(calm pop music) >> From Phoenix, Arizona, theCUBE. At Catalyst conference. Here's your host, Jeff Frick. >> Hey, welcome back everybody, Jeff Frick here in Phoenix Arizona, at the Girls in Tech Catalyst Conference. Fourth year of the conference. Going to be back in the Bay Area next year, but again as we've said before, something in the water here in Phoenix because we were here two years ago for the Grace Hopper Conference as well. So a lot of good women in tech action happening in Phoenix. So, we're really excited to have the brainchild behind this whole thing. The force who's really making it happen, Adriana Gascoigne. Welcome. >> Thank you. Good to be here. >> Thanks for having us down. So Adriana, tell us the story of Girls in Tech and Catalyst specifically. >> So Catalyst was an inspiration based on when I worked in intel. We invested, or sponsored a conference, for Oprah. It was called Oprah's O Conference, and what was super compelling about that conference, was that there were 10,000 women in the Moscone Center in San Francisco, and they were engaging and raising their hand, and sharing their own personal stories, trials and tribulations, and speaking about really interesting hot button topics. Such as building a business, or finances, or interior design, things that really were compelling to them. And so what really struck me about this environment is that women actually had a voice. They were encouraged to raise their hand and speak up. And I wanted to do this in the tech world because in a very, gender-scare world, it's important for us to have both voices, right? So, I think this environment enables women to speak up and share their feelings and their passions openly. >> And I think I heard your story early on, where you were at a startup, and you were like the only woman. And then they hired more people, and you were still the only woman, and they hired more people and (chuckles), you were still the only woman. So you kind of lived it firsthand. >> Yeah. So that was sort of the impetus behind Girls in Tech, and I felt that the company, the startup I was working at, wasn't doing enough for recruiting. And recruiting, not just women, but just diverse groups of people, which does affect product development. You need many different perspectives, many different experiences and backgrounds, in order to have a comprehensive product. So I decided to take matters into my own hands, and I started Girls in Tech in 2007, and nine plus years later, we're in 60 cities around the world, and six continents, and 36 countries, with over 40,000 members. So it's awesome to see the growth. I'm now doing it full-time, and the sky's the limit. >> So how do people get involved. What's your kind of, corporate mission statement? And then, if people are watching from some city that you either are in, or maybe you're not, how do they get involved? What does it mean to be involved in Girls in Tech in city X. >> Yeah, so our tagline is, empowerment, engagement, and education of women in tech. So this is an inclusive organization, for both high-tech women who want to learn more about entrepreneurship and leadership, and for women that are in startups that want to be employees, or leaders, or start their own companies. So we've developed curriculum that we prototype and pilot in Silicone Valley, perfect it, and then deploy it to our 60 chapters around the world in electronic press kit format. This is great because we get to customize it with the teams on the ground, and do everything from coding and design boot camps, entrepreneurship boot camps, to the Catalyst Conference, to our lady pitch night competition. Pitch night, not anything else (laughs). >> Yeah, yeah, I got that. Pitch, it's pitch. >> It's pitch. >> You know, we're a PG show, no problem. (laughs) >> And we do an exchange program that brings 20 to 30 female entrepreneurs to Silicone Valley to really experience the nuances of this tech ecosystem, what makes it thrive, learning skills on how to become entrepreneurs, meet and greet with VCs and influential people in Silicone Valley. And we have a few other programs that you can check out on the website. But it's exciting, because it's not one size fits all approach. It's, I'm a woman and there are many different changes I have in my career lifetime. So we want to be there for you within your junior, middle career, as well as a leader. >> Right, and we certainly heard that over and over with the guests that we've had on today, about people changing tracks, changing careers, changing industries, and really this theme of continual learning, continual growing. It's a long journey. We have a saying at our company, you're never there, you're only here, there is still there, and you keep moving down the road and it just keeps moving further out. So a couple three-day conference. What are some of your takeaways, some surprises, over the last three days that you'd like to share? >> Wow, where do I begin? I mean the soundbites are all so stellar, inspirational, skills, best practices, but the thing that really stood out, I think in this year specifically, was people's stories. Their emotional stories, their passions. The things that wake them up in the morning. And they say, yes, I want to change the world and make an impact and love my life while doing it. It was very candid, you know, some of these women really shared difficult situations. And these situations help fuel energy and their fire to make change in their life, to help and pay it forward with up and coming women, and leaders in the tech industry. So it was powerful from the candor, and the friends that were made, and the passions that were shared. >> Awesome. Well I know you got to get back to the conference, you're the master of ceremonies, keeping everything on track. (laughs) So I appreciate you taking a few minutes out of your time to stop by >> It's my pleasure. >> Again, thanks for inviting us to this conference. We're really excited to come down, and we'll look forward to next year's. >> Yeah, next year's going to going to be in the Bay Area. So, in your neck of the woods. >> Awesome. >> Yeah. >> Adriana, again thanks for inviting us. Running a great show, the Girls in Tech Conference. I'm Jeff Frick, you're watching theCUBE. Thanks for watching. We'll catch ya next time. (upbeat pop music)

>> From Phoenix, Arizona, The Cube at Catalyst Conference. Here's your host, Jeff Frick. (upbeat techno music) >> Hey welcome back everybody, Jeff Frick here with The Cube. We are in Phoenix, Arizona at the Girl's in Tech Catalyst Conference on the fourth year of the conference, about 400 people here, wanted to come down, get a feel for what's going on. Seems to be something about Phoenix and women in tech, because we were here two years ago at the Grace Hopper Conference, the first time we ever covered that event with Telle Whitney and Marie Klawe, et cetera. So, we're excited to be back, and with our next guest, Scarlett Spring, president and chief commercial officer of VisionGate. Welcome, Scarlett. >> Thank you, and welcome back to Phoenix. >> Absolutely, thank you. So for those that aren't familiar with VisionGate, give us a little 411 on the company. >> Absolutely, so VisionGate is a medical device company, launching an in-vitro diagnostic tool for noninvasive, early detection of lung cancer, and, as of this year, January, we now have licensed in a drug which could treat even the pre-cancerous condition before you would get lung cancer, called dysplasia of the lung. >> Okay, so you said a whole lot there. >> Exactly. >> A lot of words. So let's go through that sentence one more time, a little bit slower, so it's-- >> It's a medical-- >> It's noninvasive. >> Yeah, so we're a medical device company, so there's a hardware component to the company. There's a software component to the company, because we're in-vitro diagnostic, meaning we have an assay, and that's a noninvasive test for lung cancer, so it's a sputum test. >> What does that mean, a sputum test? >> If you give us a deep cough, from the cells of your lungs, not saliva which would come from your oral cavity but a deep cough from your lung, our device can look at those cells and make a determination whether there are abnormal cells, thus leading to think that there would be cancer cells. >> And how would that process of trying to determine whether you have cancer or not happen without your technology? >> There isn't a test, today. >> There's no test? >> Right. Sputum has been looked at manually by putting your deep cough on a glass slide since the 1930s, and there's so much variation in data, because it's like finding a needle in the haystack, because when you give a cough, you cough up about four million cells, give or take a million. So for a human to do that, exactly that's it. It's extremely laborious, it's not cost effective, and, once again, you're looking for a handful of cells which would be diagnostic, because most of what's coming out of your lungs is saliva and white cells, because obviously it's trying to kill anything that's in there. >> Right, so in terms of the way the technology works, so is it kind of advanced, kind of pattern recognition? What is trying to do-- >> Perfect. That is a perfect question. It is exactly. Our innovation is we use machine recognition technology, and we look at the morphology of a cell. What does that mean? That means the cellular features, because cell features of a cancer cell look very different from a normal cell, and you can train a computer through a series of algorithms to recognize those differences, very similar to what a human being does. So in essence, we put a pathologist in a box, and we have trained thousands and thousands, like 250,000 cells has gone into training this classifier, and some of the world's best pathologists and cytopathologists have actually trained our machine. >> And the fact that you chose to go after lung cancer, it sounds like this would work, because you're basically looking for anomalies. >> That's exactly right. >> It sounds like that would work for lots-- >> It does. >> Of different things. >> You're exactly right. Once we can train this algorithm to actually look at other cancer types, so we're still in our kind of late stage startup phase, but we already have proof of concept work that is looking in urine for bladder cancer, looking at blood for circulating tumor cells, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus by being able to get some of the cells extracted. What we're trying to do is look at noninvasive ways, because today you want to make sure that you're being cost-effective, so that's the easiest way that you could get a cell, but you could use more invasive techniques to get a cell. For instance, like a pancreatic cancer. That would kind of be a real opportunity. Some conversations that we're having with clinical collaborators, that would inquire at least an upper GI where you would go into the stomach, poke the wall to try to get a specimen. What I tell individuals is if you get us a cell, we can create the classifier to ascertain whether it's normal or abnormal. >> And, the end goal is to just come up with more