before COVID, but also what's important to them about their family life or about the situation that's happening, that's interacting with and integrating with their work life. So asking those questions in ways that are not guised, but sort of directly asking them things about what they value? How they feel that they're interdependent on other people? Why other people are important to them in their work, as well as just in their day-to-day lives? Those are the kinds of opportunities for questions around things that are not work related, are not party Friday, which are also kind of fun things right? But that get more to the core of who a person is, that whole person that you were talking about. And that allows us to see so much more deeply, ironically, into that human being. And when you talk about purpose, and really wanting to feel like we're part of something bigger than ourselves, those kinds of insights that build affinity help us help other people. So, we tend to focus on task orientation and goals and deliverables and all that which is absolutely critical for business continuity, and to get through the day and focus our attention. But actually what makes people feel really good about their day as a person is often how they can help other people. And so if we draw this closer affinity, we can actually figure out ways to help other people. And that just lifts everybody up and makes the work product actually even better. >> Right, right, I've always ascribed to the theory that right, if you spend your work helping other people do their work better, easier, get roadblocks out of the way, whatever, be an enabler, then you're getting this multiplier effect because I'm doing my work and I'm helping somebody else be more efficient. And it's a very different way to kind of think about work in terms of helping everybody be more effective, more efficient, and as you said, you get this great multiplier effect, but I want to shift gears a little bit. And this sentence, just jumped out of your book. I'm actually going to read from it, that despite the fact that many leadership challenges are new, we continue to over rely on management thinking and solutions that are fundamentally designed around outdated assumptions. I mean, to me this is such a huge thing. We had Martin Mikason at the beginning of this process and his great line, and he's managed remote companies for years and multiple companies. And he said, it's so easy to fake it in the office, right? It's so easy to look busy. (Karen chuckles) Whereas when you're working from home, the only thing you have to show is your output. And that's what you're graded on, your output. And yet when this thing first hit, we saw all types of new products coming out that are basically spyware for the employees, how often are you sitting in front of your computer? How often are you on a Zoom call? How often are you, doing these things? And it's striking to me that it's such an outdated way to measure activity, versus a way to measure outcome and output and what are you trying to do? I mean, it just drives me crazy to hear those things, I just love to get your take that people still are mixed up about what they're supposed to be measuring and what the purpose of the whole task is, which is to get output done not just to be busy and sit in Zoom calls all day. >> It's so true. So there's sort of two prongs to that question. And two very important things to look at. So one is how do we measure productivity, right among knowledge workers, which has been the topic of a lot of conversation. And the other thing is, what have leadership models been built off of in the past, right? If you just take the first thing first. Productivity today, if you go to the Bureau of Labor Statistics website, you will still see productivity defined as how many widgets can I produce in an hour. That's still today, how we measure productivity, even though (chuckles) all of our output or most of our output, right, is coming from our knowledge, our thinking, our problem solving. (clears throat) So the notion of productivity feels very heavy handed to a lot of people, because it's still rooted literally economics wise in this notion of x widgets per hour, which just doesn't fit. And that comes through the second point, which is our leadership models, right? So I talked in the book and I've been talking about this for many years, because it just jumped out at me when I started to do this research, is that if you look at most leadership models today, any one of them, pick whatever one you like, transformational leadership, transactional leadership, situational leadership or whatever it might be. Those leadership models were built mainly in the 1950s. And some of them came later in the 80s. We have a few new ones, (clears throat) excuse me that have come after the internet, but not too many. And fundamentally, if you look at the communication mode of leaders in the 50s, and the 80s, it was face-to-face or phone. I mean, just by definition, was in person or via phone. But that assumption doesn't hold true anymore and hasn't held true for a good 15 years. And yet, in every business school today, we still use those leadership models as sort of our first run at how to lead. It's not that they're not useful and helpful and don't have extremely good words of advice for leaders. But the main thing leaders do is communicate. So if the fundamental channel over which leaders are communicating has completely changed, it seems natural that we should be looking for new leadership models (chuckles) that fit our times a little bit better. Taking pieces of the best of those leadership models, but really turning them on their head and saying, what's really a better approach when fundamentally our communication mode itself, it has completely changed. >> Right right. >> And that's what we do as leaders. >> And I do just want to say a word. We're talking about working from home and knowledge workers and unfortunately, there's a whole lot of people going through COVID right now that don't have that option, right. If you're in the travel industry, if you're in the hospitality industry, if you're in a lot of services industries, if you are a plumber, you can't go virtual as a plumber, unfortunately. So just to acknowledge that, what we're talking about applies to a lot of people, but certainly not everyone and everyone doesn't have these options. So I just wanted to mention that but before we wrap, Karen, the thing that struck me, as you're talking about kind of the 50s and the organizational structure, was it was really command and control and just top down hierarchies that dictated what people did. And then you as you said, your job was to put so many widgets on the widget receiver per hour, and that's what you were graded on. Where in knowledge workers, it's a very different thing. And in fact, you shouldn't tell people how to do things, you should tell people what the objectives are, and then see what they come up with. And hopefully, they'll come up with lots of different ways to achieve the objective, most of which that management has never thought of, they're not down in the weeds, and you get all kinds of interesting and diversity of opinion and different approaches. And kind of a DevOps mentality where you try lots of things and you'll find new ways to get it done. So I want to close out on this final kind of communication piece for leadership. And this is the why. I think back in the 50s, I don't know that the why we was that important. Or maybe it was and I'm not giving it enough credit. But today the why is so important. That is such a big piece of why do I come to work every day? And why am I important to work with my colleagues and move this mission forward. And so whenever you can just share, how important the why is today, and then how important the why is in trying to build a culture and hold people together when they are now by rule distributed all over the place. Talk a little bit about the why. >> Yeah, I love that question, Jeff. Because in the book, I talk a lot about Taylorism. And Taylor was the founder of like bureaucratic management and leadership and he actually despised the worker. (chuckles) There's actually a little piece in the book where he's testifying to Congress and saying that the man who handles pig iron, a type of steel, wasn't intelligent enough to understand what pig iron really was, he got a lot of flak for that. (chuckles) So as we've evolved, right, and as we've grown as organizations into knowledge workers, and I think your point about not everyone is a quote unquote, knowledge worker, is really, really important. The bottom line is, we're trying to measure our output and the value of our work by these older standards. And so people are struggling a little bit with that sort of disconnect, and looking for why, what purpose do they have? What is their bigger purpose? How are they connected to the organization in new ways? And there's actually an excellent analogy in the Navy. Is has its traditions in the Navy, called Commander's Intent which I talk about. So if you think of ships that used to sail, right out to sea, and they had lots of goals about either taking over a certain country or whatever it was they were doing, they couldn't be together, right. So we've been working remotely for a very long time. So the commander would gather all of his lieutenants, and basically tell them what his or, there were no hers at that time, but what his intentions were. And the lieutenants, the captains of the other ships, would go out to each ship, and they wouldn't follow a blueprint tactical plan they would just have the Commander's Intent as their guide. And then they were free actually, to use whatever strategies and tactics that they thought of and that worked in their context in order to fulfill the Commander's Intent, but they weren't given a blueprint. Their goal was really to use their own smarts, their own critical thinking in order to carry forward that intent. And I think that idea is very powerful today because I think if leaders can focus on helping their workers, their employees, their ecosystem partners, supply chain partners, whatever it may be, understand what the intent of the company is, and show that they trust the employees or the partner to deliver on that intent, with whatever means and creativity and imagination, guided by the intent, can be used and selected from on their day-to-day lives, people will feel so much more empowered and still get to the same outcome or actually better, than if they're told do A, B, C and D. So this idea of leader intent, I think would serve companies really well during this time, and if I could just add one other quick thing. There's another idea that comes out of sort of the military that I used and doing some work with leadership crisis management after 9-11. Around this notion of net-centricity. Net-centricity is sort of allowing people on the ground to sort of form their own networks and push information up to leadership so that they can make certain decisions and then push those decisions down with an intention back to the ground, so that this network can operate with some freedom and flexibility. And I think corporations can put net-centricity actually into place in a structured way and they'll find themselves with a lot more flexibility, higher levels of business continuity and effectiveness, and perhaps, most importantly, giving a sense of more meaningfulness and purpose and powerfulness, or self actualization back to the worker. >> Right, right, as you're speaking the word I just can't get out of my head is trust, right? It's so much about trust. And then giving people the power, enabling people the power that you trust to go do the jobs that you've hired them to do. And then to the other point that we talked about, then as a leader, help them remove roadblocks. Give them the tools, do the things that you can do to help them do their job better, versus to your point, being super prescriptive on the road actions that you wish that they would do, and then managing to the completion of the road, actions versus the accomplishment of the bigger task. It seems so simple, it's so hard for so many people to grok. It just, it still just amazes me that so many folks are unfortunately still stuck in that old paradigm. But you can't anymore 'cause everybody's (chuckles) working from home, so you better get with the program. >> (clears throat) Yeah, I'm sorry, I have a little frog in my throat. But you can. And just to add to what you're saying. I think the best thing that leaders can do is also expand their understanding of the worker as no longer just coming to work in some kind of bubble. They're coming to work with all kinds of personal situations. And I've had clients who have sort of tried to get away from that and keep the worker in a bubble. And I think, to be successful as we get through this sort of long-term leadership crisis, I think it's important to lean in to the chaos. Lean into the complexities that COVID, the pandemic, the economic situation bring and see the corporation and their role as leaders as trying to help that whole person with the complexities of their life, as opposed to trying to divorce them from their life, because that has not worked. And what works best, and I've seen this over and over again, is that companies that lean into the crisis, embrace it, and really try to help that whole employee who's coming to work in their house, really, really works very well. >> Yeah, it's going to be interesting as we come out of the summer and go back into the fall, which is the traditional season of kids going back to school and everybody kind of going back to work, and in our world conferences, and it's kind of the ramp up of a busy activity until we get kind of to the Christmas season again coming off of summer, now knowing that isn't a temporary situation, this isn't going away anytime soon. I mean, we used to talk about the new normal in March or April and May. Well now talking about the new normal in September, October, November and into 2021 is a whole different deal. So to your point, I think that's a great tip, lean in, do the best you can, learn from the experts. You don't need to do it by yourself. There's lots of documentation out there. Darren Murph has stuff up from GitHub. Or excuse me GitLab. There's lot of good information. So you do have to kind of buy into it and embrace it, 'cause it's not it's not going away. So these are great tips Karen and I give you this, the last word before we sign off. Of all the work you've done, all the clients you've worked with, a couple of two or three really good nuggets that are really simple things that everybody should be thinking about and doing today. >> I think, there's the Waldorf Schools out by you on the west coast, right, have a motto that they use for education. And it it says in through the heart out through the mind. And I think more than ever, leadership and business can borrow that idea. I think we have to sort of look at things in through the heart. And then, distribute our directions and our leadership out through the mind. At the end of the day (chuckles) we're all human beings that are all struggling in this shared experience, something that has literally never happened on planet earth with 8 billion people, connected through technology with a global pandemic. And so if we kind of can make a shift and think about taking things in through the heart and then delivering out through the mind. I think that a lot of people will feel that compassion. And that will translate into the kind of trust that we're trying to build between all of us to get through it together. And I think when we do that, I have a lot of confidence in the human spirit that we will get through it. People will be able to look back and say, yes, this was very difficult and horrific on many levels, but at the end of the day, maybe there's a little bit of a renaissance in how we sort of look at each other and treat each other with compassion and some love and joy, even in the worst of times. I think that translates over any communication medium (chuckles) including the one we're using today. >> Well, Karen, thank you for the time and thank you for closing this with a little bit of light. Congrats again on the book, "The Power of Virtual Distance", I'm sure it's available everywhere. And again, great to see you. >> Thank you so much Jeff, you too. >> All right. >> Take care. >> She's Karen, I'm Jeff, you're watching theCUBE. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time. (soothing music)

(upbeat music) >> Man: From San Francisco it's theCUBE covering Accenture Tech Vision 2020 (upbeat music) brought to you by Accenture. >> Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We are high atop San Francisco. It is absolutely beautiful outside. Sun is going down, we're here for a really special event, It's the Accenture Tech Vision, kind of unveiling of the five things that we should be paying attention to as we look to 2020 the year that we're going to know everything with the benefit of hindsight. So it's pretty exciting, it's pretty exciting time. And we have a new guest, Mike Redding, he's the managing director of Accenture Ventures telling us where the Accenture Ventures plays in all this stuff, so Mike, well, welcome. >> Well, thanks for having me, I'm really excited to be here. It's a big day here at Accenture with the launch of the 2020 tech vision. You know, and one of the key trends is about innovation DNA, which is really saying, how does an organization connect to the external ecosystems to systematically and scalably and sustainably innovate? And that's part of the role of Accenture Ventures. >> Well, it's an interesting play, right? Because unfortunately Clayton Christensen just passed away, my favorite business writer ever. And the whole innovator's dilemma is that smart people working at big companies making sound business decisions based on revenue and their customers will always miss this continuous change. So really you need some other things to help motivate that. And that's really piece that you guys play. >> Right, exactly cause what, you know, we're a bridge builder between those highly successful large enterprises, which are big, they're slow and they're risk adverse, and the startups, which are small, fast and nothing but risk. And so for us, the role of Accenture and Accenture ventures as being part of that innovation DNA is to say, let's make a bridge, let's figure out how the elephant can dance. And as a result, not get caught up in those disruptions, but in fact leverage them to propel those big enterprises forward. >> Right, now you guys invest in all types of areas, Ais, looking through the portfolio, security, big data, I love this Industry X Dot O, what is Industry X Dot O? >> Well, so, you know, a lot of places talk about industry 4.0 but we're like, why put it, you know, X dot O, is make it a variable? five point O, six point O, which makes it evergreen. Which says, every industry on the planet is going through a transformation, you know, powered by AI, powered by all those areas you mentioned. And as a result, we want to make sure that whatever the future of any industry is, Accenture is part of it and we're bringing in the startups and of course the big technology players that are going to be the fundamental players making that transformation possible. >> Right, there's so much synergy, right? Because for the little guys, right? They've got all the juice behind the innovation and the really smart people and they're kind of breaking things and moving fast, but the challenges there are scale and a sales force and marketing and reach and distribution and all these things that are not too hard for the big guys. >> Right, and so that's why it's a marriage made heaven, right? Again, if you can bring, I always like to say the analogy of you've got the aircraft carrier and then you have all the battleships and the PT boats circling around it, that's a battle group. And so that's what we really see as the opportunity is to bring what each strength, the strength of that disruption and passion and energy and capital to marry to market scale and data and customer base, right? Put those things together, unstoppable force? >> How do the enterprises, you know, kind of view it, do they, obviously they see the value, you wouldn't be doing what you're doing, but is that something that's attracted to them? Is it too disruptive to them? How do they try to work these little startups? Cause (laughs) the other thing, right? Is always vendor viability when you're a little startup doing business with a big company and they can kill you with meetings and there's all kinds of, you know, kind of interesting things that can happen to screw that up. >> Well you're right on and so that's part of where, you know, Accenture comes in as that broker, that bridge maker, because we help each other find how to match up, how not to crush the little guy with infinite meetings, you know, in an enterprise, you know, six months is quick, in a startup, that's a funding cycle, right? And so we've got to find a way to meet each other in the middle and as a result, get the strength of each, but pointed in the same direction and really, you know, become really good dance partners. And that's what we really think any organization, cause they know they need to do it, they know they want to do it, they just don't know how. And that's the gap we help fill. >> And then how do you find your investments? Are you partnering with other venture firms? How are you kind of out prospecting for new opportunities? >> Well, so for us, since we're a corporate strategic, we're really focused on the future of our client's business, the future of the marketplace. And so for us, it's a network game. It's, you know, it's everything from what the corporate venture units at our clients are up to where they're seeing strategic bets. Of course, we're the VC, you know, of Sand Hill Road, of Tel Aviv, of Shenzhen and Shanghai, you know, Bangalore, you know, there's so many great venture capital communities. We love the syndicate, we love friends because we, you know, a financial VC will bring their discipline and we'll bring Accenture's discipline and that's a combo pack that one plus one is three. >> Right, so I want to get your take, you've been in this for a while -- >> Oh, yeah. and one of the themes that we hear over and over, right, is the acceleration of accelerating pace of technology innovation, right? And this exponential curve and people have a hard time with exponential curves, we like linear curves. But it's getting steeper and steeper and steeper. So you know, from your kind of cap bird seed, as you've watched the evolution, do you see, you know, kind of, is this the only way for the enterprises to keep ahead of these things? Is it just an augment? Is it more important than it used to be? How has the landscape kind of changing as this acceleration just keeps going and going and going? >> Well, I think that the era of build it all yourself vertically integrate it So, you know, start to finish, soup to nuts yourself, you can't do it, right? If you're a large incumbent and, but also if you think about this way, and I would talk to audience especially, you know, business audience and say, "Who's got enough budget?" Nobody, there's no such thing as enough budget, the government doesn't have enough budget, right? Nobody does, but if you partner, you can leverage other people's money, their investment cycles, and as a result, for every dollar you have, you can get multiple dollars of leverage. And as a result, no matter how fast it's going, because of the Public Clouds, because of the big software players, you can get so much further. So even though things are moving faster, what you can leverage to adapt to that change is more powerful than ever before. So the good news is the rate of change is fast, but you're not starting from dead stop. You're jumping on a moving train and going where it's going and putting your own business spin on it. >> Right, the other piece is kind of the disruptive speeds. It's funny you mentioned Amazon just, you know, watch a lot of great interviews with Bezos. One of them, he talks about AWS having, you know, a seven-year uninterrupted headstart because no one down the road in Redwood shores or Philadelphia or Waldorf was really paying attention to the little bookseller up in Seattle as a competitor for enterprise infrastructure. So you know that which is going to get you is often not the competitors that you're benchmarking against. It's not the same people that you've been competing with but can completely come out of left field. >> Well, and so that again, is why we really believe passionately that with this future, the next few years, those enterprises that have an innovation DNA that get out of their foxhole and don't just look at your bank, don't just look at FinTech, look at all tech and thanks to this thing called the internet. It's really possible, and language translation, even if you don't speak Chinese, you can get a sense of what's happening in China, where you can call a friend like Accenture and we can hook you up. And regardless of the fact is you can now, if you cast that wide net, if you challenge yourself to get out of that Foxhole and look around, well then suddenly you can't be surprised. You can see it coming and you can then use your superpowers, which is incumbency, scale, balance sheet, customer base, you know, loyalty, all those things that you brand, all the things that make you strong, you can now append that disruption to it and basically, not get disrupted. So I think that's, that's the formula for going forward. >> Yeah, well, I love the one plus one makes three formula cause it really is kind of a match made in heaven really bringing together two sets of strengths that the other person or the other party doesn't really have. So you guys been at it for awhile and continued success. >> Well, thank you very much. All right. Well, Mike, thanks for taking a minute. He's Mike, I'm Jeff, you're watching theCUBE. With the Accenture Tech Vision launch 2020. Thanks for watching, we'll see you next time. (upbeat music)

