(bright upbeat music) >> Hello, welcome to theCUBE, "Unstoppable Domains Showcase." I'm John Furrier, your host of theCUBE. We got a great discussion here called the influencers around what's going on Web 3.0. And also this new sea change, cultural change around this next generation, internet, web, cloud, all happening, Jeremiah Owyang, Industry Analyst and Founding Part of Kaleido Insights. Jeremiah, great to see you thanks for coming on I appreciate it. Ren Besnard, Vice President of Marketing and Unstoppable Domains in the middle of all the action. Gentlemen, thanks for coming on on theCUBE for this showcase. >> Wow, my pleasure. >> Thanks for having us, John. >> Jeremiah, I want to start with you. You've seen many ways refer in all of your work for over a decade now. You've seen the Web 2.0 wave now the Web 3.0 is here. And it's not, I wouldn't say hyped up it's really just ramping up. And you're seeing real practical examples. You're in the middle of all the action. What is this Web 3.0, can you frame for us? I mean, you've seen many webs. What is Web 3.0 mean, what is it all about? >> Well John, you and I worked in the Web 2.0 space and essentially that enabled peer-to-peer media where people could upload their thoughts and ideas and videos without having to rely on centralized media. Unfortunately, that distributed and decentralized movement actually became centralized on the platform which are the big social networks and big tech companies. And this has caused an uproar because the people who are creating the content did not have control, could not control their identities, and could not really monetize or make decisions. So Web 3.0 which is a moniker of a lot of different trends, including crypto, blockchain and sometimes the metaverse. Is to undo the controlling that has become centralized. And the power is now shifting back into the hands of the participants again. And in this movement, they want to have more control over their identities, their governance, the content that they're creating, how they're actually building it, and then how they're monetizing it. So in many ways it's changing the power and it's a new economic model. So that's Web 3.0. Without really even mentioning the technologies. Is that helpful? >> Yeah, it's great. And Ren, we're talking about on theCUBE many times and one notable stat I don't think it's been reported, but it's been more kind of a rumor. I hear that 30% of the Berkeley computer science students are dropping out and going into to crypto or blockchain or decentralized startups. Which means that there's a big wave coming in of talent. You're seeing startups, you're seeing a lot more formation, you're seeing a lot more, I would say it's kind of ramping up of real people, not just people with dream is actual builders out here doing stuff. What's your take on the Web 3.0 movement with all this kind of change happening from people and also the new ideas being refactored? >> I think that the competition for talent is extremely real. And we start looking at the stats, we see that there is an enormous draft of people that are moving into this space. People that are fascinated by technology and are embracing the ethos of Web 3.0. And at this stage I think it's not only engineers and developers, but we have moved into a second phase where we see that a lot of supporting functions, you know, marketing being one of them, sales, business development are being built up quite rapidly. It's not without actually reminding me of the mid 2000s, you know. When I started working with Google, at that point in time the walled gardens rightly absorbing vast, vast cohorts of young graduates and more experienced professionals that were passionate and moving into the web environment. And I think we are seeing a movement right now, which is not entirely similar except faster. >> Yeah, Jeremiah, you've seen the conversations of the cloud, I call the cloud kind of revolution. You had mobile in 2007. But you got Amazon Web Services changed the application space on how people developed in the cloud. And again, that created a lot of value. Now you're seeing the role of data as a huge part of how people are scaling and the decentralized movements. So you've got cloud which is kind of classic today, state of the art enterprise and or app developers. And you've got now decentralized wave coming, okay. You're seeing apps being developed on that architecture. Data is central in all this, right. So how, how do you view this as someone who's watching the landscape, you know, these walled gardens are hoarding all the data I mean, LinkedIn, Facebook. They're not sharing that data with anyone they're using it for themselves. So as- >> That's right. >> They can control back comes to the forefront. How do you see this market with the applications and what comes out of that? >> So the thing that we seen out of the five things that I had mentioned that are decentralizing. (Jeremiah coughing) Are the ones that have been easier to move across. Have been the ability to monetize and to build. But the data aspect has actually stayed pretty much central, frankly. What has decentralized is that the contracts, the blockchain ledgers, those have decentralized. But the funny thing is often a big portion of these blockchain networks are on Amazon 63 to 70%, same thing with (indistinct). So they're still using the Web 2.0 architectures. However, we're also seeing other forms like IPFS where the data could be spread across a wider range of folks. But right now we're still dependent on what Web 2.0. So the vision and the promise Web 3.0 when it to full decentralization is not here by any means. I'd say we're at a Web 2.25. >> Pre-Web 3.0 no, but actions there. How do you guys see the dangers, 'cause there's a lot of negative press but also there's a lot of positive press. You're seeing a lot of fraud, we've seen a lot of the crypto fraud over the past years. You've seen a lot of now positive. It's almost a self-governance thing and environment, the way the culture is. But what are the dangers, how do you guys educate people, what should people pay attention to, what should people look for to understand, you know, where to position themselves? >> Yes, so we've learned a lot from Web 1.0, Web 2.0, the sharing economy. And we are walking into Web 3.0 with eyes wide open. So people have rightfully put forth a number of challenges, the sustainability issues with excess using of computing and mining the excessive amount of scams that are happening in part due to unknown identities. Also the architecture breaks DAOn in some periods and there's a lack of regulation. This is something different though. In the last periods that we've gone through, we didn't really know what was going to happen. And we walked and think this is going to be great. The sharing economy, the gig economy, the social media's going to change the world around. It's very different now. People are a little bit jaded. So I think that's a change. And so I think we're going to see that sorted out in suss out just like we've seen with other trends. It's still very much in the early years. >> Ren, I got to get your take on this whole should influencers and should people be anonymous or should they be docs out there? You saw the board, eight guys that did that were kind of docs a little bit there. And that went viral. This is an issue, right? Because we just had a problem of fake news, fake people, fake information. And now you have a much more secure environment imutability is a wonderful thing. It's a feature, not a bug, right? So how is this all coming down? And I know you guys are in the middle of it with NFTs as authentication. Take us, what's your take on this because this is a big issue. >> Look, I think first I am extremely optimistic about technology in general. So I'm super, super bullish about this. And yet, you know, I think that while crypto has so many upsides, it's important to be super conscious and aware of the downsides that come with it to, you know. If you think about every Fortune 500 company there is always training required by all employees on internet safety, reporting of potential attacks and so on. In Web 3.0, we don't have that kind of standard reporting mechanisms yet for bad actors in that space. And so when you think about influencers in particular, they do have a responsibility to educate people about the potential, but also the dangers of the technology of Web 3.0 of crypto basically. Whether you're talking about hacks or online safety, the need for hardware, wallet, impersonators on discord, you know, security storing your seed phrase. So every actor influencer or else has got a role to play. I think that in that context to your point, it's very hard to tell whether influencers should be anonymous, oxydemous or fully docked. The decentralized nature of Web 3.0 will probably lead us to see a combination of those anonymity levels so to speak. And the movements that we've seen around some influencers identities become public are particularly interesting. I think there's probably a convergence of Web 2.O and Web 3.0 at play here, you know. Maybe occurring on the notion of 2.5. But for now I think in Web 2.0, all business founders and employees are known and they held accountable for their public comments and their actions. If Web 3.0 enables us to be anonymous, if DAOs have voting control, you know. What happens if people make comments and there is no way to know who they are, basically. What if the DAO doesn't take appropriate action? I think eventually there will be an element of community self-regulation where influencers will be acting in the best interest of their reputation. And I believe that the communities will self-regulate themselves and will create natural boundaries around what can be said or not said. >> I think that's a really good point about influencers and reputation because. Jeremiah, does it matter that you're anonymous have an icon that could be a NFT or a picture. But if I have an ongoing reputation I have trust, to this trust there. It's not like just a bot that was created just to spam someone. You know I'm starting to getting into this new way. >> You're right, and that word you said trust, that's what really this is about. But we've seen that public docs, people with their full identities have made mistakes. They have pulled the hood over people's faces and really scammed them out of a lot of money. We've seen that in the, that doesn't change anything in human behavior. So I think over time that we will see a new form of a reputation system emerge even for pseudonym and perhaps for people that are just anonymous that only show their potential wallet, address a series of numbers and letters. That form might take a new form of a Web 3.0 FICO Score. And you could look at their behaviors. Did they transact, you know, how did they behave? Were they involved in projects that were not healthy? And because all of that information is public on the chain and you can go back in time and see that. We might see a new form of a scoring emerge, of course. Who controls that scoring? That's a whole nother topic gone on controling and trust. So right now, John we do see that there's a number of projects, new NFT projects, where the founders will claim and use this as a point of differentiation that they are fully docs. So you know who they are and in their names. Secondly, we're seeing a number of products or platforms that require KYC, you know, your customers. So that's self-identification often with a government ID or credit card in order to bridge out your coins and turn that into fiat. In some cases that's required in some of these marketplaces. So we're seeing a collision here between our full names and pseudonyms and being anonymous. >> That's awesome. And I think this is the new, again, a whole new form of governance. Ren, you mentioned some comments about DAO. I want to get your thoughts again. You know, Jeremiah we've become historians over the years. We're getting old I'm a little bit older than you. (Jeremiah laughs) But we've seen the- >> You're young men. You know, I remember breaking in the business when the computer standards bodies were built to be more organic and then they became much more of a, kind of an anti-innovation environment where people, the companies would get involved, the standards organization just to slow things DAO and mark things up a little bit. So, you know, you look at DAOs like, hmm, is DAO a good thing or a bad thing. The answer is from people I talk to is, it depends. So I'd love to get your thoughts on getting momentum and becoming defacto with value, a value proposition, vis-a-vis just a DAO for the sake of having a DAO. This has been a conversation that's been kind of in the inside the baseball here, inside the ropes of the industry, but there's trade offs. Can you guys share your thoughts on when to do a DAO and when not to do a DAO and the benefits and trade offs of that? >> Sure, maybe I'll start off with a definition and then we'll go to, Ren. So a DAO, a decentralized autonomous organization, the best way to think about this It's a digital cooperative. and we've heard of worker cooperatives before. The difference is that they're using blockchain technologies in order to do three things, identity, governance, and rewards and mechanisms. They're relying on Web 2.0 tools and technologies like discord and Telegram and social networks to communicate. And as a cooperative they're trying to come up with a common goal. Ren, what's your take, that's