(upbeat music) >> Hey welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. I wish I could give you my best John Miller impersonation but I'm just not that good. But we are at Oracle Park, home of the San Francisco Giants. We haven't really done a show here since 2014, so we're excited to be back. Pretty unique event, it's called Sports Tech Tokyo World Demo Day. About 25 companies representing about 100 different companies really demonstrating a bunch of cool technology that's used for sports as well as beyond sports, so we're excited to have one of the companies here who's demoing their software today, or their solution I should say. It's Albert Ng, he's the founder and CEO of Misapplied Sciences. Albert, great to see you. >> Great to see you, thank you for having me. >> So Misapplied Sciences. Now I want to hear about the debates on that name. So how did that come about? >> Yeah, so I used to work part time for Microsoft, at Microsoft Research, and one of the groups I worked for was called the Applied Sciences group. And so it was a little bit of a spin on that and it conveys the way that we come up with innovations at our company. We're a little bit more whimsical as a company that we take technologies that weren't intended for the ways that we apply them and so we misapply those technologies to create new innovations. >> Okay, so you're here today, you're showing a demo. So what is it? What is your technology all about? And what is the application in sports, and then we'll talk about beyond sports. >> Yeah, so Misapplied Sciences, we came up with a new display technology. Think like LED video wall, digital signage, that sort of display. But what's unique about our displays, is you can have a crowd of people, all looking at the same display at the same time, yet every single person sees something completely different. You don't need to have any special glasses or anything like that. You look at your displays with your naked eyes, except everyone gets their own personalized experience. >> Interesting. So how is that achieved? Obviously, we've all been on airplanes and we know privacy filters that people put on laptops so we know there's definitely some changes based on angle. Is it based on the angles that you're watching it? How do you accomplish that and is it completely different, or I just see a little bit of difference here, there, and in other places? >> Sure, so at the risk of sounding a little too technical, it's in the pixel technology that we developed itself. So each of our pixels can control the color of light that it sends in many different directions. So one time a single pixel can emit green light towards you, whereas red light towards the person sitting right next to you, so you perceive green, whereas the person right next to you perceives red at the same time. We can do that at a massive scale. So our pixels can control the color of light that they send between tens of thousands, up to a million different angles. So using our software, our processors on our back end, we can control what each of our pixels looks like from up to a million different angles. >> So how does it have an edge between a million points of a compass? That's got to be, obviously it's your secret sauce, but what's going on in layman's terms? >> Yeah, so it's a very sophisticated technology. It's a full stack technology, as we call it. So it's everything from new optics to new high performance computing. We had to develop our own custom processor to drive this. Computer vision, software user interfaces, everything. And so this is an innovation we can up with after four and a half years in stealth mode. So we started the company in late 2014, and we were all the way completely in stealth mode until middle of last year. So about four years just hardcore doing the development work, because the technology's very sophisticated. And I know when I say this, it does sound a little impossible, a little bit like science fiction, so we knew that. So now we have our first product coming on the market, our first public installation later next year and it's going to be really exciting. >> Great. So, obviously you're not going to have a million different feeds, 'cuz you have to have a different feed I would imagine, for each different view, 'cuz you designate this is the view from point A. This is the view from point B. Use feed A, use feed B. I assume you use something like that 'cuz obviously the controller's a big piece of the display. >> Exactly, so a lot of the technology underneath the hood is to reduce the calculations, or the rendering required from a normal computer, so you can actually drive our big displays that can control hundreds of different views using a normal PC, just using our platform. >> So what's the application. You know obviously it's cute and it's fun and I told you it's a dog, no it's a cat as you said, but what are some of the applications that you see in sports? What are you going to do in your first demo that you're putting out? >> Yeah, so what the technology enables is finally having personalized experiences when in a public environment, like a stadium, like an airport, like a shopping mall. So let me give an airport example. So imagine you go up to the giant flight board and instead of a list of a hundred flights, you see only your own flight information in big letters so you can see it from 50 feet away. You can have arrows that light your path towards your particular gate. The displays could let you know exactly how many minutes you have to board, and suggest places for you to eat and shop that are convenient for you. So the environment can be tailored just for you and you're not looking down at a smart phone, you're not wearing any special glasses to see everything that you want to see. So that ability to personalize a venue stretch, is to every single public venue, even in the stadium here, imagine the stadium knowing whether you're a home team fan or away team fan or your fantasy players. You can see it all on the jumbotron or any of the displays that are in the interstitial areas. We can have the entire stadium come alive just for you and personalize it. >> Except you're not going to have 10,000 different feeds, so is there going to be some subset of infinite that people are driving in terms of the content side? >> Mhmm. >> So on your first one, you're first installation, what's that installation going to be all about? >> The first installation is going to be at an airport, I can't see right now publicly where it's going to be or when it's going to be or what partner. But the idea is to be able to have a giant flight board that you only see your own flight information, navigating you to your particular gate. You know when you're at an airport, or any other public venue like a stadium, a lot of times you feel like cow in a herd, right? And it's not tailored for you in any way. You don't have as good of an experience. So we can personalize that for you. >> All right, Misapplied Sciences. Oh I'll come down and take a look at the booth a little bit later. And thanks for taking a few minutes. Good luck on the adventure. I look forward to watching it unfold. >> Appreciate it, thank you so much. >> All right, he's Albert I'm Jeff. You're watching theCUBE. We're at Oracle Park, on the shores of McCovey Cove. Thanks for watching, we'll see ya next time. >> Thank you. (upbeat music)

(click) >> Welcome this special Cube conversation in the Intel Tech Lounge at the Sundance Film Festival. I'm John Furrier with The Cube. We are here with Ari Kuschnir, who is the founder and managing partner of Missing Pieces. Doing some really amazing work on the future of filmmaking. He's got a great entrepreneurial spirit. And creative desire to deliver great product. Welcome! >> Thank you, thank you. >> So, tell them about Missing Pieces and what's going on in your world. So, there's context. Take a minute to explain what you are working on. >> Well, the premise is to be at this intersection of storytelling technology. And to make stuff people actually want to watch. And VR and AR are parts of it. But not the whole. So, I know some of the conversation focus is on, is on VR, and we're just as excited about where storytelling is headed. In terms of what technology allows us to do. But the key for me is. I'm just passionate about, a new thing comes out. And I want to figure out how to make something really great. But meaningful, and powerful with that. >> We were talking before you came out about filmmaking, obviously trained in the discipline, obviously a variety of other things. But I want to get your perspective, we're on top of this new generation, what does that mean to you? When you hear that new generation, a new creative is coming? What does that mean to you? >> Yeah, I feel like I've ridden the wave of the thing as it's happened. And I mean, the company has too. So, I went to film school in the late 90s. And it was the first time you could buy like, first Final Cut, and the first wave of that. So you could make art little movies on the weekend, you no longer needed even to go to the school itself to borrow the equipment. That was revolutionary in 1999. And then 2005, when we started thinking about the company. You know, your Vimeo, YouTube, video i-Pod all come out within five months of each other. Towards the later part of the year. And it's a revolution. It's clear that with distribution, now not only can we make it and edit it in our laptops. But we can put it out, and millions of people could watch it. And that was the first time that was possible. And it was revolutionary. And I think it still is, to some degree. So, we've just, you know, as it evolves what I see is that, it's not, I've always felt like it's not enough to make the sausage as they say. You know, the directors, the talent that I sign now. Like the project we have now here at Sundance, young Jake. Jake is a great example of a creative who you can't fit in a box. He's an Internet artist, he's a rapper. He's an interactive video maker. He did an app called Emoji.Ink. And he does celebrity emoji portraits. He has a hundred thousand followers on Instagram. So, he can command his own audience. So, when a brand, or an agency comes to him. It's a very different approach than when they come for a very straight up work for hire, director's commercial kind of thing. That is the future, I mean. The future is about having a passionate audience, making things for that audience, understanding it. And being able to communicate with them on a daily basis, or a weekly basis in a powerful way, right? Through story. >> Yeah, I mean, you're riding the wave. And the waves are getting bigger. One of the things we do, we do a lot of tech coverage. And we see this in Cloud computing where software changed from Waterfall to Agile. And now the craft's coming back on the software side. But still now, software is eating the creative world. Because now a new wave is coming. So, speak to that, because you're, this is, you can almost look at the old ways. You mentioned the commercials and films. Almost like the Waterfall. You know, crafts, craft it up and you ship it. And you hope it works well. >> Ari: Yeah. >> But now, you have this new model of iteration. Where it's more Agile creative. How do you do Agile, like your artist, and not lose the craft? >> Yeah, well it's a challenge. Look, I've had so many opportunities in our 10 plus year career to kind of go in that direction of just like quantity over quality. And we could just never do it. I mean we're just not cut out for it. But at the same time, I'm not, I never ignore, how to optimize the content based on data, and based on what the landscape is looking like. So, an important thing for example that we consider in every project is context. Like what, how is this project going to be released? Oh, it turns out that, it's really a big social media push. It's not a TV thing. Or it turns out specifically it's Facebook versus Instagram. And that's a very different type of edit. And a very different type of way you start the video. 'Cause you've got a certain, even a different format, and a different way of looking at the content. So, you start to get into, and then you start to iterate, and look at the different ways in which you can repurpose, and rerelease the content, but customize it for each thing. So, you get into this really interesting place where the data is driving the story. And the feedback is driving the story. >> And the audience is part of the journey. >> Yes. And the comments, and the way in which people are taking the thing that you've made and re-interpreting it, is really interesting. And part of the story. >> You trigger a lot of emotion with me, when we're talking, because, you know, as an entrepreneur, I started media businesses turning into, and no-one has even seen this kind of media business before. But I have no media training of any kind. I did a science major. So, there's certain, and I've observed that there's dogma in the journalism business. And there's, but you know, how dare I challenge that, or others. You're doing the same thing. >> I love that by the way. >> So, I want to ask you. What is the dogma with the old world, 'cause the naysayers are usually the ones with the dogma. "Oh, it will never work!" >> Ari: Yeah. >> So, you're on the front end of this new trend. But you're going to have a visibility into what they're thinking, what is that? >> The dogma is, you know, the whole like, there's only big name directors, and you know, it's a certain caliber of work. And that craft is the ultimate thing. And that you just have to make the thing great. And it'll do the thing that is needs to do. Without any thinking in terms of context, or media buyer. How it can actually become a social, socially engaged piece. So, the thing that we're always fighting is some version of that. And then because we came from a scrappy place, but we're now, you know, a pretty legit thing, I think people, some people will still be like, well that's the kind of like, the problem solving sometimes gets interpreted as scrappy. Which is a word I really don't like. And I think-- >> It's a compliment on one hand. >> Yeah. >> But some people look at it as an insult. "Oh, he's just scrappy!" >> Well-- >> "He's not legit!" >> You never want to be the cheap solution. You want to be the solution that people call because nobody else can solve this problem for you. I think we, there's a strand of the company that's like, the kind of like, pick up the phone and we'll figure it out. And, the impossible project that nobody else can do. And then there's another strand where it's just like, you just want to make stuff people actually want to watch. How hard it that? The thing where you could just buy the media, and expect the results is trickier and trickier. >> I mean you could be different, and innovative, but that might not be good. But if you're good doing it, you're differentiated and you're innovating. >> Ari: That's right. >> What's the filmmaking track on that line. Because certainly there's a lot of innovation. And with innovation comes failure. But people are trying to be different. And being different actually is a good thing. What are some of the trends that you're seeing where people are having some success. And where people are stumbling. >> Yeah, that's a good. I mean what I see is, the things that do well take cultural context into account, and again speak to the people in that way. So, it's like a feedback loop that it's creating with its own audience. And we almost always, there's almost always a time in the process when we're dealing with an agency, or a brand where things start to go a little bit like, too, too much, and in that direction that you don't want it to take. Somebody, usually me, or someone will say, "Look, if we make these changes. "Or if we go in this direction. "We won't want to share it. "And if we don't want to share it, "nobody's going to want to share it." So, that becomes a key thing. Whereas before you could sort of away with some of that, now it's like, well, it has to pass this sort of, kind of litmus test in terms of like, are you comfortable with sharing this thing, because it speaks to you or not. >> So, I want to ask you the hard question, we're here at the Intel Tech Lounge, obviously Intel is doing a lot of tech things. They're trying to get all this new tech. And I see it on, whether you watch the NFL playoffs, with, you know, with the camera angles, the games, on basketball games. You see them using the power of technology-- >> We're actually working on an Intel Olympics VR related project that got a little tease ad, CES. So, I can just say that. >> Yeah I know, so what's the tech? What's the cool new game changer in your mind. As a tool that you need to be more successful, and other artists could use? >> Hmmm, well, you tend to, yeah I mean, I think we-- >> John: More horsepower, more compute, more-- >> No, I mean it's really the, What happened with the AR was really interesting, which was, everyone realized, oh, the phone's already in our pocket. While the headset needs to be something that really needs to be standalone. It needs to be $200. You know, like, you sort of, there's different kinds of headsets, of course. They do different kinds of things. But that's an extra hardware. The phone we already have in our pockets. So, everyone's started taking AR seriously. Including the big players. And what that allowed was a, a rethinking of what the possibilities with story would be. So, in some ways this last year has been a readjustment, and a rethinking of, well, what can you do with the phone that you've already got in your pocket. In terms of