Mike Scarpelli | ServiceNow Knowledge13
okay we're back this is Dave vellante Wikibon ugh i'm here with Jeff Frick this is silicon angles the Q we come to events we extract the signal from the noise we share with you our audience the best guests that we can find Mike scarpelli is here is the CFO of service now we're at knowledge great conference and extracting that signal from from all the noise in the industry Mike welcome to the cube thank you very much for having me today now you got to be thrilled with the progress coming off obviously a very strong quarter you had your financial analysts here at the event which is great for them they get to see the customers you guys are very transparent about giving access to customers and you know try to sort of Cordon them off behind the velvet rope I mean it's wide open here you got you know 4,000 people most our customers you got prospects here and so so congratulations on the progress thus far first your public company so you're never done you're you're all beginning yeah always you know the cusp so so tell me what what's the reaction been from the financial community that's had an opportunity to attend this event what are they telling you the the biggest feedback from investors was is they're surprised at the number of customers and large logo customers that we were able to have up on stage and talk glowing about the company and its beyond the whole itsm helped us because historically that's been the biggest push back we've gotten from investors there's a lot of kind of some of the more of the shorts that kind of push the limit at market size and the feedback was is now they get it how big the market size can be in the potential and many it's they feel it's endless the market size yeah let's talk about the TAM a little bit your your your main served market you're saying is the global 2000 you're about fourteen percent penetration into the global 2000 even though you've got 1600 plus customers so you've got a ways to go there there's definitely some some nice runway but the team is much more than that you certainly can serve a small and mid-sized customers plus you're approaching this new opportunity with platform as a service if I can even use that term so talk about your team a little bit how should observers been thinking about the opportunity for service next well the way we look at it is we feel the traditional itsm market is at least a four billion dollar plus mark if you just do the math based upon our run our run rate our penetration and then looking at an hour penetration boasting in terms of the number of customers and this is just focus on large enterprise we think is about 12,000 large enterprises in the world that are ideal customers today where we're going after we really don't go after the SMB market directly we let some of our MSP customers like dimension data and some of the others have served the MSP mark or the SMB market and then within our customer base even within IT we still see many g for example we're not in all the divisions of G so we know there's more room to grow and we think we're somewhere about a third penetrated if you just look at that that would tell you we're somewhere around a 4 billion dollar market there in the platform we just announced the app creator to this a date that we've really never enabled our customers to really deploy custom apps they did it on their own now with the app creator it's much easier for customers to now play with it and so we think the market is at least double the ITSM market I that's being very conservative talk to some analysts and they think it's a 20 billion dollar plus market yeah I mean I'm mice my senses that's very conservative because the big problem of the ITSM market is it's been it's sort of been forced on people you don't you don't buy the IT the legacy itsm products because you want to you're buying because you sort of have to and you sort of forced into it and they they just don't help me grow my business this is the painful environment so 20 billion dollar team that I don't know I mean that's that sounds like it's a great possibility for you but as you start to go into the business lines and new applications who knows it could be even much larger than that so talk about what it's like to be a public company now if you saw Marc Andreessen on CNBC the other day did you know I never said no so say so he basically came on and said us it's horrible to be a public company and it's very challenging and the number of public companies is down and of course it was self-serving but a lot of what he said is true now Frank and his keynote said you guys came did your IPO right after what he called the face plant yeah yeah so they had to make people nervous I I personally thought the facebook IPO was going to be a great thing for technology companies but when they overprice that it became not a great thing it wasn't Netscape it wasn't google it was faceplant so what's your take I mean obviously you've been performing ha what's it like being a public company what's the experience been like other than ringing the bell at the end why I see that much excited yeah you know things really haven't changed that much this is the fourth company have been the CFO public company what I will say today is probably the biggest challenge for being a CFO today and in any company is really the whole auditing profession with the PCAOB has really changed that the level of detail that auditors go into today has made it a lot more challenging for your quarterly clothes in your annual clothes and that's probably the most painful thing of being a public company from my perspective I I think it's great being a public come because we can have full transparency to our customers when your private company you can give transparency but they don't necessarily believe what you're saying as a public company I can't hide behind the numbers well the other thing too is as a private company they almost want to talk to the CFO you have time to talk to that's right so so that's really sort of why i asked the question because you know and reeses angle I can understand but from your standpoint you're competing with much larger players and if I'm a sales guy I'm going to say well they're small company they're underfunded it could be out of business in a while so going public had to be a big brand boost for you number one and number two it probably changes the way in which you look at cash flow a little bit so the number one thing about being a public company versus a private company is once you set expectations for the market you have to make sure you meet those expectations so if you give long term if you're