Steve Mullaney, Aviatrix | ESCAPE/19
(upbeat music) >> Announcer: From New York, it's theCUBE. Covering ESCAPE/19. >> Everyone, welcome to theCUBE coverage here in New York City for the ESCAPE Conference 19. This is the inaugural event for multicloud, I think it's the first industry event for, really talking about multicloud and the impact to enterprises and public cloud. My next guest is Steve Mullaney, President and CEO of Aviatrix, storied career in tech, been there done that, seen many waves of innovation. Nicira, Palo Alto Networks, and now Aviatrix. You retired for a while, welcome back! >> I did, yeah, five years, yeah, yeah, yeah. >> Welcome to theCUBE. >> Thank you, thanks for having me. >> It's nice to have you on because I think you have a good perspective on the multicloud because you've been in the industry since the 80s. We've both been broke in at the same time. And we've seen the waves. >> Oh, yeah. >> This wave is bigger than, I think, most of the other waves combined because it brings together so many things, infrastructure, software, cloud scale, and a new modern application environment. And then you complicate everything by throwing IoT out there, edges being pushed to their boundaries, securities equations changed, all this is going on right now, all at the same time. >> No, and that's why I was basically retired for five years, and I was at Nicira, we got bought by VMware, I stayed there for a couple years, and I just said, "Okay, that's it!" I've had a good career and I'm done. And about a year ago, the world changed. And it felt like on a Tuesday morning, I noticed enterprises really, we'd been talking about cloud for 12 years. And five years ago they said, "We're coming in, we're going to do it," but they didn't really mean it. But about a year ago, all in the same day, every enterprise said, "No, now we actually mean it." And I don't know why, I don't know if it was just people retired or just five years of talking about it, they all decided, we're comin' in, and enterprises all moved together. And this wave, as you said, is bigger than, I was around in 1992, in the early 90s, in the movement from mainframe to client server. This is 10 times bigger than that. And more importantly, it's going to happen 10,000 times faster. Because (fingers tapping). What's that? I just deployed 62 data centers around the world. Because if I can leverage the greatest infrastructure built, basic infrastructure of the hyperscalers, AWS, Azure, Google, Alibaba, Oracle, you name it. It's unbelievable the velocity at which you can now start deploying. >> Steve, I think you're onto something big here, and this is why I'm here at this event and why I'm excited, that a lot of the industry thought leaders and practitioners and leaders are doing this event. Small events, inaugural, but I think it has a lot of links. Because there's a lot of tell signs that I like to look at, one is cloud. I've been covering Amazon eight years now, with theCUBE, I've known AWS since it started, and I've done many startups in its launch using AWS. But I've had many conversations with Andy Jassy, one on ones, privately, I got an exclusive coming up for re:Invent with him. I've gotten to know him. It started out, "Everyone's moving to the cloud. "Every data center's not going to exist." And then, you know-- >> Oh, maybe not, yeah, yeah. >> Maybe not, we'll do an output. So I challenged him last year, I said, "Andy, come on, dude, like you were saying like a year ago that." >> Steve: Yeah, it's all AWS or nothing. >> And he said, "John, look I'm not, "I just listen to the customers." And I interviewed him when he did the VMware deal. And he's very customer focused. And when they make these moves with outpost, and I think it's going to be a hybrid message this year at re:Invent, you know it's real. >> Steve: Oh, yeah. >> I think this validates your point, so I got to ask you, what specifically do you see the formula being for multicloud, because certainly everyone's recognized that there's a huge benefit for AWS. But from a scale standpoint, so why not use that? What's going on on the Enterprise on-premise that's making this new thing work? >> I think it all starts with architecture, like anything else. I think right now, enterprises have said, "Okay, we've burned a boat, right? "Now, we're not going to get rid of our data centers, "but in terms of our strategic investment, "we are moving into the cloud. "We are going to leverage "the infrastructure of the hyperscalers. "And whether that is just one hyperscaler, or multiple." And I have not met an enterprise who thinks there only going to be one, right, every single one of them. Now, I don't think they're moving workloads across, I don't think that. I think they see that, I'm going to use Google for AI, I'm going to use AWS because it started there. I'm going to use Azure, for Office 365, and other different things, and everything in infrastructure is always multi. It's never homogeneous, right, it's always that. So I think is going to happen, and I think what people are begging for right now, is, I want to build an architecture that gives me the optionality to be able to deliver a common set of services whether I'm on AWS or multiple clouds. And I want them to be my services and I don't want to have understand the low level abstractions and constructs of each of those clouds, because their all different. One's metric, one's U.S., one's some other weird thing. And I don't have the time, the people, or the resources to be able to do that. Give me a common set of services, that are my services, that I can deploy and abstract away the details of those public clouds. >> Yeah, it's an interesting point there, in fact, I called BS on multicloud last year when it started to kind of rear it's head, I'm like, "Come on, multicloud is bullshit." And I said that on theCUBE. And here's what I meant. Multicloud as an operating model is directionally correct, but the architecture hasn't shown where there's true multicloud. Now, the fact of the matter is, people have Amazon, people have Office and Office 365, that's technically two clouds, >> They're siloed, yeah. >> If they give us Google, that's three clouds. >> I use two or three clouds. >> So, if he have three clouds, I guess they have multiple clouds. But you bring up an interesting point, and going back as a student of the history of tech industry, multi-vendor has been a big deal. >> It is a big deal. >> And like you said, there will be a multi-vendor world, that will happen. The question is how. How do you guys see it happening? >> Well I think what's-- >> Your company is attacking this Aviatrix. >> What's interesting is, so now you think about from a customer perspective which, I do the same thing, same thing with AWS. It's always outside in. Okay, I'm thinking as a enterprise IT person. I'm making the move. Do you believe that your basic infrastructure will lever the hyperscalers, or will you build an on-prem? Everyone says, "I believe that's the way I'm going to go." Great, how do I do that? So, I'm a IT architect, who do I go to to help me? Do I go to CISCO? No. The most shocking thing for me, of the six months I've been at Aviatrix, is that word's never used. It's like it was DEC or IBM in the conversation, when you were talking about client-server, no, why would you? CISCO, Juniper, Arista, any of the networking people, not even in the conversation. VMware, not really in the conversation. So, I don't have any incumbent vendor that I can go to that I used to go to. >> Why aren't they in the conversation? 