>> From Palo Alto, California, it's theCUBE, covering the Conference Board's Sixth Annual Innovation Master Class. (fast techno music) >> Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We are at the Innovation Master Collab at Xerox PARC. It's put on by the Conference Board, a relatively small event, but really, a lot of high-caliber individuals giving really great presentations. And we're excited about our next guest, he kicked the whole thing off this morning, and we could go for hours. We won't go for hours, we'll go about 10 minutes. But Peter Coffee, he's the VP of Strategic Research for Salesforce. Been there a long time, but you were a media guy before that for many, many years? So Peter, great to see you. >> It's good to be with you, thanks. >> So, you talk about so many things. So many things in your opening statement, and I have a ton of notes. But let's just jump into it, I think. One of the big things is you know, the future happens faster than we expect it. And we as humans have a really hard time with exponential growth, because it's not built that way. That's the way things move. >> So how do you as a businessperson kind of deal with that reality? Because the issue is you're never going to be ready for when they come. >> Yeah, well, it's not just humans as individuals, but the institutions and processes we've built. If you look at the process of getting a college degree, it's really seriously misaligned with the timeframe of change. By the time you're a senior, half of the subject matter in your field may be new since your freshman year, and conversely four years after you've graduated, perhaps a third of what you were taught will no longer be considered to be current information. Someone at Motorola once said, "a batch process "no matter how much you accelerate it "doesn't become a continuous flow process". You have to rethink what does a continuous flow look like, and that's useful conversation to have getting back to your actual opening question. When we're talking with customers, we say what are your unvoiced assumptions about the manner in which you have succession of technology, succession of product, and so on? Can we try to see what it would look like if that were a continuous process and not a project process? Many of our partners will tell us that their most difficult conversations with their customers are about getting away from a project mentality, a succession of Big Bang changes, into a process in which transformation is a way of life and not a bold initiative that will take a big sigh of relief and congratulate yourself on having transformed. No, dude, you've gotten your running shoes tied now you can begin to run. But now the hard part begins. >> Right, and the sun comes up tomorrow and you start to run again. You talked on big shifts count on new abundance and use horsepower. >> George Gilder's phrase, "errors are punctuated "by a dramatic change from a scarcity "to an abundance" so for example, horsepower or bandwidth or intelligence. >> So now we're coming into the era of massive big data we are asymptotically approaching free compute, free storage, and free networking. So how do you get business leaders to kind of rethink in an era where they have basically infinite resources, and it always goes back, so what would you build then? Because we're heading that way even if we're not there today. >> A Jedi mind trick that I often use with them is to say, let's not talk about the next couple of quarters, I want you to imagine the next Winter Olympics. When they light the torch four years from now I want you to try to visualize the world you're pretty sure you'll be living in four years from now and work backwards from that and say well if we all agree that within four years that's going to get done, well there's some implications about things we should be doing now and some things that we should stop doing now if we know that four years from now, the world is going to look like this. It helps free your mind from the pressures of incremental improvement and meeting next quarterly goals. And instead saying, ya know, that's not going to be a thing in four years and we should stop getting better at doing something that's simply not going to be relevant in that short of a time. >> So hard though, right? Innovators still, I mean, that's the classic conundrum especially if it's something that you have paying customers and you're driving great revenue to, it's hard to face the music that that may not be so important down the path. >> The willingness to acknowledge that someone will disrupt you, so it might as well be you, you might as well disrupt yourself, the conversation was had with IBM back in the days of the IBM PC, that they thought that that might be a quarter of a million machines they would sell, but whatever you do, don't touch the bread and butter of the 3270 terminal business, right? And they did not ultimately succeed in visualizing the impact of what they had done. Ironically, because they didn't think it was that important, they opened all the technology, and so things like Microsoft becoming what it is and the fact that the bios was open and allowed the compatibles industry like Compact to emerge was a side effect of IBM failing to realize how big of a door they were opening for the world. You can start off a spinoff operation. At Salesforce we have a product line called Essentials which is specifically tasked with create versions of Salesforce that are packaged and priced and supported in a way that's suitable to that small business. And that way you can kind of uncouple from that Clayton Christensen innovators dilemma thing by acknowledging it's a separate piece of the business, it can be measured differently, rewarded differently, and it's going to convey itself maybe even through a genuinely different brand. This is an example that was used once with Disney which when it decided it wanted to get away from family and children's entertainment, and start making movies aimed at more adult audiences, fine, they created the Touchstone brand so they could do that without getting in the way of, or maybe even polluting, a brand that they spent so much time building. So branding is important. A brand is a set of promises, and if you want to make different promises to different people, have a different brand. >> Right, so I'm shifting gears 'cause you touched on so many great things. A really popular thing that's going on now is the conversion of products to services. And repackaging your product as a service. And you talked about the don't taze me bro story which has so many elements of fun and interesting but I thought the best part of it, though, was now they took it to the next step. And we're only a stones throw away from Tesla, a lot of innovation but I think one of the most kind of not reported on benefits of these connected devices and a feedback loop back to the manufacturer is how people are actually using these things, checking in from home, being able to do these updates. And you talk about how the TASER company now is doing all the services, it's not even a