really giving long term guidance in a technology company it's very hard because you want to be dynamic change on the fly and if you are a public company and if you don't want to meet expectations you may make the wrong business decision and you saw del one of the reasons why you want they want to go public is so they can make the right business decisions that's more for large companies have that struggle as a small company when you're in growth if you if you set the right expectations to investors it's not difficult being a public company cash flow we've told all of our investors our goal is we have 330 340 million in cash investors invested in us to grow that I'm not looking to just grow it and earn a half a point of interest you're going to grow that more if we invest it back in the business and hence we we hired at a record pace last quarter we're expanding and more data centers and you're going to see in 2013 we've told the analysts that we're going to invest all of our free cash flow operating cash flow back into the business yeah i mean that's obviously a question that everybody's asking that you guys aren't profitable because you pour the money back into the business and that's that's by design right yours too if I understand what you're saying it's a better ROI than sticking it on the you know earning statement correct and in terms of the the profitability SAS companies are their profitability is mass given that we sign a contract and generally we signed a three-year contract and we get annual Billings in advance and you see the deferred revenue growing and you see that you want to see operating cash flow on the server with free cash flow but you want to see your deferred revenue growth you want to see the backlog bro and you've seen that every quarter are deferred revenue at 100 milli yeah we have about a hundred and don't quote me on this it's in the filing hundred seventy two million exactly okay so that's and that's a better a good observer should look at that that deferred revenue line item and other any others that observe it should be paying yeah in our mind the three things that we really manage our business by and it's as we talked at our Investor Day is we want to walk before we run and we think we have a clear line of sight to get to a billion dollars sometime in 2060 and we're going to get there at three ways it's really new customer acquisition gaining new customers and the reason why that's so important is we've shown historically and this is we've been disclosing this in all of our filings once we get a customer we retain a customer we have north of a ninety-five percent renewal rate dollar renewal rate for our customers and we've also been able to show once we get a customer we further penetrate those customers thirty percent of all of our business in any on average in any quarter is new business to existing customers those are upsells that's further penetrating the ITSM opportunity and it's also getting users on the platform as well and your average sales prices are up yeah we'll the average revenue per customer continues to increase what we're doing is we're much better disciplined around our our pricing with customers such that we're not discounting really haven't changed our list prices haven't changed yeah so that's more increased number of seats correct not charging more per correct when you talk a lot of times you'll see when we when customers buy more seats they start to get volume discounts there's tiered volume discounts when they get to us you don't reset all of your original seats there are a few original contracts that we had that that we inherited but most it's just incremental discounts on the incremental seats and you have this massive impressive renewal rate of 95 plus percent and was ninety-six percent last quarter now when we talk about that we're talking about units right that's not a value-based with you know it's a dollar we do lose so we have sixteen hundred and forty customers we exited last quarter we added 128 net new customers we lose any quarter somewhere between six to twelve customers has been as high as and those customers we lose we lose for three reasons we look customers go bankrupt as factors life customers get acquired and if they get acquired by one of our customers it's one of our existing it's still a customer but it's a lost customer because it's now going into one and then customers we have a lot of small customers we signed up historically that we're as we're increasing our prices those customers some customers never fully deployed it and saw the value because it had two small of an IT shop and they decided to go with something more of a ticketing system okay so mathematically your renewal rate could be over a hundred percent correct okay I'm not going to ask well we don't know it can't matter can't mathematically be over i miss prices in it no we don't include so that's actually a good point you raise some companies mix up cells in price increases in the renewal rates ours is a dollar for dollar renault if they originally renewed at a hundred dollar if they originally bought it a hundred dollars and they renew it 102 100 goes into reno calculation the two goes into an upsell because we pay our reps on those eyes so it's actually more conservative calculational way most people do good thank you for that clarification now you work for company that sells primarily to IT CIOs you're a CFO so you have some street cred on this question but should this should the CIO report to the CFO the CEO the clo do you have an opinion I do have an opinion on this I'm happy to give up IT to report something else you know I've had for some reason if you look at history IT historically in most companies has reported into the CFO and why was that because people looked at the cost and they thought it was something you need to really manage costs and so it went into the IT it in my mind it doesn't really matter who you report into the important thing is that whoever you have leading your IT organization whether you want to call them a CIO or vp of IT or a director of IT in a smaller shop is that they have open access to not just the CEO quite frankly a lot of times the CEO is not going to be the one driving your IT decisions and your information system divisions who it is it's going to be the other members of the executive team whether it's the vp of engineering or the vp of support or the VP of Sales with your CRM is so important that your IT leader is able to communicate and get feedback from all of the executives in the company let's talk about comparable so you must love the fact that you're like one of the big three Salesforce work