(low-key music) >> The cube's live coverage is made possible by funding from Dell Technologies. Creating technologies that drive human progress. (uplifting electronic music) (crowd chattering in background) >> Welcome back to Spain, everybody. My name's Dave Vellante. I'm here with Dave Nicholson. We are live at the Fira in Barcelona, covering MWC23 day four. We've been talking about, you know, 5G all week. We're going to talk about it some more. Jillian Kaplan is here. She's the head of Global Telecom Thought Leadership at Dell Technologies, and we're pleased to have Meg Knauth, who's the Vice President for Digital Platform Engineering at T-Mobile. Ladies, welcome to theCUBE. Thanks for coming on. >> Thanks for having us. >> Yeah, thank you. >> All right, Meg, can you explain 5G and edge to folks that may not be familiar with it? Give us the 101 on 5G and edge. >> Sure, I'd be happy to. So, at T-Mobile, we want businesses to be able to focus on their business outcomes and not have to stress about network technology. So we're here to handle the networking behind the scenes for you to achieve your business goals. The main way to think about 5G is speed, reduced latency, and heightened security. And you can apply that to so many different business goals and objectives. You know, some of the use cases that get touted out the most are in the retail manufacturing sectors with sensors and with control of inventory and things of that nature. But it can be applied to pretty much any industry because who doesn't need more (chuckles) more speed and lower latency. >> Yeah. And reliability, right? >> Exactly. >> I mean, that's what you're going to have there. So it's not like it's necessarily going to- you know, you think about 5G and these private networks, right? I mean, it's not going to, oh, maybe it is going to eat into, there's a Venn there, I know, but it's not going to going to replace wireless, right? I mean, it's new use cases. >> Yeah. >> Maybe you could talk about that a little bit. >> Yeah, they definitely coexist, right? And Meg touched a little bit on like all the use cases that are coming to be, but as we look at 5G, it's really the- we call it like the Enterprise G, right? It's where the enterprise is going to be able to see changes in their business and the way that they do things. And for them, it's going to be about reducing costs and heightening ROI, and safety too, right? Like being able to automate manufacturing facilities where you don't have workers, like, you know, getting hit by various pieces of equipment and you can take them out of harm's way and put robots in their place. And having them really work in an autonomous situation is going to be super, super key. And 5G is just the, it's the backbone of all future technologies if you look at it. We have to have a network like that in order to build things like AI and ML, and we talk about VR and the Metaverse. You have to have a super reliable network that can handle the amount of devices that we're putting out today, right? So, extremely important. >> From T-Mobile's perspective, I mean we hear a lot about, oh, we spent a lot on CapEx, we know that. You know, trillion and a half over the next seven years, going into 5G infrastructure. We heard in the early keynotes at MWC, we heard the call to you know, tax the over the top vendors. We heard the OTT, Netflix shot back, they said, "Why don't you help us pay for the content that we're creating?" But, okay, so I get that, but telcos have a great business. Where's T-Mobile stand on future revenue opportunities? Are you looking to get more data and monetize that data? Are you looking to do things like partner with Dell to do, you know, 5G networks? Where are the opportunities for T-Mobile? >> I think it's more, as Jillian said, it's the opportunities for each business and it's unique to those businesses. So we're not in it just for ourselves. We're in it to help others achieve their business goals and to do more with all of the new capabilities that this network provides. >> Yeah, man, I like that answer because again, listening to some of the CEOs of the large telcos, it's like, hmm, what's in it for me as the customer or the business? I didn't hear enough of that. And at least in the early keynotes, I'm hearing it more, you know, as the show goes on. But I don't know, Dave, what do you think about what you've heard at the event? >> Well, I'm curious from T-Mobile's perspective, you know when a consumer thinks about 5G, we think of voice, text, and data. And if we think about the 5G network that you already have in place, I'm curious, if you can share this kind of information, what percentage of that's being utilized now? How much is available for the, you know, for the Enterprise G that we're talking about, and maybe, you know, in five years in the future, do you have like a projected mix of consumer use versus all of these back office, call them processes that a consumer's not aware of, but you know the factory floor being connected via 5G, that frontiers that emerges, where are we now and what are you looking towards? Does that make sense? Kind of the mixed question? >> Hand over the business plan! (all laugh) >> Yeah! Yeah, yeah, yeah. >> Yeah, I- >> I want numbers Meg, numbers! >> Wow. (Dave and Dave laugh) I'm probably actually not the right person to speak to that. But as you know, T-Mobile has the largest 5G network in North America, and we just say, bring it, right? Let's talk- >> So you got room, you got room for Jillian's stuff? >> Yeah, let's solve >> Well, we can build so many >> business problems together. >> private 5G networks, right? Like I would say like the opportunities are... There's not a limit, right? Because as we build out these private networks, right? We're not on a public network when we're talking about like connecting these massive factories or connecting like a retail store to you and your house to be able to basically continue to try on the clothes remotely, something like that. It's limitless and what we can build- >> So they're related, but they're not necessarily mutually exclusive in the sense that what you are doing in the factory example is going to interfere with my ability to get my data through T-mobile. >> No, no, I- >> These are separated. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Okay. >> As we build out these private networks and these private facilities, and there are so many applications in the consumer space that haven't even been realized yet. Like, when we think about 4G, when 4G launched, there were no applications that needed 4G to run on our cell phones, right? But then the engineers got to work, right? And we ended up with Uber and Instagram stories and all these applications that require 4G to launch. And that's what's going to happen with 5G too, it's like, as the network continues to get built, in the consumer space as well as the enterprise space, there's going to be new applications realized on this is all the stuff that we can do with this amazing network and look how many more devices and look how much faster it is, and the lower latency and the higher bandwidth, and you know, what we can really build. And I think what we're seeing at this show compared to last year is this stuff actually in practice. There was a lot of talk last year, like about, oh, this is what we can build, but now we're building it. And I think that's really key to show that companies like T-Mobile can help the enterprise in this space with cooperation, right? Like, we're not just talking about it now, we're actually putting it into practice. >> So how does it work? If I put in a private network, what are you doing? You slice out a piece of the network and charge me for it and then I get that as part of my private network. How does it actually work for the customer? >> You want to take that one? >> So I was going to say, yeah, you can do a network slice. You can actually physically build a private network, right? It depends, there's so many different ways to engineer it. So I think you can do it either way, basically. >> We just, we don't want it to be scary, right? >> Yep. >> So it starts with having a conversation about the business challenges that you're facing and then backing it into the technology and letting the technology power those solutions. But we don't want it to be scary for people because there's so much buzz around 5G, around edge, and it can be overwhelming and you can feel like you need a PhD in engineering to have a conversation. And we just want to kind of simplify things and talk in your language, not in our language. We'll figure out the tech behind the scenes. Just tell us what problems we can solve together. >> And so many non-technical companies are having to transform, right? Like retail, like manufacturing, that haven't had to be tech companies before. But together with T-Mobile and Dell, we can help enable that and make it not scary like Meg said. >> Right, so you come into my factory, I say, okay, look around. I got all these people there, and they're making hoses and they're physically putting 'em together. And we go and we have to take a physical measurement as to, you know, is it right? And because if we don't do that, then we have to rework it. Okay, now that's a problem. Okay, can you help me digitize that business? I need a network to do that. I'm going to put in some robots to do that. This is, I mean, I'm making this up but this has got to be a common use case, right? >> Yeah. >> So how do you simplify that for the business owner? >> So we start with what we can provide, and then in some cases you need additional solution providers. You might need a robotics company, you might need a sensor company. But we have those contacts to bring that together for you so that you don't have to be the expert in all those things. >> And what do I do with all the data that I'm collecting? Because, you know, I'm not really a data expert. Maybe, you know, I'm good at putting hoses together, but what's the data layer look like here? (all laughing) >> It's a hose business! >> I know! >> Great business. >> Back to the hoses again. >> There's a lot of different things you can do with it, right? You can collect it in a database, you can send it up to a cloud, you can, you know, use an edge device. It depends how we build the network. >> Dave V.: Can you guys help me do that? Can you guys- >> Sure, yeah. >> Help me figure that out. Should I put it into cloud? Should I use this database or that data? What kind of skills do I need? >> And it depends on the size of the network, right? And the size of the business. Like, you know, there's very simple. You don't have to be a massive manufacturer in order to install this stuff. >> No, I'm asking small business questions. >> Yeah. >> Right, I might not have this giant IT team. I might not have somebody who knows how to do ETL and PBA. >> Exactly. And we can talk to you too about what data matters, right? And we can, together, talk about what data might be the most valuable to you. We can talk to you about how we use data. But again, simplifying it down and making it personal to your business. >> Your point about scary is interesting, because no one has mentioned that until you did in four days. Three? Four days. Somebody says, let's do a private 5G network. That sounds like you're offering, you know, it's like, "Hey, you know what we should do Dave? We'll build you a cruise ship." It's like, I don't need a cruise ship, I just want to go bass fishing. >> Right, right, right. >> But in fact, these things are scalable in the sense that it can be scaled down from the trillions of dollars of infrastructure investment. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. It needs to be focused on your outcome, right? And not on the tech. >> When I was at the Dell booth I saw this little private network, it was about this big. I'm like, how much is that? I want one of those. (all laugh) >> I'm not the right person to talk about that! >> The little black one? >> Yes. >> I wanted one of those, too! >> I saw it, it had a little case to carry it around. I'm like, that could fit in my business. >> Just take it with you. >> theCUBE could use that! (all laugh) >> Anything that could go in a pelican case, I want. >> It's true. Like, it's so incredibly important, like you said, to focus on outcomes, right? Not just tech for the sake of tech. What's the problem? Let's solve the problem together. And then you're getting the outcome you want. You'll know what data you need. If you know what the problem is, you're like, okay this is the data I need to know if this problem is solved or not. >> So it sounds like 2022 was the year of talking about it. 2023, I'm inferring is the year of seeing it. >> Yep. >> And 2024 is going to be the year of doing it? >> I think we're doing it now. >> We're doing it now. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> Yeah, yeah. We're definitely doing it now. >> All right. >> I see a lot of this stuff being put into place and a lot more innovation and a lot more working together. And Meg mentioned working with other partners. No one's going to do this alone. You've got to like, you know, Dell especially, we're focused on open and making sure that, you know, we have the right software partners. We're bringing in smaller players, right? Like ISVs too, as well as like the big software guys. Incredibly, incredibly important. The sensor companies, whatever we need you've got to be able to solve your customer's issue, which in this case, we're looking to help the enterprise together to transform their space. And Dell knows a little bit about the enterprise, so. >> So if we are there in 2023, then I assume 2024 will be the year that each of your companies sets up a dedicated vertical to address the hose manufacturing market. (Meg laughing) >> Oh, the hose manufacturing market. >> Further segmentation is usually a hallmark of the maturity of an industry. >> I got a lead for you. >> Yeah, there you go. >> And that's one thing we've done at Dell, too. We've built like this use case directory to help the service providers understand what, not just say like, oh, you can help manufacturers. Yeah, but how, what are the use cases to do that? And we worked with a research firm to figure out, like, you know these are the most mature, these are the best ROIs. Like to really help hone in on exactly what we can deploy for 5G and edge solutions that make the most sense, not only for service providers, right, but also for the enterprises. >> Where do you guys want to see this partnership go? Give us the vision. >> To infinity and beyond. To 5G! (Meg laughing) To 5G and beyond. >> I love it. >> It's continuation. I love that we're partnering together. It's incredibly important to the future of the business. >> Good deal. >> To bring the strengths of both together. And like Jillian said, other partners in the ecosystem, it has to be approached from a partnership perspective, but focused on outcomes. >> Jillian: Yep. >> To 5G and beyond. I love it. >> To 5G and beyond. >> Folks, thanks for coming on theCUBE. >> Thanks for having us. >> Appreciate your insights. >> Thank you. >> All right. Dave Vellante for Dave Nicholson, keep it right there. You're watching theCUBE. Go to silliconANGLE.com. John Furrier is banging out all the news. theCUBE.net has all the videos. We're live at the Fira in Barcelona, MWC23. We'll be right back. (uplifting electronic music)

