>> (upbeat music) [Narrator] From around the globe, it's theCUBE with digital coverage of AnsibleFest 2020, brought to you by Red Hat. >> Hello welcome back to theCUBE virtual coverage of AnsibleFest 2020 Virtual. We're not face to face this year. I'm John Furrier, your host. We're bringing it together remotely. We're in the Palo Alto Studios with theCUBE and we're going remote for our guests this year. And I hope you can come together online enjoy the content. Of course, go check out the events site on Demand Live. And certainly I have a lot of great content. I've got a great guest Skyla Loomis Vice president, for the Z Application Platform at IBM. Also known as IBM Z talking Mainframe. Skyla, thanks for coming on theCUBE Appreciate it. >> Thank you for having me. So, you know, I've talked many conversations about the Mainframe of being relevant and valuable in context to cloud and cloud native because if it's got a workload you've got containers and all this good stuff, you can still run anything on anything these days. By integrating it in with all this great glue layer, lack of a better word or oversimplifying it, you know, things going on. So it's really kind of cool. Plus Walter Bentley in my previous interview was talking about the success of Ansible, and IBM working together on a really killer implementation. So I want to get into that, but before that let's get into IBM Z. How did you start working with IBM Z? What's your role there? >> Yeah, so I actually just got started with Z about four years ago. I spent most of my career actually on the distributed platform, largely with data and analytics, the analytics area databases and both On-premise and Public Cloud. But I always considered myself a friend to Z. So in many of the areas that I'd worked on, we'd, I had offerings where we'd enabled it to work with COS or Linux on Z. And then I had this opportunity come up where I was able to take on the role of leading some of our really core runtimes and databases on the Z platform, IMS and z/TPF. And then recently just expanded my scope to take on CICS and a number of our other offerings related to those kind of in this whole application platform space. And I was really excited because just of how important these runtimes and this platform is to the world,really. You know, our power is two thirds of our fortune 100 clients across banking and insurance. And it's you know, some of the most powerful transaction platforms in the world. You know doing hundreds of billions of transactions a day. And you know, just something that's really exciting to be a part of and everything that it does for us. >> It's funny how distributed systems and distributed computing really enable more longevity of everything. And now with cloud, you've got new capabilities. So it's super excited. We're seeing that a big theme at AnsibleFest this idea of connecting, making things easier you know, talk about distributed computing. The cloud is one big distribute computer. So everything's kind of playing together. You have a panel discussion at AnsibleFest Virtual. Could you talk about what your topic is and share, what was some of the content in there? Content being, content as in your presentation? Not content. (laughs) >> Absolutely. Yeah, so I had the opportunity to co-host a panel with a couple of our clients. So we had Phil Allison from Black Knight and Pat Lane from Allstate and they were really joining us and talking about their experience now starting to use Ansible to manage to z/OS. So we just actually launched some content collections and helping to enable and accelerate, client's use of using Ansible to manage to z/OS back in March of this year. And we've just seen tremendous client uptake in this. And these are a couple of clients who've been working with us and, you know, getting started on the journey of now using Ansible with Z they're both you know, have it in the enterprise already working with Ansible on other platforms. And, you know, we got to talk with them about how they're bringing it into Z. What use cases they're looking at, the type of culture change, that it drives for their teams as they embark on this journey and you know where they see it going for them in the future. >> You know, this is one of the hot items this year. I know that events virtual so has a lot of content flowing around and sessions, but collections is the top story. A lot of people talking collections, collections collections, you know, integration and partnering. It hits so many things but specifically, I like this use case because you're talking about real business value. And I want to ask you specifically when you were in that use case with Ansible and Z. People are excited, it seems like it's working well. Can you talk about what problems that it solves? I mean, what was some of the drivers behind it? What were some of the results? Could you give some insight into, you know, was it a pain point? Was it an enabler? Can you just share why that was getting people are getting excited about this? >> Yeah well, certainly automation on Z, is not new, you know there's decades worth of, of automation on the platform but it's all often proprietary, you know, or bundled up like individual teams or individual people on teams have specific assets, right. That they've built and it's not shared. And it's certainly not consistent with the rest of the enterprise. And, you know, more and more, you're kind of talking about hybrid cloud. You know, we're seeing that, you know an application is not isolated to a single platform anymore right. It really expands. And so being able to leverage this common open platform to be able to manage Z in the same way that you manage the entire rest of your enterprise, whether that's Linux or Windows or network or storage or anything right. You know you can now actually bring this all together into a common automation plane in control plane to be able to manage to all of this. It's also really great from a skills perspective. So, it enables us to really be able to leverage. You know Python on the platform and that's whole ecosystem of Ansible skills that are out there and be able to now use that to work with Z. >> So it's essentially a modern abstraction layer of agility and people to work on it. (laughs) >> Yeah >> You know it's not the joke, Hey, where's that COBOL programmer. I mean, this is a serious skill gap issues though. This is what we're talking about here. You don't have to replace the, kill the old to bring in the new, this is an example of integration where it's classic abstraction layer and evolution. Is that, am I getting that right? >> Absolutely. I mean I think that Ansible's power as an orchestrator is part of why, you know, it's been so successful here because it's not trying to rip and replace and tell you that you have to rewrite anything that you already have. You know, it is that glue sort of like you used that term earlier right? It's that glue that can span you know, whether you've got rec whether you've got ACL, whether you're using z/OSMF you know, or any other kind of custom automation on the platform, you know, it works with everything and it can start to provide that transparency into it as well, and move to that, like infrastructure as code type of culture. So you can bring it into source control. You can have visibility to it as part of the Ansible automation platform and tower and those capabilities. And so you, it really becomes a part of the whole enterprise and enables you to codify a lot of that knowledge. That, you know, exists again in pockets or in individuals and make it much more accessible to anybody new who's coming to the platform. >> That's a great point, great insight.& It's worth calling out. I'm going to make a note of that and make a highlight from that insight. That was awesome. I got to ask about this notion of client uptake. You know, when you have z/OS and Ansible kind of come in together, what are the clients area? When do they get excited? When do they know that they've got to do? And what are some of the client reactions? Are they're like, wake up one day and say, "Hey, yeah I actually put Ansible and z/OS together". You know peanut butter and chocolate is (mumbles) >> Honestly >> You know, it was just one of those things where it's not obvious, right? Or is it? >> Actually I have been surprised myself at how like resoundingly positive and immediate the reactions have been, you know we have something, one of our general managers runs a general managers advisory council and at some of our top clients on the platform and you know we meet with them regularly to talk about, you know, the future direction that we're going. And we first brought this idea of Ansible managing to Z there. And literally unanimously everybody was like yes, give it to us now. (laughs) It was pretty incredible, you know? And so it's you know, we've really just seen amazing uptake. We've had over 5,000 downloads of our core collection on galaxy. And again that's just since mid to late March when we first launched. So we're really seeing tremendous excitement with it. >> You know, I want to want to talk about some of the new announcements, but you brought that up. I wanted to kind of tie into it. It is addictive when you think modernization, people success is addictive. This is another theme coming out of AnsibleFest this year is that when the sharing, the new content you know, coders content is the theme. I got to ask you because you mentioned earlier about the business value and how the clients are kind of gravitating towards it. They want it.It is addictive, contagious. In the ivory towers in the big, you know, front office, the business. It's like, we've got to make everything as a service. Right. You know, you hear that right. You know, and say, okay, okay, boss You know, Skyla, just go do it. Okay. Okay. It's so easy. You can just do it tomorrow, but to make everything as a service, you got to have the automation, right. So, you know, to bridge that gap has everything is a service whether it's mainframe. I mean okay. Mainframe is no problem. If you want to talk about observability and microservices and DevOps, eventually everything's going to be a service. You got to have the automation. Could you share your, commentary on how you view that? Because again, it's a business objective everything is a service, then you got to make it technical then you got to make it work and so on. So what's your thoughts on that? >> Absolutely. I mean, agility is a huge theme that we've been focusing on. We've been delivering a lot of capabilities around a cloud native development experience for folks working on COBOL, right. Because absolutely you know, there's a lot of languages coming to the platform. Java is incredibly powerful and it actually runs better on Z than it runs on any other platform out there. And so, you know, we're seeing a lot of clients you know, starting to, modernize and continue to evolve their applications because the platform itself is incredibly modern, right? I mean we come out with new releases, we're leading the industry in a number of areas around resiliency, in our security and all of our, you know, the face of encryption and number of things that come out with, but, you know the applications themselves are what you know, has not always kept pace with the rate of change in the industry. And so, you know, we're really trying to help enable our clients to make that leap and continue to evolve their applications in an important way, and the automation and the tools that go around it become very important. So, you know, one of the things that we're enabling is the self service, provisioning experience, right. So clients can, you know, from Open + Shift, be able to you know, say, "Hey, give me an IMS and z/OS connect stack or a kicks into DB2 stack." And that is all under the covers is going to be powered by Ansible automation. So that really, you know, you can get your system programmers and your talent out of having to do these manual tasks, right. Enable the development community. So they can use things like VS Code and Jenkins and GET Lab, and you'll have this automated CICB pipeline. And again, Ansible under the covers can be there helping to provision those test environments. You know, move the data, you know, along with the application, changes through the pipeline and really just help to support that so that, our clients can do what they need to do. >> You guys got the collections in the hub there, so automation hub, I got to ask you where do you see the future of the automating within z/OS going forward? >> Yeah, so I think, you know one of the areas that we'd like to see go is head more towards this declarative state so that you can you know, have this declarative configuration defined for your Z environment and then have Ansible really with the data and potency right. Be able to, go out and ensure that the environment is always there, and meeting those requirements. You know that's partly a culture change as well which goes along with it, but that's a key area. And then also just, you know, along with that becoming more proactive overall part of, you know, AI ops right. That's happening. And I think Ansible on the automation that we support can become you know, an integral piece of supporting that more intelligent and proactive operational direction that, you know, we're all going. >> Awesome Skyla. Great to talk to you. And so insightful, appreciate it. One final question. I want to ask you a personal question because I've been doing a lot of interviews around skill gaps and cybersecurity, and there's a lot of jobs, more job openings and there are a lot of people. And people are with COVID working at home. People are looking to get new skilled up positions, new opportunities. Again cybersecurity and spaces and event we did and want to, and for us its huge, huge openings. But for people watching who are, you know, resetting getting through this COVID want to come out on the other side there's a lot of online learning tools out there. What skill sets do you think? Cause you brought up this point about modernization and bringing new people and people as a big part of this event and the role of the people in community. What areas do you think people could really double down on? If I wanted to learn a skill. Or an area of coding and business policy or integration services, solution architects, there's a lot of different personas, but what skills can I learn? What's your advice to people out there? >> Yeah sure. I mean on the Z platform overall and skills related to Z, COBOL, right. There's, you know, like two billion lines of COBOL out there in the world. And it's certainly not going away and there's a huge need for skills. And you know, if you've got experience from other platforms, I think bringing that in, right. And really being able to kind of then bridge the two things together right. For the folks that you're working for and the enterprise we're working with you know, we actually have a bunch of education out there. You got to master the mainframe program and even a competition that goes on that's happening now, for folks who are interested in getting started at any stage, whether you're a student or later in your career, but you know learning, you know, learn a lot of those platforms you're going to be able to then have a career for life. >> Yeah. And the scale on the data, this is so much going on. It's super exciting. Thanks for sharing that. Appreciate it. Want to get that plug in there. And of course, IBM, if you learn COBOL you'll have a job forever. I mean, the mainframe's not going away. >> Absolutely. >> Skyla, thank you so much for coming on theCUBE Vice President, for the Z Application Platform and IBM, thanks for coming. Appreciate it. >> Thanks for having me. >> I'm John Furrier your host of theCUBE here for AnsibleFest 2020 Virtual. Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)

