(funky music) >> Live from San Francisco, it's theCube, covering RSA Conference 2019 brought to you by Forescout. >> Hey welcome back everybody Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We're at the RSA Conference at downtown San Francisco Moscone Center, they finally finished the remodel. We're excited to be in the Forescout booth, we've never been in the Forescout booth before, psyched that they invited us in. But we've got an old time CUBE alumni and a special company in my heart, was my very first CUBE event ever was Splunk.conf 2012. >> I did not know that Jeff. >> Yeah so we're live. We have Doug Merritt on he's a CEO of Splunk. Doug great to see you. >> Thanks Jeff, good to see you again also. >> Yeah so we've been doing Splunk.conf since 2012. >> The early days. The Cosmo Hotel and it was pouring rain that week. >> That was the third year. >> Probably the third year? >> Second year, yeah long time ago, it's grown. >> 2012 wasn't that big but this is a crazy show. You've been coming here for a while. Security is such an important part of the Splunk value proposition, just general impressions of RSA as you've been here for a couple of days. >> Yeah, it's amazing to see how the show has grown over the years, security's gone from this, kind of backwater thing that a few weird people did in the corner, that only understood the cyber landscape, to something that boards care about now. And that, obviously has helped with this show, I don't know what the attendee numbers are like, but tens of thousands of people. >> Oh yeah. >> You can't walk down a hallway without bumping into 10 brand new companies that were launched in the past year, and the security space and make the biggest challenge people that I have, and I think that other people have is, how do you tell different, where's the wheat from the chaff? What is really important in security and how do you tell different companies and different trends apart, so you can actually focus on what matters? >> Right, I just feel for the seed-sows, right, I mean, you guys have a big ecosystem at .conf, but those are all kind of complimentary things around the core Splunk solution. This is, you've got co-opetition, competition, how does somebody navigate so many options? 'Cause at the end of the day you don't have unlimited resources, you don't have unlimited people to try to figure all these pieces of the puzzle out. >> Yeah, and the CSOs have got a really tough job, the average CSO has got well over a hundred different vendors you're dealing with, and with Splunk what we're very focused on, and where I think we add value is that we become, if done right, we become the abstraction layer that creates a brain and nervous system that allows all those different products, and all of them have got unique capabilities. When you think about the complexity of all the networking, all the compute, all the storage, all the end point landscapes that's only getting worse for the cloud, because now there's more services with more varieties across more cloud vendors. How do you get visibility on that? >> Right, right. >> And you need products at those different junctures, 'cause protect and prevent and defend is still an important function for CSOs, but when we know that you can't prevent everything. >> Right. >> And things will go wrong, how do you know that, that is actually occurring? And what the splunk value prop is, we are the, we don't have as much of a point of view on any one product, we aggregate data from all the products, which is why so many people are partners, and then help companies with both raw investigations, given that if something goes wrong with our schema less data structure, but then also with effective monitoring and analytics that's correlating data across those tens, hundreds or thousands of different technologies. So you can get a better feel for what are the patterns that make sense to pay attention to. >> I think you just gave me like 10 questions to ask just in that answer, you covered it all. 'Cause the other thing, you know, there's also IoT now and OT and all these connected devices so, you know the end points, the surface area, the throughput is only going up by orders of magnitude. >> Without a doubt. >> It's crazy. >> I saw some stats the other day that, globally at this point there's, I may get these off by one digit, but lets say there's 80,000 servers that are the backbone of the entire internet. There's already over 11 billion connected devices, going back to that IoT theme. So the ramifications at the edge and what that means are so profound and companies like Forescout, as a key partner of Splunk's, help make sure that you're aware of; what are all the different elements that are ever hitting my network in a way. And what do they look like and what, what should I be doing, as different things pop on and pop off and, again, we're trying to be the interpretation and brain layer for that, so that they are more and more intelligent to the actions they're taking, given their depth of domain, their deep knowledge of what a camera should look like, or what a windows PC should look like or what a firewall should look like