the setup. >> So, you know for me when I started my journey into crypto and Web 3.0, I had no idea about what DAO actually meant. And an easy way for me to think of it and to grasp the nature of it was about the comparison between a DAO and perhaps a more traditional company structure, you know. In the traditional company structure, you have (indistinct), the company's led by a CEO and other executives. The DAO is a flat structure, and it's very much led by a group of core contributors. So to Jeremiah's point, you know, you get that notion of a cooperative type of structure. The decision making is very different, you know. We're talking about a super high level of transparency proposals getting submitted and voting systems using (indistinct) as opposed to, you know, management, making decisions behind closed doors. I think that speaks to a totally new form of governance. And I think we have hardly, hardly scratched the surface. We have seen recently very interesting moments in Web 3.0 culture. And we have seen how DAO suddenly have to make certain decisions and come to moments of claiming responsibility in order to police behavior of some of the members. I think that's important. I think it's going to redefine how we're thinking about that particularly new governance models. And I think it's going to pave the way for a lot of super interesting structure in the near future. >> Yeah and that's a great point. >> Go ahead, Jeremiah. >> That's a great point, Ren. Around the transparency for governance. So, John you post the question, does this make things faster or slower? And right now in the most doubts are actually pretty slow because they're set up as a flat organization. So as a response to that they're actually shifting to become representative democracies. Does that sound familiar? Or you can appoint delegates and use tokens to vote for them and they have a decision power. Almost like a committee and they can function. And so we've seen actually there sometimes are hierarchy except the person at the top is voted by those that have the tokens. In some cases, the people at the top had the most tokens. But that's a whole nother topic. So we're seeing a wide variety of governance structures. >> You know, Ren I was talking with Matt G, the Founder of Unstoppable. And I was telling him about the Domain Name System. And one little trivia note that many people don't know about is that the US government 'cause the internet was started by the US. The Department of Commerce kept that on tight leash because the international telecommunications wanted to get their hands on it because of ccTLDs and other things. So at that time, 'cause the innovation yet was isn't yet baked out. It was organically growing the governance, the rules of the road, keeping it very stable versus melding with it. So there's certain technologies that require, Jeremiah that let's keep an eye on as a community let's not formalize anything. Like the government did with the Domain Name System. Let's keep it tight and then finally released it. I think multiple years after 2004, I think it went over to the ITU. But this is a big point. I mean, if you get too structured, organic innovation can't go. What's you guys reaction to that? >> So I think, you know to take the stab at it. We have as a business, you know, thinking of Unstoppable Domains, a strong incentive to innovate. And this is what is going to be determining long-term value growth for the organization, for partners, for users, for customers. So you know the degree of formalization actually gives us a sense of purpose and a sense of action. And if you compare that to DAO, for instance, you can see how some of the upsides and downsides can pan out either way. It's not to say that there is a perfect solution. I think one of the advantages of the DAO is that you can let more people contribute. You can probably remove buyers quite effectively and you can have a high level of participation and involvement in decisions and own the upside in many ways. You know as a company, it's a slightly different setup. We have the opportunity to coordinate a very diverse and part-time workforce in a very you a different way. And we do not have to deal with the inefficiencies that might be inherent to some form of extreme decentralization. So there is a balance from an organizational structure that comes either side. >> Awesome. Jeremiah, I want to get your thoughts on a trend that you've been involved in, we've both been involved in. And you're seeing it now with the kind of social media world, the world of the role of an influencer. It's kind of moved from what was open source and influencer was a connect to someone who shared, created content enabled things to much more of a vanity. You update the photo on Instagram and having a large audience. So is there a new influencer model with Web 3.0 or is it, I control the audience I'm making money that way. Is there a shift in the influencer role or ideas that you see that should be in place for what is the role of an influencer? 'Cause as Web 3.0 comes you're going to see that role become instrumental. We've seen it in open source projects. Influencers, you know, the people who write code or ship code. So what's your take on that? Because this has been a conversation. People have been having the word influencer and redefining and reframing it. >> Sure, the influence model really hasn't changed that much, but the way that they're behaving has when it comes to Web 3.0. In this market, I mean there's a couple of things. Some of the influencers are investors. And so when you see their name on a project or a new startup, that's an indicator there's a higher level of success. You might want to pay more attention to it or not. Secondly, influencers themselves are launching their own NFT projects. So, Gary Vaynerchuk, a number of celebrities, Paris Hilton is involved. They are also doing theirs as well. Steve Aok, famous DJ launched his as well. So they're going head first and participating in building in this model. And their communities are coming around them and they're building economy. Now the difference is it's not I speak as an influencer to the fans. The difference is that the fans are now part of the community and they literally hold and own some of the economic value, whether it's tokens or the NFTs. So it's a collaborative economy, if you will, where they're all benefiting together. And that's a big difference as well. >> Can you see- >> Lastly, there's one little tactic we're seeing where marketers are air dropping NFTs, branded NFTs influencers wallet. So you can see it in there. So there's new tactics that are forming as well. Back to you. >> That's super exciting. Ren, what's your reaction to that? Because he just hit on a whole new way of how engagement's happening, how people are closed looping their votes, their votes of confidence or votes with their wallet. And the brands which are artists now influencers. I mean, this is a whole game changing instrumentation level. >> I think that what we are seeing right now is super reinvigorating as a marketeer who's been around for a few years, basically. I think that the shift in the way brands are going to communicate and engage with their audiences is profound. It's probably as revolutionary and even more revolutionary than the movement for brands in getting into digital. And you have that sentiment of a gold rush right now with a lot of brands that are trying to understand NFTs and how to actually engage with those communities and those audiences. There are many levels in which brands and influencers are going to engage. There are many influencers that actually advance the message and the mission because the explosion of content on Web 3.0 has been crazy. Part of that is due to the network effect nature of crypto. Because as Jaremiah mentioned, people are incentivized to promote projects. Holders of an NFT are also incentivized to promote it. So you end up with a fly wheel which is pretty unique of people that are hyping their project and that are educating other people about it and commenting on the ecosystem with IP right being given to NFT holders. You're going to see people promote brands instead of the brands actually having to. And so the notion of brands are gaining and delivering elements of the value to their fans is something that's super attractive, extremely interesting. And I think again, we have hardly scratched the surface of all that is possible in that particular space. >> That's interesting. You guys are bringing some great insight here. Jeremiah, the old days the word authentic was a kind of a cliche and brands like tried to be authentic. And they didn't really know what to do they called it organic, right? And now you have the trust concept with authenticity and environment like Web 3.0 where you can actually measure it and monetize it and capture it if you're actually authentic and trustworthy. >> That's right, and be because it's on blockchain, you can see how somebody's behaved with their economic behavior in the past. Of course, big corporations aren't going to have that type of trail on blockchain just yet. But individuals and executives who participate in this market might be. And we'll also see new types of affinity. Do executives do they participate in these NFT communities, do they purchase them or numerous brands like Adidas to acquire, you know, different NFT projects to participate. And of course the big brands are grabbing their domains. Of course you could talk to, Ren about that because it's owning your own name is a part of this trust and being found. >> That's awesome. Great insight guys. Closing comments, takeaways for the audience here. Each of you take a minute to share your thoughts on what you think is happening now where it goes, all right, where's it going to go? Jeremiah, we'll start with you. >> Sure, I think the vision of Web 3.0 where full decentralization happens, where the power is completely shifted to the edges. I don't think it's going to happen. I think we will reach Web 2.5. And I've been through so many tech trends where we said that the power's going to shift completely to of the end, it just doesn't. In part there's two reasons. One is the venture capital are the ones who tend to own the programs in the first place. And secondly, the startups themselves end up becoming the one-percenter. We see Airbnb and Uber are one-percenter now. So that trend happens over and over and over. Now with that said, the world will be in a better place. We will have more transparency. We will see economic power shifted to the people, the participants. And so they will have more control over the internet that they are building. >> Awesome, Ren final comments. >> I'm fully aligned with Jeremiah on the notion of control being returned to users, the notion of ownership and the notion of redistribution of the economic value that is created across all the different chains that we are going to see and all those ecosystems. I believe that we are going to witness two parallel movements of expansion. One that is going to be very lateral. When you think of crypto and Web 3.0 essentially you think of a few 100 tribes. And I think that more projects are going to be a more coalitions of individuals and entities, and those are going to exist around those projects. So you're going to see, you know, an increase in the number of tribes that one might join. And I also think that we're going to progress rapidly from the low 100 millions of crypto and NFT holders into the big hands basically. And that's going to be extreme interesting. I think that the next waves of crypto users, NFT fans are going to look very different from the early adopters that we had witnessed in the very early days. So it's not going to be your traditional model of technology adoption curves. I think the demographics are going to shift and the motivations are going to be different as well, which is going to be a wonderful time to educate and engage with new community members. >> All right, Ren and Jeremiah, thank you both for that great insight great segment breaking down Web 3.0 or Web 2.5 as Jeremiah says but we're in a better place. This is a segment with the influencers. As part of theCUBE and the Unstoppable Domain Showcase. I'm John Furrie, your host. Thanks for watching. (bright upbeat music)

