>> Announcer: Live from Las Vegas, its theCUBE, covering Veritas Vision 2017. Brought to you by Veritas. >> Welcome back the the Aria in Las Vegas, everybody. This is theCUBE, the leader in live tech coverage. My name is Dave Vellante, I'm here with Stu Miniman. Angelo Sciascia is here, big Tom Brady fan, Senior Vice President of NetX Information Systems, from Brooklyn, New York, I don't think so. >> Not a Tom Brady fan. >> Thanks for coming on theCUBE do you think it matters, how much it airs at a football. >> No, not at all, Tom Brady doesn't care about that. >> No, well, listen, thanks for coming on. We have a great conversation, we love talking sports on the Cube. So welcome, how's the show going for you? >> Ah, it's fantastic, you know, lots of great material Veritas has been talking about. 360 Data Management, obviously we all know the benefits of that by now. So we have a lot of customers here so I'm glad they they got to see it from a senior leadership perspective, rather than our sales guys and sales engineers going in there and talking to them, and seeing Veritas executives really getting behind what we're talking about. So it backs up our story and, you know, our customers are pretty excited about it, actually. >> What's the nature of your relationship with Veritas. I know you have a relationship, and maybe still do, with Symantec. How's that all, how did it all evolve? >> Yeah, so we are a Veritas Platinum Partner, we would be, what we consider, a solution-provider type partner. A lot of our business today is either directly or indirectly tied to Veritas, which was kind of funny because we started as a security company, so our roots are systems management, you know. That's where we were in 2005 when I joined NetX, that's where we were for many, many years after Symantec acquired a company called Altiris. We just stayed in that vein, you know, managing endpoints, securing endpoints, encrypting data. And then, somewhere in 2013, we said hey, you know, let's try to diversify the portfolio a little bit. And we used to manufacture an endpoint management appliance for Altiris so we said hey, Symantec's got these things called NetBackup Appliances, let's check it out. It's a formed fact that we know how to sell and, shoot, four years later it's been a great partnership for us, great partnership, I'm sure, for Veritas, and for our customers and that's a lot of our business today. >> So, I mean, it's hot market, you know. Data protection is exploding, and security. I mean, you're in two of the sweet spots in the market right now. So how do you approach the business with customers? Do you, are you a specialist around data protection? You deliver services around them. Maybe you can explain it on the model? >> Yeah, you know, that's actually a good question, because it's evolved quite a bit, right? So, you know, when you had a limited portfolio of just one or two products that you can sell to a customer, you're really doing a product sale, right, which, I would say that was probably the most difficult transition from the split from Symantec to Veritas, because at Symantec we had thousands of products in the portfolio, or hundreds of products in the portfolio that we could actually talk to. And for a little while, really we had a handful, you know, we had NetBackup Appliances, Enterprise Vault and ancillary things to bulk on to that, like Clearwell. I think one of the most exciting things for us, as a reseller, is to now be able to go have a discussion with our customers that we were never able to have before. And rather than sit there and try to sell them a backup product or a storage solution, we could sell them a platform that solves many problems for them, right? Rather than sitting there and trying to sell one-off. So, our conversations are significantly more strategic now then they've ever been, and frankly I speak for myself and my whole team, I know everyone enjoys the conversation more now that we have a portfolio to talk about, than just a handful of products. >> Angelo, you've got an interesting viewpoint on this split off of Aritas from Symantec. What have your customers said about it? What's been your interaction with the organization? What can you tell us about kind of the inside going on? >> Yeah, look, I've lived firsthand on a Symantec acquisition of a company, okay. I was, we were not a Symantec partner when they acquired Veritas. Funny enough, I was actually doing Veritas consulting, you know, on my own on the side prior to Symantec purchasing Veritas. So I really, I'd made my career on two products; Veritas for backup and Altiris for systems management. Symantec bought Veritas and I was like okay, you know, I'm just going to stay with Altiris. Symantec bought Altiris and here we are now, so we can talk about all of them. The thing I noticed was Symantec was always going to be a security company, right, and they weren't going to change that no matter how much they try to integrate it. It's two radically different stories. You know, and for many, many years, things that we look at as new products today were kind of already there in the Symantec portfolio, but buried underneath other products that really never saw the light of day because when you have hundreds or thousands of products, like I said earlier, you know, the ones that are going to move the most are the ones that are going to get the attention. So I think the benefit of the split is that it really allowed Veritas to focus on what they do well, which is managing data, and Symantec to do what they do well, which is securing your infrastructure and securing your data. From my perspective, our customers really appreciated that. Sure, a couple of them were a little annoyed that