>>Well, hello everybody at John Wallace here on the Cube, and glad to have you along here for day two of our coverage here at AWS Reinvent 22. We're up in the global startup program, which is part of AWS's Startup Showcase, and I've got Kevin Farley with me. He is the director of Strategic Alliances with Maria Day db. And Kevin, good to see you this morning. Good to see you, John. Thanks for joining us. Thank >>You. >>Appreciate it. Yeah. First off, tell us about Maria db. Sure. Obviously data's your thing. Yep. But to share that with some folks at home who might not be familiar with your offering. >>Yeah. So Maria DB's been around as a corporate entity for 10 plus years, and we have a massive customer base. You know, there's a billion downloads from Docker Hub, 75% of the Fortune 500. We have an enormous sea of really happy users. But what we realize is that all of these users are really thinking about what do we, what does it mean to transform it? What does cloud modernization mean? And how do we build a strategy on something we really love to drive it into the cloud and take it to the future. So what we launched about two years ago, two and a half years ago, is Skye. It's our database as a service. It leverages all the best elements, what we provide on the enterprise platform. It marries to the AWS cloud, and it really provides the best of both worlds for our >>Customers. So in your thought then, what, what problem is that solving? >>I think what you see in the overall database market is that many people have been using what we would call legacy technology. There's been lots of sort of stratification and mixes of different database solutions. All of them come with some promise, and all of 'em come with a lot of compromise. So I think what the market is really looking for is something that can take what they know and love, can bring it to the cloud and can survive the port drive the performance and scale. That completely changes the landscape, especially as you think about what modern data needs look like, right? What people did 10 years ago with the exponential scale of data no longer works. And what they need is something that not only can really deliver against their core business values and their core business deliverables, but gets 'em to the future. How do we drive something new? How do we innovate? How do we change the game? And I think what we built with AWS really delivers what we call cloud scale. It's taking something that is the best technology, and I as a V can build, marrying it to, you know, Kubernetes layer, marrying it to global availability, thinking about having true global high availability across all of your environments and really delivering that to customers through an integrated partnership. >>Could we see this coming? I mean, because you know data, right? I mean, yeah, we, we, everybody talked about the tsunami of growth, you know, >>Back 10 >>Sure. 11 years ago. But, but maybe the headlights didn't go far enough or, or, but, but you could see that there was going to be crunch time. >>There's no doubt. And I think that this has been a, there's, there's been these sort of pocket solutions, right? So if you think at the entire no sequel world, right? People said, oh, I need scale, I can get it, but what do I have to give up asset compliance? So I have to change the way I think about what data is and how I, I can govern it. So there's been these things that deliver on half the promise, but there's never been something that comes together and really drives what we deliver through CIQ is something called expand. So distributed SQL really tied to the SQL Query language, having that asset data. So having everything you need without the compromise built on the cloud allows you to scale out and allows you to think about, I can actually do exponential layers of, of data, data modeling, data querying, complete read, write, driving that forward. And I think it gives us a whole nother dynamic that we can deliver on in a way that hasn't been before. And I think that's kind of the holy grail of what people are looking for is how am I building modern applications and how do I have a database in the cloud that's really gonna support >>It? You know, you talk about distributed, you know, sequel and, and I mean, there's a little mystery behind it, isn't there? Or at least maybe not mystery. There's a little, I guess, confusion or, or just misunderstanding. I mean, I, how, nail that down a little bit. I >>Would say the best way to say it, honestly, this is the great thing, is it people believe it's too good to be true. And I think what we see over and over >>Again, you know, what they say about that. >>But this is the great part is, you know, you know, we've just had two taste studies recently with aws, with HIT labs and Certified power, both on expand, both proof in the pudding. They did the POCs, they're like, oh my God, this works. If you watch the keynote yesterday, you know, Adam had a slide that was, you know, as big as the entire room and it highlighted Samsung and they said, you know, we're doing 80,000 requests per second. So the, you know, the story there is that AWS is able as, as an entity with their scale and their breadth to handle that kind of workload. But guess what that is? That's MariaDB expand underneath there driving all of that utilization. So it's already there, it's already married, it's already in the cloud, and now we're taking it to a completely different level with a fully managed database solution. Right? >>How impressive is that? Right? I mean, you would think that somebody out there who, I mean that that volume, that kind of capacity is, is mind blowing. >>I mean, to your kind of previous point, it's like one of those things, do I see what's coming and it's here, right? You know, it's, is it actually ever gonna be possible? And now we're showing that it really is on a daily basis for some of the biggest brands in the world. We're also seeing companies moving off not only transitioning from, you know, MariaDB or myse, but all of the big licensed, you know, conversions as well. So you think about Oracle DBS Bank is one of our biggest customers, one of the largest Oracle conversions in the world onto MariaDB. And now thinking about what is the promise of connecting that to the cloud? How do you take things that you're currently doing, OnPrem delivering a hybrid model that also then starts to say, Hey, here's my path to cloud modernization. Skye gives me that bridge. And then you take it one layer farther and you think about multi-cloud, right? That's one of the things that's critical that ISVs can really only deliver in a meaningful way, is how can we have a solution for a customer that we can take to any availability zone. We can have performance, proximity, cost, proximity. We're always able to have that total data dexterity across any environment we need and we can build on that for the future. >>So if, if we're talking about cloud database and there's so many good things going forward here. You're talking about easy use and scalability and all that. But as with ever have you talked about this, there's some push and there's some pull. Yeah. So, so what's the, what's the other side that's still, you know, you that you think has to be >>Addressed? And I think that's a great question. So there's, we see that there's poll, right? We've seen these deals, this pipeline growth, this, there's great adoption. But what I think we're still not at the point of massive hockey stick adoption is that customers still don't fully understand the capabilities distributed SQL and the power they can actually deliver. So the more we drive case studies, the more we drive POCs, the more we prove the model, I think you're gonna see just a massive adoption scale. And I also think customers are tired of doing lots of different things in lots of different pockets. So neither one of the key elements of Sky SQL is we can do both transactional and analytical data out of the same database driven by the same proxy. So what, instead of having DBAs and developers try to figure out, okay, I'm gonna pull from this database here. >>Yeah. That there, it's, it's this big spaghetti wire concept that is super expensive and super time intensive. So the ability to write modern applications and pull data from both pockets and really be able to have that as a seamless entity and deliver that to customers is massive. I mean, another part of the keynote yesterday was a new deliverable, like kind of no etl. Adam talked about Aurora and Redshift and the massive complexity of what used to exist for getting data back and forth. You also have to pay for two different databases. It's super expensive. So I think the idea that you can take the real focus of AWS and US is customer value. How do you deliver that next thing that changes the game? Always utilizes AWS delivers on that promise, but then takes a net new technology that really starts to think about how do we bring things together? How do we make it more simple? How do we make it more powerful? And how do we deliver more customer value as we go forward? >>But you know, if, if I'm, I'm still an on-prim guy, just pretend I'm not saying I am. Just pretend I just for the sake of the discussion here, it's like I just can't let it go. Yeah. Right. I, I still, you know, there's control, there's the known versus the unknown. The uncertain. Yeah. So twist my arm just a little bit more and get me over the hum. >>Well, first of all, you don't have to, right? And there's gonna be some industries and some verticals that will always have elements of their business that will be OnPrem. Guess what? We make the best based in the world. It can be MariaDB, but there's those that then say, these, these elements of our business are gonna be far more effective moving to the cloud. So we give you Skye, there's a natural symbiotic bridge between everything we do and how we deliver it. Where you can be hybrid and it's great. You can adopt the cloud as your business needs grow. And you can have multi-cloud. This is that, that idea that you can, can have your cake and eat it too, right? You can literally have all these elements of your business met without these big pressure to say, you gotta throw that away. You gotta move to this. It's really, how do you kind of gracefully adopt the cloud in a way that makes sense for your business? Where are you trying to drive your business? Is it time to value, right? Is it governance? Is it is there's different elements of what matters the most to individual businesses. You know, we wanna address those and we can address >>Those. So you're saying you don't have to dive >>In, you don't have to dive >>In. You, you can, you can go ankle deep, knee deep, whatever you wanna >>Do. Absolutely. And you know, some of the largest MariaDB users still have massive, massive on-prem implementations. And that's okay. But there's elements that are starting to fall behind. There's cost savings, there's things that they need to do in the cloud that they can't do. OnPrem. And that's where expand Skye really says, okay, here is your platform. Grow as you want to, migrate as you want to. And we're there every step along the way. We, we also provide a whole Sky DBA team. Some guys just say, I wanna get outta the database world at all. This is, this is expensive, it's costly and it's difficult to be an expert. So you can bring in our DBA team and they'll man and run, they'll, they'll run your entire environment. They'll optimize it, you know, they'll troubleshoot it, they'll bug fix, they'll do everything for you. So you can just say, I just wanna focus on building phenomenal applications for my customers. And the database game as we knew it is not something that I know I want to invest in anymore. Right. I wanna make that transition >>That makes that really, yeah. You know, I mean really attractive to a lot of people because you are, you talk about a lot of headache there. Yeah. So let's talk about AWS before Sure. I let you go just about that relationship. Okay. You've talked about the platform that it provides you and, and obviously the benefits, but just talk about how you've worked with AWS over the years Yep. And, and how you see that relationship allowing you to expand your services, no pun intended. >>For sure. So, I mean, I would start with the way we even contemplated architecture. You know, we worked with the satisfactory team. We made sure that the things that we built were optimized in their environment. You know, I think it was a lot of collaboration on how does this combined entity really make the most value for our customers? How does it make the most sense for our developers as we build it out? Then we work in the, in the global startup team. So the strategic element of who we are, not all startups are created equal, right? We have, right, we have 75% of the Fortune 100, we've got over a billion downloads. So, you know, we come in with promise. And the reason this partnership is so valuable and the reason there's so much investment going forward is cuz what really, what do the cloud guys care about? >>The very, very most, they want all of these mission critical, big workloads that are on prem to land in their cloud. What do we have a massive, massive TAM sitting out there, these customers that could go to aws. So we both see, like if we can deliver incredible value to that customer base, these big workloads will end up in aws. They'll use other AWS services. And as we scale and grow, you know, we have that platform that's already built for it. So I think that when you go back to like the tenants, the core principles of aws, the one that always stands out, the one that we always kind of lean back on is, are we delivering customer value? Is this the best thing for the customer? Because we do have some competition just like many other, other partners do, right? So there is Aurora and there is rds and there is times when that's a great service for a customer. But when people are really thinking about where do I need my database to go? Where do I really need to be set for the future growth? Where am I gonna get the kind of ROI I need going forward? That's where you can go, Hey, sky sql, expand distributed sql. This is the best game in town. It's built on aws and collectively, you know, we're gonna present that to a customer. I'm >>Sold. Done. >>I love it. Right? >>Maria db, check 'em out, they're on the show floor. Great traffic. I know at at the, at the booth. They're here at AWS Reinvent. So check 'em out. Maria db. Thanks >>Kevin. Hey, thanks John. Appreciate your >>Time. Appreciate Great. That was great. Right back with more, you're watching the cube, the leader in high tech coverage.

>>When Oracle acquired my SQL via the Sun acquisition, nobody really thought the company would put much effort into the platform preferring to focus all the wood behind its leading Oracle database, Arrow pun intended. But two years ago, Oracle surprised many folks by announcing my SQL Heatwave a new database as a service with a massively parallel hybrid Columbia in Mary Mary architecture that brings together transactional and analytic data in a single platform. Welcome to our latest database, power panel on the cube. My name is Dave Ante, and today we're gonna discuss Oracle's MySQL Heat Wave with a who's who of cloud database industry analysts. Holgar Mueller is with Constellation Research. Mark Stammer is the Dragon Slayer and Wikibon contributor. And Ron Westfall is with Fu Chim Research. Gentlemen, welcome back to the Cube. Always a pleasure to have you on. Thanks for having us. Great to be here. >>So we've had a number of of deep dive interviews on the Cube with Nip and Aggarwal. You guys know him? He's a senior vice president of MySQL, Heatwave Development at Oracle. I think you just saw him at Oracle Cloud World and he's come on to describe this is gonna, I'll call it a shock and awe feature additions to to heatwave. You know, the company's clearly putting r and d into the platform and I think at at cloud world we saw like the fifth major release since 2020 when they first announced MySQL heat wave. So just listing a few, they, they got, they taken, brought in analytics machine learning, they got autopilot for machine learning, which is automation onto the basic o l TP functionality of the database. And it's been interesting to watch Oracle's converge database strategy. We've contrasted that amongst ourselves. Love to get your thoughts on Amazon's get the right tool for the right job approach. >>Are they gonna have to change that? You know, Amazon's got the specialized databases, it's just, you know, the both companies are doing well. It just shows there are a lot of ways to, to skin a cat cuz you see some traction in the market in, in both approaches. So today we're gonna focus on the latest heat wave announcements and we're gonna talk about multi-cloud with a native MySQL heat wave implementation, which is available on aws MySQL heat wave for Azure via the Oracle Microsoft interconnect. This kind of cool hybrid action that they got going. Sometimes we call it super cloud. And then we're gonna dive into my SQL Heatwave Lake house, which allows users to process and query data across MyQ databases as heatwave databases, as well as object stores. So, and then we've got, heatwave has been announced on AWS and, and, and Azure, they're available now and Lake House I believe is in beta and I think it's coming out the second half of next year. So again, all of our guests are fresh off of Oracle Cloud world in Las Vegas. So they got the latest scoop. Guys, I'm done talking. Let's get into it. Mark, maybe you could start us off, what's your opinion of my SQL Heatwaves competitive position? When you think about what AWS is doing, you know, Google is, you know, we heard Google Cloud next recently, we heard about all their data innovations. You got, obviously Azure's got a big portfolio, snowflakes doing well in the market. What's your take? >>Well, first let's look at it from the point of view that AWS is the market leader in cloud and cloud services. They own somewhere between 30 to 50% depending on who you read of the market. And then you have Azure as number two and after that it falls off. There's gcp, Google Cloud platform, which is further way down the list and then Oracle and IBM and Alibaba. So when you look at AWS and you and Azure saying, hey, these are the market leaders in the cloud, then you start looking at it and saying, if I am going to provide a service that competes with the service they have, if I can make it available in their cloud, it means that I can be more competitive. And if I'm compelling and compelling means at least twice the performance or functionality or both at half the price, I should be able to gain market share. >>And that's what Oracle's done. They've taken a superior product in my SQL heat wave, which is faster, lower cost does more for a lot less at the end of the day and they make it available to the users of those clouds. You avoid this little thing called egress fees, you avoid the issue of having to migrate from one cloud to another and suddenly you have a very compelling offer. So I look at what Oracle's doing with MyQ and it feels like, I'm gonna use a word term, a flanking maneuver to their competition. They're offering a better service on their platforms. >>All right, so thank you for that. Holger, we've seen this sort of cadence, I sort of referenced it up front a little bit and they sat on MySQL for a decade, then all of a sudden we see this rush of announcements. Why did it take so long? And and more importantly is Oracle, are they developing the right features that cloud database customers are looking for in your view? >>Yeah, great question, but first of all, in your interview you said it's the edit analytics, right? Analytics is kind of like a marketing buzzword. Reports can be analytics, right? The interesting thing, which they did, the first thing they, they, they crossed