kind of regular routine with your checkup process that you're testing for these cancers to get out ahead of the curve. >> Jeff, it is all about early detection. Unfortunately, most of our cost today happen toward the end of the disease cycle. If we could invert that and actually have better early detection tools, not only would we save lives, but downstream it would be a tremendous cost saving just to the healthcare system. >> Right, very interesting work. >> Thank you. >> And have you always been involved in-- >> Well, it's interesting, I have 19 years of big pharma experience, so I actually started with Merck which became AstraMerck, AstraZeneca. So I had 19 years of continuous service, and I launched Prilosec in 1989 and then had the pleasure of continuing my pharma career with some terrific products, you know, Nexium, the oncology division there at AstraZeneca. So, oncology did grab me, and I've been very passionate about that since the late 1990s, early 2000s. >> Does it ever just crush you though that it's oncology, that it's cancer? I always think of the saints that are in these wards that are dealing with this everyday. >> You're right, particularly at AstraZeneca, we had breast cancer, prostate cancer and lung cancer products, and one of the things that every October during National Breast Cancer Awareness Month, I would get out in the field and go and be with our sales representatives, and it never got far from me that at the end there was a patient that was receiving therapy and the tremendous impact that your body goes through. So, we can never forget that at the end of all that we're doing is. there's a patient. We're trying to save a life, and the work matters. >> Yeah, and it's a person, right not only-- >> That's a person. >> A patient, but it's a person. >> It's a person. >> A mom, a sister. >> I don't think any of probably even watching this today has not been somehow impacted by cancer. >> Yeah, crazy, so let's shift gears. Get off the cancer for a minute. You had a presentation here at the-- >> I did. >> Conference. How to fly in the face of adversity. So for the folks unfortunately that couldn't make it to Phoenix today, what's it all about? >> Well, flying in the face of adversity, my workshop is going to talk about three layers. Raising money for a startup that has a big idea, and I think just by the brief introduction I gave you to VisionGate, it's a game changing kind of idea. Secondly, how do you go from startup to scale up? And lastly, how are you as a leader, thinking about your brand and how it aligns with the mission of your company? And there isn't any given week and maybe even any give day that I don't balance those three things, whether I'm trying to raise money, because we're still not revenue generating yet, whether I'm scaling the company, because we've grown just 40% since, call it Thanksgiving of last year, to thinking about what's my responsibility being here today, because the girls that are here are just starting their careers in technology, and by them, they will be the leaders of tomorrow. So, I think it's going to be a great topic. I'm actually going to allow the audience to do some prioritization, which one of these do you want to talk about, and we're going to walk through some exercises of doing that. >> It's interesting, many moons ago, I was involved in a speaker series at Wharton, and we had David Pottruck on. He's the former CEO of Schwab, Schwab's right hand guy, really articulate speaker, phenomenal speaker, and we had dinner with him afterwards. I asked him, I said why are you such a good speaker, and he goes, you know, I practice a lot. As a senior executive of a company, all you do is communicate. You communicate to your investors. You communicate to your employees. You communicate to your customers. That's pretty much what your job is, and so I took it as a serious thing, and I hired coaches, and I practiced. And now I'm pretty good at it, so it's interesting that you tie that back that building your own personal brand and getting that out there and how important that is to really helping the development, and the movement and the success of your company. >> It's true, and if you think about your brand, if you do it from being a self-centered or trying to have it being inward focused, you're going to probably end up in the wrong place, but if you do it thinking about how you would market a brand, what are the traits, the attributes that I have, that I want to be known for, and then that I want to try to nurture. And what it really comes down to is helping someone tap into their authenticity and their reputational power. What do you want to be known for? >> That's interesting I was just thinking as you were talking to get someone the nuggets, but that is a great nugget. What do you want to be known for? And to put the consciously out front. And I do think too that the world has shifted, in kind of the sharing world that we live in. It used to be power was in retention, holding. You had your stack of business cards. You'd never let those things out of your sight. You change companies, you take your Rolodex with you. Now, it's very different. The power comes, actually, from sharing. The more you share, the more you help others, actually the more influence and power that you get. >> And that's actually some of the very things that we'll be talking about is whether you are just starting your career, whether you are looking to get a promotion and move up within your own company, whether you are toward the end of your career and looking to transition to boards or advisory boards or be more connected to something that you're passionate about. In that, what are the things that you're known for that make you valuable? Is it that you're going to take on extra projects at work and kind of get known for someone who brings solutions to the table or is the person who's going to have the uncomfortable conversation, you know, the conversation that needs to be had in the room, but you're able to do it in a way that isn't polarizing, but brings everybody in to go, oh my gosh, you just articulated what needed to be said, and that created some sort of positive change. I want to get at those things today in our workshop, and it should be fun. >> That's just phenomenal, the way you summed that up so succinctly. You know, there's a lot of places that you can add value in the way that you work and the tasks that you chose to add on and to be known for doing some of the dirty work, doing some of the ugly stuff and helping the whole organization get over that hurdle. Scarlett, sounds like it's going to be a great session. Unfortunately, we'll be here doing more interviews, which is not unfortunately. We love being here to do interviews, but sounds like you're going to have a lot of fun. Good luck with it. >> I appreciate it. Thank you so much for the time. >> Absolutely and-- >> Come back to Phoenix again! >> Good luck with VisionGate. >> Absolutely. >> So when is your next hurdle with VisionGate? When's your next kind of trial? I know these medical ones take a while. >> It is true, so we've got a couple things that are going on right now. Hopefully, there'll be a screening opportunity coming to you soon, and we're getting our drug into phase three trials. >> All right, Scarlett, again thanks for stopping by. >> Thank you, appreciate it. >> Absolutely, I'm Jeff Frick. It's Girls in Tech Catalyst Conference in Phoenix, Arizona. You're watching The Cube. Thanks for watching. (upbeat techno music)

(rhythmic music) >> From Phoenix, Arizona, The Cube. At Catalyst Conference, here's your host, Jeff Frick. (rhythmic music) >> Hey, Jeff Frick here with The Cube. We are in Phoenix, Arizona at the Girls Who Code Catalyst Conference It's a great show, about 400 people; they're fourth year. It's going back to the Bay Area next year, so I wanted to come down, talk to some of the key notes, some of the speakers. And really give you a taste if you weren't able to make the trip to Phoenix this year of what's going on. So we're really excited to be joined by our next guest, Fran Maier, she co-founded Match, she co-founded TRUSTe. Serial entrepreneur, the start-up veteran. Fran, welcome. >> Thank you so much Jeff, It's great to be here. >> Absolutely. So you were giving a presentation on really what it is to be a woman entrepreneur. >> Yes, so I've been a internet entrepreneur for now more than twenty years going back to when we started Match.com. And I joined that in late 1994. We really launched around 1995, about 21 years ago, this month, April of 1995. >> Time flies >> And many of the things that were still very much, I think, in the early years of the impact of the internet and mobile and cloud and connectivity on our lives, but Match.com has proven to be what they call a unicorn, a very successful new business model, but more than that many, many people have found their life partner or at least a few good dates on Match.com. So I am always very happy about that. >> And you're way ahead of the curve. Now, I think, I don't know, I've been married for over twenty years, but I think a lot of people that's kind of the first way >> Yeah. to meet people. >> Not the second way. Where when you guys first made Match.com, that was a pretty novel idea. >> Well, well now they call dating where like we used to do it, where you met people at parties and bars, now that's called dating in the wild. >> In the wild (laughing) >> So the more natural thing is using Match.com. But from an entrepreneurial support, I was one of the only women who was involved in starting company in the mid-1990's, still women are less than 10% of TechFounders or venture-backed founders. Women raise a lot less money. And so one of my passions and why I am here at Girls in Tech is to try and impart some of the wisdom gleamed over twenty plus years. >> So what are some of the ways that you see that barrier starting to break down? Is it just, you just got to keep banging on it and slowly and slowly it will move and >> (murmers) >> So I think there's been some difference, I think it's a lot easier to be an entrepreneur of any kind now >> Well that's true. >> than it was twenty years ago. I mean, now having meals delivered to you and the sort of support like Girls in Tech, there was very little of that guidance or certainly there were very few role models, >> Right. >> Twenty years ago. So that certainly has changed. I think another big change, and this is probably over the last two or three years, is that now women feel they can speak out loud about some of the issues. And that there is some, men are willing to listen, >> Right >> Right >> at least some are. >> We still see things like TechCrunch a couple of years ago had a team present a new mobile app called Titstare. We still hear about things like that. We still, there was a survey called The Elephant in Silicon Valley that itemized stories and stats about women and sexual abuse, other kinds of harassment, exclusion, not being invited to sit at the table. So a lot of that stuff is still going on. But I feel like we can call it out a little bit easier. >> Right, right. And it's ... >> Without