>>Hello, and welcome to the cube unstoppable Doneen showcase. I'm John furrier, host of the cube. We got a great discussion here called the influencers around what's going on in web three and also this new sea change cultural change around this next generation, internet web cloud, all happening, Jeremiah yang industry analyst, and founding part of the cleaner insights. Share my great to see you. Thanks for coming on. Appreciate it. Uh, registered vice-president of marketing at unstoppable domains in the middle of all the actions. Gentlemen, thanks for coming on on the cube for this showcase. >>My pleasure. So I think it was done >>At Jeremy. I want to start with you. You've seen many ways, but fallen all of your work for over a decade now. Um, you've seen the web 2.0 wave. Now the web three's here. Um, and it's not, I wouldn't say hyped up. It's really just ramping up and you're seeing real practical examples. Uh, you're in the middle of all the action. What is this web three? Can you frame for us that mean you've seen many waves? What is web three mean? What is it? What is it all about? >>Well, John, you and I worked in the web to space and essentially that enabled peer to peer media where people could, could upload their thoughts and ideas and videos, um, without having to rely on centralized media. And unfortunately that distributed and decentralized movement actually became centralized on the platforms or the big social networks and big tech companies. And this has caused an uproar because the people who are creating the content did not have control, could not control their identities and could not really monetize or make decisions. So web three is what is, which is a moniker of a lot of different trends, including crypto blockchain. And sometimes the metaverse is to undo the controlling that has become centralized. And the power is now shifting back into the hands of the participants again, and then this movement, they want to have more control over their identities, their governance, the content that they're creating, how they're actually building it and then how they're monetizing it. So in many ways, it's, it's changing the power and it's a new economic model. So that's web three without really even mentioning the technologies. Is that helpful? >>Yeah, that's great. And ran. We were talking about, on the cute many times and one notable stat, I don't think it's been reported, but it's been more kind of a rumor. I hear that 30% of the, um, Berkeley computer science students are dropping out and going into crypto or blockchain or decentralized startups, which means that this there's a big wave coming in of talent. You seeing startups, you're seeing a lot more formation. You're seeing a lot more, I would say, kind of ramping up of real people, not just, you know, people with a dream it's actual builders out here doing stuff. What's your take on the web three, moving with all this kind of change happening, uh, from people and also the new ideas being refactored. >>I think that the competition for talent is extremely real. And we start looking at the stats. We see that there is an draft of people that are moving into this space. People that are fascinated by technology and are embracing the ethos of web three. And at this stage, I think it's not only engineers and developers, but we have moved into a second phase where we see that a lot of supporting functions know marketing, being one of them, sales, business development, uh, are being built up quite rapidly. It's not without actually reminding me of the mid two thousands. You know, when I started, uh, working with Google at that point in time, the walled gardens rightly absorbing vast, vast cohorts of young graduates and more experienced professionals that are passionate and moving into the web environment. And I think we are seeing a movement right now, which is not entirely dissimilar, except >>Yeah, Jeremiah. You've seen the conversations over the cloud. I call the cloud kind of revolution. You had mobile in 2007, but then you got Amazon web services changed the application space on how people developed in the cloud. And again, that created a lot of value. Now you're seeing the role of data as a huge part of how people are scaling and the decentralized movement. So you've got cloud, which is kind of classic today. State-of-the-art, you know, enterprise and or app developers and you've got now decentralized wave coming. Okay. You're seeing apps being developed on that, that architecture data is central in all of this, right. So how do you view this? As, as someone who's watching the landscape, you know, these walled gardens are hoarding all the data. I mean, LinkedIn Facebook, they're not sharing that data with anyone they're using it for themselves. So as they can control back, comes to the forefront, how do you see this market with the applications and what comes out of that? >>So the thing that we've seen and out of the five things that I had mentioned that are decentralizing, the ones that have been easier to move across have been the ability to monetize and to build. But the data aspect has actually stayed pretty much central. Frankly. What has decentralized is that the contracts to block blockchain ledgers to those of decentralized. But the funny thing is often a big portion of these blockchain networks are on Amazon 63 to 70%, same thing with Stelara. So they're still using the web 2.0 architectures. However, we're also seeing other farms like IPFS, where the data could be to spread it across a wider range of folks. But right now we're still dependent on what we're to point out. So the vision and the problem with 3.0, when it comes to full de-centralization is not here by any means. I'd say we're at a web 2.2, five, >>Pre-web 3m, no actions there. What do you guys, how do you guys see the, um, the dangers? Cause there's a lot of negative press, but also is a lot of positive press. You seeing, you know, a lot of fraud, we've seen a lot of the crypto fraud over the past years. You've seen a lot of now positives, it's almost a self-governance thing and environment, the way the culture is, but what are the dangers? How do you guys educate people? What should people pay attention to? What should people look for to understand, you know, where to position themselves? >>Yes. So we've learned a lot from web one, we to the sharing economy and we are walking into two and three with eyes wide open. So people have rightfully put forth a number of challenges, the sustainability issues with excess using of computing and mining, the, um, the excessive amount of scams that are happening in part due to unknown identities. Um, also the architecture breaks down in certain periods and there's a lack of regulation. Um, this, this is something different though in the last, uh, uh, periods that we've gone through, we didn't really know what was gonna happen. And we walked in big, this is going to be great. The sharing economy, the gig economy, the social media is going to change the world. Hurrah is very different. Now people are a little bit jaded. So I think that's the big change. And so I think we're going to see that, uh, you know, soar it out and suss out just like we've seen with other prints. It's still very much in the early years, >>Right. I got to get your take on this whole, uh, should influencers and should people be anonymous or should they be doxed out there? You saw the board eight guys that did, that were kind of docs a little bit there and that went, went viral. Um, this is an issue, right? Because we, we just had a problem of fake news, uh, fake people, fake information, and now you have a much more secure environment. Immutability is a wonderful thing. It's, it's a feature, not a bug, right. So how is this all coming down? And I know you guys are in the middle of it with, uh, NFTs as, as authentication tickets. What's your take on this because this is a big issue. >>Look, I think first I am extremely optimistic about technology in general. Uh, so I'm super, super bullish about this. And yet, you know, I think that while crypto has so many upsides, it's important to be super conscious and aware of the downsides that come with it too. You know, if you think about every fortune 500 company, there is always training required by all employees on internet safety reporting of potential attacks. And so on in web three, we don't have that kind of standard reporting mechanisms yet, uh, for bad actors in that space. And so when you think about influencers in particular, they do have a responsibility to educate people about, uh, the potential, but also the dangers of the technology of web three, uh, of crypto basically, uh, whether you're talking about hacks online safety, the need for hardware impersonators on discord, uh, security, uh, storing your, your seed phrase. >>So every actor in France or ELs has got a role to play. I think that, uh, in that context, to your point, it's very hard to tell whether influencers should be, uh, anonymous, opposite inverse or footy dogs. The decentralized nature of web three will probably lead us to see a combination of those anonymity levels, um, so to speak, um, and the, uh, movements that we've seen around some influencers, identities becoming public are particularly interesting. I think there's probably a convergence of web two and web three at play here. You know, maybe a on the notion of 2.5 for, I think in way to all business founders and employees are known and they're held accountable for their public comments and actions. Um, if web three enables us to be anonymous, if dials have 14 control, you know, what happens if people make comments and there is no way to know who they are basically, uh, what if the dowel doesn't take appropriate action? I think eventually there will be an element of community self-regulation where influencers will be, uh, acting in the best interest of their reputation. And I believe that the communities will self regulate themselves and we'll create natural boundaries around what can be said or not. >>I think that's a really good point about, um, influencers and reputation because Jeremiah doesn't matter that you're anonymous. I have an icon that could be a NFT or a picture, but if I have an ongoing reputation, I have trust there's trust there. It's not like a, you know, just a bot that was created just to spam someone. It was just, you know what I'm saying? They getting into you getting into this new way. >>You're right. And that, that word you said, trust, that's what really, this is about. But we've seen that public docks people with their full identities have made mistakes. They have pulled the hood over people's faces in and really scammed them out of a lot of money. We've seen that in it that doesn't change anything in human behavior. So I think over time that we will see a new form of a reputation system emerged even for pseudonyms and perhaps for people that are just anonymous that only show their a potential, a wallet address, a series of numbers and letters. Um, that form might take a new form of a web 3.0 FICO score, and you can look at their behaviors. Did they transact? You know, how do they behave? Do they, were they involved in projects that were not healthy? And because all of that information is public on the chain and you can go back in time and see that we might see a new form of, of, of a scoring emerge. >>Of course, who controls that scoring that's a whole nother topic, gong on control and trust. So right now, John, we do see that there's a number of projects, new NFG projects, where the founders will claim and use this as a point of differentiation that they are fully docs. So you know who they are and their names. Secondly, we're seeing a number of, um, uh, products or platforms that require KYC, know your customer so that self-identification often with a government ID or a credit card in order to bridge out your, your coins and turn that into a Fiat. In some cases that's required in some of these marketplaces. So we're seeing a coalition here between, uh, full names and pseudonyms and being anonymous. >>That's awesome. And that, and I think this is the new, again, a whole new form of governance ran. You mentioned some comments about Dow. So I want to get your thoughts again, you know, Jeremiah, we become historians over the years. We're getting old, I'm a little bit older than you, but we've seen the movie war. You know, I remember breaking in the business when the computer standards bodies were built to be more organic, and then they became much more of a kind of an anti-innovation environment where people, the companies would get involved the standards organization just to slow things down and muck things up a little bit. Um, so you know, you look at Dallas like, Hmm, is a Dal, a good thing, or a bad thing that the answer is from people I talked to, is it depends. So I'd love to get your thoughts on getting momentum and becoming defacto with value, a value proposition. Vis-a-vis just adapt for the sake of having a doubt. This has been a conversation that's been kind of in the inside the baseball here, inside the ropes of the industry, but there's trade-offs, can you guys share your thoughts on when to do a Dow and when not to do a Dow and the benefits and trade-offs of that? >>Sure. Maybe I'll start off with a definition and then we'll go to rent. So a Dao, a decentralized autonomous organization, the best way to think about this. It's a digital cooperative and we've heard of worker cooperatives before the differences that they're using blockchain technologies in order to do the three things, identity governance, and rewards and mechanisms. They're relying on web 2.0 tools and technologies like discord and telegram and social networks to communicate. And there's a cooperative they're trying to come up with a common goal, um, Ren, but what's your take, that's the setup? >>So, you know, for me, when I started my journey into crypto and web tree, I had no idea about, you know, what that actually meant and, uh, an easy way for me to think of it and to grasp the nature of it was about the comparison between a dowel and perhaps a more traditional company structure. Um, you know, in a traditional company structure, you have a Yorkie, the company is led by a CEO and other executives, uh, that that was a flat structure. And it's very much led by a group of core contributors. So, uh, to Jeremiah's point, you know, you get that notion of a co-operative, uh, type of structure. The decision-making is very different. You know, we're talking about a hot, super high level of transparency proposals getting submitted and, and voting systems, using applications, as opposed to, you know, management, making decisions