service, it's a process. I thought it's awesome. >> Taking a product and selling it at a subscription price does not turn it into a service, even though some people will say, well see now we're moving to a services model. If you're still delivering a product in a lumpy, change-it-every-couple-of-years way, you haven't really achieved that transformation. So you have to go back into more of a sense of I mean, look at the expectation people have of the apps on their smartphones, that they just get better all the time, that the update process is low-burden, low-complexity, low-risk, and you have to achieve that same fluidity of continuous improvement. So that's one of the differences. You can't just take the thing you sell, bill for it on a monthly subscription, and think that you achieved that transition. The thing that they folks who were once TASER and now are Axon, of which TASER is a sub-brand, they managed to elevate their view from the device in a police officer's hand to a process of which that device is a part. Which is the incident that begins, is concluded, results in a report, maybe results in a criminal prosecution, and they broadened the scope of the Axon services package to the point that now it is selling the proposition of increased peace officer productivity rather than merely the piece of hardware that's part of that. So being able to zoom out and really see the environment in which your product is used, and this relates to yet another idea which is that people are saying you got to think outside your box. It doesn't help if you get outside your box, but all of the people with whom you might want to collaborate are all still inside their boxes. And so you may actually have to invest in the transformation and interface development of partners or maybe even competitors, and isn't that a wild idea. Elon Musk at Tesla open sourced a lot of their technology with the specific goal of growing that whole ecosystem of charging stations and other things so Tesla could be a great success. And the comment that I once made is it doesn't help if you're a perfect drop of artisanal oil in a world of water. You have to make the world capable of interacting with you and supporting you if you really want to grow. Or else you're an oddity, you're Betamax, which might have been technically superior but by failing to really build the ecosystem around it, wound up losing big time to VHS for a while. I may have to explain to all of your viewers under the age of 30 what VHS and Betamax even mean. >> I was sellin' those, I could tell you the whole Panasonic factory optimization story, which is whole 'nother piece of that puzzle. So that's good, so I'm going to shift gears again. >> You have to look a big perspective, you have to be prepared to forget that your excellence is your product, and start thinking of that as just the kernel of what needs to be your real proposition which is the need you meet, the pain you address, the process of which you become an inseparable part instead of a substitutable chunk of hardware. >> Well and I think too it's embracing the ongoing relationship as part of the process, versus selling something to your distribution and off it goes you cash the check and you build another one. >> Well that's another aspect, we've got whole industries where there's been a waterfall model. Automobiles were a particular example. Where manufacturers wholesaled cars to distributors who gave them the small markup to dealers who owned the buyer customer. And dealers would be very hostile to manufacturers trying to get involved in that relationship. But now because of the connected vehicles the manufacturer may know things about the manner of use of the vehicle and about the preliminary engagement of the prospective buyer with the manufacturers website. And so improving that relationship from a futile model, or a waterfall model, into a collaborative model is really necessary if all these great digital aspects are to have any value. >> Right, right, right. And as a distribution of information that desire to get a level of knowledge is no longer the case, there's so much more. >> Well it's scary how easy it is to do it wrong. IDC just did a study about the use in retail banking of technology like apps and websites. Which that industry was congratulating itself on adopting in ways that reduce the cost of things like bank office hours. And yet J.D. Power has found that the result is that customers no longer see differentiation among banks, are less loyal, more easily seduced by $50 to open a new bank account with direct deposit. And so innovation's a vector, and if you aim it at cost reduction, you'll get one set of results. And if you aim it at customer satisfaction improvement, you'll innovate differently, and ultimately I think much more successfully. >> Right, right, so we're almost out of time here. I want to go down one more path with you which I love. You talked a lot about visualization, you brought up some old NOPs, really talked about context, right? In the right context, this particular visualization is of value. And there's a lot of conversation about visualization especially with big data. And something I've been looking for, and maybe you've got an answer is, is there a visualization of a billion data point dataset that I can actually look at the visualization and see something, and see the insight. 'Cause most of the ones we see that are examples, they're very beautiful and there's a lot of compound shapes going on, but to actually pinpoint an actionable something out of that array, often times I don't see, I wonder if you have any good examples that you've seen out there where you can actually use visualization to drive insight from a really, really big dataset. >> Well if a big data exercise produces a table of numbers, then someone's going to have to apply an awful lot of understanding to know which numbers look odd. But a billion points, to use your initial question, well what is that? That's an array that's 1,000 by 1,000 by 1,000. We look at 1,000 by 1,000 two-dimensional screens all the time, visualizing a three-dimensional 1,000 by 1,000 cube is something we could do. And if there is use of color, use of motion, superposition of one over another with highlighting of what's changed, what people need most is for their attention to be drawn to what's changing or what's out of a range. And so it's tremendously important that people who are presenting the output of a big data exercise go beyond the high-resolution snapshot, if you will, and construct at least some sense of A B. Back in the ancient days of astronomy, they had a thing called the Blink Camera which would put two pictures side-by-side and simply let you flip back-and-forth between the images, and the human eye turned out to be amazingly good. There could be thousands of stars in that picture, the one dot that's moving and represents some new object, the one dot that suddenly appears, the human brain is very good at doing that. And there's a misperception that the human eye's just a camera. The eye does a lot of pre-processing before it