>> Live from Toronto, Canada, it's theCUBE, covering Global Cloud and Block Chain Summit 2018. Brought to you by theCUBE. >> Hello everyone, welcome back to theCUBE live coverage in Toronto for the Block Chain-Cloud Convergence Show. This is the Global Cloud Block Chain Summit part of the Futurist Event that's going on the next two days after this. Our next guest is Kesem Frank, AION co-founder and CEO of MavenNet. Doing a lot of work in the enterprise and also block chain space around the infrastructure, making it really interoperable. Of course, Jenna Pilgrim, co-founder and COO of a new opportunity called Network Effects. Welcome to the cube, thanks for joining us. >> Thanks, thanks for having us. >> Thanks, John. >> You guys were just on a panel, The Real World Applications of Block Chain. IBM was on it, which, been doing a lot of work there. This is real world, low hanging fruit, block chain, everyone's pretty excited about. A lot of people get it, and some don't. Some are learning. So you've got the believers, the I want to believe, and then the nonbelievers. Let's talk about the I want to believe and the believers in block chain. Some real world applications going on. As it's evolving, so there's evolution of the standards, technology, but people are putting it to use. What's going on in the sector around some of the real world cases you guys talked about? >> I think we're seeing a lot of collaboration as far as real world applications go, because I think people are sort of starting to understand that if a distributed network is going to work or is going to be secure, it needs diversity and it needs mass scale. If lots of different parties can work together, then they can actually form a community that's really working. As far as real world applications, there's some really interesting one as far as supply chain. Kathryn Harrison at IBM talked about their pilot about shipping, bringing together the global supply chain of distribution. There's a bunch of interesting ones about food providence and bringing together different parties just to make sure that people know what they're eating and that they are able to keep themselves safe, so I think those are two definitely interesting ones. >> Kesem, block chain, supply chain, value chains, these are kind of key words that mean something together. >> Right. >> Making things work in a new way, making things more efficient, seems to be a trend. You're kind of in that world. Is it efficient? (laughing) How's the tech working? What are some of the core threshold issues that people have to get over? >> So you know, John, that's exactly the question to ask. A lot of folks out there are looking at block chain and the promise it represents, and the one big question that keeps echoing over and over is when is this going mainstream? When are we going to see something, a domain, a use case, that is actually natively on a block chain? I think that, essentially, we kind of owe it to ourselves and to everyone that cares about this stuff to ask what's working today, August 2018 and what is still kind of pending? I co-founded a project called AION. For us, interoperability is really one of the key facets that you need to be able to solve for to make block chains real. And again, here's the 60 second argument. If you're going to grow all these solutions that are centric around the use case, they solve for different pinpoints and different stakeholders care about them. They don't really create the cohesive kind of ecosystem until they can all talk to each other, and then you have to ask yourself is the original hypothesis where it's going to be one main net, one chain that's going to rule them all, and everybody gets to play on it and everybody deploys their Dapps on stuff like Fabric or R3 or Ethereum, or whatever it might be. That is absolutely not the way we're seeing enterprise actually shaping into this domain of block chain. What we're seeing is big consortiums that already have value, tangible today, out of doing stuff on chain, and the biggest thing to solve is how do I take, to Jenna's point around supply chain or food providence, whatever it is, how do I actually open it so I can now start writing insurance events, payment events, banking, underwriting, auditing, regulation? There's this gigantic ecosystem that needs to be enabled, and again we are actively saying it's not going to be by an organic model where you and I do everything on top of a single solution. There will be a multitude of solutions, and what we need to solve for is how do we convert them from disparate islands that don't talk to each other into a cohesive ecosystem? >> This is a great point. We were talking on our intro, and we talked last night on our panel, about standards. If you look at all the major inflection points where wealth was created and value was created around innovation and entrepreneurship and industry inflection points, there's always some sort of standard thing that happened. >> Right. >> Whether it's the OSI model during the early days of the internet to certain protocols that made things happen with the internet. Here, it's interesting because if you have one chain and rule the world, it's got to be up and running. >> Yeah. >> It's not. There's no one thing yet, so I see that trend the cloud has, private cloud, public cloud, but public cloud was first but people had data centers. >> Right. >> Both not compatible, now the trend is multi-cloud. You can almost connect the dots of saying multi-chain >> Right. >> Might be a big trend. >> Right. >> This is kind of what you're teasing out here. >> That's exactly what we're about, and I think it's very interesting, the point you're making about dissimilarities between the two domains. We are in a cloud convention, and to me it means two things. One, we absolutely see the mainstream people, the mainstream players in industry, starting to take this seriously. It used to be a completely disparate world where you guys are a bunch of crazies with your Bitcoin and ether and what not. They're definitely taking this seriously now. The second thing, when you think of cloud as a model, how cloud evolved, we used to have these conversations around are you crazy, you're telling me that my data is not going to be on premise? >> It's not secure, now it's the most secure. >> Oh my God! It's in the cloud, what's a cloud? (laughing) You think of the progression model that was applicable back then, right? 