(upbeat music) >> Hello and welcome to today's session of the 2021 AWS Global Public Sector Partner Awards Program. This session's award is going to be profiling the Most Customer Obsessed Mission-based Win in the education domain. I'm your host, Donald Klein, with theCUBE. And today we are joined by Fernando Castillo. He's the Business Development Manager at CloudHesive, and then also Luis Muñoz, who's the Information Director at the Unibersidad de Los Lagos. >> Okay, everyone. Welcome to today's session. All right. Fernando, thanks for taking some time out and joining us today. Wanted to start with you and wanted to hear a little bit of background about CloudHesive. Obviously, you're a company that had won an award last year, but you're back on this year, again. Want you give us some a little bit of the story of CloudHesive, and what kind of services you provide? (speaking in foreign language) >> Translator: Thank you very much, Donald. Yes, CloudHesive is a managed consulting service provider in the cloud. We are AWS Partner and since 2014 we have been providing solutions focusing on security, trustability, and scalability in the cloud. Accompany companies to their main objective, which is reducing operational costs and increasing their productivity as they move forward in the adaption of cloud services. >> Very good. Okay. And then Luis, I'm going to turn to you now, want you talk to us a little bit about your role there at the Unibersidad de Los Lagos, and how you started this project? (speaking in foreign language) >> Translator: Good afternoon. I belong to the academic department of the engineering department at the University of Los Lagos and the director of the IT of this school. For several years, for about five years, we've been analyzing the deployment of these automation at universities of Chile. Since it's not a common item in the country, we've done several benchmarking worldwide, especially in Spain, Mexico, Columbia, and places where it's more developed. And eventually, we have to take some demos that allowed us to make some decisions. This topic was not going to be considered in 2020, but it happened because of a political situation, social political in Chile in 2019. So we have to move forward the process, but we had already made a global analysis and this was one of the reasons why we have to get closer to AWS Partners and this allowed us to move this process forward within the university. >> Okay. Very good. All right. Well then, what I'm going to do now is I'm going to come back to you, Fernando, and I want you to talk a little bit about the overall goal of what you were trying to help the university with. (speaking in foreign language) >> Translator: Well, within the main objectives we had in the project was to have a platform that would support a concurrent load of thousands of students, especially in University of Los Lagos. They had requested to have around 15,000 students and the main complication or the main challenge was to keep a virtual attendance, which is now known as learning management system, but also having the possibility of having video classes in two days, something similar to what we are doing today, but with 50 or up to 100 students. This was one of the main objectives of the project. >> Okay, understood. So the goal is here to deploy this platform and open source platform and make it available for about 15,000 students. Okay. Now coming back to you, Luis, there was a time constraint here, correct? You needed to get the system going very quickly. Maybe you could explain why you needed to accelerate this program so quickly. (speaking in foreign language) >> Translator: Well, literally, the pandemic conditions in the country started to be more evident and more severe since the first week of March in 2020. And so we have to make the decision, the double-sided decision of choosing an infrastructure that we could not buy at that time, given the emergency, logistic emergency of the pandemic at the server's room and to keep a stable platform for that number of users, student and professors of university. So we started conversations to make this scale up and move everything to the cloud. This was the first decision. So we decided to use Amazon and with CloudHesive, we were able to organize the academics charter in the same platform. So as to move no longer than three weeks so that we could give classes, online classes with the students while we were learning this new normal, which was virtual distance education. This was very difficult of every morning, afternoon, and evening of work, but this allowed us not to fall behind in the first semester of the educational needs of the students. With this modality, we have around 5% more students that we used to last year in 2020, in March 2020. And this allowed us to have a more visible structure for those who were questioning this new modality and we were applied to take this new modality in the end. >> Okay. So because of the pandemic, you had to accelerate the deployment of this learning management system very quickly. And you had to learn how to manage the system at the same time that you were deploying it. Okay. Understood. So a lot of challenges there. All right. So then maybe coming back to you, Fernando. Wanted you talk about your role and how CloudHesive helped with this sort of this very rapid deployment of this LMS system. (speaking in foreign language) >> Translator: Well, talking about the challenges and how we were able to get to the objective, within the plan, deployment and development have to accompany the University of Los Lagos not only with the use of the platform, but also how to change management. One of the biggest challenges was to do a security audit, the deployment of scalable infrastructures. And one of the main topics was, one of the main challenges for CloudHesive that we can now talk about and obtained objective was to do the tests from the point of view of scalability and security getting into 15,000 students, concurrent students, stimulating the workload of the university, keeping 99.5 availability of the platform. Going back to the challenges, it's not only the scalability and stability. Nowadays, the University of Los Lagos platform can continue to grow, as Luis mentioned, without the need to look for new resources. But with our implementation, deployment and development, we already have a scalable resource as they increase the number of professors and students to their university. >> Okay. Understood, understood. Now, maybe talk a little bit just to continue with that point. Maybe talk for a minute about how you leverage the AWS platform in order to be able to accelerate this project. What aspects of your partnership with AWS enabled you to deploy the system so quickly? (speaking in foreign language) >> Translator: Well, talking about that, we based on a referential architecture of AWS, which is an open source middle platform, and within these competencies and within things, they belong to the education. We also have the problems, the presence of (indistinct), which allows us to deploy new solution and new integrations. So this allowed us as the team to, within weeks, to develop new features that would allow us to deal with each of the requirements of the universities, specifically. So within the first week, the University of Los Lagos had the connectivity with the academic sector. On the second week, they had the infrastructure to support out two-way videos. And on the third week, they already had the platform completely deployed with all the security safeguards that we already have in all of our products and services. So having worked hand-in-hand with AWS allowed us to have success in time with this platform. >> Wow. So that's fantastic. You were able to deploy this entire system from the connection with the academics to the video infrastructure to actually getting all the security implementations in place. You were able to do that in a three week cycle, is that correct? >> Yeah, that's correct. >> Fantastic. Okay. So Luis, coming back to you then, so working with CloudHesive as a partner to help deploy the platform on AWS gave you fantastic speed and agility to get the system working. Maybe talk a little bit now about the challenges of getting students and educators to adapt the system, and what kind of successes you had? (speaking in foreign language) >> Translator: First of all, they have to, we need to need to know the geography, the landscape of the university. The geography is very varied. We have mountains and lakes and so forth, and connectivity concepts are very difficult in this area. In addition, University of Los Lagos has the characteristic of receiving students from very poor sectors within the region. So this means that more than 80% have a free education, as there are few universities that exist in the country. So one of the technological challenges was for these students to receive the mechanisms and technology to have the connectivity they needed. After that, we had a very big training plan with the deployment company, CloudHesive, with the permissions, and eventually together, we were able to go beyond students and professors. And I remember we had 50% students and professors logged in to the platform, and nowadays, we have 100% students and professors logged in having classes in the platform. But most importantly, nowadays, we have an analytical control because of an integration with CloudHesive, with certain tools that allow us to gather data in real time. And we can do a follow-up of the student that is closer actually from the previous situation when we didn't have this technology. If the student is not logged in, we can reach them directly or indirectly to know, what is happening with his meeting, which is the kind of support, academic, social or economic support that they need. Before, it was harder to get this. So we have a communion between technology and social services that we can provide as a university. And of course, the adaptability of CloudHesive in as much as most of the requirements that we needed. So as to have a good response, they've been very providing, they provided a very robust service in this terms. >> Fantastic. So you were able to reach 100% percent of your target audience very quickly. Is that correct? Great. >> Yes. >> And maybe just to kind of follow up one more. Just talk a little bit about the future of your program. Now that you've worked so hard to establish the system and to connect your students and your teachers and to optimize the system, what is your plan to use it going forward? Are you looking to expand it? What would you say are your goals? (speaking in foreign language) >> Translator: First of all, for better or for worse, this modality came here to stay. The pandemic may end, but it generated opportunities that nationwide, it moved forward at least seven or eight times faster, these kinds of possibilities. So it's hard to use or waste this opportunity with the face-to-face classes. The university nowadays, thanks to the platform and the work done by CloudHesive and AWS, the university won ministry projects from the Ministry of Education in the country, have a strengthening plans for other kinds of services that were not incorporated before, like the idea of virtual library, research work, academic development work, of training and cultural transformation as well. But eventually, they are happening in this virtually environments. And the university won this possibility through the ministry, bridging the gap between the academic sector and the students. And in order to elaborate a little bit more from the previous question, we did a survey last year and ended not long ago. And most professors said that 80%, more than 80% said that the virtual environment was considered as good or very good. So we have a very good assessment in order to participate in this project that were won by the university and they are nowadays being applied. So this generates development in the academic sector, in research, in library, in content creation, global communication, working together with other universities with work postgraduate courses and other universities without the need of getting out of home. So this is a very competitive advantage that we didn't have before. And since 2020, we were able to develop. >> Fantastic. Well, congratulations on a really well put together program. And I'm excited to hear that you've won an award in your country and that you're planning to expand the system more broadly. I think that's a fantastic success story. So maybe just to wrap this up here with you Fernando, why don't you talk a little bit about, so obviously, you guys were very critical in helping this system be deployed very quickly, but very securely at the same time. How do you see your role going forward in enabling these types of situations, this distance learning type formats? (speaking in foreign language) >> Translator: Well, just as Luis said, taking this project with the University of Los Lagos, this showed the importance of looking at technological advances and to improve the universities and research centers and how to focus on innovation and bringing the future education down. For us, the data generated in this virtual interactions are very valuable and having a clear perspective, so as to organize this data for, to make more effective decisions that allow us to act in real time. This is what we are focusing on right now. So as to keep, I mean, prove, and being able to provide new tools, the research centers and universities to operate quickly, safely, and cost effectively. >> Okay, fantastic. So really, the real lesson learned here is by working with a partner like yourself, you were able take an open source learning management system and then deploy it very quickly, manage it, and then secure it in a way that allowed the university then to do their work. So I think that's a really great end-to-end delivery story. So I think, maybe if you want to make one last comment, Fernando, about your role in any kind of future expansion for this type of work. (speaking in foreign language) >> Translator: Yes, of course. I would like to thank Amazon and University of Los Lagos, of course for giving us the chance to work together and develop this project successfully. And answering your question, I would like to say that this is a good incentive to build more robust solutions, as long as we have our focus on our clients, when working and as a final comment, I would just would like to thank you and hope to see you again with a new project. >> Okay, well, congratulations to you both on winning this award. And for CloudHesive, this is your second year in a row of winning a Public Sector Award. So with that, I'm going to sign off today and I'm going to thank you both for attending. Today, we've had Fernando Castillo, the Business Development Manager from CloudHesive and then Luis Muñoz, the Information Director at the Uniberisdad de Los Lagos, and thank you both for attending. This is Donald Klein for theCUBE, until next time. (bright music)

>>welcome. My name is Ben Bennett. I am the director of HPC Strategic programs here at Hewlett Packard Enterprise. It is my great pleasure and honor to be talking to Professor Mark Parsons from the Edinburgh Parallel Computing Center. And we're gonna talk a little about exa scale. What? It means we're gonna talk less about the technology on Maura about the science, the requirements on the need for exa scale. Uh, rather than a deep dive into the enabling technologies. Mark. Welcome. >>I then thanks very much for inviting me to tell me >>complete pleasure. Um, so I'd like to kick off with, I suppose. Quite an interesting look back. You and I are both of a certain age 25 plus, Onda. We've seen these milestones. Uh, I suppose that the S I milestones of high performance computing's come and go, you know, from a gig a flop back in 1987 teraflop in 97 a petaflop in 2000 and eight. But we seem to be taking longer in getting to an ex a flop. Um, so I'd like your thoughts. Why is why is an extra flop taking so long? >>So I think that's a very interesting question because I started my career in parallel computing in 1989. I'm gonna join in. IPCC was set up then. You know, we're 30 years old this year in 1990 on Do you know the fastest computer we have them is 800 mega flops just under a getting flogged. So in my career, we've gone already. When we reached the better scale, we'd already gone pretty much a million times faster on, you know, the step from a tariff block to a block scale system really didn't feel particularly difficult. Um, on yet the step from A from a petaflop PETA scale system. To an extent, block is a really, really big challenge. And I think it's really actually related to what's happened with computer processes over the last decade, where, individually, you know, approached the core, Like on your laptop. Whoever hasn't got much faster, we've just got more often So the perception of more speed, but actually just being delivered by more course. And as you go down that approach, you know what happens in the supercomputing world as well. We've gone, uh, in 2010 I think we had systems that were, you know, a few 1000 cores. Our main national service in the UK for the last eight years has had 118,000 cores. But looking at the X scale we're looking at, you know, four or five million cores on taming that level of parallelism is the real challenge. And that's why it's taking an enormous and time to, uh, deliver these systems. That is not just on the hardware front. You know, vendors like HP have to deliver world beating technology and it's hard, hard. But then there's also the challenge to the users. How do they get the codes to work in the face of that much parallelism? >>If you look at what the the complexity is delivering an annex a flop. Andi, you could have bought an extra flop three or four years ago. You couldn't have housed it. You couldn't have powered it. You couldn't have afforded it on, do you? Couldn't program it. But you still you could have You could have bought one. We should have been so lucky to be unable to supply it. Um, the software, um I think from our standpoint, is is looking like where we're doing mawr enabling with our customers. You sell them a machine on, then the the need then to do collaboration specifically seems mawr and Maura around the software. Um, so it's It's gonna be relatively easy to get one x a flop using limb pack, but but that's not extra scale. So what do you think? On exa scale machine versus an X? A flop machine means to the people like yourself to your users, the scientists and industry. What is an ex? A flop versus >>an exa scale? So I think, you know, supercomputing moves forward by setting itself challenges. And when you when you look at all of the excess scale programs worldwide that are trying to deliver systems that can do an X a lot form or it's actually very arbitrary challenge. You know, we set ourselves a PETA scale challenge delivering a petaflop somebody manage that, Andi. But you know, the world moves forward by setting itself challenges e think you know, we use quite arbitrary definition of what we mean is well by an exit block. So, you know, in your in my world, um, we either way, first of all, see ah flop is a computation, so multiply or it's an ad or whatever on we tend. Thio, look at that is using very high precision numbers or 64 bit numbers on Do you know, we then say, Well, you've got to do the next block. You've got to do a billion billion of those calculations every second. No, a some of the last arbitrary target Now you know today from HPD Aiken by my assistant and will do a billion billion calculations per second. And they will either do that as a theoretical peak, which would be almost unattainable, or using benchmarks that stressed the system on demonstrate a relaxing law. But again, those benchmarks themselves attuned Thio. Just do those calculations and deliver and explore been a steady I'll way if you like. So, you know, way kind of set ourselves this this this big challenge You know, the big fence on the race course, which were clambering over. But the challenge in itself actually should be. I'm much more interesting. The water we're going to use these devices for having built um, eso. Getting into the extra scale era is not so much about doing an extra block. It's a new generation off capability that allows us to do better scientific and industrial research. And that's the interesting bit in this whole story. >>I would tend to agree with you. I think the the focus around exa scale is to look at, you know, new technologies, new ways of doing things, new ways of looking at data and to get new results. So eventually you will get yourself a nexus scale machine. Um, one hopes, sooner rather >>than later. Well, I'm sure you don't tell me one, Ben. >>It's got nothing to do with may. I can't sell you anything, Mark. But there are people outside the door over there who would love to sell you one. Yes. However, if we if you look at your you know your your exa scale machine, Um, how do you believe the workloads are going to be different on an extra scale machine versus your current PETA scale machine? >>So I think there's always a slight conceit when you buy a new national supercomputer. On that conceit is that you're buying a capability that you know on. But many people will run on the whole system. Known truth. We do have people that run on the whole of our archer system. Today's A 118,000 cores, but I would say, and I'm looking at the system. People that run over say, half of that can be counted on Europe on a single hand in a year, and they're doing very specific things. It's very costly simulation they're running on. So, you know, if you look at these systems today, two things show no one is. It's very difficult to get time on them. The Baroque application procedures All of the requirements have to be assessed by your peers and your given quite limited amount of time that you have to eke out to do science. Andi people tend to run their applications in the sweet spot where their application delivers the best performance on You know, we try to push our users over time. Thio use reasonably sized jobs. I think our average job says about 20,000 course, she's not bad, but that does mean that as we move to the exits, kill two things have to happen. One is actually I think we've got to be more relaxed about giving people access to the system, So let's give more people access, let people play, let people try out ideas they've never tried out before. And I think that will lead to a lot more innovation and computational science. But at the same time, I think we also need to be less precious. You know, we to accept these systems will have a variety of sizes of job on them. You know, we're still gonna have people that want to run four million cores or two million cores. That's absolutely fine. Absolutely. Salute those people for trying really, really difficult. But then we're gonna have a huge spectrum of views all the way down to people that want to run on 500 cores or whatever. So I think we need Thio broaden the user base in Alexa Skill system. And I know this is what's happening, for example, in Japan with the new Japanese system. >>So, Mark, if you cast your mind back to almost exactly a year ago after the HPC user forum, you were interviewed for Premier Magazine on Do you alluded in that article to the needs off scientific industrial users requiring, you know, uh on X a flop or an exa scale machine it's clear in your in your previous answer regarding, you know, the workloads. Some would say that the majority of people would be happier with, say, 10 100 petaflop machines. You know, democratization. More people access. But can you provide us examples at the type of science? The needs of industrial users that actually do require those resources to be put >>together as an exa scale machine? So I think you know, it's a very interesting area. At the end of the day, these systems air bought because they are capability systems on. I absolutely take the argument. Why shouldn't we buy 10 100 pattern block systems? But there are a number of scientific areas even today that would benefit from a nexus school system and on these the sort of scientific areas that will use as much access onto a system as much time and as much scale of the system as they can, as you can give them eso on immediate example. People doing chroma dynamics calculations in particle physics, theoretical calculations, they would just use whatever you give them. But you know, I think one of the areas that is very interesting is actually the engineering space where, you know, many people worry the engineering applications over the last decade haven't really kept up with this sort of supercomputers that we have. I'm leading a project called Asimov, funded by M. P S O. C in the UK, which is jointly with Rolls Royce, jointly funded by Rolls Royce and also working with the University of Cambridge, Oxford, Bristol, Warrick. We're trying to do the whole engine gas turbine simulation for the first time. So that's looking at the structure of the gas turbine, the airplane engine, the structure of it, how it's all built it together, looking at the fluid dynamics off the air and the hot gasses, the flu threat, looking at the combustion of the engine looking how fuel is spread into the combustion chamber. Looking at the electrics around, looking at the way the engine two forms is, it heats up and cools down all of that. Now Rolls Royce wants to do that for 20 years. Andi, Uh, whenever they certify, a new engine has to go through a number of physical tests, and every time they do on those tests, it could cost them as much as 25 to $30 million. These are very expensive tests, particularly when they do what's called a blade off test, which would be, you know, blade failure. They could prove that the engine contains the fragments of the blade. Sort of think, continue face really important test and all engines and pass it. What we want to do is do is use an exa scale computer to properly model a blade off test for the first time, so that in future, some simulations can become virtual rather than having thio expend all of the money that Rolls Royce would normally spend on. You know, it's a fascinating project is a really hard project to do. One of the things that I do is I am deaf to share this year. Gordon Bell Price on bond I've really enjoyed to do. That's one of the major prizes in our area, you know, gets announced supercomputing every year. So I have the pleasure of reading all the submissions each year. I what's been really interesting thing? This is my third year doing being on the committee on what's really interesting is the way that big systems like Summit, for example, in the US have pushed the user communities to try and do simulations Nowhere. Nobody's done before, you know. And we've seen this as well, with papers coming after the first use of the for Goku system in Japan, for example, people you know, these are very, very broad. So, you know, earthquake simulation, a large Eddie simulations of boats. You know, a number of things around Genome Wide Association studies, for example. So the use of these computers spans of last area off computational science. I think the really really important thing about these systems is their challenging people that do calculations they've never done before. That's what's important. >>Okay, Thank you. You talked about challenges when I nearly said when you and I had lots of hair, but that's probably much more true of May. Um, we used to talk about grand challenges we talked about, especially around the teraflop era, the ski red program driving, you know, the grand challenges of science, possibly to hide the fact that it was a bomb designing computer eso they talked about the grand challenges. Um, we don't seem to talk about that much. We talk about excess girl. We talk about data. Um Where are the grand challenges that you see that an exa scale computer can you know it can help us. Okay, >>so I think grand challenges didn't go away. Just the phrase went out of fashion. Um, that's like my hair. I think it's interesting. The I do feel the science moves forward by setting itself grand challenges and always had has done, you know, my original backgrounds in particle physics. I was very lucky to spend four years at CERN working in the early stage of the left accelerator when it first came online on. Do you know the scientists there? I think they worked on left 15 years before I came in and did my little ph d on it. Andi, I think that way of organizing science hasn't changed. We just talked less about grand challenges. I think you know what I've seen over the last few years is a renaissance in computational science, looking at things that have previously, you know, people have said have been impossible. So a couple of years ago, for example, one of the key Gordon Bell price papers was on Genome Wide Association studies on some of it. If I may be one of the winner of its, if I remember right on. But that was really, really interesting because first of all, you know, the sort of the Genome Wide Association Studies had gone out of favor in the bioinformatics by a scientist community because people thought they weren't possible to compute. But that particular paper should Yes, you could do these really, really big Continental little problems in a reasonable amount of time if you had a big enough computer. And one thing I felt all the way through my career actually is we've probably discarded Mawr simulations because they were impossible at the time that we've actually decided to do. And I sometimes think we to challenge ourselves by looking at the things we've discovered in the past and say, Oh, look, you know, we could actually do that now, Andi, I think part of the the challenge of bringing an extra service toe life is to get people to think about what they would use it for. That's a key thing. Otherwise, I always say, a computer that is unused to just be turned off. There's no point in having underutilized supercomputer. Everybody loses from that. >>So Let's let's bring ourselves slightly more up to date. We're in the middle of a global pandemic. Uh, on board one of the things in our industry has bean that I've been particularly proud about is I've seen the vendors, all the vendors, you know, offering up machine's onboard, uh, making resources available for people to fight things current disease. Um, how do you see supercomputers now and in the future? Speeding up things like vaccine discovery on help when helping doctors generally. >>So I think you're quite right that, you know, the supercomputer community around the world actually did a really good job of responding to over 19. Inasmuch as you know, speaking for the UK, we put in place a rapid access program. So anybody wanted to do covert research on the various national services we have done to the to two services Could get really quick access. Um, on that, that has worked really well in the UK You know, we didn't have an archer is an old system, Aziz. You know, we didn't have the world's largest supercomputer, but it is happily bean running lots off covert 19 simulations largely for the biomedical community. Looking at Druk modeling and molecular modeling. Largely that's just been going the US They've been doing really large uh, combinatorial parameter search problems on on Summit, for example, looking to see whether or not old drugs could be reused to solve a new problem on DSO, I think, I think actually, in some respects Kobe, 19 is being the sounds wrong. But it's actually been good for supercomputing. Inasmuch is pointed out to governments that supercomputers are important parts off any scientific, the active countries research infrastructure. >>So, um, I'll finish up and tap into your inner geek. Um, there's a lot of technologies that are being banded around to currently enable, you know, the first exa scale machine, wherever that's going to be from whomever, what are the current technologies or emerging technologies that you are interested in excited about looking forward to getting your hands on. >>So in the business case I've written for the U. K's exa scale computer, I actually characterized this is a choice between the American model in the Japanese model. Okay, both of frozen, both of condoms. Eso in America, they're very much gone down the chorus plus GPU or GPU fruit. Um, so you might have, you know, an Intel Xeon or an M D process er center or unarmed process or, for that matter on you might have, you know, 24 g. P. U s. I think the most interesting thing that I've seen is definitely this move to a single address space. So the data that you have will be accessible, but the G p u on the CPU, I think you know, that's really bean. One of the key things that stopped the uptake of GPS today and that that that one single change is going Thio, I think, uh, make things very, very interesting. But I'm not entirely convinced that the CPU GPU model because I think that it's very difficult to get all the all the performance set of the GPU. You know, it will do well in H p l, for example, high performance impact benchmark we're discussing at the beginning of this interview. But in riel scientific workloads, you know, you still find it difficult to find all the performance that has promised. So, you know, the Japanese approach, which is the core, is only approach. E think it's very attractive, inasmuch as you know They're using very high bandwidth memory, very interesting process of which they are going to have to, you know, which they could develop together over 10 year period. And this is one thing that people don't realize the Japanese program and the American Mexico program has been working for 10 years on these systems. I think the Japanese process really interesting because, um, it when you look at the performance, it really does work for their scientific work clothes, and that's that does interest me a lot. This this combination of a A process are designed to do good science, high bandwidth memory and a real understanding of how data flows around the supercomputer. I think those are the things are exciting me at the moment. Obviously, you know, there's new networking technologies, I think, in the fullness of time, not necessarily for the first systems. You know, over the next decade we're going to see much, much more activity on silicon photonics. I think that's really, really fascinating all of these things. I think in some respects the last decade has just bean quite incremental improvements. But I think we're supercomputing is going in the moment. We're a very very disruptive moment again. That goes back to start this discussion. Why is extra skill been difficult to get? Thio? Actually, because the disruptive moment in technology. >>Professor Parsons, thank you very much for your time and your insights. Thank you. Pleasure and folks. Thank you for watching. I hope you've learned something, or at least enjoyed it. With that, I would ask you to stay safe and goodbye.

