>> Announcer: From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto and Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is a CUBE conversation. >> Hello, welcome back to theCUBE's coverage, CUBE Virtual's coverage, CUBE digital coverage, of AWS Summit, virtual online, Amazon Summit's normally in face-to-face all around the world, it's happening now online, follow the sun. Of course, we want to bring theCUBE coverage like we do at the events digitally, and we've got a great guest that usually comes on face-to-face, he's coming on virtual, Sanjay Poonen, the chief operating officer of VMware. Sanjay great to see you, thanks for coming in virtually, you look great. >> Hey, John thank you very much. Always a pleasure to talk to you. This is the new reality. We both happen to live very close to each other, me in Los Altos, you in Palo Alto, but here we are in this new mode of communication. But the good news is I think you guys at theCUBE were pioneering a lot of digital innovation, the AI platform, so hopefully it's not much of an adjustment for you guys to move digital. >> It's not really a pivot, just move the boat, put the sails up and sail into the next generation, which brings up really the conversation that we're seeing, which is this digital challenge, the virtual world, it's virtualization, Sanjay, it sounds like VMware. Virtualization spawned so much opportunity, it created Amazon, some say, I'd say. Virtualizing our world, life is now integrated, we're immersed into each other, physical and digital, you got edge computing, you got cloud native, this is now a clear path to customers that recognize with the pandemic challenges of at-scale, that they have to operate their business, reset, reinvent, and grow coming out of this pandemic. This has been a big story that we've been talking about and a lot of smart managers looking at projects saying, I'm doubling down on that, and I'm going to move the resources from this, the people and budget, to this new reality. This is a tailwind for the folks who were prepared, the ones that have the experience, the ones that did the work. theCUBE, thanks for the props, but VMware as well. Your thoughts and reaction to this new reality, because it has to be cloud native, otherwise it doesn't work, your thoughts. >> Yeah, I think, John, you're right on. We were very fortunate as a company to invent the term virtualization for an x86 architecture and the category 20 years ago when Diane founded this great company. And I would say you're right, the public cloud is the instantiation of virtualization at its sort of scale format and we're excited about this Amazon partnership, we'll talk more about that. This new world of doing everything virtual has taken the same concepts to whole new levels. We are partnering very closely with companies like Zoom, because a good part of this is being able to deliver video experiences in there, we'll talk about that if needed. Cloud native security, we announced an acquisition today in container security that's very important because we're making big moves in security, security's become very important. I would just say, John, the first thing that was very important to us as we began to shelter in place was the health of our employees. Ironically, if I go back to, in January I was in Davos, in fact some of your other folks who were on the show earlier, Matt Garman, Andy, we were all there in January. The crisis already started in China, but it wasn't on the world scene as much of a topic of discussion. Little did we know, three, four weeks later, fast forward to February things were moving so quickly. I remember a Friday late in February where we were just about to go the next week to Las Vegas for our in-person sales kickoffs. Thousands of people, we were going to do, I think, five or 6,000 people in Las Vegas and then another 3,000 in Barcelona, and then finally in Singapore. And it had not yet been categorized a pandemic. It was still under this early form of some worriable virus. We decided for the health and safety of our employees to turn the entire event that was going to happen on Monday to something virtual, and I was so proud of the VMware team to just basically pivot just over the weekend. To change our entire event, we'd been thinking about video snippets. We have to become in this sort of virtual, digital age a little bit like TV producers like yourself, turn something that's going to be one day sitting in front of an audience to something that's a lot shorter, quicker snippets, so we began that, and the next thing we began doing over the next several weeks while the shelter in place order started, was systematically, first off, tell our employees, listen, focus on your health, but if you're healthy, turn your attention to serving your customers. And we began to see, which we'll talk about hopefully in the context of the discussion, parts of our portfolio experience a tremendous amount of interest for a COVID-centered world. Our digital workplace solutions, endpoint security, SD-WAN, and that trifecta began to be something that we began to see story after story of customers, hospitals, schools, governments, retailers, pharmacies telling us, thank you, VMware, for helping us when we needed those solutions to better enable our people on the front lines. And all VMware's role, John, was to be a digital first responder to the first responder, and that gave tremendous amount of motivation to all of our employees into it. >> Yeah, and I think that's a great point. One of the things we've been talking about, and you guys have been aligned with this, you mentioned some of those points, is that as we work at home, it points out that digital and technology is now part of lifestyle. So we used to talk about consumerization of IT, or immersion with augmented reality and virtual reality, and then talk about the edge of the network as an endpoint, we are at the edge of the network, we're at home, so this highlights some of the things that are in demand, workspaces, VPN provisioning, these new tools, that some cases we've been hearing people that no one ever thought of having a forecast of 100% VPN penetration. Okay, you did the AirWatch deal way back when you first started, these are now fruits of those labors. So I got to ask you, as managers of your customer base are out there thinking, okay, I got to double down on the right growth strategy for this post-pandemic world, the smart managers are going to look at the technologies enabled for business outcome, so I have to ask you, innovation strategies are one thing, saying it, putting it place, but now more than ever, putting them in action is the mandate that we're hearing from customers. Okay I need an innovation strategy, and I got to put it into action fast. What do you say to those customers? What is VMware doing with AWS, with cloud, to make those innovation strategies not only plausible but actionable? >> That's a great question, John. We focused our energy, before even COVID started, as we prepared for this year, going into sales kickoffs and our fiscal year, around five priorities. Number one was enabling the world to be multicloud, private cloud and public cloud, and clearly our partnership here with Amazon is the best example of that and they are our preferred cloud partner. Secondly, building modern apps with microservices and cloud native, what we call app modernization. Thirdly, which is a key part to the multicloud, is building out the entire network stack, data center networking, the firewalls, the load bouncing in SD-WAN, so I'd call that cloud network. Number four, the modernization of workplace with an additional workspace solution, Workspace ONE. And five, intrinsic security from all aspects of security, network, endpoint, and cloud. So those five priorities were what we began to think through, organize our portfolio, we call them solution pillars, and for any of your viewers who're interested, there's a five-minute version of the VMware story around those five pillars that you can watch on YouTube that I did, you just search for Sanjay Poonen and five-minute story. But then COVID hit us, and we said, okay we got to take these strategies now and make them more actionable. Exactly your question, right? So a subset of that portfolio of five began to become more actionable, because it's pointless going and talking about stuff and it's like, hey, listen, guys, I'm a house on fire, I don't care about the curtains and all the wonderful art. You got to help me through this crisis. So a subset of that portfolio became kind of what was those, think about now your laptop at home, or your endpoint at home. People wanted, on top of their Zoom call, or surrounding their Zoom call, a virtual desktop managed easily, so we began to see Workspace ONE getting a lot of interest from our customers, especially the VDI part of that portfolio. Secondly, that laptop at home needed to be secured. Traditional, old, legacy AV solutions that've worked, enter Carbon Black, so Workspace ONE plus Carbon Black, one and two. Third, that laptop at home needs network acceleration, because we're dialoguing and, John, we don't want any latency. Enter SD-WAN. So the trifecta of Workspace ONE, Carbon Black and VeloCloud, that began to see even more interest and we began to hone in our portfolio around those three. So that's an example of where you have a general strategy, but then you apply it to take action in the midst of a crisis, and then I say, listen, that trifecta, let's just go and present what we can do, we call that the business continuity or business resilience part of our portfolio. We began to start talking to customers, and saying, here's our business continuity solution, here's what we could do to help you, and we targeted hospitals, schools, governments, pharmacies, retailers, the ones who're on the front line of this and said again, that line I said earlier, we want to be a digital first responder to you, you are the real first responder. Right before this call I got off a CIO call with the CIO of a major hospital in the northeast area. What gives me great joy, John, is the fact that we are serving them. Their beds are busting at the seam, in serving patients-- >> And ransomware's a huge problem you guys-- >> We're serving them. >> And great stuff there, Sanjay, I was just on a call this morning with a bunch of folks in the security industry, thought leaders, was in DC, some generals were there, some real thought leaders, trying to figure out security policy around biosecurity, COVID-19, and this invisible disruption, and they were equating it to like the World Wars. Big inflection point, and one of the generals said, in those times of crisis you need alliances. So I got to ask you, COVID-19 is impactful, it's going to have serious impact on the critical nature of it, like you said, the house is on fire, don't worry about the curtains. Alliances matter more than ever when you need to come together. You guys have an ecosystem, Amazon's got an ecosystem, this is going to be a really important test to the alliances out there. How do you view that as you look forward? You need the alliances to be successful, to compete and win in the new world as this invisible enemy, if you will, or disruptor happens, what's your thoughts? >> Yeah, I'll answer in a second, just for your viewers, I sneezed, okay? I've been on your show dozens of time, John, but in your live show, if I sneezed, you'd hear the loud noise. The good news in digital is I can mute myself when a sneeze is about to happen, and we're able to continue the conversation, so these are some side benefits of the digital part of it. But coming to your question on alliance, super important. Ecosystems are how the world run around, united we stand, divided we fall. We have made ecosystems, I've always used this phrase internally at VMware, sort of like Isaac Newton, we see clearly because we stand on the shoulders of giants. So VMware is always able to be bigger of a company if we stand on the shoulders of bigger giants. Who were those companies 20 years ago when Diane started the company? It was the hardware economy of Intel and then HP and Dell, at the time IBM, now Lenovo, Cisco, NetApp, DMC. Today, the new hardware companies Amazon, Azure, Google, whoever have you, we were very, I think, prescient, if you would, to think about that and build a strategic partnership with Amazon three or four years ago. I've mentioned on your show before, Andy's a close friend, he was a classmate over at