(innovative music) >> Hi everyone, this is Dave Vallente and welcome to part one of our four part series Conquering Enterprise Cloud co-sponsored by Oracle. You know, Cloud is on everyone's minds these days and for good reason. I'm here with Chuck Hollis of Oracle, good to see you again Chuck. >> Thanks, Dave, you know it's great to be here. You know, I think we both think this is an increasingly important topic for any IT leader these days. I'm looking forward to a deep discussion. >> You know, that's right, Chuck. Our goal here is really to deconstruct Cloud computing and specifically try and address the challenges faced by most IT groups today. We really want to understand how to best utilize Cloud to create business capabilities and really have a frank conversation about Oracle's role in Cloud. So let's dig in. In our initial segment, we're going to start with the big Why. Why is there so much interest in Cloud models and why now? Let me start by sharing some data from a survey of 1,200 respondents that we just finished last month. 33% of the respondents are thinking tactically as Cloud first. 49% are thinking about deploying Cloud selectively and only 8% say Cloud only. Less than 10% say no Cloud. So this data clearly underscores that Cloud is on virtually everyone's mind. We know public Cloud is still small, but it's rapid growth has everybody trying to figure out their own Cloud strategies. >> You know what this tells me is that over 90 percent of your 1,200 respondents are thinking seriously about Cloud in some form these days. If that's not mandate, I don't know what is. >> Well Chuck, how do you think we got here? I mean in the last few years, it looks like we've gone from 90% being skeptical of Cloud, to 90% really taking it quite seriously. Large companies like Microsoft and Oracle have completely reshaped their strategies around Cloud. >> You know, you're right. Maybe we take a step back and figure out why we're having this discussion in the first place. >> I think a good starting point might be how business itself has changed over the last few years and of course when the business changes, IT really has to adapt. Chuck, you talk to a lot of customers and really a lot of IT people. What is driving the shift from your perspective? >> If you really want to talk big picture, I think we've gone from an economy of things to an economy of information. Everything an organization does, or might ever want to do, is entirely grounded in information these days. So it's no surprise to me that IT is starting to matter a lot more than it ever has. Another way of saying the same thing I think IT has become one of the big three ingredients you need for business success. Great people, great financials, now great IT. >> You know, I remember years ago when we felt like the job of IT was to support the business, you know by automating financials or HR or whatever. Now the opposite is true. In many cases, IT has really become the business. >> Right, let me offer a different view. One way to look at any organization is as a collection of business processes. Building stuff, finding customers, making them happy, learning from the experience and doing it better the next time. To do any of these things, at any scale these days, you're going to need serious IT capabilities. >> You know, it's funny, we've both been in this business for a while and it seems like it takes less and less time for the latest buzz word to become main stream reality. I mean look at Cloud, obviously, Mobile, Big Data, IOT, what used to take a decade, or even longer, it's really now happening in a few short years. Now a lot of people feel like it's the consumer of the consumerization of IT that's driven by the likes of Facebook and Google that are really responsible for this shift and of course they're the epitome of Cloud companies my question to you is are traditional enterprises finally tuning in? >> You know, sure, consumerization of IT it's a factor. But what I really think we're seeing is an entire generation of business leaders that want to use information in new ways to thrive and compete. And they're depending on IT to help them do that. You know I find today's business leaders a whole lot more IT savvy than just five or ten years ago. >> Sure, in our survey of 1,200, we asked what the key drivers were to move to Cloud and here's what people said. Number one, scalability. Number two, agility and number three was cost. So I wanted to explore this a little bit with you. People don't typically associate traditional IT and the vendors that serve that space with these attributes, particularly agility and scalability, but even cost as well. Now cost I know can be complicated and somewhat misleading, it's not just the acquisition cost or the published price of the Cloud service, but my question is, why should anyone take seriously the perspectives of someone like yourself, a long time enterprise IT guy working at a company that was founded in the 1970's. >> Ouch. Well I think that's fair enough. Look, I think longevity in this industry isn't necessarily a disadvantage, but failure to adapt sure is. For example, Intel was founded in 1968, Microsoft was founded in 1975, Cisco in 1984 and I don't think you're saying that these guys are somehow irrelevant just because they've been so successful for a long time. As far as me, I spent close to forty years in this industry and I'm still not bored. For some strange reason, I've always been fascinated with Enterprise IT. I've also had the privilege of meeting with thousands of IT leaders over these decades and learning from each and every one of them. And I've also done pretty well at calling the big shifts over the years. So, you can take it or leave it. More to the point. I can't argue with your findings. I would suggest though that there might be a deeper interpretation to some of these. >> What do you mean by that? >> Well, let's take scalability. I think it's more than just getting really big. You know, for some shops, it's also about getting global. Look, if you're going to deliver IT services close to your users, using a public Cloud provider to get global footprint can look pretty attractive. Look how popular contract workers have become in most work places. That makes it really easy for management to dial labor costs up, or down, without too much drama. I think they'd like to be able to do the same thing with their IT costs. Or maybe we consider agility. Most people would think that the ability for IT to move faster is a good thing and yeah, that's true, but there's more to it. We're now getting to the point where there's all sorts of attractive public Cloud services that just aren't practical to attempt to recreate with a traditional IT model. If you think about it, the very best IT stuff these days runs in the Cloud. That's where all the R&D is going. And you know, I agree with you on your point on costs. I think way too often, people focus on the cost of the ingredients instead of the cost of the meal. You'll hear people say it's often cheaper to buy servers instead of rent capacity. But I always wonder, are you forgetting to include things like data center cost, people cost and that sort of thing. >> Sure. >> Public Cloud providers are very good at assembling