>>from San Francisco. It's the Q covering pager duty Summit 2019. Brought to you by pager Duty. >>Hey, welcome back there. Ready, Geoffrey? Here with the cue, we're pager duty Summit in the historic Western St Francis Hotel, downtown San Francisco. I think they've outgrown the venue. The place is packed to the gills. Standing, rolling, the keynote Really excited of our next guest. Someone who's been to this industry for awhile really done some super cool creative things. He's given the closing keynote. We're happy to have him here right now. That's Mitchell Hashimoto from Hachiko. It's great to see you. >>Good to see you too. Thanks for having >>absolutely so just a quick overview before we get into it on hot chic or for the people in our familiar >>Sure, so hospitals a company that what we try to do is help people adopt cloud, but more, more realistically, Adolfo multi cloud and hybrid cloud the real world complexities. That cloud isn't just a technical landing point, but it's really way You deliver software. You want to deliver more applications, you want to connect them faster. You want to do this in an automated away infrastructure is code of all these modern practices way. Build a suite of tools Thio provisions secure, connect and run those applications for separate products that we sell that you could adopt separately. Good mix and match. That's That's what we've been doing for a long time. Based on open source Software, Way started purely as an open source community and have grown into an enterprise cos that's that's That's the elevator pitch. >>No, it's great, but it's a great story, >>right? Europe, Europe in Seattle got some access to some cloud infrastructure and really solve your own problem. Figured out other people of that problem and then really built a really cool, open source kind of based software company. >>Yeah, I mean, I think the amount of people that had the problem I was facing personally was orders of magnitude more than I expected. I've told other people we never expected to start even a business around this. It was just scratching and building technical solutions. But a CZ, as we sort of worked at startups, started talking a bigger and bigger companies. It just kept everyone kept saying, Yes, I have that problem and it's only grown since then, right surprising, >>and the complexity has only grown exponentially before. The you know, years ago, there was this bright, shiny new object called a W s. I mean, I love Bezos is great line that nobody even paid attention. You have six or seven years. They've got a head start and kind of this Russian. Now there's been a little bit of a fallback as people trying to figure out what to go where now it's hybrid cloud and horses for courses. So a lot of great complexity, which is nothing but good news for you. >>Absolutely. I told this story before, but our first year incorporated company I actually got hung up on by an analyst because I said way we're trying to solve a multi cloud problem and they said that's not a real problem when it will never be a real problem. They hung up on me on it was a bet, then, and and I think they're the expectation that was it was gonna be Eight of us is gonna be physical infrastructure and the physical infrastructure days were numbered. It was gonna get acts out. It was just gonna all go to eight of us and our conviction was that you would have both forever and or for a very long time. And then people like Azure, Google and others would pick up and and that's been true. But I think what we didn't expect, the complexity that got introduced with things like containers in Kubernetes because it's not like Clouded option finished in the next started It all came at once. So now Riel Cos they're dealing with the complexity of their still trying to move the clouds. They're trying to get more out of their physical infrastructure, trying to adopt kubernetes. Now people are starting to peck at them about server list. So there the complexity is is a bit crazy and review our job trying to simplify that adoption make you get the most out of >>right. And that was before you could get a piece of Ian where inside of AWS, get a get a piece of the Google Data Center inside your own data center. So it just continues to get crazier. >>Yes, yeah, So you're giving a closing keynote on a >>new project. You're working on fault, and it's an existing project. Justin cry. They're old, but but I think you talked about before we turn the cameras on. It's really more of a kind of an attitude in a and a point of view and a way to go after the problem. So I wonder if you could kind of dig into a little bit of What did you see? How did you decide to kind of turn the lens a little bit and reframe this challenge? Yeah, >>I think the big picture of story I'm trying to tell him the keynote is that everybody? Anything You look around the technical nontechnical, this table, that glass. Like everything you look at, it trickles back to the idea of one or a small group of people, and it takes an army to make it show up on this table. But it starts by somebody's vision, and everything was created by somebody. So I'm talking about vault, something we made and, you know, why don't we create it? And why do we make it the way we did? And you know, another thing I say is people ask, Why did you start hot record for having this vision? Something I constantly told myself was wine on me. I get someone's gonna do it. Why not make it? Could be anybody, like I'll give it a shot. Why not? And Bolt was that way. We Armand. I'm a co founder. Way took security classes in college, but we don't have a formal security background. We didn't work in security in industry. So the odds of us launching a security product that is so prevalent today whether you know it or not, it's behind the scenes very prevalent were stacked against us. How did that happen? And that's that's sort of what I've been going to talk about. >>Let's go. But do >>dive into a little bit on the security challenge because it's funny, right? Everyone always says, Right. Security's got to be baked in and you've got these complex infrastructure and everything's connected with AP eyes, the other people's applications and, oh yes, delivered through this little thing that you carry around. And maybe the network's not working well or the CPS running low are You're running iPhone five. And of course, it's not gonna work on most modern app. Yeah, bacon security always do, but that's easy to say. It's much harder to do, you know. Still, people want to build moats and castles and drawbridges, and that's just not gonna work anymore. >>Exactly. So you exactly hit upon the two major issues that we recognize there felt we recognize. One was that a lot of people were saying it. Very few people were doing it on. The reality was it was hard to do. Everyone knew theoretically what they should do. No one, no one thought. Oh yeah, saving somebody's personal information in plain text in the daytime. It's a good idea. Nobody thought that Everyone said it should be encrypted, but encryption is hard. So maybe one day, so no one was doing it. And then the other side of it was the people that were doing it where the world's largest companies, because the solutions were catered towards his mindset of of castle and moats, which works totally fine in a physical tradition environment but completely breaks down in a cloud world where there is no four perimeters anymore. It's >>still there, There. >>You're one AP I call away from opening everything to the Internet. So how do you protect this? And we've seen a lot of trends change towards zero Trust and ServiceMaster Mutual feel like there's a lot of stuff that happened way sort of jumped on that. >>Yeah, so So you're using, like, multi level encryption, and I've read a little bit on the website. It's way over my head, I think. But, you >>know, the basics are just making kryptonite. Christian makes security, cloud infrastructure, security approachable by anybody and a core philosophy. Our company, Hashi Hashi Hashi. My name means bridge, and that is a core part of our culture. Which is you can't just have, ah, theoretical thing or a shiny object and leave people hanging. You gotta give them a bridge, a path to get there, right? And so we say, with all our technology, one of the crawl, walk and run adoption periods and with security it's the same is that to say you're secure means something totally different everybody for a bank to be secure, it's a lot more than for a five person started to be secure. So how do you give somebody a solutions they could adopt? Check the security box for themselves at every path of the lake, and bald is one of the tools that way have individuals using it, and we have the world's largest companies, almost 10% of the global 2000 paying customers evolved many more open source users on its scales the entire spectrum. >>Wow. So you keep coming up >>with lots of new, uh, new projects as we get ready to flip the counter to 2020. What are some of the things you're thinking about? >>I think the big one, you know, that our focus is right now is service. Miss Vault is we're big enough company now where we always have teams working on every every one of our projects we have release is going out. The thing we've been talking about the most is the service mess thing. I think Cloud as a mainstream thing, Let's say, has has existed for seven or eight years. It's since it's been released. It's been over in almost 15 but as a thing that people have, that is a good idea. Seven or eight years and you know we've touched security. Now we've touched how infrastructures managed touch developers. I think a place that's been relatively untouched and has gotten by without anyone noticing has been networking and network security. They're they're really doing things the way they've always done things, and I think that's been okay because there's bigger fish to fry. But I think the time has come and networking as a bull's eye on it. And people are looking at What is networking mean in a cloud world and service mash appears to be the way that is gonna happen. Way have our own service mess solution called Council on Our Approaches Standard Hasta Corp. It's nothing new. It's We're gonna work with everything containers, kubernetes, viens physical infrastructure. We're gonna make it all work across multiple data centers. That is our approach service fashion, solving that challenge. >>What's the secret sauce? >>I mean, it's not that secret, right? >>It's just building. Just execute. Better understand that this header >>JD is the problem, right? Right, I said, This is our keynote a couple weeks ago that there are a lot of service messes out there, and nine out of 10 of them are solving a solution for a single environment, whether it's kubernetes or physical environment. And I think that's a problem. But it's not the problem. The problem to me is how do I get my kubernetes instances pods to communicate to my NSX service is on my physical infrastructure. That is the problem as people, whether that's temporary, not and they intend to move the communities or whatever. It's that's the reality. And how do you make that work? And that is what we're focused on solving that problem >>just every time I hear service mess. I think there was a company a while ago that sold the CSC. Probably like 2013. Didn't really get into That is a as a good, happy story. But they were early on the name. Yeah. Yeah. So last thing pager duty were Pedrie. What? You guys doing a page of duty? >>Sure. So we've been I've actually been a paying customer pager duty since before we even made this company in my previous job was a customer wear now, still customers. So we still use it internally. But in addition to that way, do integration across the board. So with terra form our infrastructure provisioning tool way have a way to manage all pager duty as code and as your complexion pager duty rises instead of clicking through a u. I being able to version and code everything and have that realize itself and how he works very valuable from like a service MASH consul standpoint. Hooking in the monitoring to the alerting of Pedro duty is a big thing that we do so tying those together. So it's very symbiotic. I love pager duty as a user and a partner. There's a lot here. >>Yeah, is pretty interesting slide when Jennifer put up in the keynote where it listed so many integration points with so many applications with on the outside looking in and you're like how you're integrating with spunk, that making how you're innovating with service. Now that doesn't make any sense. How Integrated was in Desperate. These were all kind of systems of record, but really, there's some really elegant integration points to make. This one plus one equals three opportunity between these applications. >>Yeah, I think it's very similar to the stuff we do with Walton Security. It's like the core permanence. Everybody needs him like with security. Everyone is an auto. Everyone needs traceability. Everyone needs access control. But rebuilding that functionality and every application is unrealistic. And paging and alerting an on call and events are the same thing. So it's you'd rather integrate and leverage those systems that make that your nexus for that specific functionality. And that's where Page duties. Awesome way. Step in, >>which was always great to catch up. Good luck on your keynote tomorrow. And really, it's a really amazing story to watch that you got You guys have built >>Well, thank you very much. >>All right. He's Mitchell. I'm Jeff. You're watching the cue. Were paid your duty, Simon in downtown San Francisco. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time.

