>>from around the globe. It's the Cube presenting Cuban cloud brought to you by silicon angle. Okay, we're now going >>to explore what it's like to be the CEO of a fast paced growth company in Silicon Valley. And how the cloud, however, you wanted to find the cloud public cloud on Prem Hybrid, etcetera. How it supported that growth. And with me is Kathy Southwick, who is the CEO of pure storage. Kathy is really deep experience. Managing technology organizations spent a number of years overseeing A T and T s cloud planning and engineering and another few years overseeing a team of a Couple 1000 network and I T engineers working to break the physical stranglehold of fossilized telco networks, implementing network functions, virtualization and a software defined methodology for the company. And, of course, you spent the last couple of years is the CEO of Pure. So Cathy, it's great to see you again. Thank you for coming on the program. >>Thanks for having me. It's good to be here. >>You're very welcome. And so so >>given your >>experience with cloud, you know, dating back to really the early part of last decade. How did you look at cloud back then and how How is it evolved from your point of view? >>You know, it's Ah, it's an interesting question because I think that we've there's some things that have moved very fast and there's some some things that are very much the same as they were even a decade ago. I think that all companies are very focused on How do you think about Cloud? Do you think about it as on Prem? And when I started, we really were focused on an on Prem solution, and I'm in building an on Prem private cloud to help modernize our business. So I think that, you know, with that all companies are still in that same mindset of how do I want to think about Cloud? And how do I want to think about that on Prem versus Public versus, you know, combination or some type of hybrid solution? So I think all of us around that journey, it just seems like it's taken. It's probably a bit longer than most of us probably thought from beginning. >>So as a CEO thinking about that evolution, how has that informed the way you think about applying specifically the public cloud to pure business. >>You know, I think that we've been a for pure ourselves. I think we're in a really unique position. We were essentially born in the cloud. So we're, you know, company. That's 10 11 years old. And if I If I give the contrast of that of 18 t being, you know, 130 year old company Onda having a lot of applications that have, you know, lived historically on prim. There's very different issues and challenges that you have pure has had that. I think the advantage just like many other companies that were born in the cloud who have can see what advantages are very quickly. And we made decisions early on that said that we were gonna actually do both. We were gonna look to say, How do I put those applications in that in that data, whether it was on public or in on Prem and be able to do that both in the i t. Side as well as within the product side? So how we build our products now, >>as I mentioned up front, you have obviously a lot of experience managing large technology teams. My question is. When you first saw the emergence of the modern cloud, how did you communicate with your team members? I mean, you mentioned you were kind of building your own private cloud, so I guess that's less threatening to people. But what was it like? You know, Was there a concern? You know, with the eager to jump in? What was that dynamic like? And how did you manage >>it? You know, it's really it's a different depending on the different part of the organization. So I'll give you kind of two things I learned one of them was that our teams in the operation side, they saw it as a huge advantage. They saw it as an opportunity to really modernized to really get themselves both their own individual skill sets advanced, as well as provide a better level of service for our internal, you know, customer, so to speak. Our application in our data partners that we had to work with, um, they thought is an opportunity to bring agility to their applications quicker speed to market, um, or currency of their applications. So they actually got some benefits that they weren't. Actually, I'll call planning for they were they had the opportunity toe get investment in their applications without having to put the that investment on themselves. I would tell you the thing I learned from the teams, this is probably might be a little bit surprised. But often, you know, leaders believe like, you gotta have all the answers. You're gonna drive everything you're gonna let make sure everyone knows what needs to get done and what I actually found. This was actually one of my big moments, I think, was our Our individuals are employees are teams. They're so brilliant and so bright on driving change. And a lot of times leaders, I think, get in the way that so for cloud and adoption, it was really about me getting out of the way. It was really about setting that north star for where we want to go from the ability to deliver fast and quick for our business. And they get out of the way and let our teams actually drive. So it was a great, um, it was we actually actually saw the reverse. I saw more employees wanting to drive, and I needed to, like, back out and just say, Here's what we need to go. Let them drive us there. >>Alright, So I gotta ask you don't Please don't hate me for asking this question, but was your your gender and advantage was at a disadvantage. It wasn't really irrelevant in that regard. >>It was a relevant um, I think that it was I actually I truly believe it's irrelevant. I think it was literally recognizing that leaders need