Harvard Business School, Pat, myself, Ragoo, really got close to Andy and Matt Garman and Mike Clayville and several members of their teams, Teresa Carlson, and began to build a partnership that I think is one of the most incredible success stories of a partnership. And Dell's kind of been a really strong partner with us on private cloud, having now Amazon with public cloud has been seminal, we do regular meetings and build deep integration of, VMware Cloud and AWS is not some announcement two or three years ago. It's deep engineering between, Bask's now in a different role, but in his previous role, that and people like Mark Lohmeyer in our team. And that deep engineering allows us to know and tell customers this simple statement, which both VMware and Amazon reps tell their customers today, if you have a workload running on vSphere, and you want to move that to Amazon, the best place, the preferred place for that is VMware Cloud and Amazon. If you try to refactor that onto a native VC 2, it's a waste of time and money. So to have the entire army of VMware and Amazon telling customers that statement is a huge step, because it tells customers, we have 70 million virtual machines running on-prem. If customers are looking to move those workloads to Amazon, the best place for that VMware Cloud and AWS, and we have some credible customer case studies. Freddie Mac was at VMworld last year. IHS Markit was at VMworld last year talking about it. Those are two examples and many more started it, so we would like to have every VMware and Amazon customer that's thinking about VMware to look at this partnership as one of the best in the industry and say very similar to what Andy I think said on stage at the time of this announcement, it doesn't have to be now a trade-off between public and private cloud, you can get the best of both worlds. That's what we're trying to do here-- >> That's a great point, I want to get your thoughts on leadership, as you look at COVID-19, one of our tracks we're going to be promoting heavily on theCUBE.net and our sites, around how to manage through this crisis. Andy Jassy was quoted on the fireside chat, which is coming up here in North America, but I saw it yesterday in New Zealand time as I time shifted over there, it's a two-sided door versus a one-sided door. That was kind of his theme is you got to be able to go both ways. And I want to get your thoughts, because you might know what you're doing in certain contexts, but if you don't know where you're going, you got to adjust your tactics and strategies to match that, and there's and old expression, if you don't know where you're going, every road will take you there, okay? And so a lot of enterprise CXOs or CEOs have to start thinking about where they want to go with their business, this is the growth strategy. Then you got to understand which roads to take. Your thoughts on this? Obviously we've been thinking it's cloud native, but if I'm a decision maker, I want to make sure I have an architecture that's going to carry me forward to the future. I need to make sure that I know where I'm going, so I know what road I'm on. Versus not knowing where I'm going, and every road looks good. So your thoughts on leadership and what people should be thinking around knowing what their destination is, and then the roads to take? >> John, I think it's the most important question in this time. Great leaders are born through crisis, whether it's Winston Churchill, Charles de Gaulle, Roosevelt, any of the leaders since then, in any country, Mahatma Gandhi in India, the country I grew up, Nelson Mandela, MLK, all of these folks were born through crisis, sometimes severe crisis, they had to go to jail, they were born through wars. I would say, listen, similar to the people you talked about, yeah, there's elements of this crisis that similar to a World War, I was talking to my 80 year old father, he's doing well. I asked him, "When was the world like this?" He said, "Second World War." I don't think this crisis is going to last six years. It might be six or 12 months, but I really don't think it'll be six years. Even the health care professionals aren't. So what do we learn through this crisis? It's a test of our leadership, and leaders are made or broken during this time. I would just give a few guides to leaders, this is something tha, Andy's a great leader, Pat, myself, we all are thinking through ways by which we can exercise this. Think of Sully Sullenberger who landed that plane on the Hudson. Did he know when he flew that airbus, US Airways airbus, that few flock of birds were going to get in his engine, and that he was going to have to land this plane in the Hudson? No, but he was making decisions quickly, and what did he exude to his co-pilot and to the rest of staff, calmness and confidence and appropriate communication. And I think it's really important as leaders, first off, that we communicate, communicate, communicate, communicate to our employees. First, our obligation is first to our employees, our family first, and then of course to our company employees, all 30,000 at VMware, and I'm sure similarly Andy does it to his, whatever, 60, 70,000 at AWS. And then you want to be able to communicate to them authentically and with clarity. People are going to be reading between the lines of everything you say, so one of the things I've sought to do with my team, all the front office functions report to me, is do half an hour Zoom video conferences, in the time zone that's convenient to them, so Japan, China, India, Europe, in their time zone, so it's 10 o'clock my time because it's convenient to Japan, and it's just 10 minutes of me speaking of what I'm seeing in the world, empathizing with them but listening to them for 20 minutes. That is communication. Authentically and with clarity, and then turn your attention to your employees, because we're going stir crazy sitting at home, I get it. And we've got to abide by the ordinances with whatever country we're in, turn your attention to your customers. I've gotten to be actually more productive during this time in having more customer conference calls, video conference calls on Zoom or whatever platform with them, and I'm looking at this now as an opportunity to engage in a new way. I have to be better prepared, like I said, these are shorter conversations, they're not as long. Good news I don't have to all over the place, that's better for my family, better for the carbon emission of the world, and also probably for my life long term. And then the third thing I would say is pick one area that you can learn and improve. For me, the last few years, two, three years, it's been security. I wanted to get the company into security, as you saw today we've announced mobile, so I helped architect the acquisition of Carbon Black, very similar to kind of the moves I've made six years ago around AirWatch, very key part to all of our focus to getting more into security, and I made it a personal goal that this year, at the start of the year, before COVID, I was going to meet 1,000 CISOs, in the Fortune 1000 Global 2000. Okay, guess what, COVID happens, and quite frankly that goal's gotten a little easier, because it's much easier for me to meet a lot more people on Zoom video conferences. I could probably do five, 10 per day, and if there's 200 working days in a day, I can easily get there, if I average about five per day, and sometimes I'm meeting them in groups of 10, 20. >> So maybe we can get you on theCUBE more often too, 'cause you have access to a video camera. >> That is my growth mindset for this year. So pick a growth mindset area. Satya Nadella puts this pretty well, "Move from being a know-it-all to a learn-it-all." And that's the mindset, great company. Andy has that same philosophy for Amazon, I think the great leaders right now who are running these cloud companies have that growth mindset. Pick an area that you can grow in this time, and you will find ways to do it. You'll be able to learn online and then be able to teach in some fashion. So I think communicate effectively, authentically, turn your attention to serving your customers, and then pick some growth area that you can learn yourself, and then we will come out of this crisis collectively, individuals and as partners, like VMware and Amazon, and then collectively as a society, I believe we'll come out stronger. >> Awesome great stuff, great insight there, Sanjay. Really appreciate you sharing that leadership. Back to the more of technical questions around leadership is cloud native. It's clear that there's going to be a line in the sand, if you will, there's going to be a right side of history, people are going to have to be on the right side of history, and I believe it's cloud native. You're starting to see this emersion. You guys have some news, you just announced today, you acquired a Kubernetes security startup, around Kubernetes, obviously Kubernetes needs security, it's one of those key new enablers, disruptive enablers out there. Cloud native is a path that is a destination opportunity for people to think about, why that acquisition? Why that company? Why is VMware making this move? >> Yeah, we felt as we talked about our plans in security, backing up to things I talked about in my last few appearances on your show at VMworld, when we announced Carbon Black, was we felt the security industry was broken because there was too many point benders, and we figured there'd be three to five control points, network, endpoint, cloud, where we could play a much more pronounced role at moving a lot of these point benders, I describe this as not having to force our customers to go to a doctor and say I've got to eat 5,000 tablets to get healthy, you make it part of your diet, you make it part of the infrastructure. So how do we do that? With network security, we're off to the races, we're doing a lot more data center networking, firewall, load bouncing, SD-WAN. Really, reality is we can eat into a lot of the point benders there that I've just been, and quite frankly what's happened to us very gratifying in the network security area, you've seen the last few months, some firewall vendors are buying SD-WAN players, kind of following our strategy. That's a tremendous validation of the fact that the network security space is being disrupted. Okay, move to endpoint security, part of the reason we acquired Carbon Black was to unify the client side, Workspace ONE and Carbon Black should come together, and we're well under way in doing that, make Carbon Black agentless on the server side with vSphere, we're well on the way to that, you'll see that very soon. By the way both those things are something that the traditional endpoint players can't do. And then bring out new forms of workload. Servers that are virtualized by VMware is just one form of work. What are other workloads? AWS, the public clouds, and containers. Container's just another workload. And we've been looking at container security for a long time. What we didn't want to do was buy another static analysis player, another platform and replatform it. We felt that we could get great technology, we have incredible grandeur on container cell. It's sort of Red Hat and us, they're the only two companies who are doing Kubernetes scales. It's not any of these endpoint players who understand containers. So Kubernetes, VMware's got an incredible brand and relevance and knowledge there. The networking part of it, service mesh, which is kind of a key component also to this. We've been working with Google and others like Istio in service mesh, we got a lot of IP there that the traditional endpoint players, Symantec, McAfee, Trend, CrowdStrike, don't know either Kubernetes or service mesh well. We add now container security into this, we really distinguish ourselves further from the traditional endpoint players with bringing together, not just the endpoint platform that can do containers, but also Kubernetes service mesh. So why is that important? As people think about their future in containers, they'll want to do this at the runtime level, not at the static level. They'll want to do it at build time And they'll want to have it integrated with some of their networking capabilities like service mesh. Who better to think about that IP and that evolution than VMware, and now we bring, I think it's 12 to 14 people we're bringing in from this acquisition. Several of them in Israel, some of them here in Palo Alto, and they will build that platform into the