>> Live from San Francisco, California, it's theCUBE covering the IBM Chief Data Officers Summit, brought to you by IBM. >> Welcome back to San Francisco everybody. I'm Dave Vellante and you're watching theCUBE, the leader in live tech coverage. This is the end of the day panel at the IBM Chief Data Officer Summit. This is the 10th CDO event that IBM has held and we love to to gather these panels. This is a data all-star panel and I've recruited Seth Dobrin who is the CDO of the analytics group at IBM. Seth, thank you for agreeing to chip in and be my co-host in this segment. >> Yeah, thanks Dave. Like I said before we started, I don't know if this is a promotion or a demotion. (Dave laughing) >> We'll let you know after the segment. So, the data all-star panel and the data all-star awards that you guys are giving out a little later in the event here, what's that all about? >> Yeah so this is our 10th CDU Summit. So two a year, so we've been doing this for 5 years. The data all-stars are those people that have been to four at least of the ten. And so these are five of the 16 people that got the award. And so thank you all for participating and I attended these like I said earlier, before I joined IBM they were immensely valuable to me and I was glad to see 16 other people that think it's valuable too. >> That is awesome. Thank you guys for coming on. So, here's the format. I'm going to introduce each of you individually and then ask you to talk about your role in your organization. What role you play, how you're using data, however you want to frame that. And the first question I want to ask is, what's a good day in the life of a data person? Or if you want to answer what's a bad day, that's fine too, you choose. So let's start with Lucia Mendoza-Ronquillo. Welcome, she's the Senior Vice President and the Head of BI and Data Governance at Wells Fargo. You told us that you work within the line of business group, right? So introduce your role and what's a good day for a data person? >> Okay, so my role basically is again business intelligence so I support what's called cards and retail services within Wells Fargo. And I also am responsible for data governance within the business. We roll up into what's called a data governance enterprise. So we comply with all the enterprise policies and my role is to make sure our line of business complies with data governance policies for enterprise. >> Okay, good day? What's a good day for you? >> A good day for me is really when I don't get a call that the regulators are knocking on our doors. (group laughs) Asking for additional reports or have questions on the data and so that would be a good day. >> Yeah, especially in your business. Okay, great. Parag Shrivastava is the Director of Data Architecture at McKesson, welcome. Thanks so much for coming on. So we got a healthcare, couple of healthcare examples here. But, Parag, introduce yourself, your role, and then what's a good day or if you want to choose a bad day, be fun the mix that up. >> Yeah, sounds good. Yeah, so mainly I'm responsible for the leader strategy and architecture at McKesson. What that means is McKesson has a lot of data around the pharmaceutical supply chain, around one-third of the world's pharmaceutical supply chain, clinical data, also around pharmacy automation data, and we want to leverage it for the better engagement of the patients and better engagement of our customers. And my team, which includes the data product owners, and data architects, we are all responsible for looking at the data holistically and creating the data foundation layer. So I lead the team across North America. So that's my current role. And going back to the question around what's a good day, I think I would say the good day, I'll start at the good day. Is really looking at when the data improves the business. And the first thing that comes to my mind is sort of like an example, of McKesson did an acquisition of an eight billion dollar pharmaceutical company in Europe and we were creating the synergy solution which was based around the analytics and data. And actually IBM was one of the partners in implementing that solution. When the solution got really implemented, I mean that was a big deal for me to see that all the effort that we did in plumbing the data, making sure doing some analytics, is really helping improve the business. I think that is really a good day I would say. I mean I wouldn't say a bad day is such, there are challenges, constant challenges, but I think one of the top priorities that we are having right now is to deal with the demand. As we look at the demand around the data, the role of data has got multiple facets to it now. For example, some of the very foundational, evidentiary, and compliance type of needs as you just talked about and then also profitability and the cost avoidance and those kind of aspects. So how to balance between that demand is the other aspect. >> All right good. And we'll get into a lot of that. So Carl Gold is the Chief Data Scientist at Zuora. Carl, tell us a little bit about Zuora. People might not be as familiar with how you guys do software for billing et cetera. Tell us about your role and what's a good day for a data scientist? >> Okay, sure, I'll start by a little bit about Zuora. Zuora is a subscription management platform. So any company who wants to offer a product or service as subscription and you don't want to build your billing and subscription management, revenue recognition, from scratch, you can use a product like ours. I say it lets anyone build a telco with a complicated plan, with tiers and stuff like that. I don't know if that's a good thing or not. You guys'll have to make up your own mind. My role is an interesting one. It's split, so I said I'm a chief data scientist and we work about 50% on product features based on data science. Things like churn prediction, or predictive payment retries are product areas where we offer AI-based solutions. And then but because Zuora is a subscription platform, we have an amazing set of data on the actual performance of companies using our product. So a really interesting part of my role has been leading what we call the subscription economy index and subscription economy benchmarks which are reports around best practices for subscription companies. And it's all based off this amazing dataset created from an anonymized data of our customers. So that's a really exciting part of my role. And for me, maybe this speaks to our level of data governance, I might be able to get some tips from some of my co-panelists, but for me a good day is when all the data for me and everyone on my team is where we left it the night before. And no schema changes, no data, you know records that you were depending on finding removed >> Pipeline failures. >> Yeah pipeline failures. And on a bad day is a schema change, some crucial data just went missing and someone on my team is like, "The code's broken." >> And everybody's stressed >> Yeah, so those are bad days. But, data governance issues maybe. >> Great, okay thank you. Jung Park is the COO of Latitude Food Allergy Care. Jung welcome. >> Yeah hi, thanks for having me and the rest of us here. So, I guess my role I like to put it as I'm really the support team. I'm part of the support team really for the medical practice so, Latitude Food Allergy Care is a specialty practice that treats patients with food allergies. So, I don't know if any of you guys have food allergies or maybe have friends, kids, who have food allergies, but, food allergies unfortunately have become a lot more prevalent. And what we've been able to do is take research and data really from clinical trials and other research institutions and really use that from the clinical trial setting, back to the clinical care model so that we can now treat patients who have food allergies by using a process called oral immunotherapy. It's fascinating and this is really personal to me because my son as food allergies and he's been to the ER four times. >> Wow. >> And one of the scariest events was when he went to an ER out of the country and as a parent, you know you prepare your child right? With the food, he takes the food. He was 13 years old and you had the chaperones, everyone all set up, but you get this call because accidentally he ate some peanut, right. And so I saw this unfold and it scared me so much that this is something I believe we just have to get people treated. So this process allows people to really eat a little bit of the food at a time and then you eat the food at the clinic and then you go home and eat it. Then you come back two weeks later and then you eat a little bit more until your body desensitizes. >> So you build up that immunity >> Exactly. >> and then you watch the data obviously. >> Yeah. So what's a good day for me? When our patients are done for the day and they have a smile on their face because they were able to progress to that next level. >> Now do you have a chief data officer or are you the de facto CFO? >> I'm the de facto. So, my career has been pretty varied. So I've been essentially chief data officer, CIO, at companies small and big. And what's unique about I guess in this role is that I'm able to really think about the data holistically through every component of the practice. So I like to think of it as a patient journey and I'm sure you guys all think of it similarly when you talk about your customers, but from a patient's perspective, before they even come in, you have to make sure the data behind the science of whatever you're treating is proper, right? Once that's there, then you have to have the acquisition part. How do you actually work with the community to make sure people are aware of really the services that you're providing? And when they're with you, how do you engage them? How do you make sure that they are compliant with the process? So in healthcare especially, oftentimes patients don't actually succeed all the way through because they don't continue all the way through. So it's that compliance. And then finally, it's really long-term care. And when you get the long-term care, you know that the patient that you've treated is able to really continue on six months, a year from now, and be able to eat the food. >> Great, thank you for that description. Awesome mission. Rolland Ho is the Vice President of Data and Analytics at Clover Health. Tell us a little bit about Clover Health and then your role. >> Yeah, sure. So Clover is a startup Medicare Advantage plan. So we provide Medicare, private Medicare to seniors. And what we do is we're because of the way we run our health plan, we're able to really lower a lot of the copay costs and protect seniors against out of pocket. If you're on regular Medicare, you get cancer, you have some horrible accident, your out of pocket is infinite potentially. Whereas with Medicare Advantage Plan it's limited to like five, $6,000 and you're always protected. One of the things I'm excited about being at Clover is our ability to really look at how can we bring the value of data analytics to healthcare? Something I've been in this industry for close to 20 years at this point and there's a lot of waste in healthcare. And there's also a lot of very poor application of preventive measures to the right populations. So one of the things that I'm excited about is that with today's models, if you're able to better identify with precision, the right patients to intervene with, then you fundamentally transform the economics of what can be done. Like if you had to pa $1,000 to intervene, but you were only 20% of the chance right, that's very expensive for each success. But, now if your model is 60, 70% right, then now it opens up a whole new world of what you can do. And that's what excites me. In terms of my best day? I'll give you two different angles. One as an MBA, one of my best days was, client calls me up, says, "Hey Rolland, you know, "your analytics brought us over $100 million "in new revenue last year." and I was like, cha-ching! Excellent! >> Which is my half? >> Yeah right. And then on the data geek side the best day was really, run a model, you train a model, you get ridiculous AUC score, so area under the curve, and then you expect that to just disintegrate as you go into validation testing and actual live production. But the 98 AUC score held up through production. And it's like holy cow, the model actually works! And literally we could cut out half of the workload because of how good that model was. >> Great, excellent, thank you. Seth, anything you'd add to the good day, bad day, as a CDO? >> So for me, well as a CDO or as CDO at IBM? 'Cause at IBM I spend most of my time traveling. So a good day is a day I'm home. >> Yeah, when you're not in an (group laughing) aluminum tube. >> Yeah. Hurdling through space (laughs). No, but a good day is when a GDPR compliance just happened, a good day for me was May 20th of last year when IBM was done and we were, or as done as we needed to be for GDPR so that was a good day for me last year. This year is really a good day is when we start implementing some new models to help IBM become a more effective company and increase our bottom line or increase our margins. >> Great, all right so I got a lot of questions as you know and so I want to give you a chance to jump in. >> All right. >> But, I can get it started or have you got something? >> I'll go ahead and get started. So this is a the 10th CDO Summit. So five years. I know personally I've had three jobs at two different companies. So over the course of the last five years, how many jobs, how many companies? Lucia? >> One job with one company. >> Oh my gosh you're boring. (group laughing) >> No, but actually, because I support basically the head of the business, we go into various areas. So, we're not just from an analytics perspective and business intelligence perspective and of course data governance, right? It's been a real journey. I mean there's a lot of work to be done. A lot of work has been accomplished and constantly improving the business, which is the first goal, right? Increasing market share through insights and business intelligence, tracking product performance to really helping us respond to regulators (laughs). So it's a variety of areas I've had to be involved in. >> So one company, 50 jobs. >> Exactly. So right now I wear different hats depending on the day. So that's really what's happening. >> So it's a good question, have you guys been jumping around? Sure, I mean I think of same company, one company, but two jobs. And I think those two jobs have two different layers. When I started at McKesson I was a solution leader or solution director for business intelligence and I think that's how I started. And over the five years I've seen the complete shift towards machine learning and my new role is actually focused around machine learning and AI. That's why we created this layer, so our own data product owners who understand the data science side of things and the ongoing and business architecture. So, same company but has seen a very different shift of data over the last five years. >> Anybody else? >> Sure, I'll say two companies. I'm going on four years at Zuora. I was at a different company for a year before that, although it was kind of the same job, first at the first company, and then at Zuora I was really focused on subscriber analytics and churn for my first couple a years. And then actually I kind of got a new job at Zuora by becoming the subscription economy expert. I become like an economist, even though I don't honestly have a background. My PhD's in biology, but now I'm a subscription economy guru. And a book author, I'm writing a book about my experiences in the area. >> Awesome. That's great. >> All right, I'll give a bit of a riddle. Four, how do you have four jobs, five companies? >> In five years. >> In five years. (group laughing) >> Through a series of acquisition, acquisition, acquisition, acquisition. Exactly, so yeah, I have to really, really count on that one (laughs). >> I've been with three companies over the past five years and I would say I've had seven jobs. But what's interesting is I think it kind of mirrors and kind of mimics what's been going on in the data world. So I started my career in data analytics and business intelligence. But then along with that I had the fortune to work with the IT team. So the IT came under me. And then after that, the opportunity came about in which I was presented to work with compliance. So I became a compliance officer. So in healthcare, it's very interesting because these things are tied together. When you look about the data, and then the IT, and then the regulations as it relates to healthcare, you have to have the proper compliance, both internal compliance, as well as external regulatory compliance. And then from there I became CIO and then ultimately the chief operating officer. But what's interesting is as I go through this it's all still the same common themes. It's how do you use the data? And if anything it just gets to a level in which you become closer with the business and that is the most important part. If you stand alone as a data scientist, or a data analyst, or the data officer, and you don't incorporate the business, you alienate the folks. There's a math I like to do. It's different from your basic math, right? I believe one plus one is equal to three because when you get the data and the business together, you create that synergy and then that's where the value is created. >> Yeah, I mean if you think about it, data's the only commodity that increases value when you use it correctly. >> Yeah. >> Yeah so then that kind of leads to a question that I had. There's this mantra, the more data the better. Or is it more of an Einstein derivative? Collect as much data as possible but not too much. What are your thoughts? Is more data better? >> I'll take it. So, I would say the curve has shifted over the years. Before it used to be data was the bottleneck. But now especially over the last five to 10 years, I feel like data is no longer oftentimes the bottleneck as much as the use case. The definition of what exactly we're going to apply to, how we're going to apply it to. Oftentimes once you have that clear, you can go get the data. And then in the case where there is not data, like in Mechanical Turk, you can all set up experiments, gather data, the cost of that is now so cheap to experiment that I think the bottleneck's really around the business understanding the use case. >> Mm-hmm. >> Mm-hmm. >> And I think the wave that we are seeing, I'm seeing this as there are, in some cases, more data is good, in some cases more data is not good. And I think I'll start it where it is not good. I think where quality is more required is the area where more data is not good. For example like regulation and compliance. So for example in McKesson's case, we have to report on opioid compliance for different states. How much opioid drugs we are giving to states and making sure we have very, very tight reporting and compliance regulations. There, highest quality of data is important. In our data organization, we have very, very dedicated focus around maintaining that quality. So, quality is most important, quantity is not if you will, in that case. Having the right data. Now on the other side of things, where we are doing some kind of exploratory analysis. Like what could be a right category management for our stores? Or where the product pricing could be the right ones. Product has around 140 attributes. We would like to look at all of them and see what patterns are we finding in our models. So there you could say more data is good. >> Well you could definitely see a lot of cases. But certainly in financial services and a lot of healthcare, particularly in pharmaceutical where you don't want work in process hanging around. >> Yeah. >> Some lawyer could find a smoking gun and say, "Ooh see." And then if that data doesn't get deleted. So, let's see, I would imagine it's a challenge in your business, I've heard people say, "Oh keep all the, now we can keep all the data, "it's so inexpensive to store." But that's not necessarily such a good thing is it? >> Well, we're required to store data. >> For N number of years, right? >> Yeah, N number of years. But, sometimes they go beyond those number of years when there's a legal requirements to comply or to answer questions. So we do keep more than, >> Like a legal hold for example. >> Yeah. So we keep more than seven years for example and seven years is the regulatory requirement. But in the case of more data, I'm a data junkie, so I like more data (laughs). Whenever I'm asked, "Is the data available?" I always say, "Give me time I'll find it for you." so that's really how we operate because again, we're the go-to team, we need to be able to respond to regulators to the business and make sure we understand the data. So that's the other key. I mean more data, but make sure you understand what that means. >> But has that perspective changed? Maybe go back 10 years, maybe 15 years ago, when you didn't have the tooling to be able to say, "Give me more data." "I'll get you the answer." Maybe, "Give me more data." "I'll get you the answer in three years." Whereas today, you're able to, >> I'm going to go get it off the backup tapes (laughs). >> (laughs) Yeah, right, exactly. (group laughing) >> That's fortunately for us, Wells Fargo has implemented data warehouse for so many number of years, I think more than 10 years. So we do have that capability. There's certainly a lot of platforms you have to navigate through, but if you are able to navigate, you can get to the data >> Yeah. >> within the required timeline. So I have, astonished you have the technology, team behind you. Jung, you want to add something? >> Yeah, so that's an interesting question. So, clearly in healthcare, there is a lot of data and as I've kind of come closer to the business, I also realize that there's a fine line between collecting the data and actually asking our folks, our clinicians, to generate the data. Because if you are focused only on generating data, the electronic medical records systems for example. There's burnout, you don't want the clinicians to be working to make sure you capture every element because if you do so, yes on the back end you have all kinds of great data, but on the other side, on the business side, it may not be necessarily a productive thing. And so we have to make a fine line judgment as to the data that's generated and who's generating that data and then ultimately how you end up using it. >> And I think there's a bit of a paradox here too, right? The geneticist in me says, "Don't ever throw anything away." >> Right. >> Right? I want to keep everything. But, the most interesting insights often come from small data which are a subset of that larger, keep everything inclination that we as data geeks have. I think also, as we're moving in to kind of the next phase of AI when you can start doing really, really doing things like transfer learning. That small data becomes even more valuable because you can take a model trained on one thing or a different domain and move it over to yours to have a starting point where you don't need as much data to get the insight. So, I think in my perspective, the answer is yes. >> Yeah (laughs). >> Okay, go. >> I'll go with that just to run with that question. I think it's a little bit of both 'cause people touched on different definitions of more data. In general, more observations can never hurt you. But, more features, or more types of things associated with those observations actually can if you bring in irrelevant stuff. So going back to Rolland's answer, the first thing that's good is like a good mental model. My PhD is actually in physical science, so I think about physical science, where you actually have a theory of how the thing works and you collect data around that theory. I think the approach of just, oh let's put in 2,000 features and see what sticks, you know you're leaving yourself open to all kinds of problems. >> That's why data science is not democratized, >> Yeah (laughing). >> because (laughing). >> Right, but first Carl, in your world, you don't have to guess anymore right, 'cause you have real data. >> Well yeah, of course, we have real data, but the collection, I mean for example, I've worked on a lot of customer churn problems. It's very easy to predict customer churn if you capture data that pertains to the value customers are receiving. If you don't capture that data, then you'll never predict churn by counting how many times they login or more crude measures of engagement. >> Right. >> All right guys, we got to go. The keynotes are spilling out. Seth thank you so much. >> That's it? >> Folks, thank you. I know, I'd love to carry on, right? >> Yeah. >> It goes fast. >> Great. >> Yeah. >> Guys, great, great content. >> Yeah, thanks. And congratulations on participating and being data all-stars. >> We'd love to do this again sometime. All right and thank you for watching everybody, it's a wrap from IBM CDOs, Dave Vellante from theCUBE. We'll see you next time. (light music)