'Cause of the commodity, they've been extracted away? >> I think it's just because it's the innovation of dilemma. Right, once you're selling a lot of stuff into on-prem, to then go and say, I mean you look at Palo Alto Networks, they're trying to make that transition. Acquiring a bunch of companies, VMware acquiring a bunch of companies. Why are they doing that? Because they know, I got to get off on-prem, everything's going in the cloud. >> So it's a legacy. >> It's a legacy thing, and I think what happens is, there is only one reason, and one reason only, an enterprise customer is not using Aviatrix. 'Cause they never heard of us. That's why, that's the only reason. Once they hear about what they're doing, my God. >> Well, give the plug, talk about the company, what do you guys do-- >> So we deliver, I mean it sounds like I made it up for this conference, but actually this conference was perfect for this. It's networking and security services for the multicloud enterprise. And we're building an architecture, that people can deploy, that will give them this common architecture across all the different clouds. So whether you're just using one cloud or multiple, it doesn't matter, it's the same set of security and networking services. And we do that by embracing and extending the basic constructs that AWS, Google, Azure, and Oracle, and all the other clouds will give you, and to deliver that real enterprise class. Because the other thing we've found is, everyone thinks that the cloud gives you everything and anything you will ever need from networking and security. Let's say AWS, they're going to do everything I need. What the enterprises are figuring out, is once they start going in, what they realize is, it's created for the low-level common basic constructs. And the enterprise starts at, well, I need these BGP feature because guess what, the data center is not going away. And I need more than a hundred route limitations, and I need, all of a sudden there's fifty different limitations AWS will give me. Well, they didn't talk about that! Well, of course they're not going to talk about that. They are just going to go check, check, check, we solve all your problems. As enterprises now move in, with mission critical applications, they're realizing, I need the same level of networking and security services that I had on-prem. I can't get that with the native constructs. So where do I go? That's what we do, so we fill in, we embrace what we can of those constructs, we fill in holes where there are fill in holes. And then we give you the mechanism to be able to orchestrate that across the global network. >> So you operationalize the hyperscale clouds for enterprise, >> Yes. >> that's basically what you do. >> Steve: Exactly, for the enterprise. >> Yeah, exactly. >> On the level that they need. >> So you get the benefits of the cloud, but all those nuances under the cover details like networking and other features you abstract that away and provide an operating model for enterprise compliments. >> And the beautiful thing about it is the velocity, at which we can, we're over the top, effectively over the top. We're integrated into the Cloud Suite, understand what cloud native, we understand all the constructs of accounts, and all the things we need to do. But what we expose to the customer, to the enterprise, is a set of over-the-top services that just work. >> Okay Steve, so I got to ask you, since we are at The Multi-Cloud Conference. What is multicloud, I mean how do you define it, you laid out a pretty compelling architecture of what needs are, levers in the cloud, and on-prem is what Aviatrix does. But what is the definition, how should people understand what is multicloud? >> I think for us, for networking and security in that base, so we're basic infrastructure. We get out there first, right? So, if you're going to build a city, you don't start putting people there first the first thing, if you do it right, is you get sewers, you get electricity, gas, roads, all that. Networking and security, infrastructure, is basic infrastructure goes out first. And you want to create an architecture that's going to live with you for twenty years. You don't want to have to rip up the roads and put the sewers in later. And that architecture needs to be multicloud because, even though you think maybe, most of our customers are 90% AWS right now. But every single one of them say, "But I'm moving to Azure, I'm moving to Google, "I've got retail customers that won't allow me "to put my infrastructure on AWS." Or, "I have machine learning, AI type apps on Google." They all say that same thing. But what they all then say to us, is, "You're going to be the mechanism "upon which I'm going to be able to deploy "this common set of services." So they don't need to know that. >> All right, give an example of a customer you guys have, name a name, we had a customer on stage here-- >> Steve: So, Jefferies. >> John: They did this for a use case. >> Yeah so, Jefferies. Financial Services Institution, lots of requirements, Mark Leon Soon is going to be on stage with me tomorrow. We started working with them about nine months ago. Exactly the same thing, they said, "Okay, you know what? "We need to start moving to the cloud, "we've got to start leveraging the cloud. "But, it's too complicated, right? "Even AWS, says 'Go Build.' "I don't want to go build, I want to consume services. "But they don't have all the service that I needed, "they're too low a level. "They're very high function, high enterprise requirements." So they start using us to orchestrate things, to provide transit networking, to provide egress filtering out to the Internet, we have high performance encryption, AWS will only offer it one gig. We can offer it to 10, 20, 30, 40 gig. So they start deploying, they start realizing all the things we do. Then they go and say, "I want to bring my Palo Alto Networks firewall "into the cloud." When you start looking at that, 'cause then guess what? All my policies, I want the same level that I have on-prem when I'm in the cloud. If I go try to bring in my VM series into AWS the construct that AWS give you, they cause you limitations in performance, in visibility, It's integration hassles, there's performance, sustainability, visibility issues, they force you to use SNAT. And there's all these issues, and they go, "Oh my God, this is a pain in the ass." We solved all that