Image Title

Search Results for Ashleigh:

Steve Duplessie, ESG | Actifio Data Driven 2019


 

>> from Boston, Massachusetts. It's the queue covering active eo 2019. Data driven you by activity. >> We're back with the Cuban active FiO Data driven day one day Volante with student a man you're watching The Cube. Steve Duplessis here is the, uh, let's see. Uh, I'm going to say benevolent. Dictator of Enterprise Strategy Group. Chief analyst, Founder Welcome. Welcome back to the Cube. >> Thanks. Nice friend. Nice to be here, you fellows, and we don't Great. Congratulations. Newly newly closed. That's awesome. I want Yeah, thank you very much. >> Great. Looking good. You're here for your honeymoon. >> He said this is it? After a few marriages. This is the honeymoon. >> Yeah. That's good to know that the honeymoon's not over. So let's talk data, Tio. It's happening. >> That is a terrible question, Dave. >> So yeah, Data. Okay, everybody talks. Data you here, bro. My data is the new oil. Fate is a competitive advantage. And >> you like that. >> You do like what Data's in oil. >> So it's funny because we're I think I'm way older than you. You look better. >> God, no. >> But if you go back in time as long as we were doing this, it's been kind of hilarious, really. In retrospect, when you watch way watch these massive industries get created like the AMC just created because all they were about building bigger buckets to put data, zeros and ones. But no context, completely useless, just big buckets. So we valued Wow, you built a big fast bucket. Then IBM and her tachy whoever was gonna leap frog your next built a faster, bigger bucket. And that was with the world considered valuable. And it's now fast forward to the modern day and oh, maybe with the thing that's really valuable with those zeros and he's in contact. Maybe it's not really the bucket. It's, uh so valuable anymore. So >> So, do you think the with the bucket builders still bucket builders air they actually becoming data Insite creators? Or is it just still build a better bucket? That's cheaper. Faster >> till it's a great question. I think >> that we're first of all, you You still have to have the buckets, right? It's a relative who's going to make a smarter bucket builder. I don't know. >> You need someplace to put it, so >> you're gonna have to put it some place and you're gonna have to deliver it in the good news, you know, storage and or infrastructural say is the most brilliant business ever. From a capacity demand perspective, no one ever needs less, right. You always need Mauritz justa matter what you're gonna do with it, how you're going to address that. So it's we've propagated for 50 years and infrastructure business that build a bigger, faster bucket. Build a bigger, faster processor, build a bigger, faster. And every time you you solve one of those particular problems as long as data doesn't abate and it never does, is only is there's more versus Les. It's just every time we fix one problem way, you stick your finger in the dike and another poll springs out. So right now we're at the we've got more processing capabilities that week, ever possible. Use not true, right? We'll figure out a way to use it so that the last five years of and for the >> next five years waiting talk about analytics, wouldn't talk about io ti. We didn't talk about any of those things that are all just precursors to folk crap. We could make a whole bunch more NATO and do stuff with >> so So computers. Kind of a similar dynamic. It's sort of sensational. But is the relatively crappy business compared to storage rights? Storage is 60% plus gross margin. Business servers. I don't know. You're lucky if you get in in a low twenty's. Um, why is that? >> Hello, Number one. It's essentially monogamous. So 20% is wonderful if your intel and you get it. All right. Well, it sells. Got great gross margins, right? Everybody else's does it. You go down the supply chain. That's where you're gonna add value. So that's difficult for anything. Hard to get gross margins out of like spending. She had a box. >> So, Steve Yes, she's now 20 years old. >> I know >> when I think back 20 years ago. You know, short. You know this capacity price per dollar price per gigabyte. You know, all that stuff has changed a lot. The other thing, You know, I think back 20 years talk about automation and intelligent infrastructure. We were using those terms back that sure, one of things that they did. That that's right. Well, that's what I wanted to ask you about is like, right back then when you talked about well, how intelligent wasn't what could it do? And automation was There was a lot of times, you know, I'm just building a little script. I'm doing something like that. At least you know, from what we see, it feels like, you know, today's automation and intelligence is light times away from what we were talking about. 