>> Announcer: theCUBE's live coverage is made possible by funding from Dell Technologies creating technologies that drive human progress. (upbeat music) >> Hey everyone, welcome back to theCube's first day of coverage of MWC 23 from Barcelona, Spain. Lisa Martin here with Dave Vellante and Dave Nicholson. I'm literally in between two Daves. We've had a great first day of coverage of the event. There's been lots of conversations, Dave, on disaggregation, on the change of mobility. I want to be able to get your perspectives from both of you on what you saw on the show floor, what you saw and heard from our guests today. So we'll start with you, Dave V. What were some of the things that were our takeaways from day one for you? >> Well, the big takeaway is the event itself. On day one, you get a feel for what this show is like. Now that we're back, face-to-face kind of pretty much full face-to-face. A lot of excitement here. 2000 plus exhibitors, I mean, planes, trains, automobiles, VR, AI, servers, software, I mean everything. I mean, everybody is here. So it's a really comprehensive show. It's not just about mobile. That's why they changed the name from Mobile World Congress. I think the other thing is from the keynotes this morning, I mean, you heard, there's a lot of, you know, action around the telcos and the transformation, but in a lot of ways they're sort of protecting their existing past from the future. And so they have to be careful about how fast they move. But at the same time if they don't move fast, they're going to get disrupted. We heard some complaints, essentially, you know, veiled complaints that the over the top guys aren't paying their fair share and Telco should be able to charge them more. We heard the chairman of Ericsson talk about how we can't let the OTTs do that again. We're going to charge directly for access through APIs to our network, to our data. We heard from Chris Lewis. Yeah. They've only got, or maybe it was San Ji Choha, how they've only got eight APIs. So, you know the developers are the ones who are going to actually build out the innovation at the edge. The telcos are going to provide the connectivity and the infrastructure companies like Dell as well. But it's really to me all about the developers. And that's where the action's going to be. And it's going to be interesting to see how the developers respond to, you know, the gun to the head. If you want access, you're going to have to pay for it. Now maybe there's so much money to be made that they'll go for it, but I feel like there's maybe a different model. And I think some of the emerging telcos are going to say, you know what, here developers, here's a platform, have at it. We're not going to charge you for all the data until you succeed. Then we're going to figure out a monetization model. >> Right. A lot of opportunity for the developer. That skillset is certainly one that's in demand here. And certainly the transformation of the telecom industry is, there's a lot of conundrums that I was hearing going on today, kind of chicken and egg scenarios. But Dave, you had a chance to walk around the show floor. We were here interviewing all day. What were some of the things that you saw that really stuck out to you? >> I think I was struck by how much attention was being paid to private 5G networks. You sort of read between the lines and it appears as though people kind of accept that the big incumbent telecom players are going to be slower to move. And this idea of things like open RAN where you're leveraging open protocols in a stack to deliver more agility and more value. So it sort of goes back to the generalized IT discussion of moving to cloud for agility. It appears as though a lot of players realize that the wild wild west, the real opportunity, is in the private sphere. So it's really interesting to see how that works, how 5G implemented into an environment with wifi how that actually works. It's really interesting. >> So it's, obviously when you talk to companies like Dell, I haven't hit HPE yet. I'm going to go over there and check out their booth. They got an analyst thing going on but it's really early days for them. I mean, they started in this business by taking an X86 box, putting a name on it, you know, that sounded like it was edged, throwing it over, you know, the wall. That's sort of how they all started in this business. And now they're, you know, but they knew they had to form partnerships. They had to build purpose-built systems. Now with 16 G out, you're seeing that. And so it's still really early days, talking about O RAN, open RAN, the open RAN alliance. You know, it's just, I mean, not even, the game hasn't even barely started yet but we heard from Dish today. They're trying to roll out a massive 5G network. Rakuten is really focused on sort of open RAN that's more reliable, you know, or as reliable as the existing networks but not as nearly as huge a scale as Dish. So it's going to take a decade for this to evolve. >> Which is surprising to the average consumer to hear that. Because as far as we know 5G has been around for a long time. We've been talking about 5G, implementing 5G, you sort of assume it's ubiquitous but the reality is it is just the beginning. >> Yeah. And you know, it's got a fake 5G too, right? I mean you see it on your phone and you're like, what's the difference here? And it's, you know, just, >> Dave N.: What does it really mean? >> Right. And so I think your point about private is interesting, the conversation Dave that we had earlier, I had throughout, hey I don't think it's a replacement for wifi. And you said, "well, why not?" I guess it comes down to economics. I mean if you can get the private network priced close enough then you're right. Why wouldn't it replace wifi? Now you got wifi six coming in. So that's a, you know, and WiFi's flexible, it's cheap, it's good for homes, good for offices, but these private networks are going to be like kickass, right? They're going to be designed to run whatever, warehouses and robots, and energy drilling facilities. And so, you know the economics I don't think are there today but maybe they can be at volume. >> Maybe at some point you sort of think of today's science experiment becoming the enterprise-grade solution in the future. I had a chance to have some conversations with folks around the show. And I think, and what I was surprised by was I was reminded, frankly, I wasn't surprised. I was reminded that when we start talking about 5G, we're talking about spectrum that is managed by government entities. Of course all broadcast, all spectrum, is managed in one way or another. But in particular, you can't simply put a SIM in every device now because there are a lot of regulatory hurdles that have to take place. So typically what these things look like today is 5G backhaul to the network, communication from that box to wifi. That's a huge improvement already. So yeah, my question about whether, you know, why not put a SIM in everything? Maybe eventually, but I think, but there are other things that I was not aware of that are standing in the way. >> Your point about spectrum's an interesting one though because private networks, you're going to be able to leverage that spectrum in different ways, and tune it essentially, use different parts of the spectrum, make it programmable so that you can apply it to that specific use case, right? So it's going to be a lot more flexible, you know, because I presume the needs spectrum needs of a hospital are going to be different than, you know, an agribusiness are going to be different than a drilling, you know, unit, offshore drilling unit. And so the ability to have the flexibility to use the spectrum in different ways and apply it to that use case, I think is going to be powerful. But I suspect it's going to be expensive initially. I think the other thing we talked about is public policy and regulation, and it's San Ji Choha brought up the point, is telcos have been highly regulated. They don't just do something and ask for permission, you know, they have to work within the confines of that regulated environment. And there's a lot of these greenfield companies and private networks that don't necessarily have to follow those rules. So that's a potential disruptive force. So at the same time, the telcos are spending what'd we hear, a billion, a trillion and a half over the next seven years? Building out 5G networks. So they got to figure out, you know how to get a payback on that. They'll get it I think on connectivity, 'cause they have a monopoly but they want more. They're greedy. They see the over, they see the Netflixes of the world and the Googles and the Amazons mopping up services and they want a piece of that action but they've never really been good at it. >> Well, I've got a question for both of you. I mean, what do you think the odds are that by the time the Shangri La of fully deployed 5G happens that we have so much data going through it that effectively it feels exactly the same as 3G? What are the odds? >> That's a good point. Well, the thing that gets me about 5G is there's so much of it on, if I go to the consumer side when we're all consumers in our daily lives so much of it's marketing hype. And, you know all the messaging about that, when it's really early innings yet they're talking about 6G. What does actual fully deployed 5G look like? What is that going to enable a hospital to achieve or an oil refinery out in the middle of the ocean? That's something that interests me is what's next for that? Are we going to hear that at this event? >> I mean, walking around, you see a fair amount of discussion of, you know, the internet of things. Edge devices, the increase in connectivity. And again, what I was surprised by was that there's very little talk about a sim card in every one of those devices at this point. It's like, no, no, no, we got wifi to handle all that but aggregating it back into a central network that's leveraging 5G. That's really interesting. That's really interesting. >> I think you, the odds of your, to go back to your question, I think the odds are even money, that by the time it's all built out there's going to be so much data and so much new capability it's going to work similarly at similar speeds as we see in the networks today. You're just going to be able to do so many more things. You know, and your video's going to look better, the graphics are going to look better. But I think over the course of history, this is what's happening. I mean, even when you go back to dial up, if you were in an AOL chat room in 1996, it was, you know, yeah it took a while. You're like, (screeches) (Lisa laughs) the modem and everything else, but once you were in there- >> Once you're there, 2400 baud. >> It was basically real time. And so you could talk to your friends and, you know, little chat room but that's all you could do. You know, if you wanted to watch a video, forget it, right? And then, you know, early days of streaming video, stop, start, stop, start, you know, look at Amazon Prime when it first started, Prime Video was not that great. It's sort of catching up to Netflix. But, so I think your point, that question is really prescient because more data, more capability, more apps means same speed. >> Well, you know, you've used the phrase over the top. And so just just so we're clear so we're talking about the same thing. Typically we're talking about, you've got, you have network providers. Outside of that, you know, Netflix, internet connection, I don't need Comcast, right? Perfect example. Well, what about the over the top that's coming from direct satellite communications with devices. There are times when I don't have a signal on my, happens to be an Apple iPhone, when I get a little SOS satellite logo because I can communicate under very limited circumstances now directly to the satellite for very limited text messaging purposes. Here at the show, I think it might be a Motorola device. It's a dongle that allows any mobile device to leverage direct satellite communication. Again, for texting back to the 2,400 baud modem, you know, days, 1200 even, 300 even, go back far enough. What's that going to look like? Is that too far in the future to think that eventually it's all going to be over the top? It's all going to be handset to satellite and we don't need these RANs anymore. It's all going to be satellite networks. >> Dave V.: I think you're going to see- >> Little too science fiction-y? (laughs) >> No, I, no, I think it's a good question and I think you're going to see fragments. I think you're going to see fragmentation of private networks. I think you're going to see fragmentation of satellites. I think you're going to see legacy incumbents kind of hanging on, you know, the cable companies. I think that's coming. I think by 2030 it'll, the picture will be much more clear. The question is, and I think it's come down to the innovation on top, which platform is going to be the most developer friendly? Right, and you know, I've not heard anything from the big carriers that they're going to be developer friendly. I've heard "we have proprietary data that we're going to charge access for and developers are going to have to pay for that." But I haven't heard them saying "Developers, developers, developers!" You know, Steve Bomber running around, like bend over backwards for developers, they're asking the developers to bend over. And so if a network can, let's say the satellite network is more developer friendly, you know, you're going to see more innovation there potentially. You know, or if a dish network says, "You know what? We're going after developers, we're going after innovation. We're not going to gouge them for all this network data. Rather we're going to make the platform open or maybe we're going to do an app store-like model where we take a piece of the action after they succeed." You know, take it out of the backend, like a Silicon Valley VC as opposed to an East Coast VC. They're not going to get you in the front end. (Lisa laughs) >> Well, you can see the sort of disruptive forces at play between open RAN and the legacy, call it proprietary stack, right? But what is the, you know, if that's sort of a horizontal disruptive model, what's the vertically disruptive model? Is it private networks coming in? Is it a private 5G network that comes in that says, "We're starting from the ground up, everything is containerized. We're going to go find people at KubeCon who are, who understand how to orchestrate with Kubernetes and use containers in microservices, and we're going to have this little 5G network that's going to deliver capabilities that you can't get from the big boys." Is there a way to monetize that? Is there a way for them to be disrupted, be disruptive, or are these private 5G networks that everybody's talking about just relegated to industrial use cases where you're just squeezing better economics out of wireless communication amongst all your devices in your factory? >> That's an interesting question. I mean, there are a lot of those smart factory industrial use cases. I mean, it's basically industry 4.0 use cases. But yeah, I don't count the cloud guys out. You know, everybody says, "oh, the narrative is, well, the latency of the cloud." Well, not if the cloud is at the edge. If you take a local zone and put storage, compute, and data right next to each other and the cloud model with the cloud APIs, and then you got an asynchronous, you know, connection back. I think that's a reasonable model. I think the cloud guys figured out developers, right? Pretty well. Certainly Microsoft and, and Amazon and Google, they know developers. I don't see any reason why they can't bring their model to the edge. So, and that's really disruptive to the legacy telco guys, you