expanding the storytelling. Or placing a story in the middle of your living room, you know. A layer, using the phone as a window and a layer. But I'm equally as excited about what's coming in VR, interactive VR, room-scale VR, you know. The project that we have here is an interactive 360 project with a phone. >> What's that called? >> It's called On My Way. And the artist is young Jake. And the original conceit of it, is, it's Jake, there's four Jakes in a car. And every time you move the phone to a different Jake, it changes the Jake. So, as soon as it passes the quadrants. So, the four quadrant it kind of swaps the Jake. And that creates a really fun, and interesting thing. And he actually designed it for the phone, vertical. Because that's the way most people are going to experience it. >> John: That's awesome. >> But it's playing on a headset as well. >> Oh you're definitely a new creative. Love chatting with you. >> Thank you. >> Final, well, I have two questions, first one is, Sundance, what's the story this year? What's your report? If you had to go back and your friend asked you to give him a report, "Hey, what happened Ari, "what's going on at Sundance this year?" >> A combination of really interesting high-end VR projects. Some of them leaning into this kind of like more psychedelic less narrative driven stuff. Which I really like. Kind of like really embracing the fact that it's another world, and taking you there. And then the AR stuff. There's a thing called Tender, Ten Day R. Or Tendar. Which is a play on Tinder, by Tinder Claus. Which is, uses augmented reality, and emotion, and machine learning, everything that you could hope for in a really interesting way. So, that's kind of showing you where it's going. So, I think those two things. >> Psychedelic's interesting. I always, I mean this kind of tangent. But in, I've been seeing on The Cube interviews, I think we're going to have a digital hippy revolution. >> Ari: Definitely! >> And it's coming. I mean you can feel it. It's a different culture. >> When I was looking a lot of people, yeah, a lot of people are scared to, I mean, VR is a really great consciousness expanding way to go to get into other worlds. Without, you know-- >> And will all the crap going on in the world today you can almost look at this as a Sixties like movement in this modern era. Where it could be a major catalyst for massive change. >> Yeah, and there's a piece about, you know, this female shaman that grows through the tribe in Ecuador. And became the first ever female shaman for her tribe. And there's a piece called Chorus that, within it. Which is just super weird and trippy. And almost has no plot, but is amazing. >> All right Ari, you've got to run. Quick soundbite. What are you working on, what's exciting you these days? Share a little bit about what's happening. >> A variety of, again it's the full spectrum of storytelling, so it's not one thing. It's really pushing, experiential pushing, branded content pushing, original content that we're getting a lot more into that game. Long form series. VR series. Really, that's kind of the next wave for the company is to set foot, much stronger in the original space, and create our own original IP. Our own original content. >> Awesome, Ari Kuschnir managing partner and founder of Missing Pieces, check them out. Lot of great work. And again, it's a whole new game changing, from storytelling to the tech. The collision between technology and artistry, and creative, and it's happening. It's here at Sundance, at the Intel Tech Lounge. I'm John Furrier with The Cube conversation here at Sundance, which is part of our coverage. Was to look at the angle of Sundance 2018. Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)

>>AWS public sector summit here in person in Washington, D. C. For two days live. Finally a real event. I'm john for your host of the cube. Got a great guest Howard Levinson from data bricks, regional vice president and general manager of the federal team for data bricks. Uh Super unicorn. Is it a decade corn yet? It's uh, not yet public but welcome to the cube. >>I don't know what the next stage after unicorn is, but we're growing rapidly. >>Thank you. Our audience knows David bricks extremely well. Always been on the cube many times. Even back, we were covering them back when big data was big data. Now it's all data everything. So we watched your success. Congratulations. Thank you. Um, so there's no, you know, not a big bridge for us across to see you here at AWS public sector summit. Tell us what's going on inside the data bricks amazon relationship. >>Yeah. It's been a great relationship. You know, when the company got started some number of years ago we got a contract with the government to deliver the data brooks capability and they're classified cloud in amazon's classified cloud. So that was the start of a great federal relationship today. Virtually all of our businesses in AWS and we run in every single AWS environment from commercial cloud to Govcloud to secret top secret environments and we've got customers doing great things and experiencing great results from data bricks and amazon. >>The federal government's the classic, I call migration opportunity. Right? Because I mean, let's face it before the pandemic even five years ago, even 10 years ago. Glacier moving speed slow, slow and they had to get modernized with the pandemic forced really to do it. But you guys have already cleared the runway with your value problems. You've got lake house now you guys are really optimized for the cloud. >>Okay, hardcore. Yeah. We are, we only run in the cloud and we take advantage of every single go fast feature that amazon gives us. But you know john it's The Office of Management and Budget. Did a study a couple of years ago. I think there were 28,000 federal data centers, 28,000 federal data centers. Think about that for a minute and just think about like let's say in each one of those data centers you've got a handful of operational data stores of databases. The federal government is trying to take all of that data and make sense out of it. The first step to making sense out of it is bringing it all together, normalizing it. Fed aerating it and that's exactly what we do. And that's been a real win for our federal clients and it's been a real exciting opportunity to watch people succeed in that >>endeavour. We have another guest on. And she said those data center huggers tree huggers data center huggers, majority of term people won't let go. Yeah. So but they're slowly dying away and moving on to the cloud. So migrations huge. How are you guys migrating with your customers? Give us an example of how it's working. What are some of the use cases? >>So before I do that I want to tell you a quick story. I've I had the luxury of working with the Air Force Chief data officer Ailene vedrine and she is commonly quoted as saying just remember as as airmen it's not your data it's the Air Force's data. So people were data center huggers now their data huggers but all of that data belongs to the government at the end of the day. So how do we help in that? Well think about all this data sitting in all these operational data stores they're getting it's getting updated all the time. But you want to be able to Federated this data together and make some sense out of it. So for like an organization like uh us citizenship and immigration services they had I think 28 different data sources and they want to be able to pull that data basically in real time and bring it into a data lake. Well that means doing a change data capture off of those operational data stores transforming that data and normalizing it so that you can then enjoy it. And we've done that I think they're now up to 70 data sources that are continually ingested into their data lake. And from there they support thousands of users doing analysis and reports for the whole visa processing system for the United States, the whole naturalization environment And their efficiency has gone up I think by their metrics by 24 x. >>Yeah. I mean Sandy carter was just on the cube earlier. She's the Vice president partner ecosystem here at public sector. And I was coming to her that federal game has changed, it used to be hard to get into you know everybody and you navigate the trip wires and all the subtle hints and and the people who are friends and it was like cloak and dagger and so people were locked in on certain things databases and data because now has to be freely available. I know one of the things that you guys are passionate about and this is kind of hard core architectural thing is that you need horizontally scalable data to really make a I work right. Machine learning works when you have data. How far along are these guys in their thinking when you have a customer because we're seeing progress? How far along are we? >>Yeah, we still have a long way to go in the federal government. I mean, I tell everybody, I think the federal government's probably four or five years behind what data bricks top uh clients are doing. But there are clearly people in the federal government that have really ramped it up and are on a par were even exceeding some of the commercial clients, U. S. C. I. S CBP FBI or some of the clients that we work with that are pretty far ahead and I'll say I mentioned a lot about the operational data stores but there's all kinds of data that's coming in at U S. C. I. S. They do these naturalization interviews, those are captured in real text. So now you want to do natural language processing against them, make sure these interviews are of the highest quality control, We want to be able to predict which people are going to show up for interviews based on their geospatial location and the day of the week and other factors the weather perhaps. So they're using all of these data types uh imagery text and structure data all in the Lake House concept to make predictions about how they should run their >>business. So that's a really good point. I was talking with keith brooks earlier directive is development, go to market strategy for AWS public sector. He's been there from the beginning this the 10th year of Govcloud. Right, so we're kind of riffing but the jpl Nasa Jpl, they did production workloads out of the gate. Yeah. Full mission. So now fast forward today. Cloud Native really is available. So like how do you see the the agencies in the government handling Okay. Re platform and I get that but now to do the reef acting where you guys have the Lake House new things can happen with cloud Native technologies, what's the what's the what's the cross over point for that point. >>Yeah, I think our Lake House architecture is really a big breakthrough architecture. It used to be, people would take all of this data, they put it in a Hadoop data lake, they'd end up with a data swamp with really not good control or good data quality. And uh then they would take the data from the data swamp where the data lake and they curate it and go through an E. T. L. Process and put a second copy into their data warehouse. So now you have two copies of the data to governance models. Maybe two versions of the data. A lot to manage. A lot to control with our Lake House architecture. You can put all of that data in the data lake it with our delta format. It comes in a curated way. Uh there's a catalogue associated with the data. So you know what you've got. And now you can literally build an ephemeral data warehouse directly on top of that data and it exists only for the period of time that uh people need it. And so it's cloud Native. It's elastically scalable. It terminates when nobody's using it. We run the whole center for Medicaid Medicare services. The whole Medicaid repository for the United States runs in an ephemeral data warehouse built on Amazon S three. >>You know, that is a huge call out, I want to just unpack that for a second. What you just said to me puts the exclamation point on cloud value because it's not your grandfather's data warehouse, it's like okay we do data warehouse capability but we're using higher level cloud services, whether it's governance stuff for a I to actually make it work at scale for those environments. I mean that that to me is re factoring that's not re platform Ng. Just re platform that's re platform Ng in the cloud and then re factoring capability for on uh new >>advantages. It's really true. And now you know at CMS, they have one copy of the data so they do all of their reporting, they've got a lot of congressional reports that they need to do. But now they're leveraging that same data, not making a copy of it for uh the center for program integrity for fraud. And we know how many billions of dollars worth of fraud exist in the Medicaid system. And now we're applying artificial intelligence and machine learning on entity analytics to really get to the root of those problems. It's a game >>changer. And this is where the efficiency comes in at scale. Because you start to see, I mean we always talk on the cube about like how software is changed the old days you put on the shelf shelf where they called it. Uh that's our generation. And now you got the cloud, you didn't know if something is hot or not until the inventory is like we didn't sell through in the cloud. If you're not performing, you suck basically. So it's not working, >>it's an instant Mhm. >>Report card. So now when you go to the cloud, you think the data lake and uh the lake house what you guys do uh and others like snowflake and were optimized in the cloud, you can't deny it. And then when you compare it to like, okay, so I'm saving you millions and millions if you're just on one thing, never mind the top line opportunities. >>So so john you know, years ago people didn't believe the cloud was going to be what it is. Like pretty much today, the clouds inevitable. It's everywhere. I'm gonna make you another prediction. Um And you can say you heard it here first, the data warehouse is going away. The Lake house is clearly going to replace it. There's no need anymore for two separate copies, there's no need for a proprietary uh storage copy of your data and people want to be able to apply more than sequel to the data. Uh Data warehouses, just restrict. What about an ocean house? >>Yeah. Lake is kind of small. When you think about this lake, Michigan is pretty big now, I think it's I >>think it's going to go bigger than that. I think we're talking about Sky Computer, we've been a cloud computing, we're going to uh and we're going to do that because people aren't gonna put all of their data in one place, they're going to have, it spread across different amazon regions or or or amazon availability zones and you're going to want to share data and you know, we just introduced this delta sharing capability. I don't know if you're familiar with it but it allows you to share data without a sharing server directly from picking up basically the amazon, you RLS and sharing them with different organizations. So you're sharing in place. The data actually isn't moving. You've got great governance and great granularity of the data that you choose to share and data sharing is going to be the next uh >>next break. You know, I really loved the Lake House were fairly sing gateway. I totally see that. So I totally would align with that and say I bet with you on that one. The Sky net Skynet, the Sky computing. >>See you're taking it away man, >>I know Skynet got anything that was computing in the Sky is Skynet that's terminated So but that's real. I mean I think that's a concept where it's like, you know what services and functions does for servers, you don't have a data, >>you've got to be able to connect data, nobody lives in an island. You've got to be able to connect data and more data. We all know more data produces better results. So how do you get more data? You connect to more data sources, >>Howard great to have you on talk about the relationship real quick as we end up here with amazon, What are you guys doing together? How's the partnership? >>Yeah, I mean the partnership with amazon is amazing. We have, we work uh, I think probably 95% of our federal business is running in amazon's cloud today. As I mentioned, john we run across uh, AWS commercial AWS GovCloud secret environment. See to us and you know, we have better integration with amazon services than I'll say some of the amazon services if people want to integrate with glue or kinesis or Sagemaker, a red shift, we have complete integration with all of those and that's really, it's not just a partnership at the sales level. It's a partnership and integration at the engineering level. >>Well, I think I'm really impressed with you guys as a company. I think you're an example of the kind of business model that people might have been afraid of which is being in the cloud, you can have a moat, you have competitive advantage, you can build intellectual property >>and, and john don't forget, it's all based on open source, open data, like almost everything that we've done. We've made available to people, we get 30 million downloads of the data bricks technology just for people that want to use it for free. So no vendor lock in. I think that's really important to most of our federal clients into everybody. >>I've always said competitive advantage scale and choice. Right. That's a data bricks. Howard? Thanks for coming on the key, appreciate it. Thanks again. Alright. Cube coverage here in Washington from face to face physical event were on the ground. Of course, we're also streaming a digital for the hybrid event. This is the cubes coverage of a W. S. Public sector Summit will be right back after this short break.