they had to now split contracts and deal with that kind of stuff, but I think that was a momentary blip and for the most part, it's been well-received from everyone we've spoken to. >> Angelo, you said you're having, your conversations are evolving. Who are you talking to? And maybe take us inside some of those conversations. What are the big challenges they're having? >> Yeah, a year ago, a year and a half ago I was talking to either somebody who was on the messaging side and needed to archive emails or IMs, or on the backup side and they just wanted to be able to meet their backup windows and maybe to get some better d dub rates, right. Fun conversation to have, bit mundane. It's not really solving problems as much as backing up data or archiving data. Today, we're having overarching conversations at a C-level, or a senior VP level, or a director level, and talking about dramatic changes to the way they do business, and how we can do business with them. Six months ago, NetX, we weren't doing anything in the Cloud, you know. We were selling to some customers' Vdub space to the Cloud, and that's about it. We weren't talking Cloud strategy with them. Today we're talking to our customers about moving workloads to the Cloud, doing it in a way that's predictable for them, and doing it with Veritas. >> That's a really interesting point. I have to imagine that changed who you're talking with inside the company. Can you walk us through kind of a typical customer's, you know, and how you kind of move up into a more strategic discussion for Cloud strategy? >> You know, so for full transparency, that whole thing's still evolving, right. 360 Data Management is still fairly new. So what we're seeing, the conversations turned, it would start, again we're talking to somebody that we've been talking to historically in the backup side or architecture side, and we talk to them about wanting to do better things than what their backup is, and start to talk about, hey this is what 360 Data Management is. What's relevant to that person he's going to want to talk about but then there's going to be things in there that are not relevant to him. So he'll make that introduction and he'll get other stakeholders in the boat with him. And that's something we've really appreciated because the people you used to talk to are now bringing in stakeholders to offset their own desires and their own budgets, so want to bring in other technology. And typically, when we get to that point when we're starting to talk about strategic pricing, is when you're getting that C-level person to really have that aha moment, and say wow, we're offsetting costs here, we're doing things like truly getting rid of tape, or moving to the Cloud and things like that, and it's a conversation that really evolves and it's still starts at the bottom. But we're figuring out ways to start it at a higher point. >> Well, those strategies are still evolving for most customers; the roles of those people that might have had one role definitely are changing. I'm curious, one of the big transition points, especially for a company like Veritas, is going from licenses to some kind of more of a subscription model. Any commentary you have on your customers; their embrace, or like, dislike of some of those transitions? >> I think the one thing the Cloud has done is it's opened up a different avenue of how people consume IT, right. Cloud is very much consumption-based billing, and while that can complicate our lives from a reseller perspective in terms of how to collect and track monthly billing and things like that, they like it because they feel like, and it's the truth, they're only paying for what they're truly using, rather than paying for products or infrastructure that they're only using part of the day, or software that they're only using for a particular project. A lot of our healthcare systems might have a research project that their going on, and they might like to scale up for some backup licensing and scale back down once that project is done. Consumption licensing allows that, versus having to go to them and saying, hey, well now you got to buy 200 terabytes of perpetual licensing, and justify that capital expense, rather than having an operational expense on just that one particular workload that you have to back up for that one period of time. >> Angelo, Stu and I are always interested in the human capital management aspects of things, and you talked about, you went from sort of talking about having a conversation around email archiving or backup, to one about the Cloud, Cloud strategies. From your internal organization perspective, how did you manage that? Are you rescaling, are you retraining? Is it just you got really supersmart people that can adapt? >> We definitely have supersmart people, because they're all over there, that's right. But I definitely have supersmart people. But, you know, it's a little bit of both. It's a little bit of, you know, you take one of our data protection projects; see Christian Muma, you know, he's been in the data center for god knows how many years, he has seen technology evolve. It was a natural fit to look at Cloud infrastructure. Started taking some classes, consumed it, all the information he could, and now we're out there actively selling it. In some other respects, we had to hire from outside and bring in some services ourselves to actually use, maybe some third party partnerships to help us better understand how we price out Cloud for our customers. So it's a little bit of everything, and I think that that's what's exciting about it, because I think for the first time in a long time, everyone's learning something new at the same time, because, I don't care what anyone