20 years. Sure, and it's true. What do you see in that? Well, >> so remember where we came from When we were talking originally about automation and orchestration, we were talking about how to manage a box, how to expand a box, how to manage infrastructure. Now it's data operations. Right now it's that that's the whole point of activity. Right to be in with is all right, if you are good enough and smart enoughto have the data sort of everything. What kind of matters? There you've gotta have the data and what can you up? What can you automate an orchestra from a data out perspective? Not from a box, not from a Let's scale out or scale up or something like that again, that's just a bigger bucket. It's a better bucket, but to be able to actually take data and say, You know what? I don't even know necessarily what I'm going to want to use this for, but I know that I gotta have. It's gotta be You have to be able to go click, click, click and get it. If if and when I figure out who I want to find out how lowering the price of Sharman and Seattle at a Wal Mart is going to affect my revenue or my supply chain or whatever. >> So one of the things I've talked with you in the past about is the pace of change of the industry. And, you know, I've said, you know, we know things are changing rather fast, but the average company, how much were they? Actually are they good at adopting change? And you've called me on stupid enterprises slow getting any faster, you know? Are they Are they open to change? Mohr. You know, what do you see in 2019? Is is it any different than it was in, You know, two thousand nine? >> That's a great question. So thie answer is yes, they're getting better. We are finally getting better. Problem, though, is a CZ industry insider watcher or a Boyar is ur is you see it and know what should happen 10 years. It takes 10 years in general for the world to actually catch upto the stuff that we're talking about. So it's not really that helpful to the poor schlub that's running on operation that build sneakers in Kansas, right? That's not really that helpful that we're talking about. This is what you could be doing and should be doing. The pace of change is much faster now because and give the em where most of the credit. Because once that went into place, all of the sudden and that you gotta remember there, everyone thinks vm where was an instant home run? It was 10 years of the same cold sitting in the corner in a queue, a environment before. Finally, we ran out of room in the data center, and that's the only reason they were able to come out. But once it was there, and it enabled you to stop associating the physical to the to the logical once, we could just just dis aggregate that stuff that I think opened up a tidal wave of kind of what else can we do? And people have adopted now. Now it's pervasive. So VM where's everywhere? Now? We're moving in the next level of kind of woman. Why can't I just build a containerized app that I can execute anywhere? No matter of fact, I don't even want it in my data center on. No one has to know that necessarily. So as modernization exercises have started to take off, they just they pick up, they actually pick up steam. So what we know empirically is those that are are halfway down. Call it the transformation or the modernization curve are going three times faster than those just starting. And those guys are going three times faster than the ones that are sitting there in idle doing stuff. The same >> city with the inertia going on. What do you make of this Bubblicious Back up market. Let's talk about that a little bit. You got these big install bases? The veritas, Conmebol, Delhi emcee, IBM, Tivoli install base. Everybody wants a piece of that action. Well, I guess cohesive rubric also want a piece of each other. Sure, which is kind of, you know, they get that urinary Olympics going on. I'd like to say And then you got these guys, which is kind of, you know, playing. Uh, I said to Ashleigh kind of East Coast, West Coast, There's no no, it's not East Coast, West Coast, but there's definitely more conservativism on this side of the of the flyover states. What's your take on what's going on in the landscape right now? >> So back up is awesome from the again, still probably the single most consistently line item budget thing for five decades. It's a guaranteed money in and out, and by and large it still sucks. My general rule is still it's crazy that we haven't been able to solve that