behind closed doors. >>I think that speaks to a totally new form of governance. And I think we have hardly, hardly scratched the surface. We have seen recently, uh, very interesting moments in web tree culture. And we have seen how that was suddenly have to make certain decisions and then come to moments of claiming responsibility, uh, in order to, uh, put his behavior, uh, of some of the members. I think that's important. I think it's going to redefine how we're thinking about that, particularly new governance models. And I think he's going to pave the way for a lot of super interesting structure in the near future. >>That's a great point, ran around the transparency for governance. So John, you posed the question, does this make things faster or slower? And right now most dowels are actually pretty slow because they're set up as a flat organization. So as a response to that, they're actually shifting to become representative democracies. Does that sound familiar where you can appoint a delegates and use tokens to vote for them? And they have a decision power, almost like a committee and they can function. And so we've seen actually there are some times our hierarchies, except the person at the top is voted by those that have the tokens. In some cases, the people at the top had the most tokens, but that's a whole nother topic. So we're seeing a wide variety of governance structures, >>You know, rent. I was talking with Matt G the founder of, and I was telling him about the domain name system. And one little trivia note that many people don't know about is that the U S government cause unit it was started by the U S the department of commerce kept that on tight leash because the international telecommunications union wanted to get their hands on it because of ccTLDs and other things. So at that time, because the innovation yet wasn't yet baked out. It was organically growing the governance, the rules of the road, keeping it very stable versus meddling with it. So there's certain technologies that require Jeremiah that let's keep an eye on as a community. Let's not formalize anything like the government did with the domain name system. Let's keep it tight. And then finally released it, I think multiple years after 2004, I think it went over to the, to the ITU, but this is a big point. I mean, if you get too structured, organic innovation, can't go, what you guys' reaction to that. >>So I think to take a stab at it, um, we have as a business, you know, thinking of unstoppable domains, a strong incentive to innovate, uh, and this is what is going to be determining longterm value growth for the organization for, uh, partners, for users, for customers. So, you know, that degree of formalization actually gives us a sense of purpose and a sense of action. And if you compare that to Dows, for instance, you can see how some of the upsides and downsides can pan out either way. It's not to say that there is a perfect solution. I think one of the advantages of the Dow is that you can let more people contribute. You can probably remove bias quite effectively, and you can have a high level of participation and involvement in decisions and all the upside in many ways. Um, you know, as a company, it's a slightly different setup. We have the opportunity to coordinate a very, uh, diverse and part-time workforce in a very, uh, you know, different way. Um, and we do not have to deal with the inefficiencies that might be, you never run to some form of extreme decentralization so that those are balanced from an organizational structure, uh, that comes, uh, either side >>Sharon. I want to get your thoughts on, on, on a trend that you've been involved in. We both been involved in, and you're seeing it now with the kind of social media world, the world of a role of an influencer it's kind of moved from what was open source and influencer was a connect to someone who shared graded content, um, enabled things to much more of a vanity that the photo on Instagram and having a large audience. Um, so is there a new influencer model with web three or is it, is it the, I control the audience I'm making money that way. Is there a shift in the influencer role or, or ideas that you see that should be in place for what is the role of an influencer? Because as web three comes, you're going to see that role become instrumental. We've seen it in open source projects, influences, you know, the people who write code or ship code. So what's your take on that because there's been a conversation with people who have been having the word influencer and redefining and reframing it. >>Sure. The influence model really hasn't changed that much, but the way that they're behaving has when it comes to at three, this market, I mean, there's a couple of things. Some of the influencers are in investors. And so when you see their name on a project or a new startup, that's an indicator, there's a higher level of success. You might want to pay more attention to it or not. Secondly, influencers themselves are launching their own NFC projects. Gary Vaynerchuk, a number of celebrities, Paris Hilton is involved and they are also doing this as well. Steve Aoki, a famous DJ launched his as well. So they're going head first and participating in building in this model. And there are communities are coming around them and they're building economies. Now the difference is it's not, I speak as an influencer to the fans. The difference is that the fans are now part of the community and they hold, they literally holding own some of the economic value, whether it's tokens or the NFTs. So it's a collaborative economy, if you will, where they're all benefiting together. And that's a, that's a big difference as well. Lastly, there's, there's one little tactic we're seeing where marketers are airdropping in FTS, branded NFTs influencers with wallet. So you can see it in there. So there's new tactics that are forming as well. Yes. >>Super exciting. Ren, what's your reaction to that? Because he just hit on a whole new way of, of how engagement's happening, how people are closed, looping their, their votes, their, their votes of confidence or votes with their wallet. Um, and some brands which are artists now, influencers. I mean, this is a whole game-changing instrumentation level. >>I think that's what we are seeing right now is super re invigorating as a marketeer who has been around for a few years, basically. Um, I think that the shift in the web brands are going to communicate and engage with our audiences is profound. It's probably as revolutionary and even more revolutionary than the movement for, uh, brands in getting into digital. And you have that sentiment of a gold rush right now with a lot of brands that are trying to understand NFTs and, and how to actually engage with those communities and those audiences, um, dominate levels in which brands and influencers are going to engage. There are many influencers that actually advanced the message and the mission because the explosion of content on web tree has been crazy. Part of that is due to the network effect nature of crypto, because as Jeremiah mentioned, people are incentivized to promote projects, holders of an NFTA, also incentivized to promote it. So you end up with a flywheel, which is pretty unique of people that are hyping the project, and that are educating other people about it and commenting on the ecosystem, uh, with IP rights, being given to NFT holders, you're going to see people pull a brand since then of the brands actually having to. And so the notion of brands, again, judging and delivering, you know, elements of the value to their fans is something that's super attractive, extremely interesting. And I think, again, we've hardly scratched the surface of all that is possible in that. >>It's interesting. You guys are bringing some great insight here, Jeremiah, the old days, the word authentic was a kind of a cliche and brands like tried to be authentic and they didn't really know what to do. They called it organic, right? And now you have the trust concept with aura authenticity and environment like web three, where you can actually measure it and monetize it and capture it if you're actually authentic and trustworthy. >>That's right. And because it's on blockchain, you can see how somebody is behave with their economic behavior. In the past, of course, big corporations. Aren't going to have that type of trail on blockchain just yet. But the individuals and executives who participate in this market might be, and we'll also see a new types of affinity. Do you executives, do they participate in these NFT communities? Do they purchase them? We're seeing numerous brands like Adidas to acquire, uh, you know, different MTV projects to participate. And of course the big brands are grabbing their domains. Of course, you can talk to rant about that because it's owning your own name as a part of this trust and being >>That's awesome. Great insight guys. Closing comments, takeaways for the audience here. Each of you take a minute to give, share your thoughts on what you think is happening now, where it goes. All right, where's it going to go, Jeremy, we'll start with you. >>Sure. Um, I think the vision of web three, where full decentralization happens, where the power is completely shifted to the edges. I don't think it's going to happen. I think we will reach web 2.5 and I've been through so many tech trends where we said that the power is going to shift completely to the end. It just doesn't, there's two reasons. One is the venture capital are the ones who tend to own the pro programs in the first place. And secondly, the, the startups themselves end up becoming the one percenters. We see Airbnb and Uber are one-percenters now. So that trend happens over and over and over. Now with that said, the world will be in a better place. We will have more transparency. We will see economic power shifted to the people, the participants. And so they will have more control over the internet that they are building. >>Right. And final, final comments, >>Um, fully aligned with Jeremiah on the notions of control, being returned to users, the notion of ownership and the notion of redistribution of the economic value that is created across all the different chains, uh, uh, that we are going to see. And, and all those ecosystems. I believe that we are going to witness to palliate movements of expansion, one that is going to be very lateral. When you think of crypto and web three, essentially you think of a few hundred tribes. Uh, and I think that more projects are going to appear more, uh, coalitions of individuals and entities, and those are going to exist around those projects. So you're going to see an increase in the number of tribes that one might join. And I also think that we're going to progress rapidly from the low hundred millions of people and an FTE holders into the billions perfectly. Uh, and that's going to be extremely interesting. I think that the next wave of crypto users and Ft fans are going to look very different from the early adopters that we had witnessed in the very early days. So it's not going to be your traditional model of technology, adoption curves. I think the demographics going to shift and the motivations are going to be different as well, which is going to be a wonderful time to educate and engage with new community members. >>All right, Ron, Jeremy, thank you both for that great insight, great segment, uh, breaking down web three or web 2.5 as Jeremiah says, but we're in a better place. This is a segment with the influencers as part of the cubes and the unstoppable domain showcase. Um, John for your hosts. Thanks for watching.