>> from the Silicon Angle Media Office in Boston, Massachusetts. It's the cue now Here's your host Day Volonte. >> Hello, everyone, this is David lot. They fresh fresh off the red eye from VM World 2019. And what I wanted to do was share with you some analysis that I've done with our friends at E. T. R. Enterprise Technology Research. We've begun introducing you to some of their data. They have this awesome database 4500 panel, a panel of 4500 end users end customers, and they periodically go out and do spending surveys. They've given me access to that spending data and what I wanted to do because because you had a number of companies announced this this quarter, I wanted to do a storage drill down so pure. Announced in late July, Del just announced yesterday late August. Netapp was mid August. HP was last week again late August, and IBM was mid July. So you have all these companies, some of which are pure plays like pure netapp. Others of you know, big systems companies on DSO. But nonetheless, I wanted to squint through the data and share with you the storage spending snapshot for the second half of 2019. So let's start with the macro. >> What you heard on the conference calls was some concern about the economy. There's no question that the tariffs are on people's minds, particularly those with large exposure exposure in China. I mean, Del obviously sells a lot of PCs in China, so they're very much concerned about that. IBM does a lot of business there, pure, really. 70% appears business roughly is North America, so they're not as exposed so But the macro is probably looks like about 2% GDP growth for the quarter i. D. C. Has the overall tech market growing at two ex GDP. Interestingly, a Gartner analyst told me in May on the Cube that there is no correlation between GDP and I t spend, which surprised me. Some people disagree with that, but But that surprised me. But nonetheless, we we still look at GDP and look at that ratio. Sometimes the other macro is component costs for years. For the storage business the last several years, NAND pricing has been a headwind. Supply has been down, it's kept prices up. It has kept all flash arrays more expensive relative to some of the spinning disc spread the brethren something that we thought would attenuate sooner. It finally has. Nan pricing is now a tailwind, so prices air coming down. What that does is it opens up new workloads that we're really kind of the domain of spinning disk before big data kind of workloads is an example. Not exclusively big data, but it just opens up more workloads for storage companies, particularly Flash Cos The other big macro we're seeing is people shifting to subscription models. They want to bring that cloud like model to the data wherever two lives on Prem in ah, hybrid environment in a public cloud and company storage companies trying to be that that data management plane across clouds, whether on prime it. And that's a That's a big deal for a lot of these companies. I'll talk a little bit more about that, so you're seeing this vision of a massively parallel, scalable distributed system play out >> where >> data stays where it lives. Edge on Prem Public Cloud and storage is really a key part of that. Obviously, that's where the data lives, but you're not seeing data move across clouds so much. What you are seeing is metadata, move and compute. Move to the data so that type of architecture is being set up. It's supported by architecture's, not the least of which are all flash, and so I want to get into it. >> Now I want to share with you some data on this slide. If you wouldn't mind bringing it up. Alex on spending momentum. So the title size spending moment of pure leads, the storage packs and what this shows is the vendor on the left hand side. And it essentially looks at the breakdown of the spending survey where e t r ask the buyers of the different companies products. What percent of the spending is going to go toward replacing? They're gonna replace the vendor. Are they gonna decrease? Spend. That's the bright red is replace. The sort of pinkish is decreased, the spending. The gray is flat. The sort of evergreen forest green is increase in the lime. Green is ad, so if you take the lime green in the forest, green ad and the grow on you subtract the rest. You get the net score, so the higher the net score, the better. you can see here that pure storage has the highest net score by far 48%. I'll show you some data later. That correlates to that when we pull out some of the data from the income statements. >> So this is Ah, the >> July 2019 spending intention surveys specifically asking relative to the second half what the spending intentions are. So this looks good for pure on again. I'll show you Cem, Cem Cem Income State income statement data that really affirms this Hewlett Packard Enterprise actually was pretty strong in the spending survey. Particularly nimble is growing HP Overall, the storage business was was down a little bit, I think, three points, but nimble was up 28%. So you're seeing some spending activity there. Netapp did not have a great quarter. They were down substantially. I'll show you that in a minute. On dhe, it looks like they've got some work to do. Deli M. C. I had a flat quarter. Dell has a such a huge install base. They're everywhere on DSO. Everybody wants a piece of their pie. Del. After the merger of the acquisition of the emcee, their storage share declined. They then bounce back. They had a much, much stronger year last year, and now it's sort of a dogfight with the rest. IBM IBM is in a major cycle shift. IBM storage businesses is heavily tied to its mainframe businesses. Mainframe business was way, way down, its overall systems. Business was down, even though power was up a little bit. But the mainframe is what drives the systems business, and it drags along a lot of storage. IBM has got a new mainframe announcement that it's got to get out. It's got a new high end storage announcement that it's got to get out, and it's really relying on that. So you can see here from the E T. R data, you know, pure way out ahead of the pack continues to gain share about over 1000 respondents to this. So a lot of shared accounts by shared accounts mean the number of accounts that that actually have some combination of multiple storage vendors. And so they were able to answer this 1068 respondents pure the clear winner here. Now let's put this into context. So the next slide I want to show you some of the key performance indicators from the June quarter off the income statements. >> So again you see, I get the vendor. The revenue for the quarter of the year to year growth for that quarter relative to last year. The gross margin in the free cash flow, just some of the key performance indicators that I'd like to look at. So look at pure Let's go, Let's go to the third column Look at growth pure 28% growth. Del flat 0% for this is just for storage. There's a storage growth. NETAPP down 16% end up in a bad quarter, HP down 3%. IBM down 21% Do due to the cycle that I discussed, You see the revenue, um, pure, growing very, very fast. But you know, from a small base or at 396 million versus compared that to Dell's 4.2 billion net APs 1,000,000,000 plus H p e. Almost a billion in IBM not nearly as large. And then look at the gross margin line. Pure is the industry's leading gross margin. It's just slightly above 69%. Dell is a blended that Asterix is a blended gross margin, so it includes PCs, servers, service's of V M wear, everything and, of course, storage. So now, when dehl was a public company before it went private, it's gross. Margins were in the high teens. So Del is in gross margin heaven with with both E, M C and V M wear now as part of its portfolio NetApp high gross margins of 67%. But that gross margin is largely driven by its gross margins from software and maintenance. And so that's a screen considerable contributor. Their product gross margins air in the mid fifties, kind of where I think E. M. C. Probably is these days. And when the emcee was a public company, it's gross. Margins were in the mid sixties, but then, as it was before, went private. I think it was dipping into the high fifties as I recall you CHP again, that's a blended gross margin, just roughly around 34%. I don't have as much visibility on their their storage gross margins. I would I would say they are below, in my view, what DMC and net out well below what Netapp would be on then IBM. That's again blended gross margin includes hardware. Software service is 47.4% probably half or more of IBM businesses. Professional service is on. IBM has, of course, a large software business as well. So and then the free cash flow you can see pure crushing it from the standpoint of of gaining share, I mean way, way ahead of the other market players, but only 14 million in free cash flow. So coming from a much, much smaller base, however pure, is purely focused on storage. So there are Andy. All their R and D is going into that storage space. DEL. Free cash flow very large. 3.4 billion that again is across the entire company. Net App. You can see 278 million h p e 648 million great quarter for HP from a free cash flow standpoint, I think year to date they're probably 838 140 million. So big Big quarter. For them. An IBM A 2.4 billion again. Dell, HP, IBM. That's across the company, as is the gross margin. So the the spending data from E. T. R. Really shows us that pure, strong Aziz showed you that very high net score and the intentions look strong, so I would suspect pure is going to continue to lead in the market share game. I don't see that changing. Certainly there's no evidence in the data. I think I think everybody else is in a sort of a dogfight del holding firm, you know, 0%. You'd like to see a little bit of growth out of that, but I think Del is actually, you know, Dell's key metric is, Are we growing faster than the market? That's that's they're sort of a primary criterion in metric for Dell is to grow faster than the overall market because that means you're growing some share. I think Del is comfortable with that. Della's gross margins actually were helped this this quarter by the fact that Dell server business was down 12%. There was a higher storage mix, so it propped up the margin a little bit. But again, generally speaking, it looks like pure is the market share winner here, but much, much smaller than the other guys. HB limbo very strong, and it shows up in the survey data from E T. R. And an IBM just needs to get a new product cycle out. So we'll come back. >> We'll take a look at this in in in in January and see how you know what it looked like and will continue to fall. Obviously, the income statement and the public reporting pure accelerate is coming up next month. Justin in mid September. I have no doubt, you know, pure has been first in a lot of different areas, right? They were first really all flash Ray. The only all flash. You're a company that ever reached escape velocity. They were they in Nutanix for the first kind of new $1,000,000,000 companies that people said would never have a billion dollar company. Pure is a pure play storage company, you know? Well, over a billion. Now, you know, they were first with that evergreen model. They made a lot of play there. You know, the first with envy, Emmy and first with the Nvidia relationships with Superior likes to be first. I have no doubt and accelerate next month down in Austin, curious that they picked Austin in Dell's backyard. I have no doubt that they're gonna have some other firsts at that show. Cuba be there watching just off of the emerald, the other big player here. Of course, that I'm not showing his v. San visa is very, very strong. You know, the D. E. T. Our data shows that, and certainly the data from the income statement shows of'em were NSX, the networking products, their cell phone to find network in their self defined storage of the the the V San. Very, very strong Pat Girl singer on the Cube. We asked him last week, Thio, take us through. So if someone has big memories and one of them was sort of East san, Excuse me. One of them was V San, and the board meeting at with Joe Tucci was on the Vienna where board really put a lot of pressure on Pat's and you can't do this to me. It's funny. Emcee had the shackles on the M, where for a number of years, but the shackles are off and visa is very, very strong. So these are some of the things we're keeping an eye on. Thanks for watching everybody busy day Volante, Cuban sites. We'll see you next time

>> from Cambridge, Massachusetts. It's three Cube covering M I T. Chief data officer and information quality Symposium 2019. Brought to you by Silicon Angle Media. >> Hi already. We're back in Cambridge, Massachusetts at the M I t. Chief data officer Information quality event. Hashtag m i t cdo i Q. And I'm David Dante. He's Paul Gillen. Day one of our two day coverage of this event. This is the Cube, the leader in live tech coverage. Joe Caserta is here is the president of Caserta and Doug Laney, who is principal data strategist at Caserta, both Cube alarm guys. Great to see you again, Joe. What? Did you pick up this guy? How did that all came on here a couple of years ago? We had a great conversation. I read the book, Loved it. So congratulations. A nice pickup. >> We're very fortunate to have. >> Thanks. So I'm fortunate to be here, >> so Okay, well, what attracted you to Cassard? Oh, >> it's Joe's got a tremendous reputation. His his team of consultants has a great reputation. We both felt there was an opportunity to build some data strategy competency on top of that and leverage some of those in Phanom. Its ideas that I've been working on over the years. >> Great. Well, congratulations. And so, Joe, you and I have talked many times. And the reason I like talking because you know what's going on in the market place? You could you could siphon. What's riel? What's hype? So what do you see? It is the big trends in this data space, and then we'll get into it. Yeah, sure. Um, trends >> are chief data officer has been evolving over the last couple of years. You know, when we started doing this several years ago, there was just a handful of people, maybe 30 40 people. Now, there's 450 people here today, and it's been evolving. People are still trying to find their feet. Exactly what the chief date officers should be doing where they are in the hierarchy. Should they report to the c e o the C I O u the other CDO, which is a digital officer. So I think you know, hierarchically. That's still figuring it out politically. They're figuring it out, but technically also, they're still trying to figure it out. You know what's been happening over the past three years is the evolution of data going from traditional data warehousing