>>From around the globe, it's the Cube with digital coverage of postgres Vision 2021 brought to you by >>enterprise DB. Hello everyone. This is Dave Volonte for the cube we're covering Postgres Vision 2021. The virtual cube edition. Welcome to our conversation with the Ceo Ed Boyajian is here is the Ceo of enterprise DB and we're gonna talk about what's happening in open source and database in the future of tech. Ed welcome. >>Hi Dave, Good to be here. >>Hey, several years ago, at a, at a Postgres Vision event, you put forth the premise that the industry was approaching a threshold moment, a digital transformation was the linchpin of that shift now. Ed Well you were correct and I have no doubt the audience agreed. Most people went back to their offices after that event and they returned to their hyper focus of their day to day jobs. Maybe a few accelerated their digital initiatives, but generally pre Covid, we moved in a pretty incremental pace and then the big bang hit. And if you were digital business, you are out of business. So that single event created the most rapid change that we've ever seen in the tech industry by far, nothing really compares. So the question is why is Postgres specifically and e d B generally the right fit for this new world? >>Yeah, I think, look, a couple of things are happening gave right along the bigger picture of digital transformation. We are seeing the database market in transformation and and I think the things that are driving that shift are the things that are resulting the success of Postgres and the success of B D B I think first and foremost we're seeing a dramatic re platform ng. And just like we saw in the world of Lennox where I was at red hat during that shift where people are moving from UNIX based systems to x 86 systems. We're seeing that similar re platform in happening. Whether that's from traditional infrastructures to cloud based infrastructures or container based infrastructures, it's a great opportunity for databases to be changed out. Postgres wins in that context because it's so easily deployed anywhere. I think the second thing that's changing is we're seeing a broad expansion of developers across the enterprise so they don't just live in I. T. Anymore. And I think as developers take on more power and control their defining the agenda and it's another place where Postgres shines, it's been a priority of the dBS to make postgres easier. Uh and that's coming to life. And I think the last Stack Overflow Developer Survey suggested that I think they survey 65 developers, the second most loved and the second most used database by developers, Postgres. And so I think there again Postgres shines in a moment of change. Uh and then I think the third is kind of obvious. It's always an elephant in the room, no pun intended. But it's this relentless nagging burden of the expenses of the incumbent proprietary databases and the need. And we especially saw this in Covid to start to change that more dramatically, change that economic equation here Again. PostGres shines. >>You know, I want to ask you, I'm gonna jump ahead to the future for a second because you're talking about the re platform NG and with your red hat chops, I kind of want to pick your brain on this because you're right, you saw it with red hat and you're kind of seeing it again when you think about open shift and where it's going my my question is related to replant forming around new types of workloads, new processing models at the edge. I mean you're seeing an explosion of processing power, GPU SNP us accelerators, dSPs and it appears that this is happening at a very low cost. I'm referring that you're saying Postgres can take advantage of that trend as well that that broader re platform ng trend to the edge, is that correct? >>It is. And I think you know this is, this has been one of the, I think the most interesting things with posters now I've been here almost 13 years. So if you put that in some perspective, I've watched Uh and participated in leading transformation in the category, you know, we've been squarely focused on postgres. So we've got 300 engineers who worry about making postgres better. And as you look across that landscape of time, not only as Postgres gotten more performant and more scalable, it's also proven to be the right database choice in the world of not just legacy migrations, but new application development. And I think that stack overflow developer survey is a good indicator of how developers feel about postgres. But you know, over that time frame I think if you went back to 2008 when I joined E D. B, post chris was considered a really good general purpose database. And today I think post chris is a great general purpose database. General purpose isn't sexy in the market broadly speaking, but Postgres capabilities across workloads in every area is really robust. Let me just spend a second on it. We look at our customer base is deploying in what we think of as systems of record, which are the traditional er, P type apps, uh you know where there's a single source of truth you might think of the RP apps there. We look at our customers deploying in systems of engagement. And those are apps that you might think of in the context of social media style apps or websites that are backed by a database in the third area Systems of analytics where you would typically think of data warehouse style applications interestingly. Postgres performs well and our customers report using us across that whole landscape of application areas. And I think that is one of postgres hidden superpowers. Is that ability to reach into each area of requirement on the workload side. >>And as always alluding to before that that itself is evolving as you now inject ai into the equation ai influencing and it's just a very exciting times ahead. There's no there's no database, You know, 20 years ago it was kind of boring. Now it's just exploding. I want to come back to that the notion of of post grass and maybe talk about other database models. Uh, I mean you mentioned that you've evolved from this, you know, system of record. You can take a system engagement on structured data etcetera. Jason. It's so how should we think about post grass in relation to other databases and specifically other business models of companies that provide database services? Why is Postgres attractive? Where is it winning? >>Yeah, I think a couple of places. So I mean first and foremost Postgres, you know, at his core, post chris is a sequel, relational databases in acid compliance, equal relational database. And that is inherently a strength of Postgres. But it's also a multi model database, which means we handle a lot of other, um, you know, database requirements, whether that's geospatial or or Jason, uh, for documents or time series, things like that. And so Postgres extensive bility is one of its inherent strengths and that's kind of been built in from the beginning of Postgres. So not surprisingly, people use postgres across the number of workloads because at the end of the day there's still value in having a database is able to do more. There are a lot of important specialty databases and I think they will remain important specialty databases, but Postgres thrives in its ability to cross cross over in that way. Um and I think that is, you know, one of the different key differentiators in how we've seen the market in the business development and that's the breadth of of workloads that Postgres succeeds in. But but our growth, if you kind of ventured it across vectors, we see growth happening, you know, in a few dimensions. First we see growth happening in new applications. About half of our customers that come to us today for new uh new postgres users are deploying us on new applications. The others are our second area migrating away from some existing legacy in companies often oracle. Not always. Um The third area of growth we see is in cloud, where Postgres is deployed very prolifically, both in the traditional cloud platforms, Uh like EC two, but then then again also uh in the database as a service environment. And then the fourth area growth we're seeing now is around uh container deployment, kubernetes deployment. >>Well, you may Oracle's prominent because it's just it's a big installed base and it's expensive and people, >>you >>know, they got a look at them. It's funny, I do a lot of TCO work and mostly, you know, usually TCO is about labor costs. When it comes to Oracle, it's about license costs and maintenance costs. And so to the extent that you can reduce that, at least for a portion of your state, you're gonna you're gonna drop right to the bottom line. But but but but I want to ask you about that kind of that spectrum that you think about the prevailing models for database you've got. On the one hand, You've got the right tool for the right job approach. It might be 10 or 12 data stores in the cloud. On the other hand, you've got, you know, kind of a converged approach. Oracle's going that direction clearly. Postgres with its open source innovation is going that direction. And it seems to me that at scale that's a more the latter is a more cost effective model. How do you think about that? >>Well, you know, I think at the end of the day, you kind of have to look at it. I mean, the business side of my brain looks at that as an addressable market question. Right? And you've heard me talk about three broad categories of workloads and you know, people define workloads in different bucket, but that's how we do it. But if you look at just a system of record in the system of engagement market, I think that's what would be traditionally viewed as the database market. Uh and there that's you know, let's just say for the sake of arguments of $45-$50 billion $18 billion dollar market. And you know, as we talk about that. So all in it's still between 60 and $70 billion market. And I think what happens there's so much heat and light poured on the valuation multiples of some of the specialty players. That the market gets confused, but the reality is our customers don't get confused. I mean if you look at those specialty players take that $48 billion market. I mean add up Mongo red is cockroach neo, all of those. I mean hugely valued companies. All unicorn companies. But combined to add up to a billion bucks don't get me wrong that's important revenue and meaningful in the workloads they support. But it's not. It doesn't define the full transformation of this category. Look at the systems of analysis again, another great great market example. I mean if you add up the consolidation of the Hadoop vendors add in there. Um Snowflake, you're still talking you know a billion five in revenue and an $18 billion market. So while those are all important technologies, the question is in this transformation move to the database market fully transform you. And my view is no it didn't were in the first maybe second inning of a $65 billion transformation. And I think this is where Postgres will ultimately shine. I think this is how Postgres wins because at the end of the day the nature of the workloads fits with postgres and the future tech that we're building in post schools will serve that broader set of needs I think more effectively >>well. And I love these tam expansion discussions because I think you're right on and I think it comes back to the data and we all talk about the data growth, the data explosion, we see the I. D. C. Numbers and you ain't seen nothing yet. And so data by its very nature is distributed. That's why I get so excited about these new platform models and and I want to tie it back to developers and open source because to me that is the linchpin of innovation um in the next decade it has been, I would even say for the last decade we've seen it, but it's gaining momentum, so, so in thinking about innovation and and specifically Postgres and an open source, you know, what can you share with us in terms of how we should think about your advantage, and again, what, where people are glomming leaning in to that advantage? >>Yeah, so, I mean, I think I think you bring up a really important topic for us as a company. Postgres we think is an incredibly powerful community, uh and when you step away from it again, I remember I told you I was at red hat before, now here at E D B, and there's a common thread that runs through those two experiences in both experiences. The companies are attached and prominent alongside a strong independent, open source community, and I think the notion of an independent community is really important to understand around postgres. There are hundreds and thousands of people contributing to Postgres now. E D B plays a big role in that. About approaching a third of the contributions. In the last release released, 13 of Postgres came from E D B. You might look at that and say gee, that sounds like a lot, but if you step away from it, you know, about 30% of those contributions, Most of the contributions come from a universe around D D. B. And that's inherently healthy for the community's ability to innovate and accelerate. And I think that while we play a strong role there, you can imagine that having and there are other great companies that are contributing to Postgres, I think having those companies participating and contributing gets the best, the best ideas to the front in innovation. So I think the inherent nature Postgres community makes it strong and healthy. And then contrast that to some of the other prominent high value open source companies, the companies and the communities are intimately intertwined. They're one and the same. They're actually not independent open source communities. And I think that therein lies one of the, one of the inherent weaknesses in those but postgres to rise because you know, we bring all those ideas from the DB, we bring a commercial contingent with us all the things we hope we emphasize and focus on in growth and postgres, whether that's in the areas of scalability, manageability, all hot topics, of course security, all of those areas. And then, you know, performance as always, all of those areas are informed to us by enterprise customers deploying post chris at scale. And I think that's the heart of what makes a successful independent project. >>Yeah. The combinatorial powers of of that ecosystem. Uh they their their multiplication, I've as opposed to the resources of one. I want to talk about postgres Vision 2021 sort of set up that a little bit. The theme this year is the future. Is you, what do you mean by that? >>So if you think about what we just said post the category is in transit database categories and transformation. And we know that many of our people are interested in. Postgres are early in their journey, their early in their experience. And so we want to focus this year's postcards vision on them that we understand as a company has been committed to postgres as long as we have and with the understanding we have the technology and best practices, we want to share that view those insights uh, with those who are coming to postgres, Some for the first time, some who are experienced >>Postgres. Vision 21 is june 22nd and 23rd. Go to enterprise db dot com and register the cube is going to be there. We hope you will be too. Ed, thanks for coming to the Cuban previewing the event. >>Thanks Dave. >>Thank you. We'll see you at Vision 21 >>mm mm.