(upbeat electronic music) >> Everyone, welcome to our special Mobile World Congress 2017 coverage. I'm John Furrier here in theCUBE for two days of wall-to-wall coverage. Monday and Tuesday, February 27th and 28th, and we have on the phone right now, Lynn Comp, who's the Senior Director of the Network Platforms Group within Intel, part of the team doing the whole network transformation. The big announcements that went out prior to Mobile World Congress and hitting the ground on Monday and Tuesday of all next week in Barcelona. Lynn, great to have you on the phone. Thanks for taking the time to walk through some of the big announcements. >> Lynn: Thanks, John, for having us. It's a really exciting Mobile World Congress. We're seeing more and more of the promise of the next generation networks starting to take solution form from ingredient form a couple years ago, so it's a great, great time to be in this business. >> So 5G is happening now. You're seeing it in the network and the cloud and at the client, that you guys use the word "client" but essentially, it's the people with their smartphones and devices, wearables, AIs, and now the client is now cars, and flying drones and potentially, whatever else is connected to the Internet as an Internet of things. This has been a really big moment and I think I want to take some time to kind of unpack with you some of the complexities and kind of what's going on under the hood because 4G to 5G is a huge step up in the announcement and capabilities, and it's not just another device. There's really unique intellectual property involved, there's more power, there's a market leadership in the ecosystem, and really is a new way for service providers to achieve profitability, and get those products that are trying to connect, that need more power, more bandwidth, more capabilities. Can you take a minute just to talk about the key announcements impacting Mobile World Congress from Intel's perspective this week in your area? >> Lynn: Yeah, so we had a group of announcements that came out. Everything from solutions labs where operators are invited in to work with Nokia and Intel starting out to start working through what does it mean to try and manage a network that includes unlicensed and licensed spectrum and all these different usage models, very different model for them, to Ericsson, an initiative with GE and Honeywell and Intel, that is in Innovator's Initiative, where companies are invited to come in in the ecosystem. An early start working through what does it mean to have this kind of network capability? If you think what happened, 2G, 3G, to 4G, you start looking at the iPhone, been around for 10 years, and you've seen how the uses have changed, and how application developers have come up with completely new ways of doing things, like, who would have thought about crowdsourcing traffic patterns for driving directions? We all wanted it years ago, but it was just recently that we were able to have that on a smartphone. They're trying to unleash that with pretty unique companies. I mean, GE and Honeywell, UC Berkeley, you wouldn't necessarily think of them as being first on innovating new usage models for a wireless network, but with something like 5G, with all of these diverse use cases, you end up with a completely different ecosystem, really wanting to come in early and take advantage of the potential that's there. >> Lynn, talk about this end-to-end store because one of the things that got hidden in all the news, and certainly SiliconANGLE covered it, as well as, there was a great article in Fortune about it, but kind of talk about more of the 5G versus Qualcomm, that was kind of the big story that, the battle of the chips, if you will, and the big 5G angle there, but there's more to it and one thing that caught my attention was this end-to-end architecture, and it wasn't just Intel. You guys are a big part of that as an ingredient, but it's not just Intel, and what does that mean, end-to-end, 'cause I can see the wireless pieces and overlaying connecting devices, but where's the end-to-end fit in? Can you give some color on that? >> Lynn: Absolutely. You know what's really fascinating is you've got Intel and we've been in the cloud and heard of the genesis of what would become the consumer and the enterprise cloud from the very start, and so what we've been doing in working in that end-to-end arena is taking things like virtualization, which has allowed these service providers and enterprises to slice up compute resources and instead of having something that's completely locked and dedicated on one workload, they can create slices of different applications that all sit on the same hardware and share it, and so if you look, years ago, many of the service providers, cloud and enterprise, they were looking at utilization rights as maybe 15% of the compute power of a server, and now, a lot of them are aiming for 75 to 85% utilization, and that's just a crazy amount of (mumbles) so bringing that to this market that in traditional, we had single purpose boxes, there's various detections for one thing, but that creates a business challenge if you need to do more than one thing, so really what we're showing, for example, at Mobile World Congress, it's something that we call FlexRAN, and it's an example of how to run a radio area network on a standard server on the technology, and it does implement that network slicing. Its's very similar to the virtualization and the compute slicing, but taking advantage of it to use different bandwidths and different rates for different scenarios, whether IoT or smartphones, or even connected cars. >> So I got to ask you about, the big question I get is, first of all, thanks for that, but the big question I get is, this isn't turning into an app show, we're Mobile World Congress, and apps are everything from cars to just phone apps to network apps, et cetera, and the question that everyone's asking is, we need more bandwidth, and certainly, 5G addresses that, but the service providers are saying, "Do we really need all that power? And "When is it coming?" "What's the timing of all this?" So, specific question to you is, Lynn, is what is Intel doing to accelerate the network transformation for the service providers to get 5G ready, 'cause that seems to be the main theme as the orientation of where the progress bar is relative to is it ready for primetime, is it here and now, is it out in the future, is this kind of a pre-announcement, so there's kind of some confusion. Clarify that up. Where's the progress bar and how is Intel accelerating network transformation for folks in the service provider vis-a-vis 5G-ready? >> Lynn: So there's a couple things. So let me start with the accelerating piece because it also relates to the end-to-end piece. When you look at the way that networks have been constructed all the way, end-to-end, it has traditionally been a very, very limited set of solution providers, and they tend to survive pretty granular, pretty high-granular functions, so the appliance, the full appliance, software, hardware, everything, and I would look at some of the smartphones up until you could put new applications on it, as appliances, it did voice, and so, we have this service provider begging us for many years, "Give us an ecosystem that looks like server and PC. "I want a building block ecosystem. "I want to be able to take advantage of fast and free wires "in software and hardware. "I need people to come innovate, "like they go innovate on Amazon," and so building an ecosystem, so Intel Network Builders is something that was started about three years ago, and we had, oh, half dozen to maybe 12 different vendors who were part of it, mostly software vendors. Since then, we have 250-plus number and they range from service providers like GT and Telefonica all the way to the hardware vendors like Cisco and Ericsson, and then the software vendors that you would expect. So that's one thing that we've been really working, for a few years now, on giving these operators building block approaches, supporting them in open source. We had a big announcement from AT&T, talking about how they're putting about seven millions lines of code into the Linux Foundation, and its code has been deployed in their network already, so pretty big departure from normal practice, and then today, we had an announcement that came out, where not only did AT&T and Bell Canada and Orange in that community. Now we've got China Mobile, China Telecom, and a project called Open-O, also joining forces. If you were to map out the topics for these operators, we've got almost all of the top ten. They are joining this project to completely change the way that they run their networks, and that translates into the kind of innovation, the kind of applications that consumers love, that they're already getting out of the cloud, now they can begin to get that piece of innovation and creativity in the network as well. So the building block approach seems to be your strategy for the ecosystem. What's the challenge to keep that rolling and cohesive? How are you guys going to foster that growth on the ecosystem? You guys going to be doing a lot of joint marketing, funding, projects, and (chuckles) how are you going to foster that continuing growth? >> Lynn: Well there's a couple, it's such an opportunity-rich environment right now. Even things that you would assume would be normal and kind of standard practice, like standardized benchmarking, because you want apples-to-apples performance comparison. Well that's something that this industry really hasn't had. We've done very conceptualized testing, so we're working with the operators in a project called OPNSG to make sure that the operators have a uniform way, even if it's synthetic benchmark, but they at least understand this synthetic benchmark has this kind of performance, so they start really being able to translate and have the vendors do comparisons on paper, and they can actually do better comparisons without having to do six months of testing, so that's a really big deal. The other thing that I do want to also say about 5G is we're in a pre-standards world right now. ITU and 3GPP will have standards dropped in 2018 and 2020 is when it will be final, but every time that you're looking at a new wireless standard, there's a lot of pretrials that are happening, and that's because you want to test before you state everything has to work a specific way, so there was a trial just announced in December, with Erisson, AT&T in Austin, Texas in the Intel offices, and so if you happen to be in that office, you're starting to be able to experiment with what you could possibly get out of 5G. You'll see more of that with the Olympics in 2018 and 2020, where you've got, Japan and Korea have said we're going to have 5G at those Olympics. >> So I got to ask you some of the questions that we are going to have some guests on here in theCUBE in the Palo Alto coverage around NFV, network function virtualization, plays right into the software-defined networking virtualization world, so why is NFV and SDN so vital to the network transformation? Why now and what's happening in those two areas, and what's the enabler? >> Lynn: The enabler really started about 10 years ago, the real inspiration for it, when we were all in a world of packet processing engines and network processors, and we had some people in our research labs that realized that a lot of the efficiency in doing packet processing quickly came from parallelism, and we knew there were about two or three years to wait, but that was when multi-core came out, and so this thing called data plane development kit was born. We've referred to it as DPDK. It's now an industry organization, not an Intel invention anymore. The industry's starting to foster it. Now is really when the operators realized, "I can run a network on a general purpose processor." (coughs) Excuse me, so they can use cores for running operating systems and applications, of course, they always do that for compute cores, but they can also use the compute cores for passing packets back and forth. The line rates that we're getting are astonishing. 160 gigabits per second, which at the time, we were getting six million packets per second. Very unimpressive 10 years ago, but now, for many of those applications, we're at line rate, so that allows you to then separate the hardware and the software, which is where virtualization comes in, and when you do that, you aren't actually embedding software and hardware together in creating an appliance that, if you needed to do a software update, you might as well update the hardware, too, 'cause there's absolutely no new software load that can happen unless you're in an environment with virtualization or something like containers. So that's why NFV, network function virtualization is important. Gives the operator the ability to use general purpose processors for more than one thing, and have the ability to have future proofing of workloads where a new application or a new use becomes really popular, you don't have to issue new hardware, they just need to spin up the new virtual machine and be able to put function in it. >> So that, I got-- >> Lynn: If you went back and, we were talking about 5G and all of this new way of managing the network, now management in orchestration, it's really important but SDN is also really critical, both for cloud and for comm, because it gives you one map of the connections on the network, so you know what is connected where, and it gives you the ability to remotely change how the servers or how the hardware is connected together. If you were going to ask the CIO, "What's your biggest problem today?" they would tell you that it's almost impossible for them to be able to spin up a fully functional, new application that meets all the security protocols because they don't have a network map of everything that's connected to everything. They don't really have an easy way to be able to issue a command and then have all of the reconfigurations happen. A lot of the information's embedded in router tables. >> Yeah. >> Lynn: So it makes it very, very hard to take advantage of a really complicated network connection map, and be agile. That's where SDN comes in. It just kind of like a command control center, whereas NFV gives them the ability to have agility and spin up new functions very quickly. >> Yeah, and certainly that's where the good security part of the action is. Lynn, I want to get your final thoughts on the final question is this Mobile World Congress, it really encapsulates years and years in the industry of kind of a tipping point, and this is kind of my observation, and I want to get your thoughts on this and reaction to it, is the telcos and the service providers are finally at a moment where there's been so much pressure on the business model. We heard this, you can go on back many, many years ago, "Oh, over the top, " and you're starting to see more and more pressure. This seems to be the year that people have a focus on seeing a straight and narrow set of solutions, building blocks and a ecosystem that poised to go to the next level, where there can be a business model that actually can scale, whether it's scaling the edge, or having the core of the network work well, and up and down the stack. Can you talk about the key challenges that