given the configurations that are important to that company. >> Before we turned on the cameras you made an interesting comment. We used to talk about schema on read versus schema on write, that was the big, kind of big data theme, and you guys are sitting on a huge data flow, but you had a really kind of different take, because you never really know, even with schema on read it seems you know what the schema is but in today's changing environment you're not really sure what it is you're going to be looking for next right? And that can evolve and change over time, so you guys have kind of modified that approach a little bit. >> Yeah, I think we are this year you'll see us really reemphasizing that core of Splunk. That the reason you'd have an investigative lake, and I don't think most people know what a schema is period, much less read or write so my new terminology is hey you need a very thorough investigative lake. Going back to the discussion we were having, with so much surface area, so many network devices, so many servers, so many end points, what tool do you have that's reading in data from all of those, and they all are going to have crazy formats. The logs around those are not manageable. To say you can manage logs and centralize. Centralized logs I get, manage those words don't work together. >> Right. Logs are chaotic by nature, you're not going to manage them, you're not going to force every developer and every device to adhere to a certain data structure so it can neatly fit into your structured database. >> Right. >> It is too chaotic, but more importantly, even if you could you're going to miss a point, which is, once you structure data, you're limited with the types of questions you can ask, which means you had to visualize what the questions would be in the first place. In this chaotic environment you don't know what the questions going to be. The dynamics are changing way to quickly, so the investigative lake is truly, our index is not schematized in any way, so you can ask a million questions once versus a schematized data store where it is; I ask one question >> A million times. a million times. And that's super efficient for that, but, the uniqueness of Splunk is, the investigative lake is the fabric of what we do, and where I think our customers, almost have forgotten about Splunk is, read all that data in. I know we've got a volume based licensing model that we're working on customers, were working to solve that for you, that's not the, I'm not trying to get data in so that we can charge more, I'm trying to get data in so that everybody has got the capacity to investigate, 'cause we cannot fail in answering what, why, when, where, how, and stuff'll go wrong, if you can't answer that, man you're in big trouble. And then on top of that let's make sure you've got right monitoring capability, the right predictive analytics capability; and now with tools like Phantom, and we bought a company called victorOps, which is a beautiful collaboration tool, let's make sure you've got the right automation and action frameworks so that you can actually leverage peoples skills across the investigative, monitoring and analytical data stores that at Splunk we help with all four of those. >> Right, right, again, you touch on a lot of good stuff. We could go for hours but we don't have you all day. But I want to follow up on a couple of things, because one of the things that we hear over and over and over is the time to even know that you've been breached. The time to know that you have a problem, and again, by having all that data there you can now start adjusting your questions based on that way you now know. But I think what's even more kind of intriguing to me is, as nation states have become more active, as we've seen the politicalization of a lot of things, you know, what is valuable today is a much varied, much more varied answer than just tapping into a bank account or trying to steal credit card numbers. So it really supports, kind of this notion that you're saying, which you don't have a clue what the question is that you're going to need to ask tomorrow. So how do you make sure you're in a position, when you find out what the question is, that you can ask it? >> And that's the design architecture I like about splunk as a company is that our orientation is, if you're dealing with a world of chaos, allow that chaos to exist and then find the needles in the haystack, the meaning from that chaos, and then when you find the meaning, now you know that a monitor is worthwhile, because you've validated root cause and it exists. And when your monitor is kicked a few times, and you know it's legit, build a predictive routine, because you now know it's worth trying to predict, because you've seen this thing trip a number of times, which inverts the way that most people, that all of us were taught. Which is start with the end in mind, because garbage in equals garbage out, so be really thoughtful in what you want and then you can structure everything, it's like well, that's not the way the world works. What if the question we asked 15 years ago was, what if you couldn't start with the end in mind, what