the ingredients and offering an attractive service. In house IT groups, maybe not so much. And we can't forget opportunity cost either. When those resources are freed up, what higher value activities could they be working on other than just patching infrastructure. You know I don't think this debate will be definitively answered anytime soon. >> For the customers you talk to, let me ask you a question, is Cloud becoming less of an IT thing and more of a business thing and isn't that being driven by the ascendancy of public Cloud? >> I think you're right. Step back bit and think about how virtualization came into the market. I categorize virtualization as more of an IT win than a business win. IT saw most of the benefit, but the business users got pretty much the exact same capabilities they had before and just got them a little faster and a little cheaper. It didn't really change the game for the business users. Now when we think about public Cloud, the business realizes that they can now do things that just aren't practical to attempt to do in house. >> Right. >> So if we think about this, it's quickly becoming a business thing because no business person wants to give up on a competitive advantage. So they've started to get very vocal about IT moving to a Cloud model as quickly as possible. Remember, decades ago, we were all talking about globalization, everybody had to get global. >> Sure. >> I think business leaders realized that they had to either invest in getting global to get in the game or suffer the consequences. And I think the exact same thing is happening with Cloud. >> Well staying on that trend, it's reflected in our forecast when you look at aggregate IT spending. >> Roughly about a trillion dollars are spent on IT infrastructure and related activities. And long term, our forecast show that about a third of that spend is going to go into the public Cloud, a third is going to be On-prem, Cloud like in that organizations will be attempting to operate their own Clouds on premises, and about a third will be Legacy stuff that people are just going to manage in a slowly declining fashion. >> You know that sounds about right to me. I think another way of saying the same thing is that over the long-term, two-thirds of IT spend will shift to some sort of Cloud model. Whether that's a public Cloud, or something cloud-like that lives in the data center. I also think you're seeing that shift reflected in R&D spend for the major IT players. I can't speak for the other vendors, but at Oracle, the vast majority of our R&D spend is now tied to the Cloud in some meaningful way. If you look at our recent acquisitions, they're all in that category. StackEngine, Ravello, NetSuite, Dime, on and on. Here's the point for Enterprise ITlers. It's going to be increasingly difficult to stay current without embracing some sort of Cloud model. It's where most of the industry investment is going these days. >> Okay, let's talk about the looming talent shift you know again, the data shows, in our forecast, that over the next 10 years we'll see about 200 billion dollars coming out of IT staff expense. Shifting to vendor R&D in the form of Cloud, whether that's public Cloud, or On-prem. What does that mean to you? >> You know I think that's a great factoid. And it's not that surprising to me. When you buy a Cloud service, you're not just buying infrastructure, you're also buying the expertise and the automation to run it effectively. If you think about it, that would represent a huge shift in the Enterprise IT labor market. >> Well let's follow that thread, which is the people side of the equation. The joke is you only need two things in IT, you need money and you need people. We've talked about the cost. Talk about how Cloud impacts skill and expertise requirements. How do you see CIO's thinking about this challenge? >> You know, I think you bring up a great point. IT organizations have to compete for talent just like everyone else does. And anytime I'm with a group of CIO's, the talent and staffing discussion always comes up. Because not having the right people on your team is almost worse than not having the budget you need. >> But the real point there is that the best people want to work in a modern environment. >> That's true. >> One where you can keep developing their talents and their skill sets and these days, that means Cloud. My question is, can traditional IT organizations keep up with this change? >> You know, I don't think there's a yes, no answer to that, but I'd say they've got to try really hard. Look, you can already see signs of progress. The application developer community has embraced Cloud models and Tooling in a huge way. I think their far more productive as a result and I don't think they're going back. I'd like to think the infrastructure and operations folks are starting to see the same light. Now, just to be clear, I don't think the IT infrastructure guys are being stubborn about Cloud. It's just that getting there is a lot harder than it looks. So we, as vendors, have to work to come up with strategies and approaches that works the way they do. That being said, I've got IT leaders telling me that it's a lot easier to find key talent when you can offer them a modern environment to work in. And these days, that means Cloud. Look, it's not unusual to go through an IT org chart these days and find a beginning Cloud team working alongside the traditional IT function. I see clear evidence that IT leaders know that they need to start investing in a new way of doing things. >> Okay so Chuck, I think it's time to wrap up this segment with a quick summary. Why don't you start us off? >> I guess the first key point I'd offer is that Cloud has moved from theoretical to inevitable. >> Yeah and so let's remember the findings that I shared earlier. A third of the respondents are thinking tactically as Cloud first. 49% are thinking about Cloud selectively. Only 8% say Cloud only and less than 10% say no Cloud at all. >> Yeah, congratulations, that means 90% of you are out there thinking hard about Cloud going forward. If we look at why that is, I think we can point to the macro trends, for example, every business is trying to compete in the digital economy, and no one wants to be left behind. >> And you know, the data supports that as well based on our survey. The top three motivators were scalability, agility and of course cost is always a factor. >> And the only thing I'd add to that list is that I see Cloud becoming a business strategy issue and not just an IT only discussion. I think the next big point is that Cloud has already started to transform the vendor side of the equation. What were those forecasts? >> Well long-term, we see about a third of IT spend moving to a public Cloud model, a third moving to a Cloud model that's On-prem and about a third being spent to maintain Legacy environments. >> And I think the implication is pretty clear. IT vendors are going to invest where the money is going. And that's Cloud. And I think we need to reiterate the point about how Cloud is transforming the people's side of the equation. >> Dave: Well, that's big, our forecast is that about 200 billion dollars of labor cost is going to come out of the data center and go directly into the Cloud model. >> And if you're going to want to attract the best people, which we all do, you're going to have to give them a modern environment to work in. And that's quickly becoming Cloud. So why don't we take a moment and give people a preview of what we'll be talking about next. >> Well, sure, in this segment we wanted to look at the forces behind Cloud and more importantly, why Enterprise IT can't escape its gravitational pull. In our next segment, we're going to look at why familiar approaches to the Cloud might not always work for all Enterprise organizations and what can be done about it. >> Thanks everyone. See ya next time. (innovative music)