these service providers have to do to address that key profitability equation that being a sustainable entity rather than being the pipes? >> Lynn: Well it comes down to being able to respond to the needs of the user. I will refer to a couple demos that we have in the data center section of our booth, and one of them is so impressive to China Telecom that have put together on complete commercial off-the-shelf hardware that a cloud vendor might use. A demo that shows 4K video running from a virtualized, fixed wireline connection, so one of the cable kind of usage. Now 4K video goes over a virtualized environment from a cable-like environment, to what we call virtual INF, and that's the way that you get different messages passed between different kinds of systems. So INF is wireless, so they've got 4K video from cable out to a wireless capability, running in a virtualized environment at performance in hardware that can be used in the cloud, it could be used in communication service providers 'cause it's general purpose. That kind of capability gives a company like China Telecom the flexibility they need, so with 5G, it's the usage model for 5G that's most important. Turns out to be fixed wireless, because it's so expensive for them to deploy in fiber, well, they have the ability to do it and they can spin it up, maybe not in real time, but certainly, it's not going to take a three-month rollout. >> Yes, and-- >> Lynn: So hopefully, that gives you one example. >> Well that's great enablement 'cause in a lot of execution, well, I thought it gave me one more idea for a question, so since I have my final, final question for you is, what are you most excited about 'cause you sounded super excited with that demo. What other exciting things are happening in the Intel demo area from Intel that's exciting for you, that you could share with the folks listening and watching? >> Lynn: So, I used to never be a believer in augmented reality. (John chuckling) I thought, who's going to walk around with goggles, it's just silly, (coughs) it seemed to me like a toy and maybe I shouldn't admit that on a radio show but I became a believer, and I started to really understand how powerful it could be when Pokemon Go took over all the world in over the summer, to this, an immersive experience, and it's sort of reality, but you're interacting with a brand, or in the booth, we have a really cool virtual reality demo and it was with Nokia next and it's showing 5G network transformation. The thing about virtual reality, we have to really have low latency for it to feel real, quote-unquote, and so, it harnesses the power that we can see just emerging with 5G, and then we get this really great immersive experience, so that, I think, is one that innovate how popular brands like Disney or Disney World or Disneyland, that immersive experience, so I think we're just starting to scratch the surface on the opportunities there. >> Lynn, thanks so much for spending the time. Know you got to go and run. Thanks so much for the commentary. We are low latency here inside theCUBE, bringing you all the action. It's a good title for a show, low latency. Really fast, bringing all the action. Lynn, thanks so much for sharing the color and congratulations on your success at Mobile World Congress and looking forward to getting more post-show, post-mortem after the event's over. Thanks for taking the time. We'll be back with more coverage of Mobile World Congress for a special CUBE live in studio in Palo Alto, covering all the action in Barcelona on Monday and Tuesday, 27th and 28th. I'm John Furrier. Wrap it with more after this short break, thanks for watching. (upbeat electronic music) (bright electronic music)

>> We're here, about to go live, here in a selfie on the pre Silicon Valley Friday Show, about to go live for our show, for some live Friday. We've got a great lineup, it's on my Twitter. Donald Trump and all his viral tweets and now there's an algorithm out there that creates a shorting stock called Trump and Dump, we're going to be talking to the inventor of that new app. Bunch of other great stuff, controversy around Silicon Valley and Intel, controversy on Google, and we'll be watching a great show, well, hopefully you'll be watching. >> Male Announcer: Live, from Cube headquarters in Palo Alto, California it's the Silicon Valley Friday Show, with John Furrier. (serene techno music) >> Hello, everyone, and welcome to the Silicon Valley Friday Show, I'm John Furrier, we are here live in Palo Alto, California for the Silicon Valley Friday Show every Friday morning we broadcast what's going on in Silicon Valley, what's going on in the streets, we call up people and find out what's going on, this show we've got a great lineup. We're going to talk about, I'll say, the news, Twitter, but we've got this fun segment where we have an algorithm, a bot, an AI bot that goes out there and takes all of Donald Trump's tweets and creates a shorting of the stock and creates making money, apparently, Donald Trump's tweets do move the market. We're going to talk about Snapchat, Snap Inc's IPO, and a refiling and some controversy going around that. Also, controversy around Intel Corporation that just announced a fab plant in Arizona and the CEO is in the White House making the announcement, giving the impression that Donald Trump was all behind this, turns out the CEO is a Republican and supports Donald Trump, when apparently this has been in the works for multiple years, so, not sure that's going to be a game changer for Trump but certainly Intel's taking advantage of the schmooze factor and the PR stunt that has people in Silicon Valley up in arms. Obviously, Intel is pro-immigration, bringing people in, obviously, Andy Grove was an immigrant, legend of Intel. And we have also tons of stuff going on, we're going to preview Mobile World Congress the big show in Barcelona at the end of the month. We're doing a two day special here, live in Pal Alto, we're going to do a special, new Silicon Valley version of Mobile World Congress. We'll give you a preview, we're going to talk to some analysts. And also, the fake news, fake accuracy, and all the stuff that's going on, what is fake news? What is inaccurate news? Is there a difference? Does it matter? It certainly does, we have an opinion on that so, great show lineup. First, is actually Twitter earnings are out and they kind of missed and hit their up on the monthly active uniques by two million people. A total of I think 300 million people are using the number here, just on my notes here says, that there are up to 319 million active, monthly active users. And of course, Trump has been taking advantage of Twitter and the Trump bump did not happen for Twitter, although some say Trump kept it alive. But Trump is using Twitter. And he's been actively on Twitter and is causing a lot of people, we've talked about it many times on the show, but the funniest thing that we've seen, and probably the coolest thing that's interesting is that there's an entrepreneur out there, an agency guy named Brian, Ben Gaddis, I'm sorry, president of T3. He's a branding guy, created viral videos on NPR, all over the news, went viral, he created an AI chatbot that essentially takes Donald Trump's tweets, analyzes any company mentioned and then instantly shorts the stock of that company. And apparently it's working, so we're going to take a look at that. We're also going to talk to him and find out what's going on. We're going to have Ben Rosenbaum on, we're going to have someone from Intel on, we have a lot of great guests, so let's take a look at this clip of the Trump and Dump and then we're going to talk to Ben right after. >> Announcer: T3 noticed something interesting about Twitter lately, particularly when this guy gets hold of it. Anytime a company mentions moving to Mexico or overseas or just doing something bad, he's on it, he tweets, the stock tanks. Tweet, tank. Tweet, tank. Tweet, tank. Everyone's talking about how to make sense of all this. T3 thought the unpredictability of it created a real opportunity. Meet the Trump and Dump automated trading platform. Trump and Dump is a bot powered by a complex algorithm that helps us short stocks ahead of the market. Here's how. Every time he tweets, the bot analyzes the tweet to see if a publicly traded company is mentioned. Then, the algorithm runs an instant sentiment analysis of the tweet in less than 20 milliseconds. It figures, positive or negative. A negative tweet triggers the bot to short the stock. Like earlier this month, his Toyota tweet immediately tanked the stock. But the Trump and Dump bot was out ahead of the market. It shorted the second after his tweet. As the stock tanked, we closed our short and we made a profit, huge profit. Oh, and we donated our profits here. So now, when President Trump tweets, we save a puppy. It's the Trump and Dump automated trading platform. Twitter monitoring, sentiment analysis, complex algorithms, real time stock trades. All fully automated, all in milliseconds. And all for a good cause. From your friends at T3. >> Okay, we're back here in Silicon Valley Friday Show, I'm John Furrier and you just saw the Trump and Dump, Trump and Dump video and the creator, that is Ben Gaddis on the phone, president of T3, a privately owned think tank focused on branding. Ben, thanks for joining us today. >> Thanks for having me, John. Excited to talk with you. >> So, big news NPR had on their page, which had the embed on there and it went viral. Great video, but first talk about the motivation, what's going on behind this video? This is very cool, explain to the folks out there what this Trump and Dump video is about, why did you create it, and how does it work? >> So, we had just like, I think, almost everyone in the United States, we were having a conversation about what do you do with the fact that President Trump is tweeting and tweeting about these companies, and in many cases negatively. So we saw articles talking about it and actually one day a guy in our New York office came up with this idea that we ought to follow those tweets in real time and if he mentions a publicly traded company negatively, short the stock. And so, we kicked that idea around over slack and in about 30 minutes we had an idea for the platform. And about two days later one of our engineers had actually built it. And so what the platform does is it's really actually simple yet complex. It listens to every tweet that the president puts out and then it does two things: it determines if there's a publicly traded company mentioned and if there is, and it actually does sentiment analysis in real time, so, in about 20 milliseconds, it can tell if the tweet is positive or negative. If it's negative, we've seen the stocks typically go down and we short sell that stock. And so, the profit that we develop from that, then we donate it to the ASPCA and then hopefully we save a puppy or two in the process. >> Yeah, and that's key, I think that's one thing I liked about this was you weren't arbitraging, you weren't like a real time seller like these finance guys on Wall Street, which by the way, have all these complex trading algorithms. Yours is very specific, the variables are basically Donald Trump, public company, and he tends to be kind of a negative Tweeter so, mostly to do with moving to Mexico or some sort of you know, slam or bullying kind of Tweet he does. And which moves the market, and this is interesting though, because you're teasing out something clever and cool on the AI kind of side of life and you know, some sort of semantic bot that essentially looks at some context and looks at the impact. But this is kind of the real world we're living in now, these kinds of statements from a president of the United States, or anyone who's in a position of authority, literally moves the market, so you're not doing it to make money you're doing it to prove a point which is that the responsibility here is all about getting exposed in the sense that you got to be careful of what you say on Twitter when you're the president of the United States. I mean, if it was me saying it, I mean, I'm not going to move the market but certainly, you know, the press who impact large groups of people and certainly the president does that so, did you guys have that in mind when you were thinking about this? >> Well, we did. I mean, I think, you know, our goal was, this is what we do for a living, we help big brands monitor all their digital presences and build digital strategy. So, we're already monitoring sentiment around Twitter and around social platforms so, it's pretty core to what we do. But we're also looking at things that are happening in pop culture and societally, what kind of impact social might have on business. And so, the fact that we're able to take an action and deliver a social action, and deliver a real business outcome is pretty core to what we do. What's different here and what's so unique is the fact that we've never really seen things like, policy, whether it's monetary policy, or just general policy be distributed through one platform like Twitter and have such a big impact. So, we think it's kind of a societal shift that is sort of the new norm. That, I don't know that if everyone has figured out what to do with yet and so our goal is to experiment and decide one, can we consume the information fast enough to take an action? And then how do we build through AI platforms that allow us to be smarter in the world that we're living in today