day service now great business models you know so you work day especially you guys are comparably sized on a similar meteoric rise you know legendary founders can you talk about that a little bit i mean those are those fair comparisons you know the real comparison between the three is were sassed other than that there's so many differences between the companies you look at a work day work day really is focused on right now the HR yes they are working on financials but I think it's going to be a couple years before they have a and I'm not saying this anything bad work day I just think it's going to be a few years before you're really ready for large enterprise yes you can sell to smaller businesses today and that's a segment of the market we really don't plan at all and if you look at they don't sell that and they don't sell 2i t know who they go into and I know we were actually in my prior company we were customer number five it worked at any it's a great product and that service now we are now a customer again and I think it's a great product it's really your record-keeping place for all of your HR records but we front end it many times with our own price it doesn't on board an off-board employees it doesn't interact with your systems internally that when you have a whether you want to do a password change or you want to sign someone an active directory you want to shut them down when they leave the we can do it seamlessly through our own product workday doesn't do that in terms of sales force once again I think Salesforce is a great company and I got to give them credit for they're the ones that really paved the road for the adoption of SAS we go about it a very different way they started their business really more as an SMB and then grow up into and now they're doing they've been doing for quite some time but now they sell into the large enterprise but if you look at their average revenue per customers much lower than ours and that's because they were selling they have a lot more SMB customers than we do but once again a very very different delivery model it's not as mission-critical I know my last company we used Salesforce couldn't go without using it however it was down pretty much every Saturday where you couldn't use it or on a weekend or on and a quarter when you were trying to close the deals and then that where your where your pipeline is and what deals closed you're hitting refresh refresh refresh that doesn't work with our customers they want instantaneous feedback and hence why we have a different architecture for our cloud we have what we view as a week we call it in our enterprise cloud as erna and others have talked about this week so we were talking about the tamil earlier Frank talks about these sort of vectors that your honor you talked about as well the transformation consumerization and automation as the three sort of real opportunities that you're you're you're approaching I wonder is there a fourth in your view as I hear things like app creator is this notion of a business line penetration is that you know potentially a new vector is that part of one of these three you know you one could argue that it's a new vector but I think it kind of falls into all three of those a little bit slice through them yeah no I just think it's it's even internally we use our own product internally probably not the best of our ability but we're really focused on it as we talked about we're kind of like the the Cobblers son we're now really focused so on and we have a number of interesting initiative fool it really blows me away about this product is my pie up my finance guys my business analyst my FP na guys they've been playing around with this and they've been creating a an app where we can track our whole closed process where we can put a lot of the the whole documentation for our socks controls things that I would have never thought of doing in our product but what was amazing about it is it's done by finance people it's not done by programmers IT hasn't been involved in this they develop the apps yeah your guys yes their work they're just playing with it applies on programs they are not 55 program no that's that to me is cool what is amazing about that's why i'm saying i think you know i personally think your Tim's way bigger than 4 billion I me are gonna say that you know it who knows right you don't know but it just seems to me that the IT is is such a large opportunity for you and that piece alone is its unique in the marketplace there's really not another organization out there in the closest I think it's Microsoft Excel you know and you know we all know you know we love it and hate it so the other thing is we hear about developers the rise of developers the enablement developers earnings about the developers but no one except for the Fred talks about citizen developers I've never heard that phrase in all the farmers as we've been do it's about the developer but you know he kind of took it down a notch in terms of technical expertise has the citizen developer yes and that was that's a unique twist on it well this is what it opens it up to the lines of business any business analysts can create apps on our platform and that's what makes it so much more approachable and it's I've just never seen another company like that the thing I wonder too is this we talked to Fred about this a little bit and this is way off in the horizon but this notion of the Internet of Things GE calls it the industrial internet potentially service now having a role there we talked about the Big Data meme and so forth but there's gonna be a lot of data a lot of complexity complexity seems to be your friend and so who knows that could be just yet another wave of potential growth for a company like if you just you don't know sometimes right I mean you're going to reinvent yourself selves over the next several years like many successful companies do my last question is you know the classic what keeps you up at night what worries you I mean you're working with Frank's luqman so he's throwing gasoline on the fire we know Frank from other days and you know set of scale companies so let's meet you haven't you guys pretty hard but so what keeps you up at night what worries you what are you looking out for you know these days the two things that worry me the most as a CFO is IT and I'll explain why in a little bit and facilities and the reason being is we are growing so fast and the problem unlike my last company was that most of our growth was in one location it's just a lot easier to project your growth and the requirements for IT requirements or facility in this company we are so geographically