retribution potentially. >> Is there, is there, kind of a tipping point event, action, that you see potentially as to kind of accelerating ... accelerating it? >> Well I think the media, since lead-in has really kind of picked up on this and discovering it. And the Ellen Pao trial, last year; I spoke a little bit about that, where she brought suit to Kleiner Perkins. She lost the suit, but it started the dialogue. >> Right. >> So I think a lot of this is, is happening and my approach is to try and ... I see, I advise so many start ups. And I see business plans. And almost invariably the business plans from women aren't big enough. They don't say "Hey we're going to be a hundred million dollar company in five years. And we need to raise five million dollars to get there." >> Right. >> Women play it more safe, and, I don't think that, I'm trying to encourage them to take more risk, to figure out how to do it, to play to win. >> Right. Play big to win, right? Playing big. >> Play big to win, yes, swing big. >> It's interesting, on the Lean In, you know Sheryl Sandberg's, I don't know if ground breaking is the right word, but certainly ground breaking. >> Surely, yeah. >> But the Golden State Warriors right now, probably the most popular professional sports team in the country, at the zenith of their success, they have a Lean In commercial. I don't know if you've seen it in the Bay Area, >> I havent seen it! >> where all of the players talk about leaning in. And it just so happens that Steph Curry, their number one superstar, >> Sure. is very close to his wife. She has a cooking show. They're very family orientated. Green ... >> But I thought you were going to ... >> Draymond Green has his mom, who he just constantly just gushes about his mom. And so they, as a male sports team, have a whole commercial they run quite frequently on specifically Lean In. >> Well I, I appreciate that. I also, though, read the article that, that team is owned by bunch of venture capitalists. They all get together and play basketball and it reminded me of a little bit of another place where women have been excluded. And so I was talking to a venture capital friend of mine saying "Buy into the Warriors, or let's buy into a women's soccer team." And you know sports being what they are, it's almost a different thing, but the news about the women's soccer players being paid much less than the men, even though they generate more income. It's just another example, profession by profession where women are paid less or have less opportunity to advance. >> But to your point, I think people understand it, it's not right, but I think everyone pretty much knows that women aren't paid the same as men. But that was interesting about the soccer story, to your point is it was brought up. >> Yeah we could talk about it. >> It wasn't a retribution, right? It's like hey, you know, we're not getting paid and they listed the numbers in Sports Illustrated. They were dramatically different. And, in fact, you know, one of the knocks in the WNBA is that you can't make a living as a player in the WNBA. You just can't. They pay them like, I don't know >> So they should have been. Yeah. >> $60,000. Whatever it is. You know they have to go play in other places, foreign countries to make enough money to live. So I do think its interesting, your point that, you know, the exposure of the problem, the kind of acceptance that we need to do something about it, does seem to be in a much better place than it used to be. >> The other thing that I think that these things illustrate is one of the messages I try and get across, is women tend to settle for too little. You know, they don't necessarily negotiate for themselves. Out of college they don't do as well. They, I've talked to many women who they felt that when they were raising capital, or negotiating deals, that the men on the other side of the table, mostly, not always of course, it sort of said, "Hey this is great, you should be happy to get this. How many women get this?" And that's not really the issue. The issue should be, you should be getting what you deserve. I learned that the hard way, we talked about it a little bit, awhile ago, where Match.com was sold in 1998 for less than $10,000,000. And I was the general manager, I had grown it, we were number one, we were cash flow positive, although probably shouldn't have been. And I walked away with a hundred thousand dollars. And, at the time, sure that's a lot of money, but nobody seemed to encourage me that I probably could have raised the money and led the investment and had an equity round. A year later Match.com was sold from Send It to ISC for $70,000,000. And of course I didn't get anything. >> Yeah. >> So that's my big lesson. The good news is, ten years later, I took TRUSTe, which was a nonprofit, switched it to a for-profit, I raised the capital, and got my ownership in equity position. But tough lesson. >> Yeah, expensive one. >> Yeah. >> But those are the ones you learn though. (laughter) >> I could go through a few of those too. So Fran, we're running low on time. I wanted to give you the last word and get your perspective on, kind of, mentorship and sponsorship. We hear those words tossed around a lot. And that there's a significant difference between just being a mentor and actually being a sponsor, taking an active role in someone else's career. Pushing them to maybe uncomfortable places. Giving them, you know, kind of, the oomph, if you will, that, "Yes you can do this, you do belong." What are you seeing kind of the development of that as people try to help more women ascend, kind of up the line? >> Well, you know, I tend to think of mentorship as something that happens within a company and sponsorship can happen within a company, but advising, sponsoring, promoting, championing, are things that we certainly need to do within the entrepreneurial community of women. So, mentoring is, I see that as a little bit more passive, and I don't know why. But, it's important to have people to look up to and for you, role models are really important. But I think the active thing of championing or sponsoring or even being a more active coach or advisor, is a little bit more hands-on and willing to challenge, you know, you're not just a role model, you're really saying, "Tell me what you're dealing with, and let me see how I can help." I just got off a phone call from one of my advisees, she just raised the money, great news, you know, now she's freaking out about how to spend it. (laughing) >> Maybe with your next problem. >> Yeah. (laughter) >> Been there, done that. >> Right, right. >> You know. >> Well, it's good, good for helpin' them out, and Fran, thanks for taking a few minutes. >> Sure. Lot of fun. >> Absolutely. Track Fran down if you're a budding entrepreneur. She's been there, she's got the scars and the wounds from the early days, and learned from it on the success with TRUSTe. >> Thank you. >> And, some great videos on the web, by the way. I was watching them, the whole story on the Match thing was pretty funny. You'll enjoy it, so take the time ... >> There's one of them where I start to cry, I hate that, but what can you do? >> I didn't get to the crying part, but that's okay. >> Yeah, yeah, that's all right. >> That's what happens in Jerry McGuire all the time. All right, well thanks a lot Fran. >> Thanks so much. >> I'm Jeff Frick, you are watching The Cube. We are in Phoenix, Arizona, at the Girls in Tech Catalyst Conference. (rhythmic music)

>> From Phoenix, Arizona, the Cube at Catalyst Conference. Here's your host, Jeff Frick. (upbeat music) >> Hey, welcome back everybody, Jeff Frick here with the Cube. We are in Phoenix, Arizona, at the Girls in Tech Catalyst Conference, about 400 people, a great show, they're fourth year in existence. Back in the Bay Area next year, wanted to come down and check it out. So we're really excited to be here, and our next guest Mercedes De Luca, the Chief Operating Officer from Base Camp, welcome. >> Thank you. >> Base Camp, everybody knows Base Camp. >> Everybody knows Base Camp, it's been around for a long time. >> Absolutely, we use it and a lot of people use it, just one of those kind of tools that's ubiquitous, it's all over the place. >> Yeah, we just introduced our Base Camp 3 version, and now it's something we operate the business on. >> Excellent, so we talked a little bit off camera about your session, which is really about career pivots, and there's probably no place more important to be able to execute a successful career pivot than Silicon Valley. We hear about it often with companies, and usually it's associated when things aren't going so well that you have to do some type of a business model pivot or design pivot. But from a career perspective, super important. So what are some of the lessons that you shared here in your talk? >> Yeah, so one of the things that we did, was how do you sort of take the risk out of pivots, and what vectors do you move along. Basically recommending that people sort of take one vector at a time. I think getting the industry right is really important, and when I first started I had an opportunity to work in financial service or high-tech. I chose high-tech and that formed my career. And so I think getting the industry right's important. I think when you want to move to different functions, there's ways to do that inside companies, there's ways to do that when you move to a different company. >> It's interesting, there's so much pressure with kids and young people trying to figure out, you know, what's the right decision. I got to make the right decision. You don't really need to make the right decision. You just need to make a decision and get on your path, right? >> Exactly, you just want to make that next move. That's really where you want to focus your energy because as long as you're moving toward your strengths, you're beginning to amplify those, it's just about making that next step. And it's really important to talk to other people and verify that what you think you're going to be moving to is actually what's going to be happening. >> Right, so when you define some of these vectors, what are some of the vectors that are consistent or adjacent that make some of these moves easier or more successful? >> So one would be industry vector, so if you want to get out of the industry you're in, but you may still do the same function in that industry. There's the function vector, which says, I'm in a function of engineering and I want to get into marketing, or I'm in project management and I want to do engineering. And then the third has more to do with how you contribute the level you're at. Vice president, director, size of company, individual contributor versus line management. So there's a lot of different vectors, there's three basically, is how I think about it. And it's just a recommendation of how to think about making moves. >> Now, we had Jim McCarthy on earlier, who was a speaker, and he talked about making the big shift, you know. You have a life changing event, and you just decide this is not what I want to do, I want to do something different. How does that play