(upbeat music) >> Hello, welcome to the Cube's coverage of International Women's Day 2023. I'm John Furrier, host of the CUBE series of profiles around leaders in the tech industry sharing their stories, advice, best practices, what they're doing in their jobs their vision of the future, and more importantly, passing it on and encouraging more and more networking and telling the stories that matter. Our next guest is a great executive leader talking about how to lead in challenging times. Krista Satterthwaite, who is Senior Vice President and GM of Mainstream Compute. Krista great to see you're Cube alumni. We've had you on before talking about compute power. And by the way, congratulations on your BPT and Black Professional Tech Network 2023 Black Tech Exec of the Year Award. >> Thank you very much. Appreciate it. And thanks for having me. >> I knew I liked you the first time we were doing interviews together. You were so smart and so on top of it. Thanks for coming on. >> No problem. >> All kidding aside, let's get into it. You know, one of the things that's coming out on these interviews is leadership is being showcased and there's a network effect happening in the industry and you're starting to see people look and hear stories that they may or may not have heard before or news stories are coming out. So, one of the things that's interesting is that also in the backdrop of post pandemic, there's been a turn in the industry a little bit, there's a little bit of headwind in certain areas, some tailwinds in cloud and other areas. Compute, your area is doing very well. It could be challenging. And as a leader, has the conversation changed? And where are you at right now in the network of folks you're working with? What's the mood? >> Yeah, so actually I, things are much better. Obviously we had a chip shortage last year. Things are much, much better. But I learned a lot when it came to going through challenging times and leadership. And I think when we talk to customers, a lot of 'em are in challenging situations. Sometimes it's budget, sometimes it's attracting and retaining talent and sometimes it's just demands because, it's really exciting that technology is behind everything. But that means the demands on IT are bigger than ever before. So what I find when it comes to challenging times is that there's really three qualities that are game changers when it comes to leading and challenging times. And the first one is positivity. People have to feel like there's a light at the end of the tunnel to make sure that, their attitudes stay up, that they stay working really really hard and they look to the leader for that. The second one is communication. And I read somewhere that communication is leadership. And we had a great example from our CEO Antonio Neri when the pandemic hit and everything shut down. He had an all employee meeting every week for a month and we have tens of thousands of employees. And then even after that month, we had 'em very regularly. But he wanted to make sure that everybody heard from, him his thoughts had all the updates, knew how their peers were doing, how we were helping customers. And I really learned a lot from that in terms of communicating and communicating more during tough times. And then I would say the third one is making sure that they are informed and they feel empowered. So I would say a leader who is able to do that really, really stands out in a challenging time. >> So how do you get yourself together? Obviously you the chip shortage everyone knows in the industry and for the folks not in the tech industry, it was an economic potential disaster, because you don't get the chips you need. You guys make servers and technology, chips power everything. If you miss a shipment, it could cause a lot of backlash. So Cisco had an earnings impact. It has impact to the business. When do you have that code red moment where it's like, okay, we have to kind of put the pause and go into emergency mode. And how do you handle that? >> Well, you know, it is funny 'cause when it, when we have challenges, I come to learn that people can look at challenges and hard work as a burden or a mission and they behave totally different. If they see it as a burden, then they're doing the bare minimum and they're pointing fingers and they're complaining and they're probably not getting a whole lot done. If they see it as a mission, then all of a sudden they're going above and beyond. They're working really hard, they're really partnering. And if it affects customers for HPE, obviously we, HPE is a very customer centric company, so everyone pays attention and tries to pitch in. But when it comes to a mission, I started thinking, what are the real ingredients for a mission? And I think it's important. I think it's, people feel like they can make an impact. And then I think the third one is that the goal is clear, even if the path isn't, 'cause you may have to pivot a lot if it's a challenge. And so when it came to the chip shortage, it was a mission. We wanted to make sure that we could ship to customers as quickly as possible. And it was a mission. Everybody pulled together. I learned how much our team could pull off and pull together through that challenge. >> And the consequences can be quantified in economics. So it's like the burn the boats example, you got to burn the boats, you're stuck. You got to figure out a solution. How does that change the demands on people? Because this is, okay, there's a mission it they're not, it's not normal. What are some of those new demands that arise during those times and how do you manage that? How do you be a leader? >> Yeah, so it's funny, I was reading this statement from James White who used to be the CEO of Jamba Juice. And he was talking about how he got that job. He said, "I think it was one thing I said that really convinced them that I was the right person." And what he said was something like, "I will get more out of people than nine out of 10 leaders on the planet." He said, "Because I will look at their strengths and their capabilities and I will play to their passions." and their capabilities and I will play their passions. and getting the most out people in difficult times, it is all about how much you can get out of people for their own sake and for the company's sake. >> That's great feedback. And to people watching who are early in their careers, leading is getting the best out of your team, attitude. Some of the things you mentioned. What advice would you give folks that are starting to get into the workforce, that are starting to get into that leadership track or might have a trajectory or even might have an innate ability that they know they have and they want to pursue that dream? >> Yeah so. >> What advice would you give them? >> Yeah, what I would say, I say this all the time that, for the first half of my career I was very job conscious, but I wasn't very career conscious. So I'd get in a role and I'd stay in that role for long periods of time and I'd do a good job, but I wasn't really very career conscious. And what I would say is, everybody says how important risk taking is. Well, risk taking can be a little bit of a scary word, right? Or term. And the way I see it is give it a shot and see what happens. You're interested in something, give it a shot and see what happens. It's kind of a less intimidating way of looking at risk because even though I was job conscious, and not career conscious, one thing I did when people asked me to take something on, hey Krista, would you like to take on more responsibility here? The answer was always yes, yes, yes, yes. So I said yes because I said, hey I'll give it a shot and see what happens. And that helped me tremendously because I felt like I am giving it a try. And the more you do that, the the better it is. >> It's great. >> And actually the the less scary it is because you do that, a few times and it goes well. It's like a muscle that builds. >> It's funny, a woman executive was on the program. I said, the word balance comes up a lot. And she stopped and said, "Let's just talk about balance for a second." And then she went contrarian and said, "It's about not being unbalanced. It's about being, taking a chance and being a little bit off balance to put yourself outside your comfort zone to try new things." And then she also came up and followed and said, "If you do that alone, you increase your risk. But if you do it with people, a team that you trust and you're authentic and you're vulnerable and you're communicating, that is the chemistry." And that was a really good point. What's your reaction? 