dispersed with all of our offices in the US and what we're doing around the world it's as you're adding last quarter we added 192 net new employees we're going to add around 200 this quarter and we tool where all those people going and trying to get the I think some of the the set of the managers whether they're an RD or whether in sales or the rent our support organization are graded telling me the number of people they need but they're not necessarily great at telling us exactly where they will be located and it puts all kinds of challenges on the that just reminded me you guys are what seventy percent of your businesses North America is seventy percent of our business is North America from a from a revenue perspective just a number of those customers our global customers don't count so the way we do it is based upon where the p.o is actually generated so that doesn't mean that seventy percent of our users are in the in North America but we're growing rapidly internationally and we have such a focus half of our our ads from a sales and marketing perspective or going or now markets isn't that how for instance IBM would do it I maybe you don't know I don't know necessarily either but and IBM's I think the majority of its business is not you know IBM but 100 billion dollar company but yeah but the majority of a you know that large companies businesses overseas I would imagine they do it the same way I'm not sure is but they do but when you look at other SAS companies out there whether you're looking at Salesforce and stuff most of sales for us is still and yes they've done while in Japan but their users tend to be more where the company is it's easy for them to just add on seats from that corporate p oh right okay that's the kind of differences I Michael listen it was really a pleasure having you on and thanks for helping educate us about about your business we're really excited that you guys had us here it's been a fantastic two days we're going another half day tomorrow but so thanks very much a pleasure meeting you and thank you for having me today thank you me all right everybody keep it right there we're going to do a quick cut to we're going to check out what's happening at Google i/o in San Francisco and they'll be back to wrap this is the cube we're right back after this
SUMMARY :
the other day did you know I never said
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Frank | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mike Scarpelli | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2013 | DATE | 0.99+ |
ninety-six percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
thirty percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Marc Andreessen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
seventy percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
seventy percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three-year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mike scarpelli | PERSON | 0.99+ |
seventy percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mike | PERSON | 0.99+ |
192 net | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Fred | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2060 | DATE | 0.99+ |
100 milli | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
95 plus percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
20 billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
hundred seventy two million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
128 net | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
sixteen hundred and forty customers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last quarter | DATE | 0.99+ |
three reasons | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last quarter | DATE | 0.99+ |
billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
GE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
330 340 million | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
fourth company | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over a hundred percent | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
SAS | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
three ways | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Dave vellante | PERSON | 0.98+ |
this week | DATE | 0.98+ |
4,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two days | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ | |
55 | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
around 200 | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ | |
two | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
fourth | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
an hour | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this quarter | DATE | 0.96+ |
Salesforce | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
about a hundred | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.95+ |
about fourteen percent | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
CNBC | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
102 | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
erna | PERSON | 0.95+ |
twelve customers | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
100 billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
1600 plus customers | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
20 billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Salesforce | TITLE | 0.91+ |
about 12,000 large enterprises | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
ninety-five percent | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Excel | TITLE | 0.9+ |
2000 | DATE | 0.9+ |
one location | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
two small | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
a hundred dollars | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
4 billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
half day | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
a dollar | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Petra Zijlstra & Maarten le Noble - ServiceNow Knowledge13 - theCUBE