tech that VMware has onto the Carbon Black cloud and we will deliver that this year. It's not going to be years from now. >> Did you guys talk about the-- >> Our capability, and then we can bring the best of Carbon Black, with Tanzu, service mesh, and even future innovation, like, for example, there's a big movement going around, this thing call open policy agent OPA, which is an open source effort around policy management. You should expect us to embrace that, there could be aspects of OPA that also play into the future of this container security movement, so I think this is a really great move for Patrick and his team, I'm very excited. Patrick is the CEO of Carbon Black and the leader of that security business unit, and he came to me and said, "Listen, one of the areas "we need to move in is container security "because it's the number one request I'm hearing "from our CESOs and customers." I said, "Go ahead Patrick. "Find out who are the best player you could acquire, "but you have to triangulate that strategy "with the Tanzu team and the NSX team, "and when you have a unified strategy what we should go, "we'll go an make the right acquisition." And I'm proud of what he was able to announce today. >> And I noticed you guys on the release didn't talk about the acquisition amount. Was it not material, was it a small amount? >> No, we don't disclose small, it's a tuck-in acquisition. You should think of this as really bringing us some tech and some talent, and being able to build that into the core of the platform of Carbon Black. Carbon Black was the real big move we made. Usually what we do, you saw this with AirWatch, right, anchor on a fairly big move. We paid I think 2.1 billion for Carbon Black, and then build and build and build on top of that, partner very heavily, we didn't talk about that. If there's time we could talk about it. We announced today a security alliance with top SIEM players, in what's called a sock alliance. Who's announced in there? Splunk, IBM QRadar, Google Chronicle, Sumo Logic, and Exabeam, five of the biggest SIEM players are embracing VMware in endpoint security, saying, Carbon Black is who we want to work with. Nobody else has that type of partnership, so build, partner, and then buy. But buy is always very carefully thought through, we're not one of these companies like CA of the past that just bought every company and then it becomes a graveyard of dead acquisition. Our view is we're very disciplined about how we think about acquisition. Acquisitions for us are often the last resort, because we'd prefer to build and partner. But sometimes for time-to-market reasons, we acquire, and when we acquire, it's thoughtful, it's well-organized within VMware, and we take care of our people, 'cause we want, I mean listen, why do acquisitions fail? Because the good people leave. So we're excited about this team, the team in Israel, and the team in Palo Alto, they come from Octarine. We're going to integrate them rapidly into the platform, and this is a good evidence of VMware investing more in security, and our Q3 earnings pulled, John, I said, sorry, we said that the security business was a billion dollar business at VMware already, primarily from network, but some from endpoint. This is evidence of us putting more fuel behind that fire. It's only been six, seven months and Patrick's made his first acquisition inside Carbon Black, so you're going to see us investing more in security, it's an important priority for the company, and I expect us to be a very prominent player in these three pillars, network security, endpoint security, endpoint is both client and the workload, and cloud. Network, endpoint, cloud, they are the three areas where we think there's lots of room for innovation in security. >> Well, we'll be watching, we'll be reporting and analyzing the moves. Great playbook, by the way. Love that organic partnering and then key acquisitions which you build around, it's a great playbook, I think it's very relevant for this time. The most important question I have to ask you, Sanjay, and this is a personal question, because you're the leader of VMware, I noticed that, we all know you're into music, you've been putting music online, kind of a virtual band. You've also hired a CUBE alumni, Victoria Verango from McAfee who also puts up music, you've got some musicians, but you kind of know how to do the digital moves there, so the question is, will the music at VMworld this year be virtual? >> Oh, man. Victoria is actually an even better musician than me. I'm excited about his marketing gifts, but I'm also excited to watch him. But yeah, you've heard him sing, he's got a voice that's somewhat similar to Sting, so we, just for fun, in our Diwali, which is an Indian celebration last year, Tom Corn, myself, and a wonderful lady named Divya, who's got a beautiful voice, had sung a song, which was off the soundtrack of the Bollywood movie, "Secret Superstar," and we just for fun decided to record that in our three separate homes, and put that out on YouTube. You can listen, it's just a two or three-minute run, and it kind of went a little bit viral. And I was thinking to myself, hey, if this is one way by which we can let the VMware community know that, hey, you know what, art conquers COVID-19, you can do music even socially distant, and bring out the spirit of VMware, which is community. So we might build on that idea, Victoria and I were talking about that last night and saying, hey, maybe we do a virtual music kind of concert of maybe 10 or 15 or 20 voices in the various different countries. Record piece of a song and music and put it out there. I think these are just ways by which we're having fun in a virtual setting where people get to see a different side of VMware where, and the intent here, we're all amateurs, John, we're not like great. There are going to be mistakes in this music. If you listen to that audio, it sounds a little tinny, 'cause we're recording it off our iPhone and our iPad microphone. But we'll do the best we can, the point is just to show the human spirit and to show that we care, and at the end of the day, see, the COVID-19 virus has no prejudice on color of skin, or nationality, or ethnicity. It's affecting the whole world. We all went into the tunnel at different times, we will come out of this tunnel together and we will be a stronger human fabric when we're done with this, We shall absolutely overcome. >> Sanjay, give us a quick update to end the segment on your thoughts around VMworld. It's one of the biggest events, we look forward to it. It's the only even left standing that theCUBE's been to every year of theCUBE's existence, we're looking forward to being part of theCUBE virtual. It's been announced it's virtual. What are some of the thinking going on at the highest levels within the VMware community around how you're going to handle VMworld this year? >> Listen, when we began to think about it, we had to obviously give our customers and folks enough notice, so we didn't want to just spring that sometime this summer. So we decided to think through it carefully. I asked Robin, our CMO, to talk to many of the other CMOs in the industry. Good news is all of these are friends of ours, Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Salesforce, Adobe, and even some smaller companies, IBM did theirs. And if they were in the first half of the year, they had to go virtual 'cause we're sheltered in place, and IBM did theirs, Okta did theirs, and we began to watch how they were doing this. We're kind of in the second half, because we were August, September, and we just sensed a lot of hesitancy from our customers that wanted to get on a plane to come here, and even if we got just 500, 1,000, a few thousand, it wasn't going to be the same and there would always be that sort of, even if we were getting back to that, some worry, so we figured we'd do something that might be semi-digital, and we may have some people that roam, but the bulk of it is going to be digital, and we changed the dates to be a little later. I think it's September 20th to 29th. Right now it's all public now, we announced that, and we're going to make it a great program. In some senses like we're becoming TV producer. I told our team we got to be like Disney or ESPN or whoever your favorite show is, YouTube, and produce a really good several-hour program that has got a different way in which digital content is provided, smaller snippets, very interesting speakers, great brand names, make the content clear, crisp and compelling. And if we do that, this will be, I don't know, maybe it's the new norm for some period of time, or it might be forever, I don't know. >> John: We're all learning. >> In the past we had huge conferences that were busting 50, 70, 100,000 and then after the dot-com era, those all shrunk, they're like smaller conferences, and now with advent of companies like Amazon and Salesforce, we have huge events that, like VMworld, are big events. We may move to a environment that's a lot more digital, I don't know what the future of in-presence physical conferences are, but we, like others, we're working with AWS in terms of their future with Reinvent, what Microsoft's doing with Ignite, what Google's doing with Next, what Salesforce's going to do with Dreamforce, all those four companies are good partners of ours. We'll study theirs, we'll work together as a community, the CMOs of all those companies, and we'll come together with something that's a very good digital experience for our customers, that's really what counts. Today I did a webinar with a partner. Typically when we did a briefing in our briefing center, 20 people came. There're 100 people attending this, I got a lot more participation in this QBR that I did with this SI partner, one of the top SIs in the world, in an online session with them, than would I have gotten if they'd all come to Palo Alto. That's goodness. Should we take the best of that world and some physical presence? Maybe in the future, we'll see how it goes. >> Content quality. You know, you know content. Content quality drives everything online, good engagement creates community, that's a nice flywheel. I think you guys will figure it out, you've got a lot of great minds there, and of course, theCUBE virtual will be helping out as we can, and we're rethinking things too-- >> We count on that, John-- >> We're going to be open minded to new ideas, and, hey, whatever's the best content we can deliver, whether it's CUBE, or with you guys, or whoever, we're looking forward to it. Sanjay, thanks for spending the time on this CUBE Keynote coverage of AWS Summit. Since it's digital we can do longer programs, we can do more diverse content. We got great customer practitioners coming up, talking about their journey, their innovation strategies. Sanjay Poonen, COO of VMware, thank you for taking your precious time out of your day today. >> Thank you, John, always a pleasure. >> Thank you. Okay, more CUBE, virtual CUBE digital coverage of AWS Summit 2020, theCUBE.net is we're streaming, and of course, tons of videos on innovation, DevOps, and more, scaling cloud, scaling on-premise hybrid cloud, and more. We got great interviews coming up, stay with us our all-day coverage. I'm John Furrier, thanks for watching. (upbeat music)

