>>from Miami Beach, Florida It's the Q covering a Cronus Global Cyber Summit 2019. Brought to you by a Cronus. >>Welcome back with Cubes Coverage here for two days at the Cronus Global Cyber Sum of 2019. I'm John Courier, Post keeper in Miami Beach at the Fontainebleau Hotel, and I am here with the CEO and chairman of Cronus SP Sergei, known as SP. >>Yeah, joining that, that's fine. It's fine. >>So your inaugural event of the Global Cyber Summit What you're what you're feeling so far like it's >>very good to have exceeded the expectations. In terms of a dangerous with high quality audience. Everything is organized quite well. It's our first event of a kind. It's a first marks a transformation of the company from being data protection company to be decided protection company from the application company to be a platform. >>Talk about the vision and we're how you got here. Because again, the market's changing cloud computing, Internet of things, more threats than ever before data seems to be at the center of all this. >>Don't think about the team in terms of data, will look at 18 terms of foreclose, so workload could be day to put the application for the system. We also look at the team, not from the standpoint large passed him a small fast mark, but from the standpoint off and point, like your computer right here on the table or a mobile device from step with authority, which is a large that the center of a gentle price. Or it is a cloud like Amazon, like Google, like Microsoft. And from the standpoint of something in the middle, which we call EJ, and it's growing very rapidly, that's a small data center. That more door is that a small office that's also specialized vacations, like practically my hospital, like a railway station like restaurants. Like any retail location where you actually have specialized computers. Detective Lee servers running the infrastructure, for example. Every Starbucks location is actually 12 and those computers edge and then point. Need protection, need complete protection. And our mission is to provide a complete protection from the standpoint of safety, accessibility, privacy, authenticity of security that something which will go for any of us. >>You know, I think your divisions right on. In fact, when you think about data protection, my observation is it was because of disruption and operations. Somehow an event happened. Hurricane flood the operation of destructive. They gotta roll back and get the snapshots and bring it back. But security is now causing a disruption. I think you guys are honing in on with disruptions coming from a security vector way. Official mechanisms have to change a little bit. That seems a bit your success here with. >>I think we look at this holistically way, don't see really different, so safe its accessibility, privacy of authenticity and security. A love. This vectors are a problem, you know, perhaps authenticity. He's not yet visible as march, and privacy is new, So privacy is not the bad guys. You know, it's a good guys, guys. It's maybe yours. Employees. Maybe your partner. Or maybe maybe it's your customer. One. You don't want to see the information about somebody else and so alone. This is a threat, and you really don't want your infrastructure to be damage to your business to yourself. Unintentional damage. If you want to break something, you better break it, wasting your decision and you better be able to roll back so you know it comes from data protection, but it goes to security and privacy and authenticity. All of this together is important for defensive your idea. Infrastructure is functional and old times controlled by you. >>In your opinion, has ransomware provided a wake up call to I t around this area? Because that seems to be a theme. A lot with Ransomware. People realize that they're stuck highlights >>a problem somewhere is an interesting trend. I wouldn't really be happy about Ransomware around somewhere is a scene. So we help people to be protected against run somewhere. But that doesn't mean we like Ransomware. So yeah, >>extortion. Not really. Well, like, yeah, you're the one being extorted. >>Nice. But it's one of the wake up calls in reality again. It comes from all the directions. I think Ransomware is just very, very easy to understand. >>People can see and understand it. Explain You mentioned s a P A s. What does that explain that acronym? What does it mean? What's the vision behind >>Sabba says is safe Accessibility, privacy else intensity and security combined in a single product. That's what it means. It means that you know, don't lose in using everything is accessible at all times with the right people have access and you can control the access. Nothing is mortified in such ways that you don't know it was modified and no bad guys can break into your tea or into your date or NT applications >>you mentioned. The platform platforms are well known concept and computer science and certainly the Internet. You've seen great successes with platforms, enable something. How would you describe the enablement that comes from Cronus platform, Cyber platform. >>I think it comes back to what you start at the waist. There is a lot of new friends and part of this new Frances. The world for a while maybe 20 years ago looked like the world which is consolidating. And you can one vendor which provide solutions to watch majority of problems. Which was Michael, right? So you remember 1999. It looked like pretty much everybody is gonna use windows. Mark is not going to be there. Microsoft was making some inroads in Mobile was in C and so on and so forth. Well, now the water is consolidating. You have thousands of different types of workers. You have different systems. You have different applications. You have different cloud applications. You need to protect them in a very different way. That's another thing you need to integrate a lot about. You cannot do it all. So we opened our applications and our black from certain parties. Was event like this toe actually build on top of the platform to provide the functionality, which we don't >>You say that word system a few times, and I think this is interesting platform validation systems Thinking is like an operating system. It's a lot of consequences and systems The old system that seems that systems thinking is back in in the front lines of I t and technology because you got a cloud you got on premises, you got I ot way networks. It's a system, and so realistically thinking about it's interesting. Do you think people are getting their are you get the right thing to do? I think like a system >>wear simple people in a Cronus. We look at the world and we don't see anything but data by zeros and ones way don't look it everywhere, and I don't see anything but more clothes and these workers they could be in the cloud that could be on prayer. Music would be a partner location. It could be on your mobile device. It could be the whole device apart with. And we also see the world in terms of partners. And from our point of view, you know, it's it's was that people realize that, you know, people have idea needs to work on their partners to help him. So if I did, that work can do, innit? They cannot call their friends. They can communicate is a relative word possible head of the world. And so what we provide is a protection to make sure that it works a full time, no matter what is a possible challenge. >>That's me. Thank you for taking the time to answer some questions. I want to get one final question to you. News today Opening AP Eyes up Trading Developer network and a portal New New things. What's your message to the folks that want developing on your platform? What's the guiding principles with what's the simple value proposition of why I'm a developer? I wouldn't want to work on The Cronus is Global Platform >>so way might look relatively small. We're only 1.5000 people and we're only several $100 million. They were growing very