know? So they have to be careful. >> One step closer to my dream of eliminating the word "cloud" from IT lexicon. (Lisa laughs) I contend that it has always been IT, and it will always be IT. And this whole idea of cloud, what is cloud? If AWS, for example, is delivering hardware to the edge where it needs to be, is that cloud? Do we go back to the idea that cloud is an operational model and not a question of physical location? I hope we get to that point. >> Well, what's Apex and GreenLake? Apex is, you know, Dell's as a service. GreenLake is- >> HPE. >> HPE's as a service. That's outposts. >> Dave N.: Right. >> Yeah. >> That's their outpost. >> Yeah. >> Well AWS's position used to be, you know, to use them as a proxy for hyperscale cloud. We'll just, we'll grow in a very straight trajectory forever on the back of net new stuff. Forget about the old stuff. As James T. Kirk said of the Klingons, "let them die." (Lisa laughs) As far as the cloud providers were concerned just, yeah, let, let that old stuff go away. Well then they found out, there came a point in time where they realized there's a lot of friction and stickiness associated with that. So they had to deal with the reality of hybridity, if that's the word, the hybrid nature of things. So what are they doing? They're pushing stuff out to the edge, so... >> With the same operating model. >> With the same operating model. >> Similar. I mean, it's limited, right? >> So you see- >> You can't run a lot of database on outpost, you can run RES- >> You see this clash of Titans where some may have written off traditional IT infrastructure vendors, might have been written off as part of the past. Whereas hyperscale cloud providers represent the future. It seems here at this show they're coming head to head and competing evenly. >> And this is where I think a company like Dell or HPE or Cisco has some advantages in that they're not going to compete with the telcos, but the hyperscalers will. >> Lisa: Right. >> Right. You know, and they're already, Google's, how much undersea cable does Google own? A lot. Probably more than anybody. >> Well, we heard from Google and Microsoft this morning in the keynote. It'd be interesting to see if we hear from AWS and then over the next couple of days. But guys, clearly there is, this is a great wrap of day one. And the crazy thing is this is only day one. We've got three more days of coverage, more news, more information to break down and unpack on theCUBE. Look forward to doing that with you guys over the next three days. Thank you for sharing what you saw on the show floor, what you heard from our guests today as we had about 10 interviews. Appreciate your insights and your perspectives and can't wait for tomorrow. >> Right on. >> All right. For Dave Vellante and Dave Nicholson, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE's day one wrap from MWC 23. We'll see you tomorrow. (relaxing music)

>> Announcer: theCUBE's live coverage is made possible by funding from Dell Technologies, creating technologies that drive human progress. (upbeat music) >> Welcome to the Fira in Barcelona, everybody. This is theCUBE's coverage of MWC 23, day one of that coverage. We have four days of wall-to-wall action going on, the place is going crazy. I'm here with Dave Nicholson, Lisa Martin is also in the house. Today's ecosystem day, and we're really excited to have Manish Singh who's the CTO of the Telecom Systems Business unit at Dell Technologies. He's joined by Doug Wolf who's the head of strategy for the Telecom Systems Business unit at Dell. Gents, welcome. What a show. I mean really the first major MWC or used to be Mobile World Congress since you guys have launched your telecom business, you kind of did that sort of in the Covid transition, but really exciting, obviously a huge, huge venue to match the huge market. So Manish, how did you guys get into this? What did you see? What was the overall thinking to get Dell into this business? >> Manish: Yeah, well, I mean just to start with you know, if you look at the telecom ecosystem today, the service providers in particular, they are looking for network transformation, driving more disaggregation into their network so that they can get better utilization of the infrastructure, but then also get more agility, more cloud native characteristics onto their, for their networks in particular. And then further on, it's important for them to really start to accelerate the pace of innovation on the networks itself, to start more supply chain diversity, that's one of the challenges that they've been having. And so there've been all these market forces that have been really getting these service providers to really start to transform the way they have built the infrastructure in the past, which was legacy monolithic architectures to more cloud native disaggregated. And from a Dell perspective, you know, that really gives us the permission to play, to really, given all the expertise on the work we have done in the IT with all the IT transformations to leverage all that expertise and bring that to the service providers and really help them in accelerating their network transformation. So that's where the journey started. We've been obviously ever since then working on expanding the product portfolio on our compute platforms to bring Teleco great compute platforms with more capabilities than we can talk about that. But then working with partners and building the ecosystem to again create this disaggregated and open ecosystem that will be more cloud native and really meet the objective that the service providers are after. >> Dave Vellante: Great, thank you. So, Doug the strategy obviously is to attack this market, as Manish said, from an open standpoint, that's sort of new territory. It's like a little bit like the wild, wild west. So maybe you could double click on what Manish was saying from a, from a strategy standpoint, yes, the Telecos need to be more flexible, they need to be more open, but they also need this reliability piece. So talk about that from a strategy standpoint of what you guys saw. >> Doug: Yeah, absolutely. As Manish mentioned, you know, Dell getting into open systems isn't something new. You know, Dell has been kind of playing in that world for years and years, but the opportunity in Telecom that came was opening of the RAN, the core network, the edge, all of these with 5G really created a wide opening for us. So we started developing products and solutions, you know, built our first Telecom grade servers for open RAN over the last year, we'll talk about those at the show. But you know, as, as Manish mentioned, an open ecosystem is new to Telecom. I've been in the Telecom business along with Manish for, you know, 25 plus years and this is a new thing that they're embarking on. So started with virtualization about five, six years ago, and now moving to cloud native architectures on the core, suddenly there's this need to have multiple parties partner really well, share specifications, and put that together for an operator to consume. And I think that's just the start of really where all the challenges are and the opportunities that we see. >> Where are we in this transition cycle? When the average consumer hears 5G, feels like it's been around for a long time because it was hyped beforehand. >> Doug: Yeah. >> If you're talking about moving to an open infrastructure model from a proprietary closed model, when is the opportunity for Dell to become part of that? Is it, are there specific sites that have already transitioned to 5G, therefore they've either made the decision to be open or not? Or are there places where the 5G transition has taken place, and they might then make a transition to open brand with 5G? Where, where are we in that cycle? What does the opportunity look like? >> I'll kind of take it from the typology of the operator, and I'm sure Manish will build on this, but if I look back on the core, started to get virtualized you know, back around 2015-16 with some of the lead operators like AT&T et cetera. So Dell has been partnering with those operators for some years. So it really, it's happening on the core, but it's moving with 5G to more of a cloud-like architecture, number one. And number two, they're going beyond just virtualizing the network. You know, they previously had used OpenStack and most of them are migrating to more of a cloud native architecture that Manish mentioned. And that is a bit different in terms of there's more software vendors in that ecosystem because the software is disaggregated also. So Dell's been playing in the core for a number of years, but we brought out new solutions we've announced at the show for the core. And the parts that are really starting that transition of maybe where the core was back in 2015 is on the RAN and on the edge in particular. >> Because NFV kind of predated the ascendancy of cloud. >> Exactly, yeah. >> Right, so it really didn't have the impact that people had hoped. And there's some, when you look back, 'cause it's not same wine, new bottle as the open systems movement, there are a lot of similarities but you know, you mentioned cloud, and cloud native, you really didn't have, back in the nineties, true engineered systems. You didn't really have AI that, you know, to speak of at the sort of volume of the data that we have. So Manish, from a CTO's perspective, how are you attacking some of those differences in bringing that to market? >> Manish: Yeah, I mean, I think you touched on some very important points there. So first of all, the duck's point, a lot of this transformation started in the core, right? And as the technology evolution progress, the opportunities opened up. It has now come into the edge and the radio access network as well, in particular with open RAN. And so when we talk about the disaggregation of the infrastructure from the software itself and an open ecosystem, this now starts to create the opportunity to accelerate innovation. And I really want to pick up on the point that you'd said on AI, for example. AI and machine learning bring a whole new set of capabilities and opportunities for these service providers to drive better optimization, better performance, better sustainability and energy efficiency on their infrastructure, on and on and on. But to really tap into these technologies, they really need to open that up to third parties implementation solutions that are coming up. And again, the end objective remains to accelerate that innovation. Now that said, all these things need to be brought together, right? And delivered and deployed in the network without any degradation in the KPIs and actually improving the performance on different vectors, right? So this is what the current state of play is. And with this aggregation I'm definitely a believer that all these new technologies, including AI, machine learning, and there's a whole area, host area of problems that can be solved and attacked and are actually getting attacked by applying AI and machine learning onto these networks. >> Open obviously is good. Nobody's ever going to, you know, argue that open is a bad thing. It's like democracy is a good thing, right? At least amongst us. And so, but, the RAN, the open RAN, has to be as reliable and performant, right, as these, closed networks. Or maybe not, maybe it doesn't have to be identical. Just has to be close enough in order for that tipping point to occur. Is that a fair summarization? What are you guys hearing from carriers in terms of their willingness to sort of put their toe in the water and, and what could we expect in terms of the maturity model of, of open RAN and adoption? >> Right, so I mean I think on, on performance that, that's a tough one. I think the operators will demand performance and you've seen experiments, you've really seen more of the Greenfield operators kind of launch. >> Okay. >> Doug: Open RAN or vRAN type solutions. >> So they're going to disrupt. >> Doug: Yeah, they're going to disrupt. >> Yeah. >> Doug: And there's flexibility in an open RAN architecture also for 5G that they, that they're interested in and I think the Brownfield operators are too, but let's say maybe the Greenfield jump first in terms of doing that from a mass deployment perspective. But I still think that it's going to be critical to meet very similar SLAs and end user performance. And, you know, I think that's where, you know, maturity of that model is what's required. I think Brownfield operators are conservative in terms of, you know, going with something they know, but the opportunities and the benefits of that architecture and building new flexible, potentially cost advantaged over time solutions, that's what the, where the real interest is going forward. >> And new services that you can introduce much more quickly. You know, the interesting thing about Dell to me, you don't compete with the carriers, the public cloud vendors though, the carriers are concerned about them sort of doing an end run on them. So you provide a potential partnership for the carriers that's non-threatening, right? 'Cause you're, you're an arms dealer, you're selling hardware and software, right? But, but how do you see that? Because we heard in the keynote today, one of the Teleco, I think it was the chairman of Telefonica said, you know, cloud guys can't do this alone. You know, they need, you know, this massive, you know, build out. And so, what do you think about that in terms of your relationship with the carriers not being threatening? I mean versus say potentially the cloud guys, who are also your partners, I understand, it's a really interesting dynamic, isn't it? >> Manish: Yeah, I mean I think, you know, I mean, the way I look at it, the carriers actually need someone like Dell who really come in who can bring in the right capabilities, the right infrastructure, but also bring in the ecosystem together and deliver a performance solution that they can deploy and that they can trust, number one. Number two, to your point on cloud, I mean, from a Dell perspective, you know, we announced our Dell Telecom Multicloud Foundation and as part of that last year in September, we announced what we call is the Dell Telecom Infrastructure Blocks. The first one we announced with Wind River, and this is, think of it as the, you know, hardware and the cashier all pre-integrated with lot of automation around it, factory integrated, you know, delivered to customers in an integrated model with all the licenses, everything. And so it starts to solve the day zero, day one, day two integration deployment and then lifecycle management for them. So to broaden the discussion, our view is it's a multicloud world, the future is multicloud where you can have different clouds which can be optimized for different workloads. So for example, while our work with Wind River initially was very focused on virtualization of the radio access network, we just announced our infrastructure block with Red Hat, which is very much targeted and optimized for core network and edge, right? So, you know, there are different workflows which will require different capabilities also. And so, you know, again, we are bringing those things to these service providers to again, bring those cloud characteristics and cloud native architecture for their network. >> And It's going to be hybrid, to your point. >> David N.: And you, just hit on something, you said cloud characteristics. >> Yeah. >> If you look at this through the lens of kind of the general world of IT, sometimes when people hear the word cloud, they immediately leap to the idea that it's a hyperscale cloud provider. In