[Music] Andre one of the things that have come up is your relation with Russia as we talked about so I have to ask you a direct question do you to work with sanctioned Russian entities or Russian companies shown we and c5 we do not work with any company that's sanctioned from any country including Russia and the same applies to me we take sanctions very very seriously the one thing you don't mess with is US sanctions which has application worldwide and so you always have to stay absolutely on the right side of the law when it comes to sanctions so nothing nothing that's something that's connection nets are trying to make they're also the other connection is a guy named Victor Vail Selberg Viktor Vekselberg Vekselberg to go with the Russian names as people know what is your relationship with Viktor Vekselberg so victim Viktor Vekselberg is a is a very well known Russian businessman he's perhaps one of the best known Russian businessman in the West because he also lived in the US for a period of time it's a very well-known personality in in in Europe he's a donor for example to the Clinton Foundation and he has aggregated the largest collection of Faberge eggs in the world as part of national Russian treasure so he's a very well known business personality and of course during the course of my career which has focused heavily on also doing investigations on Russian related issues I have come across Viktor Vekselberg and I've had the opportunity to meet with him and so I know him as a as a business leader but c5 has no relationship with Viktor Vekselberg and we've never accepted any investment from him we've never asked him for an investment and our firm a venture capital firm has no ties to Viktor Vekselberg so you've worked had a relationship at some point in your career but no I wouldn't on a daily basis you don't have a deep relationship can you explain how deep that relationship is what were the interactions you had with him so clarify that point so so I know Viktor Vekselberg and I've met him on more than one occasion in different settings and as I shared with you I served on the board of a South African mining company which is black owned for a period of a year and which Renova had a minority investment alongside an Australian company called South 32 and that's the extent of the contact and exposure I've had to so casual business run-ins and interactions not like again that's correct deep joint ventures are very kind of okay let's get back to c5 for a minute cause I want to ask you it but just do just a circle just one last issue and Viktor Vekselberg Viktor Vekselberg is the chairman of scope over the Russian technology innovation park that we discussed and he became the chairman under the presidency of President Dmitry Medvedev during the time when Hillary Clinton was doing a reset on Russian relations and during that time so vekselberg have built up very effective relationships with all of the or many of the leading big US technology companies and today you can find the roster of those partners the list of those partners on the scope of our website and those nuclear drove that yes Victor drove that Victor drove that during during in the Clinton Secretary of this started the scope of our project started during the the Medvedev presidency and in the period 2010-2011 you'll find many photographs of mr. vekselberg signing partnership agreements with very well known technology companies for Skolkovo and most of those companies still in one way or another remain involved in the Skolkovo project this has been the feature the article so there are I think and I've read all the other places where they wanted to make this decision Valley of Russia correct there's a lot of Russian programmers who work for American companies I know a few of them that do so there's technology they get great programmers in Russia but certainly they have technology so oracles they're ibm's they're cisco say we talked about earlier there is US presence there are you do you have a presence there and does Amazon Web service have a presence on do you see five it and that's knowing I was alright it's well it's a warning in the wrong oh sorry about that what's the Skog Obama's called spoke over so Andres Kokomo's this has been well report it's the Silicon Valley of Russia and so a lot of American companies they're IBM Oracle Cisco you mentioned earlier I can imagine it makes sense they a lot of recruiting little labs going on we see people hire Russian engineers all the time you know c5 have a presence there and does AWS have a presence there and do you work together in a TBS in that area explain that relationship certainly c5 Amazon individually or you can't speak for Amazon but let's see if I've have there and do you work with Amazon in any way there c-5m there's no work in Russia and neither does any of our portfolio companies c5 has no relationship with the Skolkovo Technology Park and as I said the parties for this spoke of a Technology Park is a matter of record is only website anyone can take a look at it and our name is not amongst those partners and I think this was this is an issue which I which I fault the BBC report on because if the BBC report was fair and accurate they would have disclosed the fact that there's a long list of partners with a scope of our project very well known companies many of them competitors in the Jedi process but that was not the case the BBC programme in a very misleading and deceptive way created the impression that for some reason somehow c5 was involved in Skolkovo without disclosing the fact that many other companies are involved they and of course we are not involved and your only relationship with Declan Berg Viktor Vekselberg was through the c5 raiser bid three c5 no no Viktor Vekselberg was never involved in c5 raiser Petco we had Vladimir Kuznetsov as a man not as a minority investor day and when we diligence him one of our key findings was that he was acting in independent capacity and he was investing his own money as a you national aniseh Swiss resident so you if you've had no business dealings with Viktor Vekselberg other than casual working c-5 has had no business dealings with with Viktor Vekselberg in a in a personal capacity earlier before the onset of sanctions I served on the board of a black-owned South African mining company and which Renault bombs the Vekselberg company as a minority investment alongside an Australian company called South 32 and my motivation for doing so was to support African entrepreneurship because this was one of the first black owned mining companies in the country was established with a British investment in which I was involved in and I was very supportive of the work that this company does to develop manganese mining in the Kalahari Desert and your role there was advisory formal what was the role there it was an advisory role so no ownership no ownership no equity no engagement you call them to help out on a project I was asked to support the company at the crucial time when they had a dispute on royalties when they were looking at the future of the Kalahari basin and the future of the manganese reserve say and also to help the company through a transition of the black leadership the black executive leadership of the cut year is that roughly 2017 so recently okay let on the ownership of c5 can you explain who owns c5 I mean you're described as the owner if it's a venture capital firm you probably of investors so your managing director you probably have some carry of some sort and then talk about the relationship between c5 razor bidco the Russian special purpose vehicle that was created is that owning what does it fit is it a subordinate role so see my capital so Jones to start with c5 razor boot code was was never a Russian special purpose vehicle this was a British special purpose vehicle which we established for our own investment into a European enterprise software company vladimir kuznetsov later invested as an angel investor into the same company and we required him to do it through our structure because it was transparent and subject to FCA regulation there's no ties back to c5 he's been not an owner in any way of c5 no not on c5 so C fibers owned by five families who helped to establish the business and grow the business and partner in the business these are blue chip very well known European and American families it's a small transatlantic community or family investors who believe that it's important to use private capital for the greater good right history dealing with Russians can you talk about your career you mentioned your career in South Africa earlier talk about your career deal in Russia when did you start working with Russian people I was the international stage Russian Russia's that time in 90s and 2000 and now certainly has changed a lot let's talk about your history and deal with the Russians so percent of the Soviet Union I think there was a significant window for Western investment into Russia and Western investment during this time also grew very significantly during my career as an investigator I often dealt with Russian organized crime cases and in fact I established my consulting business with a former head of the Central European division of the CIA who was an expert on Russia and probably one of the world's leading experts on Russia so to get his name William Lofgren so during the course of of building this business we helped many Western investors with problems and issues related to their investments in Russia so you were working for the West I was waiting for the West so you are the good side and but when you were absolutely and when and when you do work of this kind of course you get to know a lot of people in Russia and you make Russian contacts and like in any other country as as Alexander Solzhenitsyn the great Russian dissident wrote the line that separates good and evil doesn't run between countries it runs through the hearts of people and so in this context there are there are people in Russia who crossed my path and across my professional career who were good people who were working in a constructive way for Russia's freedom and for Russia's independence and that I continue to hold in high regard and you find there's no technical security risk the United States of America with your relationship with c5 and Russia well my my investigative work that related to Russia cases are all in the past this was all done in the past as you said I was acting in the interest of Western corporations and Western governments in their relations with Russia that's documented and you'd be prepared to be transparent about that absolutely that's all those many of those cases are well documented to corporations for which my consulting firm acted are very well known very well known businesses and it's pretty much all on the on the Podesta gaiting corruption we were we were we were helping Western corporations invest into Russia in a way that that that meant that they did not get in meshed in corruption that meant they didn't get blackmailed by Russia organized crime groups which meant that their investments were sustainable and compliant with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other bribery regulation at war for everyone who I know that lives in Europe that's my age said when the EU was established there's a flight of Eastern Europeans and Russians into Western Europe and they don't have the same business practices so I'd imagine you'd run into some pretty seedy scenarios in this course of business well in drug-dealing under I mean a lot of underground stuff was going on they're different they're different government they're different economy I mean it wasn't like a structure so you probably were exposed to a lot many many post-conflict countries suffer from predatory predatory organized crime groups and I think what changed and of course of my invested investigative career was that many of these groups became digital and a lot of organized crime that was purely based in the physical world went into the into the digital world which was one of the other major reasons which led me to focus on cyber security and to invest in cyber security well gets that in a minute well that's great I may only imagine some of the things you're investigated it's easy to connect people with things when yeah things are orbiting around them so appreciate the candid response there I wanna move on to the other area I see in the stories national security risk conflict of interest in some of the stories you seeing this well is there conflict of interest this is an IT playbook I've seen over the years federal deals well you're gonna create some Fahd fear uncertainty and doubt there's always kind of accusations you know there's accusations around well are they self dealing and you know these companies or I've seen this before so I gotta ask you they're involved with you bought a company called s DB advisors it was one of the transactions that they're in I see connecting to in my research with the DoD Sally Donnelly who is Sally Donnelly why did you buy her business so I didn't buy Sonny Donnelly's business again so Sally Tony let's start with Sally darling so Sally Donny was introduced to me by Apple Mike Mullen as a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Sally served as his special advisor when he was the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Apple Mullen was one of the first operating parties which we had in c5 and he continues to serve Admiral Mullen the four start yes sir okay and he continues to serve as one of operating partners to this day salad only and that will Mike worked very closely with the Duke of Westminster on one of his charitable projects