Hi, I'm Hideo Mabuchi from Stanford University. This is my presentation on coherent nonlinear dynamics, and combinatorial optimization. This is going to be a talk, to introduce an approach, we are taking to the analysis, of the performance of Coherent Ising Machines. So let me start with a brief introduction, to ising optimization. The ising model, represents a set of interacting magnetic moments or spins, with total energy given by the expression, shown at the bottom left of the slide. Here the cigna variables are meant to take binary values. The matrix element jij, represents the interaction, strength and sign, between any pair of spins ij, and hi represents a possible local magnetic field, acting on each thing. The ising ground state problem, is defined in an assignment of binary spin values, that achieves the lowest possible value of total energy. And an instance of the easing problem, is specified by given numerical values, for the matrix j and vector h, although the ising model originates in physics, we understand the ground state problem, to correspond to what would be called, quadratic binary optimization, in the field of operations research. And in fact, in terms of computational complexity theory, it can be established that the, ising ground state problem is NP complete. Qualitatively speaking, this makes the ising problem, a representative sort of hard optimization problem, for which it is expected, that the runtime required by any computational algorithm, to find exact solutions, should asyntonically scale, exponentially with the number of spins, and four worst case instances at each end. Of course, there's no reason to believe that, the problem instances that actually arise, in practical optimization scenarios, are going to be worst case instances. And it's also not generally the case, in practical optimization scenarios, that we demand absolute optimum solutions. Usually we're more interested in, just getting the best solution we can, within an affordable cost, where costs may be measured in terms of time, service fees and or energy required for computation. This focus is great interest on, so-called heuristic algorithms, for the ising problem and other NP complete problems, which generally get very good, but not guaranteed optimum solutions, and run much faster than algorithms, that are designed to find absolute Optima. To get some feeling for present day numbers, we can consider the famous traveling salesman problem, for which extensive compilations, of benchmarking data may be found online. A recent study found that, the best known TSP solver required median runtimes, across a library of problem instances, that scaled as a very steep route exponential, for an up to approximately 4,500. This gives some indication of the change, in runtime scaling for generic, as opposed to worst case problem instances. Some of the instances considered in this study, were taken from a public library of TSPs, derived from real world VLSI design data. This VLSI TSP library, includes instances within ranging from 131 to 744,710, instances from this library within between 6,880 and 13,584, were first solved just a few years ago, in 2017 requiring days of runtime, and a 48 core two gigahertz cluster, all instances with n greater than or equal to 14,233, remain unsolved exactly by any means. Approximate solutions however, have been found by heuristic methods, for all instances in the VLSI TSP library, with, for example, a solution within 0.014% of a known lower bound, having been discovered for an instance, with n equal 19,289, requiring approximately two days of runtime, on a single quarter at 2.4 gigahertz. Now, if we simple-minded the extrapolate, the route exponential scaling, from the study yet to n equal 4,500, we might expect that an exact solver, would require something more like a year of runtime, on the 48 core cluster, used for the n equals 13,580 for instance, which shows how much, a very small concession on the quality of the solution, makes it possible to tackle much larger instances, with much lower costs, at the extreme end, the largest TSP ever solved exactly has n equal 85,900. This is an instance derived from 1980s VLSI design, and this required 136 CPU years of computation, normalized to a single core, 2.4 gigahertz. But the 20 fold larger, so-called world TSP benchmark instance, with n equals 1,904,711, has been solved approximately, with an optimality gap bounded below 0.0474%. Coming back to the general practical concerns, of applied optimization. We may note that a recent meta study, analyze the performance of no fewer than, 37 heuristic algorithms for MaxCut, and quadratic binary optimization problems. And find the performance... Sorry, and found that a different heuristics, work best for different problem instances, selected from a large scale heterogeneous test bed, with some evidence, the cryptic structure, in terms of what types of problem instances, were best solved by any given heuristic. Indeed, there are reasons to believe, that these results for MaxCut, and quadratic binary optimization, reflect to general principle, of a performance complementarity, among heuristic optimization algorithms, and the practice of solving hard optimization problems. There thus arises the critical pre processing issue, of trying to guess, which of a number of available, good heuristic algorithms should be chosen, to tackle a given problem instance. Assuming that any one of them, would incur high cost to run, on a large problem of incidents, making an astute choice of heuristic, is a crucial part of maximizing overall performance. Unfortunately, we still have very little conceptual insight, about what makes a specific problem instance, good or bad for any given heuristic optimization algorithm. This is certainly pinpointed by researchers in the field, as a circumstance and must be addressed. So adding this all up, we see that a critical frontier, for cutting edge academic research involves, both the development of novel heuristic algorithms, that deliver better performance with lower costs, on classes of problem instances, that are underserved by existing approaches, as well as fundamental research, to provide deep conceptual insight, into what makes a given problem instance, easy or hard for such algorithms. In fact, these days, as we talk about the end of Moore's law, and speculate about a so-called second quantum revolution, it's natural to talk not only about novel algorithms, for conventional CPUs, but also about highly customized, special purpose hardware architectures, on which we may run entirely unconventional algorithms, for common tutorial optimizations, such as ising problem. So against that backdrop, I'd like to use my remaining time, to introduce our work on, analysis of coherent using machine architectures, and associated optimization algorithms. Ising machines in general, are a novel class of information processing architectures, for solving combinatorial optimization problems, by embedding them in the dynamics, of analog, physical, or a cyber-physical systems. In contrast to both more traditional engineering approaches, that build ising machines using conventional electronics, and more radical proposals, that would require large scale quantum entanglement the emerging paradigm of coherent ising machines, leverages coherent nominal dynamics, in photonic or optical electronic platforms, to enable near term construction, of large scale prototypes, that leverage posting as information dynamics. The general structure of current of current CIM systems, as shown in the figure on the right, the role of the easing spins, is played by a train of optical pulses, circulating around a fiber optical storage ring, that beam splitter inserted in the ring, is used to periodically sample, the amplitude of every optical pulse. And the measurement results, are continually read into an FPGA, which uses then to compute perturbations, to be applied to each pulse, by a synchronized optical injections. These perturbations are engineered to implement, the spin-spin coupling and local magnetic field terms, of the ising hamiltonian, corresponding to a linear part of the CIM dynamics. Asynchronously pumped parametric amplifier, denoted here as PPL and wave guide, adds a crucial nonlinear component, to the CIM dynamics as well. And the basic CIM algorithm, the pump power starts very low, and is gradually increased, at low pump powers, the amplitudes of the easing spin pulses, behave as continuous complex variables, whose real parts which can be positive or negative, by the role of soft or perhaps mean field spins. Once the pump power crosses the threshold, for perimetric self oscillation in the optical fiber ring, however, the amplitudes of the easing spin pulses, become effectively quantized into binary values, while the pump power is being ramped up, the FPGA subsystem continuously applies, its measurement based feedback implementation, of the using hamiltonian terms. The interplay of the linearized easing dynamics, implemented by the FPGA , and the thresholds quantization dynamics, provided by the sink pumped parametric amplifier, result in a final state, of the optical plus amplitudes, at the end of the pump ramp, that can be read as a binary strain, giving a proposed solution, of the ising ground state problem. This method of solving ising problems, seems quite different from a conventional algorithm, that runs entirely on a digital computer. As a crucial aspect, of the computation is performed physically, by the analog continuous coherent nonlinear dynamics, of the optical degrees of freedom, in our efforts to analyze CA and performance. We have therefore turn to dynamical systems theory. Namely a study of bifurcations, the evolution of critical points, and typologies of heteroclitic orbits, and basins of attraction. We conjecture that such analysis, can provide fundamental insight, into what makes certain optimization instances, hard or easy for coherent ising machines, and hope that our approach, can lead to both improvements of the course CIM algorithm, and the pre processing rubric, for rapidly assessing the CIM insuibility of the instances. To provide a bit of intuition about how this all works. It may help to consider the threshold dynamics, of just one or two optical parametric oscillators, in the CIM architecture just described. We can think of each of the pulse time slots, circulating around the fiber ring, as are presenting an independent OPO. We can think of a single OPO degree of freedom, as a single resonant optical mode, that experiences linear dissipation, due to coupling loss, and gain in a pump near crystal, as shown in the diagram on the upper left of the slide, as the pump power is increased from zero. As in the CIM algorithm, the non-linear gain is initially too low, to overcome linear dissipation. And the OPO field remains in a near vacuum state, at a critical threshold value, gain equals dissipation, and the OPO undergoes a sort of lasing transition. And the steady States of the OPO, above this threshold are essentially coherent States. There are actually two possible values, of the OPO coherent amplitude, and any given above threshold pump power, which are equal in magnitude, but opposite in phase, when the OPO cross this threshold, it basically chooses one of the two possible phases, randomly, resulting in the generation, of a single bit of information. If we consider two uncoupled OPOs, as shown in the upper right diagram, pumped at exactly the same power at all times, then as the pump power is increased through threshold, each OPO will independently choose a phase, and thus two random bits are generated, for any number of uncoupled OPOs, the threshold power per OPOs is unchanged, from the single OPO case. Now, however, consider a scenario, in which the two appeals are coupled to each other, by a mutual injection of their out coupled fields, as shown in the diagram on the lower right. One can imagine that, depending on the sign of the coupling parameter alpha, when one OPO is lasing, it will inject a perturbation into the other, that may interfere either constructively or destructively, with the field that it is trying to generate, via its own lasing process. As a result, when can easily show that for alpha positive, there's an effective ferromagnetic coupling, between the two OPO fields, and their collective oscillation threshold, is lowered from that of the independent OPO case, but only for the two collective oscillation modes, in which the two OPO phases are the same. For alpha negative, the collective oscillation threshold, is lowered only for the configurations, in which the OPO phases are opposite. So then looking at how alpha is related to the jij matrix, of the ising spin coupling hamilitonian, it follows the, we could use this simplistic to OPO CIM, to solve the ground state problem, of the ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic angles, to ising model, simply by increasing the pump power, from zero and observing what phase relation occurs, as the two appeals first start to lase. Clearly we can imagine generalizing the story to larger, and, however, the story doesn't stay as clean and simple, for all larger problem instances. And to find a more complicated example, we only need to go to n equals four, for some choices of jij for n equals four, the story remains simple, like the n equals two case. The figure on the upper left of this slide, shows the energy of various critical points, for a non frustrated n equals for instance, in which the first bifurcated critical point, that is the one that, by forgets of the lowest pump value a, this first bifurcated critical point, flows asyntonically into the lowest energy using solution, and the figure on the upper right, however, the first bifurcated critical point, flows to a very good, but suboptimal minimum at large pump power. The global minimum is actually given, by a distinct critical point. The first appears at a higher pump power, and is not needed radically connected to the origin. The basic CIM algorithm, is this not able to find this global minimum, such non-ideal behavior, seems to become more common at margin end, for the n equals 20 instance show in the lower plots, where the lower right pod is just a zoom into, a region of the lower left block. It can be seen that the global minimum, corresponds to a critical point, that first appears that of pump parameter a around 0.16, at some distance from the adriatic trajectory of the origin. That's curious to note that, in both of these small and examples, however, the critical point corresponding to the global minimum, appears relatively close, to the adiabatic trajectory of the origin, as compared to the most of the other, local minimum that appear. We're currently working to characterise, the face portrait typology, between the global minimum, and the adiabatic trajectory of the origin, taking clues as to how the basic CIM algorithm, could be generalized, to search for