into what you're trying to help people do, to make it successful? So you don't just drop everything and change buildings. You have to kind of work your way over I would imagine. >> Right, I think the most important thing though is focusing on your strengths, really figuring out what is it in your career. For me it's been emerging technology, it's been consumer, and it's been leadership. And culture, so when I look at those things together, it's always making sure that that next step is moving you even closer and closer to that ultimate place. Base Camp is known for its culture. So one of the things that was really important to me in this last move, was to make sure that I wound up in a company that really walked the walk. That was important to me. >> So what tips do you give to people when they're thinking about that, to figure out culture? It's hard to figure out culture. You go through an interview process, and you get to meet the person across the table, and you do a little investigative work, but a lot of times you don't really know what you've got into until you got into it. So how do you coach people to try to figure out some of that culture fit, and again what are the vectors of culture that are the big ones that you should be aligning to? >> Well, we're lucky today because there's Twitter, and there's Facebook, and there's all sorts of social media that allows us to really learn a lot more about the company and the culture, check out what the people in the company are saying about the company. In my case, super lucky, because both of the founders blog a lot on our Signal Versus Noise. They do a lot of writing, so I almost felt like I knew the culture going into it. They've written books, et cetera. But for companies that haven't written books and haven't blogged, I think you can absolutely get that by also talking to people inside the company and being clear about what you're looking for. I think that's a big part of it. >> Okay, well Mercedes, I'll give you the last word. What is your kind of parting tip to people who are looking to make a move, or just concerned, oh my gosh, I'm just locked up cause I think I have to get it right the first time? >> Don't let others define you. (laughing) >> Short and sweet. I should have asked you the bumper sticker question, give me the bumper sticker for it. Don't let others define you, that's perfect. Well Mercedes, thanks for taking a few minutes to stop by. >> Thank you Jeff. I appreciate it. >> Absolutely. >> Nice to meet you. >> So Jeff Frick here, at the Girls in Tech Catalyst Conference in Phoenix, Arizona. You're watching the Cube. Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)

(funky electronic music) >> From Phoenix, Arizona, theCUBE, at Catalyst Conference. Here's your host, Jeff Frick. (music muffles) >> Hey, welcome back everybody, Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We're in Phoenix, Arizona, at the Girls in Tech Catalyst Conference. About 4,000, or excuse me, 400 people, kind of a small conference, fourth year, growing in size. Going to be back in the Bay Area next year. Wanted to come down, check it out, always like to get, you know, kind of early on some of these conferences and really see what's going on. And we're really excited for our next guest, Monique Morrow, the CTO of New Frontiers Engineering inside of Cisco, welcome. >> Thank you very much, it's a pleasure to be here. >> So we've had a ton of Cisco guests on over the years, but I never heard the New Frontiers Engineering title, so what is New Frontiers Engineering? >> So New Frontiers is exactly what you think. You can imagine it's really forward thinking in terms of technology and research. This combinatorial intersection, if you will, with economics, and what could be potential portfolio for the future business of the company, so that's what I look at. You know, that's a special position, I could say, because you really want to make sure that you're not too far out to your core business, and you care about your core business always. >> Right, I was going to ask, how much of it's kind of accelerating the core versus, you know, kind of green field? I know, you know, we've had some of the team from the UCS group, and, you know, it's a growing business inside of Cisco, not really kind of core, what you think about, in terms of core switches, and stuff. It's servers, and a data center for structure beyond just the network. Is that some of the stuff that you guys look at? To go, kind of out on new branches? >> Well, certainly cloud, so data centers, with that is cloud computing, and then you've got mobile, and you have video. I would also say you have cyber security, internet of things, very, very important business analytics. So that's core business. And it could be accelerating what we have, but it also could be creating a new business opportunity. So the modus operandi, or the modality, if you will, is not to steer too far away from your core, the network does count. Software is going to be very, very important for us, service is absolutely important. So, you know, it's really steering the ship mid way, in such a way that you de risk what you're doing as you look forward. >> If only McNeely had said the cloud is the computer, (laughing) the network is the computer, right? >> So true. (laughing) >> So I want to touch base on your talk, Changing the Landscape of the Digitized World. >> Yes, yeah. >> What was that all about? >> So, you know, setting the landscape, there are several points that I wanted to make during that presentation, and really, to fire up the audience. One is that 51% of the global population are women, and women do count. That is change is extremely, it is exponential, probably always has been. That this is all about how do you keep your skills up at the end of the day? This is all about it is never too late to understand what's happening out there, and hear the skills buckets. So cyber security, analytics, what you do with data, mobility, collab, collaboration is probably the 21st century currency in anything that we're going to do because we're so global. The notion of what you do with other components here, not only the internet of things. And with the internet of things, you've got interesting aspects with privacy and how you handle privacy, privacy engineering, privacy by design, and all kinds of modality of cyber security. Because, you know, companies and customers are very concerned about ransomware, so think about phishing attacks. And I would say that that's just a start. >> Right, right. >> But, you have to juxtapose that with critical thinking skills, and something that we call T skills. It's interdisciplinary skill sets that are going to be asked for in this century, along with intergenerational teaming. So it's not just about working with millennials, but it's about working with people who've been in the business, it's the power of the and here, and that's really, really the focus. >> We're going to run out of time way too early, I already know this. But there's so many things you just touched on, specifically back to your skills comment. What's interesting is the technology is changing so fast, it's the new skills that are the kind of the driving new programming language, that you're almost in an advantage if you don't kind of have the legacy behind you. Because everyone is learning all these new languages, and these new ways to do things, that didn't exist just a short time ago. >> Well, coding is fundamental. I think that coding is going to be fundamental, but you can learn new programming languages if you learn at least the fundamentals of coding. What's really, really important is to be able to pivot your skills sets in such a way that you are keeping up with it. It's never, ever too late. Once you have a knowledge of a particular language, or a knowledge of a particular algorithm, or a way something works, you're going to be able to learn anything. My message was it's never too late. You can start to learn now. >> Right. >> So that's really important. >> And then the other piece on the T skills, again, the IOT's is a giant bundle that we could jump into for a long time. But, you know, as the machines start to take more and more of the low level work, and increasingly the mid level, and the higher level, it is incumbent on a person to really start to bring some context, bring some relative scale, bring, you know, a lot softer skills to help influence that activity in the correct way. >> Interdisciplinary skills are the ask for the 21st century. So for example, I was just at the school of, I was actually on a strategic advisory board for the School of Computer Science, a particular university here in the United States, and one of the asks was not only have the skill set of computer science, but oh, by the way, go take an improvisational class at their school of fine arts. So to have the ability to communicate, because communication skills are the number one skills that companies and enterprises are looking for. So interdisciplinary skills, big currency for the 21st century. >> Well that's interesting, 'cause I wonder how aggressively that communications message is weaved into, kind of, your classic STEM conversation. >> They are, well, they are very much weaved into the classic STEM conversation, and I would say it's STEAM, because you have to put A for art there. >> Well, there you go. (laughing) Fixed. >> So, to the classic conversation, you can be a savant in a particular science, but if you don't have the ability, and this is with enterprises essentially, to communicate and to be able to work in teams, it's going to be a dead end for you to come into the enterprise. So it's really, really important to have those skill sets. >> Yeah, so I want to shift gears a little bit. >> Sure. >> 'Cause not only do you have your day job at Cisco-- >> Yeah. >> But you're involved in a lot of, kind of, advocacy. >> Yes. >> So tell the audience some of the work that you're doing there. >> Yes, I mean, so one of the areas that I really care about is advocating for women, and women creating technology, women who were actually in technologies, so there is also the UN component of that. I think that's very, very important, tech policy component for it. The UN women's organization received the lowest budget of all of the UN, so getting more, remember the context, 51% of the worlds population are women, and so we have to go up, and down, and across the pyramids. And so we need that, that's the level of advocacy that I'm involved in, not only from a company and an industry perspective, but also from a UN related perspective, and a standard setting perspective. Because it is about about the power of the and, and our ultimate goal is to achieve gender neutraility, I think, at the end of the day. I recall one thing is that there are 17 UN sustainable goals that were contented and approved, really, by the United Nations this past September. Number one is ending poverty, number five is achieving gender equality. >> It's just those are such big problems, just, you know, you look at hunger. >> Yes. >> And it just seems this continual battle to try to make