for them. We basically cloudify the VM series for them, so all those limitations go away. So that's just another use case that they use. Now they start looking, and they say, "Okay, now I'm going to start extending into other clouds and I want to use you as the common frame point, the common pane of glass. >> Well Steve, good luck in your venture, you're back in the saddle again. >> Steve: Yeah. >> Another ride here, you feel good about it? >> This is going to be the best, the biggest that I've been, and I was at Palo Alto Networks and VMware Nicira. And this one's going to be bigger than both of those. >> What's your vision for where this is going to be for you, where do you see the company in a few years, what are some of the outcomes you expect to happen? >> Our opportunity, and I look at it as, someone's going to take this opportunity, and the reason I came back is, why not us, someone's going to take it. And the opportunity, honestly, is to become, effectively, what Cisco was in the early 90's. To define the architecture, the networking and the security infrastructure architecture for enterprise customers. They are begging for that right now, that's our opportunity. >> Cloud Interoperability. >> Interoperability, yeah. And so there's so many things that we need to go and do. When you look at also the thing that people are going to say, the operations. So many people think, I want it the same as it was on-prem. I think with the cloud, and across multicloud you can do it right with us, and actually better. Because the visibility that you get is more, than what you get on-prem. >> Well, and the thing that's interesting that's different about this new world that we're talking about is that there is going to be constant improvements in new things which means that the functionality game is going to increase, which means the agility is even more important because the apps are going to have more things to do. >> Yeah. I mean in the end, why do you want to go to cloud? I want to go to cloud 'cause I want it to be self-service and I want agility. I want my developers, I want everybody to be able to do things quicker because all of the sudden they say, "Let's go roll this out", and you want to be able to do it. >> Well, good luck on the new venture, Aviatrix, check 'em out, hot multicloud startup, growing, how many people do you have, put the plug in, >> 100. >> what are you guys looking for, are you hiring, give me a quick plug. >> We just hired a new VP at World Wide Sales, James Winebrenner, who was Viptela CEO, VP Sales in Cisco, hiring a tremendous amount of sales guys right now, we're closing on a $40 million Series C round next week, and we're hiring a lot of people. >> Good luck, we'll be following you Steve, thanks for coming on and sharing your insights. Again, multicloud, this is a shift that's happening, multicloud is just another word for multi-vendor, in a new modern era, this is what it has been in the technology industry, but a whole new world. This is theCUBE coverage here in New York City, ESCAPE/19, I'm John Furrier, thanks for watching. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Announcer: From New York, it's theCUBE. and the impact to I did, yeah, five It's nice to have you on most of the other waves combined basic infrastructure of the hyperscalers, that a lot of the industry like you were saying he did the VMware deal. What's going on on the And I don't have the time, the people, And I said that on theCUBE. If they give us Google, the history of tech industry, And like you said, Your company is attacking of the six months I've been at Aviatrix, to then go and say, I mean you I think what happens is, and all the other clouds will give you, So you get the benefits of the cloud, and all the things we need to do. Okay Steve, so I got to ask you, the first thing, if you do it right, and I want to use you as Well Steve, good luck in your venture, And this one's going to be bigger and the reason I came back is, it the same as it was on-prem. Well, and the thing that's interesting because all of the sudden they say, what are you guys looking for, and we're hiring a lot of people. in the technology industry,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Steve | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Aviatrix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Steve Mullaney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
James Winebrenner | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alibaba | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
CISCO | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
1992 | DATE | 0.99+ |
New York City | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jefferies | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one gig | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
twenty years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
$40 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Juniper | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10,000 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Nicira | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Arista | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three clouds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mark Leon Soon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tuesday morning | DATE | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
62 data centers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
VMware Nicira | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Viptela | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
DEC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two clouds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
40 gig | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Office 365 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
next week | DATE | 0.99+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
Steve Mullaney, Aviatrix | ESCAPE/19