and business intelligence. To get inside out of data just isn't working anymore. Eso evolving that moving it forward to more modern data engineering we've been doing for the past couple of years with quote unquote big data on That's not working anymore either, right? Because it's been evolving so fast. So now we're on, like, maybe Data three dato. And now we're talking about just pure automate everything. We have to automate everything. And we have to change your mindset from from having output of a data solution to an outcome to date a solution. And that's why I hired Doug, because way have to figure out not only had to get this data and look at it and analyze really had to monetize it, right? It's becoming a revenue stream for your business if you're doing it right and Doug is the leader in the industry, how to figure that >> you keep keep premise of your book was you gotta start valuing data and its fundamental you put forth a number of approaches and techniques and examples of companies doing that. Since you've published in phenomena Microsoft Apple, Amazon, Google and Facebook. Of the top five market value cos they've surpassed all the financial service is guys all ExxonMobil's and any manufacturer? Automobile makers? And what of a data companies, right? Absolutely. But intrinsically we know there's value their way any closer to the prescription that you put forth. >> Yeah, it's really no surprise and extra. We found that data companies have, ah, market to book value. That's nearly 33 times the market average, so Apple and others are much higher than that. But on average, if you look at the data product companies, they're valued much higher than other companies, probably because data can be reused in multiple ways. That's one of the core tenets of intra nomics is that Data's is non depleted ble regenerative, reusable asset and that companies that get that an architect of businesses based on those economics of information, um, can really perform well and not just data companies, but >> any company. That was a key takeaway of the book. The data doesn't conform to the laws of scarcity. Every says data is the new oil. It's like, No, it's not more valuable. So what are some examples in writing your book and customers that you work with. Where do you see Cos outside of these big data driven firms, breaking new ground and uses of data? I >> think the biggest opportunity is really not with the big giant Cos it's really with. Most of our most valuable clients are small companies with large volumes of data. You know if and the reason why they can remain small companies with large volumes of data is the thing that holds back the big giant enterprises is they have so much technical. Dad, it's very hard. They're like trying to, you know, raise the Titanic, right? You can't really. It's not agile enough. You need something that small and agile in order to pivot because it is changing so fast every time there's a solution created, it's obsolete. We have to greet the new solution on dhe when you have a big old processes. Big old technologies, big old mind sets on big old cultures. It's very hard to be agile. >> So is there no hope? I mean, the reason I ask the question was, What hope can you give some of these smokestack companies that they can become data centric? Yeah, What you >> see is that there was a There was a move to build big, monolithic data warehouses years ago and even Data Lakes. And what we find is that through the wealth of examples of companies that have benefited in significant ways from data and analytics, most of those solutions are very vocational. They're very functionally specific. They're not enterprise class, yada, yada, kind of kind of projects. They're focused on a particular business problem or monetizing or leveraging data in a very specific way, and they're generating millions of dollars of value. But again they tend to be very, very functionally specific. >> The other trend that we're seeing is also that the technology and the and the end result of what you're doing with your data is one thing. But really, in order to make that shift, if your big enterprises culture to really change all of the people within the organization to migrate from being a conventional wisdom run company to be a data really analytics driven company, and that takes a lot of change management, a lot of what we call data therapy way actually launched a new practice within the organization that Doug is actually and I are collaborating on to really mature because that is the next wave is really we figured out the data part. We figured out the technology part, but now it's the people part people. Part is really why we're not way ahead of where we even though we're way ahead of where we were a couple of years ago, we should be even further. Culturally, it's very, very challenging, and we need to address that head on. >> And that zeta skills issue that they're sort of locked into their existing skill sets and processes. Or is it? It's fear of the unknown what we're doing, you know? What about foam? Oh, yeah, Well, I mean, there are people >> jumping into bed to do this, right? So there is that part in an exciting part of it. But there's also just fear, you know, and fear of the unknown and, you know, part of what we're trying to do. And why were you trying Thio push Doug's book not for sales, but really just to share the knowledge and remove the mystery and let people see what they can actually do with this data? >> Yeah, it's more >> than just date illiteracy. So there's a lot of talk of the industry about data literacy programs and educating business people on the data and educating data people on the business. And that's obviously important. But what Joe is talking about is something bigger than that. It's really cultural, and it's something that is changed to the company's DNA. >> So where do you attack that problem? It doesn't have to go from the top down. You go into the middle. It has to >> be from the top down. It has to be. It has to be because my boss said to do it all right. >> Well, otherwise they well, they might do it. But the organization's because if you do, it >> is a grassroots movement on Lee. The folks who are excited, right? The foam of people, right? They're the ones who are gonna be excited. But they're going to evolve in adopt anyway, right? But it's the rest of the organization, and that needs to be a top down, Um, approach. >> It was interesting hearing this morning keynote speakers. You scored a throw on top down under the bus, but I had the same reaction is you can't do it without that executive buying. And of course, we defined, I guess in the session what that was. Amazon has an interesting concept for for any initiative, like every initiative that's funded has to have what they call a threaded leader. Another was some kind of And if they don't, if they don't have a threat of leader, there's like an incentive system tau dime on initiative. Kill it. It kind of forces top down. Yeah, you know, So >> when we interview our clients, we have a litmus test and the limits. It's kind of a ready in this test. Do you have the executive leadership to actually make this project successful? And in a lot of cases, they don't And you know, we'll have to say will call us when you're ready, you know, or because one of the challenges another part of the litmus test is this IittIe driven. If it's I t driven is gonna be very tough to get embraced by the rest of the business. So way need to really be able to have that executive leadership from the business to say this is something that we need >> to do to survive. Yeah, and, you know, with without the top down support. You could play small ball. But if you're playing the Yankees, you're gonna win one >> of the reasons why when it's I t driven, it's very challenging is because the people part right is a different budget from the i T budget. And when we start talking about data therapy, right and human resource is and training and education of just culture and data literacy, which is not necessary technical, that that becomes a challenge internally figuring out, like how to pay for Andi how to get it done with a corporate politics. >> So So the CDO crowd definitely parts of your book that they should be adopting because to me, there their main job is okay. How does data support the monetization of my organization? Raising revenue, cutting costs, improving productivity, saving lives. You call it value. And so that seems to be the starting point. At the same time. In this conference, you grew out of the ashes of back room information quality of the big data height, but exploded and have kind of gone full circle. So But I wonder, I mean, is the CDO crowd still focused on that monetization? Certainly I think we all agree they should be, but they're getting sucked back into a governance role. Can they do both, I guess, is >> my question. Well, governance has been, has been a big issue the past few years with all of the new compliance regulation and focus on on on ensuring compliance with them. But there's often a just a pendulum swing back, and I think there's a swing back to adding business value. And so we're seeing a lot of opportunities to help companies monetize their data broadly in a variety of ways. A CZ you mentioned not just in one way and, um, again those you need to be driven from the top. We have a process that we go through to generate ideas, and that's wonderful. Generating ideas. No is fairly straightforward enough. But then running them through kind of a feasibility government, starting with you have the executive support for that is a technology technologically feasible, managerially feasible, ethically feasible and so forth. So we kind of run them through that gauntlet next. >> One of my concerns is that chief data officer, the level of involvement that year he has in these digital initiatives again is digital initiative of Field of Dreams. Maybe it is. But everywhere you go the CEO is trying to get digital right, and it seems like the chief data officer is not necessarily front and center in those. Certainly a I projects, which are skunk works. But it's the chief digital officer that's driving it. So how how do you see in those roles playoff >> In the less panel that I've just spoken, very similar question was asked. And again, we're trying to figure out the hierarchy of where the CDO should live in an organization. Um, I find that the biggest place it fails typically is if it rolls up to a C I. O. Right. If you think the data is a technical issue, you're wrong, Right? Data is a business issue, Andi. I also think for any company to survive today, they have to have a digital presence. And so digital presence is so tightly coupled to data that I find the best success is when the chief date officer reports directly to the chief digital officer. Chief Digital officer has a vision for the user experience for the customer customers Ella to figure out. How do we get that customer engaged and that directly is dependent on insight. Right on analytics. You know, if the four of us were to open up, any application on our phone, even for the same product, would have four different experiences based on who we are, who are peers are what we bought in the past, that's all based on analytics. So the business application of the digital presence is tightly couple tow Analytics, which is driven by the chief state officer. >> That's the first time I've heard that. I think that's the right organizational structure. Did see did. JJ is going to be sort of the driver, right? The strategy. That's where the budget's gonna go and the chief date office is gonna have that supporting role that's vital. The enabler. Yeah, I think the chief data officer is a long term play. Well, we have a lot of cheap date officers. Still, 10 years from now, I think that >> data is not a fad. I think Data's just become more and more important. And will they ultimately leapfrog the chief digital officer and report to the CEO? Maybe someday, but for now, I think that's where they belong. >> You know what's company started managing their labor and workforce is as an actual asset, even though it's not a balance sheet. Asked for obvious reasons in the 19 sixties that gave rise to the chief human resource officer, which we still see today and his company start to recognize information as an asset, you need an executive leader to oversee and be responsible for that asset. >> Conceptually, it's always been data is an asset and a liability. And, you know, we've always thought about balancing terms. Your book sort of put forth a formula for actually formalizing. That's right. Do you think it's gonna happen our lifetime? What exactly clear on it, what you put forth in your book in terms of organizations actually valuing data specifically on the balance sheet. So that's >> an accounting question and one that you know that you leave to the accounting professionals. But there have been discussion papers published by the accounting standards bodies to discuss that issue. We're probably at least 10 years away, but I think respective weather data is that about what she'd asked or not. It's an imperative organizations to behave as if it is one >> that was your point it's probably not gonna happen, but you got a finger in terms that you can understand the value because it comes >> back to you can't manage what you don't measure and measuring the value of potential value or quality of your information. Or what day do you have your in a poor position to manage it like one. And if you're not manage like an asset, then you're really not probably able to leverage it like one. >> Give us a little commercial for I do want to say that I do >> think in our lifetime we will see it become an asset. There are lots of intangible assets that are on the books, intellectual property contracts. I think data that supports both of those things are equally is important. And they will they will see the light. >> Why are those five companies huge market cap winners, where they've surpassed all the evaluation >> of a business that the data that they have is considered right? So it should be part of >> the assets in the books. All right, we gotta wraps, But give us Give us the The Caserta Commercial. Well, concert is >> a consultancy that does essentially three things. We do data advisory work, which, which Doug is heading up. We do data architecture and strategy, and we also do just implementation of solutions. Everything from data engineering gate architecture and data science. >> Well, you made a good bet on data. Thanks for coming on, you guys. Great to see you again. Thank you. That's a wrap on day one, Paul. And I'll be back tomorrow for day two with the M I t cdo m I t cdo like you. Thanks for watching. We'll see them all.

