Pat Casey | ServiceNow Knowledge15
live from Las Vegas Nevada it's the kue covering knowledge 15 brought to you by service now okay welcome back everyone you are watching SiliconANGLE weak bonds to cube our flagship program I go out for the events and extract the signal-to-noise i'm john furrier my coach dave vellante with Wikibon Darden we're pleased to have Pat Casey VP general manager of create now platform development early employee of service now great perspective we're gonna get geeky here but talk about some of the high-level stuff welcome back to the cube thank you very much so you've seen the evolution of service now from early days to public company scaling very cloud I mean it's inside the tornado to use that metaphor it's been so successful what do you feel what is what you're feeling right now and how much more work do you see on the horizon well I think probably the first thing I feel is shocked the things they honest answer this company was founded we didn't have office space so we borrowed office space in the basement of our vc and it had no windows so we're in this little tomb of a room and there were five people there one table we got from Ikea so to look out now we've got nine thousand customers who paid money to attend an event about this it's just it's shocking it's also humbling and it's also to be honest it's scary people are here because they are dependent on technology that we wrote and one of the things that just been always been sunk into my head and I believe this forum is I do not want to let anybody here who has put their faith in service now down so in terms of where the work is we've only just gotten started I get up every day and I am just I fundamentally want to make sure that this is the best product it can be that our customers get the basic question to me that's the startup cash but you guys know and starve your big company but you got some good things going on to get some wind at your back to use the French lupine sailing analogy the market is exploding with innovation so that's a challenge but it's also could be an upgrade opportunity so what's your take on it I mean you got the agile you got native we're hearing terms like microservices being kicked around in this native cloudapp swirl you guys better platform share with your take on some of those buzzwords of some of the big mega trends I think if you when this company was founded this was actually founded as a platform company which I think most people don't realize but when Fred sat down to design this his cocktail napkin design and there was actually no cocktail napkin but imagine there was it was we're gonna run enterprise business apps in the cloud that was the idea and the first few sales calls though selling a platform were kind of miserable because we'd go to the customers and we'd say hey we're here to see show you service now and they say well what does it do and we'd say well whatever you want it to do and they kind of cock their head and say what's your sales call guys you've got to talk to us so we built out a suite of applications on top of the platform so we'd have something concrete to sell and that's what the company sold for probably about eight years it was our itsm sweet incident management problem management change management that's what most of our customer base uses we're sort of pivoting back to focusing on the platform again though partly by building other apps we've got HR we've got facilities we've got legal we've got GRC but it's also about trying to get people just onto the platform itself and in terms of really big mega trends that is one of the mega trends we're seeing it's that people are not building everything from scratch anymore it's just not an efficient way to build things in the market anymore and people are also moving to more and more specialized pieces of tooling you don't start with a C compiler anymore you start with a higher-level language you start with Ruby on Rails you start with j2ee if your enterprise developer you pick a tool that's appropriate for the problem you want to solve and service now is a great tool for solving a lot of enterprise business application let's talk about developers because one of the things that I hear all the time is oh I built this on node i got this an angular get this in java there's love different stacks kind of being built but cobble together can you know i guess i'll put them in a container whatever they say these days there's a lot of cool stuff happening on the developer front open sources we're doing great what are you guys looking at in terms of leverage and oh by the way that enables non-programmers to do stuff that looks program to ethic so the innovation opportunity for create is huge so what's what's going on with you guys nice front we actually view the developer world is kind of being in three different groups you've got it's a Gartner term but I think it's a good term you've got locoed developers and that's someone they can make a form they can make a list they can potentiate a little bit of light scripting it's your kind of traditional system administrator archetype and that's who we founded the company to address that was the business idea we could enable loko developers we get enable administrators to build really meaningful business apps and that's really been the secret to our success we're really good at it because they're closer to the action but don't have to go in and just go out of bat and if you will the kind of develop requirements I think most people do their best work when they're scratching their own itch so if you're close to the problem you're like man I can solve this for myself and we've been very empowering to let administrators and loko developers do that but that's not the totality of people out there there's also people who can't even do that there are no code developers there my mother she can use Excel really well but she can't write code and my mom is a very bright woman she's a healthcare consultant but she's a no code developer but she can put a spreadsheet out there with column heading she can make forms using our no code tool she can actually put a business service out on the web with approval workflows notifications dynamic that's fever put out a HR appt in one day when he started playing with express absolutely that's the trend right it's that is definitely one of the futures you see is this democratization of access to development tools it used to be when I started in this industry you pretty much had to be an educated professional to build anything meaningful that's no longer the case you get kids today building great applications with real business value real value and that's the value of the modern era the barrier to entry has just declined and declines and declined because the tools have gotten so much better and so much more specialized the combination of the two is just incredibly empowering so what if we could talk about architecture maybe I don't know inside baseball or maybe maybe plumbing I don't know what you said in your keynote multi-tenant is the TV dinner of cloud vendor deployments what did you mean let's talk about multi-tenant versus multi-instance sure so traditionally in the in the