that is very, very unpredictable. >> We have Ben Gaddis, as president of T3 also part of the group that did the Trump and Dump video but he brings out a great point about using data and looking at the collective impact of information in real time. And this interesting, I was looking at some of the impact last night in this and Nordstrom's had a tweet about Ivanka Trump and apparently Nordstrom's stock is up so, is there a flaw in the algorithm here? What's the take on that? Because in a way, that's the reverse of the bullying, he's defensive on that one so, is there a sentiment of him being more offensive or defensive? >> It's pretty standard. So, we're starting to see a pattern. So, what happens is that actually, the Nordstrom stock actually did go down right after the tweet. And so, we saw that that's a pattern that's typical when the president tweets negatively. When he tweets positively, we don't see that much of a bump. When he tweets negatively, typically the stock drops anywhere between one and four percent, sometimes even greater than that. But it rebounds very quickly. So, a big part of what we're trying to do with the bot and the algorithm is understand how long do we hold, and what is that timeframe before people actually come back to more of a rational state and start to buy back a stock that's valuable. Now what's really interesting, you mentioned, you know, the algorithm and whether there's a flaw in it, we learned something very interesting yesterday about Nordstrom's. So, the president tweeted and in that tweet he talked negatively about Nordstrom's, but he also talked very positively about his daughter, Ivanka. And so, the algorithm actually picked up that tweet and registered it as 61.5% positive. So, it didn't trade. So, we actually got kind of lucky on that one. >> You bring up a good point, and this is something that I want to get your thoughts on. You know, we live in an era of fake news, and it's just Snapchat just filed IPO filing to make a change in their filing to show that Amazon is going to be a billion dollar partner as well, which wasn't in the filing. So, there's a line between pure, fake news, which is essentially just made up stuff, and inaccurate news, so what you're kind of pointing out is a new mechanism to take advantage of the collective intelligence of real time information. And so this is kind of a new concept in the media business. And brands, who used to advertise with big media companies, are now involved in this so, as someone who's, you know, an architect for brand and understanding data, how are brands becoming more data driven? >> Well, I think what brands are realizing is that they live in this world that is more real time, that's such a buzzword. But more real time than I think they even thought would ever be possible, the fact that someone like the president can tweet and have literally cut off billions of dollars in market cap value in a moment's time is something that they have to figure out. So, I think the first thing is having the tools in place to actually monitor and understand, and then having a plan in place to react to things that are really quite unpredictable. So, not only, I don't think that you can have a plan for everything but you have to at least have a plan for understanding how you get legal approval on a response. Who would be responsible for that. You know, who do you work with, either through partners or inside of your organization to, you know, to be able to respond to something when you need to get back in promoting, you know, minutes versus hours. The thing that we don't hear people talk near as much about is, our goal was to see how close we can get to the information so we can zoom the data from Twitter's fire hose, so we get it hopefully when everyone else does. And then our goal is to take an action on that quicker than anybody else, and that delta is where we'll make a profit. What's really interesting to me is that the only person closer to that information than the president is Twitter. >> Ben, great to have you on, appreciate it, love to get you back on as a guest. We love to talk about is our model here, it's looking angle, it's extracting the signal from the noise. And certainly the game is changing, you're working with brands and the old model of ad agencies, this is a topic we love to cover here, the old ad agency model's certainly becoming much more platform oriented with data, these real time tools really super valuable, having a listening engine, having some actionable mechanisms to go out there and be part of and influence the conversation with information. Seems to be a good trend that you guys are really riding. Love to have you back on. >> We'd love to be back on, and thanks for the time, we enjoyed it. >> That was Ben Gaddis, who's the president of T3, the firm behind the Trump and Dump, but more importantly highlighting a really big megatrend which is the use of data, understanding its impact, having some analysis, and trying to figure out what that means for people. Be right back with more after this short break. >> [Female Announcer] Why wait for the future? The next evolution in IT infrastructure is happening now. And Cisco's Unified Computing System is ready to power your data center in the internet of everything. Urgent data center needs went addressed for years, so Cisco wiped the slate clean and built a new fabric-centric computing architecture that addresses the application delivery challenges faced by IT in the dynamic environments of virtualization, Cloud, and big data. Cisco UCS represents true innovation with revolutionary integration. It improves performance, while dramatically driving down complexity and cost. Far lower than alternatives from the past. Cisco's groundbreaking solution is producing real results for a growing list of satisfied customers now moving to unified computing, transforming how IT can perform. Pushing out the boundaries of performance and scale and changing the face of business from the inside out. Right now, the industry is witnessing the next wave of computing. So, why should your business wait for the future? Unify your data center with Cisco UCS. >> Male Announcer: You're listening to Cube Fridays, brought to you by Silicon Angle Media. Now, here's John Furrier. >> Okay, welcome back to the Silicon Valley Friday Show, I'm John Furrier, great show today. Our next guest is Dan Rosenbaum, who is the editor of Wearable Tech Insider, Media Probe, been around the industry for years, been a journalist, reporter, editor, variety through his career, knows the tech business certainly on the infrastructure level with the device. Okay, welcome to the show, great to have you, thanks for being available, he's in New York so, Palo Alto, New York connection here. >> Yeah, we got about maybe an hour or so of snow left. But you know, it's February, it does this in New York. >> Great to have you on, we were just talking on our earlier segment before the break about the guy who created the Trump and Dump video which is a chat bot that goes out, looks at Donald Trump's tweets, and then identifies if there's a public company, shorts the stock, and donates to save puppies. So, they're not doing it for profit but they're, you know, they have their intelligence and listening, and we were just riffing on the concept of that there's been fake news and inaccuracy and a new dynamic that's impacting the media business, which is real time information, data, and certainly the world that you're in with Wearables, this new internet of things, which is hard to understand for most common people but it's really the AI new connected network. It's really impacting things, certainly how people get information, how fast they create data, and it's changing the industry landscape certainly from a media standpoint. You get on TV and the mainstream... >> It really is. When the press secretary stood up and said that that the administration sees the media as the adversary, you know, everyone got sort of upset about it but you know, in a lot of ways it's true. That's a fitting way that the media and any administration, any power structure should be facing each other. There's been such a hop in the media to report the truth as best as it can determine and as accurately as it can. Now, there are differing impacts depending on which sphere you're in, and in politics there's always going to be sort of the tension, well, we think, we look at these facts and we think that and we look at those facts and think the other. >> I think ultimately this new formats that are developing really comes back down to I would add to that as trust. This is a collision course of a complete re-transformation of the media landscape and technology's at the heart of it and, you know, you're in the middle of it. With Wearables, you're seeing that at the edge of the network, these are new phenomenons. What's your take on this new trend of, you know, of computing? And I'm not saying singularity, as Ray Kurzweil would say, but you know, ultimately, it is going down to the point now where it's on your body, potentially in your body, but this is a new form of connection. What's your thoughts on this? >> 12 years ago, I was at the party where they launched MSNBC, and I ran into Andrew Lack, who's the CEO of MSNBC at the time, and asked him, why NBC was cutting this collaboration deal with Microsoft, because remember that's how it was started, when there wasn't any means for the news to go upwards. There was no way for citizen news gathering to be represented on this Microsoft-NBC co-venture. And Andrew actually looked down his nose at me, sneered, and goes, "Who in the world would want "people to be contributing to the news?" Well, now we're 10 or 12 years later and as you say, Snapchat and Skype, and all these mobile technologies have just transformed how people get their information, because they're now witnesses, and there are witnesses everywhere. One of the big transformations in, or about wearable technology is that computing infrastructure has moved from islands of stand-alone, massive computers, to networks of massive computers to stand-alone PCs, to networks to PCs, and now the model for computing and communication is the personal area network, the idea of sensor-based technologies is going to change, or already has changed the world of news, it's in the process of changing the world of medicine, it's in the process of changing the way we build houses, the construction business, with the smartphone, the way that we build and relate to cities. >> So, we're here with Dan Rosenbaum, he's the editor of Wearable Tech Insider, but more importantly he's been a tech insider in media going way back, he's seen the cycles of innovation. Love your point about the flowing conversations coming out of the MSNBC kind of executive in the old broadcast models. I mean, I have four kids, my oldest is 21, they don't use, they don't really care about cable TV anymore so, you know, this is now a new narrative so, those executives that are making those comments are either retired or will be dinosaurs. You now have Amazon, you have Netflix, you have, you know, folks, trying to look at this internet TV model where it's fully synchronous so, now you have collective intelligence of vertical markets that have real time ability to surface information up to bigger outlets. So, this collective media intelligence is happening, and it's all being driven by mobile technology. And with that being said, you know, you're in the business, we've got Mobile World Congress coming up, what is that show turning into? Because it's not about the mobile device anymore, the iPhone's 10 years old, that's a game changer. It's growing up. The impact of mobile is now beyond the device. >> Mobile World Congress is all about wireless infrastructure. It goes from everything from a one millimeter square sensor to the national grade wireless network. But what's really cool about Mobile World is that it's the place where communications or telecom ministers get together with infrastructure carriers, get together with the hardware manufacturers, and they hash out the problems that won't resolve five, 10, 15 years down the road in new products and new services. This is the place where everyone comes together. The back rooms at Mobile World Congress are the hottest place, and the back rooms are the places that you can't get into. >> We're here with Dan Rosenbaum, who's an industry veteran, also in the media frontlines in wireless technology, I mean, wearable technology and among other things, good view of the landscape. Final point, I want to just get a quick comment from ya, I was watching on Facebook, you had a great post around Facebook is feeding you an ad for a $19 million staid-in, let's feel Connecticut. And then you said, "One of us as the wrong idea, so you must be really loaded." This retargeting bullshit on Facebook is just ridiculous, I mean, come on, this bad, big data, isn't it? >> (laughing) Yeah, I mean, the boast of Google is that they want to make, you know, ads so relevant that they look like content. Well, in the process to getting there, there's going to be misses. You know, if this real estate agent decides that they want to hit everyone in my zip code, or everyone in my county, or whatever, and they wanted pay the five dollars so that I'd see that video, god bless 'em, let 'em do it, it's not going to make me, it's not going to overcome any kind of sales resistance. I don't know that I wanted to move up to Litchfield, Connecticut anyway, but