>> Announcer: From San Francisco, it's theCUBE covering Accenture Tech Vision 2020, brought to you by Accenture. >> Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeff Rick here with theCUBE. We are high atop San Francisco, at the Accenture Innovation Hub, 33rd floor of the Salesforce Tower at the Accenture Technology Vision 2020 party. The party's getting started. Paul, and Mike, and the team are going to present the findings, and we're excited to have, actually, the hostess of this great facility. She's Ashley Miller, managing director of the San Francisco Innovation Hub. Ashley, great to see you. >> Great to see you again. >> So, congratulations once again. We were here last year. It was the grand opening of this facility. >> Ashley: Yes, sure was. >> You've had it open for a year now. >> We sure have. It's been a year. We also have a soft launch in September, so a little more than a year under our belt, and as you can see, the place is busy. >> Right, so you had the hard job, right? So Mike, and Paul, and all the big brains, they put together pretty pictures, and great statements. You're the one that actually has to help customers implement this stuff, so tell us a little bit about how you use the Tech Vision because it's pretty insightful. It's a lot deeper than cloud's going to be big, or mobile's going to be big, but to take some of these things to help you with your customers drive this innovation. >> Yeah, well, I don't know about having the hard job against theirs. They certainly have the hard job understanding what these technology trends are that are going to have an impact on business three to five years out, but I certainly do have the fun job, and the exciting job. I get to work with our clients every day here in the hub, and work with our 250 dedicated innovation teammates here in the hub to think about the impact of these trends to their business, so clients come in for a day, two days, a week, and we'll sit with technologists. We'll get our hands on some of these emerging technologies, on quantum computing, on artificial intelligence, machine vision, machine learning, natural language processing. You name it, we have it here. We have a smart materials showcase going on upstairs that a lot of these clients have checked out, so they can come here, they can get their hands on these technologies that are driving these trends, and then, they can sit and work with strategists, and others who can think about, what are the application of these technologies to their business? And then, what's really exciting is we have engineers here who can then help build prototypes to actually test these technologies to see what their impacts are for the business, and then, finally, support the rollout of pilots that prove successful, so it's, again, it's a fun job. I love it. >> And how does it actually work in terms of best practices? Is it starting out as some strategy conversation with the top-level people about trying to integrate say, more AI into their products, or is it maybe more of within a product group, where they're trying to be a little bit more innovative, and it really challenges on the product development path? You talked about the material science that they want to go down, what are some of the ways that people actually work with you, and work with your teams, and leverage this asset here at the hub? >> Yeah, so ultimately, it's both, and it's at all ends of the spectrum. We are here in the Silicon Valley, where clients are coming from all over the globe to understand what the trends are that are going to shape their business operations in the future, so we have clients that are coming through. Some people call them digital safaris, or innovation safaris. Some people may say that's not valuable. I think it is valuable to come and get firsthand experience, knowledge, touch and feel these things, and really dedicate time to think about the application to your business. On the other end of the spectrum, we'll have clients who are here for days, weeks, and months, and we have ongoing partnerships with clients. We've been open for about a year and a half, for that and longer to actually embed this innovation capabilities into their business, so I think maybe an answer is, what is the most successful model I see? I really get to dig into these clients who are using our services as an innovation engine to help them drive their business, and to help augment their innovation capabilities, and it's those clients I see who are continuously testing, continuously learning, understanding the impact of these technologies, driving proofs of concepts to test them who are able to make progress. >> Can it happen without top down support? I mean, we talked, unfortunately Clayton Christensen just passed away. Innovator's Dilemma, my favorite business book of all time because he said smart people making sound business decisions based on customers, profitability, and business, logical business priorities, will always miss discontinuous change. Jeff Bezos talks about AWS had a seven-year head start on their public cloud because no one down in Redwood Shores, or Waldorf was paying attention to the bookseller in Seattle, so it's hard for big companies to innovate, so is it really necessary for that top down, that, hey, we are going to invest, and we are going to saddle up, and get our hands dirty with some of these technologies for them to be successful, and drive innovation because it's not easy for big enterprises. >> You're exactly right. Innovation is hard. Change is difficult. I was a student of Clayton Christensen, and like you and many others, are mourning his passing. He made a significant impact, this area of research. Change is hard. It's difficult, so we see a lot of clients who are coming in, and are doing interesting things to overcome that inertia to stay put, and I think tops down leadership is a significant piece of that. You need to have leaders who are supporting movement, who are enabling decision making quickly, so they are supporting small decisions they're making frequently so that there's not a massive decision that happens at the end of a pilot, but rather, micro-decisions that help ensure things are being moved along, building pilots and proof of concepts, of course, helped in that movement to get buy-in, to get leaders to see the value, and to also pivot if something isn't working, so innovation is hard. Accenture's Innovation Hub helps to fill some of those gaps because really, we are a sandbox, where you can come in, build the proof of concepts, test these ideas, and then, in an ongoing, continuous way, help understand their impacts to your business. >> Right, and I'm just curious how often, as order of magnitude, this innovation around a particular, existing business, maybe it's the new materials, the new way of thinking about it, versus maybe, is this a way for them to really explore wild ideas, or go out a little bit beyond the edge of what they're going to execute in their normal, day to day, say, product development because which of those do you find is best use of your resources? >> Yeah, so again, it runs the spectrum. I mean, I think the companies who are innovating around the edges, they're spending a lot of money to run pilots, and tests, proof of concepts that may not have significant value to the core of their business, so of course, it's the companies who are really thinking about how they're going to innovate new business models, how they're going to build on these trends to figure out where their company is going in the future, and be ready, and be ahead of the curve, but in order to get there, maybe you do need to get your hands dirty, and run some tests, run some proof of concepts to understand the technology. The key is, in order to ensure that the investment in those activities is actually helping you move the needle. >> Right, so how should people, if somebody's watching this, and they want to get involved, or I'm busting my head. We're not moving as fast as we need to. I'm nervous. I have an imperative. I need to accelerate this stuff. How do they get involved, and how do they end up here getting their hands dirty with some of your team? >> Yeah, thanks for that, appreciate that. Accenture works with the largest organizations around the globe, and there's typically a client account leader, partner, from Accenture embedded into the biggest organizations, and so, for those who are existing clients, they can reach out to their client account lead, and we would be delighted to welcome them in, and do some, either, exploratory research into these technologies, or actually, do some longer-term innovation engine work, where we're helping to augment their capabilities. For those who, maybe, aren't an Accenture client, then, we do have open houses. We do quarterly open events, not only for potential new clients, but also, for people in the community for partners, for schools. We're really committed to helping to be an asset for San Francisco, for this community, so keep your eyes peeled for opportunities to come in. >> Yeah, that's great because last time when we were here when we opened there was a lot of conversation about being a very active participant in the community. You guys are sponsors with the Warriors at the Chase Center, but no, I think we had a number of people from the city and county of San Francisco in talking about the opportunities, and being an active, engaged member of the community beyond just a for-profit company. >> Absolutely, and the undercurrent of this year's Tech Vision, which is about to launch is all about thinking beyond the edges of your organization, and understanding the choices that you make, how they impact the communities you serve, so it's really important to us to be a good steward of that here at Accenture, and we have teammates accessible within the hub. For example, data enthesis, who can help you understand the decisions you're making around artificial intelligence. Are you using data securely? Are you using it in a way that makes people feel comfortable? So we have teammates here who can help clients consider the impact of these decisions that goes beyond the four walls, to really be a good steward for the next generation. >> Okay, well, next time I come, I'm wearing a white coat, so we can go get our hands dirty. >> I like it. >> All right, Ashley, well, again, congratulations to you and the team, and have a great evening. >> Thank you so much. >> All right, she's Ashley, I'm Jeff. You're watching theCUBE. We're at the Accenture Innovation Hub for the Technology Vision 2020. Thanks for watching, and we'll see you next time. (funky electronic music)

>> Announcer: Live from Madrid, Spain. It's the Cube. Covering HP Discover Madrid 2017. Brought to you by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. >> Good afternoon from Madrid everybody. Good morning on the East Coast. Good really early morning on the West Coast. This is the Cube, the leader in live tech coverage. We're here day one at HPE Discover Madrid 2017. My name is Dave Velonte, I'm here with my cohost Peter Berse. Randy Meyers here is the Vice President and General Manager of the Mission Critical business unit at Hewlett Packard Enterprise. And he's joined by Alexander Zhuk, who is the SAP practice lead at Eldorado. Welcome to the Cube, thanks for coming on. >> Thanks for having us. >> Thank you. >> Randy we were just reminiscing about the number of times you've been on the Cube, consecutive years, it's like the Patriots winning the AFC East it just keeps happening. >> Or Cal Ripkin would probably be you. >> Me and Tom Brady. >> You're the Cal Ripken of the Cube. So give us the update, what's happening in the Mission Critical Business unit. What's going on here at Discover. >> Well, actually just lots of exciting things going on, in fact we just finished the main general session keynote. And that was the coming out party for our new Superdome Flex product. So, we've been in the Mission Critical space for quite some time now. Driving the HANA business, we've got 2500 customers around the world, small, large. And with out acquisition last year of SGI, we got this fabulous technology, that not only scales up to the biggest and most baddest thing that you can imagine to the point where we're talking about Stephen Hawking using that to explore the universe. But it scales down, four sockets, one terabyte, for lots of customers doing various things. So I look at that part of the Mission Critical business, and it's just so exciting to take technology, and watch it scale both directions, to the biggest problems that are out there, whether they are commercial and enterprise, and Alexander will talk about lots of things we're doing in that space. Or even high performance computing now, so we've kind of expanded into that arena. So, that's really the big news Super Dome Flex coming out, and really expanding that customer base. >> Yeah, Super Dome Flex, any memory in that baby? (laughing) >> 32 sockets, 48 terabyte if you want to go that big, and it will get bigger and bigger and bigger over time as we get more density that's there. And we really do have customers in the commercial space using that. I've got customers that are building massive ERP systems, massive data warehouses to address that kind of memory. >> Alright, let's hear from the customer. Alexander, first of all, tell us about your role, and tell us about Eldorado. >> I'm responsible for SAP basis and infrastructure. I'm working in Eldorado who is one of the largest consumer electronics network in Russia. We have more than 600 shops all over the country in more than 200 cities and towns, and have more than 16,000 employees. We have more than 50,000 stock keeping units, and proceeding over three and a half million orders with our international primarily. >> SAP practice lead, obviously this is a HANA story, so can you take us through your HANA journey, what led to the decision for HANA, maybe give us the before, during and after. Leading up to the decision to move to HANA, what was life like, and why HANA? >> We first moved our business warehouse system to HANA back in 2011. It's a time we got strong business requirements to have weak reporting. So, retail business, it's a business whose needs and very rapid decision making. So after we moved to HANA, we get the speed increasing of reports giving at 15 times. We got stock replenishment reports nine times faster. We got 50 minute sales reports every hour, instead of two hours. May I repeat this? >> No, it makes sense. So, the move to HANA was really precipitated by a need to get more data faster, so in memory allows you to do that. What about the infrastructure platform underneath, was it always HP at the time, that was 2011. What's HP's role, HPE's role in that, HANA? >> Initially we were on our business system in Germany, primarily on IBM solutions. But then according to the law requirements, we intended to go to Russia. And here we choose HP solutions as the main platform for our HANA database and traditional data bases. >> Okay Data residency forced you to move this whole solution back to Russia. If I may, Dave, one of the things that we're talking about and I want to test this with you, Alexander, is businesses not only have to be able to scale, but we talk about plastic infrastructure, where they have to be able to change their work loads. They have to be able to go up and down, but they also have to be able to add quickly. As you went through the migration process, how were you able to use the technology to introduce new capabilities into the systems to help your business to grow even faster? >> At that time, before migration, we had strong business requirements for our business growing and had some forecasts how HANA will grow. So we represented to our possible partners, our needs, for example, our main requirement was the possibility to scale up our CRM system up to nine terabytes memory. So, at that time, there was only HP who could provide that kind of solution. >> So, you migrated from a traditional RDBMS environment, your data warehouse previously was a traditional data base, is that right? And then you moved to HANA? >> Not all systems, but the most critical, the most speed critical system, it's our business warehouse and our CRM system. >> How hard was that? So, the EDW and the CRM, how difficult was that migration, did you have to freeze code, was it a painful migration? >> Yes, from the application point of view it was very painful, because we had to change everything, some our reports they had to be completely changed, reviewed, they had to adopt some abap code for the new data base. Also, we got some HANA level troubles, because it was very elaborate. >> Early days of HANA, I think it was announced in 2011. Maybe 2012... (laughing) >> That's one of the things for most customers that we talk to, it's a journey. You're moving from a tried and true environment that you've run for years, but you want the benefits in memory of speed, of massive data that you can use to change your business. But you have to plan that. It was a great point. You have to plan it's gonna scale up, some things might have to scale out, and at the same time you have to think about the application migration, the data migration, the data residency rules, different countries have different rules on what has to be there. And I think that's one of the things we try to take into account as HPE when we're designing systems. I want to let you partition them. I want to let you scale them up or down depending on the work load that's there. Because you don't just have one, you have BW and CRM, you have development environments, test environments, staging environments. The more we can help that look similar, and give you flexibility, the easier that is for customers. And then I think it's incumbent on us also to make sure we support our customers with knowledge, service, expertise, because it really is a journey, but you're right, 2011 it was the Wild West. >> So, give us the HPE HANA commercial. Everybody always tells us, we're great at HANA, we're best at HANA. What makes HPE best at HANA, different with HANA? >> What makes us best at HANA, one, we're all in on this, we have a partnership with SAP, we're designing for the large scale, as you said, that nobody else is building up into this space. Lots of people are building one terabyte things, okay. But when you really want to get real, when you want to get to 12 terabytes, when you want to get to 24 to 48. We're not only building systems capable of that, we're doing co-engineering and co-innovation work with SAP to make that work, to test that. I put systems on site in Waldorf, Germany, to allow them to go do that. We'll go diagnose software issues in the HANA code jointly, and say, here's where you're stressing that, and how we can go leverage that. You couple that with our services capability, and our move towards, you'll consume HANA in a lot of different ways. There will be some of it that you want on premise, in house, there will be some things that you say, that part of it might want to be in the Cloud. Yes, my answer to all of those things is yes. How do I make it easy to fit your business model, your business requirements, and the way you want to consume things economically? How do I alow you to say yes to that? 2500 customers, more than half of the installed base of all HANA systems worldwide reside on Hewlett Packard Enterprise. I think we're doing a pretty good job of enabling customers to say, that's a real choice that we can go forward with, not just today, but tomorrow. >> Alexander, are you doing things in the Cloud? I'm sure you are, what are you doing in the Cloud? Are you doing HANA in the Cloud? >> We have not traditional Cloud, as to use it to say, now we have a private Cloud. We have during some circumstance, we got all the hardware into our property. Now, it's operating by our partner. Between two company they are responsible for all those layers from hardware layer, service contracts, hardware maintenance, to the basic operation systems support, SEP support. >> So, if you had to do it all over again, what might you do differently? What advice would you give to other customers going down this journey? >> My advice is to at first, choose the right team and the right service provider. Because when you go to solution, some technical overview, architectural overview, you should get some confirmation from vendor. At first, it should be confirmed by HP. It should be confirmed by SEP. Also, there is a financial question, how to sponsor all this thing. And we got all these things from HP and our service partner. >> Right, give you the last word. >> So, one, it's an exciting time. We're watching this explosion of data happening. I believe we've only just scratched the surface. Today, we're looking at tens of thousands of skews for a customer, and looking at the velocity of that going through a retail chain. But every device that we have, is gonna have a sensor in it, it's gonna be connected all the time. It's gonna be generating data to the point where you say, I'm gonna keep it, and I'm gonna use it, because it's gonna let me take real time action. Some day they will be able to know that the mobile phone they care about is in their store, and pop up an offer to a customer that's exactly meaningful to do that. That confluence of sensor data, location data, all the things that we will generate over time. The ability to take action on that in real time, whether it's fix a part before it fails, create a marketing offer to the person that's already in the store, that allows them to buy more. That allows us to search the universe, in search for how did we all get here. That's what's happening with data. It is exploding. We are at the very front edge of what I think is gonna be transformative for businesses and organizations everywhere. It is cool. I think the advent of in memory, data analytics, real time, it's gonna change how we work, it's gonna change how we play. Frankly, it's gonna change human kind when we watch some of these researchers doing things on a massive level. It's pretty cool. >> Yeah, and the key is being able to do that wherever the data lives. >> Randy: Absolutely >> Gentlemen, thanks very much for coming on the Cube. >> Thank you for having us. >> Your welcome, great to see you guys again. Alright, keep it right there everybody, Peter and I will be back with our next guest, right after this short break. This is the Cube, we're live from HPE Discover Madrid 2017. We'll be right back. (upbeat music)