10 years, 15 years back, where we started privately and we tell them OK, we'll take this side step of hybrid and then fully public. Took them a while, took them almost 20 years to get their heads around it. >> There's no one trajectory. What's interesting about block chain and crypto with token economics, there's no one trend you can map an analog to, you can't say this is going to be like this trend of the past. It's almost developing it's own kind of trajectory. A lot of organic community involvement. Different tech involvement. >> Totally. >> Different engineering mindsets coming together. You're seeing an engineering-led culture big time going on. That's propelling it up to the conversations of let's lay down the pipes, let's start running apps, but I'll do it within a two year window (laughing). >> I think the big thing to understand about that is yes, you need a whole host of developer talent to build distributed systems, but at the end of the day those systems still have to be used by people. They still have to be used by society, you still have to understand how to talk to your chief executives about what's happening within your company or what your tech teams are doing. There's a growing need for marketers, for PR people, for people who speak, I don't want to say plain English, but people who understand how-- >> Translate it to the real world. >> Yeah, they need to translate it, and how to bridge the gap between legacy systems and how do you take what you were doing before and transform it to a distributed ledger system? How do you do that without just paving the cow path? >> It's interesting, it's almost intoxicating, 'cause you got two elements that get people excited. You got the token economics, which gets people to go, "Whoa," the economics and the liquidity of money and/or value creation capture equations completely changing some of the business model stuff, which could be translated to software and Dapps and software general stuff or SaaS, et cetera. Then you got the plumbing or the networking side of it where things like latency, interoperability, absolutely matter, so with all that going on in real time, it's kind of happening at 30,000 feet and trying to change the airplane engine out. People are failing, and so there's some false promises, there's also false hopes that have not been achieved, so this clouds up the real big picture which is this is an innovative environment. We're seeing that trend. But when you get to the end of the day, what are people working on, to me, is the tell sign. Kesem, what's your project, talk about AION and the work you're doing, specifically give some examples of some of the things that you're doing in the trenches. >> Sure. >> What are you trying to solve, what are some examples you're running into and how does that relate to how things might evolve going forward? >> Sure, so there is a multitude of different problems that we work on but if you want to stick just to the fundamentals? Let's take one gigantic issue that everyone's kind of tackling from different perspectives, let's talk about scale. Scale is, especially in block chains especially challenging just because of how the technology works. How decentralized can you get before you're faced with gigantic latencies and before transaction cost are kind of through the roof? When you think about it, that is all a result of how we kind of contemplate these early stage networks. It was always the one network that is going to scale to infinity. Absolutely not the way it's going to work out. So from my perspective, again, sticking to this one issue, if you could actually give me a decentralized rail that maintains consensus throughout two networks, I can now actually have two trusted kind of go-tos instead of always putting the full brunt of the throughput on one single network. For us, that's kind of a no brainer application to interoperability. If you could actually give me all these trusted networks that work in tandem, I could now start splicing throughputs across many different parallel kind of rails. Not to similar than how we can solve for super computing. We understood there is a limit on how fast can a single CPU go and we started going wide. >> That's an interesting point, I want to just double click on that for a second because if you think about it, why would I have multiple rails and multiple systems? Maybe the use cases are different for them. >> Correct. >> You don't want to have to pick one cloud or one chain to rule them all because it's not optimized. We saw that with monolithic systems and cloud is all about levels of granularity and micro service and micro everything, right? >> Correct. >> And I would also say that gets into a security issue as well, right? You're talking about multiple layers but you also will have multiple layers of permission. You'll