>>don't talk mhm, >>Okay, thing is my presentation on coherent nonlinear dynamics and combinatorial optimization. This is going to be a talk to introduce an approach we're taking to the analysis of the performance of coherent using machines. So let me start with a brief introduction to easing optimization. The easing model represents a set of interacting magnetic moments or spins the total energy given by the expression shown at the bottom left of this slide. Here, the signal variables are meditate binary values. The Matrix element J. I. J. Represents the interaction, strength and signed between any pair of spins. I. J and A Chive represents a possible local magnetic field acting on each thing. The easing ground state problem is to find an assignment of binary spin values that achieves the lowest possible value of total energy. And an instance of the easing problem is specified by giving numerical values for the Matrix J in Vector H. Although the easy model originates in physics, we understand the ground state problem to correspond to what would be called quadratic binary optimization in the field of operations research and in fact, in terms of computational complexity theory, it could be established that the easing ground state problem is np complete. Qualitatively speaking, this makes the easing problem a representative sort of hard optimization problem, for which it is expected that the runtime required by any computational algorithm to find exact solutions should, as anatomically scale exponentially with the number of spends and for worst case instances at each end. Of course, there's no reason to believe that the problem instances that actually arrives in practical optimization scenarios are going to be worst case instances. And it's also not generally the case in practical optimization scenarios that we demand absolute optimum solutions. Usually we're more interested in just getting the best solution we can within an affordable cost, where costs may be measured in terms of time, service fees and or energy required for a computation. This focuses great interest on so called heuristic algorithms for the easing problem in other NP complete problems which generally get very good but not guaranteed optimum solutions and run much faster than algorithms that are designed to find absolute Optima. To get some feeling for present day numbers, we can consider the famous traveling salesman problem for which extensive compilations of benchmarking data may be found online. A recent study found that the best known TSP solver required median run times across the Library of Problem instances That scaled is a very steep route exponential for end up to approximately 4500. This gives some indication of the change in runtime scaling for generic as opposed the worst case problem instances. Some of the instances considered in this study were taken from a public library of T SPS derived from real world Veil aside design data. This feels I TSP Library includes instances within ranging from 131 to 744,710 instances from this library with end between 6880 13,584 were first solved just a few years ago in 2017 requiring days of run time and a 48 core to King hurts cluster, while instances with and greater than or equal to 14,233 remain unsolved exactly by any means. Approximate solutions, however, have been found by heuristic methods for all instances in the VLS i TSP library with, for example, a solution within 0.14% of a no lower bound, having been discovered, for instance, with an equal 19,289 requiring approximately two days of run time on a single core of 2.4 gigahertz. Now, if we simple mindedly extrapolate the root exponential scaling from the study up to an equal 4500, we might expect that an exact solver would require something more like a year of run time on the 48 core cluster used for the N equals 13,580 for instance, which shows how much a very small concession on the quality of the solution makes it possible to tackle much larger instances with much lower cost. At the extreme end, the largest TSP ever solved exactly has an equal 85,900. This is an instance derived from 19 eighties VLSI design, and it's required 136 CPU. Years of computation normalized to a single cord, 2.4 gigahertz. But the 24 larger so called world TSP benchmark instance within equals 1,904,711 has been solved approximately within ophthalmology. Gap bounded below 0.474%. Coming back to the general. Practical concerns have applied optimization. We may note that a recent meta study analyzed the performance of no fewer than 37 heuristic algorithms for Max cut and quadratic pioneer optimization problems and found the performance sort and found that different heuristics work best for different problem instances selected from a large scale heterogeneous test bed with some evidence but cryptic structure in terms of what types of problem instances were best solved by any given heuristic. Indeed, their their reasons to believe that these results from Mexico and quadratic binary optimization reflected general principle of performance complementarity among heuristic optimization algorithms in the practice of solving heart optimization problems there. The cerise is a critical pre processing issue of trying to guess which of a number of available good heuristic algorithms should be chosen to tackle a given problem. Instance, assuming that any one of them would incur high costs to run on a large problem, instances incidence, making an astute choice of heuristic is a crucial part of maximizing overall performance. Unfortunately, we still have very little conceptual insight about what makes a specific problem instance, good or bad for any given heuristic optimization algorithm. This has certainly been pinpointed by researchers in the field is a circumstance that must be addressed. So adding this all up, we see that a critical frontier for cutting edge academic research involves both the development of novel heuristic algorithms that deliver better performance, with lower cost on classes of problem instances that are underserved by existing approaches, as well as fundamental research to provide deep conceptual insight into what makes a given problem in, since easy or hard for such algorithms. In fact, these days, as we talk about the end of Moore's law and speculate about a so called second quantum revolution, it's natural to talk not only about novel algorithms for conventional CPUs but also about highly customized special purpose hardware architectures on which we may run entirely unconventional algorithms for combinatorial optimization such as easing problem. So against that backdrop, I'd like to use my remaining time to introduce our work on analysis of coherent using machine architectures and associate ID optimization algorithms. These machines, in general, are a novel class of information processing architectures for solving combinatorial optimization problems by embedding them in the dynamics of analog, physical or cyber physical systems, in contrast to both MAWR traditional engineering approaches that build using machines using conventional electron ICS and more radical proposals that would require large scale quantum entanglement. The emerging paradigm of coherent easing machines leverages coherent nonlinear dynamics in photonic or Opto electronic platforms to enable near term construction of large scale prototypes that leverage post Simoes information dynamics, the general structure of of current CM systems has shown in the figure on the right. The role of the easing spins is played by a train of optical pulses circulating around a fiber optical storage ring. A beam splitter inserted in the ring is used to periodically sample the amplitude of every optical pulse, and the measurement results are continually read into a refugee A, which uses them to compute perturbations to be applied to each pulse by a synchronized optical injections. These perturbations, air engineered to implement the spin, spin coupling and local magnetic field terms of the easing Hamiltonian, corresponding to a linear part of the CME Dynamics, a synchronously pumped parametric amplifier denoted here as PPL and Wave Guide adds a crucial nonlinear component to the CIA and Dynamics as well. In the basic CM algorithm, the pump power starts very low and has gradually increased at low pump powers. The amplitude of the easing spin pulses behaviors continuous, complex variables. Who Israel parts which can be positive or negative, play the role of play the role of soft or perhaps mean field spins once the pump, our crosses the threshold for parametric self oscillation. In the optical fiber ring, however, the attitudes of the easing spin pulses become effectively Qantas ized into binary values while the pump power is being ramped up. The F P J subsystem continuously applies its measurement based feedback. Implementation of the using Hamiltonian terms, the interplay of the linear rised using dynamics implemented by the F P G A and the threshold conversation dynamics provided by the sink pumped Parametric amplifier result in the final state of the optical optical pulse amplitude at the end of the pump ramp that could be read as a binary strain, giving a proposed solution of the easing ground state problem. This method of solving easing problem seems quite different from a conventional algorithm that runs entirely on a digital computer as a crucial aspect of the computation is performed physically by the analog, continuous, coherent, nonlinear dynamics of the optical degrees of freedom. In our efforts to analyze CIA and performance, we have therefore turned to the tools of dynamical systems theory, namely, a study of modifications, the evolution of critical points and apologies of hetero clinic orbits and basins of attraction. We conjecture that such analysis can provide fundamental insight into what makes certain optimization instances hard or easy for coherent using machines and hope that our approach can lead to both improvements of the course, the AM algorithm and a pre processing rubric for rapidly assessing the CME suitability of new instances. Okay, to provide a bit of intuition about how this all works, it may help to consider the threshold dynamics of just one or two optical parametric oscillators in the CME architecture just described. We can think of each of the pulse time slots circulating around the fiber ring, as are presenting an independent Opio. We can think of a single Opio degree of freedom as a single, resonant optical node that experiences linear dissipation, do toe out coupling loss and gain in a pump. Nonlinear crystal has shown in the diagram on the upper left of this slide as the pump power is increased from zero. As in the CME algorithm, the non linear game is initially to low toe overcome linear dissipation, and the Opio field remains in a near vacuum state at a critical threshold. Value gain. Equal participation in the Popeo undergoes a sort of lazing transition, and the study states of the OPIO above this threshold are essentially coherent states. There are actually two possible values of the Opio career in amplitude and any given above threshold pump power which are equal in magnitude but opposite in phase when the OPI across the special diet basically chooses one of the two possible phases randomly, resulting in the generation of a single bit of information. If we consider to uncoupled, Opio has shown in the upper right diagram pumped it exactly the same power at all times. Then, as the pump power has increased through threshold, each Opio will independently choose the phase and thus to random bits are generated for any number of uncoupled. Oppose the threshold power per opio is unchanged from the single Opio case. Now, however, consider a scenario in which the two appeals air, coupled to each other by a mutual injection of their out coupled fields has shown in the diagram on the lower right. One can imagine that depending on the sign of the coupling parameter Alfa, when one Opio is lazing, it will inject a perturbation into the other that may interfere either constructively or destructively, with the feel that it is trying to generate by its own lazing process. As a result, when came easily showed that for Alfa positive, there's an effective ferro magnetic coupling between the two Opio fields and their collective oscillation threshold is lowered from that of the independent Opio case. But on Lee for the two collective oscillation modes in which the two Opio phases are the same for Alfa Negative, the collective oscillation threshold is lowered on Lee for the configurations in which the Opio phases air opposite. So then, looking at how Alfa is related to the J. I. J matrix of the easing spin coupling Hamiltonian, it follows that we could use this simplistic to a p o. C. I am to solve the ground state problem of a fair magnetic or anti ferro magnetic ankles to easing model simply by increasing the pump power from zero and observing what phase relation occurs as the two appeals first start delays. Clearly, we can imagine generalizing this story toe larger, and however the story doesn't stay is clean and simple for all larger problem instances. And to find a more complicated example, we only need to go to n equals four for some choices of J J for n equals, for the story remains simple. Like the n equals two case. The figure on the upper left of this slide shows the energy of various critical points for a non frustrated and equals, for instance, in which the first bifurcated critical point that is the one that I forget to the lowest pump value a. Uh, this first bifurcated critical point flows as symptomatically into the lowest energy easing solution and the figure on the upper right. However, the first bifurcated critical point flows to a very good but sub optimal minimum at large pump power. The global minimum is actually given by a distinct critical critical point that first appears at a higher pump power and is not automatically connected to the origin. The basic C am algorithm is thus not able to find this global minimum. Such non ideal behaviors needs to become more confident. Larger end for the n equals 20 instance, showing the lower plots where the lower right plot is just a zoom into a region of the lower left lot. It can be seen that the global minimum corresponds to a critical point that first appears out of pump parameter, a around 0.16 at some distance from the idiomatic trajectory of the origin. That's curious to note that in both of these small and examples, however, the critical point corresponding to the global minimum appears relatively close to the idiomatic projector of the origin as compared to the most of the other local minima that appear. We're currently working to characterize the face portrait topology between the global minimum in the antibiotic trajectory of the origin, taking clues as to how the basic C am algorithm could be generalized to search for non idiomatic trajectories that jump to the global minimum during the pump ramp. Of course, n equals 20 is still too small to be of interest for practical optimization applications. But the advantage of beginning with the study of small instances is that we're able reliably to determine their global minima and to see how they relate to the 80 about trajectory of the origin in the basic C am algorithm. In the smaller and limit, we can also analyze fully quantum mechanical models of Syrian dynamics. But that's a topic for future talks. Um, existing large scale prototypes are pushing into the range of in equals 10 to the 4 10 to 5 to six. So our ultimate objective in theoretical analysis really has to be to try to say something about CIA and dynamics and regime of much larger in our initial approach to characterizing CIA and behavior in the large in regime relies on the use of random matrix theory, and this connects to prior research on spin classes, SK models and the tap equations etcetera. At present, we're focusing on statistical characterization of the CIA ingredient descent landscape, including the evolution of critical points in their Eigen value spectra. As the pump power is gradually increased. We're investigating, for example, whether there could be some way to exploit differences in the relative stability of the global minimum versus other local minima. We're also working to understand the deleterious or potentially beneficial effects of non ideologies, such as a symmetry in the implemented these and couplings. Looking one step ahead, we plan to move next in the direction of considering more realistic classes of problem instances such as quadratic, binary optimization with constraints. Eso In closing, I should acknowledge people who did the hard work on these things that I've shown eso. My group, including graduate students Ed winning, Daniel Wennberg, Tatsuya Nagamoto and Atsushi Yamamura, have been working in close collaboration with Syria Ganguly, Marty Fair and Amir Safarini Nini, all of us within the Department of Applied Physics at Stanford University. On also in collaboration with the Oshima Moto over at NTT 55 research labs, Onda should acknowledge funding support from the NSF by the Coherent Easing Machines Expedition in computing, also from NTT five research labs, Army Research Office and Exxon Mobil. Uh, that's it. Thanks very much. >>Mhm e >>t research and the Oshie for putting together this program and also the opportunity to speak here. My name is Al Gore ism or Andy and I'm from Caltech, and today I'm going to tell you about the work that we have been doing on networks off optical parametric oscillators and how we have been using them for icing machines and how we're pushing them toward Cornum photonics to acknowledge my team at Caltech, which is now eight graduate students and five researcher and postdocs as well as collaborators from all over the world, including entity research and also the funding from different places, including entity. So this talk is primarily about networks of resonate er's, and these networks are everywhere from nature. For instance, the brain, which is a network of oscillators all the way to optics and photonics and some of the biggest examples or metal materials, which is an array of small resonate er's. And we're recently the field of technological photonics, which is trying thio implement a lot of the technological behaviors of models in the condensed matter, physics in photonics and if you want to extend it even further, some of the implementations off quantum computing are technically networks of quantum oscillators. So we started thinking about these things in the context of icing machines, which is based on the icing problem, which is based on the icing model, which is the simple summation over the spins and spins can be their upward down and the couplings is given by the JJ. And the icing problem is, if you know J I J. What is the spin configuration that gives you the ground state? And this problem is shown to be an MP high problem. So it's computational e important because it's a representative of the MP problems on NPR. Problems are important because first, their heart and standard computers if you use a brute force algorithm and they're everywhere on the application side. That's why there is this demand for making a machine that can target these problems, and hopefully it can provide some meaningful computational benefit compared to the standard digital computers. So I've been building these icing machines based on this building block, which is a degenerate optical parametric. Oscillator on what it is is resonator with non linearity in it, and we pump these resonate er's and we generate the signal at half the frequency of the pump. One vote on a pump splits into two identical photons of signal, and they have some very interesting phase of frequency locking behaviors. And if you look at the phase locking behavior, you realize that you can actually have two possible phase states as the escalation result of these Opio which are off by pie, and that's one of the important characteristics of them. So I want to emphasize a little more on that and I have this mechanical analogy which are basically two simple pendulum. But there are parametric oscillators because I'm going to modulate the parameter of them in this video, which is the length of the string on by that modulation, which is that will make a pump. I'm gonna make a muscular. That'll make a signal which is half the frequency of the pump. And I have two of them to show you that they can acquire these face states so they're still facing frequency lock to the pump. But it can also lead in either the zero pie face states on. The idea is to use this binary phase to represent the binary icing spin. So each opio is going to represent spin, which can be either is your pie or up or down. And to implement the network of these resonate er's, we use the time off blood scheme, and the idea is that we put impulses in the cavity. These pulses air separated by the repetition period that you put in or t r. And you can think about these pulses in one resonator, xaz and temporarily separated synthetic resonate Er's if you want a couple of these resonator is to each other, and now you can introduce these delays, each of which is a multiple of TR. If you look at the shortest delay it couples resonator wanted to 2 to 3 and so on. If you look at the second delay, which is two times a rotation period, the couple's 123 and so on. And if you have and minus one delay lines, then you can have any potential couplings among these synthetic resonate er's. And if I can introduce these modulators in those delay lines so that I can strength, I can control the strength and the phase of these couplings at the right time. Then I can have a program will all toe all connected network in this time off like scheme, and the whole physical size of the system scales linearly with the number of pulses. So the idea of opium based icing machine is didn't having these o pos, each of them can be either zero pie and I can arbitrarily connect them to each other. And then I start with programming this machine to a given icing problem by just setting the couplings and setting the controllers in each of those delight lines. So now I have a network which represents an icing problem. Then the icing problem maps to finding the face state that satisfy maximum number of coupling constraints. And the way it happens is that the icing Hamiltonian maps to the linear loss of the network. And if I start adding gain by just putting pump into the network, then the OPI ohs are expected to oscillate in the lowest, lowest lost state. And, uh and we have been doing these in the past, uh, six or seven years and I'm just going to quickly show you the transition, especially what happened in the first implementation, which was using a free space optical system and then the guided wave implementation in 2016 and the measurement feedback idea which led to increasing the size and doing actual computation with these machines. So I just want to make this distinction here that, um, the first implementation was an all optical interaction. We also had an unequal 16 implementation. And then we transition to this measurement feedback idea, which I'll tell you quickly what it iss on. There's still a lot of ongoing work, especially on the entity side, to make larger machines using the measurement feedback. But I'm gonna mostly focused on the all optical networks and how we're using all optical networks to go beyond simulation of icing Hamiltonian both in the linear and non linear side and also how we're working on miniaturization of these Opio networks. So the first experiment, which was the four opium machine, it was a free space implementation and this is the actual picture off the machine and we implemented a small and it calls for Mexico problem on the machine. So one problem for one experiment and we ran the machine 1000 times, we looked at the state and we always saw it oscillate in one of these, um, ground states of the icing laboratoria. So then the measurement feedback idea was to replace those couplings and the controller with the simulator. So we basically simulated all those coherent interactions on on FB g. A. And we replicated the coherent pulse with respect to all those measurements. And then we injected it back into the cavity and on the near to you still remain. So it still is a non. They're dynamical system, but the linear side is all simulated. So there are lots of questions about if this system is preserving important information or not, or if it's gonna behave better. Computational wars. And that's still ah, lot of ongoing studies. But nevertheless, the reason that this implementation was very interesting is that you don't need the end minus one delight lines so you can just use one. Then you can implement a large machine, and then you can run several thousands of problems in the machine, and then you can compare the performance from the computational perspective Looks so I'm gonna split this idea of opium based icing machine into two parts. One is the linear part, which is if you take out the non linearity out of the resonator and just think about the connections. You can think about this as a simple matrix multiplication scheme. And that's basically what gives you the icing Hambletonian modeling. So the optical laws of this network corresponds to the icing Hamiltonian. And if I just want to show you the example of the n equals for experiment on all those face states and the history Graham that we saw, you can actually calculate the laws of each of those states because all those interferences in the beam splitters and the delay lines are going to give you a different losses. And then you will see that the ground states corresponds to the lowest laws of the actual optical network. If you add the non linearity, the simple way of thinking about what the non linearity does is that it provides to gain, and then you start bringing up the gain so that it hits the loss. Then you go through the game saturation or the threshold which is going to give you this phase bifurcation. So you go either to zero the pie face state. And the expectation is that Theis, the network oscillates in the lowest possible state, the lowest possible loss state. There are some challenges associated with this intensity Durban face transition, which I'm going to briefly talk about. I'm also going to tell you about other types of non aerodynamics that we're looking at on the non air side of these networks. So if you just think about the linear network, we're actually interested in looking at some technological behaviors in these networks. And the difference between looking at the technological behaviors and the icing uh, machine is that now, First of all, we're looking at the type of Hamilton Ian's that are a little different than the icing Hamilton. And one of the biggest difference is is that most of these technological Hamilton Ian's that require breaking the time reversal symmetry, meaning that you go from one spin to in the one side to another side and you get one phase. And if you go back where you get a different phase, and the other thing is that we're not just interested in finding the ground state, we're actually now interesting and looking at all sorts of states and looking at the dynamics and the behaviors of all these states in the network. So we started with the simplest implementation, of course, which is a one d chain of thes resonate, er's, which corresponds to a so called ssh model. In the technological work, we get the similar energy to los mapping and now we can actually look at the band structure on. This is an actual measurement that we get with this associate model and you see how it reasonably how How? Well, it actually follows the prediction and the theory. One of the interesting things about the time multiplexing implementation is that now you have the flexibility of changing the network as you are running the machine. And that's something unique about this time multiplex implementation so that we can actually look at the dynamics. And one example that we have looked at is we can actually go through the transition off going from top A logical to the to the standard nontrivial. I'm sorry to the trivial behavior of the network. You can then look at the edge states and you can also see the trivial and states and the technological at states actually showing up in this network. We have just recently implement on a two D, uh, network with Harper Hofstadter model and when you don't have the results here. But we're one of the other important characteristic of time multiplexing is that you can go to higher and higher dimensions and keeping that flexibility and dynamics, and we can also think about adding non linearity both in a classical and quantum regimes, which is going to give us a lot of exotic, no classical and quantum, non innate behaviors in these networks. Yeah, So I told you about the linear side. Mostly let me just switch gears and talk about the nonlinear side of the network. And the biggest thing that I talked about so far in the icing machine is this face transition that threshold. So the low threshold we have squeezed state in these. Oh, pios, if you increase the pump, we go through this intensity driven phase transition and then we got the face stays above threshold. And this is basically the mechanism off the computation in these O pos, which is through this phase transition below to above threshold. So one of the characteristics of this phase transition is that below threshold, you expect to see quantum states above threshold. You expect to see more classical states or coherent states, and that's basically corresponding to the intensity off the driving pump. So it's really hard to imagine that it can go above threshold. Or you can have this friends transition happen in the all in the quantum regime. And there are also some challenges associated with the intensity homogeneity off the network, which, for example, is if one opioid starts oscillating and then its intensity goes really high. Then it's going to ruin this collective decision making off the network because of the intensity driven face transition nature. So So the question is, can we look at other phase transitions? Can we utilize them for both computing? And also can we bring them to the quantum regime on? I'm going to specifically talk about the face transition in the spectral domain, which is the transition from the so called degenerate regime, which is what I mostly talked about to the non degenerate regime, which happens by just tuning the phase of the cavity. And what is interesting is that this phase transition corresponds to a distinct phase noise behavior. So in the degenerate regime, which we call it the order state, you're gonna have the phase being locked to the phase of the pump. As I talked about non degenerate regime. However, the phase is the phase is mostly dominated by the quantum diffusion. Off the off the phase, which is limited by the so called shallow towns limit, and you can see that transition from the general to non degenerate, which also has distinct symmetry differences. And this transition corresponds to a symmetry breaking in the non degenerate case. The signal can acquire any of those phases on the circle, so it has a you one symmetry. Okay, and if you go to the degenerate case, then that symmetry is broken and you only have zero pie face days I will look at. So now the question is can utilize this phase transition, which is a face driven phase transition, and can we use it for similar computational scheme? So that's one of the questions that were also thinking about. And it's not just this face transition is not just important for computing. It's also interesting from the sensing potentials and this face transition, you can easily bring it below threshold and just operated in the quantum regime. Either Gaussian or non Gaussian. If you make a network of Opio is now, we can see all sorts off more complicated and more interesting phase transitions in the spectral domain. One of them is the first order phase transition, which you get by just coupling to Opio, and that's a very abrupt face transition and compared to the to the single Opio phase transition. And if you do the couplings right, you can actually get a lot of non her mission dynamics and exceptional points, which are actually very interesting to explore both in the classical and quantum regime. And I should also mention that you can think about the cup links to be also nonlinear couplings. And that's another behavior that you can see, especially in the nonlinear in the non degenerate regime. So with that, I basically told you about these Opio networks, how we can think about the linear scheme and the linear behaviors and how we can think about the rich, nonlinear dynamics and non linear behaviors both in the classical and quantum regime. I want to switch gear and tell you a little bit about the miniaturization of these Opio networks. And of course, the motivation is if you look at the electron ICS and what we had 60 or 70 years ago with vacuum tube and how we transition from relatively small scale computers in the order of thousands of nonlinear elements to billions of non elements where we are now with the optics is probably very similar to 70 years ago, which is a table talk implementation. And the question is, how can we utilize nano photonics? I'm gonna just briefly show you the two directions on that which we're working on. One is based on lithium Diabate, and the other is based on even a smaller resonate er's could you? So the work on Nana Photonic lithium naive. It was started in collaboration with Harvard Marko Loncar, and also might affair at Stanford. And, uh, we could show that you can do the periodic polling in the phenomenon of it and get all sorts of very highly nonlinear processes happening in this net. Photonic periodically polls if, um Diabate. And now we're working on building. Opio was based on that kind of photonic the film Diabate. And these air some some examples of the devices that we have been building in the past few months, which I'm not gonna tell you more about. But the O. P. O. S. And the Opio Networks are in the works. And that's not the only way of making large networks. Um, but also I want to point out that The reason that these Nana photonic goblins are actually exciting is not just because you can make a large networks and it can make him compact in a in a small footprint. They also provide some opportunities in terms of the operation regime. On one of them is about making cat states and Opio, which is, can we have the quantum superposition of the zero pie states that I talked about and the Net a photonic within? I've It provides some opportunities to actually get closer to that regime because of the spatial temporal confinement that you can get in these wave guides. So we're doing some theory on that. We're confident that the type of non linearity two losses that it can get with these platforms are actually much higher than what you can get with other platform their existing platforms and to go even smaller. We have been asking the question off. What is the smallest possible Opio that you can make? Then you can think about really wavelength scale type, resonate er's and adding the chi to non linearity and see how and when you can get the Opio to operate. And recently, in collaboration with us see, we have been actually USC and Creole. We have demonstrated that you can use nano lasers and get some spin Hamilton and implementations on those networks. So if you can build the a P. O s, we know that there is a path for implementing Opio Networks on on such a nano scale. So we have looked at these calculations and we try to estimate the threshold of a pos. Let's say for me resonator and it turns out that it can actually be even lower than the type of bulk Pip Llano Pos that we have been building in the past 50 years or so. So we're working on the experiments and we're hoping that we can actually make even larger and larger scale Opio networks. So let me summarize the talk I told you about the opium networks and our work that has been going on on icing machines and the measurement feedback. And I told you about the ongoing work on the all optical implementations both on the linear side and also on the nonlinear behaviors. And I also told you a little bit about the efforts on miniaturization and going to the to the Nano scale. So with that, I would like Thio >>three from the University of Tokyo. Before I thought that would like to thank you showing all the stuff of entity for the invitation and the organization of this online meeting and also would like to say that it has been very exciting to see the growth of this new film lab. And I'm happy to share with you today of some of the recent works that have been done either by me or by