non-adiabatic trajectories, that jumped to the global minimum, during the pump up, of course, n equals 20 is still too small, to be of interest for practical optimization applications. But the advantage of beginning, with the study of small instances, is that we're able to reliably to determine, their global minima, and to see how they relate to the idea, that trajectory of the origin, and the basic CIM algorithm. And the small land limit, We can also analyze, for the quantum mechanical models of CAM dynamics, but that's a topic for future talks. Existing large-scale prototypes, are pushing into the range of, n equals, 10 to the four, 10 to the five, 10 to the six. So our ultimate objective in theoretical analysis, really has to be, to try to say something about CAM dynamics, and regime of much larger in. Our initial approach to characterizing CAM behavior, in the large end regime, relies on the use of random matrix theory. And this connects to prior research on spin classes, SK models, and the tap equations, et cetera, at present we're focusing on, statistical characterization, of the CIM gradient descent landscape, including the evolution of critical points, And their value spectra, as the pump powers gradually increase. We're investigating, for example, whether there could be some way, to explain differences in the relative stability, of the global minimum versus other local minima. We're also working to understand the deleterious, or potentially beneficial effects, of non-ideologies such as asymmetry, in the implemented using couplings, looking one step ahead, we plan to move next into the direction, of considering more realistic classes of problem instances, such as quadratic binary optimization with constraints. So in closing I should acknowledge, people who did the hard work, on these things that I've shown. So my group, including graduate students, Edwin Ng, Daniel Wennberg, Ryatatsu Yanagimoto, and Atsushi Yamamura have been working, in close collaboration with, Surya Ganguli, Marty Fejer and Amir Safavi-Naeini. All of us within the department of applied physics, at Stanford university and also in collaboration with Yoshihisa Yamamoto, over at NTT-PHI research labs. And I should acknowledge funding support, from the NSF by the Coherent Ising Machines, expedition in computing, also from NTT-PHI research labs, army research office, and ExxonMobil. That's it. Thanks very much.

>> From Tavern on the Green in Central Park, New York it's theCUBE. Covering Veritas Vision Solution Day, brought to you by Veritas. >> Welcome back to New York City everybody. We're here in the heart of Central Park at Tavern On the Green, a beautiful facility. I'm surrounded by Yankee fans so I'm like a fish out of water. But that's okay, it's a great time of the year. We love it, we're still in it up in Boston so we're happy. Dave Vellante here, you're watching theCUBE, the leader in live tech coverage. Nathan Hall is here, he's the field CTO at Pure Storage. Nathan, good to see you. >> Good to see you too. >> Thanks for coming on. >> Thanks. >> So you guys made some announcements today with Veritas, what's that all about? >> It's pretty exciting and Veritas, being the market leader in data protection software. Now our customers are able to take Veritas's net backup software and use it to drive the policy engine of Snapshots for our FlashArrays. They're also able to take Veritas and back up our data hub, which is our new strategy with FlashBlade to really unify all of data analytics onto a single platform. So Veritas really is the solution net back up that's able to back up all the workloads and Pure is the solution that's able to run all the workloads. >> So what if I could follow-up on that, maybe push you a little bit? A lot of these announcements that you see, we call them Barney deals, I love you, you love me, we go to market together and everything's wonderful. Are we talking about deeper integration than that or is just kind of press release? >> Absolutely deeper integration. So you'll see not just how-to guides, white papers, et cetera, but there's actual engineering-level integration that's happening here. We're available as an advanced disk target within that back up, we've integrated into CloudPoint as well. We certify all of our hardware platforms with Veritas. So this is deep, deep engineering-level integration. >> Yeah, we're excited about Pure, we followed you guys since the early days. You know we saw Scott Dietzen, what he built, very impressive modern architecture, you won't be a legacy for 20, 25 years so you've got a lot going for you. Presumably it's easier to integrate with such a modern architecture, but now at the same time you got to integrate with Veritas, it's been around for about 25 years. We heard a lot about how they're investing in API-based architectures, and microservices, and containers and the like, so what is that like in terms of integrating with a 25-year-old company? >> Well I think, from Pure's perspective we are API first, we're RESTfull APIs first. We've done a ton of integrations across multiple platforms whether it's Kubernetes, Docker, VMware, et cetera, so we have a lot of experience in terms of how to integrate with various flavors of other infrastructure. I think Veritas has done a lot of work as well in terms of maturing their API to really be this kind of cloud-first type of API, this RESTful API, that made our cross-integration much easier. >> You guys like being first, there were a number of firsts, you guys were kind of the first, or one of the first with flash for block. You were kind of the first for file. You guys have hit AI pretty hard, everybody's now doing that. You guys announced the first partnership with NVIDIA, everybody's now doing that. (laughs) You guys announced giving away NVME as part of the Stack for no upcharge, everybody's now doing that. So, you like to be first. Culturally, you've worked at some other companies, what's behind that? >> Well culturally, this is best company I've worked at in terms of culture, period, and really it all starts with the culture of the company. I think that's why we're first in so many places and it's not just first in terms of first to market. It's really about first in terms of customer feedback. If you look at the Gartner Magic Quadrant we're up, we've been at leaders quadrant for five years in a row. But this year, we're indisputably the leader. Furthest to the right on the X-axis, furthest north on the Y-axis and that's all driven by just a customer-obsessed culture. We've got a Net Promoter Score of 86.6 which is stratospheric. It's something that puts us in the top 1% of all business-to-business companies, not just tech companies. So, it's really that culture about customer obsession that drives us to be first. Both to market, in a lot of cases, but also just first in terms of customer perception of our technology. >> You guys were a first at really escape velocity, the billion dollar unicorn status, and now you're kind of having that fly-wheel effect where you're able to throw off different innovations in different areas. Can you talk more about the data hub and the relevance to what you're doing with Veritas and data protection? Let's unpack that a little bit. >> Sure, sure, the data hub, we had a great keynote this morning with Jyothi the VP of Marketing for Veritas and he had an interesting customer tidbit. He had some sort of unnamed government agency customer that actually gets penalized when they're unable to retrieve data fast enough. That's not something that many of our customers have, but they do get penalized in terms of opportunity costs. The reason why is 'cause customers just have their data siloed into all these different split-up locations and that prevents them from being able to get insight out of that data. If you look at AI luminaries like Andrew Ng or even people like Dominique Brezinski at Apple, they all agree that you have to, in order to be successful with your data strategy, you have to unify these data silos. And that's what the data hub does. For the first time we're able to unify everything from data warehousing, to data lakes, to streaming analytics, to AI and now even backup all onto a single platform with multidimensional performance. That's FlashBlade and that is our data hub, we think it's revolutionary and we're challenging the rest of the storage industry to follow suit. Let's make less silos, let's unify the data into a data hub so that our customers can get real actionable information out of their data. >> I was on a crowd chat the other day, you guys put out an open letter to the storage community, an open challenge, so that was kind of both a little controversial but also some fun. That's a very important point you're making about sort of putting data at the core. I make an observation, it's not so much true about Facebook anymore 'cause after the whole fake news thing their market value dropped. But if you look at the top five companies in terms of market value, include Facebook in there, they and Berkshire keep doing this, but let's assume for a second that Facebook's up there. Apple, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and Amazon, top five in terms of US market value. Of course markets ebb and they flow, but it's no coincidence that those are data companies. They all have a lot of hard assets at those companies. They've got data at their core so it's interesting to hear you talk about data hub because one of the challenges that we see for traditional companies, call them incumbents, is they have data in stovepipes. For them to compete they've got to put it in the digital world, they've got to put data at their core. It's not just for start-ups and people doing Greenfield, it's for folks that are established and don't want to get disrupted. Long-winded question, how do they get, let's think of traditional company, an incumbent company, how do they get from point A to point B with the data hub? >> I think Andrew Ng has a great talked-point on this. He basically talks about your data strategy and you need to think about, as a company, how do you acquire data and then how do you unify into a single data hub? It's not just around putting it on a single platform, such as FlashBlade. A valuable byproduct of that is if you have all the stove-piped data, though you probably in terms of your data scientist trying to get access to it, now have to, they have 10 different stovepipes you've got 10 different VPs that you have to go talk to in order to get access to that data. So it really starts with stopping the bleeding and starting to have a data strategy around how do we acquire and how do we make certain or storing data in the same place and have a single unified data hub in order to maximize the value we are able to get out of that data. >> You know when I talked to, I'll throw my two cents in, I talk to a lot of chief data officers. To me, the ones that are most insightful talk about their five imperatives. First of all, is they got to understand how data contributes to monetization. Whether it's saving money or making money, it's not necessarily selling your data. I think a lot of people make that mistake, oh I'm going to monetize my data, I mean I'm going to sell my data, no, it's all about how it contributes to value. The second is, what about data sources? And then how do I get access to data sources? There's a lot implied there in terms of governance and security and who has access to that. And in the same time, how do I scale up my business so that I get the right people who can act on that data? Then how do I form relationships with a line of business so that I can maximize that monetization? Those are, I think, sensible steps that aren't trivial. They require a lot of thought and a lot of cultural change and I would imagine that's what a lot of your customers are going through right now. >> I think they are and I think as IT practitioners out there, I think that we have a duty to get closer to our business and be able to kind of educate them around these data strategies. To give them the same level of insight that you're talking about, you see in some chief data officers. But if I looked out at the, there's a recent study on the Fortune 50, the CXOs, and these aren't even CIOs, they're actually, we think as IT practitioners that the cloud is the most disruptive thing that we see, but the CEOs and the CFOs are actually five times more likely to talk about AI and data as being more disruptive to their business. But most of them have no data strategy, most of them don't know how AI works. It's up to us as IT practitioners to educate the business. To say here's what's possible, here's what we have to do in order to maximize the value out of data, so that you can get a business advantage out of this. It's incumbent on us as IT leaders. >> So Nathan, I think again, that's really insightful because let's face it, if you're moving at the speed of the CIO, which is what many companies want to do, because that's the so called, fat middle and that's where the money is. But you're behind, I mean we're moving into a new era, the cloud era, no pun intended, is here, it's solid but we're entering that data of machine intelligence and we built the foundation with the dupe even, there's a lot of data now what do we do with it? We see, and I wonder if you could comment on this, is the innovation engine of the future changing it? It use to be Moore's Law, we marched to the cadence of Moore's Law for years. Now it's data applying machine intelligence and then, of course, using the cloud for scale and attracting start-ups and innovation. That's fine because we want to program infrastructure, we don't want to deploy infrastructure. If you think about Pure, you got data for sure. You're going hard after machine intelligence. And cloud, if I understand your cloud play, you sell to cloud providers whether they're on-prem or in the public cloud but what do you think about those? That innovation sandwich that I just described and how do you guys play? >> Well, cloud is where we get over 30% of our revenue so we're actually selling to the cloud, cloud service providers, et cetera. For example, one of the biggest cloud service providers out there that I think today's announcement helps them out a lot from a policy perspective actually used FlashBlade to reduce their SLAs, to reduce their restore time from, I think, it was 30 hours down to 38 minutes. They were paying money before to their customers. What we see in our cloud strategy is one of empowering cloud providers, but also we think that cloud is increasingly, at the infrastructure layer, going to be commoditized and it's going to be about how do we enable multicloud? So how do we enable customers to get around data gravity problems? I've got this big, weighty database that I want to see if I can move it up to the cloud but that takes me forever. So how do we help customers be able to move to one cloud or even exit a cloud to another or back to on-prem? We think there's a lot of value in applying our, for example deduplication technology, et cetera, to helping customers with those data gravity problems, to making a more open world in terms of sharing data to and from the cloud. >> Great, well we looked at Pure and Veritas getting together, do some hard core engineering, going to market, solving some real problems. Thanks Nathan for hanging out, this iconic beautiful Tavern on the Green in the heart of New York City. Appreciate you coming on theCUBE. >> Thanks Dave. >> All right, keep it right there everybody, Dave Vallante. We'll be right back right after this short break. You're watching theCUBE from Veritas Solutions Day, #VeritasVision, be right back. (digital music)