said about the Cloud years ago; it's different today, it's going to be different in six months, it's going to be different in nine months. And I think that that's exciting, and I've been in this industry since 1996. I've seen a lot of really cool things come and go. I just think that there's still infancy in the Cloud and I think it's exciting because everyone's still learning. And any time you can still learn, I think that's, I think an important part of your job. >> So when you think about your, sort of, near-term and midterm and long-term plan for the company, how do you sort of describe that? Where do you want to take this thing? >> Near-term, I want to have a solid end of the quarter. >> Business is good, right, I mean market's booming right now. >> Business is very good. Veritas will tell me it's not good enough but they're just never happy. No, business is, business is very good. I think, near-term for us, you said hey, how do we get our head around it? Near-term for us is, as we're absorbing all this information, is start to really figure out what our path is going to be. So near-term, I think we still have to identify other ancillary partners that we need to bring to the table. We've got our partnerships with Azure, Microsoft Azure, and our partnerships with AWS. We'll probably have to look at Google and IBM and see what they're doing, and then we have to look at other partnerships that are not related to Veritas but still drive that home. We maybe look at a different colo partnership or partnerships around outsourcing billing, things like that, that we can make where it's easier for our customers to consume the technology. So I think six to nine months from now if we were to have the same conversation, everything that we're doing today is probably going to be somewhat different. But I just think that there's still a lot of planning to do. >> Angelo, any feedback from your customers on what there's still on the to-do list from the vendors? We talked, you know, the strategy, Cloud's changing a lot, you know. What are some of the pinpoints that they said hey, if we could get this into the offering from Veritas or some of the others it would make our lives a lot easier. >> I mean, that's a tough question, because we're going to them now and changing the conversation already. You know, obviously they're always asking for different features, but I don't like to get into a feature conversation with the customers. I try to solve the problem. >> Dave: You're leading that conversation, is what you're saying. >> Yeah, I don't want to get into the weeds of talking about well, this widget does it at 50% and you do it at 48%. You know, I try to sit a little bit more macro. I think that one of the things our customers have asked us to do a better job at is figure out better ways to make it easier to consume the technology from budget perspective. So we're trying to figure that out now; 360 Data Management is a subscription, Veritas would like them sold in three years, we're trying to figure out ways to get creative with our customers on that. What's the right bundle, what's not the right bundle. One thing that I've noticed, and Veritas have been great at it, is we have to have some flexibility in terms of adding things in and make it seem like it's all part of that bundle. There's been some flexibility and I think that, because of that, we haven't hit that roadblock yet where, well, we really want this product in the bundle. Reality is that we'll work through that and try to add it in there, some way, shape or form, even if behind the scenes. >> The customers see you as the experts, and what we often see is that technology is the technology; it's pretty much understood. What's not understood by the customers is how to apply it to their business, and their business is changing so fast that it seems like they're looking to organizations like yours saying okay, here's our business challenge. How can you help me? You tell me, and then the best answer is somebody he'll be able to work with. Is that a valid, sort of, premise? >> Yeah, it is, it certainly is and I think we're really uniquely positioned in the fact that, here we've got, we've got our partnership with Veritas and we're 100% focused to everything in the Veritas portfolio so we don't compete from within. That's the same thing that we could say, basically, on Symantec and some of our traditional storage partners as well. That'll change most likely, on our storage partners, especially because of what Veritas have been releasing with Access and some of the other software providing storage technology. When we're brought in, we're brought in as the experts in that finite area, so we're not brought in as a generalist-type of reseller. We're brought in as, hey, I've got a data management problem, I've got a data security problem, or I'm trying to do some high-performance workloads on storage. So yeah, we are the experts, but at the same time we're being brought in for those handfuls of things, so we're not having these, hey, can you maximize my span on anti-virus software because I want to sell you commoditized software. It's just not us, it's not our thing. We're not adding any value to the customers, or the poor owners for that matter. >> Angelo, curious that there's a lot of startups in the data protection space. What do you here, your customers asking you about them? You know, what's your thoughts there? >> I guess I got to be nice, right? Because I'm being streamed everywhere. >> Stu: They're not listening, go ahead, be a New Yorker. >> Listen, I challenge Rubrik at any point of time, you know, those guys, Rubrik, Cohesity, those guys, they're new, they're the shiny new toy. The problem, the problem is