(upbeat music) >> Announcer: From New York, it's theCUBE. Covering ESCAPE/19. >> Everyone, welcome to theCUBE coverage here in New York City for the ESCAPE Conference 19. This is the inaugural event for multicloud, I think it's the first industry event for, really talking about multicloud and the impact to enterprises and public cloud. My next guest is Steve Mullaney, President and CEO of Aviatrix, storied career in tech, been there done that, seen many waves of innovation. Nicira, Palo Alto Networks, and now Aviatrix. You retired for a while, welcome back! >> I did, yeah, five years, yeah, yeah, yeah. >> Welcome to theCUBE. >> Thank you, thanks for having me. >> It's nice to have you on because I think you have a good perspective on the multicloud because you've been in the industry since the 80s. We've both been broke in at the same time. And we've seen the waves. >> Oh, yeah. >> This wave is bigger than, I think, most of the other waves combined because it brings together so many things, infrastructure, software, cloud scale, and a new modern application environment. And then you complicate everything by throwing IoT out there, edges being pushed to their boundaries, securities equations changed, all this is going on right now, all at the same time. >> No, and that's why I was basically retired for five years, and I was at Nicira, we got bought by VMware, I stayed there for a couple years, and I just said, "Okay, that's it!" I've had a good career and I'm done. And about a year ago, the world changed. And it felt like on a Tuesday morning, I noticed enterprises really, we'd been talking about cloud for 12 years. And five years ago they said, "We're coming in, we're going to do it," but they didn't really mean it. But about a year ago, all in the same day, every enterprise said, "No, now we actually mean it." And I don't know why, I don't know if it was just people retired or just five years of talking about it, they all decided, we're comin' in, and enterprises all moved together. And this wave, as you said, is bigger than, I was around in 1992, in the early 90s, in the movement from mainframe to client server. This is 10 times bigger than that. And more importantly, it's going to happen 10,000 times faster. Because (fingers tapping). What's that? I just deployed 62 data centers around the world. Because if I can leverage the greatest infrastructure built, basic infrastructure of the hyperscalers, AWS, Azure, Google, Alibaba, Oracle, you name it. It's unbelievable the velocity at which you can now start deploying. >> Steve, I think you're onto something big here, and this is why I'm here at this event and why I'm excited, that a lot of the industry thought leaders and practitioners and leaders are doing this event. Small events, inaugural, but I think it has a lot of links. Because there's a lot of tell signs that I like to look at, one is cloud. I've been covering Amazon eight years now, with theCUBE, I've known AWS since it started, and I've done many startups in its launch using AWS. But I've had many conversations with Andy Jassy, one on ones, privately, I got an exclusive coming up for re:Invent with him. I've gotten to know him. It started out, "Everyone's moving to the cloud. "Every data center's not going to exist." And then, you know-- >> Oh, maybe not, yeah, yeah. >> Maybe not, we'll do an output. So I challenged him last year, I said, "Andy, come on, dude, like you were saying like a year ago that." >> Steve: Yeah, it's all AWS or nothing. >> And he said, "John, look I'm not, "I just listen to the customers." And I interviewed him when he did the VMware deal. And he's very customer focused. And when they make these moves with outpost, and I think it's going to be a hybrid message this year at re:Invent, you know it's real. >> Steve: Oh, yeah. >> I think this validates your point, so I got to ask you, what specifically do you see the formula being for multicloud, because certainly everyone's recognized that there's a huge benefit for AWS. But from a scale standpoint, so why not use that? What's going on on the Enterprise on-premise that's making this new thing work? >> I think it all starts with architecture, like anything else. I think right now, enterprises have said, "Okay, we've burned a boat, right? "Now, we're not going to get rid of our data centers, "but in terms of our strategic investment, "we are moving into the cloud. "We are going to leverage "the infrastructure of the hyperscalers. "And whether that is just one hyperscaler, or multiple." And I have not met an enterprise who thinks there only going to be one, right, every single one of them. Now, I don't think they're moving workloads across, I don't think that. I think they see that, I'm going to use Google for AI, I'm going to use AWS because it started there. I'm going to use Azure, for Office 365, and other different things, and everything in infrastructure is always multi. It's never homogeneous, right, it's always that. So I think is going to happen, and I think what people are begging for right now, is, I want to build an architecture that gives me the optionality to be able to deliver a common set of services whether I'm on AWS or multiple clouds. And I want them to be my services and I don't want to have understand the low level abstractions and constructs of each of those clouds, because their all different. One's metric, one's U.S., one's some other weird thing. And I don't have the time, the people, or the resources to be able to do that. Give me a common set of services, that are my services, that I can deploy and abstract away the details of those public clouds. >> Yeah, it's an interesting point there, in fact, I called BS on multicloud last year when it started to kind of rear it's head, I'm like, "Come on, multicloud is bullshit." And I said that on theCUBE. And here's what I meant. Multicloud as an operating model is directionally correct, but the architecture hasn't shown where there's true multicloud. Now, the fact of the matter is, people have Amazon, people have Office and Office 365, that's technically two clouds, >> They're siloed, yeah. >> If they give us Google, that's three clouds. >> I use two or three clouds. >> So, if he have three clouds, I guess they have multiple clouds. But you bring up an interesting point, and going back as a student of the history of tech industry, multi-vendor has been a big deal. >> It is a big deal. >> And like you said, there will be a multi-vendor world, that will happen. The question is how. How do you guys see it happening? >> Well I think what's-- >> Your company is attacking this Aviatrix. >> What's interesting is, so now you think about from a customer perspective which, I do the same thing, same thing with AWS. It's always outside in. Okay, I'm thinking as a enterprise IT person. I'm making the move. Do you believe that your basic infrastructure will lever the hyperscalers, or will you build an on-prem? Everyone says, "I believe that's the way I'm going to go." Great, how do I do that? So, I'm a IT architect, who do I go to to help me? Do I go to CISCO? No. The most shocking thing for me, of the six months I've been at Aviatrix, is that word's never used. It's like it was DEC or IBM in the conversation, when you were talking about client-server, no, why would you? CISCO, Juniper, Arista, any of the networking people, not even in the conversation. VMware, not really in the conversation. So, I don't have any incumbent vendor that I can go to that I used to go to. >> Why aren't they in the conversation? 'Cause of the commodity, they've been extracted away? >> I think it's just because it's the innovation of dilemma. Right, once you're selling a lot of stuff into on-prem, to then go and say, I mean you look at Palo Alto Networks, they're trying to make that transition. Acquiring a bunch of companies, VMware acquiring a bunch of companies. Why are they doing that? Because they know, I got to get off on-prem, everything's going in the cloud. >> So it's a legacy. >> It's a legacy thing, and I think what happens is, there is only one reason, and one reason only, an enterprise customer is not using Aviatrix. 