>> Narrator: Congratulations, Reggie Jackson. >> Certainly in the moment, is about what are youth is and who we are today as a country, as a universe. You are CUBE alumni. Live from San Francisco, it's theCUBE covering Oracle OpenWorld 2016. Brought to you by Oracle now here's your host John Furrier and Peter Burris. >> Hey welcome back everyone we're live here in San Francisco at Oracle OpenWorld. This is SiliconANGLE Media's flagship program, theCUBE, where we go out to the events and extract the signal from noise. I'm John Furrier, co-CEO of SiliconANGLE Media, with Peter Burris, general manager at Wikibon research, and Head of Research at SiliconANGLE Media. Our next guest is CUBE alumni, Chuck Hollis, Senior Vice-President of Infrastructure at cloud and storage. Welcome back to theCUBE. >> It's always a pleasure. I always have a good time when I'm here. >> So the best part of having you on is you've seen the movie before, you've lived it on other teams, you're now at Oracle, what, two and a half years? >> Chuck: One year at Oracle. >> Almost two years, so -- >> Chuck: I'm not dead yet. >> I don't think you -- >> What's that mean? Let's explore that. When will you be dead? >> You're looking good right now. You actually look like you been working out. >> A little tan, like you, like you, you know? >> So is it the country club here at Oracle? >> No, no, no. >> Chairs spinning at five o' clock? >> I'm up early and to bed late and weekends included, right? >> Well, certainly, Dave Donatelli's here, and a team of people really ramping up, essentially engineered systems, AKA hardware engineered in with the software. >> Both, in the cloud, and on premises, right? >> In the cloud and on premises. Clear, end-to-end oracle solution, which will, one, be optimized to run on Oracle, or -- >> Among other things, yes. >> So give us the update; what's the new announcements today? >> So Larry from onstage was very proud to talk about our new gen-two infrastructures of service, and our belief is there's a gap in the market. We have people doing public cloud, right, which, basically, is Startover, Azure, AWS. No chance of an on-prem solution. We have the private cloud guys, basically a Vmware shop, infrastructure only, no pass no nothing, and certainly not a lot of choices if you want to go to public cloud. We think that Oracle's doing a good job of creating that third option. Here's a combined, integrated strategy, on-premises and in the cloud, same technology, same set of capabilities aimed at enterprise applications that basically works the way enterprise IT needs it to work. So this next-gen two infrastructures of service is kind of the first peak of this massive investment we'd be making making entirely new infrastructure cloud that meets the needs of enterprise IT. >> So is this a reboot, or is this an extension of where you guys were? Some were, analysts were saying, not us, but -- >> Chuck: Ah, you'd never say that. >> Well, they said, I was using their words. Holger at Constellation said it's a reboot of their other infrastructure service, so he didn't want to say it failed, implied a transition -- >> Well, I wouldn't say it failed, it's more like a leapfrog. >> John: Explain. >> Oracle got into this business software as service, rather than standalone Sass packages, they worked on integrating everything tightly together, unifying the company. That was followed by platform as a service, aimed at 9,000,000 Java developers around the planet and everything they do. Infrastructure as a service was just made separately about a year ago. We got into the market, we learned a lot of things, but we also realized that we could actually start over again. We look at the engineering team, it's up to about 400 people who are building this next-gen IS, are all ex-Amazon, all ex-Azure. This is not their first infrastructure cloud, and because they were handed a blank piece of paper and said, "you can start over again," it actually is pretty exciting what they've done architecturally. >> So there's got to be something Oracle's doing that's distinct, so just for any number of reasons. Oracle has a lot of existing customers that're running heavy-duty enterprise applications. >> Chuck: Yeah, the tough stuff. >> The tough stuff, so talk to us about how the tough stuff is going to end up in the cloud. >> I think you bring up a good point. One way of looking at it now is that the easy stuff is gone. Desktop has gone to Office 365, and those kids from college are playing with AWS, and maybe I've got some generic workload consolidation sitting in the back room with a private cloud. What about those hairy applications, the demanding databases, in-memory analytics, the big to-do workloads? Where are they going to go? Well, what you see with out infrastructure-to-service is that we're actually providing two capabilities. We can run all of those through our cloud using those exact same technologies that we're running on-premises. You're probably familiar with products like Exadata. Well, you can buy an Exadata. You can use the Exadata in the Oracle public cloud, or you can consume it as a cloud machine, something we call "cloud-to-customer" on premises. And I think that's an important differentiation. A lot of this market is focused on consolidating generic workloads. That's more moderately interesting to us. To your point, what we're really interested are the big, hairy ones. As I joke, these are the ones that have vice-presidents attached to them, right? Yeah, the ones that people really care about. >> Peter: And typically eight figures. >> Depends on the size of the company. Like, Mark was interviewing a lot of people, a lot of customers this morning, and some of them were not large shops. >> But even those partners that're serving those customers often have eight figures associated with their investment in Oracle as well, so it cascades out through the entire industry. But it's also, I want to ask you this, Chuck. It's also not always the applications that have to be brought forward, but we were talking about ageism and it's always better if it's new, but there's a lot of skills in the industry. It's not a question of we want to bring them along. That's still where a lot of the value's being created, so talk about how this third way is going to make not only existing customers and existing apps, but also existing skill sets more rapidly develop inside and experience the expertise with these new technologies. >> I think that's a very good important because any IT organization's only as good as their skill set portfolio. I think anybody who's worked with