would you have to do? Well you'd have to have a schema less storage vehicle and a language that allows you to ask any question you want and get structure on the question, but then you still need a structure. So you're going to structure them one way or the other, how do you make sure you've got high quality structure, and in our dynamic landscape that's always going to change. >> Right, well the good news is 2020 next year so we'll all know everything right? >> Yeah, exactly. >> We'll have the hindsight. So the last thing before I let you go is really to talk about automation, and just the quantity and volume and throughput of these systems. Again, one, escalating, just 'cause it's always escalating, but two, now adding this whole connected devices and IoT, and this whole world of operational technology devices, you just, you can't buy your way out of it, you can't hire your way out of it, you have to have an increasing level of automation. So how are you kind of seeing that future evolve over the next couple of years? >> I've been meeting with a lot of customers obviously this week, and one of them said, the interesting part about where we are now is, you can't unsee what you've seen. And where we were five years ago, as most people in security and IT; which are natively digitized, they still didn't know how to wrap there arms around the data. So they just didn't see it, they were like the ostrich. Now with tools like Splunk they can actually see the data, but now, what do I do with it? When I've got a billion potential events per day, how do I deal with that? And even if I could find enough manpower, the skills are going to be changing at such a constant basis, so I think this security, orchestration, automation, response; SOAR, area and we were fortunate enough to form a great relationship with phantom a couple of years ago and add them to the Splunk fold, exactly a year ago, as, I think, the best of the SOAR vendors, but it's a brand new category. Because companies have not yet had that unseeing moment of, holy cow, what do I do, how do I even deal with this amount of information? And adding in automation, intelligent automation, dynamic automation, with the right orchestration layer is an absolute imperative for these shops going forward, and when I look at a combination of phantom and their competitors there's still less then a thousand companies in a sea of a million plus corporate entities, globally, that have licensed these products. So we're at the very beginning of this portion of the wave. But there's no way that companies will be able to be successful without beginning to understand what that means, and wrapping their minds around how to use it. What we're so excited about with Splunk, is traversing investigate, monitor, analyze and automate up and down continuously, we think is the key to getting the best value from this really, really diverse and chaotic landscape and then having phantom as part of the fold helps a lot, because you can get signal on, did I do the right automation? Did It actually achieve the goal that my brain told me to do, or not? And if not, what do I adjust in the brain? Do I go after different data, do I structure the data a different way? But that up and down the chain of check and balance, am I doing the right stuff is something that-- >> And do it continuously. >> It's got to be continuous. >> It's got to be continuous. So we're sitting in the Forescout booth, so talk about how Forescout plays. I mean you guys have been sitting on those (mumbles), really fundamental core date, they're really kind of been opening up a whole different set of data, so how is that kind of working out? >> Yeah, so I'm really thankful for the relationship, mostly because they're a great company and I love their CEO, but mostly, if you go customer back, it's a very important relationship. Which is the proliferation of devices, developments continues to grow, and most companies aren't even aware of the number of devices that exist in their sphere, much less how they should look, and then what vulnerabilities might exist because of changes in those devices. So the information flow of, here's what's in the eco-sphere of a customer into Splunk is really helpful, and then the correlation that Splunk drives, so that Forescout gets even more intelligent on what corrective actions to what type of actions period do I take across this sea of devices is a really important and beneficial relationship for our customers. >> Excellent, so I'll give you the last word, little plug for Splunk.conf coming up in October. >> Yeah, I'm really excited about conf, excited to have you guys there again. We've been on a really intense innovation march for the past few years. This last conf we introduced 20 products at conf, which was a record. We're trying to keep the same pace for conf 2019 and I hope that everyone gets a chance to come, because we're going to both be, moving forward those products that we talked about, but, I think really surprising people, with some of the directions that were taking, the investigate, monitor, analyze and act capabilities both as a platform and for security IT and our other key buy-in centers. >> Alright, well we'll see you there Doug, thanks for stopping by. >> Thank you, Jeff. >> Great seeing you. >> He's Doug, I'm Jeff, you're watching theCUBE, we're in the Forescout booth at RSA Conference 2019, thanks for watching we'll see ya next time. >> Thank you. (electronic music)

