>>mm we are back and we're continuing the coverage on H P E. Aruba's news today around the D S X six S C X 10-K with Pensando. Now we want to get the perspective of a system Integrator because they're in the front lines, they understand how to put the pieces together where you're happy to bring john Galatea of Dasher technologies dashes and in the end I. T solutions provider, they gotta focus a lot of expertise on infrastructure, jOHn welcome. Good to see you. >>Thank you for having me. Good to be here. >>That's our pleasure. So I wonder if you could give us a little bit more color on Dasher where you focus what your core companies competencies are, what industries you focus on etcetera. >>Yeah, absolutely. So a dasher, we assess architect implement and manage I. T. Solutions that digitally transform businesses. Our practice areas include cybersecurity, networking, cloud data center and we also offer pro professional services around those practice areas. We partner with all the major tech companies in the space. Some of the examples are HP, Cisco, Aruba Palo Alto eight Ws and many others that fill out the, you know that practice area. >>Well that's great. So you have a very wide observation space, that's why we like talking to SA as you have an independent mindset and you can kind of tell it like it is. But so what are you seeing with customers? It's exactly, we hear a lot about digital transformation, you mentioned security, you're obviously doing cloud that's it's almost like john these pieces are all coming together to power Digital and digital transformation and we were forced into it over the past 18 months. And now people are stepping back saying hey okay we have all these resources, how do we put them together and really transform our business? What do you see? >>Yeah, seeing similar things. So you know, our customers are telling us that they're looking for more speed, more agility, um you know, limited complexity because they're trying to do more every single day with less staffing and a sophistication of integrating functionality that breaks down I. T. Silos. Um there also evaluating security span versus effectiveness And they're moving towards zero trust. >>Yeah. So I want to, I'm gonna come back and ask you about that. So I've written a lot about this is that you look at how much we spend versus as you say the effectiveness and there's sort of an imbalance there, it's like we can't spend enough, it budgets they're not infinite. And even though security is top of top priority for ceos, they've got other things that they have to fund and then zero trust, you know, before the pandemic john that was a buzzword and now it's become a mandate. Any thoughts on that >>in terms of zero Trust? Absolutely yeah it is a mandate, we've seen more and more of our customers moving toward in this direction and defending themselves against cyber threats and yeah absolutely. It accelerated during the pandemic and is continuing to accelerate today. >>Right? And I think there's some things that were reported now going to be permanent with regard to obviously hybrid and the like, cloud security and so forth. So, okay, let's get into some of the news here. What's the big trend, john can you explain the relevance of the H P E, Aruba and Pensando news? >>Yeah, I mean when I first heard of it, you know, I I looked at it as a whole new category because it's a category that's going to deliver cloud scale distributed services closer to where applications are. It's going to simplify. One of the things we mentioned earlier was limiting complexity. So it simplifies the network um, by putting security provisions and operations in a unified management platform and it helps improve your security posture around moving towards zero trust and limits the appliance and vendor sprawl that you might ordinarily have in a in a existing network today. >>Okay, so that's kind of the business cases, you're consolidating a lot of piece parts and that's, you know, from a system integrator standpoint. You know, it's funny people often say, well, isn't that bad for the s I'm like, no, they don't want to be in the business of plumbing, they want to be in the business of, you know, more strategy if they if they just end up bolting stuff together, they're going to go out of business, They need to extend their value. So as a strategic partner, you got an early preview of this launch? The D S S D S S C X 10,000, what was your initial impression reaction you called it? A new category? What do you mean by that? >>Well, it's a new category of of of a data center switch in the digital infrastructure because it includes or incorporates security. Um And more specifically it includes security around east west traffic, which is it doesn't eliminate your perimeter firewall but it actually incorporates more functionality which leads to better simplicity and easier use of management of a platform. So for us, I'm really excited to go position and talk to our clients about this. >>Yes. So we're seeing the flattening of that network, that's even it's obviously been accelerated by the pandemic, everybody talks about that. But if you think about the traditional headquarter hierarchical network and now all of a sudden everybody's working remotely using more cloud. Using more distributed infrastructure that flattens the network. That creates security challenges because you can't just build a perimeter and say, okay, we're