>> Live from San Francisco, California, it's theCUBE covering the IBM Chief Data Officer Summit. Brought to you by IBM. >> Hi everybody, welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of the IBM Chief Data Officer Event. We're here at Fisherman's Wharf in San Francisco at the Centric Hyatt Hotel. This is the 10th anniversary of IBM's Chief Data Officer Summits. In the recent years, anyway, they do one in San Francisco and one in Boston each year, and theCUBE has covered a number of them. I think this is our eighth CDO conference. I'm Dave Vellante, and theCUBE, we like to go out, especially to events like this that are intimate, there's about 140 chief data officers here. We've had the chief data officer from AstraZeneca on, even though he doesn't take that title. We've got a panel coming up later on in the day. And I want to talk about the evolution of that role. The chief data officer emerged out of kind of a wonky, back-office role. It was all about 10, 12 years ago, data quality, master data management, governance, compliance. And as the whole big data meme came into focus and people were realizing that data is the new source of competitive advantage, that data was going to be a source of innovation, what happened was that role emerged, that CDO, chief data officer role, emerged out of the back office and came right to the front and center. And the chief data officer really started to better understand and help companies understand how to monetize the data. Now monetization of data could mean more revenue. It could mean cutting costs. It could mean lowering risk. It could mean, in a hospital situation, saving lives, sort of broad definition of monetization. But it was really understanding how data contributed to value, and then finding ways to operationalize that to speed up time to value, to lower cost, to lower risk. And that required a lot of things. It required new skill sets, new training. It required a partnership with the lines of business. It required new technologies like artificial intelligence, which have just only recently come into a point where it's gone mainstream. Of course, when I started in the business several years ago, AI was the hot topic, but you didn't have the compute power. You didn't have the data, you didn't have the cloud. So we see the new innovation engine, not as Moore's Law, the doubling of transistors every 18 months, doubling of performance. Really no, we see the new innovation cocktail as data as the substrate, applying machine intelligence to that data, and then scaling it with the cloud. And through that cloud model, being able to attract startups and innovation. I come back to the chief data officer here, and IBM Chief Data Officer Summit, that's really where the chief data officer comes in. Now, the role in the organization is fuzzy. If you ask people what's a chief data officer, you'll get 20 different answers. Many answers are focused on compliance, particularly in what emerged, again, in those regulated industries: financial service, healthcare, and government. Those are the first to have chief data officers. But now CDOs have gone mainstream. So what we're seeing here from IBM is the broadening of that role and that definition and those responsibilities. Confusing things is the chief digital officer or the chief analytics officer. Those are roles that have also emerged, so there's a lot of overlap and a lot of fuzziness. To whom should the chief data officer report? Many say it should not be the CIO. Many say they should be peers. Many say the CIO's responsibility is similar to the chief data officer, getting value out of data, although I would argue that's never really been the case. The role of the CIO has largely been to make sure that the technology infrastructure works and that applications are delivered with high availability, with great performance, and are able to be developed in an agile manner. That's sort of a more recent sort of phenomenon that's come forth. And the chief digital officer is really around the company's face. What does that company's brand look like? What does that company's go-to-market look like? What does the customer see? Whereas the chief data officer's really been around the data strategy, what the sort of framework should be around compliance and governance, and, again, monetization. Not that they're responsible for the monetization, but they responsible for setting that framework and then communicating it across the company, accelerating the skill sets and the training of existing staff and complementing with new staff and really driving that framework throughout the organization in partnership with the chief digital officer, the chief analytics officer, and the chief information officer. That's how I see it anyway. Martin Schroeder, the senior vice president of IBM, came on today with Inderpal Bhandari, who is the chief data officer of IBM, the global chief data officer. Martin Schroeder used to be the CFO at IBM. He talked a lot, kind of borrowing from Ginni Rometty's themes in previous conferences, chapter one of digital which he called random acts of digital, and chapter two is how to take this mainstream. IBM makes a big deal out of the fact that it doesn't appropriate your data, particularly your personal data, to sell ads. IBM's obviously in the B2B business, so that's IBM's little back-ended shot at Google and Facebook and Amazon who obviously appropriate our data to sell ads or sell goods. IBM doesn't do that. I'm interested in IBM's opinion on big tech. There's a lot of conversations now. Elizabeth Warren wants to break up big tech. IBM was under the watchful eye of the DOJ 25 years ago, 30 years ago. IBM essentially had a monopoly in the business, and the DOJ wanted to make sure that IBM wasn't using that monopoly to hurt consumers and competitors. Now what IBM did, the DOJ ruled that IBM had to separate its applications business, actually couldn't be in the applications business. Another ruling was that they had to publish the interfaces to IBM mainframes so that competitors could actually build plug-compatible products. That was the world back then. It was all about peripherals plugging into mainframes and sort of applications being developed. So the DOJ took away IBM's power. Fast forward 30 years, now we're hearing Google, Amazon, and Facebook coming under fire from politicians. Should they break up those companies? Now those companies are probably the three leaders in AI. IBM might debate that. I think generally, at theCUBE and SiliconANGLE, we believe that those three companies are leading the charge in AI, along with China Inc: Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, et cetera, and the Chinese government. So here's the question. What would happen if you broke up big tech? I would surmise that if you break up big tech, those little techs that you break up, Amazon Web Services, WhatsApp, Instagram, those little techs would get bigger. Now, however, the government is implying that it wants to break those up because those entities have access to our data. Google's got access to all the search data. If you start splitting them up, that'll make it harder for them to leverage that data. I would argue those small techs would get bigger, number one. Number two, I would argue if you're worried about China, which clearly you're seeing President Trump is worried about China, placing tariffs on China, playing hardball with China, which is not necessarily a bad thing. In fact, I think it's a good thing because China has been accused, and we all know, of taking IP, stealing IP essentially, and really not putting in those IP protections. So, okay, playing hardball to try to get a quid pro quo on IP protections is a good thing. Not good for trade long term. I'd like to see those trade barriers go away, but if it's a negotiation tactic, okay. I can live with it. However, going after the three AI leaders, Amazon, Facebook, and Google, and trying to take them down or break them up, actually, if you're a nationalist, could be a bad thing. Why would you want to handcuff the AI leaders? Third point is unless they're breaking the law. So I think that should be the decision point. Are those three companies, and others, using monopoly power to thwart competition? I would argue that Microsoft actually did use its monopoly power back in the '80s and '90s, in particular in the '90s, when it put Netscape out of business, it put Lotus out of business, it put WordPerfect out of business, it put Novell out of the business. Now, maybe those are strong words, but in fact, Microsoft's bundling, its pricing practices, caught those companies off guard. Remember, Jim Barksdale, the CEO of Netscape, said we don't need the browser. He was wrong. Microsoft killed Netscape by bundling Internet Explorer into its operating system. So the DOJ stepped in, some would argue too late, and put handcuffs on Microsoft so they couldn't use that monopoly power. And I would argue that you saw from that two things. One, granted, Microsoft was overly focused on Windows. That was kind of their raison d'etre, and they missed a lot of other opportunities. But the DOJ definitely slowed them down, and I think appropriately. And if out of that myopic focus on Windows, and to a certain extent, the Department of Justice and the government, the FTC as well, you saw the emergence of internet companies. Now, Microsoft did a major pivot to the internet. They didn't do a major pivot to the cloud until Satya Nadella came in, and now Microsoft is one of those other big tech companies that is under the watchful eye. But I think Microsoft went through that and perhaps learned its lesson. We'll see what happens with Facebook, Google, and Amazon. Facebook, in particular, seems to be conflicted right now. Should we take down a video that has somewhat fake news implications or is a deep hack? Or should we just dial down? We saw this recently with Facebook. They dialed down the promotion. So you almost see Facebook trying to have its cake and eat it too, which personally, I don't think that's the right approach. I think Facebook either has to say damn the torpedoes. It's open content, we're going to promote it. Or do the right thing and take those videos down, those fake news videos. It can't have it both ways. So Facebook seems to be somewhat conflicted. They are probably under the most scrutiny now, as well as Google, who's being accused, anyway, certainly we've seen this in the EU, of promoting its own ads over its competitors' ads. So people are going to be watching that. And, of course, Amazon just having too much power. Having too much power is not necessarily an indication of abusing monopoly power, but you know the government is watching. So that bears watching. theCUBE is going to be covering that. We'll be here all day, covering the IBM CDO event. I'm Dave Vallente, you're watching theCUBE. #IBMCDO, DM us or Tweet us @theCUBE. I'm @Dvallente, keep it right there. We'll be right back right after this short break. (upbeat music)

>> Live from Boston, it's theCUBE! Covering IBM Chief Data Officers Summit. Brought to you by IBM. >> Welcome back to theCUBE's live coverage of the IBM CDO Summit here in Boston, Massachusetts. I'm your host Rebecca Knight, along with my co-host Paul Gillin. We're joined by Inderpal Bhandari, he is the Global Chief Data Officer at IBM. Thank you so much for coming back on theCUBE, Inderpal. >> It's my pleasure. >> It's great to have you. >> Thank you for having me. >> So I want to talk, I want to start by talking a little bit about your own career journey. Your first CDO job was in the early 2000s. You were one of the first CDOs, ever. In the history of Chief Data Officers. Talk a little bit about the evolution of the role and sort of set the scene for our viewers in terms of what you've seen, in your own career. >> Yes, no thank you, December 2006, I became a Chief Data Officer of a major healthcare company. And you know, it turned out at that time there were only four of us. Two in banking, one in the internet, I was the only one in healthcare. And now of course there are well over 1,999 of us and the professions taken off. And I've had the fortune of actually doing this four times now. So leading a legacy in four different organizations in terms of building that organizational capability. I think initially, when I became Chief Data Officer, the culture was one of viewing data's exhaust. Something that we had to discard, that came out of the transactions that you were, that your business was doing. And then after that you would discard this data, or you didn't really care about it. And over the course of time, people had begun to realize that data is actually a strategic asset and you can really use it to drive not just the data strategy, but the actual business strategy, and enable the business to go to the next level. And that transitions been tremendous to watch and to see. I've just been fortunate that I've been there for the full journey. >> Are you seeing any consensus developing around what background makes for a good CDO? What are the skills that a CDO needs? >> Yeah, no that's a very, very good question. My view has been evolving on that one too, over the last few years, right, as I've had these experiences. So, I'll jump to the conclusion, so that you kind of, to answer your question as opposed to what I started out with. The CDO, has to be the change agent in chief, for the organization. That's really the role of the CDO. So yes, there's the technical sharps that you have to have and you have to be able to deal with people who have advanced technical degrees and to get them to move forward. But you do have to change the entire organization and you have to be adept at going after the culture, changing it. You can't get frustrated with all the push back, that's inevitable. You have to almost develop it as an art, as you move forward. And address it, not just bottom up and lateral, but also top down. And I think that's probably where the art gets the most interesting. Because you've got to push a for change even at the top. But you can push just so far without really derailing everything that you are trying to do. And so, I think if I have to pick one attribute, it would be that the CDO has to be the change agent in chief and they have to be adept at addressing the culture of the organization, and moving it forward. >> You're laying out all of these sort of character traits that someone has to be indefatigable, inspirational, visionary. You also said during the keynote you have six months to really make your first push, the first six months are so important. When we talk about presidents, it's the first 100 days. Describe what you mean by that, you have six months? >> So if a new, and I'm talking here mainly about a large organization like an IBM, a large enterprise. When you go in, the key observation is it's a functioning organization. It's a growing concern. It's already making money, it's doing stuff like that. >> We hope. >> And the people who are running that organization, they have their own needs and demands. So very quickly, you can just become somebody who ends up servicing multiple demands that come from different business units, different people. And so that's kind of one aspect of it. The way the organization takes over if you don't really come in with an overarching strategy. The other way the organizations take over is typically large organizations are very siloed. And even at the lower levels you who have people who developed little fiefdoms, where they control that data, and they say this is mine, I'm not going to let anybody else have it. They're the only one's who really understand that curve. And so, pretty much unless you're able to get them to align to a much larger cause, you'll never be able to break down those silos, culturally. Just because of the way it's set up. So its a pervasive problem, goes across the board and I think, when you walk in you've got that, you call it honeymoon period, or whatever. My estimate is based on my experience, six months. If you don't have it down in six months, in terms of that larger cause that your going to push forward, that you can use to at least align everybody with the vision, or you're not going to really succeed. You'll succeed tactically, but not in a strategic sense. >> You're about to undertake the largest acquisition in IBM's history. And as the Chief Data Officer, you must be thinking right now about what that's going to mean for data governance and data integration. How are you preparing for an acquisition that large? >> Yeah so, the acquisition is still got to work through all the regulations, and so forth. So there's just so much we can do. It's much more from a planning stand point that we can do things. I'll give you a sense of how I've been thinking about it. Now we've been doing acquisitions before. So in that since we do have a set process for how we go about it, in terms of evaluating the data, how we're going to manage the data and so forth. The interesting aspect that was different for me on this one is I also talked back on our data strategy itself. And tried to understand now that there's going to be this big acquisition of move forward, from a planning standpoint how should I be prepared to change? With regard to that acquisition. And because we were so aligned with the overall IBM business strategy, to pursue cognition. I think you could see that in my remarks that when you push forward AI in a large enterprise, you very quickly run into this multi-cloud issue. Where you've got, not just different clouds but also unprime and private clouds, and you have to manage across all that and that becomes the pin point that you have to scale. To scale you have to get past that pin point. And so we were already thinking about that. Actually, I just did a check after the acquisition was announced, asking my team to figure out well how standardized are we with Red Hat Linux? And I find that we're actually completely standardized across with Red Hat Linux. We pretty much will have use cases ready to go, and I think that's the facet of the goal, because we were so aligned with the business strategy to begin with. So we were discovering that pinpoint, just as all our customers were. And so when the cooperation acted as it did, in some extent we're already ready to go with used cases that we can take directly to our clients and customers. I think it also has to do with the fact that we've had a partnership with Red Hat for some time, we've been pretty strategic. >> Do you think people understand AI in a business context? >> I actually think that that's, people don't really understand that. That's was the biggest, in my mind anyway, was the biggest barrier to the business strategy that we had embarked on several years ago. To take AI or cognition to the enterprise. People never really understood it. And so our own data strategy became one of enabling IBM itself to become an AI enterprise. And use that as a showcase for our clients and customers, and over the journey in the last two, three years that I've been with IBM. We've become more, we've been putting forward more and more collateral, but also technology, but also business process change ideas, organizational change ideas. So that our clients and customers can see exactly how it's done. Not that i'ts perfect yet, but that too they benefit from, right? They don't make the same mistakes that we do. And so we've become, your colleagues have been covering this conference so they will know that it's become more and more clear, exactly what we're doing. >> You made an interesting comment, in the keynote this morning you said nobody understands AI in a business context. What did you mean by that? >> So in a business context, what does it look like? What does AI look like from an AI enterprise standpoint? From a business context. So excuse me I just trouble them for a tissue, I don't know why. >> Okay, alright, well we can talk about this a little bit too while he-- >> Yeah, well I think we understand AI as an Amazon Echo. We understand it as interface medium but I think what he was getting at is that impacting business processes is a lot more complicated. >> Right. >> And so we tend to think of AI in terms of how we relate to technology rather than how technology changes the rules. >> Right and clearly its such, on the consumers side, we've all grasped this and we all are excited by its possibilities but in terms of the business context. >> I'm back! >> It's the season, yes. >> Yeah, it is the season, don't