Rohit De Souza, Actian Corporation | CUBE Conversation, December 2018
(light music) >> Hi, I'm Peter Burris and welcome to another CUBE Conversation from our wonderful studios in beautiful Palo Alto, California. Today we're going to be talking about digital transformation, more specifically the tooling that you have to establish or put in place to achieve digital transformation objectives and to do that, we've got Actian corporation here today. Rohit De Souza is the President CEO of Actian. Rohit, welcome to theCUBE. >> Thank you, Peter, I'm glad to be here. >> Well, we're happy to have you 'cause this is a really important topic, but before we get into the actual topic, give us the update on what's going on with Actian. >> Perfect, I'm not sure how much you know about Actian or how much you've followed it, but we've assembled over the years a series of assets that range from Data Management to Data Integration and Data Analytics, really targeted at the next generation of hybrid-data management, really helps companies manage the digital transformation. >> Alright, so let's jump into that digital transformation because that's where a lot of the conversation about hybrid starts, so our belief, and I want to test this with you, is that there really is a difference between a business and a digital business. And that difference is the degree to which a digital business treats data as an asset. >> Absolutely. >> And, in fact, we think that digital transformation is the process by which you re-institutionalize work, reorganize everything else to achieve the goals of using data as an asset, does that? >> Absolutely, and it's not just using the data as purely an asset, but it's using, it's leveraging the data that an enterprise has or has access to and the quantitative analysis of this to influence all aspects of that businesses functions or processes, the way it deals with customers, the way it deals with internal processes, and so on. >> You have to be able to capture data better, you have to be able to turn that data into value, and then you have to be able to act on it. Where does Actian fit in that kind of virtuous cycle? >> So Actian fits all along that chain. We've got the data management assets to allow you to manage that data effectively, we've got the integration assets to allow you to move data to the compute, to the compute to the data effectively, and we've got the best high-performing tools to be able to extract insights from that data at scale and do this all on commodity hardware, so you're doing this at a price-performance level that you can match up elsewhere. >> So it sounds like, but sounds really like you're more focused on creating value out of your data. You might be doing some work at the edge. >> Absolutely. >> And you might have some tooling-- >> Absolutely, absolutely. >> So tell us a little bit about how Actian's vision of data warehousing, data analytics, data warehousing, that whole range of capabilities, is different because of what the base tooling is capable of doing. >> Absolutely, the Actian, the premise behind Actian is that we're going to supplement an organization's digital strategy or data management strategy. So, we're not talking about having to replace stuff in mass, but we're talking about being able to supplement these things where necessary and giving organizations the flexibility to run things on premise or in the cloud, in multi-clouds giving them the flexibility to move from one cloud to the other, and so on. Those capabilities, that capability to manage that data, whether it's in relational systems, whether it's object-oriented systems, whether it's edge systems. To be able to extract the information from those edge systems, move that along to your central systems and then run analytics through it is what Actian does really, really well. >> So if I can kind of repeat that back to you, so, the idea here is that we've got data in an analytics function, that is now, has to be much more high-performance than it used to be. >> That's correct. >> So that we can do a faster close with almost operational time instead of queries from the analytics back to the transaction systems, have I got that right? >> Absolutely, so if you go back a ways the whole process was and the transactional systems here that are generating some information. I pull that information out into an enterprise data warehouse. I've got some things that happen with that, some results and analytics that results, that are driven and those are the results. May or may not make their way back into operations. Today, the business is slightly different. In this era of hyper-personalization, it's no use to me to find out that you were on my website last week, and you were looking at these three products, and you did buy this last year. I want to understand that you're here now and I want to understand how best we can make use of your presence on our company's website to sell you something else, to give you the next best offer, to know how you're interacting with us at that point and to change the interaction that we have with you. If that's going to take place, that needs to happen while the transaction systems are currently in operation. And so the notion of this operational data warehouse, is I'm interacting, I'm generating analytics while I've got those transactions in flight. >> I would even say that it sounds like it's not just a transaction systems are operational but the transaction-- >> That's correct. >> Is open. >> That's correct. >> So that you have, so you need a high-performance store data manager that's capable of responding while the transaction's open to shape, guide, and hyper-personalize the characteristics of the transaction. >> Absolutely. >> Alright, so now let's talk about the hybrid part. You mentioned that earlier. Another belief that we have is that we're going to see a lot of data moved up into the cloud but we can increasingly, the cloud is going to move to the data. We're going to see the services associated the cloud be bought down to the data. >> Couldn't agree more and, oh, by the way, this move to the cloud, this is not just a one time move. Most people think movement to the cloud is a one-time affair. I've got my data on premises for the move to the cloud. No, it's going to move from cloud to cloud. I'm going to have the ability, at some point and time, I'm going to want the ability to run this thing on multiple clouds. I'm not going to risk locking myself in to a particular vendor, so this notion of movement of data from premise to the cloud, perhaps from the cloud back to premise. And into cloud, is here to stay. So, the notion of creating the platform or the capability to move this data around, to move my compute to that data when I need to. It's here to stay, it's going to be with us for awhile. >> Well, it's one of the premises of cloud. The whole motion that data has to be made more fungible, you don't want to go to a bank where your money is contingent upon the definition of money by the bank. >> Absolutely. >> Same thing exists in cloud, so we want that degree of openness, a degree of evolveability but it also, and this is what I'm testing with you is, we think increasing