if I did, sure, a $19 million house would be really nice. >> You could take a chopper into Manhattan, you know, just drop into Manhattan with a helicopter. >> They would want to take it. >> Alright, we can always take the helicopter in from Litchfield, you know, right at the top of your building. Dan, thanks so much for spending the time, really appreciate it, and we'll have to bring, circle back with you on our two day Mobile World Congress special in Palo Alto we'll be doing, so appreciate the time. Thanks a lot. >> Love to do it, thanks for having me. >> Okay, that was Dan Rosenbaum, really talking about, going down in the weeds a little bit but really more importantly, this Mobile World Congress, what's going on with this new trend, digital transformation really is about the impact to the consumer. And what's going on Silicon Valley right now is there's some hardcore tech that is changing the game from what we used to know as a device. The iPhone's only 10 years old, yet 10 years old, before the iPhone, essentially it was a phone, you made phone calls, maybe surf the Web through some bad browser and do text messages. That's now completely transforming, not just the device, it's the platform, so what we're going to see is new things that are happening and the tell signs are there. Self driving cars, autonomous vehicles, drones delivering packages from Amazon, a completely new, digitized world is coming. This is the real trend and we're going to have an executive from Intel on next to tell us kind of what's going on because Intel is at the ground zero of the innovation with Moore's Law and the integrated circuit. But they're bringing their entire Intel inside as a global platform, and this is really going to be driven through a ton of 5G, a new technology so, we're going to dig in on that, and we're going to have a call-in from her, she's going to be coming in from Oregon and again, we're going to get down to the engineers, the people making the chips under the hood and bringing that to you here on the Silicon Valley Friday Show, I'm John Furrier, we'll be right back after this short break. >> My name is Dave Vellante, and I'm a long-time industry analyst. So, when you're as old as I am you've seen a lot of transitions. Everybody talks about industry cycles and waves, I've seen many, many waves. I've seen a lot of industry executives and I'm a little bit of an industry historian. When you interview many thousands of people, probably five or six thousand people as I have over the last half of the decade, you get to interact with a lot of people's knowledge. And you begin to develop patterns so, that's sort of what I bring is an ability to catalyze a conversation and, you know, share that knowledge with others in the community. Our philosophy is everybody is an expert at something, everybody's passionate about something and has real deep knowledge about that something. Well, we want to focus in on that area and extract that knowledge and share with our communities. This is Dave Vellante, and thanks for watching the Cube. (serene techno music) >> Male Announcer: You're listening to the Silicon Valley Friday Show with John Furrier. >> Okay, welcome back to the Silicon Valley Friday Show, I'm John Furrier, we're here in Palo Alto for this Friday Show, we're going to go under the hood and get into some technology impact around what's going on in the industry, specifically kind of as a teaser for Mobile World Congress at the end of the month, it's a big show in Barcelona, Spain where the whole mobile and infrastructure industry comes together, it's kind of like CES, Consumer Electronics Show, in the mobile world but it's evolved in a big way and it's certainly impacting everyone in the industry and all consumers and businesses. This is Intel's Lynn Comp and this is Intel who, we know about Moore's Law, we know all about the chips that make everything happen, Intel has been the engine of innovation of the PC revolutions, it's been the engine of innovation now in the Cloud and as Intel looks at the next generation, they are the key player in this transformation that we are seeing with AI, wearable computers, internet of things, self driving cars, AI, this is all happening, new stuff's going on. Lynn, welcome to the program. >> Thank you so much, it's great to be here. >> So, you're up in Oregon, thanks for taking the time to allow us to talk via phone, appreciate it. Obviously, Intel, we've been following you guys, and I've been a big fan since 1987, when I almost worked there right out of college. Went to Hewlett Packard instead, but that's a different story but, great, great innovation over the years, Intel has been the bell weather in the tech industry, been a big part of the massive change. But now, as you look at the next generation, I mean, I have four kids and they don't watch cable TV, they don't like, they don't do the things that we used to do, they're on the mobile phone all the time. And the iPhone is now 10 years old as of this year, this early winter part of this, Steve Jobs announced it 10 years ago. And what a change has it been, it's moved from telephone calls to a computer that happens to have software that makes telephone calls. This is a game changer. But now it seems that Mobile World Congress has changed from being a telephone centric, voice centric, phone device centric show to a software show, it seems to be that software is eating the world just like CES is turning into an automotive show. What is Mobile World Congress turning into? What's the preview from Intel's perspective? >> You know, it's a really fascinating question because many years ago, you would only see a bunch of very, very intense base station design, you know, it was very, very oriented around wireless, wireless technology, and radios, and those are really important because they're an engine of fabric that you can build capabilities onto. But last year, just as a reference point for how much it's changed, we have Facebook giving one of the main keynotes. And they're known for their software, they're known for social media, and so you'll see Facebook and Google with an exhibitor there last year as well, so you're not just seeing suppliers into the traditional wireless industry for equipment and the operators who are the purchaser, you're seeing many, many different players show up very much like how you said CES has a lot of automotives there now. >> Yeah, we've seen a lot of revolutions in the computer industry, Intel created a revolution called the Computer Revolution, the PC Revolution, and then it became kind of an evolution, that seems to be the big trends you see, that cycle. But it seems now that we are, kind of been doing the evolution of mobile computing, and my phone gets better, 10 years down to the iPhone, 3G, 4G, LT, okay, I want more bandwidth, of course, but is there a revolution? Where can you point to? Where is the revolution, versus just standard evolutionary kind of trends? Is there something coming out of this that we're going to see? >> That is such a great question because when you look at the first digital wireless technologies that came out and then you had 2G, and 3G, and 4G, those really were evolutionary. And what we're finding with 5G that I believe is going to be a huge theme at Mobile World Congress this year is it is a completely different ballgame, I would say it's more of an inflection point or very revolutionary. And there's a couple reasons for that, both tie up in how ITU is specifying the use cases, it's licensed and unlicensed spectrum which is kind of unusual for how it's been done if you will get 2, 3, and 4G. The other thing that's really interesting about 5G, that it's an inflection point is there's a lot more intelligence assumed in the network and it helps address some of the challenges I think that the industry is seeing a different industry with some of the IoT promise we'll roll out where some of the macro design networks that we'd seen in the past, the ability to have the right latency, the right bandwidth, and the right cost matched to the needs of a specific IoT use case was much more limited in the past and I think we'll see a lot more opportunities moving forward. >> Great, great stuff, we're with Lynn Comp with the Network Platforms Group at Intel. You know, you bring up some, I like the way you're going with this, there's so much like, impact to society going on with these big, big trends. But also I was just having a conversation with some young folks here in Palo Alto, high school kids and some college kids and they're all jazzed up about AI, you can almost see the... I don't want to say addiction but fascination and intoxication with technology. And there's some real hardcore good tech going on here, could you just share your thoughts on, you know, what are some of those things that are going to, 'cause I mean, 5G to wireless, I get that, but I mean, you know, these kids that we talked to and folks that are in the next generation, they love the autonomous vehicles. But sometimes I can't get a phone signal, how are cars going to talk to each other? I mean, how does this, I mean, you've got to pull this together. And these kids are like, and it's into these new careers. What's your thoughts on what are some of the game changing tech challenges that are coming out of this? >> Let's just start with something that was a great example this year 'cause I think I have kids a similar age. And I had been skeptical of things like even just virtual reality, a augmented or virtual reality. And then we had this phenomena last summer that really was just a hint, it wasn't really augmented reality, but it was a hint of the demand that could be met by it and it's Pokemon Go. And so, an example with that, I mean, it really wasn't asking a significantly higher amount of data off the network, but it did change the use profile for many of the coms service providers and many of the networks where they realized I actually have to change the architecture, not just of what's at the edge but in my core network, to be more responsive and flexible, you are going to see something even more so with autonomous driving, even if it's just driver assist. And similar to how the auto pilot evolution happened, you're still going to have these usage patterns where people have too many demands, too much information coming at them, they do want that assistance, or they do want that augmented experience to interact with a brand, and it's going to really stress the network and there's going to have to be a lot of innovation about where some of these capabilities are placed and how much intelligence is close to the user as opposed to just a radio, probably going to need a lot more analytics and a lot more machine learning capabilities there as well. >> We had a segment earlier in the show, it was the entrepreneur who created the Trump and Dump chat bot that would go out and read Donald Trump's tweets and then short all public companies that were mentioned because the trend is, they would do that, but this is an example of some of these chat bots and some of this automation that's going on and it kind of brings the question up to some of the technology challenges that we're looking out at the landscape that we're discussing is the role of data really is a big deal and software and data now have an interaction play where you got to move data around the networks, networks are now ubiquitous, networks are now on people, networks are now in cars, networks are now part of all this, I won't say unstructured networks, but omni-connected fabric. So, data can really change what looks like an optimal architecture to a failed one, if you don't think about it properly. So, how do you guys at Intel think about the role of data? I mean, how do you build the new chips and how do you look at the landscape? And it must be a big consideration, what's your thoughts about the role of data? Because it can happen at any time, a tsunami of data could hit anything. >> Right, the tsunami of data. So for us, it's any challenge, and this is just in Intel's DNA, historically, we'll get challenges as opportunities because we love to solve these really big problems. And so, when you're talking about data moving around a network you're talking about transformation of the network. We've been having a lot of discussions with operators where they see the data tsunami, they're already seeing it, and they realized, I have got to reconfigure the architecture of my network to leverage these technologies and these capabilities in a way that's relevant for the regulatory environment I'm in. But I still have to be flexible, I have to be agile, I have to be leveraging programmability instead of having to rewrite software every generation or every time a new app comes out. >> Lynn, thanks so much for coming on. Like we always say, you know, engine room more power, you can never have enough compute power available in network bandwidth, as far as I'm concerned. You know, we'd love to increase the power, Moore's Law's been just a great thing, keeps on chugging along. Thanks for your time and joining us on the Silicon Valley Friday Show, appreciate it. Thanks so much. >> Thank you. >> Alright, take care. Okay, this is Silicon Valley Friday Show, I'm John Furrier, thanks so much for listening. I had Ben Gaddis on, Dan Rosenbaum, and Lynn Comp from Intel really breaking it down and bringing you all the best stories of the week here on the Silicon Valley, thanks for watching. (techno music) (bright instrumental music)