>> Announcer: Live from the Bill Graham Auditorium in San Francisco, it's theCUBE. Covering Pure Storage Accelerate 2018. Brought to you by, Pure Storage. (upbeat music) >> Welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of Pure Storage Accelerate 2018. I'm Lisa Martin with Dave Vellante. We're at the Bill Graham Civic Auditorium, and we are sportin' some. >> You can't see mine-- >> Who are you? >> Because it's chilly-- >> Who are you? >> I'm a symbol. (laughing) >> I don't know, there's a name for that. I'm formally known as Prince. Dave and I are here with Rob Lee, the VP and chief architect at Pure Storage. Hey Rob, welcome to theCUBE. >> Thanks, thanks for having me. >> You're sporting a lot of gray. >> We won't make a comment. >> I don't see any orange. >> I don't have a symbol or T-shirt either. >> I can't believe you haven't been kicked out. Like they didn't just actually eject you. Going to have to fix that. So, you've been at Pure for about five years now. You were one of the founders of FlashBlade. Here we are, third annual Accelerate, packed house this morning in the keynote session. What are some of your observations about the growth that you've seen at this company? >> Well you know, it's really been amazing. When I joined Pure, we were about 150 employees. I joined as part of the founding team for FlashBlade. One of the first two or three people. In fact, my first day on the job was takin' monitors out of boxes and settin' up desks. Since then, we've obviously grown tremendously from 150 employees to over 2,300. But more importantly, what we've been able to grow in terms of customers. So we've went from that tiny size to over 4,800 customers today. From the FlashBlade side of the house, it's been a really, really fun ride. The first couple of years of my time at Pure was spent really heads down building the product, figuring out how do we repeat some of the core philosophies and values that we've brought to FlashArray into FlashBlade and take that product into new markets. We brought that product out and launched it at our first Accelerate conference three years ago. So that first year was really about getting it up to market, growing that customer base. Last year, you saw us take it into a lot of more kind of newer and emerging workloads, analytics, AI, so and so forth. And this past year has really been spent just doubling down on that and not only building a lot more expertise within the company about understanding where that direction of the market is going, but also translating that experience that we're gathering, working with customers on the leading edge of all of those industries into helping our customers, our new and perspective customers. Figure out how do they deploy those solutions into their environments and be maximally successful. So it's really been a very, very exciting ride. >> So Rob, you're the sort of the resident AI expert inside of Pure and I'm sure there are many, but you're on theCUBE now (laughing) so we want to attack that a little bit. AI seems to be this emerging technology that's a horizontal layer of tech that cuts across virtually every industry and every application, but it's application seems to be narrow, whether it's facial recognition or natural language processing, supply chain optimization. So what's Pure's point-of-view on AI, artificial intelligence. I'm not crazy about the name. I like machine intelligence better personally, but what's your point-of-view on the AI space and how it will get adopted. Maybe some of the barriers to that adoption? >> Sure, well so I think. So I share the same distaste for the term mostly because I think it's overused and it's misused in many ways. I think if you look at AI at its heart, it's really about gathering more intelligence and more value from data. Now, more recently, technology advances mostly in compute and algorithms have caused and created an explosion in subsets of AI particularly machine learning or deep learning. And that's really what's driving a lot of these new applications. You mentioned a few, image recognition, voice recognition, so on and so forth. But really what it is, is, it's re-highlighting the focus on the fact that organizations, for decades, have been gathering and collecting and storing and paying to store volumes and volumes of data. But they haven't been able to get the maximum value out of it. And I think one of the most chilling statistics I've seen is that, over 80% of data that's gathered, is unstructured data, but if you look at all of that unstructured data, less than 1% is actually analyzed. What that means is that 99% of data that people have been collecting over the last several decades, they haven't been able to extract maximum value out of it. And I think what we're seeing is that the recent advances in hardware technology, software technology, algorithms to drive a lot of these deep learning type of applications. Even though the applications may be very focused in terms of the types of data they work with, image recognition, object recognition, emotion detection, so on and so forth. It's really bringing the spotlight back across organizations onto how do we get more information out of all of our data. And in a lot of cases, conversations that we get into with customers that start out with the glitzy use cases, the object detection demos. When we start peeling into, so what is it, how are you going to deploy this into your organization, how are you going to translate this into better customer outcomes. We're actually finding ways to apply more traditional data analysis techniques to get better and more information out of people's data. And they may be everything from relational databases to big data analytic stacks. So again, I think the bigger movement here is that recent advances in technology have really re-highlighted the focus on organizations getting more out of their data of all forms. >> When you think about the top market cap companies, Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft, Google, et cetera. They seem to be companies that have mastered or at least are ahead of the pack in terms of machine intelligence. You guys recently conducted a study with MIT. What do you see from that study and the conversations with customers in terms of the incumbence being able to close that gap? >> So, I think there are a couple of really interesting points that came up out of the MIT survey. One is that the prevalence and demand for AI on particularly machine learning applications is both broad-based across all industries, but it's also huge. I think one of the stats that I saw was that over 80% of organizations expect to deploy into production some form of AI or machine learning technology into their companies by 2020. I think the other thing that wasn't in that survey, but was instead, of remarks that Andrew Ng actually from Google made was that, the rapid pace of development in AI research and particularly the algorithm side in terms of different training frameworks and the way that people are working with data, that the rapid advance on that is actually democratizing entry into the AI space. I don't remember the exact quote, but he said something to the effect of, as algorithm research advances, it's easier and easier for new entrants to get into machine learning, to get into data science and make a bigger and bigger impact. And I think that the other thing that we've learned from the large incumbence, is that in many cases, and I think actually Google is the one that came out and said this, they said, the reason why Google is at the head of the pack, if you will in terms of data intelligence and machine intelligence, in some respect, they got their lead by having the most advanced algorithms, most advanced software engineers. But they maintain their lead because they have the most data. Basically the take away point there is having a lot of data trumps having the best algorithm, and we expect that to continue as AI research and algorithms continue to evolve. So I think it's really in many ways, it's much more a democratized landscape than previous approaches to. >> And a lot of that makes sense because the incumbence. You use that word, I like that word. They're going to buy AI from technology suppliers, and then they're going to apply it to their business. At the same time, data generally is not at the core of their business. It tends to be either humans or maybe the bottling plant or some other manufacturing assets or whatever it is. So they have to figure out the data model, and that study suggested that while they were optimistic about AI, they were struggling with trying to figure out how to apply it and the skill sets, et cetera. Maybe share some of your thoughts on that. >> Absolutely. I think one of the things that study really highlighted was that while there was a tremendous excitement and demand from the upper levels of management, the CIO, the kind of see-swee to deploy AI technologies, that there was an increasing and growing disconnect between the policy decision makers, the executive management and the people that are actually doing the work. And I think that disconnect with this technology set is... We see it on a day-to-day basis. We see it with customers that we talk to. I think that a lot of that disconnect actually comes from poor infrastructure planning. One of the things that we see is that many companies go and get really excited about the promise of the AI technology, the promise of hey, I could deploy this solution, I could understand my customers better, great, let's go do it. And they go off and they hire a bunch of data scientists without investing in or thinking about the infrastructure that they're going to put into place to make those data scientists productive. One of the things that I think there was an article in Financial Times that actually looked at hiring and retention for data scientists. And what they found was that the lack of infrastructure, the lack of automation was materially contributing to frustration in terms of data scientists being able to do their jobs. To the point where even those really, really hard to hire data scientists, it's becoming difficult to retain them if you're not giving them, if you're not equipping them with the tools to do their jobs efficiently. So this is an area where there's a growing disconnect between the decision makers that are saying, hey we've got to go that way. Their understanding of the tool sets and the automation of the infrastructure required to get there, and their staffs and their employees that are actually responsible for getting them there, and this is a scenario where as we, one of the exciting parts of my job at Pure is, I get to talk to a lot of customers that are on the bleeding edge of implementing these technologies. One of the things that we get to do by working with each of these customers by understanding what works, what doesn't work, we could help kind of bridge that gap. >> I'll take the bait. (laughs) >> What does that infrastructure for AI look like? I mean it's kind of self-serving. But, describe it. >> Sure. Well, so, I think at the heart of it, it's all about simplicity, it's all about removing friction in bottle necks. There's a Harvard business review article a while ago that looked at data science in general, where time is spent, where resources are spent. And they came up with a statistic that said, more than 80% of the data scientist's time is spent not doing data science, it's actually spent preparing data, moving data, copying data, doing basic data wrangling, data management tasks, and the other 20% is spent complaining about the first 80%. (laughing) >> So I think what we see, Pure helping with, what we see kind of the ideal kind of infrastructure to enable these types of projects, is an infrastructure that is simple, easy to work with, easy to manage. But more importantly, you heard Charlie and Kix during the keynote talk today, talk about data-centered architecture. You heard them talk about the importance of building an architecture, building a practice, building a set of processes around the idea that data is very, very difficult to move. You want to move it as few times as possible. You want to manage it as little as possible. And that really, really applies in a lot of these AI applications. To give you a very, very quick example, if you take a look at an AI pipeline to do something like training and object detection system for self-driving cars, that pipeline, that simple sentence may encapsulate 30 or 40 different applications. You've got video coming off of video cameras that have to be adjusted somewhere. That video has to be cut, downsized, rendered, cut into still images. Those still images have to be warped, noise filters applied, color filters applied. If you play this out, in most cases, there's 30, 40 different applications that are at play here. And without an infrastructure to make it easy to centralize the data management portion of that, you've also potentially got 30 or 40 different data silos. And so when we look at how to make projects successful, and we look at how do you make infrastructure that helps data science teams spend more time doing data science and less time copying data around, tracking where it is, so and so forth. That's all part of what we see as a larger data strategy. >> Oh, sorry Rob. So one of the customers that was shared on stage this morning, Paige AI, how they're leveraging not just pure technology but also really kind of taking what used to be and still is for a lot of organizations, an analog process of actually looking at cancer pathology slides and digitizing that and taking it forward. Did you see in the study any leading industries that are maybe better positioned to align the (mumbling) with the ITDs to take advantage of AI faster? Are there any industries that kind of jumped out in the study as maybe those that are going to be leading edge? >> So I think the thing that actually jumped out was that how broad-based across industries really the AI applications are. I think if you look at specific types of data sets or specific-use cases, if you look at image detection for example. Yes I think you can drive that into specific industries. I think you're going to see a lot in