to set vision and what we want to achieve and let our letter of teams help us drive to get there. And I think that that is, you know, gender neutral. I think it's really about, you know, kind of checking your ego and everything else out to the side. And it's really about empowering people in our teams. Thio help drive us there. >>So thinking about that that learning specifically are there any similar tectonic shifts that you're you're seeing today where you can apply that experience? I'm just like, for instance, new modes of application development and requiring new skill sets are, or maybe another that you can think of. >>Yeah, I think I think honestly, it traverse is everything that we that we have to do as a you know, as a leader of a technology team, and whether you're in a high growth company like Pure or you're in a company that's trying to take costs out of your business or trying to, you know, do things. I think that it, um it really is a matter of leaders needing to set the stage. And so if we're trying to drive, you know, changing the business, it's really making sure that we're doing I'll calm or more empowering of our employees and they because they will see the way that we can get there. It's just a matter of, you know, letting them have that ability to do it. >>So you joined pure around two years ago and obviously growing very quickly. I love pandemic has changed the trajectory of that growth, but still good outlook. Um, but Silicon Valley fast paced company, you know, I kind of put it in the camp of the the work days, and the service now is that could have similar similar cultural patterns there. So you talked a little bit about this, but I wonder if we could come back and more specifically how you're leveraging cloud, how you're thinking about it, you know, on Prem Hybrid, Now the edge. And how did that contribute Thio Puros growth? >>Yeah, that za great question because I think that why I shared earlier, you know, we were essentially born in the cloud. I think that what it's really driven us is to be thinking more forward about where customers were going and what their challenges are. So whether it's for the I t. Teams on what we're trying to do to deliver for our business and, you know, innovation, they're obviously trying to make sure they can hit their revenue goals and all those things that important that every business deals with. But we also have that same mindset on how we develop our products. So it's really all driven by where the customer is going that they need data mobility. They need application mobility. They need really portability so that the moment that you have that ability where you can kind of control your destiny and define it, and you only could get that by having, you know, applications that are portable and data that is mobile and secure, that you have that kind of flexibility. So I think for pure we've been definitely in a great position to drive for our customers or drive where our customers are going. And so we have to find our entire product set. So not just how we operate as a business and run our business. But then how we define for our customers Same mindset is if our customers are going to the cloud that we need, have products that can help them to be in the cloud or be, you know, on print and let them decide what that looks like. Well, >>it's interesting you mentioned that and I hearken back to the The Port Works acquisition, which is an attempt to really change the way application development has done is another sort of approach Thio in a sort of modern data architecture, you, as the CEO of a technology company, most CEO, is that I know inside the tech companies that they're sort of the dog Fuding or champagne drinking, you know, testing. So So had you already started to sort of use that tech? Are you starting to, you know, Does it support that vision that you just put forth? Maybe you could talk a little bit about that. >>Yeah, It does. So we eso We had not been using port works as a za product. We were just starting down that path of looking at How do we do container ization for the applications that we do have on Prem? That's both in our engineering side as well as within I t. And so But we quickly have recognized, just like you know, And part of that acquisition is applications or companies won't have the ability to have that portability of their applications and have that flexibility that they're all striving for unless they've done things like containerized or applications made them that they're able to move them across different cloud environments, whether that's on Prem or off Prem or some hybrid eso for ourselves. You know, Port Works was a really critical acquisition, will help us on our own journey of doing the application, modernization and putting that keep those capabilities in place. But it will also enable our customers to have that same flexibility. So, again, going back to the we've adopt, these things aren't like a this is for this group, and this is for you know, this customer. It's really about how we operate both internally and then what we are providing for our customers so that portability and being able to have control of your own destiny, that's that's really to me what hybrid cloud is all about. And you can't really achieve that If you don't have some of these capabilities within your, you know, within kind of your toolbox. >>Great. Thank you for that. So I'm interested in is the head of, ah technology group at a tech company? And what are the meaningful differences? I mean, a lot of differences, but relative to CEO of a large telco or or other incumbent, you know, what are some of the good, the bad? And, uh, you know, the ugly, the differences. >>Yeah, you know, it's I meet with a