rapidly. We have 6000 partners who can sell your products, and this number is going. Read it after you have 30,007 years. And so you have also a lot of data on the management. Five exabytes of data on the management and this amount of it is growing very rapidly. If you build applications for protection of this data, this number of workloads, this number off partners to sell it, you can sell your products successfully. Ultimately, for developers, it's It's about doing something which makes money and doing something which makes sense. And with our partner network, with our workload and they reach, they get to make sense and they get to make money. >>And it's a hot area. Cyber protection of a new Category Emerging out of the old data protection If you had to describe someone, the old waivers of the New way data protection the old way. Cyber Protection New Way. What's the difference between the two? >>Well, the difference is that includes security, privacy management, know sadistic management in one package. The difference is that it's designed to work in the world which is in parenting secure. It designed to work in the world where if you connect a network, you don't trust this network. And so if you have a cyber protection application cyber protection car where it has to be protected itself, that's >>thank you. Come on. Cue and taking the time out of your busy schedule to talk to us. Thank you. Very welcome. Appreciate it to give coverage here in Miami Beach across Global Cyber 7 2019 I'm John. Four year. Thanks for watching two days of coverage here. Be right back.

>> Live from Washington D.C., it's the CUBE covering dot next conference. Brought to you by Nutanix. >> Welcome back to Nutanix.next everybody. This is Dave Villante with Stu and this is the CUBE, the leader in live tech coverage. We go out to the events, we extract the signal from the noise. Alan Cohen is here, he's the chief commercial officer of hot startup Illumio. Alan, friend of the CUBE, great to see you again. Always happy to be here. Wherever you guys are, I'm going to show up. >> It's nice not to be in Silicon Valley for a change, hanging out with the CUBE. >> Right, the real world, you'll have to talk to John Courier that things happen outside of Palo Alto. >> So the timing of this interview is perfect because we just had Stephen Hadley on, who's sort of a public policy expert. We were talking about basically how industry should really lead with this whole new era of cyber and he was talking about if we let government do it, they're probably going to mess it up. >> Right. >> So it's guys like yourselves and others in our industry that really have to lead, so, but before we do that, give us the update on Illumio. You guys did another big raise, you guys are smokin' hot, growing like crazy, what's the update? >> So I mean so since we spoke to you guys last we did have a little funding round. It was led by J.P. Morgan Chase. You might have heard of them, they have credit cards and branches and things like that. Actually, they're also a customer of Illumio's. Which is a really big deal. They are advanced, so we're growing very rapidly, lot of geographic expansion, lot of technology expansion and I think actually today and this morning Sineal and the technology roadmap talked about micro segmentation, the ability to create really smaller and smarter water tight compartments around your data, down even to the workload or the process level is just going to be a way that people are going to have to do their computing. And so as you look at the journey now from data center or enterprise cloud into public cloud, this approach to security that we're building is a key component allowing people to take advantage of cloud architectures. So that's also really led to our growth. >> So I think it's fair to say you guys are really the pioneer of this concept of micro segmentation. Others have sort of hopped on board. >> Well I got to give Vmware credit, they actually did break- >> They were first. >> Yeah, but they- >> To commercialize it. >> Yeah, they commercialized it in their environment, I would say Illumio is the first company through software to commercialize it in all environments. In a cloud, in a box, with a fox, in a house, with a mouse, bare metal virtual machines, containers, Amazon, Azure, Oracle, across all of those environments simultaneously. And I think we were talking earlier this morning about the idea of multi-cloud, right? So you're going to pick your cloud based on where the workload and the applications should live. So your security has to move with that. And that's really what we've focused on. >> Right, okay, so VMware's there, you know Cisco's in there as well, so- >> Yeah, I've heard of those guys. >> Duking it out, so how do you feel about our competitive position, talk about about that a little bit. >> Well, we feel good that our competitors have finally kind of woken up and started to amplify our message. About this, you know, at the end of the day, you have to make a decision whether your goal in building security is to drive the sale of your infrastructure, or is to make your customer's environment more secure wherever they run. So in their own environments they're clearly adding value. But at the end of the day they're dependent on maintaining server licenses or upgrading your switches. That's not a really good motivation for how to make your security decision. You should make your security decision based on what you're trying to do, not what infrastructure you're in. >> Okay, so, now what about the traditional security guys? Are they catching up, are they hopping on board, do they just think this is an itch that's not worth it, or they just missed the boat? >> Well, you know, with the I'm being respectful and aggressive at the same time, I think most of the firewall vendors have been primarily focused on the perimeter, and then they've looked at APT technologies, things like fire I have done and they've made a lot of their investments there, so they have not been as focused. Now, to also be fair, in the heart of the data center in the public cloud, you don't see firewall technology. Right? So people said I have this hard crunchy exterior, I protect the perimeter of my environment, and I assume once I protect the perimeter the inside is safe. So their traditional model didn't lend itself to that kind of introspection and focus on the interior. What's happened in the last couple of years, though, and you had Hadley on, is that the focus of cyber has shifted to the interior, right? So, Target, Sony, OPM, all the big breaches started with basically vulnerabilities on the inside that have then kind of spread and then ex-filtrated outside of the organization. So we started focusing on the inside out, not the outside in, I mean to say I think ultimately the large security venues and perimeters, they're partners of ours, because they're going to wind up working both sides of the equation. >> Yeah, because even an air gap doesn't protect you. >> You don't want an air gap, actually, you know, we have a partnership with F-five, we actually talked about it with the CUBE couple years ago, because you think about the consequence of something like a load balancer, it sits between tiers of applications, you don't want that to be a black box. So the basically the world is moving into the zero trust model, so trust nothing. And you know it's kind of like running it you know like in a mob, it's like the Sopranos, you've got to make sure everybody does the collections and everybody's got to check in everyday, everything's got to be part of the security fabric. >> Alan, so, bringing it back to the Nutanix discussion. We had Sue Neil on earlier in the keynote this morning I saw broad ecosystem, love our partners, saw Illumio, >> Huge logo, wasn't that great? They got me. >> Great glow man, they finally figured it out. >> Release the Krakken, yeah, you know what, up