'Cause you were talking about authentic conversations good communications with Antonio. How does someone get, feel, find that team and do you agree with it? And what was your, how would you react to that? >> Yes, I agree with that. And when it comes to being authentic, that's the magic and when someone isn't, if someone's not really being themselves, it's really funny because you can feel it, you can sense it. There's kind of a wall between you and them. And over time people won't be able to put their finger on it, but they'll feel a distance from you. But when you're authentic and you share who you are, what you find is you find things in common with other people. 'Cause you're sharing more of who you are and it's like, oh, I do that too. Oh, I'm interested in that too. And build the bonds between people and the authenticity. And that's what people crave. They want people to be authentic and people can tell when you're authentic and when you're not. >> Is managing and leading through a crisis a born talent or can you learn it? >> Oh, definitely learned. I think that we're born knowing nothing and I once read people are nurtured into greatness and I think that's true. So yeah, definitely learned. >> What are some examples that can come out of a tough time as folks may look at a crisis and be shy away from it? How do they lean into it? What advice would you give folks? How do you handle it? I mean, everyone's got different personality. Okay, they get to a position but stepping through that door. >> Yeah, well, I do this presentation called, "10 things I Wish I Knew Earlier in my Career." And one of those things is about the growth mindset and the growth mindset. There's a book called "Mindset" by Carol Dweck and the growth mindset is all about learning and not always having to know everything, but really the winning is in the learning. And so if you have a growth mindset it makes you feel better about everything because you can't lose. You're winning because you're learning. So when I've learned that, I started looking at things much differently. And when it comes to going through tough times, what I find is you're exercising muscles that you didn't even know you had, which makes you stronger when the crisis is over, obviously. And I also feel like you become a lot a much more creative when you're in challenging times. You're forced to do things that you hadn't had to do before. And it also bonds the team. It's almost like going through bootcamp together. When you go through a challenge together it bonds you for life. >> I mean, you could have bonding, could be trauma bonding or success bonding. People love to be on the success side because that's positive and that's really the key mindset. You're always winning if you have that attitude. And learnings is also positive. So it's not, it's never a failure unless you make it. >> That's right, exactly. As long as you learn from it. And that's the name of the game. So, learning is the goal. >> So I have to ask you, on your job now, you have a really big responsibility HPE compute and big division. What's the current mindset that you have right now in your career, where you're at? What are some of the things on your mind that you think about? We had other, other seniors leaders say, hey, you know I got the software as my brain and the hardware's my body. I like to keep software and hardware working together. What is your current state of your career and how you looking at it, what's next and what's going on in your mind right now? >> Yeah, so for me, I really want to make sure that for my team we're nurturing the next generation of leadership and that we're helping with career development and career growth. And people feel like they can grow their careers here. Luckily at HPE, we have a lot of people stay at HPE a long time, and even people who leave HPE a lot of times they come back because the culture's fantastic. So I just want to make sure I'm contributing to that culture and I'm bringing up the next generation of leaders. >> What's next for you? What are you looking at from a career personal standpoint? >> You know, it's funny, I, I love what I'm doing right now. I'm actually on a joint venture board with H3C, which is HPE Joint Venture Company. And so I'm really enjoying that and exploring more board service opportunities. >> You have a focus of good growth mindset, challenging through, managing through tough times. How do you stay focused on that North star? How do you keep the reinforcement of the mission? How do you nurture the team to greatness? >> Yeah, so I think it's a lot of clarity, providing a lot of clarity about what's important right now. And it goes back to some of the communication that I mentioned earlier, making sure that everybody knows where the North Star is, so everybody's focused on the same thing, because I feel like with the, I always felt like throughout my career I was set up for success if I had the right information, the right guidance and the right goals. And I try to make sure that I do that with my team. >> What are some of the things that you could share as we wrap up here for the folks watching, as the networks increase, as the stories start to unfold more and more on digital like we're doing here, what do you hope people walk away with? What's working, what needs work, and what is some things that people aren't talking about that should be discussed publicly? >> Do you mean from a career standpoint or? >> For career? For growing into tech and into leadership positions. >> Okay. >> Big migration tech is now a wide field. I mean, when I grew up, broke into the eighties, it was computer science, software engineering, and three degrees in engineering, right? >> I see huge swath of AI coming. So many technical careers. There's a lot more women. >> Yeah. And that's what's so exciting about being in a technical career, technical company, is that everything's always changing. There's always opportunity to learn something new. And frankly, you know, every company is in the business of technology right now, because they want to closer to their customers. Typically, they're using technology to do that. Everyone's digitally transforming. And so what I would say is that there's so much opportunity, keep your mind open, explore what interests you and keep learning because it's changing all the time. >> You know I was talking with Sue, former HP, she's on a lot of boards. The balance at the board level still needs a lot of work and the leaderships are getting better, but the board at the seats at the table needs work. Where do you see that transition for you in the future? Is that something on your mind? Maybe a board seat? You mentioned you're on a board with HPE, but maybe sitting on some other boards? Any, any? >> Yes, actually, actually, we actually have a program here at HPE called the Board Ready Now program that I'm a part of. And so HPE is very supportive of me exploring an independent board seat. And so they have some education and programming around that. And I know Sue well, she's awesome. And so yes, I'm looking into those opportunities right now. >> She advises do one no more than two. The day job. >> Yeah, I would only be doing one current job that I have. >> Well, kris, it was great to chat with you about these topics and leadership and challenging times. Great masterclass, great advice. As SVP and GM of mainstream compute for HPE, what's going on in your job these days? What's the most exciting thing happening? Share some of your work situations. >> Sure, so the most exciting thing happening right now is HPE Gen 11, which we just announced and started shipping, brings tremendous performance benefit, has an intuitive operating experience, a trusted security by design, and it's optimized to run workloads so much faster. So if anybody is interested, they should go check it out on hpe.com. >> And of course the CUBE will be at HPE Discover. We'll see you