character of Hong Kong. Honest Group indicates the title of my talk is a neuro more fic in silica simulator for the communities in machine. And here is the outline I would like to make the case that the simulation in digital Tektronix of the CME can be useful for the better understanding or improving its function principles by new job introducing some ideas from neural networks. This is what I will discuss in the first part and then it will show some proof of concept of the game and performance that can be obtained using dissimulation in the second part and the protection of the performance that can be achieved using a very large chaos simulator in the third part and finally talk about future plans. So first, let me start by comparing recently proposed izing machines using this table there is elected from recent natural tronics paper from the village Park hard people, and this comparison shows that there's always a trade off between energy efficiency, speed and scalability that depends on the physical implementation. So in red, here are the limitation of each of the servers hardware on, interestingly, the F p G, a based systems such as a producer, digital, another uh Toshiba beautification machine or a recently proposed restricted Bozeman machine, FPD A by a group in Berkeley. They offer a good compromise between speed and scalability. And this is why, despite the unique advantage that some of these older hardware have trust as the currency proposition in Fox, CBS or the energy efficiency off memory Sisters uh P. J. O are still an attractive platform for building large organizing machines in the near future. The reason for the good performance of Refugee A is not so much that they operate at the high frequency. No, there are particular in use, efficient, but rather that the physical wiring off its elements can be reconfigured in a way that limits the funding human bottleneck, larger, funny and phenols and the long propagation video information within the system. In this respect, the LPGA is They are interesting from the perspective off the physics off complex systems, but then the physics of the actions on the photos. So to put the performance of these various hardware and perspective, we can look at the competition of bringing the brain the brain complete, using billions of neurons using only 20 watts of power and operates. It's a very theoretically slow, if we can see and so this impressive characteristic, they motivate us to try to investigate. What kind of new inspired principles be useful for designing better izing machines? The idea of this research project in the future collaboration it's to temporary alleviates the limitations that are intrinsic to the realization of an optical cortex in machine shown in the top panel here. By designing a large care simulator in silicone in the bottom here that can be used for digesting the better organization principles of the CIA and this talk, I will talk about three neuro inspired principles that are the symmetry of connections, neural dynamics orphan chaotic because of symmetry, is interconnectivity the infrastructure? No. Next talks are not composed of the reputation of always the same types of non environments of the neurons, but there is a local structure that is repeated. So here's the schematic of the micro column in the cortex. And lastly, the Iraqi co organization of connectivity connectivity is organizing a tree structure in the brain. So here you see a representation of the Iraqi and organization of the monkey cerebral cortex. So how can these principles we used to improve the performance of the icing machines? And it's in sequence stimulation. So, first about the two of principles of the estimate Trian Rico structure. We know that the classical approximation of the car testing machine, which is the ground toe, the rate based on your networks. So in the case of the icing machines, uh, the okay, Scott approximation can be obtained using the trump active in your position, for example, so the times of both of the system they are, they can be described by the following ordinary differential equations on in which, in case of see, I am the X, I represent the in phase component of one GOP Oh, Theo f represents the monitor optical parts, the district optical Parametric amplification and some of the good I JoJo extra represent the coupling, which is done in the case of the measure of feedback coupling cm using oh, more than detection and refugee A and then injection off the cooking time and eso this dynamics in both cases of CNN in your networks, they can be written as the grand set of a potential function V, and this written here, and this potential functionally includes the rising Maccagnan. So this is why it's natural to use this type of, uh, dynamics to solve the icing problem in which the Omega I J or the eyes in coping and the H is the extension of the icing and attorney in India and expect so. Not that this potential function can only be defined if the Omega I j. R. A. Symmetric. So the well known problem of this approach is that this potential function V that we obtain is very non convicts at low temperature, and also one strategy is to gradually deformed this landscape, using so many in process. But there is no theorem. Unfortunately, that granted conventions to the global minimum of There's even Tony and using this approach. And so this is why we propose, uh, to introduce a macro structures of the system where one analog spin or one D O. P. O is replaced by a pair off one another spin and one error, according viable. And the addition of this chemical structure introduces a symmetry in the system, which in terms induces chaotic dynamics, a chaotic search rather than a learning process for searching for the ground state of the icing. Every 20 within this massacre structure the role of the er variable eyes to control the amplitude off the analog spins toe force. The amplitude of the expense toe become equal to certain target amplitude a uh and, uh, and this is done by modulating the strength off the icing complaints or see the the error variable E I multiply the icing complaint here in the dynamics off air d o p. O. On then the dynamics. The whole dynamics described by this coupled equations because the e I do not necessarily take away the same value for the different. I thesis introduces a symmetry in the system, which in turn creates security dynamics, which I'm sure here for solving certain current size off, um, escape problem, Uh, in which the X I are shown here and the i r from here and the value of the icing energy showing the bottom plots. You see this Celtics search that visit various local minima of the as Newtonian and eventually finds the global minimum? Um, it can be shown that this modulation off the target opportunity can be used to destabilize all the local minima off the icing evertonians so that we're gonna do not get stuck in any of them. On more over the other types of attractors I can eventually appear, such as limits I contractors, Okot contractors. They can also be destabilized using the motivation of the target and Batuta. And so we have proposed in the past two different moderation of the target amateur. The first one is a modulation that ensure the uh 100 reproduction rate of the system to become positive on this forbids the creation off any nontrivial tractors. And but in this work, I will talk about another moderation or arrested moderation which is given here. That works, uh, as well as this first uh, moderation, but is easy to be implemented on refugee. So this couple of the question that represent becoming the stimulation of the cortex in machine with some error correction they can be implemented especially efficiently on an F B. G. And here I show the time that it takes to simulate three system and also in red. You see, at the time that it takes to simulate the X I term the EI term, the dot product and the rising Hamiltonian for a system with 500 spins and Iraq Spain's equivalent to 500 g. O. P. S. So >>in >>f b d a. The nonlinear dynamics which, according to the digital optical Parametric amplification that the Opa off the CME can be computed in only 13 clock cycles at 300 yards. So which corresponds to about 0.1 microseconds. And this is Toby, uh, compared to what can be achieved in the measurements back O C. M. In which, if we want to get 500 timer chip Xia Pios with the one she got repetition rate through the obstacle nine narrative. Uh, then way would require 0.5 microseconds toe do this so the submission in F B J can be at least as fast as ah one g repression. Uh, replicate pulsed laser CIA Um, then the DOT product that appears in this differential equation can be completed in 43 clock cycles. That's to say, one microseconds at 15 years. So I pieced for pouring sizes that are larger than 500 speeds. The dot product becomes clearly the bottleneck, and this can be seen by looking at the the skating off the time the numbers of clock cycles a text to compute either the non in your optical parts or the dog products, respect to the problem size. And And if we had infinite amount of resources and PGA to simulate the dynamics, then the non illogical post can could be done in the old one. On the mattress Vector product could be done in the low carrot off, located off scales as a look at it off and and while the guide off end. Because computing the dot product involves assuming all the terms in the product, which is done by a nephew, GE by another tree, which heights scarce logarithmic any with the size of the system. But This is in the case if we had an infinite amount of resources on the LPGA food, but for dealing for larger problems off more than 100 spins. Usually we need to decompose the metrics into ah, smaller blocks with the block side that are not you here. And then the scaling becomes funny, non inner parts linear in the end, over you and for the products in the end of EU square eso typically for low NF pdf cheap PGA you the block size off this matrix is typically about 100. So clearly way want to make you as large as possible in order to maintain this scanning in a log event for the numbers of clock cycles needed to compute the product rather than this and square that occurs if we decompose the metrics into smaller blocks. But the difficulty in, uh, having this larger blocks eyes that having another tree very large Haider tree introduces a large finding and finance and long distance start a path within the refugee. So the solution to get higher performance for a simulator of the contest in machine eyes to get rid of this bottleneck for the dot product by increasing the size of this at the tree. And this can be done by organizing your critique the electrical components within the LPGA in order which is shown here in this, uh, right panel here in order to minimize the finding finance of the system and to minimize the long distance that a path in the in the fpt So I'm not going to the details of how this is implemented LPGA. But just to give you a idea off why the Iraqi Yahiko organization off the system becomes the extremely important toe get good performance for similar organizing machine. So instead of instead of getting into the details of the mpg implementation, I would like to give some few benchmark results off this simulator, uh, off the that that was used as a proof of concept for this idea which is can be found in this archive paper here and here. I should results for solving escape problems. Free connected person, randomly person minus one spring last problems and we sure, as we use as a metric the numbers of the mattress Victor products since it's the bottleneck of the computation, uh, to get the optimal solution of this escape problem with the Nina successful BT against the problem size here and and in red here, this propose FDJ implementation and in ah blue is the numbers of retrospective product that are necessary for the C. I am without error correction to solve this escape programs and in green here for noisy means in an evening which is, uh, behavior with similar to the Cartesian mission. Uh, and so clearly you see that the scaring off the numbers of matrix vector product necessary to solve this problem scales with a better exponents than this other approaches. So So So that's interesting feature of the system and next we can see what is the real time to solution to solve this SK instances eso in the last six years, the time institution in seconds to find a grand state of risk. Instances remain answers probability for different state of the art hardware. So in red is the F B g. A presentation proposing this paper and then the other curve represent Ah, brick a local search in in orange and silver lining in purple, for example. And so you see that the scaring off this purpose simulator is is rather good, and that for larger plant sizes we can get orders of magnitude faster than the state of the art approaches. Moreover, the relatively good scanning off the time to search in respect to problem size uh, they indicate that the FPD implementation would be faster than risk. Other recently proposed izing machine, such as the hope you know, natural complimented on memories distance that is very fast for small problem size in blue here, which is very fast for small problem size. But which scanning is not good on the same thing for the restricted Bosman machine. Implementing a PGA proposed by some group in Broken Recently Again, which is very fast for small parliament sizes but which canning is bad so that a dis worse than the proposed approach so that we can expect that for programs size is larger than 1000 spins. The proposed, of course, would be the faster one. Let me jump toe this other slide and another confirmation that the scheme scales well that you can find the maximum cut values off benchmark sets. The G sets better candidates that have been previously found by any other algorithms, so they are the best known could values to best of our knowledge. And, um or so which is shown in this paper table here in particular, the instances, uh, 14 and 15 of this G set can be We can find better converse than previously known, and we can find this can vary is 100 times faster than the state of the art algorithm and CP to do this which is a very common Kasich. It s not that getting this a good result on the G sets, they do not require ah, particular hard tuning of the parameters. So the tuning issuing here is very simple. It it just depends on the degree off connectivity within each graph. And so this good results on the set indicate that the proposed approach would be a good not only at solving escape problems in this problems, but all the types off graph sizing problems on Mexican province in communities. So given that the performance off the design depends on the height of this other tree, we can try to maximize the height of this other tree on a large F p g a onda and carefully routing the components within the P G A and and we can draw some projections of what type of performance we can achieve in the near future based on the, uh, implementation that we are currently working. So here you see projection for the time to solution way, then next property for solving this escape programs respect to the prime assize. And here, compared to different with such publicizing machines, particularly the digital. And, you know, 42 is shown in the green here, the green line without that's and, uh and we should two different, uh, hypothesis for this productions either that the time to solution scales as exponential off n or that the time of social skills as expression of square root off. So it seems, according to the data, that time solution scares more as an expression of square root of and also we can be sure on this and this production show that we probably can solve prime escape problem of science 2000 spins, uh, to find the rial ground state of this problem with 99 success ability in about 10 seconds, which is much faster than all the other proposed approaches. So one of the future plans for this current is in machine simulator. So the first thing is that we would like to make dissimulation closer to the rial, uh, GOP oh, optical system in particular for a first step to get closer to the system of a measurement back. See, I am. And to do this what is, uh, simulate Herbal on the p a is this quantum, uh, condoms Goshen model that is proposed described in this paper and proposed by people in the in the Entity group. And so the idea of this model is that instead of having the very simple or these and have shown previously, it includes paired all these that take into account on me the mean off the awesome leverage off the, uh, European face component, but also their violence s so that we can take into account more quantum effects off the g o p. O, such as the squeezing. And then we plan toe, make the simulator open access for the members to run their instances on the system. There will be a first version in September that will be just based on the simple common line access for the simulator and in which will have just a classic or approximation of the system. We don't know Sturm, binary weights and museum in term, but then will propose a second version that would extend the current arising machine to Iraq off F p g. A, in which we will add the more refined models truncated, ignoring the bottom Goshen model they just talked about on the support in which he valued waits for the rising problems and support the cement. So we will announce later when this is available and and far right is working >>hard comes from Universal down today in physics department, and I'd like to thank the organizers for their kind invitation to participate in this very interesting and promising workshop. Also like to say that I look forward to collaborations with with a file lab and Yoshi and collaborators on the topics of this world. So today I'll briefly talk about our attempt to understand the fundamental limits off another continues time computing, at least from the point off you off bullion satisfy ability, problem solving, using ordinary differential equations. But I think the issues that we raise, um, during this occasion actually apply to other other approaches on a log approaches as well and into other problems as well. I think everyone here knows what Dorien satisfy ability. Problems are, um, you have boolean variables. You have em clauses. Each of disjunction of collaterals literally is a variable, or it's, uh, negation. And the goal is to find an assignment to the variable, such that order clauses are true. This is a decision type problem from the MP class, which means you can checking polynomial time for satisfy ability off any assignment. And the three set is empty, complete with K three a larger, which means an efficient trees. That's over, uh, implies an efficient source for all the problems in the empty class, because all the problems in the empty class can be reduced in Polian on real time to reset. As a matter of fact, you can reduce the NP complete problems into each other. You can go from three set to set backing or two maximum dependent set, which is a set packing in graph theoretic notions or terms toe the icing graphs. A problem decision version. This is useful, and you're comparing different approaches, working on different kinds of problems when not all the closest can be satisfied. You're looking at the accusation version offset, uh called Max Set. And the goal here is to find assignment that satisfies the maximum number of clauses. And this is from the NPR class. In terms of applications. If we had inefficient sets over or np complete problems over, it was literally, positively influenced. Thousands off problems and applications in industry and and science. I'm not going to read this, but this this, of course, gives a strong motivation toe work on this kind of problems. Now our approach to set solving involves embedding the problem in a continuous space, and you use all the east to do that. So instead of working zeros and ones, we work with minus one across once, and we allow the corresponding variables toe change continuously between the two bounds. We formulate the problem with the help of a close metrics. If if a if a close, uh, does not contain a variable or its negation. The corresponding matrix element is zero. If it contains the variable in positive, for which one contains the variable in a gated for Mitt's negative one, and then we use this to formulate this products caused quote, close violation functions one for every clause, Uh, which really, continuously between zero and one. And they're zero if and only if the clause itself is true. Uh, then we form the define in order to define a dynamic such dynamics in this and dimensional hyper cube where the search happens and if they exist, solutions. They're sitting in some of the corners of this hyper cube. So we define this, uh, energy potential or landscape function shown here in a way that this is zero if and only if all the clauses all the kmc zero or the clauses off satisfied keeping these auxiliary variables a EMS always positive. And therefore, what you do here is a dynamics that is a essentially ingredient descend on this potential energy landscape. If you were to keep all the M's constant that it would get stuck in some local minimum. However, what we do here is we couple it with the dynamics we cooperated the clothes violation functions as shown here. And if he didn't have this am here just just the chaos. For example, you have essentially what case you have positive feedback. You have increasing variable. Uh, but in that case, you still get stuck would still behave will still find. So she is better than the constant version but still would get stuck only when you put here this a m which makes the dynamics in in this variable exponential like uh, only then it keeps searching until he finds a solution on deer is a reason for that. I'm not going toe talk about here, but essentially boils down toe performing a Grady and descend on a globally time barren landscape. And this is what works. Now I'm gonna talk about good or bad and maybe the ugly. Uh, this is, uh, this is What's good is that it's a hyperbolic dynamical system, which means that if you take any domain in the search space that doesn't have a solution in it or any socially than the number of trajectories in it decays exponentially quickly. And the decay rate is a characteristic in variant characteristic off the dynamics itself. Dynamical systems called the escape right the inverse off that is the time scale in which you find solutions by this by this dynamical system, and you can see here some song trajectories that are Kelty because it's it's no linear, but it's transient, chaotic. Give their sources, of course, because eventually knowledge to the solution. Now, in terms of performance here, what you show for a bunch off, um, constraint densities defined by M overran the ratio between closes toe variables for random, said Problems is random. Chris had problems, and they as its function off n And we look at money toward the wartime, the wall clock time and it behaves quite value behaves Azat party nominally until you actually he to reach the set on set transition where the hardest problems are found. But what's more interesting is if you monitor the continuous time t the performance in terms off the A narrow, continuous Time t because that seems to be a polynomial. And the way we show that is, we consider, uh, random case that random three set for a fixed constraint density Onda. We hear what you show here. Is that the right of the trash hold that it's really hard and, uh, the money through the fraction of problems that we have not been able to solve it. We select thousands of problems at that constraint ratio and resolve them without algorithm, and we monitor the fractional problems that have not yet been solved by continuous 90. And this, as you see these decays exponentially different. Educate rates for different system sizes, and in this spot shows that is dedicated behaves polynomial, or actually as a power law. So if you combine these two, you find that the time needed to solve all problems except maybe appear traction off them scales foreign or merely with the problem size. So you have paranormal, continuous time complexity. And this is also true for other types of very hard constraints and sexual problems such as exact cover, because you can always transform them into three set as we discussed before, Ramsey coloring and and on these problems, even algorithms like survey propagation will will fail. But this doesn't mean that P equals NP because what you have first of all, if you were toe implement these equations in a device whose behavior is described by these, uh, the keys. Then, of course, T the continue style variable becomes a physical work off. Time on that will be polynomial is scaling, but you have another other variables. Oxidative variables, which structured in an exponential manner. So if they represent currents or voltages in your realization and it would be an exponential cost Al Qaeda. But this is some kind of trade between time and energy, while I know how toe generate energy or I don't know how to generate time. But I know how to generate energy so it could use for it. But there's other issues as well, especially if you're trying toe do this son and digital machine but also happens. Problems happen appear. Other problems appear on in physical devices as well as we discuss later. So if you implement this in GPU, you can. Then you can get in order off to magnitude. Speed up. And you can also modify this to solve Max sad problems. Uh, quite efficiently. You are competitive with the best heuristic solvers. This is a weather problems. In 2016 Max set competition eso so this this is this is definitely this seems like a good approach, but there's off course interesting limitations, I would say interesting, because it kind of makes you think about what it means and how you can exploit this thes observations in understanding better on a low continues time complexity. If you monitored the discrete number the number of discrete steps. Don't buy the room, Dakota integrator. When you solve this on a digital machine, you're using some kind of integrator. Um and you're using the same approach. But now you measure the number off problems you haven't sold by given number of this kid, uh, steps taken by the integrator. You find out you have exponential, discrete time, complexity and, of course, thistles. A problem. And if you look closely, what happens even though the analog mathematical trajectory, that's the record here. If you monitor what happens in discrete time, uh, the integrator frustrates very little. So this is like, you know, third or for the disposition, but fluctuates like crazy. So it really is like the intervention frees us out. And this is because of the phenomenon of stiffness that are I'll talk a little bit a more about little bit layer eso. >>You know, it might look >>like an integration issue on digital machines that you could improve and could definitely improve. But actually issues bigger than that. It's It's deeper than that, because on a digital machine there is no time energy conversion. So the outside variables are efficiently representing a digital machine. So there's no exponential fluctuating current of wattage in your computer when you do this. Eso If it is not equal NP then the exponential time, complexity or exponential costs complexity has to hit you somewhere. And this is how um, but, you know, one would be tempted to think maybe this wouldn't be an issue in a analog device, and to some extent is true on our devices can be ordered to maintain faster, but they also suffer from their own problems because he not gonna be affect. That classes soldiers as well. So, indeed, if you look at other systems like Mirandizing machine measurement feedback, probably talk on the grass or selected networks. They're all hinge on some kind off our ability to control your variables in arbitrary, high precision and a certain networks you want toe read out across frequencies in case off CM's. You required identical and program because which is hard to keep, and they kind of fluctuate away from one another, shift away from one another. And if you control that, of course that you can control the performance. So actually one can ask if whether or not this is a universal bottleneck and it seems so aside, I will argue next. Um, we can recall a fundamental result by by showing harder in reaction Target from 1978. Who says that it's a purely computer science proof that if you are able toe, compute the addition multiplication division off riel variables with infinite precision, then you could solve any complete problems in polynomial time. It doesn't actually proposals all where he just chose mathematically that this would be the case. Now, of course, in Real warned, you have also precision. So the next question is, how does that affect the competition about problems? This is what you're after. Lots of precision means information also, or entropy production. Eso what you're really looking at the relationship between hardness and cost of computing off a problem. Uh, and according to Sean Hagar, there's this left branch which in principle could be polynomial time. But the question whether or not this is achievable that is not achievable, but something more cheerful. That's on the right hand side. There's always going to be some information loss, so mental degeneration that could keep you away from possibly from point normal time. So this is what we like to understand, and this information laws the source off. This is not just always I will argue, uh, in any physical system, but it's also off algorithm nature, so that is a questionable area or approach. But China gets results. Security theoretical. No, actual solar is proposed. So we can ask, you know, just theoretically get out off. Curiosity would in principle be such soldiers because it is not proposing a soldier with such properties. In principle, if if you want to look mathematically precisely what the solar does would have the right properties on, I argue. Yes, I don't have a mathematical proof, but I have some arguments that that would be the case. And this is the case for actually our city there solver that if you could calculate its trajectory in a loss this way, then it would be, uh, would solve epic complete problems in polynomial continuous time. Now, as a matter of fact, this a bit more difficult question, because time in all these can be re scared however you want. So what? Burns says that you actually have to measure the length of the trajectory, which is a new variant off the dynamical system or property dynamical system, not off its parameters ization. And we did that. So Suba Corral, my student did that first, improving on the stiffness off the problem off the integrations, using implicit solvers and some smart tricks such that you actually are closer to the actual trajectory and using the same approach. You know what fraction off problems you can solve? We did not give the length of the trajectory. You find that it is putting on nearly scaling the problem sites we have putting on your skin complexity. That means that our solar is both Polly length and, as it is, defined it also poorly time analog solver. But if you look at as a discreet algorithm, if you measure the discrete steps on a digital machine, it is an exponential solver. And the reason is because off all these stiffness, every integrator has tow truck it digitizing truncate the equations, and what it has to do is to keep the integration between the so called stability region for for that scheme, and you have to keep this product within a grimace of Jacoby in and the step size read in this region. If you use explicit methods. You want to stay within this region? Uh, but what happens that some off the Eigen values grow fast for Steve problems, and then you're you're forced to reduce that t so the product stays in this bonded domain, which means that now you have to you're forced to take smaller and smaller times, So you're you're freezing out the integration and what I will show you. That's the case. Now you can move to increase its soldiers, which is which is a tree. In this case, you have to make domain is actually on the outside. But what happens in this case is some of the Eigen values of the Jacobean, also, for six systems, start to move to zero. As they're moving to zero, they're going to enter this instability region, so your soul is going to try to keep it out, so it's going to increase the data T. But if you increase that to increase the truncation hours, so you get randomized, uh, in the large search space, so it's it's really not, uh, not going to work out. Now, one can sort off introduce a theory or language to discuss computational and are computational complexity, using the language from dynamical systems theory. But basically I I don't have time to go into this, but you have for heart problems. Security object the chaotic satellite Ouch! In the middle of the search space somewhere, and that dictates how the dynamics happens and variant properties off the dynamics. Of course, off that saddle is what the targets performance and many things, so a new, important measure that we find that it's also helpful in describing thesis. Another complexity is the so called called Makarov, or metric entropy and basically what this does in an intuitive A eyes, uh, to describe the rate at which the uncertainty containing the insignificant digits off a trajectory in the back, the flow towards the significant ones as you lose information because off arrows being, uh grown or are developed in tow. Larger errors in an exponential at an exponential rate because you have positively up north spawning. But this is an in variant property. It's the property of the set of all. This is not how you compute them, and it's really the interesting create off accuracy philosopher dynamical system. A zay said that you have in such a high dimensional that I'm consistent were positive and negatively upon of exponents. Aziz Many The total is the dimension of space and user dimension, the number off unstable manifold dimensions and as Saddam was stable, manifold direction. And there's an interesting and I think, important passion, equality, equality called the passion, equality that connect the information theoretic aspect the rate off information loss with the geometric rate of which trajectory separate minus kappa, which is the escape rate that I already talked about. Now one can actually prove a simple theorems like back off the envelope calculation. The idea here is that you know the rate at which the largest rated, which closely started trajectory separate from one another. So now you can say that, uh, that is fine, as long as my trajectory finds the solution before the projective separate too quickly. In that case, I can have the hope that if I start from some region off the face base, several close early started trajectories, they kind of go into the same solution orphaned and and that's that's That's this upper bound of this limit, and it is really showing that it has to be. It's an exponentially small number. What? It depends on the end dependence off the exponents right here, which combines information loss rate and the social time performance. So these, if this exponents here or that has a large independence or river linear independence, then you then you really have to start, uh, trajectories exponentially closer to one another in orderto end up in the same order. So this is sort off like the direction that you're going in tow, and this formulation is applicable toe all dynamical systems, uh, deterministic dynamical systems. And I think we can We can expand this further because, uh, there is, ah, way off getting the expression for the escaped rate in terms off n the number of variables from cycle expansions that I don't have time to talk about. What? It's kind of like a program that you can try toe pursuit, and this is it. So the conclusions I think of self explanatory I think there is a lot of future in in, uh, in an allo. Continue start computing. Um, they can be efficient by orders of magnitude and digital ones in solving empty heart problems because, first of all, many of the systems you like the phone line and bottleneck. There's parallelism involved, and and you can also have a large spectrum or continues time, time dynamical algorithms than discrete ones. And you know. But we also have to be mindful off. What are the possibility of what are the limits? And 11 open question is very important. Open question is, you know, what are these limits? Is there some kind off no go theory? And that tells you that you can never perform better than this limit or that limit? And I think that's that's the exciting part toe to derive thes thes this levian 10.