'Cause they never heard of us. That's why, that's the only reason. Once they hear about what they're doing, my God. >> Well, give the plug, talk about the company, what do you guys do-- >> So we deliver, I mean it sounds like I made it up for this conference, but actually this conference was perfect for this. It's networking and security services for the multicloud enterprise. And we're building an architecture, that people can deploy, that will give them this common architecture across all the different clouds. So whether you're just using one cloud or multiple, it doesn't matter, it's the same set of security and networking services. And we do that by embracing and extending the basic constructs that AWS, Google, Azure, and Oracle, and all the other clouds will give you, and to deliver that real enterprise class. Because the other thing we've found is, everyone thinks that the cloud gives you everything and anything you will ever need from networking and security. Let's say AWS, they're going to do everything I need. What the enterprises are figuring out, is once they stop going in, what they realize is, it's created for the low-level common basic constructs. And the enterprise starts at, well, I need these BGP feature because guess what, the data center is not going away. And I need more than a hundred route limitations, and I need, all of a sudden there's fifty different limitations AWS will give me. Well, they didn't talk about that! Well, of course they're not going to talk about that. They are just going to go check, check, check, we solve all your problems. As enterprises now move in, with mission critical applications, they're realizing, I need the same level of networking and security services that I had on-prem. I can't get that with the native constructs. So where do I go? That's what we do, so we fill in, we embrace what we can of those constructs, we fill in holes where there are fill in holes. And then we give you the mechanism to be able to orchestrate that across the global network. >> So you operationalize the hyperscale clouds for enterprise, >> Yes. >> that's basically what you do. >> Steve: Exactly, for the enterprise. >> Yeah, exactly. >> On the level that they need. >> So you get the benefits of the cloud, but all those nuances under the cover details like networking and other features you abstract that away and provide an operating model for enterprise compliments. >> And the beautiful thing about it is the velocity, at which we can, we're over the top, effectively over the top. We're integrated into the Cloud Suite, understand what cloud native, we understand all the constructs of accounts, and all the things we need to do. But what we expose to the customer, to the enterprise, is a set of over-the-top services that just work. >> Okay Steve, so I got to ask you, since we are at The Multi-Cloud Conference. What is multicloud, I mean how do you define it, you laid out a pretty compelling architecture of what needs are, levers in the cloud, and on-prem is what Aviatrix does. But what is the definition, how should people understand what is multicloud? >> I think for us, for networking and security in that base, so we're basic infrastructure. We get out there first, right? So, if you're going to build a city, you don't start putting people there first the first thing, if you do it right, is you get sewers, you get electricity, gas, roads, all that. Networking and security, infrastructure, is basic infrastructure goes out first. And you want to create an architecture that's going to live with you for twenty years. You don't want to have to rip up the roads and put the sewers in later. And that architecture needs to be multicloud because, even though you think maybe, most of our customers are 90% AWS right now. But every single one of them say, "But I'm moving to Azure, I'm moving to Google, "I've got retail customers that won't allow me "to put my infrastructure on AWS." Or, "I have machine learning, AI type apps on Google." They all say that same thing. But what they all then say to us, is, "You're going to be the mechanism "upon which I'm going to be able to deploy "this common set of services." So they don't need to know that. >> All right, give an example of a customer you guys have, name a name, we had a customer on stage here-- >> Steve: So, Jefferies. >> John: They did this for a use case. >> Yeah so, Jefferies. Financial Services Institution, lots of requirements, Mark Leon Soon is going to be on stage with me tomorrow. We started working with them about nine months ago. Exactly the same thing, they said, "Okay, you know what? "We need to start moving to the cloud, "we've got to start leveraging the cloud. "But, it's too complicated, right? "Even AWS, says 'Go Build.' "I don't want to go build, I want to consume services. "But they don't have all the service that I needed, "they're too low a level. "They're very high function, high enterprise requirements." So they start using us to orchestrate things, to provide transit networking, to provide egress filtering out to the Internet, we have high performance encryption, AWS will only offer it one gig. We can offer it to 10, 20, 30, 40 gig. So they start deploying, they start realizing all the things we do. Then they go and say, "I want to bring my Palo Alto Networks firewall "into the cloud." When you start looking at that, 'cause then guess what? All my policies, I want the same level that I have on-prem when I'm in the cloud. If I go try to bring in my VM series into AWS the construct that AWS give you, they cause you limitations in performance, in visibility, It's integration hassles, there's performance, sustainability, visibility issues, they force you to use SNAT. And there's all these issues, and they go, "Oh my God, this is a pain in the ass." We solved all that for them. We basically cloudify the VM series for them, so all those limitations go away. So that's just another use case that they use. Now they start looking, and they say, "Okay, now I'm going to start extending into other clouds and I want to use you as the common frame point, the common pane of glass. >> Well Steve, good luck in your venture, you're back in the saddle again. >> Steve: Yeah. >> Another ride here, you feel good about it? >> This is going to be the best, the biggest that I've been, and I was at Palo Alto Networks and VMware Nicira. And this one's going to be bigger than both of those. >> What's your vision for where this is going to be for you, where do you see the company in a few years, what are some of the outcomes you expect to happen? >> Our opportunity, and I look at it as, someone's going to take this opportunity, and the reason I came back is, why not us, someone's going to take it. And the opportunity, honestly, is to become, effectively, what Cisco was in the early 90's. To define the architecture, the networking and the security infrastructure