improvement, make improvement, make improvement, and yet we're continued to be surrounded, probably within blocks of where we're sitting now, with people that are not getting enough to eat. So how does education compare to that, or how tightly are they intertwined? And then, within education, is STEAM a leading edge? Is STEAM, you know, kind of a way to break through, and get more education? How does STEAM fit within the education broader? >> Oh, well, it's, (chuckling) it's all intertwined. >> I told you we weren't going to have enough time. (laughing) >> Yeah, so, it's all, it's really all intertwined at the end of the day. It's what is taught at what age group, it depends on whether you're in a developing country or a developed country. So we're, you know, in the United States advocating, and most of other countries advocating that technology STEAM be really taught at a very early age, you know, primary school. If you get skill sets really broadened and developed at and early age, you also develop the capacity to actually be able to work, or to be able to create, and to be able to add to your household. And if you're in a village, to be able to do some very creative things, too, because of what you're dealing with. So think about connecting here's the bigger problem that we, as an industry, want to solve. That is connecting one to two billion people on the internet in the next several years, and they're not going to be in North America, and they're not going to be in Europe. They're going to be in Africa. They're going to be in other countries of the world, and so we need to think creatively, working with people on the ground, learning from them, and not being techno, what was told to me, not to be techno colonialist at the same time. Because there's some very interesting solutions that are coming out of the countries that we could actually tap into. >> Right, and just to wrap, not that you don't have enough to do in your day job, (chuckling) or your global advocacy, but you're also a very prolific writer. >> Yes, I'm a, well, a prolific writer, and I'm so proud to have coauthored three books this year. one that is already out, is Disrupting Unemployment. The other two will be out in June, which is Inner Cloud Interoperability with our three other coauthors. And the third book, which I'm almost most proud of, is The Internet of Women Accelerating Cultural Change, and that will be out on June 30th of this year. >> You're a busy lady. >> Busy. (chuckling) >> Alright, well, Monique, thanks for taking a few minutes-- >> Thank you. >> Out of your busy day. You probably could've written another couple chapters-- (chuckling) >> In the 20 minutes that we've had together. I really appreciate the time. I look forward to really kind of looking for where your guys imprint starts coming out of the Cisco machine on the back and with the products. So thank you very much-- >> Thank you. >> For all your work. >> Well, it's a pleasure to be here. >> Absolutely. Jeff Frick, here at the Girls in Tech Catalyst Conference in Phoenix, Arizona. Thanks for watching. (funky electronic music)

(upbeat music) >> From Phoenix, Arizona, the CUBE, at Catalyst Conference. Here's your host, Jeff Frick. >> Hey welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with the CUBE. We're in Phoenix, Arizona at the Girls in Tech Catalyst Conference. There's a lot of catalyst conference, but there's only one Girls in Tech Catalyst Conference. It's their fourth year, about 400 people they're going to be back in San Francisco next year. Wanted to come down and see what's going on. And we're really excited with our next guest. Actually part of my prep, I went and watched our last interview and we knocked it out of the park, I have to say. Jennifer Tejada, former President and the CEO of Keynote. Welcome back. >> Thank you, thanks so much for having me. It's great to see you again. >> Absolutely, so just to set the record straight, 'cause there's little bits on the internet, you're no longer the CEO of Keynote. >> I am no longer the CEO of Keynote. Keynote was acquired by a company called Compuware. It was merged with a business within Compuware called Dynatrace. Following that integration last year, I stepped out of the business and have been spending my time making some investments, pursuing the growth arena in Tech, and also spending a lot of time on boards and helping other women establish themselves in the community of boards and the technology industry. >> Okay, so if they weren't ringing off the hook already, now your phones will begin to ring off the hook. >> (laughs) >> You couldn't get a better CEO than Jennifer. >> Oh, thank you. >> But let's jump in. So you've been spending your time too, helping at conferences like this. So you had a session here. >> Yeah, I'm speaking today about operations. >> That's right, coming up. >> My presentation's called "Ops Chops". It's a subject that's very dear to my heart because of the pragmatism of operations, and how underrepresented I think it is at conferences like this. You know, we've seen many inspiring speakers in the last two days, talking about their paths to success, and to leadership, and giving the women in the room a lot of great advice on how to manage everything, from your career development, to work-life balance, to conflict, to challenges, how to really navigate the tech industry. Which, you know if someone could send me the book on that, that would be great. But no-one's really talking about, I think, where the rubber meets the road, which is operations. I believe operations is the bridge between strategy and the execution of great results. And there's a lot of math in operations. In the tech industry right now, we're hearing a lot of storytelling, and narratives about great new companies, new products, and the vision for how we're going to change the world, et cetera. But at the end of the day, if you want to be successful, you have to set goals that are helpfully aspirational, but realistic, and then you've got to nail your delivery. Because if you miss a beat, you don't have a lot of time to make up for that miss. And you've got investors, you've got shareholders, you have employees that expect you to deliver. And so operations I think is a great mix between art and science. The math of really measuring your business, the rigor of measuring your progress, really understanding the underlying financial drivers in your business, and then orienting your culture, and your people around the best possible execution that gives your strategy the most potential to be successful >> Right, and ops kind of gets a bad rap all the time. Everyone's talking about strategy and strategy, and we're all about strategy. At the end of the day, strategy with no execution, it's just a nice PowerPoint slide, right? But it's not like you on this. >> Exactly, exactly. And I think, you know I've been around for a little while. I've seen the market cycles in the technology industry. And we're certainly seeing a connection now. And a lot of businesses that marked themselves and measured themselves on how much money they've raised, or how much money they've spent, are now trying to figure out how to generate cash flow, and how to survive over a longer period of time if the market does soften. So I have a lot of respect for people who know how to generate cash flow, and deliver results, and deliver revenue, and measure their business on the basis of growth. Customers that vote with their dollars, right? >> Right. >> And so, yeah, I think operations, it's the unsung hero. When it comes to business outcomes. And so we're going to spend some time today talking about what I think is the quiet achiever in leadership. >> The other thing that's kind of interesting, cause we've got all these big data shows, right? Big data, cloud, probably two of the biggest topics right now, internet of things, of course being right there. But this kind of nirvana picture that gets painted, where there's going to be all this automation, and I'm just going to throw it in a big Hadoop cluster, and voila, everything happens. >> Boom, I'll have the answer. >> It doesn't really work that way. >> Not yet. I do think that machine learning, and artificial intelligence is progressing rapidly. And I think we're moving away from the automation of process to the automation of getting to the answer. I think analytics without action, though, leaves you kind of empty-handed. >> Right >> Like, so great, I have a lot of information, I have all this big data. I need the small data. I need data in the context of problems that I'm trying to solve. Whether, I'm thinking about it from consumer perspective, or a business perspective. So I see a real convergence between analytics and applications coming. You know, I think LifeLock has a funny commercial where they talk about alerting. And you know, don't just point to the fire. Like help me put the fire out. Help me figure out how the thing caught fire. And I think that's where machine learning and artificial intelligence can be super helpful. I also think that we're a long way away from really being able to leverage the true power of all this data. If you think about digital health, for example, and all the proprietary data stacks, that are being built through your FitBit, or your iPhone. You know, the way we're sensoring our personal health and fitness. But where's all that data going? Is it really contributing to research to solve, you know, health epidemics, right? No, because those stacks are all proprietary. No one wants to share them. >> Right >> So we need to get to a universal language, or a universal technology platform, that enables the researchers of the world to get a hold of that data, and do something super meaningful with it. So I think with progress, you'll also create open-ended questions. >> Absolutely >> And I think it's all positive. But I think we still have a long way to go, to see that big data environment really deliver great results. >> Right. So let's shift gears a little bit to leadership. >> Yeah. >> Another kind of softer topic. Not a big data topic. And when we talked last time, you came from Procter & Gamble When I graduated from undergrad, one of the great training programs was the Macy training program. May Company had one. So there were kind of these established things. IBM was always famous for their kind of training. It's a process where you went into a program, and it was kind of like extended school, just in a business context. You don't see that as much any more. Those programs aren't as plentiful. And so many people with the startup bug, so you see like in Iberia, they jump right in. I think you're mentioning off-air, one of the companies you're involved with, the guy's never had another job. So how do you see that kind of playing out? Kind of the lack of these kind of formal leadership opportunities, and what's that going to look like down the road. As the people who haven't had the benefit of this kind of training, or maybe it wasn't a benefit, get into these more senior positions. >> For sure. Look, leadership development is a topic that is of real interest to me. I was so fortunate