Narrator: From theCUBE studios in Palo Alto and Boston, it's theCUBE, covering IBM Think, brought to you by IBM. >> We're back. You're watching theCUBE and our coverage of IBM Think 2020, the digital IBM thinking. We're here with Jamie Thomas, who's the general manager of strategy and development for IBM Systems. Jamie, great to see you. >> It's great to see you as always. >> You have been knee deep in qubits, the last couple years. And we're going to talk quantum. We've talked quantum a lot in the past, but it's a really interesting field. We spoke to you last year at IBM Think about this topic. And a year in this industry is a long time, but so give us the update what's new in quantum land? >> Well, Dave first of all, I'd like to say that in this environment we find ourselves in, I think we can all appreciate why innovation of this nature is perhaps more important going forward, right? If we look at some of the opportunities to solve some of the unsolvable problems, or solve problems much more quickly, in the case of pharmaceutical research. But for us in IBM, it's been a really busy year. First of all, we worked to advance the technology, which is first and foremost in terms of this journey to quantum. We just brought online our 53 qubit computer, which also has a quantum volume of 32, which we can talk about. And we've continued to advance the software stack that's attached to the technology because you have to have both the software and the hardware thing, right rate and pace. We've advanced our new network, which you and I have spoken about, which are those individuals across the commercial enterprises, academic and startups, who are working with us to co-create around quantum to help us understand the use cases that really can be solved in the future with quantum. And we've also continued to advance our community, which is serving as well in this new digital world that we're finding ourselves in, in terms of reaching out to developers. Now, we have over 300,000 unique downloads of the programming model that represents the developers that we're touching out there every day with quantum. These developers have, in the last year, have run over 140 billion quantum circuits. So, our machines in the cloud are quite active, and the cloud model, of course, is serving us well. The data's, in addition, to all the other things that I mentioned. >> So Jamie, what metrics are you trying to optimize on? You mentioned 53 qubits I saw that actually came online, I think, last fall. So you're nearly six months in now, which is awesome. But what are you measuring? Are you measuring stability or coherence or error rates? Number of qubits? What are the things that you're trying to optimize on to measure progress? >> Well, that's a good question. So we have this metric that we've defined over the last year or two called quantum volume. And quantum volume 32, which is the capacity of our current machine really is a representation of many of the things that you mentioned. It represents the power of the quantum machine, if you will. It includes a definition of our ability to provide error correction, to maintain states, to really accomplish workloads with the computer. So there's a number of factors that go into quantum volume, which we think are important. Now, qubits and the number of qubits is just one such metric. It really depends on the coherence and the effect of error correction, to really get the value out of the machine, and that's a very important metric. >> Yeah, we love to boil things down to a single metric. It's more complicated than that >> Yeah, yeah. >> specifically with quantum. So, talk a little bit more about what clients are doing and I'm particularly interested in the ecosystem that you're forming around quantum. >> Well, as I said, the ecosystem is both the network, which are those that are really intently working with us to co-create because we found, through our long history in IBM, that co-creation is really important. And also these researchers and developers realize that some of our developers today are really researchers, but as you as you go forward you get many different types of developers that are part of this mix. But in terms of our ecosystem, we're really fundamentally focused on key problems around chemistry, material science, financial services. And over the last year, there's over 200 papers that have been written out there from our network that really embody their work with us on this journey. So we're looking at things like quadratic speed up of things like Monte Carlo simulation, which is used in the financial services arena today to quantify risk. There's papers out there around topics like trade settlements, which in the world today trade settlements is a very complex domain with very interconnected complex rules and trillions of dollars in the purview of trade settlement. So, it's just an example. Options pricing, so you see examples around options pricing from corporations like JPMC in the area of financial services. And likewise in chemistry, there's a lot of research out there focused on batteries. As you can imagine, getting everything to electric powered batteries is an important topic. But today, the way we manufacture batteries can in fact create air pollution, in terms of the process, as well as we want batteries to have more retention in life to be more effective in energy conservation. So, how do we create batteries and still protect our environment, as we all would like to do? And so we've had a lot of research around things like the next generation of electric batteries, which is a key topic. But if you can think, you know Dave, there's so many topics here around chemistry, also pharmaceuticals that could be advanced with a quantum computer. Obviously, if you look at the COVID-19 news, our supercomputer that we installed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory for instance, is being used to analyze 8000 different compounds for specifically around COVID-19 and the possibilities of using those compounds to solve COVID-19, or influence it in a positive manner. You can think of the quantum computer when it comes online as an accelerator to a supercomputer like that, helping speed up this kind of research even faster than what we're able to do with something like the Summit supercomputer. Oak Ridge is one of our prominent clients with the quantum technology, and they certainly see it that way, right, as an accelerator to the capacity they already have. So a great example that I think is very germane in the time that we find ourselves in. >> How 'about startups in this ecosystem? Are you able to-- I mean there must be startups popping up all over the place for this opportunity. Are you working with any startups or incubating any startups? Can you talk about that? >> Oh yep. Absolutely. There's about a third of our network are in VC startups and there's a long list of them out there. They're focused on many different aspects of quantum computing. Many of 'em are focused on what I would call loosely, the programming model, looking at improving algorithms across different industries, making it easier for those that are, perhaps more skilled in domains, whether that is chemistry or financial services or mathematics, to use the power of the quantum computer. Many of those startups are leveraging our Qiskit, our quantum information science open programming model that we put out there so it's open. Many of the startups are using that programming model and then adding their own secret sauce, if you will, to understand how they can help bring on users in different ways. So it depends on their domain. You see some startups that are focused on the hardware as well, of course, looking at different hardware technologies that can be used to solve quantum. I would say I feel like more of them are focused on the software programming model. >> Well Jamie, it was interesting hear you talk about what some of the clients are doing. I mean obviously in pharmaceuticals, and battery manufacturers do a lot of advanced R and D, but you mentioned financial services, you know JPMC. It's almost like they're now doing advanced R and D trying to figure out how they can apply quantum to their business down the road. >> Absolutely, and we have a number of financial institutions that we've announced as part of the network. JPMC is just one of our premiere references who have written papers about it. But I would tell you that in the world of Monte Carlo simulation, options pricing, risk management, a small change can make a big difference in dollars. So we're talking about operations that in many cases they could achieve, but not achieve in the right amount of time. The ability to use quantum as an accelerator for these kind of operations is very important. And I can tell you, even in the last few weeks, we've had a number of briefings with financial companies for five hours on this topic. Looking at what could they do and learning from the work that's already done out there. I think this kind of advanced research is going to be very important. We also had new members that we announced at the beginning of the year at the CES show. Delta Airlines joined. First Transportation Company, Amgen joined, a pharmaceutical, an example of pharmaceuticals, as well as a number of other research organizations. Georgia Tech, University of New Mexico, Anthem Insurance, just an example of the industries that are looking to take advantage of this kind of technology as it matures. >> Well, and it strikes me too, that as you start to bring machine intelligence into the equation, it's a game changer. I mean, I've been saying that it's not Moore's Law driving the industry anymore, it's this combination of data, AI, and cloud for scale, but now-- Of course there are alternative processors going on, we're seeing that, but now as you bring in quantum that actually adds to that innovation cocktail, doesn't it? >> Yes, and as you recall when you and I spoke last year about this, there are certain domains today where you really cannot get as much effective gain out of classical computing. And clearly, chemistry is one of those domains because today, with classical computers, we're really unable to model even something as simple as a caffeine molecule, which we're all so very familiar with. I have my caffeine here with me today. (laughs) But you know, clearly, to the degree we can actually apply molecular modeling and the advantages that quantum brings to those fields, we'll be able to understand so much more about materials that affect all of us around the world, about energy, how to explore energy, and create energy without creating the carbon footprint and the bad outcomes associated with energy creation, and how to obviously deal with pharmaceutical creation much more effectively. There's a real promise in a lot of these different areas. >> I wonder if you could talk a little bit about some of the landscape and I'm really interested in what IBM brings to the table that's sort of different. You're seeing a lot of companies enter this space, some big and many small, what's the unique aspect that IBM brings to the table? You've mentioned co-creating before. Are you co-creating, coopertating with some of the other big guys? Maybe you could address that. >> Well, obviously this is a very hot topic, both within the technology industry and across government entities. I think that some of the key values we bring to the table is we are the only vendor right now that has a fleet of systems available in the cloud, and we've been out there for several years, enabling clients to take advantage of our capacity. We have both free access and premium access, which is what the network is paying for because they get access to the highest fidelity machines. Clearly, we understand intently, classical computing and the ability to leverage classical with quantum for advantage across many of these different industries, which I think is unique. We understand the cloud experience that we're bringing to play here with quantum since day one, and most importantly, I think we have strong relationships. We have, in many cases, we're still running the world. I see it every day coming through my clients' port vantage point. We understand financial services. We understand healthcare. We understand many of these important domains, and we're used to solving tough problems. So, we'll bring that experience with our clients and those industries to the table here and help them on this journey. >> You mentioned your experience in sort of traditional computing, basically if I understand it correctly, you're still using traditional silicon microprocessors to read and write the data that's coming out of quantum. I don't know if they're sitting physically side by side, but you've got this big cryogenic unit, cables coming in. That's the sort of standard for some time. It reminds me, can it go back to ENIAC? And now, which is really excites me because you look at the potential to miniaturize this over the next several decades, but is that right, you're sort of side by side with traditional computing approaches? >> Right, effectively what we do with quantum today does not happen without classical computers. The front end, you're coming in on classical computers. You're storing your data on classical computers, so that is the model that we're in today, and that will continue to happen. In terms of the quantum processor itself, it is a silicon based processor, but it's a superconducting technology, in our case, that runs inside that cryogenics unit at a very cold temperature. It is powered by next-generation electronics that we in IBM have innovated around and created our own electronic stack that actually sends microwave pulses into the processor that resides in the cryogenics unit. So when you think about the components of the system, you have to be innovating around the processor, the cryogenics unit, the custom electronic stack, and the software all at the same time. And yes, we're doing that in terms of being surrounded by this classical backplane that allows our Q network, as well as the developers around the world to actually communicate with these systems. >> The other thing that I really like about this conversation is it's not just R and D for the sake of R and D, you've actually, you're working with partners to, like you said, co-create, customers, financial services, airlines, manufacturing, et cetera. I wonder if you could maybe kind of address some of the things that you see happening in the sort of near to midterm, specifically as it relates to where people start. If I'm interested in this, what do I do? Do I need new skills? Do I need-- It's in the cloud, right? >> Yeah. >> So I can spit it up there, but where do people get started? >> Well they can certainly come to the Quantum Experience, which is our cloud experience and start to try out the system. So, we have both easy ways to get started with visual composition of circuits, as well as using the programming model that I mentioned, the Qiskit programming model. We've provided extensive YouTube videos out there already. So, developers who are interested in starting to learn about quantum can go out there and subscribe to our YouTube channel. We've got over 40 assets already recorded out there, and we continue to do those. We did one last week on quantum circuits for those that are more interested in that particular domain, but I think that's a part of this journey is making sure that we have all the assets out there digitally available for those around the world that want to interact with us. We have tremendous amount of education. We're also providing education to our business partners. One of our key network members, who I'll be speaking with later, I think today, is from Accenture. Accenture's an example of an organization that's helping their clients understand this quantum journey, and of course they're providing their own assets, if you will, but once again, taking advantage of the education that we're providing to them as a business partner. >> People talk about quantum being a decade away, but I think that's the wrong way to think about it, and I'd love your thoughts on this. It feels like, almost like the return coming out of COVID-19, it's going to come in waves, and there's parts that are going to be commercialized thoroughly and it's not binary. It's not like all of a sudden one day we're going to wake, "Hey, quantum is here!" It's really going to come in layers. Your thoughts? >> Yeah, I definitely agree with that. It's very important, that thought process because if you want to be competitive in your industry, you should think about getting started now. And that's why you see so many financial services, industrial firms, and others joining to really start experimentation around some of these domain areas to understand jointly how we evolve these algorithms to solve these problems. I think that the production level characteristics will curate the rate and pace of the industry. The industry, as we know, can drive things together faster. So together, we can make this a reality faster, and certainly none of us want to say it's going to be a decade, right. I mean, we're getting advantage today, in terms of the experimentation and the understanding of these problems, and we have to expedite that, I think, in the next few years. And certainly, with this arms race that we see, that's going to continue. One of the things I didn't mention is that IBM is also working with certain countries and we have significant agreements now with the countries of Germany and Japan to put quantum computers in an IBM facility in those countries. It's in collaboration with Fraunhofer Institute or miR Scientific Organization in Germany and with the University of Tokyo in Japan. So you can see that it's not only being pushed by industry, but it's also being pushed from the vantage of countries and bringing this research and technology to their countries. >> All right, Jamie, we're going to have to leave it there. Thanks so much for coming on theCUBE and give us the update. It's always great to see you. Hopefully, next time I see you, it'll be face to face. >> That's right, I hope so too. It's great to see you guys, thank you. Bye. >> All right, you're welcome. Keep it right there everybody. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE. Be back right after this short break. (gentle music)

>>From Miami beach, Florida. It's the queue covering a Chronis global cyber summit 2019. Brought to you by Acronis. >>Okay. Welcome back. Everyone's cubes coverage here and the Kronos is global cyber summit 2019 and Sarah inaugural event around cyber protection. I'm John Forrey hosted the cube. We're talking to all the thought leaders, experts talking about the platforms. We've got a great guest here, security analyst, author and Ted speaker. Karen Ellis, Zari who runs the besides Tel Aviv. Um, she gave a keynote here. Welcome to the queue. Thanks for coming on. >>Oh, thanks for having me. It's a pleasure. >>Love to have you on. Security obviously is hot. You've been on that wave. Even talking a lot about it. You had talked here and opposed the conference. But for us, before we get into that, I want to get in and explore what you've been doing that besides Tel Aviv, this is the global community that would be runs a cyber week. He wrote a big thing there. >>So that's something that's really important to me. So 10 years ago, hackers and security researchers thing start that somebody called security besides which was an alternative community event for hackers that couldn't find their voice in their space. In the more mainstream events like RSA conference or black hat for example. That's when security besides was born 10 years ago. Now it's a global movement and there's been more than a hundred besides events. Just this year alone, just in 2019 anywhere from Sao Paolo to Cairo, Mexico city, Athens, Colorado, Zurich, London, and in my hometown of Tel Aviv. I was very proud to bring the besides idea and the concept to Tel Aviv five years ago. This year, 2020 will be our fifth year and we'll be, I hope our biggest year yet last summer we had more than 1200 participants. We take place during something called Telaviv cyber week, which if you've never visited Tel Aviv, that's your opportunity next year of Bellevue cyber Wade brings 9,000 people to Israel. >>It's hosted by Tel Aviv university where I'm also a researcher and all of these events are free. They're in English, they are welcoming to people from all sorts of places in all walks of life. We bring people from more than 70 countries and I think it's great that we can have that platform in Israel, in Tel Aviv to share not just our knowledge but also our points of view, our different opinions about the future of cyber security. Tel Aviv university. Yeah. So Tel Aviv university hosts me cyber week and they're also the gracious hosts for the sites televi which runs as a nonprofit separate from the university. >>You know, I love these movements where you have organic, just organic growth. And then we saw that with the unconference wave couple years ago where you know, the fancy conferences got too stuffy to sponsor oriented, right? That's >>right. Yeah. Up there too. They want to have more face to face, more community oriented conversations, more or, yeah. So besides actually the first one was absolutely an unconference and to this day we maintain some of that vibe, that important community aspect of providing a stage for people that really may not have the opportunity to speak at Blackhat or here or there. They may not feel comfortable on a huge with all those lights on them. So we really need to have that community aspect of them and believe it or not. And unconference is how I got on the Ted stage because a producer from Ted actually came all the way to Israel to an unconference in the Northern city of Nazareth in Israel, and she was sitting in the room while I was giving a talk to 15 people in the lobby of a hotel. And it wasn't that, it wasn't, you know, I didn't have a big projector. >>It wasn't a fancy production on any scale, but that's where that took for loser found me and my perspective and decided that this was this sort of point of view deserves to have a bigger stage. Now with digital technologies, the lobby conference, we call it the lobby copy, cons, actions in the hallway, just always kind of cause do you have a programs? It's not about learning anymore at these events because if all you can learn online, it's a face to face communal activity. I think it's a difference between people talking at you. Two people talking with you and that's why I'm very happy to give talks and I'm here focused on sharing my point of view. But I also want to focus on having conversations with people and that's what I've been doing this morning, sharing my points of view, teaching people about how I think the security worlds could look like, learning from them, listening to them. >>And it's really about creating that sort of an atmosphere and there's a lot of tension right now in the security space. I want to get your thoughts on this because you know, I have my personal passion is I really believe that communities is where the action is in a lot of problems can be solved if tapped properly, if they want, if they're not used or if they're, if the collective intelligence of a community can be harnessed. Yes, absolutely. Purity community right now has a imperative mandate, which is there's a lot of to do better. I think good that could be happening. The adversaries are at scale. You seeing, um, you know, zero day out there yet digital warfare going on, you got all kinds of things on a national global scale happening and people are worried. Absolutely. So there's directions, there's a lot of fear, there's a lot of panic going on these days. >>If you're an average individual, you hear about cybersecurity, you're of all hackers, you're thinking, Oh my God, they should turn all of my devices off, go live in the woods with some sheep and that's going to be my future. Otherwise I'm a twist and I agree with you. It's the responsibility, all the security industry and the security community to come together and also harness the power and the potential of the many friendly hackers out there. Friendly hackers such as myself, security researchers and not all security researchers are working in a lab at the university or in the big company and they might want to, you know, be wherever they are in the world, but still contributing. This is why I talk about the hackers immune system, how hackers can actually contribute to an immune system helping us identify vulnerabilities and fix them. And in many cases I found that it's not just a friendly hackers, even the unfriendly ones, even the criminals have a lot to teach us and we can actually not afford not to pay attention, not to be really more immersed, more closely connected with what is happening in the hacker's world, whether it's criminal hackers underground or the friendly hackers who get together at community events, who share their work, who participate on bug bounty platforms, which is a big part of my personal work and my passion bug bounty programs for the viewers who are not familiar with it are frameworks that will help companies that you might rely on like Google or Facebook, United airlines or Starbucks or any company that you can imagine. >>So many big companies now have bug bounty programs in place, allowing them to actively reward individual hackers that are identifying vulnerabilities. Yeah. And they pay him a lot of money to up to millions of dollars. Yes, they do, but it's not just about the money, you know, don't, it's not just amount of money. There's all kinds of other rewards that place as well. Whether it's a fancy, you know, a tee shirt or a sticker, or in the case of Tesla for example, they give out challenge coins, the challenge coins that only go out to the top hackers. I've worked with them now you can't find anything with these challenge coins. You keep the tray, you can trade them in in the store for money. But what you can do is that you get a lot of reputational and you know, unmonitored value out of that as well. Additionally, you know another organization that's called them, the Pentagon has a similar program, so depending on his giving out, not just monetary rewards but challenge coins for hackers that are working with them. >>This reputation kind of system is really cutting edge and I think that's a great point. I personally believe that that will be a big movement in all community behavior because when you start getting into having people arbitrator who's reputable, that's an incentive beyond money. Well, what I've found great I guess, but like reputation also is important. I can tell you this because I've, I've this, I've really dissected and researched this in my academic work and the look at the data from several bug bounty programs and the data that was available. There's all kinds of value on the table. Some of the value is money and you get paid. And you know, last month I heard about the first bug bounty millionaire and he's a guy from Argentina. But the value is not just in the money, it's also reputational value. It's also work value. So some hackers, some security researchers just want to build up their resume and then they get job offers and they start working for companies that may have never looked at them before because they're not graduates of this and that school didn't have this or that upbringing. >>We have to remember that from, from the global perspective, not everybody has access to, you know, the American school system or the Israeli school system. They can't just sign up for a college degree in cybersecurity or engineering if they live in parts of the world where that's not accessible to them. But through being a researcher on the bug bounty platform, they gain up their experience, they gain up their knowhow, and then companies want to work with them and want to hire them. So that's contributing to the, you've seen this really? Yeah. We've seen this and the reports are showing this. The data is showing this, all of the bug bounty programs that ha have reports that come out that show this information as well. Do you see that the hackers on bug bounty pack platforms that usually under 30 a lot of them are. They're 30 they're young people. >>They're making their way into this industry. Now, let me tell you something. When I was growing up in Israel, that was a young hacker. I didn't know any bug bounty programs. None of that stuff was around. Granted, we also didn't have a cyber crime law, so anything I did wasn't officially illegal because we didn't have, yeah, it wouldn't necessarily. Fermentation is good. It certainly was and I was very driven by curiosity, but the point I'm trying to make is that I didn't actually have a legal, legitimate alternative to, you know, the type of hacking that I was doing. There wasn't any other option for me until it was time for me to serve in the Israeli military, which is where I really got my chops. But for people living in parts of the world where they don't have any legitimate legal way to work in cybersecurity, previously, they would have turned to criminal activities to using their knowhow to make money as a cybercriminal. >>Now that alternative of being part of a global immune system is available to them on a legitimate legal pathway, and that's really important for our workforce as well. A lot of people will tell you that cybersecurity workforce needs all the help it can get. There's a shortage of talent gap. A lot of people talk about the talent gap. I believe a big part of the solution is going to come from all of these hackers all over the world that are now accessing the legitimate legal world of cybersecurity or something. I want to amplify that. Certainly after this interview, I'd love to follow up with you. Really, we will come to Tel Aviv. It's on our list for the cube stuff. We'll be there. We'd love to launch loving mutation. What you're talking about is an unforeseen democratization, the positive impact of the world. I want you to just take a minute to explain how this all came together for this. >>With your view on this reputational thing. I talk about the impact. Where does it go beyond just reputational for jobs? What? How does a community flex and organically grow from this and so one thing that I'm very happy to see, I think in the past couple of years, the reputations generally of hackers have become important and that the concept of a hacker is not what we used to think about in the past where we would automatically go to somebody who was a criminal or a bad guy. Did you know that the girl Scouts organization, the U S girl Scouts are now teaching girls Scouts to be hackers. They're teaching them cybersecurity skills. Arguably, I would claim this is a more important skill than making cookies or you know, selling cookies. Certainly a more money to survive in the wilderness. Why not in the digital wilderness? Yes, in a fire counter than that. >>More than that, it's about service. So the girl Scouts organization's always been very dedicated to values of service. Imagine these girls, they're now becoming very knowledgeable about cybersecurity. They can teach their peers, their families, so they can actually help spread. The more you build a more secure world, certainly they could probably start the fire or track a rapid in the forest or whatever it is that girl Scouts used to do that digitally too. That's called tracing. Really motivating that person. I think that's aspiring to many young women. That's very kind of, you actually have to have more voices out there. What can we do differently? What help? What can I do as a guy, as in the industry, I have two daughters. Everyone has, as I get older, I have daughters because they care now, but most men want to help. What can we do as a group? >>So I think you're absolutely right that diversity and inclusivity within the technology workforce is not a problem there. Just the underrepresented groups need to solve by. It's actually an issue for the entire group to solve. It's men or women or any underrepresented minority and overrepresented groups as well because diversity of the workforce will actually help build a more resilient, sustainable workforce and will help with that talent gap, that shortage of people of skilled employees that we mentioned. Others, a few things that you can do. I personally decided to do what I can, so I contributed to a book called women in tech at practical guide and in that book there's also a chapter for allies. So if you're a person that wants to help a woman or women in tech in your community, you are very welcome to check out the book. It's on Amazon, women in tech, a practical guide. >>I'm a contributor to that and myself. I also started a group called leading cyber ladies, which is a global meetup for women in cyber security and we have chapters on events in Israel, in New York city, in Canada, and soon I believe in United Kingdom and Silicon Valley and perhaps in your company or in your community, you could help start a similar group or maybe encourage some of the ladies that you know to start a group, help them by finding a space, creating a safe environment for them to create meetups like that by providing resources, by sponsoring events, by mentoring does a few, a lot of things. Yeah, there's a lot of things that you can do and it's certainly most important to consider that diversity in the workforce is everybody's issue with Cod. Something just one gender or one group needs to figure out how to be a big bang theory. >>You can share with three people, two people, absolutely organic growth or conditional. Yes, certainly. And as men, if you don't want to, you know, start them an event for women because that may seem disingenuous, but you can do certainly encourage the women that you find around you. In your workforce to see if they want to maybe have a meetup and if they do, what kind of help you can offer? Can you run the AB for them? Can you as sponsored lacrosse songs, whatever kind of help that you can offer to create that sort of a space. The reason we we started cyber ladies is because I didn't see enough women speaking at security events, so I wanted to fray the meet up where the women in cybersecurity could share their work network with one another and really build up also their speaking port portfolio, their speaking powers so that they can really feel more comfortable speaking and sharing their work on other events as well. >>Camaraderie there too. Yes, it very important. Thank you so much to you now, what is your, your professional and personal interests these days? What's getting you excited? So there's some of the cool things. That's a fantastic question. So one thing I'm super excited about is that I'm actually collaborating with my sister. So my sister, believe it or not is a lawyer and she's a lawyer who specializing in cyber line, intellectual property privacy, security policy work, and I'm collaborating with her to create a new book which would be a guide to the future of cybersecurity from the hacker's perspective and the lawyers perspective because we are seeing a lot of regulators, a lot of companies that are now really having to follow laws and guidelines and regulations around cybersecurity and we really want to bring these two points of view together. We've already collaborated in the past and in fact my sister has worked on the legal terms of many of the bug bounty programs that I mentioned earlier, including the Tesla program. >>So it's very exciting. I'm very proud to be able to work with my younger sister who followed me into the cyber world. I'm the hacker, she's the lawyer and we are creating something together. Dynamic duo that's going to be, I'm excited to interview her. Yeah, so in my family we call her the tour Vogue version. Can you imagine that together? It's really unstoppable. We didn't have a chance to speak together at the RSA conference earlier this year and that was really unique. Am I going to fall off on that with the book? Well, our platform is your platform. Anything we can do to help you get the word out, super exciting work that you're doing. We think cyber community will be one of the big answers to some of the challenges out there. And we need more education. Law makers and global politicians have to get more tech savvy. Yes, this is a big, everybody, it's everybody's issue. Like I said in this morning speech, everybody's on the front lines. It's not the cyber generals or you know, the hackers in the basements that are fighting. We are on that digital Battlefront and we all have to be safer together. Karen, thanks for your great insights here in energy. Bug bounties are hot. The community is growing. This is the cyber conference here that, uh, Acronis global cyber summit 2019. I'm John Barry here to be back with more coverage after this short break.