>> Narrator: New York City, it's the Cube covering CyberConnect 2017 brought to you by Centrify and the Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology. >> Welcome back, everyone. This is the Cube's live coverage in New York City's Grand Hyatt Ballroom for CyberConnect 2017 presented by Centrify. I'm John Furrier, the co-host of the Cube with my co-host this week is Dave Vellante, my partner and co-founder and co-CEO with me in SiliconAngle Media in the Cube. Our next guest is James Scott who is the co-founder and senior fellow at ICIT. Welcome to the Cube. >> Thanks for having me. >> You guys are putting on this event, really putting the content together. Centrify, just so everyone knows, is underwriting the event but this is not a Centrify event. You guys are the key content partner, developing the content agenda. It's been phenomenal. It's an inaugural event so it's the first of its kind bringing in industry, government, and practitioners all together, kind of up leveling from the normal and good events like Black Hat and other events like RSA which go into deep dives. Here it's a little bit different. Explain. >> Yeah, it is. We're growing. We're a newer think tank. We're less than five years old. The objective is to stay smaller. We have organizations, like Centrify, that came out of nowhere in D.C. so we deal, most of what we've done up until now has been purely federal and on the Hill so what I do, I work in the intelligence community. I specialize in social engineering and then I advise in the Senate for the most part, some in the House. We're able to take these organizations into the Pentagon or wherever and when we get a good read on them and when senators are like, "hey, can you bring them back in to brief us?" That's when we know we have a winner so we started really creating a relationship with Tom Kemp, who's the CEO and founder over there, and Greg Cranley, who heads the federal division. They're aggressively trying to be different as opposed to trying to be like everyone else, which makes it easy. If someone wants to do something, they have to be a fellow for us to do it, but if they want to do it, just like if they want to commission a paper, we just basically say, "okay, you can pay for it but we run it." Centrify has just been excellent. >> They get the community model. They get the relationship that you have with your constituents in the community. Trust matters, so you guys are happy to do this but more importantly, the content. You're held to a standard in your community. This is new, not to go in a different direction for a second but this is what the community marketing model is. Stay true to your audience and trust. You're relied upon so that's some balance that you guys have to do. >> The thing is we deal with cylance and others. Cylance, for example, was the first to introduce machine learning artificial intelligence to get passed that mutating hash for endpoint security. They fit in really well in the intelligence community. The great thing about working with Centrify is they let us take the lead and they're very flexible and we just make sure they come out on top each time. The content, it's very content driven. In D.C., we have at our cocktail receptions, they're CIA, NSA, DARPA, NASA. >> You guys are the poster child of be big, think small. >> Exactly. Intimate. >> You say Centrify is doing things differently. They're not falling in line like a lemming. What do you mean by that? What is everybody doing that these guys are doing differently? >> I think in the federal space, I think commercial too, but you have to be willing to take a big risk to be different so you have to be willing to pay a premium. If people work with us, they know they're going to pay a premium but we make sure they come out on top. What they do is, they'll tell us, Centrify will be like, "look, we're going to put x amount of dollars into a lunch. "Here are the types of pedigree individuals "that we need there." Maybe they're not executives. Maybe they're the actual practitioners at DHS or whatever. The one thing that they do different is they're aggressively trying to deviate from the prototype. That's what I mean. >> Like a vendor trying to sell stuff. >> Yeah and the thing is, that's why when someone goes to a Centrify event, I don't work for Centrify (mumbles). That's how they're able to attract. If you see, we have General Alexander. We've got major players here because of the content, because it's been different and then the other players want to be on the stage with other players, you know what I mean. It almost becomes a competition for "hey, I was asked to come to an ICIT thing" you know, that sort of thing. That's what I mean. >> It's reputation. You guys have a reputation and you stay true to that. That's what I was saying. To me, I think this is the future of how things get done. When you have a community model, you're held to a standard with your community. If you cross the line on that standard, you head fake your community, that's the algorithm that brings you a balance so you bring good stuff to the table and you vet everyone else on the other side so it's just more of a collaboration, if you will. >> The themes here, what you'll see is within critical infrastructure, we try to gear this a little more towards the financial sector. We brought, from Aetna, he set up the FS ISAC. Now he's with the health sector ISAC. For this particular geography in New York, we're trying to have it focus more around health sector and financial critical infrastructure. You'll see that. >> Alright, James, I've got to ask you. You're a senior fellow. You're on the front lines with a great Rolodex, great relationships in D.C., and you're adivising and leaned upon by people making policy, looking at the world and the general layout in which, the reality is shit's happening differently now so the world's got to change. Take us through a day in the life of some of the things you guys are seeing and what's the outlook? I mean, it's like a perfect storm of chaos, yet opportunity. >> It really depends. Each federal agency, we look at it from a Hill perspective, it comes down to really educating them. When I'm in advising in the House, I know I'm going to be working with a different policy pedigree than a Senate committee policy expert, you know what I mean. You have to gauge the conversation depending on how new the office is, House, Senate, are they minority side, and then what we try to do is bring the issues that the private sector is having while simultaneously hitting the issues that the federal agency space is. Usually, we'll have a needs list from the CSWEP at the different federal agencies for a particular topic like the Chinese APTs or the Russian APT. What we'll do is, we'll break down what the issue is. With Russia, for example, it's a combination of two types of exploits that are happening. You have the technical exploit, the malicious payload and vulnerability in a critical infrastructure network and then profiling those actors. We also have another problem, the influence operations, which is why we started the Center for Cyber Influence Operations Studies. We've been asked repeatedly since the elections last year by the intelligence community to tell us, explain this new propaganda. The interesting thing is the synergies between the two sides are exploiting and weaponizing the same vectors. While on the technical side, you're exploiting a vulnerability in a network with a technical exploit, with a payload, a compiled payload with a bunch of tools. On the influence operations side, they're weaponizing the same social media platforms that you would use to distribute a payload here but only the... >> Contest payload. Either way you have critical infrastructure. The payload being content, fake content or whatever content, has an underpinning that gamification call it virality, network effect and user psychology around they don't really open up the Facebook post, they just read the headline and picture. There's a dissonance campaign, or whatever they're running, that might not be critical to national security at that time but it's also a post. >> It shifts the conversation in a way where they can use, for example, right now all the rage with nation states is to use metadata, put it into big data analytics, come up with a psychographic algorithm, and go after critical infrastructure executives with elevated privileges. You can do anything with those guys. You can spearfish them. The Russian modus operandi is to call and act like a recruiter, have that first touch of contact be the phone call, which they're not expecting. "Hey, I got this job. "Keep it on the down low. Don't tell anybody. "I'm going to send you the job description. "Here's the PDF." Take it from there. >> How should we think about the different nation state actors? You mentioned Russia, China, there's Iran, North Korea. Lay it out for us. >> Each geography has a different vibe to their hacking. With Russia you have this stealth and sophistication and their hacking is just like their espionage. It's like playing chess. They're really good at making pawns feel like they're kings on the chessboard so they're really good at recruiting insider threats. Bill Evanina is the head of counterintel. He's a bulldog. I know him personally. He's exactly what we need in that position. The Chinese hacking style is more smash and grab, very unsophisticated. They'll use a payload over and over again so forensically, it's easy to... >> Dave: Signatures. >> Yeah, it is. >> More shearing on the tooling or whatever. >> They'll use code to the point of redundancy so it's like alright, the only reason they got in... Chinese get into a network, not because of sophistication, but because the network is not protected. Then you have the mercenary element which is where China really thrives. Chinese PLA will hack for the nation state during the day, but they'll moonlight at night to North Korea so North Korea, they have people who may consider themselves hackers but they're not code writers. They outsource. >> They're brokers, like general contractors. >> They're not sophisticated enough to carry out a real nation state attack. What they'll do is outsource to Chinese PLA members. Chinese PLA members will be like, "okay well, here's what I need for this job." Typically, what the Chinese will do, their loyalties are different than in the west, during the day they'll discover a vulnerability or an O day. They won't tell their boss right away. They'll capitalize off of it for a week. You do that, you go to jail over here. Russia, they'll kill you. China, somehow this is an accepted thing. They don't like it but it just happens. Then you have the eastern European nations and Russia still uses mercenary elements out of Moscow and St. Petersburg so what they'll do is they will freelance, as well. That's when you get the sophisticated, carbonic style hack where they'll go into the financial sector. They'll monitor the situation. Learn the ins and outs of everything having to do with that particular swift or bank or whatever. They go in and those are the guys that are making millions of dollars on a breach. Hacking in general is a grind. It's a lot of vulnerabilities work, but few work for long. Everybody is always thinking there's this omega code that they have. >> It's just brute force. You just pound it all day long. >> That's it and it's a grind. You might have something that you worked on for six months. You're ready to monetize. >> What about South America? What's the vibe down there? Anything happening in there? >> Not really. There is nothing of substance that really affects us here. Again, if an organization is completely unprotected. >> John: Russia? China? >> Russia and China. >> What about our allies? >> GCHQ. >> Israel? What's the collaboration, coordination, snooping? What's the dynamic like there? >> We deal, mostly, with NATO and Five Eyes. I actually had dinner with NATO last night. Five Eyes is important because we share signals intelligence and most of the communications will go through Five Eyes which is California, United States, Australia, New Zealand, and the UK. Those are our five most important allies and then NATO after that, as far as I'm concerned, for cyber. You have the whole weaponization of space going on with SATCOM interception. We're dealing with that with NASA, DARPA. Not a lot is happening down in South America. The next big thing that we have to look at is the cyber caliphate. You have the Muslim brotherhood that funds it. Their influence operations domestically are extremely strong. They have a lot of contacts on the Hill which is a problem. You have ANTIFA. So there's two sides to this. You have the technical exploit but then the information warfare exploit. >> What about the bitcoin underbelly that started with the silk roads and you've seen a lot of bitcoin. Money laundering is a big deal, know your customer. Now regulation is part of big ICOs going on. Are you seeing any activity from those? Are they pulling from previous mercenary groups or are they arbitraging just more free? >> For updating bitcoin? >> The whole bitcoin networks. There's been an effort to commercialize (mumbles) so there's been a legitimate track to bring that on but yet there's still a lot of actors. >> I think bitcoin is important to keep and if you look at the more black ops type hacking or payment stuff, bitcoin is an important element just as tor is an important element, just as encryption is an important element. >> John: It's fundamental, actually. >> It's a necessity so when I hear people on the Hill, I have my researcher, I'm like, "any time you hear somebody trying to have "weakened encryption, back door encryption" the first thing, we add them to the briefing schedule and I'm like, "look, here's what you're proposing. "You're proposing that you outlaw math. "So what? Two plus two doesn't equal four. "What is it? Three and a half? "Where's the logic?" When you break it down for them like that, on the Hill in particular, they begin to get it. They're like, "well how do we get the intelligence community "or the FBI, for example, to get into this iphone?" Civil liberties, you've got to take that into consideration. >> I got to ask you a question. I interviewed a guy, I won't say his name. He actually commented off the record, but he said to me, "you won't believe how dumb some of these state actors are "when it comes to cyber. "There's some super smart ones. "Specifically Iran and the Middle East, "they're really not that bright." He used an example, I don't know if it's true or not, that stuxnet, I forget which one it was, there was a test and it got out of control and they couldn't pull it back and it revealed their hand but it could've been something worse. His point was they actually screwed up their entire operation because they're doing some QA on their thing. >> I can't talk about stuxnet but it's easy to get... >> In terms of how you test them, how do you QA your work? >> James: How do you review malware? (mumbles) >> You can't comment on the accuracy of Zero Days, the documentary? >> Next question. Here's what you find. Some of these nation state actors, they saw what happened with our elections so they're like, "we have a really crappy offensive cyber program "but maybe we can thrive in influence operations "in propaganda and whatever." We're getting hit by everybody and 2020 is going to be, I don't even want to imagine. >> John: You think it's going to be out of control? >> It's going to be. >> I've got to ask this question, this came up. You're bringing up a really good point I think a lot of people aren't talking about but we've brought up a few times. I want to keep on getting it out there. In the old days, state on state actors used to do things, espionage, and everyone knew who they were and it was very important not to bring their queen out, if you will, too early, or reveal their moves. Now with Wikileaks and public domain, a lot of these tools are being democratized so that they can covertly put stuff out in the open for enemies of our country to just attack us at will. Is that happening? I hear about it, meaning that I might be Russia or I might be someone else. I don't want to reveal my hand but hey, you ISIS guys out there, all you guys in the Middle East might want to use this great hack and put it out in the open. >> I think yeah. The new world order, I guess. The order of things, the power positions are completely flipped, B side, counter, whatever. It's completely not what the establishment was thinking it would be. What's happening is Facebook is no more relevant, I mean Facebook is more relevant than the UN. Wikileaks has more information pulsating out of it than a CIA analyst, whatever. >> John: There's a democratization of the information? >> The thing is we're no longer a world that's divided by geographic lines in the sand that were drawn by these two guys that fought and lost a war 50 years ago. We're now in a tribal chieftain digital society and we're separated by ideological variation and so you have tribe members here in the US who have fellow tribe members in Israel, Russia, whatever. Look at Anonymous. Anonymous, I think everyone understands that's the biggest law enforcement honeypot there is, but you look at the ideological variation and it's hashtags and it's keywords and it's forums. That's the Senate. That's congress. >> John: This is a new reality. >> This is reality. >> How do you explain that to senators? I was watching that on TV where they're trying to grasp what Facebook is and Twitter. (mumbles) Certainly Facebook knew what was going on. They're trying to play policy and they're new. They're newbies when it comes to policy. They don't have any experience on the Hill, now it's ramping up and they've had some help but tech has never been an actor on the stage of policy formulation. >> We have a real problem. We're looking at outside threats as our national security threats, which is incorrect. You have dragnet surveillance capitalists. Here's the biggest threats we have. The weaponization of Facebook, twitter, youtube, google, and search engines like comcast. They all have a censorship algorithm, which is how they monetize your traffic. It's censorship. You're signing your rights away and your free will when you use google. You're not getting the right answer, you're getting the answer that coincides with an algorithm that they're meant to monetize and capitalize on. It's complete censorship. What's happening is, we had something that just passed SJ res 34 which no resistance whatsoever, blew my mind. What that allows is for a new actor, the ISPs to curate metadata on their users and charge them their monthly fee as well. It's completely corrupt. These dragnet surveillance capitalists have become dragnet surveillance censorists. Is that a word? Censorists? I'll make it one. Now they've become dragnet surveillance propagandists. That's why 2020 is up for grabs. >> (mumbles) We come from the same school here on this one, but here's the question. The younger generation, I asked a gentleman in the hallway on his way out, I said, "where's the cyber west point? "We're the Navy SEALS in this new digital culture." He said, "oh yeah, some things." We're talking about the younger generation, the kids playing Call of Duty Destiny. These are the guys out there, young kids coming up that will probably end up having multiple disciplinary skills. Where are they going to come from? So the question is, are we going to have a counterculture? We're almost feeling like what the 60s were to the 50s. Vietnam. I kind of feel like maybe the security stuff doesn't get taken care of, a revolt is coming. You talk about dragnet censorship. You're talking about the lack of control and privacy. I don't mind giving Facebook my data to connect with my friends and see my thanksgiving photos or whatever but now I don't want fake news jammed down my throat. Anti-Trump and Anti-Hillary spew. I didn't buy into that. I don't want that anymore. >> I think millennials, I have a 19 year old son, my researchers, they're right out of grad school. >> John: What's the profile like? >> They have no trust whatsoever in the government and they laugh at legislation. They don't care any more about having their face on their Facebook page and all their most intimate details of last night's date and tomorrow's date with two different, whatever. They just don't... They loathe the traditional way of things. You got to talk to General Alexander today. We have a really good relationship with him, Hayden, Mike Rogers. There is a counterculture in the works but it's not going to happen overnight because we have a tech deficit here where we need foreign tech people just to make up for the deficit. >> Bill Mann and I were talking, I heard the general basically, this is my interpretation, "if we don't get our shit together, "this is going to be an f'd up situation." That's what I heard him basically say. You guys don't come together so what Bill talked about was two scenarios. If industry and government don't share and come together, they're going to have stuff mandated on them by the government. Do you agree? >> I do. >> What's going to happen? >> The argument for regulation on the Hill is they don't want to stifle innovation, which makes sense but then ISPs don't innovate at all. They're using 1980s technology, so why did you pass SJ res 34? >> John: For access? >> I don't know because nation states just look at that as, "oh wow another treasure trove of metadata "that we can weaponize. "Let's start psychographically charging alt-left "and alt-right, you know what I mean?" >> Hacks are inevitable. That seems to be the trend. >> You talked before, James, about threats. You mentioned weaponization of social. >> James: Social media. >> You mentioned another in terms of ISPs I think. >> James: Dragnet. >> What are the big threats? Weaponization of social. ISP metadata, obviously. >> Metadata, it really depends and that's the thing. That's what makes the advisory so difficult because you have to go between influence operations and the exploit because the vectors are used for different things in different variations. >> John: Integrated model. >> It really is and so with a question like that I'm like okay so my biggest concern is the propaganda, political warfare, the information warfare. >> People are underestimating the value of how big that is, aren't they? They're oversimplifying the impact of info campaigns. >> Yeah because your reality is based off of... It's like this, influence operations. Traditional media, everybody is all about the narrative and controlling the narrative. What Russia understands is to control the narrative, the most embryo state of the narrative is the meme. Control the meme, control the idea. If you control the idea, you control the belief system. Control the belief system, you control the narrative. Control the narrative, you control the population. No guns were fired, see what I'm saying? >> I was explaining to a friend on Facebook, I was getting into a rant on this. I used a very simple example. In the advertising world, they run millions of dollars of ad campaigns on car companies for post car purchase cognitive dissonance campaigns. Just to make you feel good about your purchase. In a way, that's what's going on and explains what's going on on Facebook. This constant reinforcement of these beliefs whether its for Trump or Hillary, all this stuff was happening. I saw it firsthand. That's just one small nuance but it's across a spectrum of memes. >> You have all these people, you have nation states, you have mercenaries, but the most potent force in this space, the most hyperevolving in influence operations, is the special interest group. The well-funded special interests. That's going to be a problem. 