ever sends stuff to the brain. And understanding what human vision does, it impressed the heck out of me the first time I had a consultation on the big data program at a university where the faculty waiting to meet with me turned out to be from the schools of Computer Science, Mathematics, Business, and Visual Arts. And having people with a sense of visual understanding and human perception in the room is going to be that critical link between having data and having understanding of opportunity threat or change. And that's really where it has to go. So if you just ask yourself, how can I add an element of color, or motion, or something else that the human eye and brain have millennia of evolution to get good at detecting, do that. And you will produce something that changes behavior and doesn't just give people facts >> Right, right. Well, Peter, thank you for taking a few minutes. We could go on, and on, and on. >> Happy to do chapters two, three, and four any time you like, yeah. >> We'll do chapter two at the new tower downtown. >> Any old time, thanks so much. >> Thanks for stoppin' by. >> My pleasure. >> He's Peter, I'm Jeff, you're watching theCUBE. We're at the Master Innovation Class at Xerox PARC put on by the Conference Board. Thanks for watching. (fast techno music)

>> Announcer: Live, from Santa Clara, California, it's The Cube. Covering Open Networking Summit 2017. Brought to you by The Linux Foundation. >> Welcome back, everybody. Jeff Frick here with The Cube. We are in Santa Clara, California at the Open Networking Summit 2017. I'm joined this whole show by my co-host, Scott Raynovich. Scott, great to see you. We're excited in this segment to get one of the keynote presenters to come down and spend some time with us on The Cube. So, Sandra Rivera, she's the Corporate VP and GM of Network Platform Groups at Intel. Welcome. >> Thank you. >> Jeff: And your keynote is all about >> 5G. >> Jeff: 5G is now. >> 5G is happening now. >> That is a powerful, declarative statement. >> Indeed, but it's true. >> Jeff: It's true. >> Yes. If you look at 5G being the true convergence of computing and communications, then you see that so much of the capabilities that we have had in the cloud and in the core of the network, really need to scale out to both the Edge and the Access network, to be ever closer to the end user or the end point. It could be a smart phone, it could be a laptop, it could be a tablet, or it could be some of the new devices that we see, drones and robots and connected cars. So this idea that we have to bring programmable, scalable, flexible computing closer to those end points is really the foundation upon which 5G is going to be built. All of that is really what we're driving with software defined networking and network functions virtualization. So 5G is indeed happening now. >> This is really a continuation of the theme from Mobile World Congress just a few weeks ago. Time flies. >> Is it a few weeks? I think it's a couple months. >> I don't know, I can't keep track anymore. >> 5G at Mobile Congress was all the rage. We were talking a lot about what 5G will enable. Connected cars and smart cities and smart factories and smart homes, as well as those immersive experiences that you'll have in your home, cloud gaming and 3D types of experiences and virtual reality or, actually what we're calling merged reality, the ability to put physical objects in the virtual world or virtual objects in your physical world. All of that requires way more bandwidth, very low latency, and much better responsiveness in that end point near the device or the user, which is what all the innovations in 5G from a radio perspective will enable, but of course the rest of the infrastructure has to support it as well. >> There was quite a bit of discussion at Mobile World Congress about 5G, and I think there was a lot of questions also being raised. Some of the larger carriers, such as Deutsche Telekom, I think maybe Orange, they were questioning the size of the investment that's necessary, and I think for some people it threw the timeline into question a little bit, as we know. As we were discussing prior to the show, the standard, we're looking at 2019, 2020 maybe for deployment? >> Sandra: Right. >> What's Intel's view on the deployment timeline? Does that matter to you? >> It matters a lot because we are investing now, and we're investing with a broad ecosystem of partners. If you look at it just from a pure radio perspective, yes indeed, the 3GPP spec for 5G doesn't really get nailed down until the end of '18. You'll start to see true compliant 5G devices introduced in 2019, and rampant scale in 2020. But the network infrastructure, that idea that you need this programmable, agile, composable infrastructure, really starts now, because you're not going to be able to have a light switch of, "Well, this is the network that I need to support all those devices and all those use cases." That composability of the network is anchored on having a programmable capability as opposed to a fixed function set of boxes or appliances, which is really how networks have been architected and built and deployed up until now. It embraces server volume economics, virtualization technologies and that pooling benefit that you get from sharing an underlying resource, as well as cloud architectures and cloud business models. The idea that you can pay as you go. You hear a lot about network slicing and that really is about composing the network for not too few or not too many resources that you need for that particular end use case. So all that is happening now. We are participating with Verizon in the 5G tech forum. We're working with KT and SKT as they get ready for the Winter Olympics. We're working with operators and telecom equipment manufacturers all over the world to prove out connected car and smart cities and smart factories types of use cases. I think that there's always some healthy skepticism about, are we over-investing or are we investing too early? But if you look at the amount of work that we have to get done in what is a relatively short window of time, we feel like we actually need to speed up. >> And 2019 is right around the corner, Scott. I can't believe we're already a third of the way through 2017. >> I have it marked on my calendar already. It's right here. 5G arrives. But tell us, the play for Intel is to be in the NFV Infrastructure for 5G, is that your play? >> Actually, Intel's strategy for 5G is end to end. Clearly we have modem technology that will go into client devices, yes smartphones, yes tablets, yes laptops, but also drones and robots and cars and any number of devices that haven't even yet been invented. We are in all of the infrastructure, from the access layer in terms of the base stations and a lot of the edge computing that is happening there, we're in the edge of the network which could be close to the enterprise, or close to the consumer, and we're in the core of the network which is where a lot of the switching and routing functions, the authentication functions, the security functions are