(electronic dance music) (Intel Jingle) (ethereal electronic dance music) ♪ Okay ♪ (upbeat techno dance music) ♪ Oh oh oh oh ♪ ♪ Oh oh oh oh ♪ ♪ Oh oh oh oh oh ♪ ♪ Oh oh oh oh ♪ ♪ Oh oh oh oh oh ♪ ♪ Take it back take it back ♪ ♪ Take it back ♪ ♪ Take it back take it back ♪ ♪ Take it back ♪ ♪ Take it back take it back ♪ ♪ Yeah everybody get loose yeah ♪ ♪ Yeah ♪ ♪ Ye-yeah yeah ♪ ♪ Yeah yeah ♪ ♪ Everybody everybody yeah ♪ ♪ Whoo whoo ♪ ♪ Whoo whoo ♪ ♪ Whoo yeah ♪ ♪ Everybody get loose whoo ♪ ♪ Whoo ♪ ♪ Whoo ♪ ♪ Whoo ♪ >> As a courtesy to the presenters and those around you, please silence all mobile devices, thank you. (electronic dance music) ♪ Everybody get loose ♪ ♪ Whoo ♪ ♪ Whoo ♪ ♪ Whoo ♪ ♪ Whoo ♪ ♪ Whoo ♪ ♪ Whoo ♪ ♪ Whoo ♪ ♪ Whoo ♪ (upbeat salsa music) ♪ Ha ha ha ♪ ♪ Ah ♪ ♪ Ha ha ha ♪ ♪ So happy ♪ ♪ Whoo whoo ♪ (female singer scatting) >> Ladies and gentlemen, please take your seats. Our program will begin momentarily. ♪ Hey ♪ (female singer scatting) (male singer scatting) ♪ Hey ♪ ♪ Whoo ♪ (female singer scatting) (electronic dance music) ♪ All hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ Red all hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ Red red red red ♪ ♪ All hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ Red all hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ Red red red red ♪ ♪ All hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ Red all hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ All hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ Red all hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ Red red red red ♪ ♪ Red don't go ♪ ♪ All hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ In don't go ♪ ♪ Oh red go ♪ ♪ All hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ Red all hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ All hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ Red all hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ Red red red red ♪ ♪ All hands are red don't go ♪ ♪ All hands are in red red red red ♪ ♪ All hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ All hands are in red go ♪ >> Ladies and gentlemen, there are available seats. Towards house left, house left there are available seats. If you are please standing, we ask that you please take an available seat. We will begin momentarily, thank you. ♪ Let go ♪ ♪ All hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ Red all hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ All hands are in don't go ♪ ♪ Red all hands are in don't go ♪ (upbeat electronic dance music) ♪ Just make me ♪ ♪ Just make me ♪ ♪ Just make me ♪ ♪ Just make me ♪ ♪ Just make me ♪ ♪ I live ♪ ♪ Just make me ♪ ♪ Just make me ♪ ♪ Hey ♪ ♪ Yeah ♪ ♪ Oh ♪ ♪ Ah ♪ ♪ Ah ah ah ah ah ah ♪ ♪ Just make me ♪ ♪ Just make me ♪ (bouncy techno music) >> Ladies and gentlemen, once again we ask that you please take the available seats to your left, house left, there are many available seats. If you are standing, please make your way there. The program will begin momentarily, thank you. Good morning! This is Lenovo Transform 2.0! (keyboard clicks) >> Progress. Why do we always talk about it in the future? When will it finally get here? We don't progress when it's ready for us. We need it when we're ready, and we're ready now. Our hospitals and their patients need it now, our businesses and their customers need it now, our cities and their citizens need it now. To deliver intelligent transformation, we need to build it into the products and solutions we make every day. At Lenovo, we're designing the systems to fight disease, power businesses, and help you reach more customers, end-to-end security solutions to protect your data and your companies reputation. We're making IT departments more agile and cost efficient. We're revolutionizing how kids learn with VR. We're designing smart devices and software that transform the way you collaborate, because technology shouldn't just power industries, it should power people. While everybody else is talking about tomorrow, we'll keep building today, because the progress we need can't wait for the future. >> Please welcome to the stage Lenovo's Rod Lappen! (electronic dance music) (audience applauding) >> Alright. Good morning everyone! >> Good morning. >> Ooh, that was pretty good actually, I'll give it one more shot. Good morning everyone! >> Good morning! >> Oh, that's much better! Hope everyone's had a great morning. Welcome very much to the second Lenovo Transform event here in New York. I think when I got up just now on the steps I realized there's probably one thing in common all of us have in this room including myself which is, absolutely no one has a clue what I'm going to say today. So, I'm hoping very much that we get through this thing very quickly and crisply. I love this town, love New York, and you're going to hear us talk a little bit about New York as we get through here, but just before we get started I'm going to ask anyone who's standing up the back, there are plenty of seats down here, and down here on the right hand side, I think he called it house left is the professional way of calling it, but these steps to my right, your left, get up here, let's get you all seated down so that you can actually sit down during the keynote session for us. Last year we had our very first Lenovo Transform. We had about 400 people. It was here in New York, fantastic event, today, over 1,000 people. We have over 62 different technology demonstrations and about 15 breakout sessions, which I'll talk you through a little bit later on as well, so it's a much bigger event. Next year we're definitely going to be shooting for over 2,000 people as Lenovo really transforms and starts to address a lot of the technology that our commercial customers are really looking for. We were however hampered last year by a storm, I don't know if those of you who were with us last year will remember, we had a storm on the evening before Transform last year in New York, and obviously the day that it actually occurred, and we had lots of logistics. Our media people from AMIA were coming in. They took the, the plane was circling around New York for a long time, and Kamran Amini, our General Manager of our Data Center Infrastructure Group, probably one of our largest groups in the Lenovo DCG business, took 17 hours to get from Raleigh, North Carolina to New York, 17 hours, I think it takes seven or eight hours to drive. Took him 17 hours by plane to get here. And then of course this year, we have Florence. And so, obviously the hurricane Florence down there in the Carolinas right now, we tried to help, but still Kamran has made it today. Unfortunately, very tragically, we were hoping he wouldn't, but he's here today to do a big presentation a little bit later on as well. However, I do want to say, obviously, Florence is a very serious tragedy and we have to take it very serious. We got, our headquarters is in Raleigh, North Carolina. While it looks like the hurricane is just missing it's heading a little bit southeast, all of our thoughts and prayers and well wishes are obviously with everyone in the Carolinas on behalf of Lenovo, everyone at our headquarters, everyone throughout the Carolinas, we want to make sure everyone stays safe and out of harm's way. We have a great mixture today in the crowd of all customers, partners, industry analysts, media, as well as our financial analysts from all around the world. There's over 30 countries represented here and people who are here to listen to both YY, Kirk, and Christian Teismann speak today. And so, it's going to be a really really exciting day, and I really appreciate everyone coming in from all around the world. So, a big round of applause for everyone whose come in. (audience applauding) We have a great agenda for you today, and it starts obviously a very consistent format which worked very successful for us last year, and that's obviously our keynote. You'll hear from YY, our CEO, talk a little bit about the vision he has in the industry and how he sees Lenovo's turned the corner and really driving some great strategy to address our customer's needs. Kirk Skaugen, our Executive Vice President of DCG, will be up talking about how we've transformed the DCG business and once again are hitting record growth ratios for our DCG business. And then you'll hear from Christian Teismann, our SVP and General Manager for our commercial business, get up and talk about everything that's going on in our IDG business. There's really exciting stuff going on there and obviously ThinkPad being the cornerstone of that I'm sure he's going to talk to us about a couple surprises in that space as well. Then we've got some great breakout sessions, I mentioned before, 15 breakout sessions, so while this keynote section goes until about 11:30, once we get through that, please go over and explore, and have a look at all of the breakout sessions. We have all of our subject matter experts from both our PC, NBG, and our DCG businesses out to showcase what we're doing as an organization to better address your needs. And then obviously we have the technology pieces that I've also spoken about, 62 different technology displays there arranged from everything IoT, 5G, NFV, everything that's really cool and hot in the industry right now is going to be on display up there, and I really encourage all of you to get up there. So, I'm going to have a quick video to show you from some of the setup yesterday on a couple of the 62 technology displays we've got on up on stage. Okay let's go, so we've got a demonstrations to show you today, one of the greats one here is the one we've done with NC State, a high-performance computing artificial intelligence demonstration of fresh produce. It's about modeling the population growth of the planet, and how we're going to supply water and food as we go forward. Whoo. Oh, that is not an apple. Okay. (woman laughs) Second one over here is really, hey Jonas, how are you? Is really around virtual reality, and how we look at one of the most amazing sites we've got, as an install on our high-performance computing practice here globally. And you can see, obviously, that this is the Barcelona supercomputer, and, where else in New York can you get access to being able to see something like that so easily? Only here at Lenovo Transform. Whoo, okay. (audience applauding) So there's two examples of some of the technology. We're really encouraging everyone in the room after the keynote to flow into that space and really get engaged, and interact with a lot of the technology we've got up there. It seems I need to also do something about my fashion, I've just realized I've worn a vest two days in a row, so I've got to work on that as well. Alright so listen, the last thing on the agenda, we've gone through the breakout sessions and the demo, tonight at four o'clock, there's about 400 of you registered to be on the cruise boat with us, the doors will open behind me. the boat is literally at the pier right behind us. You need to make sure you're on the boat for 4:00 p.m. this evening. Outside of that, I want everyone to have a great time today, really enjoy the experience, make it as experiential as you possibly can, get out there and really get in and touch the technology. There's some really cool AI displays up there for us all to get involved in as well. So ladies and gentlemen, without further adieu, it gives me great pleasure to introduce to you a lover of tennis, as some of you would've heard last year at Lenovo Transform, as well as a lover of technology, Lenovo, and of course, New York City. I am obviously very pleasured to introduce to you Yang Yuanqing, our CEO, as we like to call him, YY. (audience applauding) (upbeat funky music) >> Good morning, everyone. >> Good morning. >> Thank you Rod for that introduction. Welcome to New York City. So, this is the second year in a row we host our Transform event here, because New York is indeed one of the most transformative cities in the world. Last year on this stage, I spoke about the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and our vision around the intelligent transformation, how it would fundamentally change the nature of business and the customer relationships. And why preparing for this transformation is the key for the future of our company. And in the last year I can assure you, we were being very busy doing just that, from searching and bringing global talents around the world to the way we think about every product and every investment we make. I was here in New York just a month ago to announce our fiscal year Q1 earnings, which was a good day for us. I think now the world believes it when we say Lenovo has truly turned the corner to a new phase of growth and a new phase of acceleration in executing the transformation strategy. That's clear to me is that the last few years of a purposeful disruption at Lenovo have led us to a point where we can now claim leadership of the coming intelligent transformation. People often asked me, what is the intelligent transformation? I was saying this way. This is the unlimited potential of the Fourth Industrial Revolution driven by artificial intelligence being realized, ordering a pizza through our speaker, and locking the door with a look, letting your car drive itself back to your home. This indeed reflect the power of AI, but it just the surface of it. The true impact of AI will not only make our homes smarter and offices more efficient, but we are also completely transformed every value chip in every industry. However, to realize these amazing possibilities, we will need a structure built around the key components, and one that touches every part of all our lives. First of all, explosions in new technology always lead to new structures. This has happened many times before. In the early 20th century, thousands of companies provided a telephone service. City streets across the US looked like this, and now bundles of a microscopic fiber running from city to city bring the world closer together. Here's what a driving was like in the US, up until 1950s. Good luck finding your way. (audience laughs) And today, millions of vehicles are organized and routed daily, making the world more efficient. Structure is vital, from fiber cables and the interstate highways, to our cells bounded together to create humans. Thankfully the structure for intelligent transformation has emerged, and it is just as revolutionary. What does this new structure look like? We believe there are three key building blocks, data, computing power, and algorithms. Ever wondered what is it behind intelligent transformation? What is fueling this miracle of human possibility? Data. As the Internet becomes ubiquitous, not only PCs, mobile phones, have come online and been generating data. Today it is the cameras in this room, the climate controls in our offices, or the smart displays in our kitchens at home. The number of smart devices worldwide will reach over 20 billion in 2020, more than double the number in 2017. These devices and the sensors are connected and generating massive amount of data. By 2020, the amount of data generated will be 57 times more than all the grains of sand on Earth. This data will not only make devices smarter, but will also fuel the intelligence of our homes, offices, and entire industries. Then we need engines to turn the fuel into power, and the engine is actually the computing power. Last but not least the advanced algorithms combined with Big Data technology and industry know how will form vertical industrial intelligence and produce valuable insights for every value chain in every industry. When these three building blocks all come together, it will change the world. At Lenovo, we have each of these elements of intelligent transformations in a single place. We have built our business around the new structure of intelligent transformation, especially with mobile and the data center now firmly part of our business. I'm often asked why did you acquire these businesses? Why has a Lenovo gone into so many fields? People ask the same questions of the companies that become the leaders of the information technology revolution, or the third industrial transformation. They were the companies that saw the future and what the future required, and I believe Lenovo is the company today. From largest portfolio of devices in the world, leadership in the data center field, to the algorithm-powered intelligent vertical solutions, and not to mention the strong partnership Lenovo has built over decades. We are the only company that can unify all these essential assets and deliver end to end solutions. Let's look at each part. We now understand the important importance data plays as fuel in intelligent transformation. Hundreds of billions of devices and smart IoTs in the world are generating better and powering the intelligence. Who makes these devices in large volume and variety? Who puts these devices into people's home, offices, manufacturing lines, and in their hands? Lenovo definitely has the front row seats here. We are number one in PCs and tablets. We also produces smart phones, smart speakers, smart displays. AR/VR headsets, as well as commercial IoTs. All of these smart devices, or smart IoTs are linked to each other and to the cloud. In fact, we have more than 20 manufacturing facilities in China, US, Brazil, Japan, India, Mexico, Germany, and more, producing various devices around the clock. We actually make four devices every second, and 37 motherboards every minute. So, this factory located in my hometown, Hu-fi, China, is actually the largest laptop factory in the world, with more than three million square feet. So, this is as big as 42 soccer fields. Our scale and the larger portfolio of devices gives us access to massive amount of data, which very few companies can say. So, why is the ability to scale so critical? Let's look again at our example from before. The early days of telephone, dozens of service providers but only a few companies could survive consolidation and become the leader. The same was true for the third Industrial Revolution. Only a few companies could scale, only a few could survive to lead. Now the building blocks of the next revolution are locking into place. The (mumbles) will go to those who can operate at the scale. So, who could foresee the total integration of cloud, network, and the device, need to deliver intelligent transformation. Lenovo is that company. We are ready to scale. Next, our computing power. Computing power is provided in two ways. On one hand, the modern supercomputers are providing the brute force to quickly analyze the massive data like never before. On the other hand the cloud computing data centers with the server storage networking capabilities, and any computing IoT's, gateways, and miniservers are making computing available everywhere. Did you know, Lenovo is number one provider of super computers worldwide? 170 of the top 500 supercomputers, run on Lenovo. We hold 89 World Records in key workloads. We are number one in x86 server reliability for five years running, according to ITIC. a respected provider of industry research. We are also the fastest growing provider of hyperscale public cloud, hyper-converged and aggressively growing in edge computing. cur-ges target, we are expand on this point soon. And finally to run these individual nodes into our symphony, we must transform the data and utilize the computing power with advanced algorithms. Manufactured, industry maintenance, healthcare, education, retail, and more, so many industries are on the edge of intelligent transformation to improve efficiency and provide the better products and services. We are creating advanced algorithms and the big data tools combined with industry know-how to provide intelligent vertical solutions for several industries. In fact, we studied at Lenovo first. Our IT and research teams partnered with our global supply chain to develop an AI that improved our demand forecasting accuracy. Beyond managing our own supply chain we have offered our deep learning supply focused solution to other manufacturing companies to improve their efficiency. In the best case, we have improved the demand, focused the accuracy by 30 points to nearly 90 percent, for Baosteel, the largest of steel manufacturer in China, covering the world as well. Led by Lenovo research, we launched the industry-leading commercial ready AR headset, DaystAR, partnering with companies like the ones in this room. This technology is being used to revolutionize the way companies service utility, and even our jet engines. Using our workstations, servers, and award-winning imaging processing algorithms, we have partnered with hospitals to process complex CT scan data in minutes. So, this enable the doctors to more successfully detect the tumors, and it increases the success rate of cancer diagnosis all around the world. We are also piloting our smart IoT driven warehouse solution with one of the world's largest retail companies to greatly improve the efficiency. So, the opportunities are endless. This is where Lenovo will truly shine. When we combine the industry know-how of our customers with our end-to-end technology offerings, our intelligent vertical solutions like this are growing, which Kirk and Christian will share more. Now, what will drive this transformation even faster? The speed at which our networks operate, specifically 5G. You may know that Lenovo just launched the first-ever 5G smartphone, our Moto Z3, with the new 5G Moto model. We are partnering with multiple major network providers like Verizon, China Mobile. With the 5G model scheduled to ship early next year, we will be the first company to provide a 5G mobile experience to any users, customers. This is amazing innovation. You don't have to buy a new phone, just the 5G clip on. What can I say, except wow. (audience laughs) 5G is 10 times the fast faster than 4G. Its download speed will transform how people engage with the world, driverless car, new types of smart wearables, gaming, home security, industrial intelligence, all will be transformed. Finally, accelerating with partners, as ready as we are at Lenovo, we need partners to unlock our full potential, partners here to create with us the edge of the intelligent transformation. The opportunities of intelligent transformation are too profound, the scale is too vast. No company can drive it alone fully. We are eager to collaborate with all partners that can help bring our vision to life. We are dedicated to open partnerships, dedicated to cross-border collaboration, unify the standards, share the advantage, and market the synergies. We partner with the biggest names in the industry, Intel, Microsoft, AMD, Qualcomm, Google, Amazon, and Disney. We also find and partner with the smaller innovators as well. We're building the ultimate partner experience, open, shared, collaborative, diverse. So, everything is in place for intelligent transformation on a global scale. Smart devices are everywhere, the infrastructure is in place, networks are accelerating, and the industries demand to be more intelligent, and Lenovo is at the center of it all. We are helping to drive change with the hundreds of companies, companies just like yours, every day. We are your partner for intelligent transformation. Transformation never stops. This is what you will hear from Kirk, including details about Lenovo NetApp global partnership we just announced this morning. We've made the investments in every single aspect of the technology. We have the end-to-end resources to meet your end-to-end needs. As you attend the breakout session this afternoon, I hope you see for yourself how much Lenovo has transformed as a company this past year, and how we truly are delivering a future of intelligent transformation. Now, let me invite to the stage Kirk Skaugen, our president of Data Center growth to tell you about the exciting transformation happening in the global Data C enter market. Thank you. (audience applauding) (upbeat music) >> Well, good morning. >> Good morning. >> Good morning! >> Good morning! >> Excellent, well, I'm pleased to be here this morning to talk about how we're transforming the Data Center and taking you as our customers through your own intelligent transformation journey. Last year I stood up here at Transform 1.0, and we were proud to announce the largest Data Center portfolio in Lenovo's history, so I thought I'd start today and talk about the portfolio and the progress that we've made over the last year, and the strategies that we have going forward in phase 2.0 of Lenovo's transformation to be one of the largest data center companies in the world. We had an audacious vision that we talked about last year, and that is to be the most trusted data center provider in the world, empowering customers through the new IT, intelligent transformation. And now as the world's largest supercomputer provider, giving something back to humanity, is very important this week with the hurricanes now hitting North Carolina's coast, but we take this most trusted aspect very seriously, whether it's delivering the highest quality products on time to you as customers with the highest levels of security, or whether it's how we partner with our channel partners and our suppliers each and every day. You know we're in a unique world where we're going from hundreds of millions of PCs, and then over the next 25 years to hundred billions of connected devices, so each and every one of you is going through this intelligent transformation journey, and in many aspects were very early in that cycle. And we're going to talk today about our role as the largest supercomputer provider, and how we're solving humanity's greatest challenges. Last year we talked about two special milestones, the 25th anniversary of ThinkPad, but also the 25th anniversary of Lenovo with our IBM heritage in x86 computing. I joined the workforce in 1992 out of college, and the IBM first personal server was launching at the same time with an OS2 operating system and a free mouse when you bought the server as a marketing campaign. (audience laughing) But what I want to be very clear today, is that the innovation engine is alive and well at Lenovo, and it's really built on the culture that we're building as a company. All of these awards at the bottom are things that we earned over the last year at Lenovo. As a Fortune now 240 company, larger than companies like Nike, or AMEX, or Coca-Cola. The one I'm probably most proud of is Forbes first list of the top 2,000 globally regarded companies. This was something where 15,000 respondents in 60 countries voted based on ethics, trustworthiness, social conduct, company as an employer, and the overall company performance, and Lenovo was ranked number 27 of 2000 companies by our peer group, but we also now one of-- (audience applauding) But we also got a perfect score in the LGBTQ Equality Index, exemplifying the diversity internally. We're number 82 in the top working companies for mothers, top working companies for fathers, top 100 companies for sustainability. If you saw that factory, it's filled with solar panels on the top of that. And now again, one of the top global brands in the world. So, innovation is built on a customer foundation of trust. We also said last year that we'd be crossing an amazing milestone. So we did, over the last 12 months ship our 20 millionth x86 server. So, thank you very much to our customers for this milestone. (audience applauding) So, let me recap some of the transformation elements that have happened over the last year. Last year I talked about a lot of brand confusion, because we had the ThinkServer brand from the legacy Lenovo, the System x, from IBM, we had acquired a number of networking companies, like BLADE Network Technologies, et cetera, et cetera. Over the last year we've been ramping based on two brand structures, ThinkAgile for next generation IT, and all of our software-defined infrastructure products and ThinkSystem as the world's highest performance, highest reliable x86 server brand, but for servers, for storage, and for networking. We have transformed every single aspect of the customer experience. A year and a half ago, we had four different global channel programs around the world. Typically we're about twice the mix to our channel partners of any of our competitors, so this was really important to fix. We now have a single global Channel program, and have technically certified over 11,000 partners to be technical experts on our product line to deliver better solutions to our customer base. Gardner recently recognized Lenovo as the 26th ranked supply chain in the world. And, that's a pretty big honor, when you're up there with Amazon and Walmart and others, but in tech, we now are in the top five supply chains. You saw the factory network from YY, and today we'll be talking about product shipping in more than 160 countries, and I know there's people here that I've met already this morning, from India, from South Africa, from Brazil and China. We announced new Premier Support services, enabling you to go directly to local language support in nine languages in 49 countries in the world, going directly to a native speaker level three support engineer. And today we have more than 10,000 support specialists supporting our products in over 160 countries. We've delivered three times the number of engineered solutions to deliver a solutions orientation, whether it's on HANA, or SQL Server, or Oracle, et cetera, and we've completely reengaged our system integrator channel. Last year we had the CIO of DXE on stage, and here we're talking about more than 175 percent growth through our system integrator channel in the last year alone as we've brought that back and really built strong relationships there. So, thank you very much for amazing work here on the customer experience. (audience applauding) We also transformed our leadership. We thought it was extremely important with a focus on diversity, to have diverse talent from the legacy IBM, the legacy Lenovo, but also outside the industry. We made about 19 executive changes in the DCG group. This is the most senior leadership team within DCG, all which are newly on board, either from our outside competitors mainly over the last year. About 50 percent of our executives were now hired internally, 50 percent externally, and 31 percent of those new executives are diverse, representing the diversity of our global customer base and gender. So welcome, and most of them you're going to be able to meet over here in the breakout sessions later today. (audience applauding) But some things haven't changed, they're just keeping getting better within Lenovo. So, last year I got up and said we were committed with the new ThinkSystem brand to be a world performance leader. You're going to see that we're sponsoring Ducati for MotoGP. You saw the Ferrari out there with Formula One. That's not a surprise. We want the Lenovo ThinkSystem and ThinkAgile brands to be synonymous with world record performance. So in the last year we've gone from 39 to 89 world records, and partners like Intel would tell you, we now have four times the number of world record workloads on Lenovo hardware than any other server company on the planet today, with more than 89 world records across HPC, Java, database, transaction processing, et cetera. And we're proud to have just brought on Doug Fisher from Intel Corporation who had about 10-17,000 people on any given year working for him in workload optimizations across all of our software. It's just another testament to the leadership team we're bringing in to keep focusing on world-class performance software and solutions. We also per ITIC, are the number one now in x86 server reliability five years running. So, this is a survey where CIOs are in a blind survey asked to submit their reliability of their uptime on their x86 server equipment over the last 365 days. And you can see from 2016 to 2017 the downtime, there was over four hours as noted by the 750 CXOs in more than 20 countries is about one percent for the Lenovo products, and is getting worse generation from generation as we went from Broadwell to Pearlie. So we're taking our reliability, which was really paramount in the IBM System X heritage, and ensuring that we don't just recognize high performance but we recognize the highest level of reliability for mission-critical workloads. And what that translates into is that we at once again have been ranked number one in customer satisfaction from you our customers in 19 of 22 attributes, in North America in 18 of 22. This is a survey by TVR across hundreds of customers of us and our top competitors. This is the ninth consecutive study that we've been ranked number one in customer satisfaction, so we're taking this extremely seriously, and in fact YY now has increased the compensation of every single Lenovo employee. Up to 40 percent of their compensation bonus this year is going to be based on customer metrics like quality, order to ship, and things of this nature. So, we're really putting every employee focused on customer centricity this year. So, the summary on Transform 1.0 is that every aspect of what you knew about Lenovo's data center group has transformed, from the culture to the branding to dedicated sales and marketing, supply chain and quality groups, to a worldwide channel program and certifications, to new system integrator relationships, and to the new leadership team. So, rather than me just talk about it, I thought I'd share a quick video about what we've done over the last year, if you could run the video please. Turn around for a second. (epic music) (audience applauds) Okay. So, thank you to all our customers that allowed us to publicly display their logos in that video. So, what that means for you as investors, and for the investor community out there is, that our customers have responded, that this year Gardner just published that we are the fastest growing server company in the top 10, with 39 percent growth quarter-on-quarter, and 49 percent growth year-on-year. If you look at the progress we've made since the transformation the last three quarters publicly, we've grown 17 percent, then 44 percent, then 68 percent year on year in revenue, and I can tell you this quarter I'm as confident as ever in the financials around the DCG group, and it hasn't been in one area. You're going to see breakout sessions from hyperscale, software-defined, and flash, which are all growing more than a 100 percent year-on-year, supercomputing which we'll talk about shortly, now number one, and then ultimately from profitability, delivering five consecutive quarters of pre-tax profit increase, so I think, thank you very much to the customer base who's been working with us through this transformation journey. So, you're here to really hear what's next on 2.0, and that's what I'm excited to talk about today. Last year I came up with an audacious goal that we would become the largest supercomputer company on the planet by 2020, and this graph represents since the acquisition of the IBM System x business how far we were behind being the number one supercomputer. When we started we were 182 positions behind, even with the acquisition for example of SGI from HP, we've now accomplished our goal actually two years ahead of time. We're now the largest supercomputer company in the world. About one in every four supercomputers, 117 on the list, are now Lenovo computers, and you saw in the video where the universities are said, but I think what I'm most proud of is when your customers rank you as the best. So the awards at the bottom here, are actually Readers Choice from the last International Supercomputing Show where the scientific researchers on these computers ranked their vendors, and we were actually rated the number one server technology in supercomputing with our ThinkSystem SD530, and the number one storage technology with our ThinkSystem DSS-G, but more importantly what we're doing with the technology. You're going to see we won best in life sciences, best in data analytics, and best in collaboration as well, so you're going to see all of that in our breakout sessions. As you saw in the video now, 17 of the top 25 research institutions in the world are now running Lenovo supercomputers. And again coming from Raleigh and watching that hurricane come across the Atlantic, there are eight supercomputers crunching all of those models you see from Germany to Malaysia to Canada, and we're happy to have a SciNet from University of Toronto here with us in our breakout session to talk about what they're doing on climate modeling as well. But we're not stopping there. We just announced our new Neptune warm water cooling technology, which won the International Supercomputing Vendor Showdown, the first time we've won that best of show in 25 years, and we've now installed this. We're building out LRZ in Germany, the first ever warm water cooling in Peking University, at the India Space Propulsion Laboratory, at the Malaysian Weather and Meteorological Society, at Uninett, at the largest supercomputer in Norway, T-Systems, University of