the businesses are going to look at the value propositions, what activities are necessary to deliver those value propositions, where those activities are going to be extent or going to be an operation, and what data's going to be necessary to satisfactory and successfully and with high quality perform those. So, it means increasing that the data is going to be, you're going to want to move the data closer to the activity with right performance, manageability, security, everything else in place. >> That's correct. Or move the compute to the data. >> Or move the compute to the date. So is that kind of the vision that Actian has? Because you've got this family of data managers that each can be, start to become associated with certain styles or transactions or, better put, certain styles of compute and work, digital work. >> Absolutely, now, we take that one step further. There are people who do this today, but many of the approaches that people are using are either cost-prohibitive or don't work. What we've done is actually developed a set of approaches that make these approaches accessible. Today, the notion of true operational data warehousing to operation analytics has been available to really the large companies that have invested completely in extracting value from their data assets. We're bringing that value all the way down to enterprises without gigantic IT staffs, without necessarily spending an arm and a leg on some of the bespoke data management systems of yesterday. We're looking at leveraging commodity hardware to really move performance up a notch, taking your traditional hadoop systems, transitioning those from these swamps that they were into really, honest, goodness operational data store, operational data warehouses, so I can actually update and delete and manage these things like I would any ordinary database. And I've done this on commodity hardware which is distributed across the enterprise. >> So, it is the commodity hardware allows us to place the processing wherever we want. >> That's correct. >> And now we can put the manageability of the data and creating value out of the data. >> That's correct. >> Wherever we want. >> Very. >> So that we are not constrained by associating the data with the action wherever it needs to be. >> Absolutely. >> So as you look forward, what types of future do you anticipate for the evolving role of transaction systems, operational data stores, and digital business? >> I see them converging. I see there being a convergence of these... Digital business involves the operational data stores and the transaction systems, I think you're going to see an increasing number of hybrid systems. These systems that are good at doing both transactions and analytics out of the same systems. We've got one such one. Such one where we've embedded a very high-speed Colmar engine into a traditional relational source. That allows us to do very, very rapid reporting off of existing transactional systems but get analytics out of these systems without any additional overhead. >> Do you anticipate that customers, I mean, I do, but do you anticipate that enterprises are increasing to get alook at almost a data control plane? How does that likely to evolve and what role might Actian play in that? >> I think you bring up a very interesting point for the next generation of data management. There will be a data control plane, we aspire to play in that data control plane. It's not one plane yet. I don't think that the architecture of that one control plane that manages all your data assets across the company. >> And there probably never will be. >> Come about very soon but-- >> Nor is there likely to be one control plane for the reasons you said, you don't want to get locked in. >> But Actian does play in that control plane to allow enterprises the ability to then move their data selectively from on premise to the cloud or between the clouds. >> Alright, so, Rohit, you're a CEO, you've been around for a long time, lot of different places. Imagine, put yourself in the seat of another CEO at one of these large companies. What is the message that they need to bring to their senior staff and others in your organization about affecting this core transition with technology to become more data-oriented, data-friendly, and a culture rated to data utilization? >> I think if you're looking at, you more than likely underestimated the value that's locked in the data that's within your enterprise. Either from a view from a customer or competitive view or a view to improving the processes in you organization. If you task your organization with unlocking this, unlocking the value of these data assets, and being able to respond in more real time to some of the customer or the operations requirements, I think that would go a long way. >> And a part (mumbles) of that is if you've undervalued the data, you're under-investing in the tooling to get value out of the data. >> That's correct. >> Rohit De Souza is the president and CEO of Actian Conversation. Once again, Rohit, thanks for being on theCUBE and talking to us about digital transformation and Actian. >> Thank you very much, Peter. >> And once again, I'm Peter Burris and this has been another CUBE Conversation. Thanks very much for listening, until next time. (lightt music)
SUMMARY :
and to do that, we've got Well, we're happy to have you Management to Data Integration And that difference is the degree to which or has access to and the You have to be able to allow you to manage at the edge. that whole range of capabilities, To be able to extract the information repeat that back to you, place, that needs to happen So that you have, so you need the cloud is going to move to the data. for the move to the cloud. has to be made more fungible, the data closer to the activity Or move the compute to the data. Or move the compute to the date. to really the large companies to place the processing wherever we want. of the data and creating the data with the action and the transaction systems, of that one control plane that manages for the reasons you said, you the ability to then move that they need to bring and being able to to get value out of the data. and talking to us about digital and this has been another
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rohit | PERSON | 0.99+ |
December 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Rohit De Souza | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Actian | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Actian Corporation | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one-time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Actian Conversation | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
three products | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
one control plane | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one cloud | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one step | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one plane | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Colmar | ORGANIZATION | 0.73+ |
k | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
President CEO | PERSON | 0.59+ |
Conversation | EVENT | 0.5+ |