done. Then, of course, we power most of the world's cloud infrastructure. So back into the cloud and the data center, that's Intel. It really is end to end. We have this broad view and this scalable architecture where it's a consistent silken architecture, a common tool chain, and a very broad access to ecosystem and developers to take you through that end to end portfolio of services and capabilities that you require. >> And at the end of the day, it's just eating up a lot of compute, right? >> Lots of compute. If it's a compute problem, Intel feels pretty comfortable that we have leadership there. Indeed. But we have some new announcements here. >> Okay, because you're here. Besides the keynote, you have announcements, too. >> We have some announcements around our data playing development kit, or DPDK. Intel invented DPDK in 2010. That was a set of libraries and optimized drivers for running high performance packet processing on general purpose CPUs. And of course, if you're in the network business it's all about moving the packets, so you need high performance packet processing. But the ability to have these optimized libraries for queue and buffer management, for flow classification, for quality of service, and run it on your standard server CPU, is a very powerful capability because you no longer need purpose built silken to run those functions. We invented DPDK, we contributed it into open source, it ran in an open source project called DPDK.org, but we announced on Monday of this week that that's moving to the Linux Foundation. We're broadening the community of developers, we are multi-architecture, we are very broad in terms of the developers that are contributing to DPDK and we think that this is a fundamental building block of networks that will be, again, built and deployed over time. >> So you'd already invented it, but you handed it over to Linux Foundation. >> We invented it and we contributed it to open source, actually some years ago, into a project called DPDK.org but the announcement was that it was now moving into a Linux Foundation hosted project, because that gives us a broader umbrella by which we can attract more developers and have greater contributions from a broad ecosystem. >> Right. And we saw AT&T just gave a bunch of stuff to the Linux Foundation. >> Sandra: That's right. >> Scott: Everybody's giving it to the Linux Foundation. >> That's right, it's a good place to be. I was curious. Tell me your take, from the Intel perspective on this show specifically, but also more just open source in general and the role that Linux Foundation plays in taking a project that was obviously of significant value, but enabling it to go places maybe that it wouldn't if it wasn't part of the Foundation. >> Indeed, yeah. So Intel is a big believer in open source, open standards, and a big enabler and investor in broad ecosystems. We're consistently the number one or the number two contributor to many of the projects that we participate in, including Linux, the actual Linux kernel. From networking projects perspective, we really do like the leadership that the Linux Foundation is demonstrating in coalescing the industry around some of the big problems and challenges, as well as opportunities that we face together. >> Yes, we're live. >> We're live, it's that stage. So, we do believe that having just a broader landing zone, if you will, for the work that we're contributing, and having that parallelization that comes from a community of developers tackling the same problems together as opposed to one at a time, or as opposed to doing the same thing in various places, is very, very powerful. So we're very happy to be part of many of these networking projects and, of course, we're a big supporter and partner to the Linux Foundation for many years. >> Okay. I guess we're a third of the way, or a quarter of the way through 2017, on our way to 2019, the launch of 5G. Just curious, Sandra, as you look at what you're working on in 2017, obviously the 5G Initiative and all the developments around that are very exciting, we really are excited about it for the IoT side. We don't really spend too much time on the handset side, per se, but obviously for IoT it's very exciting. But what are some of the other priorities you have for 2017 that you're working on if we catch up a year from now that you can report back on? >> We definitely are driving toward the commercialization of NFV and SDN. We have been through a period of time, of technical feasibility, a lot of early lab trials followed by field trials. But we are absolutely seeing now this much broader scale of commercial deployments and we're going to see that throughout 2017 and 2018. We think that, clearly 5G acts as an accelerant to a lot of that work. A lot of the foundational work that needs to be done in terms of network transformation and network virtualization, enables 5G, and then 5G creates a compelling event for us to go faster. So we're getting ready for some of the 2018 Olympics, types of demonstrations of early technologies on the path to 5G in 2019 and 2020. Network transformation, network virtualization is a fundamental piece of that. The other area that we're investing quite a bit in is data analytics. AI, machine learning, deep learning. One of the things that we know is once we have programmable computing in all parts of the network, in the entire spectrum, from the client, to the access, to the edge, the core, and the cloud, that you can actually collect and harness that data and turn it into business value, either upstream to the content providers or downstream to the consumers of the information or the data. We'll see much more of that really starting to come to fruition this year, not just in the big hyperscale cloud guys but a lot of ways that the enterprises can use data and turn that into business value. So we're pretty excited about everything that's happening on that front, as well. >> You're going to be a busy lady. >> Sandra: We're busy. >> All right. Well, Sandra, thanks for stopping by. I know for Mobile World Congress we could only get you on the phone so it was great to get to meet you in person. >> Sandra: I know, it's more fun this way. >> Absolutely, all right. She's Sandra Rivera, he's Scott Raynovich, I'm Jeff Frick, you're watching The Cube from Open Networking Summit 2017. We'll be back after this short break. Thanks for watching.