architecture for enterprise customers. They are begging for that right now, that's our opportunity. >> Cloud Interoperability. >> Interoperability, yeah. And so there's so many things that we need to go and do. When you look at also the thing that people are going to say, the operations. So many people think, I want it the same as it was on-prem. I think with the cloud, and across multicloud you can do it right with us, and actually better. Because the visibility that you get is more, than what you get on-prem. >> Well, and the thing that's interesting that's different about this new world that we're talking about is that there is going to be constant improvements in new things which means that the functionality game is going to increase, which means the agility is even more important because the apps are going to have more things to do. >> Yeah. I mean in the end, why do you want to go to cloud? I want to go to cloud 'cause I want it to be self-service and I want agility. I want my developers, I want everybody to be able to do things quicker because all of the sudden they say, "Let's go roll this out", and you want to be able to do it. >> Well, good luck on the new venture, Aviatrix, check 'em out, hot multicloud startup, growing, how many people do you have, put the plug in, >> 100. >> what are you guys looking for, are you hiring, give me a quick plug. >> We just hired a new VP at World Wide Sales, James Winebrenner, who was Viptela CEO, VP Sales in Cisco, hiring a tremendous amount of sales guys right now, we're closing on a $40 million Series C round next week, and we're hiring a lot of people. >> Good luck, we'll be following you Steve, thanks for coming on and sharing your insights. Again, multicloud, this is a shift that's happening, multicloud is just another word for multi-vendor, in a new modern era, this is what it has been in the technology industry, but a whole new world. This is theCUBE coverage here in New York City, ESCAPE/19, I'm John Furrier, thanks for watching. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Announcer: From New York, it's theCUBE. and the impact to enterprises and public cloud. It's nice to have you on most of the other waves combined in the movement from mainframe to client server. that a lot of the industry thought leaders and practitioners like you were saying like a year ago that." and I think it's going to be a hybrid message What's going on on the Enterprise on-premise And I don't have the time, the people, And I said that on theCUBE. and going back as a student of the history of tech industry, And like you said, Your company is attacking of the six months I've been at Aviatrix, to then go and say, I mean you look at Palo Alto Networks, It's a legacy thing, and I think what happens is, and all the other clouds will give you, So you get the benefits of the cloud, and all the things we need to do. What is multicloud, I mean how do you define it, the first thing, if you do it right, Exactly the same thing, they said, "Okay, you know what? Well Steve, good luck in your venture, And this one's going to be bigger and the reason I came back is, Because the visibility that you get is more, because the apps are going to have more things to do. I mean in the end, why do you want to go to cloud? what are you guys looking for, and we're hiring a lot of people. Good luck, we'll be following you Steve,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Steve | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Aviatrix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Steve Mullaney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
James Winebrenner | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alibaba | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
CISCO | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
1992 | DATE | 0.99+ |
New York City | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jefferies | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one gig | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
twenty years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
$40 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Juniper | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10,000 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Nicira | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Arista | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three clouds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mark Leon Soon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tuesday morning | DATE | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
62 data centers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
VMware Nicira | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Viptela | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
DEC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two clouds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
40 gig | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Office 365 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
next week | DATE | 0.99+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
Sam Greenblatt, Nano Global - Open Networking Summit 2017 - #ONS2017 - #theCUBE
(lively synth music) >> Announcer: Live, from Santa Clara, California, it's The Cube, covering Open Networking Summit 2017. Brought to you by The Linux Foundation. >> Hey welcome back everybody, Jeff Frick here with The Cube. We are at Open Networking Summit, joined here in this segment by Scott Raynovich, my guest host for the next couple days, great to see you again Scott. >> Good to see you. >> And real excited to have a long-time Cube alumni, a many-time Cube alumni always up to some interesting and innovative thing. (Scott laughs) Sam Greenblat, he's now amongst other things the CTO of Nano Global, nano like very very small. Sam, great to see ya. >> Great to see you too Jim. >> So you said before we went offline, you thought you would retire, but there's just too many exciting things going on, and it drug you back into this crazy tech world. >> Just when you think you're out, they pull you back in. (all laugh) >> All right, so what is Nano Global, for people that aren't familiar with the company? >> Nano Global is a Amosil-Q, which is the compound, which is a nano compound that basically kills viruses, pathogens, funguses, and it does it by attaching itself at the nano level to these microbiol, microlife, and it implodes it, and technically that term is called lysis. >> (Jeff) That sounds very scary. >> It's very scary, because we try to sell it as a hand processing. >> You just told me it kills everything, I don't know if I want to put that on my hands, Sam. (all laugh) >> No it's good, that it kills some of the good bacteria, but it basically protects you for 24 hours. You don't have to reapply it, you can wash your hands. >> (Scott) It's like you become Superman or something. >> Absolutely, I literally use it to wash off the trays on the planes, and the armrests, while