2020, I keep hitting that because I was doing an interview earlier. 2020 is going to be a tug of war for the psychological core of the population and it's free game. Dragnet surveillance capitalists will absolutely be dragnet surveillance propagandists. They will have the candidates that they're going to push. Now that can also work against them because mainstream media, twitter, Facebook were completely against trump, for example, and that worked in his advantage. >> We've seen this before. I'm a little bit older, but we are the same generation. Remember when they were going to open up sealex? Remember the last mile for connectivity? That battle was won before it was even fought. What you're saying, if I get this right, the war and tug of war going on now is a big game. If it's not played in one now, this jerry rigging, gerrymandering of stuff could happen so when people wake up and realize what's happened the game has already been won. >> Yeah, your universe as you know it, your belief systems, what you hold to be true and self evident. Again, the embryo. If you look back to the embryo introduction of that concept, whatever concept it is, to your mind it came from somewhere else. There are very few things that you believe that you came up with yourself. The digital space expedites that process and that's dangerous because now it's being weaponized. >> Back to the, who fixes this. Who's the watchdog on this? These ideas you're talking about, some of them, you're like, "man that guy has lost it, he's crazy." Actually, I don't think you're crazy at all. I think it's right on. Is there a media outlet watching it? Who's reporting on it? What even can grasp what you're saying? What's going on in D.C.? Can you share that perspective? >> Yeah, the people that get this are the intelligence community, okay? The problem is the way we advise is I will go in with one of the silos in the NSA and explain what's happening and how to do it. They'll turn around their computer and say, "show me how to do it. "How do you do a multi vector campaign "with this meme and make it viral in 30 minutes." You have to be able to show them how to do it. >> John: We can do that. Actually we can't. >> That sort of thing, you have to be able to show them because there's not enough practitioners, we call them operators. When you're going in here, you're teaching them. >> The thing is if they have the metadata to your treasure trove, this is how they do it. I'll explain here. If they have the metadata, they know where the touch points are. It's a network effect mole, just distributive mole. They can put content in certain subnetworks that they know have a reaction to the metadata so they have the knowledge going in. It's not like they're scanning the whole world. They're monitoring pockets like a drone, right? Once they get over the territory, then they do the acquired deeper targets and then go viral. That's basically how fake news works. >> See the problem is, you look at something like alt-right and ANTIFA. ANTIFA, just like Black Lives Matter, the initiatives may have started out with righteous intentions just like take a knee. These initiatives, first stage is if it causes chaos, chaos is the op for a nation state in the US. That's the op. Chaos. That's the beginning and the end of an op. What happens is they will say, "oh okay look, this is ticking off all these other people "so let's fan the flame of this take a knee thing "hurt the NFL." Who cares? I don't watch football anyway but you know, take a knee. It's causing all this chaos. >> John: It's called trolling. >> What will happen is Russia and China, China has got their 13 five year plan, Russia has their foreign influence operations. They will fan that flame to exhaustion. Now what happens to the ANTIFA guy when he's a self-radicalized wound collector with a mental disorder? Maybe he's bipolar. Now with ANTIFA, he's experienced a heightened more extreme variation of that particular ideology so who steps in next? Cyber caliphate and Muslim brotherhood. That's why we're going to have an epidemic. I can't believe, you know, ANTIFA is a domestic terrorist organization. It's shocking that the FBI is not taking this more serious. What's happening now is Muslim brotherhood funds basically the cyber caliphate. The whole point of cyber caliphate is to create awareness, instill the illusion of rampant xenophobia for recruiting. They have self-radicalized wound collectors with ANTIFA that are already extremists anyway. They're just looking for a reason to take that up a notch. That's when, cyber caliphate, they hook up with them with a hashtag. They respond and they create a relationship. >> John: They get the fly wheel going. >> They take them to a deep web forum, dark web forum, and start showing them how it works. You can do this. You can be part of something. This guy who was never even muslim now is going under the ISIS moniker and he acts. He drives people over in New York. >> They fossilized their belief system. >> The whole point to the cyber caliphate is to find actors that are already in the self-radicalization phase but what does it take psychologically and from a mentoring perspective, to get them to act? That's the cyber caliphate. >> This is the value of data and context in real time using the current events to use that data, refuel their operation. It's data driven terrorism. >> What's the prescription that you're advising? >> I'm not a regulations kind of guy, but any time you're curating metadata like we're just talking about right now. Any time you have organizations like google, like Facebook, that have become so big, they are like their own nation state. That's a dangerous thing. The metadata curation. >> John: The value of the data is very big. That's the point. >> It is because what's happening... >> John: There's always a vulnerability. >> There's always a vulnerability and it will be exploited and all that metadata, it's unscrubbed. I'm not worried about them selling metadata that's scrubbed. I'm worried about the nation state or the sophisticated actor that already has a remote access Trojan on the network and is exfiltrating in real time. That's the guy that I'm worried about because he can just say, "forget it, I'm going to target people that are at this phase." He knows how to write algorithms, comes up with a good psychographic algorithm, puts the data in there, and now he's like, "look I'm only going to promote this concept, "two people at this particular stage of self-radicalization "or sympathetic to the kremlin." We have a big problem on the college campuses with IP theft because of the Chinese Students Scholar Associations which are directly run by the Chinese communist party. >> I heard a rumor that Equifax's franchising strategy had partners on the VPN that were state sponsored. They weren't even hacking, they had full access. >> There's a reason that the Chinese are buying hotels. They bought the Waldorf Astoria. We do stuff with the UN and NATO, you can't even stay there anymore. I think it's still under construction but it's a no-no to stay there anymore. I mean western nations and allies because they'll have bugs in the rooms. The WiFi that you use... >> Has fake certificates. >> Or there's a vulnerability that's left in that network so the information for executives who have IP or PII or electronic health records, you know what I mean? You go to these places to stay overnight, as an executive, and you're compromised. >> Look what happened with Eugene Kaspersky. I don't know the real story. I don't know if you can comment, but someone sees that and says, "this guy used to have high level meetings "at the Pentagon weekly, monthly." Now he's persona non grata. >> He fell out of favor, I guess, right? It happens. >> James, great conversation. Thanks for coming on the Cube. Congratulations on the great work you guys are doing here at the event. I know the content has been well received. Certainly the key notes we saw were awesome. CSOs, view from the government, from industry, congratulations. James Scott who is the co founder and senior fellow of ICIT, Internet Critical Infrastructure Technology. >> James: Institute of Critical Infrastructure Technology. >> T is for tech. >> And the Center for Cyber Influence Operations Studies. >> Good stuff. A lot of stuff going on (mumbles), exploits, infrastructure, it's all mainstream. It's the crisis of our generation. There's a radical shift happening and the answers are all going to come from industry and government coming together. This is the Cube bringing the data, I'm John Furrier with Dave Vellante. Thanks for watching. More live coverage after this short break. (music)

(click) >> Hey, welcome everybody, Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. Well, it is an excited day and we're really happy to be covering big announcements coming out of Google Next today. And we wanted to get right down here to SAP Silicon Valley Headquarters and talk to Sam Yen and get his take on what's happening up in San Francisco today. So, first off, Sam great to see ya. >> Yeah, great to see you as well. >> So, Sam you are the Managing Director of SAP Silicon Valley. Obviously, you guys have a big presence in Philly, and a big presence here in Paulo Alto. And also the Chief Design Officer. So, let's just jump into it. So, Bernd Leukert was onstage with Diane Green this morning kicking off the Google Next Conference and talking about this new relationship between SAP and Google. >> I think, first of all, it's the trend in what the industry's happening right now. If you look at companies, companies are more and more willing to go to the public cloud in terms of helping them with their infrastructure needs. The market is actually really going to double between now and 2020. So, with that we have three major announcements that we announced today. The first one was SAP's flagship products running on GCP, Google's Cloud Platform. The first one is HANA. If you know anything about SAP, HANA's been our data processing engine, memory processing engine for the last number of years. It's our flagship product that we've been talking about. And that's now certified for GCP. The second thing is really more for the, it's still part of the first announcement, but for the development community bringing HANA Express which is a downloadable version of HANA that you can put on your laptop and really get to know what HANA's all about and see how easy it is to develop on top of HANA. So, that's now available on Google Cloud Launcher. Also, SAP's cloud platform is also going to be, we're working very closely together to co-innovate together with Google. The second part of the second announcement, is taking infrastructure as a service to the next level. SAP has always had a multi-cloud strategy offering customers choice in where they want to deploy on public cloud. And Google is now available from that perspective. But beyond just infrastructure to service, we want to partner with Google to take things like data privacy and protection to the next level by offering transparency over how customers monitor and understand what's going on from the governance, risk and compliance perspective on their information. The last thing, which is really exciting as well, is bringing together productivity tools together with SAP. Google's G Suite, things like Mail and Sheets and Hangouts and things like that, and making that integrate seamlessly into the SAP backend system. >> So, so many layers to these announcements. And thank you for laying it all down. The first one, just at a high level, is clearly enterprises are comfortable with public cloud. There's now more enterprisy software firm out there than SAP. And for you guys to really get together with Google and Google Cloud, that really shows that the conversation is no longer about, "Should I go to the cloud?" or "Is the cloud safe?" or "Is it appropriate for enterprise?" But enterprises are fully all in. >> That's definitely the trend. Customers are different in their journey but more and more we're seeing that. And the numbers that I talked about in terms of the investment and spend for public cloud is growing through the roof. At the end of the day, SAP from an SAP perspective, and also from a Google perspective, we want to provide as many options for customers as we can. And we think that by doing this we're providing the best potential solutions for where a customer thinks they need to be today and tomorrow. >> Right, and it's really about workloads, right? It's not even specifically about customers. 'Cause you guys still have Google Cloud, or excuse me, SAP Cloud, recently the HANA Cloud platform recently renamed. So, you still have your own cloud if they want their own kind of enterprise cloud that you're going to run for them. Obviously, they can run SAP on their own internal cloud now you're saying they can run SAP on Google's cloud. But it's really more workload and application and use case specific as opposed to a company. >> Yeah, and I think ultimately options for the customer in terms of their particular situation. Yes, SAP will continue to have our own hosting, our own cloud as well. But you also mentioned SAP Cloud Platform. So, there's many, many different ways from a platform as a service perspective, enterprise services that we provide from a SAP perspective running on Google's infrastructure. And also leveraging the Google services that they provide on their Cloud Platform as well. >> Right, another piece that you said kind of towards the end of many, many announcements happening today, is really the developer angle. Every show, we cover a hundred shows a year, and every one is fighting for the attention of the developer, and really trying to cater to the developer. 'Cause that's where the power is. And you want a robust developer ecosystem because that's what moves things forward. So, this is a pretty interesting announcement now that developers can basically download a version of HANA onto their laptop to have an appeal to help them develop more stuff for you. >> Yeah, and I think the broader statement here is we're combining the power of the SAP development ecosystem with the millions and millions of people also in the Google development ecosystem to build solutions for customers. At the end of the day, the power of your offering is really the power of your ecosystem. And it's kind of interesting, being here in a German company actually in Silicon Valley from an SAP perspective, enterprise seems to be the new black right now. There are more consumer brands that are looking at going into the enterprise. And SAP's starting to become more and more an on-ramp into the enterprise for these companies. >> And it's interesting because public clouds, traditionally, years ago weren't really thought of as a true enterprise solution or maybe test but you'd never run your production workloads. But clearly now that's going away. That said, there's a lot of very specific issues that you have to deal with with the enterprise security, compliance, the rules around the world that are different for data sovereignty, etc. So, you guys bring a real depth of experience in those areas to this new announcement. >> Yeah, I think that's the power of the partnership if you think about Google and the public cloud, the scalability, the availability, the reach of the Google public cloud and their expertise in terms of the infrastructure and the operations. And then you combine that with SAP's experience in terms of what works from a governance, risk and compliance perspective. We have an understanding both with customers and their needs. And also working with local governments and the policies that need to be in place. So, I think it's a beautiful combination of the two companies. >> Now, the next kind of big trend that cloud is helping even accelerate more is A.I. and machine learning and you know, we're kind of going to Phase Two of what was formerly known as Big Data and Hadoop and now were moving to a much more sophisticated version of that enabled by cloud. Obviously, Google's got a ton of expertise in machine learning and A.I. You guys have been doing it on the enterprise side. Again, coming together, one plus one makes three? >> Absolutely, this is one of the exciting things that we're also, we've also talked about and announced, that we are partnering with Google to really take machine learning to the enterprise use cases. There's so much information that's going through enterprise systems. More and more information as things like Big Data, and Internet of Things, and social things are bringing information in. This is really, really fruitful area where think there's a lot of collaboration. Also, from a design perspective, once you have this information, how do you expose this stuff to the users that makes sense and really amplify human capabilities when we're talking about all this technology. >> Right, so you're sitting 6,000 miles from Waldorf, 3,000 miles from Philadelphia. How does this change things for you? You said you've been at SAP for a number of years now. You're sitting in the heart of Silicon Valley. What does this mean to you, kind of personally, and to SAP's presence in Silicon Valley to do this partnership with Google who's just right down the road and clearly one of the main powers. >> Yeah, I think it really talks about the importance of SAP's presence here in Silicon Valley. Again, as an on-ramp into the enterprise. There's lots and lots of partners that want to expand their business and figure out how they can bring their services also to the enterprise. It's almost like consumerization of IT if you will. And really, that's SAP's purpose and reason for being here. >> All right, well Sam I'll give you the last word. Great event today. Really exciting but before we know it SAP Sapphire will be upon us. I presume you guys will keep working tomorrow and have something new and special for us in Sapphire. >> Yeah, Google and SAP, we're in it for the long term. This is just the beginning. And look out for exciting announcements coming in Sapphire as well. >> All right, super. He's Sam Yen, I'm Jeff Frick. You're watching theCUBE. Thanks for watching. (energetic, techno music)