>> [Announcer] Live, from Silicon Valley, it's The Cube Covering Mobile World Congress 2017. Brought to you by Intel. >> [John] Welcome back, everyone. We are here live in Palo Alto, California for a special two days of Mobile World Congress. We're on day two of wall to wall coverage from eight a.m. to six p.m. Really breaking down what's happening in studio and going to our reporters and analysts in the field. We'll have Pete Injerich coming up next and we're going to get on the ground analysis from the current analysis, now with global data. But next we have a segment where, I had a chance this morning early in the morning my time top of the morning Tuesday in Barcelona which was hours ago, I had a chance to speak with Caroline Chan and Dan Rodriguez. I wanted to get their opinion on what's happening and I asked Caroline Chan, "What's the biggest story coming out of Mobile World Congress?" This is what she had to say: >> [Caroline Chan] So last year this time, the people coming in asked a lot of questions about 5G technology. Is it real? Can we really pull it off? You know, 3G, 4G, it's a little bit ho-hum. But this year, I would say when I look around, not just in Apple, everybody else is good. I'm also hoping to, people talk about it as a faithful, I went to a panel last night with Orange, and AT&T, and Telefonica. I think the conversation switched from will there be a 5G to solutions. So, I look around in our booth and next door in Verizon there's a lot of cars, autonomous driving. We had network 5G enable smart city, it's in our homes, It becomes from technology to solution, and then in the last discussion about this iteration of 5G, there was an announcement about the 5G in our loan, Whole bunch of talk about acceleration. It's really becoming how can we quickly get out there. And then the other thing I've read is about AI. How does AI now because 5G becomes an enigma. AI and the cloud, there's all these analytics, so 5G can actually now be able to bring that into the cloud. So AI becomes a buzzword. I just read the SAT CTO Was all NWC live TV at the venue, I talked about AI and 5G transforming the mobile industry, so it really becomes much more of a solution oriented. >> [Dan] No, I can't agree with Caroline more there. Tremendous amount of excitement around 5G as well as network transformation in the show and the two things are really becoming linked. So Caroline mentioned a few of the use cases out there on 5G, so again, lots of autonomous driving, lots of smart home, lots of smart city. I personally had a great time hanging out in our smart home demonstration earlier, but I think the key linkage of all those use cases is that the network needs to become more intelligent, more flexible, and definitely more agile to be able to support this wide variety of use cases. And we're seeing it being really echoed back by not only operators, but a lot of the OES and telecommunication equipment factors, really rallying behind NSE and truly the path to 5G. >> [John] Take a minute, guys, to explain the 5G revolution and why it's not just an evolution from 4G. What's the difference? What is the key enabler of 5G and what is Intel have that's different now than it was before. >> [Caroline] So you imagined 3G is all about getting better voice and also a little bit of SMS, and 4G is a literal 3G on steroids. Now 4G has all these, you can go on the internet and download all kind of things. 5G takes that to the next level. So 2G, 3G, and 4G is about network building for the masses If you think about it it's like a general network. So when you build it and somebody vertical says I want to make this my private network for my enterprise it's a best effort basis, so either too hot or too cold. So what that means is it operates under a wirenut either giving you way too much, unable to recuperate your investments or if it gives you not enough, you wind up with a bad user experience. 5G fundamentally changes this. Why does it change in the standard itself that's undergoing in the 3G PP. As you have a different type of schedule with them, you must predict the different use cases. For example, if you're doing a mission cryptic IOG versus a massive connector IOG, you get a different protocol. You strip out some of the heavy amount of signaling that is typically needed for mission critical for something that's just there like smart city, like traffic light changes, that kind of information you don't need that to generate a whole bunch of bandwidth. So you see something with a different, natively different in the protocol itself so that's a fundamental shift from the mindset that we always had. So that is technology enabled. And the second thing is that the network today, thanks to all the network transformation journey that everybody is on, it's much softer and flexible, it moves away from a single part purse, a belt, power to something that is much more flexible, such that you can enable something like the network driving So a prize for enhanced mobile program for ARPR would be different from something for autonomous driving. So it makes the network fundamentally different, the interface itself is much more flexible for different types of applications, and then not to mention that we have different types of spectrums on the traditional 3 GHz to 6 And now two millimeter waves we open up a whole swathe of the spectrum to allow for a much, much bigger bandwidth and things like camera applications. It really changed the game. >> [Dan] Thanks, Caroline. So I think at a high level, what Caroline was pointing out is that the wide variety of use cases with 5G will stretch and pull the network in all sorts of directions. Essentially, there will be different use cases that require blatant fact network speed, but maximum amounts of bandwidth, but some use cases also require very low latency. So when you think about all the variety of use cases, the best way to truly insure you're meeting the user experience and also delivering the right economic value for the industry is to move to more intelligent and a flexible network. And as Caroline mentioned, it is going to be software-defined. And when you think about some of the products that we're investing in, and the status in our group for networking of course you think about our Intel Xeon processors. These processors can be found in a number of servers around the globe, and customers are using these for a variety of virtual network functions, really everything ranging from the core network to the access network to newer use cases such as virtual TV. In this bit, we did announce some additional products that will be made available later in the year. This is the Atom C3000 series as well as the Xeon D1500 network series. Both of these are SoC, and when you think about 5G, you do think about the mix of centralized and distributed to plan it, and you think about that network edge becoming smarter, so these types of SoCs are very critical because they provide excellent performance density at the right power level so you can have a very intelligent edge of your network. >> [John] Great point. Just to follow up on that, it's interesting, we had a conversation yesterday in The Cube around millimeter waves, CBMA, all the different types of wireless, and I think what's interesting is you have some use cases where you have a lot of density and some cases where you need low latency, but you also have an internet of things. A car, for example, you could say, we were discussing a car is essentially going to become a data center on wheels, where mobility is going to be very important and might not need precise bandwidth per se, but in more mobility in some cases you'll need more bandwidth. And also as an internet of things comes on, whether they're industrial devices that the notion of a phone being