have multiple layers of how much information someone can see and what I think is emerging, if data is the new oil, then what's emerging is for the first time we're now able to trust data that we do not own. For corporations who say, "I don't know to market to you "if I don't know everything about you." But at the end of the day, they want to be able to leverage your data but they don't need to secure it and I think that cybersecurity issue is a huge, huge thing that's definitely coming. >> I want to get both of your thoughts on this, because we were talking about this last night. We were riffing on the notion that with cloud compute and data really drove scale. So Amazon is a great example and their value now is things like Kinesis and Aurora, some of their fastest growing services. You got SageMaker, probably will be announced at re:Invent coming up as the fastest growing service, right now it's Aurora. All data concepts. So the dataization really made cloud, great. >> True. >> Okay what's the analog for crypto and block chain? Tokenization is an interesting concept. There's almost an extension of cloud where you're saying, hey, with tokenization, the tokenization phase, how do you explain that to a common person? You say, is token going to be the token and the money aspect of and the economics the killer app? How's it transverse the infrastructures, plural? >> Yeah, or is the wallet going to be the browser? Or how are all of these things happening? >> How do you make sense of this? What's your reaction to that trend? >> So I actually get excited when I think about what token, on the most profound level, actually means. When you kind of think of where value happens in the context of these gigantic enterprises, right? You think of Apple, Amazon, Google, Facebook, any of them, and you kind of think of what the product is, it's all about the data and it's all about how do you convince people to give up data so they can monetize on it. And then you have two distinct, like literally gigantic groups of stakeholders at play. You have the users, that essentially get something free, right? I get to post on Facebook or I get to write an e-mail on Gmail. Then you have the stakeholders that actually extract all that value from my activities. A token, I think most profoundly represents, how do we actually get to a unified group where the user himself is the stakeholder that gets to extract the data? And again, the proposition is pretty straightforward. The more you use a network and the more the network becomes valuable and grows, the more value the token that drives at it. >> So it changes the value capture equation? >> Correct, different model altogether. >> The value creators get to capture the value and obviously network effects plays a big part in this? >> Yes. >> Which is your wheelhouse. (laughing) >> Yeah, definitely. I think it really comes down to core principles. Now you're able to really get down, to what Kesem was talking about, about when you're designing a token or if you're designing an incentive mechanism, you're really going down to the sort of deep game theory of why people do specific things and if we can financially incentivize people to do good rather than punish them or fine them for doing bad then we can actually create value for everyone. We're designing a new economy that now has the ability to propel itself in a fair and prosperous way, if done correctly, obviously that's the disclaimer afterwards, but. >> I love what you're saying there because if you look at collective intelligence a lot of the AI concepts came around from collective intelligence, predictive analytics, prescriptive analytics all came around using data to create value. I always talk about fake news because we have a cloud of media business that's kind of tokenized now but fake news it two things, it's payload, fake news, the fake content and then the infrastructure dynamics that they arbitraged, with network effects. They targeted specific people, fake payload, but the distribution was a network effect. Again, this was the perverse incentive that no one was monitoring, there was no- >> Well and I think in that case, yes there is news that is inherently false information but then there's also a whole spectrum of trueness, if you want to call it that so now we have this technology that allows us to overlay on top of that and say, "Well what is the providence of my information?" And with different layers of block chain systems you're actually able to prove the providence of your information without exposing the user's privacy and without exposing the whole supply chain of the media because there's like media buyers, go through all kinds of hands. >> And we believe the answer to fake news, frankly, is data access, collective intelligence and something like a block chain where you have incentive systems to filter out the fake news. >> Totally. >> Exactly. >> Reputation systems, these things are not new concepts. >> It's all about stake at the end of the day, right? It's how do you keep a stakeholder accountable for their action? You need backing so I think we're definitely on the same page. >> I love, I could talk about fake news all day because we think we can solve that with our CUBEcoin token coming out soon. I want to shift gears and talk about some of the examples we've seen with cloud. >> Sure. >> And try to map that to some navigation for people in how to get through the block chain token world. One of the key things about the cloud was something they called shadow IT. Shadow IT was people who said, hey, you know what? I could just put my credit card down and move this non