>> Announcer: Live from New York, it's theCUBE, covering the IBM machine learning launch event. Brought to you by IBM. Now, here are your hosts, Dave Vellante and Stu Miniman. >> Alright, we're back. Jean Francois Puget is here, he's the distinguished engineer for machine learning and optimization at IBM analytics, CUBE alum. Good to see you again. >> Yes. >> Thanks very much for coming on, big day for you guys. >> Jean Francois: Indeed. >> It's like giving birth every time you guys give one of these products. We saw you a little bit in the analyst meeting, pretty well attended. Give us the highlights from your standpoint. What are the key things that we should be focused on in this announcement? >> For most people, machine learning equals machine learning algorithms. Algorithms, when you look at newspapers or blogs, social media, it's all about algorithms. Our view that, sure, you need algorithms for machine learning, but you need steps before you run algorithms, and after. So before, you need to get data, to transform it, to make it usable for machine learning. And then, you run algorithms. These produce models, and then, you need to move your models into a production environment. For instance, you use an algorithm to learn from past credit card transaction fraud. You can learn models, patterns, that correspond to fraud. Then, you want to use those models, those patterns, in your payment system. And moving from where you run the algorithm to the operation system is a nightmare today, so our value is to automate what you do before you run algorithms, and then what you do after. That's our differentiator. >> I've had some folks in theCUBE in the past have said years ago, actually, said, "You know what, algorithms are plentiful." I think he made the statement, I remember my friend Avi Mehta, "Algorithms are free. "It's what you do with them that matters." >> Exactly, that's, I believe in autonomy that open source won for machine learning algorithms. Now the future is with open source, clearly. But it solves only a part of the problem you're facing if you want to action machine learning. So, exactly what you said. What do you do with the results of algorithm is key. And open source people don't care much about it, for good reasons. They are focusing on producing the best algorithm. We are focusing on creating value for our customers. It's different. >> In terms of, you mentioned open source a couple times, in terms of customer choice, what's your philosophy with regard to the various tooling and platforms for open source, how do you go about selecting which to support? >> Machine learning is fascinating. It's overhyped, maybe, but it's also moving very quickly. Every year there is a new cool stuff. Five years ago, nobody spoke about deep learning. Now it's everywhere. Who knows what will happen next year? Our take is to support open source, to support the top open source packages. We don't know which one will win in the future. We don't know even if one will be enough for all needs. We believe one size does not fit all, so our take is support a curated list of mid-show open source. We start with Spark ML for many reasons, but we won't stop at Spark ML. >> Okay, I wonder if we can talk use cases. Two of my favorite, well, let's just start with fraud. Fraud has become much, much better over the past certainly 10 years, but still not perfect. I don't know if perfection is achievable, but lot of false positives. How will machine learning affect that? Can we expect as consumers even better fraud detection in more real time? >> If we think of the full life cycle going from data to value, we will provide a better answer. We still use machine learning algorithm to create models, but a model does not tell you what to do. It will tell you, okay, for this credit card transaction coming, it has a high probability to be fraud. Or this one has a lower priority, uh, probability. But then it's up to the designer of the overall application to make decisions, so what we recommend is to use machine learning data prediction but not only, and then use, maybe, (murmuring). For instance, if your machine learning model tells you this is a fraud with a high probability, say 90%, and this is a customer you know very well, it's a 10-year customer you know very well, then you can be confident that it's a fraud. Then if next fraud tells you this is 70% probability, but it's a customer since one week. In a week, we don't know the customer, so the confidence we can get in machine learning should be low, and there you will not reject the transaction immediately. Maybe you will enter, you don't approve it automatically, maybe you will send a one-time passcode, or you enter a serve vendor system, but you don't reject it outright. Really, the idea is to use machine learning predictions as yet another input for making decisions. You're making decision informed on what you could learn from your past. But it's not replacing human decision-making. Our approach with IBM, you don't see IBM speak much about artificial intelligence in general because we don't believe we're here to replace humans. We're here to assist humans, so we say, augmented intelligence or assistance. That's the role we see for machine learning. It will give you additional data so that you make better decisions. >> It's not the concept that you object to, it's the term artificial intelligence. It's really machine intelligence, it's not fake. >> I started my career as a PhD in artificial intelligence, I won't say when, but long enough. At that time, there were already promise that we have Terminator in the next decade and this and that. And the same happened in the '60s, or it was after the '60s. And then, there is an AI winter, and we have a risk here to have an AI winter because some people are just raising red flags that are not substantiated, I believe. I don't think that technology's here that we can replace human decision-making altogether any time soon, but we can help. We can certainly make some proficient, more efficient, more productive with machine learning. >> Having said that, there are a lot of cognitive functions that are getting replaced, maybe not by so-called artificial intelligence, but certainly by machines and automation. >> Yes, so we're automating a number of things, and maybe we won't need to have people do quality check and just have an automated vision system detect defects. Sure, so we're automating more and more, but this is not new, it has been going on for centuries. >> Well, the list evolved. So, what can humans do that machines can't, and how would you expect that to change? >> We're moving away from IMB machine learning, but it is interesting. You know, each time there is a capacity that a machine that will automate, we basically redefine intelligence to exclude it, so you know. That's what I foresee. >> Yeah, well, robots a while ago, Stu, couldn't climb stairs, and now, look at that. >> Do we feel threatened because a robot can climb a stair faster than us? Not necessarily. >> No, it doesn't bother us, right. Okay, question? >> Yeah, so I guess, bringing it back down to the solution that we're talking about today, if I now am doing, I'm doing the analytics, the machine learning on the mainframe, how do we make sure that we don't overrun and blow out all our MIPS? >> We recommend, so we are not using the mainframe base compute system. We recommend using ZIPS, so additional calls to not overload, so it's a very important point. We claim, okay, if you do everything on the mainframe, you can learn from operational data. You don't want to disturb, and you don't want to disturb takes a lot of different meanings. One that you just said, you don't want to slow down your operation processings because you're going to hurt your business. But you also want to be careful. Say we have a payment system where there is a machine learning model predicting fraud probability, a part of the system. You don't want a young bright data scientist decide that he had a great idea, a great model, and he wants to push his model in production without asking anyone. So you want to control that. That's why we insist, we are providing governance that includes a lot of things like keeping track of how models were created from which data sets, so lineage. We also want to have access control and not allow anyone to just deploy a new model because we make it easy to deploy, so we want to have a role-based access and only someone someone with some executive, well, it depends on the customer, but not everybody can update the production system, and we want to support that. And that's something that differentiates us from open source. Open source developers, they don't care about governance. It's not their problem, but it is our customer problem, so this solution will come with all the governance and integrity constraints you can expect from us. >> Can you speak to, first solution's going to be on z/OS, what's the roadmap look like and what are some of those challenges of rolling this out to other private cloud solutions? >> We are going to shape this quarter IBM machine learning for Z. It starts with Spark ML as a base open source. This is not, this is interesting, but it's not all that is for machine learning. So that's how we start. We're going to add more in the future. Last week we announced we will shape Anaconda, which is a major distribution for Python ecosystem, and it includes a number of machine learning open source. We announced it for next quarter. >> I believe in the press release it said down the road things like TensorFlow are coming, H20. >> But Anaconda will announce for next quarter, so we will leverage this when it's out. Then indeed, we have a roadmap to include major open source, so major open source are the one from Anaconda (murmuring), mostly. Key deep learning, so TensorFlow and probably one or two additional, we're still discussing. One that I'm very keen on, it's called XGBoost in one word. People don't speak about it in newspapers, but this is what wins all Kaggle competitions. Kaggle is a machine learning competition site. When I say all, all that are not imagery cognition competitions. >> Dave: And that was ex-- >> XGBoost, X-G-B-O-O-S-T. >> Dave: XGBoost, okay. >> XGBoost, and it's-- >> Dave: X-ray gamma, right? >> It's really a package. When I say we don't know which package will win, XGBoost was introduced a year ago also, or maybe a bit more, but not so long ago, and now, if you have structure data, it is the best choice today. It's a really fast-moving, but so, we will support mid-show deep learning package and mid-show classical learning package like the one from Anaconda or XGBoost. The other thing we start with Z. We announced in the analyst session that we will have a power version and a private cloud, meaning XTC69X version as well. I can't tell you when because it's not firm, but it will come. >> And in public cloud as well, I guess we'll, you've got components in the public cloud today like the Watson Data Platform that you've extracted and put here. >> We have extracted part of the testing experience, so we've extracted notebooks and a graphical tool called ModelBuilder from DSX as part of IBM machine learning now, and we're going to add more of DSX as we go. But the goal is to really share code and function across private cloud and public cloud. As Rob Thomas defined it, we want with private cloud to offer all the features and functionality of public cloud, except that it would run inside a firewall. We are really developing machine learning and Watson machine learning on a command code base. It's an internal open source project. We share code, and then, we shape on different platform. >> I mean, you haven't, just now, used the word hybrid. Every now and then IBM does, but do you see that so-called hybrid use case as viable, or do you see it more, some workloads should run on prem, some should run in the cloud, and maybe they'll never come together? >> Machine learning, you basically have to face, one is training and the other is scoring. I see people moving training to cloud quite easily, unless there is some regulation about data privacy. But training is a good fit for cloud because usually you need a large computing system but only for limited time, so elasticity's great. But then deployment, if you want to score transaction in a CICS transaction, it has to run beside CICS, not cloud. If you want to score data on an IoT gateway, you want to score other gateway, not in a data center. I would say that may not be what people think first, but what will drive really the split between public cloud, private, and on prem is where you want to apply your machine learning models, where you want to score. For instance, smart watches, they are switching to gear to fit measurement system. You want to score your health data on the watch, not in the internet somewhere. >> Right, and in that CICS example that you gave, you'd essentially be bringing the model to the CICS data, is that right? >> Yes, that's what we do. That's a value of machine learning for Z is if you want to score transactions happening on Z, you need to be running on Z. So it's clear, mainframe people, they don't want to hear about public cloud, so they will be the last one moving. They have their reasons, but they like mainframe because it ties really, really secure and private. >> Dave: Public cloud's a dirty word. >> Yes, yes, for Z users. At least that's what I was told, and I could check with many people. But we know that in general the move is for public cloud, so we want to help people, depending on their journey, of the cloud. >> You've got one of those, too. Jean Francois, thanks very much for coming on theCUBE, it was really a pleasure having you back. >> Thank you. >> You're welcome. Alright, keep it right there, everybody. We'll be back with our next guest. This is theCUBE, we're live from the Waldorf Astoria. IBM's machine learning announcement, be right back. (electronic keyboard music)

>> Announcer: Live from New York, it's theCUBE, covering the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event, brought to you by IBM. Now, here are your hosts, Dave Vellante and Stu Miniman. >> Welcome back to New York City, everybody. We're here at the Waldorf Astoria covering the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event, bringing machine learning to the IBM Z. Bryan Smith is here, he's the vice president of R&D and the CTO of Rocket Software, powering the path to digital transformation. Bryan, welcome to theCUBE, thanks for coming on. >> Thanks for having me. >> So, Rocket Software, Waltham, Mass. based, close to where we are, but a lot of people don't know about Rocket, so pretty large company, give us the background. >> It's been around for, this'll be our 27th year. Private company, we've been a partner of IBM's for the last 23 years. Almost all of that is in the mainframe space, or we focused on the mainframe space, I'll say. We have 1,300 employees, we call ourselves Rocketeers. It's spread around the world. We're really an R&D focused company. More than half the company is engineering, and it's spread across the world on every continent and most major countries. >> You're esstenially OEM-ing your tools as it were. Is that right, no direct sales force? >> About half, there are different lenses to look at this, but about half of our go-to-market is through IBM with IBM-labeled, IBM-branded products. We've always been, for the side of products, we've always been the R&D behind the products. The partnership, though, has really grown. It's more than just an R&D partnership now, now we're doing co-marketing, we're even doing some joint selling to serve IBM mainframe customers. The partnership has really grown over these last 23 years from just being the guys who write the code to doing much more. >> Okay, so how do you fit in this announcement. Machine learning on Z, where does Rocket fit? >> Part of the announcement today is a very important piece of technology that we developed. We call it data virtualization. Data virtualization is really enabling customers to open their mainframe to allow the data to be used in ways that it was never designed to be used. You might have these data structures that were designed 10, 20, even 30 years ago that were designed for a very specific application, but today they want to use it in a very different way, and so, the traditional path is to take that data and copy it, to ETL it someplace else they can get some new use or to build some new application. What data virtualization allows you to do is to leave that data in place but access it using APIs that developers want to use today. They want to use JSON access, for example, or they want to use SQL access. But they want to be able to do things like join across IMS, DB2, and VSAM all with a single query using an SQL statement. We can do that relational databases and non-relational databases. It gets us out of this mode of having to copy data into some other data store through this ETL process, access the data in place, we call it moving the applications or the analytics to the data versus moving the data to the analytics or to the applications. >> Okay, so in this specific case, and I have said several times today, as Stu has heard me, two years ago IBM had a big theme around the z13 bringing analytics and transactions together, this sort of extends that. Great, I've got this transaction data that lives behind a firewall somewhere. Why the mainframe, why now? >> Well, I would pull back to where I said where we see more companies and organizations wanting to move applications and analytics closer to the data. The data in many of these large companies, that core business-critical data is on the mainframe, and so, being able to do more real time analytics without having to look at old data is really important. There's this term data gravity. I love the visual that presents in my mind that you have these different masses, these different planets if you will, and the biggest, massivest planet in that solar system really is the data, and so, it's pulling the smaller satellites if you will into this planet or this star by way of gravity because data is, data's a new currency, data is what the companies are running on. We're helping in this announcement with being able to unlock and open up all mainframe data sources, even some non-mainframe data sources, and using things like Spark that's running on the platform, that's running on z/OS to access that data directly without having to write any special programming or any special code to get to all their data. >> And the preferred place to run all that data is on the mainframe obviously if you're a mainframe customer. One of the questions I guess people have is, okay, I get that, it's the transaction data that I'm getting access to, but if I'm bringing transaction and analytic data together a lot of times that analytic data might be in social media, it might be somewhere else not on the mainframe. How do envision customers dealing with that? Do you have tooling them to do that? >> We do, so this data virtualization solution that I'm talking about is one that is mainframe resident, but it can also access other data sources. It can access DB2 on Linux Windows, it can access Informix, it can access Cloudant, it can access Hadoop through IBM's BigInsights. Other feeds like Twitter, like other social media, it can pull that in. The case where you'd want to do that is where you're trying to take that data and integrate it with a massive amount of mainframe data. It's going to be much more highly performant by pulling this other small amount of data into, next to that core business data. >> I get the performance and I get the security of the mainframe, I like those two things, but what about the economics? >> Couple of things. One, IBM when they ported Spark to z/OS, they did it the right way. They leveraged the architecture, it wasn't just a simple port of recompiling a bunch of open source code from Apache, it was rewriting it to be highly performant on the Z architecture, taking advantage of specialty engines. We've done the same with the data virtualization component that goes along with that Spark on z/OS offering that also leverages the architecture. We actually have different binaries that we load depending on which architecture of the machine that we're running on, whether it be a z9, an EC12, or the big granddaddy of a z13. >> Bryan, can you speak the developers? I think about, you're talking about all this mobile and Spark and everything like that. There's got to be certain developers that are like, "Oh my gosh, there's mainframe stuff. "I don't know anything about that." How do you help bridge that gap between where it lives in the tools that they're using? >> The best example is talking about embracing this API economy. And so, developers really don't care where the stuff is at, they just want it to be easy to get to. They don't have to code up some specific interface or language to get to different types of data, right? IBM's done a great job with the z/OS Connect in opening up the mainframe to the API economy with ReSTful interfaces, and so with z/OS Connect combined with Rocket data virtualization, you can come through that z/OS Connect same path using all those same ReSTful interfaces pushing those APIs out to tools like Swagger, which the developers want to use, and not only can you get to the applications through z/OS Connect, but we're a service provider to z/OS Connect allowing them to also get to every piece of data using those same ReSTful APIs. >> If I heard you correctly, the developer doesn't need to even worry about that it's on mainframe or speak mainframe or anything like that, right? >> The goal is that they never do. That they simply see in their tool-set, again like Swagger, that they have data as well as different services that they can invoke using these very straightforward, simple ReSTful APIs. >> Can you speak to the customers you've talked to? You know, there's certain people out in the industry, I've had this conversation for a few years at IBM shows is there's some part of the market that are like, oh, well, the mainframe is this dusty old box sitting in a corner with nothing new, and my experience has been the containers and cool streaming and everything like that, oh well, you know, mainframe did virtualization and Linux and all these things really early, decades ago and is keeping up with a lot of these trends with these new type of technologies. What do you find in the customers that, how much are they driving forward on new technologies, looking for that new technology and being able to leverage the assets that they have? >> You asked a lot of questions there. The types of customers certainly financial and insurance are the big two, but that doesn't mean that we're limited and not going after retail and helping governments and manufacturing customers as well. What I find is talking with them that there's the folks who get it and the folks who don't, and the folks who get it are the ones who are saying, "Well, I want to be able "to embrace these new technologies," and they're taking things like open source, they're looking at Spark, for example, they're looking at Anaconda. Last week, we just announced at the Anaconda Conference, we stepped on stage with Continuum, IBM, and we, Rocket, stood up there talking about this partnership that we formed to create this ecosystem because the development world changes very, very rapidly. For a while, all the rage was JDBC, or all the rage was component broker, and so today it's Spark and Anaconda are really in the forefront of developers' minds. We're constantly moving to keep up with developers because that's where the action's happening. Again, they don't care where the data is housed as long as you can open that up. We've been playing with this concept that came up from some research firm called two-speed IT where you have maybe your core business that has been running for years, and it's designed to really be slow-moving, very high quality, it keeps everything running today, but they want to embrace some of their new technologies, they want to be able to roll out a brand-new app, and they want to be able to update that multiple times a week. And so, this two-speed IT says, you're kind of breaking 'em off into two separate teams. You don't have to take your existing infrastructure team and say, "You must embrace every Agile "and every DevOps type