provisioned once and then being used is not the same use case as, say, IOT, which you could have anything connected to a network, these devices are going to come on and offline all the time, so there's a real need for dynamic networks. What is Intel's approach here, because this seems to be the conversation that most people are talking about that's happening under the hood, that's the true enabler around bringing out the real mobile edge. >> [Caroline] The couple things that we're doing, number one we use a concept called flex term, flex core which is a server-based platform that works on a variety of technologies applied to it lots of these real time visualizations, dynamic resource sharing and reconfigurations, we're able to support what you just described and provide a flex support team for different types of scenarios. And then the other thing that builds into the 5G support network Splicing allows you to splice up to the pairs of light resources for a variety of cases, Including the coarse part of it, so for example, HP here in this room is demonstrating what looks a server, walks like a server and is a server and it has the RAM, virtual PC, it has orchestration, it has mobile edge computing, it's really become a network in a box. So the fact is the ultimate freedom to support the service providers and enterprises and to apply all the 5G to different scenarios. >> [John] The final question, guys, is market readiness through partners and collaboration. Intel obviously is the leader, Intel Inside who was the main story we've been hearing at Mobile World Congresses end to end, fortunately a great piece with Intel CEO talking about the end to end value in the underlying architecture, it all runs on Intel, it works better, it brings up the notion of market readiness in the ecosystem. What are you guys doing to make the ecosystem robust and vibrant, because Intel can't do it alone, you're going to need partners. Thoughts on how you guys are accelerating it, and really the market readiness for 5G and just timing in your mind when all the fruit comes off the 5G tree, if you will. >> [Caroline] We started with the trials this year, so 2017 we're going to be able, we're working closely with partners, like Ericsson, Nokia, and Cisco and we should be seeing early performance coming up and I really think the wide spread of commercial publicly is more like 2019, 2020 timeframe because of some of the standardization, would you say? >> [Dan] Yeah, so that's a great summary, Caroline. I think the key thing that we're really seeing at Mobile Congress and things that we're investing in, diverse as you mentioned. It definitely takes a village to pull off this network transformation and the movement to 5G, and I think the great thing is about the network size is the network is becoming much more pliable, more software to find, more resilient, more agile, and it's out there to find. You can really invest in many of these innovations we've been discussing today now. So we're seeing a lot of folks start investing in Flex-Core, Network in a Box, mobilized computing, et cetera, so you transform your network now, utilizing network function virtualization, and then you have a sturdy foundation when all the 5G use cases come online in the next years. >> [John] Guys, final question. What power demos are you showing? You guys usually have great demos on the floor, Mobile World Congress, lot of glam, lot of flair at the show. >> [Dan] Great question. We have a number of super demos here, we have a smart and connected home, which showcases all sorts of intel, wireless technology out of the gateway as well as other devices we're showing a smart city, as you know, with 5G, and its lightening fast speeds to pass the lower latencies. It's truly going to change the urban landscape. And we're also showing augmented virtual reality in a few different demonstrations and one definitely caught my eye and I was pretty excited about it. In our Flex Ren demo, we were showcasing augmented virtual reality, actually viewing a skier going downhill and it was pretty exciting. I had a great time, I can't wait to when, in a few years when 5G is out there and I can use augmented virtual reality to watch a number of sporting events ranging from college football to my favorite sport, which is surfing. >> [John] What's next for 5G? How are you guys going to roll this out, what's the big plans post Mobile World Congress? >> [Caroline] Like I mentioned, we have trial plans with our partners through 2017, and then we're also participating in the Winter Olympics showcase, again through our customers. There's activities happening in China now, so I think we can be in a lot of places. You can see us in 5G. >> [John] Winter Olympics, expect to get the downloads and all the video in real time on 4K screens, thank you very much. (laughs) We expect to see some good bandwidth on the Olympics, I'm sure. >> [Dan] Hey thanks, John, this was great. >> [Caroline] Thanks, bye! >> [John] Thank you. Caroline Chan and Dan Rodriguez, from Barcelona, calling in with all the details, I'm John Furrier, we'll be back with more live coverage from the Mobile World Congress after this short break.

(intel sound logo) >> [Announcer] Live from Silicon Valley, it's the CUBE. Covering Mobile World Congress 2017, brought to you by INTEL. >> Okay welcome back everyone to our special two days of coverage of Mobile World Congress 2017. I'm John Furrier, here in the Palo Alo Studios covering what's happening in Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain. Of course this is our day two of wall to wall coverage. Eight a.m. to six p.m. for two days and of course, as we kick off our day two and get early morning here in California or mid morning, they're ending the day in Barcelona and all the news is dropping. Again, it's continuing the theme of 5G, IoT and the notion of the super demos, all the flare and glam around IoT, AI and everything else. On the phone right now in Barcelona, Spain, is our friend and analyst with the Futuriom Group, Scott Raynovich, who will also be co-hosting with the CUBE at ONS, Open Networking Summit. Longtime industry analyst, guru in the space around mobile, certainly SDN and what's going on. Scott, welcome and thanks for taking the time to call in from Barcelona. >> [Scott] Thanks, John. Great to be here, and also I might add some color to one thing you said, when you said the day was winding down. (John laughs) Apparently in Barcelona the day never ends. It just goes all the way through. >> Well the show is ending but now the real action happens, all the hallway conversations at dinner and certainly we know that you take a nap around this time and go out and get ready to burn the midnight oil 'til three in the morning. We have many stories of Barcelona, but let's get down to it. What's happened today in Barcelona? What's the big story? What are you seeing on the ground there? What's the vibe? Give us some insight into what's happening, the experiences you're having and what's the big stories today coming out of Mobile World Congress. >> [Scott] Yeah sure, John. Well