want to get in closer. So to your question with regard to how-- >> AI in a business context. >> AI in a business context. Consumer context everybody understands, but in a business context what does it really mean? That's difficult for people to understand. But eventually it's all around making decisions. But in my mind its not the big decisions, it's not the decisions we going to acquire Red Hat. It's not those decisions. It's the thousands and thousands of little decisions that are made day in and night out by people who are working the rank and file who are actually working the different processes. That's what we really need to go after. And if you're able to do that, it completely changes the process and you're going to get just such a lot more out of it, not just terms of productivity but also in terms of new ideas that lead to revenue enhancement, new products, et cetera, et cetera. That's what a business AI enterprise looks like. And that's what we've been bringing forward and show casing. In today's keynote I actually had Sonya, who is one of our data governance people, SMEs, who works on metadata generation. Really a very difficult manual problem. Data about data, specifically labeling data so that a business person could understand it. Its all been done manually but now it's done automatically using AI and its completely changed the process. But Sonya is the person who's at the forefront of that and I don't think people really understand that. They think in terms of AI and business and they think this is going to be somebody who's a data scientist, a technologist, somebody who's a very talented technical engineer, but it's not that. It's actually the rank and file people, who've been working these business processes, now working with an intelligent system, to take it to the next level. >> And that's why as you've said it's so important that the CDO is a change agent in chief. Because it is, it does require so much buy-in from, as you say, the rank and file, its not just the top decision makers that you're trying to persuade. >> Yes, you are affecting change at all levels. Top down, bottom up, laterally. >> Exactly. >> You have to go after it across the board. >> And in terms of talking about the data, it's not just data for data's sake. You need to talk about it in terms that a business person can understand. During the keynote, you described an earlier work that you were doing with the NBA. Can you tell our viewers a little bit about that? And sort of how the data had to tell a story? >> Yes, so that was in my first go 'round with IBM, from 1990 through '97. I was with IBM Research, at the Watson Research Lab, as a research staff member. And I created this program called Advanced Scout for the National Basketball Association. Ended up being used by every team on the NBA. And it would essentially suggest who to put in the line up, when you're matching lines up and so forth. By looking at a lot of game data and it was particularly useful during the Playoff games. The major lesson that came out of that experience for me, at that time, alright, this was before Moneyball, and before all this stuff. I think it was like '90, '93, '92. I think if you Google it you will still see articles about this. But the main lesson that came out for me was the first time when the program identified a pattern and suggested that to a coach during a playoff game where they were down two, zero, it suggested they start two backup players. And the coach was just completely flabbergasted, and said there's no way I'm going to do this. This is the kind of thing that would not only get me fired, but make me look really silly. And it hit me then that there was context that was missing, that the coach could not really make a decision. And the way we solved it then was we tied it to the snippets of video when those two players were on call. And then they made the decision that went on and won that game, and so forth. Today's AI systems can actually fathom all that automatically from the video itself. And I think that's what's really advanced the technology and the approaches that we've got today to move forward as quickly as they have. And they've taken hold across the board, right? In the sense of a consumer setting but now also in the sense of a business setting. Where we're applying it pretty much to every business process that we have. >> Exciting. Well Inderpal, thank you so much for coming back on theCUBE, it was always a pleasure talking to you. >> It's my pleasure, thank you. >> I'm Rebecca Knight for Paul Gillin, we will have more from theCUBE's live coverage of IBM CDO coming up in just a little bit. (upbeat music)

>> Announcer: Live from downtown San Francisco, it's theCUBE, covering IBM Chief Data Officers Strategy Summit 2018, brought to you by IBM. >> We're back in San Francisco, everybody. This is theCUBE, the leader in live tech coverage, and we're here covering exclusive coverage of IBM's Chief Data Officer Strategy Summit. This is the summit, as I said, they book in at each coast, San Francisco and Boston. Intimate, a lot of senior practitioners, chief data officers, data folks, people who love data. Caitlyn Halferty is back. She's the Client Engagement Executive and the Chief Data Officer office at IBM. Great. And, Allen Crane, Vice President at USAA. >> Thank you. >> Good to see you. Thanks for coming on. All right. >> Thanks for having us. >> You're welcome. Well, good day today, as I said, a very intimate crowd. You're here as a sort of defacto CDO, learning, sharing, connecting with peers. Set up your role, Allen. Tell us about that. >> At USA, we've got a distributed data and analytics organization where we have centralized functions in our hub, and then each of the lines of business have their own data offices. I happen to have responsibility for all the different ways that our members interact with us, so about 100 million phone calls a year, about a couple billion internet and digital sessions a year, most of that is on mobile, and always lookin' at the ways that we can give back time to our membership, as well as our customer service reps, who we call our member service reps, so that they can serve our members better. The faster and more predictive we can be with being able to understand our members better and prompt our MSRs with the right information to serve them, then the more they can get on to the actual value of that conversation. >> A lot of data. So, one of the things that Inderpal talked about the very first time I met him, in Boston, he talked about the Five Pillars, and the first one was you have to understand as a CDO, how your organization gets value out of data. You said that could be direct monetization or, I guess, increased revenue, cut costs. That's value. >> Right. >> That's right. >> That's the starting point. >> Right. >> So, how did you start? >> Well, actually, it was the internal monetization. So, first off, I want to say USA never sells any of our member data, so we don't think of monetization in that framework, but we do think of it terms of how do we give something that's even more precious than money back to our company and to our members and the MSRs? And, that is really that gift of time. By removing friction from the system, we've been able to reduce calls per member, through digitization activities, and reduced transfers and reduced misdirects by over 10% every year. We're doing work with AI and machine learning to be able to better anticipate what the member is calling about, so that we can get them to the right place at the right time to the right set member service representatives. And, so all these things have resulted in, not just time savings but, obviously, that translates directly to bottom line savings, but at the end of the day, it's about increasing that member service level, increasing your responsiveness, increasing the speed that you're answering the phone, and ultimately increasing that member satisfaction. >> Yeah, customer satisfaction, lowers churn rates, that's a form of monetization, >> Absolutely. >> so it's hard dollars to the CFO, right? >> Absolutely, yeah. >> All right, let's talk about the role of the CDO. This is something that we touched on earlier. >> Yes. >> We're bringing it home here. >> Yes. >> Last segment. Where are we at with the role of the CDO? It was sort of isolated for years in regulated industries, >> Correct. >> permeated to mainstream organizations. >> Correct. >> Many of those mainstream organizations can move faster, 'cause their not regulated, so have we sort of reached parody between the regulated and the unregulated, and what do you discern there in terms of patterns and states of innovation? >> Sure. I think when we kicked off these summits in 2014, many of our CDOs came from CIO type organizations, defensive posture, you know, king of the data warehouse that we joke about, and now annuls reports of that time were saying maybe 20% of large organizations were investing in the CDO or similar individual responsible for enterprise data, and now we see analysts reports coming out to say upwards of 85, even 90%, of organizations are investing in someone responsible for that role of the CDO type. In my opening remarks this morning, I polled the room to say who's here for the first time. It was interesting, 69, 70% of attendees were joining us for the first time, and I went back, okay, who's been here last year, year before, and I said who was here from the beginning, 2014 with us, and Allen is one of the individuals who's been with us. And, as much as the topics have changed and the role has grown and the purview and scope of responsibilities, some topics have remained, our attendees tell us, they're still important, top-of-mind, and data monetization is one of those. So, we always have a panel on data monetization, and we've had some good discussions recently, that the idea of it's just the external resell, or something to do with selling data externally is one view, but really driving that internal value, and the ways you drive out those efficiencies is another perspective on it. So, fortunate to have Allen here. >> Well, we've been able to, for that very reason, we've been able to grow our team from about six or seven people five years ago to well over a hundred people, that's focused on how we inefficiency out of the system. That mere 10%, when your call-per-member reduction, when you're taking 30 million calls in the bank, you know, that's real dollars, three million calls out of the system that you can monetize like that. So, it's real value that the company sees in us, and I think that, in a sense, is really how you want to be growing in a data organization, because people see value in you, are willing to give you more, and then you start getting into those interesting conversations, if I gave you more people, could you get me more results? >> Let's talk about digital transformation and how it relates to all this. Presumably, you've got a top down initiative, the CEO says, he or she says, okay, this is important. We got to do it. Boom, there's the North Star. Let's go. What's the right regime that you're seeing? Obviously, you've got to have the executive buy-in, you've got the Chief Data Officer, you have the Chief Digital Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the CFO's always going to be there, making sure things are on track. How are you seeing that whole thing shake out, at least in your organization? >> Well, one thing that we've been seeing is digital digitization or the digital transformation is not about just going only digital. It's how does all this work together. It can't just be an additive function, where you're still taking just as many calls and so forth, but it's got to be something that that experience online has got to do something that's transformative in your organization. So, we really look at the member all the way through that whole ecosystem, and not just through the digital lens. And, that's really where teams like ours have really been able to stitch together the member experience across all their channels that they're interacting with us, whether that's the marketing channels or the digital channels or the call channel, so that we can better understand that experience. But, it's certainly a complementary one. It can't just be an additive one. >> I wonder if we could talk about complacency, in terms of digital transformation. I talk to a lot of companies and there's discussion about digital, but you talk to a lot of people who say, well, we're doing fine. Maybe not in our industry. Insurance is one that hasn't been highly disruptive, financial services, things like aerospace. I'll be retired by the time this all, I mean, that's true, right? And, probably accurate. So, are you seeing a sense of complacency or are you seeing a sense of urgency, or a mix or both? What are you seeing, Caitlyn? >> Well, it's interesting, and people may not be aware, but I'm constantly polling our attendees to ask what are top-of-mind topics, what are you struggling with, where are you seeing successes, and digital was one that came up for this particular session, which is why tomorrow's keynote, we have our Chief Digital Officer giving the morning keynote, to show how our data office and digital office are partnering to drive transformation internally. So, at least for our perspective, in the internal side of it, we have a priority initiative, a cognitive sales advisor, and it's essentially intended to bring in disparate part of customer data, obtained through many different channels, all the ways that they engage with us, online and other, and then, deliver it through sales advisor app that empowers our digital sellers to better meet their revenue targets and impact, and develop more of a quality client relationship and improve that customer experience. So, internally, at least, it's been interesting to see one of our strongest partnerships, in terms of business unit, has been our data and digital office. They say, look, the quality of the data is at the core, you then enable our digital sellers, and our clients benefit, for a better client experience. >> Well, about a year ago, we absolutely changed the organization to align the data office with the digital office, so that reports to our executive counsel level, so their peers, that reporting to the same organization, to ensure that those strategies are connected. >> Yeah, so as Caitlyn was saying, this Chief Data Officer kind of emerged from a defensive posture of compliance, governance, data quality. The Chief Digital Officer, kind of new, oftentimes associated with marketing, more of an external, perhaps, facing role, not always. And then, the CIO, we'll say, well, wait a minute, data is the CIO's job, but, of course, the CIO, she's too busy trying to keep the lights on and make everything work. So, where does the technology organization fit? >> Well, all that's together, so when we brought all those things together at the organizational level, digital, data, and technology were all together, and even design. So, you guys are all peers, reporting into the executive committee, essentially, is that right? Yes, our data, technology, and design, and digital office are all peers reporting to the same executive level. And then, one of the other pillars that Inderpal talks about is the relationship with the line of business. So, how is that connective tissue created? Well, being on the side that is responsible for how all of our members interact, my organization touches every product, every line of business, every channel that our members are interacting with, so our data is actually shared across the organization, so right now, really my focus is to make sure that that data is as accessible as it can be across our enterprise partners, it's as democratized as it can be, it's as high as quality. And then, things that we're doing around machine learning and AI, can be enabled and plugged into from all those different lines of business. >> What does success look like in your organization? How do you know you're doing well? I mean, obviously, dropping money to the bottom line, but how are you guys measuring yourselves and setting objectives? What's your North Star? >> I think success, for me, is when you're doing a good job, to the point that people say that question, could you do more if I gave you more? That, to me, is the ultimate validation. It's how we grew as an organization. You know, we don't have to play that justification game When people are already coming to the table saying, You're doing great work. How can you do more great work? >> So, what's next for these summits? Are you doing Boston again in the fall? Is that right? Are you planning >> We are, we are, >> on doing that? >> and you know, fall of last year, we released the blueprint, and the intent was to say, hey, here's the reflection of our 18 months, internal journey, as well as all our client interactions and their feedback, and we said, we're coming back in the spring and we're showing you the detail of how we really built out these internal platforms. So, we released our hybrid on-prem Cloud showcase today, which was great, and to the level of specificity that shows that the product solutions, what we're using, the Flash Storage, some of the AI components of machine learning models. >> The cognitive systems component? >> Exactly. And then, our vision, to your question to the fall, is coming back with the public Cloud showcases. So, we're already internally doing work on our public Cloud, in particular respect to our backup, some of our very sensitive client data, as well as some initial deep learning models, so those are the three pieces we're doing in public Cloud internally, and just as we made the commitment to come back and unveil and show those detail, we want to come back in the fall and show a variety of public Cloud showcases where we're doing this work. And then, hopefully, we'll continue to partner and say, hey, here's how we're doing it. We'd love to see how you're doing it. Let's share some best practices, accelerate, build these capabilities. And, I'll say to your business benefit question, what we've found is once we've built that platform, we call it, internally, a one IBM architecture, out our platform, we can then drive critical initiatives for the enterprise. So, for us, GVPR, you know, we own delivery of GVPR readiness across the IBM corporation, working with senior executives in all of our lines of business, to make sure we get there. But, now we've got the responsibility to drive out initiatives like that cross business unit, to your question on the partnerships. >> The evolution of this event seems to be, well, it's got a lot of evangelism early on, and now it's really practical, sort of sharing, like you say, the blueprint, how to apply it, a lot of people asking questions, you know, there's different levels of maturity. Now, you guys back tomorrow? You got to panel, you guys are doing a panel on data monetization? >> We're doing a panel on data monetization tomorrow. >> Okay, and then, you've got Bob Lord and Inderpal talking about that, so perfect juxtaposition and teamwork of those two major roles. >> And, this is the first time we've really showcased the data/digital partnership and connection, so I'm excited, want to appeal to the developer viewpoint of this. So, I think it'll be a great conversation about data at the core, driving digital transformation. And then, as you said, our data monetization panel, both external efforts, as well as a lot of the internal value that we're all driving, so I think that'll be a great session tomorrow. >> Well, and it's important, 'cause there's a lot of confusing, and still is a lot of confusion about those roles, and you made the point early today, is look, there's a big organizational issue you have to deal with, particularly around data silos, MyData. I presume you guys are attacking that challenge? >> Absolutely. >> Still, it's still a-- >> It's an ongoing-- >> Oh, absolutely. >> I think we're getting a lot better at it, but you've got to lean in, because if it's not internal, it's some of the external challenges around. Now we're picking Cloud vendors and so forth. Ten years ago, we had our own silos and our own warehouses, if we had a warehouse, and then, we were kind of moving into our own silos in our own databases, and then as we democratized that, we solved the one problem, but now our data's so big and compute needs are so large that we have no choice but to get more external into Cloud. So, you have to lean in, because everything is changing at such a rapid rate. >> And, it requires leadership. >> Yep. >> Absolutely. >> The whole digital data really requires excellent leadership, vision. IBM's catalyzing a lot of that conversation, so congratulations on getting this going. Last thoughts. >> Oh, I would just say, we were joking that 2014, the first couple of summits, small group, maybe 20-30 participants figuring out how to best organize from a structural perspective, you set up the office, what sort of outcomes, metrics, are we going to measure against, and those things, I think, will continue to be topics of discussion, but now we see we've got about 500 data leaders that are tracking our journey and that are involved and engaged with us. We've done a lot in North America, we're starting to do more outside the geographies, as well, which is great to see. So, I just have to say I think it's interesting to see the topics that continue to be of interest, the governance, the data monetization, and then, the new areas around AI, machine learning, data science, >> data science >> the empowering developers, the DevOps delivery, how we're going to deliver that type of training. So, it's been really exciting to see the community grow and all the best practices leveraged, and look forward to continuing to do more of that this year as well. >> Well, you obviously get a lot of value out of these events. You were here at the first one, you're here today. So, 2018. Your thoughts? >> I think the first one, we were all trying to figure out who we are, what's our role, and it varied from I'm a individual contributor, data evangelist in the organization to I'm king of the warehouse thing. >> Right. >> And, largely, from that defensive standpoint. I think, today, you see a lot more people that are leaning in, leading data science teams, leading the future of where the organizations are going to be going. This is really where the center of a lot of organizations are starting to pivot and look, and see, where is the future, and how does data become the leading edge of where the organization is going, so it's pretty cool to be a part of a community like this that's evolving that way, but then also being able to have that at a local level within your own organization. >> Well, another big take-away for me is the USAA example shows that this can pay for itself when you grow your own organization from a handful of people to a hundred plus individuals, driving value, so it makes it easier to justify, when you can demonstrate a business case. Well, guys, thanks very much for helping me wrap here. >> Absolutely. >> I appreciate you having us here. >> Thank you. >> It's been a great event. Always a pleasure, hopefully, we'll see you in the fall. >> Sounds good. Thank you so much. >> All right, thanks, everybody, for watching. We're out. This is theCUBE from IBM CDO Summit. Check out theCUBE.net for all of the videos, siliconangle.com for all the news summaries of this event, and wikibon.com for all the research. We'll see you next time. (techy music)