safe. You now have to go to where the adversary is and that's everywhere. So what's your sense as to how customers are going to react to this new category of switch? >>I think really my sense is that I've got a really positive outlook on this product. I mean hardware, firewalls are costly and deploying software agents can be very disruptive and when you're integrating it into the switch layer. So um I think the C X 10,000 provides a great alternative to an embedded accelerated services embedded in accelerate service into the D C fabric. Um, it's great for brownfield migration, um, rack pod and you know, and the standards based leaf, you know, L two, L three um, and it doesn't necessarily replace, as I mentioned earlier the perimeter security, but um, it can cap and grow with DSS and east west firewall traffic. >>Yeah. And I think we've seen when we talked to see so, so like you said, it does, it doesn't replace the traditional perimeter security but you're going to see a shift and spending priorities obviously to a comedy because as I said earlier, there's not infinite budget but john give us the big takeaway, Bring us home. What what, what do you want to leave our audience with? >>Yeah, I think, you know, the number one takeaway is that it's a massive opportunity to reduce complexity, enhanced security and lower costs in the data center by eliminating dedicated devices and embedding services through software capability in the network closer to where workloads are are moving. So that's the big takeaway for me and for, I think for our clients, um, you know, other things are, you know, you're the data center perimeter is no longer confined and open an on prem location but extends out, right. We're seeing customers extend out to the cloud and across uh, you know, disparate locations, co locations. So The traditional architecture isn't going to be well suited for this, and I think the CX- 10,000 and its feature set are going to be really great for addressing the changing market. >>Yeah, that's, that's all. I mean, again, we're seeing the democratization of everything and and networking is, is no exception. The notion of simplify simplification, john really appreciate your time. Thanks for coming on. >>Thank you for having me. >>You're welcome. Okay, keep it right. There were unpacking the changing trends in networking generally, and specifically switch networking with HP, Aruba and Pensando and the cube. Keep it right there.

>> Narrator: From Berlin, Germany, it's theCUBE. Covering Dataworks Summit Europe 2018. Brought to you by Hortonworks. >> Hello, welcome to theCUBE. We're here at Dataworks Summit 2018 in Berlin, Germany. I'm James Kobielus. I'm the lead analyst for Big Data Analytics, within the Wikibon team of SiliconAngle Media. Our guest is John Kreisa. He's the VP for Marketing at Hortonworks, of course, the host company of Dataworks Summit. John, it's great to have you. >> Thank you Jim, it's great to be here. >> We go long back, so you know it's always great to reconnect with you guys at Hortonworks. You guys are on a roll, it's been seven years I think since you guys were founded. I remember the founding of Hortonworks. I remember when it splashed in the Wall Street Journal. It was like oh wow, this big data thing, this Hadoop thing is actually, it's a market, it's a segment and you guys have built it. You know, you and your competitors, your partners, your ecosystem continues to grow. You guys went IPO a few years ago. Your latest numbers are pretty good. You're continuing to grow in revenues, in customer acquisitions, your deal sizes are growing. So Hortonworks remains on a roll. So, I'd like you to talk right now, John, and give us a sense of where Hortonworks is at in terms of engaging with the marketplace, in terms of trends that you're seeing, in terms of how you're addressing them. But talk about first of all the Dataworks Summit. How many attendees do you have from how many countries? Just give us sort of the layout of this show. >> I don't have all of the final counts yet. >> This is year six of the show? >> This is year six in Europe, absolutely, thank you. So it's great, we've moved it around different locations. Great venue, great host city here in Berlin. Super excited about it, I know we have representatives from more than 51 countries. If you think about that, drawing from a really broad set of countries, well beyond, as you know, because you've interviewed some of the folks beyond just Europe. We've had them from South America, U.S., Africa, and Asia as well, so really a broad swath of the open-source and big data community, which is great. The final attendance is going to be 1,250 to 1,300 range. The final numbers, but a great sized conference. The energy level's been really great, the sessions have been, you know, oversubscribed, standing room only in many of the popular sessions. So the community's strong, I think that's the thing that we really see here and that we're really continuing to invest in. It's something that Hortonworks was founded around. You referenced the founding, and driving the community forward and investing is something that has been part of our mantra since we started and it remains that way today. >> Right. So first of all what is Hortonworks? Now how does Hortonworks position itself? Clearly Hadoop is your foundation, but you, just like Cloudera, MapR, you guys have all continued to evolve to address a