core thing out in this cloud and prove to my boss, show them, not pitch 'em on the Power Point deck, to say look it, I just did this for that cost in this timeframe, and that started around 2009/2010 timeframe, the early digerati or the clouderati kind of did that but around 2012 it became, wow, this shadow IT is actually R and D practice. >> Mm-hmm. >> Right. >> You started to see that now, so the question that we see for people evaluating in the enterprise is how do you judge what's a good project? Certainly people are kicking the tires and doing a little bit, I won't call it shadow IT, but they're taking on some projects as you were talking about on the panel. How should they, the enterprises in general, the large companies, start thinking about how to enable a shadow IT-like dynamic and how should they evaluate the kind of projects? I think that's an area people just don't know what to look for. Your thoughts? >> I want to add a premise to that, because I think that's absolutely the right question to ask. We also need to add the why. Why should we, as people that do native crypto currency, even care about enterprises? A lot of people kind of theorized when Bitcoin was created to say it was anti institutional is an understatement, right? Aren't we meant to kill enterprise? The thing is, I don't think it's going to be a big bang. I don't think it's going be we wake up and nobody's using banking anymore or nobody's using the traditional healthcare or government and you know whatever insurance policies. We care about block chain in the context of enterprise because we think block chain is a fundamentally better model of doing things. It kind of does away with the black box where I need to be in business, I need to blindly trust you and it introduces a much more transparent and democratic model of doing things. We absolutely want to introduce and make block chain mainstream because that's important for us. When you think of how we do it, to your question, AION is all about interoperability, right? We create a solution that helps scale and helps different networks, decentralized networks, communicate to each other. What we also do with MavenNet, the company I run, is essentially make that enterprise friendly. It's extremely hard to do adoption and implementation within an enterprise, they're very immune to change. >> Antibodies as they say. >> Oh. >> The antibodies to innovation, they kill innovation. >> Totally, so going back to your original question, it all starts with a P and L. If somebody is going to authorize, you know, an actual production system in enterprise for block chain, it needs to create a tangible value, a tangible return, quickly and that's the key. The model that actually scales is you start by flushing out inefficiency plate. You show the enterprise how you could actually achieve, I don't know 20%/30%, that's the order of magnitude that they care about, efficiency by moving some part of your value chain on top of a block chain. >> It has to have an order of magnitude difference or so. I mean cloud was a great example, too, it changes the operating model. >> Yeah. >> They achieve what they wanted to achieve faster and more efficiently and operated it differently. >> Correct. >> And people were starting at it like a three headed monster like what is this thing, right? The cloud thing. And throwing all kinds of fud out there, but ultimately at the end of the day, it's a new operating model for the same thing that they're trying to do with the old stuff. >> Mm-hmm. >> I mean, it's almost that simple. >> Yeah, I think in some cases you need to really, in my previous life at the Block Chain Research Institute, we encouraged a lot of our clients to really take a step back and say, well will I actually, A, will I have this problem in eight years or seven years or 20 years or 50 years, if we're really fundamentally building a new financial system or a new way of doing things that is fundamentally different? Are we building it on old technology? We need to make sure that, and that's why you've seen banks were the first in the door to say, "Yeah, payments, that sounds great, that sounds great." But the real applications that we're seeing from banks are in loyalty, they're in AMLKYC, they're in the sort of fringe operations. Something like payments is going to take a really long time to push through because of those legacy systems because payments is the fundamentals of what banks do. >> This is an interesting point, I want to get your thoughts to end the segment because I think one of the things that we've certainly seen with cloud that over the generational shifts that have happened, the timeframe for innovation is getting shorter and shorter, so timeframe is critical so if the communities are fumbling around hitting that time to value, it seems to be trending to faster and we don't want to hear slower because these systems are inadequate, they're antiquated. >> Mm-hmm. >> These are the systems that are disrupted so the timing of, whether it's standards, or interoperability or business models, operating models, they got to be faster. >> Yeah. >> That's the table stakes. >> I think it all comes down to collaborative governance. >> People have to figure out block chain faster. >> Yeah. >> What's holding us back? Or what's accelerating us? What's the key for the community at large from the engineering community and the business community to make it go faster? Your thoughts? >> Right, so I think we're still searching for the next killer app. If Bitcoin is the reason we're all sitting here today and I profoundly believe that. >> Yeah. >> What is the next thing that