there. Any final wisdom you'd like to share as we wrap up the last minute here? >> Yeah, so I think the last thing I'll say is that when it comes to setting your sights, I think, expecting it, good things to happen usually happens when you believe you deserve it. So what happens is you believe you deserve it, then you expect it and you get it. And so sometimes that's about making sure you raise your thermostat to expect more. And I always talk about you don't have to raise it all up at once. You could do that incrementally and other people can set your thermostat too when they say, hey, you should be, you should get a level this high or that high, but raise your thermostat because what you expect is what you get. >> Krista, thank you so much for contributing to this program. We're going to do it quarterly. We're going to do getting more stories out there, so we'll have you back and if you know anyone with good stories, send them our way. And congratulations on your BPTN Tech Executive of the Year award for 2023. Congratulations, great prize there and great recognition for your hard work. >> Thank you so much, John, I appreciate it. >> Okay, this is the Cube's coverage of National Woodman's Day. I'm John Furrier, stories from the front lines, management ranks, developers, all there, global coverage of international events with theCUBE. Thanks for watching. (soft music)

>> Announcer: From the Cube's studios in Palo Alto in Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from The Cube and ETR. This is "Breaking Analysis" with Dave Vellante. >> Exactly one week after Pat Gelsinger's announcement of his plans to reinvent Intel. Arm announced version nine of its architecture and laid out its vision for the next decade. We believe this vision is extremely strong as it combines an end-to-end capability from Edge to Cloud, to the data center, to the home and everything in between. Arms aspirations are ambitious and powerful. Leveraging its business model, ecosystem and software compatibility with previous generations. Hello every one and welcome to this week's Wikibon Cube Insights powered by ETR. And this breaking analysis will explain why we think this announcement is so important and what it means for Intel and the broader technology landscape. We'll also share with you some feedback that we received from the Cube Community on last week's episode and a little inside baseball on how Intel, IBM, Samsung, TSMC and the U.S. government might be thinking about the shifting landscape of semiconductor technology. Now, there were two notable announcements this week that were directly related to Intel's announcement of March 23rd. The Armv9 news and TSMC's plans to invest a $100 billion in chip manufacturing and development over the next three years. That is a big number. It appears to tramp Intel's plan $20 billion investment to launch two new fabs in the U.S. starting in 2024. You may remember back in 2019, Samsung pledged to invest a $116 billion to diversify its production beyond memory trip, memory chips. Why are all these companies getting so aggressive? And won't this cause a glut in chips? Well, first, China looms large and aims to dominate its local markets, which in turn is going to confer advantages globally. The second, there's a huge chip shortage right now. And the belief is that it's going to continue through the decade and possibly beyond. We are seeing a new inflection point in the demand as we discussed last week. Stemming from digital, IOT, cloud, autos in new use cases in the home as so well presented by Sarjeet Johal in our community. As to the glut, these manufacturers believe that demand will outstrip supply indefinitely. And I understand that a lack of manufacturing capacity is actually more deadly than an oversupply. Look, if there's a glut, manufacturers can cut production and take the financial hit. Whereas capacity constraints mean you can miss entire cycles of growth and really miss out on the demand and the cost reductions. So, all these manufacturers are going for it. Now let's talk about Arm, its approach and the announcements that it made this week. Now last week, we talked about how Pat Gelsinger his vision of a system on package was an attempt to leapfrog system on chip SOC, while Arm is taking a similar system approach. But in our view, it's even broader than the vision laid out by Pat at Intel. Arm is targeting a wide variety of use cases that are shown here. Arm's fundamental philosophy is that the future will require highly specialized chips and Intel as you recall from Pat's announcement, would agree. But Arm historically takes an ecosystem approach that is different from Intel's model. Arm is all about enabling the production of specialized chips to really fit a specific application. For example, think about the amount of AI going on iPhones. They move if I remember from fingerprint to face recognition. This requires specialized neural processing units, NPUs that are designed by Apple for that particular use case. Arm is facilitating the creation of these specialized chips to be designed and produced by the ecosystem. Intel on the other hand has historically taken a one size fits all approach. Built around the x86. The Intel's design has always been about improving the processor. For example, in terms of speed, density, adding vector processing to accommodate AI, et cetera. And Intel does all the design and the manufacturing in any specialization for the ecosystem is done by Intel. Much of the value, that's added from the ecosystem is frankly been bending metal or adding displays or other features at the margin. But, the advantage is that the x86 architecture is well understood. It's consistent, reliable, and let's face it. Most enterprise software runs on x86. So, but very, very different models historically, which we heard from Gelsinger last week they're going to change with a new trusted foundry strategy. Now let's go through an example that might help explain the power of Arm's model. Let's say, your AWS and you're doing graviton. Designing graviton and graviton2. Or Apple, designing the M1 chip, or Tesla designing its own chip, or any other company in in any one of these use cases that are shown here. Tesla is a really good example. In order to optimize for video processing, Tesla needed to add specialized code firmware in the NPU for it's specific use case within autos. It was happy to take off the shelf CPU or GPU or whatever, and leverage Arm's standards there. And then it added its own value in the NPU. So the advantage of this model is Tesla could go from tape out in less or, or, or or in less than a year versus get the tape out in less than a year versus what would normally take many years. Arm is, think of Arm is like customize a Lego blocks that enable unique value add by the ecosystem with a much faster time to market. So like I say, the Tesla goes from logical tape out if you will, to Samsung and then says, okay run this against your manufacturing process. And it should all work as advertised by Arm. Tesla, interestingly, just as an aside chose the 14 nanometer process to keep its costs down. It didn't need the latest and greatest density. Okay, so you can see big difference in philosophies historically between Arm and Intel. And you can see Intel vectoring toward the Arm model based on what Gelsinger said last week for its foundry business. Essentially it has to. Now, Arm announced a new Arm architecture, Armv9. v9 is backwards compatible with previous generations. Perhaps Arm learned from Intel's failed, Itanium effort for those remember that word. Had no backward compatibility and it really floundered. As well, Arm adds some additional capabilities. And today we're going to focus on the two areas that have highlighted, machine learning piece and security. I'll take note of the call out, 300 billion chips. That's Arm's vision. That's a lot. And we've said, before, Arm's way for volumes are 10X those of x86. Volume, we sound like a broken record. Volume equals cost reduction. We'll come back to that a little bit later. Now let's have a word on AI and machine learning. Arm is betting on AI and ML. Big as are many others. And this chart really shows why, it's a graphic that shows ETR data and spending momentum and pervasiveness