of methodology." What we're seeing customers be successful with is this two-speed IT where you can fracture these two, and now you need to create some nice integration between those two teams, so things like data virtualization really help with that. It opens up and allows the development teams to very quickly access those assets on the mainframe in this case while allowing those developers to very quickly crank out an application where quality is not that important, where being very quick to respond and doing lots of AB testing with customers is really critical. >> Waterfall still has its place. As a company that predominately, or maybe even exclusively is involved in mainframe, I'm struck by, it must've been 2008, 2009, Paul Maritz comes in and he says VMWare our vision is to build the software mainframe. And of course the world said, "Ah, that's, mainframe's dead," we've been hearing that forever. In many respects, I accredit the VMWare, they built sort of a form of software mainframe, but now you hear a lot of talk, Stu, about going back to bare metal. You don't hear that talk on the mainframe. Everything's virtualized, right, so it's kind of interesting to see, and IBM uses the language of private cloud. The mainframe's, we're joking, the original private cloud. My question is you're strategy as a company has been always focused on the mainframe and going forward I presume it's going to continue to do that. What's your outlook for that platform? >> We're not exclusively by the mainframe, by the way. We're not, we have a good mix. >> Okay, it's overstating that, then. It's half and half or whatever. You don't talk about it, 'cause you're a private company. >> Maybe a little more than half is mainframe-focused. >> Dave: Significant. >> It is significant. >> You've got a large of proportion of the company on mainframe, z/OS. >> So we're bullish on the mainframe. We continue to invest more every year. We invest, we increase our investment every year, and so in a software company, your investment is primarily people. We increase that by double digits every year. We have license revenue increases in the double digits every year. I don't know many other mainframe-based software companies that have that. But I think that comes back to the partnership that we have with IBM because we are more than just a technology partner. We work on strategic projects with IBM. IBM will oftentimes stand up and say Rocket is a strategic partner that works with us on hard problem-solving customers issues every day. We're bullish, we're investing more all the time. We're not backing away, we're not decreasing our interest or our bets on the mainframe. If anything, we're increasing them at a faster rate than we have in the past 10 years. >> And this trend of bringing analytics and transactions together is a huge mega-trend, I mean, why not do it on the mainframe? If the economics are there, which you're arguing that in many use cases they are, because of the value component as well, then the future looks pretty reasonable, wouldn't you say? >> I'd say it's very, very bright. At the Anaconda Conference last week, I was coming up with an analogy for these folks. It's just a bunch of data scientists, right, and during most of the breaks and the receptions, they were just asking questions, "Well, what is a mainframe? "I didn't know that we still had 'em, "and what do they do?" So it was fun to educate them on that. But I was trying to show them an analogy with data warehousing where, say that in the mid-'90s it was perfectly acceptable to have a separate data warehouse separate from your transaction system. You would copy all this data over into the data warehouse. That was the model, right, and then slowly it became more important that the analytics or the BI against that data warehouse was looking at more real time data. So then it became more efficiencies and how do we replicate this faster, and how do we get closer to, not looking at week-old data but day-old data? And so, I explained that to them and said the days of being able to do analytics against old data that's copied are going away. ETL, we're also bullish to say that ETL is dead. ETL's future is very bleak. There's no place for it. It had its time, but now it's done because with data virtualization you can access that data in place. I was telling these folks as they're talking about, these data scientists, as they're talking about how they look at their models, their first step is always ETL. And so I told them this story, I said ETL is dead, and they just look at me kind of strange. >> Dave: Now the first step is load. >> Yes, there you go, right, load it in there. But having access from these platforms directly to that data, you don't have to worry about any type of a delay. >> What you described, though, is still common architecture where you've got, let's say, a Z mainframe, it's got an InfiniBand pipe to some exit data warehouse or something like that, and so, IBM's vision was, okay, we can collapse that, we can simplify that, consolidate it. SAP with HANA has a similar vision, we can do that. I'm sure Oracle's got their vision. What gives you confidence in IBM's approach and legs going forward? >> Probably due to the advances that we see in z/OS itself where handling mixed workloads, which it's just been doing for many of the 50 years that it's been around, being able to prioritize different workloads, not only just at the CPU dispatching, but also at the memory usage, also at the IO, all the way down through the channel to the actual device. You don't see other operating systems that have that level of granularity for managing mixed workloads. >> In the security component, that's what to me is unique about this so-called private cloud, and I say, I was using that software mainframe example from VMWare in the past, and it got a good portion of the way there, but it couldn't get that last mile, which is, any workload, any application with the performance and security that you would expect. It's just never quite got there. I don't know if the pendulum is swinging, I don't know if that's the accurate way to say it, but it's certainly stabilized, wouldn't you say? >> There's certainly new eyes being opened every day to saying, wait a minute, I could do something different here. Muscle memory doesn't have to guide me in doing business the way I have been doing it before, and that's this muscle memory I'm talking about of this ETL piece. >> Right, well, and a large number of workloads in mainframe are running Linux, right, you got Anaconda, Spark, all these modern tools. The question you asked about developers was right on. If it's independent or transparent to developers, then who cares, that's the key. That's the key lever this day and age is the developer community. You know it well. >> That's right. Give 'em what they want. They're the customers, they're the infrastructure that's being built. >> Bryan, we'll give you the last word, bumper sticker on the event, Rocket Software, your partnership, whatever you choose. >> We're excited to be here, it's an exciting day to talk about machine learning on z/OS. I say we're bullish on the mainframe, we are, we're especially bullish on z/OS, and that's what this even today is all about. That's where the data is, that's where we need the analytics running, that's where we need the machine learning running, that's where we need to get the developers to access the data live. >> Excellent, Bryan, thanks very much for coming to theCUBE. >> Bryan: Thank you. >> And keep right there, everybody. We'll be back with our next guest. This is theCUBE, we're live from New York City. Be right back. (electronic keyboard music)

>> [Announcer] Live from New York, it's the Cube. Covering the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event. Brought to you by IBM. Now here are your hosts Dave Vellante and Stu Miniman. >> Welcome back to New York City everybody, this is the CUBE. We're here live at the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event. Bringing analytics and transactions together on Z, extending an announcement that IBM made a couple years ago, sort of laid out that vision, and now bringing machine learning to the mainframe platform. We're here with Jim Kobielus. Jim is the Director of IBM's Community Engagement for Data Science and a long time CUBE alum and friend. Great to see you again James. >> Great to always be back here with you. Wonderful folks from the CUBE. You ask really great questions and >> Well thank you. >> I'm prepared to answer. >> So we saw you last week at Spark Summit so back to back, you know, continuous streaming, machine learning, give us the lay of the land from your perspective of machine learning. >> Yeah well machine learning very much is at the heart of what modern application developers build and that's really the core secret sauce in many of the most disruptive applications. So machine learning has become the core of, of course, what data scientists do day in and day out or what they're asked to do which is to build, essentially artificial neural networks that can process big data and find patterns that couldn't normally be found using other approaches. And then as Dinesh and Rob indicated a lot of it's for regression analysis and classification and the other core things that data scientists have been doing for a long time, but machine learning has come into its own because of the potential for great automation of this function of finding patterns and correlations within data sets. So today at the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event, and we've already announced it, IBM Machine Learning for ZOS takes that automation promised to the next step. And so we're real excited and there'll be more details today in the main event. >> One of the most funs I had, most fun I had last year, most fun interviews I had last year was with you, when we interviewed, I think it was 10 data scientists, rock star data scientists, and Dinesh had a quote, he said, "Machine learning is 20% fun, 80% elbow grease." And data scientists sort of echoed that last year. We spent 80% of our time wrangling data. >> [Jim] Yeah. >> It gets kind of tedious. You guys have made announcements to address that, is the needle moving? >> To some degree the needle's moving. Greater automation of data sourcing and preparation and cleansing is ongoing. Machine learning is being used for that function as well. But nonetheless there is still a lot of need in the data science, sort of, pipeline for a lot of manual effort. So if you look at the core of what machine learning is all about, it's supervised learning involves humans, meaning data scientists, to train their algorithms with data and so that involves finding the right data and then of course doing the feature engineering which is a very human and creative process. And then to be training the data and iterating through models to improve the fit of the machine learning algorithms to the data. In many ways there's still a lot of manual functions that need expertise of data scientists to do it right. There's a lot of ways to do machine learning wrong you know there's a lot of, as it were, tricks of the trade you have to learn just through trial and error. A lot of things like the new generation of things like generative adversarial models ride on machine learning or deep learning in this case, a multilayered, and they're not easy to get going and get working effectively the first time around. I mean with the first run of your training data set, so that's just an example of how, the fact is there's a lot of functions that can't be fully automated yet in the whole machine learning process, but a great many can in fact, especially data preparation and transformation. It's being automated to a great degree, so that data scientists can focus on the more creative work that involves subject matter expertise and really also application development and working with larger teams of coders and subject matter experts and others, to be able to take the machine learning algorithms that have been proved out, have been trained, and to dry them to all manner of applications to deliver some disruptive business value. >> James, can you expand for us a little bit this democratization of before it was not just data but now the machine learning, the analytics, you know, when we put these massive capabilities in the broader hands of the business analysts the business people themselves, what are you seeing your customers, what can they do now that they couldn't do before? Why is this such an exciting period of time for the leveraging of data analytics? >> I don't know that it's really an issue of now versus before. Machine learning has been around for a number of years. It's artificial neural networks at the very heart, and that got going actually in many ways in the late 50s and it steadily improved in terms of sophistication and so forth. But what's going on now is that machine learning tools have become commercialized and refined to a greater degree and now they're in a form in the cloud, like with IBM machine learning for the private cloud on ZOS, or Watson machine learning for the blue mixed public cloud. They're at a level of consumability that they've never been at before. With software as a service offering you just, you pay for it, it's available to you. If you're a data scientist you being doing work right away to build applications, derive quick value. So in other words, the time to value on a machine learning project continues to shorten and shorten, due to the consumability, the packaging of these capabilities and to cloud offerings and into other tools that are prebuilt to deliver success. That's what's fundamentally different now and it's just an ongoing process. You sort of see the recent parallels with the business intelligence market. 10 years ago BI was reporting and OLEP and so forth, was only for the, what we now call data scientists or the technical experts and all that area. But in the last 10 years we've seen the business intelligence community and the industry including IBM's tools, move toward more self service, interactive visualization, visual design, BI and predictive analytics, you know, through our cognos and SPSS portfolios. A similar dynamic is coming in to the progress of machine learning, the democratization, to use your term, the more self service model wherein everybody potentially will be able to be, to do machine learning, to build machine learning and deep learning models without a whole of university training. That day is coming and it's coming fairly rapidly. It's just a matter of the maturation of this technology in the marketplace. >> So I want to ask you, you're right, 1950s it was artificial neural networks or AI, sort of was invented I guess, the concept, and then in the late 70s and early 80s it was heavily hyped. It kind of died in the late 80s or in the 90s, you never heard about it even the early 2000s. Why now, why is it here now? Is it because IBM's putting so much muscle behind it? Is it because we have Siri? What is it that has enabled that? >> Well I wish that IBM putting muscle behind a technology can launch anything to success. And we've done a lot of things in that regard. But the thing is, if you look back at the historical progress of AI, I mean, it's older than me and you in terms of when it got going in the middle 50s as a passion or a focus of computer scientists. What we had for the last, most of the last half century is AI or expert systems that were built on having to do essentially programming is right, declared a rule defining how AI systems could process data whatever under various scenarios. That didn't prove scalable. It didn't prove agile enough to learn on the fly from the statistical patterns within the data that you're trying to process. For face recognition and voice recognition, pattern recognition, you need statistical analysis, you need something along the lines of an artificial neural network that doesn't have to be pre-programmed. That's what's new now about in the last this is the turn of this century, is that AI has become predominantly now focused not so much on declarative rules, expert systems of old, but statistical analysis, artificial neural networks that learn from the data. See the, in the long historical sweep of computing, we have three eras of computing. The first era before the second world war was all electromechanical computing devices like IBM's start of course, like everybody's, was in that era. The business logic was burned into the hardware as it were. The second era from the second world war really to the present day, is all about software, programming, it's COBAL, 4trans, C, Java, where the business logic has to be developed, coded by a cadre of programmers. Since the turn of this millennium and really since the turn of this decade, it's all moved towards the third era, which is the cognitive era, where you're learning the business rules automatically from the data itself, and that involves machine learning at its very heart. So most of what has been commercialized and most of what is being deployed in the real world working, successful AI, is all built on artificial neural networks and cognitive computing in the way that I laid out. Where, you still need human beings in the equation, it can't be completely automated. There's things like unsupervised learning that take the automation of machine learning to a greater extent, but you still have the bulk of machine learning is supervised learning where you have training data sets and you need experts, data scientists, to manage that whole process, that over time supervised learning is evolving towards who's going to label the training data sets, especially when you have so much data flooding in from the internet of things and social media and so forth. A lot of that is being outsourced to crowd sourcing environments in terms of the ongoing labeling of data for machine learning projects of all sorts. That trend will continue a pace. So less and less of the actual labeling of the data for machine learning will need to be manually coded by data scientists or data engineers. >> So the more data the better. See I would argue in the enablement pie. You're going to disagree with that which is good. Let's have a discussion [Jim Laughs]. In the enablement pie, I would say the profundity of Hadup was two things. One is I can leave data where it is and bring code to data. >> [Jim] Yeah. >> 5 megabytes of code to petabyte of data, but the second was the dramatic reduction in the cost to store more data, hence my statement of the more data the better, but you're saying, meh maybe not. Certainly for compliance and other things you might not want to have data lying around. >> Well it's an open issue. How much data do you actually need to find the patterns of interest to you, the correlations of interest to you? Sampling of your data set, 10% sample or whatever, in most cases that might be sufficient to find the correlations you're looking for. But if you're looking for some highly deepened rare nuances in terms of anomalies or outliers or whatever within your data set, you may only find those if you have a petabyte of data of the population of interest. So but if you're just looking for broad historical trends and to do predictions against broad trends, you may not need anywhere near that amount. I mean, if it's a large data set, you may only need five to 10% sample. >> So I love this conversation because people have been on the CUBE, Abi Metter for example said, "Dave, sampling is dead." Now a statistician said that's BS, no way. Of course it's not dead. >> Storage isn't free first of all so you can't necessarily save and process all the data. Compute power isn't free yet, memory isn't free yet, so forth so there's lots... >> You're working on that though. >> Yeah sure, it's asymptotically all moving towards zero. But the bottom line is if the underlying resources, including the expertise of your data scientists that's not for free, these are human beings who need to make a living. So you've got to do a lot of things. A, automate functions on the data science side so that your, these experts can radically improve their productivity. Which is why the announcement today of IBM machine learning is so important, it enables greater automation in the creation and the training and deployment of machine learning models. It is a, as Rob Thomas indicated, it's very much a multiplier of productivity of your data science teams, the capability we offer. So that's the core value. Because our customers live and die increasingly by machine learning models. And the data science teams themselves are highly inelastic in the sense that you can't find highly skilled people that easily at an affordable price if you're a business. And you got to make the most of the team that you have and help them to develop their machine learning muscle. >> Okay, I want to ask you to weigh in on one of Stu's favorite topics which is man versus machine. >> Humans versus mechanisms. Actually humans versus bots, let's, okay go ahead. >> Okay so, you know a lot of discussions, about, machines have always replaced humans for jobs, but for the first time it's really beginning to replace cognitive functions. >> [Jim] Yeah. >> What does that mean for jobs, for skill sets? The greatest, I love the comment, the greatest chess player in the world is not a machine. It's humans and machines, but what do you see in terms of the skill set shift when you talk to your data science colleagues in these communities that you're building? Is that the right way to think about it, that it's the creativity of humans and machines that will drive innovation going forward. >> I think it's symbiotic. If you take Watson, of course, that's a star case of a cognitive AI driven machine in the cloud. We use a Watson all the time of course in IBM. I use it all the time in my job for example. Just to give an example of one knowledge worker and how he happens to use AI and machine learning. Watson is an awesome search engine. Through multi-structure data types and in real time enabling you to ask a sequence of very detailed questions and Watson is a relevance ranking engine, all that stuff. What I've found is it's helped me as a knowledge worker to be far more efficient in doing my upfront research for anything that I might be working on. You see I write blogs and I speak and I put together slide decks that I present and so forth. So if you look at knowledge workers in general, AI as driving far more powerful search capabilities in the cloud helps us to eliminate a lot of the grunt work that normally was attended upon doing deep research into like a knowledge corpus that may be preexisting. And that way we can then ask more questions and more intelligent questions and really work through our quest for answers far more rapidly and entertain and rule out more options when we're trying to develop a strategy. Because we have all the data at our fingertips and we've got this expert resource increasingly in a conversational