and am so grateful for the opportunity that I had at Proctor & Gamble. I spent nearly six years there. And a big chunk of my time was spent in a leadership rotation program. Where you got to participate in a number of different projects and jobs, but you had mentorship, structured training and education, around what it takes to be, not just a good manager, but an effective leader. How you build a culture. How you engender people's commitments and dedication. How you really make the best of the resources that you have. How you manage your management. Whether that's board, or that's a CEO, or that's your shareholders. How you think about those things. And really tactically, what works and what doesn't. And being surrounded by people who are experts in their field. That was a long time ago, Jeff. And I don't see as many companies in the tech industry investing in that kind of leadership. And for kids coming out of college today, they're not rolling into structured leadership training programs. And so if you fast forward 20 years, what does that mean for the boards of the future? What does that mean for the Global 1000, and how those businesses are run? The good news is there's technology, there are plenty of amazing, inspirational founders out there, that have figured out how to build businesses on their own. And there's plenty of people like me, who actually want to mentor and help to build out the skill sets of these founders and these executives. But I do think that like many other areas of training and education which have been democratized in the industry, there's an opportunity to democratize leadership development and leadership training. And so that's something I'm spending a little bit of time on now. >> Good. And one of the great points you talked about. Again, go back and look at the other interview. Just Google Jennifer Tejada the Cube. Was really about as a leader, how you worked with exchanging value with your employees, right? And to quote you, you know, they're doing things that, they're not doing things that they might rather be doing. Spending time with their family on vacation, et cetera. And how you manage that as a leader of the company, to make them happy that they're there working, and to give them a meaningful place to be. And to spend that time that they're not spending on things that they might like more. >> I think culture is so important to the success of a business. You know, there are some investors that think culture is like an afterthought. It's one of those soft topics that they really don't need to care about. But for employees today, culture is everything. If you are going to spend a disproportionate amount of your waking hours with a group of people, it better be on a mission that's meaningful to you. And you'd better be working alongside of people that you think you can learn from, that inspire you, that stretch you to do more than you thought you could do. And so for me, it's about creating a culture of innovation, of performance, of collaboration. A real orientation around goals that everybody in the organization understands. In a way that is meaningful to them, within their role in the business. And that it's fun. Like, I won't do anything if it's not fun. I don't want to work with people who aren't fun. I was really excited. Two of the women who were on my leadership team at Keynote Flew here just to join me today, and support me as I'm giving a talk. But also to go out and have a drink. Because that's what we used to do after a long day at work. >> Right, right. >> And I think you have to be able to create a fire in someone by making sure that they, that they are being stretched. That they're learning and developing in that process. That they're part of something bigger than them. And that they can look back after a week, after a month, after a year in that business with you, and realize that they made an impact. That they made a difference. But that they also gained something from it, too. And I don't think we can ever underestimate the value of recognition, right? Not just money, but are you really recognizing someone for their commitment. For their emotional commitment to the business. For the time that they're spending and for what they've delivered for you, for the business, for your shareholder, for your customers. >> Jennifer, I could go with you all day long. >> (laughs) >> I'm going to get to one more before I let you go. Cause we're out of time, unfortunately. But you're now on some boards. There's a lot of talk. It feels like kind of the last plateau. Not that we've conquered the other ones. Because the last plateau is to get more women on boards. And we hear it's a matching problem, it's not so much of a pipeline problem. From your perspective, what can you advise? How can you help either people looking for qualified women, such as yourself, to be on boards. For qualified women who want to get on boards, to find them? >> That's a great question. I am very fortunate that there are people within my network that have spent time working with me, and can identify pieces of my experience that they think could be useful within their investment portfolio or within their companies. I'm part of a board called Puppet. It's an infrastructure software company based out of Portland. Super talented founder and team. Fast growing business in a really important space, software automation. Great board. I mean, I joined that board because every single person on the board, to a fault, is an amazing, accomplished executive, in and of themselves. Whether they're an investor, or a career CFO, or a career sales leader from the big technology side of the industry. So for me, it's such a great opportunity to collaborate with those people, and also take my experience, and lend what I know, and the pattern recognition that I have from running businesses, to loop the founder into his team. But I tell you, I wish that, and I hope that, the market starts to really think about diversity at the board level from a longer-term perspective. It's not just about how you find the women now. And by the way, there aren't that many female CEOs. But those of us who have sort of ticked that box and had that experience, we are available. And there are places where it's easy to find us. The Boardlist, for instance, is one of them. The Athena Alliance. Coco, the founder of that business is here. Women in Tech. I mean, it's out there. It's not that hard to find us. The challenge, I think, is the depth, the bench strength. Like who are the next female leaders that are coming up? That have functional expertise. You may need someone who's a marketing expert. You may need someone who's a product expert. You may need somebody who functionally knows consumer software, right? And it's really being willing, as a recruiter, as a recruiting executive, as a board member on the governance and nomination committee to say to your recruiters, to say to your investors, we want women on the short list. Or we want diversity on the short list. Like gender diversity, age diversity, racial diversity. A diverse board makes better decisions, full stop. Delivers better results. And I think we have to be demanding about that effort. We have to, the recruiting industry needs to hear that over and over again. And then on the flip side, we've got to develop these women. Help them build the skills. I mean, when I talk to women who want to be on boards, I say tell everybody, you want to be on a board. Be specific about the help that you need, right? Find the people that are connected in that network. Because once you're on one board, you meet board members there, they're on other boards. It does snowball. And in fact then you have to really choose the board wisely. Because it's not a two year commitment. You're in it for the long haul. So when you make that decision to choose a board, make sure it's a business that you have a real affinity to. That these are people that you want to spend time with over several years, right? And that you're willing to see that business through thick and thin. You don't get to leave the board if things go badly. That's when they need you the most. >> Right. >> So my hope is that we become much more open minded and demanding about diversity at the board level. And equally that we invest in developing women, men, people of different ages and bringing them to the board level. You don't have to be a CEO to be an effective board member, either. If you have functional, visional, regional expertise, that is a fit to that business, then you're going to be a very effective board member. >> All right, Jennifer, we have to let you go unfortunately. Thank you so much for stopping by and sharing your insight. No longer keynote, so now we can just use all our tags. Great Cube alumni, and tech athlete. So again, thanks for stopping by. >> Awesome, thank you so much for having me. >> Absolutely. Jennifer Tejada, I'm Jeff Frick. We are in Phoenix, Arizona at the Girls in Tech Catalyst Conference. Thanks for watching, we'll be right back. (upbeat music)

>> From Phoenix, Arizona, theCUBE. At Catalyst Conference, here's your host Jeff Frick. (soft music) >> Hey Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We're in Phoenix, Arizona at the Girls in Tech Catalyst Conference. About 400 people. The fourth year of the conference. Really getting together, talking about women in tech issues. Something in the water, here in Phoenix. We were here two years ago at the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women and Computing, also just down the road. So we're happy to be here and really get a feel. And bring to you some of the leaders here, that are making things happen. We're really excited by our next guest, Coco Brown, the founder and CEO of the Alena Alliance, or Athena Alliance, excuse me, welcome. >> Thank you. >> So the Athena Alliance, what's it all about? >> Well so the Athena Alliance is an organization of executive women who've achieved great success in their careers. And they have vision collectively of women operating at their highest level of impact. And within the context of a business leadership realm, that highest level really is the boardroom. And so our mission is to help women obtain board seats and be successful in the role. >> So there's a lot of conversations about board. It seems to be kind of the new hot button topic about inequality. There's certainly ton of conversations about inequality and pay highlighted recently by the women's national soccer team, which got a lot of buzz. And I think everyone knows that conversation that's been going on for a while. But the boardroom conversation is kind of new. It's kind of bubbling up. Or at least that's my sense of it, that barely have cracked the surface in terms of historical numbers in getting women representation on boards. >> Yeah. >> Why does that continue to be a problem? Is it a pipeline issue? Is it a match making issue? Is it a networking issue? Is it just, I just don't know? What is the issue? >> It's not a pipeline issue. And so what's happened in this discussion is there were some, sort of, pretty notable examples of situations where women