>> from Boston, Massachusetts. It's the queue covering active eo 2019. Data driven you by activity. >> Welcome back to Boston, Everybody. Money >> belong here with my co host, a student of John >> Kerry's. Also here today You watching the Cuban leader and on the ground tech coverage. This is day one of active fio 19 data driven content Conference hashtag data driven 19 red cara minuses. Here is the senior vice president of fantasy Sports A draftkings Greg. Thanks for coming on. What a cool title. >> Yeah, it's It's, you know, I was joking with my wife. Anytime you could be working fantasy sports, it's a great place to be. Everybody's a little bit jealous. >> So the formula is easy, right? Offer big giant prizes and everybody comes And that's all there is suing. Anybody can come >> in. I just have the dream job right now. >> So hugely competitive market. You guys, you become the >> leader. We were in the radio. Check out your websites. I mean, take us through the draft kings and your ascendancy. How you got here? >> So, you know, company started in 2012 initially around sort of the major big American sports on DH. Then really a CZ. We started scale that we saw there was a huge consumer interest in the product players that would come on. We're very, very, very sticky. Um, and we've just been kind of, you know, pushing, pushing on growing that using these. So the initial founders are three former analyst. So come on. It's always been sort of a very analytically driven company. So they looked at what we were dealing with, and it was we had L TVs that were way higher than our cracks. So let's keep marketing and growing and growing and growing and finding out ways to offer a better product. So, over 2015 we did a major marketing blitz, blew up the company Absolutely huge. Um, and since then we've been just constantly innovating, adding new sports, adding new features on DH, adding ways toe on the product. And then even more recently, just about a year ago, we expanded also into online sports betting over New Jersey has that's become a legal product across the U. S. So it's been a great time to be at the company a lot of fun. >> What what was your first sport was like Amazon started in books and then, you know, scaled out what was your first sport. So it's actually the first sport was >> baseball because of the time that they actually launched. So is the middle of April. Sporting calendar is a little bit thin. Right then, so is it was baseball to start, and then once football season started, that's really when things take on >> 2015 is when you started the marketing blitz and I remember just here in the ads and it was just intense, like a while. This company's going for it. So you sort of took >> all the chips I went >> all in and it worked. Yeah, I mean, it's part of the, you know, the lifeblood of the company. It's We're a company that ends up being taking risks, but we take calculated risks. So at any given point, you sort of say, like, Hey, what is the what is the range of outcomes over here? We're not playing for second place. We want to be a market leader, so you have to take risks in order, be a market leader. So let's take calculated risks. Let's make sure we're not being insane, but you know we did the math. We figured out what? This is A This is a worthwhile shot. We pushed him for it. Andi really took off from their love to bet on >> sure things. Yeah, well, Greg, we know the people that play the fantasy for it feel that data is what differentiates whether they're going to live in, you know, winner lose. Talk to us a little bit about the data journey inside your business And how that helped differentiate draftkings in the market. Yes. So we think Death draftkings >> is one of the most analytically based companies in the, you know, definitely in the market, but also into sort of like General Cos right now we use our analytics platform to inform pretty much everything we dio on. Go to your point. You're joking. You know, it seems like fantasy sports is easy throughout some giant prizes there, and everything will take care of itself. You know, running a fantasy sports car company. If you throw out a contest that's too big, you lose a ton of money. There's a lot of asymmetric risk in the business where if we're right, we make a little bit more. But if we're wrong. We lose a ton very, very, very fast. So our ability to be very, very sound analytically is what allows us to sort of pushed the envelope and grow, grow, grow but not, you know, lose our heads along the way. You know, some of the fun of that is really, you know, when we first ran, I think one of the most game changing contest we ran was actually back in October of 2014. It was the very first millionaire maker contest I could still remember. It was Week five of the 2020 14 NFL season where we said, Hey, this it's crazy. We need crazy things that happen in order for it to work. But if we're on a $20 contest to enter with $1,000,000 top prize and 2,000,000 of total prizes, it could go viral, go absolutely crazy. And if it loses, here's how it'll losing. Here's how much will hurt us. It's a worthwhile risk. Let's go for it. So that sort of energy of, you know, doing discipline analysis and constantly sort of them. Taking the risk on the back of it is what allowed us to build >> up the brand value that you would have got out of that was sort of worth that risk in part anyway. And you wouldn't have to hurt presumably. >> Exactly. We knew our downside. As long as you know your downside, you're normally in a pretty good spot to take those risks. >> So where do you >> see this All going mean? So the company has grown. You're at this kind of critical mass now, Like we said, highly competitive, you know, knock down. You know, if you take your eye off the ball. So how do you guys keep this going? >> So we have a huge challenge ahead of us over the next couple of years, as sports betting becomes legal across the US, we need to make sure that we are one of the top competitors in that market. Sports betting in the US, we expect to be an absolutely enormous market. It will probably be significantly larger than the fantasy sports market in terms of absolute revenue and even, you know, on order of magnitude more competitive. So we need to be executing each step along the way a CZ markets open up. We need to be able to get into getting two market very, very fast. And that means our tech team needs to be working feverishly to make sure that we can hit the requirements that each legislator and each regulator puts on market entry in their state. We didn't mean making sure we're constantly figuring out what are the product elements that are absolutely critical for our for our users. Is it Maura around the live betting experiences that around the different markets that you offer? It's around pricing. And how do we find these things, these different lovers and told them to make sure that we're putting out a great product for users. And if we do that and throw a great product after users were pretty sure we can make you want >> to be one stop shopping presumably, right? I mean, all sports, right? But But then you've got these niche sports betting. I mean eggs, invest. Example. I could think of this horse racing. You know where it is alive. It's gonna video. It's got commentators on the ground that you know the business really well. Is >> that Is that the strategy to go sort of horizontal and so be a one stop shop or you >> gonna sort of pick your spots? What is the day to tell you? >> You know, I think we're constantly talking about it. One of the things that allowed our fantasy sports business to grow so fast was going a little bit more horizontal. So we offered Gulf in Mass at a time period when the primary competitors and the space vandal did not. On DH, we built that product into one of our largest sports. It's, you know, right up there with MLB in terms of the actual size that that comes in a Z have gone also horizontal, we pulled in other places, like NASCAR. Mm, a great sports that people are interested in. It gets more users into our platform. And honestly, if uses are interested in a product, we don't want them to have to go elsewhere. We want to be able to have the offerings that any sort of, you know, critical mass type environment is going toe is gonna have >> Well, it's that experience, right? Well, I like to shop in Amazon. You do, too, because I >> trusted. And it's the same user experience. So, Greg, one of things >> I'm hearing from you is something that everybody tries for, but it's really challenging that speed. How do you react that fast and move the company into new markets and new offerings and keep innovating? You know, culturally technology wise, you know, How does Draftkings do that? You know, I think a za company, you know, from really every single person that we recruit in higher We've been actually execution Aly disciplined throughout the company's history. It's It's something that our founders did a great job of instilling in the culture right at the gates. I mean, we've tried to foster all the way along the way, which is all the best strategies of the world. They're going to fail if you can't execute well and every single person down the company knows that. And we try to, you know, enable each person to be as autonomous as possible in their ability to execute their their portion of the business that allows us to move really, really, really fast. You know, we disseminate that responsibility quickly, and each leader and sort of each person knows what they have to do to execute. There's a high degree of accountability behind that, you know, I'd like to say there's some. There's some magic recipe that's, um, secret sauce, but it's a lot of just great people doing great work everyday. Well, Greg, you know it's any your competitors that they look at, You know, Boston's been been doing pretty well in Draftkings era, you know, for the last few years. ES o Boston's been a great market for us. We've expanded Conover here on DH. The sports teams have been fantastic, although the Bruins it was a little bit sad about Game seven over there, but it happens. >> So his m o be the flagship news that no, I wouldn't say >> that MLB was first, primarily just of the time of the year when we launched. NFL is always going to go, are not always going to be, but for the for the foreseeable future is the dominant US sport on will remain the dominant US for >> no reason. I mean, kids there watch MLB anymore. Maybe the maybe the playoffs and the games. It was a game. I think I'm some Father's day was like almost five hours long, you know, gets called. You can come in and out. But you know what some of the trends. You see soccer. Is that growing NFL? Obviously huge. Do you see so niche sports like lax coming on. >> So, uh, you know, starting point NFL has been huge. We actually launched a new product Ah, little over a year ago called Showdown, which allowed you start to do fantasy for a single game as opposed to the combination of games that's taken off fantastically because that's tapping into more of the I'm going to sit down and watch this game, and I would love to have a fantasy team on that on this game. That's really expanded the audience like that. That >> was genius because, look, if you're >> out of the running, it doesn't matter because I'm weak. On top of that N b A and NHL on fire. The embassy put out a great product is an actual sport league. You know, the Finals were great. You hate to see the injuries, but it was a great final. Siri's very competitive. The NHL Finals has been very, very competitive. Golf is growing phenomenally as a sport, way farm or interesting golf than I ever anticipated when I first started with the company and it's one of the most exciting things. When the Masters comes each year, every screen has turned to it and we see a huge player. Player number is kind of coming into that one. Beyond that, you know NASCAR. What's been interesting? NASCAR's been having a tough couple years, but the Truck series for us? We launched it this year and the trucks have been great. I don't know if you've watched NASCAR Trucks. They're wildly entertaining. Uh, you know, Emma, you got the big fighter. So every sport sort of has its moments. It's a matter of like picking those moments and figuring out how to make >> the most of them. Do you see boxing at all making a comeback? >> So we have thought about how to get boxing into a into a fantasy. We don't have it at the moment. We're putting a lot of thought into it, so we are actually seeing through. We've seen, you know, we've been in the M M A space and we've seen the growth out from there where that sports doing great and you look at places like Bela Tor. The Professional Fighters league is other leagues, and then boxing is the next step. There's a lot of interest there. I don't think they have the right products yet to be able to kind of engage with that extra way. So that's one of things we're working on. Also, you need a marquee fighter. You always need a marquee fighter. Kind of helped bring in the interest over on that side. So, um, be interesting to see with Taki on sort of the downside of his career. At this point on DH, Mayweather hasn't been fighting much. Will be interesting to see. Who's that next meeting with Adam. But >> I grew up in an era >> of Marquis fighters. What? They would fight, you know, they literally fight 6 70 times a year, you know, and you had used huge names on DSO, and then mm comes along and he's really hurt, >> but it feels like it's tryingto so to resuscitate. Yeah. I mean, I think these things could >> be a little bit cyclical. Like you get one Marquis fighter out there like so my wife, this Filipino. So I'm a huge backing out fan now way watch every fight. Even when we were living in remote locations that forces watching at weird hours. He's a type of athlete that could bring popularity of the sport. So if there was a major U. S. Fighter that gains that degree of sort of, you know that that degree of fame people will be into it, I think >> Do do do your analytics sort of have a probe into the activity at the at the fan level at the sports level, not just the fantasy level or the betting level? Is that a sort of ah ah predictor for you? Yet we >> see a lot of correlations between how many people play our sport are fantasy game, and how many people actually follow the underlying sport. Way can also see trends in terms of If I'm from Boston, I probably pick more patriots in my fantasy lineups than, uh, normal on DH. You can actually see that as people play different sports that you know, the number one Q. Be drafted in in Boston is almost always gonna be Tom Brady. And once you leave that you start seeing Aaron Rodgers pop up. Let's really, really fast. So you see these little micro trends where it's like you are still a sports fan of your local team in your local environment, but it manifest itself in the fantasy. >> So what you think that is? Do you think it's fan affinity >> or do you think it's just the sort of lack of knowledge out inside? You're sort of a circle of trust. >> I think it's probably a combination. I mean, I could say is, you know, following the Celtics in the mid to thousands, I knew the depth of the Celtics pension, how they would use their rotation better than anybody else, Probably better than anybody else in the coaches would probably disagree. But it's like I knew that James Posey was a huge value play on Saturday nights. I knew. I kind of with I feel the Eddie House nights. Uh, so, you know, on your local team, you probably know those players at the not the top top echelon All Stars, but the guy's right beneath. You know them a little bit better and probably more comfortable using >> what's your favorite sport. >> So my favorite sport, from a fantasy perspective, is I play all the basket. I play all football, played basketball just during play offs, and I played baseball. But baseball I'm strictly a fantasy player. I don't really follow the sport to play. I'm just playing fantasy. Okay, >> That's great. So, what do you think? The conference. Here. >> You have you Have you had any timeto interact? I know you were swamped after coming off the stage. >> You know, it looks like a great turnout over here. There's a lot of enthusiasm amongst them from people. I was a little bit late to the late to show up this morning, so I got a bit Swanson eager to go and be able to catch up a bit more. >> Okay, Well, Greg, thanks so much for coming on. The Cuba's great to have your every pleasure meeting you. >> All right, people. Right there. Still, when I >> was back with our next guest, John for it is also in the house. You wanted The Cube from active field data driven 19. Right back