in the dataset across all the different sectors that ETR tracks within its taxonomy. Note that ML/AI gets the top spot on the vertical axis, which represents net score. That's a measure of spending momentum or spending velocity. The horizontal axis is market share presence in the dataset. And we give this sector four stars to signify it's consistent lead in the data. So pretty reasonable bet by Arm. But the other area that we're going to talk about is security. And its vision day, Arm talked about confidential compute architecture and these things called realms. Note in the left-hand side, showing data traveling all over the different use cases and around the world and the call-out from the CISO below, it's a large public airline CISO that spoke at an ETR Venn round table. And this individual noted that the shifting end points increase the threat vectors. We all know that. Arm said something that really resonated. Specifically, they said today, there's far too much trust on the OS and the hypervisor that are running these applications. And their broad access to data is a weakness. Arm's concept of realms as shown in the right-hand side, underscores the company strategy to remove the assumption that privileged software. Like the hypervisor needs to be able to see the data. So by creating realms, in a virtualized multi-tenant environment, data can be more protected from memory leaks which of course is a major opportunity for hackers that they exploit. So it's a nice concept in a way for the system to isolate attendance data from other users. Okay, we want, we want to share some feedback that we got last week from the community on our analysis of Intel. A tech exec from city pointed out that, Intel really didn't miss a mobile, as we said, it really missed smartphones. In fact, whell, this is a kind of a minor distinction, it's important to recognize we think. Because Intel facilitated WIFI with Centrino, under the direction of Paul Alini. Who by the way, was not an engineer. I think he was the first non-engineer to be the CEO of Intel. He was a marketing person by background. Ironically, Intel's work in wifi connectivity enabled, actually enabled the smartphone revolution. And maybe that makes the smartphone missed by Intel all that more egregious, I don't know. Now the other piece of feedback we received related to our IBM scenario and our three-way joint venture prediction bringing together Intel, IBM, and Samsung in a triumvirate where Intel brings the foundry and it's process manufacturing. IBM brings its dis-aggregated memory technology and Samsung brings its its volume and its knowledge of of volume down the learning curve. Let's start with IBM. Remember we said that IBM with power 10 has the best technology in terms of this notion of dis-aggregating compute from memory and sharing memory in a pool across different processor types. So a few things in this regard, IBM when it restructured its micro electronics business under Ginni Rometty, catalyzed the partnership with global foundries and you know, this picture in the upper right it shows the global foundries facility outside of Albany, New York in Malta. And the partnership included AMD and Samsung. But we believe that global foundries is backed away from some of its contractual commitments with IBM causing a bit of a rift between the companies and leaving a hole in your original strategy. And evidently AMD hasn't really leaned in to move the needle in any way and so the New York foundry, is it a bit of a state of limbo with respect to its original vision. Now, well, Arvind Krishna was the face of the Intel announcement. It clearly has deep knowledge of IBM semiconductor strategy. Dario Gill, we think is a key player in the mix. He's the senior vice president director of IBM research. And it is in a position to affect some knowledge sharing and maybe even knowledge transfer with Intel possibly as it relates to disaggregated architecture. His questions remain as to how open IBM will be. And how protected it will be with its IP. It's got, as we said, last week, it's got to have an incentive to do so. Now why would IBM do that? Well, it wants to compete more effectively with VMware who has done a great job leveraging x86 and that's the biggest competitor in threat to open shift. So Arvind needs Intel chips to really execute on IBM's cloud strategy. Because almost all of IBM's customers are running apps on x86. So IBM's cloud and hybrid cloud. Strategy really need to leverage that Intel partnership. Now Intel for its part has great FinFET technology. FinFET is a tactic goes beyond CMOs. You all mainframes might remember when IBM burned the boat on ECL, Emitter-coupled Logic. And then moved to CMOs for its mainframes. Well, this is the next gen beyond, and it could give Intel a leg up on AMD's chiplet intellectual properties. Especially as it relates to latency. And there could be some benefits there for IBM. So maybe there's a quid pro quo going on. Now, where it really gets interesting is New York Senator, Chuck Schumer, is keen on building up an alternative to Silicon Valley in New York now it is Silicon Alley. So it's possible that Intel, who by the way has really good process technology. This is an aside, it really allowed TSMC to run the table with the whole seven nanometers versus 10 minute nanometer narrative. TSMC was at seven nanometer. Intel was at 10 nanometer. And really, we've said in the past that Intel's 10 nanometer tech is pretty close to TSMC seven. So Intel's ahead in that regard, even though in terms of, you know, the intervener thickness density, it's it's not, you know. These are sort of games that the semiconductor companies play, but you know it's possible that Intel with the U.S. government and IBM and Samsung could make a play for that New York foundry as part of Intel's trusted foundry strategy and kind of reshuffle that deck in Albany. Sounds like a "Game of Thrones," doesn't it? By the way, TSMC has been so consumed servicing Apple for five nanometer and eventually four nanometer that it's dropped the ball on some of its other's customers, namely Nvidia. And remember, a long-term competitiveness and cost reductions, they all come down to volume. And we think that Intel can't get to volume without an Arm strategy. Okay, so maybe the JV, the Joint Venture that we talked about, maybe we're out on a limb there and that's a stretch. And perhaps Samsung's not willing to play ball, given it's made huge investments in fabs and infrastructure and other resources, locally, but we think it's still viable scenario because we think Samsung definitely would covet a presence in the United States. No good to do that directly but maybe a partnership makes more sense in terms of gaining ground on TSMC. But anyway, let's say Intel can become a trusted foundry with the help of IBM and the U.S. government. Maybe then it could compete on volume. Well, how would that work? Well, let's say Nvidia, let's say they're not too happy with TSMC. Maybe with entertain Intel as a second source. Would that do it? In and of itself, no. But what about AWS and Google and Facebook? Maybe this is a way to placate the U.S. government and call off the antitrust dogs. Hey, we'll give Intel Foundry our business to secure America's semiconductor leadership and future and pay U.S. government. Why don't you chill out, back off a little bit. Microsoft even though, you know, it's not getting as much scrutiny from the U.S. government, it's anti trustee is maybe perhaps are behind it, who knows. But I think Microsoft would be happy to play ball as well. Now, would this give Intel a competitive volume posture? Yes, we think it would, for sure. If it can gain the trust of these companies and the volume we think would be there. But as we've said, currently, this is a very, very long shot because of the, the, the new strategy, the distance the difference in the Foundry business all those challenges that we laid out last week, it's going to take years to play out. But the dots are starting to connect in this scenario and the stakes are exceedingly high hence the importance of the U.S. government. Okay, that's it for now. Thanks to the community for your comments and insights. And thanks again to David Floyer whose analysis around Arm and semiconductors. And this work that he's done for the past decade is of tremendous help. Remember I publish each week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com. And these episodes are all available as podcasts, just search for braking analysis podcast and you can always connect on Twitter. You can hit the chat right here or this live event or email me at david.vellante@siliconangle.com. Look, I always appreciate the comments on LinkedIn and Clubhouse. You can follow me so you're notified when we start a room and riff on these topics as well as others. And don't forget to check out etr.plus where all the survey data. This is Dave Vellante for the Cube Insights powered by ETR. Be well, and we'll see you next time. (cheerful music) (cheerful music)