IT understands that. By the same token, look at the portfolio. Walk into an average IT shop. Here's the stuff that was built decades ago. Here's the stuff that's kind of modern client-server three-tier. Here's the new stuffs that were using containers and microservices. If you're going to be an enterprise cloud provider to that IT shop, you got to support the old stuff, you got to support the kind of current stuff, and you definitely got to give a little pathway to the new stuff, and give me the ability to evolve that portfolio, and peoples' skills forward at the same time. This is what my big arguments that most public cloud providers is public cloud is easy. Just blow everything up and start over in our cloud. Well, as attractive as that might sound, that may not just be a financial reality for the majority of IT organizations. >> Yeah, operationally, too, they can't run their business. So so much for the container stuff. Ravello was the new container cloud server. >> Two things. So we have Ravello and we have a new container cloud service. So we'll put that on Ravello. So we all know hypervisors virtualize hardware. Ravello virtualizes hypervisors. What it does is it comes in to a VC or KVM environment, lifts it up, strips off the hypervisor, encapsulates the network to storage and the compute, then you can actually choose your cloud. You want to run it on AWS, you want to run it on Google, or do you want to run on the Oracle cloud? And it'll show you the prices for each, and you can shop there, so the reason we think that's interesting is nobody really wants to get locked into anybody's cloud, and if we can give people workload portability through VMs, that's great. Well, that's for stuff that we wrapped with virtualization. What about the new containerization? Well, trick with containers is container management, and today, if you want to do container management, you got to graft some open-source stuff and basically build your own. What Oracle has done is created and end-to-end container management service that says, alright, if you really would like to build your own, have at it, but in the meantime, here's something that kind of works. We can do that on-premises, on our cloud machines. We can do this in public Oracle clouds. We have this fast-burning desire to do this on other people's clouds just as soon as we get our own stuff sorted out. But it's the same thing. If I'm developing an application, Oracle has to go compete for that infrastructure business. It can't just say, well, you're an Oracle customer, you have go on all our stuff. And it would be the rare IT leader that would accept lock-in at the cloud level. >> There's no reason to do it today. There's absolutely no reason to do that. >> They may choose to go with us. >> But even if they choose to go with you, they want to do so in a way that doesn't force the lock-in. >> We all flew here, did you pay attention to the flight attendant when she showed where the exit rows are and everything? You may not plan on using that, but it's nice to know they're there. >> And it's nice for you to know where they are, too. Because you guys have learned that to stay at the vanguard of the industry, you have to be always aware of who's about to eat your lunch. >> And I think the Oracle database did a good job back in the day, and still to this day of being affordable. You can invest in the database, it can go wherever you want. And we're trying to do the same thing for that application ecosystem. And we're trying to involve three categories. The old, legacy stuff, the somewhat contemporary stuff, and the emerging containers, microservices-based stuff. >> So talk about your partners, because I know that something that we've been talking about on theCUBE a fair amount is -- >> Partners, we got lots of them. Infrastructure partners in particular? >> John: Well, Centure has an announcement. >> There's a disco party going on behind us here. >> There sure is, unfortunately theCUBE sign's in the way. Otherwise I could participate in it. >> I can see. >> But come back to this notion of a lot of the value that has always been created in the Oracle ecosystems has been created in partners. I have this theory, we have this theory at Wikibon that ultimately there will be more examples of college suppliers being created by your customers and your partners than by individual like AWS and Oracle and Microsoft. >> So Oracle's always had a very rich partner ecosystem. Applications, development, to infrastructure. And the exciting thing that I'm seeing with out partners is like they're seeing opportunity. So let's say that you have this cool vertical application. Five years ago your were selling on-prem hardware with all that entailed. Now you can run the in the Oracle cloud and simply sell a subscription service to your customers. You've evolved your business model forward. Folks that we partner with do application development. They have a platform now for application integration where they have vastly more capablites as opposed to the old school, got to go build it, got to go assemble it, etc, etc. The people who're feeling a little threatened by all of this not surprisingly, are the box-shifters, right? They're guys who just move hardware from A to B. And we're working with them, it's like there's still opportunity there. You just have to look up the stack a little bit. Their skills are still valid, they're just not assembling hardware. >> And you got a Centure announced that the business groups taking the infrastructure-to-service products out, that press release went out today. We covered that. >> I didn't know if that went out yet, but thanks for confirming. >> Oh, maybe that was embargoed, oops. >> Roll back, roll back, roll back. >> Put that back in the model, live TV. >> Centure, all these guys, they want to provide more value to their clients, and 10 years ago, that was stitching together hardware. Now it's about teaching them how to intelligently consume cloud. And I think what these partners like about the Oracle offering is designed to work the way enterprise IT works. It's not this, hey, here's our model, take it or leave it. >> One more thought on this, that there's a difference between the traditional, as you said, three-tier infrastructure, client-server innovation center, and some of the new analytic stuff that's on the horizon. Talk about how you guys are specifically focusing on some of the new analytics applications that are on the horizon coming into the cloud and how you intend to make the two worlds work better together. >> So I think that's great. Old-school analytics we used to call data warehousing, and business intelligence. That hasn't gone away. If you look back five years, it was all about big data, and mining values. Now we're moving to a phase of real-time decision making. Welcome to in-memory analytics things as fast as they can be. And once you figure out how to monetize data, it's addictive, you just want to do it faster and faster and faster and faster. Also, we're talking about relatively exotic infrastructure, right? Multi-terabyte memory spaces, shared Numa architectures. Pretty hard to go down to Best Buy and find the hardware for that and go build that, so as people start pushing the envelope, they're