particular problem. But regardless, the reason that it's so important is, besides the obvious. Yeah, you need to protect stuff, case. Something goes away and something bad happened good. But really, it's That's the inn. Just point for everything you do, you create data today. I'm backing it up on our later so that backup becomes the injust engine and it also is kicking off point. So at tapioca it started as wow, this is a better backup, most trap for lack of a better term. But really what? It was is didn't matter what with was back up or something else. It's I need tohave the data in order to do other stuff with it, and back up is just a natural, easiest way to be able to do that. So I think what's finally happening is we're moving from Christophe Would would say it's really about intelligence intelligence more so than just capturing those bits and being able to assemble and put it back together. It's understanding the context of those bits so that I can say stew in test. Dev has a different use case than Dave in whatever analytics, etcetera, etcetera. But they both need a copy of the exact scene data, the exact same state at the exact same point in time, etcetera. So if lungs backup's going to be kind of a tip of the spear in terms of going from what I will say, production or live data to the first copy, there's almost always back up. It's gonna matter. >> Christoph, Christoph Bertrand want your analyst? And so we saw, uh, c'mon, Danni Allen put a slideshow $15,000,000,000 tam and back up being a big chunk of that, probably half of it um, how does that jibe with your gut feel in terms of the opportunity beyond backup Dev ops? You know, I don't know. Ransomware insights. So you think that's low? High? Makes sense. >> I think I could justify the number. And what history has taught me is that it's probably low because we we're only talking about a handful of use cases that we've all glommed onto. But there will be remembered, like 11 years ago, there was no iPhone. You know what? How bad that changed. Everything that we do over there. And when did you know at some point during that particular journey, the phone became Who gives a shit about the phone? Excuse. But it's a text machine and it's an instagram thing, and it's a video production facility and all these other things, and the phone's almost dead. I only use it when my mom calls me kind of thing. So, you know, really, it's difficult to imagine. I certainly don't have the mental capabilities to imagine what the next 10 things after Dev Ops and this that and the other. But it's still all predicated on the same you got Somebody's gonna have a copy of that data and you're gonna be able to access it. You've got to be able to put it where you need it for whatever the reason again, a disaster is an important thing to recover from. But so is being ableto farm That data for nuggets of gold. >> Well, I guess I asked the question because, you know, it's a logical question is, is the market big enough to support all these companies that are in, You know, that gardener thing that they do? And I hope so because we love competition. >> I think I >> can answer it >> this way. Everything. Even the oldest guard Veritas, for God's sakes, 1000 years old, t sm 1000 years old con vault code base, 1000 years old. You're all big companies, right? And they're not perishing anytime soon. And I don't run. Love the startup Love the active FiOS or the cohesive sees coming in. But what they're really trying to do is not, you know, they might have started, as in a common ground, backup is a common warzone, but because there's money there like this consistent money there go get. But they soon turn in Teo other value propositions. And that's not is true with the incumbent back up guys because of their own legacy, right? It's hard to turn 1,000,000 year 1,000,000 lines of code into something. It wasn't designed, innit? >> Yeah, and it's not trivial to disrupt that base. But I guess if you get, you know, raising I don't know how much the industry is raised, but it's well over $1,000,000,000 now. I mean, activity has raised 200,000,000 and that's like chump change. Compared to some of the other races that you've seen. Cody City was to 60 and their last rubric was even, you know, crazy, crazy, even >> count the private money that beam God is that, you know, that was half 1,000,000,000 >> right? Well, that's a That's an off camera discussion. All right, we gotta go. So, Steve, thanks so much for for coming. Thank you. Great to >> have you. All right. All right, everybody. We'll be back with our next guest. You wanted the Cube from active field data driven from Boston, right on the harbor. Right back