lot of CEOs across Silicon Valley and we kind of joked that when you are working in a company that is a technology based company, you know, everybody knows how to dio, you know, because you do you have a brilliant engineers and and that they do know. I think the difference that you start to see is that you know, I t is, um is required to make sure that availability is their inherent in what you're doing on immediate roll out with like, you know, an application that's occurring. That's very different than how you do product lifecycle management. Um, what what we've what I've seen, actually, though, is more similarities. I know that's probably surprised to you, but coming out of a T and T, what I have been working on those last couple of years was actually doing the combination of engineering and I t into one organization and that you do have a lot of benefits for, for how you can then develop, how you can manage and the skill sets. There's a lot of similarities. So there's there's actually probably more similarities between companies and on what they're trying to achieve than than you would probably think there would be just because we're all trying to make sure that we can develop quickly. How about is >>it relates to cloud Cathy? I mean, I remember the early days of cloud, a lot of the big banks that we could build our own cloud. We can essentially compete at scale with with Amazon, where you know the big bank on. Then I think they quickly realized well, the economics actually don't favor us necessarily. Do you think there's a different perception about the use of cloud between sort of traditional incumbents and a tech company in Silicon Valley? And if so, how? >>So now I think that the if you are, you know, a bank is you refer to, and having it really is where you're starting from. If you have a very large infrastructure footprint and application footprint, your applications probably not born in the cloud. There's a lot of modernization that has to be done with those applications so that they could operate as efficiently in a public cloud as an example. And I think that's something that sometimes gets overlooked is there are enormous benefits going to public cloud. But there's also cost if your applications or your data doesn't really fit as well in that type of environment. So I think that for large enterprises like the banks, some of the telcos they've got very large footprints of infrastructure. Already, those investments have been made, and what they're really looking for is how doe I increase my ability to, you know, whether it's agility or its speed, or it's lower cost or it's all those things, and I think that's the That's a different path of different journey that they're on. So they're trying to balance all those equations of, you know, the economics as well as the ability to have, you know, no more investment or minimal investment in that infrastructure. For companies like Pure, where we started off of those investments are decision and kind of. The decision tree that we use is if it makes sense. And I don't have to make that investment on Prem for whatever reason, that I should go ahead and make that investment in a public cloud strategy or a hybrid cloud strategy kind. Differentiate that because I think that it's different depending on the company. You are, um, and so it really kind of depends on where you're starting from then. It also depends on what you're trying to achieve if you're just trying to achieve an economic solution. If you're trying to achieve a strategic solution, if you're trying to get agility. Andi, I think it is different for companies, and it's different depending where you're at in your kind of journey. So for a Silicon Valley company whose you know hyper growth, you know, one. We're very focused on abilities. You know everything from scale, because we've got to scale quickly. And those are things that we don't wanna have to start going and building all these data centers to go do that. We don't have those embedded investments. So it's Ah, it's a real difference in where your starting point is. And I think there I think there's value in in all those different type of approaches, >>right? And it's a real advantage for you that you don't have to shell out all that cap ex on Data Center. >>That's right. Um, as you look >>back at the last 10 years of cloud, you know, it was largely about eliminating the heavy lift of infrastructure deployment and SAS if I ng you know the business, what do you see? Going forward? What do you think the was gonna unfold in the 2020 is? Is it gonna be more of the same? Or do you expect meaningful differences? >>I think that we're going to get better as, um as you know, technology leaders on how to quickly make decisions. Um, and not its have it less political. And I think Kobe is actually taught us a lot about that around companies more willing to make. I'll call it a A you know, a faster decision and remove some of the red tape. I've heard this from many of my peers that things that might have taken them months and months to get approved. Um, it's nowadays if even if they even have to go get approval. So I think that what we're going to see is we'll see the continuance of, um, you know, a public and I'll call really hybrid cloud type of solutions. And I think it will be more purposeful about what goes there and how. How that can help us toe, you know, I'll call it enable us much faster than we've been able to do it before. I think that's been our challenges. We've, you know, we get mired into some of the you know, the details of some of these things that maybe it would be easier for us to just make the decision to move forward than Thio. Keep going around around on what's the right way to do