the chasm between OTP and all up, right? In the same database, right? So major engineering feed very much what customers want and it's all about creating Bellevue for customers, which, which I think is the part why they go into the multi-cloud and why they add these capabilities. And they certainly with the AI capabilities, it's kind of like getting it into an autonomous field, self-driving field now with the lake cost capabilities and meeting customers where they are, like Mark has talked about the e risk costs in the cloud. So that that's a significant advantage, creating value for customers and that's what at the end of the day matters. >>And I believe strongly that long term it's gonna be ones who create better value for customers who will get more of their money From that perspective, why then take them so long? I think it's a great question. I think largely he mentioned the gentleman Nial, it's largely to who leads a product. I used to build products too, so maybe I'm a little fooling myself here, but that made the difference in my view, right? So since he's been charged, he's been building things faster than the rest of the competition, than my SQL space, which in hindsight we thought was a hot and smoking innovation phase. It kind of like was a little self complacent when it comes to the traditional borders of where, where people think, where things are separated between OTP and ola or as an example of adjacent support, right? Structured documents, whereas unstructured documents or databases and all of that has been collapsed and brought together for building a more powerful database for customers. >>So I mean it's certainly, you know, when, when Oracle talks about the competitors, you know, the competitors are in the, I always say they're, if the Oracle talks about you and knows you're doing well, so they talk a lot about aws, talk a little bit about Snowflake, you know, sort of Google, they have partnerships with Azure, but, but in, so I'm presuming that the response in MySQL heatwave was really in, in response to what they were seeing from those big competitors. But then you had Maria DB coming out, you know, the day that that Oracle acquired Sun and, and launching and going after the MySQL base. So it's, I'm, I'm interested and we'll talk about this later and what you guys think AWS and Google and Azure and Snowflake and how they're gonna respond. But, but before I do that, Ron, I want to ask you, you, you, you can get, you know, pretty technical and you've probably seen the benchmarks. >>I know you have Oracle makes a big deal out of it, publishes its benchmarks, makes some transparent on on GI GitHub. Larry Ellison talked about this in his keynote at Cloud World. What are the benchmarks show in general? I mean, when you, when you're new to the market, you gotta have a story like Mark was saying, you gotta be two x you know, the performance at half the cost or you better be or you're not gonna get any market share. So, and, and you know, oftentimes companies don't publish market benchmarks when they're leading. They do it when they, they need to gain share. So what do you make of the benchmarks? Have their, any results that were surprising to you? Have, you know, they been challenged by the competitors. Is it just a bunch of kind of desperate bench marketing to make some noise in the market or you know, are they real? What's your view? >>Well, from my perspective, I think they have the validity. And to your point, I believe that when it comes to competitor responses, that has not really happened. Nobody has like pulled down the information that's on GitHub and said, Oh, here are our price performance results. And they counter oracles. In fact, I think part of the reason why that hasn't happened is that there's the risk if Oracle's coming out and saying, Hey, we can deliver 17 times better query performance using our capabilities versus say, Snowflake when it comes to, you know, the Lakehouse platform and Snowflake turns around and says it's actually only 15 times better during performance, that's not exactly an effective maneuver. And so I think this is really to oracle's credit and I think it's refreshing because these differentiators are significant. We're not talking, you know, like 1.2% differences. We're talking 17 fold differences, we're talking six fold differences depending on, you know, where the spotlight is being shined and so forth. >>And so I think this is actually something that is actually too good to believe initially at first blush. If I'm a cloud database decision maker, I really have to prioritize this. I really would know, pay a lot more attention to this. And that's why I posed the question to Oracle and others like, okay, if these differentiators are so significant, why isn't the needle moving a bit more? And it's for, you know, some of the usual reasons. One is really deep discounting coming from, you know, the other players that's really kind of, you know, marketing 1 0 1, this is something you need to do when there's a real competitive threat to keep, you know, a customer in your own customer base. Plus there is the usual fear and uncertainty about moving from one platform to another. But I think, you know, the traction, the momentum is, is shifting an Oracle's favor. I think we saw that in the Q1 efforts, for example, where Oracle cloud grew 44% and that it generated, you know, 4.8 billion and revenue if I recall correctly. And so, so all these are demonstrating that's Oracle is making, I think many of the right moves, publishing these figures for anybody to look at from their own perspective is something that is, I think, good for the market and I think it's just gonna continue to pay dividends for Oracle down the horizon as you know, competition intens plots. So if I were in, >>Dave, can I, Dave, can I interject something and, and what Ron just said there? Yeah, please go ahead. A couple things here, one discounting, which is a common practice when you have a real threat, as Ron pointed out, isn't going to help much in this situation simply because you can't discount to the point where you improve your performance and the performance is a huge differentiator. You may be able to get your price down, but the problem that most of them have is they don't have an integrated product service. They don't have an integrated O L T P O L A P M L N data lake. Even if you cut out two of them, they don't have any of them integrated. They have multiple services that are required separate integration and that can't be overcome with discounting. And the, they, you have to pay for each one of these. And oh, by the way, as you grow, the discounts go away. So that's a, it's a minor important detail. >>So, so that's a TCO question mark, right? And I know you look at this a lot, if I had that kind of price performance advantage, I would be pounding tco, especially if I need two separate databases to do the job. That one can do, that's gonna be, the TCO numbers are gonna be off the chart or maybe down the chart, which you want. Have you looked at this and how does it compare with, you know, the big cloud guys, for example, >>I've looked at it in depth, in fact, I'm working on another TCO on this arena, but you can find it on Wiki bod in which I compared TCO for MySEQ Heat wave versus Aurora plus Redshift plus ML plus Blue. I've compared it against gcps services, Azure services, Snowflake with other services. And there's just no comparison. The, the TCO differences are huge. More importantly, thefor, the, the TCO per performance is huge. We're talking in some cases multiple orders of magnitude, but at least an order of magnitude difference. So discounting isn't gonna help you much at the end of the day, it's only going to lower your cost a little, but it doesn't improve the automation, it doesn't improve the performance, it doesn't improve the time to insight, it doesn't improve all those things that you want out of a database or multiple databases because you >>Can't discount yourself to a higher value proposition. >>So what about, I wonder ho if you could chime in on the developer angle. You, you followed that, that market. How do these innovations from heatwave, I think you used the term developer velocity. I've heard you used that before. Yeah, I mean, look, Oracle owns Java, okay, so it, it's, you know, most popular, you know, programming language in the world, blah, blah blah. But it does it have the, the minds and hearts of, of developers and does, where does heatwave fit into that equation? >>I think heatwave is gaining quickly mindshare on the developer side, right? It's not the traditional no sequel database which grew up, there's a traditional mistrust of oracles to developers to what was happening to open source when gets acquired. Like in the case of Oracle versus Java and where my sql, right? And, but we know it's not a good competitive strategy to, to bank on Oracle screwing up because it hasn't worked not on Java known my sequel, right? And for developers, it's, once you get to know a technology product and you can do more, it becomes kind of like a Swiss army knife and you can build more use case, you can build more powerful applications. That's super, super important because you don't have to get certified in multiple databases. You, you are fast at getting things done, you achieve fire, develop velocity, and the managers are happy because they don't have to license more things, send you to more trainings, have more risk of something not being delivered, right? >>So it's really the, we see the suite where this best of breed play happening here, which in general was happening before already with Oracle's flagship database. Whereas those Amazon as an example, right? And now the interesting thing is every step away Oracle was always a one database company that can be only one and they're now generally talking about heat web and that two database company with different market spaces, but same value proposition of integrating more things very, very quickly to have a universal database that I call, they call the converge database for all the needs of an enterprise to run certain application use cases. And that's what's attractive to developers. >>It's, it's ironic isn't it? I mean I, you know, the rumor was the TK Thomas Curian left Oracle cuz he wanted to put Oracle database on other clouds and other places. And maybe that was the rift. Maybe there was, I'm sure there was other things, but, but Oracle clearly is now trying to expand its Tam Ron with, with heatwave into aws, into Azure. How do you think Oracle's gonna do, you were at a cloud world, what was the sentiment from customers and the independent analyst? Is this just Oracle trying to screw with the competition, create a little diversion? Or is this, you know, serious business for Oracle? What do you think? >>No, I think it has lakes. I think it's definitely, again, attriting to Oracle's overall ability to differentiate not only my SQL heat wave, but its overall portfolio. And I think the fact that they do have the alliance with the Azure in place, that this is definitely demonstrating their commitment to meeting the multi-cloud needs of its customers as well as what we pointed to in terms of the fact that they're now offering, you know, MySQL capabilities within AWS natively and that it can now perform AWS's own offering. And I think this is all demonstrating that Oracle is, you know, not letting up, they're not resting on its laurels. That's clearly we are living in a multi-cloud world, so why not just make it more easy for customers to be able to use cloud databases according to their own specific, specific needs. And I think, you know, to holder's point, I think that definitely lines with being able to bring on more application developers to leverage these capabilities. >>I think one important announcement that's related to all this was the JSON relational duality capabilities where now it's a lot easier for application developers to use a language that they're very familiar with a JS O and not have to worry about going into relational databases to store their J S O N application coding. So this is, I think an example of the innovation that's enhancing the overall Oracle portfolio and certainly all the work with machine learning is definitely paying dividends as well. And as a result, I see Oracle continue to make these inroads that we pointed to. But I agree with Mark, you know, the short term discounting is just a stall tag. This is not denying the fact that Oracle is being able to not only deliver price performance differentiators that are dramatic, but also meeting a wide range of needs for customers out there that aren't just limited device performance consideration. >>Being able to support multi-cloud according to customer needs. Being able to reach out to the application developer community and address a very specific challenge that has plagued them for many years now. So bring it all together. Yeah, I see this as just enabling Oracles who ring true with customers. That the customers that were there were basically all of them, even though not all of them are going to be saying the same things, they're all basically saying positive feedback. And likewise, I think the analyst community is seeing this. It's always refreshing to be able to talk to customers directly and at Oracle cloud there was a litany of them and so this is just a difference maker as well as being able to talk to strategic partners. The nvidia, I think partnerships also testament to Oracle's ongoing ability to, you know, make the ecosystem more user friendly for the customers out there. >>Yeah, it's interesting when you get these all in one tools, you know, the Swiss Army knife, you expect that it's not able to be best of breed. That's the kind of surprising thing that I'm hearing about, about heatwave. I want to, I want to talk about Lake House because when I think of Lake House, I think data bricks, and to my knowledge data bricks hasn't been in the sites of Oracle yet. Maybe they're next, but, but Oracle claims that MySQL, heatwave, Lakehouse is a breakthrough in terms of capacity and performance. Mark, what are your thoughts on that? Can you double click on, on Lakehouse Oracle's claims for things like query performance and data loading? What does it mean for the market? Is Oracle really leading in, in the lake house competitive landscape? What are your thoughts? >>Well, but name in the game is what are the problems you're solving for the customer? More importantly, are those problems urgent or important? If they're urgent, customers wanna solve 'em. Now if they're important, they might get around to them. So you look at what they're doing with Lake House or previous to that machine learning or previous to that automation or previous to that O L A with O ltp and they're merging all this capability together. If you look at Snowflake or data bricks, they're tacking one problem. You look at MyQ heat wave, they're tacking multiple problems. So when you say, yeah, their queries are much better against the lake house in combination with other analytics in combination with O ltp and the fact that there are no ETLs. So you're getting all this done in real time. So it's, it's doing the query cross, cross everything in real time. >>You're solving multiple user and developer problems, you're increasing their ability to get insight faster, you're having shorter response times. So yeah, they really are solving urgent problems for customers. And by putting it where the customer lives, this is the brilliance of actually being multicloud. And I know I'm backing up here a second, but by making it work in AWS and Azure where people already live, where they already have applications, what they're saying is, we're bringing it to you. You don't have to come to us to get these, these benefits, this value overall, I think it's a brilliant strategy. I give Nip and Argo wallet a huge, huge kudos for what he's doing there. So yes, what they're doing with the lake house is going to put notice on data bricks and Snowflake and everyone else for that matter. Well >>Those are guys that whole ago you, you and I have talked about this. Those are, those are the guys that are doing sort of the best of breed. You know, they're really focused and they, you know, tend to do well at least out of the gate. Now you got Oracle's converged philosophy, obviously with Oracle database. We've seen that now it's kicking in gear with, with heatwave, you know, this whole thing of sweets versus best of breed. I mean the long term, you know, customers tend to migrate towards suite, but the new shiny toy tends to get the growth. How do you think this is gonna play out in cloud database? >>Well, it's the forever never ending story, right? And in software right suite, whereas best of breed and so far in the long run suites have always won, right? So, and sometimes they struggle again because the inherent problem of sweets is you build something larger, it has more complexity and that means your cycles to get everything working together to integrate the test that roll it out, certify whatever it is, takes you longer, right? And that's not the case. It's a fascinating part of what the effort around my SQL heat wave is that the team is out executing the previous best of breed data, bringing us something together. Now if they can maintain that pace, that's something to to, to be seen. But it, the strategy, like what Mark was saying, bring the software to the data is of course interesting and unique and totally an Oracle issue in the past, right? >>Yeah. But it had to be in your database on oci. And but at, that's an interesting part. The interesting thing on the Lake health side is, right, there's three key benefits of a lakehouse. The first one is better reporting analytics, bring more rich information together, like make the, the, the case for silicon angle, right? We want to see engagements for this video, we want to know what's happening. That's a mixed transactional video media use case, right? Typical Lakehouse use case. The next one is to build more rich applications, transactional applications which have video and these elements in there, which are the engaging one. And the third one, and that's where I'm a little critical and concerned, is it's really the base platform for artificial intelligence, right? To run deep learning to run things automatically because they have all the data in one place can create in one way. >>And that's where Oracle, I know that Ron talked about Invidia for a moment, but that's where Oracle doesn't have the strongest best story. Nonetheless, the two other main use cases of the lake house are very strong, very well only concern is four 50 terabyte sounds long. It's an arbitrary limitation. Yeah, sounds as big. So for the start, and it's the first word, they can make that bigger. You don't want your lake house to be limited and the terabyte sizes or any even petabyte size because you want to have the certainty. I can put everything in there that I think it might be relevant without knowing what questions to ask and query those questions. >>Yeah. And you know, in the early days of no schema on right, it just became a mess. But now technology has evolved to allow us to actually get more value out of that data. Data lake. Data swamp is, you know, not much more, more, more, more logical. But, and I want to get in, in a moment, I want to come back to how you think the competitors are gonna respond. Are they gonna have to sort of do a more of a converged approach? AWS in particular? But before I do, Ron, I want to ask you a question about autopilot because I heard Larry Ellison's keynote and he was talking about how, you know, most security issues are human errors with autonomy and autonomous database and things like autopilot. We take care of that. It's like autonomous vehicles, they're gonna be safer. And I went, well maybe, maybe someday. So Oracle really tries to emphasize this, that every time you see