>> Announcer: Live from the Bill Graham Auditorium in San Francisco, it's theCUBE, covering Pure Storage Accelerate 2018. Brought to be you by Pure Storage. >> Welcome back to theCUBE, we are live at Pure Storage Accelerate 2018 in San Francisco. I'm Lisa Prince Martin with Dave The Who Vellante, and we're with David Hatfield, or Hat, the president of Purse Storage. Hat, welcome back to theCUBE. >> Thank you Lisa, great to be here. Thanks for being here. How fun is this? >> The orange is awesome. >> David: This is great. >> Super fun. >> Got to represent, we love the orange here. >> Always a good venue. >> Yeah. >> There's not enough orange. I'm not as blind yet. >> Well it's the Bill Graham, I mean it's a great venue. But not generally one for technology conferences. >> Not it's not. You guys are not conventional. >> So far so good. >> But then-- >> Thanks for keeping us out of Las Vegas for a change. >> Over my dead body I thin I've said once or twice before. >> Speaking of-- Love our customers in Vegas. Unconventional, you've said recently this is not your father's storage company. What do you mean by that? >> Well we just always want to do things a little bit less conventional. We want to be modern. We want to do things differently. We want to create an environment where it's community so our customers and our partners, prospective customers can get a feel for what we mean by doing things a little bit more modern. And so the whole orange thing is something that we all opt in for. But it's more about really helping transform customer's organizations think differently, think out of the box, and so we wanted to create a venue that forced people to think differently, and so the last three years, one was on Pier 48, we transformed that. Last year was in a big steelworkers, you know, 100 year old steel manufacturing, ship building yard which is now long since gone. But we thought the juxtaposition of that, big iron rust relative to what we're doing from a modern solid state perspective, was a good metaphor. And here it's about making music, and how can we together as an industry, develop new things and develop new songs and really help transform organizations. >> For those of you who don't know, spinning disk is known as spinning rust, right? Eventually, so very clever sort of marketing. >> The more data you put on it the slower it gets and it gets really old and we wanted to get rid of that. We wanted to have everything be online in the data center, so that was the point. >> So Hat, as you go around and talk to customers, they're going through a digital transformation, you hear all this stuff about machine intelligence, artificial intelligence, whatever you want to call it, what are the questions that you're getting? CEO's, they want to get digital right. IT professionals are wondering what's next for them. What kind of questions and conversations are you having? >> Yeah, I think it's interesting, I was just in one of the largest financial services companies in New York, and we met with the Chief Data Officer. The Chief Data Officer reports into the CEO. And he had right next to him the CIO. And so they have this development of a recognition that moving into a digital world and starting to harness the power of data requires a business context. It requires people that are trying to figure out how to extract value from the data, where does our data live? But that's created the different organization. It drives devops. I mean, if you're going to go through a digital transformation, you're going to try and get access to your data, you have to be a software development house. And that means you're going to use devops. And so what's happened from our point of view over the last 10 years is that those folks have gone to the public cloud because IT wasn't really meeting the needs of what devops needed and what the data scientists were looking for, and so what we wanted to create not only was a platform and a tool set that allowed them to bridge the gap, make things better today dramatically, but have a platform that gets you into the future, but also create a community and an ecosystem where people are aware of what's happening on the devop's side, and connect the dots between IT and the data scientists. And so we see this exploding as companies digitize, and somebody needs to be there to help kind of bridge the gap. >> So what's your point of view and advice to that IT ops person who maybe really good at provisioning LUNS, should they become more dev like? Maybe ops dev? >> Totally, I mean I think there's a huge opportunity to kind of advance your career. And a lot of what Charlie talked about and a lot of what we've been doing for nine years now, coming up on nine years, is trying to make our customers heroes. And if data is a strategic asset, so much so they're actually going to think about putting it on your balance sheet, and you're hiring Chief Data Officers, who knows more about the data than the storage and infrastructure team. They understand the limitations that we had to go through over the past. They've recognized they had to make trade offs between performance and cost. And in a shared accelerated storage platform where you have tons of IO and you can put all of your applications (mumbles) at the same time, you don't have to make those trade offs. But the people that really know that are the storage leads. And so what we want to do is give them a path for their career to become strategic in their organization. Storage should be self driving, infrastructure should be self driving. These are not things that in a boardroom people care about, gigabytes and petabytes and petaflops, and whatever metric. What they care about is how they can change their business and have a competitive advantage. How they can deliver better customer experiences, how they can put more money on the bottom line through better insights, etc. And we want to teach and work with and celebrate data heroes. You know, they're coming from the infrastructure side and connecting the dots. So the value of that data is obviously something that's new in terms of it being front and center. So who determines the value of that data? You would think it's the business line. And so there's got to be a relationship between that IT ops person and the business line. Which maybe here to for was somewhat adversarial. Business guys are calling, the clients are calling again. And the business guys are saying, oh IT, they're slow, they say no. So how are you seeing that relationship changing? >> It has to come together because, you know, it does come down to what are the insights that we can extract from our data? How much more data can we get online to be able to get those insights? And that's a combination of improving the infrastructure and making it easy and removing those trade offs that I talked about. But also being able to ask the right questions. And so a lot has to happen. You know, we have one of the leaders in devops speaking tomorrow to go through, here's what's happening on the software development and devops side. Here's what the data scientists are trying to get at. So our IT professionals understand the language, understand the problem set. But they have to come together. We have Dr. Kate Harding as well from MIT, who's brilliant and thinking about AI. Well, there's only .5% of all the data has actually been analyzed. You know, it's all in these piggy banks as Burt talked about onstage. And so we want to get rid of the piggy banks and actually create it and make it more accessible, and get more than .5% of the data to be usable. You know, bring as much of that online as possible, because it's going to provide richer insights. But up until this point storage has been a bottleneck to making that happen. It was either too costly or too complex, or it wasn't performing enough. And with what we've been able to bring through solid state natively into sort of this platform is an ability to have all of that without the trade offs. >> That number of half a percent, or less than half a percent of all data in the world is actually able to be analyzed, is really really small. I mean we talk about, often you'll here people say data's the lifeblood of an organization. Well, it's really a business catalyst. >> David: Oil. >> Right, but catalysts need to be applied to multiple reactions simultaneously. And that's what a company needs to be able to do to maximize the value. Because if you can't do that there's no value in that. >> Right. >> How are you guys helping to kind of maybe abstract storage? We hear a lot, we heard the word simplicity a lot today from Mercedes Formula One, for example. How are you partnering with customers to help them identify, where do we start narrowing down to find those needles in the haystack that are going to open up new business opportunities, new services for our business? >> Well I think, first of all, we recognize at Pure that we want to be the innovators. We want to be the folks that are, again, making things dramatically better today, but really future-proofing people for what applications and insights they want to get in the future. Charlie talked about the three-legged stool, right? There's innovations that's been happening in compute, there's innovations that have been happening over the years in networking, but storage hasn't really kept up. It literally was sort of the bottleneck that was holding people back from being able to feed the GPUs in the compute that's out there to be able to extract the insights. So we wanted to partner with the ecosystem, but we recognize an opportunity to remove the primary bottleneck, right? And if we can remove the bottleneck and we can partner with firms like NVIDIA and firms like Cisco, where you integrate the solution and make it self driving so customers don't have to worry about it. They don't have to make the trade offs in performance and cost on the backend, but it just is easy to stamp out, and so it was really great to hear Service Now and Keith walk through is story where he was able to get a 3x level improvement and something that was simple to scale as their business grew without having an impact on the customer. So we need to be part of an ecosystem. We need to partner well. We need to recognize that we're a key component of it because we think data's at the core, but we're only a component of it. The one analogy somebody shared with me when I first started at Pure was you can date your compute and networking partner but you actually get married to your storage partner. And we think that's true because data's at the core of every organization, but it's making it available and accessible and affordable so you can leverage the compute and networking stacks to make it happen. >> You've used the word platform, and I want to unpack that a little bit. Platform versus product, right? We hear platform a lot today. I think it's pretty clear that platforms beat products and that allows you to grow and penetrate the market further. It also has an implication in terms of the ecosystem and how you partner. So I wonder if you could talk about platform, what it means to you, the API economy, however you want to take that. >> Yeah, so, I mean a platform, first of all I think if you're starting a disruptive technology company, being hyper-focused on delivering something that's better and faster in every dimension, it had to be 10x in every dimension. So when we started, we said let's start with tier one block, mission critical data workloads with a product, you know our Flash Array product. It was the fastest growing product in storage I think of all time, and it still continues to be a great contributor, and it should be a multi-billion dollar business by itself. But what customers are looking for is that same consumer like or cloud like experience, all of the benefits of that simplicity and performance across their entire data set. And so as we think about providing value to customers, we want to make sure we capture as much of that 99.5% of the data and make it online and make it affordable, regardless of whether it's block, file, or object, or regardless if it's tier one, tier two, and tier three. We talk about this notion of a shared accelerated storage platform because we want to have all the applications hit it without any compromise. And in an architecture that we've provided today you can do that. So as we think about partnering, we want to go, in our strategy, we want to go get as much of the data as we possibly can and make it usable and affordable to bring online and then partner with an API first open approach. There's a ton of orchestration tools that are out there. There's great automation. We have a deep integration with ACI at Cisco. Whatever management and orchestration tools that our customer wants to use, we want to make those available. And so, as you look at our Flash Array, Flash Deck, AIRI, and Flash Blade technologies, all of them have an API open first approach. And so a lot of what we're talking about with our cloud integrations is how do we actually leverage orchestration, and how do we now allow and make it easy for customers to move data in and out of whatever clouds they may want to run from. You know, one of the key premises to the business was with this exploding data growth and whether it's 30, 40, 50 zettabytes of data over the next you know, five years, there's only two and a half or three zettabytes of internet connectivity in those same period of time. Which means that companies, and there's not enough data platform or data resources to actually handle all of it, so the temporal nature of the data, where it's created, what a data center looks