the guy next to me is sneezing like crazy, to try to kill any airborne pathogens. >> So what about the nanotechnology's got you traveling up to Santa Clara today for? >> Well, what I'm doing is, one of the things we're working on, besides that, is we're working on genomics, and I worked with some other companies on genomics besides Nano, and genomics has me totally fascinated. When I was at Dell, I went to ASU, and for the first time, I saw, pediatric genomics being processed quickly, and that was in a day. Today, a day is unheard of, it's terrible, you want to do it in less than an hour, and I was fascinated by how many people can be affected by the use of genomic medicine, and genomic pharmacology. And you see some of the ads on TV like Teva, that's genomic medicine, added tax, a genomic irregularity in your DNA, so it's amazing. And the other thing I'm very interested in is eradicating in my lifetime, which I don't know if it's going to happen, cancer, and how you do that is very simple. They found that chemotherapy is interesting, but not fascinating, it doesn't always work, but what they're finding is if they can find enough biometric information from genomes, from your proteomics, from your RNA, they can literally customize, it's called precision medicine, a specific medicine track for you, to actually fight the cancer successfully. >> I can't wait for the day, and hopefully it will be in your lifetime, when they look back at today's cancer treatments, and said "now what did you do again? (Sam laughs) You gave them as much poison as they could take, right up to the time they almost die, and hopefully the cancer dies first?" >> I'll take the - >> It's like bloodletting, it will not be that long from now that we look back at this time and say that was just archaic, which is good. >> It's called reactive medicine. It's funny, there's a story, that the guy who actually did the sequencing of the DNA, the original DNA strand tells, that when he was younger, he basically were able to see his chromosomes, and then he was able to get down to the DNA and to the proteins, and he could see that he had an irregularity that was known for basically cancer. And he went to the doctor, and he said "I think I have cancer of the pancreas." And the guy said "your blood tests don't show it." and by the way you don't get that blood test until you're over 40 years old, PS-1, the PS scan. And what happened was they actually found out that he had cancer of the pancreas, so... >> Yeah, it's predictive isn't it? So basically what you're doing is you're data mining the human and the human genome, and trying to do some sort of - >> We're not doing the 23andme, which tells you you have a propensity to be fat. >> Right, right, but walk us through what you're doing. You're obviously, you're here at an IT cloud conference so you're obviously using cloud technology to help accelerate the discovery of medicine, so walk us through how you're doing that. >> What happens is, when you get the swab, or the blood, and your DNA is then processed, it comes in and it gets cut to how many literal samples that they need. 23andme uses the 30x, that's 30 pieces. That's 80, by the way, gigabytes of data. If you were to take a 50x, is what you need for cancer, which is probably low, but it's, that takes you up to 150 gigabytes per person. Now think about the fact, you got to capture that, then you got to capture the RNA of the person, you got to capture his biometrics, and you got to capture his electronic medical record, and all the radiology that's done. And you got to bring it together, look at it, and determine what they should do. And the problem is the oncologic doctors today are scared to death of this, because they know how, if you have this, I'm going to take you in and basically do some radiation. I'm going to do chemotherapy on you and run the course. What's happening is, when you do all of this, you got to correlate all this data, it's probably the world's largest big data outside of Youtube. It's number two in number of bytes, and we haven't sequenced everybody on the planet. Everybody should get sequenced, it should be stored, and then when you get, that's called a germline you're healthy, then you take the cancer and you look at the germline and compare it, and then you're able to see what the difference is. Now open source has great technology to deal with this flood of data. LinkedIn, as you know open source, cacafa and one of the things that's great about that is it's a pull model, it's a producer, broker, subscriber model, and you can open up multiple channels, and by opening up multiple channels, since the subscribers are doing the pull instead of trying to send it all and overflow it, and we all know what it's like to overflow a pipe. It goes everywhere. But doing it through a cacafa model or a NiFi model, which is, by the way, donated by the NSA. We're not going to unmask who donated it but, (laughs) no, I'm only kidding, but the NSA donated it, and data flows now become absolutely critical, because as you get these segments of DNA, you got to send it all down, then what you got to do is do, and you're going to love this, a hidden Markovian chain, and put it all back together, so you can match the pattern, and then once you match the pattern, then you got to do quality control to see whether or not you screwed it up. And then, beyond that, you then have to do something called Smith-Waterman, which is a QC time, and then you can give it to somebody to figure out where the variant is. The whole key is all three of us share 99.9% of the same DNA. That one percent, tenth of a percent, is what is a variant. The variant is what causes all the diseases. We're all born with cancer. You have cancer in you, I have it, Jeff has it, and the only difference between a healthy person and a sick person is your killer cell went to sleep and doesn't attack the cancer. The only way to attack cancer is not chemotherapy, and I know every oncologic person who sees this is going to have a heart attack, it's basically let your immune system fight it. So what this tech does is it moves all that massive data into the variant. Once you get the variant, then you got to look at the RNA and see if there's variance there. Then you got to look at the radiology, the germline, and the biometric data, and once you get that, you can make a decision. I'll give you the guy who's my hero in this is the guy named Dr. Soon. He's the guy who came up with Abroxane. Abroxane is for pancreatic -- >> Jeff: Who is he with now? >> NantHealth. (both laugh) And why I, he discovered, he knew all about medicine, but he didn't know anything about technology. So then this becomes probably the best machine learning issue that you can have, because you have all this data, you're going to learn what it works on patients. And you're going to get all the records back, so what I'm going to talk about, because they wanted to talk about using SDM, using NFA, opening up hundreds of channels