raised their hands and said, hey where are the women on these boards. And the response was, well where are the women? Which kind of created this energy around the topic a lot more strongly more recently. Which is to say, there are a lot of qualified women out there who would be great board directors. And yet the positions of board director are gate kept by largely men. This is just the circumstance. Men are the ones who back companies. They're their VCs, they're the founders, they're the CEOs. And within their networks, they don't have a lot of women. Executive women. Likewise, executive women tend to seek each other out too. So we're not in each other's realms. So a lot of the conversation has been around raising awareness to the issue. There's been great tracking of exactly where is the issue. And how are we making progress. And then there's been a lot of great organizations that have been helping women get ready for board positions, training them. And thirdly, there's a lot of great organizations out there who are, essentially, identifying qualified women, and cataloging them, putting them in data bases and saying, hey no excuses, here they are. But the key missing element and my feeling as to why the problem continues to persist, part of it is just time. It's just going to take time. But part of it is also, really networking, what you said. It is about networking. It is that the women who want these positions and who are qualified for these positions need to know the men who are looking for board directors. And when you actually connect, make those two connections happen, you get incredible success. And we're seeing it already. >> Or as the age old advice, it's not who you know, but who knows you. >> Yes! >> It used to always be the other way around. But it's really who knows you. And we live in such a time of personal branding and external communication via LinkedIn, Twitter, blogs, medium, however you choose to externalize your professional position. And it kind of gets intermingled with your personal position. There really is not much excuse, at least, to make the attempt, to get yourself out there. >> Exactly, it's why. So there's 16 of the speakers here at this conference, are Athena Alliance women. And part of the reason we're here, we're here because this is such a noble and important and fantastic event for us to participate in. The other reason we're here is because this is apart of our way of getting known too, right. Of becoming more visible. Of making our brand, personal brand known. So this is one of those key things about who knows you that we should and need to be doing. >> So how many Athena foundation women are in executive boards now? >> So Athena Alliance is relatively new. So we're just getting started. About 50% of, 47% of the women associated with Athena Alliance are already on boards. >> That's pretty good, 47%. >> Yes, largely those are non-profit boards. >> Okay. >> They also are on a fair number of advisory boards. And they're now looking for the private boards and corporate boards and they're looking for public boards as well. >> And do you see that as kind of a logical stepping stone between an advisory board, a non-profit board, potentially a private company board, a VC company and then to a larger public entity. Is that kind of? >> Yeah I see it two ways. On the one hand, it's stepping stones and on the other, we have a variety of careers. So let's take me for example. I ran and was an owner of a privately held company. We reached about 50 million dollars in revenue before I sold my ownership, moved on. I'm qualified for a certain kind of a board. I'm qualified for a private board of a certain type of growth, sort of trajectory or stage. Others like Yvonne, who you spoke with, she's qualified for public boards of a different size. So some of it is what we're qualified for and what we can really contribute to and some of it is stepping stones. So for example, advisory boards are a great stepping stone. You get absolutely zero board credit for being on an advisory board, 'cause it doesn't have fiduciary responsibilities. >> No fiduciary responsibility. >> Right. But it's incredible network experience. It's a great way to get to know CEOs, to get to know VCs, to make yourself known as a candidate for other aspects of that company. >> Where do you see the natural networking opportunities? 'Cause clearly there's networks that exist around where you went to school. There's networks around, increasingly alumni groups, within companies, especially a big company like an Intel or an HP, where you got these huge alumni groups, 'cause they've been around for so long. Where are some of the other natural alumni groups that then cross over that are going to allow rubbing of shoulders with the old school guy board members with some of these women that are trying to break through? >> Yeah it's interesting. I think that is a really good opportunity space because I do see that mostly, the networking pods, if you will, are within school alumni groups, or corporate alumni groups, or organizations that women belong to. But that are largely then just women organizations. Or maybe some industry organizations. And industry boards are a great way to make that connection point. But I don't think that women do have opportunities of overlap with men in those organizations and those networking communities. So the way it has to happen is, I think we have to make it happen. So it's almost like, creating mixers. We need some mixers, right? Male VCs mixed with Athena Alliance women. Let's get together. We actually have an event coming up like that. Where you can have some men and women in the same room. They get to get a sense of each other. Those you do start seeing more of that going on and it's kind of essential. >> 'Cause you really need that right? I mean, they are networks. And everything going on today is all about networks, whether it's IOT or social media or whatever. It's networks and they're all naturally bound by something but how do you get that overlap from one network to the other when there's not enough overlap to really make the activity that you're seeking. Of course, there's always CUBE alumni, which is a terrific network. So we'll use that as a founding point. >> Absolutely. Well and Dan Scholnick, who is a general partner with Trinity, he's on a number of boards. He's speaking at an event for the Athena Alliance on a panel coming up. And he's got board openings in the variety of boards that he's on. Those are the kinds of connections. Make opportunities for Dan to be in the same room as a number of these great women. I think we just have to create it. >> It's interesting, interesting. 'Cause it is all about the connection, right. You got to know people and you got to put the word out. Nobody ever got a board seat sending out a resume. I don't know. How many come from executive head hunters? I never got a job from executive head hunters. It's really more about who you know. >> And executive recruiters only actually fill about one to two percent of board seats. It's only the top companies with the deepest pockets or the greatest pressure that can do that. >> Okay so what are your priorities for the next six months, nine months, what are your top things your guys are working on at the Alliance? >> So we're relatively new, so big, big priority for us is funding. We're also scaling. So scaling is one of the important things. In other words, scaling our relationships with those VCs, with CEOs, and starting to create great linkages through these networking events. >> All right, well Coco, thank you for taking a few minutes. >> Thank you. >> Absolutely and good luck with the Alliance. It sounds like you guys are on your way. We see increasingly, we did a show at SAP in conjunction with MAKERS and they got a great movie about some of the women who just broke down barriers in advertising, fashion, finance, tech, et cetera. Meg Whitman, among many women highlighted there. And it's tough to break down that door. When the first one gets through, hopefully they leave a little space for somebody else to scooch in behind them. >> Yeah, yeah. >> Absolutely. All right, Jeff Frick here with Coco Brown. We are the Girls in Tech Catalyst Conference, Phoenix, Arizona. You're watching theCUBE. See you next time. (soft music)

(energetic electronic music) >> From Phoenix, Arizona, the Cube, at Catalyst Conference. Here's your host, Jeff Frick. >> Hey, welcome back everybody, Jeff Frick here, with the Cube. We are on the ground in Phoenix Arizona at the Girls In Tech Catalyst Conference. We're really excited to return to Phoenix, ironically, it was two years ago, about this same time, we went to our first Grace Hopper conference that was here in Phoenix, and I don't know what it is with Phoenix, but it seems to be a great place for women in tech conferences. So, we're back, and we wanted to come down and talk to some of the people here that are giving keynotes, presentations, give you a flavor for what's going on, so if you got an opportunity to go next year, it'll be back in the Bay Area. You certainly want to sign up for that. So we're really excited, our first guest Yvonne Wassenaar, the CIO of New Relic, welcome. >> Thank you so much, it's great to be here, I love the Cube. >> Oh, thank you very much, that's right, you were at VMworld, or VMware, I always say world not ware, for years. And we've been doing, I think, the VMworld show for something like six years, or seven years. >> Yeah, super long time, and I watch you guys at reinvents, and a lot of other places. >> Oh great, well thank you for watching. So now you're at New Relic, so for the people that aren't familiar with New Relic, why don't you give them the quick 411. >> Yeah, so New Relic is is a software analytics company, and in the simplest terms, you don't bank in your retail branch, you bank on your phone. What matters is how your software's performing. Both from an application perspective, and a business perspective. So we help you understand what's going on. We're the best, first place to look to understand your digital business. >> It's really interesting, because we've got a premise that we're, at Wikibon, that it's all about, really, your digital engagement model. And you think about banking, how many times do you go into the bank, and actually interact with a teller? It's really moved to this electronic interface, in terms of your relationship. >> Exactly, it's not how warm the coffee is, or how long the teller line is, it's how performant is your application, and do you have the right feature functionality? >> Okay, so you're here, you had a keynote earlier in the week. >> This is the third day of the conference. So first of all, give us kind of what's the vibe been here for the last three days? >> It's phenomenal, and what I love about the Girl In Tech Conference, is that it brings together women of all types. I was speaking yesterday to a student at Stanford, who's here, who has her own non-profit, who's getting her degree to go out and change the world as an enterpreneur, to very, very seasoned executives who sit on boards. And everybody's here to