there. And I asked Neil, how do you balance the we're going to have broad ecosystem but seems a lot of that energy is being put into AHV. And one of the examples he brought up was like oh, if you buy, if you use AHV, you get micro segmentation for free included in there. What are you seeing, how does Nutanix fit into micro segmentation environment? >> Yeah, I mean I showed her the slides too, right, so? If you remember how he defined it, if I have ten workloads, and I want to segment them off, I will put it in what I call micro segmentation. And that to me is like a virtual network segment, but he said you don't have to use an FCN overlay, and that is not any different than what a security group does in Amazon or Azure and I assume Google has its own version of that. When you go into that couple of levels deeper, that's where Illumio lives. So we live inside public cloud security groups today and across them and to non-environment. So you got to remember a lot of people are going to have Nutanix workloads, but then they're going to have workloads sitting in Azure and they're not going to have anything to do with each other for awhile from a software point of view. So illumio is really that bridge. So I mean I think it's actually a fairly synergystic kind of relationship to do that. Actually for me, that recognition, and that communication and micro segmentation into their base, is really good. So, you're always going to have a little bit of overlap. I mean they're smart and they really build great software. >> So it sounds like you're saying the definitions of micro segmentation are a little bit complementary and you're also going to help with that heterogeneous mess that everybody has and gives them consistent security across those environments. >> Right, we don't define micro segmentation that way. I might want to say I want to micro segment off one workload or I want to segment processes or I'm going to have a Kubernetes application running someplace and then I'm going to have the core database someplace else. How do I move across that? >> So it's granularity and flexibility of the use case that you provide. >> Yeah, we have this thing we call the wheel of cheese, from the segmentation. So there's like rough front use segmentation, and then there's micro and then there's nano, so over time, people are going to basically close the gates tighter and tighter. Because the challenge in cyber is lateral spread. Like you guys you have these fast high speed networks. So if I compromise one server, one workload, today it flies through the environment, so you actually have to keep closing those doors from a security point of view. So, I mean I think it was a great first move for them. And I mean, we like it, it works really well. We work with other vendors, cloud vendors, today that do some form of segmentation. >> So I know we're super tight on time, everybody wants to talk security, and your schedule's packed John Furry is watching, no surprise. >> Oh, hey John. >> So when he has to give up the mic there's always crowd chat, so he's got a question on crowd share for you. Ask Alan about the economics of the cyber security business models with all this stuff going on with cyber war and ransom ware and- >> Yes, so here are some stats. You guys are great analysts you focus on this. So cyber security is about a hundred billion dollar business somewhere between 80 and 100, depending on who's counting on that. But think about the scheme of overall IT. How much is IT? Three trillion dollars? >> Trillions, yeah. >> Right, so a hundred billion dollars is a fairly small segment. Now, I would be disingenuous as a vendor, but I'll go for it, I would say people are highly underinvested in security relative ... Stu's laughing his head off, right? >> Well, is that not a big enough pie for you, come on. >> No, it's not, I think the pie should be like five times bigger, I mean. >> You don't want to make that comparison with health insurance, do you? >> You have health insurance, you have life insurance, you insurance on your car, you have insurance on your home. You guys are high net worth individuals, you probably have policies so you don't get sued. You probably spend ten percent of your total income on forms of insurance, things that protect you and your family. >> So you're saying it should be triple the spend. >> Why are you only spending two or three percent of your IT given the criticality of the data that's sitting in those environments? >> Okay, so we know we only pay for insurance when we need it, in marketing the joke's always I waste half of money, I just don't know which half. You know, how much are we wasting in security vs. >> Well, I mean I think if you're buying infrastructure based models you're spending, you're building, you're wasting a lot. Illumio is a consumption-based model based on how much you use. So I mean we look more like you know, it's a per operating system instance that you pay a yearly license for. So I think we're closer to the Amazon consumption model for security, and we've led with that four years ago, when we started the company. So I think if security became more like you pay as you go, and less pay for just having it, just as we talk about the different models for infrastructure, where I own it, where I rent it, where I pay as I go, I think you will get better spends. I mean, we effectively sell security the way Uber sells or Lyft sells car, when you need to pay for it, use it, you pay for it. There's probably a whole lot of efficiency that could be there, but I'd argue it's under invested. >> Well, the other dimension that is inside out vs. outside in, I mean, you're building more moats. We know still more money is spent over here. >> Well here's a stat. So the vast bulk of data center security, so the perimeter firewall market's about a ten billion dollar market. Only about Cisco just sent out their announcement this week about their cloud index. 17 percent of the traffic, net traffic that goes in and out of the data center and about 80 percent of it's inside, and a little bit of it goes to the co-load, right? So you are putting all your investment on 17 percent of your traffic. So that's like buying all the cable channels. You watch the cooking channel? You're paying for it. You're watching rugged outdoor fishermen channel? You're paying for it. So I think you're going to have to, just like you're making infrastructure investments are moving to paying for what you use, your security investments have to go the same way. So why would you put all your money only guarding 17% of your network traffic? >> Okay, we're out of time, but so, last question, what are you guys going to do, what are you doing with this big bag of money that you just got? Where are you directing it? What's your strategy? >> Well, I mean we're probably going to have to hire the CUBE to come to like Illumio. >> Fantastic, let's do that. >> Yeah, we're totally going to do that but ... >> Oh really, well, what's the show, Illumio World? >> Well there's going to be an Illumio World when we launch it you guys are going to be there. >> Fantastic, I'd love to be there. >> So, there's no doubt. You have that in writing, you have that on video, like testimony. >> Yeah, even better. >> Yeah, like I can't even say I didn't tweet it, like you'll have a record of it. >> We can shame you into it. >> You can totally shame me into it. I think you're going to see a lot of geographic expansion of the company. We're about to expand down under and other places we've been mostly in North America and parts of Europe. And a lot of investments going into the channels, strategic partnerships and I mean a lot like Nutanix, I mean our company's half R&D, we're going to just as heavily a year from now we'll still be half R&D. Even with growth, because we've got a lot of platform build, and we're building a platform that's going to be around for decades. So there's still a lot of engineering to do too. >> Al, we love having you on, you're plugged in, great Silicon Valley friend, really appreciate you coming back. >> Appreciate you having me today. >> You're welcome. Okay, keep it right there everybody, we're back with our next guest after this short break. This is the CUBE here live from next.conf. We'll be right back.