it. Yeah, >>so that's interesting. You're saying about the fast decisions? I felt like, ah, lot of 2020 was very tactical. Okay, go deal with the work from home, etcetera. Although you you definitely see I t spending, uh, suppressed in 2020. Our forecast was minus 4% but we're saying it's gonna grow. We actually see a decent snapback. You know, what are you seeing? Generally, Not even necessarily pure. But when you talk to some of your colleagues, you obviously in the technology business, it's good to be in the technology business these days. But to use do you see spending, you know, generally coming back And maybe the timing first half, maybe a little soft second. What are you seeing >>there? Yeah, almost identical wage that. I think that we'll see, you know, a little bit of, ah tendency toe, not really hold back, but really kind of see what's happening in the first quarter of the year. There's a lot, you know, going on with companies and everyone's having to kind of balance at what that looks like. I do see. And what I'm hearing from several of my peers is that, you know, it's not necessarily budget cuts. It might be budget re directions. It might be rude prioritization, but definitely technology investments are still there, and it's still important for businesses to keep on their journeys on. But we do see that even at pure as a way to differentiate ourselves in the market as well, do you? What >>about the work from home piece? I mean, prior to co vid, I think the average was about 15 or 16% of employees work from home. You know, now it's gotta be, you know, well, over in the high seventies, Onda CEO is that we've talked to suggest that, you know, that's gonna come down in the first half, maybe down toe, still pretty high 50 60%. But then eventually is gonna settle at a higher rate than it was pre pre covert. Maybe double that rate may be in the 30 35 maybe even 40%. You know? What are you expecting >>Something probably very similar. I think that what companies have recognized and I actually tell you CEO have thought this many of them for many years that there is a huge value value and having some type of hybrid model. There's value in having, you know, both from a business perspective as well as a personal perspective. So employees work life balance and trying to balance that. So I think that, you know, we a pure and myself, As you know the CEO hugely expect that we will see some type of you know, I'll call leveling off, figure out what's the right for the right group. And I think what we don't want to get into is, you know, Chris prescriptive that says, You know, this is what the company will look like as a whole. I think it really is going to come down to certain certain types of work are more conducive to a more work, remote environment others need to have. And I always kind of uses term of individual, you know, productivity versus team. You know, productivity. We've seen, you know, great advances and or individual productivity. A team productivity is still a challenge when you're still trying to do very collaborative, you know, brainstorming sessions. And so we are looking at capabilities to be able to enable our employees to do that. But there there's some things you just can't replace. The human interaction and ability to very quickly inter actively, you know, five minutes catch someone to do that. So I think we'll see. We'll see both. We'll see some leveling off, and I think we'll see some areas of businesses that have once thought You can't do that remote. They might actually say, Hey, that is work that commute remote So I think we'll see a combination of both. That's an >>interesting perspective on productivity. And what's the What's the old saying is You could go go faster alone. But further as a team and and not a lot of folks have been talking about that team productivity, we we clearly saw the hit the positive hit on productivity, especially in the in the technology business. So So my question then is so you expect? You know H Q doesn't go away. Maybe it gets, you know, maybe it gets smaller, Uh, but so is their pent up demand for technology spending at the headquarters. Because you've been you've been, you know, pushing tech out out to the edge out to the remote workers. Securing those remote workers figuring out better ways to collaborate is their pent up demand at H. Q. >>Um, absolutely. We've been, you know, we've been actually exploring different technologies. We've been uh, looking at what are things that you know could help create a different kind of experience, eh? So I do think it will be some different types of technology. Those would be the things that maybe aren't even out there developed yet on Have you create some of those comparable experiences. So I think that the notion of you know individuals will continue to thrive, but we've got to start working on How do we continue to enhance that? That team, um, collaborative productivity environment that looks and feels different than what it might look like today. Yeah. >>They got to leave it there. Great as always. Having you in the Cube. Thanks so much for participating in Cuban Cloud. >>Great. It's great to be here. Thank you. >>Keep it right there. Back more content right after this short break. >>Yeah.