broader range of use-cases with a deeper stack of technology with fairly extensive partner ecosystems. So what kind of a beast is Hortonworks? It's an elephant, but what kind of an elephant is it? >> We're an elephant or riding on the elephant I'd say, so we're a global data management company. That's what we're helping organizations do. Really the end-to-end lifecycle of their data, helping them manage it regardless of where it is, whether it's on-premise or in the cloud, really through hybrid data architectures. That's really how we've seen the market evolve is, we started off in terms of our strategy with the platform based on Hadoop, as you said, to store, process, and analyze data at scale. The kind of fundamental use-case for Hadoop. Then as the company emerged, as the market kind of continued to evolve, we moved to and saw the opportunity really, capturing data from the edge. As IOT and kind of edge-use cases emerged it made sense for us to add to the platform and create the Hortonworks DataFlow. >> James: Apache NiFi >> Apache NiFi, exactly, HDF underneath, with associated additional open-source projects in there. Kafka and some streaming and things like that. So that was now move data, capture data in motion, move it back and put it into the platform for those large data applications that organizations are building on the core platform. It's also the next evolution, seeing great attach rates with that, the really strong interest in the Apache NiFi, you know, the meetup here for NiFi was oversubscribed, so really really strong interest in that. And then, the markets continued to evolve with cloud and cloud architectures, customers wanting to deploy in the cloud. You know, you saw we had that poll yesterday in the general session about cloud with really interesting results, but we saw that there was really companies wanting to deploy in a hybrid way. Some of them wanted to move specific workloads to the cloud. >> Multi-cloud, public, private. >> Exactly right, and multi-data center. >> The majority of your customer deployments are on prem. >> They are. >> Rob Bearden, your CEO, I think he said in a recent article on SiliconAngle that two-thirds of your deployments are on prem. Is that percentage going down over time? Are more of your customers shifting toward a public cloud orientation? Does Hortonworks worry about that? You've got partnerships, clearly, with the likes of IBM, AWS, and Microsoft Dasher and so forth, so do you guys see that as an opportunity, as a worrisome trend? >> No, we see it very much as an opportunity. And that's because we do have customers who are wanting to put more workloads and run things in the cloud, however, there's still almost always a component that's going to be on premise. And that creates a challenge for organizations. How do they manage the security and governance and really the overall operations of those deployments as they're in the cloud and on premise. And, to your point, multi-cloud. And so you get some complexity in there around that deployment and particularly with the regulations, we talked about GDPR earlier today. >> Oh, by the way, the Data Steward Studio demo today was really, really good. It showed that, first of all, you cover the entire range of core requirements for compliance. So that was actually the primary announcement at this show; Scott Gnau announced that. You demoed it today, I think you guys are off on a good start, yeah. We've gotten really, and thank you for that, we've gotten really good feedback on our DataPlane Services strategy, right, it provides that single pane of glass. >> I should say to our viewers that Data Steward Studio is the second of the services under the DataPlane, the Hortonworks DataPlane Services Portfolio. >> That's right, that's exactly right. >> Go ahead, keep going. >> So, you know, we see that as an opportunity. We think we're very strongly positioned in the market, being the first to bring that kind of solution to the customers and our large customers that we've been talking about and who have been starting to use DataPlane have been very, very positive. I mean they see it as something that is going to help them really kind of maintain control over these deployments as they start to spread around, as they grow their uses of the thing. >> And it's built to operate across the multi-cloud, I know this as well in terms of executing the consent or withdrawal of consent that the data subject makes through what is essentially a consent portal. >> That's right, that's right. >> That was actually a very compelling demonstration in that regard. >> It was good, and they worked very hard on it. And I was speaking to an analyst yesterday, and they were saying that they're seeing an increasing number of the customers, enterprises, wanting to have a multi-cloud strategy. They don't want to get locked into any one public cloud vendor, so, what they want is somebody who can help them maintain that common security and governance across their different deployments, and they see DataPlane Services is the way that's going to help them do that. >> So John, how is Hortonworks, what's your road map, how do you see the company in your go to market evolving over the coming years in terms of geographies, in terms of your focuses? Focus, in terms of the use-cases and workloads that the Hortonworks portfolio addresses. How is that shifting? You mentioned the Edge. AI, machine learning, deep