Birmingham. This is truly amazing technology where we're actually using water to cool the machine to deliver a significantly more energy-efficient computer. Super important, when we're looking at global warming and some of the electric bills can be millions of dollars just for one computer, and could actually power a small city just with the technology from the computer. We've built AI centers now in Morrisville, Stuttgart, Taipei, and Beijing, where customers can bring their AI workloads in with experts from Intel, from Nvidia, from our FPGA partners, to work on their workloads, and how they can best implement artificial intelligence. And we also this year launched LICO which is Lenovo Intelligent Compute Orchestrator software, and it's a software solution that simplifies the management and use of distributed clusters in both HPC and AI model development. So, what it enables you to do is take a single cluster, and run both HPC and AI workloads on it simultaneously, delivering better TCO for your environment, so check out LICO as well. A lot of the customers here and Wall Street are very excited and using it already. And we talked about solving humanity's greatest challenges. In the breakout session, you're going to have a virtual reality experience where you're going to be able to walk through what as was just ranked the world's most beautiful data center, the Barcelona Supercomputer. So, you can actually walk through one of the largest supercomputers in the world from Barcelona. You can see the work we're doing with NC State where we're going to have to grow the food supply of the world by 50 percent, and there's not enough fresh water in the world in the right places to actually make all those crops grow between now and 2055, so you're going to see the progression of how they're mapping the entire globe and the water around the world, how to build out the crop population over time using AI. You're going to see our work with Vestas is this largest supercomputer provider in the wind turbine areas, how they're working on wind energy, and then with University College London, how they're working on some of the toughest particle physics calculations in the world. So again, lots of opportunity here. Take advantage of it in the breakout sessions. Okay, let me transition to hyperscale. So in hyperscale now, we have completely transformed our business model. We are now powering six of the top 10 hyperscalers in the world, which is a significant difference from where we were two years ago. And the reason we're doing that, is we've coined a term called ODM+. We believe that hyperscalers want more procurement power than an ODM, and Lenovo is doing about $18 billion of procurement a year. They want a broader global supply chain that they can get from a local system integrator. We're more than 160 countries around the world, but they want the same world-class quality and reliability like they get from an MNC. So, what we're doing now is instead of just taking off the shelf motherboards from somewhere, we're starting with a blank sheet of paper, we're working with the customer base on customized SKUs and you can see we already are developing 33 custom solutions for the largest hyperscalers in the world. And then we're not just running notebooks through this factory where YY said, we're running 37 notebook boards a minute, we're now putting in tens and tens and tens of thousands of server board capacity per month into this same factory, so absolutely we can compete with the most aggressive ODM's in the world, but it's not just putting these things in in the motherboard side, we're also building out these systems all around the world, India, Brazil, Hungary, Mexico, China. This is an example of a new hyperscale customer we've had this last year, 34,000 servers we delivered in the first six months. The next 34,000 servers we delivered in 68 days. The next 34,000 servers we delivered in 35 days, with more than 99 percent on-time delivery to 35 data centers in 14 countries as diverse as South Africa, India, China, Brazil, et cetera. And I'm really ashamed to say it was 99.3, because we did have a forklift driver who rammed their forklift right through the middle of the one of the server racks. (audience laughing) At JFK Airport that we had to respond to, but I think this gives you a perspective of what it is to be a top five global supply chain and technology. So last year, I said we would invest significantly in IP, in joint ventures, and M and A to compete in software defined, in networking, and in storage, so I wanted to give you an update on that as well. Our newest software-defined partnership is with Cloudistics, enabling a fully composable cloud infrastructure. It's an exclusive agreement, you can see them here. I think Nag, our founder, is going to be here today, with a significant Lenovo investment in the company. So, this new ThinkAgile CP series delivers the simplicity of the public cloud, on-premise with exceptional support and a marketplace of essential enterprise applications all with a single click deployment. So simply put, we're delivering a private cloud with a premium experience. It's simple in that you need no specialists to deploy it. An IT generalist can set it up and manage it. It's agile in that you can provision dozens of workloads in minutes, and it's transformative in that you get all of the goodness of public cloud on-prem in a private cloud to unlock opportunity for use. So, we're extremely excited about the ThinkAgile CP series that's now shipping into the marketplace. Beyond that we're aggressively ramping, and we're either doubling, tripling, or quadrupling our market share as customers move from traditional server technology to software-defined technology. With Nutanix we've been public, growing about more than 150 percent year-on-year, with Nutanix as their fastest growing Nutanix partner, but today I want to set another audacious goal. I believe we cannot just be Nutanix's fastest growing partner but we can become their largest partner within two years. On Microsoft, we are already four times our market share on Azure stack of our traditional business. We were the first to launch our ThinkAgile on Broadwell and on Skylake with the Azure Stack Infrastructure. And on VMware we're about twice our market segment share. We were the first to deliver an Intel-optimized Optane-certified VSAN node. And with Optane technology, we're delivering 50 percent more VM density than any competitive SSD system in the marketplace, about 10 times lower latency, four times the performance of any SSD system out there, and Lenovo's first to market on that. And at VMworld you saw CEO Pat Gelsinger of VMware talked about project dimension, which is Edge as a service, and we're the only OEM beyond the Dell family that is participating today in project dimension. Beyond that you're going to see a number of other partnerships we have. I'm excited that we have the city of Bogota Columbia here, an eight million person city, where we announced a 3,000 camera video surveillance solution last month. With pivot three you're going to see city of Bogota in our breakout sessions. You're going to see a new partnership with Veeam around backup that's launching today. You're going to see partnerships with scale computing in IoT and hyper-converged infrastructure working on some of the largest retailers in the world. So again, everything out in the breakout session. Transitioning to storage and data management, it's been a great year for Lenovo, more than a 100 percent growth year-on-year, 2X market growth in flash arrays. IDC just reported 30 percent growth in storage, number one in price performance in the world and the best HPC storage product in the top 500 with our ThinkSystem DSS G, so strong coverage, but I'm excited today to announce for Transform 2.0 that Lenovo is launching the largest data management and storage portfolio in our 25-year data center history. (audience applauding) So a year ago, the largest server portfolio, becoming the largest fastest growing server OEM, today the largest storage portfolio, but as you saw this morning we're not doing it alone. Today Lenovo and NetApp, two global powerhouses are joining forces to deliver a multi-billion dollar global alliance in data management and storage to help customers through their intelligent transformation. As the fastest growing worldwide server leader and one of the fastest growing flash array and data management companies in the world, we're going to deliver more choice to customers than ever before, global scale that's never been seen, supply chain efficiencies, and rapidly accelerating innovation and solutions. So, let me unwrap this a little bit for you and talk about what we're announcing today. First, it's the largest portfolio in our history. You're going to see not just storage solutions launching today but a set of solution recipes from NetApp that are going to make Lenovo server and NetApp or Lenovo storage work better together. The announcement enables Lenovo to go from covering 15 percent of the global storage market to more than 90 percent of the global storage market and distribute these products in more than 160 countries around the world. So we're launching today, 10 new storage platforms, the ThinkSystem DE and ThinkSystem DM platforms. They're going to be centrally managed, so the same XClarity management that you've been using for server, you can now use across all of your storage platforms as well, and it'll be supported by the same 10,000 plus service personnel that are giving outstanding customer support to you today on the server side. And we didn't come up with this in the last month or the last quarter. We're announcing availability in ordering today and shipments tomorrow of the first products in this portfolio, so we're excited today that it's not just a future announcement but something you as customers can take advantage of immediately. (audience applauding) The second part of the announcement is we are announcing a joint venture in China. Not only will this be a multi-billion dollar global partnership, but Lenovo will be a 51 percent owner, NetApp a 49 percent owner of a new joint venture in China with the goal of becoming in the top three storage companies in the largest data and storage market in the world. We will deliver our R and D in China for China, pooling our IP and resources together, and delivering a single route to market through a complementary channel, not just in China but worldwide. And in the future I just want to tell everyone this is phase one. There is so much exciting stuff. We're going to be on the stage over the next year talking to you about around integrated solutions, next-generation technologies, and further synergies and collaborations. So, rather than just have me talk about it, I'd like to welcome to the stage our new partner NetApp and Brad Anderson who's the senior vice president and general manager of NetApp Cloud Infrastructure. (upbeat music) (audience applauding) >> Thank You Kirk. >> So Brad, we've known each other a long time. It's an exciting day. I'm going to give you the stage and allow you to say NetApp's perspective on this announcement. >> Very good, thank you very much, Kirk. Kirk and I go back to I think 1994, so hey good morning and welcome. My name is Brad Anderson. I manage the Cloud Infrastructure Group at NetApp, and I am honored and privileged to be here at Lenovo Transform, particularly today on today's announcement. Now, you've heard a lot about digital transformation about how companies have to transform their IT to compete in today's global environment. And today's announcement with the partnership between NetApp and Lenovo is what that's all about. This is the joining of two global leaders bringing innovative technology in a simplified solution to help customers modernize their IT and accelerate their global digital transformations. Drawing on the strengths of both companies, Lenovo's high performance compute world-class supply chain, and NetApp's hybrid cloud data management, hybrid flash and all flash storage solutions and products. And both companies providing our customers with the global scale for them to be able to meet their transformation goals. At NetApp, we're very excited. This is a quote from George Kurian our CEO. George spent all day yesterday with YY and Kirk, and would have been here today if it hadn't been also our shareholders meeting in California, but I want to just convey how excited we are for all across NetApp with this partnership. This is a partnership between two companies with tremendous market momentum. Kirk took you through all the amazing results that Lenovo has accomplished, number one in supercomputing, number one in performance, number one in x86 reliability, number one in x86 customers sat, number five in supply chain, really impressive and congratulations. Like Lenovo, NetApp is also on a transformation journey, from a storage company to the data authority in hybrid cloud, and we've seen some pretty impressive momentum as well. Just last week we became number one in all flash arrays worldwide, catching EMC and Dell, and we plan to keep on going by them, as we help customers modernize their their data centers with cloud connected flash. We have strategic partnerships with the largest hyperscalers to provide cloud native data services around the globe and we are having success helping our customers build their own private clouds with just, with a new disruptive hyper-converged technology that allows them to operate just like hyperscalers. These three initiatives has fueled NetApp's transformation, and has enabled our customers to change the world with data. And oh by the way, it has also fueled us to have meet or have beaten Wall Street's expectations for nine quarters in a row. These are two companies with tremendous market momentum. We are also building this partnership for long term success. We think about this as phase one and there are two important components to phase one. Kirk took you through them but let me just review them. Part one, the establishment of a multi-year commitment and a collaboration agreement to offer Lenovo branded flash products globally, and as Kurt said in 160 countries. Part two, the formation of a joint venture in PRC, People's Republic of China, that will provide long term commitment, joint product development, and increase go-to-market investment to meet the unique needs to China. Both companies will put in storage technologies and storage expertise to form an independent JV that establishes a data management company in China for China. And while we can dream about what phase two looks like, our entire focus is on making phase one incredibly successful and I'm pleased to repeat what Kirk, is that the first products are orderable and shippable this week in 160 different countries, and you will see our two companies focusing on the here and now. On our joint go to market strategy, you'll see us working together to drive strategic alignment, focused execution, strong governance, and realistic expectations and milestones. And it starts with the success of our customers and our channel partners is job one. Enabling customers to modernize their legacy IT with complete data center solutions, ensuring that our customers get the best from both companies, new offerings the fuel business success, efficiencies to reinvest in game-changing initiatives, and new solutions for new mission-critical applications like data analytics, IoT, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. Channel partners are also top of mind for both our two companies. We are committed to the success of our existing and our future channel partners. For NetApp channel partners, it is new pathways to new segments and to new customers. For Lenovo's channel partners, it is the competitive weapons that now allows you to compete and more importantly win against Dell, EMC, and HP. And the good news for both companies is that our channel partner ecosystem is highly complementary with minimal overlap. Today is the first day of a very exciting partnership, of a partnership that will better serve our customers today and will provide new opportunities to both our companies and to our partners, new products to our customers globally and in China. I am personally very excited. I will be on the board of the JV. And so, I look forward to working with you, partnering with you and serving you as we go forward, and with that, I'd like to invite Kirk back up. (audience applauding) >> Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Well, thank you, Brad. I think it's an exciting overview, and these products will be manufactured in China, in Mexico, in Hungary, and around the world, enabling this amazing supply chain we talked about to deliver in over 160 countries. So thank you Brad, thank you George, for the amazing partnership. So again, that's not all. In Transform 2.0, last year, we talked about the joint ventures that were coming. I want to give you a sneak peek at what you should expect at future Lenovo events around the world. We have this Transform in Beijing in a couple weeks. We'll then be repeating this in 20 different locations roughly around the world over the next year, and I'm excited probably more than ever about what else is coming. Let's talk about Telco 5G and network function virtualization. Today, Motorola phones are certified on 46 global networks. We launched the world's first 5G upgradable phone here in the United States with Verizon. Lenovo DCG sells to 58 telecommunication providers around the world. At Mobile World Congress in Barcelona and Shanghai, you saw China Telecom and China Mobile in the Lenovo booth, China Telecom showing a video broadband remote access server, a VBRAS, with video streaming demonstrations with 2x less jitter than they had seen before. You saw China Mobile with a virtual remote access network, a VRAN, with greater than 10 times the throughput and 10x lower latency running on Lenovo. And this year, we'll be launching a new NFV company, a software company in China for China to drive the entire NFV stack, delivering not just hardware solutions, but software solutions, and we've recently hired a new CEO. You're going to hear more about that over the next several quarters. Very exciting as we try to drive new economics into the networks to deliver these 20 billion devices. We're going to need new economics that I think Lenovo can uniquely deliver. The second on IoT and edge, we've integrated on the device side into our intelligent devices group. With everything that's going to consume electricity computes and communicates, Lenovo is in a unique position on the device side to take advantage of the communications from Motorola and being one of the largest device companies in the world. But this year, we're also going to roll out a comprehensive set of edge gateways and ruggedized industrial servers and edge servers and ISP appliances for the edge and for IoT. So look for that as well. And then lastly, as a service, you're going to see Lenovo delivering hardware as a service, device as a service, infrastructure as a service, software as a service, and hardware as a service, not just as a glorified leasing contract, but with IP, we've developed true flexible metering capability that enables you to scale up and scale down freely and paying strictly based on usage, and we'll be having those announcements within this fiscal year. So Transform 2.0, lots to talk about, NetApp the big news of the day, but a lot more to come over the next year from the Data Center group. So in summary, I'm excited that we have a lot of customers that are going to be on stage with us that you saw in the video. Lots of testimonials so that you can talk to colleagues of yourself. Alamos Gold from Canada, a Canadian gold producer, Caligo for data optimization and privacy, SciNet, the largest supercomputer we've ever put into North America, and the largest in Canada at the University of Toronto will be here talking about climate change. City of Bogota again with our hyper-converged solutions around smart city putting in 3,000 cameras for criminal detection, license plate detection, et cetera, and then more from a channel mid market perspective, Jerry's Foods, which is from my home state of Wisconsin, and Minnesota which has about 57 stores in the specialty foods market, and how they're leveraging our IoT solutions as well. So again, about five times the number of demos that we had last year. So in summary, first and foremost to the customers, thank you for your business. It's been a great journey and I think we're on a tremendous role. You saw from last year, we're trying to build credibility with you. After the largest server portfolio, we're now the fastest-growing server OEM per Gardner, number one in performance, number one in reliability, number one in customer satisfaction, number one in supercomputing. Today, the largest storage portfolio in our history, with the goal of becoming the fastest growing storage company in the world, top three in China, multibillion-dollar collaboration with NetApp. And the transformation is going to continue with new edge gateways, edge servers, NFV solutions, telecommunications infrastructure, and hardware as a service with dynamic metering. So thank you for your time. I've looked forward to meeting many of you over the next day. We appreciate your business, and with that, I'd like to bring up Rod Lappen to introduce our next speaker. Rod? (audience applauding) >> Thanks, boss, well done. Alright ladies and gentlemen. No real secret there. I think we've heard why I might talk about the fourth Industrial Revolution in data and exactly what's going on with that. You've heard Kirk with some amazing announcements, obviously now with our NetApp partnership, talk about 5G, NFV, cloud, artificial intelligence, I think we've hit just about all the key hot topics. It's with great pleasure that I now bring up on stage Mr. Christian Teismann, our senior vice president and general manager of commercial business for both our PCs and our IoT business, so Christian Teismann. (techno music) Here, take that. >> Thank you. I think I'll need that. >> Okay, Christian, so obviously just before we get down, you and I last year, we had a bit of a chat about being in New York. >> Exports. >> You were an expat in New York for a long time. >> That's true. >> And now, you've moved from New York. You're in Munich? >> Yep. >> How does that feel? >> Well Munich is a wonderful city, and it's a great place to live and raise kids, but you know there's no place in the world like New York. >> Right. >> And I miss it a lot, quite frankly. >> So what exactly do you miss in New York? >> Well there's a lot of things in New York that are unique, but I know you spent some time in Japan, but I still believe the best sushi in the world is still in New York City. (all laughing) >> I will beg to differ. I will beg to differ. I think Mr. Guchi-san from Softbank is here somewhere. He will get up an argue very quickly that Japan definitely has better sushi than New York. But obviously you know, it's a very very special place, and I have had sushi here, it's been fantastic. What about Munich? Anything else that you like in Munich? >> Well I mean in Munich, we have pork knuckles. >> Pork knuckles. (Christian laughing) Very similar sushi. >> What is also very fantastic, but we have the real, the real Oktoberfest in Munich, and it starts next week, mid-September, and I think it's unique in the world. So it's very special as well. >> Oktoberfest. >> Yes. >> Unfortunately, I'm not going this year, 'cause you didn't invite me, but-- (audience chuckling) How about, I think you've got a bit of a secret in relation to Oktoberfest, probably not in Munich, however. >> It's a secret, yes, but-- >> Are you going to share? >> Well I mean-- >> See how I'm putting you on the spot? >> In the 10 years, while living here in New York, I was a regular visitor of the Oktoberfest at the Lower East Side in Avenue C at Zum Schneider, where I actually met my wife, and she's German. >> Very good. So, how about a big round of applause? (audience applauding) Not so much for Christian, but more I think, obviously for his wife, who obviously had been drinking and consequently ended up with you. (all laughing) See you later, mate. >> That's the beauty about Oktoberfest, but yes. So first of all, good morning to everybody, and great to be back here in New York for a second Transform event. New York clearly is the melting pot of the world in terms of culture, nations, but also business professionals from all kind of different industries, and having this event here in New York City I believe is manifesting what we are trying to do here at Lenovo, is transform every aspect of our business and helping our customers on the journey of intelligent transformation. Last year, in our transformation on the device business, I talked about how the PC is transforming to personalized computing, and we've made a lot of progress in that journey over the last 12 months. One major change that we have made is we combined all our device business under one roof. So basically PCs, smart devices, and smart phones are now under the roof and under the intelligent device group. But from my perspective makes a lot of sense, because at the end of the day, all devices connect in the modern world into the cloud and are operating in a seamless way. But we are also moving from a device business what is mainly a hardware focus historically, more and more also into a solutions business, and I will give you during my speech a little bit of a sense of what we are trying to do, as we are trying to bring all these components closer together, and specifically also with our strengths on the data center side really build end-to-end customer solution. Ultimately, what we want to do is make our business, our customer's businesses faster, safer, and ultimately smarter as well. So I want to look a little bit back, because I really believe it's important to understand what's going on today on the device side. Many of us have still grown up with phones with terminals, ultimately getting their first desktop, their first laptop, their first mobile phone, and ultimately smartphone. Emails and internet improved our speed, how we could operate together, but still we were defined by linear technology advances. Today, the world has changed completely. Technology itself is not a limiting factor anymore. It is how we use technology going forward. The Internet is pervasive, and we are not yet there that we are always connected, but we are nearly always connected, and we are moving to the stage, that everything is getting connected all the time. Sharing experiences is the most driving force in our behavior. In our private life, sharing pictures, videos constantly, real-time around the world, with our friends and with our family, and you see the same behavior actually happening in the business life as well. Collaboration is the number-one topic if it comes down to workplace, and video and instant messaging, things that are coming from the consumer side are dominating the way we are operating in the commercial business as well. Most important beside technology, that a new generation of workforce has completely changed the way we are working. As the famous workforce the first generation of Millennials that have now fully entered in the global workforce, and the next generation, it's called Generation Z, is already starting to enter the global workforce. By 2025, 75 percent of the world's workforce will be composed out of two of these generations. Why is this so important? These two generations have been growing up using state-of-the-art IT technology during their private life, during their education, school and study, and are taking these learnings and taking these behaviors in the commercial workspace. And this is the number one force of change that we are seeing in the moment. Diverse workforces are driving this change in the IT spectrum, and for years in many of our customers' focus was their customer focus. Customer experience also in Lenovo is the most important thing, but we've realized that our own human capital is equally valuable in our customer relationships, and employee experience is becoming a very important thing for many of our customers, and equally for Lenovo as well. As you have heard YY, as we heard from YY, Lenovo is focused on intelligent transformation. What that means for us in the intelligent device business is ultimately starting with putting intelligence in all of our devices, smartify every single one of our devices, adding value to our customers, traditionally IT departments, but also focusing on their end users and building products that make their end users more productive. And as a world leader in commercial devices with more than 33 percent market share, we can solve problems been even better than any other company in the world. So, let's talk about transformation of productivity first. We are in a device-led world. Everything we do is connected. There's more interaction with devices than ever, but also with spaces who are increasingly becoming smart and intelligent. YY said it, by 2020 we have more than 20 billion connected devices in the world, and it will grow exponentially from there on. And users have unique personal choices for technology, and that's very important to recognize, and we call this concept a digital wardrobe. And it means that every single end-user in the commercial business is composing his personal wardrobe on an ongoing basis and is reconfiguring it based on the work he's doing and based where he's going and based what task he is doing. I would ask all of you to put out all the devices you're carrying in your pockets and in your bags. You will see a lot of you are using phones, tablets, laptops, but also cameras and even smartwatches. They're all different, but they have one underlying technology that is bringing it all together. Recognizing digital wardrobe dynamics is a core factor for us to put all the devices under one roof in IDG, one business group that is dedicated to end-user solutions across mobile, PC, but also software services and imaging, to emerging technologies like AR, VR, IoT, and ultimately a AI as well. A couple of years back there was a big debate around bring-your-own-device, what was called consumerization. Today consumerization does not exist anymore, because consumerization has happened into every single device we build in our commercial business. End users and commercial customers today do expect superior display performance, superior audio, microphone, voice, and touch quality, and have it all connected and working seamlessly together in an ease of use space. We are already deep in the journey of personalized computing today. But the center point of it has been for the last 25 years, the mobile PC, that we have perfected over the last 25 years, and has been the undisputed leader in mobility computing. We believe in the commercial business, the ThinkPad is still the core device of a digital wardrobe, and we continue to drive the success of the ThinkPad in the marketplace. We've sold more than 140 million over the last 26 years, and even last year we exceeded nearly 11 million units. That is about 21 ThinkPads per minute, or one Thinkpad every three seconds that we are shipping out in the market. It's the number one commercial PC in the world. It has gotten countless awards but we felt last year after Transform we need to build a step further, in really tailoring the ThinkPad towards the need of the future. So, we announced a new line of X1 Carbon and Yoga at CES the Consumer Electronics Show. And the reason is not we want to sell to consumer, but that we do recognize that a lot of CIOs and IT decision makers need to understand what consumers are really doing in terms of technology to make them successful. So, let's take a look at the video. (suspenseful music) >> When you're the number one business laptop of all time, your only competition is yourself. (wall shattering) And, that's different. Different, like resisting heat, ice, dust, and spills. Different, like sharper, brighter OLA display. The trackpoint that reinvented controls, and a carbon fiber roll cage to protect what's inside, built by an engineering and design team, doing the impossible for the last 25 years. This is the number one business laptop of all time, but it's not a laptop. It's a ThinkPad. (audience applauding) >> Thank you very much. And we are very proud that Lenovo ThinkPad has been selected as the best laptop in the world in the second year in a row. I think it's a wonderful tribute to what our engineers have been done on this one. And users do want awesome displays. They want the best possible audio, voice, and touch control, but some users they want more. What they want is super power, and I'm really proud to announce our newest member of the X1 family, and that's the X1 extreme. It's exceptionally featured. It has six core I9 intel chipset, the highest performance you get in the commercial space. It has Nvidia XTX graphic, it is a 4K UHD display with HDR with Dolby vision and Dolby Atmos Audio, two terabyte in SSD, so it is really the absolute Ferrari in terms of building high performance commercial computer. Of course it has touch and voice, but it is one thing. It has so much performance that it serves also a purpose that is not typical for commercial, and I know there's a lot of secret gamers also here in this room. So you see, by really bringing technology together in the commercial space, you're creating productivity solutions of one of a kind. But there's another category of products from a productivity perspective that is incredibly important in our commercial business, and that is the workstation business . Clearly workstations are very specifically designed computers for very advanced high-performance workloads, serving designers, architects, researchers, developers, or data analysts. And power and performance is not just about the performance itself. It has to be tailored towards the specific use case, and traditionally these products have a similar size, like a server. They are running on Intel Xeon technology, and they are equally complex to manufacture. We have now created a new category as the ultra mobile workstation, and I'm very proud that we can announce here the lightest mobile workstation in the industry. It is so powerful that it really can run AI and big data analysis. And with this performance you can go really close where you need this power, to the sensors, into the cars, or into the manufacturing places where you not only wannna read the sensors but get real-time analytics out of these sensors. To build a machine like this one you need customers who are really challenging you to the limit. and we're very happy that we had a customer who went on this journey with us, and ultimately jointly with us created this product. So, let's take a look at the video. (suspenseful music) >> My world involves pathfinding both the hardware needs to the various work sites throughout the company, and then finding an appropriate model of desktop, laptop, or workstation to match those needs. My first impressions when I first seen the ThinkPad P1 was I didn't actually believe that we could get everything that I was asked for inside something as small and light in comparison to other mobile workstations. That was one of the I can't believe this is real sort of moments for me. (engine roars) >> Well, it's better than general when you're going around in the wind tunnel, which isn't alway easy, and going on a track is not necessarily the best bet, so having a lightweight very powerful laptop is extremely useful. It can take a Xeon processor, which can support ECC from when we try to load a full car, and when we're analyzing live simulation results. through and RCFT post processor or example. It needs a pretty powerful machine. >> It's come a long way to be able to deliver this. I hate to use the word game changer, but it is that for us. >> Aston Martin has got a lot of different projects going. There's some pretty exciting projects and a pretty versatile range coming out. Having Lenovo as a partner is certainly going to ensure that future. (engine roars) (audience applauds) >> So, don't you think the Aston Martin design and the ThinkPad design fit very well together? (audience laughs) So if Q, would get a new laptop, I think you would get a ThinkPad X P1. So, I want to switch gears a little bit, and go into something in terms of productivity that is not necessarily on top of the mind or every end user but I believe it's on top of the mind of every C-level executive and of every CEO. Security is the number one threat in terms of potential risk in your business and the cost of cybersecurity is estimated by 2020 around six trillion dollars. That's more than the GDP of Japan and we've seen a significant amount of data breach incidents already this years. Now, they're threatening to take companies out of business and that are threatening companies to lose a huge amount of sensitive customer data or internal data. At Lenovo, we are taking security very, very