you Wiki bon org this is the cube Silicon angles continuous production we're here at knowledge service now it's big used user conference that we'd be going this is day three for us we had a half day today but we've been meeting with a number of customers CIOs IT practitioners folks from kpn are here Petros L Stroh is the CIO of KPN and Martin the no blue is the person in charge of ServiceNow and manages that implementation at kpn Petra Martin welcome to the cube thank you thanks for having us good morning yeah it's it's our pleasure really appreciate you guys spending some time there let's start with kpn tell us more about kpn you are the dominant telecommunications provider in the Netherlands but tell us a little bit more about so kpn is actually quite important on the market of the Netherlands we focused mainly on fixed and wireless communication but also on IT solutions so customers we have over 45 million customers within the Netherlands and within the kpn we are serving around 26,000 employees so talk a little bit about what's happening in your your business I mean here you've got you know tremendous you know disruption and lots of competition but you still got a couple of big giant whales in the industry what's it like in your region so within our region what you see is this we are dominating the market quite heavily is the government is focusing on to get the monopolies down so we are struggling a lot getting other partners on the market and we have to serve them as well so it is a little bit of a hardest feel to working - yeah so there's a big hand it's sort of dictating some of the requirements that you have to comply to so what does that mean for your IT infrastructure what kind of pressures does that put on you so as we are dominating the infrastructure we need to allow our competitors to use our infrastructure so yeah we do that at the best serves as we can but it feels a little bit off I remember when we went to that the United States you have to bite your tongue and do it okay so let's let's get into the whole ServiceNow implementation well first of all is it if you've been to more multiple knowledge conferences or is this your first one so this is my first one for ServiceNow although it was two weeks ago I was also at the CA Technology event both in their Las Vegas as well so but I'm enjoying it a lot oh you spent a lot of time in less of a so so give me your impressions of the of the conference what do you think what I noticed and I'm not sure what Martha thinks of it but I taste a lot of fun and I really enjoy that their service now is really liking what they do they're really interesting and that gives me also a lot of energy and ideas what you could say utilize in the Netherlands yeah I'm also really impressed with the way it was organized it's good incredible you have 4,000 people who all can can drink and eat and and and and be in a conference room at the same time is incredible yeah the logistics were very good here the accommodations are very nice so and it's also a good mix of informal meetings meeting people in just in the hallways and having good conversations and good speeches as well and it's a good mix of CIOs and IT practice all right so let's get it to the service how long you guys been working with ServiceNow what was the catalyst to bring ServiceNow into your organization so we three years ago we started to work with ServiceNow so we have quite some experience at these states and a year ago we started to work with the self-service portal as well and I must say we started to become innovative using that kind of services okay so well what was the what was the catalyst to bring it in and how did you justify bringing it in so what we had in the in the previous time we had several systems that meant every time we had to unboard a customer it took several systems to work with so what we did is we decided within the company that we didn't want to develop our own software anymore so we were looking for the best breed of applications or suppliers that could help us to bring value to our business so one of the things what notified with ServiceNow is that they are first the best brief with this application area but also the relationship with ServiceNow is quite good because if you want a strategic partnership you need to focus both on also development and new functionalities and that's actually what we find in ServiceNow so how did it occur that you were able to bring in ServiceNow Petra it was that something that that you had a vision of was that someone like Martin brought it to your attention was that the CFO driving it how did that all come about and as I'm quite recently in the role but I know a little bit of history it was actually on the strategic level PP level where they decided we need to go into a another direction so together together with the CEO CFO etc decision has been made to go into a new direction and they finally select the service now for this part of business you feel like your executive management or RIT savvy man it's somewhat uncommon to have we keep hearing about the the Cobblers children but here you had a situation where the senior executives were pushing for something like this is that unique in your field and I think because our company is focusing both on telecommunication and IT they they know sometimes much more than we do so I think that is also part of of that job a bit of a blessing and a curse I think they know what they're talking about but that's also that the DAR says sometimes there's no even better yeah so there's there's no hiding enough to be dangerous and we need to make sure that we keep focus what we need to do and not interfering that then interfering us too much so that is quite a fat joke all right let's talk about the self-service capability that you've built it's describe what that is you seem you know very proud of it so I want to learn more about that yeah so we're quite proud on the self-service part of what we actually had started one year ago we started to build the self-service portal in which the customer has the possibility to find answers on their issues problem incidents etc and what makes it so unique is that actually customers who entered the self-service portal can find their answers directly they can do that 24 by 7 so as you know if you're Matt home and you work on your iPad you solution now and not tomorrow and what is also quite unique is that they uses from this community help each other and what does that mean is if you have an question and you go to the self-service parking don't find an answer you can accelerate your own no let's article goes to the service desk who make it qualified that it can enter into the system so the next time and other users has this question can find the right answer into this no its database so there's a social component of it now now where did that come from was that part of the service now capability if you guys build that no it's it's a it is part of the surface now capability but it was specifically thought up for this just to bring the cost down and to to keep it interactive weekly it's it's it's always strange to have people work with you and not being able to help each other but at night when evening they go home and write Wikipedia about other