learning. You are a reseller of IBM Data Science Experience. >> DSX, that's right. >> So, let's just focus on that. Do you see more customers turning to Hortonworks and IBM for a complete end-to-end pipeline for the ingest, for the preparation, modeling, training and so forth? And deployment of operationalized AI? Is that something you see going forward as an evolution path for your capabilities? >> I'd say yes, long-term, or even in the short-term. So, they have to get their data house in order, if you will, before they get to some of those other things, so we're still, Hortonworks strategy has always been focused on the platform aspect, right? The data-at-rest platform, data-in-motion platform, and now a platform for managing common security and governance across those different deployments. Building on that is the data science, machine learning, and AI opportunity, but our strategy there, as opposed to trying to trying to do it ourselves, is to partner, so we've got the strong partnership with IBM, resell their DSX product. And also other partnerships around to deliver those other capabilities, like machine learning and AI, from our partner ecosystem, which you referenced. We have over 2,300 partners, so a very, very strong ecosystem. And so, we're going to stick to our strategy of the platforms enabling that, which will subsequently enable data science, machine learning, and AI on top. And then, if you want me to talk about our strategy in terms of growth, so we already operate globally. We've got offices in I think 19 different countries. So we're really covering the globe in terms of the demand for Hortonworks products and beginning implements. >> Where's the fastest growing market in terms of regions for Hortonworks? >> Yeah, I mean, international generally is our fastest growing region, faster than the U.S. But we're seeing very strong growth in APAC, actually, so India, Asian countries, Singapore, and then up and through to Japan. There's a lot of growth out in the Asian region. And, you know, they're sort of moving directly to digital transformation projects at really large scale. Big banks, telcos, from a workload standpoint I'd say the patterns are very similar to what we've seen. I've been at Hortonworks for six and a half years, as it turns out, and the patterns we saw initially in terms of adoption in the U.S. became the patterns we saw in terms of adoption in Europe and now those patterns of adoption are the same in Asia. So, once a company realizes they need to either drive out operational costs or build new data applications, the patterns tend to be the same whether it's retail, financial services, telco, manufacturing. You can sort of replicate those as they move forward. >> So going forward, how is Hortonworks evolving as a company in terms of, for example with GDPR, Data Steward, data governance as a strong focus going forward, are you shifting your model in terms of your target customer away from the data engineers, the Hadoop cluster managers who are still very much the center of it, towards more data governance, towards more business analyst level of focus. Do you see Hortonworks shifting in that direction in terms of your focus, go to market, your message and everything? >> I would say it's not a shifting as much as an expansion, so we definitely are continuing to invest in the core platform, in Hadoop, and you would have heard of some of the changes that are coming in the core Hadoop 3.0 and 3.1 platform here. Alan and others can talk about those details, and in Apache NiFi. But, to your point, as we bring and have brought Data Steward Studio and DataPlane Services online, that allows us to address a different user within the organization, so it's really an expansion. We're not de-investing in any other things. It's really here's another way in a natural evolution of the way that we're helping organizations solve data problems. >> That's great, well thank you. This has been John Kreisa, he's the VP for marketing at Hortonworks. I'm James Kobielus of Wikibon SiliconAngle Media here at Dataworks Summit 2018 in Berlin. And it's been great, John, and thank you very much for coming on theCUBE. >> Great, thanks for your time. (techno music)

>> Voiceover: Live from Austin, Texas. It's the Cube, covering DockerCon 2017, brought to you by Docker and support from its Ecosystem partners. >> Hi, I'm Stu Miniman and joining me, my co-host, for the second day of theCube's program, Jim Kobielus. Really excited to have, not only the founder of Docker, Solomon Hykes, he's also the CTO, Chief Product Officer, did some keynotes here, all over the place. So, Solomon, thank you so much, thanks for havin' us. Congratulations on all the progress and welcome back to theCUBE. >> Thanks a lot! It's a lot of fun! >> So many things to talk about, but let's start with you. How ya doin'? I'm sure there's so much that went into this week. What are you most proud of? What are you most excited about these days? >> Where to start? The cool thing, for me, about DockerCon is I focus on the keynote. We just package up the nice story, try to explain what we're doing, where we're going, and that's a pretty massive team effort. I think it's 30 of us for months preparing, deciding what we want to talk about, working on demos, pulling all-nighters. It's just really fun to see a keynote go from nothing to a really nice, fun story. Then I get to show up and discover all