>> From the Cube's studios in Palo Alto in Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from The Cube and ETR. This is "Breaking Analysis" with Dave Vellante. >> Exactly one week after Pat Gelsinger's announcement of his plans to reinvent Intel. Arm announced version nine of its architecture and laid out its vision for the next decade. We believe this vision is extremely strong as it combines an end-to-end capability from Edge to Cloud, to the data center, to the home and everything in between. Arms aspirations are ambitious and powerful. Leveraging its business model, ecosystem and software compatibility with previous generations. Hello every one and welcome to this week's Wikibon Cube Insights powered by ETR. And this breaking analysis will explain why we think this announcement is so important and what it means for Intel and the broader technology landscape. We'll also share with you some feedback that we received from the Cube Community on last week's episode and a little inside baseball on how Intel, IBM, Samsung, TSMC and the U.S. government might be thinking about the shifting landscape of semiconductor technology. Now, there were two notable announcements this week that were directly related to Intel's announcement of March 23rd. The Armv9 news and TSMC's plans to invest a $100 billion in chip manufacturing and development over the next three years. That is a big number. It appears to tramp Intel's plan $20 billion investment to launch two new fabs in the U.S. starting in 2024. You may remember back in 2019, Samsung pledged to invest a $116 billion to diversify its production beyond memory trip, memory chips. Why are all these companies getting so aggressive? And won't this cause a glut in chips? Well, first, China looms large and aims to dominate its local markets, which in turn is going to confer advantages globally. The second, there's a huge chip shortage right now. And the belief is that it's going to continue through the decade and possibly beyond. We are seeing a new inflection point in the demand as we discussed last week. Stemming from digital, IOT, cloud, autos in new use cases in the home as so well presented by Sarjeet Johal in our community. As to the glut, these manufacturers believe that demand will outstrip supply indefinitely. And I understand that a lack of manufacturing capacity is actually more deadly than an oversupply. Look, if there's a glut, manufacturers can cut production and take the financial hit. Whereas capacity constraints mean you can miss entire cycles of growth and really miss out on the demand and the cost reductions. So, all these manufacturers are going for it. Now let's talk about Arm, its approach and the announcements that it made this week. Now last week, we talked about how Pat Gelsinger his vision of a system on package was an attempt to leapfrog system on chip SOC, while Arm is taking a similar system approach. But in our view, it's even broader than the vision laid out by Pat at Intel. Arm is targeting a wide variety of use cases that are shown here. Arm's fundamental philosophy is that the future will require highly specialized chips and Intel as you recall from Pat's announcement, would agree. But Arm historically takes an ecosystem approach that is different from Intel's model. Arm is all about enabling the production of specialized chips to really fit a specific application. For example, think about the amount of AI going on iPhones. They move if I remember from fingerprint to face recognition. This requires specialized neural processing units, NPUs that are designed by Apple for that particular use case. Arm is facilitating the creation of these specialized chips to be designed and produced by the ecosystem. Intel on the other hand has historically taken a one size fits all approach. Built around the x86. The Intel's design has always been about improving the processor. For example, in terms of speed, density, adding vector processing to accommodate AI, et cetera. And Intel does all the design and the manufacturing in any specialization for the ecosystem is done by Intel. Much of the value, that's added from the ecosystem is frankly been bending metal or adding displays or other features at the margin. But, the advantage is that the x86 architecture is well understood. It's consistent, reliable, and let's face it. Most enterprise software runs on x86. So, but very, very different models historically, which we heard from Gelsinger last week they're going to change with a new trusted foundry strategy. Now let's go through an example that might help explain the power of Arm's model. Let's say, your AWS and you're doing graviton. Designing graviton and graviton2. Or Apple, designing the M1 chip, or Tesla designing its own chip, or any other company in in any one of these use cases that are shown here. Tesla is a really good example. In order to optimize for video processing, Tesla needed to add specialized code firmware in the NPU for it's specific use case within autos. It was happy to take off the shelf CPU or GPU or whatever, and leverage Arm's standards there. And then it added its own value in the NPU. So the advantage of this model is Tesla could go from tape out in less or, or, or or in less than a year versus get the tape out in less than a year versus what would normally take many years. Arm is, think of Arm is like customize a Lego blocks that enable unique value add by the ecosystem with a much faster time to market. So like I say, the Tesla goes from logical tape out if you will, to Samsung and then says, okay run this against your manufacturing process. And it should all work as advertised by Arm. Tesla, interestingly, just as an aside chose the 14 nanometer process to keep its costs down. It didn't need the latest and greatest density. Okay, so you can see big difference in philosophies historically between Arm and Intel. And you can see Intel vectoring toward the Arm model based on what Gelsinger said last week for its foundry business. Essentially it has to. Now, Arm announced a new Arm architecture, Armv9. v9 is backwards compatible with previous generations. Perhaps Arm learned from Intel's failed, Itanium effort for those remember that word. Had no backward compatibility and it really floundered. As well, Arm adds some additional capabilities. And today we're going to focus on the two areas that have highlighted, machine learning piece and security. I'll take note of the call out, 300 billion chips. That's Arm's vision. That's a lot. And we've said, before, Arm's way for volumes are 10X those of x86. Volume, we sound like a broken record. Volume equals cost reduction. We'll come back to that a little bit later. Now let's have a word on AI and machine learning. Arm is betting on AI and ML. Big as are many others. And this chart really shows why, it's a graphic that shows ETR data and spending momentum and pervasiveness in the dataset across all the different sectors that ETR tracks within its taxonomy. Note that ML/AI gets the top spot on the vertical axis, which represents net score. That's a measure of spending momentum or spending velocity. The horizontal axis is market share presence in the dataset. And we give this sector four stars to signify it's consistent lead in the data. So pretty reasonable bet by Arm. But the other area that we're going to talk about is security. And its vision day, Arm talked about confidential compute architecture and these things called realms. Note in the left-hand side, showing data traveling all over the different