which we supported and which is close to my heart which is established a new veteran rehabilitation center for Britain upgrading our facility which dates back to the Second World War which is called Headley court to a brand-new state-of-the-art facility which was a half a billion dollar public-private partnership which Duke led and in this context that Ron Mullen and Sally helped the Duke and it's team to meet some of the best experts in the US on veteran rehabilitation on veteran care and on providing for veterans at the end of the service and this was a this was a great service which it did to the to this new center which is called the defense and national rehabilitation center which opened up last summer in Britain and is a terrific asset not only for Britain but also for allies and and so the acquisition she went on to work with secretary Manus in the Department of Defense yes in February Feb 9 you through the transaction yes in February 2017 Sally decided to do public service and support of safety matters when he joined the current administration when she left her firm she sold it free and clear to a group of local Washington entrepreneurs and she had to do that very quickly because the appointment of secretary mattis wasn't expected he wasn't involved in any political campaigns he was called back to come and serve his country in the nation's interest very unexpectedly and Sally and a colleague of us Tony de Martino because of their loyalty to him and the law did to the mission followed him into public service and my understanding is it's an EAJA to sell a business in a matter of a day or two to be able to be free and clear of title and to have no compliance issues while she was in government her consulting business didn't do any work for the government it was really focused on advising corporations on working with the government and on defense and national security issues I didn't buy Sonny's business one of c-5 portfolio companies a year later acquired SPD advisors from the owner supported with a view to establishing and expanding one of our cyber advising businesses into the US market and this is part of a broader bind bolt project which is called Haven ITC secure and this was just one of several acquisitions that this platform made so just for the record c5 didn't buy her company she repeat relieved herself of any kind of conflict of interest going into the public service your portfolio company acquired the company in short order because they knew the synergies because it would be were close to it so I know it's arm's length but as a venture capitalist you have no real influence other than having an investment or board seat on these companies right so they act independent in your structure absolutely make sure I get that's exactly right John but but not much more importantly only had no influence over the Jedi contract she acted as secretary mitosis chief of staff for a period of a year and have functions as described by the Government Accounting Office was really of a ministerial nature so she was much more focused on the Secretary's diary than she was focused on any contracting issues as you know government contracting is very complex it's very technical sally has as many wonderful talents and attributes but she's never claimed to be a cloud computing expert and of equal importance was when sally joined the government in february 17 jeddah wasn't even on the radar it wasn't even conceived as a possibility why did yet I cannot just for just for the record the Jedi contract my understanding is that and I'm not an expert on one government contracting but my understanding is that the RFP the request for proposals for the July contract came out in quarter three of this year for the first time earlier this year there was a publication of an intention to put out an RFP I think that happened in at the end of quarter one five yep classic yeah and then the RFP came out and called a three bits had to go in in November and I understand a decision will be made sometime next year what's your relationship well where's she now what she still was so sunny left finished the public service and and I think February March of this year and she's since gone on to do a fellowship with a think-tank she's also reestablished her own business in her own right and although we remain to be good friends I'm in no way involved in a business or a business deal I have a lot of friends in DC I'm not a really policy wonk of any kind we have a lot of friends who are it's it's common when it administrations turnover people you know or either appointed or parked a work force they leave and they go could they go to consultancy until the next yeah until the next and frustration comes along yeah and that's pretty common that's pretty cool this is what goes on yeah and I think this whole issue of potential conflicts of interest that salad only or Tony the Martino might have had has been addressed by the Government Accounting Office in its ruling which is on the public record where the GAO very clearly state that neither of these two individuals were anywhere near the team that was writing the terms for the general contract and that their functions were really as described by the GAO as ministerial so XI salient Antonia was such a long way away from this contact there's just no way that they could have influenced it in in in any respect and their relation to c5 is advisory do they and do they both are they have relations with you now what's the current relationship since since Sally and Tony went to do public service we've had no contact with them we have no reason of course to have contact with them in any way they were doing public service they were serving the country and serving the nation and since they've come out of public service we've we've not reestablished any commercial relationship so we talked earlier about the relation with AWS there's only if have a field support two incubators its accelerator does c5 have any portfolio companies that are actually bidding or working on the Jedi contract none what Santa John not zero zero so outside of c5 having relation with Amazon and no portfolios working with a Jedi contract there's no link to c5 other than a portfolio company buying Sally Donnelly who's kind of connected to general mattis up here yeah Selleck has six degrees of separation yes I think this is a constant theme in this conspiracy theory Jonas is six degrees of separation it's it's taking relationships that that that developed in a small community in Washington and trying to draw nefarious and sinister conclusions from them instead of focusing on competing on performance competing on innovation and competing on price and perhaps that's not taking place because the companies that are trying to do this do not have the capability to do so Andre I really appreciate you coming on and answering these tough questions I want to talk about what's going on with c5 now but I got to say you know I want to ask you one more time because I think this is critical you've worked for big-time company Kroll with terminus international market very crazy time time transformation wise you've worked with the CIA in Quantico the FBI nuclei in Quantico on a collaboration you were to know you've done work for the good guys you have see if I've got multiple years operating why why are you being put as a bad guy here I mean you're gonna you know being you being put out there with if you search your name on Google it says you're a spy all these evil all these things are connecting and we're kind of digging through them they kind of don't Joan I've had the privilege of a tremendous career I've had the privilege of working with with great leaders and having had great mentors if you do anything of significance if you do anything that's helping to make a difference or to make a change you should first expect scrutiny but also expect criticism when that scrutiny and criticism are fact-based that's helpful and that's good for society and for the health of society when on the other hand it is fake news or it is the construct of elaborate conspiracy theories that's not good for the health of society it's not good for the national interest is not good for for doing good business you've been very after you're doing business for the for the credibility people questioning your credibility what do you want to tell people that are watching this about your credibility that's in question again with this stuff you've done and you're continuing to do what's the one share something to the folks that might mean something to them you can sway them or you want to say something directly what would you say the measure of a person it is his or her conduct in c-five we are continuing to build our business we continue to invest in great companies we continue to put cravat private capital to work to help drive innovation including in the US market we will continue to surround ourselves with good people and we will continue to set the highest standards for the way in which we invest and build our businesses it's common I guess I would say that I'm getting out as deep as you are in the in term over the years with looking at these patterns but the pattern that I see is very simple when bad guys get found out they leave the jurisdiction they flee they go do something else and they reinvent themselves and scam someone else you've been doing this for many many years got a great back record c5 now is still doing business continuing not skipping a beat the story comes out hopefully kind of derail this or something else will think we're gonna dig into it so than angle for sure but you still have investments you're deploying globally talk about what c5 is doing today tomorrow next few months the next year you have deals going down you're still doing business you have business out there our business has not slowed down for a moment we have the support of tremendous investors we have the support of tremendous partners in our portfolio companies we have the support of a great group of operating partners and most important of all we have a highly dedicated highly focused group of investment teams of very experienced and skilled professionals who are making profitable investments and so we are continuing to build our business we have a very full deal pipeline we will be completing more investment transactions next week and we are continue to scalar assets under management next year we will have half a billion dollars of assets under management and we continue to focus on our mission which is to use private capital to help innovate and drive a change for good after again thank you we have the story in the BBC kicked all this off the 12th no one's else picked it up I think other journals have you mentioned earlier you think this there's actually people putting this out you you call out let's got John wheeler we're going to look into him do you think there's an organized campaign right now organized to go after you go after Amazon are you just collateral damage you mentioned that earlier is there a funded effort here well Bloomberg has reported on the fact that that one of the competitors for this bit of trying to bring together a group of companies behind a concerted effort specifically to block Amazon Web Services and so we hear these reports we see this press speculation if that was the case of course that would not be good for a fair and open and competitive bidding process which is I think is the Department of Defense's intention and what is in the interests of the country at a time when national security innovation will determine not only the fate of future Wars but also the fate of a sons and daughters who are war fighters and to be fair to process having something undermine it like a paid-for dossier which I have multiple sources confirming that's happened it's kind of infiltrating the journalists and so that's kind of where I'm looking at right now is that okay the BBC story just didn't feel right to me credible outlet you work for them you did investigations for them back in the day have you talked to them yes no we are we are we are in correspondence with the BBC I think in particular we want them to address the fact that they've conflated facts in this story playing this parlor game of six degrees of separation we want them to address the important principle of the independence of the in editorial integrity at the fact that they did not disclose that they expert on this program actually has significant conflicts of interests of his own and finally we want them to disclose the fact that it's not c5 and Amazon Web Services who have had a relationship with the scope of our technology park the scope of our technology park actually has a very broad set of Western partners still highly engaged there and even in recent weeks of hosted major cloud contracts and conferences there and and all of this should have been part of the story in on the record well we're certainly going to dig into it I appreciate your answer the tough questions we're gonna certainly look into this dossier if this is true this is bad and if there's people behind it acting behind it then certainly we're gonna report on that and I know these were tough questions thanks for taking the time Andre to to answer them with us Joan thanks for doing a deep dive on us okay this is the Q exclusive conversation here in Palo Alto authority narc who's the founder of c-5 capital venture capital firm in the center of a controversy around this BBC story which we're going to dig into more this has been exclusive conversation I'm John Tory thanks for watching [Music] you