looking more for on-prem engineered solutions or more often, what can you do for me in the cloud. Interestingly enough, we talked about this gen-2 infrastructure service. One of the things it's very good at is having enormous memory spaces and very fast to compute, this kind of bare-metal compute we're seeing in real-time analytics. I think the other factor on this is internet of things, forgive me for playing buzzword bingo, the easy part is gathering the data. The real-time decisioning and actioning on it, that's heavy computing. >> Peter: And delivery with control. >> Yeah, delivering with control. You've got 10 million gas meters. Okay, how do I reason over that in real time, right? That kind of thing. >> So I had to ask you, we've been hearing about this spark-based exadata, what it's all about. What's that all about, is it a new product? >> Another member in the family. So you guys probably know the headlines on the spark chip has a couple of unique talents. It's got 32 encryption processors, so it can encrypt in real time, no delay. Has this ability to take queries and run them in silicon. It also has the ability to compress and decompress memory for in-memory analytics. So the exadata is basically a purpose-built, engineered system for database, so by taking our processor technology and putting it in this purpose-built machine, it gets a whole bunch of new talents for no more money because again, that's part of our differentiation. Things I've learned since I've been a year at Oracle is it's nice to have your own chips. Sometimes they come in very very handy as you build differentiated solutions, so I think exadata customers will have a new option, and I'm sure in the fullness of time it'll be available in our public cloud, it'll be available as a cloud -- >> But this brings up a good point, though. Intel was on stage yesterday, gave the same old corporate pitch, didn't really learn anything new there. >> Chuck: They had nice slides, though. >> That Ian Bryant's awesome. But the thing is, and Larry said that I find compelling is now that I can get your thoughts on it because it kind of comes back to the hyperconversion trend, which is he said, "we are going to provide it faster and cheaper." So he's clearly looking at infrastructures, bring this thing down, cost down to zero if possible, while performance he wants to bring up to a whole other level. How are you guys going to do that, what's the strategy? >> I think Larry and Oracle have the ability to invest like crazy. Don't forget, we build our own hardware. We build our own servers. We build our own data center fabrics. We don't have to buy this stuff from anybody. We build it, so Larry and the team, a couple years ago set this team up with a mission to go compete. Now if you've looked at Amazon, AWS margins, you know there's a lot of fat there. They're also running on really old stuff, the basic architecture was designed 10, 11 years ago. I don't want to throw aspersions around, but you could call it legacy cloud, right? >> John: What do you call it? >> Legacy cloud, anything 10 years or older, it's got to be legacy. So there's a clear opportunity to go build something new. That being said, this is a big boy's game. This is not let's round up a couple million dollars of VC and build a new cloud. So to look at the aggregate spend Oracle's putting behind this infrastructure -- >> Well, you just said the big boys are public, like Rackspace, they couldn't make it, right? So you're starting to see, they were a little, kind of a big boy, I mean... >> They're reasonable out there. But look at it this way, Oracle's got a national software franchise. Much like Microsoft does bring people on. We build our own hardware. We build our own data centers. We actually can become a vertical supplier in this and the argument is efficiency is result. >> So we're going to see Dave Donatelli on Wednesday after his keynote. I know he's prepping up for that. How's it going with Dave, what's going on with Dave? >> Dave's having a good time. I mean, we all came to Oracle on the same premise, is that the industry was rotating, and I think we've seen that in some of the analyst numbers, less and less on-premise spend, more and more spent in the cloud. >> A lot of new hires coming in from an industry that we know on Oracle, pre-existing players. >> And if you asked 'em five years ago if they ever would end up working for Oracle, they might have not said so. >> John: You're being polite. They'd say, "no friggin' way." >> Go through your mind and think what are the traditional on-prem IT vendors that transition their customers to the cloud? It would be a very short list. >> So you buy the whole cloud-broker Dell technologies? >> They don't have a cloud. I think customers want to consume cloud. >> Bing cloud air network now has 4,000 cloud providers. >> All slightly different, all slightly different. >> All working together with hypervisor. >> It's like a big portfolio management company. >> Is that a chess game, or is that just hail Mary? >> Vshpere was designed for the data centers. EMC bombed 10 years ago. Our tech's designed for the data center, and it wasn't designed for a world where people don't want data centers anymore. So I think VM ware's very challenged because their technology and business model is standing up viable public cloud options. The last big one was, oh no, we can't do it. We'll go to IBM. What's your cloud strategy, VM ware? Call IBM? That's kind of a rough deal on a sales call. >> Well, if you put it in the context of a V-cloud air network, you could argue that they're giving up the cloud. Basically, VM world, they said, "we're done with the cloud." they yielded -- >> Peter: I don't think they said that, John. >> They yielded that they weren't going to have their own cloud. >> Absolutely they yielded. >> They yielded on not having their own cloud. >> Okay, they yielded on their own cloud, that's what I meant. >> Nothing more than kind of a boutique offering, and certainly there's a market for small regional service providers around the world. No argument there. And there's a natural tendency, but as I look at people going to cloud, the sticking point isn't the hypervisor, the sticking point is the database and the applications, the middleware. This is something Microsoft has done brilliantly with Azure. >> Larry pointed out that's Ernie's call. Microsoft's well ahead of Oracle on migrating their install base half into their cloud. >> And that's what you guys have to try to figure out how to do as well. >> We're well along the way. But the point is that without that franchise, that's a tough road to hoe, right? The infrastructure guys maybe, the applications guys are the ones you want to talk to. >> Peter said, I'd like to get your thoughts on a comment Peter made on our intro with Matt Eastwood from IDC, everything's on the table. Ecosystems, channel partners, >> Chuck: And we're shaking the table apart. >> So if you have the gravity, an Oracle face of the world that's a suite, which I think is a little bit orthogonal to where the cloud is, but I get the language of Oracle the suite. Is it gravity around the suite, not a winner-take-all? >> You got to be able to pick off pieces and they have to stand on their own. >> You