there's, as you know, there's a lot of hype about a lot of buzz words, so you got to throw all the buzz words out there: IoT, 5g, self driving cars, VR, AR, augmented reality. If you run through the halls you see a lot of those gizmos and gadgets and I would say the scene has shifted a lot in recent years. As you know a couple years ago it was all about Samsung's big tablet or the latest phone and now it's more about these kind of more advanced technologies, they call them interactive technologies that we're going to see coming down the road the next few years, so there's lots of stuff. >> The show has been very telco orientated and still really is a device and telco show basically. The device guys had their moment in the sun on Saturday and Sunday, but Monday kicked off really the telco show. This is really about ... The telco is trying to figure out their future. Their core competency over the years has been how to provision subscribers and billing, and been trying to figure out the over the top, and now as you look at the software that's coming out with the 5g plus the end to end, some of the things happening at the network transformation area. There's some real action happening. I want to just get your thoughts on is this the time where we're starting to see the needle move on the progress of really bringing the kind of networks that are going to power the cool technologies and promises of use cases, whether it's e-sports up to driving cars that are essentially data centers. Huge amount of data problems, huge amount of network reconfiguration, is this the time where there is an inflection point? What's your thoughts? >> [Scott] Yeah, that's a great point. You have the service providers for a number of years have felt a little bit - I don't know what the word is - spurned by success. They created all this plumbing and they put this massive investment into LTE, broadband, that really enabled all these applications, but it was more people like Apple and Netflix and Amazon that kind of stole the show by leveraging that bandwidth for these new services. Cloud services, music services, of course Netflix, the most popular internet service in the world, and so the service providers kind of feel like 5G is another opportunity that they don't want to squander and so they're being very careful about how to position that. But to your point, they have realized that they absolutely need to virtualize their network because what's going to addle a 5G is you have this massive amount of bandwidth but you need to splice it up into different - they called them actually network slices - so that you can provide all these advanced services, and that's where the service providers want to figure out how they're going to monetize that. So it's certainly a launchpad for the technology and the somewhat maligned technology known as NFV, Network Function Virtualization, but I think that the pressure to get 5G out is going to accelerate their investment in NFV because they need that cloud platform to kind of serve up all these next generation services. >> Is the telco's NFV efforts going to make them more cloud ready in your mind? Is that the sentiment? Is it that, do they have to kind of do a lot of things right now? And the question is, what are the use cases if they are cloud ready and if they can get their act together, the network layer to power these aps that are going to be running on 5G, so you know? >> [Scott] Yeah, yeah. I think so, I mean they're progressing. AT&T makes periodic announcements that they've virtualized whatever it is, 30 or 40 percent of the network, and Verizon has a pretty interesting company Radisys, which recently got a 70 million dollar contract from Verizon to install NFV infrastructure. Now that's not ... 70 million dollars is a drop in the bucket in terms of capital spending for a small virtualization platform like Radisys, but that's a pretty big move and so I think you're seeing this stuff finally becoming real, and they are going to have, within a few ... We'll wait for them because they're a much more flexible platform. It's based on the cloud web scale model, where you snap in a bunch of servers and all the networking is virtualized and you can move things around in the cloud and they want to take advantage of new services they can offer, whether that's a virtualized enterprise security service, you know security service in the cloud where you go into the Verizon Data Center and you order it up and you have a cloud security model that it will protect you, or other what we call Virtual Network Functions, another hot area you've probably heard of SD-WAN. There are a lot of SD-WAN services being rolled out >> Cool >> and that's a virtualized WAN solution that doesn't require you to, say you have a bunch of branch offices around the world, you don't have to ship them all routers and then hook them up with expensive leased lines. You can kind of close them in with the cloud if you will, and there are a bunch of hot companies in that area, including Aryaka Networks, Velo Cloud, Viptela, which are all mentioned as active acquisition targets these days, so there's definitely still a lot of virtualization thought going on but I will say it took a backseat to, this year it took a backseat to 5g and IoT. >> Yeah great commentary. I got to say, I talked with Intel with an exclusive interview with Sandra Rivera from Intel GM, with Communications Network Platforms Group, and we were talking about the dynamics and I think the big IoT thing has been autonomous vehicles. Obviously smart cities is, you've got some surveillance, you've got cameras and stuff in towns and cities, and certainly the smart home. You can't move an inch in the industry without hearing about echo and google in the home, kind of voice activated automation. Then you've got media entertainment, you mentioned Netflix. You know all these things are essentially coming back to rear its data center environment. This is like the data center meets consumer, and we were commenting that the autonomous vehicle is essentially a data center on wheels and that there's going to be trade offs between low latency high bandwidth and true mobility. You know car is not going to be dictated by millimeter wave technology because they might have different frequencies, so this brings up this diversity of network. And so I'll get your thoughts on how you see the market evolving with the pressure for open source software, you mentioned SD WAN it's software defined, WAN software defined radio, software defined networks, software defined data center, the whole world is software defined so the role of open standards both on open source software as well as open wireless if you will, meaning not one vendor is going to own it, how do you grok that? How do you pull that picture together and how do you advise your clients on what this actually means for them and their impact? >> [Scott] Yeah that's a great question. Well, you kind of hit the nail on the head with the question, because I spent much of the show looking at all of the ... If you want to break it up into