use cases and around the world and the call-out from the CISO below, it's a large public airline CISO that spoke at an ETR Venn round table. And this individual noted that the shifting end points increase the threat vectors. We all know that. Arm said something that really resonated. Specifically, they said today, there's far too much trust on the OS and the hypervisor that are running these applications. And their broad access to data is a weakness. Arm's concept of realms as shown in the right-hand side, underscores the company strategy to remove the assumption that privileged software. Like the hypervisor needs to be able to see the data. So by creating realms, in a virtualized multi-tenant environment, data can be more protected from memory leaks which of course is a major opportunity for hackers that they exploit. So it's a nice concept in a way for the system to isolate attendance data from other users. Okay, we want, we want to share some feedback that we got last week from the community on our analysis of Intel. A tech exec from city pointed out that, Intel really didn't miss a mobile, as we said, it really missed smartphones. In fact, whell, this is a kind of a minor distinction, it's important to recognize we think. Because Intel facilitated WIFI with Centrino, under the direction of Paul Alini. Who by the way, was not an engineer. I think he was the first non-engineer to be the CEO of Intel. He was a marketing person by background. Ironically, Intel's work in wifi connectivity enabled, actually enabled the smartphone revolution. And maybe that makes the smartphone missed by Intel all that more egregious, I don't know. Now the other piece of feedback we received related to our IBM scenario and our three-way joint venture prediction bringing together Intel, IBM, and Samsung in a triumvirate where Intel brings the foundry and it's process manufacturing. IBM brings its dis-aggregated memory technology and Samsung brings its its volume and its knowledge of of volume down the learning curve. Let's start with IBM. Remember we said that IBM with power 10 has the best technology in terms of this notion of dis-aggregating compute from memory and sharing memory in a pool across different processor types. So a few things in this regard, IBM when it restructured its micro electronics business under Ginni Rometty, catalyzed the partnership with global foundries and you know, this picture in the upper right it shows the global foundries facility outside of Albany, New York in Malta. And the partnership included AMD and Samsung. But we believe that global foundries is backed away from some of its contractual commitments with IBM causing a bit of a rift between the companies and leaving a hole in your original strategy. And evidently AMD hasn't really leaned in to move the needle in any way and so the New York foundry, is it a bit of a state of limbo with respect to its original vision. Now, well, Arvind Krishna was the face of the Intel announcement. It clearly has deep knowledge of IBM semiconductor strategy. Dario Gill, we think is a key player in the mix. He's the senior vice president director of IBM research. And it is in a position to affect some knowledge sharing and maybe even knowledge transfer with Intel possibly as it relates to disaggregated architecture. His questions remain as to how open IBM will be. And how protected it will be with its IP. It's got, as we said, last week, it's got to have an incentive to do so. Now why would IBM do that? Well, it wants to compete more effectively with VMware who has done a great job leveraging x86 and that's the biggest competitor in threat to open shift. So Arvind needs Intel chips to really execute on IBM's cloud strategy. Because almost all of IBM's customers are running apps on x86. So IBM's cloud and hybrid cloud. Strategy really need to leverage that Intel partnership. Now Intel for its part has great FinFET technology. FinFET is a tactic goes beyond CMOs. You all mainframes might remember when IBM burned the boat on ECL, Emitter-coupled Logic. And then moved to CMOs for its mainframes. Well, this is the next gen beyond, and it could give Intel a leg up on AMD's chiplet intellectual properties. Especially as it relates to latency. And there could be some benefits there for IBM. So maybe there's a quid pro quo going on. Now, where it really gets interesting is New York Senator, Chuck Schumer, is keen on building up an alternative to Silicon Valley in New York now it is Silicon Alley. So it's possible that Intel, who by the way has really good process technology. This is an aside, it really allowed TSMC to run the table with the whole seven nanometers versus 10 minute nanometer narrative. TSMC was at seven nanometer. Intel was at 10 nanometer. And really, we've said in the past that Intel's 10 nanometer tech is pretty close to TSMC seven. So Intel's ahead in that regard, even though in terms of, you know, the intervener thickness density, it's it's not, you know. These are sort of games that the semiconductor companies play, but you know it's possible that Intel with the U.S. government and IBM and Samsung could make a play for that New York foundry as part of Intel's trusted foundry strategy and kind of reshuffle that deck in Albany. Sounds like a "Game of Thrones," doesn't it? By the way, TSMC has been so consumed servicing Apple for five nanometer and eventually four nanometer that it's dropped the ball on some of its other's customers, namely Nvidia. And remember, a long-term competitiveness and cost reductions, they all come down to volume. And we think that Intel can't get to volume without an Arm strategy. Okay, so maybe the JV, the Joint Venture that we talked about, maybe we're out on a limb there and that's a stretch. And perhaps Samsung's not willing to play ball, given it's made huge investments in fabs and infrastructure and other resources, locally, but we think it's still viable scenario because we think Samsung definitely would covet a presence in the United States. No good to do that directly but maybe a partnership makes more sense in terms of gaining ground on TSMC. But anyway, let's say Intel can become a trusted foundry with the help of IBM and the U.S. government. Maybe then it could compete on volume. Well, how would that work? Well, let's say Nvidia, let's say they're not too happy with TSMC. Maybe with entertain Intel as a second source. Would that do it? In and of itself, no. But what about AWS and Google and Facebook? Maybe this is a way to placate the U.S. government and call off the antitrust dogs. Hey, we'll give Intel Foundry our business to secure America's semiconductor leadership and future and pay U.S. government. Why don't you chill out, back off a little bit. Microsoft even though, you know, it's not getting as much scrutiny from the U.S. government, it's anti trustee is maybe perhaps are behind it, who knows. But I think Microsoft would be happy to play ball as well. Now, would this give Intel a competitive volume posture? Yes, we think it would, for sure. If it can gain the trust of these companies and the volume we think would be there. But as we've said, currently, this is a very, very long shot because of the, the, the new strategy, the distance the difference in the Foundry business all those challenges that we laid out last week, it's going to take years to play out. But the dots are starting to connect in this scenario and the stakes are exceedingly high hence the importance of the U.S. government. Okay, that's it for now. Thanks to the community for your comments and insights. And thanks again to David Floyer whose analysis around Arm and semiconductors. And this work that he's done for the past decade is of tremendous help. Remember I publish each week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com. And these episodes are all available as podcasts, just search for braking analysis podcast and you can always connect on Twitter. You can hit the chat right here or this live event or email me at david.vellante@siliconangle.com. Look, I always appreciate the comments on LinkedIn and Clubhouse. You can follow me so you're notified when we start a room and riff on these topics as well as others. And don't forget to check out etr.plus where all the survey data. This is Dave Vellante for the Cube Insights powered by ETR. Be well, and we'll see you next time. (cheerful music) (cheerful music)