an announcement from Oracle, they talk about new, you know, autonomous capabilities. It, how legit is it? Do people care? What about, you know, what's new for heatwave Lakehouse? How much of a differentiator, Ron, do you really think autopilot is in this cloud database space? >>Yeah, I think it will definitely enhance the overall proposition. I don't think people are gonna buy, you know, lake house exclusively cause of autopilot capabilities, but when they look at the overall picture, I think it will be an added capability bonus to Oracle's benefit. And yeah, I think it's kind of one of these age old questions, how much do you automate and what is the bounce to strike? And I think we all understand with the automatic car, autonomous car analogy that there are limitations to being able to use that. However, I think it's a tool that basically every organization out there needs to at least have or at least evaluate because it goes to the point of it helps with ease of use, it helps make automation more balanced in terms of, you know, being able to test, all right, let's automate this process and see if it works well, then we can go on and switch on on autopilot for other processes. >>And then, you know, that allows, for example, the specialists to spend more time on business use cases versus, you know, manual maintenance of, of the cloud database and so forth. So I think that actually is a, a legitimate value proposition. I think it's just gonna be a case by case basis. Some organizations are gonna be more aggressive with putting automation throughout their processes throughout their organization. Others are gonna be more cautious. But it's gonna be, again, something that will help the overall Oracle proposition. And something that I think will be used with caution by many organizations, but other organizations are gonna like, hey, great, this is something that is really answering a real problem. And that is just easing the use of these databases, but also being able to better handle the automation capabilities and benefits that come with it without having, you know, a major screwup happened and the process of transitioning to more automated capabilities. >>Now, I didn't attend cloud world, it's just too many red eyes, you know, recently, so I passed. But one of the things I like to do at those events is talk to customers, you know, in the spirit of the truth, you know, they, you know, you'd have the hallway, you know, track and to talk to customers and they say, Hey, you know, here's the good, the bad and the ugly. So did you guys, did you talk to any customers my SQL Heatwave customers at, at cloud world? And and what did you learn? I don't know, Mark, did you, did you have any luck and, and having some, some private conversations? >>Yeah, I had quite a few private conversations. The one thing before I get to that, I want disagree with one point Ron made, I do believe there are customers out there buying the heat wave service, the MySEQ heat wave server service because of autopilot. Because autopilot is really revolutionary in many ways in the sense for the MySEQ developer in that it, it auto provisions, it auto parallel loads, IT auto data places it auto shape predictions. It can tell you what machine learning models are going to tell you, gonna give you your best results. And, and candidly, I've yet to meet a DBA who didn't wanna give up pedantic tasks that are pain in the kahoo, which they'd rather not do and if it's long as it was done right for them. So yes, I do think people are buying it because of autopilot and that's based on some of the conversations I had with customers at Oracle Cloud World. >>In fact, it was like, yeah, that's great, yeah, we get fantastic performance, but this really makes my life easier and I've yet to meet a DBA who didn't want to make their life easier. And it does. So yeah, I've talked to a few of them. They were excited. I asked them if they ran into any bugs, were there any difficulties in moving to it? And the answer was no. In both cases, it's interesting to note, my sequel is the most popular database on the planet. Well, some will argue that it's neck and neck with SQL Server, but if you add in Mariah DB and ProCon db, which are forks of MySQL, then yeah, by far and away it's the most popular. And as a result of that, everybody for the most part has typically a my sequel database somewhere in their organization. So this is a brilliant situation for anybody going after MyQ, but especially for heat wave. And the customers I talk to love it. I didn't find anybody complaining about it. And >>What about the migration? We talked about TCO earlier. Did your t does your TCO analysis include the migration cost or do you kind of conveniently leave that out or what? >>Well, when you look at migration costs, there are different kinds of migration costs. By the way, the worst job in the data center is the data migration manager. Forget it, no other job is as bad as that one. You get no attaboys for doing it. Right? And then when you screw up, oh boy. So in real terms, anything that can limit data migration is a good thing. And when you look at Data Lake, that limits data migration. So if you're already a MySEQ user, this is a pure MySQL as far as you're concerned. It's just a, a simple transition from one to the other. You may wanna make sure nothing broke and every you, all your tables are correct and your schema's, okay, but it's all the same. So it's a simple migration. So it's pretty much a non-event, right? When you migrate data from an O LTP to an O L A P, that's an ETL and that's gonna take time. >>But you don't have to do that with my SQL heat wave. So that's gone when you start talking about machine learning, again, you may have an etl, you may not, depending on the circumstances, but again, with my SQL heat wave, you don't, and you don't have duplicate storage, you don't have to copy it from one storage container to another to be able to be used in a different database, which by the way, ultimately adds much more cost than just the other service. So yeah, I looked at the migration and again, the users I talked to said it was a non-event. It was literally moving from one physical machine to another. If they had a new version of MySEQ running on something else and just wanted to migrate it over or just hook it up or just connect it to the data, it worked just fine. >>Okay, so every day it sounds like you guys feel, and we've certainly heard this, my colleague David Foyer, the semi-retired David Foyer was always very high on heatwave. So I think you knows got some real legitimacy here coming from a standing start, but I wanna talk about the competition, how they're likely to respond. I mean, if your AWS and you got heatwave is now in your cloud, so there's some good aspects of that. The database guys might not like that, but the infrastructure guys probably love it. Hey, more ways to sell, you know, EC two and graviton, but you're gonna, the database guys in AWS are gonna respond. They're gonna say, Hey, we got Redshift, we got aqua. What's your thoughts on, on not only how that's gonna resonate with customers, but I'm interested in what you guys think will a, I never say never about aws, you know, and are they gonna try to build, in your view a converged Oola and o LTP database? You know, Snowflake is taking an ecosystem approach. They've added in transactional capabilities to the portfolio so they're not standing still. What do you guys see in the competitive landscape in that regard going forward? Maybe Holger, you could start us off and anybody else who wants to can chime in, >>Happy to, you mentioned Snowflake last, we'll start there. I think Snowflake is imitating that strategy, right? That building out original data warehouse and the clouds tasking project to really proposition to have other data available there because AI is relevant for everybody. Ultimately people keep data in the cloud for ultimately running ai. So you see the same suite kind of like level strategy, it's gonna be a little harder because of the original positioning. How much would people know that you're doing other stuff? And I just, as a former developer manager of developers, I just don't see the speed at the moment happening at Snowflake to become really competitive to Oracle. On the flip side, putting my Oracle hat on for a moment back to you, Mark and Iran, right? What could Oracle still add? Because the, the big big things, right? The traditional chasms in the database world, they have built everything, right? >>So I, I really scratched my hat and gave Nipon a hard time at Cloud world say like, what could you be building? Destiny was very conservative. Let's get the Lakehouse thing done, it's gonna spring next year, right? And the AWS is really hard because AWS value proposition is these small innovation teams, right? That they build two pizza teams, which can be fit by two pizzas, not large teams, right? And you need suites to large teams to build these suites with lots of functionalities to make sure they work together. They're consistent, they have the same UX on the administration side, they can consume the same way, they have the same API registry, can't even stop going where the synergy comes to play over suite. So, so it's gonna be really, really hard for them to change that. But AWS super pragmatic. They're always by themselves that they'll listen to customers if they learn from customers suite as a proposition. I would not be surprised if AWS trying to bring things closer together, being morely together. >>Yeah. Well how about, can we talk about multicloud if, if, again, Oracle is very on on Oracle as you said before, but let's look forward, you know, half a year or a year. What do you think about Oracle's moves in, in multicloud in terms of what kind of penetration they're gonna have in the marketplace? You saw a lot of presentations at at cloud world, you know, we've looked pretty closely at the, the Microsoft Azure deal. I think that's really interesting. I've, I've called it a little bit of early days of a super cloud. What impact do you think this is gonna have on, on the marketplace? But, but both. And think about it within Oracle's customer base, I have no doubt they'll do great there. But what about beyond its existing install base? What do you guys think? >>Ryan, do you wanna jump on that? Go ahead. Go ahead Ryan. No, no, no, >>That's an excellent point. I think it aligns with what we've been talking about in terms of Lakehouse. I think Lake House will enable Oracle to pull more customers, more bicycle customers onto the Oracle platforms. And I think we're seeing all the signs pointing toward Oracle being able to make more inroads into the overall market. And that includes garnishing customers from the leaders in, in other words, because they are, you know, coming in as a innovator, a an alternative to, you know, the AWS proposition, the Google cloud proposition that they have less to lose and there's a result they can really drive the multi-cloud messaging to resonate with not only their existing customers, but also to be able to, to that question, Dave's posing actually garnish customers onto their platform. And, and that includes naturally my sequel but also OCI and so forth. So that's how I'm seeing this playing out. I think, you know, again, Oracle's reporting is indicating that, and I think what we saw, Oracle Cloud world is definitely validating the idea that Oracle can make more waves in the overall market in this regard. >>You know, I, I've floated this idea of Super cloud, it's kind of tongue in cheek, but, but there, I think there is some merit to it in terms of building on top of hyperscale infrastructure and abstracting some of the, that complexity. And one of the things that I'm most interested in is industry clouds and an Oracle acquisition of Cerner. I was struck by Larry Ellison's keynote, it was like, I don't know, an hour and a half and an hour and 15 minutes was focused on healthcare transformation. Well, >>So vertical, >>Right? And so, yeah, so you got Oracle's, you know, got some industry chops and you, and then you think about what they're building with, with not only oci, but then you got, you know, MyQ, you can now run in dedicated regions. You got ADB on on Exadata cloud to customer, you can put that OnPrem in in your data center and you look at what the other hyperscalers are, are doing. I I say other hyperscalers, I've always said Oracle's not really a hyperscaler, but they got a cloud so they're in the game. But you can't get, you know, big query OnPrem, you look at outposts, it's very limited in terms of, you know, the database support and again, that that will will evolve. But now you got Oracle's got, they announced Alloy, we can white label their cloud. So I'm interested in what you guys think about these moves, especially the industry cloud. We see, you know, Walmart is doing sort of their own cloud. You got Goldman Sachs doing a cloud. Do you, you guys, what do you think about that and what role does Oracle play? Any thoughts? >>Yeah, let me lemme jump on that for a moment. Now, especially with the MyQ, by making that available in multiple clouds, what they're doing is this follows the philosophy they've had the past with doing cloud, a customer taking the application and the data and putting it where the customer lives. If it's on premise, it's on premise. If it's in the cloud, it's in the cloud. By making the mice equal heat wave, essentially a plug compatible with any other mice equal as far as your, your database is concern and then giving you that integration with O L A P and ML and Data Lake and everything else, then what you've got is a compelling offering. You're making it easier for the customer to use. So I look the difference between MyQ and the Oracle database, MyQ is going to capture market more market share for them. >>You're not gonna find a lot of new users for the Oracle debate database. Yeah, there are always gonna be new users, don't get me wrong, but it's not gonna be a huge growth. Whereas my SQL heatwave is probably gonna be a major growth engine for Oracle going forward. Not just in their own cloud, but in AWS and in Azure and on premise over time that eventually it'll get there. It's not there now, but it will, they're doing the right thing on that basis. They're taking the services and when you talk about multicloud and making them available where the customer wants them, not forcing them to go where you want them, if that makes sense. And as far as where they're going in the future, I think they're gonna take a page outta what they've done with the Oracle database. They'll add things like JSON and XML and time series and spatial over time they'll make it a, a complete converged database like they did with the Oracle database. The difference being Oracle database will scale bigger and will have more transactions and be somewhat faster. And my SQL will be, for anyone who's not on the Oracle database, they're, they're not stupid, that's for sure. >>They've done Jason already. Right. But I give you that they could add graph and time series, right. Since eat with, Right, Right. Yeah, that's something absolutely right. That's, that's >>A sort of a logical move, right? >>Right. But that's, that's some kid ourselves, right? I mean has worked in Oracle's favor, right? 10 x 20 x, the amount of r and d, which is in the MyQ space, has been poured at trying to snatch workloads away from Oracle by starting with IBM 30 years ago, 20 years ago, Microsoft and, and, and, and didn't work, right? Database applications are extremely sticky when they run, you don't want to touch SIM and grow them, right? So that doesn't mean that heat phase is not an attractive offering, but it will be net new things, right? And what works in my SQL heat wave heat phases favor a little bit is it's not the massive enterprise applications which have like we the nails like, like you might be only running 30% or Oracle, but the connections and the interfaces into that is, is like 70, 80% of your enterprise. >>You take it out and it's like the spaghetti ball where you say, ah, no I really don't, don't want to do all that. Right? You don't, don't have that massive part with the equals heat phase sequel kind of like database which are more smaller tactical in comparison, but still I, I don't see them taking so much share. They will be growing because of a attractive value proposition quickly on the, the multi-cloud, right? I think it's not really multi-cloud. If you give people the chance to run your offering on different clouds, right? You can run it there. The multi-cloud advantages when the Uber offering comes out, which allows you to do things across those installations, right? I can migrate data, I can create data across something like Google has done with B query Omni, I can run predictive models or even make iron models in different place and distribute them, right? And Oracle is paving the road for that, but being available on these clouds. But the multi-cloud capability of database which knows I'm running on different clouds that is still yet to be built there. >>Yeah. And >>That the problem with >>That, that's the super cloud concept that I flowed and I I've always said kinda snowflake with a single global instance is sort of, you know, headed in that direction and maybe has a league. What's the issue with that mark? >>Yeah, the problem with the, with that version, the multi-cloud is clouds to charge egress fees. As long as they charge egress fees to move data between clouds, it's gonna make it very difficult to do a real multi-cloud implementation. Even Snowflake, which runs multi-cloud, has to pass out on the egress fees of their customer when data moves between clouds. And that's really expensive. I mean there, there is one customer I talked to who is beta testing for them, the MySQL heatwave and aws. The only reason they didn't want to do that until it was running on AWS is the egress fees were so great to move it to OCI that they couldn't afford it. Yeah. Egress fees are the big issue but, >>But Mark the, the point might be you might wanna root query and only get the results set back, right was much more tinier, which been the answer before for low latency between the class A problem, which we sometimes still have but mostly don't have. Right? And I think in general this with fees coming down based on the Oracle general E with fee move and it's very hard to justify those, right? But, but it's, it's not about moving data as a multi-cloud high value use case. It's about doing intelligent things with that data, right? Putting into other places, replicating it, what I'm saying the same thing what you said before, running remote queries on that, analyzing it, running AI on it, running AI models on that. That's the interesting thing. Cross administered in the same way. Taking things out, making sure compliance happens. Making sure when Ron says I don't want to be American anymore, I want to be in the European cloud that is gets migrated, right? So tho those are the interesting value use case which are really, really hard for enterprise to program hand by hand by developers and they would love to have out of the box and that's yet the innovation to come to, we have to come to see. But the first step to get there is that your software runs in multiple clouds and that's what Oracle's doing so well with my SQL >>Guys. Amazing. >>Go ahead. Yeah. >>Yeah. >>For example, >>Amazing amount of data knowledge and, and brain power in this market. Guys, I really want to thank you for coming on to the cube. Ron Holger. Mark, always a pleasure to have you on. Really appreciate your time. >>Well all the last names we're very happy for Romanic last and moderator. Thanks Dave for moderating us. All right, >>We'll see. We'll see you guys around. Safe travels to all and thank you for watching this power panel, The Truth About My SQL Heat Wave on the cube. Your leader in enterprise and emerging tech coverage.