this scenario we're talking about radio towers that have intelligence living on them and physically at the base. And so the cloud characteristics that you're delivering might be living physically in these remote locations all over the place, is that correct? >> Yeah, I mean that, that's true. That will definitely happen over time. But I think, I think we've seen the hyperscalers enter, you know, public cloud providers, enter at the edge and they're dabbling maybe with private, but I think the public RAN is another further challenge. I think that maybe a little bit down the road for them. So I think that is a different characteristic that you're talking about managing the macro RAN environment. >> Manish: If I may just add one more perspective of this cloud, and I mean, again, the hyperscale cloud, right? I mean that world's been great when you can centralize a lot of compute capability and you can then start to, you know, do workload aggregation and use the infrastructure more efficient. When it comes to Telecom, it is inherently it distributed architecture where you have access, you talked about radio access, your port, and it is inherently distributed because it has to provide the coverage and capacity. And so, you know, it does require different kind of capabilities when you're going out and about, and this is where I was talking about things like, you know, we just talked, we just have been working on our bare metal orchestration, right? This is what we are bringing is a capability where you can actually have distributed infrastructure, you can deploy, you can actually manage, do lifecycle management, in a distributed multicloud form. So it does require, you know, different set of capabilities that need to be enabled. >> Some, when talking about cloud, would argue that it's always been information technology, it always will be information technology, and especially as what we might refer to as public cloud or hyperscale cloud providers, are delivering things essentially on premises. It's like, well, is that cloud? Because it feels like some of those players are going to be delivering physical infrastructure outside of their own data centers in order to address this. It seems the nature, the nature of the beast is that some of these things need to be distributed. So it seems perfectly situated for Dell. That's why you guys are both at Dell now and not working for other Telecom places, right? >> Exactly. Exactly, yes. >> It's definitely an exciting space. It's transformed, the networks are under transformation and I do think that Dell's very well positioned to, to really help the customers, the service providers in accelerating their transformation journey with an open ecosystem. >> Dave V.: You've got the brand, and the breadth, and the resources to actually attract an ecosystem. But I wonder if you could sort of take us through your strategy of ecosystem, the challenges that you've seen in developing that ecosystem and what the vision is that ultimately, what's the outcome going to be of that open ecosystem? >> Yeah, I can start. So maybe just to give you the big picture, right? I mean the big picture, is disaggregation with performance, right, TCO models to the service providers, right? And it starts at the infrastructure layer, builds on bringing these cloud capabilities, the cast layer, right? Bringing the right accelerators. All of this requires to pull the ecosystem. So give you an example on the infrastructure in a Teleco grade servers like XR8000 with Sapphire, the new intel processors that we've just announced, and an extended array of servers. These are Teleco grade, short depth, et cetera. You know, the Teleco great characteristic. Working with the partners like Marvel for bringing in the accelerators in there, that's important to again, drive the performance and optimize for the TCO. Working then with partners like Wind River, Red Hat, et cetera, to bring in the cast capabilities so you can start to see how this ecosystem starts to build up. And then very recently we announced our private 5G solution with AirSpan and Expeto on the core site. So bringing those workloads together. Similarly, we have an open RAN solution we announce with Fujitsu. So it's, it's open, it's disaggregated, but bringing all these together. And one of the last things I would say is, you know, to make all this happen and make all of these, we've also been putting together our OTEL, our open Telecom ecosystem lab, which is very much geared, really gives this open ecosystem a playground where they can come in and do all that heavy lifting, which is anyways required, to do the integration, optimization, and board. So put all these capabilities in place, but the end goal, the end vision again, is that cloud native disaggregated infrastructure that starts to innovate at the speed of software and scales at the speed of cloud. >> And this is different than the nineties. You didn't have something like OTEL back then, you know, you didn't have the developer ecosystem that you have today because on top of everything that you just said, Manish, are new workloads and new applications that are going to be developed. Doug, anything you'd add to what Manish said? >> Doug: Yeah, I mean, as Manish said, I think adding to the infrastructure layers, which are, you know, critical for us to, to help integrate, right? Because we kind of took a vertical Teleco stack and we've disaggregated it, and it's gotten a little bit more complex. So our Solutions Dell Technology infrastructure block, and our lab infrastructure with OTEL, helps put those pieces together. But without the software players in this, you know, that's what we really do, I think in OTEL. And that's just starting to grow. So integrating with those software providers with that integration is something that the operators need. So we fill a gap there in terms of either providing engineered solutions so they can readily build on or actually bringing in that software provider. And I think that's what you're going to see more from us going forward is just extending that ecosystem even further. More software players effectively. >> In thinking about O-RAN, are they, is it possible to have the low latency, the high performance, the reliability capabilities that carriers are used to and the flexibility? Or can you sort of prioritize one over the other from a go to market and rollout standpoint and optimize one, maybe get a foothold in the market? How do you see that balance? >> Manish: Oh the answer is absolutely yes you can have both We are on that journey, we are on that journey. This is where all these things I was talking about in terms of the right kind of accelerators, right kind of capabilities on the infrastructure, obviously retargeting the software, there are certain changes, et cetera that need to be done on the software itself to make it more cloud native. And then building all the surrounding capabilities around the CICD pipeline and all where it's not just day zero or day one that you're doing the cloud-like lifecycle management of this infrastructure. But the answer to your point, yes, absolutely. It's possible, the technology is there, and the ecosystem is coming together, and that's the direction. Now, are there challenges? Absolutely there are challenges, but directionally that's the direction the industry is moving to. >> Dave V.: I guess my question, Manish, is do they have to go in lockstep? Because I would argue that the public cloud when it first came out wasn't nearly as functional as what I could get from my own data center in terms of recovery, you know, backup and recovery is a perfect example and it took, you know, a decade plus to get there. But it was the flexibility, and the openness, and the developer affinity, the programmability, that attracted people. Do you see O-RAN following a similar path? Or does it, my question is does it have to have that carrier class reliability today? >> David N.: Everything on day one, does it have to have everything on day one? >> Yeah, I mean, I would say, you know, like again, the Greenfield operators I think we're, we're willing do a little bit more experimentation. I think the operators, Brownfield operators that have existing, you know, deployments, they're going to want to be closer. But I think there's room for innovation here. And clearly, you know, Manish came from, from Meta and we're, we've been very involved with TIP, we're very involved with the O-RAN alliance, and as Manish mentioned, with all those accelerators that we're working with on our infrastructure, that is a space that we're trying to help move the ball forward. So I think you're seeing deployments from mainstream operators, but it's maybe not in, you know, downtown New York deployment, they're more rural deployments. I think that's getting at, you know, kind of your question is there's maybe a little bit more flexibility there, they get to experiment with the technology and the flexibility and then I think it will start to evolve >> Dave V.: And that's where the disruption's going to come from, I think. >> David N.: Well, where was the first place you could get reliable 4K streaming of video content? It wasn't ABC, CBS, NBC. It was YouTube. >> Right. >> So is it possible that when you say Greenfield, are a lot of those going to be what we refer to as private 5G networks where someone may set up a private 5G network that has more functions and capabilities than the public network? >> That's exactly where I was going is that, you know, that that's why you're seeing us getting very active in 5G solutions that Manish mentioned with, you know, Expeto and AirSpan. There's more of those that we haven't publicly announced. So I think you'll be seeing more announcements from us, but that is really, you know, a new opportunity. And there's spectrum there also, right? I mean, there's public and private spectrum. We plan to work directly with the operators and do it in their spectrum when needed. But we also have solutions that will do it, you know, on non-public spectrum. >> So let's close out, oh go ahead. You you have something to add there? >> I'm just going to add one more point to Doug's point, right? Is if you look on the private 5G and the end customer, it's the enterprise, right? And they're, they're not a service provider. They're not a carrier. They're more used to deploying, you know, enterprise infrastructure, maintaining, managing that. So, you know, private 5G, especially with this open ecosystem and with all the open run capabilities, it naturally tends to, you know, blend itself very well to meet those requirements that the enterprise would have. >> And people should not think of private 5G as a sort of a replacement for wifi, right? It's to to deal with those, you know, intense situations that can afford the additional cost, but absolutely require the reliability and the performance and, you know, never go down type of scenario. Is that right? >> Doug: And low latencies usually, the primary characteristics, you know, for things like Industry 4.0 manufacturing requirements, those are tough SLAs. They're just, they're different than the operator SLAs for coverage and, you know, cell performance. They're now, you know, Five9 type characteristics, but on a manufacturing floor. >> That's why we don't use wifi on theCUBE to broadcast, we need a hard line. >> Yeah, but why wouldn't it replace wifi over time? I mean, you know, I still have a home phone number that's hardwired to align, but it goes to a voicemail. We don't even have handset anymore for it, yeah. >> I think, well, unless the cost can come down, but I think that wifi is flexible, it's cheap. It's, it's kind of perfect for that. >> Manish: And it's good technology. >> Dave V.: And it works great. >> David N.: For now, for now. >> Dave V.: But you wouldn't want it in those situations, and you're arguing that maybe. >> I'm saying eventually, what, put a sim in a device, I don't know, you know, but why not? >> Yeah, I mean, you know, and Dell offers, you know, from our laptop, you know, our client side, we do offer wifi, we do offer 4G and 5G solutions. And I think those, you know, it's a volume and scale issue, I think for the cost structure you're talking about. >> Manish: Come to our booth and see the connected laptop. >> Dave V.: Well let's, let's close on that. Why don't you guys talk a little bit about what you're going on at the show, I did go by the booth, you got a whole big lineup of servers. You got some, you know, cool devices going on. So give us the rundown and you know, let's end with the takeaways here. >> The simple rundown, a broad range of new powered servers, broad range addressing core, edge, RAN, optimized for those with all the different kind of acceleration capabilities. You can see that, you can see infrastructure blocks. These are with Wind River, with Red Hat. You can see OTEL, the open telecom ecosystem lab where all that playground, the integration, the real work, the real sausage makings happening. And then you will see some interesting solutions in terms of co-creation that we are doing, right? So you, you will see all of that and not to forget the connected laptops. >> Dave V.: Yeah, yeah, cool. >> Doug: Yeah and, we mentioned it before, but just to add on, I think, you know, for private 5G, you know, we've announced a few offers here at the show with partners. So with Expeto and AirSpan in particular, and I think, you know, I just want to emphasize the partnerships that we're doing. You know, we're doing some, you know, fundamental integration on infrastructure, bare metal and different options for the operators to get engineered systems. But building on that ecosystem is really, the move to cloud native is where Dell is trying to get in front of. And we're offering solutions and a much larger ecosystem to go after it. >> Dave V.: Great. Manish and Doug, thanks for coming on the program. It was great to have you, awesome discussion. >> Thank you for having us. >> Thanks for having us. >> All right, Dave Vellante for Dave Nicholson and Lisa Martin. We're seeing the disaggregation of the Teleco network into open ecosystems with integration from companies like Dell and others. Keep it right there for theCUBE's coverage of MWC 23. We'll be right back. (upbeat tech music)