>> Announcer: Life from Palo Alto. It's theCUBE, covering Women Transforming Technology 2017. Brought to you by VMware. >> Welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of the Women Transforming Technology Conference held at VMware here in beautiful Palo Alto, California. I'm your host, Rebecca Knight. I'm joined by Lily Chang. She is the VP R&D/Office of CTO VMware. Thanks so much for joining us, Lily. >> Thank you for having me. >> You're also a board member. You started out on the advisory board, but now you're a board member on Women Who Code. >> Lily: Yes, recently. >> What is the organization? I mean, it's such a powerful and important organization. Can you tell us a little bit more about it? >> Women Who Code has a mission, which is very similar like today's conference you were seeing. It's to propel the technical women and R&D women across the globe. Basically no boundary of region, cities, or countries. So they're spanning about 50 plus countries and many cities, and we being a founding partner ... We, VMware, have been a founding partner since middle of 2015. They have gone through a rapid growth. I think we bet on the right horse ... (both laugh) Using the business term, and interestingly, they have gone through, in the past 18 months, a tremendous growth of the membership, and because it resonates with a lot of the technical women across the countries over the world, in China, in India, in eastern Europe, based in United States and Europe as well. Basically, right now their membership is about 87,000. They started with 10,000 members back about 18 months ago. >> So it's propelling the women who are already in the industry, but also bringing in new people, new young women into the industry, too. >> It's more than that. We focus on very much mid-range ... >> Okay. >> And early-stage career as well, but the professional bell curve, that golden bell curve, where in the middle of your career, or you're in the career for about two, three years, you're thinking about expanding your career horizon to be a different technical area. You just need that technical skills, and you need a way to be in a non-intimidating environment in a very gender-friendly environment and a very supporting and sponsoring setting where you're learning from each other and sharing all the knowledge, like different programming language, big data, algorithms, mobile technology, how that's involved. And that's really the key value proposition from Women Who Code, and that's what we subscribe to as well. >> Well, Lily, you talked about that sweet spot of a woman's career ... >> Lily: Right. >> And that also happens to be when a lot of women get stuck, or they leave ... >> Lily: Exactly. >> Or they have children, or they pull back and work part-time ... What will it take ... What are you doing with Women Who Code to get them over that, and as you said, help them gain those next skills to help them move up? >> So we basically establish a strategic partnership with Women Who Code, and we offer together with them a monthly meetup or sometimes bi-weekly meetup. We actually opened to several countries in the world. That's where we believe R&D, innovation, are also key. For example, we opened to China. We basically expanded to India and elevated it. In fact, Women Who Code has a annual technology conference for tech women in that particular region, like US is coming in April. We, VMware, are working with Women Who Code later this week to actually launch the first international Connect conference in India. And basically we got huge support and passion and commitment, and we also find it's a very good thing for women to basically learn about leadership and basically be able not to share just their technology with one another, about what they're good at. It's also a way for them to do networking, to learn how to communicate more effectively, and how to basically build the team, sustain the team. So we work out a global leadership initiative through this collaboration with Women Who Code. So we're driving China, we're driving India, we're driving Sofia. We collaborated on the Silicon Valley as well. >> And are the issues the same across the board? >> Yes, we have found the issue is very similar globally. It's where a woman needs encouragement, and a woman needs a very specific setting about how they learn from one another. These technical meetups and these chat over the woman technology community basically are helping that, and then we're also, in a non-profit way, sponsoring Women Who Code through their job board, and that's a non-profit way of helping, opening opportunities and possibility for technical women that basically want to expand their career or finding different avenue in their progression as well. So, basically, for ... You early on talked about, this is age where you're choosing between, do I want to have kids? Do I want to focus more on that? >> These are real things, yes! >> There's a sense of guilt, right. >> Right, right. >> Like, am I going to be so selfish, not to be a working mother? And what we found is that these technical meetings or conferences is not only just a way for women in the appropriate setting to learn about new technology without a very unnecessary peer competition, and they also can basically start sharing what they know, and they can learn together and grow together, and so for example, we offer all this with no charge. If you're a mom, I still remember, with young kids, basically, you will probably want that one or two hours to just spend ... (Rebecca laughs) >> In a bath. >> Yeah, not that you don't love your kids, right? >> Yes. >> But it's just you need that one or two hours. Your brain needs that kind of a chemistry balance as well. >> Yes, yes. >> And you're more rejuvenated, and then when you go back to work, you don't feel like, God, I am missing so many months of work, right? >> Right. >> Reality is you're spending a lot of time rejuvenating your knowledge, and you're keeping pace with the industry growth. We find a lot of other companies that are basically sharing the same vision as we are. >> And that is exactly what this conference is doing. >> Lily: Yes. >> There is a mix of technical breakout sessions, the hard skills, mixed in with the professional tips ... >> Lily: Exactly. >> Of how to give a better presentation and things like that. >> Exactly. So in some of the meetups, for example, if you're a woman that has an upcoming conference and usually there's the stage fright, right, and I kid you not ... >> Rebecca: But men face it too! >> Yeah, exactly. >> It's not ... But then how can we create a more nurturing environment to help the woman to curate her contents without fear and without intimidation. So that's basically the ... Sometimes the meetup is devoted to do things like that, or to just do a programming hackathon, but you're basically collaborating across the genders and the age group ... And your career span as well. Basically, it created a lot of this more collaborative and nurturing environment. >> One of the stereotypes about women in the workplace is that they are very competitive and don't help each other, and there's a real queen bee syndrome, a bitchiness that takes place. >> Lily: Yes, I'm aware of that. >> Yeah, well, what's your experience? Because it's ... There are some women, sure, but what's your experience? >> My experience is it's a matter of perspective and how you actually set up the environment. If you set up the environment where women can actually collaborate, I believe that is actually one of the gender's strength. A lot of the women leaders are into details, and some of the women are into strategic thinking and orientation. We found that if you can blend that together, especially in the global sense, that helps not only learning technology and advancing technology ... Like, one of the most popular thread of technical discussion is the algorithms. When you're talking about innovation, and when you talk about creativity, when you talk about the science, and that's where things has no boundary. >> Yes. >> And it's only yourself that's imposing that kind of thing. So we believe the sponsorship of