the other cool stuff. I'm like everyone else. I just marvel at the organization, the crowd, the energy. I'm a happy camper right now. >> It's interesting some of the dynamics in the industry. Okay, what's the important part? Who contributes to what? What fits where? Two years ago we had the hugging out as to the runtime and had the Open Source Foundation step in. Big thing at the keynote yesterday, two big things: it was Moby project and Linux Kit. Can you, maybe, unpack for our audience a little bit? What is Docker, the company? What's the Open Source? Who are some of the main players? It was the whole keynote, so we don't have time to get into it. What's real, and what was there? >> You're right, that was the big announcement, the Moby Project. Basically, in a nutshell, we launched Docker and we made it a product and an open source project, all rolled into one. We just kind of adopted this hybrid model, building a product that would just help people be more efficient, developers and ops, and at the same time, we would develop that in the open. That really helped us. It participated in the appearance of this huge Ecosystem. It was a big decision for us. Over time, both grew. Docker grew as a product, and it grew as an open source project. So over time we had to adapt to that growth. On the open source side that meant gradually spitting out smaller projects out of the main one. Now we have dozens of projects, literally. We got containerd. We got SwarmKit. We got InfraKit. We got all these components, and each of those is a project. Then we integrate them. What we're doing now, is we're completing that transformation and making sure there's a place for open source collaboration, free-for-all, openness, modularity, try new things, move fast, break things maybe. Then there's the product that integrates, takes the best parts, integrates them together, makes sure they're tested, they're solid, and then ships that to developers and customers. Basically we're saying, Moby is for open source collaboration. It's our project and all of it. And Docker is the product that integrates that open project into something that people can consume that's simple. It's two complementary parts to our platform. >> Could you talk a little bit about, there's kind of that composable nature of what you're building there. There's what Docker will build from it, and I think you've got a couple of examples of some of your partners. What's going to happen in the Cloud? What's going to happen with some of these others? Walk us through one of those. >> Everything about Docker's modular. So really, if you installed Docker for your favorite platform, whether it's the Mac, Windows, your favorite Cloud provider, Linux server, etc., you're actually installing a product that's an assembly of lots of components. Like I said, these components are developed in the open and then they're assembled. Now with the Moby Project, there's a place to assemble in the open, start the assembly in the open, so that other companies, the broader Ecosystem, can collaborate in the assembly, kind of experiment with how things fit together. The really cool thing about that is it makes it way easier to ports the platform, to expand it and customize it. So if you're a Cloud provider and you see all the pieces and you think "Well, I could optimize that. "I could add a little bit of magic "to make it work even better in my Cloud or in my hardware." Then you can do that in the open. You can do that with a community. Then you can partner with Docker to test it, and certify it, and distribute it as an easy-to-use product. Everything can go faster. >> You mentioned open a lot there. Does that mean that Docker is now closed? There's certain people that are very dogmatic when it comes to open source, so maybe you can parse that for us. >> I think it's the same people that were complaining before that we were confusing our product and an open project. We think of ourselves as having a lot to learn, and there's an Ecosystem that's made of a lot of people and companies and projects that have had a lot of experience with openness in the past. We spend most of our time listening, figuring out what the next step should be, and then taking that next step. People told us, "Clarify the relative place, "open source collaboration and your product." That's what we did. Now, I'm sure someone's going to say, "I preferred it before." Well, we just have to, at some point, chose. The key thing to remember is, Docker does everything in the open, and then integrates it into a product that you can use. If you don't like the product, if you want an alternative, then you still have all the pieces in the open right now. I would say, no. Not only is Docker not going closed, we're actually accelerating the rate at which we're opening up stuff. >> Personally, I felt it was a nice maturation of what you've done before, which was batteries are included but swappable. But we've taken the next step. It reminds me of those cool little science kits my kids get. Where it's like, oh okay, I could free build it or I can do it or I could do some other things. >> We use that tagline. It used to be, Docker has batteries included, but swappable. You can make other batteries and we'll swap them in to the product. We'll decide what's in there. Now everyone can do the swapping. It's a big free-for-all. Honestly, it's fun to watch. >> Is there any piece of Docker, the