>>live from San Francisco, extracting the signal from the noise. It's the cues covering Oracle OpenWorld 2015. Brought to you by Oracle. How your hosts, John Courier and Jeff Rick Wait, >>We are here. Live in Howard's treated oracle. OpenWorld for Silicon Angles, The Cube Exclusive coverage Star flagship program. We go out to the events extract the cinnamon noise. I'm John Kerry, the founder of Silicon, and Brian gracefully lead analyst on all the cloud and all the infrastructure stuff going on here. Next guess is Jeffrey Davis, Principal Gore, Oracle, global leader for Deloitte and Touche. Legend in the industry. I've been covering Oracle for a long time. Good to see you, John Bryan allegedly knew she had to get that in there. Love that. You know you guys are. The service's angle has been something that the service's business is. It's been changing radically. Now more than ever with clouds. I really want to get your take because you are an executive looking at this transformation of cloud. But the Lloyd across all the Oracle customer base, your party with customers. So you're the front lines. I gotta ask you straight up. What is the number one thing customers are looking at right now that you partner with four Cloud to figure it out. Is it a migration? All the above, And what do you think about that? So when customers are evaluating the cloud or our clients are looking at the club, you really focus on three things. One is agility. Thea other one is time and the other one is valued. So how quickly can we adopt to the changing environment? How quickly can we leverage technologies like clouds in order to be able to respond to our customers, to adapt to the changing needs of our employees, to embrace our business strategy in a new and innovative way? So I said legend, you know, talk about the eighties for women on camera. That's important point I want to bring up. Is that Is that the old way? Big growth of client server was around software middleware right year BC around you name it that created huge consultancies like Lloyd, you participated in that create a lot of wealth creation for the customers, create value, right, but their cycles were long in the deal. That'll be about 12 13 years now, months and almost a year or two, there were all these big deployments. Now the cloud is accelerating when you compare and contrast time of then share. And now with the cloud Just how much the deployments change the software, the organizations, How you guys operate a new way to do that job well, and we're all responding to the market, right? While responding to customers needs Cloud didn't come about because of technology in it of itself. But we're really all in this ecosystem responding to our customers must customers a really demanding from us is there demanding agility and speed. As I said before, if you take a look at the way we used to do things, basically you had a a large capital investment on the part of the customers. They went, they bought the software, they bought the hardware, they had to hire the expertise of an advantage, mail the eggs, and you're looking at a transformation for them that could take anywhere from 12 to 24 months or longer before they would get time to value. And, you know, these projects didn't go as planned. No, that's this is Yeah, I know the change orders came in paid more cash on DSO. We all got a really bad reputation because of the high costs in a long time to value and even if value was ever realized in some cases, now we take a look at the environment and what the cloud enables us to do is move in a much faster pace. Way used to have what we call a waterfall approach to design and implementation went into a big room and you talked about the world and I never ran that way. And then you put it into the system and then people never really embraced it, because when it came out, it didn't look like anything they thought they were gonna get. This is completely different with cloud. Now you can take an agile approach. Now you can sit and listen to the customer demands very quickly respond to what they think they need, where they really generate value. And then you can focus on those things and very quickly there, in a design session with you And at the end of the day, >>changed management is much easier because they've been a part of the process and also, you know, looking at 90 days sprints. You're looking at things that are done. You know, in >>six months, six months, time to value that can give you compress a competitive advantage. You know, that could help you retain Maur employees or customers. So it's really some timetable. Met Lavery s V p of the Cloud Gru. Gru Integration was saying they were doing provisioning on in 24 minutes. Multiple deployments like like nobody's business. What has them in the timetable that you're seeing for some of these times of value, horizons means hurdles. These milestones said days, weeks, months, hours, minutes. I mean, when you go to a customer base where their expectations of what you guys deliver, there's some insight there. Some of it depends on the environment. So remember they're still clients. We have local customers that are in a highly regulated industry or have a very complex prisons process. Those are gonna take a longer there is they're gonna take in. Technology is not necessarily on the critical path. But when you look at those other areas that frankly, you don't differentiate yourself very much or speed with a solution concave you a competitive advantage. You know, you're looking at a client expectations of anywhere from 90 days, you know, to six months, you know, manager here, very manager, but aggressive. Visa VI the old way. Well, certainly, And the other piece that we're not really talking about is, you know, it's not enough for us to put the technology out there. It's also got to be used and adopted. You know, when you had those large transformations. It's very hard for an organization to absorb all of that change. Now we're looking at the fine entry point that you could get with clouds with that fine entry point. Now we can sub select areas with greatest impact, but we're not changing the entire organization. >>Mark Hurd has the C I. O. G. On this morning and one of the comments that he made. I've heard this a number of times over the last 12 18 months. He essentially said, I have a ton of undifferentiated applications now. They're things that that Oracle thinks are fantastic. HCM and C. R. M and Air P. But in essence, everybody has those. Every business has those very undifferentiated, but they're complicated. What? You Seymour, you see more people saying you know what take those. Help me migrate those into SAS applications, you know, save costs. Where do you see more saying, You know what? Give me the other 20%. The ones that drive business differentiation, ones that are new cloud native applications. What do you see in your mix? What's pushing your customers >>to push you? You know, it depends on the geography, and it depends on the industry and some other things. If you want to talk about North America, which tends to be one of the largest markets in the world, if not the largest market in the world, when you're looking in North America, really people have gone through a lot of the major ear piece. Remember the earlier conversation? You know, they have suffered through tens of millions, hundreds of millions of dollars, and their boards were not satisfied that they got the results of the expected. Now, when you take a look at what's happening, you know, people are now being much more strategic in their