could build a ecosystem around that, and open ecosystem, so that means a new lock-in spec is stickyness, or pure performance, or not, am I getting that right? >> I think Oracle's going to try to play on both sides. If you appreciate the value of the suite, the IAS working with a pass, working with a Sass, great, we have all those pieces; pick and choose. Larry made it pretty clear. He wanted to go head-to-head on iops, memory and core, and dollars per whatever. Oracle intends to feed on that as well, so it'll be interesting to see how this plays out. Nothing like a low price to get an IT buyer -- >> Well he said, and the word he called this is interesting, he was overselling in my opinion, I've heard Larry. >> Chuck: Larry? I can't imagine he'd do that. >> Larry was overselling on their earnings call, but I don't think the analysts understand, they don't see the long game. You look down the 20-mile stare, it just hasn't even started for Oracle. >> Larry is a master at the long game in ways that I'm just now starting to appreciate. >> Well, let's be honest. What is the most sticky thing in the industry? Your applications, that's the stickiest thing in the industry. After that, the developer ecosystem and then you get down to the hypervisor, and you get down to the first -- >> Chuck: And then you get to the wires that connect it together and all that kind of stuff. >> But the most sticky thing is the businesses are still run around some of these floor applications. >> Well, that's why I brought up the suite angle, because I think that the developer angle is sticky because agility has proven that not everyone can build a killer app, so for instance, with an HCM there's probably some feature of HCM that is sub-par relative to some genius entrepreneur that eats, breathes that one feature, has an app, that could be integrated into that feature. >> I think that's your point, and with the platform-as-a-service offering, oh, you want to add it, do something different, great. Yes, exactly. >> It's all a continuous development, continuous integration, but that continuity still is close to the application. >> Yeah, ecosystem to me is, I've heard talks about what the developers' market, go-to-market strategy is. If that's in place, Oracle could have a very robust -- >> We're seeing the both the same thing on the hardware and the software. So hardware, build-your-own, is starting to get out of bow, ya know? Less and less popular buying servers and storage and knitting them together. A lot of guys still buy into that, but that market's going down. I think you're going to see the same thing with software and applications. Rather than starting with a blank piece of paper, where are the big chunks of enterprise functionality that I can grab out of the box and build the thing -- >> Reused, preexisting applications. >> Yes, yes! >> Everybody's talking about business capabilities, right? And the idea is that this capability is the things that I have to do to perform the activities to fit my business needs. And those activities are people, and increasingly, software. And being able to grab those capabilites and pick parts of them from the industry and weave them together quickly, continuously sustained, the match with the marketplace, to your point -- >> Well, we're going to have Juan Luzon next, and we're going to go deep on this, but I think -- >> That was a great guy. >> The API economy, if anything, showed us one, security is FUBARed and needs to be fixed fast, and the encryption on a chip thing has been downplayed. I don't know why Fowler's not getting more airtime on that. That's a really huge thing, but the API economy has proven that this ability to pull stuff that someone else has already done, not assembling like a junkyard kind of situation, why build it if someone's got to get it though an API? >> You talk about giving capital management, right? And you know, there's 175 functions, I don't know, some large number of function there, they're fine. I need this one little thing, so I'm just going to extend it, and still do it in such a way that I'm not developing -- >> And a developer who does that becomes a feature in a bigger pie. I mean, he'll make more money, doesn't go out of business, doesn't try to go public. >> So I wanted to share, before we wrapped up, one interesting thought. We all talked about cloud is coming, cloud is coming. I actually got tangible evidence at the beginning of the year that it's here. So a new word was given to me, cloud quotas. Cloud quotas, and it was kind of funny. This is happening mostly in the larger banks. Senior management, executive management, you're a little slow on this cloud thing. Let me help you out. We'll set a strategic objective. Five years from now, how much did we cloud-spend? This year, your cloud quota is 15% between cloud and non-cloud spent. Next year, etc, and I think what we're seeing is that kind of like the gears are starting to rub, between the businesses says, guys, this can't be so hard. Let's get on with it. >> I'm sure your sales guys have cloud quotas, too. >> Different kind of cloud quota. Different kind of cloud quota. >> On that point, 20 years ago, when it became very popular to pay executives on the basis of RONA, return on net assets, it was right about that time that outsourcing got popular. >> Shocking, isn't that, your mess for less, right? >> Sounds like cloud. >> Okay, bottom line, for the folks at home, Oracle's infrastructure stuff that you're involved in is not new, but it's growing now because it didn't have a lot of nurturing. It was always kind of like that back office secret sauce. What's the update, give a quick update. >> We want to give people a strategy for their enterprise applications for cloud. If they want to consume on-prem, great. Engineered system's cloud equivalence. You want to consume off-prem, same set of capabilites and more in our public cloud. You want to consume the public cloud in your data center, that's a cloud machine, and it oughtta be the technology stack and the set of capabilities. Geographical location, the consumption model really doesn't matter, and when we put this in front of large IT shops, and even smaller ones, they're like, this is great. I can build my architecture, I can build my strategy. I don't have to make a cloud decision now, and if I do make one, then I can undo it later. That agility has become very very attractive to people. >> I could invest in options but have a future. >> Chuck Hollis, Senior Vice-President of infrastructure, congratulations, and then Larry Ellison got to the end of his keynote, didn't have a lot of time, but there's a lot of meat on the bone in the keynote, that he kind of, he couldn't hit. Welcome to the cloud, too many product announcements. Welcome to Amazon's world. >> Peter: Seems excited. >> There's a lot of stuff coming down. It was great talking to you guys, thanks for your time. >> Thanks for sharing your insight and the data and the bits here. Here at theCUBE, we're always sending out the packets of content out to the network, live, original content. I'm John for Peter Burris with SiliconANGLE theCUBE. We'll be right back with more live coverage after this short break. >> Hi, I'm John Furrier, the co-founder of