understand what's the change going on, and how do I drive relevancy. And it's just phenomenal. >> Excellent, so your keynote was on how to stay relevant, and how to avoid extinction. >> Yeah. >> So why don't you give us some of the, I'm sure that was a well received one. >> Yeah, well, what's interesting is, change is the new constant. And it's actually riskier to not do something, than do something, today, but what do you do? And everybody says, "Oh, go out and be bold." and being bold's great, but fundamentally, it's hard. And it's easy to say, it's hard to do in practice. And so what my talk was really on, is, how do you address the unconscious fears? How do you say "Yeah, those bad things could happen, but you know what, if nothing bad happened, here's how I could change the world." And then just go after that vision. Free yourself from those kind of unconscious constraints, and really go after it wholeheartedly. >> And so is it more of a willingness to fail? Is it more of a willingness to, you know, look silly, if you feel? I mean, what are some of these unconscious fears, that if you consciously just address them, that will help you kind of overcome them, and be more proactive in your experimentation? >> Yeah, so for me it was very personal. It was some challenges that I had in my childhood, that really made me risk-averse, in ways that I didn't understand. And it's one of the things that they say, "Hey, women should lean in more." And I actually believe the reason that women don't lean in, is that they're trying to aim for a level of perfection, and don't realize it's a numbers game. Failure is not a reflection on you personally, failure is step towards your future successes. And so really it's a mindset change. >> Right, right, and I fundamentally feel too, as we try to innovate on the Cube, and do things different, if we're not failing sometimes, we're not really pushing the envelope enough, right? Everything shouldn't be successful. It's like the old economics newsboy model, right? If you come home with no newspapers, that means you could have sold a couple more probably, so it's not about perfection, it's about trying, and not being afraid to, "Mm, that didn't work out." >> You're spot on, and I led a workshop yesterday as well, on increasing your return on investment. And I literally told the women, I said, "If you are not failing, if everybody on your team's performing perfectly, you're a failed leader. You have to stumble, it's like skiing, if you don't fall, when you're skiing, you're not pushing yourself hard enough, you're not really doing it, so you need to let your team members fall, you have to fall yourself, and that's how you you're pushing the boundaries. >> So how is the reception then, of that message that you're trying to convey? Is it "You know, I know it, I just can't do it", is it, just, "Oh, there's just so many hurdles in the way"? How do you get over the, you know, here's this unconscious thing that you need to be thinking about, okay, now it's conscious, but to actually start to change behavior? What are some of the little behavioral changes and tips and tricks you give people? Because at the end of the day, a lot of times, it's do the behavior, not think about it too much. >> Exactly, I'd say it's a couple things, first off, you need role models, that can help prove to you and your subconcious, that, "My gosh, if those five amazingly successful people did this, and they're telling me, very specifically, the failures they had, and they're still that successful, maybe they're not lying."(laughs) The other thing is, I try to give really specific tips, so one of my favorites is, I'm an ex-consultant, so two by two, what's the business impact? What's your unique value? Throw all the things you're working on in there, you should have one to two that are high impact that you're uniquely skilled to do, hit those balls out of the park. You can get 20 guys to third base, doesn't matter. You got to get one person home. >> Got to get him home, that's great. I'm just curious, because you spent a long time at Accenture, before you jumped into the tech company world, so you probably saw a lot of different companies. What's your perspective at a macro view, of how this environment has changed over the years? I mean, do you see positive change? I know we have a long way to go, but what's your perspective from some of those early Accenture days? >> You know, it's never been a more exciting time. I mean, in some regards, I wish I was that Stanford student, just starting my career, because technology is changing how we do everything, in absolutely amazing ways. But, we need to bring the right level of social consciousness to how we apply it. And we need to figure out new engagement models. And I think those engagement models actually play to the strength of a lot of women we have in the room. You have to figure out how to fuse across different industries. So, the Apple Watch, it's designer, it's technology, like how do you bring those competencies together? You get better stuff done with partners than all internally. VCs are the new R&D innovation engines, so I think the change is really exciting. But you have to be open to new operating models, and new engagement styles, to take advantage of it. >> Right, okay I want to shift gears a little bit, because our audience might not know, but you're actually a very rare breed. >> (laughs) >> You're a woman on boards, and we hear over and over, I'm teasing you, because we hear over and over, there's just not near enough representation of women on corporate boards. You're on a couple of boards. So I'd like to get your perspective on, how did you get on the boards, how do we get more women on the boards? There's always a conversation, is it a pipeline problem? Are there just not enough, are they dropping out mid-career? What are some of the things you can see from your seat on a couple of boards? >> Yeah, so I'm on three boards, I'm on the board of Harvey Mudd, I'm on the board of Idiom, which is the series B start-up, and I'm on the board of the Athena Alliance. And the Athena Alliance is actually an organization, a non-profit focused on getting more women on boards, because I fundamentally believe it is not a pipeline problem, and I say that because there's many senior executive level women like myself, who just are waiting to check off the ten things on the list they think they need to be on a board. And it's studied time and time again, women set really high bars for themselves. So I don't think enough women are putting themselves forward. and I don't think that they're known well enough. We're not unicorns, we're really not. Like there are valleys where we all congregate, (laughs) and so what we need to do, is really help the men, who I think have amazing intention, and want to have greater diversity on their boards, understand how to make the connections, and find the right women with the right profiles to round out the organizations. >> So you think it's really more of a matching issue, the desire is there, but really just making the match when the timing is right, and it's a good fit. >> Yeah, exactly. >> All right, so I'm going to shift gears on you one more time, and talk about education, and specifically Harvey Mudd, because as I'd mentioned, two years ago, we were here interviewing Maria Klawe, still one of my all-time favorite interviews. She's got such phenomenal energy, she's the President at Harvey Mudd College, who are the Athenas, I don't know if you knew the Harvey Mudd gals' teams are the Athenas, boys are the Stags, but talk about education, and what Maria has done, I mean her thing in our interview, is she wants the intro CS, to be the best class you've ever taken. >> Yeah. >> Bar none, not the best computer science class, not the best science class, the best class ever, and I can tell you, my son's at Claremont, it's a really hard class to get into. Your perspective on education, and what somebody like Maria, with her kind of energy, point of view, enthusiasm, does to expanding computer science breadth in women specifically. >> Oh, it's phenomenal, I actually had the opportunity to sit in the intro CS class. And there's a couple really key things they've done. First off, is they've expanded and energized the CS team with new amazing talent, many women, but not just women, other diversity, to just round out perspective, so keeping it fresh. The second thing they've done, is they've realized that CS theory is interesting to some, but not to all, and a lot of women tend to be more purpose driven, so they've created classes like CS biology. Same core concepts, but now solving the problems in a field where they have questions. So they learn the same thing, but in a way that's more interesting. And the final thing is, they've restructured how they run the class. So they don't say, "Hey, here's a question," everybody goes, "Oh, I'll get that!" They say, "Here's a question I want you to think about. And talk to your partner, scribble some notes, and in a minute, let's discuss what you've come up with." and that allows people of all types to be more thoughtful and to get better, well-rounded answers coming out. So they've changed it on all dimensions, and it's just, it's an amazing place to go and be, and see the energy, and really see transformation in work in our education system, because that's where it all starts. >> That's really interesting, the way you say it, to phrase the question so people are forced to think a minute, because I have two daughters, they went to all-girls middle schools, and that's one of the classic plugs for going to all-girls, because the boys, they don't wait, right? >> (laughs) "Okay if I have the right answer, I'm going to get picked! >> "Pick me, I love the teacher, pick me, pick me!" >> You picked me, I win!" >> Right, "and then I'll figure it out," versus people that want to think about it a little bit, and contemplate, and noodle, and maybe try to get the right answer before they raise their hand, so great strategy. So before we let you go, unfortunately we're out of time, how do people get involved with the Athena Foundation, what are you up to, in terms of priorities for the next six months? >> Yeah, so it's the Athenaalliance.org, we're on the web, we're just starting, DLA Piper is one of our sponsors, getting our 501c3 status, there's information there in terms of membership, who we're working to connect with. If any of you listening have board seats and you want women, come to us. If you're a qualified woman, and you're looking to get on a board, reach out, we'd love to hear you, we know you're there, and we know that men want to put you on boards, so let's make it happen. >> What a great service really, doing that matching game, because it's always about the matching game. Well, Yvonne, thanks for taking a few minutes out of your busy day, and we look forward to seeing you again sometime in the Bay Area. >> Great, thank you so much, great stuff. >> Jeff Frick here at the Girls In Tech Catalyst Conference in Phoenix Arizona, we'll be back after this short break. Thanks for watching. (energetic electronic music)