>> From Las Vegas, it's theCUBE covering Open Systems. The future is crystal clear with security and SD-Wan. Brought to you by Open Systems. >> Hello everyone, I'm John Furrier here in Las Vegas for special CUBE presentation. We're at the Chandelier Bar at the Cosmopolitan Hotel, the Cosmo, on the Las Vegas strip. Part of a series of a lot of events going on. Gartner's got two events happening, But we're here as part of Open Systems. You got exclusive get-together of influencers, customers, all talking about the impact the Cloud, Secure, SD-Wan, a variety of other things. Open Systems, a very successful, Switzerland-based company expanding rapidly in the United States, a global platform and we're here with the CTO, Stefan Keller, thanks for joining me. >> Thank you for having me. >> You guys have been very successful in this, I will say, changing SD-Wan, a completely new re-imagined SD-Wan market because with the internet and Cloud, people don't want to connect to the internet anymore, they want either direct connection, they want high-secure, wide-area network connections. They want secure connections. More important than ever when you have Internet of Things, a lot of surface area, nevermind multiple headquarters or branch offices, so SD-Wan has gone from a connection, connectivity, move packets from A to B, to a fully-integrated, secure architecture that's easy to use, that can deal with mobile embedded. You guys have been successful, with almost no marketing, all word of mouth, successful product, tell us, Stefan, as the CTO, what is the most compelling thing about the technology that's been resonating with customers? >> Well, as I said, the last couple of years there was a lot of change, technology change. The requirements of our customers changed as well. With Cloud, you'll all of a sudden have traffic pattern that you didn't have before. Before, everything was static. You had just your band connectivity to the data center and there is left, towards the internet. But with SD-Wan, you now have the capability to have very complex traffic flow at the branch office, itself. So, you have a lot of logic that you put to the branch office and the challenge is now, how can you actually control all that traffic flow in a central way? Because in the end, all our customers or companies, what they want, they want to have the flexibility to use all those new technologies, be it Cloud, be it IOT, whatever. But still have the security in mind in the sense, they want to be protected, they want to be protected. You now have the branch office with a lot of new traffic patterns. How do you control that? And that's where our integrated approach of SD-Wan and security is the perfect fit. So you really have a global policy that you assign locally. >> One of the big trends that's happening now obviously, is the Cloud has grown so big and popular that the economics, you cannot ignore the economics and the value in the cloud for what you're paying. Agility, etc., we've heard that. However, validated even more than ever is on-premises. People are going to have an on-premises and Cloud or Hybrid Cloud solution. Now, IT departments and these people managing CSOS, managing all these people have to deal with the distributed, in some cases decentralized operations. The problem is there's so many vendors. They don't have the expertise so they need things as a managed service, sometimes they want to maybe choose something on premise that's deployed. So you need a diversity of choices without compromising ease of use. So the question for you is: How do you guys make that happen because this is something that you've heard people like about your product, complex, I hate the word single-pane of glass but that's been an IT term, that's essentially dashboard, central teams can use telemetry... and data but get the benefits of.. variety of environments. Why is it so successful, what is the choices for customer? Is it managed service, is that the direction? Or and odd PRAM, what's your thoughts? >> Yeah, that's a good point. In the end it's a combination because we are a managed service because, as you said, things get more complex and the talent market is challenging so it's difficult to find the right talents that can manage it. So that's where we come in as a strategic partner. We are not only in the SD-Wan market, we are also in the security market as well. So we combine security and the SD-Wan. That's what you see with all the SD-Wan vendors out there and they're very strong with SD-Wan capabilities but in order to provide security functionality they start to partner, be it with a firewall vendor, with a proxy vendor what so on. So, in the end, you as a customer, you don't deal just with one partner, all of a sudden you have four, five, or even six such partners you have to deal with. And if a managed service provider