>> Presenter: Live from San Francisco, it's theCUBE, covering Oracle OpenWorld 2016. Brought to you by Oracle. Now, here's your hosts, John Furrier and Peter Burris. >> Welcome back, everyone. We are here live in San Francisco, for three days of wall-to-wall coverage of Oracle OpenWorld 2016. The big story, Oracle moving through the cloud. I'm John Furrier with SiliconANGLE. My cohost this week, Peter Burris, head of Research at SiliconANGLE Media, General Manager of Wikibon Research. Our next guest is Ashish Mohindroo, who is the Vice President of Oracle Cloud on the good old market side. Welcome to theCUBE, good to see you. >> Thanks John, same here. >> John: We have a mutual friend from Prasada. (laughter) Say hello. >> Hi Prakash! >> John: Prakash! He's good. Okay, entrepreneurs are all moving to the cloud, obviously it's a green field for them. But Oracle is a big company, this is clearly the mandate, this isn't cloud washing. People are saying oh they're cloud washing, but not really, Oracle is putting the effort in, we've been watching and documenting it. Obviously some critical analysis that's due here and there but for the most part, the progression is good, they're moving to the cloud. Can you give us an update because SaaS business, everyone sees that, knows that, the Platform as a Service, last year, was the big push, a lot of progress, so give us a quick one minute overview of what's the update on PaaS, Platform as a Service, and what's different this year about Infrastructure as a Service. >> Definitely, well thanks John, I think you hit the nail on the head with the fact that Oracle is the biggest secret in the industry, being the biggest cloud company, right, the most exciting cloud company in the valley. What we've really done is if you look at our numbers, we just announced our Q1 earnings, our business SaaS and PaaS business grew about 77%. It's the fastest growing SaaS and PaaS growth rate in the industry, compared to any other vendor, including Amazon, including Microsoft, and if you compare that to the Q4 numbers, where we grew at 66%, that was again faster than Amazon and Microsoft. So the market is expanding and Oracle is the fastest growing business in there. In addition to that-- >> John: By revenue or by percentage growth? >> By percentage growth. So we're close to about a $4 billion run rate on SaaS and PaaS as of Q1 FY17. >> That's across all the different, as a service? >> It's primarily SaaS, PaaS infrastructure and overall cloud revenue for us. >> John: Okay, got it. >> A big chunk of that is attributed to SaaS and PaaS. Now I want to give you some other statistics in terms of the size of our cloud business. You know there are about 98 million plus daily active users on a cloud. In addition, we do about 50 billion plus transactions a day on Oracle Cloud, right, so the massive scale, but we are operating across 195 different countries and growing, we have 19 plus regional data centers, I mean expanding more into China and Middle East, so the growth and the pace and the expansion of the business is massive and we believe that this market is growing at such an unprecedented rate that Oracle is well positioned to take advantage of that and really provide and end-to-end offerings to our customers. >> Larry Ellison in his key note last night and Rob Hope, our Editor in Chief at SiliconANGLE, who runs our editorial, grabbed the head line, his quote was Amazon, talking to Amazon, Amazon, your lead is over. Okay, what does that mean? What does that mean? Saying that your lead is over in the sense that we're closing the gap or enjoy it while you have it, we're coming after you? >> A number of things. One is that we're really making new exciting announcements into the infrastructure of the service play market. So you're going to hear within the next couple of days in terms of new offerings. We today announced the fact that we expanded our infrastructure's service capabilities from virtualized environments to also bare metal, which is something that Amazon doesn't offer. And the advantage of that is that companies can now run more high performance applications on bare metal service, versus being bothered by having to share that capacity to compute space with other applications and other customers. The other big thing what Oracle is doing is providing an end-to-end offering. So if you think about it, right, Amazon started out being with a compute layer. They said look, if you want to spin up a server, and just have to compute capacity, storage capacity, great, you don't need to invest in that, you don't need to buy it on premise, you can go to us. What customers are really looking for is yes, you can spin up a server, then what do you do next? You got to be able to build an application, you got to be able to scale that application, monitor that application, integrate that application, run analytics on that, and then at some point, do an end-of-life. So you want to have a complete application life cycle and management so you need an integrated capabilities. Today if you look at the public cloud offerings, you got to piece that together for multiple vendors. Even in Amazon, they provide you the basic services, but then you have to go to their partners to kind of fill in those pieces, manage multiple contracts, worry about integration, Oracle is providing an end-to-end capability. So today we also announced 19 plus additional services on our PaaS layer, from databases to integration, to IOT, so we are really providing you everything you need to not only get your data center moving towards the cloud but also your application development, integration, and management capabilities, that have not been available in the market today from a single vendor. So Oracle, with Larry, what he was really claiming was the market is up for grabs, we are the only vendor providing everything from end-to-end and we are going to be aggressively competing in the core infrastructure space with our new expanded offerings. >> What do you think Oracle's biggest advantage is? >> Sorry? >> What do you think Oracle's biggest advantage in the cloud is? I mean, you talked about the size of it, what do you think, fundamentally, is going to set Oracle apart from everybody else in the cloud? >> So part of that is the comprehensive nature of our offerings. From IAS to PaaS to SaaS. There's no other vendor that has that breadth. Customers are looking for a single throat to choke, in some ways, or a single vendor to deal with for a majority of the services, so we have a big advantage there. The second is our application ecosystem. If you look at the number of customers we have, the size of our offerings from ERP to CRM, to ACM, you can see that we provide everything, there's an economy around that, so customers want to build extensions, they want to integrate through these applications, and they really want to drive their business to one primary vendor, so Oracle has that advantage. The other stuff as we look at the cloud environment today, only 6% of all workloads are running on public infrastructure. That's growing at about 50% year over year. Now, 90% plus of workloads are still relying on on-premise environments, where do you think those are running on? Those are primarily running on Oracle