they have their messaging out there, and the problem we have is that they're the shiny new toy. But when the rubber hits the road and when it's time to actually go and prove out what the technology can do, we'll win all the time. We will win ten out of ten times if we get the seat at the table, right. The problem is is because we were a limited portfolio, a limited product, limited integration type of company before, we weren't getting that seat at the table. I think they see it now, I think they're starting to get a little concerned about, hey, you know what, if this 360 Data Management is what it's going to be, and we all know it is, I think they're going to be concerned. They're new, and they're going to get attention. My honest opinion: I'm glad they came out, I'm glad that Rubrik and Cohesity and all these guys came out and did all this different ways to go to market, because I think it really forced all of us to say hey, we got some real tough decisions to make here, the competition has caught up, in certain ways. Let's change the game, and 360 Data Management does that. I think they should take as much business as they can right now, because it's going to be short-lived. >> You said it makes you rethink your strengths, and like you said, change the game. >> Yeah, it changes the game. >> Yeah. Uh, okay, predictions on the MLB? Yankees won their getaway game today to put the pressure on the Red Sox, two and a half to two and a half games back. You know, the Indians are looking good, my man, Terry Francona. What's your prediction for it? >> The Sox fan's outnumbered two to one here, so go ahead. >> You know, so I shouldn't say that the Yankees are going to win the World Series? >> No, he's a Yankees fan. >> I'm a Yankee fan, too. >> Honestly, as a Yankee fan, I think we all know that they weren't supposed to be this team, so I think this is, that's the team to look out for. >> Dave: Maybe this is their year. >> I think this is the year that they're going to challenge people, I mean, are they going to win? It's Cleveland, do you really think Cleveland's going to win anything? They won one thing in the last, what, 30 years. >> That's what they used to say about us in Boston. Angelo, thanks so much coming on, really appreciate it. Keep right there, buddy, we'll be back with our next guest right after this short break. We're live from-- (electronic music)

>> Announcer: Live from Las Vegas, it's theCube. Covering Veritas Vision 2017. Brought to you by Veritas. >> Welcome back to Las Vegas everybody, this is theCube, the leader in live tech coverage. This is day one of two day coverage of Veritas Vision #VtasVision. My name is Dave Vellante, and I'm here with my co-host Stu Miniman. Zach Bosin is here. He's the director of information governance solutions at Veritas. And Anna Simpson is a distinguished systems engineer at Veritas. Which Anna means you know where all the skeletons are buried and how to put the pieces back together again. Welcome to theCube, thanks for coming on. >> Thank You. >> Thank You. >> Let's start with, we've heard a little bit today about information governance, Zach we'll start with you. It's like every half a decade or so every decade, there's a new thing. And GDPR is now the new thing. What's the state of information governance today? How would you describe it? >> I think the primary problem that organizations are still trying to fight off, is exponential data growth. We release research every year called the Data Genomics Index, and what came back this past year is that data growth has continued to accelerate, as a matter of fact, 49% year over year. So this problem isn't going anywhere and now it's actually being magnified by the fact that data is being stored, not only in the data center on premises, but across the multi-cloud. So information governance, digital compliance is all about trying to understand that data, control that data, put the appropriate policies against it. And that's really what we try to do with helping customers. >> I always wonder how you even measure data. I guess you could measure capacity that leaves the factory. There's so much data that's created that's not even persistent. We don't even know, I think, how fast data is growing. And it feels like, and I wonder if you guys agree or have any data suggestions, it feels like the curve is reshaping. I remember when we were talking to McAfee and Brynjolfsson it feels the curve is just going even more exponential. What's your sense? >> That's typically what we see. And then you have IoT data coming online, faster and faster and it really is a vertical shot up. And all different types and new files types. One of the other really interesting insights, is that unknown file types jumped 30-40%. Things that we don't even recognize with our file analysis tools today, are jumping off the charts. >> It used to be that PST was the little nag, it looks trivial compared to what we face today, Anna. What's your role as a distinguished systems engineer? How do you spend your time? And what are you seeing out there? >> I definitely spend my time dealing with customers around the world. Speaking to them about information governance. Particularly around risk mitigation these day. In terms of the issues we see in information governance, data privacy is a big one. I'm sure you've been hearing about GDPR quite a bit today already. That's definitely a hot topic and something our customers are concerned about. >> Are they ringing you up saying, "Hey, get in here. "I need to talk you about GDPR?" Or is more you going in saying, "You ready for GDPR? How does that conversation go? >> It's definitely a combination between the two. I think there is definitely a lot of denial out