(upbeat music) >> TheCUBE presents UiPath Forward 5. Brought to you by UiPath. >> Hello and welcome back to TheCUBE's coverage of UiPath Forward 5. We're here in Las Vegas at the Venetian Convention Center. This is day two. We're wrapping up Dave Nicholson and Dave Vellante. This is the fourth time theCUBE has been at UiPath Forward. And we've seen the transformation of the company from, essentially, what was a really interesting and easy to adopt point product to now one through acquisitions, IPO, has made a number of enhancements to its platform. David Cardenas is here. Deputy Director of Operations for County of Los Angeles, the Department of Public Health. David, good to see you. Thanks for coming on theCUBE. >> Thanks for having me on guys. Appreciate it. >> So what is your role? What does it have to do with automation? >> So I had been, actually started off in the IT space within the public health. Had served as a CIO previously, but now been moving into broader operations. And I basically manage all of the back office operations for the department, HR, IT, finance, all that. >> So you've had a wild ride in the last couple of years. >> Yeah, I think, like I've been talking earlier, it's just been, the last two years have just been horrendous. It's been a really difficult experience for us. >> Yeah, and I mean, the scars are there, and maybe permanently. But it also had major effects on organizations, on operations that, again, seem to be permanent. How would you describe the situation in your organization? >> So I think it, the urgency that came along with the pandemic response, kind of required us to look at things, you know, differently. We had to be, realize we had to be a lot more nimble than when we were and try to figure out how to enhance our operations. But really look at the core of what we're doing and figure out how it is to be more efficient. So I think we've kind of seen it as an opportunity to really examine ourselves a little bit more deeply and see what things we need to do to kind of, to fix our operations and get things on a better path. >> You know, I think a lot of organizations we talked to say that. But I want to understand how you handle this is, you didn't have time to sit back in the middle of the pandemic. >> Yeah. >> And then as you exit, what I call the isolation economy, people are so burned out, you know? So how do you deal with that organizational trauma? Say, okay now, let's sit back and think about this. Do people, are they eager to do so? Do they have the appetite for it? What's that dynamic like? >> So I think certainly there's a level of exhaustion inside the organization. I can't say that there isn't because it's just been, you know, two years of 24/7/365 kind of work. And that's tough on any organization. But I think what we realize is that there's, you know, we need to move into action quickly 'cause we don't know what's going to come next, right? And we're expecting that this is just a sign of what's to come and that we're just at the start of that stage of, we're just going to see a lot more outbreaks, we're going to see a lot more conditions kind of hitting us. And if we're not prepared for that, we're not going to be able to respond for the, and preserve the health and safety of our citizens, right? So I think we're taking a very active, like, look at these opportunities and see what we've done and say how do we now make the changes that we made in response to the pandemic permanent so that the next time this comes at us, we won't have to be struggling the way that we were to try to figure things out because we'll have such a better foundation in place to be able to move things forward. >> I mean, I've never served in the military, but I imagine that when you're in the military, you're always prepared for some kind of, you know, in your world, code red, right? >> Yeah. >> So it's like this code red culture. And that seems to have carried through, right? People are, you know, constantly aware that, wow. We got caught off guard and we don't want that to happen again. Because that was a big part of the trauma was just the unknown- >> Right. >> and the lack of preparedness. So thinking about technology and its role in helping you to prepare for that type of uncertainty. Can you describe how you're applying technology to prepare for the next unknown? >> So I think, so that first part of what you said, I think the difficulty we've always had in the public health side is that there's the, generally the approach to healthcare is very reactionary, right? Your first interface with the healthcare system is, "I'm going to go see my doctor; I'm going to go to the hospital." The work that we do in public health is to try to do everything we can to keep you out of that, right? So it's broad-based messaging, social media now is going to put us out there. But also, to be able to surveil disease in a different way. And so the holy grail for us in healthcare has always been, at least on the public health side, has been to try to see how can we tap in more actively that when you go see the doctor or when you go to the hospital, how can I get access to that information very, very quickly so that I know, and can see, and surveil my entire county in my jurisdiction and know, oh, there's an outbreak of disease happening in this section of the county. We're 10 million people with, you know, hundreds of square miles inside of LA. There are places where we can see very, you know, specific targets that we know we have to hit. But the data's a little stale and we find out several months after. We need to figure out a way to do that more actively. Technology's going to be our path to be able to capture that information more actively and come up on something a little bit, so we can track things faster and be able to respond more quickly. So that's our focus for all our technology implementations, automation like UiPath has offered us and other things, is around how to gather that information more quickly and put that into action so we can do quick interventions. >> People have notoriously short memories. Please tell me (chuckles) any of the friction that you may have experienced in years past before the pandemic. That those friction points where people are thinking, "Eh, what are the odds?" >> Yeah. "Eh, I've got finite budget, I think I'm going to spend it on this thing over here." Do you, are you able to still ride sort of the wave of mind share at this point when putting programs together for the future? >> So whatever friction was there during the pandemic wiped away. I mean, we had amazing collaboration with the medical provider community, our hospital partners. The healthcare system in LA was working very closely with us to make sure that we were responding. And there is that wave that we are trying to make sure that we use this as an opportunity to kind of ride it so that we can implement all the things that we want. 'Cause we don't know how long that's going to last us. The last time that I saw anything this large was after the anthrax attacks and the bioterrorism attacks that we had after 9/11. >> How interesting. >> Public health was really in lens at that point. And we had a huge infusion of funding, a lot of support from stakeholders, both politically and within the healthcare system. And we were able to make some large steps in movement at that point. This feels the same but in a larger scale because now it touched every part of the infrastructure. And we saw how society really had to react to what was going on in a different way than anyone has ever prepared for. And so now is we think is a time where we know that people are making more investments. And our success is going to be their success in the longterm. >> And you have to know that expectations are now set- >> Extremely high. >> at a completely different level, right? >> Yes, absolutely. >> There is no, "Oh, we don't have enough PPE." >> Correct. >> Right? >> David: Correct. >> The the expectation level is, hey, you should have learned from all of- >> We should have it; we can deliver it, We'll have it at the ready when we need to provide it. Yes, absolutely. >> Okay, so I sort of mentioned, we're, David cubed on theCUBE (all laughing). So three Daves. You spoke today at the conference? >> Actually I'm speaking later actually in the session in an hour or so. >> Oh Okay. My understanding is that you've got this concept of putting humans at the center of the automation. What does that mean? Why is that important? Help us understand that. >> So I think what we found in the crisis is that the high demand for information was something we hadn't seen before, right? We're one of the largest media markets in the United States. And what we really had trouble with is trying to figure out how to serve the residents, to provide them the information that we needed to provide to them. And so what we had traditionally done is press releases, you know, just general marketing campaigns, billboards, trying to send our message out. And when you're talking about a pandemic where on a daily basis, hour-by-hour people wanted to know what was going on in their local communities. Like, we had to change the way that we focused on. So we started thinking about, what is the information that the residents of our county need? And how can we set up an infrastructure to sustain the feeding of that? Because if we can provide more information, people will make their own personal decisions around their personal risk, their personal safety measures they need to take, and do so more actively. More so than, you know, one of us going on camera to say, "This is what you should do." They can look for themselves and look at the data that's in front of them and be able to make those choices for themselves, right? And so we needed to make sure that everything that we were doing wasn't built around feeding it to our political stakeholders, which are important stakeholders. We needed to make sure that they're aware and are messaging out, and our leadership are aware. But it's what could we give the public to be able to make them have access to information that we were collecting on an every single day basis to be able to make the decisions for their lives. And so the automation was key to that. We were at the beginning of the pandemic just had tons and tons of resources that we were throwing at the problem that was, our systems were slow, we didn't have good ability to move data back and forth between our systems, and we needed a stop-gap solution to really fill that need and be able to make the data cycles to meet the data cycles. We had basically every day had to deliver reports and analytics and dashboards by like 10 o'clock in the morning because we knew that the 12 an hour and the five-hour news cycles were going to hit and the press were going to then take those and message out. And the public started to kind of come in at that same time and look at 10 and 11 o'clock and 12 o'clock. >> Yeah. >> We could see it from how many hits were hitting our website, looking for that information. So when we failed and had a cycle where that data cycle didn't work and we couldn't deliver, the public would let us know, the press would let us know, the stakeholders would let us know. We had never experienced anything like that before, right. Where people had like this voracious appetite for the information. So we needed to have a very bulletproof process to make sure that every single 24 hours we were delivering that data, making it available at the ready. >> Software robots enabled that. >> Exactly. >> Okay. And so how were you able to implement that so quickly within such a traumatic environment? >> So I think, I guess necessity is always the mother of invention. It kind of drove us to go real quickly to look at what we had. We had data entry operations set up where we had dozens and dozens of people whose sole job in life on a 24-hour cycle was to receive medical reports that we we're getting, interview data that's coming from our case interviews, hospitalization data that was coming in through all these different channels. And it was all coming in in various forms. And they were entering that into our systems of record. And that's what we were using, extracts from that system of record, what was using to generate the data analyses in our systems and our dashboards. And so we couldn't rely on those after a while because the data was coming in at such high volume. There wasn't enough data entry staff to be able to fit the need, right? And so we needed to replace those humans and take them out of that data entry cycle, pop in the bots. And so what we started to look at is, let's pick off the, where it is that that data entry cycle starts and see what we could do to kind of replace that cycle. And we started off with a very discreet workload that was focused on some of our case interview data that was being turned into PDFs that somebody was using to enter into our systems. And we said, "Well before you do that," since we can't import into the systems 'cause it wasn't working, the import utilities weren't working. We got 'em into simple Excel spreadsheets, mapped those to the fields in our systems and let the bots do that over and over again. And we just started off with that one-use case and just tuned it and went cycle after cycle. The bots just got better and better to the point where we had almost like 95% success rates on each submission of data transactions that we did every day. >> Okay, and you applied that automation, I don't know, how many bots was it roughly? >> We're now at like 30; we started with about five. >> Okay, oh, interesting. So you started with five and you applied 'em to this specific use case to handle the velocity and volume of data- >> Correct. >> that was coming in. But that's obviously dynamic and it's changed. >> Absolutely. >> I presume it's shifted to other areas now. So how did you take what you learned there and then apply it to other use cases in other parts of the organization? >> So, fortunately for us, the process that was being used to capture the information to generate the dashboards and the analyses for the case interview data, which is what we started with- >> Yeah. >> Was essentially being used the same for the hospitalization data that we were getting and for tracking deaths as they were coming in as well. And so the bots essentially were just, we just took one process, take the same bots, copy them over essentially, and had them follow the very same process. We didn't try to introduce any different workflow than what was being done for the first one so we could replicate quickly. So I think it was lucky for us a lot- >> Dave V.: I was going to say, was that luck or by design? >> It was the same people doing the same analyses, right? So in the end they were thinking about how to be efficient themselves. So they kind of had coalesced around a similar process. And so it was kind of like fortunate, but it was by design in terms of how they- >> Dave V.: It was logical to them. >> Logical to them to make it. >> Interesting. >> So for us to be able to insert the bots became pretty easy on the front end. It's just now as we're trying to now expand to other areas that were now encountering like unique processes that we just can't replicate that quickly. We're having to like now dig into. >> So how are you handling that? First of all, how are you determining which processes? Is it sort of process driven? Is it data driven? How do you determine that? >> So obviously right now the focus still is COVID. So the the priorities scale that we've set internally for analyzing those opportunities really is centered around, you know, which things are really going to help our pandemic response, right? We're expecting another surge that's going to happen probably in the next couple of weeks. That'll probably take us through December. Hopefully, at that point, things start to calm down. But that means high-data volume again; these same process. So we're looking at optimizing the processes that we have, what can we do to make those cycles better, faster, you know, what else can we add? The data teams haven't stopped to try to figure out how else can they turn out new data reports, new data analysis, to give us a different perspective on the new variants and the new different outbreaks and hotspots that are popping up. And so we also have to kind of keep up with where they're going on these data dashboards. So they're adding more data into these reports so we know we have to optimize that. And then there's these kind of tangential work. So for example, COVID brought about, unfortunately, a lot of domestic violence reports. And so we have a lot of domestic violence agencies that we work with and that we have interactions with and to monitor their work, we have certain processes. So that's kind of like COVID-adjacent. But it's because it's such a very critical task, we're looking at how we can kind of help in those processes