things so why not bring that action through the workplace so talk about the the clients that are on this using this self-service policy it's mostly internal clients but you also have external clients can you describe that so we have the customers who intern and you're using odd of course the people who have the office automation of workspace so they can use it for that one and actually this year we're going to bring also business applications to the knowledge articles so a 600 applications will be served by the self-service portal as well so that is mainly internal focus we have also external customers are over a thousand customers who also have the possibility to enter this self-service portal and find the answers on their questions and by the way we have reached this year that over ten percent of the incidents are actually solved by the users themselves and forty-one percent of customers who have a question to solve that answers on the self-service portal versa now what oversees what calling up sending an email nicely so that is amazing so it means the Service Desk can focus on the more complicated stuff where do you see those metrics going over time the idea of the self service desk is is that it will go up even beyond the 56 that's what we anticipate on so well when it gets to that level what happens you know to your business from a cost standpoint how does that you know how does that benefit can you quantify that in any way that is a little bit hard because we are in the way to find it out but for me as an idea responsibilities we always have to drive on cost so I'm I'm really looking forward to the cost is going down so what we did is we made an agreement with the service there's they promised us that a cost would go dramatically downsize and let's see what we will accomplish so maybe next year you can ask me what and so we we hear a lot of customers saying ok we start with incident and change and problem and we start building the CMDB yeah is that where you started and where are you on that journey that's that's where we started and that's where we're at now and we use the knowledge geoportal as well but we're always exploring other options ServiceNow is always expanding always always searching for new ways to to please their customers and our our vision on this is that we already paid for all those modules so why not use them so we're always exploring at the moment we're exploring the asset management module and we're exploring the vendor management module as well so you have existing tools to do things like vendor management and asset management how does that transition go how do you sort of bring on the new and tear down the old and how do you manage the disruption associated with that well it's it's of course always a life cycle and clothes driven sometimes certain things are just end of life cycle you have to replace them are you going to buy something new or are you going to buy or are you going to use something that is in sa P or in ServiceNow so that's that's always a choice you have to make can you go ahead so I think what is also quite important as I mentioned before we are always looking of the best-of-breed solutions what we do see is the Suites into ServiceNow we always look at them are they indeed the Best of Breed for that kind of specific services if not we will go for another solution if yes we will go for the service now and the second hand we're trying to influence ServiceNow as much as possible so they can actually change the modules into the way our customers are looking for so this brings up a very interesting discussion this whole best-of-breed versus integrated suite now you mentioned you use sa P there's a classic example sa PE the beauty of it is it's sort of big and you could do so many things with it but the problem is it's big uns how many things you could do with it it's complex so for instance if you want to do HR there might be some other packages so you your philosophy Petra is you guys want to be Best of Breed that's the the primary objective and then maybe secondarily is sort of the integrated suite is that right that's correct and so what we do is is for every process we are looking into application so no development on outside anymore we're looking for most of the times our solutions who are really Best of Breed in that kind of fur field so that is the idea now doesn't that somewhat defeat the purpose of sort of a single system of record or does you somehow integrate ServiceNow into maybe those other components yeah so we have a platform of several systems and we integrate them heavily so the CA technology which ServiceNow is heavily insert that and also sup we're looking into it how we can integrate that as well but that is quite a challenge yes the ServiceNow is our core and other systems are integrated in the ServiceNow fire bus now given that you're looking for sounds like you're really looking for SAS and off-the-shelf commercial software can I infer from that that you don't plan on developing a lot of your own applications you know we're hearing a lot about app creator and things like that or will you take advantage of those things so the app creation is definitely a field I'm interested in I because what I want is technology infrastructure should be a commodity everything seems working my customer these days want services they don't want technology so what I'm looking for is how can I keep up with the speed of my customers and therefore I'm looking for solutions outside of the market so we saw that presentation of threat with the application development and quite interested in that part that looks really promising so how do you so let's go back to the self-service for a bit because it's something that you guys are is somewhat unique in terms of what you're describing and it's quite a large scale when you think of self-service you think of things like you know Google and Facebook and Amazon do you feel like you're on the path to achieve that level of experience for your users I definitely think so and it's not because I'm saying it's my customer actually saying that and that is key important to me so we saw the satisfaction level of the customer went up and what we do also see is is the customer these days one 24/7 support so example you're coming home and your kid have problems with the iPad Mini I know how that % sure they go to my self-service for and it's fine and if they don't find the answer they can enter it into it so for me more open the better it is I have to serve each other yeah and you get learning from that that knowledge permeate so so how about things like single sign-on how do you handle that challenge we already