like, is going to be highly distributed, and it's going to be multi cloud. And so we wanted to provide an architecture and a platform that removed the trade offs and the bottlenecks while also being open and allowing customers to take advantage of Red Shift and Red Hat and all the container technologies and platform as a service technologies that exist that are completely changing the way we can access the data. And so we're part of an ecosystem and it needs to be API and open first. >> So you had Service Now on stage today, and obviously a platform company. I mean any time they do M and A they bring that company into their platform, their applications that they build are all part of that platform. So should we think about Pure? If we think about Pure as a platform company, does that mean, I mean one of your major competitors is consolidating its portfolio. Should we think of you going forward as a platform company? In other words, you're not going to have a stovepipe set of products, or is that asking too much as you get to your next level of milestone. >> Well we think we're largely there in many respects. You know, if you look at any of the competitive technologies that are out there, you know, they have a different operating system and a different customer experience for their block products, their file products, and their object products, etc. So we wanted to have a shared system that had these similar attributes from a storage perspective and then provide a very consistent customer experience with our cloud-based Pure One platform. And so the combination of our systems, you hear Bill Cerreta talk about, you have to do different things for different protocols to be able to get the efficiencies in the data servers as people want. But ultimately you need to abstract that into a customer experience that's seamless. And so our Pure One cloud-based software allows for a consistent experience. The fact that you'll have a, one application that's leveraging block and one application that's leveraging unstructured tool sets, you want to be able to have that be in a shared accelerated storage platform. That's why Gartner's talking about that, right? Now you can do it with a solid state world. So it's super key to say, hey look, we want consistent customer experience, regardless of what data tier it used to be on or what protocol it is and we do that through our Pure One cloud-based platform. >> You guys have been pretty bullish for a long time now where competition is concerned. When we talk about AWS, you know Andy Jassy always talks about, they look forward, they're not looking at Oracle and things like that. What's that like at Pure? Are you guys really kind of, you've been also very bullish recently about NVME. Are you looking forward together with your partners and listening to the voice of the customer versus looking at what's blue over the corner? >> Yes, so first of all we have a lot of respect for companies that get big. One of my mentors told me one time that they got big because they did something well. And so we have a lot of respect for the ecosystem and companies that build a scale. And we actually want to be one of those and are already doing that. But I think it's also important to listen and be part of the community. And so we've always wanted to the pioneers. We always wanted to be the innovators. We always wanted to challenge conventions. And one of the reasons why we founded the company, why Cos and Hayes founded the company originally was because they saw that there was a bottleneck and it was a media level bottleneck. In order to remove that you need to provide a file system that was purpose built for the new media, whatever it was going to be. We chose solid state because it was a $40 billion industry thanks to our consumer products and devices. So it was a cost curve where I and D was going to happen by Samsung and Toshiba and Micron and all those guys that we could ride that curve down, allowing us to be able to get more and more of the data that's out there. And so we founded the company with the premise that you need to remove that bottleneck and you can drive innovation that was 10x better in every dimension. But we also recognize in doing so that putting an evergreen ownership model in place, you can fundamentally change the business model that customers were really frustrated by over the last 25 years. It was fair because disk has lots of moving parts, it gets slower with the more data you put on, etc., and so you pass those maintenance expenses and software onto customers. But in a solid state world you didn't need that. So what we wanted to do was actually, in addition to provide innovation that was 10x better, we wanted to provide a business model that was evergreen and cloud like in every dimension. Well, those two forces were very disruptive to the competitors. And so it's very, very hard to take a file system that's 25 years old and retrofit it to be able to really get the full value of what the stack can provide. So we focus on innovation. We focus on what the market's are doing, and we focus on our customer requirements and where we anticipate the use cases to be. And then we like to compete, too. We're a company of folks that love to win, but ultimately the real focus here is on enabling our customers to be successful, innovating forward. And so less about looking sidewise, who's blue and who's green, etc. >> But you said it before, when you were a startup, you had to be 10x better because those incumbents, even though it was an older operating system, people's processes were wired to that, so you had to give them an incentive to do that. But you have been first in a number of things. Flash itself, the sort of All-Flash, at a spinning disk price. Evergreen, you guys set the mark on that. NVME you're doing it again with no premium. I mean, everybody's going to follow. You can look back and say, look we were first, we led, we're the innovator. You're doing some things in cloud which are similar. Obviously you're doing this on purpose. But it's not just getting close to your customers. There's got to be a technology and architectural enabler for you guys. Is that? >> Well yeah, it's software, and at the end of the day if you write a file system that's purpose built for a new media, you think about the inefficiencies of that media and the benefits of that media, and so we knew it was going to be memory, we knew it was going to be silicon. It behaves differently. Reads are effectively free. Rights are expensive, right? And so that means you need to write something that's different, and so you know, it's NVME that we've been plumbing and working on for three years that provides 44,000 parallel access points. Massive parallelism, which enables these next generation of applications. So yeah we have been talking about that and inventing ways to be able to take full advantage of that. There's 3D XPoint and SCM and all kinds of really interesting technologies that are coming down the line that we want to be able to take advantage of and future proof for our customers, but in order to do that you have to have a software platform that allows for it. And that's where our competitive advantage really resides, is in the software. >> Well there are lots more software companies in Silicon Valley and outside Silicon Valley. And you guys, like I say, have achieved that escape velocity. And so that's pretty impressive, congratulations. >> Well thank you, we're just getting started, and we really appreciate all the work you guys do. So thanks for being here. >> Yeah, and we just a couple days ago with the Q1FY19, 40%, you have a year growth, you added 300 more customers. Now what, 4800 customers globally. So momentum. >> Thank you, thank you. Well we only do it if we're helping our customers one day at a time. You know, I'll tell you that this whole customer first philosophy, a lot of customers, a lot of companies talk about it, but it truly has to be integrated into the DNA of the business from the founders, and you know, Cos's whole pitch at the very beginning of this was we're going to change the media which is going to be able to transform the business model. But ultimately we want to make this as intuitive as an iPhone. You know, infrastructure should just work, and so we have this focus on delivering simplicity and delivering ownership that's future proofed from the very beginning. And you know that sort of permeates, and so you think about our growth, our growth has happened because our customers are buying more stuff from us, right? If you look at our underneath the covers on our growth, 70 plus percent of our growth every single quarter comes from customers buying more stuff, and so, as we think about how we partner and we think about how we innovate, you know, we're going to continue to build and innovate in new areas. We're going to keep partnering. You know, the data protection staff, we've got great partners like Veeam and Cohesity and Rubrik that are out there. And we're going to acquire. We do have a billion dollars of cash in the bank to be able to go do that. So we're going to listen to our customers on where they want us to do that, and that's going to guide us to the future. >> And expansion overseas. I mean, North America's 70% of your business? Is that right? >> Rough and tough. Yeah, we had 28%-- >> So it's some upside. >> Yeah, yeah, no any mature B2B systems company should line up to be 55, 45, 55 North America, 45, in line with GDP and in line with IT spend, so we made investments from the beginning knowing we wanted to be an independent company, knowing we wanted to support global 200 companies you have to have operations across multiple countries. And so globalization is always going to be key for us. We're going to continue our march on doing that. >> Delivering evergreen from an orange center. Thanks so much for joining Dave and I on the show this morning. >> Thanks Lisa, thanks Dave, nice to see you guys. >> We are theCUBE Live from Pure Accelerate 2018 from San Francisco. I'm Lisa Martin for Dave Vellante, stick around, we'll be right back with our next guests.

>>Hi. Welcome to the Cube. I'm Lisa Martin on the ground at the Computer History Museum with the Association for Corporate Go Silicon Valley. Tonight is their 13th annual grow worth, and we're very excited to be with one of their pick sponsors. Deloitte Christie. Simon's from Deloitte. Welcome. Thank you. Great to have you here. So you are a veteran and technology. You've been in the tech industry over 25 years. You've probably seen incredible transformation. Tell us about what you're doing with Deloitte and the advisory service is not you. Offer way. Offer a number of service is advisory audit tax too in Silicon Valley to a lot of these emerging growth companies. So it's been very exciting >>in my >>career to see the evolution of what I call old technology right where we kind of got the traditional software semiconductor box companies to what is now digitally what I call a new technology and what is propelling the economy in the throat that we're seeing. Not only in Bali. Exactly. So right now you are working, leading hurt and development of Deloitte's technology practice up in San Francisco. You're working with clients and you mentioned digital and clown Internet media sectors tell us about that, especially as you mentioned new technology. So a lot of them are startup companies, which is really sweet spotted, A C G. And that's why we're so involved with a G. But a lot of these new technology companies that you mentioned, you know, cloud software service, Internet media, data security, those types of companies, eyes really propelling the digital economy. So we see a lot of growth in that sector, primarily in San Francisco but also in the broader Bay Area. Silicon being checked better and as you are you mentioned out of what's going on domestically but also internationally. How do you see the influence of Silicon Valley here in Silicon Valley as well as across the globe? You know, there's a lot of factors weigh serve companies all over the globe. So primarily, Silicon Valley is propelling a lot of those. And to the extent that companies here are international, most of a lot of multinational companies and do sell their products lovely there, developed here with products are actually sold. Are you seeing kind of the inverse where companies may be headquartered in in Europe or Asia? are influencing and bringing technology over to the Silicon Valley. Next thing, let us here. Yeah, some of that, especially as we think about, uh, engineers and the aspects and some of that development that happens there, obviously sourcing that from around interest of an industry perspective in 2017. It's like every company's tech way. Look at tests around the street. Look at Walmart Labs and what they're doing there. How are you seeing some of the clients you advise for? What are some of the industries that you're seeing are now technology? There's definitely a convergence says you mentioned Too many industries, actually, all industries. So when we think about financial service is no fintech. When you think about life sciences, health, when you think about retail, right, you got Internet. So definitely saying convergence and technology is impacting our daily lives and almost everything that we d'oh and in almost every product and service that we buy, there's some form or elements of technology. Exactly. It's really remarkable. Speaking of remarkable, tonight we're here with a C G to recognize two Fantastic Cos Twilio is the emerging growth winner, 2017 and video the Outstanding Growth Award winner. If you look at and video, for example, inventor of the GPS, which is really catalyzed a tremendous amount of technology across industries. If we were just talking about you, look at their market kind of what you see them over the next couple of years. The market drivers you think they're gonna impact mentioned and video write graphic way historically have been known for games and films and virtual reality kind of thing. Now they're actually moving more into artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence? A. I knew Buzz Word, right? So there's probably a lot of opportunities for a video that technology evolves and develops over the next. Several questions for Twilio. Who's winning the emerging world? What would you do for them? So they're, you know, cloud platform company for software developers. So you think that part of the new technology is and a cloud, so providing an opportunity for engineers to develop software and software is involved in almost everything that we do as well in our daily lives. So you know that convergence of all the industries that's happening, a lot of that is a result of software and the developers who are creating that software Twilio is providing a platform for that communicated a tremendous opportunity. Companies in this new technology. Christy, thank you so much for joining us on the Cuban. Sharing your insight. Have a great evening tonight. Yes, it's, uh, it's a great turn out Isn't a lot of fun. It is. I want to thank you for watching way around the museum with a c D E f G. I'm Lisa Martin. Thanks.