from source to, from provider to the subscriber, or consumer, as they call it, with the broker in the middle. And moving that data, then getting it over there, and doing the processing fast enough that it can be done while the patient still hasn't had any other problems. So I have great charts of what the genome looks like. I sent it to you. >> So it's clear these two fields are going to continue to merge, and the bioinformatics, and IT cloud. >> Sam: They're merging, as fast as possible. >> And we just plug our brain and our bodies into the health cloud, and it tells us what's up. >> Exactly, if Ginni was here, Ginni Rometty from IBM, she would tell you that quantum, she'd just announce it first commercially, an available quantum computer. Her first use for it is genomics, because genomics is a very repetitive process that is done in parallel. Remember you just cut this thing into 50 pieces, you put it back together, and now you're looking to see what's hidden, and it doesn't look like it's normal. If you looked at my genetics, one of the things you'll notice, that I will not consume a lot of caffeine. And how they know that is because there's a set of chromosomes, and my 23 chromosomes, that basically says I won't consume it. Turns out to be totally wrong, because of my behavior over the day. (all laugh) But what the Linux Foundation was interesting is everybody here wants to talk about, are we going to use this technology or that technology. What they want is an application, using the technology, and NantHealth that I talked about, can transport a terabyte of data virtually. In other words, it's not really doing it, but it's doing it through multiple sources and multiple consumers, and that's what people are fascinated by. >> All right, well like I said, Sammy gets into the wild and wooly ways and exciting new things. (Sam laughs) So sounds great, and a very bright future on the health care side. Thanks for stopping by. >> Thank you very much. I hope I didn't bore you with... (Jeff and Sam laugh) >> No, no, no, we don't want more chemotherapy, so that's definitely better to have less chemotherapy and more genetic fixing of sickness. So Sam, nice to see you again, thanks for stopping by. >> Thank you very much. >> Scott Raynovich, Jeff Frick, you're watching The Cube, from Open Networking Summit in Santa Clara, we'll be back after this short break. Thanks for watching. (synth music) >> Announcer: Robert Hershevech.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by The Linux Foundation. great to see you again Scott. the CTO of Nano Global, nano like very very small. and it drug you back into this crazy tech world. Just when you think you're out, they pull you back in. and it does it by attaching itself at the nano level It's very scary, because we try to sell it as I don't know if I want to put that on my hands, Sam. You don't have to reapply it, you can wash your hands. on the planes, and the armrests, while the guy going to happen, cancer, and how you do that is very simple. that was just archaic, which is good. and by the way you don't get that blood test until which tells you you have a propensity to be fat. accelerate the discovery of medicine, and the biometric data, and once you get that, issue that you can have, because you have all this data, continue to merge, and the bioinformatics, and IT cloud. into the health cloud, and it tells us what's up. you put it back together, and now you're looking the health care side. Thank you very much. So Sam, nice to see you again, thanks for stopping by. Scott Raynovich, Jeff Frick, you're watching The Cube,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Sam Greenblat | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Scott | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sam Greenblatt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Scott Raynovich | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ginni Rometty | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Robert Hershevech | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
80 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 pieces | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
NSA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50 pieces | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jim | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Santa Clara | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
24 hours | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ginni | PERSON | 0.99+ |
23 chromosomes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
99.9% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Linux Foundation | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50x | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Santa Clara, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Sammy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
The Cube | TITLE | 0.99+ |
less than an hour | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30x | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Nano Global | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Youtube | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
over 40 years old | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
The Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Dr. | PERSON | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
NantHealth | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
#ONS2017 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
Soon | PERSON | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Open Networking Summit | EVENT | 0.96+ |
two fields | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Superman | PERSON | 0.95+ |
tenth of a percent | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Amosil-Q | OTHER | 0.94+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Nano Global - Open Networking Summit 2017 | EVENT | 0.94+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Open Networking Summit 2017 | EVENT | 0.93+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
hundreds of channels | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Teva | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
first use | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
a day | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
ASU | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
RNA | OTHER | 0.89+ |
CTO | PERSON | 0.88+ |
gigabytes | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
The Linux Foundation | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
Nano Global | OTHER | 0.73+ |
up to 150 gigabytes per person | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
both laugh | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
lysis | OTHER | 0.67+ |
terabyte of data | QUANTITY | 0.65+ |
couple days | DATE | 0.65+ |
-1 | OTHER | 0.62+ |
Smith-Waterman | PERSON | 0.58+ |
Abroxane | OTHER | 0.57+ |
Abroxane | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.57+ |
variant | OTHER | 0.56+ |