investments, much more prescriptive there. Look how they spent exactly, because now the boards have different expectations. They've already gone and spent all that money on technology. They can't go back to the board. Can't say we need to redo this. What they do are willing to fund is you want to get into a new business. If you want to spin something off, you need to stand it up right away. If a customer you know, provide you a new opportunity, you want to shift to that new opportunity. Really? Well, technology is the basis of a lot of this transformation. So Cloud provides that opportunity and it's modest investment with really quick, high value. It's a great point >>you look at I t In the past decades prior to this evolution, we're seeing the cloud consolidate, consolidate, consolidate, right? I don't know the well again. I just went to the well, apparently running, you know, whatever the model was there. But now they're under a lot of pressure to drive top line revenue. Absolute. Now, the top line revenue equations, a completely different mindset. You have to go out and oh, cut the market. You gotta use a shadow I t or your authorized go out. Do legitimate stand up new platforms are Can you give me an example of that? We're seeing more of that now. A clear Mandate. Cee Io's Go take a New Hill or let's consolidate these apt and reposition for this new use case, which is not. That's experiment, but it's certainly a new market opportunity, and they gotta do their due diligence, so it's almost unparalleled. Due diligence kills your waterfall. That's one doesn't talk about that dynamic. Where examples you give go. Take that new top line revenue driver. So you know that there are customers that are looking at new partnerships in the marketplace, and those new partnerships have dynamic new business models. You know, it's not like opening up another hamburger stand. You know, they're not necessarily expanding into our core business. They're really looking at ways to amplify growth. If you're gonna take that as a strategic position, then you know customer or client of ours would focus on, you know, let's take this innovation the market. We don't want to invest a lot in it, waste a lot of time and lose the competitive advantage. Let's >>get to market first. Let's provide a new product or service to the market where we can move very quickly, and then the >>net result is we can see the benefits right away. And if it isn't way, haven't sunk a lot of time and money and something that's not necessarily gonna have the same values. We just had Shawn Price on. And I'm gonna ask this because it's a lemon that you're in because you're part of the customer right here, the strategic partner of the customer. So that idea top line revenue growth could come from a partner. When I see How do you work in that? Quick, You're cool to work with my Aunt VI's. Bring that into the table. You're absolutely so this market is changing. You know, Cloud clearly changes everything and much more so than some of the things we've seen in the past. And so now we need to position ourselves differently now for the Deloitte Business Model way. We're really in a specialized business of focusing highly on value and value creation. We weren't necessarily in other areas and we have different partnerships now. Those partnerships are shifting. Oracle provides us a complete platform. You know, we don't >>have to really get involved in a lot of the aspects of the platform that, frankly, we're in our core competency and frankly, weren't our clients what >>you talked about that customer interaction? What do you have to do to change what we've seen? Different size, trying different approaches? We've seen some that are partnering with cloud Provider, but they want to be their own flat for acquiring them. What changes in terms of the skills you have to hire the way you expect that interaction toe happen between you and customer. Because to a certain extent, like for developers, developers love self service. They do. You know, they they are shadow I because they're driving What changes in your world for that? >>So this is really kind of an interesting question. Very early on, when Oracle made cloud product available >>in HCM, we saw an opportunity. Our clients had the demand because they wanted to create a more sticky environment from customers. What better >>way than providing them better products in the HCM space? We made major investments there. Now we're a leader in HCM, and if I look back over that experience, what do we do differently? First of all, we had to change our mindset. You know, it's not enough just to say the cloud, but you gotta live the cloud because it truly is more agile. It truly is faster. You can take your old methods and tools and approaches all the things that worked for you before. A lot of them don't work anymore. There's some but some really good winds here, especially in the change management side. Also, you know, we'd have clients that had to kind of do it yourself brain surgery that have to order their own hardware that have provisional themselves. You know, that became a real mess. Now we're looking at something that's a lot different. We're not in that business anymore. You know, we do support on Prem where our clients think it's important and strategic course. But now we've got a new, agile methodology. Now we've trained our workforce. We've got 14,500 professionals around the world. We've had to move that group, and Oracle really helped us do that. They've been very collaborative in sharing I p and sharing methods and tools with us so we can make that adjustment. Not only have we had to change that when you think about our other methodologies, all of our other methodology to create value to change management, they were all thoroughly integrated. We've had to rethink those, but it's been a great story because we could go to the client. We can say we can get you there faster because where technology was a barrier world, >>it was on the critical path. We're now changing that. And by the way, this technology is not your old technology. It's much better. It's much more robust. How >>do you you know, obviously we're here It at an oracle OpenWorld. It could be called Oracle Cloud >>World if we really wanted to. I mean, >>it's a lot of it is the red stack. A lot of it is one cloud. How do you manage that against customers saying, Well, look, there's other options as well. I wanna have the ability to leverage this cloud for something. Oracles cloud for certain things. How do you do? You find your customers want multiple clouds or one cloud is good enough? >>Well, we're all teaching right? We're all teaching the world about God because you know there's still people that look at it in a variety of different ways. I think it's an excellent question, so let's think about this. >>Do you want to be your own systems integrator for your smartphone. You want to go by an operating system? Do you want to go buy a separate peace of heart? Where do you >>want to decide what APS fit? What don't. And do you want to actually try to get those abs together? I don't think we want to do that anymore. And I try to use that as an example for my clients. Tell them. Look, let's not be your own systems integrator. You is a iittie executive. You could be an officer toe, help the organization get to their business goals. You know, you're not in another yourself a business objective, but you could be an agent for change. I try to educate them so they can help their colleagues explain cloud, take the fear out and then show the art of the possible. What about the security model? I mean, I wouldn't get your take on you little bit biased because your manager Oracle really? But what would be global, critical or complementary events? How you feel about it? But the intense security message is really a game changer in my mind. Follows on incredible theory. Incredible application. Certainly the