SAS space there's really two different architectures people deploy the most common is something called multi tenant and multi tenant if you imagine a big old apartment building where there's one big construct is one big database some software on top of it and each individual customer is a separate software construct your sharing hardware you're sharing software you're sharing memory you're sharing an apartment in an apartment building it's really sort of efficient for the vendor it's certainly convenient for the vendor because they've got one thing to manage it you think about it though there's downsides though where if the water main breaks you have the entire apartment building or every customer in this case they don't have water so the failure modes tend to be really extreme with multi tenant environments and you can't do things like let people paint their apartment any color they want to or expand their apartment or cook foods that are really smelly you have to have apartment rules in place and you see the same thing with multi tenant architectures where in order to make it work you have to restrict what people can do within your platform you get licensing restrictions you get technical restrictions you get wrapped up in quotas that's part and parcel for multi-tenancy your service now is not multi-tenant we're multi-instance so every time a customer joins us they get a unique instance of service now it's just for them it's your own house and because of that we don't have to go in and tell you what you can do with your house there's no HOA you can paint it green you can paint it pink you can do whatever you want to because it's yours and that's the big freedom that we can do for the enterprise customer base for big customers and multi-tenancy does have its use case I don't want to oversell it if you're selling largely into kind of the SMB space for example it's a really good architecture but up at the enterprise level it's really not the multi-instance architecture we use is fundamentally I think superior okay so what what point did you make the decision to go to multi-instance obviously early on you were there early on and and why did you make that decision I think it's not as clear-cut as it is in history always look back and say well we had this great design system we set out knowing we wanted to address the enterprise space and we eventually figured out that in order to do this we couldn't do it with multi-tenancy but we sort of talked ourselves into kind of our own little version I know if you are watch south park but the underpants gnomes dilemma and if you remember that episode Cartman I think butters they decide they're going to stake out the underpants gnomes who sneak into your house and they steal your underwear and they follow them they watch them steal some underwear and they followed them down to their underground lair and they accost them and they say why have you been stealing everybody's underwear and so the gnomes take them to a small room and they show them powerpoints and the PowerPoint has three parts in part one the gnomes steal underpants and in part three the gnomes profit and then they skip back to part two and is a big question mark so we had the same problem we knew we wanted to go with multi-instance and we knew it was going to be great in the market we had no idea how to do it so we probably spent about three years of engineering effort figuring out how to make a multi instance architecture work well at scale because doing it once it's really easy we have 18,000 instances in the platform right now that's a lot things have to work with automation they have to work cleanly and they have to work all the time so it wasn't a matter of convenience for you just the opposite oh absolutely it's a terrible Jam it was a challenge we had to overcome I think it was necessary for our target audience and if you're listening to this and you're actually looking to start your own SAS company figure out who your SAS audiences if it's small business if it's medium business multi-tenancy may be absolutely the right answer okay in the trade-off is cost efficiency I mean it's more expensive right so not necessarily I think there's this myth that you know it's more expensive it's not convenient you did two more engineering work but in terms of what we actually spend on hardware and power and cooling the data center Computers Computers compute if I have to buy a lot of servers and plug them into one database or I have a lot of servers plugged into a lot of databases it generally equates to roughly the same hardware costs so it doesn't generally drive capex but what it does drive is you've got to put that engineering effort in its work up front and you're not a data intensive you have a lot of data and service now but if I remember my numbers rate were about 5 petabytes of storage so that's not how we are not saying Netflix you know we are not box you know we're not storage centric its transactions so it wasn't authorized for transaction absolutely but the the implication that you've made is that many of the clouds that are out there are fine for SMB maybe yeah if you're an SMB that is okay with that but many are not suitable for the enterprise absolutely and I think that's the big change we're seeing in the cloud space using different analogy but a hundred years ago just under half of all the cars on the road where one model is the ford model t say forty-eight percent and the best-selling car was actually a truck in 2014 was a Ford f-150 was two-point-three percent of the market the day when one car could dominate the market like that has long since passed but in the early days of the cloud there were only a few vendors so they were trying to address as much of the market as they possibly could so they built very general case solutions well time has changed people are getting much more specialized so if you wanted to surveys you probably use survey monkey they're really flip and good at surveys they're not claiming to do anything else the same thing is true with the cloud platforms the people who built general case platforms are generally getting kind of pushed a little aside by more specialized offerings that are addressing narrower market segments better how important is this issue of multi-tenant versus multi-instance you obviously feel it's important I mean you guys are talking about it now let me put you in a hypothetical situation you may or may not want to answer let's say you're a CIO you're bigger Oracle customer most your CIOs here I guarantee you're using Oracle in some way shape or form Oracle's making a big push to the cloud 12 cc4 cloud see four containers I don't know pick your poison but Oracle's generally considered a pretty you know reliable company sure um recovery is you know name of the game for them and you know they do a good job should I be concerned if they're going in a multi-tenant direction or is Oracle sort of an outlier in the cloud you honestly I'm not sure if they're an outlier but I would say that if I were hired by Oracle to run their our cloud I would not do that given their customer base I do think there's a case where the early cloud companies use sales forces with example