there. A lot of people don't understand that it will apply to them. Obviously if they are storing or processing data which belongs to an EU resident, containing their personal data. I think organizations are either in that denial phase or otherwise they're probably too aware, so they've probably started a project, done some assessment, and then they're buried in the panic mode if we have to remediate all these issues before May next year. >> What's the bell curve look like? Let's make it simple. One is, "we got this nailed." That's got to be tiny. The fat middle which is "we get it, we know it's coming, "we got to allocate some budget, let's go." Versus kind of clueless. What's the bell curve look like? >> I would say that there's 2% of companies, maybe, that think they have it nailed. >> Definitely in single digits, a low single digits. >> I think maybe another 30% at least understand the implications and are trying to at least but a plan in place. And the rest, 66% or so, still aren't very aware of what GDPR means for their business. >> Dave: Wow. >> Can you take us inside? what's Veritas's role in helping customers get ready for GDPR? We talked to one of Veritas's consulting partners today and it's a big issue, it crosses five to ten different budget areas. So what's the piece that Veritas leads and what's the part that you need to pull in other partners for? >> Sure thing. So in terms of our approach, we have what we refer to as a wheel. Which sort of attacks different parts of the GDPR, so various articles step you through the processes you need to be compliant. Things like locating personal data, being able to search that data, minimizing what you have, because GDPR is really dictating you can no longer data hoard, because you can only keep data which has business value. Further downstream it's obviously protecting the data that has business value, and then monitoring that over time. From a Veritas approach perspective, we tying those articles obviously to some of our products, some of our solutions. There's also definitely a services component around that as well. When you think about e-discovery of regulatory requirements, when the regulators come in, generally they're not necessarily going to be questioning the tools, they're going to be questioning how you're using those tools to be compliant. It is sort of a combination between tools and services. And then we're also partnering with other consulting companies on that process piece, as well. Zach, at the keynote this morning, there was a lot of discussion about there's dark data out there, and we need to shine a light on it I have to imagine that's a big piece of this. Why don't you bring us up to speed. What are some of the new products that were announced that help with this whole GDRP problem. >> In to that point, 52% of data is dark, 33% is rot, 15% is mission critical. Today we announced 23 new connectors for the Veritas information map. This is our immersive visual data mapping tool, that really highlights where you're stale, and orphaned, and non-business critical data is across the entire enterprise. New connectors with Microsoft as your Google Cloud storage, Oracle databases, so forth and so on, there's quite a number that we're adding into the fold. That really gives organizations better visibility into where risk may be hiding, and allows you to shine that light and interrogate that data in ways you couldn't do previously because you didn't have those types of insights. >> Also we heard about Risk Analyzer? >> Yes, that's right. We just recently announced the Veritas Risk Analyzer, this is a free online tool, where anyone can go to Veritas.com/riskanalyzer, take a folder of their data, and try out our brand new integrated classification engine. We've got preset policies for GDPR, so you drop in your files, and we'll run the classification in record speed, and it will come back with where PII is, how risky that folder was, tons of great insights. >> So it's identifying the PII, and how much there is, and how siloed it is? Are you measuring that? What are you actually measuring there? >> We're actually giving you a risk score. When we're analyzing risk, you might find one individual piece of PII, or you might find much more dense PII. So depending on the number of files, and the types of files, we'll actually give you a different risk tolerance. What we're doing with the Risk Analyzer is giving you a preview, or just a snapshot of the types of capabilities that Veritas can bring to that discussion. >> Who do you typically talk to? Is it the GC, is it the head of compliance, chief risk officer, all of the above? >> Yeah, it's definitely all of the above-- >> Some person who has a combination of those responsibilities, right? >> Yeah, exactly. It's usually, if we're talking GDPR specifically, it's usually information security, compliance, legal, and particularly in organizations now, we're definitely seeing more data privacy officers. And they're the ones that truly understand what these issues are; GDPR or other personal data privacy regulations. >> Let's say I'm the head of compliance security risk information governance, I wear that hat. Say I'm new to the job, and I call you guys in and say, "I need help." Where do I start? Obviously you're going to start with some kind of assessment Maybe you have a partner to help you do that, I can run my little risk analyzer, sort of leech in machine, and that's good but that's just scratching the surface. I know I have a problem. Where do we start? What are the critical elements? And how long is it going to take me to get me where I need to be? >> I think visibility is obviously the first step, which Zach already spoke to. You really have to