can provide a holistic approach of security and SD-Wan you have one partner you can deal with so it makes, for you, very easy. >> So a lot of peoples have say, "oh" they've been trying security, a variety, "we've seen every scheme in the book." And the easiest one was, oh, network traffic. Pack an inspection, kind of not very good. But you want to watch the bad guys move. When things are moving around, that's when you get the pattern recognition. Is there software that you guys write? How do you get that security edge? Is it watching the movement patterns, not just the packets but who has what systems, is it a variety of things? What's the underlying secret sauce for Open Systems? >> The secret sauce, well let's say, is that we are flexible to take out whatever is state of the art and put it together to a managed service in a standardized way for our customers If you look as today's companies they want to do it on their own. They may have to deal with 30, 40 different kind of vendors and components and put it together. We do that for our customers. We take state of the art technology, put it together, and make all the service of it. And the advantage is, because we have that high level of integration, we can all of a sudden, use one component for different kind of services we provide. That's the difference when you have an ecosystem like SD-Wan where you have three, four components, they don't really talk with each other, they do not have a common language. We bring that common language so that the consistent view and the consistent logic over the entire band of our customers. >> So you're the glue layer. Between all the different components. >> Right. >> Okay, so I got to ask you a question. If someone says to you "hey Stefan, this other vendor promised me all this stuff over here, some other person. I got to get current on SD-Wan." What do you think people don't know about SD, whether they should know, that might be a surprise or things that you've observed with your successful customer deployments that's a lot harder than it looks. Cause a lot of people say "oh we got that!" And it doesn't really work very well. Or is a blind spot for the CSOS team, security team, around capabilities. So you can be aspirational but you got to have the capability what are some areas that you've seen that are important for buyers to consider when architecting and then deploying and executing an SD-Wan strategy? >> I mean, When you see all those SD-Wan vendors what they say, "hey it's easy to deploy, it's zero-touch deployment." Can't be true but in the end, you have a global network you want to deploy a global policy and somehow, you have to manage that. And this is something that most of them just underestimate. You only need, really, a strategic partner who knows how to deal with it, who has the capabilities, the experience, and the know-how to deploy it easily and manage it for you So then you don't have the pain. >> Give me an example of a customer, you don't have to say their name, where the old way they did something and then the Open Systems side of it, they did it your way and watch changed, what was the impact? Did they have more efficiency with the people? Did they save time, what was some of the consequences of doing the old way versus the new way? >> The old way also then involved some kind of an MPLS network, or course, if we go with the SD-Wan approach, the really good ones convince a customer, "hey, you don't need MPLS for the application you need." For the SLA you want to have. Internet connectivity if fine and just have two or three such internet connection per location. So in the end, it was cost-saving, it was a full put agreement. Performance all of a sudden was very great and in the end they liked us because of our operational efficiency so our operations model is very efficient and helps our customers so that they can focus on their core business. >> So the applications get smarter, and then you actually saved money because, remember, it still costs a lot of money to send traffic over the network, in some cases. Okay, final question. There's a big trend towards direct connections, where do you see that going, how does that impact SD-Wan? >> I would say that's again on the security side because with SD-Wan, you have a lot of flexibility we just didn't have in the past. This means you have traffic flow all of a sudden which is not expected by many people. If you go to a single branch office, a small one, all of a sudden they have local exits, they do internet surfing, youtube video-ing, they have connections to their private data center, to their public Cloud environment, everything. So different kind of traffic pattern. And here we have just the single way, a unique approach, about a global Zone-Based Firewall. So this makes your traffic pattern all of a sudden very transparent and simple again, this helps you to control the traffic flow and to avoid any kind of leak. >> As we always say, don't send those cat videos. It still costs money to share the cat videos around. Super Content is a big part of this too, you've got all kinds of new SAS applications, talking to each other, this is another