drives change on a global scale? That's kind of what we're trying, collectively as an industry, to figure out. Sure, many kind of roadblocks on the way. Some of them educational, perceptional, regulation, technology, but the next big wave that's going to accelerate us to the next ten years of block chain is that next killer app. Organizations such as myself, Jenna, that's our day job, we wake up and that's what we do. >> I mean I've always said, and Dr. Wong, who's the founder of Alibaba Cloud agreed with me, I've been saying that the TCPIP protocol, that standard really enabled a lot of interoperability and created lots of diverse value up the stacks of the OSI model, Open Systems Interconnect, seven layer model, actually never got standardized. It's kind of stopped at TCPIP and that was good, everyone snapped at the line, that created massive value. >> But that's a collaborative governance thing. That's people coming together and saying that these are the standards that we wish to adhere to. >> We need the moment right now. >> Yeah, so you see organizations like the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance coming out with a prospective list of standards that they think the community should adhere here. You know you have the ERC20 standard, you have all these different organizations, the World Economic Forum is playing a role in that and the UN is playing a role, especially when it comes to identity and those kind of really big, societal issues but I think that it comes down to that everyone plays a role that I'm doing my best, I think it's going to be somewhere in the realm of data so that's where I've chosen to sort of make my course. >> I think this is a good conversation to have, and I think we could continue it. I mean, I read on Medium, everyone's reading these fat protocols, thin protocols but at the end of the day what does that matter if there's no like scale? >> Yeah. >> You can have all the fat protocols you want, more of a land grab I would say but there's certainly models but is that subordinate or is that the cart before the horse? This is the conversation I think is in the hallways. >> Totally agree, totally agreed. >> Guys, thanks so much for coming on theCUBE, really appreciate it. Breaking down real world applications of block chain we're at the Global Cloud and Block Chain Summit. It's an inaugural event and think it's going to be the kind of format we're going to see more of, cloud and block chain coming together. Collision course or is it going to come in nicely and land together and work together? We'll see, of course theCUBE's covering it. Thanks for watching. Stay with us for more all day coverage. Part of the Futurist Conference coming up the next two days. We're in Toronto, we'll be back with more after this short break. (theCUBE theme music)

>> Hey, welcome back everybody Jeff Frick here with theCUBE, we're downtown San Francisco, the Hotel Nikko, it's International Women's Day, March 8th, there's stuff going on all around the world, but we're excited to be here at the Accenture event, about 400 people, a lot of great panels, some familiar faces, some new faces, and one of those familiar faces joins us in the next segment. He's Marc Carrel, from Accenture, great to see you. >> Great to see you too. >> And a new face, Mary Hamilton, managing director also from Accenture Labs. Mary, great to see you. >> Great to see you too. >> So, first things, just kind of impressions of this event. I don't know if you did it last year, we weren't here, you know, there's a lot of energy, kind of, initial takeaways from some of the early panels. >> I mean, the energy is there, I mean, definitely last year we were here, I mean we do that every year for sure, and last year it was amazing as well, but I think this year is even bigger than we had last year. We have a kind of a hub and spokesmen of our organization where we have also our top leadership to go from different cities and then we celebrate all over the world. So this year the hub is here, and that's the reason why there's so much buzz and so much excitement. So that's pretty cool. >> Yeah, all of our leadership is here, and just phenomenal guests, um, from, yeah, we really aim for diversity, even not just gender diversity but diversity across all of our different panelists, you know, kind of thing they're thinking about, the way they're thinking about diversity, um, and you know, for me just some of those takeaways, you know, Vivian Ming, her point was when she showed up um, and, is there a difference between how men and women are treated? When she showed up as herself, as she is today, as a woman, she said she's never been asked a math question since. And that just blew me away that it's so black and white and they're really you know, from someone who's lived on both sides, there really is a difference. >> Right, right. So what are the topics? You guys are involved in Labs, is innovation, right? So there's digital transformation, yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah, but really innovation is kind of a more concrete thing that people are trying to achieve. And you guys are a big part of that at Labs, diversity is a big part of being more innovative. >> It's critical. >> So how do you guys see it in your customer base, and how do you see it within the work that you guys do within your own department at the Labs group? >> Well, I'll start, just, you know, you think about innovation that taps diversity is stronger innovation. Right? Our clients are delivering products and services to a diverse audience. And as we serve our clients and try to help them transform