Published Date : Jun 18 2019

SUMMARY :

Data driven you by activity. Welcome back to the Cube. Nice to be here, you fellows, and we don't Great. You're here for your honeymoon. This is the honeymoon. So let's talk data, Data you here, So it's funny because we're I think I'm way older than you. And it's now fast forward to the modern day and oh, maybe with the thing that's really valuable So, do you think the with the bucket builders still bucket builders air I think that we're first of all, you You still have to have the buckets, It's just every time we fix one problem way, you stick your finger in the We didn't talk about any of those things that are all just precursors to folk crap. But is the relatively crappy You go down the supply And automation was There was a lot of times, you know, I'm just building a little script. Right to be in with is all right, if you are good enough and smart enoughto have the data So one of the things I've talked with you in the past about is the pace of change of the industry. So it's not really that helpful to the poor schlub that's running I'd like to say And then you got these guys, which is kind of, you know, lungs backup's going to be kind of a tip of the spear in terms of going from what I will say, So you think that's low? But it's still all predicated on the same you got Somebody's gonna have a copy of that data and you're gonna Well, I guess I asked the question because, you know, it's a logical question is, is the market big enough to support all these But what they're really trying to do is not, you know, they might have started, as in a common ground, But I guess if you get, you know, raising I don't know how much the industry Great to from Boston, right on the harbor.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
StevePERSON

0.99+

Danni AllenPERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

Steve DuplessiePERSON

0.99+

Christoph BertrandPERSON

0.99+

60%QUANTITY

0.99+

2019DATE

0.99+

Steve DuplessisPERSON

0.99+

50 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

KansasLOCATION

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

ChristophPERSON

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

$15,000,000,000QUANTITY

0.99+

Wal MartORGANIZATION

0.99+

ChristophePERSON

0.99+

1,000,000QUANTITY

0.99+

60QUANTITY

0.99+

20%QUANTITY

0.99+

first copyQUANTITY

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Boston, MassachusettsLOCATION

0.99+

1000 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

ConmebolORGANIZATION

0.99+

TivoliORGANIZATION

0.99+

five decadesQUANTITY

0.99+

iPhoneCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

three timesQUANTITY

0.98+

AMCORGANIZATION

0.98+

NATOORGANIZATION

0.98+

11 years agoDATE

0.98+

20 yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

OlympicsEVENT

0.98+

East CoastLOCATION

0.98+

West CoastLOCATION

0.98+

one problemQUANTITY

0.97+

bothQUANTITY

0.97+

200,000,000QUANTITY

0.97+

twentyQUANTITY

0.97+

The CubeTITLE

0.97+

Sharman and SeattleORGANIZATION

0.96+

CubanOTHER

0.96+

20 years agoDATE

0.96+

TioPERSON

0.95+

one dayQUANTITY

0.95+

oneQUANTITY

0.95+

20 years oldQUANTITY

0.95+

singleQUANTITY

0.94+

10 thingsQUANTITY

0.93+

Dev OpsTITLE

0.93+

todayDATE

0.93+

instagramORGANIZATION

0.93+

two thousand nineQUANTITY

0.93+

emceeORGANIZATION

0.92+

1,000,000 linesQUANTITY

0.92+

over $1,000,000,000QUANTITY

0.9+

FiOSORGANIZATION

0.89+

half 1,000,000,000QUANTITY

0.89+

AshleighLOCATION

0.89+

veritasORGANIZATION

0.87+

about. 20 yearsQUANTITY

0.87+

tapiocaORGANIZATION

0.86+

1000 years oldQUANTITY

0.86+

last five yearsDATE

0.8+

VeritasORGANIZATION

0.78+

next five yearsDATE

0.77+

Cody CityLOCATION

0.74+

DataPERSON

0.73+

intelORGANIZATION

0.7+

Enterprise Strategy GroupORGANIZATION

0.65+

BoyarORGANIZATION

0.64+

DelhiLOCATION

0.63+

Actifio Data DrivenTITLE

0.62+

MohrPERSON

0.61+

zerosQUANTITY

0.61+

DevPERSON

0.6+

ESGORGANIZATION

0.56+

MauritzPERSON

0.51+

weekDATE

0.47+

CubePERSON

0.47+