>> (Narrator) Live from Madrid, Spain. It's The Cube covering HP Discover Madrid 2017, brought to you by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. >> We're back at HPE Discover Madrid 2017. This is The Cube, the leader in live tech coverage. My name is Dave Vellante and I'm with my co-host for the week, Peter Burris. Cat Graves is here, she's a research scientist at Hewlett Packard Enterprises. And she's joined by Natalia Vassilieva. Cube alum, senior research manager at HPE. Both with the labs in Palo Alto. Thanks so much for coming on The Cube. >> Thank you for having us. >> You're welcome. So for decades this industry has marched to the cadence of Moore's Law, bowed down to Moore's Law, been subservient to Moore's Law. But that's changing, isn't it? >> Absolutely. >> What's going on? >> I can tell Moore's Law is changing. So we can't increase the number, of course, on the same chip and have the same space. We can't increase the density of the computer today. And from the software perspective, we need to analyze more and more data. We are now marching calls into the area of artificial intelligence when we need to train larger and larger models, we need more and more compute for that. And the only possible way today to speed up the training of those modules, to actually enable the AI, is to scale out. Because we can't put more cores on the chip. So we try to use more chips together But then communication bottlenecks come in. So we can't efficiently use all of those chips. So for us on the software side, on the part of people who works how to speed up the training, how to speed up the implementation of the algorithms, and the work of those algorithms, that's a problem. And that's where Cat can help us because she's working on a new hardware which will overcome those troubles. >> Yeah, so in our lab what we do is try and think of new ways of doing computation but also doing the computations that really matter. You know, what are the bottlenecks for the applications that Natalia is working on that are really preventing the performance from accelerating? Again exponentially like Moore's Law, right? We'd like to return to Moore's Law where we're in that sort of exponential growth in terms of what compute is really capable of. And so what we're doing in labs is leveraging novel devices so, you've heard of memristor in the past probably. But instead of using memristor for computer memory, non volatile memory for persistent memory driven computer systems, we're using these devices instead for doing computation itself in the analog domain. So one of our first target applications, and target core computations that we're going after is matrix multiplication. And that is a fundamental mathematical building block for a lot of different machine learning, deep learning, signal processing, you kind of name it, it's pretty broad in terms of where it's used today. >> So Dr. Tom Bradicich was talking about the dot product, and it sounds like it's related. Matrix multiplications, suddenly I start breaking out in hives but is that kind of related? >> That's exactly what it is. So, if you remember your linear algebra in college, a dot product is exactly a matrix multiplication. It's the dot in between the vector and the matrix. The two itself, so exactly right. Our hardware prototype is called the dot product engine. It's just cranking out those matrix multiplications. >> And can you explain how that addresses the problem that we're trying to solve with respect to Moore's Law? >> Yeah, let me. You mentioned the problem with Moore's Law. From me as a software person, the end of Moore's Law is a bad thing because I can't increase their compute power anymore on the single chip. But for Cat it's a good thing because it forced her to think what's unconventional. >> (Cat) It's an opportunity. >> It's an opportunity! >> It forced her to think, what are unconventional devices which she can come up with? And we also have to mention they understand that general purpose computing is not always a solution. Sometimes if you want to speed up the thing, you need to come up with a device which is designed specifically for the type of computation which you care about. And for machine learning technification, again as I've mentioned, these matrix-matrix multiplications matrix-vector multiplications, these are the core of it. Today if you want to do those AI type applications, you spend roughly 90% of the time doing exactly that computation. So if we can come up with a more power efficient and a more effective way of doing that, that will really help us, and that's what dot product engine is solving. >> Yes, an example some of our colleagues did in architectural work. Sort of taking the dot product engine as the core, and then saying, okay if I designed a computer architecture specifically for doing convolutional neural networks. So image classification, these kinds of applications. If I built this architecture, how would it perform? And how would it compare to GPUs? And we're seeing 10 to 100 X speed up over GPUs. And even 15 X speed up over if you had a custom-built, state of the art specialized digital Asic. Even comparing to the best that we can do today, we are seeing this potential for a huge amount of speed up and also energy savings as well. >> So follow up on that, if I may. So you're saying these alternative processors like GPUs, FGPAs, custom Asics, can I infer from that that that is a stop-gap architecturally, in your mind? Because you're seeing these alternative processors pop up all over the place. >> (Cat) Yes. >> Is that a fair assertion? >> I think that recent trends are obviously favoring a return to specialized hardware. >> (Dave) Yeah, for sure. Just look at INVIDIA, it's exploding. >> I think it really depends on the application and you have to look at what the requirements are. Especially in terms of where there's a lot of power limitations, right, GPUs have become a little bit tricky. So there's a lot of interest in the automotive industry, space, robotics, for more low power but still very high performance, highly efficient computation. >> Many years ago when I was actually thinking about doing computer science and realized pretty quickly that I didn't have the brain power to get there. But I remember thinking in terms of there's three ways of improving performance. You can do it architecturally, what do you do with an instruction? You can do it organizationally, how do you fit the various elements together? You can do it with technology, which is what's the clock speed, what's the underlying substrate? Moore's Law is focused on the technology. Risk, for example, focused on architecture. FPGAs, arm processors, GPUs focus on architecture. What we're talking about to get back to that doubling the performance every 18 months from a computing standpoint not just a chip standpoint, now we're talking about revealing and liberating, I presume, some of the organization elements. Ways of thinking about how to put these things together. So even if we can't get improvements that we've gotten out of technology, we can start getting more performance out of new architectures. But organizing how everything works together. And make it so that the software doesn't have to know, or the developer, doesn't have to know everything about the organization. Am I kind of getting there with this? >> Yes, I think you are right. And if we are talking about some of the architectural challenges of today's processors, not only we can't increase the power of a single device today, but even if we increase the power of a single device, then the challenge would be how do you bring the data fast enough to that device? So we will have problems with feeding that device. And again, what dot product engine does, it does computations in memory, inside. So you limit the number of data transfers between different chips and you don't face the problem of feeding their computation thing. >> So similar same technology, different architecture, and using a new organization to take advantage of that architecture. The dot product engine being kind of that combination. >> I would say that even technology is different. >> Yeah, my view of it we're actually thinking about it holistically. We have in labs software working with architects. >> I mean it's not just a clock speed issue. >> It's not just a clock speed issue. It's thinking about what computations actually matter, which ones you're actually doing, and how to perform them in different ways. And so one of the great things as well with the dot product engine and these kind of new computation accelerators, is with something like the memory driven computing architecture. We have now an ecosystem that is really favoring accelerators and encouraging the development of these specialized hardware pieces that can kind of slot in in the same architecture that can scale also in size. >> And you invoke that resource in an automated way, presumably. >> Yeah, exactly. >> What's the secret sauce behind that? Is that software that does that or an algorithm that chooses the algorithm? >> A gen z. >> A gen z's underlying protocol is to make the device talk to the data. But at the end of the system software, it's algorithms also which will make a decision at every particular point which compute device I should use to do a particular task. With memory driven computing, if all my data sits in the shared pool of memory and I have different heterogeneous compute devices, being able to see that data and to talk to that data, then it's up to the system management software to allocate the execution of a particular task to the device which does that the best. In a more power efficient way, in the fastest way, and everybody wins. >> So as a software person, you now with memory driven computing have been thinking about developing software in a completely different way. Is that correct? >> (Natalia) Yeah. You're not thinking about going through I/O stack anymore and waiting for a mechanical device and doing other things? >> It's not only the I/O stack. >> As I mentioned today, the only possibility for us to decrease the time of processing for the algorithms is to scale out. That means that I need to take into account the locality of the data. It's not only when you distribute the computation across multiple nodes, even if we have some number based which is we have different sockets in a single system. With local memory and the memory which is remote to that socket but which is local to another socket. Today as a software programmer, as a developer, I need to take into account where my data sits. Because I know in order to accept the data on a local memory it'll take me 100 seconds to accept my data. In the remote socket, it will take me longer. So when I developed the algorithm in order to prevent my computational course to stall and to wait for the data, I need to schedule that very carefully. With memory driven computing, giving an assumption that, again, all memory not only in the single pool, but it's also evenly accessible from every compute device. I don't need to care about that anymore. And you can't even imagine such a relief it is! (laughs) It makes our life so much easier. >> Yeah, because you're spending a lot of time previously trying to optimize your code >> Yes for that factor of the locality of the data. How much of your time was spent doing that menial task? >> Years! In the beginning of