seriously, and we run a very deep analysis, around our own security capabilities in the products that we are building. And we are announcing today a new brand under the Think umbrella that is called ThinkShield. Our goal is to build the world's most secure PC, and ultimately the most secure devices in the industry. And when we looked at this end-to-end, there is no silver bullet around security. You have to go through every aspect where security breaches can potentially happen. That is why we have changed the whole organization, how we look at security in our device business, and really have it grouped under one complete ecosystem of solutions, Security is always something where you constantly are getting challenged with the next potential breach the next potential technology flaw. As we keep innovating and as we keep integrating, a lot of our partners' software and hardware components into our products. So for us, it's really very important that we partner with companies like Intel, Microsoft, Coronet, Absolute, and many others to really as an example to drive full encryption on all the data seamlessly, to have multi-factor authentication to protect your users' identity, to protect you in unsecured Wi-Fi locations, or even simple things like innovation on the device itself, to and an example protect the camera, against usage with a little thing like a thinkShutter that you can shut off the camera. SO what I want to show you here, is this is the full portfolio of ThinkShield that we are announcing today. This is clearly not something I can even read to you today, but I believe it shows you the breadth of security management that we are announcing today. There are four key pillars in managing security end-to-end. The first one is your data, and this has a lot of aspects around the hardware and the software itself. The second is identity. The third is the security around online, and ultimately the device itself. So, there is a breakout on security and ThinkShield today, available in the afternoon, and encourage you to really take a deeper look at this one. The first pillar around productivity was the device, and around the device. The second major pillar that we are seeing in terms of intelligent transformation is the workspace itself. Employees of a new generation have a very different habit how they work. They split their time between travel, working remotely but if they do come in the office, they expect a very different office environment than what they've seen in the past in cubicles or small offices. They come into the office to collaborate, and they want to create ideas, and they really work in cross-functional teams, and they want to do it instantly. And what we've seen is there is a huge amount of investment that companies are doing today in reconfiguring real estate reconfiguring offices. And most of these kind of things are moving to a digital platform. And what we are doing, is we want to build an entire set of solutions that are just focused on making the workspace more productive for remote workforce, and to create technology that allow people to work anywhere and connect instantly. And the core of this is that we need to be, the productivity of the employee as high as possible, and make it for him as easy as possible to use these kind of technologies. Last year in Transform, I announced that we will enter the smart office space. By the end of last year, we brought the first product into the market. It's called the Hub 500. It's already deployed in thousands of our customers, and it's uniquely focused on Microsoft Skype for Business, and making meeting instantly happen. And the product is very successful in the market. What we are announcing today is the next generation of this product, what is the Hub 700, what has a fantastic audio quality. It has far few microphones, and it is usable in small office environment, as well as in major conference rooms, but the most important part of this new announcement is that we are also announcing a software platform, and this software platform allows you to run multiple video conferencing software solutions on the same platform. Many of you may have standardized for one software solution or for another one, but as you are moving in a world of collaborating instantly with partners, customers, suppliers, you always will face multiple software standards in your company, and Lenovo is uniquely positioned but providing a middleware platform for the device to really enable multiple of these UX interfaces. And there's more to come and we will add additional UX interfaces on an ongoing base, based on our customer requirements. But this software does not only help to create a better experience and a higher productivity in the conference room or the huddle room itself. It really will allow you ultimately to manage all your conference rooms in the company in one instance. And you can run AI technologies around how to increase productivity utilization of your entire conference room ecosystem in your company. You will see a lot more devices coming from the node in this space, around intelligent screens, cameras, and so on, and so on. The idea is really that Lenovo will become a core provider in the whole movement into the smart office space. But it's great if you have hardware and software that is really supporting the approach of modern IT, but one component that Kirk also mentioned is absolutely critical, that we are providing this to you in an as a service approach. Get it what you want, when you need it, and pay it in the amount that you're really using it. And within UIT there is also I think a new philosophy around IT management, where you're much more focused on the value that you are consuming instead of investing into technology. We are launched as a service two years back and we already have a significant number of customers running PC as a service, but we believe as a service will stretch far more than just the PC device. It will go into categories like smart office. It might go even into categories like phone, and it will definitely go also in categories like storage and server in terms of capacity management. I want to highlight three offerings that we are also displaying today that are sort of building blocks in terms of how we really run as a service. The first one is that we collaborated intensively over the last year with Microsoft to be the launch pilot for their Autopilot offering, basically deploying images easily in the same approach like you would deploy a new phone on the network. The purpose really is to make new imaging and enabling new PC as seamless as it's used to be in the phone industry, and we have a complete set of offerings, and already a significant number customers have deployed Autopilot with Lenovo. The second major offering is Premier Support, like in the in the server business, where Premier Support is absolutely critical to run critical infrastructure, we see a lot of our customers do want to have Premier Support for their end users, so they can be back into work basically instantly, and that you have the highest possible instant repair on every single device. And then finally we have a significant amount of time invested into understanding how the software as a service really can get into one philosophy. And many of you already are consuming software as a service in many different contracts from many different vendors, but what we've created is one platform that really can manage this all together. All these things are the foundation for a device as a service offering that really can manage this end-to-end. So, implementing an intelligent workplace can be really a daunting prospect depending on where you're starting from, and how big your company ultimately is. But how do you manage the transformation of technology workspace if you're present in 50 or more countries and you run an infrastructure for more than 100,000 people? Michelin, famous for their tires, infamous for their Michelin star restaurant rating, especially in New York, and instantly recognizable by the Michelin Man, has just doing that. Please welcome with me Damon McIntyre from Michelin to talk to us about the challenges and transforming collaboration and productivity. (audience applauding) (electronic dance music) Thank you, David. >> Thank you, thank you very much. >> We on? >> So, how do you feel here? >> Well good, I want to thank you first of all for your partnership and the devices you create that helped us design, manufacture, and distribute the best tire in the world, okay? I just had to say it and put out there, alright. And I was wondering, were those Michelin tires on that Aston Martin? >> I'm pretty sure there is no other tire that would fit to that. >> Yeah, no, thank you, thank you again, and thank you for the introduction. >> So, when we talk about the transformation happening really in the workplace, the most tangible transformation that you actually see is the drastic change that companies are doing physically. They're breaking down walls. They're removing cubes, and they're moving to flexible layouts, new desks, new huddle rooms, open spaces, but the underlying technology for that is clearly not so visible very often. So, tell us about Michelin's strategy, and the technology you are deploying to really enable this corporation. >> So we, so let me give a little bit a history about the company to understand the daunting tasks that we had before us. So we have over 114,000 people in the company under 170 nationalities, okay? If you go to the corporate office in France, it's Clermont. It's about 3,000 executives and directors, and what have you in the marketing, sales, all the way up to the chain of the global CIO, right? Inside of the Americas, we merged in Americas about three years ago. Now we have the Americas zone. There's about 28,000 employees across the Americas, so it's really, it's really hard in a lot of cases. You start looking at the different areas that you lose time, and you lose you know, your productivity and what have you, so there, it's when we looked at different aspects of how we were going to manage the meeting rooms, right? because we have opened up our areas of workspace, our CIO, CEOs in our zones will no longer have an office. They'll sit out in front of everybody else and mingle with the crowd. So, how do you take those spaces that were originally used by an individual but now turn them into like meeting rooms? So, we went through a large process, and looked at the Hub 500, and that really met our needs, because at the end of the day what we noticed was, it was it was just it just worked, okay? We've just added it to the catalog, so we're going to be deploying it very soon, and I just want to again point that I know everybody struggles with this, and if you look at all the minutes that you lose in starting up a meeting, and we know you know what I'm talking about when I say this, it equates to many many many dollars, okay? And so at the end the day, this product helps us to be more efficient in starting up the meeting, and more productive during the meeting. >> Okay, it's very good to hear. Another major trend we are seeing in IT departments is taking a more hands-off approach to hardware. We're seeing new technologies enable IT to create a more efficient model, how IT gets hardware in the hands of end-users, and how they are ultimately supporting themselves. So what's your strategy around the lifecycle management of the devices? >> So yeah you mentioned, again, we'll go back to the 114,000 employees in the company, right? You imagine looking at all the devices we use. I'm not going to get into the number of devices we have, but we have a set number that we use, and we have to go through a process of deploying these devices, which we right now service our own image. We build our images, we service them through our help desk and all that process, and we go through it. If you imagine deploying 25,000 PCs in a year, okay? The time and the daunting task that's behind all that, you can probably add up to 20 or 30 people just full-time doing that, okay? So, with partnering with Lenovo and their excellent technology, their technical teams, and putting together the whole process of how we do imaging, it now lifts that burden off of our folks, and it shifts it into a more automated process through the cloud, okay? And, it's with the Autopilot on the end of the project, we'll have Autopilot fully engaged, but what I really appreciate is how Lenovo really, really kind of got with us, and partnered with us for the whole process. I mean it wasn't just a partner between Michelin and Lenovo. Microsoft was also partnered during that whole process, and it really was a good project that we put together, and we hope to have something in a full production mode next year for sure. >> So, David thank you very, very much to be here with us on stage. What I really want to say, customers like you, who are always challenging us on every single aspect of our capabilities really do make the big difference for us to get better every single day and we really appreciate the partnership. >> Yeah, and I would like to say this is that I am, I'm doing what he's exactly said he just said. I am challenging Lenovo to show us how we can innovate in our work space with your devices, right? That's a challenge, and it's going to be starting up next year for sure. We've done some in the past, but I'm really going to challenge you, and my whole aspect about how to do that is bring you into our workspace. Show you how we make how we go through the process of making tires and all that process, and how we distribute those tires, so you can brainstorm, come back to the table and say, here's a device that can do exactly what you're doing right now, better, more efficient, and save money, so thank you. >> Thank you very much, David. (audience applauding) Well it's sometimes really refreshing to get a very challenging customers feedback. And you know, we will continue to grow this business together, and I'm very confident that your challenge will ultimately help to make our products even more seamless together. So, as we now covered productivity and how we are really improving our devices itself, and the transformation around the workplace, there is one pillar left I want to talk about, and that's really, how do we make businesses smarter than ever? What that really means is, that we are on a journey on trying to understand our customer's business, deeper than ever, understanding our customer's processes even better than ever, and trying to understand how we can help our customers to become more competitive by injecting state-of-the-art technology in this intelligent transformation process, into core processes. But this cannot be done without talking about a fundamental and that is the journey towards 5G. I really believe that 5G is changing everything the way we are operating devices today, because they will be connected in a way like it has never done before. YY talked about you know, 20 times 10 times the amount of performance. There are other studies that talk about even 200 times the performance, how you can use these devices. What it will lead to ultimately is that we will build devices that will be always connected to the cloud. And, we are preparing for this, and Kirk already talked about, and how many operators in the world we already present with our Moto phones, with how many Telcos we are working already on the backend, and we are working on the device side on integrating 5G basically into every single one of our product in the future. One of the areas that will benefit hugely from always connected is the world of virtual reality and augmented reality. And I'm going to pick here one example, and that is that we have created a commercial VR solution for classrooms and education, and basically using consumer type of product like our Mirage Solo with Daydream and put a solution around this one that enables teachers and schools to use these products in the classroom experience. So, students now can have immersive learning. They can studying sciences. They can look at environmental issues. They can exploring their careers, or they can even taking a tour in the next college they're going to go after this one. And no matter what grade level, this is how people will continue to learn in the future. It's quite a departure from the old world of textbooks. In our area that we are looking is IoT, And as YY already elaborated, we are clearly learning from our own processes around how we improve our supply chain and manufacturing and how we improve also retail experience and warehousing, and we are working with some of the largest companies in the world on pilots, on deploying IoT solutions to make their businesses, their processes, and their businesses, you know, more competitive, and some of them you can see in the demo environment. Lenovo itself already is managing 55 million devices in an IoT fashion connecting to our own cloud, and constantly improving the experience by learning from the behavior of these devices in an IoT way, and we are collecting significant amount of data to really improve the performance of these systems and our future generations of products on a ongoing base. We have a very strong partnership with a company called ADLINK from Taiwan that is one of the leading manufacturers of manufacturing PC and hardened devices to create solutions on the IoT platform. The next area that we are very actively investing in is commercial augmented reality. I believe augmented reality has by far more opportunity in commercial than virtual reality, because it has the potential to ultimately improve every single business process of commercial customers. Imagine in the future how complex surgeries can be simplified by basically having real-time augmented reality information about the surgery, by having people connecting into a virtual surgery, and supporting the surgery around the world. Visit a furniture store in the future and see how this furniture looks in your home instantly. Doing some maintenance on some devices yourself by just calling the company and getting an online manual into an augmented reality device. Lenovo is exploring all kinds of possibilities, and you will see a solution very soon from Lenovo. Early when we talked about smart office, I talked about the importance of creating a software platform that really run all these use cases for a smart office. We are creating a similar platform for augmented reality where companies can develop and run all their argumented reality use cases. So you will see that early in 2019 we will announce an augmented reality device, as well as an augmented reality platform. So, I know you're very interested on what exactly we are rolling out, so we will have a first prototype view available there. It's still a codename project on the horizon, and we will announce it ultimately in 2019, but I think it's good for you to take a look what we are doing here. So, I just wanted to give you a peek on what we are working beyond smart office and the device productivity in terms of really how we make businesses smarter. It's really about increasing productivity, providing you the most secure solutions, increase workplace collaboration, increase IT efficiency, using new computing devices and software and services to make business smarter in the future. There's no other company that will enable to offer what we do in commercial. No company has the breadth of commercial devices, software solutions, and the same data center capabilities, and no other company can do more for your intelligent transformation than Lenovo. Thank you very much. (audience applauding) >> Thanks mate, give me that. I need that. Alright, ladies and gentlemen, we are done. So firstly, I've got a couple of little housekeeping pieces at the end of this and then we can go straight into going and experiencing some of the technology we've got on the left-hand side of the room here. So, I want to thank Christian obviously. Christian, awesome as always, some great announcements there. I love the P1. I actually like the Aston Martin a little bit better, but I'll take either if you want to give me one for free. I'll take it. We heard from YY obviously about the industry and how the the fourth Industrial Revolution is impacting us all from a digital transformation perspective, and obviously Kirk on DCG, the great NetApp announcement, which is going to be really exciting, actually that Twitter and some of the social media panels are absolutely going crazy, so it's good to see that the industry is really taking some impact. Some of the publications are really great, so thank you for the media who are obviously in the room publishing right no. But now, I really want to say it's all of your turn. So, all of you up the back there who are having coffee, it's your turn now. I want everyone who's sitting down here after this event move into there, and really take advantage of the 15 breakouts that we've got set there. There are four breakout sessions from a time perspective. I want to try and get you all out there at least to use up three of them and use your fourth one to get out and actually experience some of the technology. So, you've got four breakout sessions. A lot of the breakout sessions are actually done twice. If you have not downloaded the app, please download the app so you can actually see what time things are going on and make sure you're registering correctly. There's a lot of great experience of stuff out there for you to go do. I've got one quick video to show you on some of the technology we've got and then we're about to close. Alright, here we are acting crazy. Now, you can see obviously, artificial intelligence machine learning in the browser. God, I hate that dance, I'm not a Millenial at all. It's effectively going to be implemented by healthcare. I want you to come around and test that out. Look at these two guys. This looks like a Lenovo management meeting to be honest with you. These two guys are actually concentrating, using their brain power to race each others in cars. You got to come past and give that a try. Give that a try obviously. Fantastic event here, lots of technology for you to experience, and great partners that have been involved as well. And so, from a Lenovo perspective, we've had some great alliance partners contribute, including obviously our number one partner, Intel, who's been a really big loyal contributor to us, and been a real part of our success here at Transform. Excellent, so please, you've just seen a little bit of tech out there that you can go and play with. I really want you, I mean go put on those black things, like Scott Hawkins our chief marketing officer from Lenovo's DCG business was doing and racing around this little car with his concentration not using his hands. He said it's really good actually, but as soon as someone comes up to speak to him, his car stops, so you got to try and do better. You got to try and prove if you can multitask or not. Get up there and concentrate and talk at the same time. 62 different breakouts up there. I'm not going to go into too much detai, but you can see we've got a very, very unusual numbering system, 18 to 18.8. I think over here we've got a 4849. There's a 4114. And then up here we've got a 46.1 and a 46.2. So, you need the decoder ring to be able to understand it. Get over there have a lot of fun. Remember the boat leaves today at 4:00 o'clock, right behind us at the pier right behind us here. There's 400 of us registered. Go onto the app and let us know if there's more people coming. It's going to be a great event out there on the Hudson River. Ladies and gentlemen that is the end of your keynote. I want to thank you all for being patient and thank all of our speakers today. Have a great have a great day, thank you very much. (audience applauding) (upbeat music) ♪ Ba da bop bop bop ♪ ♪ Ba da bop bop bop ♪ ♪ Ba da bop bop bop ♪ ♪ Ba da bop bop bop ♪ ♪ Ba da bop bop bop ♪ ♪ Ba da bop bop bop ♪ ♪ Ba da bop bop bop ba do ♪

>> From Santa Clara, California, in the heart of Silicon Valley, it's theCUBE covering Technovation's World Pitch 2018. Now, here's Sonia Tagare. >> Hi, welcome back. I'm Sonia Tagare here with theCUBE in Santa Clara, California covering Technovation's World Pitch Summit 2018. A pitch competition in which girls develop apps in order to create positive change in the world. This week 12 finalist teams are competing for their chance to win the coveted gold or silver scholarships. With us today from Mexico we have Edutec and they're consisted of Miriam, Angelica, Luna, and Medina. We have then Luzdhy Huerta and Citalli Ruiz Puga, Ivana Michelle Orozco Lopez, Cesar Valdez, Consuelo Sarahi Checa Navarro, and Vanessa Dinorah Perez Ramirez. Congratulations and welcome to theCUBE. >> Thank you. >> So your app, Care For Me, tell us more about that. >> Who wants to tell? Well, this application, Care For Me, is an app that is focused on the caregiver of a patient with Alzheimer. That normally turns out one person in the family. So during the process of the Alzheimer disease, it's a very difficult situation for all the family. But when they developed the application, they started thinking of the caregiver because sometimes they lost in all the disease. So they developed the application so the caregiver has more support and tools in order to provide very good care for the patient, and as well for themselves. >> And what was the inspiration to create this app? >> Somebody wants to answer that? What is the inspiration? >> My teammate Tivana had a grandma who suffered this disease, so we inspire in this case. >> Well, that's wonderful that you're doing that, and I'm sure it's going to help a lot of people. So what made you join Technovation? (speaks in foreign language) >> Let me just translate it? >> Sure. >> They knew about Technovation because an invitation from the university that we all belong that is (speaks in foreign language). And they mentioned that there were some courses about technology, especially for the science mobile application. (speaks in foreign language) >> Then they mentioned when the course was starting, they informed what is Technovation about, and they know that they have to develop an application with a social impact, so they have to attack some problematic they see in their communities. And then they get very excited to help people, to help another. And at that time, that's where they knew each other because they didn't previously know each other before the competition. >> So how did you all meet? And how did you decide to make this team? (speaks in foreign language) >> So the course is offered by the University of Guadalajara. We offer app inventor and marketing, we brought some experts after some courses. Roughly December, the girls all got together, they didn't know each other, and they decided to form a team, and we're here now, right? (laughs) >> And what are you most excited about for this competition? (speaks in foreign language) (speaks in foreign language) >> She's saying that... Sorry. She's saying that the most exciting about all this and working together is about the opportunity to help other people, and have an impact, and that's why they enjoy working together. >> That's so inspiring. So how do you think Technovation is helping the larger girls in tech conversation? (speaks in foreign language) (speaks in foreign language) >> She's saying that the most impact that they have about these kind of programs is about getting all the fears that you think you have that may be stopping from doing something, so you have to believe that you can to solve all these fears. >> That's awesome. (laughs) So who do you think is the team to beat? Who's the competition? (speaks in foreign language) (speaks in foreign language) >> I think the focus of Technovation is to not pit girls against each other, but to work on themselves and on their project, and hope for the best, I guess. (laughs) >> That's a wonderful perspective to have on this. I want to thank you all so much for being on theCUBE, and congratulations on becoming a finalist, and good luck on your pitch tomorrow. >> Thank you. >> We're here at Technovation's World Pitch Summit 2018 here in Santa Clara, California. Stay tuned for more. (upbeat music)

>> Announcer: Live, from Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, it's theCUBE covering Women in Data Science Conference 2018, brought to you by Stanford. (light techno music) >> Welcome back to theCUBE's continuing coverage of the Women in Data Science event, WiDS 2018. We are live at Stanford University. You can hear some great buzz around us. A lot of these exciting ladies in data science are here around us. I'm pleased to be joined by my next guest, Bhavani Thuraisingham, who is one of the speakers this afternoon, as well as a distinguished professor of computer science and the executive director of Cyber Security Institute at the University of Texas at Dallas. Bhavani, thank you so much for joining us. >> Thank you very much for having me in your program. >> You have an incredible career, but before we get into that I'd love to understand your thoughts on WiDS. In it's third year alone, they're expecting to reach over 100,000 people today, both here at Stanford, as well as more than 150 regional events in over 50 countries. When you were early in your career you didn't have a mentor. What does an event like WiDS mean to you? What are some of the things that excite you about giving your time to this exciting event? >> This is such an amazing event and just in three years it has just grown and I'm just so motivated myself and it's just, words cannot express to see so many women working in data science or wanting to work in data science, and not just in U.S. and in Stanford, it's around the world. I was reading some information about WiDS and I'm finding that there are WiDS ambassadors in Africa, South America, Asia, Australia, Europe, of course U.S., Central America, all over the world. And data science is exploding so rapidly because data is everywhere, right? And so you really need to collect the data, stow the data, analyze the data, disseminate the data, and for that you need data scientists. And what I'm so encouraged is that when I started getting into this field back in 1985, and that was 32 plus years ago in the fall, I worked 50% in cyber security, what used to be called computer security, and 50% in data science, what used to be called data management at the time. And there were so few women and we did not have, as I said, women role models, and so I had to sort of work really hard, the commercial industry and then the MITRE Corporation and the U.S. Government, but slowly I started building a network and my strongest supporters have been women. And so that was sort of in the early 90's when I really got started to build this network and today I have a strong support group of women and we support each other and we also mentor so many of the junior women and so that, you know, they don't go through, have to learn the hard way like I have and so I'm very encouraged to see the enthusiasm, the motivation, both the part of the mentors as well as the mentees, so that's very encouraging but we really have to do so much more. >> We do, you're right. It's really kind of the tip of the iceberg, but I think this scale at which WiDS has grown so quickly shines a massive spotlight on there's clearly such a demand for it. I'd love to get a feel now for the female undergrads in the courses that you teach at UT Dallas. What are some of the things that you are seeing in terms of their beliefs in themselves, their interests in data science, computer science, cyber security. Tell me about that dynamic. >> Right, so I have been teaching for 13 plus years full-time now, after a career in industry and federal research lab and government and I find that we have women, but still not enough. But just over the last 13 years I'm seeing so much more women getting so involved and wanting to further their careers, coming and talking to me. When I first joined in 2004 fall, there weren't many women, but now with programs like WiDS and I also belong to another conference and actually I shared that in 2016, called WiCyS, Women in Cyber Security. So, through these programs, we've been able to recruit more women, but I would still have to say that most of the women, especially in our graduate programs are from South Asia and East Asia. We hardly find women from the U.S., right, U.S. born women pursuing careers in areas like cyber security and to some extent I would also say data science. And so we really need to do a lot more and events like WiDS and WiCys, and we've also started a Grace Lecture Series. >> Grace Hopper. >> We call it Grace Lecture at our university. Of course there's Grace Hopper, we go to Grace Hopper as well. So through these events I think that, you know women are getting more encouraged and taking leadership roles so that's very encouraging. But I still think that we are really behind, right, when you compare men and women. >> Yes and if you look at the statistics. So you have a speaking session this afternoon. Share with our audience some of the things that you're going to be sharing with the audience and some of the things that you think you'll be able to impart, in terms of wisdom, on the women here today. >> Okay, so, what I'm going to do is that, first start off with some general background, how I got here so I've already mentioned some of it to you, because it's not just going to be a U.S. event, you know, it's going to be in Forbes reports that around 100,000 people are going to watch this event from all over the world so I'm going to sort of speak to this global audience as to how I got here, to motivate these women from India, from Nigeria, from New Zealand, right? And then I'm going to talk about the work I've done. So over the last 32 years I've said about 50% of my time has been in cyber security, 50% in data science, roughly. Sometimes it's more in cyber, sometimes more in data. So my work has been integrating the two areas, okay? So my talk, first I'm going to wear my data science hat, and as a data scientist I'm developing data science techniques, which is integration of statistical reasoning, machine learning, and data management. So applying data science techniques for cyber security applications. What are these applications? Intrusion detection, insider threat detection, email spam filtering, website fingerprinting, malware analysis, so that's going to be my first part of the talk, a couple of charts. But then I'm going to wear my cyber security hat. What does that mean? These data science techniques could be hacked. That's happening now, there are some attacks that have been published where the data science, the models are being thwarted by the attackers. So you can do all the wonderful data science in the world but if your models are thwarted and they go and do something completely different, it's going to be of no use. So I'm going to wear my cyber security hat and I'm going to talk about how we are taking the attackers into consideration in designing our data science models. It's not easy, it's extremely challenging. We are getting some encouraging results but it doesn't mean that we have solved the problem. Maybe we will never solve the problem but we want to get close to it. So this area called Adversarial Machine Learning, it started probably around five years ago, in fact our team has been doing some really good work for the Army, Army research office, on Adversarial Machine Learning. And when we started, I believe it was in 2012, almost six years ago, there weren't many people doing this work, but now, there are more and more. So practically every cyber security conference has got tracks in data science machine learning. And so their point of view, I mean, their focus is not, sort of, designing machine learning techniques. That's the area of data scientists. Their focus is going to be coming up with appropriate models that are going to take the attackers into consideration. Because remember, attackers are always trying to thwart your learning process. >> Right, we were just at Fortinet Accelerate last week, theCUBE was, and cyber security and data science are such interesting and pervasive topics, right, cyber security things when Equifax happened, right, it suddenly translates to everyone, male, female, et cetera. And the same thing with data science in terms of the social impact. I'd love your thoughts on how cyber security and data science, how you can educate the next generation and maybe even reinvigorate the women that are currently in STEM fields to go look at how much more open and many more opportunities there are for women to make massive impact socially. >> There are, I would say at this time, unlimited opportunities in both areas. Now, in data science it's really exploding because every company wants to do data science because data gives them the edge. But what's the point in having raw data when you cannot analyze? That's why data science is just exploding. And in fact, most of our graduate students, especially international students, want to focus in data science. So