layer of abstraction that needs to be managed. That's an area you guys do? API's and applications? >> We're going in that direction, I would say we're not that far yet. We can do much more but this is the direction we have to go to. >> Final question: you come to the U.S. A lot of people are learning about you guys, If we're at a cocktail party, which we are at now, and I say "hey Stefan, bottom line me, what's the one thing about Open Systems that makes you guys great?" >> Then I'll still go back to our operational excellence. We really have a way to operate thousands of devices in a way that is so efficient and scaled very well for a huge customer base. >> Alright Stefan, thanks for coming on. Stefan Keller, CTO of Open Systems, hot start-up out of Zurich, Switzerland. A very successful company, really now exploding in the United States, expanding to Silicon Valley. We are here in Las Vegas, theCUBE coverage. Bringing all the action down here at the Open Systems influencer, expert cocktail party, here at the Chandelier Bar at the Cosmo hotel. Part of a lot of events around Gartner's events are here. Covering it all, stay with us for more after this short break. (chill electronic beats)

>> From Las Vegas, it's theCUBE. Covering Open Systems. The future is crystal clear with security in SD-WAN. Brought to you by Open Systems. >> Welcome back to Las Vegas everybody, my name is Dave Valanti and you're watching theCUBE, the leader in live tech coverage. We go out to the events, we extract the signal from the noise. We are covering the Open Systems networking event. They're here as part of the two Gartner events here this week. On the heels of AWS Reinvent, a lot of action going on in Las Vegas. Steve Garson is here, he's the president and founder of SD-WAN experts consultancy in this space. Steve, thanks so much for coming on theCUBE. >> Glad to be here. >> So tell us a little bit more about your background. >> Okay. I've been in the networking space since about 2007. Initially, my company was called MPLS Experts, when companies were migrating to MPLS and not understanding, well, what carriers should I use. I helped companies re-engineer their WAN back then. As that developed, the WAN optimization came into the scene and I helped companies evaluate the right WAN optimization solution. Then I had the foresight to see the potential of SD-WAN. I pivoted the business, called it SD-WAN Experts and started writing for network world and blogging on my own sites and with a number of other websites. I've been helping enterprises worldwide re-engineer their network, make a WAN transformation that's secure and supports easy management and save a lot of money. >> So, awesome. So you have a practitioners background, right? >> Exactly. >> That's fair to say. So you know your stuff, let's get into it. So let's talk trends, I mean. At a high level we always talk at theCUBE about the cloud and how that's affecting network traffic. Going from North South to East West has a major impact on security and performance. What are the big trends in the market space that you see, that are relevant? >> Well, we see consolidation obviously. (coughs) Obviously moving to the cloud is a big driver. The WAN has been designed for a data center with an MPLS network. That's a hub and spoke architecture that really doesn't make sense anymore. Companies are moving to Office 365, they're using Salesforce.com, they're using all kinds of softwares and service. That just doesn't work with a data center. So what companies have traditionally done is they have regional secure gateways and they're sending the traffic from an office to a secure gateway and now they're going through the internet. It just is convoluted, the traffic is tromboned and the latency is higher than it has to be. They're spending more money for these expensive circuits that, ultimately, they're going to the internet anyways. >> So, there's a lot of technical debt out there. How does a company go from point A to point B without spending a zillion dollars or bringing in, you know, a huge SI to re-architect everything. Is there a path that you can advise customers, or is it just every situation is a snowflake? >> You could probably define a half-dozen different basic situations that are snowflakes. Essentially you're moving to, you know, if you have an MPLS network companies typically will need more bandwidth and instead of getting more MPLS bandwidth they'll add internet connectivity. Using SD-WAN they'll root traffic over the internet that's supposed to go to the internet. The things that are still required on their MPLS network will stay in play. When those MPLS contracts expire, then there's a question of, do I need MPLS? That's a complicated question to answer. I will not say that you can eliminate MPLS, I'll always say it depends. It depends on the latency between paths on your network. I presented a paper at O-NUG a few weeks ago in New York, in which I analyzed with a lot of empirical data. Latency, packet-loss, and standard deviation of that latency between paths like from Tokyo to New York. You might a have 200 millisecond latency. But your standard deviation over