project, outside of core Docker, that Docker the company will refrain from building, will rely on ISVs to build? Or will Docker the company get involved, or reserve for itself the latitude to get involved in development of more peripheral pieces of the overall project going forward? >> We spent a lot of time thinking about that. Honestly, there's so many different constraints, we just decided we're going to follow the users, follow the customers. We just want a platform that works and solves people's problems. That's the starting point. From there, we work out the implementation details, what technology to use, the order in which to build things. Also, what makes more sense in the core platform and what makes more sense as an add-on. It's kind of on a case-by-case basis. >> Is there a grand vision document or functional service layered architecture that all of these components of the project are implementing or enabling? In other words, will Docker, as a project ever be complete or will it always be open-ended, will it constantly evolve and possibly broaden in scope continuously, indefinitely? >> If you look at the Moby Project on the one side, with experimentations and all the building blocks, I think that's going to just continuously expand. Really, openness is all about scale. There's only so much one company can build on their own, but if you really show the Ecosystem you're serious about really welcoming everybody and allowing for different opinions and approaches, then, honestly, I think there's no limit to how large that project can scale. I think Moby can go into tens of thousands of contributors as open source becomes easier and more accessible, which we're really working on, I think it can go into hundreds of thousands. That's going to take a while. That will, I think, never end growing. I think Docker, the product, the company, the reason we've been so successful is that we've been, well at least we've worked really hard to focus and be disciplined in what problems we want to solve, so it's a more iterative approach. We would rather solve less problems, but solve them really, really well, so that if you're using Docker for developing or going to production, you're really delighted Just every detail kind of fits together. There's a roadmap, of course. We're going to do more and more. But we don't want to rush trying to do everything. >> Solomon, great progress on all of these pieces. I've got the tough one for you. In the last year or so, Kubernetes has really exploded out there. Lots of your Ecosystem is heavily using it. Is it that Docker Swarm and Kubernetes will just be options out there? I look at Microsoft Dasher and they're very supportive of both initiatives. Many of your partners are there. How do you guys look at that dynamic and how would you like people to think of that going forward? >> It's a great case study of why we're transitioning to this open project model with Moby. The whole point is that at any given time, Docker, the product, will not be using all of the building blocks out there. It's just not possible. There's too many permutations. So we have to chose. One of these building blocks is orchestration. A year ago when we decided to build an orchestration, we had really specific opinions on what it should look like, as product builders. We looked around and we decided it needs to be a new kind of a building block. So we built Swarm Kits for our own use and we integrated it. Now that there's an open project for elaboration, we're throwing Swarm Kit in there so that everyone can modify it, extend it, and also replace it with something else. I think the big change, now, is that if you look at something like Kubernetes or Rocket as a container on time. Honestly, I could make a super long list of all the components out there that are really cool and we don't use in Docker. Now you can combine them all in Moby in custom assemblies. And we actually demoed that on stage yesterday. We showed taking some pieces from Docker and taking Kubernetes as a piece and plugging it together and saying "Look, there you go! "Weekend project." I think we're going to see a lot of conversions and reuse of ideas and codes, especially in the orchestration piece. I think over time, the differences between Kubernetes, Swarm Kit, and others will really diminish. We'll just integrate the bits and pieces that make the most sense. I don't really think of Kubernetes as a competitor or a problem. I think of it as another cool component in the Moby Ecosystem. Yeah, I think it's a lot of cool stuff. >> I tell ya, the Kubernetes community is just so thrilled that containerd is now open source. It really solves that issue and really it hasn't been something I've heard a lot, coming into the show. It's one of the themes we wanted to look at, and it hasn't been something that is like, Oh boy! Fight, war, anything like that. Hey! Congrats on that! I want to turn back to your root there. I think about dotCloud to Docker. It's a lot about the application modernization. Fast forward to today, Ben's up on stage talking of the journey. How do we take your legacy applications and wrap them in? What do you think about that kind of progression? We like that spectrum out there to help customers, at least partially, and be able to make changes. But I can't imagine that's when you started Docker that that was one of the use cases that you really thought you'd use. What surprised