back and forth that's working on our behalf predictively to find what we need. So if you look at that, everybody who's a knowledge worker which is really the bulk now of the economy, can be far more productive cause you have this high performance virtual assistant in the cloud. I don't know that it's really going, AI or deep learning or machine learning, is really going to eliminate a lot of those jobs. It'll just make us far smarter and more efficient doing what we do. That's, I don't want to belittle, I don't want to minimize the potential for some structural dislocation in some fields. >> Well it's interesting because as an example, you're like the, you're already productive, now you become this hyper-productive individual, but you're also very creative and can pick and choose different toolings and so I think people like you it's huge opportunities. If you're a person who used to put up billboards maybe it's time for retraining. >> Yeah well maybe you know a lot of the people like the research assistants and so forth who would support someone like me and most knowledge worker organizations, maybe those people might be displaced cause we would have less need for them. In the same way that one of my very first jobs out of college before I got into my career, I was a file clerk in a court in Detroit, it's like you know, a totally manual job, and there was no automation or anything. You know that most of those functions, I haven't revisited that court in recent years, I'm sure are automated because you have this thing called computers, especially PCs and LANs and so forth that came along since then. So a fair amount of those kinds of feather bedding jobs have gone away and in any number of bureaucracies due to automation and machine learning is all about automation. So who knows where we'll all end up. >> Alright well we got to go but I wanted to ask you about... >> [Jim] I love unions by the way. >> And you got to meet a lot of lawyers I'm sure. >> Okay cool. >> So I got to ask you about your community of data scientists that you're building. You've been early on in that. It's been a persona that you've really tried to cultivate and collaborate with. So give us an update there. What's your, what's the latest, what's your effort like these days? >> Yeah, well, what we're doing is, I'm on a team now that's managing and bringing together all of our program for community engagement programs for really for across portfolio not just data scientists. That involves meet ups and hack-a-thons and developer days and user groups and so forth. These are really important professional forums for our customers, our developers, our partners, to get together and share their expertise and provide guidance to each other. And these are very very important for these people to become very good at, to help them, get better at what they do, help them stay up to speed on the latest technologies. Like deep learning, machine learning and so forth. So we take it very seriously at IBM that communities are really where customers can realize value and grow their human capital ongoing so we're making significant investments in growing those efforts and bringing them together in a unified way and making it easier for like developers and IT administrators to find the right forums, the right events, the right content, within IBM channels and so forth, to help them do their jobs effectively and machine learning is at the heart, not just of data science, but other professions within the IT and business analytics universe, relying more heavily now on machine learning and understanding the tools of the trade to be effective in their jobs. So we're bringing, we're educating our communities on machine learning, why it's so critically important to the future of IT. >> Well your content machine is great content so congratulations on not only kicking that off but continuing it. Thanks Jim for coming on the CUBE. It's good to see you. >> Thanks for having me. >> You're welcome. Alright keep it right there everybody, we'll be back with our next guest. The CUBE, we're live from the Waldorf-Astoria in New York City at the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event right back. (techno music)

>> [Announcer] Live from New York, it's theCube, covering the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event brought to you by IBM. Now, here are your hosts, Dave Vellante and Stu Miniman. >> Welcome back to the Waldorf Astoria, everybody. This is theCube, the worldwide leader in live tech coverage. We're covering the IBM Machine Learning announcement. IBM bringing machine learning to its zMainframe, its private cloud. Dinesh Nirmel is here. He's the Vice President of Analytics at IBM and a Cube alum. Dinesh, good to see you again. >> Good to see you, Dave. >> So let's talk about ML. So we went through the big data, the data lake, the data swamp, all this stuff with the dupe. And now we're talking about machine learning and deep learning and AI and cognitive. Is it same wine, new bottle? Or is it an evolution of data and analytics? >> Good. So, Dave, let's talk about machine learning. Right. When I look at machine learning, there's three pillars. The first one is the product. I mean, you got to have a product, right. And you got to have a different shared set of functions and features available for customers to build models. For example, Canvas. I mean, those are table stakes. You got to have a set of algorithms available. So that's the product piece. >> [Dave] Uh huh. >> But then there's the process, the process of taking that model that you built in a notebook and being able to operationalize it. Meaning able to deploy it. That is, you know, I was talking to one of the customers today, and he was saying, "Machine learning is 20% fun and 80% elbow grease." Because that operationalizing of that model is not easy. Although they make it sound very simple, it's not. So if you take a banking, enterprise banking example, right? You build a model in the notebook. Some data sense build it. Now you have to take that and put it into your infrastructure or production environment, which has been there for decades. So you could have a third party software that you cannot change. You could have a set of rigid rules that already is there. You could have applications that was written in the 70's and 80's that nobody want to touch. How do you all of a sudden take the model and infuse in there? It's not easy. And so that is a tremendous amount of work. >> [Dave] Okay. >> The third pillar is the people or the expertise or the experience, the skills that needs to come through, right. So the product is one. The process of operationalizing and getting it into your production environment is another piece. And then the people is the third one. So when I look at machine learning, right. Those are three key pillars that you need to have to have a successful, you know, experience of machine learning. >> Okay, let's unpack that a little bit. Let's start with the differentiation. You mentioned Canvas, but talk about IBM specifically. >> [Dinesh] Right. What's so great about IBM? What's the differentiation? >> Right, exactly. Really good point. So we have been in the productive side for a very long time, right. I mean, it's not like we are coming into ML or AI or cognitive yesterday. We have been in that space for a very long time. We have SPSS predictive analytics available. So even if you look from all three pillars, what we are doing is we are, from a product perspective, we are bringing in the product where we are giving a choice or a flexibility to use the language you want. So there are customers who only want to use R. They are religious R users. They don't want to hear about anything else. There are customers who want to use Python, you know. They don't want to use anything else. So how do we give that choice of languages to our customers to say use any language you want. Or execution engines, right? Some folks want to use Park as execution engine. Some folks want to use R or Python, so we give that choice. Then you talked about Canvas. There are folks who want to use the GUI portion of the Canvas or a modeler to build models, or there are, you know, tekkie guys that we'll approach who want to use notebook. So how do you give that choice? So it becomes kind of like a freedom or a flexibility or a choice that we provide, so that's the product piece, right? We do that. Then the other piece is productivity. So one of the customers, the CTO of (mumbles) TV's going to come on stage with me during the main session, talk about how collaboration helped from an IBM machine learning perspective because their data scientists are sitting in New York City, our data scientists who are working with them are sitting in San Jose, California. And they were real time collaborating using notebooks in our ML projects where they can see the real time. What changes their data scientists are making. They can slack messages between each other. And that collaborative piece is what really helped us. So collaboration is one. Right from a productivity piece. We introduced something called Feedback Loop, whereby which your model can get trained. So today, you deploy a model. It could lose the score, and it could get degraded over time. Then you have to take it off-line and re-train, right? What we have done is like we introduced the Feedback Loops, so when you deploy your model, we give you two endpoints. The first endpoint is, basically, a URI, for you to plug-in your application when you, you know, run your application able call the scoring API. The second endpoint is this feedback endpoint, where you can choose to re-train the model. If you want three hours, if you want it to be six hours, you can do that. So we bring that flexibility, we bring that productivity into it. Then, the management of the models, right? How do we make sure that once you develop the model, you deploy the model. There's a life cycle involved there. How do you make sure that we enable, give you the tools to manage the model? So when you talk about differentiation, right? We are bringing differentiation on all three pillars. From a product perspective, with all the things I mentioned. From a deployment perspective. How do we make sure we have different choices of deployment, whether it's streaming, whether it's realtime, whether it's batch. You can do deployment, right? The Feedback Loop is another one. Once you deployed, how do we keep re-training it. And the last piece I talked about is the expertise or the people, right? So we are today announcing IBM Machine Learning Hub, which will become one place where our customers can go, ask questions, get education sessions, get training, right? Work together to build models. I'll give you an example, that although we are announcing hub, the IBM Machine Learning Hub today, we have been working with America First Credit Union for the last month or so. They approached us and said, you know, their underwriting takes a long time. All the knowledge is embedded in 15 to 20 human beings. And they want to make sure a machine should be able to absorb that knowledge and make that decision in minutes. So it takes hours or days. >> [Dave] So, Stu, before you jump in, so I got, put the portfolio. You know, you mentioned SPSS, expertise, choice. The collaboration, which I think you really stressed at the announcement last fall. The management of the models, so you can continuously improve it. >> Right. >> And then this knowledge base, what you're calling the hub. And I could argue, I guess, that if I take any one of those individual pieces, there, some of your competitors have them. Your argument would be it's all there. >> It all comes together, right? And you have to make sure that all three pillars come together. And customers see great value when you have that. >> Dinesh, customers today are used to kind of the deployment model on the public cloud, which is, "I want to activate a new service," you know. I just activate it, and it's there. When I think about private cloud environments, private clouds are operationally faster, but it's usually not miniature hours. It's usually more like months to deploy projects, which is still better than, you know, kind of, I think, before big data, it was, you know, oh, okay, 18 months to see if it works, and let's bring that down to, you know, a couple of months. Can you walk us through what does, you know, a customer today and says, "Great, I love this approach. "How long does it take?" You know, what's kind of the project life cycle of this? And how long will it take them to play around and pull some of these levers before they're, you know, getting productivity out of it? >> Right. So, really good questions, Stu. So let me back one step. So, in private cloud, we are going, we have new initiative called Download and Go, where our goal is to have our desktop products be able to install on your personal desktop in less than five clicks, in less than fifteen minutes. That's the goal. So the other day, you know, the team told me it's ready. That the first product is ready where you can go less than five clicks, fifteen minutes. I said the real test is I'm going to bring my son, who's five years old. Can he install it, and if he can install it, you know, we are good. And he did it. And I have a video to prove it, you know. So after the show, I will show you because and that's, when you talk about, you know, in the private cloud side, or the on-premise side, it has been a long project cycle. What we want is like you should be able to take our product, install it, and get the experience in minutes. That's the goal. And when you talk about private cloud and public cloud, another differentiating factor is that now you get the strength of IBM public cloud combined with the private cloud, so you could, you know, train your model in public cloud, and score on private cloud. You have the same experience. Not many folks, not many competitors can offer that, right? So that's another . .. >> [Stu] So if I get that right. If I as a customer have played around with the machine learning in Bluemix, I'm going to have a similar look, feel, API. >> Exactly the same, so what you have in Bluemix, right? I mean, so you have the Watson in Bluemix, which, you know, has deep learning, machine learning--all those capabilities. What we have done is we have done, is like, we have extracted the core capabilities of Watson on private cloud, and it's IBM Machine Learning. But the experience is the same. >> I want to talk about this notion of operationalizing analytics. And it ties, to me anyway, it ties into transformation. You mentioned going from Notebook to actually being able to embed analytics in workflow of the business. Can you double click on that a little bit, and maybe give some examples of how that has helped companies transform? >> Right. So when I talk about operationalizing, when you look at machine learning, right? You have all the way from data, which is the most critical piece, to building or deploying the model. A lot of times, data itself is not clean. I'll give you an example, right. So >> OSYX. >> Yeah. And when we are working with an insurance company, for example, the data that comes in. For example, if you just take gender, a lot of times the values are null. So we have to build another model to figure out if it's male or female, right? So in this case, for example, we have to say somebody has done a prostate exam. Obviously, he's a male. You know, we figured that. Or has a gynocology exam. It's a female. So we have to, you know, there's a lot of work just to get that data cleansed. So that's where I mentioned it's, you know, machine learning is 20% fun, 80% elbow grease because it's a lot of grease there that you need to make sure that you cleanse the data. Get that right. That's the shaping piece of it. Then, comes the building the model, right. And then, once you build the model on that data comes the operationalization of that model, which in itself is huge because how do you make sure that you infuse that model into your current infrastructure, which is where a lot of skill set, a lot of experience, and a lot of knowledge that comes in because you want to make sure, unless you are a start-up, right? You already have applications and programs and third-party vendors applications worth running for years, or decades, for that matter. So, yeah, so that's operationalization's a huge piece. Cleansing of the data is a huge piece. Getting the model right is another piece. >> And simplifying the whole process. I think about, I got to ingest the data. I've now got to, you know, play with it, explore. I've got to process it. And I've got to serve it to some, you know, some business need or application. And typically, those are separate processes, separate tools, maybe different personas that are doing that. Am I correct that your announcement in the Fall addressed that workflow. How is it being, you know, deployed and adopted in the field? How is it, again back to transformation, are you seeing that people are actually transforming their analytics processes and ultimately creating outcomes that they expect? >> Huge. So good point. We announced data science experience in the Fall. And the customers that who are going to speak with us today on stage, are the customers who have been using that. So, for example, if you take AFCU, America First Credit Union, they worked with us. In two weeks, you know, talk about transformation, we were able to absorb the knowledge of their underwriters. You know, what (mumbles) is in. Build that, get that features. And was able to build a model in two weeks. And the model is predicting 90%, with 90% accuracy. That's what early tests are showing. >> [Dave] And you say that was in a couple of weeks. You were, you developed that model. >> Yeah, yeah, right. So when we talk about transformation, right? We couldn't have done that a few years ago. We have transformed where the different personas can collaborate with each other, and that's a collaboration piece I talked about. Real time. Be able to build a model, and put it in the test to see what kind of benefits they're getting. >> And you've obviously got edge cases where people get really sophisticated, but, you know, we were sort of talking off camera, and you know like the 80/20 rule, or maybe it's the 90/10. You say most use cases can be, you know, solved with regression and classification. Can you talk about that a little more? >> So, so when we talk about machine learning, right? To me, I would say 90% of it is regression or classification. I mean there are edge case of our clustering and all those things. But linear regression or a classification can solve most of the, most of our customers problems, right? So whether it's fraud detection. Or whether it's underwriting the loan. Or whether you're trying to determine the sentiment analysis. I mean, you can kind of classify or do regression on it. So I would say that 90% of the cases can be covered, but like I said, most of the work is not about picking the right algorithm, but it's also about cleansing the data. Picking the algorithm, then comes building the model. Then comes deployment or operationalizing the model. So there's a step process that's involved, and each step involves some amount of work. So if I could make one more point on the technology and the transformation we have done. So even with picking the right algorithm, we automated, so you as a data scientist don't need to, you know, come in and figure out if I have 50 classifiers and each classifier has four parameters. That's 200 different combinations. Even if you take one hour on each combination, that's 200 hours or nine days that takes you to pick the right combination. What we have done is like in IBM Machine Learning we have something called cognitive assistance for data science, which will help you pick the right combination in minutes instead of days. >> So I can see how regression scales, and in the example you gave of classification, I can see how that scales. If you've got a, you know, fixed classification or maybe 200 parameters, or whatever it is, that scales, what happens, how are people dealing with, sort of automating that classification as things change, as they, some kind of new disease or pattern pops up. How do they address that at scale? >> Good point. So as the data changes, the model needs to change, right? Because everything that model knows is based on the training data. Now, if the data has changed, the symptoms of cancer or any disease has changed, obviously, you have to retrain that model. And that's where I talk about the, where the feedback loop comes in, where we will automatically retrain the model based on the new data that's coming in. So you, as an end user, for example, don't need to worry about it because we will take care of that piece also. We will automate that, also. >> Okay, good. And you've got a session this afternoon with you said two clients, right? AFCU and Kaden dot TV, and you're on, let's see, at 2:55. >> Right. >> So you folks watching the live stream, check that out. I'll give you the last word, you know, what shall we expect to hear there. Show a little leg on your discussion this afternoon. >> Right. So, obviously, I'm going to talk about the different shading factors, what we are delivering IBM Machine Learning, right? And I covered some of it. There's going to be much more. We are going to focus on how we are making freedom or flexibility available. How are we going to do productivity, right? Gains for our data scientists and developers. We are going to talk about trust, you know, the trust of data that we are bringing in. Then I'm going to bring the customers in and talk about their experience, right? We are delivering a product, but we already have customers using it, so I want them to come on stage and share the experiences of, you know, it's one thing you hear about that from us, but it's another thing that customers come and talk about it. So, and the last but not least is we are going to announce our first release of IBM Machine Learning on Z because if you look at 90% of the transactional data, today, it runs through Z, so they don't have to off-load the data to do analytics on it. We will make machine learning available, so you can do training and scoring right there on Z for your real time analytics, so. >> Right. Extending that theme that we talked about earlier, Stu, bringing analytics and transactions together, which is a big theme of the Z 13 announcement two years ago. Now you're seeing, you know, machine learning coming on Z. The live stream starts at 2 o'clock. Silicon Angle dot com had an article up on the site this morning from Maria Doucher on the IBM announcement, so check that out. Dinesh, thanks very much for coming back on theCube. Really appreciate it, and good luck today. >> Thank you. >> All right. Keep it right there, buddy. We'll be back with our next guest. This is theCube. We're live from the Waldorf Astoria for the IBM Machine Learning Event announcement. Right back.