product's gonna be ready soon. If it works, it's like a car that does the key turnover. It's like it's all good on paper. Certainly a game changer. Security outside number One thing you're hearing Get some color to that because, you know, if that plays out, if you believe that end N security on the chips and software Silicon plays out the way they say it would, that's gonna change the game. For sure. It is. So none of us and you can go through a week without hearing about a major security breach. When you think about this, you step back and think about the potential here. Our stuff is starting to talkto our stuff. But our stuff isn't unless it's based on. Oracle isn't all thoroughly integrated, so somebody can break into our stuff and they can get access to our lives and they can change our lives. That's hugely powerful. So we are very concerned about security, and Lloyd is one of the largest organizations. In fact, we have a cyber practice that looks at both Proactiv reactive aspects of security. Here's the big concern we have as all this stuff starts, get interconnected. The Internet of things, security becomes a major issue. We need more breakthroughs and security. And I think oracles on the vanguard certainly as we get into what we call a hyper hybrid cloud on Prem on Cloud. Some of that's gonna be a great emotion is no. Perimeter is nothing either. Protect is the Wild West total while and, you know, despite what you believe, boards and people are not reacting fast enough to security threats. And that's why you're seeing these breaches into my knowledge. I don't think anybody has been breached with Orgel security in place. But that said, you have to be really, But still, they probably would get out. There's not that they're hiding it, but the point is, you need to be united engine system. It's hard to do that in a open source world, right? So you have a horizontally scaled open source phenomenon, and it's growing our market and a vertically integrated product requirement. You believe I want Indian security, then you gonna go vertically integrated. You do purpose built. But if you want scale a 1,000,000,000 large scale a k a cloud, you want horizontally scalable. How do you reconcile that with your customers? Well, you know so again. It's difficult for them because unless you've had a security threat, it's very difficult to really get them to take the initiative. You know, the more that we can build security in, the more that it's covered in the Red Sea. More that we get a comprehensive end to end product. I think it allows us to help the client realize you know the risk and help them. The old Fowler said. In The Cube they had they had this done in 2005. Finally took a bunch of security breaches to get people's attention to your point. It's on everyone's agenda. Number one right it is. And yet you know how much is enough? Well, we find the people are too reactive and not not proactive enough. >>What's the What's the temperature of your customers right now? I mean, you know, Tesla's out, they're disrupting Uber's out. Their Airbnb are they? Are they sort of defensive and paranoid? You know that Andy Grove, always trying to be aggressive with a saying No, no, no, no. I'm not letting these little guys into my market. I'm gonna go be aggressive and try and push back what a general feeling. There's a lot of interesting startup disruption going on really changing industry. >>There is, and you know, there's so many sort of partnerships and alliances, mergers and new innovations. You know, right now, clients are very uncomfortable. Just the transition from on Prem to Cloud is a major change in our clients have been the expert for technology for decades for their organization. They are having trouble keeping up with all of it. It can be disruptive. They're looking at what's unique in their industry. You know what is regulation driving? You know what is innovation driving in their industry? But, you know, they're always on the learning curve. They're always trying to figure out if we want to get your final thought wrapping up here to get your take for the folks that are watching here on camera that couldn't make it here were beloved world. What is this show about it? We've been here six years. You've seen that transformation. About four years ago, Larry looked like a deer in the headlights, almost stuck in his tracks and smoke coming out of his ears like he felt that the scene felt like a pivotal moment couple years ago. And then since then, just been every year. Oracle just gets more and more energy, just like dominated that march of the crowd. Almost like four years ago. Like we're gonna win that. What's your vibe? You see that same thing here and shared some color on the take is over the years, and we've been doing this a lot in various forms Over the years. There's been the promise of riel innovation. There's been the promise, real change in the industry. We saw sort of incremental change. We really see increments. Exponential change now and now. The promises fulfilled. We have real product. We're taking the market. We're doing interesting product, right? Israel product. It's very riel, and we have work to be done. But yeah, really studies and customers? Well, it's an evolution. But this is really sort of an epiphany at the moment, because we've never had, >>you know, full sweets of product in the marketplace. Not right now. I don't know that there are any other large you know. Air Pia options in the clouds away there is for Oracle and look at the host of service is that have been announced over the last year. >>This this particular show for us, you know, really isn't accelerating. All these products and service is in the cloud that are now available. They give us a lot of different options that we never had. A great quote. Put that on a cube. Jim. Thanks for joining Us. Way are here live in San Francisco's Howard Street for the Cube Special. Exclusive coverage of Oracle OpenWorld Q. Be right back with more of this short break. Thanks for watching.

>> live from San Francisco, California It's the queue at PM World 2014 Brought to you by VM where Cisco, E M, C, H P and Nutanix. Now, here are your hosts John Courier and Dave Ilan. Take >> Okay. Welcome back when live in San Francisco, California v m World 2014. This is the Cube where we extract the signal in the noise. I'm John for day. Volante are 50 year here Of'em world broadcasting wall to wall. Three days of live coverage. Our next guest, John Gill Martin, GM and VP of the Supper defined Data center business unit. Welcome to the Cube. >> Thank you. Glad to be here. >> Yeah. So this is an area. That may be mean. Streams. Not on top of what we love to geek out stuffing. Find data center Two years ago. Maybe three years. Feels like 10 years ago. See your acquisition and Martine's been on multiple times. Suffer. Virtualization really has set the agenda for what's going on in the data center. And remember, it was very much a buzzword. Std. See some fun data center. But now it's becoming a reality. I want first question get your perspective. Is Where is the meat on the bone right now. This year with somebody find designer. What is materializing right now in market that's available in happening >> has been fantastic, because if you think about our customers, they're all trying to move to this notion of self service. Cloud help the developers be more agile, be more productive and soft, defined clearly the right architecture to go do that. And the last year has really brought us the last couple of pieces to go. Make that a reality, Obviously never. Fertilization is a huge component. Delivery of NSX is really brought us a kind of leaps and bounds forward around that. The adoption of that has been great and then now a virtual sand as well, just to bring soft defined into the storage space. We were seeing a tremendous amount of interest. You take all of that, you fully virtualized your