infrastructures, whether it's Oracle databases, Oracle metalware, or also on-premise Oracle applications. So we believe customers want to have the same enterprise-grade capabilities on the cloud, which we've been working on for 40 years, now we learn from that experience, we learned from what our competitors have done over the last ten years, we bring that together to our new cloud infrastructure, PaaS and SaaS offerings. So from a technology perspective, the breadth perspective, and the customer experience perspective, we believe Oracle has a tremendous advantage, which is kind of hard to close a gap for it in terms of other competitors. >> The declining revenue on licenses, and the earnings call was pointed out, some color was given by Mark Heard on that but the growth in cloud was higher than the decline in on-prem licenses. And then Larry came over the top and said well, Microsoft has been moving all their customers to the cloud, we really haven't moved our people over. And then Mark Heard said we're in the long game, I'm kind of playing at that I want to get to a question, which is interesting, the database is very sticky. You guys have an in to all of your applications so it seems to me that the core of the show here is talking about infrastructure as a service, seem to be table stays low cost, high performance, comodotize the IaaS, and then move your customers over. Is that the strategy, is that just the timing? Am I over-reading into this thing, is it a conspiracy theory? >> What it is actually is that customers want high-quality, high-performance capabilities in the cloud, right? They've been used to building their own data centers. There's a reason for that. They could choose the infrastructure that they wanted, the servers that they wanted, the stories they wanted, the compute capacity they really needed, and they want the same experience on the public cloud. But cost was a big factor. So if you look at Amazon, it's very easy to get started but as your application scales, the cost starts to ramp, accelerate really fast, and customers are very wary of that fact that is this really a cost benefit for me in the long run to move to Amazon. One example is a company like Dropbox. That was in the news that brought back the infrastructure from Amazon to in-house, right? Couple of things for that, one was they wanted a better infrastructure and secondly they wanted to lower the costs. With Oracle, what we are saying is cost is a big factor for you to move to the cloud. We're going to take that away. We're going to make sure that you're getting the best performance, the best infrastructure, at the lowest cost possible in the industry, then we're going to give you capabilities to brace moving to the cloud, to migrate to the cloud. You're not going to say only build cloud-native applications in the cloud, but how do you take all these critical business applications, the core infrastructure that you're running today, and be able to transition that to the cloud, so we have new capabilities that we're introducing and infrastructures to servers, called Ravello Cloud Service, for example, that can literally do a lift and shift of all your V-Ems, of virtualized environment workloads, to the cloud. You don't have to rewrite them, you don't have to reconfigure them, all it does is simply point and click and you got them moving there. Nobody in the industry has that native cability coming with us. So we understand the challenges that other companies are going through, and we're giving them the capabilities and a path to move there. On top of that, Oracle went through a similar transition, so we learned a lot from our own internal transition. We went from on-premise systems to actually moving our internal systems to the Oracle Cloud. So we understood the pain, the challenges, and the opportunities that provided us to get that and we bring that same experience back to our customers. >> And as my final question for you, if you could take a minute and explain kind of what you do at Oracle but mainly, what going on in the field. As you guys take this to the customers, what are some of the things you're working on, do you have any events coming up, what's your road map for activities, and how are customers are engaging with Oracle? >> Very good questions, so my responsibility is go to market for Oracle Cloud, so especially for IaaS and PaaS. What we're noticing with our customers is every single conversation that we engage in, any size customer, whether it's a Fortune 500 customer, mid-size, or even a small company, they're all interested in either building out new applications in the cloud, migrating to the cloud, or really retiring their entire data center, and then moving all the workloads into the cloud. So we are noticing the tremendous amount of interest. They're all figuring out strategies of how do you get there. A lot of interest in hybrid clouds. So customers are going to start with new applications, up their applications in the cloud, but they'll still want to retain, because of regulatory compliance, security purposes, some applications in-house, so they want to know how do you kind of built out these hybrid cloud capabilities where you can have the same business model of subscription, metered offerings, within their own data center, and at the same time have the same flexibility to move to the cloud. So for that, we got to introduce our Oracle Cloud machine, or cloud customer capabilities that gives them that option, the flexibility to decide and move at their own pace. >> John: So a lot of education. >> Sorry? >> So you're doing a lot of education. >> Tremendous amount of education, we're actually going to be doing about a 50 plus city roadshow with our Cloud Days and Cloud World, close to OpenWorld. We're doing a lot of virtual-- >> So Cloud World is going to continue, we did the Cloud World in DC with theCUBE there, that was great. You going to do more of those regionally? >> We're going to do a global tour starting in October. We're actually going to be covering AMIA, APAC, North America, and even Latin America and South America so we're going across the world, going to different countries, I think we're covering about 50 plus countries in those events and basically spreading the word out and engaging with every kind of customer to educate them on Oracle and also give them a-- >> So big tent events in regions and then city events, satellite events to hub and spoke off those kinds of activities. >> Absolutely, yes. And doing a lot on the virtual as well, online. >> Yeah. Any virtual reality, walk into an Oracle database with my headset, look at this scheme, it's all screwed up! >> Ashish: That will be the next time around, we aren't there yet for that one. >> Thanks so much for sharing your insight and good luck with your activities, great to see you, thanks for coming on. >> Thanks John, thanks man. >> Alright, we are here live at Oracle OpenWorld and if you want to join the conversation, go to Twitter and check out the hashtag #thecube, go to siliconangle.com and check out the research at wikibon.com and of course, go to siliconangle.tv, I'm John Furrier, Peter Burris live here in San Francisco for Oracle OpenWorld 2016. In fact, there's more after this short break. (techno music)