you? What's changed how you built things? What do you see from customers? >> Actually, you'll find this surprising, but this actually was a use case that we had in mind from the very beginning. I think that was lost in the noise for the first few years in the life of Docker because it became this exciting, new thing. >> Come on, Cloud native, Cloud native! >> Yeah, exactly! Docker has a huge developer community now. We spent a lot of time making it great for devs. The truth is, I used to be sysadmin. I used to be on call. I'm an ops guy first and we learned how to help developers. Developers are the customer. The Docker came out of our ops roots and then it evolved to help the developers. That's something that's now lost in the noise of history. It's a really pragmatic tool. It's built to solve real problems. One design opinion we baked in from the beginning is that it has to allow you to do things incrementally. If Docker forces you to throw away what you have, just to get the benefits, then we screwed up. The whole point is that Docker can adapt to what you're doing. For example, you'll see a lot of details in how Docker's designed to allow for stateful applications to run in there, to allow for your own network model to fit. Before Docker, all the containers solutions, all the paths, required you to change your app. Even things like port discovery. You had to change the source code. Docker did not require that. It gives you extra things you can do if you want to go further. But the starting point is incremental. Honestly, I'm really glad that now that's resonating, that we're reaching that point in the community where there's a lot of people using Docker interested in that, because for a few years I was worried that that would be missed in the noise of early adopters that don't mind rewriting everything. From the beginning, Docker was not just for Cloud-Native, microservices, Twelve-Factor, etc. I'm, personally, as a designer of products, as a pragmatist, I'm just happy that we're there. >> How do you see Docker evolving to support more complex orchestrations for data? For hybrid data cloud, environments private and public? You got the likes of Microsoft, Oracle, and IBM as partners and so forth. They have these complex scenarios now, their customers or petabytes scale and so forth. Where do you see that going, the data, the persistence of storage side of the containerization under Docker going? >> I think there's a lot of work to do. I think over time we're going to see specialized solutions for different uses of data. Data has such a big word. It's like computing. Just like computing now is no longer considered one category but it's specialized, I think data will be the same. I think it's a great fit for this modular Lego approach to the Docker Ecosystem. We're going to see different approaches to different data models, and I think we're going to see a lot modularization and a lot of different assemblies. Again, I think a lot of that will happen in Moby and we'll see a lot of cool, open stuff. We, ourselves, are facing a lot of data related questions, in request for customers. There's stuff in there already. You've got data volumes. And I think you're going to see a lot more on the data topic in the next year. >> Like containerization of artificial intelligence and deep learning and all that. Clearly, that's very incognito so far because, yeah. >> We're seeing a lot of really cool machine learning use cases using Docker already. OpenAI is all on Docker. We watch what they're doing with great interest. >> Are you a member of that consortium? >> Let's say friends and family (laughs). So OpenAI came out of the Y Combinator Ecosystem and Docker is a Y Combinator company. We spend a lot of time with them. I think AI on Docker is a really cool use case. I'm a big fan of that. >> Jim: Cool! Us too! >> Solomon, unfortunately, we're runnin' low on time. Last question I have for you is, there is so many things we can do with Docker now. Here's a bunch of the use cases like, "Oh, I can run lots of applications." Everything from Oracles in the store now, things like that. What is the quick win when you're talking to customers and let's get started? What's the thing that gets them the most excited that impacts their business the fastest? >> Ya know, it's-- >> And it never comes down to one thing, but, ya know. >> Honestly, we keep talking about Lego. I think it's like asking, what's your favorite Lego toy? I think we're maturing in the model. I think Lego is just the perfect analogy because it's a lot of building blocks. There's more and more, but there's also the sets. I think we're consolidating around a few different sets. There's maybe a dozen main use cases. We're seeing people identify with one, and then we're helping them see a starting point there. Here's a starter set for your problem, and then it clicks. >> Yeah, I hear that, and I can't help but think back. You're the big green platform that all my Legos build on. I can have my space stuff. I can have my farm set. Maybe the Duplos don't quite fit on it. It's the platform helping me to modernize a lot of what we're doing. Solomon Hykes, always a pleasure to catch up. >> Likewise! Congratulations on all the progress here, and we look forward to catching up with you the next time! We'll be back. Jim and I will be back with lots more coverage here from DockerCon 2017. You're watching theCUBE. (electronic music)