infrastructure, and then you bring management on top of that automate on top of that and really, now we have the ability building self service files inside the enterprise. Start to meet the meeting with developers, and you have this kind of a self service agile idea. >> It's almost as if you change in the airplane engine out at 30,000 feet with summer defined data center, people said on the Q bond. It's very difficult, but I want to get your perspective of where the pressure points of innovation are coming from coming from the APS service containers show the app, sir, setting the agenda were close. Now diversities another variable. It used to be the infrastructure would enable on top of it. Now we seem to be rushing down from the top, and this dynamic provisioning environment seems to be this DEV ops requirement all that's in place. So how do you how do you How do we talk about the innovation of the pressure point? What are those pressure >> points? Yeah, well, as you point out, it's really about the applications and the requirements of applications. And pushing down on the infrastructure, and in particular, is you look a kind of new style cloud native applications, which tend to be a bit different than traditional laps. They asking different things the infrastructure, and that's asking. Your developers are asking to do different things than necessarily what kind of fish in a lapse of required developers are looking for portability. They're looking for agility. They're looking for a difference that a tooling really. And you know they want that experience where they go to a website that Newton A P I and programmatically spin up infrastructure. And so that's really what enterprise like the organization's now our challenge to go Dio is to go provide that type of investor, actually support that for the helpers. Technology today is fundamental to the business model of every company out there. Used to just be about back office operations. Now it's really about the marketing organization, the sales organization, product development organizations. Every part of the business depends on technology is changing business models, and therefore this is really what's asking Iike organizations to be much more responsive and to do a lot more than they initially ever have in the past to support the business, to move >> quickly. So in terms of network organization, So how much is that? A part of this new model >> in our virtual station? Cooley a critical component to this right and, you know, a super interesting. When we first brought out NSX last year, a lot of value proposition was around the speed agility. And if you look at the big cloud providers, you like the big financial firms. That was the kind of primary motivation. Initially, we still see that a lot. It's been interesting, though, the last year to start to see the value proposition for network organization really shift. And if you're looking more than mainstream now, it's really a lot about this notion of micro segmentation. This notion of how do I bring security from that used to just be in the perimeter and start to bring that inside the data center. And that's been driving a lot of the interest and be able to get security controls all way down to the PM and the application >> itself. Just on Fridays. Pregame crowd shot we had Steve Perrin chimed in, Gone. The security question. I were the big opportunity for start ups, and he said Security. Yep, and it's really not about perimeter security anymore. It's about something else. Could you describe what he means by that icy perimeter? Security was the old way. Secure the perimeter. But people are getting in. Protect the queen with a moat. What does he mean by that? And why do you say that opportunities there? >> Yeah, that's the traditional model of security. The data center is you put up this big as you said moat around the data center, and you hope that no one get over that The problem was, if someone did, then it's all exposed on the inside it. And so the notion now is how do we bring security inside the data center? Protect those applications. But in order to do that, you know that traditional models were doing that, or just two operationally complex or too expensive just can't do it. Physical systems. So the beauty of never quit realization use and start to bring that in inside the data center, bring those security controls the BM and do so in with enough automation and policy based on mation that it's operationally feasible to manage. >> Well, what about the flip side of that? When the queen wants to leave her castle, >> how do >> you secure that use case? If I'm making sense and >> I'm not sure I understand. >> So Okay, so you get queen being the data, let's say and the data by its very nature is distributed. Right? So, um, okay, protect the perimeter. That's that's not enough. Now I can go deeper inside the data center and provide tools to make it simpler to deploy. Or if Aiken, you know, find a problem faster toe to solve that problem. But it's the data starts to become dispersed. How do I create a security model on? Does this software defined data center Help me do that. Accommodate that dispersed data that distributed data model? >> Yeah, because I mean the great thing is as you bring security controls into software and set it in the hardware, then you can travel and be part of that application. And actually, as the application moves or the date of that application moves, you can tie the security policies. The application itself >> was an application centric data centers security model, >> and it's and it's a platform also that you know, an ecosystem is building on top of to go, bring even deeper set of security capabilities. And top of you talk about the startups you're talking about a second ago, you know, it's this whole platform doubted for innovation. On top of that, you could bring really interesting ways of thinking about new security. >> Two years ago, when Pat Gelsinger took over as the C E o m. C. Had a financial analyst meeting, and Pat was part of that of your new C C F O stood up and talked about tam on gave a really good Chris presentation run that. I'm sure you're seeing these slides a lot. We see them as analysts big, big opportunity for VM wear, and a huge part of that opportunity is the software to find data center. So I wanted to dig into that a little bit. Specifically, when I look at things like Tam, I say, Okay, what's the business case? Because the business case is gonna ultimately determine the degree of the rapidity of the adoption. So I want if you could talk about the business case for the software defined data center, maybe compare it to sort of phase one, which is, you know, virtualized compute. Yes, this case was enormous. It was a 10 X value proposition. Is this bigger? Similar, Smaller, twice as big when we could talk about a little bit. >> And when you say business case obviously thinking about from the customer perspective, >> Wellit's, either I'm gonna cut costs or I'm gonna create some other kind of incremental business value. Other. I'm gonna drive revenues. I'm gonna reduce cycle times or introduce the lap times timeto value, et cetera. >> Yes, that's the interesting thing is often find data centers really kind of hitting on all of those things where the key motivators is really moving faster and be able to reduce like a times instead of four weeks to deploy an application. Let's get it down to a couple of minutes. Let's be able to meet the needs of developers to do Dave off style soft development. So it's all about speed and kind of driving revenue from the back end. If you start to think about the operating expense and capital expense, so shoot with the infrastructure. You can start to address those pretty aggressively, you know, if you think about virtual sand, for example, it's all about a different operating model for deploying storage virtual machines, its applications centric and V M Central, and