Moore's Law and the beginning of the traditional architectures, if you turn to the HPC applications, every HPC application device today needs to take care of data locality. >> And you hear about when a new GPU comes out or even just a slightly new generation. They have to take months to even redesign their algorithm to tune it to that specific hardware, right? And that's the same company, maybe even the same product sort of path lined. But just because that architecture has slightly changed changes exactly what Natalia is talking about. >> I'm interested in switching subjects here. I'd love to spend a minute on women in tech. How you guys got into this role. You're both obviously strong in math, computer backgrounds. But give us a little flavor of your background, Cat, and then, Natalia, you as well. >> Me or you? >> You start. >> Hm, I don't know. I was always interested in a lot of different things. I kind of wanted to study and do everything. And I got to the point in college where physics was something that still fascinated me. I felt like I didn't know nearly enough. I felt like there was still so much to learn and it was constantly challenging me. So I decided to pursue my Ph.D in that, and it's never boring, and you're always learning something new. Yeah, I don't know. >> Okay, and that led to a career in technology development. >> Yeah, and I actually did my Ph.D in kind of something that was pretty different. But towards the end of it, decided I really enjoyed research and was just always inspired by it. But I wanted to do that research on projects that I felt like might have more of an impact. And particularly an impact in my lifetime. My Ph.D work was kind of something that I knew would never actually be implemented in, maybe a couple hundred years or something we might get to that point. So there's not too many places, at least in my field in hardware, where you can be doing what feels like very cutting edge research, but be doing it in a place where you can see your ideas and your work be implemented. That's something that led me to labs. >> And Natalia, what's your passion? How did you arrive here? >> As a kid I always liked different math puzzles. I was into math and pretty soon it became obvious that I like solving those math problems much more than writing about anything. I think in middle school there was the first class on programming, I went right into that. And then the teacher told me that I should probably go to a specialized school and that led me to physics and mathematics lyceum and then mathematical department at the university so it was pretty straightforward for me since then. >> You're both obviously very comfortable in this role, extremely knowledgeable. You seem like great leaders. Why do you feel that more women don't pursue a career in technology. Do you have these discussions amongst yourselves? Is this something that you even think about? >> I think it starts very early. For me, both my parents are scientists, and so always had books around the house. Always was encouraged to think and pursue that path, and be curious. I think its something that happens at a very young age. And various academic institutions have done studies and shown when they do certain things, its surmountable. Carnegie Mellon has a very nice program for this, where they went for the percentage of women in their CS program went from 10% to 40% in five years. And there were a couple of strategies that they implemented. I'm not gonna get all of them, but one was peer to peer mentoring, when the freshmen came in, pairing them with a senior, feeling like you're not the only one doing what you're doing, or interested in what you're doing. It's like anything human, you want to feel like you belong and can relate to your group. So I think, yeah. (laughs) >> Let's have a last word. >> On that topic? >> Yeah sure, or any topic. But yes, I'm very interested in this topic because less than 20% of the tech business is women. Its 50W% of the population. >> I think for me its not the percentage which matters Just don't stay in the way of those who's interested in that. And give equal opportunities to everybody. And yes, the environment from the very childhood should be the proper one. >> Do you feel like the industry gives women equal opportunity? >> For me, my feeling would be yes. You also need to understand >> Because of your experience Because of my experience, but I also originally came from Russia, was born in St. Petersburg, and I do believe that ex-Soviet Union countries has much better history in that. Because the Soviet Union, we don't have man and woman. We have comrades. And after the Second World War, there was women who took all hard jobs. And we used to get moms at work. All moms of all my peers have been working. My mom was an engineer, my dad is an engineer. From that, there is no perception that the woman should stay at home, or the woman is taking care of kids. There is less of that. >> Interesting. So for me, yes. Now I think that industry going that direction. And that's right. >> Instructive, great. Well, listen, thanks very much for coming on the Cube. >> Sure. >> Sharing the stories, and good luck in lab, wherever you may end up. >> Thank you. >> Good to see you. >> Thank you very much. >> Alright, keep it right there everybody. We'll be back with our next guest, Dave Vallante for Peter Buress. We're live from Madrid, 2017, HPE Discover. This is the Cube.

>> [Announcer] Live from New York, it's the Cube. Covering the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event. Brought to you by IBM. Now here are your hosts Dave Vellante and Stu Miniman. >> Welcome back to New York City everybody, this is the CUBE. We're here live at the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event. Bringing analytics and transactions together on Z, extending an announcement that IBM made a couple years ago, sort of laid out that vision, and now bringing machine learning to the mainframe platform. We're here with Jim Kobielus. Jim is the Director of IBM's Community Engagement for Data Science and a long time CUBE alum and friend. Great to see you again James. >> Great to always be back here with you. Wonderful folks from the CUBE. You ask really great questions and >> Well thank you. >> I'm prepared to answer. >> So we saw you last week at Spark Summit so back to back, you know, continuous streaming, machine learning, give us the lay of the land from your perspective of machine learning. >> Yeah well machine learning very much is at the heart of what modern application developers build and that's really the core secret sauce in many of the most disruptive applications. So machine learning has become the core of, of course, what data scientists do day in and day out or what they're asked to do which is to build, essentially artificial neural networks that can process big data and find patterns that couldn't normally be found using other approaches. And then as Dinesh and Rob indicated a lot of it's for regression analysis and classification and the other core things that data scientists have been doing for a long time, but machine learning has come into its own because of the potential for great automation of this function of finding patterns and correlations within data sets. So today at the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event, and we've already announced it, IBM Machine Learning for ZOS takes that automation promised to the next step. And so we're real excited and there'll be more details today in the main event. >> One of the most funs I had, most fun I had last year, most fun interviews I had last year was with you, when we interviewed, I think it was 10 data scientists, rock star data scientists, and Dinesh had a quote, he said, "Machine learning is 20% fun, 80% elbow grease." And data scientists sort of echoed that last year. We spent 80% of our time wrangling data. >> [Jim] Yeah. >> It gets kind of tedious. You guys have made announcements to address that, is the needle moving? >> To some degree the needle's moving. Greater automation of data sourcing and preparation and cleansing is ongoing. Machine learning is being used for that function as well. But nonetheless there is still a lot of need in the data science, sort of, pipeline for a lot of manual effort. So if you look at the core of what machine learning is all about, it's supervised learning involves humans, meaning data scientists, to train their algorithms with data and so that involves finding the right data and then of course doing the feature engineering which is a very human and creative process. And then to be training the data and iterating through models to improve the fit of the machine learning algorithms to the data. In many ways there's still a lot of manual functions that need expertise of data scientists to do it right. There's a lot of ways to do machine learning wrong you know there's a lot of, as it were, tricks of the trade you have to learn just through trial and error. A lot of things like the new generation of things like generative adversarial models ride on machine learning or deep learning in this case, a multilayered, and they're not easy to get going and get working effectively the first time around. I mean with the first run of your training data set, so that's just an example of how, the fact is there's a lot of functions that can't be fully automated yet in the whole machine learning process, but a great many can in fact, especially data preparation and transformation. It's being automated to a great degree, so that data scientists can focus on the more creative work that involves subject matter expertise and really also application development and working with larger teams of coders and subject matter experts and others, to be able to take the machine learning algorithms that have been proved out, have been trained, and to dry them to all manner of applications to deliver some disruptive business value. >> James, can you expand for us a little bit this democratization of before it was not just data but now the machine learning, the analytics, you know, when we put these massive capabilities in the broader hands of the business analysts the business people themselves, what are you seeing your customers, what can they do now that they couldn't do before? Why is this such an exciting period of time for the leveraging of data analytics? >> I don't know that it's really an issue of now versus before. Machine learning has been around for a number of years. It's artificial neural networks at the very heart, and that got going actually in many ways in the late 50s and it steadily improved in terms of sophistication and so forth. But what's going on now is that machine learning tools have become commercialized and refined to a greater degree and now they're in a form in the cloud, like with IBM machine learning for the private cloud on ZOS, or Watson machine learning for the blue mixed public cloud. They're at a level of consumability that they've never been at before. With software as a service offering you just, you pay for it, it's available to you. If you're a data scientist you being doing work right away to build applications, derive quick value. So in other words, the time to value on a machine learning project continues to shorten and shorten, due to the consumability, the packaging of these capabilities and to cloud offerings and into other tools that are prebuilt to deliver success. That's what's fundamentally different now and it's just an ongoing process. You sort of see the recent parallels with the business intelligence market. 