>> Narrator: Live from Silicon Valley, it's The Cube. Covering Mobile World Congress 2017. Brought to you by Intel. >> Kay, welcome back everyone. We're here live in Palo Alto, California for SiliconANGLE Media's The Cube. Coverage of two days of wall-to-wall, eight a.m. pacific time to six both days. Yesterday, Monday. Today, Tuesday. Breaking down the news, getting the analysis, sharing our commentary, and getting reaction, from here inside the studio for folks in Silicon Valley who couldn't make it to Barcelona, but also covering what's happening on the ground. And of course we'd love to phone in and get commentary directly from Barcelona, and we have on the live Peter Jarich who's the Chief Analyst at Global Data, formerly a Current Analyst, Peter thanks for taking the time, I know it's gettin' late there. It's close to bedtime for the people who are burnt out and for the people who are going to go party, they're just going out. Thanks for-- >> Peter: You know, unfortunately it's this thing, then dinner starts at nine o'clock, it's still early, late nights, early mornings but no worries, glad to talk to you guys. >> So, obviously, the show at Mobile World Congress this year is kind a bi-polar, as always, you have the device people making their big announcements on Saturday and Sunday on the weekend leading up to the show, LG, Huawei, and everyone else, but the big phones, and all the, you know, the screens, that's the glam and sizzle, but behind second half of the show is about tel cos, right? The transformation going on the wireless world the, the tel co world, the service provider world, where the new network architecture seems to be the top story. A new network transformation, IOT, Internet of Things with cars, autonomous vehicles, smart cities, and certainly 5G has been at the center of all the action, really since yesterday and today. So I wanted to get your take. Is that actually what's happened, are we reading the tea leaves on the grid properly? Is 5G the top story, or what's your take on the top stories out there right now? >> Peter: Yeah, you know, I mean clearly, as far as the buzz, where the buzz is, you're right, 5G is sucking a lot of the energy out of the (coughing), excuse me, out of the show. It's interesting, I mean it's, the show is, I feel like a proverbial blind man, (mumbling) man. (coughing) Excuse me, I mean, there's so much going on, that depending upon where you want to focus, you could come away with any take away. If you focus on the devices, you could focus on IOT, and you could literally come away with anything. If 5G has been the one piece of news that is sort of in the background of anything, I think it's in the background of everything because in part, the definition of 5G is still broad. Right, there's the radio access side, there's the core network side, IOT is a big part of 5G, reaching out to (mumbling) industries, vertical industry is a big part of it. So, as operators start talking about 5G, it's easy enough for every vendor to sort of just attach themselves in some way, and I think that's what we're seeing here this year. It really is just a question of, how we get the 5G, are we ready for 5G we saw on Sunday, the big news of acceleration, how are we accelerating towards it, (mumbling) deals from a number of major mobile operators and they're talking about how we're going to get there. But that's really from the transformation side of things, completely right. That's the big question on everyone's mind. >> Is 5G ready honestly? It seems to be hyped up big time. As we said in one of our blog posts, "Hug the hype," cause 5G people want to all go there. But is that the real meaty story or is it, it's kind of like the AI in my mind. AI's obviously relevant, but where's the real AI. We're seeing more IOT conversations in the back channel around service provider impact, the IOT, so'd loved to get your thoughts on, you know, the impact of IOT to the business model and architecture, of the service providers. >> Peter: Yeah, it's interesting, because IOT, I mean, I think if we look at IOT versus 5G, right, one is solely sold in that theoretical stage, one is, we kind of understand IOT, and I think the number of times I've heard people talk about IOT is the way that (mumbling) will figure out how to grow their (mumbling) and not just (mumbling) to the bottom line, right? I mean, there's like, last year, and the year before that, and the year before that, there's a lot of discussion around the air transformation that will be opex reduced and it'll be (mumbling) reduced, and then some of it will save them money, but we know that they also struggle to grow their revenues, and proof at the topline. I think a lot of folks are looking at IOT, the question I think is still out there, that I'm not necessarily seeing addressed here, is how, right, because a lot of that focuses on how do they move beyond just being access providers, and we know that, yes, we're going to be talking about the devices, that it'll be low brand with many of them, and so (mumbling) revenues from those may not be where they need to be to really help grow those revenues, and so the question is how we (mumbling) move beyond it? Or how does it mix with the move into industry deep enough so that connectivity (mumbling) be reaching enough industries, reach enough connections, that connectivity (mumbling) will be significant. And I don't know that we've got an answer for that, and everyone's talking about vertical industries. Everyone. And the operators, I think what's interesting, is I heard from both operators and vendors, that we don't know them well enough. >> What's the key enabler-- >> Peter: I was running a panel with CTO's from Ericson, Nokia, Huiwei, and they all said at the end, you know, one of the biggest concerns for 5G is that we pin the hopes of 5G to some extent on helping enable these vertical industries, right? How do we reach out to mining and utilities and smart cities, and how we make 5G be pervasive towards not just consumers but (mumbling) in those markets? That there's no certainty that we actually understand what they need, and it's (mumbling) service to them unsuccessfully, as with some places that (mumbling) automotive that would be good to see progress on, a lot of them I think are still that sort of >> Yeah. >> Peter: We don't know enough to know how we'll help them. >> That's a great analysis. We have Peter on the phone here, an analyst breaking down the commentary. Question for you, as an analyst, you have a good approach on this, and I want to get some commentary on you around for the folks who are trying to keep up with the turbulence, I mean, there's so much going on, you got wireless, which has it's own set of things, is it more bandwidth, or more mobility, what's the trade off, is it a (mumbling), is this spectrum, unlicensed, all this craziness, radios, core network you mentioned, it's a lot of moving parts. Question is, how do you figure out the tell signs of success, and what are red flags, so what are you looking for that is proof points that things are going in the right direction for the industry, and proof points that there's red flags? What do you, what's your key indicators for benchmarking this opportunity around 5G and network transformation? To make all this stuff work? Smart cities, autonomous vehicles, et cetera. >> Peter: To be honest, it's a great question, I think in a lot of the conversations here come down to the focus on business versus technology, right, and I'm not too worried. I mean, we need to continue to watch technology, and make sure technology gets (mumbling) and we need to make sure that what we're hoping to do with 5G, that we can do, and (mumbling) right, the idea of we found something with (mumbling), the twee if you will, for (mumbling), work great. I've got no doubt that we can solve the tecnology issues. Oh that's supporting, unlike the spectrum, or shared spectrum of (mumbling) bands, a millimeter, or whatever (mumbling). No doubt that we can make those work. I think where I look to make sure that things are okay is, you know, none of this will really matter if it's just, 5G is no different than what we saw with 3G or 4G. And one way to think about it is, we moved from 1G to 2G and 2G to 3G and three to four, it was always a fairly one dimensional move. Right, 1G to 2G was really about more voice capacity. 2G to 3G you know, was really moving to do basic data. 3G to 4G was more data, meaning we took IP network. But, you know, what we see with 5G is that it can't just be about more data. It can't just be about faster. We've seen, I mean, heck, just look at the U.S., right, we've seen where the pricing is, and the price wars, so just throwing more bandwidth at this isn't going to help the operators. What we need to do is to figure out how to leverage these new technologies to test new markets and grow the revenues, right, grow their business, and I think that's why we're hearing so many people talk about all these different industries. And do I know that automotive is the best example, no. You know, I think automotive is sexy-- >> Yeah, it's eye candy. It's total eye candy-- >> Peter: You can get people rallied around it, but. You know what, it's public safety, you know, automotive or utilities, or industrial automation or retail, or whatever, that seeing operators build those relationships, manage to serve them, figure out how to serve them (mumbling), that's what I'm looking for, otherwise it's just going to be no different than any other G. >> Yeah. >> Peter: And it'll be sort of a race to the bottom. >> Yeah, I agree. I think another thing too, when you looked at even when wireless was exploding, the question for the carriers and the operators was, can they move past managing subscribers and truck rolls, and building core competencies, to being much more comprehensive through their operations. I think, now more than ever, that's the big pressure point, isn't it? They have to go outside of there core competencies, traditionally, and get down and dirty. >> Peter: Yeah, and you know I'm always encouraged when I see interesting little business models, right, (mumbling) AT&T move it's select products, and try to take it internationally. Or we've seen Verizon do this week. It's interesting seeing those business models. Look what Telfonica is doing, data platforms. You know, I think those innovations are great, but, whether or not they work, I'm not too-- >> Yeah. >> Peter: I'm not too (mumbling) whether or not those work. What I am more concerned about again is how they reach past that consumer and just basically business user, (mumbling) because, you can talk about IOT and I think IOT and 5G get going (mumbling), but with every IOT, except for consumer IOT, which we (mumbling) that's (mumbling) IOT cases are all vertical specific. And so, you're not going to get to address things, your (mumbling) won't, unless they come to understand that and they show that they can actually reach out to those (mumbling). >> Peter Jarich, Chief Analyst at Global Data, formerly Current Analysis, great to chat with you. Calling in from Barcelona, thanks for taking the time. Final question for you. What's the bumper sticker on the show this year? As you look at the formations of what's been announced, and where it's going, the trajectory, wraps up, you know, next day and a half. What's going to be the bumper sticker for this year's Mobile World Congress? >> Peter: You know, honestly, I think what's probably surprising is, so the bumper sticker will probably be LTE before 5G. And what I mean is as much as we're talking about 5G and really those being our big sexy topics, and seeing so many operators talking about how they see it in the near term, going into the long term, LTE supporting them, especially with gigabit LTE speed. And you've got Qualcomm talking about what they can do, (mumbling) LTE speeds are only 20 megahertz LTE carrier than you'd even notice (mumbling). You hear T-Mobile, who came up from the first morning at presentation, there was a session, media event with Ericson, and as much as Ericson was talking about 5G, (mumbling) from T-Mobile got to talk about how excited they are about their LTE network, right. And I think there is this recognition that yes, 5G is coming, but (phone cuts out). >> Alright Peter, we just lost you there. Quick, quick I lost my battery on my phone here, or the speaker. Thanks so much for your commentary, really appreciate it. >> Peter: No, no worries, no worries. Thanks again, and feel free to reach out any time. >> Alright, have a great time in Barcelona. Get some sleep, or go out, hit the night clubs. As always, going on the ground, getting to our friends and colleagues out doing the work, pounding the pavement, that's Peter, he's got the great commentary. We'll have that on replay as well, and it'll be up on YouTube as well, so this is The Cube, with more coverage from Mobile World Congress after this short break. (electronic music)