and be more digital, we have to reflect, the consumers or the buyers, for their products. And if we don't have that diversity, we're not going to deliver the right kinds of innovation. >> Right. >> I think Mary is absolutely right. And then what's very important to us is that we absolutely demonstrate that through numbers. So, you know, we have like seven labs, two of our leaders are women from those labs, we have five research domains, out of the five research domains, three out of the five are lead by women. >> Right. >> And I think that's pretty amazing. Now you see that from an organization's perspective. But I think if you look at who are the researchers, the most prolific that we have in the labs, from the few hundred people that we have, they're women. Hands down. And I'm going to give you some numbers which is again amazing, we are again publishing about 2,000 patents. I mean from the labs, since we exist. More than thirty eight percent have been driven by women. And then our most prolific labber is a woman. She has many of her, 124 applications and patents. How about that? I mean, she's amazing. >> Well drive is such an important piece, which is one of my favorite quotes. "In God we trust, but everybody else better bring data." Right? So if you don't apply data, if you don't measure the data, and you don't actually put in processes to specifically address the problem, it's just conversation, right? It's just interesting words. >> Absolutely, Jeff. And I think Mary will share with you, I mean also we're putting a process and an approach, a culture that is really changing the mind. >> Yeah. We focus on programs, not just at the junior level of recruiting, we do spend a lot of time and effort on getting out where women are, so we do things like Grace Hopper. We invest a lot to go to Grace Hopper and meet those technical women, we do things with women who code, with girls who code, what's the pipeline going to look like? But then once we have them in, how do we retain them? And so we've created a community and a network where we do a number of things. We mentor them, we create external networks, we create internal networks, we create kind of a social space, a safe social space, where you can bring up questions like "what should I wear to International Women's Day?", without having to feel awkward about asking those kind of things. We create a community that empowers and makes people feel comfortable. >> And do the clients get now that for whatever good, bad or otherwise they just need more good people. I mean we can't just not pull from the greatest population of good people that you can pull from. >> Absolutely, you're absolutely right. And I think another aspect from what I see what's happening in the lab, and I think Mary is a great example of that, we're looking at raw morals. Like, amazing woman like Mary, that is going to be driving, basically striving, and showing our people that you can really have a fantastic capacity as a technology person in the lab and in the Accenture organization overall. And that is very, very important for us. >> Yeah, and for me I'm not just a technologist but I'm also a mother of three small kids and I try to bring that to work, right? I try to show people, you know, I'm not just taking the hardcore path, I'm balancing a family I'm doing all these things that probably the rest of you are trying to do too and I let it show. Right? This is hard, how can I help you, here's what I'm going through, here are the challenges I'm facing, and try to bring others along too. >> So funny I did an interview years ago at an IBM event and there was a great women who was from an HR kind of consultative background, and she said, "You know, we spent all this time trying to find these great people, that have all these great attributes, and then we bring them in and then we just like give them the compliance manual, now you need to not be you, the mom, you've just got to be this little machine." And that's really not the way anymore, not at all. >> And credit to our leadership, to Marc, to Paul, Ellen, all the way up, right? There's true support for being truly human, bringing yourself to the workplace, and they do support it, they encourage it, right? And I think that that culturally seeps in to how we bring diversity to innovation too, right? It's bring your whole self to how you think about innovation. When we're hiring, I mean, I have a great example, I had a client come visit us, and he's been a strong supporter of us within his client space, and he came in and we were talking about you know, his work, and then I took him out to meet the team that was building the proof of concept for him, some tangential areas, and he met people from not just men and women, you know, diverse, but also different backgrounds, engineers, researchers, businessfolks, he met people from all kinds of backgrounds around the world. And he was able to have conversations about sports science, cricket, extended reality, and bring all those conversations back and at the end of his meeting he said "I was just floored at how many engaged conversations I was able to have with different people and the diversity of your workforce." And it's not just male female, right? You need that broad spectrum diversity to fuel innovation. >> Right. >> So -- >> Go ahead. >> Go ahead, Mark. Oh, I was just going to say, so, you know obviously it's a feel-good day today, it's feel-good place right here, but what are some of the significant, is it just execution or are there still some big hurdles that we have to overcome? Let's see, Mary, from your perspective. Marc's got it all figured out