>> fly from San Francisco. It's the Cube covering Google Club next nineteen Rock Tio by Google Cloud and its ecosystem Partners. >> Okay, welcome back, everyone. We're here live in San Francisco for cubes coverage of Google next twenty nineteen. I'm suffering my coast, David. Want to many men also doing interviews out, getting, reporting and collecting all the data. And we're gonna bring it back on the Q R. Next to gas mark in l. A. Who's a senior technical account manager? AccuWeather at enough was the director product manager. Google Cloud Platform. Now welcome back to the Cube and >> thank you for >> coming on. Thank you. >> You got a customer. Big customer focus here this year. Step function of just logo's growth. New announcements. Technical. Really good stuff. Yeah. What's going on? Give us the update. AP economies here, full throttle. >> I mean, you know, the great thing is it's a pea eye's on all fronts. So what you saw this morning was about standardizing the AP eyes that cloud infrastructure is based on. You saw, You know, how do we build applications with AP eyes at a finer grained level? Micro services, you know, And we've had a lot of great customer examples of people using, and that's what you know with AC. You weather here talking about how do you use a P ice to service and build business models reached developer ecosystems. So you know. So I look at everything today. It's every aspect of it brings it back home tape. Yas. >> It's just things that's so exciting because we think about the service model of cloud and on premise. And now cloud, it's integration and AP Eyes or Ki ki and all and only getting more functional. Talk about your implementation. Aki weather. What do you guys do with Apogee? Google clouds just chair. What >> would implementation is so accurate? There's been running an AP I service for the past ten years, and we have lots of enterprise clients, but we started to realize we're missing a whole business opportunity. So we partnered with Apogee, and we created a new self survey P developer portal that allows developers to go in there, sign up on their own and get started. And it's been great for us as far as like basically unlocking new revenue opportunities with the FBI's because, as he said, everything is a p i cz. We also say everything is impacted by the weather. So why not have everyone used ac you other empty eyes to fulfill their weather needs? >> It wasn't like early on when you guys were making this call, was it more like experimenting? Did men even have a clue where they're like You's a p I I was gonna start grass Roots >> Way knew right >> away like we were working very heavily with the enterprise clients. But we wanted to really cater to the small business Is the individual developers to weather enthusiasts are students. Even so, we wanted to have this easy interface that instead of talking to a sales rep, you could just go through this portal and sign upon your own. It get started and we knew right away there is money to be left or money to be had money left on the table. So we knew right away with by working with apogee and creating this portal, it would run itself. Everyone uses a P eyes and everyone needs to weather, so to make it easier to find and use >> and what was it like? Now let's see how >> it we've been using it now for about two years, and it's been very successful. We've we've seen great, rather revenue growth. And more importantly, it's worked as a great sales channel for us because now, instead of just going directly to an enterprise agreement and talking about legal terms and contracts, you can go through this incremental steps of signed up on your own. Do a free trial. Then you could buy a package. You can potentially increase your package, and we can then monitor that. Let them do it on their own, and it allows us ability to reach out to them and see could just be a new partner that we want to work with, or is there a greater opportunity there? So it's been great for us as faras elite generator in the sales channel to really more revenue, more opportunities and just more aware these'LL process a whole new business model. It's amore awareness, actually replies. Instead, people were trying to find us. Now it's out there and people see great Now it Khun, use it, Get started >> Admission in the back end. The National Weather Service, obviously the government's putting up balloons taking data and presumably and input to your models. How are they connecting in to the AP eyes? Maybe described that whole process. Yeah. Tilak, You other works >> of multiple weather providers and government agencies from around the world. It's actually one of our strengths because we are a global company, and we have those agreements with all kinds of countries around the world. So we ingest all of that data into our back and database, and then we surface it through our story and users. >> Okay, so they're not directly sort of plugging into that ap economy yet? Not yet. So we have to be right there. Well, I >> mean, for now we have the direct data feeds that were ingesting that data, and we make it available through the AC you other service, and we kind of unjust that data with some of our own. Augur those to kind of create our own AccuWeather forecast to >> That's actually a barrier to entry for you guys. The fact that you've built those pipelines from the back end and then you expose it at the front end and that's your business model. So okay, >> tell about that. We're where it goes from here because this is a great example of how silly the old way papering legal contracts. Now you go. It was supposed to maybe eyes exposing the data. Where does it go from here? Because now you've got, as were close, get more complex. This is part of the whole announcement of the new rebranding. The new capabilities around Antos, which is around Hey, you know, you could move complex work clothes. Certainly the service piece. We saw great news around that because it gets more complex with sap. Ichi, go from here. How did these guys go? The next level. >> So, you know, I think that the interesting thing is you look at some of the themes here that we've talked about. It's been about unlocking innovation. It's about providing