>> Announcer: Live from downtown San Francisco, it's the Cube, covering IBM Chief Data Officer Strategy Summit 2018. Brought to you by IBM. >> Welcome back to San Francisco everybody. We're at the Parc 55 in Union Square and this is the Cube, the leader in live tech coverage and we're covering exclusive coverage of the IBM CDO strategy summit. IBM has these things, they book in on both coasts, one in San Francisco one in Boston, spring and fall. Great event, intimate event. 130, 150 chief data officers, learning, transferring knowledge, sharing ideas. Cayn Woodruff is here as the principle data scientist at IBM and she's joined by Ritesh Ororo, who is the director of digital analytics at HCL Technologies. Folks welcome to the Cube, thanks for coming on. >> Thank you >> Thanks for having us. >> You're welcome. So we're going to talk about data management, data engineering, we're going to talk about digital, as I said Ritesh because digital is in your title. It's a hot topic today. But Caryn let's start off with you. Principle Data Scientist, so you're the one that is in short supply. So a lot of demand, you're getting pulled in a lot of different directions. But talk about your role and how you manage all those demands on your time. >> Well, you know a lot of, a lot of our work is driven by business needs, so it's really understanding what is critical to the business, what's going to support our businesses strategy and you know, picking the projects that we work on based on those items. So it's you really do have to cultivate the things that you spend your time on and make sure you're spending your time on the things that matter and as Ritesh and I were talking about earlier, you know, a lot of that means building good relationships with the people who manage the systems and the people who manage the data so that you can get access to what you need to get the critical insights that the business needs, >> So Ritesh, data management I mean this means a lot of things to a lot of people. It's evolved over the years. Help us frame what data management is in this day and age. >> Sure, so there are two aspects of data in my opinion. One is the data management, another the data engineering, right? And over the period as the data has grown significantly. Whether it's unstructured data, whether it's structured data, or the transactional data. We need to have some kind of governance in the policies to secure data to make data as an asset for a company so the business can rely on your data. What you are delivering to them. Now, the another part comes is the data engineering. Data engineering is more about an IT function, which is data acquisition, data preparation and delivering the data to the end-user, right? It can be business, it can be third-party but it all comes under the governance, under the policies, which are designed to secure the data, how the data should be accessed to different parts of the company or the external parties. >> And how those two worlds come together? The business piece and the IT piece, is that where you come in? >> That is where data science definitely comes into the picture. So if you go online, you can find Venn diagrams that describe data science as a combination of computer science math and statistics and business acumen. And so where it comes in the middle is data science. So it's really being able to put those things together. But, you know, what's what's so critical is you know, Interpol, actually, shared at the beginning here and I think a few years ago here, talked about the five pillars to building a data strategy. And, you know, one of those things is use cases, like getting out, picking a need, solving it and then going from there and along the way you realize what systems are critical, what data you need, who the business users are. You know, what would it take to scale that? So these, like, Proof-point projects that, you know, eventually turn into these bigger things, and for them to turn into bigger things you've got to have that partnership. You've got to know where your trusted data is, you've got to know that, how it got there, who can touch it, how frequently it is updated. Just being able to really understand that and work with partners that manage the infrastructure so that you can leverage it and make it available to other people and transparent. >> I remember when I first interviewed Hilary Mason way back when and I was asking her about that Venn diagram and she threw in another one, which was data hacking. >> Caryn: Uh-huh, yeah. >> Well, talk about that. You've got to be curious about data. You need to, you know, take a bath in data. >> (laughs) Yes, yes. I mean yeah, you really.. Sometimes you have to be a detective and you have to really want to know more. And, I mean, understanding the data is like the majority of the battle. >> So Ritesh, we were talking off-camera about it's not how titles change, things evolve, data, digital. They're kind of interchangeable these days. I mean we always say the difference between a business and a digital business is how they have used data. And so digital being part of your role, everybody's trying to get digital transformation, right? As an SI, you guys are at the heart of it. Certainly, IBM as well. What kinds of questions are our clients asking you about digital? >> So I ultimately see data, whatever we drive from data, it is used by the business side. So we are trying to always solve a business problem, which is to optimize the issues the company is facing, or try to generate more revenues, right? Now, the digital as well as the data has been married together, right? Earlier there are, you can say we are trying to analyze the data to get more insights, what is happening in that company. And then we came up with a predictive modeling that based on the data that will statically collect, how can we predict different scenarios, right? Now digital, we, over the period of the last 10 20 years, as the data has grown, there are different sources of data has come in picture, we are talking about social media and so on, right? And nobody is looking for just reports out of the Excel, right? It is more about how you are presenting the data to the senior management, to the entire world and how easily they can understand it. That's where the digital from the data digitization, as well as the application digitization comes in picture. So the tools are developed over the period to have a better visualization, better understanding. How can we integrate annotation within the data? So these are all different aspects of digitization on the data and we try to integrate the digital concepts within our data and analytics, right? So I used to be more, I mean, I grew up as a data engineer, analytics engineer but now I'm looking more beyond just the data or the data preparation. It's more about presenting the data to the end-user and the business. How it is easy for them to understand it. >> Okay I got to ask you, so you guys are data wonks. I am too, kind of, but I'm not as skilled as you are, but, and I say that with all due respect. I mean you love data. >> Caryn: Yes. >> As data science becomes a more critical skill within organizations, we always talk about the amount of data, data growth, the stats are mind-boggling. But as a data scientist, do you feel like you have access to the right data and how much of a challenge is that with clients? >> So we do have access to the data but the challenge is, the company has so many systems, right? It's not just one or two applications. There are companies we have 50 or 60 or even hundreds of application built over last 20 years. And there are some applications, which are basically duplicate, which replicates the data. Now, the challenge is to integrate the data from different systems because they maintain different metadata. They have the quality of data is a concern. And sometimes with the international companies, the rules, for example, might be in US or India or China, the data acquisitions are different, right? And you are, as you become more global, you try to integrate the data beyond boundaries, which becomes a more compliance issue sometimes, also, beyond the technical issues of data integration. >> Any thoughts on that? >> Yeah, I think, you know one of the other issues too, you have, as you've heard of shadow IT, where people have, like, servers squirreled away under their desks. There's your shadow data, where people have spreadsheets and databases that, you know, they're storing on, like a small server or that they share within their department. And so you know, you were discussing, we were talking earlier about the different systems. And you might have a name in one system that's one way and a name in another system that's slightly different, and then a third system, where it's it's different and there's extra granularity to it or some extra twist. And so you really have to work with all of the people that own these processes and figure out what's the trusted source? What can we all agree on? So there's a lot of... It's funny, a lot of the data problems are people problems. So it's getting people to talk and getting people to agree on, well this is why I need it this way, and this is why I need it this way, and figuring out how you come to a common solution so you can even create those single trusted sources that then everybody can go to and everybody knows that they're working with the the right thing and the same thing that they all agree on. >> The politics of it and, I mean, politics is kind of a pejorative word but let's say dissonance, where you have maybe of a back-end syst6em, financial system and the CFO, he or she is looking at the data saying oh, this is what the data says and then... I remember I was talking to a, recently, a chef in a restaurant said that the CFO saw this but I know that's not the case, I don't have the data to prove it. So I'm going to go get the data. And so, and then as they collect that data they bring together. So I guess in some ways you guys are mediators. >> [Caryn And Ritesh] Yes, yes. Absolutely. >> 'Cause the data doesn't lie you just got to understand it. >> You have to ask the right question. Yes. And yeah. >> And sometimes when you see the data, you start, that you don't even know what questions you want to ask until you see the data. Is that is that a challenge for your clients? >> Caryn: Yes, all the time. Yeah >> So okay, what else do we want to we want to talk about? The state of collaboration, let's say, between the data scientists, the data engineer, the quality engineer, maybe even the application developers. Somebody, John Fourier often says, my co-host and business partner, data is the new development kit. Give me the data and I'll, you know, write some code and create an application. So how about collaboration amongst those roles, is that something... I know IBM's gone on about some products there but your point Caryn, it's a lot of times it's the people. >> It is. >> And the culture. What are you seeing in terms of evolution and maturity of that challenge? >> You know I have a very good friend who likes to say that data science is a team sport and so, you know, these should not be, like, solo projects where just one person is wading up to their elbows in data. This should be something where you've got engineers and scientists and business, people coming together to really work through it as a team because everybody brings really different strengths to the table and it takes a lot of smart brains to figure out some of these really complicated things. >> I completely agree. Because we see the challenges, we always are trying to solve a business problem. It's important to marry IT as well as the business side. We have the technical expert but we don't have domain experts, subject matter experts who knows the business in IT, right? So it's very very important to collaborate closely with the business, right? And data scientist a intermediate layer between the IT as well as business I will say, right? Because a data scientist as they, over the years, as they try to analyze the information, they understand business better, right? And they need to collaborate with IT to either improve the quality, right? That kind of challenges they are facing and I need you to, the data engineer has to work very hard to make sure the data delivered to the data scientist or the business is accurate as much as possible because wrong data will lead to wrong predictions, right? And ultimately we need to make sure that we integrate the data in the right way. >> What's a different cultural dynamic that was, say ten years ago, where you'd go to a statistician, she'd fire up the SPSS.. >> Caryn: We still use that. >> I'm sure you still do but run some kind of squares give me some, you know, probabilities and you know maybe run some Monte Carlo simulation. But one person kind of doing all that it's your point, Caryn. >> Well you know, it's it's interesting. There are there are some students I mentor at a local university and you know we've been talking about the projects that they get and that you know, more often than not they get a nice clean dataset to go practice learning their modeling on, you know? And they don't have to get in there and clean it all up and normalize the fields and look for some crazy skew or no values or, you know, where you've just got so much noise that needs to be reduced into something more manageable. And so it's, you know, you made the point earlier about understanding the data. It's just, it really is important to be very curious and ask those tough questions and understand what you're dealing with. Before you really start jumping in and building a bunch of models. >> Let me add another point. That the way we have changed over the last ten years, especially from the technical point of view. Ten years back nobody talks about the real-time data analysis. There was no streaming application as such. Now nobody talks about the batch analysis, right? Everybody wants data on real-time basis. But not if not real-time might be near real-time basis. That has become a challenge. And it's not just that prediction, which are happening in their ERP environment or on the cloud, they want the real-time integration with the social media for the marketing and the sales and how they can immediately do the campaign, right? So, for example, if I go to Google and I search for for any product, right, for example, a pressure cooker, right? And I go to Facebook, immediately I see the ad within two minutes. >> Yeah, they're retargeting. >> So that's a real-time analytics is happening under different application, including the third-party data, which is coming from social media. So that has become a good source of data but it has become a challenge for the data analyst and the data scientist. How quickly we can turn around is called data analysis. >> Because it used to be you would get ads for a pressure cooker for months, even after you bought the pressure cooker and now it's only a few days, right? >> Ritesh: It's a minute. You close this application, you log into Facebook... >> Oh, no doubt. >> Ritesh: An ad is there. >> Caryn: There it is. >> Ritesh: Because everything is linked either your phone number or email ID you're done. >> It's interesting. We talked about disruption a lot. I wonder if that whole model is going to get disrupted in a new way because everybody started using the same ad. >> So that's a big change of our last 10 years. >> Do you think..oh go ahead. >> oh no, I was just going to say, you know, another thing is just there's so much that is available to everybody now, you know. There's not this small little set of tools that's restricted to people that are in these very specific jobs. But with open source and with so many software-as-a-service products that are out there, anybody can go out and get an account and just start, you know, practicing or playing or joining a cackle competition or, you know, start getting their hands on.. There's data sets that are out there that you can just download to practice and learn on and use. So, you know, it's much more open, I think, than it used to be. >> Yeah, community additions of software, open data. The number of open day sources just keeps growing. Do you think that machine intelligence can, or how can machine intelligence help with this data quality challenge? >> I think that it's it's always going to require people, you know? There's always going to be a need for people to train the machines on how to interpret the data. How to classify it, how to tag it. There's actually a really good article in Popular Science this month about a woman who was training a machine on fake news and, you know, it did a really nice job of finding some of the the same claims that she did. But she found a few more. So, you know, I think it's, on one hand we have machines that we can augment with data and they can help us make better decisions or sift through large volumes of data but then when we're teaching the machines to classify the data or to help us with metadata classification, for example, or, you know, to help us clean it. I think that it's going to be a while before we get to the point where that's the inverse. >> Right, so in that example you gave, the human actually did a better job from the machine. Now, this amazing to me how.. What, what machines couldn't do that humans could, you know last year and all of a sudden, you know, they can. It wasn't long ago that robots couldn't climb stairs. >> And now they can. >> And now they can. >> It's really creepy. >> I think the difference now is, earlier you know, you knew that there is an issue in the data. But you don't know that how much data is corrupt or wrong, right? Now, there are tools available and they're very sophisticated tools. They can pinpoint and provide you the percentage of accuracy, right? On different categories of data that that you come across, right? Even forget about the structure data. Even when you talk about unstructured data, the data which comes from social media or the comments and the remarks that you log or are logged by the customer service representative, there are very sophisticated text analytics tools available, which can talk very accurately about the data as well as the personality of the person who is who's giving that information. >> Tough problems but it seems like we're making progress. All you got to do is look at fraud detection as an example. Folks, thanks very much.. >> Thank you. >> Thank you very much. >> ...for sharing your insight. You're very welcome. Alright, keep it right there everybody. We're live from the IBM CTO conference in San Francisco. Be right back, you're watching the Cube. (electronic music)

(music playing) >> Narrator: Live, from downtown San Francisco It's the Cube. Covering IBM Chief Data Officer Startegy Summit 2018. Brought to you by: IBM >> Welcome back to San Francisco everybody we're at the Parc 55 in Union Square. My name is Dave Vellante, and you're watching the Cube. The leader in live tech coverage and this is our exclusive coverage of IBM's Chief Data Officer Strategy Summit. They hold these both in San Francisco and in Boston. It's an intimate event, about 150 Chief Data Officers really absorbing what IBM has done internally and IBM transferring knowledge to its clients. Steven Eluk is here. He is one of those internal practitioners at IBM. He's the Vice President of Deep Learning and the Global Chief Data Office at IBM. We just heard from him and some of his strategies and used cases. He's joined by Sumit Gupta, a Cube alum. Who is the Vice President of Machine Learning and deep learning within IBM's cognitive systems group. Sumit. >> Thank you. >> Good to see you, welcome back Steven, lets get into it. So, I was um paying close attention when Bob Picciano took over the cognitive systems group. I said, "Hmm, that's interesting". Recently a software guy, of course I know he's got some hardware expertise. But bringing in someone who's deep into software and machine learning, and deep learning, and AI, and cognitive systems into a systems organization. So you guys specifically set out to develop solutions to solve problems like Steven's trying to solve. Right, explain that. >> Yeah, so I think ugh there's a revolution going on in the market the computing market where we have all these new machine learning, and deep learning technologies that are having meaningful impact or promise of having meaningful impact. But these new technologies, are actually significantly I would say complex and they require very complex and high performance computing systems. You know I think Bob and I think in particular IBM saw the opportunity and realized that we really need to architect a new class of infrastructure. Both software and hardware to address what data scientist like Steve are trying to do in the space, right? The open source software that's out there: Denzoflo, Cafe, Torch - These things are truly game changing. But they also require GPU accelerators. They also require multiple systems like... In fact interestingly enough you know some of the super computers that we've been building for the scientific computing world, those same technologies are now coming into the AI world and the enterprise. >> So, the infrastructure for AI, if I can use that term? It's got to be flexible, Steven we were sort of talking about that elastic versus I'm even extending it to plastic. As Sumit you just said, it's got to have that tooling, got to have that modern tooling, you've got to accommodate alternative processor capabilities um, and so, that forms what you've used Steven to sort of create new capabilities new business capabilities within IBM. I wanted to, we didn't touch upon this before, but we touched upon your data strategy before but tie it back to the line of business. You essentially are a presume a liaison between the line of business and the chief data office >> Steven: Yeah. >> Officer office. How did that all work out, and shake out? Did you defining the business outcomes, the requirements, how did you go about that? >> Well, actually, surprisingly, we have very little new use cases that we're