two buckets of things here, you talked about cloud and WAN, so the infrastructure that builds the data center but as you pointed out, this is a service provider show, so a lot of the discussion is around connectivity standards of course, and it's really amazing John. It's amazing. You know we can boil these things down into these neat little buzz words >> IoT and 5G - but just today, I talked to people about at least five different forms of IoT standards and of course 5G today was a super controversial topic. So let me just break those off one by one. With IoT connectivity, you have something called LoRaWAN, which is a open standard, an IoT open standard, and there's about 500 members signed onto the LoRaWAN alliance, including Cisco and IBM and China Electric, so that has a fair amount of momentum. It has certain characteristics. Very low bandwidth, and not in real time so it's, I'll just give you one example. If you want a connected cow, John, I saw a connected cow, and the idea is that is be large. When a massive operation wanted, you want to track your livestock, so you need a very low cost device that does that. That's an example. You also have so called MBIOT, which Cisco's pushing pretty hard narrow band IoT, with another standard that's going to be used for IoT applications. You have the 3GPP working on LPWAN, which is kind of like a 2G recycled for IoT. The characteristics of IoT have to be really cheap there has to be really low power, so you can't use LTE right? So that's another one. Then you have a couple of hot private companies. SigFox, which has over 100 million dollars funding, and it might even be hundreds of millions of dollars at this point, based in France. Another company called Ingenu, which is spun out of east San Diego qualcon hotbed with a lot of really interesting IT and they have a technology called RPMA, so those two companies are building networks worldwide based on proprietary standards. They've said, "We're going to build an IoT network, "a radio network for IoT all over the world, "and it's going to be based on our proprietary technology, "'cuz it works better," so that ... I just gave you IoT, right? Okay, and then you have 5G, which dozens of service providers (incoming call beep) all have different things about that and actually argued about 5G doesn't exist right? Right so you have Verizon rolling out a pretty standard 5G trial and then you have something called 5GNR, New Radio, which is a multi spectrum flavor of 5G that Qualcomm and are fooling around with, and then you have people like Nokia saying, "Woah, woah, woah slow down. We can't push 5G "before its time. We don't want it to fragment, you know? (vibrating phone) "We don't want it to just "splinter all over the place," >> Yeah. >> [Scott] You know, pull like an Android. So I don't know, that was a mouthful but if you- >> So what does it mean? Is it ... >> You get the idea of how these buzzwords, when you unpack them, they get really complicated. >> Is it forking? Is 5G essentially a land grab right now, or is this all part of the evolution in your mind, because it does seem that you need a catalyst. Obviously Intel's taking a leadership position. They've done a deal with Nokia. You've seen some Ericcson announcement but then you've got Qualcomm on the other side with Snapdragon and you know the competition between Intel and Qualcomm is at an all time high, certainly on the handset side. But at the end of the day, the network is the key at this point, and so the question is, is 5G going to be broken down by the forking? >> 5G is a hype grab, it's totally a grab. >> It's a hype grab. (laughs) >> [Scott] Because 5G will not exist for at least ... They won't be rolling it out 'til 2020 and I heard several people argue today that it's really 2021, so it's not a land grab until it actually exists, right? So it's all about positioning your marketing around it, but just to give you an example of one of the controversies today was accelerating. Should we accelerate to 5G? You know and then BT came out and said, "Well we have to be careful because it's really expensive." 5G is actually going to be more expensive than LTE. If you don't have the return on investment, you know you're going to kill yourself, so people are confused. >> Scott, Intel claims they're going to have 5G in Winter Olympics in Korea. That is what they told me on the record. Not sure if that is a trial network or is that going to be just some data stations? >> [Scott] Yeah they'll have some form of 5G. I mean what I'm trying to point out with all these things is when somebody says the buzz word, it doesn't mean one thing, right? >> Yeah. >> [Scott] It means like yeah, it means several things. And it'll certainly be pretty standard 5G trials. I'm just saying right now we don't even know what that is. Nobody has even settled on what the spectrum is for 5G. There's like been four different announcements about different spectrums and then you have this 5GNR thing which is a multi spectrum technology, so it's really hard to say. I'd be shocked if anybody at Intel definitively knows what 5G looks like at this point. >> Well certainly it begs a question for a follow up conversation around what is 5G. Certainly people will argue what that means in terms of bandwidth, but the question we had on The CUBE yesterday was, "What aps are even ready for a gigabyte "and what does that mean?" Is that fixed wire, is that true mobility, is that latency versus bandwidth, and et cetera et cetera. You know the debate will rage on. Honestly I just want to see more bandwidth. I love connectivity so. Alright Scott, thanks so much for taking the time. I got to ask you a final question. You know, what's the best party so far in Barcelona? What's the best tapas you've had? What's the scene like in and around town? What's some of the buzz? >> [Scott] (laughing) Well I haven't been to any big parties to tell you the truth, I've mostly been to private dinners. The food is amazing and so is the wine. >> Yeah. >> [Scott] It's pretty hard to go wrong in Barcelona. It's probably like a foodie's paradise I would say. >> Yeah it certainly is. When we were there last time it was amazing. Great gothic vibe there, great little restaurants. Scott Raynovich here inside the CUBE and Scott you got some new credentials here. You're still at rayno on twitter but you now have a new firm called Futuriom - F-u-t-u-r-i-o-m Research. Congratulations. >> [Scott] Futuriom, yep. >> Futuriom. So appreciate it and thanks for taking the time, want to give you a shout out for the new gig and you'll be hosting for the CUBE at the Open Networking Summit, ONS, coming up. Appreciate that and thanks for calling in and sharing the insight, what's happening in Spain and Barcelona for Mobile World Congress. Thanks so much. >> [Scott] Thanks, John. It was geat. Thanks for having, that was great stuff. >> Great. We'll be back with more after this short break. This is special two days coverage inside the Studios of Palo Alto live, here in California, breaking down what's happening in Barcelona with all the news, the analysis.