and areas. Same thing in like in our substance abuse area. We have substance use disorder treatment services that we provide. And we're delivering those at a higher rate because COVID kind of created more of a crisis than we would've liked. And so that's how we're prioritizing. It's really about what is the social need, what does the community need, and how can we put the technology work in those areas? >> So how do you envision the future of automation in your organization and the future of your organization? What does that look like? Paint a picture for us. >> So I'm hoping that it really does, you know, so we're going to take everything that's COVID related in the disease control areas, both in terms of our laboratory operations, in terms of our clinic operations, the way we respond, vaccination campaigns, things of that nature. And we're going to look at it to see what can efficiencies can we do there because it's a natural outgrowth of everything we've done on COVID up to this point. So, you know, it's almost like it's as simple as you're just replicating it with another disease. The disease might have different characteristics, but the work process that we follow is very similar. It's not like we're going to change everything and do something completely different for a respiratory condition as we would for some other type of foodborne condition or something else that might happen. So we certainly see very easy opportunities to just to grow out what we've already done in terms of the processes is to do that. So that's wave one, is really focus on that grow out. The second piece I think is to look at these kind of other general kind of community-based type of operations and see what operations we can do there to kind of implement some improvements there. And then I'm certainly in my new role of, in Deputy Director of Operation, I'm a CIO before. Now that I'm in this operations role, I have access to the full administrative apparatus for the department. And believe me, there's enough to keep me busy there. (Dave V. Laughing) And so that's going to be kind of my third prong is to kind of look at the implement there. >> Awesome. Go ahead, Dave. >> Yeah, so, this is going to be taking a step back, kind of a higher level view. If we could direct the same level of rigor and attention towards some other thing that we've directed towards COVID, if you could snap your fingers and make that happen, what would that thing be in the arena of public health in LA County in particular, or if you want California, United States. What is something that you feel maybe needs more attention that it's getting right now? >> So I think I touched on it a little bit earlier, but I think it's the thing we've been always been trying to get to is how to really become just very intentional about how we share data more actively, right? I don't have to know everything about you, but there are certain things I care about when you go to the doctor for that doctor and that physician to tell me. Our physicians, our healthcare system as you know, is always under a lot of pressure. Doctors don't have the time to sit down and write a form out for me and tell me everything that's going on. During COVID they did because they were, they cared about their patients so much and knew, I need to know what's going on at every single moment. And if I don't tell you what's going on in my office, you'll never know and can't tell us what's going on in the community. So they had a vested interest in telling us. But on a normal day-to-day, they don't have the time for that. I got to replace that. We got to make sure that when we get to, not me only, but everyone in this public health community has to be focused and working with our healthcare partners to automate the dissemination and the distribution of information so that I have the information at my fingers, that I can then tell you, "Here's what's going on in your local community," down to your neighborhood, down to your zip code, your census tracked, down to your neighbors' homes. We'll be able to tell you, "This is your risk. Here are the things that are going on. This is what you have to watch out for." And the more that we can be more that focused and laser-focused on meeting that goal, we will be able to do our job more effectively. >> And you can do that while preserving people's privacy. >> Privacy, absolutely. >> Yeah, absolutely. But if people are informed then they can make their own decisions. >> Correct. >> And they're not frustrated at the systems. David, we got to wrap. >> Sure. >> But maybe you can help us. What's your impression of the, first of all, is this your first Forward? You've been to others? >> This is my first time. >> Okay. >> My first time. >> What's your sort of takeaway when you go back to the office or home and people say, "Hey, how was the show? What, what'd you learn?" What are you going to say? >> Well, from just seeing all the partners here and kind of seeing all the different events I've been able to go to and the sessions there's, you don't know many times I've gone to and say, "We've got to be doing that." And so there's certainly these opportunities for, you know, more AI, more automation opportunities that we have not, we just haven't even touched on really. I think that we really need to do that. I have to be able to, as a public institution at some point our budgets get capped. We only have so much that we're going to receive. Even riding this wave, there's only so much we're going to be able to get. So we have to be very efficient and use our resources more. There's a lot more that we can do with AI, a lot more with the tools that we saw, some of the work product that are coming out at this conference that we think we can directly apply to kind of take the humans out of that, their traditional roles, get them doing higher level work so I can get the most out of them and have this other more mundane type of work, just have the systems just do it. I don't need anybody doing that necessarily, that work. I need to be able to leverage them for other higher level capabilities. >> Well thank you for that. Thanks for coming on theCUBE and really appreciate. Dave- >> It's been great talking to you guys, thank you. >> Dave, you know, I love software shows because the business impact is so enormous and I especially love cool software shows. You know, this first of all, the venue. 3,500 people here. Very cool venue. I like the fact that it's not like booth in your face, booth competition. I mean I love VMware, VMworld, VMware Explore. But it's like, "My booth is bigger than your booth." This is really nice and clean, and it's all about the experience. >> A lot of steak, not as much sizzle. >> Yeah, definitely. >> A lot of steak. >> And the customer content at the UiPath events is always outstanding. But we are entering a new era for UiPath, and we're talking. We heard a lot about the Enterprise platform. You know, the big thing is this company's been in this quarterly shock-lock since last April when it went public. And it hasn't all been pretty. And so new co-CEO comes in, they've got, you know, resetting priorities around financials, go to market, they've got to have profitable growth. So watching that that closely. But also product innovation so the co-CEOs will be able to split that up, split their duties up. Daniel Dines the product visionary, product guru. Rob Enslin, you know- making the operations work. >> Operations execution business, yeah. >> We heard that Carl Eschenbach did the introduction. Carl's a major operator, wanted that DNA into the company. 'Cause they got to keep product innovation. And I want to, I want to see R&D spending, stay relatively high. >> Product innovation, but under the heading of platform. And that's the key thing is just not being that tool set. The positioning has been, I think, accurate that, you know, over history, we started with these RPA tools and now we've moved into business process automation and now we're moving into new frontiers where, where truly, AI and ML are being leveraged. I love the re-infer story about going in and using natural national (chuckles) national, natural language processing. I can't even say it, to go through messaging. That's sort of a next-level of intelligence to be able to automate things that couldn't be automated before. So that whole platform story is key. And they seem to have made a pretty good case for their journey into platform as far as I'm concerned. >> Well, yeah, to me again. So it's always about the customers, want to come to an event like this, you listen to what they say in the keynotes and then you listen to what the customers say. And there's a very strong alignment in the UiPath community between, you know, the marketing and the actual implementation. You know, marketing's always going to be ahead. But, we saw this a couple of years ago with platform. And now we're seeing it, you know, throughout the customer base, 10,000+ customers. I think this company could have, you know, easily double, tripled, maybe even 10x that. All right, we got to wrap. Dave Nicholson, thank you. Two weeks in a row. Good job. And let's see. Check out siliconangle.com for all the news. Check out thecube.net; wikibon.com has the research. We'll be on the road as usual. theCUBE, you can follow us. UiPath Forward 5, Dave Vellante for Dave Nicholson. We're out and we'll see you next time. Thanks for watching. (gentle music)

(upbeat music) >> We're back in Boston, theCUBE's coverage of Re:Inforce 2022. My name is Dave Vellante. Dave Hatfield is here. He's the co-CEO of Lacework. Dave, great to see again. Hat. >> Thanks Dave. >> Do you still go by Hat? >> Hat is good for me. (Dave V laughing) >> All right cool. >> When you call me David, I'm in trouble for something. (Dave V Laughing) So just call me Hat for now. >> Yeah, like my mom, David Paul. >> Exactly. >> All right. So give us the update. I mean, you guys have been on a tear. Obviously the Techlash, >> Yep. >> I mean, a company like yours, that has raised so much money. You got to be careful. But still, I'm sure you're not taking the foot off the gas. What's the update? >> Yeah no. We were super focused on our mission. We want to de deliver a cloud security for everybody. Make it easier for developers and builders, to do their thing. And we're fortunate to be in a situation, where people are in the early innings of moving into the cloud, you know. So our customers, largely digital natives. And now increasingly cloud migrants, are recognizing that in order to build fast, you know, in the cloud, they need to have a different approach to security. And, you know, it used to be that you're either going be really secure or really fast. And we wanted to create a platform that allowed you to have both. >> Yeah. So when you first came to theCUBE, you described it. We are the first company. And at the time, I think you were the only company, thinking about security as a data problem. >> Yeah. >> Explain what that means. >> Well, when you move to the cloud, you know, there's literally a quintillion data sets, that are out there. And it's doubling every several days or whatever. And so it creates a massive problem, in that the attack surface grows. And different than when you're securing a data center or device, where you have a very fixed asset, and you kind of put things around it and you kind of know how to do it. When you move to the shared ephemeral massive scale environment, you can't write rules, and do security the way you used to do it, for a data centers and devices. And so the insight for us was, the risk was the data, the upside was the data, you know? And so if you can harness all of this data, ingest it, process it, contextualize it, in the context of creating a baseline of what normal is for a company. And then monitor it constantly in real time. Figure out, you know, identify abnormal activity. You can deliver a security posture for a company, unlike anything else before. Because it used to be, you'd write a rule. You have a known adversary or a bad guy that's out there, and you constantly try and keep up with them for a very specific attack service. But when you move to the cloud, the attack service is too broad. And so, the risk of the massive amount of data, is also the solution. Which is how do you harness it and use it with machine learning and AI, to solve these problems. >> So I feel like for CISOs, the cloud is now becoming the first line of defense. >> Yep. The CISOs is now the second line. Maybe the auditing is the third line. I don't know. >> Yeah. >> But, so how do you work with AWS? You mentioned, you know, quadrillion. We heard, I think it was Steven Schmidt, who talked about in his keynote. A quadrillion, you know, data points of a month or whatever it was. That's 15 zeros. Mind boggling. >> Yeah. >> How do you interact with AWS? You know, where's your data come from? Are you able to inspect that AWS data? Is it all your own kind of first party data? How does that all work? >> Yeah, so we love AWS. I mean we ultimately, we started out our company building our own service, you know, on AWS. We're the first cloud native built on the cloud, for the cloud, leveraging data and harnessing it. So AWS enabled us to do that. And partners like Snowflake and others, allowed us to do that. But we are a multi-cloud solution too. So we allow builders and customers, to be able to have choice. But we'd go deep with AWS and say, the shared responsibility model they came up with. With partners and themselves to say, all right, who ultimately owns security? Like where is the responsibility? And AWS does a great job on database storage, compute networking. The customer is responsible for the OS, the platform, the workloads, the applications, et cetera, and the data. And that's really where we come in. And kind of help customers secure their posture, across all of their cloud environments. And so we take a cloud trail data. We look at all of the network data. We look at configuration data. We look at rules based data and policies, that customers might have. Anything we can get our hands on, to be able to ingest into our machine learning models. And everybody knows, the more data you put into a machine learning model, the finer grain it's going to be. The more insightful and the more impactful it's going to be. So the really hard computer science problem that we set out to go do seven years ago, when we founded the company, was figure out a way to ingest, process, and contextualize mass amounts of data, from multiple streams. And the make sense out of it. And in the traditional way of protecting customers' environments, you know, you write a rule, and you have this linear sort of connection to alerts. And so you know, if you really want to tighten it down and be really secure, you have thousands of alerts per day. If you want to move really fast and create more risk and exposure, turn the dial the other way. And you know, we wanted to say, let's turn it all the way over, but maintain the amount of alerts, that really are only the ones that they need to go focus on. And so by using machine learning and artificial intelligence, and pulling all these different disparate data systems into making sense of them, we can take, you know, your alert volume from thousands per day, to one or two high fidelity critical alerts per day. And because we know the trail, because we're mapping it through our data graph, our polygraph data platform, the time to remediate a problem. So figure out the needle in the haystack. And the time to remediate is 90, 95% faster, than what you have to do on your own. So we want to