generating internally from my organization. Because there's so many to pick from already throughout the organization, right? There's all these business units coming to us and saying, "Hey, now the data is in the data lake and now we know there's more data, now we want to do this. How do we do it?" You know, so that's where we come in, that's where we start touching and massaging and enabling them. And that's the main efforts that we have. We do have some derivative works that have come out, that have been like new offerings that you'll see here. But mostly we already have so many use cases that from those businesses units that we're really trying to heighten and bring extra value to those domains first. >> So, a lot of organizations sounds like IBM was similar you created the data lake you know, things like "a doop" made a lower cost to just put stuff in the data lake. But then, it's like "okay, now what?" >> Steven: Yeah. >> So is that right? So you've got the data and this bog of data and you're trying to make more sense out of it but get more value out of it? >> Steven: Absolutely. >> That's what they were pushing you to do? >> Yeah, absolutely. And with that, with more data you need more computational power. And actually Sumit and I go pretty far back and I can tell you from my previous roles I heightened to him many years ago some of the deficiencies in the current architecture in X86 etc and I said, "If you hit these points, I will buy these products." And what they went back and they did is they, they addressed all of the issues that I had. Like there's certain issues... >> That's when you were, sorry to interrupt, that's when you were a customer, right? >> Steven: That's when I was... >> An external customer >> Outside. I'm still an internal customer, so I've always been a customer I guess in that role right? >> Yep, yep. >> But, I need to get data to the computational device as quickly as possible. And with certain older gen technologies, like PTI Gen3 and certain issues around um x86. I couldn't get that data there for like high fidelity imaging for autonomous vehicles for ya know, high fidelity image analysis. But, with certain technologies in power we have like envy link and directly to the CPU. And we also have PTI Gen4, right? So, so these are big enablers for me so that I can really keep the utilization of those very expensive compute devices higher. Because they're not starved for data. >> And you've also put a lot of emphasis on IO, right? I mean that's... >> Yeah, you know if I may break it down right there's actually I would say three different pieces to the puzzle here right? The highest level from Steve's perspective, from Steven's teams perspective or any data scientist perspective is they need to just do their data science and not worry about the infrastructure, right? They actually don't want to know that there's an infrastructure. They want to say, "launch job" - right? That's the level of grand clarity we want, right? In the background, they want our schedulers, our software, our hardware to just seamlessly use either one system or scale to 100 systems, right? To use one GPU or to use 1,000 GPUs, right? So that's where our offerings come in, right. We went and built this offering called Powder and Powder essentially is open source software like TensorFlow, like Efi, like Torch. But performace and capabilities add it to make it much easier to use. So for example, we have an extremely terrific scheduling software that manages jobs called Spectrum Conductor for Spark. So as the name suggests, it uses Apache Spark. But again the data scientist doesn't know that. They say, "launch job". And the software actually goes and scales that job across tens of servers or hundreds of servers. The IT team can determine how many servers their going to allocate for data scientist. They can have all kinds of user management, data management, model management software. We take the open source software, we package it. You know surprisingly ugh most people don't realize this, the open source software like TensorFlow has primarily been built on a (mumbles). And most of our enterprise clients, including Steven, are on Redhat. So we, we engineered Redhat to be able to manage TensorFlow. And you know I chose those words carefully, there was a little bit of engineering both on Redhat and on TensorFlow to make that whole thing work together. Sounds trivial, took several months and huge value proposition to the enterprise clients. And then the last piece I think that Steven was referencing too, is we also trying to go and make the eye more accessible for non data scientist or I would say even data engineers. So we for example, have a software called Powder Vision. This takes images and videos, and automatically creates a trained deep learning model for them, right. So we analyze the images, you of course have to tell us in these images, for these hundred images here are the most important things. For example, you've identified: here are people, here are cars, here are traffic signs. But if you give us some of that labeled data, we automatically do the work that a data scientist would have done, and create this pre trained AI model for you. This really enables many rapid prototyping for a lot of clients who either kind of fought to have data scientists or don't want to have data scientists. >> So just to summarize that, the three pieces: It's making it simpler for the data scientists, just run the job - Um, the backend piece which is the schedulers, the hardware, the software doing its thing - and then its making that data science capability more accessible. >> Right, right, right. >> Those are the three layers. >> So you know, I'll resay it in my words maybe >> Yeah please. >> Ease of use right, hardware software optimized for performance and capability, and point and click AI, right. AI for non data scientists, right. It's like the three levels that I think of when I'm engaging with data scientists and clients. >> And essentially it's embedded AI right? I've been making the point today that a lot of the AI is going to be purchased from companies like IBM, and I'm just going to apply it. I'm not going to try to go build my own, own AI right? I mean, is that... >> No absolutely. >> Is that the right way to think about it as a practitioner >> I think, I think we talked about it a little bit about it on the panel earlier but if we can, if we can leverage these pre built models and just apply a little bit of training data it makes it so much easier for the organizations and so much cheaper. They don't have to invest in a crazy amount of infrastructure, all the labeling of data, they don't have to do that. So, I think it's definitely steering that way. It's going to take a little bit of time, we have some of them there. But as we as we iterate, we are going to get more and more of these types of you know, commodity type models that people could utilize. >> I'll give you an example, so we have a software called Intelligent Analytics at IBM. It's very good at taking any surveillance data and for example recognizing anomalies or you know if people aren't suppose to be in a zone. Ugh and we had a client who wanted to do worker safety compliance. So they want to make sure workers are wearing their safety jackets and their helmets when they're in a construction site. So we use surveillance data created a new AI model using Powder AI vision. We were then able to plug into this IVA - Intelligence Analytic Software. So they have the nice gooey base software for the dashboards and the alerts, yet we were able to do incremental training on their specific use case, which by the way, with their specific you know equipment and jackets and stuff like that. And create a new AI model, very quickly. For them to be able to apply and make sure their workers are actually complaint to all of the safety requirements they have on the construction site. >> Hmm interesting. So when I, Sometimes it's like a new form of capture says identify "all the pictures with bridges", right that's the kind of thing you're capable to do with these video analytics. >> That's exactly right. You, every, clients will have all kinds of uses I was at a, talking to a client, who's a major car manufacturer in the world and he was saying it would be great if I could identify the make and model of what cars people are driving into my dealership. Because I bet I can draw a ugh corelation between what they drive into and what they going to drive out of, right. Marketing insights, right. And, ugh, so there's a lot of things that people want to do with which would really be spoke in their use cases. And build on top of existing AI models that we have already. >> And you mentioned, X86 before. And not to start a food fight but um >> Steven: And we use both internally too, right. >> So lets talk about that a little bit, I mean where do you use X86 where do you use IBM Cognitive and Power Systems? >> I have a mix of both, >> Why, how do you decide? >> There's certain of work loads. I will delegate that over to Power, just because ya know they're data starved and we are noticing a complication is being impacted by it. Um, but because we deal with so many different organizations certain organizations optimize for X86 and some of them optimize for power and I can't pick, I have to have everything. Just like I mentioned earlier, I also have to support cloud on prim, I can't pick just to be on prim right, it so. >> I imagine the big cloud providers are in the same boat which I know some are your customers. You're betting on data, you're betting on digital and it's a good bet. >> Steven: Yeah, 100 percent. >> We're betting on data and AI, right. So I think data, you got to do something with the data, right? And analytics and AI is what people are doing with that data we have an advantage both at the hardware level and at the software level in these two I would say workloads or segments - which is data and AI, right. And we fundamentally have invested in the processor architecture to improve the performance and capabilities, right. You could offer a much larger AI models on a power system that you use than you can on an X86 system that you use. Right, that's one advantage. You can train and AI model four times faster on a power system than you can on an Intel Based System. So the clients who have a lot of data, who care about how fast their training runs, are the ones who are committing to power systems today. >> Mmm.Hmm. >> Latency requirements, things like that, really really big deal. >> So what that means for you as a practitioner is you can do more with less or is it I mean >> I can definitely do more with less, but the real value is that I'm able to get an outcome quicker. Everyone says, "Okay, you can just roll our more GPU's more GPU's, but run more experiments run more experiments". No no that's not actually it. I want to reduce the time for a an experiment Get it done as quickly as possible so I get that insight. 'Cause then what I can do I can get possibly cancel out a bunch of those jobs that are already running cause I already have the insight, knowing that that model is not doing anything. Alright, so it's very important to get the time down. Jeff Dean said it a few years ago, he uses the same slide often. But, you know, when things are taking months you know that's what happened basically from the 80's up until you know 2010. >> Right >> We didn't have the computation we didn't have the data. Once we were able to get that experimentation time down, we're able to iterate very very quickly on this. >> And throwing GPU's at the problem doesn't solve it because it's too much complexity or? >> It it helps the problem, there's no question. But when my GPU utilization goes from 95% down to 60% ya know I'm getting only a two-thirds return on investment there. It's a really really big deal, yeah. >> Sumit: I mean the key here I think Steven, and I'll draw it out again is this time to insight. Because time to insight actually is time to dollars, right. People are using AI either to make more money, right by providing better customer products, better products to the customers, giving better recommendations. Or they're saving on their operational costs right, they're improving their efficiencies. Maybe their routing their trucks in the right way, their routing their inventory in the right place, they're reducing the amount of inventory that they need. So in all cases you can actually coordinate AI to a revenue outcome or a dollar outcome. So the faster you can do that, you know, I tell most people that I engage with the hardware and software they get from us pays for itself very quickly. Because they make that much more money or they save that much more money, using power systems. >> We, we even see this internally I've heard stories and all that, Sumit kind of commented on this but - There's actually sales people that take this software & hardware out and they're able to get an outcome sometimes in certain situations where they just take the clients data and they're sales people they're not data scientists they train it it's so simple to use then they present the client with the outcomes the next day and the client is just like blown away. This isn't just a one time occurrence, like sales people are actually using this right. So it's getting to the area that it's so simple to use you're able to get those outcomes that we're even seeing it you know deals close quicker. >> Yeah, that's powerful. And Sumit to your point, the business case is actually really easy to make. You can say, "Okay, this initiative that you're driving what's your forecast for how much revenue?" Now lets make an assumption for how much faster we're going to be able to deliver it. And if I can show them a one day turn around, on a corpus of data, okay lets say two months times whatever, my time to break. I can run the business case very easily and communicate to the CFO or whomever the line of business head so. >> That's right. I mean just, I was at a retailer, at a grocery store a local grocery store in the bay area recently and he was telling me how In California we've passed legislation that does not allow plastic bags anymore. You have to pay for it. So people are bringing their own bags. But that's actually increased theft for them. Because people bring their own bag, put stuff in it and walk out. And he didn't want to have an analytic system that can detect if someone puts something in a bag and then did not buy it at purchase. So it's, in many ways they want to use the existing camera systems they have but automatically be able to detect fraudulent behavior or you know anomalies. And it's actually quite easy to do with a lot of the software we have around Power AI Vision, around video analytics from IBM right. And that's what we were talking about right? Take existing trained AI models on vision and enhance them for your specific use case and the scenarios you're looking for. >> Excellent. Guys we got to go. Thanks Steven, thanks Sumit for coming back on and appreciate the insights. >> Thank you >> Glad to be here >> You're welcome. Alright, keep it right there buddy we'll be back with our next guest. You're watching "The Cube" at IBM's CDO Strategy Summit from San Francisco. We'll be right back. (music playing)

(pulsating music) >> Live from Fisherman's Wharf in San Francisco, it's theCUBE! Covering IBM Chief Data Officer Strategy Summit, Spring 2017. Brought to you by IBM. >> Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We're at Fisherman's Wharf in San Francisco at the IBM Chief Data Officer Strategy Summit, Spring 2017. It's a mouthful, it's a great event, and it's one of many CDO summits that IBM's putting in around the country, and soon around the world. So check it out. We're happy to be here and really talk to some of the thought leaders about getting into the nitty gritty detail of strategy and execution. So we're excited to be joined by our next guest, Rebecca Shockley. She's an Analytics Global Research Leader for the IBM Institute for Business Value. Welcome, Rebecca. I didn't know about the IBM Institute for Business Value. >> Thank you. >> Absolutely. And Priya V. She said Priya V's good, so you can see the whole name on the bottom, but Priya V. is the CTO of Cognitive/IOT/Watson Health at IBM. Welcome, Priya. >> Thank you. >> So first off, just impressions of the conference? It's been going on all day today. You've got 170 or some-odd CDO's here sharing best practices, listening to the sessions. Any surprising takeaways coming out of any of the sessions you've been at so far? >> On a daily basis I live and breathe data. That's what I help our customers to get better at it, and today is the day where we get to talk about how can we adopt something which is emerging in that space? We talk about data governance, what we need to look at in that space, and cognitive as being the fabric that we are integrating into this data governance actually. It's a great day, and I'm happy to talk to over, like you said, 170 CDO's representing different verticals. >> Excellent. And Rebecca, you do a lot of core research that feeds a lot of the statistics that we've seen on the keynote slides, this and that. And one of the interesting things we talked about off air, was really you guys are coming up with a playbook which is really to help CDO's basically execute and be successful CDO's. Can you tell us about the playbook? >> Well, the playbook was born out of a Gartner statistic that came out I guess two or three years ago that said by 2016 you'll have 90% of organizations will have a CDO and 50% of them will fail. And we didn't think that was very optimistic. >> Jeff: 90% will have them and 50% will fail? >> Yes, and so I can tell you that based on our survey of 6,000 global executives last fall, the number is at 41% in 2016. And I'm hoping that the playbook kept them from being a failure. So what we did with the playbook is basically laid out the six key questions that an organization needs to think about as they're either putting in a CDO office or revamping their CDO offices. Because Gartner wasn't completely unfounded in thinking a lot of CDO offices weren't doing well when they made that prediction. Because it is very difficult to put in place, mostly because of culture change, right? It's a very different kind of way to think. So, but we're certainly not seeing the turnover we were in the early years of CDO's or hopefully the failure rate that Gartner predicted. >> So what are the top two or three of those six that they need to be thinking about? >> So they need to think about their objectives. And one of the things that we found was that when we look at CDO's, there's three different categories that you can really put them in. A data integrator, so is the CDO primarily focused on getting the data together, getting the quality of the data, really bringing the organization up to speed. The next thing that most organizations look at is being a business optimizer. So can they use that data to optimize their internal processes or their external relationships? And then the third category is market innovator. Can they use that data to really innovate, bring in new business models, new data monetization strategies, things like that. The biggest problem we found is that CDO's that we surveyed, and we surveyed 800 CDO's, we're seeing that they're being assessed on all three of those things, and it's hard to do all three at once, largely because if you're still having to focus on getting your data in a place where you can start doing real science against it you're probably not going to be full-time market innovator either. You can't be full-time in two different places. That's not to say as a data integrator you can't bring in data scientists, do some skunk works on some of the early work, find... and we've seen organizations really, like Bank Itau down in Brazil, really in that early stages still come up with some very innovative things to do, but that's more of a one-off, right. If you're being judged on all three of those, that I think is where the failure rate comes in. >> But it sounds like those are kind of sequential, but you can't operate them sequentially cause in theory you never finish the first phase, right? >> You never finish, you're always keeping up with the data. But for some organizations, they really need to, they're still operating with very dirty, very siloed data that you really can't bring together for analytics. Now once you're able to look at that data, you can be doing the other two, optimizing and innovating, at the same time. But your primary focus has to be on getting the data straight. Once you've got a functioning data ecosystem, then the level of attention that you have to put there is going to go down, and you can start working on, focusing on innovation and optimization more as your full-time role. But no, data integrator never goes away completely. >> And cleanser. Then, that's a great strategy. Then, as you said, then the rubber's got to hit the road. And Priya, that's where you play in, the execution point. Like you say, you like to get your hands dirty with the CDO's. So what are you seeing from your point of view? In terms of actually executing, finding early wins, easy paths to success, you know, how to get those early wins basically, right? To validate what you're doing. That's right. Like you said, it's become a universal fact that data governance and things, everything around consolidating data and the value of insights we get off it, that's been established fact. Now CDO's and the rest of the organization, the CIO's and the CTO's, have this mandate to start executing on them. And how do we go about it? That's part of my job at IBM as well. As a CTO, I work with our customers to identify where are the dominant business value? Where are those things which is completely data-driven? Maybe it is cognitive forecasting, or your business requirement could be how can I maximize 40% of my service channel? Which in the end of the day could be a cognitive-enabled data-driven virtual assistant, which is automating and bringing a TCO of huge incredible value. Those are some of the key execution elements we are trying to bring. But like we said, yes, we have to bring in the data, we have to hire the right talent, and we have to have a strategy. All those great things happen. But I always start with a problem, a problem which actually anchors everything together. A problem is a business problem which demonstrates key business values, so we actually know what we are trying to solve, and work backwards in terms of what is the data element to it, what are the technologies and toolkits that we can put on top of it, and who are the right people that we can involve in parallel with the strategy that we have already established. So that's the way we've been going about. We have