ways that developers in a self service way Khun, get at the data. The resource is that they need ask. They need them to build these types of new types of applications and vacuum weather experience and their journey on. That's a great example of it. Look, you know, moving from from a set of enterprise customers that they were serving very well to the fact that really ah, whole ecosystem of applications need act needs access to weather data, and they knew that if they could just unlock that, that would be an incredibly powerful things. So we see a lot of variants of that. And in fact, a lot of what you see it's on announcements this morning with Google Cloud is part of that. You know, Google Cloud is very much about taking these resource is that Google is built that were available to a select few and unlocking those in a self service fashion, but in a standard way that developers anywhere and now with andthe oh, switches hybrid a multi cloud wherever they are being able to unlock those capabilities. So why've you? This is a continuation of a P. I promise. You know, we're very excited about this because what we're seeing is more and more applications that are being built across using AP eyes and more more environments. The great thing for Apogee is that any time people are trying to consume AP eyes in a self service fashion agile way, we're able to add value. >> So Allison Wagner earlier was we asked her about the brand promise, and she said, We want our customers, customers they're not help them innovate all the way down our customers customers level. So I'm thinking about whether whether it gets a bad rap, right? I mean, >> look at it >> for years and we make make jokes about the weather. But the weather has been looked uncannily accurate. These they used to be art. Now it's becoming more silent. So in the spirit of innovation, talk about what's happening just in terms of predicting whether it's, you know, big events, hurricanes, tornadoes and some of the innovation that's occurring on that end. >> Well, I mean, look at from a broader standpoint to weather impacts everything. I mean, as we say, you look at all the different products out there in the marketplace that use whether to enhance that. So there's things you can do for actionable decisions, too. It's not just what is the weather, it is. How can whether impact what I'm doing next, what I'm doing, where I go, what I wear, how I feel even said every day you make a conscious and subconscious decision based on the weather. So when you can put that into products and tools and services that help make those actionable decisions for the users. That makes it a very, very powerful products. That's why a lot of people are always seeking out whether data to use it to enhance their product. >> Give us an example. >> What So a famous story I even told Justin my session earlier. Connected Inhaler Company named co hero they use are FBI's by calling our current conditions every time a user had a respiratory attack over time, it started to build a database as the user is using your inhaler. Then use machine learning to kind of find potential weather triggers and learn pattern recognition to find in the future. Based on our forecast, a p I When white might that user have another attack? So buy this. It's a connected health product that's helping them monitor their own health and keep them safe and keep them prepared as opposed to being reactive. >> The inhaler is instrumented. Yeah, and he stated that the cloud >> and that's just that's just one product. I mean, there's all kinds of things connected, thermostats and connect that >> talks about the creativity of the application developer. I think this highlights to me what Deva is all about and what cloud and FBI's all about because you're exposing your resource products. You don't have to have a deaf guy going. Hey, let's car get the pollen application, Martin. Well, what the hell does that mean? You put the creativity of the in the edge, data gets integrated to the application. This kind of kind of hits on the core cloud value problems, which is let the data drive the value from the APP developer. Without your data, that APP doesn't have the value right. And there's multiple instances of weird what it could mean the most viable in golf Africa and Lightning. Abbott could be whatever. Exactly. So this is kind of the the notion of cloud productivity. >> Well, it's a notion of club activity. It's also this idea of a digital value change. So, you know, Data's products and AP Icer products. And and so now we see the emergence of a P I product managers. You know, you know this idea that we're going to go and build a whole ecosystem of products and applications, that meat, the whole set of customer needs that you might not even initially or ever imagine. I'm sure you folks see all the time new applications, new use cases. The idea is, you know, can I I take this capability or can I take this set of data, package it up us an a p I that any developer can use in anyway that they want to innovate on DH, build new functionality around, and it's a very exciting time in makes developers way more productive than they could have been in >> this talks about the C I C pipeline and and programmable bramble AP eyes. But you said something interesting. I wanna unpack real quick talk about this rise of a pipe product managers because, yes, this is really I think, a statement that not only is the FBI's around for a long time to stay, but this is instrumental value. Yes. What is it? A byproduct. Men and okay, what they do. >> So it's a new concept that has Well, I should say a totally new concept. If you talk to companies that have provided a P eyes, you go back to the the early days of you