this, or like the conference today, is breaking down a lot of those barriers. >> That's the theme of the day! >> Bringing the more kind side of the gender onto the table. >> And a camaraderie, too, around solving problems. >> Yeah, exactly. >> So let's actually talk about what you're doing at VMware. You're leading a joint venture in China. Can you tell us more about it? >> Yeah, China is full of myth. >> Rebecca: It's full of ...? >> It's a very mythical country, and so there's a lot of talk about how Chinese does business. I was born and raised in one part of the greater China, and so I was very fortunate to be brought up by a very loving father and a mother. My mom, in those days... In those days, women have to really fight for anything, even education. There wasn't really good career for any technical women that graduated from the best university in the island. So the job I was kind of really encouraged to look for was like a secretary job or an airline stewardess job. My mom is not one of those types. She believed I need to come overseas and study and propel myself. She believes in lifelong learning. She's a career woman, and she coached my dad, who owns his own business, and he cultivated me a lot about this business best practice. How do you do business in China, and how do you work through the generation gaps and communicate more effectively? So I'm very blessed that I'm bilingual, and logically, I can debate and think basically in both language and both cultural mode, and so that helps a lot, in terms of doing a successful job in China. And the joint venture is really VMware's way to do it the right way in China, and we're not trying to brag about, we're a multinational company. We're trying to basically say, this is a good economy and a good part of the world that we want to be able to have our technology to make a difference. So we collaborated with a local China company called Qù Guàng and formed a private joint venture that's focusing on basically cloud management system, and we're bringing a lot of the virtualization and combining the technology and innovation from both cultures together. So that's really the mission of this company. >> And would you say that the Chinese customers are similar to the western customers in terms of what their needs are and where they want their businesses to go? >> At the very high level, absolutely. Relatively speaking, how do you get to that end target, that's where culture difference and social difference and how you orient your habits of doing business is where that difference comes in. But we focus on ... We were very fortunate to have this company that works with us. We have the same mission, same vision, and the same strategy. So we're basically co-founding this and marrying the best technology from both sides of the region together to basically offer to advance the data centers for all of China. For example, China has a very major initiative to revamp a lot of their data center across all provinces. That includes your very rich town like the Beijing and very, very far away regions, and we're very proud that the software can make anything happen. We believe this is a magical combination to basically help the economy and the society. >> And do you think ... Because this is so important, this joint venture, and as you said, we're coming in and doing this the right way in China ... >> Lily: Yes. >> Will this be the blueprint from now on for how VMware sets up its joint ventures? >> Well, this will be the first joint venture we do in greater China, and so far, it's been pretty successful. We are basically writing the blueprint as we go. So one of the key things I love about VMware is just we love creativity and we choose and bet on the right innovation, and we propel and drive and push for that, and we inspire all the country and the regions and the people and the teams around us to do it. So I think this is showing that spirit, meaning that, regardless what the policymaker may say, we believe business and technology, when you marry them in the right way, it's going to make a difference, and will make a revolutionary difference. So we're writing the blueprint as to how to do that. >> How would you describe the differences in the technology cultures of China and the US? Kara Swisher, in her keynote, took Silicon Valley to task a little bit and made fun the buzzy words about how people brag and failing and disruptor and other kind of buzzy things. Innovation, pivot. How would you describe the way the Chinese business culture thinks about creativity and innovation? >> So there is some similarity with western culture, or what you see in Silicon Valley, like what she was talking about. Young generation. They don't understand there is any limit. In fact, that is across genders. I notice a lot of the technology women actually are leading companies and starting companies, and basically, for example, in November, we did a pitch competition with Women Who Code in Beijing, and we focused only on women C-level in the China startup, and we're basically collaborating with local venture company and the VC company to basically choose the most innovative woman leaders in the startup industry, because the country is so entrepreneur, and to some extent, China is growing, and they're basically learning how to basically be really big, and scalability it a big thing. And this is where our technology can come in and our culture, working with them. To basically together make it a better place also comes in as well. So that portion, entrepreneurship is the same. The desire and aspiration, that undying commitment to basically propel the society, those are all the same. I do see a lot of young people, but I also see a lot of the generation, like in my age, basically are coming in with very much a mentoring and a sponsoring attitude to basically help cultivate a younger generation, and very forgiving on that, and so that is something I see, and it does remind me a lot about the focus on the family and the focus on this team working together. >> And is that having an impact on your western colleagues, seeing ... >> Yes, I think it's a little bit of a culture difference, a lot less about yourself. A lot more about, how do I make this work? There's a little bit of a pride in some of these young startup, or even in the age group like me, saying, I am going to help this country to be stronger. I'm going to help the people to be stronger. So they take pride in that as well. And that reminds me a little bit about ... I heard about made in USA, so China talk about made in China, but in essence, it's all the same. You want to take pride with your family. >> A national pride, yes. >> Yeah, you want to take pride with your family, with your national pride, but it doesn't mean you don't want to do business internationally. You still value your international collaboration. Then the key is, how do you go across that culture boundary and focus on the right business problem and the right social phenomenon to solve the problem and the challenges, and just propel the society and the people altogether. >> But that is a good point, that the pride that you feel in your country, someone else from another country feels that same degree of pride for their country, and that's the ... >> Exactly. And sometimes I feel doing this job is not just a technologist job or an R&D job. It's almost like blending the DNA between the two countries and the two cultures together, and how to figure out working together. I know it sounds like a cliche. But when you go ... >> Rebecca: Or a great campaign slogan. >> Yeah, but it's really something that's actually a big challenge, especially with some of the political environment nowadays. But what I notice is when we work together as a group of engineers, we don't talk about those kinds of things. We talk about technology, and we talk about products. We talk about innovation. We talk about customer problems. We talk about how to make the place better. And that's basically what we focus on. Day in, day out. >> Well, Lily Chang, thank you so much for talking to us today. It's been great. >> Thank you very much for having me. >> I'm Rebecca Knight, and we'll be right back with theCUBE's coverage of Women Transforming Technology. (upbeat techno music)