we're a multi-tenant there multi-tenant because it was convenient there multi-tenant because that was their target audience and so they were pitching hey look the cloud and that message ultimately got tangled up with their deployment architecture so it's stuck in people's head that the cloud equals multi-tenant and it really does it SMB cloud multi-tenant is probably exactly what you want to do departmentally focus is probably right at the enterprise level it's not the right design decision them talk about what's new in the platform let's get into the platform what's happening give us the update give us the highlight reel real quick and then talk about what it's exciting you about the next evolution of the platform sure so a couple of different things I'll talk a little about what we're doing for developers historically i mentioned i talked about loko developers talks about no code developers there are also professionals I'm a professional developer i did this for 20 years of my life I lived in an IDE I started writing code I wrote C code I wrote 370 assembler I've done a lot of terrible horrifying stuff back in my day terrible is probably long school with no natural there you go that's where to put it here it was really hard you know I was being shot at but no the trick to that though is that if you were a professional and you wanted to use service now the tools were not familiar there was no IDE or single place you go to see your whole app so we built one the Geneva release the product actually has an in-browser IDE as code search it as editing it has code management you see your whole app in one place it's great and actually our teams use it to build itself it's a little bit self eating watermelon but the team working on the IDE actually programs in the IDE so they prefer that to programming and eclipse for example we're biased we like our IDE but it's actually very valuable that's for the developer side there's also a new developer program and go to developers service now calm join the program you don't need to be a customer just have an email address you can get a hold of a free instance you can get access to technology you can actually join the forums long as you use it it's yours it's really aimed everybody if you want to learn service now go to the developer program join it there's no requirements other than a willingness to learn on your part technology wise though talk about something else we live in a post Edward Snowden world and I don't really like Edward Snowden because it made my work harder but one of the things he's done is make the concept of data sovereignty and data privacy a foreground concern for a lot of people especially outside the US people don't want to put data in the cloud if there's fear of it a us-based vendor or us-based firms can potentially see it we're set aside the u.s. if it's just private information they don't want to put it in the cloud if anybody can see it one of the ways to solve that and we're addressing this is to allow the data to get encrypted before it comes to us so we're putting an encryption proxy inside the customers network along with its keys and data will pass through the proxy certain fields get encrypted and we see only ciphertext we literally can't read it so encryptions your solution there it is absolutely our solution side the international lies you go to create a replica have a cloud-based system potentially or do you can you store in the US oh it's stored in the US because the data is ciphertext we literally can't read it and that's their side effects there that are actually kind of cool in that because we can't read it you also can't use it in back-end workflows so you've got to design your wrap around the encryption but that is a hard guarantee of it is we don't have the keys it is not possible for service now to get your data back and the government subpoena you can't give it okay given really know either know that you have to supreme the cup of the company in question who had the keys and up to their legal department as to what they wanted to do with it okay so can I ask you kind of as we wrap up here a lot of great stuff containers are all the rage I think doc I just got another 95 million dollars 95 million they've raised so much funding over the years containers but promises interoperability I bring that up only as a way to tease out this notion of interoperability sure how does that how do you guys view that trend in the cloud is that something that's you change I've been around for a while sure you know programming but Dockers got the traction than you seeing security it was like lumio make it a lot of hype I think there's two different parts to bet you no one is there definitely is a push to keep applications from messing each other up and impact each other in bad ways either from a security standpoint or just from a architecture overload and you see that on back-end technologies you'll contain docker is a good example of that you know vmware's a little more mature technology doing something very similar then you know choose your virtualization layer in the more application space where service now fits we have the same problem in that we don't want a service now application to impact a different service now application so we actually invested very heavily in fuji something called scoping it allows for applications to be managed individually to be deployed individually and to be interact with each other only through defined api's and that means that you can actually deploy an application with a high degree of confidence it's not going to impact any of the other for lack of a better word innocent applications inside your system it's a very big improvement and one of the things actually allowed us to do the service now store how does open source evolution if you will you know we always talked about this but you know be me being computer science degree back in the 80s we lived in the same generations we're open source was new second classes and now its first classes and now you have beyond that now it's proven it's working is there new business models you're seeing kind of like pure pure red hat and you seeing you know open platforms like data platforms so what's the next evolution open source on how do you guys going to tap into that and what's the most relevant thing to for the folks to be looking at I think first what we're very big users of open source especially in our back-end I mean we're sent OS we're a little bit of red hat where or you know f5s we've got pixie we've got we got Python we got puppet we've got lots of open source environment and the product as well we're huge fans we think it really has brought a lot of really good technology out it's very accessible to the engineering community so we use a lot of it we even contribute back to some of them case maybe I think if you look at business models i'll be honest i have not seen a lot of open source companies do really well in the environment they built a lot of great technology and i think it's been very empowering for the developer community but even red hat has not really you know they're not huge it's not a 20 billion dollar company the case may be so I don't expect to see people