seen phenomenal successes, huge results, which has been transformative in nature and not just these 170 CDO's. I mean, we want to make sure every one of our customers is able to take advantage of that. >> But it's not just the CDO, it's the entire business. So the IBM Institute on Business Value looks at an enormous amount of research, or does an enormous amount of research and looks at a lot of different issues. So for example, your CDO report is phenomenal, I think you do one for the CMO, a number of different chief officers. How are other functions or other roles within business starting to acculturate to this notion of data as a driver of new behaviors? And then we can talk about, what are some of those new behaviors? The degree to which the leadership is ready to drive that? >> I think the executive suite is really starting to embrace data much more than it has in the past. Primarily because of the digitization of everything, right. Before, the amount of data that you had was somewhat limited. Often it was internal data, and the quality was suspect. As we started digitizing all the business processes and being able to bring in an enormous amount of external data, I think organizationally executives are getting much more comfortable with the ability to use that data to further their goals within the organization. >> So in general, the chief groups are starting to look at data as a way of doing things differently. >> Absolutely. >> And how is that translating into then doing things differently? >> Yeah, so I was just at the session where we talked about how organizations and business units are even coming together because of data governance and the data itself. Because they are having federated units where a certain part of business is enabled and having new insights because we are actually doing these things. And new businesses like monetizing data is something which is happening now. Data as a service. Actually having data as a platform where people can build new applications. I mean the whole new segment of people as data engineers, full stack developers, and data scientists actually. I mean, they are incubated and they end up building lots of new applications which has never been part of a typical business unit. So these are the cultural and the business changes we are starting to see in many organizations actually. Some of them are leading the way because they just did it without knowing actually that's the way they should be doing it. But that's how it influences many organizations. >> I think you were looking for kind of an example as well, so in the keynote this morning one of the gentlemen was talking about working with their CFO, their risk and compliance office, and were able to take the ability to identify a threat within their ecosystem from two days down to three milliseconds. So that's what can happen once you really start being able to utilize the data that's available to an organization much more effectively, is that kind of quantum leap change in being able to understand what's happening in the marketplace, bing able to understand what's happening with consumers or customers or clients, whichever flavor you have, and we see that throughout the organization. So it's not just the CFO, but the CMO, and being able to do much more targeted, much more focused on the consumer side or the client customer side, that's better for me, right. And the marketing teams are seeing 30, 40% increase in their ability to execute campaigns because they're more data-driven now. >> So has the bit flipped where the business units are now coming to the CDO's office and pounding on the door, saying "I need my team"? As opposed to trying to coerce that you no longer use intuition? >> So it depends upon where you are, where the company is. Because what we call that is the snowball effect. It's one of the reasons you have to have the governance in place and get things going kind of in parallel. Because what we see is that most organizations go in skeptically. They're used to running on their gut instinct. That's how they got their jobs mostly, right? They had good instincts, they made good decisions, they got promoted. And so making that transition to being a data-driven organization can be very difficult. What we find though, is that once one section, one segment, one flavor, one good campaign happens, as soon as those results start to mount up in the organization, you start to see a snowball effect. And what I was hearing particularly last year when I was talking to CDO's was that it had taken them so long to get started, but now they had so much demand coming from the business that they want to look at this, and they want to look at that, and they want to look at the other thing, because once you have results, everybody else in the organization wants those same kind of results. >> Just to add to that, data is not anymore viewed as a commodity. If you have seen valuable organizations who know what their asset is, it's not just a commodity. So the parity of... >> Peter: Or even a liability is what it used to be, right? >> Exactly. >> Peter: It's expensive to hold it and store it, and keep track of it. >> Exactly. So the parity of this is very different right now. So people are talking about, how can I take advantage of the intelligence? So business units, they don't come and pound the door rather they are trying to see what data that I can have, or what intelligence that I can have to make my business different shade, or I can value add something more. That's a type of... So I feel based on the experiences that we work with our customers, it's bringing organizations together. And for certain times, yes sometimes the smartness and the best practices come in place that how we can avoid some of the common mistakes that we do, in terms of replicating 800 times or not knowing who else is using. So some of the tools and techniques help us to master those things. It is bringing organizations and leveraging the intelligence that what you find might be useful to her, and what she finds might be useful. Or what we all don't know, that we go figure it out where we can get it. >> So what's the next step in the journey to increase the democratization of the utilization of that data? Because obviously Chief Data Officers, there aren't that many of them, their teams are relatively small. >> Well, 41% of businesses, so there's a large number of them out there. >> Yeah, but these are huge companies with a whole bunch of business units that have tremendous opportunity to optimize around things that they haven't done yet. So how do we continue to kind of move this democratization of both the access and the tools and the utilization of the insights that they're all sitting on? >> I have some bolder expectations on this, because data and the way in which data becomes an asset, not anymore a liability, actually folds up many of the layers of applications that we have. I used to come from an enterprise background in the past. We had layers of application programming which just used data as one single layer. In terms of opportunities for this, there is a lot more deserving silos and deserving layers of IT in a typical organization. When we build data-driven applications, this is all going to change. It's fascinating. This role is in the front and center of everything actually, around data-driven. And you also heard enough about cognitive computing these days, because it is the key ingredient for cognitive computing. We talked about full ease of cognitive computing. It has to start first learning, and data is the first step in terms of learning. And then it goes into process re-engineering, and then you reinvent things and you disrupt things and you bring new experiences or humanize your solution. So it's on a great trajectory. It's going tochange the way we do things. It's going to give new and unexpected things both from a consumer point and from an enterprise point as well. It'll bring effects like consumerization of enterprises and what-not. So I have bolder and broader expectations out of this fascinating data world. >> I think one of the things that made people hesitant before was an unfamiliarity with thinking about using data, say a CSR on the front line using data instead of the scripts he or she had been given, or their own experience. And I think what we're seeing now is A, everybody's personal life is much more digital than it was before, therefore everybody's somewhat more comfortable with interacting. And B, once you start to see those results and they realize that they can move from having to crunch numbers and do all the background work once we can automate that through robotic process automation or cognitive process automation, and let them focus on the more interesting, higher value parts of their job, we've seen that greatly impact the culture change. The culture change question comes whether people are thinking they're going to lose their job because of the data, or whether it's going to let them do more interesting things with their jobs. And I think hopefully we're getting past that "it's me or it" stage, into the, how can I use data to augment the work that I'm doing, and get more personal satisfaction, if not business satisfaction, out of the work that I'm doing. Hopefully getting rid of some of the mundane. >> I think there's also going to be a lot of software that's created that's going to be created in different ways and have different impacts. The reality is, we're creating data incredibly fast. We know that is has enormous value. People are not going to change that rapidly. New types of algorithms are coming on, but many of the algorithms are algorithms we've had for years, so in many respects it's how we render all of that in some of the new software that's not driven by process but driven by data. >> And the beauty of it is this software will be invisible. It will be self-healing, regeneratable software. >> Invisible to some, but very very highly visible to others. I think that's one of the big challenges that IT organizations face, and businesses face. Is how do they think through that new software? So you talked about today, or historically, you talked about your application stack, where you have stacks which would have some little view of the data, and in many respects we need to free that data up, remove it out of the application so we can do new things with it. So how is that process going to either be facilitated, or impeded by the fact that in so many organizations, data is regarded as a commodity, something that's disposable. Do we need to become more explicit in articulating or talking about what it means to think of data as an asset, as something that's valuable? What do you think? >> Yeah, so in the typical application world, when we start, if you really look at it, data comes at the very end of it. Because people start designing what is going to be their mockups, where are they going to integrate with what sources, am I talking to the bank as an API, et cetera. So the data representation comes at the very end. In the current generation of applications, the cognitive applications that we are building, first we start with the data. We understand what are we working on, and we start applying, taking advantage of machines and all these algorithms which existed like you said, many many decades ago. And we take advantage of machines to automate them to get the intelligence, and then we write applications. So you see the order has changed actually. It's a complete reversal. Yes we had typical three-tier, four-tier architecture. But the order of how we perceive and understand the problem is different. But we are very confident. We are trying to maximize 40% of your sales. We are trying to create digital connected dashboards for your CFO where the entire board can make decisions on the fly. So we know the business outcome, but we are starting with the data. So the fundamental change in how software is built, and all these modules of software which you are talking about, why I mentioned invisible, is some are generatable. The AI and cognitive is advanced in such a way that some are generatable. If it understands the data underlying, it can generate what it should do with the data. That's what we are teaching. That's what ontology and all this is about. So that's why I said it's limitless, it's pretty bold, and it's going to change the way we have done things in the past. And like she said, it's only going to complement humans, because we are always better decision-makers, but we need so much of cognitive capability to aid and supplement our decision-making. So that's going to be the way that we run our businesses. >> All right. Priya's painting a pretty picture. I like it. You know, some people see only the dark side. That's clearly the bright side. That's a terrific story, so thank you. So Priya and Rebecca, thanks for taking a few minutes. Hope you enjoy the rest of the show, surrounded by all this big brain power. And I appreciate you stopping by. >> Thanks so much. >> Thank you. >> All right. Jeff Frick and Peter Burris. You're watching theCUBE from the IBM Chief Data Officers Summit, Spring 2017. We'll be right back after this short break. Thanks for watching. (drums pound) (hands clap rhythmically) >> [Computerized Voice] You really crushed it. (quiet synthesizer music) >> My name is Dave Vellante, and I'm a long-time industry analyst. I was at IDC for a number of years and ran the company's largest and most profitable business. I focused on a lot of areas, infrastructure, software, organizations, the CIO community. Cut my teeth there.

>> Announcer: Live from Fisherman's Wharf in San Francisco, it's theCUBE, covering IBM Chief Data Officer Strategy Summit Spring 2017. Brought to you by IBM. >> Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We're at Fisherman's Wharf in San Francisco at the IBM Chief Data Officer Strategy Summit Spring 2017. It's a mouthful, it's 170 people here, all high-level CXOs learning about data, and it's part of an ongoing series that IBM is doing around chief data officers and data, part of a big initiative with Cognitive and Watson, I'm sure you've heard all about it, Watson TV if nothing else, if not going to the shows, and we're really excited to have the drivers behind this activity with us today, also Peter Burris from Wikibon, chief strategy officer, but we've got Caitlin Lepech who's really driving this whole show. She is the Communications and Client Engagement Executive, IBM Global Chief Data Office. That's a mouthful, she's got a really big card. And Cortnie Abercrombie, who I'm thrilled to see you, seen her many, many times, I'm sure, at the MIT CDOIQ, so she's been playing in this space for a long time. She is a Cognitive and Analytics Offerings leader, IBM Global Business. So first off, welcome. >> Thank you, great to be here. >> Thanks, always a pleasure on theCUBE. It's so comfortable, I forget you guys aren't just buddies hanging out. >> Before we jump into it, let's talk about kind of what is this series? Because it's not World of Watson, it's not InterConnect, it's a much smaller, more intimate event, but you're having a series of them, and in the keynote is a lot of talk about what's coming next and what's coming in October, so I don't know. >> Let me let you start, because this was originally Cortnie's program. >> This was a long time ago. >> 2014. >> Yeah, 2014, the role was just starting, and I was tasked with can we identify and start to build relationships with this new line of business role that's cropping up everywhere. And at that time there were only 50 chief data officers worldwide. And so I-- >> Jeff: 50? In 2014. >> 50, and I can tell you that earnestly because I knew every single of them. >> More than that here today. >> I made it a point of my career over the last three years to get to know every single chief data officer as they took their jobs. I would literally, well, hopefully I'm not a chief data officer stalker, but I basically was calling them once I'd see them on LinkedIn, or if I saw a press announcement, I would call them up and say, "You've got a tough job. "Let me help connect you with each other "and share best practices." And before we knew, it became a whole summit. It became, there were so many always asking to be connected to each other, and how do we share best practices, and what do you guys know as IBM because you're always working with different clients on this stuff? >> And Cortnie and I first started working in 2014, we wrote IBM's first paper on chief data officers, and at the time, there was a lot of skepticism within our organization, why spend the time with data officers? There's other C-suite roles you may want to focus on instead. But we were saying just the rise of data, external data, unstructured data, lot of opportunity to rise in the role, and so, I think we're seeing it reflected in the numbers. Again, first summit three years ago, 30 participants. We have 170 data executives, clients joining us today and tomorrow. >> And six papers later, and we're goin' strong still. >> And six papers later. >> Exactly, exactly. >> Before we jump into the details, some of the really top-level stuff that, again, you talked about with John and David, MIT CDOIQ, in terms of reporting structure. Where do CDOs report? What exactly are they responsible for? You covered some of that earlier in the keynote, I wonder if you can review some of those findings. >> Yeah, that was amazing >> Sure, I can share that, and then, have Cortnie add. So, we find about a third report directly to the CEO, a third report through the CIO's office, sort of the traditional relationship with CIOs, and then, a third, and what we see growing quite a bit, are CXOs, so functional or business line function. Originally, traditionally it was really a spin-off of CIO, a lot of technical folks coming up, and we're seeing more and more the shift to business expertise, and the focus on making sure we're demonstrating the business impact these data programs are driving for our organization. >> Yeah, it kind of started more as a data governance type of role, and so, it was born out of IT to some degree because, but IT was having problems with getting the line of business leaders to come to the table, and we knew that there had to be a shift over to the business leaders to get them to come and share their domain expertise because as every chief data officer will tell you, you can't have lineage or know anything about all of this great data unless you have the experts who have been sitting there creating all of that data through their processes. And so, that's kind of how we came to have this line of business type of function. >> And Inderpal really talked about, in terms of the strategy, if you don't start from the business strategy-- >> Inderpal? >> Yeah, on the keynote. >> Peter: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. >> You are really in big risk of the boiling the ocean problem. I mean, you can't just come at it from the data first. You really have to come at it from the business problem first. >> It was interesting, so Inderpal was one of our clients as a CEO three times prior to rejoining IBM a year ago, and so, Cortnie and I have known him-- >> Express Scripts, Cambia. >> Exactly, we've interviewed him, featured him in our research prior, too, so when he joined IBM in December a year ago, his first task was data strategy. And where we see a lot of our clients struggle is they make data strategy an 18-month, 24-month process, getting the strategy mapped out and implemented. And we say, "You don't have the time for it." You don't have 18 months to come to data, to come to a data strategy and get by and get it implemented. >> Nail something right away. >> Exactly. >> Get it in the door, start showing some results right away. You cannot wait, or your line of business people will just, you know. >> What is a data strategy? >> Sure, so I can say what we've done internally, and then, I know you've worked with a lot of clients on what they're building. For us internally, it started with the value proposition of the data office, and so, we got very clear on what that was, and it was the ability to take internal, external data, structured, unstructured, and pull that together. If I can summarize it, it's drive to cognitive business, and it's infusing cognition across all of our business processes internally. And then, we identified all of these use cases that'll help accelerate, and the catalyst that will get us there faster. And so, Client 360, product catalog, et cetera. We took data strategy, got buy-in at the highest levels at our organization, senior vice president level, and then, once we had that support and mandate from the top, went to the implementation piece. It was moving very quickly to specify, for us, it's about transforming to cognitive business. That then guides what's critical data and critical use cases for us. >> Before you answer, before you get into it, so is a data strategy a means to cognitive, or is it an end in itself? >> I would say it, to be most effective, it's a succinct, one-page description of how you're going to get to that end. And so, we always say-- >> Peter: Of cognitive? >> Exactly, for us, it's cognitive. So, we always ask very simple question, how is your company going to make money? Not today, what's its monetization strategy for the future? For us, it's coming to cognitive business. I have a lot of clients that say, "We're product-centric. "We want to become customer, client-centric. "That's our key piece there." So, it's that key at the highest level for us becoming a cognitive business. >> Well, and data strategies are as big or as small as you want them to be, quite frankly. They're better when they have a larger vision, but let's just face it, some companies have a crisis going on, and they need to know, what's my data strategy to get myself through this crisis and into the next step so that I don't become the person whose cheese moved overnight. Am I giving myself away? Do you all know the cheese, you know, Who Moved My Cheese? >> Every time the new iOS comes up, my wife's like-- >> I don't know if the younger people don't know that term, I don't think. >> Ah, but who cares about them? >> Who cares about the millenials? I do, I love the millenials. But yes, cheese, you don't want your cheese to move overnight. >> But the reason I ask the question, and the reason why I think it's important is because strategy is many things to many people, but anybody who has a view on strategy ultimately concludes that the strategic process is what's important. It's the process of creating consensus amongst planners, executives, financial people about what we're going to do. And so, the concept of a data strategy has to be, I presume, as crucial to getting the organization to build a consensus about the role the data's