work with AWS, and make it really easy for builders to use AWS services, and accelerate their consumption of them. So we were one of the first to really embrace Fargate and Graviton. We're embedded in Security Hub. We're, you know, embedded in all of the core platforms. We focus on competencies, you know. So, you know, we got container competency. We've got security and compliance competencies. And we really just want to continue to jointly invest with AWS. To deliver a great customer outcome and a really integrated seamless solution. >> I got a lot to unpack there. >> Okay. >> My first question is, what you just described, that needle in the haystack. You're essentially doing that in near real time? >> Yep. >> Or real time even, with using AI inferencing. >> Yeah. >> Describe it a little better. >> You're processing all of this data, you know, how do you do so efficiently? You know. And so we're the fastest. We do it in near real time for everything. And you know, compared to our competitors, that are doing, you know, some lightweight side scanning technology, and maybe they'll do a check or a scan once a day or twice a day. Well, the adversaries aren't sleeping, you know, over the other period of time. So you want to make it as near real time as you can. For certain applications, you know, you get it down into minutes. And ideally over time, you want to get it to actual real time. And so there's a number of different technologies that we're deploying, and that we're putting patents around. To be able to do as much data as you possibly can, as fast as you possibly can. But it varies on the application of the workload. >> And double click in the technology. >> Yeah. >> Like tell me more about it. What is it? Is it a purpose-built data store? >> Yeah. Is it a special engine? >> Yeah. There's two primary elements to it. The first part is the polygraph data platform. And this is this ingestion engine, the processing engine, you know, correlation engine. That has two way APIs, integrates into your workflows, ingests as much data as we possibly can, et cetera. And unifies all the data feeds that you've got. So you can actually correlate and provide context. And security now in the cloud, and certainly in the future, the real value is being able to create context and correlate data across the board. And when you're out buying a bunch of different companies, that have different architectures, that are all rules based engines, and trying to stitch them together, they don't talk to each other. And so the hard part first, that we wanted to go do, was build a cloud native platform, that was going to allow us to build applications, that set on top of it. And that, you know, handled a number of different security requirements. You know, behavior based threat detection, obviously is one of the first services that we offered, because we're correlating all this data, and we're creating a baseline, and we're figuring out what normal is. Okay, well, if your normal behavior is this. What's abnormal? So you can catch not only a known bad threat, you know, with rules, et cetera, that are embedded into our engines, but zero day threats and unknown unknowns. Which are the really scary stuff, when you're in the cloud. So, you know, we've got, you know, application, you know, for behavioral threat detection. You have vulnerability management, you know. Where you're just constantly figuring out, what vulnerabilities do I have across my development cycle and my run time cycle, that I need to be able to keep up on, and sort of patch and remediate, et cetera. And then compliance. And as you're pulling all these data points in, you want to be able to deliver compliance reports really efficiently. And the Biden Administration, you know, is issuing, you know, all of these, you know, new edicts for regulations. >> Sure. Obviously countries in, you know, in Europe. They have been way ahead of the US, in some of these regulations. And so they all point to a need for continuous monitoring of your cloud environment, to ensure that you're, you know, in real time, or near real time complying with the environments. And so being able to hit a button based on all of this data and, you know, deliver a compliance report for X regulation or Y regulation, saves a lot of time. But also ensures customers are secure. >> And you mentioned your multi-cloud, so you started on AWS. >> Yeah. >> My observation is that AWS isn't out trying to directly, I mean, they do some monetization of their security, >> Yep. >> But it's more like security here it is, you know. Use it. >> Yeah. >> It comes with the package. Whereas for instance, take Microsoft for example, I mean, they have a big security business. I mean, they show up in the spending surveys. >> Yeah. >> Like wow, off the charts. So sort of different philosophies there. But when you say you're Multicloud, you're saying, okay, you run on AWS. Obviously you run on Azure. You run on GCP as well. >> Yeah. Yep. >> We coin this term, Supercloud, Dave. It's it's like Multicloud 2.0. The idea is it's a layer above the clouds, that hides the underlying complexity. >> Yep. >> You mentioned Graviton. >> Yep. >> You worry about Graviton. Your customer don't, necessarily. >> We should be able to extract that. >> Right. But that's going to be different than what goes on Microsoft. With Microsoft primitives or Google primitives. Are you essentially building a Supercloud, that adds value. A layer, >> Yeah. >> on top of those Hyperscalers. >> Yeah. >> Or is it more, we're just going to run within each of those individual environments. >> Yeah. No we definitely want to build the Security OS, you know, that sort of goes across the Supercloud, as you talk about. >> Yeah. >> I would go back on one thing that you said, you know, if you listen to Andy or Adam now, talk about AWS services, and all the future growth that they have. I mean, security is job one. >> Yeah. Right, so AWS takes security incredibly seriously. They need to. You know, they want to be able to provide confidence to their customers, that they're going to be able to migrate over safely. So I think they do care deeply it. >> Oh, big time. >> And are delivering a number of services, to be able to do it for their customers,. Which is great. We want to enhance that, and provide Multicloud flexibility, deeper dives on Kubernetes and containers, and just want to stay ahead, and provide an option for companies. You know, when you're operating in AWS, to have better or deeper, more valuable, more impactful services to go layer on top. >> I see. >> And then provide the flexibility, like you said, of, hey look, I want to have a consistent security posture across all of my clouds. If I choose to use other clouds. And you don't, the schema are different on all three. You know, all of the protocols are different, et cetera. And so removing all of that complexity. I was just talking with the CISO at our event last night, we had like 300 people at this kind of cocktail event. Boston's pretty cool in the summertime. >> Yeah. Boston in July is great. >> It's pretty great. They're like going, look, we don't want to hire a Azure specialist, and a AWS specialist, and you know, a GCP specialist. We don't want to have somebody that is deep on just doing container security, or Kubernetes security. Like we want you to abstract all of that. Make sense of it. Stay above it. Continue to innovate. So we can actually do what we want to do. Which is, we want to build. We want to build fast. Like the whole point here, is to enable developers to do their job without restriction. And they intuitively want to have, and build secure applications. And, you know, because they recognize the importance of it. But if it slows them down. They're not going to do it. >> Right. >> And so we want to make that as seamless as possible, on top of AWS. So their developers feel confident. They can move more and more applications over. >> So to your point about AWS, I totally agree. I mean, security's job one. I guess the way I would say it is, from a monetization standpoint. >> Yeah. >> My sense is AWS, right now anyway, is saying we want the ecosystem, >> Yeah. >> to be able to monetize. >> Yeah. >> We're going to leave that meat on the bone for those guys. Whereas Microsoft is, they sometimes, they're certainly competitive with the ecosystem, sometimes. End point. >> Yeah. >> They compete with CrowdStrike. There's no question about it. >> Yeah. >> Are they competitive with you in some cases? Or they're not there yet. Are you different. >> Go talk to George, about what he thinks about CrowdStrike and I, versus Microsoft. (Dave V laughing) >> Well, yeah. (Dave H laughing) A good point in terms of the depth of capability. >> Yeah. >> But there's definitely opportunities for the ecosystem there as well. >> Yeah. But I think on certain parts of that, there are more, there's higher competitiveness, than less. I think in the cloud, you know, having flexibility and being open, is kind of core to the cloud's premise. And I think all three of the Hyperscalers, want to provide a choice for customers. >> Sure. >> And they want to provide flexibility. They obviously, want to monetize as much as they possibly can too. And I think they have varying strategies of those. And I do think AWS is the most open. And they're also the biggest. And I think that bodes well for what the marketplace really wants. You know, if you are a customer, and you want to go all in for everything, with one cloud. All right, well then maybe you use their security stack exclusively. But that's not the trend on where we're going. And we're talking about a $154 billion market, growing at, you know, 15% for you. It's a $360 billion market. And one of the most fragmented in tech. Customers do want to consolidate on platforms. >> Absolutely. >> If they can consolidate on CSPs, or they consolidate on the Supercloud, I'm going to steal that from you, with the super cloud. You know, to be able to, you know, have a consistent clarity posture, for all of your workloads, containers, Kubernetes, applications, across multiple clouds. That's what we think customers want. That's what we think customers need. There's opportunity for us to build a really big, iconic security business as well. >> I'm going to make you laugh. Because, so AWS doesn't like the term Supercloud. And the reason is, because it implies that they're the infrastructure, kind of commodity layer. And my response is, you'll appreciate this, is Pure Storage has 70% gross margin. >> Yeah. Yep. >> Right. Look at Intel. You've got Graviton. You control, you can have Intel, like gross margin. So maybe, your infrastructure. But it's not necessarily commodity, >> Yeah. >> But it leaves, to me, it leaves the ecosystem value. Companies like Lacework. >> Amazon offers 220 something services, for customers to make their lives easier. There's all kinds of ways, where they're actually focusing on delivering value, to their customers that, you know, is far from commodity and always will be. >> Right. >> I think when it comes to security, you're going to have, you're going to need security in your database. Your storage. Your network compute. They do all of that, you know, monetize all of that. But customers also want to, you know, be able to have a consistent security posture, across the Supercloud. You know, I mean, they don't have time. I think security practitioners, and security hiring in general, hasn't had unemployment for like seven or 10 years. It's the hardest place to find quality people. >> Right. >> And so our goal, is if we can up level and enable security practitioners, and DevSecOps teams, to be able to do their job more efficiently, it's a good thing for them. It's a win for them. And not having to be experts, on all of these different environments, that they're operating in. I think is really important. >> Here's the other thing about Supercloud. And I think you'll appreciate this. You know, Andreesen says, all companies are software companies. Well, all companies are becoming SAS and Cloud companies. >> Yeah. >> So you look at Capital One. What they're doing with on Snowflake. You know, Goldman what they're doing with AWS. Oracle by Cerner, you know that. So industries, incumbents, are building their own Superclouds. They don't want to deal with all this crap. >> Yeah. >> They want to add their own value. Their own tools. Their own software. And their own data. >> Yeah. >> And actually serve their specific vertical markets. >> Yeah. A hundred percent. And they also don't want tools, you know. >> Right. >> I think when you're in the security business. It's so fragmented, because you had to write a rule for everything, and they were super nuanced. When you move to a data driven approach, and you actually have a platform, that removes the need to actually have very nuanced, specific expertise across all these different. Because you're combining it into your baseline and understanding it. And so, customers want to move from, you know, one of the biggest banks in North America, has 550 different point solutions for security. Thousands of employees to go manage all of this. They would love to be able to consolidate around a few platforms, that integrate the data flows, so they can correlate value across it. And this platform piece is really what differentiates our approach. Is that we already have that built. And everybody else is sort of working backwards from Legacy approaches, or from a acquired companies. We built it natively from the ground up. Which we believe gives us an advantage for our customers. An advantage of time to market speed, efficacy, and a much lower cost. Because you can get rid of a bunch of point solutions in the process. >> You mentioned Devs. Did you, you know, that continuous experience across clouds. >> Yep. >> Do you have like the equivalent of a Super PAs layer, that is specific to your use case? Or are you kind of using, I mean, I know you use off the shelf tooling, >> Yep. >> you allow your developers to do so, but is, is the developer experience consistent across the clouds? That's really what I'm asking? >> Well, I think it is. I mean, I was talking to another CEO of a company, you know, on the floor here, and it's focusing on the build side. You know we focus on both the build and the run time. >> Right. >> And we were talking about, you know, how many different applications, or how fragmented the developer experience is, with all the different tools that they have. And it's phenomenal. I mean, like this, either through acquisition or by business unit. And developers, like to have choice. Like they don't like to be told what to do or be standardized, you know, by anybody. Especially some compliance organization or security organization. And so, it's hard for them to have a consistent experience, that they're using a bunch of different tools. And so, yeah. We want to be able to integrate into whatever workload, a workflow a customer uses, in their Dev cycle, and then provide consistent security on top of it. I mean, for our own company, you know, we got about a thousand people. And a lot of them are developers. We want to make it as consistent as we possibly can, so they can build code, to deliver security efficacy, and new applications and new tools for us. So I think where you can standardize and leverage a platform approach, it's always going to be better. But the reality is, especially in large existing companies. You know, they've got lots of different tools. And so you need to be able to set above it. Integrate with it and make it consistent. And security is one of those areas, where having a consistent view, a consistent posture, a consistent read, that you can report to the board, and know that your efficacy is there. Whatever environment you're in. Whatever cloud you're on. Is super, super critical. >> And in your swim lane, you're providing that consistency, >> Yep. >> for Devs. But you're right. You've got to worry about containers. You got to worry about the run time. You got to worry about the platform. The DevSecOps team is, you know, becoming the new line of defense, right? I mean, security experts. >> Absolutely. Well, we have one customer, that we just have been working with for four years ago. And it's, you know, a Fortune, a Global 2000 company. Bunch of different industries grew through acquisition, et cetera. And four years ago, their CTO said, we're moving to the cloud. Because we want to drive efficiency and agility, and better service offerings across the board. And so he has engineering. So he has Dev, you know. He has operations. And he has security teams. And so organizationally, I think that'll be the model, as companies do follow entries in to sort of, you know, quote. Become software companies and move on their digital journeys. Integrating the functions of DevSecOps organizationally, and then providing a platform, and enabling platform, that makes their jobs easier for each of those personas. >> Right. >> Is what we do. You want to enable companies to shift left. And if you can solve the problems in the code, on the front end, you know, before it gets out on the run time. You're going to solve, you know, a lot of issues that exist. Correlating the data, between what's happening in your runtime, and what's happening in your build time, and being able to fix it in near realtime. And integrate with those joint workflows. We think is the right answer. >> Yeah. >> Over the long haul. So it's a pretty exciting time. >> Yeah. Shift left, ops team shield right. Hat, great to see you again. >> Good to see you, Dave. >> Thanks so much for coming on theCUBE. >> Thanks a lot. >> All Right. Keep it right there. We'll be back. Re:Inforce 2022. You're watching theCUBE from Boston. (calming music)