that's one thing. Cyber security is also exploding because every technology that is being developed, anything that has a microprocessor could be hacked. So, we can do all the great data science in the world but an attacker can thwart everything, right? And so cyber security is really crucial because you have to try and stop the attacker, or at least detect what the attacker is doing. So every step that you move forward you're going to be attacked. That doesn't mean you want to give up technology. One could say, okay, let's just forget about Facebook, and Google, and Amazon, and the whole lot and let's just focus on cyber security but we cannot. I mean we have to make progress in technology. Whenever we make for progress in technology, driver-less cars or pacemakers, these technologies could be attacked. And with cyber security there is such a shortage with the U.S. Government. And so we have substantial funding from the National Science Foundation to educate U.S. citizen students in cyber security. And especially recruit more women in cyber security. So that's why we're also focusing, we are a permanent coach here for the women in cyber security event. >> What have some of the things along that front, and I love that, that you think are key to successfully recruiting U.S. females into cyber security? What do you think speaks to them? >> So, I think what speaks to them, and we have been successful in recent years, this program started in 2010 for us, so it's about eight years. The first phase we did not have women, so 2000 to 2014, because we were trying to get this education program going, giving out the scholarships, then we got our second round of funding, but our program director said, look, you guys have done a phenomenal job in having students, educating them, and placing them with U.S. Government, but you have not recruited female students. So what we did then is to get some of our senior lecturers, a superb lady called Dr. Janelle Stratch, she can really speak to these women, so we started the Grace Lecture. And so with those events, and we started the women in cyber security center as part of my cyber security institute. Through these events we were able to recruit more women. We are, women are still under-represented in our cyber security program but still, instead of zero women, I believe now we have about five women, and that's, five, by the time we will have finished a second phase we will have total graduated about 50 plus students, 52 to 55 students, out of which, I would say about eight would be female. So from zero to go to eight is a good thing, but it's not great. >> We want to keep going, keep growing that. >> We want out of 50 we should get at least 25. But at least it's a start for us. But data science we don't have as much of a problem because we have lots of international students, remember you don't need U.S. citizenship to get jobs at Facebook or, but you need U.S. citizenships to get jobs as NSA or CIA. So we get many international students and we have more women and I would say we have, I don't have the exact numbers, but in my classes I would say about 30%, maybe just under 30%, female, which is encouraging but still it's not good. >> 30% now, right, you're right, it's encouraging. What was that 13 years ago when you started? >> When I started, before data science and everything it was more men, very few women. I would say maybe about 10%. >> So even getting to 30% now is a pretty big accomplishment. >> Exactly, in data science, but we need to get our cyber security numbers up. >> So last question for you as we have about a minute left, what are some of the things that excite you about having the opportunity, to not just mentor your students, but to reach such a massive audience as you're going to be able to reach through WiDS? >> I, it's as I said, words cannot express my honor and how pleased and touched, these are the words, touched I am to be able to talk to so many women, and I want to say why, because I'm of, I'm a tamil of Sri Lanka origin and so I had to make a journey, I got married and I'm going to talk about, at 20, in 1975 and my husband was finishing, I was just finishing my undergraduate in mathematics and physics, my husband was finishing his Ph.D. at University of Cambridge, England, and so soon after marriage, at 20 I moved to England, did my master's and Ph.D., so I joined University of Bristol and then we came here in 1980, and my husband got a position at New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Center and so New Mexico Tech offered me a tenure-track position but my son was a baby and so I turned it down. Once you do that, it's sort of hard to, so I took visiting faculty positions for three years in New Mexico then in Minneapolis, then I was a senior software developer at Control Data Corporation it was one of the big companies. Then I had a lucky break in 1985. So I wanted to get back into research because I liked development but I wanted to get back into research. '85 I became, I was becoming in the fall, a U.S. citizen. Honeywell got a contract to design and develop a research contract from United States Air Force, one of the early secure database systems and Honeywell had to interview me and they had to like me, hire me. All three things came together. That was a lucky break and since then my career has been just so thankful, so grateful. >> And you've turned that lucky break by a lot of hard work into what you're doing now. We thank you so much for stopping. >> Thank you so much for having me, yes. >> And sharing your story and we're excited to hear some of the things you're going to speak about later on. So have a wonderful rest of the conference. >> Thank you very much. >> We wanted to thank you for watching theCUBE. Again, we are live at Stanford University at the third annual Women in Data Science Conference, #WiDs2018, I am Lisa Martin. After this short break I'll be back with my next guest. Stick around. (light techno music)

>> Announcer: Live from Orlando, Florida, it's theCUBE! Covering Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing. Brought to you buy SiliconANGLE Media. >> Welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of the Grace Hopper conference here in Orlando, Florida. I'm your host, Rebecca Knight, along with my cohost, Jeff Frick. We're joined by Dr. Deborah Berebichez. She is the chief data scientist at Metis, which is owned by Kaplan. Thanks so much for joining us. >> Thank you, Rebecca. Thanks for inviting me, too. >> You have had such an interesting and varied professional career. You were even a host of a lot of different science-oriented television programs. You work on initiatives to get young women into technology. But one of the things that is most impressive is that you were the first Mexican woman to ever earn her PhD in physics-- >> Deborah: In physics, at Stanford. >> From Stanford University. What an accomplishment. But talk a little bit about your path to Stanford. Tell our viewers a little bit more about your trajectory. >> It's definitely a convoluted, and not a typical path. I grew up in Mexico City in a conservative community that discouraged girls and young women from pursuing a career in the hard sciences. I was told from a very young age that physics was for geniuses, and that I had better pick a more feminine path, like communications or something else, which were great careers, but they were not the right ones for a very inquisitive mind like mine. When I confessed to my mom in high school that I loved physics and math, she said, "Don't tell the boys, "because you'll intimidate them, "and you may not be able to get married." >> Rebecca: Nonsense! >> Actually, it's funny, because that kind of overt bias is sometimes easier to combat than the one that more women experience, which is a more subtle bias. You know, that the media tells us that some things are for boys and for women. So, in my case, it was very open, and so it almost gave me more courage to try to fight against it. Anyways, so, it came time to pick what career, what BA to do in college, and I was told by the advisors in school that philosophy was a more feminine and acceptable path, but it also asked a lot of questions about the universe. So, I enrolled in a local college in Mexico City to study philosophy, but the more I tried to stifle my love for physics and math, the more that inner voice was screaming, "This is your path. "You have to do it, you have to study physics." Just like a lot of kids do their rebellious things behind their parents' back, I would go and rent from the library books about obscure physicists like Tycho Brahe, this Danish astronomer who was locked up in a tower, and I was thinking, I'll be just like him, kind of antisocial, nobody will like me, but at least I'll have my data, my numbers, to keep me company. >> Rebecca: This was your teenage rebellion, is reading about brooding philosophers? >> Well, there other-- >> Okay. >> In the middle of my BA in philosophy in Mexico, I decided to apply to universities in the US to give it a chance, and give myself the opportunity to pursue both BAs, physics and philosophy. I was very fortunate to get a full scholarship to attend Brandeis University, and I say that because, in Mexico, universities are about eight times less expensive than in the US, so I could have not afford to go anywhere else. While at Brandeis, I took the courage to take a very general course in astronomy. Very little math, introductory course, and there I met the teaching assistant, who was a graduate student by the name of Roopesh. He was from India. Roopesh and I became good friends, and he told me that I wasn't the typical student that just wanted to get an A in the class and do the homework well, that my curiosity had no end. That I would ask questions about quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics, and I wanted to know everything about the universe and nature. So, one time, we were walking in Harvard Square, and I realized that I was the only one who could make my dream of becoming a physicist happen. With teary eyes, I told Roopesh, "I don't want to die without trying. "I just don't want to die without trying to do physics." He called his advisor on a payphone. He was the head of the graduate student committee, so he called me to Brandeis. He handed me a book called Div, Grad and Curl, Vector Calculus in Three Dimensions. For me, it was an alien language. He said to me, "There's a problem, "because the BA in physics takes four years, "and your scholarship is only for two years. "But guess what, someone else has done this at Brandeis. "His name is Ed Witten. "Do you know who he is? "He switched from history to physics." I said, "You're kidding. "Ed Witten is a very famous physicist, "the father of string theory. "Clearly, there's no way I could pull this off." He says to me, "I give you two months this summer. "If, by the end of the summer, "you pass a test on this one book, "I'll let you skip through "the first two years of the physics major "so you can complete the BA in only two years." Roopesh decided to mentor me and tutor me 10 hours a day for eight weeks. I tell the story of Roopesh because I always wanted to pay him back. He said to me, when he was growing up in India, in Darjeeling, there was an old man who would teach him and his sisters the tabla, the musical instrument, English, and math. And when they wanted to pay him back, the old man said, "No, the only way you could ever pay me back "is if you do this with someone else in the world." That's how my mission in life started, to inspire, encourage, and help other, especially women, but minorities who, like myself, want a career in STEM, but for some reason, whether it be financial or social, feel that they cannot achieve their dreams. >> Great story. >> Yeah, wow! Incredible! >> And then, you asked about Stanford. So, then I went back to Mexico, and I was doing a Master's in theoretical physics, and I was again told by my community, "Okay, you've got it over with. "Stay here, get married and stay as part of the community." But I was still more hungry for knowledge, and to do more physics. I was very late in the application cycle, and I decided to apply to schools. I went to my Mexican advisor's office, and I said, "You know, I'm going to leave again. "I'd like to go to the US where I can pursue experiments. "I wrote to a couple of professors." He says, "Who did you write to?" I say, "Well, there's one particularly interesting one, "Steve Chu at Stanford." His jaw dropped. He said, "Steve Chu?" I said, "Yes, why?" He said, "Do you realize he just won the Nobel Prize "a couple of months ago?" And Steve Chu later became Secretary of Energy in the US. I was so fortunate that he received my email with interest, invited me to work directly with him at Stanford. That's how my career started. >> It's such a good mix of fortuitousness, serendipity, but also doggedness on your part, so, really, there's a lot going on. >> Don't be shy, is my-- >> This gets to our final question, really, which is, what's your advice for the younger versions of you? >> The first thing is that it was not all easy for me. There was a lot of failure along the way. My first advice is, the people who get to the end of the line and succeed in life are not the ones that simply persevere and get everything right. They're the ones that keep getting up and succeeding step after step. It's the courage to get to the end and persevere even when failure exists. The second piece of advice, especially for parents out there, is when your kids ask questions about the world and nature, don't just give them the answer. Go through the pleasure of finding things out, as Feynman would say. Especially with computing. Computers are a tool, a magnificent tool. But they're just a tool to another goal, which is to gain insights about the world. It's more important to be a critical thinker and a thought leader, rather than just focus on being proficient at coding. >> You had the element of humor, you had the element of storytelling, you had the element of everyday things in the way, 'cause you're obviously a super smart lady to accomplish these things. Not everybody's so super smart, so you've created a style in which you can help those that aren't maybe necessarily PhDs from Stanford to gain interest, to become interested, to kind of hook 'em into this interesting world that you're so passionate about. >> Yeah, thank you. I try to do it through my TV show that I cohost with The Science Channel called Outrageous Acts of Science, which serves exactly that purpose, to get people interested in the fact that science and STEM is behind everyday life. It's not just some complicated equation in a board. It's what we go through every day, and if you just gain the joy of discovering those concepts, you're set. >> Great. Well, Deborah, thank you so much for joining us. It's been so much fun talking to you. >> Thank you. I loved being here. >> I'm Rebecca Knight for Jeff Frick. We will have more from Grace Hopper just after this. (fast techno music)

>> Narrator: Live from Las Vegas, it's the Cube, covering Dell EMC world 2017 Brought to you by Dell EMC. >> Welcome back to Dell E, Dell EMC world, I'm your host Rebecca Knight along with my co-host Keith Townsend. We are joined by Fernando Thompson. He is the CIO of University of the Americas, Puebla, Mexico. Thanks so much for joining us, Fernando. >> Thanks Rebecca, to you. >> So I want you to just set the scene a little bit for our viewers and talk a little bit about some of the biggest technology problems you were facing on your campus. >> Well, Universidad de las Américas Puebla is in the state of Puebla. We have around, less than 10,000 students. We have 1,000 employees. And we are full dedicated to research and development. And also bachelor's degrees. I used to work for the federal government and also for the private sector in television and entertainment. But I have never been in such a huge challenge, like, in a university because, you know, it is, it is so difficult to implement the governance but at the same time the freedom and, if you think, well for instance, when, when is a period of time where, where more appears in the world, it's on vacations where the students of the universities have enough time to build that kind of thing. Not very creative people, so in, in the sense that, well we live in an environment where you have to deal, to deliver technology, to protect to millennials that doesn't want to be protected and also, you know, they always ask for more services, no? And now is coming the generation C, so, it's going to be real tough for the next years. >> So, so, so set the scene and talk to us about the kinds of things that you are trying to deliver. Better products, better speed, better services to both students, perspective students, faculty and staff. Talk about what some of the needs were. >> Well, we have to think that, actually, technology is very important in the university because we have to prepare our students to give them the tools to face the future. The world is changing. And, in Mexico right now, we have a huge challenge because we're competing against China, Brazil, and India. We used to have an advantage with, with the price, and people that is very well prepared and with their salaries, but not any longer. So, we have to give this advantage to our students. So, nine years ago, when I arrived to university, for instance, we have the subscription system, and it was awful, no? Because it was very slow with the performance and not very reliable, so the people was really complaining, no? Because we're a private, private university. You always suspect, you know, good performance for a private university. And especially in subscription where your main customer, that is a student. So, we start to work to fix the main system and it take us years, years, no? So, we passed through availability and relability but bad performance. Now, performance, but since we implement XtremIO and we changed our data center with Dell products, this very year, in, in, in the spring, in the spring semester, we make a huge change cause the subscription system now became, you know, one of the biggest transformation tools in the service for the students. What happened was that, during the subscription, we announced on a special day, and a special hour, 8:30, and if you are okay with your administrative stuff and qualifications, you can get into the system and subscribe. Four years ago, that takes, like, one hour or 45 minutes. But with the change that we made, now it is a matter of two minutes. So-- >> Wow. It was a change of 100 degrees, no? What happened was that, yes, we changed the application, but also, you know, with this Flash technology, we use it because at the end, what we want to make was, you know, to impact to the student, in order that they can receive the schedule. He can take faster decisions. They move very fast with their computers and with their devices, so they needed the applications, so, we build it, we test it, and it worked fantastic. And let me tell you something, no? How I measure, I don't have a business analytic tool or a business intelligence tool. What I have was, you know, access to Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat. And, man, they gave us such a compliment, no? Like, hey TI finally did something well for us also and it was thousands of comments, no? >> Members was waiting. >> A lot of thumbs up. >> Yeah, yeah. Members was waiting, you know, to attack us, like, you shall not pass, and stuff like that. Like past years. But not this year. So, it was, it was, it was a successful story and now we are thinking to implement all these changes that we made in an ordered space itself, of the university. >> So let's talk about that a little bit. So that's, I think, is a great example of digital transformation. I don't need to ask you if you believe in digital transformation. That was a digital transformation to your business. Specifically, I'm interested in research. What type of research does the university do and how does your group play a role in enabling that? >> Yeah, basically, for instance, we have four programs of PSD with specialization in technology and also in environment, no? One of the top challenge that we are facing in Latin America. So we have to supply the technology that our researchers need. And it has to be at the same level of the United States. We belong to the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools in the United States. So, it's not United States soil, but we belong to that association. >> Reporter: So you have the same SLEs? >> Yeah, basically, basically, you know? And we have to supply, you know, all the bandwidth and performance because they're discussing, at the same time, with people in Texas or Wisconsin or Alaska or Brazil and they need, you know, for instance, high-performance computing, storage, cloud tools, and for them, have to be, you know, pretty clear and transparent. What I mean is that they don't care, and they don't have to care about where it's working, of it is expensive or not, no? Do you have, do you have to supply what they need? Let me give you an example. For instance, a fractal. If you send the information of a fractal, we don't have a super-computer in our university, but we have a deal with another university and they have this super-computer. So, what we do is to supply the connection of the computer to send information and to receive information immediately, in order than the graphic can have information in real time. And people are taking decision in different parts of the, of the country with that information that we're sending. Sometimes, could be, you know, if we're facing a hurricane or we're going to have a problem with water or if we want to avoid, you know, you know, something that can happen with an earthquake or something like that. And with that kind of information, now, our researchers certainly can know what is happening. So, we give the info, we give the technology for them. We make a mixture between cloud-computing services and also our data center. Then that a wonderful tool because with XtremIO and with our new servers, if you can go to our new data center, you will realize that it's only Dell and EMC right there, no? And something funny is that we have a wonderful data center, but to be honest with you, we only use, right now, only three racks. So, the space that we are using right now with this new disk is, the space that we are saving is amazing, no? Because if you can, if you can see our racks, you will see that we have, for instance, Clarion, and DMX and another technology. Right now, we shut down all those racks. And right now, we are using just like, 40 inches of disk. And, man, you know, I have more performance, I have savings on air, savings on electricity. The people think then, right, we are having, you know, more space with more racks and more this. But not any longer. So, I think what is going to happen with Dell and EMC in the future, I think that they are going to deliver, for instance, 100 terabytes in just in a USB or something like that, it's the future. So, there's not going to be need over that, that's good, no? >> Hit it on the head of a, on the head of a pin. >> Yeah. >> Fernando, thank you so much for joining us. >> No, thank you to you. Thank you Rebecca, thank you. >> I'm Rebecca Knight for Keith Townsen. We will have more from Dell EMC world after this. (progressive music)

>> Narrator: Live from Boston, Massachusetts, it's The Cube, covering Red Hat Summit 2017, brought to you by Red Hat. >> Welcome back to The Cube's coverage of the Red Hat Summit here in Boston, Massachusetts. I'm your host, Rebecca Knight, along with my cohost, Stu Miniman. We are joined by Kirk Skaugen, he is the Executive Vice President and President of Lenovo Data Center group, Lenovo. So thanks so much for joining us, Kirk. >> Thanks for having me. >> I want to start out by talking about Lenovo's commitment to open source, right. We're hearing a lot about this in this summit, It's the real deal! >> Yeah, well I was at for 24 years and had a long partnership with Red Hat there so as I moved over to Lenovo on that, open source is a key aspect of our strategy. Kind of foundational for us and where we sit with the days in our company, because we don't have this legacy. We're not someone who's trying to protect an old router business or an old storage business. So as we look at open source as part of our, kind of, open partnerships commitment, it's pretty foundational to what we're doing. >> Kirk, could you help us unpack that a little bit? We heard in Keynote this morning they talked about open source hardware. I know you guys have been involved in OCP. How much is software, how much is hardware? Where do you guys put commitment in? How much of it is partners? >> Yeah, so I think we're in about over 30 different standards bodies now committed to open source. It really happened after our acquisition of the IBM xSeries server business, so now we're the third largest x86 server provider in the world and we're expanding ahead in the data center, so we're participating about 30 standards bodies. We have about 12 open source projects going on with Red Hat, and we're really at the base level, announcing today something called Open Platform at Lenovo. It's something we said we would do a year ago at this conference, and now here at the Red Hat summit we're showing it in our booth actually there. It's a base open platform with an optimized stack which you can put NFE and other solutions on top of, so that's one example of things we said we were going to do a year ago today and then are doing today. It's really about, from our perspective, optimizing the base hardware for all these platforms. >> Interesting, we look at things. I hear people look at open source and there's more transparency. It's not like '08; there's a secret project we're working on and here it is. You worked at Intel. Everybody kind of understood the tick-tock that went on there, how does open source influence the planing that you guys go into and do you feel the road maps at a company like Lenovo are more transparent since you're part of open source? I mean, again, what you should expect from us is we're a leader in x86 system technology but we've also acquired assets like blade network technologies in the past as well. We're expanding as a company out of our server routes into networking and storage. We think containerization is going to be the future. Today we're sitting with, something like 32 world record benchmarks and our theme is kind of "different is better" which means it's the little things that we're doing with all these partners to tune out the best performance of these systems working with our partners. We're not trying to go far up the stack and compete with our partners. I think that makes us a little bit unique. We're in trying to be the best x86 system provider in the world. Expand that into storage and networking as we get the software defined. >> Great, and absolutely. It would be useful to kind of explain your role in the data center group itself. As you said, you've got in some pieces. >> Some came from the IBM, there's various acquisitions. >> Kirk: Mmmhmm. >> Lay out a little bit more of what you guys do and what your partner does. >> Sure, so I think a lot of people know Lenovo as being number one in PCs. This is the 25th year of ThinkPad and we look at our Think Server brand today and our X series brand that we acquired from IBM. >> So we're, again, the third largest server provider but expanding that into storage and networking and then we acquired the Motorola phone business, so we just crossed to be number four in the world outside of China, with a presence in India. So we basically have three businesses within Lenovo but Data Center group, we believe, is a big growth driver for the future. A lot of people I think, 25 years ago, would have never thought Lenovo would be number one in PCs worldwide. I think we're kind of sitting there as a server provider with number one in customer satisfaction, number one in server reliability, number one in quality by all these third party measures. Our biggest issue is people don't realize we acquired this amazing asset from IBM so we're here at the summit basically showing and promoting our brand, but also promoting the proof points underneath that. >> This event is very global, multicultural. Lenovo's also a global company. Maybe speak a little bit to that; where your teams live, where development happens and what your customer base looks like. >> I live in Raleigh. We have a dual headquarters in Raleigh and Beijing, but we operate in over 160 countries. We have over 10,000 IT professionals now within the data center group. We have manufacturing in the United States, in Mexico, in Hungary, in China, so we can basically globally ship everywhere. When I looked at moving from Intel to another company, number one this enabled me to get one step closer to the customer, but I thought Lenovo's one of the best companies I saw that we're partnering. I think in the data center group, you look at our list of partners and it's unprecedented partly because we don't have a legacy business, so almost every startup and everybody who wants to do something new ends up wanting access to our presence in China, being number one in China, but also because we're not protecting a legacy so they see us as someone interesting and unique to partnership with. So open source is one of those areas where I think, now that we separated from IBM we're clearly an x86 provider committed to open source and the way we're getting into telecom, where we hadn't been, and competing with our big customers is because we're open and ideally we're more agile and partner better. >> I'm wondering if you could comment on the culture of these culture of these various places. As you said, you've been in Portland for a long time. You're now new to Raleigh. Your company is Beijing and Raleigh and you do business all over the world. How do you experience how these engineers, are they different in different parts of the world? Or is open source really transcending that and there is a much more of an openness and a transparency? >> Yeah, I thought I'd fit really well into the Lenovo culture. I think six months into the job, I feel like it's exceeded my expectations. If you look at the executive staff at Lenovo there's something like seven different nationalities on there from Italy, and Switzerland, and Australia, and the U.S., and China, Hong Kong, Singapore, India. >> Rebecca: And that's by design. >> Yeah, by design. So I think it provides a really unique perspective as you're looking at market trends, and then customers and things like that. When you look at the engineering aspect of it I'm looking at this efficiencies of the PC, the cost economics of the PC, having some of these factors. We're actually one of the last companies who's designing our own systems and putting them in our own factory, so from that perspective we get the efficiencies of being part of a larger PC company, but listen, data center's very different, right? We have a completely autonomous data center group now but we get the efficiencies of that, so we can kind of get the best of all the cultures that we participate in with development in Romania, in India, in China, Raleigh and again, we can manufacture in any place the customer wants us to manufacture pretty much. >> You mentioned that you're one of the last companies that's designing your own systems and putting them into your machines. Is that going to go by the wayside? You're one of the last, so all these other companies have decided it's just not sustainable. Can you comment on that? >> Well I think consolidation is absolutely key. If you look at the PC industry, and I managed the PC business at Intel the last three years. There's absolutely been consolidation in that market. You should look at some of the Japanese suppliers going away, but that's what enabled Lenovo to continue to grow in a multi-hundred million unit market. Today we ship about 100 servers a minute. A hundred servers an hour, rather, about one a minute. If you look at the consolidation trends I think still going to be a lot of consolidation in the market around that, so we believe we can grow in that market. PCs through consolidation, and if the PC market flattens out, even in the data center space where I think there'll be fewer and fewer players that will be able to compete. It really gets down to just uber-efficiency. When you're running in a factory that's building as the number one PC company, you get manufacturing efficiencies that other people can't do at our subscale. So as an example, when we look at things like supercomputing we're now the fastest growing supercomputing company on the planet. 99 of the top 500 supercomputers. That's because we can build very, very efficient products in a market that typically runs on razor-thin margins, right. >> Kirk, we talk about that huge volume of servers. Can you speak to where Lenovo's playing in the service provider and cloud marketplace? >> Sure, I think we just reorganized into kind of, four customer-centric markets. So first is in hyperscale, we participate with Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent and we're expanding across some of the largest hyperscale providers in the West Coast. We believe designing our own board, putting in our own factories gives us the cost economics to compete with the largest data centers in the world, just 'cause we can make money in PC desktop towers which is a pretty commoditized business. We think we can make money there. Software-defined, I think what we're seeing is because of our lack of legacy hardware whether it's a legacy SAN or a legacy routing business, we can leap ahead there both through our own stack but also our partner's stack. Third is supercomputing, so this is something where we brought a lot of that application knowledge over from IBM to the acquisition, and our goal is to continue to be the fastest growing supercomputing company on the planet and right now we're number two in the world, so we're building our Barcelona supercomputer right now to be 12 times more powerful that what it is today. With the University of Adelaide, 30 times more powerful than their last computer. Supercomputing's the third, and then the fourth is just traditional data center. So there you look at things like SAP HANA, where we were solutions-lead. We're trying to not just ship the hardware, but deliver optimized solutons so we feel like the little things don't mean a lot, the little things mean everything. So why does Lenovo have 32 worldwide per benchmarks? 'Cause we're tuning things with SAP, and now, for example, SAP just went public that they're running their own internal HANA on Lenovo. So I think it's a testament, it's the fine tuning of the application. It's hyperscale, software-defined, supercomputing, and then legacy data center infrastructure lead by solutions. Those are our four segments. >> Kirk, you talked about, it was 25 years for ThinkPad. As I look out towards the future, the data center group, what's kind of the touchstone? What are people going to really understand and know that group for in the future? >> Well, I think we want to be most trusted from a data center provider, right. We're not trying to contain anyone in a legacy thinking. We want to leap ahead into software-defined. We think we have the base hardware, customer satisfaction, reliability to do that. So I think, number one, we want to be most trusted. Number two, we're trying to be incredibly agile. Much faster than companies that are larger than us. That's been an innovation culture that's lead us to be number one in PCs, not through cost, but through innovation. We want to be known for innovation and being faster to deploy innovation both with us, but as well was with our partners. So if you go into our both, you showcasing with Intel. We're showcasing with Juniper. We're showcasing with Red Hat. So that's a very decent foundation. I think we can leap ahead, not be encumbered by the past, and be trusted, innovative, cost-effective, and make a lead to software-defined. What's interesting to me is, I think when I joined Intel in 1992, there was something like 100 gigabytes a day. When I joined Lenovo 24 years later, it was like 250 million gigabytes a day of data, if I have my numbers correctly. It's going to leapfrog up just in a massive way over the next 10 years with 5G and the whole internet buildup so you hear that from almost every keynote speaker, but what it means to me is that, we're just at the beginning of cloud transformation. A company like Lenovo, we didn't invent the PC, we just became number one in it over 25 years. We didn't invent servers, but we acquired amazing people. They can then leap us ahead over the next, now, 25 years. (laughing) >> Well Kirk, thank you so much for joining us. Thank you for your time. >> Yeah. Thank you It's a pleasure, it's a great event. So thank you. >> I'm Rebecca Knight for Stu Miniman. We'll be more with the Red Hat summit after this. (electronic music)