going to play in business. >> Absolutely. >> And that is the hardest. That is the hardest job. Everybody thinks of a data officer as being a technical, highly technical person, when in fact, the best thing you can be as a chief data officer is political, very, very adept at politics and understanding what drives the business forward and how to bring results that the CEO will get behind and that the C-suite table will get behind. >> And by politics here you mean influencing others to get on board and participate in this process? >> Even just understanding, sometimes leaders of business don't articulate very well in terms of data and analytics, what is it that they actually need to accomplish to get to their end goal, and you find them kind of stammering when it comes to, "Well, I don't really know "how you as Inderpal Bhandari can help me, "but here's what I've got to do." And it's a crisis usually. "I've got to get this done, "and I've got to make these numbers by this date. "How can you help me do that?" And that's when the chief data officer kicks into gear and is very creative and actually brings a whole new mindset to the person to understand their business and really dive in and understand, "Okay, this is how "we're going to help you meet that sales number," or, "This is how we're going to help you "get the new revenue growth." >> In certain respects, there's a business strategy, and then, you have to resource the business strategy. And the data strategy then is how are we going to use data as a resource to achieve our business strategy? >> Cortnie: Yes. >> So, let me test something. The way that we at SiliconANGLE, Wikibon have defined digital business is that a business, a digital business uses data as an asset to differentially create and keep customers. >> Caitlin: Right. >> Does that work for you guys? >> Cortnie: Yeah, sure. >> It's focused on, and therefore, you can look at a business and say is it more or less digital based on how, whether it's more or less focused on data as an asset and as a resource that's going to differentiate how it's business behaves and what it does for customers. >> Cortnie: And it goes from the front office all the way to the back. >> Yes, because it's not just, but that's what, create and keep, I'm borrowing from Peter Drucker, right. Peter Drucker said the goal of business is to create and keep customers. >> Yeah, that's right. Absolutely, at the end of the day-- >> He included front end and back end. >> You got to make money and you got to have customers. >> Exactly. >> You got to have customers to make the money. >> So data becomes a de-differentiating asset in the digital business, and increasingly, digital is becoming the differentiating approach in all business. >> I would argue it's not the data, because everybody's drowning in data, it's how you use the data and how creative you can be to come up with the methods that you're going to employ. And I'll give you an example. Here's just an example that I've been using with retailers lately. I can look at all kinds of digital exhaust, that's what we call it these days. Let's say you have a personal digital shopping experience that you're creating for these new millenials, we'll go with that example, because shoppers, 'cause retailers really do need to get more millenials in the door. They're used to their Amazon.coms and their online shopping, so they're trying to get more of them in the door. When you start to combine all of that data that's underlying all of these cool things that you're doing, so personal shopping, thumbs up, thumb down, you like this dress, you like that cut, you like these heels? Yeah, yes, yes or no, yes or no. I'm getting all this rich data that I'm building with my app, 'cause you got to be opted in, no violating privacy here, but you're opting in all the way along, and we're building and building, and so, we even have, for us, we have this Metro Pulse retail asset that we use that actually has hyperlocal information. So, you could, knowing that millenials like, for example, food trucks, we all like food trucks, let's just face it, but millenials really love food trucks. You could even, if you are a retailer, you could even provide a fashion truck directly to their location outside their office equipped with things that you know they like because you've mined that digital exhaust that's coming off the personal digital shopping experience, and you've understood how they like to pair up what they've got, so you're doing a next best action type of thing where you're cross-selling, up-selling. And now, you bring it into the actual real world for them, and you take it straight to them. That's a new experience, that's a new millennial experience for retail. But it's how creative you are with all that data, 'cause you could have just sat there before and done nothing about that. You could have just looked at it and said, "Well, let's run some reports, "let's look at a dashboard." But unless you actually have someone creative enough, and usually it's a pairing of data scientist, chief data officers, digital officers all working together who come up with these great ideas, and it's all based, if you go back to what my example was, that example is how do I create a new experience that will get millenials through my doors, or at least get them buying from me in a different way. If you think about that was the goal, but how I combined it was data, a digital process, and then, I put it together in a brand new way to take action on it. That's how you get somewhere. >> Let me see if I can summarize very quickly. And again, just as an also test, 'cause this is the way we're looking at it as well, that there's human beings operate and businesses operate in an analog world, so the first test is to take analog data and turn it into digital data. IOT does that. >> Cortnie: Otherwise, there's not digital exhaust. >> Otherwise, there's no digital anything. >> Cortnie: That's right. >> And we call it IOT and P, Internet of Things and People, because of the people element is so crucial in this process. Then we have analytics, big data, that's taking those data streams and turning them into models that have suggestions and predictions about what might be the right way to go about doing things, and then there's these systems of action, or what we've been calling systems of enactment, but we're going to lose that battle, it's probably going to be called systems of action that then take and transduce the output of the model back into the real world, and that's going to be a combination of digital and physical. >> And robotic process automation. We won't even introduce that yet. >> Which is all great. >> But that's fun. >> That's going to be in October. >> But I really like the example that you gave of the fashion truck because people don't look at a truck and say, "Oh, that's digital business." >> Cortnie: Right, but it manifested in that. >> But it absolutely is digital business because the data allows you to bring a more personal experience >> Understand it, that's right. >> right there at that moment, and it's virtually impossible to even conceive of how you can make money doing that unless you're able to intercept that person with that ensemble in a way that makes both parties happy. >> And wouldn't that be cheaper than having big, huge retail stores? Someone's going to take me up on that. Retailers are going to take me up on this, I'm telling you. >> But I think the other part is-- >> Right next to the taco truck. >> There could be other trucks in that, a much cleaner truck, and this and that. But one thing, Cortnie, you talk about and you got to still have a hypothesis, I think of the early false promises of big data and Hadoop, just that you throw all this stuff in, and the answer just comes out. That just isn't the way. You've got to be creative, and you have to have a hypothesis to test, and I'm just curious from your experience, how ready are people to take in the external data sources and the unstructured data sources and start to incorporate that in with the proprietary data, 'cause that's a really important piece of the puzzle? It's very different now. >> I think they're ready to do it, it depends on who in the business you are working with. Digital offices, marketing offices, merchandising offices, medical offices, they're very interested in how can we do this, but they don't know what they need. They need guidance from a data officer or a data science head, or something like this, because it's all about the creativity of what can I bring together to actually reach that patient diagnostic, that whatever the case may be, the right fashion truck mix, or whatever. Taco Tuesday. >> So, does somebody from the chief data office, if you will, you know, get assigned to, you're assigned to marketing and you're assigned to finance, and you're assigned to sales. >> I have somebody assigned to us. >> To put this in-- >> Caitlin: Exactly, exactly. >> To put this in kind of a common or more modern parlance, there's a design element. You have to have use case design, and what are we going, how are we going to get better at designing use cases so we can go off and explore the role that data is going to play, how we're going to combine it with other things, and to your point, and it's a great point, how that turns into a new business activity. >> And if I can connect two points there, the single biggest question I get from clients is how do you prioritize your use cases. >> Oh, gosh, yeah. >> How can you help me select where I'm going to have the biggest impact? And it goes, I think my thing's falling again. (laughing) >> Jeff: It's nice and quiet in here. >> Okay, good. It goes back to what you were saying about data strategy. We say what's your data strategy? What's your overarching mission of the organization? For us, it's becoming cognitive business, so for us, it's selecting projects where we can infuse cognition the quickest way, so Client 360, for example. We'll often say what's your strategy, and that guides your prioritization. That's the question we get the most, what use case do I select? Where am I going to have the most impact for the business, and that's where you have to work with close partnership with the business. >> But is it the most impact, which just sounds scary, and you could get in analysis paralysis, or where can I show some impact the easiest or the fastest? >> You're going to delineate both, right? >> Exactly. >> Inderpal's got his shortlist, and he's got his long list. Here's the long term that we need to be focused on to make sure that we are becoming holistically a cognitive company so that we can be flexible and agile in this marketplace and respond to all kinds of different situations, whether they're HR and we need more skills and talent, 'cause let's face it, we're a technology company who's rapidly evolving to fit with the marketplace, or whether it's just good old-fashioned we need more consultants. Whatever the case may be. >> Always, always. >> Yes! >> I worked my business in. >> More consultants! >> Alright, we could go, we could go and go and go, but we're running out of time, we had a full slate. >> Caitlin: We just started. >> I know. >> I agree, we're just starting this convers, I started a whole other conversation to him. We haven't even hit the robotics yet. >> We need to keep going, guys. >> Get control. >> Cortnie: Less coffee for us. >> What do people think about when they think about this series? What should they look forward to, what's the next one for the people that didn't make it here today, where should they go on the calendar and book in their calendars? >> So, I'll speak to the summits first. It's great, we do Spring in San Francisco. We'll come back, reconvene in Boston in fall, so that'll be September, October frame. I'm seeing two other trends, which I'm quite excited about, we're also looking at more industry-specific CDO summits. So, for those of our friends that are in government sectors, we'll be in June 6th and 7th at a government CDO summit in D.C., so we're starting to see more of the industry-specific, as well as global, so we just ran our first in Rio, Brazil for that area. We're working on a South Africa summit. >> Cortnie: I know, right. >> We actually have a CDO here with us that traveled from South Africa from a bank to see our summit here and hoping to take some of that back. >> We have several from Peru and Mexico and Chile, so yeah. >> We'll continue to do our two flagship North America-based summits, but I'm seeing a lot of growth out in our geographies, which is fantastic. >> And it was interesting, too, in your keynote talking about people's request for more networking time. You know, it is really a sharing of best practices amongst peers, and that cannot be overstated. >> Well, it's community. A community is building. >> It really is. >> It's a family, it really is. >> We joke, this is a reunion. >> We all come in and hug, I don't know if you noticed, but we're all hugging each other. >> Everybody likes to hug their own team. It's a CUBE thing, too. >> It's like therapy. It's like data therapy, that's what it is. >> Alright, well, Caitlin, Cortnie, again, thanks for having us, congratulations on a great event, and I'm sure it's going to be a super productive day. >> Thank you so much. Pleasure. >> Thanks. >> Jeff Frick with Peter Burris, you're watchin' theCUBE from the IBM Chief Data Officer Summit Spring 2017 San Francisco, thanks for watching. (electronic keyboard music)

>> (lively music) (lively music) >> [Narrator] Live, from Fisherman's Wharf in San Francisco, it's theCUBE. Covering IBM Chief Data Officers Strategy Summit Spring 2017. Brought to you by IBM. >> Hey, welcome back everybody. >> Jeff Flick here with theCUBE alongside Peter Burris, our chief research officer from Wikibon. We're at the IBM Chief Data Officers Strategy Summit Sprint 2017. It's a mouthful but it's an important event. There's 170 plus CDO's here sharing information, really binding their community, sharing best practices and of course, IBM is sharing their journey which is pretty interesting cause they're taking their own transformational journey, writing up a blue print and going to deliver it in October. Drinking their own champagne as they like to say. We're really excited to have CUBE alumni, many time visitor Seth Dobrin. He is the chief data officer of IBM Analytics. Seth welcome. >> Yeah, thanks for having me again. >> Absolutely, so again, these events are interesting. There's a series of them. They're in multiple cities. They're, now, going to go to multiple countries. And it's really intended, I believe, or tell me, it's a learning experience in this great, little, tight community for this, very specific, role. >> Yeah, so these events are, actually, really good. I've been participating in these since the second one. >> So, since the first one in Boston about 2 1/2 years ago. They're really great events because it's an opportunity for CDO's or de facto CDO's in organizations to have in depth conversations with their peers about struggles, challenges, successes. >> It really helps to, kind of, one piece says you can benchmark yourself, how are we doing as an organization and how am I doing as a CDO and where do I fit within the bigger community or within your industry? >> How have you seen it evolve? Not just the role, per say, but some of the specific challenges or implementation issues that these people have had in trying to deliver a value inside their company. >> Yeah, so when they started, three years ago, there, really, were not a whole lot of tools that CDO's could use to solve your data science problems, to solve your cloud problems, to solve your governance problem. We're starting to get to a place in the world where there are actual tools out there that help you do these things. So you don't struggle to figure out how do I find talent that can build the tools internally and deploy em. It's now getting the talent to, actually, start implementing things that already exist. >> Is the CDO job well enough defined at this point in time? Do you think that you can, actually, start thinking about tools as opposed to the challenges of the business? In other words, is every CDO different or are the practices, now, becoming a little bit more and the conventions becoming a little bit better understood and stable so you >> can outdo a better job of practicing the CDO role? >> Yeah, I think today, the CDO role is still very ill defined. It's, really, industry by industry and company by company even, CDO's play different roles within each of those. I've only been with IBM for the last four months. I've been spending a lot of that time talking to our clients. Financial services, manufacturing, all over the board and really, the CDO's in those people are all industry specific, they're in different places and even company by company, they're in different places. It really depends on where the company's are on their data and digital journey what role the CDO has. Is it really a defensive play to make sure we're not going to violate any regulations or is it an offensive play and how do we disrupt our industry instead of being disrupted because, really, every industry is in a place where you're either going to be the disruptor or you're going to be the distruptee. And so, that's the scope, the breadth of, I think, the role the CDO plays. >> Do you see it all eventually converging to a common point? Cause, obviously, the CFO and the CMO, those are pretty good at standardized functions over time that wasn't always that way. >> Well, I sure hope it does. I think CDO's are becoming pretty pervasive. I think you're starting to see, when this started, the first one I went to, there were, literally, 35 people >> and only 1/2 of then were called CDO's. We've progressed now where we've got 100 people over 170 some odd people that are here that are CDO's. Most of them have the CDO title even. >> The fact that that title is much more pervasive says that we're heading that way. I think industry by industry you'll start seeing similar responsibilities for CDO's but I don't think you'll start seeing it across the board like a CFO where a CFO does the same thing regardless of the industry. I don't think you'll see that in a CDO for quite some time. >> Well one of the things, certainly, we find interesting is that the role the data's playing in business involvement. And it, partly, the CDO's job is to explain to his or her peers, at that chief level, how using data is going to change the way that they do things from the way that they're function works. And that's part of the reason, I think, why you're suggesting that on a vertical basis that the CDO's job is different. Cause different industries are being impacted themselves by data differently. So as you think about the job that you're performing and the job the CDO's are performing, what part is technical? What part is organizational? What part is political? Et cetera. >> I think a lot of the role of a CDO is political. Most of the CDO's that I know have built their careers on stomping on people's toes. How do I drive change by infringing on other people's turf effectively? >> Peter: In a nice way. >> Well, it depends. In the appropriate way, right? >> Peter: In a productive way. >> In the appropriate way. It could be nice, it could not be nice >> depending on the politics and the culture of the organization. I think a lot of the role of a CDO, it's, almost, like chief disruption officer as much as it is data officer. I think it's a lot about using data >> but, I think, more importantly, it's about using analytics. >> So how do you use analytics to, actually, drive insights and next best action from the data? I think just looking at data and still using gut based on data is not good enough. For chief data officers to really have an impact and really be successful, it's how do you use analytics on that data whether it's machine learning, deep learning, operations research, to really change how the business operates? Because as chief data officers, you need to justify your existence a lot. The way you do that is you tie real value to decisions that your company is making. The data and the analytics that are needed for those decisions. That's, really, the role of a CDO in my mind is, how do I tie value of data based on decisions and how do I use analytics to make those decisions more effective? >> Were the early days more defensive and now, shifting to offensive? It sounds like it. That's a typical case where you use technology, initially, often to save money before you start to use it to create new value, new revenue streams. Is that consistent here? By answering that, you say they have to defend themselves sometimes when you would think it'd be patently obvious >> that if you're not getting on a data software defined train, you're going to be left behind. >> I think there's two types. There's CDO's that are there to protect freedom to operate and that's what I call, think of, as defensive. And then, there's offensive CDO's and that's really bringing more value out of existing processes. In my mind, every company is on this digital transformation journey and there's two steps to it. >> One is this data science transformation which is where you use data and analytics to accelerate your businesses current goals. How do I use data analytics to accelerate my businesses march towards it's current goals? Then there's the second stage which is the true digital transformation which is how do I use data and analytics to, fundamentally, change how my industry and my company operates? So, actually, changing the goals of the industry. For example, moving from selling physical products to selling outcomes. You can't do that until you've done this data transformation till you've started operating on data, till you've started operating on analytics. You can't sell outcomes until you've done that. It's this two step journey. >> You said this a couple of times and I want to test an idea on you and see what you think. Industry classifications are tied back to assets. So, you look at industries and they have common organization of assets, right? >> Seth: Yep. Data, as an asset, has very, very, different attributes because it can be shared. It's not scarce, it's something that can be shared. As we become more digital and as this notion of data science or analytics, the world of data places in asset and analytics plays as assets becomes more pervasive, does that start to change the notion of industry because, now, by using data differently, you can use other assets and deploy other assets differently? >> Yeah, I think it, fundamentally, changes how business operates and even how businesses are measured because you hit on this point pretty well which is data is reusable. And so as I build these data or digital assets, the quality of a company's margins