>>Good morning from New York city, Lisa Martin and John furrier with the cube. We are at AWS summit NYC. This is a series of summits this year, about 15 summit globally. And we're excited to be here, John, with about 10,000 folks. >>It's crowded. New York is packed big showing here at 80 of us summit. So it's super exciting, >>Super exciting. Just a little bit before the keynote. And we have our first guest, Kevin Farley joins us the director of strategic alliances at Maria DB. Kevin, welcome to >>The program. Thank you very much. Appreciate you guys having us. >>So all of us out from California to NYC. Yeah, lots of eyes. We got keynote with Warner Vogels coming up. We should be some good news, hopefully. Yep. But talk to us about Maria DB Skys cloud native version released a couple years ago. What's going on? >>Yeah, well, it's, you know, Skys SQL for us is really a be on the future. I think when we think about like the company's real mission is it's just creating a database for everyone. It's it's any cloud, any scale, um, any size of performance and really making sure that we're able to deliver on something that really kind of takes advantage of everything we've done in the market to date. If you think about it, there's not very many startups that have a billion downloads and 75% of the fortune 500 already using our service. So what we're really thinking about is how do we bridge that gap? How do we create a natural path for all of these customers? And if you think about not just Maria DB, but anyone else using the sequel query language, all the, my people, what I think most Andy jazzy TK, anyone says, you know, it's about 10% of the market currently is in the clouds. That's 90% of a total addressable market that hasn't done it yet. So creating cloud modernization for us, I think is just a huge opportunity. Do >>You guys have a great history with AWS? I want to just step back, you mentioned some stats on, on success. Can you scope the size and track record of Maria DB for us real quick and set the table? Because I think there's a bigger picture going on that we've been tracking for the past 13 years we address is the role of the database has always been one of those things where they didn't believe a one database fits all things, right. You guys have been part of that track record scope, the size and scale of Maria DB, the usage, the use cases and some of the successes. >>Yeah. I mean, like I said, some of the stats are already threw out there. So, you know, it is pervasive, I think is the best way to put it. I think what you look at what the database market really became is very siloed. Right? I think there was a lot of unique solutions that were built and delivered that had promise, but they also had compromise. And I think once you look at the landscape of a lot of fortune 500 companies, they have probably 10 to 15 different database solutions, right? And they're all doing unique things. They're difficult to manage. They're very costly. So what Marie DB is always kind of focused on is how do we continue to build more and more functionality into the database itself and allow that to be a single source of truth where application developers can seamlessly integrate applications. >>So then the theme of this event in New York city, which is scale dot, dot, dot, anything must align quite well with Maria and your >>Objectives. I mean, honestly, I think when I think of the problems that most database, um, companies, um, face customers, I should say it, it really comes down to performance and scale. Most of them like Maria DB, like you said, they it's like the car, you know, and love you've been driving it for years. You're an expert at it. It works great, but it doesn't have enough range. It doesn't go fast enough. It's hitting walls. That modern data requirements are just breaking. So scale for me is the favorite thing to talk about because what we launched as MariaDB expand, which is a plugable storage engine that is integrated into Skye, and it really gives you dynamic scale. So you can scale in, you can scale out, it's not costly compute to try to get for seasonality. So you can make your black Friday numbers. It's really about the dexterity to be able to come in and out as you need in a share, nothing architecture with full failover sale healing, high availability, married to the cloud for full cloud scale. And that's really the beauty of the AWS partnership. >>Can you elaborate a bit more on the partnership? How long have you guys been partners? Where is it now anything exciting coming out? >>Yeah, it it's, it's actually been a wonderful ride. They've really invested from the very beginning we went for the satisfactory. So they really brought a lot of resources to bear. And I think if you're looking at why it works, um, it's probably two things. I think the number one thing is that we share one of the core tenants and it's customer obsession in a, in a, in an environment where there is co-opetition right. You have to find paths for how do you get the best thing for the customer? And the second is pretty obvious, but if you look at any major cloud, their number one priority is getting large mission critical workloads into their cloud because the revenue is exponential on the backside. So what do we own? Large mission critical workloads. So if you marry that objective with AWS, the partnership is absolutely perfect for driving true revenue, growth scale, and, and revenue across, across both entities in the partner ecosystem. >>So Kevin talk about the, um, the hybrid strategy, cuz you're seeing cloud operations. Yep. Go hybrid. Amazon announced AWS announced outpost like four years ago. Right now edge is super hot. Yeah. So you're seeing like most of the enterprise is saying mm-hmm <affirmative> okay. Love cloud love the cloud database, but I got the on-prem hybrid cloud operations. Right. So it's not just proprietary operations. It's cloud ops. Yeah. How do you guys fit into that? What's the story. >>We, we actually it's. I mean, there's, there's all these new deliverables outposts, you know, come out with a promise. What we have is a reality right now, um, one of the largest, um, networking companies, which I can't mention yet publicly, um, we want a really big sky SQL deal, but what they had manufacturing plants, they needed to have on-prem deployments. So Maria DB naturally syncs with sky SQL. It's the same technology. It works in perfect harmony. So we really already deliver on the promise of hybrid, but of course there's a lot more we can grow in that area. And certainly thinking about app posts and other solutions, um, is definitely on the, the longer term roadmap of what could make sense for in our customer. What, >>What are some of the latest things that, that you guys are doing now that you weren't doing a few years ago that customers should know about the audience should know about? >>I mean, I think the game changer, we're always innovating. I mean, when you're the company that writes the code owns the code, you know, we can do hot fixes, we can do security patches, we can always do the things that give you real time access to what you need. But I think the game changer is what I mentioned a little bit earlier. And I think it's really the, the holy grail of the cloud. It's like, how can we take the, the SQL query language, which is well over 50% of the open source market. Right. And how do we convert that seamlessly into the cloud? How do we help you modernize on that journey? And expand gives you the ability to say, I can be the small, I can be a small startup. I got my C round. I don't wanna manage databases. I can use the exact same service as the largest fortune 100 company that has massive global scale and needs to be able to drive that across globe. Yeah. So I think that's the beauty is that it's really a democratization of the database, >>At least that, you know, we've been covering the big data space for 10 years. Remember all those different conversations had do those days and oh, they have big data and right. But then it's like too hard to set up. Then you had that kind of period where you saw a spark and data lakes emerge. Yeah. Then you, now it almost seems, seems like now more than ever, there's a data revolutions back. Right. It was almost like a lull in the, in, in the, in the market a little bit. Yeah. I'm gonna democratize data science right now. You got data. So now it just seems to be an explosion at that level. What's your analysis on that? Because you you've been in, in, in the weeds and in the, in the, in this market for 10 years. Yeah. And nothing really changed. It's just now it's more ready. Yeah. I think what's your observation. Why >>Is that? I think that's a really good question. And I love it cuz I mean, what the promise of things like could do and net new technologies sort of, it was always out there, but it required this whole net new lift and how do I do it? How do I manage it? How do I optimize it? The beauty of what we can do with Maria DB is that sky SQLs, which you already know and love. Right? And now we can Del you can deliver a data lake on S3, right? You can pull that data. And we also have the ability to do both analytical data and transactional data from the same database. So you can write applications that can pull column, store data up into, um, your application, but you can also have all of your asset transactions, which are absolutely required for all of your mission critical business. So I think that we're seeing more and more adoption. You've seen other companies start to talk about bringing the different elements in, but we're the only ones that really >>Do it and SQL standardizing that front end. Yeah. Even better than ever before. All the stuff under the covers is all being connected. >>That's the awesome part is right. Is you're literally doing what you already know how to do, but you blow it out on the back end, married to the cloud. And that I think is the real revolution of what makes usability real in the data space. And I think that's what was always the problem before >>When you're in partner conversations, you mentioned co-opetition. Yeah. <laugh> so I think when you're in partner conversations and customer conversations, there is a lot of the, the there's a lot of competition out there. Absolutely. Everyone's got their own key messages. What are the key differentiators that you're saying AWS Marie to be together better? And here's why, >>Yeah. I, I think that certainly you, you start with the global footprint of AWS, right? So what we rely on the most is having the ability to truly deal with global customers in availability zones, they're gonna optimize performance from them. But then when we look at what we do that really changes the game, it comes down to scale and performance. We actually just ran, um, a suspense test against cockroach that also does distributed sequel. Absolutely. You know, the results were off the chart. So we went public and said, we have an open challenge. Anyone that wants to try to beat, um, expand and Skye will we'll if you can, we'll put $25,000 towards charity. So we really are putting our money where our mouth is on that challenge. So we believe the performance cuz we've seen it and we know it's real, but then it's really always about data scale. Modern data requirements are breaking the mold of charting. They're breaking the mold of all these bandaids that people have put in these traditional services. And we give them future. We, we feature proof their investments, so they can say, Hey, I can start here. But if I end up being a startup that becomes Airbnb, I'm already built to blow it out on the back end. I can already use what I have. >>Speaking of startups, being the next Airbnb. If you look at behind us here, you can see, this is a really packed event in New York city events are back, but the ecosystem here is even flourishing. So Dave and I and Lisa were observing that we're still kind of in a growth mode, big time. So yeah, there's some market forces headwinds for the big unicorns, overfunded, you know, public companies, maybe the valuations are a little bit off, but there's still a surge of new innovations, new companies coming out of this. Um, and it's all around data and scale. It's all around new names. We've never heard of. Absolutely. What's your take on >>Reaction? Well, actually another awesome segues cuz in addition to the public clouds, I manage the ecosystem. And one of the things that we've really been focused on with Skys SQL is making it accessible API accessible. So if you're a company that has a huge Marine DB footprint change data capture might be the most important thing for you to say, we wanna do this, but we want you to stay in sync with our environments. Um, things like monitoring, things like BI, all of these are ecosystem plays and current partners that we have, um, that we really think about how do you holistically look at not only the database and what it can do, but how does it deliver value to different segments of your customer base or just your employee base that are using that stuff? So I think that's huge for us. >>Well, you know, one of the things that we talk often about is that every company, these days, regardless of industry, has to be a data company. Yep. You've gotta be able to access the data glean insights from an act on it quickly, whether it's manufacturing, retail, healthcare, are there any verticals in where Maria DB really excels? >>Um, so certainly we Excel in areas like financial services is huge DBS bank. Um, in APAC, one of our biggest customers, also one of the largest Oracle migrations, probably the, that we've ever done. A lot of people trying to get off Oracle, we make it seamless to get into Maria DB. Um, you can think about Samsung cloud and another, their entire consumer cloud is built on Maria DB, why it's integrated with expand right seasonality. So there's customers like that that really bring it home for us as far as ServiceNow tech sector. Right? So these are all different ones, but I think we're really strong in those >>Areas. So this brings up a good point. Dave and I a coined a term called super cloud at reinvent and Lisa and Dave were at multiple events we're together at events. And so a lot of people are getting behind this cuz it's multi-cloud sounds like something's broken. Yes. But so we call it super cloud because customers are building on top of ecosystems like Maria DB and others. Yeah. Not just AWS SOS does all the CapEx absolutely provide the value. So now people are having this new super cloud moment. We' saying we can get all the benefits of cloud scale mm-hmm <affirmative> without actually being a cloud. Right. So this is where the next gen layer comes. What's your reaction to, to super cloud. Do you think it's a thing? >>Well, I think it's a thing in the sense, from our perspective as an ISV, we're, we're laser focused on making sure that we support any cloud and we have a truly multicloud cloud platform. But the beauty of that as well is from a single UI, you're able to deploy databases in different clouds underneath that you're not looking at so you can have performance proximity, but you're still driving it through the same Skys UI. So for us it's, it's unequivocally true. Got it. And I think it's only ISVs like Maria DB that can deliver on that value because >>You're enabling, >>We're enabling it. Right. We partner, we build on top of everything. Right. So we can access everything underneath >>And they can then build on top of you. >>Sure, exactly. And that's exactly where it goes. Right? Yeah. So that, I think in that sense, the super cloud is actually already somewhat real. >>It's interesting. You look at the old, it spend, you take a big company. I won't say a name, but a leader in a, a vertical, they have such a big spend. Now they can leverage that spend in with the super cloud model. They then could become a service provider in the vertical. Absolutely capital one S doing it. Yeah. You're seeing, um, Goldman Sachs doing it. They have the power on the spend that they're leveraging in for their business and servicing their vertical and the smaller players. Do you see that trend? >>Well, I think that's the reality is that everyone is getting this place where if you're talking about sort of this broader super concept, you're talking about global scale, right? That's if in order to deliver a backbone that can service that model, you have to have the right data structure and the right database footprint to be able to scale. And I think that's what they all need to be able to do. And that's what we're really well positioned with Skys >>To enable companies, as we talked about a minute ago to truly become data companies. Yeah. And to be competitive and to scale on their own, where are your customer conversations? Are they at the C-suite level? Has that changed in the last couple of years? >>Uh, that's actually a really great way to state that question because I think you would've traditionally probably talked more to, um, the DBAs, right? They're the people that are having headaches. They're having problems. They're, they're trying to solve. We see a lot of developers now tons, right? They're thinking about, I have this, I have this new thing that I need to do to deliver this new application. And here's the requirements and the current model's broken. It doesn't optimize that it's a lot of work and it's hard to manage. So I think that we're in a great position to be able to take that to that next phase and deliver. And then of course, as you get deeper in with AWS, you're talking about, you know, CIO level, CISO level, they're they need to understand how do you fit into our larger paradigm. And many of these guys have, you know, hundreds of million dollar commits with AWS. So they think of their investment in the sense of the cloud stack. And we're part of that cloud stack, just like AWS services. So those conversations continue to happen certainly with our larger customers, cuz it truly is married. >>It is. And they continue to evolve. Kevin, thank you so much >>For joining. You're welcome. Great, >>John and me talking about what's going on with Maria >>D. Thank you, John. Thank you, Lisa. On behalf of Maria B, it was wonderful. Really >>Appreciate it. Fantastic as well for John furrier. I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching the cube live from New York city at AWS summit NYC, John and I we're back with our next guest in a minute.