healthcare, in manufacturing, certainly self-driving cars is a big one. I think if you look at natural language processing or speech detect, that sort of thing. A lot of customer service that's being put into use in a lot of automating a lot of chat bots, a lot of customer service kind of call center type applications. So I think if you look at a particular application or at a particular data set or data type, you can drive that to industries that are likely to lead the charge. But what was interesting to me was if you consider all of the machine-learning approaches, all of the AI kind of interests, how broad-based across all industries that was. >> I know we're out of time, but we'd be remiss if we didn't ask you what you guys are doing internally. You're not just selling a infrastructure for AI, you're AI practitioners as well. Can you briefly describe what you're doing? >> Sure, sure. So I think the most interesting application of AI that we've got internally is really the AI engine that powers Meta which is our Pure1 hosted kind of-- (cell phone ringing) (laughing) Our Pure1 offering that helps us predictively and proactively manage customer arrays. We started Pure1 as a remote support offering since the beginning of Pure, since we first shipped FlashArray, and we did it originally to get to the point where we could better understand arrays. The more arrays that we shipped in the field, we want the marginal cost of support, the marginal kind of effort, if you will, to understand that the arrays behavior to decrease with the number of arrays that we ship. And we want our understanding of the array's behavior of the customer use case, of the workload behavior to increase with the number of arrays that we ship. And we started off by using more traditional AI techniques. Basic language processing, basic statistics, so on and so forth. What we've since done is built a machine-learning engine behind it so that we can make more intelligent inferences, more intelligent decisions. And so you've seen this come out as, in the form of tools that we've released as such as Will It Fit, so we can now take a look at an array, and we can say, okay well you've got this many workloads you've got this many VMs sitting on this array and on this volume. What would it look like to put double that? What can you expect in terms of capacity of utilization? What can you expect in terms of performance? We can also take that to a hypothetical kind of hypothesis analysis to different harbor platforms. We can say hey you've got this workload running on a X50 today, what would it look like to double that workload and move it to an X70? What would that look like? And again, a lot of those inferences, we can do that without exactly tracking and exactly testing that workload because we have a broad-based set of data points across our entire fleet. >> Too complicated for humans to do all that. It really is. >> Yes, it really is. >> But generating workload DNA. >> Exactly, exactly. And more importantly, to get to Dave's point, more importantly, doing it an automated way so that you don't have to put an army of human beings, an army of administrators behind it to calculate it by hand. >> Well Rob thanks so much for stopping by theCUBE and sharing with us what's goin' on from your perspective. Go get some orange. (laughing) >> Thanks for having me. >> For Dave Vellante, I am Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE. We are live at Pure Storage Accelerate 2018 in San Francisco. Stick around, Dave and I will be right back with our next guest. (upbeat music)

>>we're back. >>This is Dave Volante. I'm with Wiki bond dot Oregon. This is Silicon angle's the cube where we extract the signal from the noise. We go into the events, we're bringing you the best guests that we can find. And we're here at the AWS summit. Amazon is taking the cloud world by storm. He was on, invented the cloud in 2006. They've popularized it very popular of course with developers. Everybody knows that story. Uh, Amazon appealing to the web startups, but what's most impressive is the degree to which Amazon is beginning to enter the enterprise markets. I'm here with my cohost Jeff Frick and Jeff, we heard Andy Jassy this morning just laying out the sort of marketing messaging and progress and strategies of AWS. One of the things that was most impressive was the pace at which they put forth innovations. We talked about that earlier, but also the pace at which they proactively reduce prices. Uh, that's different than what you'd see in the normal sort of enterprise space. Talk about that a little bit. >>Yeah. Again, I think it really speaks to their strategy to lock up the customer. It's really a lifetime value of the customer and making sure that they don't have a really an opportunity or a reason to go anywhere else. So as we discussed a little bit earlier, they leverage, you know, kind of the pure hardware economics of, of decreasing a computing power, decreasing storage, decreasing bandwidth, but then they also get all the benefits of scale. And I think what's in one of the interesting things that Andy talked about and kind of his six key messages was that it's actually cheaper to rent from them because of the scale than it is to buy yourself. And I know that's a pretty common knock between kind of a build or buy, um, kind of process you go through and usually you would think renting at some scale becomes less economical than if you just did it yourself. But because their scale is so massive because of the flexibility that you can bring, uh, computing resources to bear based on what you're trying to accomplish really kind of breaks down the, uh, the old age old thought that, you know, at scale we need to do it ourselves. >>Well, and that's the premise. Um, I think, and, uh, let's Brits break down a little bit about that, that analysis and, and Andy's keynote. So he put forth some data from IDC which showed that, uh, the Amazon cloud is cheaper than the, uh, a, a so-called private cloud or an in house on premise installation. You know, I certainly, there's, it's, it's a, it's an, it's depends, right? It really depends on the workload. That's somewhat of an apples to orange is going on here and the types of workloads that are going down in the AWS cloud, granted he's right and that they're running Oracle, they're running SAP, but the real mission critical workloads, what he calls mission critical aren't the same as what, you know, Citi would call mission critical. Right? So to replicate that level of mission criticality, uh, would probably almost most certainly be more expensive rental versus owning the real Achilles heel of, of, of any cloud, not just Amazon. >>Cloud really is getting data out. Um, moving data, right? Amazon's going to charge you not to get data in. They're gonna charge you to store it there to exercise, you know, compute. Uh, and then, but they're also gonna charge it if you wanted to take it out. That's expensive. The bandwidth costs and the extrication costs are expensive. Uh, the other issue with cloud again is data movement. It takes a long time to move a terabyte, let alone multiple terabytes. So those are sort of the two sort of Achilles heels of, of cloud. But that's not specific to Amazon's cloud. That's any cloud. Yeah. So we've got a great lineup today. Um, let's see. We've got Ariel Kelman coming on, uh, and I believe he's in the house. So we're going to take a quick break. Quick break. Right now we right back with Ariel Kelman, who's the head of marketing at AWS. Keep right there. This is the cube right back. >>we lift out all the programs out there and identified a gap in tech news coverage. Those shows are just the tip of the iceberg and we're here for the deep dive, the market beg for our program to fill that void. We're not just touting off headlines. We also want to analyze the big picture and ask the questions that no one else is asking. We work with analysts who know the industry from the inside out. So what do you think was the source of this missing? So you mentioned briefly there are, that's the case then why does the world need another song? We're creating a fundamental change in news coverage, laying the foundation and setting the standard, and this is just the beginning. We looked on all the programs out there and identified a gap in tech news coverage. There are plenty of tech shows that provide new gadgets and talk about the latest in gaming, but those shows aren't just the tip of the iceberg. And we're here for the deep dive. >>Okay, >>Dave Olanta. I'm with Wiki bond.org and this is Silicon angle's the cube where we extract signal from the noise. We bring you the best guest that we can find. We go into events like ESPN goes into sporting events, we go into tech events, we find the tech athletes and bring to you their knowledge and share with you our community. We're here at Moscone in San Francisco at the AWS summit. We're here with Arielle Kellman who's the head of worldwide marketing for AWS. Arielle, welcome to the cube. Thanks for having me, Dave. Yeah, our pleasure. I really appreciate you guys having us here. Great venue. Uh, let's see. What's the numbers? It looks like you know, many, many thousands, well over 5,000 people here by four or 5,000 people here. We're doing a about a dozen of these around the world, one to 4,000 people to help educate our customers about all the new things we're doing, all the new partners that are available to help them thrive in the AWS cloud. >>It's mind boggling the amount of stuff that you guys are doing. We just heard NG Jesse's keynote, for those of you who saw Andy's keynote at reinvent, a lot of similar themes with some, some new stuff in there, but one of the most impressive, he said, he said, other than security, one of the things that we're most proud of is the pace at which we introduce new services. And he talked about this fly wheel effect. Can you talk about that a little bit? Sure. Well, there's kind of two different things going on. The pace of innovation is we're really trying to be nimble and customer centric and ultimately we're trying to give our customers a complete set of services to run virtually any workload in the cloud. So you see us expanding a broader would additional services. And then as we get feedback we add more and more features. >>Yeah. So we're obviously seeing a big enterprise push. Uh, Andy was, was very, I thought, politically correct. He said, look, there's one model which is to keep charging people as much as you possibly can. And then there's our model, which is we proactively cut prices and we passed that on to customers. Um, and, and he also stressed that that's not something that's not a gimmick. It's not a sort of a onetime thing. Can you talk about that in terms of your philosophy and your DNA? It's just our philosophy. It's actually a lot less dramatic than is often portrayed in the press. Just the way we look at things as we're constantly trying to drive efficiencies out of our operations. And as we lower our cost structure, we have a choice. We can either pocket those savings as extra margin or we can pass those savings along to our customers in the form of lower prices. >>And we feel that the ladder is the approach that customers like and we want to make our customers happy. So this event, uh, we were talking off camera, you said you've been doing these now for about two years. You do re-invent once a year. That's your big conference out in Vegas and it's a very, very large event, very well attended. And you do these regionally and in and around the world, right. Talk about that a little bit. We do about a dozen of these a year. Um, we did, uh, New York a couple of weeks ago, London, Australia and Sydney. I'm going to go to India and Tokyo, really about a dozen cities in the world and it's a little tactic. I'm not going to beat all of them, but you know, the focus is to really, uh, deliver educational content. Uh, we'll do about maybe 12 to 16 technical breakout sessions all for free, uh, for, for customers and people who want to learn about AWS for the first time. >>And the, and the audience here is largely practitioners and partners, right? Can it talk about the makeup a little bit? Sure. It's a pretty diverse set of people. Um, we have a technical executives like CEOs and architects and we have lots of developers and then lots of people from our, our partner ecosystem of integrators wanting to, um, you know, brush up on the latest technologies and skills and a lot of people who just want to learn about the cloud and learn about AWS. I think there are a lot of misconceptions about AWS and I'd like to just tackle some of those with you if I may. So let me just sort of, let's list them off and you can respond. Yeah, we'll let our audience to sort of decide. So the first is that AWS has only tested dev workloads. Can you talk about that a little bit? >>Sure. Um, well test and dev local workloads are very popular. We saw, we covered that in the keynote. Um, and it's often a place where it organizations will start out with AWS, but it is by no means the most popular or most dominant workload. We have a lot of people migrating, uh, enterprise apps to the cloud. Um, if you look at, uh, in New York, uh, in our summit we talked about Bristol Myers Squibb, uh, running all of their, um, clinical trial simulations and reducing the amount of time it takes to run a simulation by 98%. Uh, if people are running Oracle, SharePoint, SAP, pretty much any workload in the cloud. And then another popular use is building brand new applications, uh, for the cloud. You can miss, some people call them cloud native applications. A good example is the Washington post who built an app called the social reader that delivers their content to Facebook and now as more people viewing their content, their than with their print magazines and they just couldn't have done that, uh, on premises. >>So, uh, the other one I want to talk about, we're going to do some serious double clicking on security so we don't have to go crazy on it, but, but there's a sort of common perception that the cloud is not secure. What do you guys say about that? Yeah, so, um, really our number one priority is security. You're looking at a security, operational performance, uh, and then our pace of innovation. But with security, um, what we want to do is to give enterprises everything they need to understand how our security works and to evaluate it and how it meets with their requirements for their projects. So it really all starts with our, our physical security, um, our network security, the access of our people. They're all the similar types of technologies that our customers are familiar with. And then they also tend to look at all the certifications and accreditations, SAS 70 type two SOC one SIS trust. >>I ATAR for our government customers. And then I think it was something a lot of people don't understand is how much work we've put into the security features. It's not just is the cloud secure, but