10 years ago BI was reporting and OLEP and so forth, was only for the, what we now call data scientists or the technical experts and all that area. But in the last 10 years we've seen the business intelligence community and the industry including IBM's tools, move toward more self service, interactive visualization, visual design, BI and predictive analytics, you know, through our cognos and SPSS portfolios. A similar dynamic is coming in to the progress of machine learning, the democratization, to use your term, the more self service model wherein everybody potentially will be able to be, to do machine learning, to build machine learning and deep learning models without a whole of university training. That day is coming and it's coming fairly rapidly. It's just a matter of the maturation of this technology in the marketplace. >> So I want to ask you, you're right, 1950s it was artificial neural networks or AI, sort of was invented I guess, the concept, and then in the late 70s and early 80s it was heavily hyped. It kind of died in the late 80s or in the 90s, you never heard about it even the early 2000s. Why now, why is it here now? Is it because IBM's putting so much muscle behind it? Is it because we have Siri? What is it that has enabled that? >> Well I wish that IBM putting muscle behind a technology can launch anything to success. And we've done a lot of things in that regard. But the thing is, if you look back at the historical progress of AI, I mean, it's older than me and you in terms of when it got going in the middle 50s as a passion or a focus of computer scientists. What we had for the last, most of the last half century is AI or expert systems that were built on having to do essentially programming is right, declared a rule defining how AI systems could process data whatever under various scenarios. That didn't prove scalable. It didn't prove agile enough to learn on the fly from the statistical patterns within the data that you're trying to process. For face recognition and voice recognition, pattern recognition, you need statistical analysis, you need something along the lines of an artificial neural network that doesn't have to be pre-programmed. That's what's new now about in the last this is the turn of this century, is that AI has become predominantly now focused not so much on declarative rules, expert systems of old, but statistical analysis, artificial neural networks that learn from the data. See the, in the long historical sweep of computing, we have three eras of computing. The first era before the second world war was all electromechanical computing devices like IBM's start of course, like everybody's, was in that era. The business logic was burned into the hardware as it were. The second era from the second world war really to the present day, is all about software, programming, it's COBAL, 4trans, C, Java, where the business logic has to be developed, coded by a cadre of programmers. Since the turn of this millennium and really since the turn of this decade, it's all moved towards the third era, which is the cognitive era, where you're learning the business rules automatically from the data itself, and that involves machine learning at its very heart. So most of what has been commercialized and most of what is being deployed in the real world working, successful AI, is all built on artificial neural networks and cognitive computing in the way that I laid out. Where, you still need human beings in the equation, it can't be completely automated. There's things like unsupervised learning that take the automation of machine learning to a greater extent, but you still have the bulk of machine learning is supervised learning where you have training data sets and you need experts, data scientists, to manage that whole process, that over time supervised learning is evolving towards who's going to label the training data sets, especially when you have so much data flooding in from the internet of things and social media and so forth. A lot of that is being outsourced to crowd sourcing environments in terms of the ongoing labeling of data for machine learning projects of all sorts. That trend will continue a pace. So less and less of the actual labeling of the data for machine learning will need to be manually coded by data scientists or data engineers. >> So the more data the better. See I would argue in the enablement pie. You're going to disagree with that which is good. Let's have a discussion [Jim Laughs]. In the enablement pie, I would say the profundity of Hadup was two things. One is I can leave data where it is and bring code to data. >> [Jim] Yeah. >> 5 megabytes of code to petabyte of data, but the second was the dramatic reduction in the cost to store more data, hence my statement of the more data the better, but you're saying, meh maybe not. Certainly for compliance and other things you might not want to have data lying around. >> Well it's an open issue. How much data do you actually need to find the patterns of interest to you, the correlations of interest to you? Sampling of your data set, 10% sample or whatever, in most cases that might be sufficient to find the correlations you're looking for. But if you're looking for some highly deepened rare nuances in terms of anomalies or outliers or whatever within your data set, you may only find those if you have a petabyte of data of the population of interest. So but if you're just looking for broad historical trends and to do predictions against broad trends, you may not need anywhere near that amount. I mean, if it's a large data set, you may only need five to 10% sample. >> So I love this conversation because people have been on the CUBE, Abi Metter for example said, "Dave, sampling is dead." Now a statistician said that's BS, no way. Of course it's not dead. >> Storage isn't free first of all so you can't necessarily save and process all the data. Compute power isn't free yet, memory isn't free yet, so forth so there's lots... >> You're working on that though. >> Yeah sure, it's asymptotically all moving towards zero. But the bottom line is if the underlying resources, including the expertise of your data scientists that's not for free, these are human beings who need to make a living. So you've got to do a lot of things. A, automate functions on the data science side so that your, these experts can radically improve their productivity. Which is why the announcement today of IBM machine learning is so important, it enables greater automation in the creation and the training and deployment of machine learning models. It is a, as Rob Thomas indicated, it's very much a multiplier of productivity of your data science teams, the capability we offer. So that's the core value. Because our customers live and die increasingly by machine learning models. And the data science teams themselves are highly inelastic in the sense that you can't find highly skilled people that easily at an affordable price if you're a business. And you got to make the most of the team that you have and help them to develop their machine learning muscle. >> Okay, I want to ask you to weigh in on one of Stu's favorite topics which is man versus machine. >> Humans versus mechanisms. Actually humans versus bots, let's, okay go ahead. >> Okay so, you know a lot of discussions, about, machines have always replaced humans for jobs, but for the first time it's really beginning to replace cognitive functions. >> [Jim] Yeah. >> What does that mean for jobs, for skill sets? The greatest, I love the comment, the greatest chess player in the world is not a machine. It's humans and machines, but what do you see in terms of the skill set shift when you talk to your data science colleagues in these communities that you're building? Is that the right way to think about it, that it's the creativity of humans and machines that will drive innovation going forward. >> I think it's symbiotic. If you take Watson, of course, that's a star case of a cognitive AI driven machine in the cloud. We use a Watson all the time of course in IBM. I use it all the time in my job for example. Just to give an example of one knowledge worker and how he happens to use AI and machine learning. Watson is an awesome search engine. Through multi-structure data types and in real time enabling you to ask a sequence of very detailed questions and Watson is a relevance ranking engine, all that stuff. What I've found is it's helped me as a knowledge worker to be far more efficient in doing my upfront research for anything that I might be working on. You see I write blogs and I speak and I put together slide decks that I present and so forth. So if you look at knowledge workers in general, AI as driving far more powerful search capabilities in the cloud helps us to eliminate a lot of the grunt work that normally was attended upon doing deep research into like a knowledge corpus that may be preexisting. And that way we can then ask more questions and more intelligent questions and really work through our quest for answers far more rapidly and entertain and rule out more options when we're trying to develop a strategy. Because we have all the data at our fingertips and we've got this expert resource increasingly in a conversational back and forth that's working on our behalf predictively to find what we need. So if you look at that, everybody who's a knowledge worker which is really the bulk now of the economy, can be far more productive cause you have this high performance virtual assistant in the cloud. I don't know that it's really going, AI or deep learning or machine learning, is really going to eliminate a lot of those jobs. It'll just make us far smarter and more efficient doing what we do. That's, I don't want to belittle, I don't want to minimize the potential for some structural dislocation in some fields. >> Well it's interesting because as an example, you're like the, you're already productive, now you become this hyper-productive individual, but you're also very creative and can pick and choose different toolings and so I think people like you it's huge opportunities. If you're a person who used to put up billboards maybe it's time for retraining. >> Yeah well maybe you know a lot of the people like the research assistants and so forth who would support someone like me and most knowledge worker organizations, maybe those people might be displaced cause we would have less need for them. In the same way that one of my very first jobs out of college before I got into my career, I was a file clerk in a court in Detroit, it's like you know, a totally manual job, and there was no automation or anything. You know that most of those functions, I haven't revisited that court in recent years, I'm sure are automated because you have this thing called computers, especially PCs and LANs and so forth that came along since then. So a fair amount of those kinds of feather bedding jobs have gone away and in any number of bureaucracies due to automation and machine learning is all about automation. So who knows where we'll all end up. >> Alright well we got to go but I wanted to ask you about... >> [Jim] I love unions by the way. >> And you got to meet a lot of lawyers I'm sure. >> Okay cool. >> So I got to ask you about your community of data scientists that you're building. You've been early on in that. It's been a persona that you've really tried to cultivate and collaborate with. So give us an update there. What's your, what's the latest, what's your effort like these days? >> Yeah, well, what we're doing is, I'm on a team now that's managing and bringing together all of our program for community engagement programs for really for across portfolio not just data scientists. That involves meet ups and hack-a-thons and developer days and user groups and so forth. These are really important professional forums for our customers, our developers, our partners, to get together and share their expertise and provide guidance to each other. And these are very very important for these people to become very good at, to help them, get better at what they do, help them stay up to speed on the latest technologies. Like deep learning, machine learning and so forth. So we take it very seriously at IBM that communities are really where customers can realize value and grow their human capital ongoing so we're making significant investments in growing those efforts and bringing them together in a unified way and making it easier for like developers and IT administrators to find the right forums, the right events, the right content, within IBM channels and so forth, to help them do their jobs effectively and machine learning is at the heart, not just of data science, but other professions within the IT and business analytics universe, relying more heavily now on machine learning and understanding the tools of the trade to be effective in their jobs. So we're bringing, we're educating our communities on machine learning, why it's so critically important to the future of IT. >> Well your content machine is great content so congratulations on not only kicking that off but continuing it. Thanks Jim for coming on the CUBE. It's good to see you. >> Thanks for having me. >> You're welcome. Alright keep it right there everybody, we'll be back with our next guest. The CUBE, we're live from the Waldorf-Astoria in New York City at the IBM Machine Learning Launch Event right back. (techno music)