(upbeat music) >> When Oracle acquired Sun in 2009, it paid $5.6 billion net of Sun's cash and debt. Now I argued at the time that Oracle got one of the best deals in the history of enterprise tech, and I got a lot of grief for saying that because Sun had a declining business, it was losing money, and its revenue was under serious pressure as it tried to hang on for dear life. But Safra Catz understood that Oracle could pay Sun's lower profit and lagging businesses, like its low index 86 product lines, and even if Sun's revenue was cut in half, because Oracle has such a high revenue multiple as a software company, it could almost instantly generate $25 to $30 billion in shareholder value on paper. In addition, it was a catalyst for Oracle to initiate its highly differentiated engineering systems business, and was actually the precursor to Oracle's Cloud. Oracle saw that it could capture high margin dollars that used to go to partners like HP, it's original exit data partner, and get paid for the full stack across infrastructure, middleware, database, and application software, when eventually got really serious about cloud. Now there was also a major technology angle to this story. Remember Sun's tagline, "the network is the computer"? Well, they should have just called it cloud. Through the Sun acquisition. Oracle also got a couple of key technologies, Java, the number one programming language in the world, and MySQL, a key ingredient of the LAMP stack, that's Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP, Perl or Python, on which the internet is basically built, and is used by many cloud services like Facebook, Twitter, WordPress, Flicker, Amazon, Aurora, and many other examples, including, by the way, Maria DB, which is a fork of MySQL created by MySQL's creator, basically in protest to Oracle's acquisition; the drama is Oscar worthy. It gets even better. In 2020, Oracle began introducing a new version of MySQL called MySQL HeatWave, and since late 2020 it's been in sort of a super cycle rolling, out three new releases in less than a year and a half in an attempt to expand its Tam and compete in new markets. Now we covered the release of MySQL Autopilot, which uses machine learning to automate management functions. And we also covered the bench marketing that Oracle produced against Snowflake, AWS, Azure, and Google. And Oracle's at it again with HeatWave, adding machine learning into its database capabilities, along with previously available integrations of OLAP and OLTP. This, of course, is in line with Oracle's converged database philosophy, which, as we've reported, is different from other cloud database providers, most notably Amazon, which takes the right tool for the right job approach and chooses database specialization over a one size fits all strategy. Now we've asked Oracle to come on theCUBE and explain these moves, and I'm pleased to welcome back Nipun Agarwal, who's the senior vice president for MySQL Database and HeatWave at Oracle. And today, in this video exclusive, we'll discuss machine learning, other new capabilities around elasticity and compression, and then any benchmark data that Nipun wants to share. Nipun's been a leading advocate of the HeatWave program. He's led engineering in that team for over 10 years, and he has over 185 patents in database technologies. Welcome back to the show Nipun. Great to see you again. Thanks for coming on. >> Thank you, Dave. Very happy to be back. >> Yeah, now for those who may not have kept up with the news, maybe to kick things off you could give us an overview of what MySQL HeatWave actually is so that we're all on the same page. >> Sure, Dave, MySQL HeatWave is a fully managed MySQL database service from Oracle, and it has a builtin query accelerator called HeatWave, and that's the part which is unique. So with MySQL HeatWave, customers of MySQL get a single database which they can use for transactional processing, for analytics, and for mixed workloads because traditionally MySQL has been designed and optimized for transaction processing. So in the past, when customers had to run analytics with the MySQL based service, they would need to move the data out of MySQL into some other database for running analytics. So they would end up with two different databases and it would take some time to move the data out of MySQL into this other system. With MySQL HeatWave, we have solved this problem and customers now have a single MySQL database for all their applications, and they can get the good performance of analytics without any changes to their MySQL application. >> Now it's no secret that a lot of times, you know, queries are not, you know, most efficiently written, and critics of MySQL HeatWave will claim that this product is very memory and cluster intensive, it has a heavy footprint that adds to cost. How do you answer that, Nipun? >> Right, so for offering any database service in the cloud there are two dimensions, performance and cost, and we have been very cognizant of both of them. So it is indeed the case that HeatWave is a, in-memory query accelerator, which is why we get very good performance, but it is also the case that we have optimized HeatWave for commodity cloud services. So for instance, we use the least expensive compute. We use the least expensive storage. So what I would suggest is for the customers who kind of would like to know what is the price performance advantage of HeatWave compared to any database we have benchmark against, Redshift, Snowflake, Google BigQuery, Azure Synapse, HeatWave is significantly faster and significantly lower price on a multitude of workloads. So not only is it in-memory database and optimized for that, but we have also optimized it for commodity cloud services, which makes it much lower price than the competition. >> Well, at the end of the day, it's customers that sort of decide what the truth is. So to date, what's been the customer reaction? Are they moving from other clouds from on-prem environments? Both why, you know, what are you seeing? >> Right, so we are definitely a whole bunch of migrations of customers who are running MySQL on-premise to the cloud, to MySQL HeatWave. That's definitely happening. What is also very interesting is we are seeing that a very large percentage of customers, more than half the customers who are coming to MySQL HeatWave, are migrating from other clouds. We have a lot of migrations coming from AWS Aurora, migrations from RedShift, migrations from RDS MySQL, TerriData, SAP HANA, right. So we are seeing migrations from a whole bunch of other databases and other cloud services to MySQL HeatWave. And the main reason we are told why customers are migrating from other databases to MySQL HeatWave are lower cost, better performance, and no change to their application because many of these services, like AWS Aurora are ETL compatible with MySQL. So when customers try MySQL HeatWave, not only do they get better performance at a lower cost, but they find that they can migrate their application without any changes, and that's a big incentive for them. >> Great, thank you, Nipun. So can you give us some names? Are there some real world examples of these customers that have migrated to MySQL HeatWave that you can share? >> Oh, absolutely, I'll give you a few names. Stutor.com, this is an educational SaaS provider raised out of Brazil. They were using Google BigQuery, and when they migrated to MySQL HeatWave, they found a 300X, right, 300 times improvement in performance, and it lowered their cost by 85 (audio cut out). Another example is Neovera. They offer cybersecurity solutions and they were running their application on an on-premise version of MySQL when they migrated to MySQL HeatWave, their application improved in performance by 300 times and their cost reduced by 80%, right. So by going from on-premise to MySQL HeatWave, they reduced the cost by 80%, improved performance by 300 times. We are Glass, another customer based out of Brazil. They were running on AWS EC2, and when they migrated, within hours they found that there was a significant improvement, like, you know, over 5X improvement in database performance, and they were able to accommodate a very large virtual event, which had more than a million visitors. Another example, Genius Senority. They are a game designer in Japan, and when they moved to MySQL HeatWave, they found a 90 times percent improvement in performance. And there many, many more like a lot of migrations, again, from like, you know, Aurora, RedShift and many other databases as well. And consistently what we hear is (audio cut out) getting much better performance at a much lower cost without any change to their application. >> Great, thank you. You know, when I ask that question, a lot of times I get, "Well, I can't name the customer name," but I got to give Oracle credit, a lot of times you guys have at your fingertips. So you're not the only one, but it's somewhat rare in this industry. So, okay, so you got some good feedback from those customers that did migrate to MySQL HeatWave. What else did they tell you that they wanted? Did they, you know, kind of share a wishlist and some of the white space that you guys should be working on? What'd they tell you? >> Right, so as customers are moving more data into MySQL HeatWave, as they're consolidating more data into MySQL HeatWave, customers want to run other kinds of processing with this data. A very popular one is (audio cut out) So we have had multiple customers who told us that they wanted to run machine learning with data which is stored in MySQL HeatWave, and for that they have to extract the data out of MySQL (audio cut out). So that was the first feedback we got. Second thing is MySQL HeatWave is a highly scalable system. What that means is that as you add more nodes to a HeatWave cluster, the performance of the system improves almost linearly. But currently customers need to perform some manual steps to add most to a cluster or to reduce the cluster size. So that was other feedback we got that people wanted this thing to be automated. Third thing is that we have shown in the previous results, that HeatWave is significantly faster and significantly lower price compared to competitive services. So we got feedback from customers that can we trade off some performance to get even lower cost, and that's what we have looked at. And then finally, like we have some results on various data sizes with TPC-H. Customers wanted to see if we can offer some more data points as to how does HeatWave perform on other kinds of workloads. And that's what we've been working on for the several months. >> Okay, Nipun, we're going to get into some of that, but, so how did you go about addressing these requirements? >> Right, so the first thing is we are announcing support for in-database machine learning, meaning that customers who have their data inside MySQL HeatWave can now run training, inference, and prediction all inside the database without the data or the model ever having to leave the database. So that's how we address the first one. Second thing is we are offering support for real time elasticity, meaning that customers can scale up or scale down to any number of nodes. This requires no manual intervention on part of the user, and for the entire duration of the resize operation, the system is fully available. The third, in terms of the costs, we have double the amount of data that can be processed per node. So if you look at a HeatWave cluster, the size of the cluster determines the cost. So by doubling the amount of data that can be processed per node, we have effectively reduced the cluster size which is required for planning a given workload to have, which means it reduces the cost to the customer by half. And finally, we have also run the TPC-DS workload on HeatWave and compared it with other vendors. So now customers can have another data point in terms of the performance and the cost comparison of HeatWave with other services. >> All right, and I promise, I'm going to ask you about the benchmarks, but I want to come back and drill into these a bit. How is HeatWave ML different from competitive offerings? Take for instance, Redshift ML, for example. >> Sure, okay, so this is a good comparison. Let's start with, let's say RedShift ML, like there are some systems like, you know, Snowflake, which don't even offer any, like, processing of machine learning inside the database, and they expect customers to write a whole bunch of code, in say Python or Java, to do machine learning. RedShift ML does have integration with SQL. That's a good start. However, when customers of Redshift need to run machine learning, and they invoke Redshift ML, it makes a call to another service, SageMaker, right, where so the data needs to be exported to a different service. The model is generated, and the model is also outside RedShift. With HeatWave ML, the data resides always inside the MySQL database service. We are able to generate models. We are able to train the models, run inference, run explanations, all inside the MySQL HeatWave service. So the data, or the model, never have to leave the database, which means that both the data and the models can now be secured by the same access control mechanisms as the rest of the data. So that's the first part, that there is no need for any ETL. The second aspect is the automation. Training is a very important part of machine learning, right, and it impacts the quality of the predictions and such. So traditionally, customers would employ data scientists to influence the training process so that it's done right. And even in the case of Redshift ML, the users are expected to provide a lot of parameters to the training process. So the second thing which we have worked on with HeatWave ML is that it is fully automated. There is absolutely no user intervention required for training. Third is in terms of performance. So one of the things we are very, very sensitive to is performance because performance determines the eventual cost to the customer. So again, in some benchmarks, which we have published, and these are all available on GitHub, we are showing how HeatWave ML is 25 times faster than Redshift ML, and here's the kicker, at 1% of the cost. So four benefits, the data all remain secure inside the database service, it's fully automated, much faster, much lower cost than the competition. >> All right, thank you Nipun. Now, so there's a lot of talk these days about explainability and AI. You know, the system can very accurately tell you that it's a cat, you know, or for you Silicon Valley fans, it's a hot dog or not a hot dog, but they can't tell you how the system got there. So what is explainability, and why should people care about it? >> Right, so when we were talking to customers about what they would like from a machine learning based solution, one of the feedbacks we got is that enterprise is a little slow or averse to uptaking machine learning, because it seems to be, you know, like magic, right? And enterprises have the obligation to be able to explain, or to provide a answer to their customers as to why did the database make a certain choice. With a rule based solution it's simple, it's a rule based thing, and you know what the logic was. So the reason explanations are important is because customers want to know why did the system make a certain prediction? One of the important characteristics of HeatWave ML is that any model which is generated by HeatWave ML can be explained, and we can do both global explanations or model explanations as well as we can also do local explanations. So when the system makes a specific prediction using HeatWave ML, the user can find out why did the system make such a prediction? So for instance, if someone is being denied a loan, the user can figure out what were the attribute, what were the features which led to that decision? So this ensures, like, you know, fairness, and many of the times there is also like a need for regulatory compliance where users have a right to know. So we feel that explanations are very important for enterprise workload, and that's why every model which is generated by HeatWave ML can be explained. >> Now I got to give Snowflakes some props, you know, this whole idea of separating compute from storage, but also bringing the database to the cloud and driving elasticity. So that's been a key enabler and has solved a lot of problems, in particular the snake swallowing the basketball problem, as I often say. But what about elasticity and elasticity in real time? How is your version, and there's a lot of companies chasing this, how is your approach to an elastic cloud database service different from what others are promoting these days? >> Right, so a couple of characteristics. One is that we have now fully automated the process of elasticity, meaning that if a user wants to scale up or scale down, the only thing they need to specify is the eventual size of the cluster and the system completely takes care of it transparently. But then there are a few characteristics which are very unique. So for instance, we can scale up or scale down to any number of nodes. Whereas in the case of Snowflake, the number of nodes someone can scale up or scale down to are the powers of two. So if a user needs 70 CPUs, well, their choice is either 64 or 128. So by providing this flexibly with MySQL HeatWave, customers get a custom fit. So they can get a cluster which is optimized for their specific portal. So that's the first thing, flexibility of scaling up or down to any number of nodes. The second thing is that after the operation is completed, the system is fully balanced, meaning the data across the various nodes is fully balanced. That is not the case with many solutions. So for instance, in the case of Redshift, after the resize operation is done, the user is expected to manually balance the data, which can be very cumbersome. And the third aspect is that while the resize operation is going on, the HeatWave cluster is completely available for queries, for DMLS, for loading more data. That is, again, not the case with Redshift. Redshift, suppose the operation takes 10 to 15 minutes, during that window of time, the system is not available for writes, and for a big part of that chunk of time, the system is not even available for queries, which is very limiting. So the advantages we have are fully flexible, the system is in a balanced state, and the system is completely available for the entire duration operation. >> Yeah, I guess you got that hypergranularity, which, you know, sometimes they say, "Well, t-shirt sizes are good enough," but then I think of myself, some t-shirts fit me better than others, so. Okay, I saw on the announcement that you have this lower price point for customers. How did you actually achieve this? Could you give us some details around that please? >> Sure, so there are two things for announcing this service, which lower the cost for the customers. The first thing is that we have doubled the amount of data that can be processed by a HeatWave node. So if we have doubled the amount of data, which can be a process by a node, the cluster size which is required by customers reduces to half, and that's why the cost drops to half. The way we have managed to do this is by two things. One is support for Bloom filters, which reduces the amount of intermediate memory. And second is we compress the base data. So these are the two techniques we have used to process more data per node. The second way by which we are lowering the cost for the customers is by supporting pause and resume of HeatWave. And many times you find customers of like HeatWave and other services that they want to run some other queries or some other workloads for some duration of time, but then they don't need the cluster for a few hours. Now with the support for pause and resume, customers can pause the cluster and the HeatWave cluster instantaneously stops. And when they resume, not only do we fetch the data, in a very, like, you know, a quick pace from the object store, but we also preserve all the statistics, which are used by Autopilot. So both the data and the metadata are fetched, extremely fast from the object store. So with these two capabilities we feel that it'll drive down the cost to our customers even more. >> Got it, thank you. Okay, I promised I was going to get to the benchmarks. Let's have it. How do you compare with others but specifically cloud databases? I mean, and how do we know these benchmarks are real? My friends at EMC, they were back in the day, they were brilliant at doing benchmarks. They would produce these beautiful PowerPoints charts, but it was kind of opaque, but what do you say to that? >> Right, so there are multiple things I would say. The first thing is that this time we have published two benchmarks, one is for machine learning and other is for SQL analytics. All the benchmarks, including the scripts which we have used are available on GitHub. So we have full transparency, and we invite and encourage customers or other service providers to download the scripts, to download the benchmarks and see if they get any different results, right. So what we are seeing, we have published it for other people to try and validate. That's the first part. Now for machine learning, there hasn't been a precedence for enterprise benchmarks so we talk about aiding open data sets and we have published benchmarks for those, right? So both for classification, as well as for aggression, we have run the training times, and that's where we find that HeatWave MLS is 25 times faster than RedShift ML at one percent of the cost. So fully transparent, available. For SQL analytics, in the past we have shown comparisons with TPC-H. So we would show TPC-H across various databases, across various data sizes. This time we decided to use TPC-DS. the advantage of TPC-DS over TPC-H is that it has more number of queries, the queries are more complex, the schema is more complex, and there is a lot more data skew. So it represents a different class of workloads, and which is very interesting. So these are queries derived from the TPC-DS benchmark. So the numbers we have are published this time are for 10 terabyte TPC-DS, and we are comparing with all the four majors services, Redshift, Snowflake, Google BigQuery, Azure Synapse. And in all the cases, HeatWave is significantly faster and significantly lower priced. Now one of the things I want to point out is that when we are doing the cost comparison with other vendors, we are being overly fair. For instance, the cost of HeatWave includes the cost of both the MySQL node as well as the HeatWave node, and with this setup, customers can run transaction processing analytics as well as machine learning. So the price captures all of it. Whereas with the other vendors, the comparison is only for the analytic queries, right? So if customers wanted to run RDP, you would need to add the cost of that database. Or if customers wanted to run machine learning, you would need to add the cost of that service. Furthermore, with the case of HeatWave, we are quoting pay as you go price, whereas for other vendors like, you know, RedShift, and like, you know, where applicable, we are quoting one year, fully paid upfront cost rate. So it's like, you know, very fair comparison. So in terms of the numbers though, price performance for TPC-DS, we are