be able to understand what you have to then be able to make some educated decisions about that. Generally that's where we see the gap in most organizations today. And that's particularly around unstructured data. Because if it's structured, generally you have some sort of search tools that you can quickly identify what is within there. >> To add on to that, you actually have 24 hours. We can bring back one hundred million items using the information map, so you get a really clean snapshot in just one day to start to understand where some of that risk may be hiding. >> Let's unpack that a little bit. You're surveying all my data stores, and that's because you see that because you've got the back-up data, is that right? >> The backup data is one portion of it. The rest is really coming from these 23 new connectors into those different data stores and extracting and sweeping out that metadata, which allows us to make more impactful decisions about where we think personal data may be, and then you can take further downstream actions using the rest of our tool kit. >> And what about distributed data on laptops, mobile devices, IoT devices, is that part of the scope, or is that coming down the road, or is it a problem to be solved? >> It's a little out of scope for what we do. On the laptop/desktop side of things, we do have e-discovery platform, formally known as Clearwell, which does have the ability to go out and search those types of devices and then you could be doing some downstream review of that data, or potentially moving it elsewhere. It's definitely a place we don't really play right now. I don't know if you had other comments? >> You got to start somewhere. Start within your enterprise. This has always been a challenge. We were talking off camera about FRCP and email archiving. I always thought the backup ... The back company was in a good spot. They analyzed that data. But then there's the but. Even these are backed up, kind of, laptops and mobile devices. Do you see the risk and exposures in PII really at the corporate level, or are attorneys going to go after the processes around distributed data, and devices, and the like? >> I think anything is probably fair game at this point given that GDPR isn't being enforced yet. We'll have to see how that plays out. I think the biggest gap right now, or the biggest pain point for organizations, is on structured data. It kind of becomes a dumping ground and people come and go from organizations, and you just have no visibility into the data that's being stored there. And generally people like to store things on corporate networks because it gets backed up, because it doesn't get deleted, and it's usually things that probably should not be stored there. >> If I think back to 2006, 2007 time frame with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which basically said that electronic information is now admissible. And it was a high profile case, I don't want to name the name because I'll get it wrong, but they couldn't produce the data in court, the judge penalized them, but then they came back and said, "We found some more data. "We found some more data. "We found some more data." Just an embarrassment. It was one hundred million dollar fine. That hit the press. So what organizations did, and I'm sure Anna you could fill in the gaps, they basically said, "Listen, "it's an impossible problem so we're going to go after "email archiving. "We're going to put the finger in the dyke there, "and try to figure the rest of this stuff out later." What happened is plaintiff's attorney's would go after their processes and procedures, and attack those. And if you didn't have those in place, you were really in big trouble. So what people did is try to put those in place. With GDPR, I'm not sure that's going to fly. It's almost binary. If somebody says, "I want you to delete my data," you can't prove it, I guess that's process-wise, you're in trouble, in theory. We'll see how it holds up and what the fines look like, but it sounds like it's substantially more onerous, from what we understand. Is that right? >> Yes, I would 100% agree. From an e-discovery standpoint, there's proportionality and what's reasonable relative to the cost of the discovery and things like that. I actually don't think that that is going to come into play with GDPR because the fines are so substantial. I don't know what would be considered unreasonable to go out and locate data. >> Zach you have to help us end this on an up note. (group laughs) >> Dave: Wait, I wanted to keep going in to the abyss. (group laughs) We've talk about the exponential growth of data, and big data was supposed to be that bit-flip ... of turned it for, "Oh my God, I need to store it "and do everything, I need to be able to harness it "and take advantage of it" Is GDPR an opportunity for customers, to not only get their arms around information, but extract new value from it? >> Absolutely. It's all about good data hygiene. It's about good information governance. It's about understanding where your most valuable assets are, focusing on those assets, and getting the most value you can from them. Get rid of the junk, you don't need that. It's just going to get you into trouble and that's what Veritas can help you do. >> So a lot of unknowns. I guess the message is, get your house in order, call some experts. I'd call a lot of experts, obviously Veritas. We had PWC on earlier today, and a number of folks in your ecosystem I'm sure can help. Guys, thanks very much for coming on theCube and scaring the crap out of us. (group laughs) >> Thanks a lot. >> Alright, keep it right there buddy, we'll be back for our wrap, right after this short break. (light electronic music)