can I interact and integrate, uh, your security functionality with all of my existing systems so we can integrate with people's identity and access systems. You could have a private dedicated connection from your enterprise to AWS with direct connect to, I really encourage anyone who has interest in digging into our security features to go to the security center and our website. It's got tons of information. So I'm putting on the spot. Um, what percent of data centers in the world have security that are, that is as good or better than AWS. It'd be an interesting thing for us to do a survey on. But if you think about security at the infrastructure layer down is what we take care of. >>Now when you build your application, you can build a secure app or non-secure app. So the customer has some responsibility there. But in terms of that cloud infrastructure, um, for a vast majority of our customers, they're getting a pretty substantial upgrade in their security. And here's something to think about is that, um, we run a multitenant service, so we have lots and lots of customers sharing that infrastructure and we get feedback from some of the most security conscious companies in the world and government agencies. So when our customers are giving us a enhancement request, and let's say it is, uh, an oil company like shell or financial services company like NASDAQ, and we implement that improvement because there's always new requirements. We implement that all of our hundreds of thousands of customers get those improvements. So it's very hard for a lot of companies to match that internally, to stay up to speed with all the latest, um, requirements that people need. >>Yeah. Okay. So, uh, and you touched on this as well as the compliance piece of it, but when you think of things like, like HIPAA compliance for example, I think a lot of people don't realize that you guys are a lead in that regard. Can you talk about that a little bit more? Yeah. So, uh, we have a lot of customers running HIPAA compliant, uh, workloads. Um, there's, there's one company or the, the Schumacher group, which does emergency room staffing out of Lafayette, Louisiana. And we, companies like that are going through the process. They have to follow their internal compliance guidelines for implementing a HIPAA compliant plan app. It's actually, it's more about how you implement and manage the application than the infrastructure, which is part of it. But we, we satisfy that for our customers. Let's talk a little bit about SLA. That didn't come up at least today in Andy's keynote, but it didn't reinvent and he made a statement at reinvent. >>He said, we've never lost a piece of business because of SLS. And that caught my attention and I said, okay, interesting. Um, talk about, uh, the criticisms of the SLA. So a lot of people say, wow, SLA, not just of Amazon's cloud, but any public cloud. I mean, SLA is a really a, in essence, a, an indication of the risk that you're able to take and willing to take. What are your customers tell you about SLS? The first thing is we don't hear a lot of questions about SLS from our customers. Some customers, it's very important that we have SLA is for most of our services, but what they're usually judging us on is the operational track record that we provide and doing testing and seeing how we operate and how we perform. Uh, and, uh, we had an analyst from IDC recently do a survey of a bunch of our customers and they found that on average the average app that runs on AWS had 80% less downtime than similar apps that are running on premises. >>So we have a lot of anecdotal evidence to suggest that our customers are seeing a reliability improvement by migrating their apps to AWS. You're saying don't judge us on the paper, judge us on our actual activities in production and in the field. Typically what most of our customers are asking for is they want to dig into the actual operational features and, and a track record. Now the other thing I want to address is the so called, you know, uh, uh, exit tax, right? It's no charge to get my data in there. I keep my data in there. You, you, you charged me for storing it for exercise and compute activity, but it's expensive to get it out. Um, how do you address that criticism? Well, our pricing is different for every service and we really model it around our customers to both really to really satisfy a broad set of use cases. >>So one example I think you may be talking about is I would Amazon glacier archive service, which is one penny per gigabyte per month. And for an archive service, we figured that most people want to keep their data in there for a long period of time so that we want to make it as cheap as possible for people to put it in. And if you actually needed to pull it out, the reason is because you may have had some disaster or you accidentally deleted something and that you are going to be, uh, you're going to be retrieving data on a far less frequent basis. So on an overall basis for most customers it makes sense that we could have done is made the retrieval costs lower and then made the storage costs higher. But the feedback we got from customers is, you know, archiving a majority of customers may never even retrieve that data at all. >>So it ended up being cheaper for a vast majority of our customers. I mean that's the point of glacier. If you put it there, you kind of hope you never have to go back and get it. Um, the other thing I wanted to ask you about is some of the innovations that we've seen lately in the industry, like a red shift, right? The data warehouse, you mentioned glacier. It was interesting. Andy said that glacier is the fastest growing service in terms of customers. Red shift was the fastest growing service, I guess overall at NAWS. So Redshift is an interesting move for you guys. Uh, that whole big data and analytics space. What if you could talk about that a little bit? If you talk to it, executives in the enterprise and even startups now, they have to analyze lots of data. Building a big data warehouse is, is one of the best examples of how much the pain of hardware and software infrastructure gets in the way of people. >>And there's also a gatekeeping aspect to it. If you're working in a big company and you want to run, you have a question and a hypothesis, you want to run queries against terabytes and petabytes of data, you pretty often have to go and ask for permission. Can I borrow some time from the data warehouse? No, no, no, no. You're not as important. Well, what are customers going to go, Hey, I'm going to go load the data, load a petabyte of data, run a bunch of analysis, and shut it down and only pay for a few hours. So it's not just about making a cheaper, it's about making use of technology possible where it was just not possible in feasible and cost prohibited before. Yeah, so that's an important point. I mean, it's not, it's not just about sort of moving workloads to the cloud, you know, the old saying a my mess for less. >>It's about enabling new business processes and new procedures and deeper business integration. Um, can you talk about that a little bit more? Add a little color to that notion of adding value beyond just moving workloads out of, you know, on premise into the cloud to cut costs, cut op ex, but enabling new business capabilities. When you remove the infrastructure burden between your ideas and what you want to do, you enable new things to be possible. I think innovation is a big aspect of this where if you think about if you reduce the cost of failure for technology projects so much that approaches zero, you change the whole risk taking culture in a company and more people can try out new ideas and companies can Greenlight more ideas because if they fail it doesn't cost you that much. You haven't built up all this infrastructure. So if you have more ideas that are, that are cultivated, you end up with more innovation. >>Whereas before people are too afraid to try new things. So I'm a reader of of Jeffrey's a annual letters. I mean I think they're great. They're Warren buffet like in that regard. One of the exact emphasizes, you know this year was the customer focus. You guys are a customer focused organization, not a competitive focused organization. And again, you got to recognize that both models can work, right? Can you talk about that a little bit? Just the church of the culture. Yeah, I mean when, you know, starts out with how we build our products. Anyone who has a new idea for a product, first thing they got to do is write the press release. So what our customers are going to see is it valuable to them. And then we get come get products out quickly and then we iterate with customers. We don't spend five years building the first version of something. >>We get it out quickly. Uh, sort of the, the, the lean startup, if you heard of the minimum viable product approach, get it out there and get feedback from customers. Uh, and iterate. We don't spend a lot of time looking at what our competitors are doing cause they're not the ones that pay our bill. They're not the ones that can hire and fire us. It's the customers. So I'm you've seen this thing come, you know, quite a ways. I mean, you were at Salesforce, right? Um, which I guess started at all in 99. You could sell that, look at that as the modern cloud sort of movement was, wasn't called cloud. And then you guys in 2006 actually announced what we now know is, you know, the cloud, where are we in terms of, you know, the cloud, you know, what ending is it? To use the sports analogy, I don't know what ending is it, but you know, it's an amazing time where there's such a massive amount of momentum of adoption of the cloud from every type of company, every type of government agency. >>But yet still, when you look at the percentage of it spend or you go talk to a large company and you say, even with all these projects, what percentage of your total projects, there's still tremendous growth ahead of us. Yeah. So, um, there's always that conversation about the pie charts. 70% of our, our effort is spent on keeping the lights on. 30% is spent on, on innovation. And I don't know where that number came from but, but I think generally anecdotally it feels about right. Um, talk about that shift. Yeah. Well I mean your customer base, you talk to any CIO, they don't like the idea of having 80% of their staff and budget being focused on keeping the lights on and the infrastructure would they like to do is to really shift the mix of what people are working on within their organization. It's not about getting rid of it, it's about giving it tools so that every ounce of effort they're doing is geared towards delivering things to the business. >>And that, that, that's what gets CIO is excited about the cloud is really shifting that and having a majority of their people building and iterating with their end users and with their customers. So we talked about the competition a little bit. I want to ask you a question in general, general terms, you guys have laid out sort of the playbook and there's a lot more coming. We know that, uh, but you know this industry quite well. You know, it's very competitive. People S people see what leaders are doing and they all sort of go after it. Why do you feel confident that AWS will be able to maintain its lead and Kennedy even extend its lead in why? Well, there's a couple things that we sort of suggest for customers to look at. I think first of all is the track record and experience of when you're looking at a cloud provider, have they been in this business for a long time? >>Do they have a services mentality where they've had customers trust them for their, for applications that really they trust their business on? Um, and then I think secondly, is there a commitment to innovation? Is there a pace of new features and new technologies as requirements change? And I think the other, the other piece that our customers really give us a lot of feedback on is that they can count on us Lauren prices, they can count on a real partnership as we get better at this and we're always learning as we get better and we reduce our cost structure, they're going to get to benefit and lower their costs as well. So I think those are kind of big things. The other thing is, is the customer ecosystem I think is a big part of it where, um, you know, this is technology. Uh, people need advice, they need, uh, best practices. >>They often need help. And I'm in a kind of analogy I make is if I have a problem with my phone, with my iPhone, I can probably close my eyes and throw it, I'm going to hit someone who also has an iPhone. I can ask them for help. Well, if you're a startup in San Francisco or London or if you're an enterprise in New York or Sydney, odds are that your colleagues, if they're doing cloud, they're doing it with AWS and you have a lot of people to help you out. A lot of people to share best practices with. And that's a subtle but important point is as, as industry participants begin to aggregate within your cloud, there's a data angle there, right? Because there's data that potentially those organizations could share if they so choose to a, that is a, that is a value. And as you say, the best practice sharing as well. >>I have two last questions for you. Sure. First is, is what gets you excited in this whole field? I think it's like seeing what customers are doing. I mean, that's the cool thing about, uh, offering cloud infrastructure is that anything is possible. Like we met Ryan, uh, who spoke from atomic fiction. These guys are the world's first digital effects agency that's 100% in the cloud. And to see that they made a movie and all the effects like the Robertson mech, his flight film without owning a single server, um, it's just, it's amazing. And to see what these guys can do, how happy they are to have a group of 30, 40 artists that, um, can say yes when the director says I want it to do differently. I want to add, go from 150 to 300 shots and to see how happy and excited they are. >>I mean that, that's what motivates me. Yeah. Okay. And then my last question, Ariel, is, um, you know, what keeps you up at night? What worries you? Well, I think, you know, the most important thing that we can't forget is to really keep our fingers on the pulse of the customers and what they want, and also helping them to figure out what they want next. Because if we don't keep moving, then we're not going to keep pace with what the customers want to use the cloud for. All right, Ariel Kelman thanks very much. Congratulations on the Mason's progress and we'll be watching and, and really appreciate, again, you having us here. Appreciate your time coming on. Good luck with the rest of the tour. I hope you don't have to do every city. It sounds like you don't, but, uh, but if it sounds like you've enjoyed them, so, uh, congratulations again. Great. All right. This is Dave Milan to keep it right there. This is the cube. We'll be back with our next guest right after this word.