about 4.8 times better price performance compared to RedShift We are 14.4 times better price performance compared to Snowflake, 13 times better than Google BigQuery, and 15 times better than Synapse. So across the board, we are significantly faster and significantly lower price. And as I said, all of these scripts are available in GitHub for people to drive for themselves. >> Okay, all right, I get it. So I think what you're saying is, you could have said this is what it's going to cost for you to do both analytics and transaction processing on a competitive platform versus what it takes to do that on Oracle MySQL HeatWave, but you're not doing that. You're saying, let's take them head on in their sweet spot of analytics, or OLTP separately and you're saying you still beat them. Okay, so you got this one database service in your cloud that supports transactions and analytics and machine learning. How much do you estimate your saving companies with this integrated approach versus the alternative of kind of what I called upfront, the right tool for the right job, and admittedly having to ETL tools. How can you quantify that? >> Right, so, okay. The numbers I call it, right, at the end of the day in a cloud service price performance is the metric which gives a sense as to how much the customers are going to save. So for instance, for like a TPC-DS workload, if we are 14 times better price performance than Snowflake, it means that our cost is going to be 1/14th for what customers would pay for Snowflake. Now, in addition, in other costs, in terms of migrating the data, having to manage two different databases, having to pay for other service for like, you know, machine learning, that's all extra and that depends upon what tools customers are using or what other services they're using for transaction processing or for machine learning. But these numbers themselves, right, like they're very, very compelling. If we are 1/5th the cost of Redshift, right, or 1/14th of Snowflake, these numbers, like, themselves are very, very compelling. And that's the reason we are seeing so many of these migrations from these databases to MySQL HeatWave. >> Okay, great, thank you. Our last question, in the Q3 earnings call for fiscal 22, Larry Ellison said that "MySQL HeatWave is coming soon on AWS," and that caught a lot of people's attention. That's not like Oracle. I mean, people might say maybe that's an indication that you're not having success moving customers to OCI. So you got to go to other clouds, which by the way I applaud, but any comments on that? >> Yep, this is very much like Oracle. So if you look at one of the big reasons for success of the Oracle database and why Oracle database is the most popular database is because Oracle database runs on all the platforms, and that has been the case from day one. So very akin to that, the idea is that there's a lot of value in MySQL HeatWave, and we want to make sure that we can offer same value to the customers of MySQL running on any cloud, whether it's OCI, whether it's the AWS, or any other cloud. So this shows how confident we are in our offering, and we believe that in other clouds as well, customers will find significant advantage by having a single database, which is much faster and much lower price then what alternatives they currently have. So this shows how confident we are about our products and services. >> Well, that's great, I mean, obviously for you, you're in MySQL group. You love that, right? The more places you can run, the better it is for you, of course, and your customers. Okay, Nipun, we got to leave it there. As always it's great to have you on theCUBE, really appreciate your time. Thanks for coming on and sharing the new innovations. Congratulations on all the progress you're making here. You're doing a great job. >> Thank you, Dave, and thank you for the opportunity. >> All right, and thank you for watching this CUBE conversation with Dave Vellante for theCUBE, your leader in enterprise tech coverage. We'll see you next time. (upbeat music)

(gentle music) >> Welcome back to theCUBE's continuous coverage of AWS re:Invent 2021. I'm your host, Lisa Martin. We are running one of the industry's most important and largest hybrid tech events of the year with AWS and its ecosystem partners. We have two live sets, two remote sites, and over a hundred guests on the program talking about the next decade in cloud innovation. I'm pleased to welcome Jon Bakke, Chief Revenue Officer from Maria DB as my next guest. Jon, welcome to the program. >> Thanks for having me, Lisa. >> Talk to me a little bit about MariaDB. What makes it unique? What differentiates it? What gaps in the market does it address? >> Yeah, so we have a lot of passion here at MariaDB because we are, at the end of the day, we're the backbone of services used by people everyday, all over the world. In fact, you might not realize that, but you've probably hit a MariaDB database in the past 60 minutes. It's true. For example, if you're using a Samsung mobile phone, we provide data services for the Samsung cloud. In fact, we've provided services for 5G networks all over the globe. And so at the end of the day, we actually process trillions of transactions per day. And I think that's really cool. >> Awesome. Talk to me a little bit about the key problems. You mentioned Samsung. Big fan, lots of Samsung devices in the house. Talk to me about some of the key problems that MariaDB SkySQL specifically solves for customers. What are they coming to you, looking for them, looking for help for? >> Yeah, so we launched SkySQL and AWS earlier this year. It's become wildly popular. And so SkySQL overcome some of the limitations of the cloud. 1.0, 2.0 era. In fact, we went from having zero customers to a slew of customers in just a short period of time. There are a ton of pent up demand from MariaDB and distributed SQL in particular, and that's our Xpand product. And where Samsung uses Xpand is, they use it to store data for the phones, just like, you might if you're an iPhone user on the iCloud, they have the Samsung cloud. So what we do is we provide expanding database services for them, for a large user base across the globe. And they do that because they just can't get the scale out of some of the community databases that are offered by the major CSPs. >> And obviously that scale is critical. We've seen so much change in the last year and a half, two years with growth, with acceleration to cloud acceleration of digital. Talk to me about what you seen as the CRO of the company from a customer lens perspective. How has the last 20 months really affected acceleration, adoption, of Maria's technologies? >> Yeah, so, I'm a geek at heart. I grew up in the database business. In fact, I've been in the database business for 30 years and during the last 20 months during the pandemic, and even before that, companies like MariaDB strive to create a beautiful database and what it really is a beautiful database. It's a database that is flushed with features that make applications work. Lightweight, portable, and fast for the cloud, but still reliable and familiar so that application developers can use it for multiple workloads. So when it comes to the database industry, we're still going after those characteristics and we provide world-class support. My team just rocks it for our customers. And it's really important to them to get that. And at the end of the day, our costs while at the end of the day, we're the least expensive. So it really is a beautiful database and we're very proud of it. >> Beautiful database that's the least expensive. That sounds like music to probably a lot of companies ears. Talk to me about where it went. Obviously AWS, you mentioned SkySQL was launched earlier this year on AWS? >> That's correct. Yep. >> Talk to me a little bit more about the capabilities there, the partnership that Maria and AWS have, what you bring to your customers. >> Yeah, so we have a great partnership with AWS. They provide a tremendous levels of support to help startups like MariaDB get going satisfactory and everything about their go-to market strategy to make enabled partners like us. But we have a customer that is, well, they're a major trading application on the internet and they were an AWS customer, right? So they were an existing AWS customer, but they were struggling with some of the community databases in AWS to find that scale and that elasticity that they were looking for on their platform. So enter MariaDB Xpand, where we can scale a relational database out far and wide to make it possible for a customer like that. Who's really pushing the limits of what a database needs to do to remain an AWS customer. So in this particular case, we worked with AWS to land them on SkySQL and use Xpand, a distributed database technology. So we went together and that's a really great story for everybody. >> Talk to me about some of the technical requirements, as we've seen so much change in the last 20 months, as I said, but so much growth and scale and needs are changing so dynamically. What are some of the key technical requirements of the database to keep up with that? And how does MariaDB exhibit those? >> Yeah, that's a great question. So in distributed SQL, in particular, which I see as sort of the next wave of database, particularly in the cloud, right? The database needs to leverage familiar application paradigms like relational and document databases do and connection protocols so that existing applications connect to those. But at the end, they have to be highly scalable for the cloud by design and highly available in the cloud by design. Xpand just screams. It's really fast. It's really reliable. And transactional integrity is inherent to the architecture. So our customers love it. And so really, what's not to love about a database that does all of those things? >> What's not to love about a beautiful database? That speed. I mean, the speed is critical. I think one of the many things that we've learned in the last interesting couple of years of our lives is that real time is no longer a nice to have, right? Nobody wants a less data, slower. That ability to deliver real-time data, real-time analytics is critical for businesses in any company as we're seeing. And you're probably seeing this as a CRO, every company becoming a software company, or leaning to. >> Absolutely, yeah. Some of our biggest customers are major SAS providers. So if you work for a business that is using ServiceNow, one of the largest SAS companies in the world, you're using MariaDB every day, billions and billions of transactions by service, now on an hourly basis and it's all in the cloud. So when we look at how we've evolved to this point, we're offering services to companies big and small, we're being tested by companies like ServiceNow and their infrastructure on a regular basis. >> What are some of the trends that you're seeing as we... And 22 months or so in this pandemic, what are some of the market trends that you're seeing from a scalability perspective? And what is it that a distributed SQL database can deliver to help customers meet those trends? >> Well, certainly, I think when you look at what is a good database for the cloud in the future, it really does need to have the features that make applications work. So you had mentioned analytical databases and transactional databases. One thing that is inherent to our strategy, is the ability to use hybrid approach to transactional and analytical because a lot of applications are both at the end of the day. And why use two different databases in order to get there? Right? Our database is lightweight and fast. It's portable. It's reliable and familiar to the customer and versatile in the workload. So those are the things that are trending at the conclusion of sort of this year going into next year, as we roll out more technology in subsequent versions, we'll just enhance those capabilities, make it possible for even more and more workloads to find their way into SkySQL. >> And talk about the adoption of cloud, the acceleration. We've been talking about that a lot in the last year and a half about the acceleration of digital transformation, the acceleration to cloud. It was so critical for so many businesses, especially if you think of the SAS adoption, the collaboration tools, but what are some of the things that you're seeing? How are you helping customers on that migration journey? >> Yeah. So migration is a key element there. there are customers leading older proprietary database technology. There are customers trying to enhance their cloud experience and go from the early cloud databases up to more modern architectures. And so migration is a constant activity that we work with our customers on. And so over the years, just as a matter of course, we've become better and better at getting database workloads from proprietary, older databases, even other open source databases onto MariaDB, so that we can consume those workloads and get those in the cloud and make them work for customers better than they ever have before. >> And I'm curious as the Chief Revenue Officer, how your customer conversations have evolved in the last year or so, where is cloud database security? Where are those things with respect to the level of conversations that you're having with customers? And is that conversation going up the stack? >> Yeah, so the security has always been a key cornerstone of the database industry, really, when you think about it, database is information assurance and confidentiality is a key tenant to information security and information assurance in general. So it's always an ever present in the discussion. MariaDB is enhancing its list of compliance that we've gone through, like SOC 2, we're on the precipice of that. We've got ISO certifications and we have US Department of Defense install guys that are secure for a MariaDB. All sorts of activity around that, to make it possible for customers to standardize on MariaDB. We have customers that have taken out every ounce of their legacy, relational database, the older incumbents, and replace that with lighter weight MariaDB, because we have the security qualifications, but we also meet their functional needs and their information assurance needs. And so that's whats made us really successful. >> In addition to compliance, you talked about this database being beautiful. You described what you meant by that, but also you said least expensive. So I'm wondering from a business outcome perspective, are customers all across the board, reducing TCO, leveraging MariaDB? >> Absolutely. And in cases where we displace a proprietary database, the TCO can reduce by as much as 90%. And so it's very attractive to customers that are looking for the next wave. Not only do we take them to a lower cost, but we bring them to a more modern multi-cloud architecture. So AWS is our primary focus for certain in this conversation but also just generally because there's such a huge install base. But they do like the option of being able to say, "Hey, I can use this database on any cloud. It works everywhere. And the vendor that makes it is supporting it in all environments." So for us, that's a huge strong point in terms of what makes our business run. >> And we're seeing so much, we're talking so much about Hybrid, Hybrid IT, Hybrid Cloud, Hybrid work from anywhere environments. So I imagine MariaDB runs on, obviously AWS, but Azure, Google cloud platform, so that customers that are in that multi-cloud world and those that will be can take advantage of the services. >> That's correct. So Azure is in our near term pipeline or roadmap for the cloud, but we're already present in GCP and we're available in other clouds as well. >> Excellent. So talk to me a little bit about what customers can do. Can they test out MariaDB? Can they test out SkySQL, Xpand? If so, where do they go? How do they get their hands on it? >> Right, so existing AWS customers, they can get to SkySQL on the AWS marketplace, right? It's incredibly easy. AWS customers go to the marketplace. They can find us by doing a search. But not to be outdone, there are customers that aren't on AWS and they can come to MariaDB.com. You can start SkySQL there and select AWS as the deployment cloud and try it for free. It's super cool. It's really easy. >> I'm just curious. What's the typical deployment time from the free trial POC to deployment? What do you normally see from a time distinct band perspective? >> Oh yeah, customers are up and running with a live database in just a few minutes. >> Minutes? >> Yep. >> Minutes up to 90% TCO. Big business outcomes there that affect every business in every industry. John, we appreciate you coming on, talking to us about MariaDB, the solutions that you offer, and how you're partnering with AWS and where folks can go to get started. >> Thank you. >> He's Jon Bakke. I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE's continuous coverage of AWS re:Invent 2021. Stick around, more coverage coming up next. (peaceful music)

>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of aws reinvent 2024 sponsored by Intel and AWS. Yeah. >>Welcome back here to our coverage here on the Cube of AWS reinvent 2020. It's now pleasure. Welcome. Sean. Vice to the program was the vice president of databases at AWS and Sean. Good day to you. How you doing, sir? >>I'm doing great. Thank you for having me. >>You bet. You bet. Thanks for carving out time. I know it was a very a busy couple of weeks for the A. W s team on DSO certainly was kicked off key notes today. We heard right away that there's some fairly significant announcements that I know certainly affect your world at AWS. Tell us a little bit about those announcements, and then we'll do a little deeper divers. You you go through >>sure, you know. And he made three big announcements this morning as it relates to databases, one of whom was around Aurora serverless V two on. Do you could just think of that as, uh um, no infrastructure whatsoever to manage and Aurora server list that can scale for, you know, from zero to hundreds of thousands of transactions in a fraction of a second, literally with no infrastructure to manage. So it's a really easy way to build applications in the cloud. Eso excited about that? Another big announcement WAAS related to a lot of our customers today are really they're using the right tool for the right job. In other words, they're not trying toe GM all of their data into one database management systems. They're breaking app down into smaller parts. They pick the right tool for the right job. And with that context, we announce glue elastic views, which just allows you to very easily write a sequel. Query most. There's a lot of developers that understand sequel. So if I could easily write a sequel query to reach out to the source databases and then materialize, um, that data into a different target, Um, that's a really simple way toe. Build new customer experiences and make the most of the databases you have. Aan den. The third big announcement remained today was called Babble Eso Babel. Babel Fish is really a a compatibility or a sequel server compatibility layer on Aurora post grass. So if you have ah sequel server application. You've been trying to migrate it to post grass, and you've been wishing for an easier way to get that done. Babel Fish allows you to take your T sequel or your Microsoft sequel server application connected to post grass. Using your same client drivers with little to no code change eso That's a big deal for those that are trying to migrate from commercial systems to open source. And then finally, we didn't stop there as we thought about Babel, Um, and talked to a lot of customers about it. We actually are open sourcing the technology, so it will be available later in 21. All the development will be done open transparently hosted on get hub and licensed under Apache 20 so those that's kind of one lap around the track, if you will, of the big announcements from today How big >>the open source announcement to me. I mean, that's fairly significant that that you're opening up this new opportunity thio the entire community, um, that you're willing to open it up, and I'm sure you're gonna have you know, I mean, this is this is gonna be I would imagine Ah, very popular destination for a lot of folks. >>Yeah, I think so, too. You know, I'm I'm personally, I'm a believer that every customer can use data to build a foundation for future innovation. And to me, a lot of things start and end with data. As we know, data really is a foundational component of at a swell A systems and, you know, and you know, what we found is not every customer can plan for every contingency that happens. But what they can do is build a strong foundation. So, you know, and with a strong foundation, you really stand the best chance to overcome whatever that next unexpected thing is or innovate new ways. And with that is a backdrop. We think this open source piece is a big deal. Why? I'll tell you, you know, it's just us right now. But if I told you the story behind the story, I have met so many customers over the last few years that you know, John, if you and I were sitting down with them, it kind of sounds like this. You sit down, you talk to somebody and they'll say things like, Hey, I've built, you know, we've built years and years and years of application development against sequel server. We really don't like the punitive commercial licensing and, you know, we're trying to get over Thio open source, but we need an easier way and, you know, and we thought about that long and hard and, you know, we came up with the team, came up with a wonderful solution for this, But to tell you the truth, as we were building Babel fish and talking to customers, what became really clear with the community enterprises in I S V s and s eyes is they all basically said, Hey, if there was a way where we could go and extend this, um for, you know, like it could be Boy, if this thing supported to more features, that would be awesome. But if it was open source, that would be even better, because then we could we could take things under our own control so that that's what truly motivated this decision to go open source and based on conversations we've had in the decisions we made, we actually think it's it's really big. It's really big for everybody who has been trying to move off of commercial systems and over toe open source. You. >>Let's talk about transforming your kind of your database mindset in general right now from a client's perspective, especially for somebody who was considering, you know, substantial moves, you know, a major reconfigurations off their processes. What's the process that you go through with them to evaluate their needs, to evaluate their capabilities, to evaluate their storage? All that, you know, that comes into play here and help them to get thio kind of the end of the rainbow >>because it z absolutely, you know, so it really depends on who you're talking Thio and no, at this stage of the game, the clouds been around now for 10, 14 years. I think it is something in that range, you know? So a lot of the early cloud adopters, you know, they've been here and they've been building in a certain way. Um and you know, you and I know early cloud adopters by way of watching streaming media, ordering rideshare, taking a selfie, you know, and you know, we