know, folks like eBay or flicker. All of these idea was that you can completely reinvent your business in the way that you partner with other companies by using AP eyes to tie these businesses together. And what you've now seen has been really, I'd say, over the last five years become a mainstream thing. You've got thousands of people out there and enterprises and Internet companies and all sorts of industries that are a P I product managers who are going in looking at how doe I packet a package up, the capabilities the business processes, the data that my business has built and enable other companies, other developers, to go on, package these and embed them in the products and services that they're building. And, uh, that's the job of a P A. Product measures just like a product manager that you would have for any other product. But what they're thinking about is how do they make their A P? I success >> had to Mark's point there. He saw money being left on the table. Small little tweak now opens up a new product line at an economic model. The constructor that's it's pretty *** good. >> It's shifting to this idea platform business models, and it's a super exciting thing that we're seeing the companies that successfully do it, they see huge growth way. Think that every business is goingto have to transition into this AP I product model eventually. >> Mark, what's the what's the role of the data scientist? Obviously very important in your organization and the relationship between the data scientists and the developers. And it specifically What is Google doing, Tio? Help them coordinate, Collaborate better instead of wrangling data all day. Yeah, I mean, >> so far, a data scientists when we actually have multiple areas. Obviously, we're studying the weather data itself. But then we're studying the use case of data how they're actually ingesting it itself, but incorporating that into our products and services. I mean I mean, that's kind of >> mean date is every where the key is the applications have the data built in. This is to your point about >> unnecessarily incorporating it in, but to collaborate on creating products, right? I mean, you're doing a lot of data science. You got application developers. All right? You're talking about tooling, right? R, are they just sort of separate silos or they >> I mean, we obviously have to have an understanding of what day it is going to be successful. What's gonna be adjusted and the easiest way to adjust it a swell so way obviously are analyzing it from that sense is, >> I say step back for a second. Thiss Google Next mark. What's your impression of the show this year? What's the vibe? What's this day? One storyline in your mind. Yet a session you were in earlier. What's been some of the feedback? What's what's it like >> for me personally? It's that AP eyes, power, everything. So that's obviously what we've been very focused on, and that's what the messaging I've been hearing. But yeah, I mean, divide has been incredible here. Obviously be around so many different great minds and the creativity. It's it's definitely >> talk. What was the session that you did? What was the talk about? Outside? Maybe I was some >> of the feedback. Yeah, I mean, so the session I gave was how wacky weather unlock new business opportunities with the FBI's on way. Got great feedback was a full house, had lots of questions afterwards that followed me out to the hallway. It's was actually running here, being held up, but lots people are interested in learning about this. How can they unlock their own opportunity? How can they take what they have existing on and bring it to a new audience? For >> some of the questions that that was kind of the thematic kind of weaken stack rank, the categorical questions were mean point. The >> biggest thing was like trying to make decisions about how for us, for example, having an enterprise model already transitioning that toe a self serve model that actually worked before we're kind of engaging clients directly. So having something that users could look at and on their own, immediately engage with and connect with and find ways that they can utilize it for their own business models and purposes. >> And you gotta be psychic, FBI as a business model, You got FBI product managers, you got you got the cloud and those spanning now multiple domain spaces on Prem Hybrid Multi. >> Well, that last points are very exciting to us. So, you know, if you look at it, you know, it was about two and a half years ago that apogee became part of Google and G C P got into hybrid of multi cloud with aptitude that we were, you know, the definitive AP I infrastructure for AP eyes. Wherever they live. And what we saw this morning was DCP doubling down in a very big way on hybrid of multi clap. And so this is fantastic four. This message of AP eyes everywhere. Apogee is going to be able Teo sit on top of Antos and really, wherever people are looking at either producing are consuming AP eyes. We'LL be able to sit on top of that and make it a lot easier to do. Capture that data and build new business models. On top of it, >> we'LL make a prediction here in the Cube. That happens. He's going to be the center. The value proposition. As those abs get built, people go to the business model. Connecting them under the covers is going to be a very interesting opportunity with you guys. It's >> a very exciting, very exciting for us to >> get hurt here first in the queue, of course. The cubes looking for product manager a p I to handle our cube database. So if you're interested, we're always looking for a product manager. FBI economies here I'm Jeopardy Volante here The Cube Day one coverage Google Next stay with us for more of this short break