so you can reduce the amount of time that initiators of spending, managing infrastructure and get them focused on the energy and kind of applications. So, one way to address topics, or if you think about the capital expense, what we see now you've done quite a bit of analysis is by virtual izing network fertilizing storage you can actually get down to anywhere between I think it's 35 49% reduction in the total capital expense of building your data center. So really significant opportunities to reduce costs both on the operating expense side through automation, but also the capital expense side by moving more intelligence into the hardware itself so that just like with virtualization, if you go back, you know, 5 10 years virtualization was a very simple capital expense story here. Now, where we have a story that's well, much broader than that, but still inclusive all those kind of capital expense benefits. >> I gotta ask you about competition. Just chicken out. What's going on around the conversations? Um, obsolete VM where staking their claim out Amazon on one front. But Microsoft's a player in the enterprise. So what do you guys do? These of the Microsoft partner frenemy. They're in there and start stuff. Our players got plowed. So how do you guys look at those guys? You guys too far down S o. >> You know, with Microsoft? Yeah. At this point, we still are. Let's see ourselves. It's really kind of leading the way around sort of virtual ization. And that's really been the kind of core in the foundation which we started from, and we still have tremendous set of capabilities there. And so that's kind of a starting point. And then you build off on everything we're doing around network fertilization, everything you're doing around soft defined storage, really a very differentiated set of capabilities and your eyes really unique set of capabilities from be able to build that whole virtualized infrastructure, then your episode of management capabilities on that that are increasingly header genius in nature. And we have this ability to kind of extend the data center in unique ways, you know, managing automated here but extended after the cloud as well. So pretty powerful set of kind of technology. >> Car legend Box said that VM wears it is a data center automation company. Um, should he added orchestration to that, too, or talk about that. What is data center automation company mean? Because he's referring to the South to find a descent course cloud certainly is automation, orchestration and the cloud, but from your in your world What does that mean? >> Automation is really about taking a lot of the manual activities that United Administrator or anybody else who's spending time infrastructures does. And let's run that in software. And that's not tie ourselves to operations that are specific, proprietary pieces of hardware. Let's get to a model where everything could be automated through software. We could get the scalable models of deployments and operations naturally, what automation means. Automation then allows you to start to move at the speed of business rather than being tied to the kind of infrastructure in the hardware and everything else underneath. >> So the other quote from Carl was awesome, by the way. Great interview, he said. How glad the customers still on friend. Okay, I buy that you have a zillion customers, a lot of Amon prim. Why not private club or private cloud is today? Or his private cloud, the halfway house or a way station to the hybrid cloud? So talk about that dynamic. You know, summer defined data center at the end of the day could be software driven. The end of the day is still a data center. You still have a data center somewhere where the damn ploughed or on Prem talk about that on premise dynamic. Yeah, >> so, yeah. Ultimately, if you think about kind of hybrid Cloud hybrid Cloud is really the combination of assets that you own inside the data center, along with assets. They're sitting someplace else. And you know, the motivations for that are I want to be able to think about how do I optimized? I want to think about how Doe I optimize my choices, a placement for projects that are either short lived, etcetera. And so there's a set of applications or projects where makes sense to go rent capacity. But if you actually look at the total total cost of ownership inside the data center, you can actually get too much better economics by owning the assets yourself, building on top. So there's definitely a ongoing and continued rule for the private cloud. But there's a very clear you said the use cases for extending periodically into the hybrid cloud. So, really, you know, let's combine both of those that could boast best of both. So let's do that away that seamless. So we really treat the management. The operations of everything is the same, regardless of whether it's inside or outside, right? >> So I mean the buzzword. Bingos all getting resect is the new new new names Air coming out of that re naming convention? I gotta ask you about kind of specifically around the suite that Pat talks about talks with sweet. So I just don't understand how that parses out relative the hyper conversion and describe to the folks what is hyper converge. That's the new buzzword I know. I know. Hyper scale is a hyper scale with convergence. Is that Web scale? So what you guys to find hyper converged as hyper >> converged is, in our mind, really kind of the coming together of prescriptive hardware definition with software that's preinstalled on tightly integrated so that it's really easy to get to time to die So you could get up running virtual machines in less than 15 minutes and do that all with kind of a prescriptive design, guidance, prescriptive kind of price understanding and a single support organization that call and get support. If you need help on, that's really >> built definition right here, up and running with >> 15 minutes right and one of the key enabler. So that is the sphere and other key enablers virtual sand and really building all that and types of inside. One of these kind of off the show, >> called Converge, Prepackaged, converge on purpose, built, converged essentially. But that's where it's going, right? That would be me. That's >> where it's headed, right? And it's so it's really about making it easy for an organization to get up and running, get person machines deployed super quickly on, then be able to expand that in a building block way that's expand very quickly and easily. >> John Gill Martin is the V P and general manager. Somebody find business unit for the M. Where, um, tell the folks out there the last word he had in the segment. Um, what's the biggest misconception of summer defined data center in context? Of'em, where >> I think the biggest misconception is that it's something that's far into the future. The reality is this is something that people are doing today. Technology exists. We can build this, and you know this is the way in the architecture that everyone's headed down doors. >> And what's the one thing that you could share that they might not know about you guys? It's a very positive thing. >> Well, you know, I hopefully people saw all the announcements and work we're doing around open staff, for example, Really looking to bring these types of open a pea eye's been a neutral AP eyes on top of this soft to find platform. And yeah, that's a big news item for us. I wanna make sure that everybody saw that. It's a big part of Webber Head >> Open Stack and Dr Too Big Documents. Relevant news pieces exactly. Gives the app developers essentially access to infrastructure without being infrastructure. Guys. Right, that's fundamentally >> again helping enterprise guys set up in infrastructure that developers can access. Programmatically. That's >> John Gill Martin inside the Cube. We're here live in San Francisco for the emerald 2014. I'm John for what David wanted right back after this short break