the internet might be 200 milliseconds. So that means, potentially, if you're using only the internet, you might have 400 milliseconds latency. Can your application work appropriately? >> If you need 200 guaranteed, you've got a problem. Right? >> Right, exactly. In a situation like that, you might want to use MPLS or there's a new category of connectivity called SDCore which is an MPLS network in the Cloud that you access through an IPSec VPN to pops that are typically within 20 milliseconds. So you get that stability, but you cut the cost dramatically. >> Now the Edge just confuses us even further, right? IOT, The Edge, I mean certainly a trend everybody's talking about. From your standpoint, how real is it? Is it here today? Is it coming? What is the effect going to be on all these trends? >> You mean, the Edge? >> Yeah, the Edge, IOT. >> I mean it's a complicated thing. I mean the Edge. >> The industrial internet. >> Yeah, I mean, when people talk about the Edge today the Edge used to be their router and SD-WAN devices are supplanting the router. Gartner has indicated that by 2023 nobody is going to be buying routers. Everybody is going to be using an SD-WAN device which will route. >> Amazon, we were at Reinvent last week, they might even look at the data center as the Edge. But, I digress. Let's talk about the horses on the track. Lay out the competitive environment right now. We're here at the Open Systems event. Where do they fit in the market landscape? >> Open Systems is a very unique company where people will say, who's Open Systems competitor. They really don't have a competitor because they're unique. Open Systems is a company that has a secure SD-WAN which means there's a full security stack with SD-WAN. So you have the benefits of SD-WAN, but instead of having to deal with all these different security applications like HASBY, Data-loss Prevention, and IPSIDS, authentication, VPN integration with active directory. They do all of that and it's all managed. It's a very unique offering. >> So the competition is Do-It-Yourself, right? >> The competition is Do-It-Yourself or use a managed service provider who probably doesn't have all the pieces that work together. Open Systems has been doing this for 25 years. They have developed what the customers want. I went to one of their global customer meetings. They called a cap meeting last year. Each year they get input from the customers as far as what kind of enhancements they want to see. They actually take that input and the following year the customers, I was amazed, the customers just are thrilled that the company listens and the company implements what they ask. >> Again, I've mentioned there's a couple of Gartner shows going on this week. Sounds like Open Systems wouldn't really fit cleanly into a magic quadrant. >> They don't. They don't because they're not an Edge device. They're a complete Edge security solution that's managed. >> We talked about this at theCUBE, John Ferrs has brought up several times that the magic quadrants will have to evolve as these managed services, the Cloud certainly affects that. As more and more things get co-opted by the services, you know, economy. But, your thoughts on magic quadrants, how customers are using them. My understanding is, today, you heard a talk from a Gartner analyst that was helping people understand the do's and don'ts of a magic quadrant. Your thoughts? >> Yeah, well what Gartner was talking about today is how many people use the magic quadrant inappropriately. They think this tells us which companies we should look at and really what it's telling you is how that customer's strategy fits in with the market place. But you really have to look at what your requirements are. You can't just say, okay I'm going to look at quote the top three SD-WAN vendors. What are your requirements? That's what my firm does as a consultant is we help companies figure out what their requirements are to find out what's the right solution. A story I love to tell is a company that spent a year evaluating SD-WANs. They were about to make a decision and the CIO basically told the committee after a year of evaluations hey before we sign a contract, let's get an independent sanity check that we've made the right decision. I met with the company, spent a couple weeks assessing their requirements, and I know all of the major technologies and I knew that what they had selected wasn't correct. But you can't tell a client that they've made a mistake. So we set up a meeting with the vendor, which was a carrier, and their technology provider and the committee and I asked the hard questions that the vendor couldn't answer. Which made it really clear to the client that this is the wrong solution. They went a completely different direction. >> Saved them a lot of money. I love those stories. What's your website? >> SD-WAN-experts.com >> Alright, Steve thanks so much for coming on theCUBE. Sharing your knowledge. >> Thank you. >> Awesome stuff. Really appreciate it. >> Pleasure. >> Keep it right there, everybody. We'll be back from Las Vegas Cosmo hotel. Open Systems networking event. You're watching theCUBE. (techno music)