have these great application experiences and we expect them to work all the time at Super Low. Leighton See, they should always be available. So you know, the single biggest thing we learned from Early Cloud builders was there's no such thing as one size football. There's one thing doesn't fit anything at all. Um, that's kind of the way data was, you know, 20 years ago. But today, if you take the learning from these early cloud builders, the journey that we go on with, let's say a mid to late stage cloud a doctor. We're all excited on, you know, sort of. If they can start now today, where Early Cloud Wilders have done a bunch of pioneering, they get excited. So So what happens is, um, there's usually to kind of conversations. One is how do we you know, we've got all these databases that we self managed on premise. How do we bring those into the cloud? And then how do we stop doing undifferentiated heavy lifting? In other words, what they're saying is, we don't want to do patching and back up and monitoring that Z instead, our precious resources should be working on innovations for the business. So in that context, you and I would end up talking to somebody about moving to fully managed services like an already s, for example, um and then the other conversation we have with customers is is the one about breaking free, which is hey, a burn on commercial. I wanna move for open source. And in that context, there are a lot of customers today that they'll move to the cloud. And then and then when they get there as a first step, their second step is to is to migrate over toe open source. And then that third piece is folks that are trying to build for the cloud, these modern APS. And in that context, they follow the playbook of these early cloud builders, which is what you take this big app. You break it into smaller parts and then they pick the right tool for the right job. So that's that's kind of the conversation that we go through there. And finally, what I would say is, most customers say that they'll say to me, What do you mean by picking the right tool for the right job? And the mindset is very different than the one that we all grew up in from 20 years ago. 20 years ago, you just bought a database platform. And then whatever the business was trying to do, you you you would try to support that access pattern on on that database choice. But today, the new world that we live in, it really is. Let's start with the business use case first, understand the access pattern and then pick the best optimized database storage for that. So that's that's kind of how those conversations go. >>You've got what, 15, 14, 15 different data based instruments, you know, like in your tool chest? Um, how how is that evolution occurred? Um because I'm sure, you know one, but got another big at another big at another, looking at different capabilities, different needs. So I mean, >>kind of walked me >>through that a little bit and how you've gotten to the point that you've got 15 >>Tonto eso. So one of the things that you know I'd start off with here, like the question is, Well, if there's 15 today, is there gonna be 100 tomorrow? The real answer is, I don't know, you know, And but what I do know is there's really a handful of categories around data models and access patterns that if you will kind of fill out the portfolio if you will. Um, the first one is around relation. Also, relational databases have been around for a long time. It has a certain set of characteristics that people have come to appreciate and understand and, you know, and we provide a set of services that provide fully managed relational services. Let it be for things like Oracle or sequel, server or open source, like Maria DB or my sequel or Post Press and even Aurora, which provides commercial grade performance availability and scale it about 1/10 the cost of commercial. So you know, there's a handful of different services in that context. But there's new services in this key value. And think of a key value access pattern along the lines of you. Imagine. We order you order a ride share and you're trying to track a vehicle every second. So on your phone you can see it moving across your phone. And now imagine if you were building that at our a million people going to do that all at the same time or 10. So in that kind of access pattern, a product like dynamodb is excellent because It's designed for basically unlimited scale, really high throughput. So developer doesn't have toe really worry about a million people. 10 million people are one. This thing can just scale inevitably. Yeah, it's just not an issue. And, you know, I'll give you one other example like, um, in Neptune, which is a graph database. So you and I would know graph databases by way of seeing a product recommendation, for example, Um, and you know, grab the beauty of a graph databases. It's optimized for highly connected data. In other words, as a developer, I can what I can do with a few lines of code and a graph database because it's optimized for all these different relationships. I might try to do that in a different system that I might write 1500 lines of codes and because it was never designed for something like highly connect the data like graph. So that's kind of the evolution of how things there's just these different categories that have to do with access patterns and data models. And our strategy is simple. In each category, we wanna have the very best AP is available for our customers. Let's >>talk about security here for a moment because you have, you know, these just these tremendous reservoirs now, right that you've built up in capabilities got, you know, new data centers going up every day. It seems like around around the country and around the world, security or securing data nevermore important on dnep ver mawr, I guess on the radar of the bad actors to at the same time because of the value of that data. So just if you would paint the picture in terms of security awareness three encryption devices that you're now deploying the stuff that's keeping you up at night, I would think probably falls into this category a little bit. Eso Let's just take it on security and the level of concern. And then what you at a w s are doing about that? >>Yeah. So, you know, when I talked to customers, I always remind people security is a shared responsibility on De So Amazon's piece of that is the infrastructure that we build the processes that we have, you know, from how people you know can enter a building toe, what they can do in an environment. The auditing to the encryption systems that rebuild. Um, there's there's three infrastructure responsibility, which, you know, we think about every second of every day. Um, Andi, it's, you know, yes, it's one of those things that keeps you up at night. But you have to kind of have this level of paranoia, if you will. There's bad actors everywhere. And, you know, that mindset is kind of, you know, kind of helps you stay focused on Ben. There's the customers responsibility to in in terms of how they think about security. So, you know, um and what that means is, uh, you know, best practices around how they how they integrate identity and access management into their solution. Um, you know how they use how they rotate encryption keys, how they apply encryption and all the safeguards that you would expect the customer do so together, you know, we work with our customers to ensure that our systems are are secure. Um, and the only other thing that I would add to this is that, you know, kind of in the old world. And I keep bringing up the old world because security in the old world was sort of one of those things. Like if you go back 20 years ago. You know, security sometimes is one of those things that you think about a little bit later in the cycle. And I've met a lot of customers that tryto bolt on security and it never works. It's just hard to just bolt it into an app. But the really nice thing about thes fully managed services in the cloud they have security built right in. So security, performance and availability is built right into these fully managed A p I s eso customer doesn't have to think about Well, how do I add this capability onto it? You know, in some sense, it could be a simple is turning a feature on or something like encryption being turned on by default, and they don't have to do anything. So, you know, there it's just a completely different world that we live in today, and we try to improve it every second of every day. >>Well, Sean, it's nice to know that you're experiencing the paranoia for all your customers. That Zaveri very gracious yesterday There. Hey, thanks for the time. I appreciate it. I know you're very busy the next couple of weeks with the number of leadership sessions and intermediate sessions as well with AWS reinvent. So thanks again for carving a little bit of time for us here today on the Cube. >>You bet, John. Thank you. I really appreciate it. >>Take care.

from Las Vegas it's the queue covering VMworld 2018 brought to you by VMware and its ecosystem partners and we're back here at the Mandalay Bay in somewhat beautiful Las Vegas where we're doing third day of VMworld on the cube and on Peterborough and I'm joined by my two lead analysts here at Ricky bond with me Jim Camilo's who's looking at a lot of the software stuff David floor who's helping to drive a lot of our hardware's research guys you've spent an enormous amount of time talking to an enormous number of customers a lot of partners and we all participated in the Analyst Day on Monday let me give you my first impressions and I want to ask you guys some questions here you thought so I have it this is you know my third I guess VMworld in or in a row and and my impression is that this has been the most coherent of the VM worlds I've seen you can tell when a company's going through a transition because they're reaching to try to bring a story together and that sets the tone but this one hot calendar did a phenomenal job of setting up the story it makes sense it's coherent possibly because it aligns so well with what we think is going to happen in the industry so I want to ask you guys based on three days of one around and talking to customers David foyer what's been the high point what have you found is the most interesting thing well I think the most interesting thing is the excitement that there is over VMware if you if you contrast that with a two three years ago the degree of commitment of customers to viennois the degree of integration they're wanting to make the degree rate of change and ideas that have come out of VMware it's like two different companies totally different companies some of the highlights for me were the RDS the bringing from AWS to on site as well as on the AWS cloud RDS capabilities I think that's a very very interesting thing that's the relational database is services the Maria DB and all the other services that's a very exciting thing to me and a hint to me that AWS is going to have to get serious about well Moore's gone out I think it's a really interesting point that after a lot of conversations with a lot of folks saying all AWS it's all going to go up to the cloud and wondering whether that also is a one-way street for VMware Casta Moore's right but now we're seeing it's much more of a bilateral relationship it's a moving it to the right place and that's the second thing the embracing of multi-cloud by everybody one cloud is not going to do everything they're going to be SAS clouds they're going to be multiple places where people are gonna put certain workloads because that's the best strategic fit for it and the acceptance in the marketplace that that is where it's going to go I think that again is a major change so hybrid cloud and multi cloud environments and then the third thing is I think the richness of the ecosystem is amazing the the going on the floor and the number of people that have come to talk to us with new ideas really fascinating ideas is something I haven't seen at all for the last last three four years and so I'm gonna come back to you on that but it goes back to the first point that you make that yeah there is a palpable excitement here about VMware that two-three years ago the conversation was how much longer is the franchise gonna be around Jim but now it's clear yeah it's gonna be around Jim how about you yeah actually I'm like you guys I'm a newbie to VM world this is my very first remember I'm a big data analyst I'm a data science an AI guy but obviously I've been aware of VMware and I've had many contacts with them over the years my take away my prime and I like Pat Gail singers I agree with you Peter they're really coherent take and I like that phrase even though it sounds clucking impact kind of apologize they are the dial tone to the multi-cloud if the surgery really gives you a strong sense or who else can you character is in this whole market space cloud computing has essentially a multi cloud provider who provide the unifying virtualization glue to help their custom to help customers who are investing in an AWS and maybe in a bit of you know you're adopting Google and Microsoft Azure and so forth providing a virtualization layer that's the above server virtualization network virtualization VDI all the way to the edge nobody can put it all is putting it all together and quite the way that VMware is one of the my chief takeaways is similar to David's which is that in terms of the notion of a hybrid cloud VMware with its whole what's it's doing with RDS but also projects like this project dimension which is in project in progress taking essentially the entire VMware virtualization stack and putting it onto an appliance for deployment on the edges and then for them to manage it VMware of this their plans as an end-to-end managed edge cloud service and so forth Wow the blurring of public and private cloud I don't even think the term hybrid cloud applies it's just a blurry the common cloud yeah it's moving to the workload the clouds moving to the data which is exactly what we say they are halfway there in terms of that vision halfway in a sense that RDS has been announced the you know on the VMware and this project dimension they're well along with that if there was a briefings for the analyst space I'm really impressed for how they're architecting this I think they've got a shot to really dominate well I'll tell you so I would agree with you just to maybe provide a slightly different version of one of the things you said I definitely agree I think what's VMware hopes to do and I think they're not alone is to have AWS look like an appliance to their console to have as you look like an appliance of their Khan so through free em where you can get access to whatever services you need including your VMware machines your VMs inside those clouds but that increasingly their their goal is to be that control point that management point for all of these different resources that are building and it is very compelling I think that there's one area that I still think we need more from as analysts and we always got to look through no and what's yeah what was more required and I hear what you say about project dimension but I think that the edge story still requires a fair amount of work oh yeah it's a project in place but that's going to be an increasingly important locus of how architectures get laid out how people think about applications in the future how design happens how methodologies for building software work David what do you think what when you look out what what is what what is more is needed for you so really I think there are two things that give me a small concern the the edge that's a long term view so they got time to get that right but the edge view is very much an IT view top-down and they are looking to put in place everything that they think the OT people should fit in with I think that is personally not going to be a winning strategy you you have to take it from the bottom up the world is going to go towards devices very rich devices and sensors lots of software right on that device the inference work on those devices and the job of IT will be to integrate those devices it won't be those devices taking on the standards of IT it'll be IT that has to shape itself to look after all those devices there so that's a that's the main viewpoint I think that needs adjustment and it will come I'm sure over time but as you said there's a lot of computer science it's going to be an enormous amount of new partnerships are gonna be fabricate exactly to make this happen Jim what do you think yeah I agree terms of partnerships one big gap from both VMware and Dell technologies partnerships and romance and technology proposes AI now they have a project VMware call from another project called project Magna which is really AI ops in fact I published a wiki about reports this week on AI ops AI to drive IT Service Management and to and they're doing some stuff they're working on that project it's just you know the beginning stages I think what's going to happen is that vmware dell technologies they're gonna have to make strategic acquisitions of AI solution providers to build up that capability because that's going to be fundamental to their ability to manage this complex multi called fabric from end to end continuously they need that competency internally that can't be simply a partner providing that that's got to be their core competencies so you know I'm gonna push it I'll give you the contrarian point of view okay we actually had Khamsin VMware we've had a lot of conversations about this does that is that a reflection of David's point about top-down buying things and pushing it down as opposed to other conversations we've had about how the edge is going to evolve where a lot of OT guys are going to combine with business expertise and technology expertise to create specialized solutions and is and then VMware is gonna have to reach out to them and make VMware relevant to them do you think it's going to be VMware buying a bunch of stuff or an a-grade no solution or is it going to be the solutions coming from elsewhere and VM at VMware I just becoming more relevant to them now you can still be buying a bunch of stuff to get that horizontal in place but which way you think it's going to go I think it's gonna be the top-down they're gonna buy stuff because if I talk to the channel one of the channel people this morning about well you know but they've got an IOT connected bundle and so forth they announced this show you know I think they agree with me that the core AI technology needs to be built into the fundamentals like the IOT stack bundle that they then provide to the channel partners for with you know with channel specific content that they can then tweak and customize to their specific needs but you know the core requirements for a I are horizontal you know it's the ability to run neural networks to do predictive analysis anomaly detection and so forth this is all cross-cutting across all domains it has to be in the core application stack they can't be simply something they source for particular channel opportunities it has to be leveraged across you know the same core tensorflow models for anomaly detection for manufacturing for logistics for you know customer relationship management whatever it's or are you saying essentially that then VMware becomes that horizontal play even though even if the solution providers are increasingly close to the actual action where the edges III I'm gonna disagree we can gently on that but we'd still be friends [Music] no it's you know I'm I'm an OT guy of hearth I suppose and I think that that is going to be a stronger force in terms of VMware but there will be some places where you it will be top-down but other places that where it's going to be need needed to adjust but I think there's one other there very interesting area I'd like to bring up in terms of of this question of acquisition what what we heard about beforehand was excellent results and VMware has been adding a you know a billion dollars a year in terms of free cash there and they have thirteen billion in short term cash there and the the refinancing from Dell is gonna take eleven of that thirteen and put it towards the towards the the company now you can work towards deltek yes well just Dell Dell as a hold and and silver later towards those partners I I personally believe that there is such a lot of opportunity that's going to be out there if you take NSX for example it has the potential to do things in new areas they're gonna need to provide solutions in those new areas and aggressively go after those new areas and that's going to mean big investments and many other areas where I think they are going to need acquisitions to strengthen the whole story they have the whole multi-cloud story about this real-time operating system in a sexy has a network routing virtualization backplane I mean it needs to go real-time so sensitive guaranteed ladies if they need that big investments guarantee yeah they need to go there yeah so what we're agreeing on that and I get concerned that it's not going to be given the right resources you know to be able to actually go after the opportunities that they have genuinely created it's gonna mean from you see how that plays out so I think all drugs in the future I think saying though is that there is going to be a solution a set of solution players that VMware is going to have to make significant moves to make them relevant and then the question is where it's the values story what's the value proposition it's probably gonna be like all partnerships yeah some are gonna claim that they are doing it also some are gonna DM where it's gonna claim that they do more of it but at the end of the day VMware has to make themself relevant to the edge however that happens I want to pick up on NSX because I'm a pretty big believer that NSX may be the very special crown jewel and a lot of the stuff this notion of hybrid cloud whatever we call it let's just call it extended cloud let me talk of a better word like it is predicated on the idea that I also have a network that can naturally and easily not just bridge but truly multi network interoperate internet work with a lot of different cloud sources but also all different cloud locations and there's not a lot of technologies out there that are great candidates to do that and it's and I look at NSX and I'm wondering is that gonna be kind of a I want to take the metaphor too far but is that gonna be kind of a new tcp/ip for the cloud in the sense that you're still gonna run over tcp/ip and you're still gonna run over the Internet but now we're gonna get greater visibility into jobs into workloads into management infrastructures into data locations and data placement predictive movement and NSX is going to be the at the vanguard of showing how that's gonna work and the security side of that especially to be able to know what is connected to what and what shouldn't be connected to what and to be able to have that yeah they need stateful structured streaming others Kafka flink whatever they need that to be baked into the whole nsx virtualization layer that much more programmable and that provides that much better a target for applications all right last question then we got a wrap guys David as you walk out the door get in the plane what are you taking away what's your last impression my last impression is one of genuine excitement wanting to work wanting to follow up with so many of the smaller organizations the partners that have been here and who are genuinely providing in this ecosystem a very rich tapestry of of capability that's great Jim my takeaway is I want to see their roadmap for kubernetes and serverless there wasn't a hole last year they made an announcement of a serverless project I forgot what the code name is didn't hear a whole lot about it this year but they're going up the app stack they got a coop you know distribution you know they're if they need a developer story I mean developers are building functional apps and so forth you know you can and they're also containerized they need they need a developer story and they need a server list story and they need to you need to bring us up to speed on where they're going in that regard because AWS their predominant partner I mean they got lambda functions and all that stuff you know that's that's the development platform of the present and future and I'm not hearing an intersection of that story with VMware's a story yeah my last thing that I'll say is that I think that for the next five years VMware is gonna be one of the companies that shapes the future of the cloud and I don't think we would have said that a couple of names no they wouldn't I agree with you so you said yes all right so this has been the wiki bond research leadership team talking about what we've heard at VMware this year VMworld this year a lot of great conversation feel free to reach out to us and if you want to spend more time with rookie bond love to have you once again Peter burrows for David floor and Jim Kabila's thank you very much for watching the cube we'll talk to you again [Music]