should change. For every dollar of revenue I generate. Maybe today I generate 15% profit. As you start moving to a digital being a more digital company built on data and analytics, that percent of profit based on revenue should go up. Because these assets that you're building to reuse them is extremely cheap. I don't have to build another factory to scale up, I buy a little bit more compute time. Or I develop a new machine learning model. And so it's very scalable unlike building physical products. I think you will see a fundamental shift in how businesses are measured. What standards that investors hold businesses to. I think, another good point is, a mind set shift that needs to happen for companies is that companies need to stop thinking of data as a digital dropping of applications and start thinking of it as an asset. Cause data has value. It's no longer just something that's dropped on the table from applications that I built. It's we are building to, fundamentally, create data to drive analytics, to generate value, to build new revenue for a company that didn't exist today. >> Well the thing that changes the least, ultimately, is the customer. And so it suggests that companies that have customers can use data to get in a new product, or new service domains faster than companies who don't think about data as an asset and are locked into how can I take my core set up, my organization, >> my plant, my machinery and keep stamping out something that's common to it or similar to it. So this notion of customer becomes the driver, increasingly, of what industry you're in or what activities you perform. Does that make sense? >> I think everything needs to be driven from the prospective of the customer. As you become a data driven or a digital company, everything needs to be shifted in that organization from the perspective of the customer. Even companies that are B to B. B to B companies need to start thinking about what is the ultimate end user. How are they going to use what I'm building, for my business partner, my B to B partner, >> what is their, actual, human being that's sitting down using it, how are they going to use it? How are they going to interact with it? It really, fundamentally, changes how businesses approach B to B relationships. It, fundamentally, changes the type of information that, if I'm a B to B company, how do I get more information about the end users and how do I connect? Even if I don't come in direct contact with them, how do I understand how they're using my product better. That's a fundamental just like you need to stop thinking of data as a digital dropping. Every question needs to come from how is the end user, ultimately, going to use this? How do I better deploy that? >> So the utility that the customer gets capturing data about the use of that, the generation of that utility and drive it all the way back. Does the CDO have to take a more explicit role in getting people to see that? >> Yes, absolutely. I think that's part of the cultural shift that needs to happen. >> Peter: So how does the CDO do that? >> I think every question needs to start with what impact does this have on the end user? >> What is the customer perspective on this? Really starting to think about. >> I'm sorry for interrupting. I'd turn that around. I would say it's what impact does the customer have on us? Because you don't know unless you capture data. That notion of the customer impact measurement >> which we heard last time, the measureability and then drive that all the way back. That seems like it's going to become an increasingly, a central design point. >> Yeah, it's a loop and you got to start using these new methodologies that are out there. These design thinking methodologies. It's not just about building an Uber app. It's not just about building an app. It's about how do I, fundamentally, shift my business to this design thinking methodology to start thinking cause that's what design thinking is all about. It's all about how is this going to be used? And every aspect of your business you need to approach that way. >> Seth, I'm afraid they're going to put us in the chaffing dish here if we don't get off soon. >> Seth: I think so too, yeah. >> So we're going to leave it there. It's great to see you again and we look forward to seeing you at the next one of these things. >> Yeah, thanks so much. >> He's Seth, he's Peter, I'm Jeff. You're watching theCUBE from the IBM Chief Data Officers Strategy Summit Spring 2017, I got it all in in a mouthful. We'll be back after lunch which they're >> setting up right now. (laughs) (lively music) (drum beats)

>> live from Boston, Massachusetts. >> It's the Cube >> covering IBM Chief Data Officer Strategy Summit brought to you by IBM. Now, here are your hosts. Day villain Day and >> stew minimum. Welcome back to Boston, everybody. This is the IBM Chief Data Officer Summit. And this is the Cube, the worldwide leader in live tech coverage. Caitlin Lepic is here. She's an executive within the chief data officer office at IBM. And she's joined by Dave Shoot Mel, who's a research director at, uh D. C. And he covers cognitive systems and content analytics. Folks, welcome to the Cube. Good to see you. Thank you. Can't. Then we'll start with you. You were You kicked off the morning and I referenced the Forbes article or CDOs. Miracle workers. That's great. I hadn't read that article. You put up their scanned it very quickly, but you set up the event. It started yesterday afternoon at noon. You're going through, uh, this afternoon? What's it all about? This is evolved. Since, what, 2014 >> it has, um, we started our first CDO summit back in 2014. And at that time, we estimated there were maybe 200 or so CDOs worldwide, give or take and we had 30, 30 people at our first event. and we joked that we had one small corner of the conference room and we were really quite excited to start the event in 30 2014. And we've really grown. So this year we have about 170 folks joining us, 70 of which are CEOs, more acting, the studios in the organization. And so we've really been able to grow the community over the last two years and are really excited to see to see how we can continue to do that moving forward. >> And IBM has always had a big presence at the conference that we've covered the CDO event. So that's nice that you can leverage that community and continue to cultivate it. Didn't want to ask you, so it used that we were talking when we first met this morning. It used to be dated was such a wonky topic, you know, data was data value. People would try to put a value on data, and but it was just a really kind of boring but important topic. Now it's front and center with cognitive with analytics. What are you seeing in the marketplace. >> Yeah, I think. Well, what we're seeing in the market is this emphasis on predictive applications, predictive analytics, cognitive applications, artificial intelligence of deep learning. All of those those types of applications are derived and really run by data. So unless you have really good authoritative data to actually make these models work, you know, the systems aren't going to be effective. So we're seeing an emerging marketplace in both people looking at how they can leverage their first party data, which, you know, IBM is really talking about what you know, Bob Picciotto talked about this morning. But also, we're seeing thie emergency of a second party and third party data market to help build these models out even further so that I think that's what we're really seeing is the combination of the third party data along with the first party data really being the instrument for building these kind of predictive models, you know, they're going to take us hopefully, you know, far into the future. >> Okay, so, Caitlin square the circle for us. So the CDO roll generally is not perceived. Is it technology role? Correct. Yet as Davis to saying, we're talking about machine learning cognitive. Aye, aye. These air like heavy technical topics. So how does the miracle worker deal with all this stuff generally? And how does IBM deal with it inside the CDO office? Specifically? >> Sure. So it is. It's a very good point, you know, Traditionally, Seo's really have a business background, and we find that the most successful CDO sit in the business organization. So they report somewhere in a line of business. Um, and there are certainly some that have a technical background, but far more come from business background and sit in the business. I can't tell you how we are setting up our studio office at IBM. Um, so are new. And our first global chief date officer joined in December of last year. Interpol Bhandari, um and I started working for him shortly thereafter, and the way he's setting up his office is really three pillars. So first and foremost, we focused on the data engineering data sign. So getting that team in place next, it's information, governance and policy. How are we going to govern access, manage, work with data, both data that we own within our organization as well as the long list of of external data sources that that we bring in and then third is the business integration filler. So the idea is CDOs are going to be most successful when they deliver those data Science data engineering. Um, they manage and govern the data, but they pull it through the business, so ensuring that were really, you know, grounded in business unit and doing this. And so those there are three primary pillars at this point. So prior >> to formalizing the CDO role at I b m e mean remnants of these roles existed. There was a date, equality, you know, function. There was certainly governance in policy, and somebody was responsible to integrate between, you know, from the i t. To the applications, tow the business. Were those part of I t where they sort of, you know, by committee and and how did you bring all those pieces together? That couldn't have been trivial, >> and I would say it's filling. It's still going filling ongoing process. But absolutely, I would say they typically resided within particular business units, um, and so certainly have mature functions within the unit. But when we're looking for enterprise wide answers to questions about certain customers, certain business opportunities. That's where I think the role the studio really comes in and what we're What we're doing now is we are partnering very closely with business units. One example is IBM analytic. Seen it. So we're here with Bob Luciano and other business units to ensure that, as they provide us, you know, their data were able to create the single trusted source of data across the organization across the enterprise. And so I agree with you, I think, ah, lot of those capabilities and functions quite mature, they, you know, existed within units. And now it's about pulling that up to the enterprise level and then our next step. The next vision is starting to make that cognitive and starting to add some of those capabilities in particular data science, engineering, the deep learning on starting to move toward cognitive. >> Dave, I think Caitlin brought up something really interesting. We've been digging into the last couple of years is you know, there's that governance peace, but a lot of CEOs are put into that role with a mandate for innovation on. That's something that you know a lot of times it has been accused of not being all that innovative. Is that what you're seeing? You know what? Because some of the kind of is it project based or, you know, best initiatives that air driving forward with CEOs. I think what we're seeing is that enterprises they're beginning to recognize that it's not just enough to be a manufacturer. It's not just enough to be a retail organization. You need to be the one of the best one of the top two or the top three. And the only way to get to that top two or top three is to have that innovation that you're talking about and that innovation relies on having accurate data for decision making. It also relies on having accurate data for operations. So we're seeing a lot of organizations that are really, you know, looking at how data and predictive models and innovation all become part of the operational fabric of a company. Uh, you know, and if you think about the companies that are there, you know, just beating it together. You know Amazon, for example. I mean, Amazon is a completely data driven company. When you get your recommendations for, you know what to buy, or that's all coming from the data when they set up these logistics centers where they're, you know, shipping the latest supplies. They're doing that because they know where their customers are. You know, they have all this data, so they're they're integrating data into their day to day decision making. And I think that's what we're seeing, You know, throughout industry is this this idea of integrating decision data into the decision making process and elevating it? And I think that's why the CDO rule has become so much more important over the last 2 to 3 years. >> We heard this morning at 88% percent of data is dark data. Papa Geno talked about that. So thinking about the CEOs scope roll agenda, you've got data sources. You've gotto identify those. You gotta deal with data quality and then Dave, with some of the things you've been talking about, you've got predictive models that out of the box they may not be the best predictive models in the world. You've got iterated them. So how does an organization, because not every organizations like Amazon with virtually unlimited resource is capital? How does an organization balance What are you seeing in terms of getting new data sources? Refining those data source is putting my emphasis on the data vs refining and calibrating the predictive models. How organizations balancing that Maybe we start with how IBM is doing. It's what you're seeing in the field. >> So So I would say, from what we're doing from a setting up the chief data office role, we've taken a step back to say, What's the company's monitor monetization strategy? Not how your mind monetizing data. How are how are you? What's your strategy? Moving forward, Um, for Mance station. And so with IBM we've talked about it is moved to enabling cognition throughout the enterprise. And so we've really talked about taking all of your standard business processes, whether they be procurement HR finance and infusing those with cognitive and figuring out how to make those smarter. We talking examples with contracts, for example. Every organization has a lot of contracts, and right now it's, you know, quite a manual process to go through and try and discern the sorts of information you need to make better decisions and optimize the contract process. And so the idea is, you start with that strategy for us. IBM, it's cognitive. And that then dictates what sort of data sources you need. Because that's the problem you're trying to solve in the opportunity you're chasing down. And so then we talk about Okay, we've got some of that data currently residing today internally, typically in silos, typically in business units, you know, some different databases. And then what? What are longer term vision is, is we want to build the intelligence that pulls in that internal data and then really does pull in the external data that we've that we've all talked about. You know, the social data, the sentiment analysis, analysis, the weather. You know, all of that sort of external data to help us. Ultimately, in our value proposition, our mission is, you know, data driven enablement cognition. So helps us achieve our our strategy there. >> Thank you, Dad, to that. Yeah, >> I mean, I think I mean, you could take a number of examples. I mean, there's there's ah, uh, small insurance company in Florida, for example. Uh, and what they've done is they have organized their emergency situation, their emergency processing to be able to deal with tweets and to be able to deal with, you know, SMS messages and things like that. They're using sentiment analysis. They're using Tex analytics to identify where problems are occurring when hurricane happens. So they're what they're doing is they're they're organizing that kind of data and >> there and there were >> relatively small insurance company. And a lot of this is being done to the cloud, but they're basically getting that kind of sentiment analysis being ableto interpret that and add that to their decision making process. About where should I land a person? Where should I land? You know, an insurance adjuster and agent, you know, based on the tweets, that air coming in rather than than just the phone calls that air coming into the into the organization, you know? So that's a That's a simple example. And you were talking about Not everybody has the resources of an Amazon, but, you know, certainly small insurance companies, small manufacturers, small retail organizations, you, Khun get started by, you know, analyzing your You know what people are saying about you. You know, what are people saying about me on Twitter? What are people saying about me on Facebook? You know how can I use that to improve my customer service? Uh, you know, we're seeing ah whole range of solutions coming out, and and IBM actually has a broad range of solutions for things like that. But, you know, they're not the only points out there. There's there's a lot of folks do it that kind of thing, you know, in terms of the dark data analysis and barely providing that, you know, as part of the solution to help people make better decisions. >> So the answers to the questions both You're doing both new sources of data and trying to improve the the the analytics and the models. But it's a balancing act, and you could come back to the E. R. A. Y question. It sounds like IBM strategies to supercharge your existing businesses by infusing them with new data and new insights. Is >> that correctly? I would say that is correct. >> Okay, where is in many cases, the R A. Y of analytics projects that date have been a reduction on investment? You know, I'm going to move stuff from my traditional W two. A dupe is cheaper, and we feels like Dave, we're entering a new wave now maybe could talk about that a little bit. >> Yeah. I mean, I think I think there's a desk in the traditional way of measuring ROI. And I think what people are trying to do now is look at how you mentioned disruption, for example. You know what I think? Disruption is a huge opportunity. How can I increase my sales? How can I increase my revenue? How can I find new customers, you know, through these mechanisms? And I think that's what we're starting to see in the organization. And we're starting to see start ups that are dedicated to providing this level of disruption and helping address new markets. You know, by using these kinds of technologies, uh, in in new and interesting ways. I mean, everybody uses the airbnb example. Everybody uses uber example. You know that these are people who don't own cars. They don't know what hotel rooms. But, you know, they provide analytics to disrupt the hotel industry and disrupt the taxi industry. It's not just limited to those two industries. It's, you know, virtually everything you know. And I think that's what we're starting to see is this height of, uh, virtual disruption based on the dark data, uh, that people can actually begin to analyze >> within IBM. Uh, the chief data officer reports to whom. >> So the way we've set up in our organization is our CBO reports to our senior vice president of transformation and operations, who then reports to our CEO our recommendation as we talked with clients. I mean, we see this as a CEO level reporting relationship, and and oftentimes we advocate, you know, for that is where we're talking with customers and clients. It fits nicely in our organization within transformation operations, because this line is really responsible for transforming IBM. And so they're really charged with a number of initiatives throughout the organization to have better skills alignment with some of the new opportunities. To really improve process is to bring new folks on board s. So it made sense to fit within, uh, organization that the mandate is really transformation of the company of the >> and the CDO was a peer of the CIA. Is that right? Yes. >> Yes, that's right. That's right. Um, and then in our organization, the role of split and that we have a chief data officer as well as a chief analytics officer. Um, but, you know, we often see one person serving both of those roles as well. So that's kind of, you know, depend on the organizational structure of the company. >> So you can't run the business. So to grow the business, which I guess is the P and L manager's role and transformed the business, which is where the CDO comes. >> Right? Right, right. Exactly. >> I can't give you the last word. Sort of Put a bumper sticker on this event. Where do you want to see it go? In the future? >> Yes. Eso last word. You know, we try Tio, we tried a couple new things. Uh, this this year we had our deep dive breakout sessions yesterday. And the feedback I've been hearing from folks is the opportunity to talk about certain topics they really care about. Is their governance or is innovation being able to talk? How do you get started in the 1st 90 days? What? What do you do first? You know, we we have sort of a five steps that we talk through around, you know, getting your data strategy and your plan together and how you execute against that. Um And I have to tell you, those topics continue to be of interest to our to our participants every year. So we're going to continue to have those, um, and I just I love to see the community grow. I saw the first Chief data officer University, you know, announced earlier this year. I did notice a lot of PR and media around. Role of studio is miracle workers, As you mentioned, doing a lot of great work. So, you know, we're really supportive. Were big supporters of the role we'll continue to host in person events. Uh, do virtual events continue to support studios? To be successful on our big plug is will be world of Watson. Eyes are big IBM Analytics event in October, last week of October in Vegas. So we certainly invite folks to join us. There >> will be, >> and he'll be there. Right? >> Get still, try to get Jimmy on. So, Jenny, if you're watching, talking to come on the Q. >> So we do a second interview >> and we'll see. We get Teo, And I saw Hillary Mason is going to be the oh so fantastic to see her so well. Excellent. Congratulations. on being ahead of the curve with the chief date officer can theme. And I really appreciate you coming to Cube, Dave. Thank you. Thank you. All right, Keep right there. Everybody stew and I were back with our next guest. We're live from the Chief Data Officers Summit. IBM sze event in Boston Right back. My name is Dave Volante on DH. I'm a longtime industry analysts.