>>Welcome back to HP discover 2021 the virtual version my name is Dave valentin. You're watching the cubes continuous coverage of the event, john Ramallah is here. He's the senior director of product management for HP. Green Lake Lighthouse. New offering from HP. We're gonna talk about that. We're gonna talk about cloud native. Hey john, welcome to the cube. Good to see you again. >>Awesome. Great to be with you again. >>All right. So what is Green Lake Lighthouse? >>Yeah, it's very excited. Another new offering and innovation from H P E to support our broader Green Lake strategy and plans. It's really a brand new, purpose built cloud native platform that we've developed and created. That pulls together all of our infrastructure leadership with our platform software leadership into a single integrated system built to run green light cloud services. So think of it as you know, fully integrated, deploy it any place you want on your premises at a co location provider or at the edge wherever you need. Um, they'll inter operate, work together sharing data, you know, running apps together. Great capability for people to bring the cloud where they want as we talk about what Green like it's the cloud that comes to you. >>So should we think of this as a as a management platform? Is it also sort of a quasi development platform kind of, where does it fit in that spectrum? >>Well, it's really more of an integrated system with all of the integrated control planes needed to run it in a distributed fashion. So it's a it's a true distributed cloud intended to run at any client location that's needed, connects back to Green Lake Central and our Green Light cloud operations teams to go ahead and run any cloud services that they want. So you get the benefit of running those workloads wherever you need but that, you know, uh centralized control that people want in terms of how they run their class. >>Okay so we think of these things like for instance how is it different from a WS outposts or things like you know as your stack or as your hub? >>Yeah, very simply this is because it's a distributed cloud intended to make it so you can run it wherever you need. You don't need to be tethered to any of the public cause or the various public clouds out there so people can now run their systems wherever they want however they need without that required tethering that much of those other vendors require. So you can really sort of own your own cloud or have that cloud come to wherever you need it within your overall. I. T. >>Can I tether to a public cloud if I want to. >>Yes. The cloud services like many other cloud services can interconnect together, so no issue, if you want to run or even do fail over between public cloud or on premises, it's all how you want to set it up. But that connection to public cut again through Green Lake is done at that cloud services level. Uh you know where you would connect one of the screen, like lighthouse systems to the public cloud three services. >>Okay, so maybe we talk a little bit about the use cases in a minute, but but how flexible is this? How do I configure Lighthouse? You know what what comes standard? What what what what are my options? >>Yes, so we've designed it in a very modular fashion so that people can really configure it to whatever their needs are at any given location. So there's a basic set of modules that align to a lot of the compute and storage instances that people are familiar with from all of the cloud providers, you simply tell us which workloads you want to be running on it and how much capacity you want and that will get configured and deployed to that given site. In terms of the different types, we have what we're calling to series or a set of series that are available for this to meet different sets of needs, one being more mainstream for broad use cases that people need virtualized container, any other type of enterprise workloads and another more technically focused with higher performance networking. For higher performance deployments, you can choose which of those fits your needs for those given areas. >>So maybe you could talk a little bit more about the workloads and what specifically is uh supported and how they get deployed. >>Again, all of it is managed and run through Green Lake Central. That's our one location where people can go to watch these things manage them. You can run container as a service VM as a service as needed on these different platforms. You can actually mix and match those as well. So one of these platforms can run multiple of those and you can vary the mix of those as your business needs change over time. So think of it as a very flexible way to manage this, which is really what cloud native is all about, having that flexibility to run those workloads wherever and however you need. In addition, we can build more advanced type of solutions on top of those sort of foundational capabilities with things like HPC is a service and collapses a service to better enable clients to deploy any of their given enterprise workloads. >>John what about the security model for lighthouse? Um, that's obviously a big deal. Everybody's talking about these days. It can't open the, the news without seeing some kind of, you know, hack de jure, how does Lighthouse operate in the, you know, secure environment? >>Well, you know, first of all, there's sort of a new standard that was established, um, you know, within these cloud operating models and HPV was leading in terms of infrastructure innovation with our Silicon Root of Trust, where we came out with the world's most secure infrastructure a few years ago. And what we're doing now, since this is a full platform and integrated system will be extending that capability beyond just how we create a root of trust in our manufacturing facilities to ensure that it's secure. Running it within the infrastructure itself, will be extending that vertically up into the software stacks of containers and VMS sort of using that root of trust up to make sure everything's secure in that sense. And then eventually up to the workloads themselves. So by being able to go back to that root of trust, it really makes a big difference in how people can run things in an enterprise secure way. Great innovations continued and one of our big focus areas throughout this year. >>So where does it fit in the portfolio, john I mean, how is it uh, compliment or how is it different from, you know, the typical HP systems, the hardware and software that we're used to? >>You might think of this as sort of a best of bringing together all the great innovations of H P D. You know, we we've got awesome infrastructure that we lead for many, many years. We've got, you know, great more cloud native software that's being developed. We've got great partnerships that we've got with a lot of the leading vendors out there. This allows us to bring all of those things together into an integrated platform that is really intended to run these cloud native services. So uh it builds on top of that leadership fits uh in that sense with the portfolio, but it's ultimately about how it allows us to run and extend our green light capabilities as we know them, to make them more uh more consumable if you want to call it for a lot of our enterprise clients and whatever location. So >>when would I when would I use Lighthouse? And when would I use sort of a traditional H P E system? >>Again, it's a matter of which level of integration people want. Cloud is really also in terms of experience about simplifying what people are purchasing and making it easier for them to consume easier for them to roll out a lot of these things. That's when you'd want to purchase a Lighthouse versus our other infrastructure products, we'll always have those leading infrastructure products where people can put together everything exactly the way that they want and go through the qualification and certification of a lot of those workloads or they can go ahead and select this green like Lighthouse, where they have a lot of these things available in a catalog. We do validation of, of the workloads and, and uh, platform systems so that it's all sort of ready for people to roll out in a much more secure, tested and agile fashion. >>So if I have a cloud first strategy, but I don't want to put it in the public cloud, but I want that cloud experience. Uh, and I want to go fast. It sounds like Lighthouse is that I'm the perfect customer for for Lighthouse, >>precisely. You know, this is taking that cloud experience that people are wanting the simplicity of those deployments and making it where it can come to them in whichever location that they want. You know, running it on a consumption basis so that it's a lot easier wait for them to go ahead and manage and deploy those things with out a lot of the internal qualifications and certifications that they had to do over the years >>versus okay. But or, and or if I want to customize it, maybe I want to, maybe I'm a channel partner. I want to bring some of my own value. I got a specific use case that's not covered by something like Lighthouse. That's where I would go with the more traditional infrastructure, >>correct? Yes. If anyone wants to do customization, we've got a great set of products for that. We really want to use Lighthouses, a mechanism for us to standardize and focus on more enabling these broader cloud capabilities for crime >>and Lighthouse. Uh Talk a little bit more about the automation that that I get, you know, things like patching and software updates that's sort of included in this integrated system. >>Is that correct? Absolutely. You know, when, when when people think about, you know, managing workloads in the cloud, they don't worry about taking care of from we're updating and a lot of those things that's all taken care of by the provider. So uh in that same experience, Lighthouse comes with all of the firmware, updating, all of the software, updating all included, all managed through our Green Lake managed services teams. So that's just part of how the system takes care of itself. Um You know, that's a new level of capability and experience that's consistent with all other cloud providers >>and that's that's okay, so that's that's something that is a managed service. Um So let's say I have a lighthouse on prem, you're gonna you're gonna that managed services doing all the patching and the releases and the updates and that lives that lives in the cloud, that lives in hp, that lives in my prem. >>Well, yeah, ultimately it all goes through Green Lake Central and it's managed. Um you know, all of those deployments are are automated in nature so that people don't have to worry about them. Um There's multiple ways that that can get delivered to them. We have some automation and control plane technology that brings that all together for them. Um You know, it can vary based on the client on their degree of of how they want to manage some of that, but it's all taken care of for them. >>And you've got Green Lake in the name and my to infer from that that it's sort of dovetails in is one of the puzzles in the Green Lake mosaic. >>Yeah, exactly. So think of think of Green Lake as our broader initiative for everything cloud and how do we start enabling not only these cloud services, but make it easier for people to deploy those and consume them, consume them wherever they need. And this is the enablement piece. This is that portion of green light that helps them enable that connected to green like Central where they can manage everything centrally. And then we've got that broad catalog of services available. >>And when can I get it? When you go G. A. >>Yes. So it'll july is when our first set of shipments and availability are there. So just a very few days after you discover here, and we'll expand the portfolio over time with more of a mainstream version early, more technical or performance oriented ones available soon thereafter. And we've got plans even for edge type offerings, uh more in the, in the future as well. So a case where we'll continue to build and expand more targeting these platforms to folks needs whether their enterprise or maybe there are vertical offerings that they want in terms of how they move all these things together. Think of Telco is a great case where people want this. Healthcare is another area where we can add the value of these integrated systems in a very purpose built way. >>Can I ask you what, like what's inside, you know, what, what can I get in terms of, you know, basic infrastructure, compute storage, networking, what are my options, >>all of the above. You know, what we'll do is we'll we'll go through the basic selection of all of that greatest hits uh within our complete portfolio. Pulling together, give you a few simple choices, you know, you think about it as you want, general purpose compute modules you might want compute optimized or memory optimized modules. Each of those are simple choices that you'll make that come together underlying all that are the great infrastructure pieces that you've known for years, but we take care of simplifying that for you so you don't have to worry about those details. >>Great well, john, congratulations on the new new product and uh and thank you for sharing the the the update with the cube. >>Thank you very much appreciate. >>All right, thank you for watching the cubes coverage of HP discover 2021. My name is Dave Volonte. Keep it right there right back with more coverage. Right after this short break. >>Yeah. Mhm.