hey welcome back to vmworld 2013 this is the cube our flagship program out the advanced extracted from the noise I'm John furry the founders SiliconANGLE my co-host Dave allante co-founder Wikibon or go to Wikibon org for free content go to slipping the angle for the reference point for tech innovation and go to SiliconANGLE com for all the footage also go to youtube.com slash SiliconANGLE for all the replays i'm showing with my co-host hi everybody i'm dafe a lot a leak as well as here is the vice president virtualization product group that fusion-io we welcome back to the cube thank you very much it's great to be here see you guys again this venue is terrific yeah you here in a new role actually I a new company new role is very exciting to us I'm going for you how many vm Rose have you been to oh yes it's all right yeah you Jen your veteran exactly so you have seen a lot of change and that you know since virtualization I mean flash is the next big exciting thing is 0 10 years I mean a lot to change first five years just give us your perspectives you worked at VMware right five years and second five years what's just what's a summary what's the bumper sticker you know when we started off the back in like two thousand we basically like to say well what are we going to virtualize first and it was the easy stuff right take all the applications that were running that weren't very i/o intensive it wasn't the Oracle databases we want to go put on virtualization now we've got what seventy eighty percent of workloads being virtualized what's left well all the hard stuff right and that's where flash is coming in is how do we go and take the hard applications and make those sing in a virtual environment so I've seen you're at heading up the virtualization team at fusion is that correct that's the roles that's the official title yes so what's the big news for you guys this week you know we've got some very exciting deliverables that we've shown we have a technology demonstration we're doing on a new product called I ovd i Iove I basically solves the problem of how you get performance into virtual desktops without breaking persistent storage and giving you a cost that's less than a physical desktop which is what everybody wanted from the start so you have to solve the cost problem solve the performance problem I ovd I is that that's the latest port now the latest implementation of our i/o turbine software so it's a very interesting way to go and say we'll take all the benefits of the i/o memory flash platform which you know I've been you know the basics of fusion-io success so you and I had you and I had a chance to chat on last week prior to the embargo of the new yet but one of the things we were talking about and then I was I went Dave about earlier they say was that everything at the top of the stack has always been this elusive dream right when Palmer its laid out the original vision you know 2010 it was really laid out we called the software mainframe what everyone want to call it it was a stack at the top of the stack e with apps being where I tried to her hand at that now pivotal's out outside and still there was a lot of work to do in the middle ground right so yes I would say it got stalled a little bit mainly because the hypervisor stuff a lot of the middle where big data hit the scene storage virtualization network virtualization all kind of started to happen yes so with that what's happening above the stack so stuff starting to commodify the infrastructure service platform deserves but then the apps data fabrics are there so what's your at the top of the thing you got to look up what's the view and what's the trends there well one of the aspects of virtualizing flash is that we're looking at basic hypervisor level virtualization first and this was the phase one of what I owe turbine had to develop which is how do we go and solve the i/o blender problem so any virtual virtual appliances or virtual machines have to go and look carefully at how we're going to go take what looks like now a random workload and how do we accelerate that that was phase one now we have with IO vdi a very interesting way to run in the guest and add more intelligence and so the intelligence now could be paying a desktop environment how do I take advantage of common files to speed up boot times how do I take advantage of the fact that there's a substantial amount of desktop rights that actually never matter remember your desktop even that drive goes on you're like what's it doing that's all data that doesn't ever have to go to this and we could take advantage of this now intelligently at the guest and do some very interesting work to speed up acceleration make sure desktops are working fast and that's the sort of intelligence you look at and it's all based on applications and solution knowledge one of the things that I've been working on it at fusion-io so I got to ask you leave I've been coming to vmworld now probably auto six or seven years and and my remember my first vmworld I said oh my gosh storage is good to get killed right and it was everybody's complaining about storage and and so so then we started down this path of integration you know via a I and Vasa and the Lycan right and every year Wikibon does this evaluation of the integration points and we rank oh you know who's got wat and I'm looking at the other day and I'm saying all this stuff is designed to sort of minimize the the spinning disk penalty mm-hmm and I've look at the integration points that relate to flash and it's like a handful of them mm-hmm so to the extent we get to that vision it seems to be is coming soon we're all my active data we talked about this with Gary earlier well my active data is served out of flash all those other integrations that I just spent all this time and money on kind of become irrelevant that was my take so the first time I've articulated that I wonder you know you're an expert in this area and products is that a fair characterization yet for years the disk drive has been doing a dual service it's been providing both performance which it's not very good at and capacity which is very good at right and so what's happening is it as you look at flash right now this is one of the reasons fusion-io is so successful early on is a single pci card serves the performance delivery of over 200 drives and so what's happening now is there's this radical split happening where wherever you can take the performance and disaggregate it from the capacity needs now that's changing extremely fast and so we're seeing that overall or I'm going to use a disc for a relatively cold store anywhere I can provide acceleration the software stack is how we do that yeah well if I could do that through an API call right right based on some kind of policy so so where are we in terms of being able to do that and what role does fusion-io play in that regard yeah very good question we've done some very interesting things with IO control for example this is an acquisition we had recently where we're now applying quality of service across as a policy across application environments so if you want to have a sand and basically run multiple applications how do I go make sure that I've got I've got performance now that I can allocate so that I can make sure that i'm getting the performance i need for the applications i care about allocating not just baseline performance but quality of service becomes a very important differentiator that fusion-io is driving okay and i can do that through an API call that's why I can open the API yes and you can go and actually allocate this on a policy-based by your application then I can change that pretty much on the fly on the fly yes it's one way of thinking that it's not just raw performance that users care about it turns out what users care about and you know this from your own experience waiting for that look that little life you know the hourglass to change what you care about is you care about persistent or seek consistent performance as much as you care about vegetable consistent performance right yeah the one thing that drives users nuts is if they don't know when something's gonna complete right and if it's too slow then they'll throw it out and get a new one but if it's consistent and predictable and I know what's coming one of the build processes around it here's one of the area's we've spending a lot of time on we are so early with flash we spend a lot of time on solutions so if you look at what are the key solutions at flash accelerates today well its databases server virtualization VDI big data if you take those as a group we have a set of customers that have deployed and seen successful the acceleration in the field and we're just going to show other customers here's how you can do this we've stripped out all the risk of making this work in the field so talk a little bit more about the the customers and how use cases are expanding kind of where they started and where you see them going and I know that's if there's a wide variety but I wonder if we can generalize especially as your product line has begun more more robust well we've taken a mapping right now of whether you're on a server side are you on the storage side with caching are you going to basically try and bridge the gap between these and the applications look like this so within databases databases love block storage and they love fast response times you can service more customers you can save costs you can consolidate infrastructure these are terrific benefits now for how flash can make a difference in server virtualization we've got the ability to go and run more VMs more consistently that's a huge driver of getting more virtual workloads going personal desktops got that same same concept of how do I make sure that users get that level of consistent response times and then lastly in big data big data is all about processing no data is deleted anymore the data that you have is just processed over and over and over again and that processing is all consistent with high-performance flash so big daddy talking about extending in-memory analytics potentially persisting in-memory analytics right every yeah we have some is Hannah crazy but Hannah Healy persistent data we've been doing a lot of work on Hannah lately his eats it's great I mean I love we love the concept but but you talk to Hannah users and they keep telling you what goes down a lot so well we need to persist it I know you guys are working on part on helping us ap out with that problem well there's some very interesting applications we announced Spotify as a customer for example streaming music is an ideal case of how do you have very fast performance over latency sensitive applications these types of things and how you go and manage things like playlists right become very important for businesses that want to take all of the effort they were doing on managing i/o take those developers off that work put them on developing new applications or new features that you're going to use to competing as your you know your competition that's how you've changed the game right now is I don't have to actually worry about managing io because we have thousands of I ops to work with hundreds of thousands of I ops the all of a sudden what was a scarce resource in the past now you've got a lot of it so think about riorca texting that's the that's the sort of you know cathartic change we're going through right now Lee how do you talk to guys first of all there's two there's two professions to this one first one is Silicon Valley is always a new stars coming on so like are there any seats left at the table in the i/o gain we'll get to that one to say but I watch this or the second one first which is if you're an IT guy you get all the storage laying around yes you know Nass and gas and all of its laying around usually tied to some app by going server-side talk about the dynamics that you guys get in there is it a rip and replace is an extension you guys commoditize it is it just you treat storage as a a resource that can be commoditized I mean how you view that what's the solution it's very interesting one thing we're finding is that there's so much extra capacity now because customers into buying discs to deliver performance that element right if having to buy so you know 15k SAS drive gives you a hundred and fifty I ops it costs seven dollars to get that level of performance flash is relatively inexpensive at a nickel so you can all of a sudden now you can free up all of this capacity so one of the things we're seeing first off is what drives buying decisions is how do I consolidate the infrastructure I have we're consolidating physical infrastructure we're consolidating licenses as well by having this level of performance so that's one dynamic customers are come in different shapes and sizes some customers want to buy server-side flash some customers want to buy storage side flash we're delivering both we have with our eye on products and IO control products if you want to buy storage we have some very interesting ways to deploy it that way if you want to buy servers we got the fastest in the industry on the server side so you know our metal our Metro right now is that you know however you want to consume it we're going to supply the economics is you can come in and maximize pre existing investments same time get that flash data center built out is that kind of like yeah let me describe one one way we're doing that with IO vdi which is new for virtual desktops we're coming in saying we're taking all the performance dependencies from the sand and basically moving them into the server side so by having it on the server side now you can say well I'll just tap into the sand for capacity which is really what you wanted in the first place huh I just wanted to add sand for data protection and so the sand administrators is great this is what I was hoping to do in the first place give you a few terabytes you're off and running I deploy this on server side deployments basically gets you back into that seamless increments of deployment well we saw a lot of action today in the news violin filed to go possible that so competition there was always new startups coming out so what are you back to the start of a question is always a new startup iOS hot so you have some innovation what are you seeing on the on the startup scene and are there any seats left at the table well who knew storage was going to be so sexy we did I guess you guys did right shopper come on Georgie day really yeah head Jojo Jojo G of storage a sexy I'll tell you what you know he got enough expected when he turns out he's gonna taught yeah it's funny mate if there's a lot of room for innovation left this is what you know we're we're seeing you know flash by itself is one way to go and deploy this there will be others right over time what what we're looking at is once you take any imperfect media and flash like disc is an imperfect media you have to start thinking about hey how do i how do i basically overcome some of the limitations there's reliability considerations i got to make it reliable right there's density how do i go and aggregate it together there's protection i mean all of these things and so all of that tends to lead towards software innovation right software innovation is where we're putting the bulk of our effort right now on making flash more more social so everybody wants a piece of you I mean you guys came out you had like a four-year lease on the industry and you did the side because oh wow maybe yeah the flash in the pan and so so it now all these big guys investing buying you back etc so you said software is where the innovation is is that how you keep your regiment if we could talk about that a little bit and help us understand you know what we can expect generally yeah that's that's a really good question there's no doubt and I've had experience in the past at one time my career I was selling some silicon to Intel for 69 margins and the question was so how did you get away with that rest of the day thank you me too and the answer was C 45 the value prop was not about this so yeah right listen item at what's not about the silicon itself who is how did you prove out things like compatibility software value add and in our case at fusion-io solutions what we've done and what we offer to customers is it's not so much about like raw acceleration because anybody can pull a number off a data sheet and say hey we're faster in this one case what we can show is we've made these customers this much more successful in the field and so our value right now is to show that we're going to accelerate your success with flash not just accelerate some portion of your data so what are those solutions we talked about him briefly before but so what talking about in generic terms database you know I abetik stuff it was interesting actually looking we have a luxury it from a marketing standpoint of saying they're actually fairly definable so within the database case Microsoft sequel server we've got Oracle both for rack for Oracle 11 12 X my sequel if you look there when you look into virtualization well clearly we've got VMware today and then moving to hyper-v right within VDI so it's both VMware for view and Citrix and then within big data we see some very interesting we're some work there not like to comment on that for a minute because because of our success on flash just showing the raw performance then we had application developer saying hey I'd like to rewrite the applications now and so we've had some very good success with companies like sky sequel Maria DB percona of rewriting the applications now to take advantage of the native the native benefits of flash yeah so that's two orders of magnitude performance it's a very interesting dynamic right so so okay so that's that's always been fundamental to your strategy and a big part of it has mediation and you guys are kind of unique in that area I think you got it well at some point there we're moving from the early adopters so early adopters right they like words like visionary disruptive groundbreaking this is going to be de like well to the later adopters right the CIO of a grain company in the Midwest like that sounds pretty scary so what we've done now is we've reduced the risk saying hey you get these / benefits and one of the things we have we have a theme st. same planet different world and that is designed around the aha moment that occurs when people realize are you kidding me forty percent of our customers see more than 10x performance in their applications 10x in the field from our surveys 10x performance can you imagine the moment where you go really seriously I could do that while the norm is to get that low latency you know feel like hey no disc at all but you know I think that's the key so I want to ask you two final questions we wrap up the place what's so you guys also you're doing great and we were talking earlier with Gary orenstein and some other folks the stuff under the under the hood is where all the actions in the data center so yeah so I'm gonna find data centers not just one thing it's that it's a bunch of parts yeah flashes is a big part of it yeah what is the big takeaway for folks out there shares I'll give you the last word share with them in your own words what's going on with flash this year at vmworld is 10th anniversary so flash the benefits of flash are so compelling it's going to be deployed everywhere where disk has been deployed when you think about it that way all of a sudden you look at the server side you look at the storage side and you look at how you bridge the gap in between we're going to see flash come on than everyone and what fusion-io has done is said we're going to be able to give you solutions however you want to consume it will give an offering there that you can go and say the advantages that we've developed and hardware and software take that and deploy it at low risk final question please add one more you've been at vmware veteran your industry vet been on the block you've seen at the movie a few times kids going to college our kids going to college so yeah but you've been all the vm worlds what what can you share the folks from the beginning of the first vmworld to now ten years what has happened how big has it become what's your giving the order of magnitude share some perspective or experiences sure you know in the early days the question was hey there was a customer question of virtualization is it safe right just to start off with like will my data like will my apps run and so you go through that first phase right of jumping in the pool like am I going to jump it is it okay right and then you jump in and you're like wow that was pretty good right one of my experiences early on was that the first benefit was about consolidation because that drove cost improvement and then the subsequent value was around high availability and management we're seeing the same thing in flash right now and you're seeing everyone get in the act the first element is hey is it safe is it going to work how can I consolidate infrastructure we're going through that we've gone through that phase now it's how do I manage this how do I make sure it works in the applications how do i get a che how do I support vmotion these are the questions customers are asking it's an integration question we think we're in a great position to capitalize on that the castle is fusion-io thanks for me on the cube we right back with wrap up after this short break day 1 i'm john forward day volante this is silicon angles the cube here live at vmworld in San Francisco we right back after this short break