flocking to the open source world to make money I see people flocking to the open source world for the same reason engineers have always built cool stuff it's that joy of creation that power of building to be of value creation and contribution it's absolute like a love innovation and it's not i think no one objects to money and that's why they call it money but the open source world from what I've seen it's not being driven by financials it's being driven by engineers wanting to solve problems it's kind of creativity brick it's also a great way to play ball and get a job and show you what you're worth it's like you know I'm sorry just like playing ball in the yard Sandlot baseball then you go pro right so it's a way for recruiting and also to meet people absolutely and we're actually as I said we're big users and we love a lot of its at knowledge we use my sequel community users as well so okay probably gonna get the hook here but I want to view the final word the future give us your take of the preferred future technology wise and just next five years ten years what's good what's the world going to be like I think five years out it's going to look fairly similar to it does today you're definitely going to see a push to drive the information you need to you without you having to go and look for it you're already seeing this you know Twitter pops when something happens data comes to you you don't have to go here hit refresh periodically that's going to drive itself into more and more parts of the world your iPhone dings when something comes up that's going to seep out away from the phone away from specialty platforms like Twitter and other applications and you're going to get more and more used to seeing things come to you other than you having to go out and look for information mission that's relevant it's going to be kind of a service-oriented internet it's going to kind of push stuff out to you ten years out I suspect there'll be more dramatic changes the big thing actually seen this is a little bit of inside baseball but operational architectures are getting much more standardized so I do suspect that the amount of compute people can throw at problems is going to continue to go up astronomically so right now big data solutions are generally applicable to fairly narrow companies who can apply a lot of data to it like a netflix can afford to optimize for recommendations for you that computes going to get cheaper and cheaper and more and more accessible and you will see that sort of solution get applied to more and more specialized problems so I think you're going to find that information is going to come to you and it's going to be more and more germane to you asynchronous definitely absolutely the value and the goodness of more and more cheap compute will create faster faster personalization faster personalization and it'll be it'll be real time there's no need for you to pull on it asynchronous it'll come to you and it'll be the information you're not near real-time real-time self-driving cars don't do very well in your that's how I okay thanks so much for sharing your time and insights here inside the Cuban my pleasure get the insight from the early days to what's going on now appreciate it this is the cube or live in Las Vegas for three days for no 15 I'm John for Dave vellante we right back with more cube signal from the noise after this short break you
SUMMARY :
of an outlier in the cloud you honestly
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Pat Casey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2014 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
18,000 instances | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ikea | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Python | TITLE | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Excel | TITLE | 0.99+ |
f-150 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ten years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Edward Snowden | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
forty-eight percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
nine thousand customers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first classes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
PowerPoint | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Dave vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
95 million dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ruby on Rails | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Ford | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Fred | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second classes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
95 million | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Edward Snowden | PERSON | 0.98+ |
dave vellante | PERSON | 0.98+ |
20 billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two different parts | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.98+ |
about three years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
south park | TITLE | 0.98+ |
one car | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Cartman | TITLE | 0.97+ |
three different groups | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one database | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one day | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one model | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one table | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Las Vegas Nevada | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
about eight years | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
john furrier | PERSON | 0.96+ |
two different architectures | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
a hundred years ago | DATE | 0.95+ |
java | TITLE | 0.95+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
u.s. | LOCATION | 0.92+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
today | DATE | 0.91+ |
each individual customer | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
SAS | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
two-point- | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
about 5 petabytes | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
SiliconANGLE | TITLE | 0.88+ |
Cuban | LOCATION | 0.88+ |
lumio | TITLE | 0.87+ |
agile | TITLE | 0.87+ |
three parts | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
one big | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
loko | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ | |
a few vendors | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
lot of data | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
Wikibon Darden | ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ |
a lot of servers | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
part two | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
baseball | TITLE | 0.78+ |
ford | ORGANIZATION | 0.76+ |
people | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
one place | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
VP | PERSON | 0.74+ |
one big | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
first few sales calls | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.74+ |