>> Narrator: Live from New York, it's theCUBE. Covering the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event. Brought to you by IBM. Now, here are your hosts, Dave Vellante and Stu Miniman. >> Welcome back to New York City, everybody this is theCUBE, we're here at the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event, Rob Thomas is here, he's the general manager of the IBM analytics group. Rob, good to see you again. >> Dave, great to see you, thanks for being here. >> Yeah it's our pleasure. So two years ago, IBM announced the Z platform, and the big theme was bringing analytics and transactions together. You guys are sort of extending that today, bringing machine learning. So the news just hit three minutes ago. >> Rob: Yep. >> Take us through what you announced. >> This is a big day for us. The announcement is we are going to bring machine learning to private Clouds, and my observation is this, you look at the world today, over 90% of the data in the world cannot be googled. Why is that? It's because it's behind corporate firewalls. And as we've worked with clients over the last few years, sometimes they don't want to move their most sensitive data to the public Cloud yet, and so what we've done is we've taken the machine learning from IBM Watson, we've extracted that, and we're enabling that on private Clouds, and we're telling clients you can get the power of machine learning across any type of data, whether it's data in a warehouse, a database, unstructured content, email, you name it we're bringing machine learning everywhere. To your point, we were thinking about, so where do we start? And we said, well, what is the world's most valuable data? It's the data on the mainframe. It's the transactional data that runs the retailers of the world, the banks of the world, insurance companies, airlines of the world, and so we said we're going to start there because we can show clients how they can use machine learning to unlock value in their most valuable data. >> And which, you say private Cloud, of course, we're talking about the original private Cloud, >> Rob: Yeah. >> Which is the mainframe, right? >> Rob: Exactly. >> And I presume that you'll extend that to other platforms over time is that right? >> Yeah, I mean, we're going to think about every place that data is managed behind a firewall, we want to enable machine learning as an ingredient. And so this is the first step, and we're going to be delivering every quarter starting next quarter, bringing it to other platforms, other repositories, because once clients get a taste of the idea of automating analytics with machine learning, what we call continuous intelligence, it changes the way they do analytics. And, so, demand will be off the charts here. >> So it's essentially Watson ML extracted and placed on Z, is that right? And describe how people are going to be using this and who's going to be using it. >> Sure, so Watson on the Cloud today is IBM's Cloud platform for artificial intelligence, cognitive computing, augmented intelligence. A component of that is machine learning. So we're bringing that as IBM machine learning which will run today on the mainframe, and then in the future, other platforms. Now let's talk about what it does. What it is, it's a single-place unified model management, so you can manage all your models from one place. And we've got really interesting technology that we pulled out of IBM research, called CADS, which stands for the Cognitive Assistance for Data Scientist. And the idea behind CADS is, you don't have to know which algorithm to choose, we're going to choose the algorithm for you. You build your model, we'll decide based on all the algorithms available on open-source what you built for yourself, what IBM's provided, what's the best way to run it, and our focus here is, it's about productivity of data science and data scientists. No company has as many data scientists as they want, and so we've got to make the ones they do have vastly more productive, and so with technology like CADS, we're helping them do their job more efficiently and better. >> Yeah, CADS, we've talked about this in theCUBE before, it's like an algorithm to choose an algorithm, and makes the best fit. >> Rob: Yeah. >> Okay. And you guys addressed some of the collaboration issues at your Watson data platform announcement last October, so talk about the personas who are asking you to give me access to mainframe data, and give me, to tooling that actually resides on this private Cloud. >> It's definitely a data science persona, but we see, I'd say, an emerging market where it's more the business analyst type that is saying I'd really like to get at that data, but I haven't been able to do that easily in the past. So giving them a single pane of glass if you will, with some light data science experience, where they can manage their models, using CADS to actually make it more productive. And then we have something called a feedback loop that's built into it, which is you build a model running on Z, as you get new data in, these are the largest transactional systems in the world so there's data coming in every second. As you get new data in, that model is constantly updating. The model is learning from the data that's coming in, and it's becoming smarter. That's the whole idea behind machine learning in the first place. And that's what we've been able to enable here. Now, you and I have talked through the years, Dave, about IBM's investment in Spark. This is one of the first, I would say, world-class applications of Spark. We announced Spark on the mainframe last year, what we're bringing with IBM machine learning is leveraging Spark as an execution engine on the mainframe, and so I see this as Spark is finally coming into the mainstream, when you talk about Spark accessing the world's greatest transactional data. >> Rob, I wonder if you can help our audience kind of squint through a compare and contrast, public Cloud versus what you're offering today, 'cause one thing, public Cloud adding new services, machine learning seemed like one of those areas that we would add, like IBM had done with a machine learning platform. Streaming, absolutely you hear mobile streaming applications absolutely happened in the public Cloud. Is cost similar in private Cloud? Can I get all the services? How will IBM and your customer base keep up with that pace of innovation that we've seen from IBM and others in the public Cloud on PRIM? >> Yeah, so, look, my view is it's not an either or. Because when you look at this valuable data, clients want to do some of it in public Cloud, they want to keep a lot of it in the system that they built on PRIMA. So our job is, how do we actually bridge that gap? So I see machine learning like we've talked about becoming much more of a hybrid capability over time because the data they want to move to the Cloud, they should do that. The economics are great. The data, doing it on private Cloud, actually the economics are tremendous as well. And so we're delivering an elastic infrastructure on private Cloud as well that can scale the public Cloud. So to me it's not either or, it's about what everybody wants as Cloud features. They want the elasticity, they want a creatable interface, they want the economics of Cloud, and our job is to deliver that in both places. Whether it's on the public Cloud, which we're doing, or on the private Cloud. >> Yeah, one of the thought exercises I've gone through is if you follow the data, and follow the applications, it's going to show you where customers are going to do things. If you look at IOT, if you look at healthcare, there's lots of uses that it's going to be on PRIMA it's going to be on the edge, I got to interview Walmart a couple of years ago at the IBM Ed show, and they leveraged Z globally to use their sales, their enablement, and obviously they're not going to use AWS as their platform. What's the trends, what do you hear form their customers, how much of the data, are there reasons why it needs to stay at the edge? It's not just compliance and governance, but it's just because that's where the data is and I think you were saying there's just so much data on the Z series itself compared to in other environments. >> Yeah, and it's not just the mainframe, right? Let's be honest, there's just massive amounts of data that still sits behind corporate firewalls. And while I believe the end destination is a lot of that will be on public Cloud, what do you do now? Because you can't wait until that future arrives. And so the place, the biggest change I've seen in the market in the last year is clients are building private Clouds. It's not traditional on-premise deployments, it's, they're building an elastic infrastructure behind their firewall, you see it a lot in heavily-regulated industries, so financial services where they're dealing with things like GDPR, any type of retailer who's dealing with things like PCI compliance. Heavy-regulated industries are saying, we want to move there, but we got challenges to solve right now. And so, our mission is, we want to make data simple and accessible, wherever it is, on private Cloud or public Cloud, and help clients on that journey. >> Okay, so carrying through on that, so you're now unlocking access to mainframe data, great, if I have, say, a retail example, and I've got some data science, I'm building some models, I'm accessing the mainframe data, if I have data that's elsewhere in the Cloud, how specifically with regard to this announcement will a practitioner execute on that? >> Yeah, so, one is you could decide one place that you want to land your data and have it be resonant, so you could do that. We have scenarios where clients are using data science experience on the Cloud, but they're actually leaving the data behind the firewalls. So we don't require them to move the data, so our model is one of flexibility in terms of how they want to manage their data assets. Which I think is unique in terms of IBM's approach to that. Others in the market say, if you want to use our tools, you have to move your data to our Cloud, some of them even say as you click through the terms, now we own your data, now we own your insights, that's not our approach. Our view is it's your data, if you want to run the applications in the Cloud, leave the data where it is, that's fine. If you want to move both to the Cloud, that's fine. If you wanted to leave both on private Cloud, that's fine. We have capabilities like Big SQL where we can actually federate data across public and private Clouds, so we're trying to provide choice and flexibility when it comes to this. >> And, Rob, in the context of this announcement, that would be, that example you gave, would be done through APIs that allow me access to that Cloud data is that right? >> Yeah, exactly, yes. >> Dave: Okay. >> So last year we announced something called Data Connect, which is basically, think of it as a bus between private and public Cloud. You can leverage Data Connect to seamlessly and easily move data. It's very high-speed, it uses our Aspera technology under the covers, so you can do that. >> Dave: A recent acquisition. >> Rob, IBM's been very active in open source engagement, in trying to help the industry sort out some of the challenges out there. Where do you see the state of the machine learning frameworks Google of course has TensorFlow, we've seen Amazon pushing at MXNet, is IBM supporting all of them, there certain horses that you have strong feelings for? What are your customers telling you? >> I believe in openness and choice. So with IBM machine learning you can choose your language, you can use Scala, you can use Java, you can use Python, more to come. You can choose your framework. We're starting with Spark ML because that's where we have our competency and that's where we see a lot of client desire. But I'm open to clients using other frameworks over time as well, so we'll start to bring that in. I think the IT industry always wants to kind of put people into a box. This is the model you should use. That's not our approach. Our approach is, you can use the language, you can use the framework that you want, and through things like IBM machine learning, we give you the ability to tap this data that is your most valuable data. >> Yeah, the box today has just become this mosaic and you have to provide access to all the pieces of that mosaic. One of the things that practitioners tell us is they struggle sometimes, and I wonder if you could weigh in on this, to invest either in improving the model or capturing more data and they have limited budget, and they said, okay. And I've had people tell me, no, you're way better off getting more data in, I've had people say, no no, now with machine learning we can advance the models. What are you seeing there, what are you advising customers in that regard? >> So, computes become relatively cheap, which is good. Data acquisitions become relatively cheap. So my view is, go full speed ahead on both of those. The value comes from the right algorithms and the right models. That's where the value is. And so I encourage clients, even think about maybe you separate your teams. And you have one that's focused on data acquisition and how you do that, and another team that's focused on model development, algorithm development. Because otherwise, if you give somebody both jobs, they both get done halfway, typically. And the value is from the right models, the right algorithms, so that's where we stress the focus. >> And models to date have been okay, but there's a lot of room for improvement. Like the two examples I like to use are retargeting, ad retargeting, which, as we all know as consumers is not great. You buy something and then you get targeted for another week. And then fraud detection, which is actually, for the last ten years, quite good, but there's still a lot of false positives. Where do you see IBM machine learning taking that practical use case in terms of improving those models? >> Yeah, so why are there false positives? The issue typically comes down to the quality of data, and the amount of data that you have that's why. Let me give an example. So one of the clients that's going to be talking at our event this afternoon is Argus who's focused on the healthcare space. >> Dave: Yeah, we're going to have him on here as well. >> Excellent, so Argus is basically, they collect data across payers, they're focused on healthcare, payers, providers, pharmacy benefit managers, and their whole mission is how do we cost-effectively serve different scenarios or different diseases, in this case diabetes, and how do we make sure we're getting the right care at the right time? So they've got all that data on the mainframe, they're constantly getting new data in, it could be about blood sugar levels, it could be about glucose, it could be about changes in blood pressure. Their models will get smarter over time because they built them with IBM machine learning so that what's cost-effective today may not be the most effective or cost-effective solution tomorrow. But we're giving them that continuous intelligence as data comes in to do that. That is the value of machine learning. I think sometimes people miss that point, they think it's just about making the data scientists' job easier, that productivity is part of it, but it's really about the voracity of the data and that you're constantly updating your models. >> And the patient outcome there, I read through some of the notes earlier, is if I can essentially opt in to allow the system to adjudicate the medication or the claim, and if I do so, I can get that instantaneously or in near real-time as opposed to have to wait weeks and phone calls and haggling. Is that right, did I get that right? >> That's right, and look, there's two dimensions. It's the cost of treatment, so you want to optimize that, and then it's the effectiveness. And which one's more important? Well, they're both actually critically important. And so what we're doing with Argus is building, helping them build models where they deploy this so that they're optimizing both of those. >> Right, and in the case, again, back to the personas, that would be, and you guys stressed this at your announcement last October, it's the data scientist, it's the data engineer, it's the, I guess even the application developer, right? Involved in that type of collaboration. >> My hope would be over time, when I talked about we view machine learning as an ingredient across everywhere that data is, is you want to embed machine learning into any applications that are built. And at that point you no longer need a data scientist per se, for that case, you can just have the app developer that's incorporating that. Whereas another tough challenge like the one we discussed, that's where you need data scientists. So think about, you need to divide and conquer the machine learning problem, where the data scientist can play, the business analyst can play, the app developers can play, the data engineers can play, and that's what we're enabling. >> And how does streaming fit in? We talked earlier about this sort of batch, interactive, and now you have this continuous sort of work load. How does streaming fit? >> So we use streaming in a few ways. One is very high-speed data ingest, it's a good way to get data into the Cloud. We also can do analytics on the fly. So a lot of our use case around streaming where we actually build analytical models into the streaming engine so that you're doing analytics on the fly. So I view that as, it's a different side of the same coin. It's kind of based on your use case, how fast you're ingesting data if you're, you know, sub-millisecond response times, you constantly have data coming in, you need something like a streaming engine to do that. >> And it's actually consolidating that data pipeline, is what you described which is big in terms of simplifying the complexity, this mosaic of a dupe, for example and that's a big value proposition of Spark. Alright, we'll give you the last word, you've got an audience outside waiting, big announcement today; final thoughts. >> You know, we talked about machine learning for a long time. I'll give you an analogy. So 1896, Charles Brady King is the first person to drive an automobile down the street in Detroit. It was 20 years later before Henry Ford actually turned it from a novelty into mass appeal. So it was like a 20-year incubation period where you could actually automate it, you could make it more cost-effective, you could make it simpler and easy. I feel like we're kind of in the same thing here where, the data era in my mind began around the turn of the century. Companies came onto the internet, started to collect a lot more data. It's taken us a while to get to the point where we could actually make this really easy and to do it at scale. And people have been wanting to do machine learning for years. It starts today. So we're excited about that. >> Yeah, and we saw the same thing with the steam engine, it was decades before it actually was perfected, and now the timeframe in our industry is compressed to years, sometimes months. >> Rob: Exactly. >> Alright, Rob, thanks very much for coming on theCUBE. Good luck with the announcement today. >> Thank you. >> Good to see you again. >> Thank you guys. >> Alright, keep it right there, everybody. We'll be right back with our next guest, we're live from the Waldorf Astoria, the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event. Be right back. [electronic music]

>> Narrator: Live from New York, it's The Cube covering the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event brought to you by IBM. Here are your hosts, Dave Vellante and Stu Miniman. >> Good morning everybody, welcome to the Waldorf Astoria. Stu Miniman and I are here in New York City, the Big Apple, for IBM's Machine Learning Event #IBMML. We're fresh off Spark Summit, Stu, where we had The Cube, this by the way is The Cube, the worldwide leader in live tech coverage. We were at Spark Summit last week, George Gilbert and I, watching the evolution of so-called big data. Let me frame, Stu, where we're at and bring you into the conversation. The early days of big data were all about offloading the data warehouse and reducing the cost of the data warehouse. I often joke that the ROI of big data is reduction on investment, right? There's these big, expensive data warehouses. It was quite successful in that regard. What then happened is we started to throw all this data into the data warehouse. People would joke it became a data swamp, and you had a lot of tooling to try to clean the data warehouse and a lot of transforming and loading and the ETL vendors started to participate there in a bigger way. Then you saw the extension of these data pipelines to try to more with that data. The Cloud guys have now entered in a big way. We're now entering the Cognitive Era, as IBM likes to refer to it. Others talk about AI and machine learning and deep learning, and that's really the big topic here today. What we can tell you, that the news goes out at 9:00am this morning, and it was well known that IBM's bringing machine learning to its mainframe, z mainframe. Two years ago, Stu, IBM announced the z13, which was really designed to bring analytic and transaction processing together on a single platform. Clearly IBM is extending the useful life of the mainframe by bringing things like Spark, certainly what it did with Linux and now machine learning into z. I want to talk about Cloud, the importance of Cloud, and how that has really taken over the world of big data. Virtually every customer you talk to now is doing work on the Cloud. It's interesting to see now IBM unlocking its transaction base, its mission-critical data, to this machine learning world. What are you seeing around Cloud and big data? >> We've been digging into this big data space since before it was called big data. One of the early things that really got me interested and exciting about it is, from the infrastructure standpoint, storage has always been one of its costs that we had to have, and the massive amounts of data, the digital explosion we talked about, is keeping all that information or managing all that information was a huge challenge. Big data was really that bit flip. How do we take all that information and make it an opportunity? How do we get new revenue streams? Dave, IBM has been at the center of this and looking at the higher-level pieces of not just storing data, but leveraging it. Obviously huge in analytics, lots of focus on everything from Hadoop and Spark and newer technologies, but digging in to how they can leverage up the stack, which is where IBM has done a lot of acquisitions in that space and leveraging that and wants to make sure that they have a strong position both in Cloud, which was renamed. The soft layer is now IBM Bluemix with a lot of services including a machine learning service that leverages the Watson technology and of course OnPrem they've got the z and the power solutions that you and I have covered for many years at the IBM Med show. >> Machine learning obviously heavily leverages models. We've seen in the early days of the data, the data scientists would build models and machine learning allows those models to be perfected over time. So there's this continuous process. We're familiar with the world of Batch and then some mini computer brought in the world of interactive, so we're familiar with those types of workloads. Now we're talking about a new emergent workload which is continuous. Continuous apps where you're streaming data in, what Spark is all about. The models that data scientists are building can constantly be improved. The key is automation, right? Being able to automate that whole process, and being able to collaborate between the data scientist, the data quality engineers, even the application developers that's something that IBM really tried to address in its last big announcement in this area of which was in October of last year the Watson data platform, what they called at the time the DataWorks. So really trying to bring together those different personas in a way that they can collaborate together and improve models on a continuous basis. The use cases that you often hear in big data and certainly initially in machine learning are things like fraud detection. Obviously ad serving has been a big data application for quite some time. In financial services, identifying good targets, identifying risk. What I'm seeing, Stu, is that the phase that we're in now of this so-called big data and analytics world, and now bringing in machine learning and deep learning, is to really improve on some of those use cases. For example, fraud's gotten much, much better. Ten years ago, let's say, it took many, many months, if you ever detected fraud. Now you get it in seconds, or sometimes minutes, but you also get a lot of false positives. Oops, sorry, the transaction didn't go through. Did you do this transaction? Yes, I did. Oh, sorry, you're going to have to redo it because it didn't go through. It's very frustrating for a lot of users. That will get better and better and better. We've all experienced retargeting from ads, and we know how crappy they are. That will continue to get better. The big question that people have and it goes back to Jeff Hammerbacher, the best minds of my generation are trying to get people to click on ads. When will we see big data really start to affect our lives in different ways like patient outcomes? We're going to hear some of that today from folks in health care and pharma. Again, these are the things that people are waiting for. The other piece is, of course, IT. What you're seeing, in terms of IT, in the whole data flow? >> Yes, a big question we have, Dave, is where's the data? And therefore, where does it make sense to be able to do that processing? In big data we talked about you've got masses amounts of data, can we move the processing to that data? With IT, the day before, your RCTO talked that there's going to be massive amounts of data at the edge and I don't have the time or the bandwidth or the need necessarily to pull that back to some kind of central repository. I want to be able to work on it there. Therefore there's going to be a lot of data worked at the edge. Peter Levine did a whole video talking about how, "Oh, Public Cloud is dead, it's all going to the edge." A little bit hyperbolic to the statement we understand that there's plenty use cases for both Public Cloud and for the edge. In fact we see Google big pushing machine learning TensorFlow, it's got one of those machine learning frameworks out there that we expect a lot of people to be working on. Amazon is putting effort into the MXNet framework, which is once again an open-source effort. One of the things I'm looking at the space, and I think IBM can provide some leadership here is to what frameworks are going to become popular across multiple scenarios? How many winners can there be for these frameworks? We already have multiple programming languages, multiple Clouds. How much of it is just API compatibility? How much of work there, and where are the repositories of data going to be, and where does it make sense to do that predictive analytics, that advanced processing? >> You bring up a good point. Last year, last October, at Big Data CIV, we had a special segment of data scientists with a data scientist panel. It was great. We had some rockstar data scientists on there like Dee Blanchfield and Joe Caserta, and a number of others. They echoed what you always hear when you talk to data scientists. "We spend 80% of our time messing with the data, "trying to clean the data, figuring out the data quality, "and precious little time on the models "and proving the models "and actually getting outcomes from those models." So things like Spark have simplified that whole process and unified a lot of the tooling around so-called big data. We're seeing Spark adoption increase. George Gilbert in our part one and part two last week in the big data forecast from Wikibon showed that we're still not on the steep part of the Se-curve, in terms of Spark adoption. Generically, we're talking about streaming as well included in that forecast, but it's forecasting that increasingly those applications are going to become more and more important. It brings you back to what IBM's trying to do is bring machine learning into this critical transaction data. Again, to me, it's an extension of the vision that they put forth two years ago, bringing analytic and transaction data together, actually processing within that Private Cloud complex, which is what essentially this mainframe is, it's the original Private Cloud, right? You were saying off-camera, it's the original converged infrastructure. It's the original Private Cloud. >> The mainframe's still here, lots of Linux on it. We've covered for many years, you want your cool Linux docker, containerized, machine learning stuff, I can do that on the Zn-series. >> You want Python and Spark and Re and Papa Java, and all the popular programming languages. It makes sense. It's not like a huge growth platform, it's kind of flat, down, up in the product cycle but it's alive and well and a lot of companies run their businesses obviously on the Zn. We're going to be unpacking that all day. Some of the questions we have is, what about Cloud? Where does it fit? What about Hybrid Cloud? What are the specifics of this announcement? Where does it fit? Will it be extended? Where does it come from? How does it relate to other products within the IBM portfolio? And very importantly, how are customers going to be applying these capabilities to create business value? That's something that we'll be looking at with a number of the folks on today. >> Dave, another thing, it reminds me of two years ago you and I did an event with the MIT Sloan school on The Second Machine Age with Andy McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson talking about as machines can help with some of these analytics, some of this advanced technology, what happens to the people? Talk about health care, it's doctors plus machines most of the time. As these two professors say, it's racing with the machines. What is the impact on people? What's the impact on jobs? And productivity going forward, really interesting hot space. They talk about everything from autonomous vehicles, advanced health care and the like. This is right at the core of where the next generation of the economy and jobs are going to go. >> It's a great point, and no doubt that's going to come up today and some of our segments will explore that. Keep it right there, everybody. We'll be here all day covering this announcement, talking to practitioners, talking to IBM executives and thought leaders and sharing some of the major trends that are going on in machine learning, the specifics of this announcement. Keep it right there, everybody. This is The Cube. We're live from the Waldorf Astoria. We'll be right back.