so we don't have to worry about him. >> Well, yeah, I mean there absolutely are, right? There is a pipeline problem, there is pipeline problem both from girls in STEM, coming up, right, what culturally we're telling girls and then there's a pipeline problem for, you know, we need to hire today. And I'm actually on the board of Women Who Code because I'm so passionate about their mission is, let's get women to understand that technology is approachable. That it is for all of us. >> Right. >> There's so many, the spectrum of what you can do with technology is so broad and so really if you think about it it's so appealing to so many women if you hit the right focus for them, then I think we can bring more women into tech even now, right? We don't have to wait for the pipe, we have to work on the pipeline, but we don't have to wait for it. We can start now. >> It's great, we do stuff with girls in tech and girls who code and obviously your Grace Hopper too. So you saw, just basing on her name, the gal that got the keynote, from uh, from the UK, who was basically, you know, at her last nickel with her kids, the poorest, homeless, and she learned how to code. And I dunno how old she was but she wasn't -- >> And we have so many stories of women who code. It turns their life around. And maybe the Tech For Good. >> Yeah, I think that's interesting, I mean also the nature of some of the projects we're doing also are driving women to be involved in this project. Do you know what is Tech For Good? I think I discussed that with you for some of these interviews. >> Yes. >> Where we're using technology and innovation to bring change to the world and the society and everything. We really believe, and we're not the only ones who believe that, you know, I mean, there are CEOs from other organizations that believe that, like, women are really on track today to build solutions or projects, with meaningful projects that really have purpose. That are meaningful to the society. And so Tech For Good, that we have launched, first of all got an incredible success, not only within the firm but outside of the firm, and the second thing is that it attracted tons of women talents. They love these kind of things. And then because they loved that, they want to stick with Accenture, and they, you couldn't describe it. >> Yeah, I mean, you get both sides of the coin. You're doing things that are empowering women in many cases, a lot of the projects we're doing. >> Right, right. And then that's also attracting women because we're excited about betterment of society and humanity and -- >> It's interesting, you know I got to give a lot of credit to kind of the younger generation coming up in terms of the prioritization of purpose within their hierarchy in deciding what to do, what companies to work for, how to spend their time, you know, it's very different than when we were, we didn't think about purpose, was trying to get a good job. Pay off the mortgage and then get a car. They don't want a car, they don't want a mortgage, they just want to do good. >> Absolutely, and I'll tell you something Jeff, I mean it's just like the Tech For Good I was just discussing with Mike Sutcliff before that, our chief officer of Accenture, and I was telling him that Tech For Good, the reason why we decided to do the Tech For Good and lab, talking to my leaders and everything is just like because my kids come to me and say "Hey Dad, you have the best job in the firm now, I mean, you need to do something with it." And so obviously we had to do some Tech For Good things. That's it. >> I love it. Alright, we're running out of time so I'll give you the last word, if when we come back a year from now, I'll probably see you in a month since I see you all the time. But a year from now at International Women's Day what are you working on, what are your priorities, how does this integrate into what you guys are doing at Labs, in your brand new space, by the way. >> Yeah, yeah. I mean part of the mission in that brand new space is to create these accidental collisions, right? >> Accidental collisions? >> Collaborative collisions I should say. (laughter) >> I was like, I love that term. >> No, we're not just colliding with each other. We're collaborating in these collisions. >> When atoms collide big things happen, right? >> Exactly. >> I'm sorry, knocked your train of thought. >> No, no, no, that's perfect. Um, and I think that whole mission is about how to create that diversity of thought. How do we bring people together that wouldn't have collaborated in the past? So my mission as we're moving into that new space, is to get my labbers, who are, you know, we're on our own little floor doing our own little thing, to expand our horizons, right? To think about diversity across the spectrum, how are we going to work with other groups, how are we going to bring different pieces to the innovation? So I hope we can reflect than even as we come back next year to this program. >> Great, alright. >> And my job is really to, I mean, as a, to pile on what Mary says, like, I'm going to continue stretching the limit of others' research. Because I think that there's nothing better than to do that hard research to solve that hard problem to elevate our people. And to be honest whether it's woman or man, they're all labbers, they're all part of our family, and there's no better, basically, reward for you to see these people, basically shining and explaining their passion to our clients, changes society and everything. That's what we got to do. >> Love the passion Marc, Mary, it's always great to catch up. >> It's great to see you. (soft music)