incorporated single sign-on so it's not a problem for ServiceNow at the moment yeah we started that last year because what we saw is is people entering twice the system is not of their convenience so we started to enter that last year and I must say people are quite happy with it so tell me more about what the users are saying I'm interested in your client's experiences what kind of feedback have you received if it is a it's a good question you're asking there are double reaction first of all they are not aware of it so you need to make sure they get aware that there is a self-service portal so what we did we did a lot of communication and telling and broadcast in the world we have a new self-service portal once they get used to it is that quite happy with it and what you also see is this we're actually rewarding people to come to the self-service portal so every time they go that'll help someone they deserve points and in the net and say quite keen on getting points and I think based upon that the reactions became quite positive and they're quite upset if they can't find answer into the system so yeah I think that's positive I think users don't really care if they're using ServiceNow or something else they just wanted to work and and the ServiceNow is just it's just the means to an end I think that's a good thing he said it's actually not the tool it's actually the services of delivering and service and I was able to give us that possibility that's an interesting comment because you think about you think about sales force people sales people know they're in Salesforce now very sort of high degree of affinity there whereas ServiceNow it's invisible you're the you're the service and and that comes with the shell we put over it as well our self-service portal it gives us our own looking fuel so people don't have an idea they think they're on an internet sites probably yeah I love that philosophy ServiceNow seems to have they want to make you the heroes they don't want that's good okay we have time for one more question for each of you so petrol let me start with you from a cio perspective what advice would you give your CIO peers in terms of thinking about bringing in capabilities such as ServiceNow generally and specifically around self-service so my comment is what I do see is it's technology is a given for the customers the customers just want the serves and they want the best service that is so what I think you need to do is make sure your lights on is as it should be but focus so much more on the self-service so people can have the perception that they get what they want and they get it now and they get it whenever and the best kind of answers they're looking for so I think that's why you need to look for and with your own department you will not be able to do that anymore so you need partners to help you to be quick flexible and profiling to service your customer wants no marks on your in the front lines yeah making it all happen what advice would you give your fellow peers and practitioners I would say invest heavily in heavily in communication as well people process and especially the people part is very important if you're replacing all tools with new tools people always get a bit homesick and they want their all they want the old functionality back and you have to force them to get to give it to give it a chance and stay state state suit will be out of the box SAS solution don't go changing too much in the beginning and really give people the time and a chance to to get the note to get to know to get to know the new product yeah communicate those benefits I see I pet your Martin thank you very much for coming on and sharing the the kpn service now stories really pleasure meeting you both alright keep it right there everybody we'll be back with the winner of the hackathon right after this this is the cube so like an angle we'll be back right after this word
**Summary and Sentiment Analysis are not been shown because of improper transcript**
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
KPN | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
600 applications | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
forty-one percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Netherlands | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
iPad | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
iPad Mini | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
4,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ServiceNow | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Petra Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
a year ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Petra Zijlstra | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ServiceNow | TITLE | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
three years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
two weeks ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
one year ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Maarten le Noble | PERSON | 0.98+ |
over ten percent | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over a thousand customers | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
twice | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over 45 million customers | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Martha | PERSON | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
around 26,000 employees | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
7 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
kpn | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Petra | PERSON | 0.91+ |
day three | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
24 | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
single system | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
DAR | ORGANIZATION | 0.84+ |
Salesforce | TITLE | 0.84+ |
single sign | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
one more question | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
lot of customers | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
Wikipedia | ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ |
half day | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
single sign | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
CA | LOCATION | 0.8+ |
double | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
Cobblers | ORGANIZATION | 0.7+ |
systems | QUANTITY | 0.69+ |
org | ORGANIZATION | 0.68+ |
things | QUANTITY | 0.67+ |
Wiki | ORGANIZATION | 0.61+ |
several systems | QUANTITY | 0.61+ |
several systems | QUANTITY | 0.6+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.6+ |
lot | QUANTITY | 0.57+ |